A prospective evaluation of dietary status and symptoms after near-total esophagectomy without gastric emptying procedure

Intensified outpatient nutrition management improves body weight and skeletal muscle loss after esophageal cancer surgery: a single-center, retrospective, single-arm clinical study

BACKGROUND

The progression of malnutrition and sarcopenia after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer negatively influences long-term prognosis. To improve nutritional status after esophagectomy, we introduced an intensified nutrition management (iNM) protocol, in which nutritional counselling by dietitians was provided more frequently. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of iNM compared with the conventional NM (cNM).

METHODS

We included 126 patients who underwent esophagectomy before and after NM revision, and compared nutritional status and changes in body composition after esophagectomy between the cNM and iNM groups. Nutritional parameters were assessed, and we also calculated skeletal muscle index (SMI), skeletal muscle density (SMD), and visceral fat area (VFA) using computed tomography volumetry.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics or surgical outcomes between the groups. Compared with the cNM group, nutritional counselling was provided more frequently (P < 0.001) in the iNM group, and compliance rate increased from 56.3 to 91.9% (P < 0.001). Body weight loss at 4 and 6 months and SMI reduction at 6 months were significantly improved in the iNM group compared with the cNM group (P < 0.001, P = 0.032, and P = 0.023, respectively). There were no significant differences in the changes in SMD, VFA, serum albumin level, and prealbumin level between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient iNM significantly mitigated the reduction in body weight and SMI 3-6 months after esophagectomy.

Gastrointestinal side effects of upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery

In this chapter, we describe the gastrointestinal side effects of oesophagectomy, gastrectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer, with a focus on long-term functional impairments and their management. Improvements in upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery have led to a growing group of long-term survivors. The invasive nature of these surgeries profoundly alters the upper gastrointestinal anatomy, with lasting implications for long-term function, and how these impairments may be treated. Successfully maintaining a high quality of survivorship requires multidisciplinary approach, with survivorship care plans focused on function as much as the detection of recurrence.

Randomized Comparison of Gastric Tube Reconstruction With and Without Duodenal Diversion Plus Roux-en-Y Anastomosis After Esophagectomy

OBJECTIVE

This prospective randomized phase-II trial examined whether gastric reconstruction with duodenal diversion plus Roux-en-Y anastomosis(RY) minimized gastroduodenal reflux and delayed gastric emptying compared with standard gastric reconstruction.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

There is no established standard surgical procedure to prevent both gastroduodenal reflux and delayed gastric emptying simultaneously.

METHODS

Sixty patients with thoracic esophageal cancer scheduled to undergo esophagectomy with retrosternal gastric tube reconstruction were randomly allocated to standard gastric reconstruction (non-RY, n = 31) or gastric reconstruction with duodenal diversion plus RY (n = 29) groups. Primary endpoint was quality of life assessed by DAUGS-32 score 1 year after surgery. Secondary endpoints were the extent of postoperative duodenal juice reflux into the gastric tube, postoperative morbidity, endoscopic findings, body weight changes, and nutritional status.

RESULTS

Preoperative clinicopathological characteristics and postoperative morbidity did not differ significantly between groups. However, operation time and blood loss volume were significantly higher in the RY group. Pancreatic amylase concentrations in the gastric conduit on postoperative days 2, 3, and 7 were higher in the non-RY group. Postoperative endoscopic examination showed residual gastric content in 7 of 17 patients in the non-RY group but in none in the RY group (P = 0.012). Quality of life was significantly favorable in the RY group with regard to reflux symptoms and food passage dysfunction. Postoperative body weight changes, serum albumin levels, and peripheral blood lymphocyte counts were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSION

Gastric reconstruction with duodenal diversion plus RY is effective in improving both gastroduodenal reflux and delayed gastric emptying.

Prognostic Implication of Postoperative Weight Loss After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer

BACKGROUND

Preoperative weight loss in esophageal cancer is reported to be associated with a poor prognosis. However, the impact of postoperative weight loss on the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer remains unclear.

METHODS

This study included 186 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent surgery between January 2012 and January 2015. The relationship between weight loss 6 months after esophagectomy as well as the clinical factors and prognosis of patients was investigated.

RESULTS

The mean weight loss rate for all the patients was 9.3% at 3 months, 10.8% at 6 months, 11.1% at 12 months, and 11.4% at 24 months after surgery. The patients with severe weight loss 6 months after surgery (≥ 12%) exhibited lower serum albumin levels and a lower prognostic nutrition index 6 months after esophagectomy than the patients with moderate weight loss (< 12%; p = 0.011 and 0.009, respectively). Although overall survival did not differ significantly between the two groups, for all the patients, severe weight loss was significantly associated with shortened overall survival for the cStages 3 and 4 patients (3-year overall survival rate, 76.6% in the moderate group vs 54.5% in the severe group; p = 0.042). The multivariate analyses identified only severe weight loss as an independent factor associated with worse overall survival for the cStages 3 and 4 patients (p = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that postoperative weight loss negatively affected the prognosis for patients with advanced esophageal cancer, indicating the necessity of administering nutritional interventions to these patients to prevent postoperative weight loss.

Long-term weight development after esophagectomy for cancer-comparison between open Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive surgical approaches

Esophagectomy is an extensive procedure with severe postoperative effects. It can be assumed that the greater the trauma, the longer the nutritional recovery. This retrospective observational single-center cohort study compared weight development after esophagectomy with open and minimally invasive techniques. Three groups were compared in this study, one representing the first 41 patients who underwent the minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy (MIMK). The second group included the first 84 consecutive patients operated with the minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (MIIL). The third group comprised 100 consecutive patients operated with open thoracoabdominal Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (IL). Virtually all patients submitted to a minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and the majority with an IL had a jejunal catheter inserted during operation for postoperative enteral feeding. All together 225 patients were included in this study. The mean weight loss during the first year was 13.1% (±4.1), 11.2% (±6.1), and 9.6% (±7.5) in the IL, MIIL, and MIMK group, respectively (P = 0.85 and P = 0.95, respectively). The median duration of postoperative enteral nutrition support varied substantially within the groups and was 23.5 days in the IL group (range: 0-2033 days), 54.5 days in those having an MIIL (range: 0-308 days; P ≤ 0.001) and 57.0 days among patients in the MIMK group (range: 0-538 days; P ≤ 0.022). There was no difference in the risk of losing at least 10% of the preoperative weight at 3 or 6 months postoperatively between the groups. However, in patients who suffered severe complications (Clavien-Dindo score ≥ IIIb) after MIIL, there was a nonsignificant trend toward a lower risk of a 10% or greater weight loss, 3 months postoperatively. In conclusion, the greater surgical trauma associated with the traditional open esophagectomy was not followed by more severe weight loss, or other signs of poorer nutritional recovery, when compared to minimal invasive surgical techniques.

Nutritional status, the development and persistence of malnutrition and dietary intake in oesophago-gastric cancer: a longitudinal cohort study

BACKGROUND

Patients with oesophago-gastric (OG) cancer may be at risk of malnutrition, troublesome gastrointestinal symptoms (GI) and reduced dietary intake in view of the tumour location and multimodality curative treatment approach. Longitudinal research is lacking. The present study aimed to assess (i) nutritional status and how it evolved over the first year; (ii) the association between nutritional status scores and GI symptom scores; and (iii) the nutrient and food group intake pattern.

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational study of patients with an OG lesion planned for radical treatment, with assessment at diagnosis, 3 months and 12 months after the start of treatment. Nutritional assessment was performed using the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment, GI symptoms measured using the modified Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale and dietary intake assessed using a semi-quantitative food frequency approach.

RESULTS

Eighty patients (61 males, 19 females; aged 46-89 years) were recruited. At baseline, 3 (n = 68) and 12 months (n = 57), 61%, 62% and 60%, respectively, were moderately/severely malnourished. Higher symptom burden was associated with poorer nutritional status at baseline (r = 0.55, P < 0.001), 3 months (r = 0.51, P < 0.001) and 12 months (r = 0.42, P = 0.001). At each respective time point, 37%, 38% and 42% were meeting their estimated average requirement for energy. No change in mean (SD) intake of energy, fibre, nutrient and food groups was observed over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with OG cancer have progressive weight loss, with malnutrition present over the majority of the 12-month study period. Optimising nutritional status and symptom management throughout the treatment pathway should be a clinical priority.

Long-Term Nutritional Outcome and Health Related Quality of Life of Patients Following Esophageal Cancer Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

Long term health related quality of life (HRQL) and nutritional outcome of patients following esophagectomy for cancer has become increasingly significant as the 5-year survival rate in this patient group is increasing. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the HRQOL, nutritional impact symptoms and nutritional outcomes of patients following an esophagectomy at greater than 12 months after surgery. In studies reporting on HRQL as an outcome, global QOL score at 6-month compare to greater than 12-month showed no statistically significant difference (65.92 vs. 75.78, p = 0.07). Forty-one percent of patients reported a greater than 10% weight loss at six-month follow-up (95% CI: 20-65%; I2 = 94.27, p < 0.001), and at the greater than 12-month follow-up, 33% of patients had the greater than 10% weight loss (95% CI: 15-57%; I2 = 96.18, p < 0.001). At the 12-month or longer post esophagectomy, just over half the patients reported dysphagia (51%, 95% CI: 25-76%; I2 = 95.70, p < 0.001), nausea was reported by 11% (95% CI: 7-19%; I2 = 59.31, p = 0.09), dumping syndrome reported by 60% (95% CI: 43-76%; I2 = 96.92, p < 0.001). Symptoms such as dysphagia, diarrhea, reflux, dumping syndrome, and nausea were found to persist following esophagectomy. There were insufficient robust research investigating how these symptoms impact on the adequacy of dietary intake and micronutrient status.

Routine jejunostomy tube feeding following esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition is an important problem following esophagectomy. A surgically placed jejunostomy secures an enteral feeding route, facilitating discharge with home-tube feeding and long-term nutritional support. However, specific complications occur, and data are lacking that support its use over other enteral feeding routes. Therefore routine jejunostomy tube feeding and discharge with home-tube feeding was evaluated, with emphasis on weight loss, length of stay and re-admissions.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer, with gastric tube reconstruction and jejunostomy creation, were analyzed. Two different regimens were compared. Before January 07, 2011 patients were discharged when oral intake was sufficient, without tube feeding. After that discharge with home-tube feeding was routinely performed. Logistic regression analysis corrected for confounders.

RESULTS

Some 236 patients were included. The median duration of tube feeding was 35 days. Reoperation for a jejunostomy-related complication was needed in 2%. The median body mass index (BMI) remained stable during tube feeding. The BMI decreased significantly after stopping tube feeding: from 25.6 (1st-3rd quartile 23.0-28.6) kg/m2 to 24.4 (22.0-27.1) kg/m2 at 30 days later [median weight loss: 3.0 (1.0-5.3) kg; 3.9% (1.5-6.3%)]. Weight loss was not affected by the duration of tube feeding duration. Routine home-tube feeding did not affect weight loss, admission time or the readmission rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight loss following esophagectomy occurs once that tube feeding is stopped, independently from the time interval after esophagectomy. Moreover routine discharge with home-tube feeding does not reduce length of stay or readmissions. These findings question the value of routine jejunostomy placement and emphasize the need for further research.

Nutrient intake and contribution of home enteral nutrition to meeting nutritional requirements after oesophagectomy and total gastrectomy

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated nutrition after oesophago-gastric resection and the influence of home jejunostomy feeding in the six months after surgery.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

Data on nutritional intake and physiologic measures were collected as part of a randomised trial with measurements taken before and up to six months after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 41 participants (32 oesophagectomy, 9 total gastrectomy) received home jejunostomy feeding (n=18) or usual care without feeding (n=23). At hospital discharge, oral intakes were adequate for energy and protein in 9% and 6%, respectively. By three and six months, these values had increased to 61% and 55%, 94% and 77% respectively. Six participants (26%) who received usual care required rescue feeding. Six weeks after hospital discharge, energy intakes were met in those who received jejunal feeding because of the contribution of enteral nutrition. Jejunal feeding did not affect oral intake, being similar in both groups (fed: 77% estimated need, usual care: 79%). At three months, inadequate micronutrient intakes were seen in over one third. Compared to baseline values, six weeks after surgery, weight loss exceeding 5% was seen in 5/18 (28%) who received feeding, 14/17 (82%) who received usual care and 5/6 (83%) of those who required rescue feeding, P=0.002. Weight loss averaged 4.1% (fed), 10.4% (usual care) and 9.2% (rescue fed), P=0.004. These trends persisted out to six months.

CONCLUSIONS

Supplementary jejunostomy feeding made an important contribution to meeting nutrition after oesophago-gastric resection. Importantly, oral nutritional intake was not compromised dispelling the assertion that jejunal feeding deincentivises patients from eating.

[Management of delayed complications after esophagectomy]

Esophagectomy and subsequent reconstruction represent major physiological insults to the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract, which as a consequence can lead to malnutrition, dysphagia and reflux. From a technical perspective, operative reconstruction involving gastric pull-up with a 2-3 cm wide tube and an anastomosis cranial to the azygos vein may minimize the symptoms. Overall, the problems tend to improve approximately 6 months after the operation. Newly occurring delayed physical functional impairments with previously known underlying malignant disease may be indicative of cancer relapse. Interventional techniques, such as stent placement or brachytherapy may be better suited for treatment of recurrent disease.

A systematic review of the nutritional consequences of esophagectomy

BACKGROUND & AIMS

As improved outcomes after esophagectomy have been observed over the last two decades, the focus on care has shifted to survivorship and quality of life. The aim of this review was to determine changes in nutrition after esophagectomy and to assess the evidence for extended nutrition support.

METHODS

A search strategy was developed to identify primary research reporting change in nutritional status a minimum of one month after esophagectomy.

RESULTS

Changes in nutritional parameters reported by 18 studies indicated a weight loss of 5-12% at six months postoperatively. More than half of patients lost >10% of body weight at 12 months. One study reported a persistent weight loss of 14% from baseline three years after surgery. Three studies reporting on longer term follow up noted that 27%-95% of patients failed to regain their baseline weight. Changes in dietary intake (three studies) indicated inadequate energy and protein intake up to three years after surgery. Global quality of life scores reported in one study correlated with better weight preservation. There were a high frequency of gastrointestinal symptoms reported in six studies, most notably in the first year after surgery, but persisting up to 19 years. Extended enteral nutrition on a selective basis has been reported in several studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Nutritional status is compromised in the months/years following oesophagectomy and may never return to baseline levels. The causes/consequences of weight loss/impaired nutritional intake require further investigation. The role of extended nutritional support in this population remains unclear.

Six weeks of home enteral nutrition versus standard care after esophagectomy or total gastrectomy for cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Each year approximately 3000 patients in the United Kingdom undergo surgery for esophagogastric cancer. Jejunostomy feeding tubes, placed at the time of surgery for early postoperative nutrition, have been shown to have a positive impact on clinical outcomes in the short term. Whether feeding out of hospital is of benefit is unknown. Local experience has identified that between 15 and 20% of patients required 'rescue' jejunostomy feeding for nutritional problems and weight loss while at home. This weight loss and poor nutrition may contribute to the detrimental effect on the overall quality of life (QoL) reported in these patients.

METHODS/DESIGN

This randomized pilot and feasibility study will provide preliminary information on the routine use of jejunostomy feeding after hospital discharge in terms of clinical benefits and QoL. Sixty participants undergoing esophagectomy or total gastrectomy will be randomized to receive either a planned program of six weeks of home jejunostomy feeding after discharge from hospital (intervention) or treatment-as-usual (control). The intention of this study is to inform a multi-centre randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome measures will be recruitment and retention rates at six weeks and six months. Secondary outcome measures will include disease specific and general QoL measures, nutritional parameters, total and oral nutritional intake, hospital readmission rates, and estimates of healthcare costs. Up to 20 participants will also be enrolled in a qualitative sub-study that will explore participants' and carers' experiences of home tube feeding.The results will be disseminated by presentation at surgical, gastroenterological and dietetic meetings and publication in appropriate peer review journals. A patient-friendly lay summary will be made available on the University of Leicester and the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust websites. The study has full ethical and institutional approval and started recruitment in July 2012.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UKClinical Research Network ID #12447 (Main study); UKCRN ID#13361 (Qualitative sub study); ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01870817 (First registered 28 May 2013).

Suboptimal intake of nutrients after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction

Esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction results in a variety of postoperative nutrition-related complaints that can impair nutritional intake and nutritional status. The aim of this study was to determine to what extent patients reached the recommended intake of various nutrients at 6 and 12 months after esophagectomy. It was also analyzed whether a suboptimal intake could be explained by the most clinically significant nutrition-related complaints after esophagectomy. In a prospective cohort study (2002 to 2006), the nutrient intake of 96 patients, recorded in preprinted nutritional diaries, was compared with the recommended energy intake in The Netherlands and Recommended Dietary Allowance of protein and micronutrients. Energy and protein intake remained below recommendations in 24% and 7% of the patients, respectively. Less than 10% of the patients had a sufficient intake of all micronutrients. Folic acid, vitamin D, copper, calcium, and vitamin B-1 were the micronutrients most often reported to have a suboptimal intake. Multivariate logistic regression, corrected for preoperative epigastric pain and energy intake, showed that the number of nutrition-related complaints was not an independent risk factor for the presence of a suboptimal intake of nutrients (adjusted odds ratio=1.11; 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.31; P = 0.22). This study shows that the intake of micronutrients remains below recommendations in the majority of patients 12 months after esophagectomy. This problem requires special attention and care by registered dietitians.

Prevention of gastroduodenal content reflux and delayed gastric emptying after esophagectomy: gastric tube reconstruction with duodenal diversion plus Roux-en-Y anastomosis

Reflux of gastroduodenal contents and delayed gastric emptying are the most common and serious problems after esophagectomy with gastric reconstruction. However, attempts to reduce the above symptoms, surgically as well as non-surgically, had no or limited effect. To address this issue, we performed retrosternal gastric reconstruction with duodenal diversion plus Roux-en-Y anastomosis (RY) in eight patients with thoracic esophageal cancer and compared the outcomes with control patients who underwent standard reconstruction. The procedure is simple, safe, and not associated with any postoperative complications. The pancreatic amylase concentrations in the gastric juice samples on postoperative day 2 were slightly lower in the non-RY group than in the RY group (1884 ± 2152 vs. 25,790 ± 23,542IU/mL, respectively, P= 0.07). Postoperative endoscopic examination showed neither reflux esophagitis nor residual gastric content in the RY group. Quality of life assessed by the Dysfunction After Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery-32 questionnaire postoperatively was significantly better in the RY group than in the non-RY group for 'decreased physical activity,''symptoms of reflux,''nausea and vomiting,' and 'pain.' The results of this pilot study suggest that gastric reconstruction with duodenal diversion plus RY seems effective in improving both the reflux and delayed gastric emptying. The benefits of this procedure need to be further assessed in a large-scale, randomized controlled trial.

Resting energy expenditure and nutritional status in patients undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

This study was to assess the resting energy expenditure of patients with esophageal cancer using indirect calorimetry. Eight male patients with esophageal cancer and eight male healthy controls were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent transthoracic esophagectomy with lymph nodes dissections. The resting energy expenditure was measured preoperatively, and on postoperative day 7 and 14 using indirect calorimetry. Preoperatively, the measured resting energy expenditure/body weight in these patients was significantly higher than that of the controls (23.3 ± 2.1 kcal/kg/day vs 20.4 ± 1.6 kcal/kg/day), whereas the measured/predicted energy expenditure from the Harris-Benedict equation ratio was 1.01 ± 0.09, which did not differ significantly from the control values. The measured resting energy expenditure/body weight was 27.3 ± 3.5 kcal/kg/day on postoperative day 7, and 23.7 ± 5.07 kcal/kg/day on postoperative day 14. Significant increases in the measured resting energy expenditure were observed on postoperative day 7, and the measured/predicted energy expenditure ratio was 1.17 ± 0.15. In conclusion, patients with operable esophageal cancers were almost normometabolic before surgery. On the other hand, the patients showed a hyper-metabolic status after esophagectomy. We recommended that nutritional management based on 33 kcal/body weight/day (calculated by the measured resting energy expenditure × active factor 1.2-1.3) may be optimal for patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Presence and persistence of nutrition-related symptoms during the first year following esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction in clinically disease-free patients

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction results in a variety of postoperative nutrition-related symptoms that may influence the patient's nutritional status.

METHODS

We developed a 15-item questionnaire, focusing on the nutrition-related complaints the first year after an esophagectomy. The questionnaire was filled out the first week after discharge and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The use of enteral nutrition, meal size and frequency, social aspects related to eating, defecation pattern, and body weight were recorded at the same time points. We analyzed the relationship between the baseline characteristics and the number of nutrition-related symptoms, as well as the relationship between those symptoms and body weight with linear mixed models.

RESULTS

We found no significant within-patient change for the total number of nutrition-related symptoms (P = 0.67). None of the baseline factors were identified as predictors of the complaint scores. The most frequently experienced complaints were early satiety, postprandial dumping syndrome, inhibited passage due to high viscosity, reflux, and absence of hunger. One year after surgery, meal sizes were still smaller, the social aspects of eating were influenced negatively, and patients experienced an altered stool frequency. Directly after the surgical procedure 78% of the patients lost weight, and the entire postoperative year the mean body weight remained lower (P = 0.47). We observed no association between the complaint scores and body weight (P = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

After an esophagectomy, most patients struggle with nutrition-related symptoms, are confronted with nutrition-related adjustments and a reduced body weight.

Randomized phase II study of clinical effects of ghrelin after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Ghrelin is a peptide hormone with pleiotropic functions including stimulation of growth hormone secretion and appetite, and its levels decrease after esophagectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether exogenous ghrelin administration can meliorate the postoperative decrease of oral food intake and body weight, which are serious complications after esophagectomy.

METHODS

This prospective randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial assigned a total of 20 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent radical operation into either a ghrelin (n =10) or placebo (n =10) group. Synthetic human ghrelin (3 microg/kg) or 0.9% saline placebo was administered intravenously twice daily for 10 days from the day after the start of food intake. The primary end point was calories of food intake. Comparison of appetite and changes in weight and body composition were also made between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Intake of food calories was greater in ghrelin group than placebo group (mean 874 vs 605 kcal per day; P =.015). The appetite score tended to be greater in ghrelin group than placebo group (P =.094). Loss of weight was less in ghrelin group (-1% vs -3%; P =.019) and this attenuation was due largely to a decrease of lean body weight loss (0% vs -4%; P =.012). No side effects were observed in either groups.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary results suggest that administration of ghrelin after esophagectomy increased oral food intake and attenuated weight loss together with maintenance of lean body weight.

Short-term nutritional implications of total gastrectomy for malignancy, and the impact of parenteral nutritional support

AIMS

To report on peri-operative nutritional status in gastric cancer patients undergoing total gastrectomy, and to examine the role of post-operative parenteral nutrition.

METHODS

Retrospective study of prospectively collected data on 90 consecutive patients who underwent total gastrectomy for malignancy.

RESULTS

At diagnosis 46% of patients reported clinically severe weight loss, and dietary intake was inadequate in 72% of patients. Post-operatively 42% were given total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and 53% were given intravenous fluids (IVF) alone. TPN patients spent a mean of 13.6 days on nutrition support versus IVF patients who spent a mean of 9.2 days without any form of nutrition. IVF patients lost significantly more weight in hospital than TPN patients (5.2 kg versus 3.1 kg, p=0.008). 69% of IVF patients lost severe amount of weight versus 34% in the TPN group (p=0.01). Post-discharge, IVF patients continued to lose significantly more weight than those given TPN post-operatively (7.5 kg versus 2.9 kg, p=0.01) corresponding to 10.5% of their body weight from discharge to follow up versus 4.9% for TPN group (p=0.014). From pre-illness to follow up, patients lost an average of 15.5 kg--IVF patients lost 17.8 kg versus 9.6 kg in TPN (p<0.01). There was no difference in post-operative complications between the groups; however, patients with >10% weight loss had a significantly higher rate of complications and a significantly higher mortality rate than patients who lost <10% body weight (26.2% versus 51.9%, p=0.036 and 11.1% versus 0%, p=0.027, respectively). On multivariate logistic regression analysis >10% weight loss at diagnosis was the only predictive factor of post-operative complications OR 3.1 (95% CI 1.0-9.6), p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a high prevalence of malnutrition in gastric cancer patients undergoing surgery. Total gastrectomy is associated with dramatic weight loss, which continues beyond the surgeon's view post-discharge, with patients losing an average of 15.5 kg by 3-month follow up. Provision of nutrition support in the form of TPN post-operatively significantly reduces in-hospital weight loss and also helps to attenuate further weight loss post-discharge.

Does cancer risk affect health-related quality of life in patients with Barrett's esophagus?

BACKGROUND

Health-related quality of life is decreased in patients with GERD and Barrett's esophagus (BE).

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether time-tradeoff (TTO) values would differ in patients with BE when patients were asked to trade away the potential risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma rather than chronic heartburn symptoms.

DESIGN

A prospective clinical trial.

PATIENTS

Subjects with biopsy-proven BE.

INTERVENTIONS

Custom-designed computer program to elicit health-state utility values, quality of life in reflux and dyspepsia (QOLRAD), and Medical Outcomes Survey short form-36 surveys.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

TTO utility values for the annual cancer-risk-associated current health state and for hypothetical scenarios of dysplasia and esophageal cancer.

RESULTS

We studied 60 patients in the cancer-risk cohort (57 men, 92% veteran; mean age [standard deviation; SD], 65 years [11 years], mean GERD duration 17 years [12 years]). The heartburn cohort included 40 patients with GERD and BE with TTO values derived for GERD symptoms. The mean (SD) utility for nondysplastic BE was 0.91 (0.13) compared with 0.90 (0.12) for the heartburn cohort (P = .7). The mean utility values were significantly lower for scenarios of low-grade dysplasia (0.85 [0.12], P = .02) and high-grade dysplasia (0.77 [0.14], P < .005). The mean TTO was 0.67 (0.19) for the scenario of esophageal cancer. There was no correlation between the utility scores and the disease-specific survey scores.

LIMITATIONS

TTO values were hypothetical for states of dysplasia and cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

TTO utility values based on heartburn symptoms or annual risk of cancer in patients with nondysplastic BE are roughly equivalent. However, TTO utility values are significantly lower for health states with increasing cancer risks.

An investigation into the current peri-operative nutritional management of oesophageal carcinoma patients in major carcinoma centres in England

INTRODUCTION

Patients with oesophageal carcinoma are at high risk of malnutrition. The aim of this study was to assess current practice for the nutritional management of patients following surgery for oesophageal carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A postal questionnaire was sent to 82 dietetic departments of those hospitals in England identified as major centres for upper gastrointestinal surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 66 (80%) responses received, 22 (33%) centres routinely perform pre-operative nutritional screening/assessment on oesophageal carcinoma patients. Centres with dietetic support dedicated to these patients are more likely to perform a pre-operative nutritional assessment (n = 17; 55%) than those without (n = 5; 14%; P < 0.001; chi(2) = 12.17). Pre-operative nutritional support is routinely provided in only 11 (17%) centres with the majority of centres (n = 50; 75%), providing it if patients are considered malnourished only. A total of 47 (70%) centres routinely provide postoperative nutritional support with jejunal feeding being the most commonly chosen route. Dedicated dietetic support is provided at 31 (47%) centres. Those centres with a dedicated dietitian are more likely to provide early postoperative nutritional support (n = 27; 87%) than those without (n = 20; 57%; P = 0.007; chi(2) = 7.195) and more likely to review patients routinely following discharge from hospital (n = 25 [81%] with a dietitian versus n = 17 [49%] without; P = 0.007; chi(2) = 7.2).

CONCLUSIONS

The nutritional management of patients following surgery for upper gastrointestinal carcinoma is not uniform with practice varying considerably between centres. Those centres with a dedicated dietitian are more likely to assess patients' nutritional status and provide nutritional support.

Post-oesophagectomy early enteral nutrition via a needle catheter jejunostomy: 8-year experience at a specialist unit

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate post-operative jejunostomy feeding in terms of nutritional, biochemical, gastrointestinal and mechanical complications in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal surgery for oesophageal malignancy.

METHODS

The study included 205 consecutive patients who underwent oesophagectomy for malignancy. All patients had a needle catheter jejunostomy (NCJ) inserted at the conclusion of laparotomy. Patients were followed prospectively to record nutritional intake, type of feed administered, rate progression, tolerance, weight changes and complications either mechanical, biochemical or gastrointestinal.

RESULTS

Ninety-two per cent of patients were successfully fed exclusively by NCJ post-oesophagectomy, and 94% of patients were tolerating a maintenance regimen of 2000 ml feed over 20 h by day 2 post-operatively. Patients spent a median of 15 days on jejunostomy feeding post-surgery (range 2-112 days); however, 26% required prolonged jejunostomy feeding (>20 days). Minor gastrointestinal complications were effectively managed by slowing the rate of infusion, or administering medication. Three (1.4%) serious complications of jejunostomy feeding occurred, all requiring re-laparotomy, one resulting in death. NCJ feeding was extremely effective in preventing severe post-operative weight loss in the majority of oesophagectomy patients post-op. However, oral intake was generally poor at discharge with only 65% of requirements being met orally. Sixteen patients (8%) patients required home jejunostomy feeding. By the first post-operative month, a further 6% (12) patients were recommenced on jejunostomy feeding.

CONCLUSION

NCJ feeding is an effective method of providing nutritional support post-oesophagectomy, and allows home support for the subset that fail to thrive. Serious complications, most usually intestinal ischaemia or intractable diarrhoea, are rare.

Functional Conduit Disorders After Esophagectomy

Unfortunately normal gastrointestinal function after an esophagectomy is rare. Most patients will never eat the way they did before their illness. Most patients require smaller more frequent meals. It is common for patients to loose up to 15% of their body weight from the time of diagnosis through the first 6 months postoperatively, but fortunately this trend levels off after 6 months. Dumping syndrome, delayed gastric emptying, reflux, and dysphagia can all contribute to nutritional deficiency and poor quality of life. There is no one surgical modification to eliminate any one of these complications, but several guidelines can help reduce conduit dysfunction. Most patients seem to benefit from a 5-cm-wide greater-curvature gastric tube brought up through the posterior mediastinum. The gastric-esophageal anastomosis should be placed higher than the level of the azygous vein. Drainage procedures seem to be helpful, especially when using the whole stomach as a conduit. Early erythromycin therapy significantly aids in the function of the gastric conduit. Proton-pump inhibitors are important for improvement of postoperative reflux symptoms and to help prevent Barrett's metaplasia in the esophageal remnant. Single-layer hand-sewn or semi-mechanical anastomoses provide greater cross-sectional area and fewer problems with stricture. When benign strictures occur, early endoscopy and dilation with proton-pump inhibition greatly reduces the morbidity. Patients should be instructed to eat six small meals a day and to remain upright for as long as possible after eating. Simple sugars and fluid at mealtime should be avoided until the function of the conduit is established.

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and cardia: a review of the disease and its treatment

BACKGROUND

Over the past 50 years there has been a remarkable change in the epidemiology of esophageal cancer. Previously rare, adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction is now the most common esophageal cancer, and in the United States the incidence is increasing faster than that of any other malignancy. Surveillance in patients with Barrett's esophagus is identifying adenocarcinoma at an earlier, more curable stage in many patients, and at the same time new endoscopic and surgical options are available for the therapy of these localized tumors.

METHODS

This article is a review of the epidemiology, diagnosis, staging, and treatment options for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

The epidemiology, prognosis, patterns of lymphatic metastasis, and survival for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma suggest that these tumors are similar. New options for therapy, as well as the results of surgical resection with and without chemoradiotherapy, are reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

Surveillance programs for Barrett's are identifying patients with early, curable adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Therapy for more advanced tumors hinges on local control of the disease and the eradication of systemic metastases.