1
|
van Bodegraven EA, Balduzzi A, van Ramshorst TME, Malleo G, Vissers FL, van Hilst J, Festen S, Abu Hilal M, Asbun HJ, Michiels N, Koerkamp BG, Busch ORC, Daams F, Luyer MDP, Ramera M, Marchegiani G, Klaase JM, Molenaar IQ, de Pastena M, Lionetto G, Vacca PG, van Santvoort HC, Stommel MWJ, Lips DJ, Coolsen MME, Mieog JSD, Salvia R, van Eijck CHJ, Besselink MG. Prophylactic abdominal drainage after distal pancreatectomy (PANDORINA): an international, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 9:438-447. [PMID: 38499019 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(24)00037-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prophylactic passive abdominal drainage is standard practice after distal pancreatectomy. This approach aims to mitigate the consequences of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) but its added value, especially in patients at low risk of POPF, is currently being debated. We aimed to assess the non-inferiority of a no-drain policy in patients after distal pancreatectomy. METHODS In this international, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older undergoing open or minimally invasive elective distal pancreatectomy for all indications in 12 centres in the Netherlands and Italy. We excluded patients with an American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status of 4-5 or WHO performance status of 3-4, added by amendment following the death of a patient with ASA 4 due to a pre-existing cardiac condition. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) intraoperatively by permuted blocks (size four to eight) to either no drain or prophylactic passive drain placement, stratified by annual centre volume (<40 or ≥40 distal pancreatectomies) and low risk or high risk of grade B or C POPF. High-risk was defined as a pancreatic duct of more than 3 mm in diameter, a pancreatic thickness at the neck of more than 19 mm, or both, based on the Distal Pancreatectomy Fistula Risk Score. Other patients were considered low-risk. The primary outcome was the rate of major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo score ≥III), and the most relevant secondary outcome was grade B or C POPF, grading per the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery. Outcomes were assessed up to 90 days postoperatively and analysed in the intention-to-treat population and per-protocol population, which only included patients who received the allocated treatment. A prespecified non-inferiority margin of 8% was compared with the upper limit of the two-sided 95% CI (Wald) of unadjusted risk difference to assess non-inferiority. This trial is closed and registered in the Netherlands Trial Registry, NL9116. FINDINGS Between Oct 3, 2020, and April 28, 2023, 376 patients were screened for eligibility and 282 patients were randomly assigned to the no-drain group (n=138; 75 [54%] women and 63 [46%] men) or the drain group (n=144; 73 [51%] women and 71 [49%] men). Seven patients in the no-drain group received a drain intraoperatively; consequently, the per-protocol population included 131 patients in the no-drain group and 144 patients in the drain group. The rate of major morbidity was non-inferior in the no-drain group compared with the drain group in the intention-to-treat analysis (21 [15%] vs 29 [20%]; risk difference -4·9 percentage points [95% CI -13·8 to 4·0]; pnon-inferiority=0·0022) and the per-protocol analysis (21 [16%] vs 29 [20%]; risk difference -4·1 percentage points [-13·2 to 5·0]; pnon-inferiority=0·0045). Grade B or C POPF was observed in 16 (12%) patients in the no-drain group and in 39 (27%) patients in the drain group (risk difference -15·5 percentage points [95% CI -24·5 to -6·5]; pnon-inferiority<0·0001) in the intention-to-treat analysis. Three patients in the no-drain group died within 90 days; the cause of death in two was not considered related to the trial. The third death was a patient with an ASA score of 4 who died after sepsis and a watershed cerebral infarction at second admission, leading to multiple organ failure. No patients in the drain group died within 90 days. INTERPRETATION A no-drain policy is safe in terms of major morbidity and reduced the detection of grade B or C POPF, and should be the new standard approach in eligible patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy. FUNDING Ethicon UK (Johnson & Johnson Medical, Edinburgh, UK).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduard A van Bodegraven
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Alberto Balduzzi
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Tess M E van Ramshorst
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Hospital Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Malleo
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Frederique L Vissers
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jony van Hilst
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Hospital Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Horacio J Asbun
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Nynke Michiels
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery and Pulmonology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Olivier R C Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Marco Ramera
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Hospital Brescia, Brescia, Italy; Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giovanni Marchegiani
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy; Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological, and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Matteo de Pastena
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Gabriella Lionetto
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Pier Giuseppe Vacca
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Mariëlle M E Coolsen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery and Pulmonology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Emmen AMLH, Zwart MJW, Khatkov IE, Boggi U, Groot Koerkamp B, Busch OR, Saint-Marc O, Dokmak S, Molenaar IQ, D'Hondt M, Ramera M, Keck T, Ferrari G, Luyer MDP, Moraldi L, Ielpo B, Wittel U, Souche FR, Hackert T, Lips D, Can MF, Bosscha K, Fara R, Festen S, van Dieren S, Coratti A, De Hingh I, Mazzola M, Wellner U, De Meyere C, van Santvoort HC, Aussilhou B, Ibenkhayat A, de Wilde RF, Kauffmann EF, Tyutyunnik P, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a pan-European multicenter propensity-matched study. Surgery 2024:S0039-6060(24)00078-3. [PMID: 38570225 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of robot-assisted and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy is increasing, yet large adjusted analyses that can be generalized internationally are lacking. This study aimed to compare outcomes after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in a pan-European cohort. METHODS An international multicenter retrospective study including patients after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy from 50 centers in 12 European countries (2009-2020). Propensity score matching was performed in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥III). RESULTS Among 2,082 patients undergoing minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy, 1,006 underwent robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and 1,076 laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. After matching 812 versus 812 patients, the rates of major morbidity (31.9% vs 29.6%; P = .347) and 30-day/in-hospital mortality (4.3% vs 4.6%; P = .904) did not differ significantly between robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy, respectively. Robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with a lower conversion rate (6.7% vs 18.0%; P < .001) and higher lymph node retrieval (16 vs 14; P = .003). Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with shorter operation time (446 minutes versus 400 minutes; P < .001), and lower rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C (19.0% vs 11.7%; P < .001), delayed gastric emptying grade B/C (21.4% vs 7.4%; P < .001), and a higher R0-resection rate (73.2% vs 84.4%; P < .001). CONCLUSION This European multicenter study found no differences in overall major morbidity and 30-day/in-hospital mortality after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy compared with laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. Further, laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with a lower rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, wound infection, shorter length of stay, and a higher R0 resection rate than robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy. In contrast, robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with a lower conversion rate and a higher number of retrieved lymph nodes as compared with laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk M L H Emmen
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy; Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands. http://www.twitter.com/AnoukEmmen
| | - Maurice J W Zwart
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands. http://www.twitter.com/mauricezwart
| | - Igor E Khatkov
- Department of Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Russia
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier Saint-Marc
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Endocrinienne et Thoracique, Center Hospitalier Universitaire Orleans, France
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of HPB surgery and liver transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France. University Paris Cité
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital and University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Marco Ramera
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Tobias Keck
- Clinic for Surgery, University of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Germany
| | - Giovanni Ferrari
- Department of Oncological and Minimally Invasive Surgery, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Luca Moraldi
- Department of Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Benedetto Ielpo
- Department of Surgery, HPB unit, University Mar Hospital, Parc Salut, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Uwe Wittel
- Department of Surgery, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Francois-Regis Souche
- Department de Chirurgie Digestive (A), Mini-invasive et Oncologigue, Hôspital Saint-Eloi, Montpellier, France
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Dept. of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Daan Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, s-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Regis Fara
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Européen Marseille, France
| | | | - Susan van Dieren
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Department of Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Ignace De Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Michele Mazzola
- Department of Oncological and Minimally Invasive Surgery, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Ulrich Wellner
- Clinic for Surgery, University of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Germany
| | - Celine De Meyere
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital and University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Béatrice Aussilhou
- Department of HPB surgery and liver transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France. University Paris Cité
| | - Abdallah Ibenkhayat
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Endocrinienne et Thoracique, Center Hospitalier Universitaire Orleans, France
| | - Roeland F de Wilde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Pavel Tyutyunnik
- Department of Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Russia
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Jongh C, van der Meulen MP, Gertsen EC, Brenkman HJF, van Sandick JW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, van Lanschot JJB, Lagarde SM, Wijnhoven BPL, de Steur WO, Hartgrink HH, Stoot JHMB, Hulsewe KWE, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ, van Det MJ, Kouwenhoven EA, Daams F, van der Peet DL, van Grieken NCT, Heisterkamp J, van Etten B, van den Berg JW, Pierie JP, Eker HH, Thijssen AY, Belt EJT, van Duijvendijk P, Wassenaar E, Wevers KP, Hol L, Wessels FJ, Haj Mohammad N, Frederix GWJ, van Hillegersberg R, Siersema PD, Vegt E, Ruurda JP. Impact of 18FFDG-PET/CT and Laparoscopy in Staging of Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Cost Analysis in the Prospective Multicenter PLASTIC-Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15103-4. [PMID: 38526832 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15103-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unnecessary D2-gastrectomy and associated costs can be prevented after detecting non-curable gastric cancer, but impact of staging on treatment costs is unclear. This study determined the cost impact of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18FFDG-PET/CT) and staging laparoscopy (SL) in gastric cancer staging. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this cost analysis, four staging strategies were modeled in a decision tree: (1) 18FFDG-PET/CT first, then SL, (2) SL only, (3) 18FFDG-PET/CT only, and (4) neither SL nor 18FFDG-PET/CT. Costs were assessed on the basis of the prospective PLASTIC-study, which evaluated adding 18FFDG-PET/CT and SL to staging advanced gastric cancer (cT3-4 and/or cN+) in 18 Dutch hospitals. The Dutch Healthcare Authority provided 18FFDG-PET/CT unit costs. SL unit costs were calculated bottom-up. Gastrectomy-associated costs were collected with hospital claim data until 30 days postoperatively. Uncertainty was assessed in a probabilistic sensitivity analysis (1000 iterations). RESULTS 18FFDG-PET/CT costs were €1104 including biopsy/cytology. Bottom-up calculations totaled €1537 per SL. D2-gastrectomy costs were €19,308. Total costs per patient were €18,137 for strategy 1, €17,079 for strategy 2, and €19,805 for strategy 3. If all patients undergo gastrectomy, total costs were €18,959 per patient (strategy 4). Performing SL only reduced costs by €1880 per patient. Adding 18FFDG-PET/CT to SL increased costs by €1058 per patient; IQR €870-1253 in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS For advanced gastric cancer, performing SL resulted in substantial cost savings by reducing unnecessary gastrectomies. In contrast, routine 18FFDG-PET/CT increased costs without substantially reducing unnecessary gastrectomies, and is not recommended due to limited impact with major costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03208621. This trial was registered prospectively on 30-06-2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cas de Jongh
- Department of Surgery, Medical Oncology and Radiology, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Emma C Gertsen
- Department of Surgery, Medical Oncology and Radiology, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hylke J F Brenkman
- Department of Surgery, Medical Oncology and Radiology, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna W van Sandick
- Surgery and Nuclear Medicine Department, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Surgery Department, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Surgery and Pathology Department, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Surgery Department, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Surgery and Pathology Department, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Surgery Department, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jan J B van Lanschot
- Surgery and Nuclear Medicine Department, Erasmus Medical Center UMC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Surgery and Nuclear Medicine Department, Erasmus Medical Center UMC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Surgery and Nuclear Medicine Department, Erasmus Medical Center UMC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jan H M B Stoot
- Surgery Department, Zuyderland MC, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marc J van Det
- Surgery Department, ZGT Hospital, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | | | - Freek Daams
- Surgery and Pathology Department, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Surgery and Pathology Department, Location Vrije University, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Donald L van der Peet
- Surgery and Pathology Department, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Surgery and Pathology Department, Location Vrije University, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole C T van Grieken
- Surgery and Pathology Department, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Surgery and Pathology Department, Location Vrije University, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joos Heisterkamp
- Surgery Department, Elisabeth Twee-Steden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jean-Pierre Pierie
- Surgery Department, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Hasan H Eker
- Surgery Department, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Annemieke Y Thijssen
- Gastroenterology Department, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eric J T Belt
- Gastroenterology Department, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Eelco Wassenaar
- Surgery Department, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Kevin P Wevers
- Surgery Department, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Lieke Hol
- Gastroenterology Department, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank J Wessels
- Department of Surgery, Medical Oncology and Radiology, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Surgery, Medical Oncology and Radiology, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Geert W J Frederix
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, Medical Oncology and Radiology, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Vegt
- Surgery and Nuclear Medicine Department, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Surgery and Nuclear Medicine Department, Erasmus Medical Center UMC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, Medical Oncology and Radiology, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rijken A, Pape M, Simkens GA, de Hingh IHJT, Luyer MDP, van Sandick JW, van Laarhoven HWM, Verhoeven RHA, van Erning FN. Peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer in a nationwide cohort: Incidence, treatment and survival. Int J Cancer 2024; 154:992-1002. [PMID: 37916797 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
The aims of this study were to investigate incidence, risk factors and treatment of synchronous or metachronous peritoneal metastases (PM) from gastric cancer and to estimate survival of these patients using population-based data. Patients diagnosed with gastric cancer in 2015 to 2016 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The incidence of synchronous and metachronous PM were calculated. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the occurrence of PM. Treatment and survival were compared between patients with synchronous and metachronous PM. Of 2206 patients with gastric cancer, 741 (34%) were diagnosed with PM. Of these, 498 (23%) had synchronous PM. The cumulative incidence of metachronous PM in patients who underwent potentially curative treatment (n = 675) was 22.8% at 3 years. A factor associated with synchronous and metachronous PM was diffuse type histology. Patients diagnosed with synchronous PM more often received systemic treatment than patients with metachronous PM (35% vs 18%, respectively, P < .001). Median overall survival was comparable between synchronous and metachronous PM (3.2 vs 2.3 months, respectively, P = .731). Approximately one third of all patients with gastric cancer are diagnosed with PM, either at primary diagnosis or during 3-year follow-up after potentially curative treatment. Patients with metachronous PM less often received systemic treatment than those with synchronous PM but survival was comparable between both groups. Future trials are warranted to detect gastric cancer at an earlier stage and to examine strategies that lower the risk of peritoneal dissemination. Also, specific treatment options for patients with gastric PM should be further investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke Pape
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert A Simkens
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
- GROW-School for Oncology and Development Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W van Sandick
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rob H A Verhoeven
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Felice N van Erning
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ketel MHM, Klarenbeek BR, Eddahchouri Y, Cheong E, Cuesta MA, van Daele E, Ferri LE, Gisbertz SS, Gutschow CA, Hubka M, Hölscher AH, Law S, Luyer MDP, Merritt RE, Morse CR, Mueller CL, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson M, Pattyn P, Shen Y, van den Wildenberg FJH, Abma IL, Rosman C, van Workum F. A Video-Based Procedure-Specific Competency Assessment Tool for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. JAMA Surg 2024; 159:297-305. [PMID: 38150247 PMCID: PMC10753443 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
Importance Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a complex procedure with substantial learning curves. In other complex minimally invasive procedures, suboptimal surgical performance has convincingly been associated with less favorable patient outcomes as assessed by peer review of the surgical procedure. Objective To develop and validate a procedure-specific competency assessment tool (CAT) for MIE. Design, Setting, and Participants In this international quality improvement study, a procedure-specific MIE-CAT was developed and validated. The MIE-CAT contains 8 procedural phases, and 4 quality components per phase are scored with a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 4. For evaluation of the MIE-CAT, intraoperative MIE videos performed by a single surgical team in the Esophageal Center East Netherlands were peer reviewed by 18 independent international MIE experts (with more than 120 MIEs performed). Each video was assessed by 2 or 3 blinded experts to evaluate feasibility, content validity, reliability, and construct validity. MIE-CAT version 2 was composed with refined content aimed at improving interrater reliability. A total of 32 full-length MIE videos from patients who underwent MIE between 2011 and 2020 were analyzed. Data were analyzed from January 2021 to January 2023. Exposure Performance assessment of transthoracic MIE with an intrathoracic anastomosis. Main Outcomes and Measures Feasibility, content validity, interrater and intrarater reliability, and construct validity, including correlations with both experience of the surgical team and clinical parameters, of the developed MIE-CAT. Results Experts found the MIE-CAT easy to understand and easy to use to grade surgical performance. The MIE-CAT demonstrated good intrarater reliability (range of intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs], 0.807 [95% CI, 0.656 to 0.892] for quality component score to 0.898 [95% CI, 0.846 to 0.932] for phase score). Interrater reliability was moderate (range of ICCs, 0.536 [95% CI, -0.220 to 0.994] for total MIE-CAT score to 0.705 [95% CI, 0.473 to 0.846] for quality component score), and most discrepancies originated in the lymphadenectomy phases. Hypothesis testing for construct validity showed more than 75% of hypotheses correct: MIE-CAT performance scores correlated with experience of the surgical team (r = 0.288 to 0.622), blood loss (r = -0.034 to -0.545), operative time (r = -0.309 to -0.611), intraoperative complications (r = -0.052 to -0.319), and severe postoperative complications (r = -0.207 to -0.395). MIE-CAT version 2 increased usability. Interrater reliability improved but remained moderate (range of ICCs, 0.666 to 0.743), and most discrepancies between raters remained in the lymphadenectomy phases. Conclusions and Relevance The MIE-CAT was developed and its feasibility, content validity, reliability, and construct validity were demonstrated. By providing insight into surgical performance of MIE, the MIE-CAT might be used for clinical, training, and research purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirte H. M. Ketel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Yassin Eddahchouri
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Edward Cheong
- The PanAsia Surgery Group, Mount Elizabeth Hospital, Singapore
| | - Miguel A. Cuesta
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Elke van Daele
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lorenzo E. Ferri
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Suzanne S. Gisbertz
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christian A. Gutschow
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michal Hubka
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Arnulf H. Hölscher
- Department for General, Visceral and Trauma Surgery, Elisabeth-Krankenhaus-Essen GmbH, Essen, Germany
| | - Simon Law
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Misha D. P. Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Robert E. Merritt
- Department of Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus
| | | | - Carmen L. Mueller
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Magnus Nilsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Piet Pattyn
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Yaxing Shen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Inger L. Abma
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Janssen HJB, Geraedts TCM, Simkens GA, Visser M, de Hingh IHJT, van Det MJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, van Hillegersberg R, Luyer MDP, Nienhuijs SW. The impact of hospital experience in bariatric surgery on short-term outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a nationwide analysis. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:720-734. [PMID: 38040832 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10560-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a technically challenging procedure with a substantial learning curve. Composite volume of upper gastrointestinal (upper GI) procedures for cancer has been previously linked to postoperative outcomes. This study aimed to investigate an association between hospital experience in bariatric surgery and short-term outcomes in MIE. METHOD Data on esophagectomy patients between 2016 and 2020 were collected from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit, a mandatory nationwide registry. Hospitals were categorized as bariatric or non-bariatric. Multivariable logistic regression investigated short-term postoperative outcomes, adjusting for case mix. RESULTS Of 3371 patients undergoing esophagectomy in sixteen hospitals, 2450 (72.7%) underwent MIE. Bariatric hospitals (N = 6) accounted for 1057 (43.1%) MIE. Annual volume of bariatric procedures was median 523 and esophagectomies 42. In non-bariatric hospitals, volume of esophagectomies was median 52 (P = 0.145). Overall postoperative complication rate was lower in bariatric hospitals (59.2% vs. 65.9%, P < 0.001). Bariatric hospitals were associated with a reduced risk of overall complications (aOR 0.76 [95% CI 0.62-0.92]), length of hospital (aOR 0.79 [95% CI 0.65-0.95]), and ICU stay (aOR 0.81 [95% CI 0.67-0.98]) after MIE. Surgical radicality (R0) did not differ. Lymph node yield (≥ 15) was lower in bariatric hospitals (90.0% vs. 94.7%, P < 0.001). Over the years, several short-term outcomes improved in bariatric hospitals compared to non-bariatric hospitals. CONCLUSION In this nationwide analysis, there was an association between bariatric hospitals and improved short-term outcomes after MIE. Characteristics of bariatric hospitals that could explain this phenomenon and whether this translates to other upper GI procedures may be warranted to identify.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henricus J B Janssen
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - Tessa C M Geraedts
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Geert A Simkens
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Cancer and Surgery, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Maurits Visser
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Marc J van Det
- Department of Surgery, ZGT Hospital Group Twente, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Henckens SPG, Liu D, Gisbertz SS, Kalff MC, Anderegg MCJ, Crull D, Daams F, van Dalsen AD, Dekker JWT, van Det MJ, van Duijvendijk P, Eshuis WJ, Groenendijk RPR, Haveman JW, van Hillegersberg R, Luyer MDP, Olthof PB, Pierie JPEN, Plat VD, Rosman C, Ruurda JP, van Sandick JW, Sosef MN, Voeten DM, Vijgen GHEJ, Bijlsma MF, Meijer SL, Hulshof MCCM, Oyarce C, Lagarde SM, van Laarhoven HWM, van Berge Henegouwen MI. Prognostic value of Mandard score and nodal status for recurrence patterns and survival after multimodal treatment of oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae034. [PMID: 38387083 PMCID: PMC10883709 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluated the association of pathological tumour response (tumour regression grade, TRG) and a novel scoring system, combining both TRG and nodal status (TRG-ypN score; TRG1-ypN0, TRG>1-ypN0, TRG1-ypN+ and TRG>1-ypN+), with recurrence patterns and survival after multimodal treatment of oesophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS This Dutch nationwide cohort study included patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by oesophagectomy for distal oesophageal or gastro-oesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma between 2007 and 2016. The primary endpoint was the association of Mandard score and TRG-ypN score with recurrence patterns (rate, location, and time to recurrence). The secondary endpoint was overall survival. RESULTS Among 2746 inclusions, recurrence rates increased with higher Mandard scores (TRG1 30.6%, TRG2 44.9%, TRG3 52.9%, TRG4 61.4%, TRG5 58.2%; P < 0.001). Among patients with recurrent disease, the distribution (locoregional versus distant) was the same for the different TRG groups. Patients with TRG1 developed more brain recurrences (17.7 versus 9.8%; P = 0.001) and had a longer mean overall survival (44 versus 35 months; P < 0.001) than those with TRG>1. The TRG>1-ypN+ group had the highest recurrence rate (64.9%) and worst overall survival (mean 27 months). Compared with the TRG>1-ypN0 group, patients with TRG1-ypN+ had a higher risk of recurrence (51.9 versus 39.6%; P < 0.001) and worse mean overall survival (33 versus 41 months; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Improved tumour response to neoadjuvant therapy was associated with lower recurrence rates and higher overall survival rates. Among patients with recurrent disease, TRG1 was associated with a higher incidence of brain recurrence than TRG>1. Residual nodal disease influenced prognosis more negatively than residual disease at the primary tumour site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofie P G Henckens
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dajia Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Centre for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marianne C Kalff
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten C J Anderegg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David Crull
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marc J van Det
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands
| | | | - Wietse J Eshuis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jan Willem Haveman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Pim B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Groep, Delft, the Netherlands
| | | | - Victor D Plat
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W van Sandick
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Daan M Voeten
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Guy H E J Vijgen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten F Bijlsma
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Centre for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sybren L Meijer
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten C C M Hulshof
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cesar Oyarce
- Centre for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
de Graaf N, Zwart MJW, van Hilst J, van den Broek B, Bonsing BA, Busch OR, Coene PPLO, Daams F, van Dieren S, van Eijck CHJ, Festen S, de Hingh IHJT, Lips DJ, Luyer MDP, Mieog JSD, van Santvoort HC, van der Schelling GP, Stommel MWJ, de Wilde RF, Molenaar IQ, Groot Koerkamp B, Besselink MG. Early experience with robotic pancreatoduodenectomy versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: nationwide propensity-score-matched analysis. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae043. [PMID: 38415878 PMCID: PMC10898866 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although robotic pancreatoduodenectomy has shown promising outcomes in experienced high-volume centres, it is unclear whether implementation on a nationwide scale is safe and beneficial. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of the early experience with robotic pancreatoduodenectomy versus open pancreatoduodenectomy in the Netherlands. METHODS This was a nationwide retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients who underwent robotic pancreatoduodenectomy or open pancreatoduodenectomy who were registered in the mandatory Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit (18 centres, 2014-2021), starting from the first robotic pancreatoduodenectomy procedure per centre. The main endpoints were major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade greater than or equal to III) and in-hospital/30-day mortality. Propensity-score matching (1 : 1) was used to minimize selection bias. RESULTS Overall, 701 patients who underwent robotic pancreatoduodenectomy and 4447 patients who underwent open pancreatoduodenectomy were included. Among the eight centres that performed robotic pancreatoduodenectomy, the median robotic pancreatoduodenectomy experience was 86 (range 48-149), with a 7.3% conversion rate. After matching (698 robotic pancreatoduodenectomy patients versus 698 open pancreatoduodenectomy control patients), no significant differences were found in major complications (40.3% versus 36.2% respectively; P = 0.186), in-hospital/30-day mortality (4.0% versus 3.1% respectively; P = 0.326), and postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C (24.9% versus 23.5% respectively; P = 0.578). Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with a longer operating time (359 min versus 301 min; P < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (200 ml versus 500 ml; P < 0.001), fewer wound infections (7.4% versus 12.2%; P = 0.008), and a shorter hospital stay (11 days versus 12 days; P < 0.001). Centres performing greater than or equal to 20 robotic pancreatoduodenectomies annually had a lower mortality rate (2.9% versus 7.3%; P = 0.009) and a lower conversion rate (6.3% versus 11.2%; P = 0.032). CONCLUSION This study indicates that robotic pancreatoduodenectomy was safely implemented nationwide, without significant differences in major morbidity and mortality compared with matched open pancreatoduodenectomy patients. Randomized trials should be carried out to verify these findings and confirm the observed benefits of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy versus open pancreatoduodenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nine de Graaf
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of General Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - Maurice J W Zwart
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jony van Hilst
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bram van den Broek
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susan van Dieren
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Epidemiologist Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Deptartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Roeland F de Wilde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Söderström H, Moons J, Nafteux P, Uzun E, Grimminger P, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson M, Hayami M, Degisors S, Piessen G, Vanommeslaeghe H, Van Daele E, Cheong E, Gutschow CA, Vetter D, Schuring N, Gisbertz SS, Räsänen J. ASO Visual Abstract: Major Intraoperative Complications During Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:8294-8295. [PMID: 37821789 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14386-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- H Söderström
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - J Moons
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - P Nafteux
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Uzun
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - P Grimminger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - M D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - M Nilsson
- Department of Upper Abdominal Surgery, Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Hayami
- Department of Upper Abdominal Surgery, Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - S Degisors
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Hospital C. Huriez Place de Verdun, Lille Cedex, France
| | - G Piessen
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Hospital C. Huriez Place de Verdun, Lille Cedex, France
| | - H Vanommeslaeghe
- Department of Gastro-intestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - E Van Daele
- Department of Gastro-intestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - E Cheong
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS FT, Norwich, UK
| | - Ch A Gutschow
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - D Vetter
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - N Schuring
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Räsänen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Triemstra L, de Jongh C, Tedone F, Brosens LAA, Luyer MDP, Stoot JHMB, Lagarde SM, van Hillegersberg R, Ruurda JP. The Comprehensive Complication Index versus Clavien-Dindo grading after laparoscopic and open D2-gastrectomy in the multicenter randomized LOGICA-trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49:107095. [PMID: 37913608 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complications can be classified using the most-severe Clavien-Dindo-Classification (CDC) per patient or the total complication burden per patient expressed in the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). This study determined the additional value of CCI to CDC in examining the impact of complications after gastric cancer surgery. METHODS The CCI and CDC were determined in the multicenter randomized LOGICA-trial comparing laparoscopic versus open D2-gastrectomy for cancer (cT1-4aN0-3M0). Differences in median CCI between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy were compared for overall postoperative complications and cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, infectious, pulmonary, and other complications. CCI and CDC were correlated to hospitalization, ICU-stay and reoperations using Spearman's rho-test and compared with standard Fisher's z-transformation. RESULTS Between 2015 and 2018, 211 patients underwent laparoscopic (n = 106) or open (n = 105) D2-gastrectomy, and 157 (74%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Median CCI was comparable between laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy regarding overall complications (CCI 0 [IQR 0-23.5] versus 0 [IQR 0-22.6]; p = 0.755) and subgroups of complications (p > 0.05). Both CCI and CDC showed moderate positive correlations for hospitalization (rs = 0.646 versus rs = 0.628; p = 0.001, difference clinically irrelevant), and reoperations (rs = 0.590 versus rs = 0.599; p = 0.070), and weak correlations for ICU-stay (rs = 0.446 versus rs = 0.440; p = 0.189). CONCLUSIONS The CCI is a composite scoring system based on the CDC and reflects a subjective interpretation of complication burden from the perspectives of both physicians and patients, following abdominal surgery other than gastrectomy. Implementing CCI showed no clinically relevant benefit and caused additional workload compared to CDC for assessing complication burden. Therefore, using the CCI alongside the CDC after gastric cancer surgery is not recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianne Triemstra
- University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Department of Surgery, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Cas de Jongh
- University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Department of Surgery, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Fabrizio Tedone
- University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Department of Surgery, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Misha D P Luyer
- Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Department of Surgery, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Jan H M B Stoot
- Zuyderland Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Sittard, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jelle P Ruurda
- University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Department of Surgery, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Söderström H, Moons J, Nafteux P, Uzun E, Grimminger P, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson M, Hayami M, Degisors S, Piessen G, Vanommeslaeghe H, Van Daele E, Cheong E, Gutschow CA, Vetter D, Schuring N, Gisbertz SS, Räsänen J. Major Intraoperative Complications During Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:8244-8250. [PMID: 37782412 PMCID: PMC10625950 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14340-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have shown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) to be a feasible surgical technique in treating esophageal carcinoma. Postoperative complications have been extensively reviewed, but literature focusing on intraoperative complications is limited. The main objective of this study was to report major intraoperative complications and 90-day mortality during MIE for cancer. METHODS Data were collected retrospectively from 10 European esophageal surgery centers. All intention-to-treat, minimally invasive laparoscopic/thoracoscopic esophagectomies with gastric conduit reconstruction for esophageal and GE junction cancers operated on between 2003 and 2019 were reviewed. Major intraoperative complications were defined as loss of conduit, erroneous transection of vascular structures, significant injury to other organs including bowel, heart, liver or lung, splenectomy, or other major complications including intubation injuries, arrhythmia, pulmonary embolism, and myocardial infarction. RESULTS Amongst 2862 MIE cases we identified 98 patients with 101 intraoperative complications. Vascular injuries were the most prevalent, 41 during laparoscopy and 19 during thoracoscopy, with injuries to 18 different vessels. There were 24 splenic vascular or capsular injuries, 11 requiring splenectomies. Four losses of conduit due to gastroepiploic artery injury and six bowel injuries were reported. Eight tracheobronchial lesions needed repair, and 11 patients had significant lung parenchyma injuries. There were 2 on-table deaths. Ninety-day mortality was 9.2%. CONCLUSIONS This study offers an overview of the range of different intraoperative complications during minimally invasive esophagectomy. Mortality, especially from intrathoracic vascular injuries, appears significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Söderström
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - J Moons
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - P Nafteux
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Uzun
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - P Grimminger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - M D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - M Nilsson
- Department of Upper Abdominal Surgery, Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Hayami
- Department of Upper Abdominal Surgery, Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - S Degisors
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Hospital C. Huriez Place de Verdun, Lille Cedex, France
| | - G Piessen
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Hospital C. Huriez Place de Verdun, Lille Cedex, France
| | - H Vanommeslaeghe
- Department of Gastro-Intestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - E Van Daele
- Department of Gastro-Intestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - E Cheong
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS FT, Norwich, UK
| | - Ch A Gutschow
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - D Vetter
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - N Schuring
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Räsänen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
de Graaf N, Emmen AMLH, Ramera M, Björnsson B, Boggi U, Bruna CL, Busch OR, Daams F, Ferrari G, Festen S, van Hilst J, D'Hondt M, Ielpo B, Keck T, Khatkov IE, Koerkamp BG, Lips DJ, Luyer MDP, Mieog JSD, Morelli L, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC, Sprangers MAG, Ferrari C, Berkhof J, Maisonneuve P, Abu Hilal M, Besselink MG. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. Trials 2023; 24:665. [PMID: 37828593 PMCID: PMC10571285 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07657-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) aims to reduce the negative impact of surgery as compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) and is increasingly becoming part of clinical practice for selected patients worldwide. However, the safety of MIPD remains a topic of debate and the potential shorter time to functional recovery needs to be confirmed. To guide safe implementation of MIPD, large-scale international randomized trials comparing MIPD and OPD in experienced high-volume centers are needed. We hypothesize that MIPD is non-inferior in terms of overall complications, but superior regarding time to functional recovery, as compared to OPD. METHODS/DESIGN The DIPLOMA-2 trial is an international randomized controlled, patient-blinded, non-inferiority trial performed in 14 high-volume pancreatic centers in Europe with a minimum annual volume of 30 MIPD and 30 OPD. A total of 288 patients with an indication for elective pancreatoduodenectomy for pre-malignant and malignant disease, eligible for both open and minimally invasive approach, are randomly allocated for MIPD or OPD in a 2:1 ratio. Centers perform either laparoscopic or robot-assisted MIPD based on their surgical expertise. The primary outcome is the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®), measuring all complications graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification up to 90 days after surgery. The sample size is calculated with the following assumptions: 2.5% one-sided significance level (α), 80% power (1-β), expected difference of the mean CCI® score of 0 points between MIPD and OPD, and a non-inferiority margin of 7.5 points. The main secondary outcome is time to functional recovery, which will be analyzed for superiority. Other secondary outcomes include post-operative 90-day Fitbit™ measured activity, operative outcomes (e.g., blood loss, operative time, conversion to open surgery, surgeon-reported outcomes), oncological findings in case of malignancy (e.g., R0-resection rate, time to adjuvant treatment, survival), postoperative outcomes (e.g., clinically relevant complications), healthcare resource utilization (length of stay, readmissions, intensive care stay), quality of life, and costs. Postoperative follow-up is up to 36 months. DISCUSSION The DIPLOMA-2 trial aims to establish the safety of MIPD as the new standard of care for this selected patient population undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy in high-volume centers, ultimately aiming for superior patient recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN27483786. Registered on August 2, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nine de Graaf
- Department of General Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, 25123, Italy.
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Anouk M L H Emmen
- Department of General Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, 25123, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marco Ramera
- Department of General Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, 25123, Italy
| | | | - Ugo Boggi
- Department of Surgery, Universitá Di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Caro L Bruna
- Department of General Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, 25123, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Giovanni Ferrari
- Department of Surgery, Niguarda Ca'Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Jony van Hilst
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Tobias Keck
- Department of Surgery, UKSH Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Igor E Khatkov
- Department of Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | | | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Luca Morelli
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Mirjam A G Sprangers
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Clarissa Ferrari
- Department of General Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, 25123, Italy
| | - Johannes Berkhof
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Patrick Maisonneuve
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of General Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, 25123, Italy.
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Geraedts TCM, Weijs TJ, Berkelmans GHK, Fransen LFC, Kouwenhoven EA, van Det MJ, Nilsson M, Lagarde SM, van Hillegersberg R, Markar SR, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Luyer MDP. Long-Term Survival Associated with Direct Oral Feeding Following Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial (NUTRIENT II). Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4856. [PMID: 37835550 PMCID: PMC10571988 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Advancements in perioperative care have improved postoperative morbidity and recovery after esophagectomy. The direct start of oral intake can also enhance short-term outcomes following minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MIE-IL). Subsequently, short-term outcomes may affect long-term survival. This planned sub-study of the NUTRIENT II trial, a multicenter randomized controlled trial, investigated the long-term survival of direct versus delayed oral feeding following MIE-IL. The outcomes included 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and the influence of complications and caloric intake on OS. After excluding cases of 90-day mortality, 145 participants were analyzed. Of these, 63 patients (43.4%) received direct oral feeding. At 3 years, OS was significantly better in the direct oral feeding group (p = 0.027), but not at 5 years (p = 0.115). Moreover, 5-year DFS was significantly better in the direct oral feeding group (p = 0.047) and a trend towards improved DFS was shown at 3 years (p = 0.079). Postoperative complications and caloric intake on day 5 did not impact OS. The results of this study show a tendency of improved 3-year OS and 5-year DFS, suggesting a potential long-term survival benefit in patients receiving direct oral feeding after esophagectomy. However, the findings should be further explored in larger future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa C. M. Geraedts
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands; (T.C.M.G.); (T.J.W.); (G.A.P.N.)
| | - Teus J. Weijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands; (T.C.M.G.); (T.J.W.); (G.A.P.N.)
| | - Gijs H. K. Berkelmans
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands; (T.C.M.G.); (T.J.W.); (G.A.P.N.)
| | - Laura F. C. Fransen
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands; (T.C.M.G.); (T.J.W.); (G.A.P.N.)
| | - Ewout A. Kouwenhoven
- Department of Surgery, ZGT Hospital Group Twente, 7609 PP Almelo, The Netherlands; (E.A.K.); (M.J.v.D.)
| | - Marc J. van Det
- Department of Surgery, ZGT Hospital Group Twente, 7609 PP Almelo, The Netherlands; (E.A.K.); (M.J.v.D.)
| | - Magnus Nilsson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, 141-86 Stockholm, Sweden;
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, 171-77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sjoerd M. Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Eramus Medical Center, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | | | - Sheraz R. Markar
- Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK;
| | - Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands; (T.C.M.G.); (T.J.W.); (G.A.P.N.)
| | - Misha D. P. Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands; (T.C.M.G.); (T.J.W.); (G.A.P.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ketel MHM, Klarenbeek BR, Eddahchouri Y, Cuesta MA, van Daele E, Gutschow CA, Hölscher AH, Hubka M, Luyer MDP, Merritt RE, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Shen Y, Abma IL, Rosman C, van Workum F. Crowd-sourced and expert video assessment in minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:7819-7828. [PMID: 37605010 PMCID: PMC10520122 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10297-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Video-based assessment by experts may structurally measure surgical performance using procedure-specific competency assessment tools (CATs). A CAT for minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE-CAT) was developed and validated previously. However, surgeon's time is scarce and video assessment is time-consuming and labor intensive. This study investigated non-procedure-specific assessment of MIE video clips by MIE experts and crowdsourcing, collective surgical performance evaluation by anonymous and untrained laypeople, to assist procedure-specific expert review. METHODS Two surgical performance scoring frameworks were used to assess eight MIE videos. First, global performance was assessed with the non-procedure-specific Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) of 64 procedural phase-based video clips < 10 min. Each clip was assessed by two MIE experts and > 30 crowd workers. Second, the same experts assessed procedure-specific performance with the MIE-CAT of the corresponding full-length video. Reliability and convergent validity of GOALS for MIE were investigated using hypothesis testing with correlations (experience, blood loss, operative time, and MIE-CAT). RESULTS Less than 75% of hypothesized correlations between GOALS scores and experience of the surgical team (r < 0.3), blood loss (r = - 0.82 to 0.02), operative time (r = - 0.42 to 0.07), and the MIE-CAT scores (r = - 0.04 to 0.76) were met for both crowd workers and experts. Interestingly, experts' GOALS and MIE-CAT scores correlated strongly (r = 0.40 to 0.79), while crowd workers' GOALS and experts' MIE-CAT scores correlations were weak (r = - 0.04 to 0.49). Expert and crowd worker GOALS scores correlated poorly (ICC ≤ 0.42). CONCLUSION GOALS assessments by crowd workers lacked convergent validity and showed poor reliability. It is likely that MIE is technically too difficult to assess for laypeople. Convergent validity of GOALS assessments by experts could also not be established. GOALS might not be comprehensive enough to assess detailed MIE performance. However, expert's GOALS and MIE-CAT scores strongly correlated indicating video clip (instead of full-length video) assessments could be useful to shorten assessment time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirte H M Ketel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Yassin Eddahchouri
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Miguel A Cuesta
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elke van Daele
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Christian A Gutschow
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Arnulf H Hölscher
- Department for General, Visceral and Trauma Surgery, Elisabeth-Krankenhaus-Essen GmbH, Essen, Germany
| | - Michal Hubka
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, SE, USA
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Robert E Merritt
- Department of Surgery, Ohio State University - Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Yaxing Shen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Inger L Abma
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
van der Veen A, Ramaekers M, Marsman M, Brenkman HJF, Seesing MFJ, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Stoot JHMB, Tegels JJW, Wijnhoven BPL, de Steur WO, Kouwenhoven EA, Wassenaar EB, Draaisma WA, Gisbertz SS, van der Peet DL, May AM, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Pain and Opioid Consumption After Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial (LOGICA-Trial). J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:2057-2067. [PMID: 37464143 PMCID: PMC10579125 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05728-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic gastrectomy could reduce pain and opioid consumption, compared to open gastrectomy. However, it is difficult to judge the clinical relevance of this reduction, since these outcomes are reported in few randomized trials and in limited detail. METHODS This secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial compared laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma (cT1-4aN0-3bM0). Postoperative pain was analyzed by opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (OME, mg/day) at postoperative day (POD) 1-5, WHO analgesic steps, and Numeric Rating Scales (NRS, 0-10) at POD 1-10 and discharge. Regression and mixed model analyses were performed, with and without correction for epidural analgesia. RESULTS Between 2015 and 2018, 115 patients in the laparoscopic group and 110 in the open group underwent surgery. Some 16 patients (14%) in the laparoscopic group and 73 patients (66%) in the open group received epidural analgesia. At POD 1-3, mean opioid consumption was 131, 118, and 53 mg OME lower in the laparoscopic group, compared to the open group, respectively (all p < 0.001). After correcting for epidural analgesia, these differences remained significant at POD 1-2 (47 mg OME, p = 0.002 and 69 mg OME, p < 0.001, respectively). At discharge, 27% of patients in the laparoscopic group and 43% patients in the open group used oral opioids (p = 0.006). Mean highest daily pain scores were between 2 and 4 at all PODs, < 2 at discharge, and did not relevantly differ between treatment arms. CONCLUSION In this multicenter randomized trial, postoperative pain was comparable between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy. After laparoscopic gastrectomy, this was generally achieved without epidural analgesia and with fewer opioids. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02248519.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arjen van der Veen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100 G04.228, 3508 GA, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - Mark Ramaekers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Marije Marsman
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Hylke J F Brenkman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100 G04.228, 3508 GA, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Maarten F J Seesing
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100 G04.228, 3508 GA, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | | | - Jan H M B Stoot
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen and Sittard-Geleen, Netherlands
| | - Juul J W Tegels
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen and Sittard-Geleen, Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wobbe O de Steur
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Werner A Draaisma
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Donald L van der Peet
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anne M May
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100 G04.228, 3508 GA, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100 G04.228, 3508 GA, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ramaekers M, Viviers CGA, Janssen BV, Hellström TAE, Ewals L, van der Wulp K, Nederend J, Jacobs I, Pluyter JR, Mavroeidis D, van der Sommen F, Besselink MG, Luyer MDP. Computer-Aided Detection for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: Radiological Challenges and Future Directions. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4209. [PMID: 37445243 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiological imaging plays a crucial role in the detection and treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, there are several challenges associated with the use of these techniques in daily clinical practice. Determination of the presence or absence of cancer using radiological imaging is difficult and requires specific expertise, especially after neoadjuvant therapy. Early detection and characterization of tumors would potentially increase the number of patients who are eligible for curative treatment. Over the last decades, artificial intelligence (AI)-based computer-aided detection (CAD) has rapidly evolved as a means for improving the radiological detection of cancer and the assessment of the extent of disease. Although the results of AI applications seem promising, widespread adoption in clinical practice has not taken place. This narrative review provides an overview of current radiological CAD systems in pancreatic cancer, highlights challenges that are pertinent to clinical practice, and discusses potential solutions for these challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Ramaekers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Christiaan G A Viviers
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Boris V Janssen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Terese A E Hellström
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Lotte Ewals
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Kasper van der Wulp
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Nederend
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Igor Jacobs
- Department of Hospital Services and Informatics, Philips Research, 5656 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Jon R Pluyter
- Department of Experience Design, Philips Design, 5656 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Dimitrios Mavroeidis
- Department of Data Science, Philips Research, 5656 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Fons van der Sommen
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fransen LFC, Verhoeven RHA, Janssen THJB, van Det MJ, Gisbertz SS, van Hillegersberg R, Klarenbeek B, Kouwenhoven EA, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Rosman C, Ruurda JP, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Luyer MDP. The association between postoperative complications and long-term survival after esophagectomy: a multicenter cohort study. Dis Esophagus 2023; 36:6874520. [PMID: 36477850 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Conflicting results are reported on the association between post-esophagectomy complications and long-term survival. This multicenter study assesses the association between complications after an esophagectomy and long-term overall survival. Five Dutch high-volume centers collected data from consecutive patients undergoing esophagectomy between 2010 and 2016 and merged these with long-term survival data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Exclusion criteria were non-curative resections and 90-day mortality, among others. Primary outcome was overall survival related to the presence of a postoperative complication in general. Secondary outcomes analyzed the presence of anastomotic leakage and cardiopulmonary complications. Propensity score matching was performed and the outcomes were analyzed via Log-Rank test and Kaplan Meier analysis. Among the 1225 patients included, a complicated course occurred in 719 patients (59.0%). After matching for baseline characteristics, 455 pairs were successfully balanced. Patients with an uncomplicated postoperative course had a 5-year overall survival of 51.7% versus 44.4% in patients with complications (P = 0.011). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 18.4% (n = 226), and in 208 matched pairs, it was shown that the 5-year overall survival was 57.2% in patients without anastomotic leakage versus 44.0% in patients with anastomotic leakage (P = 0.005). Overall cardiopulmonary complication rate was 37.1% (n = 454), and in 363 matched pairs, the 5-year overall survival was 52.1% in patients without cardiopulmonary complications versus 45.3% in patients with cardiopulmonary complications (P = 0.019). Overall postoperative complication rate, anastomotic leakage, and cardiopulmonary complications were associated with a decreased long-term survival after an esophagectomy. Efforts to reduce complications might further improve the overall survival for patients treated for esophageal carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura F C Fransen
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rob H A Verhoeven
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marc J van Det
- Department of Surgery, ZGT Hospital Group Twente, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bastiaan Klarenbeek
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Seesing MFJ, Janssen HJB, Geraedts TCM, Weijs TJ, van Ark I, Leusink-Muis T, Folkerts G, Garssen J, Ruurda JP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, van Hillegersberg R, Luyer MDP. Exploring the Modulatory Effect of High-Fat Nutrition on Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Acute Lung Injury in Vagotomized Rats and the Role of the Vagus Nerve. Nutrients 2023; 15:nu15102327. [PMID: 37242210 DOI: 10.3390/nu15102327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
During esophagectomy, the vagus nerve is transected, which may add to the development of postoperative complications. The vagus nerve has been shown to attenuate inflammation and can be activated by a high-fat nutrition via the release of acetylcholine. This binds to α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (α7nAChR) and inhibits α7nAChR-expressing inflammatory cells. This study investigates the role of the vagus nerve and the effect of high-fat nutrition on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced lung injury in rats. Firstly, 48 rats were randomized in 4 groups as follows: sham (sparing vagus nerve), abdominal (selective) vagotomy, cervical vagotomy and cervical vagotomy with an α7nAChR-agonist. Secondly, 24 rats were randomized in 3 groups as follows: sham, sham with an α7nAChR-antagonist and cervical vagotomy with an α7nAChR-antagonist. Finally, 24 rats were randomized in 3 groups as follows: fasting, high-fat nutrition before sham and high-fat nutrition before selective vagotomy. Abdominal (selective) vagotomy did not impact histopathological lung injury (LIS) compared with the control (sham) group (p > 0.999). There was a trend in aggravation of LIS after cervical vagotomy (p = 0.051), even after an α7nAChR-agonist (p = 0.090). Cervical vagotomy with an α7nAChR-antagonist aggravated lung injury (p = 0.004). Furthermore, cervical vagotomy increased macrophages in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and negatively impacted pulmonary function. Other inflammatory cells, TNF-α and IL-6, in the BALF and serum were unaffected. High-fat nutrition reduced LIS after sham (p = 0.012) and selective vagotomy (p = 0.002) compared to fasting. vagotomy. This study underlines the role of the vagus nerve in lung injury and shows that vagus nerve stimulation using high-fat nutrition is effective in reducing lung injury, even after selective vagotomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten F J Seesing
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Tessa C M Geraedts
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, 5623 Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Teus J Weijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, 5623 Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid van Ark
- Division of Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, 3584 Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Thea Leusink-Muis
- Division of Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, 3584 Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gert Folkerts
- Division of Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, 3584 Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Garssen
- Division of Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, 3584 Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Danone Nutricia Research & Innovation, Immunology, 3584 Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, 5623 Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kalff MC, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Baas PC, Bahadoer RR, Belt EJT, Brattinga B, Claassen L, Ćosović A, Crull D, Daams F, van Dalsen AD, Dekker JWT, van Det MJ, Drost M, van Duijvendijk P, Eshuis WJ, van Esser S, Gaspersz MP, Görgec B, Groenendijk RPR, Hartgrink HH, van der Harst E, Haveman JW, Heisterkamp J, van Hillegersberg R, Kelder W, Kingma BF, Koemans WJ, Kouwenhoven EA, Lagarde SM, Lecot F, van der Linden PP, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Olthof PB, van der Peet DL, Pierie JPEN, Pierik EGJMR, Plat VD, Polat F, Rosman C, Ruurda JP, van Sandick JW, Scheer R, Slootmans CAM, Sosef MN, Sosef OV, de Steur WO, Stockmann HBAC, Stoop FJ, Voeten DM, Vugts G, Vijgen GHEJ, Weeda VB, Wiezer MJ, van Oijen MGH, Gisbertz SS. Trends in Distal Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Care: The Dutch Nationwide Ivory Study. Ann Surg 2023; 277:619-628. [PMID: 35129488 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study evaluated the nationwide trends in care and accompanied postoperative outcomes for patients with distal esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction cancer. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The introduction of transthoracic esophagectomy, minimally invasive surgery, and neo-adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy changed care for patients with esophageal cancer. METHODS Patients after elective transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy for distal esophageal or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma in the Netherlands between 2007-2016 were included. The primary aim was to evaluate trends in both care and postoperative outcomes for the included patients. Additionally, postoperative outcomes after transthoracic and tran-shiatal esophagectomy were compared, stratified by time periods. RESULTS Among 4712 patients included, 74% had distal esophageal tumors and 87% had adenocarcinomas. Between 2007 and 2016, the proportion of transthoracic esophagectomy increased from 41% to 81%, and neo-adjuvant treatment and minimally invasive esophagectomy increased from 31% to 96%, and from 7% to 80%, respectively. Over this 10-year period, postoperative outcomes improved: postoperative morbidity decreased from 66.6% to 61.8% ( P = 0.001), R0 resection rate increased from 90.0% to 96.5% (P <0.001), median lymph node harvest increased from 15 to 19 ( P <0.001), and median survival increased from 35 to 41 months ( P = 0.027). CONCLUSION In this nationwide cohort, a transition towards more neo-adju-vant treatment, transthoracic esophagectomy and minimally invasive surgery was observed over a 10-year period, accompanied by decreased postoperative morbidity, improved surgical radicality and lymph node harvest, and improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne C Kalff
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peter C Baas
- Department of Surgery, Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Renu R Bahadoer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Eric J T Belt
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Baukje Brattinga
- Department of Surgery, MC Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Linda Claassen
- Department of Surgery, Gelre Ziekenhuis, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands
| | - Admira Ćosović
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - David Crull
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marc J van Det
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands
| | - Manon Drost
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Wietse J Eshuis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stijn van Esser
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Groep, Delft, the Netherlands
| | | | - Burak Görgec
- Department of Surgery, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Henk H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jan Willem Haveman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Joos Heisterkamp
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | | | - Wendy Kelder
- Department of Surgery, Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - B Feike Kingma
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Willem J Koemans
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Frederik Lecot
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland, Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Pim B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Groep, Delft, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Victor D Plat
- Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Fatih Polat
- Department of Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W van Sandick
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rene Scheer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Odin V Sosef
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland, Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - Wobbe O de Steur
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Fanny J Stoop
- Department of Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Daan M Voeten
- Department of Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - Guusje Vugts
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Víola B Weeda
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marinus J Wiezer
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn G H van Oijen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Brenkman HJF, Claassen L, Hannink G, van der Werf LR, Ruurda JPH, Nieuwenhuizen GAP, Luyer MDP, Kouwenhoven EA, van Det MJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, Stoot JHMB, Hulsewé KWE, van Workum F, van Hillegersberg R, Rosman C. Learning Curve of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy: A Multicenter Study. Ann Surg 2023; 277:e808-e816. [PMID: 35801714 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the learning curve of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) after an implementation program. BACKGROUND Although LG is increasingly being performed worldwide, little is known about the learning curve. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent elective LG for gastric adenocarcinoma with curative intent in each of the 5 highest-volume centers in the Netherlands were enrolled. Generalized additive models and a 2-piece model with a break point were used to determine the learning curve length. Analyses were corrected for casemix and were performed for LG and for the subgroups distal gastrectomy (LDG) and total gastrectomy (LTG). The learning curve effect was assessed for (1) anastomotic leakage; and (2) the occurrence of postoperative complications, conversions to open surgery, and short-term oncological parameters. RESULTS In total 540 patients were included for analysis, 108 patients from each center; 268 patients underwent LDG and 272 underwent LTG. First, for LG, no learning effect regarding anastomotic leakage could be identified: the rate of anastomotic leakage initially increased, then reached a plateau after 36 cases at 10% anastomotic leakage. Second, the level of overall complications reached a plateau after 20 cases, at 38% overall complications, and at 5% conversions. For both LDG and LTG, each considered separately, fluctuations in secondary outcomes and anastomotic leakage followed fluctuations in casemix. CONCLUSION On the basis of our study of the first 108 procedures of LG in 5 high-volume centers with well-trained surgeons, no learning curve effect could be identified regarding anastomotic leakage. A learning curve effect was found with respect to overall complications and conversion rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Linda Claassen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Gerjon Hannink
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie R van der Werf
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Camiel Rosman
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Napoli N, Cacace C, Kauffmann EF, Jones L, Ginesini M, Gianfaldoni C, Salamone A, Asta F, Ripolli A, Di Dato A, Busch OR, Cappelle ML, Chao YJ, de Wilde RF, Hackert T, Jang JY, Koerkamp BG, Kwon W, Lips D, Luyer MDP, Nickel F, Saint-Marc O, Shan YS, Shen B, Vistoli F, Besselink MG, Hilal MA, Boggi U. The PD-ROBOSCORE: A difficulty score for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery 2023; 173:1438-1446. [PMID: 36973127 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Difficulty scoring systems are important for the safe, stepwise implementation of new procedures. We designed a retrospective observational study for building a difficulty score for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS The difficulty score (PD-ROBOSCORE) aims at predicting severe postoperative complications after robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. The PD-ROBOSCORE was developed in a training cohort of 198 robotic pancreatoduodenectomies and was validated in an international multicenter cohort of 686 robotic pancreatoduodenectomies. Finally, all centers tested the model during the early learning curve (n = 300). Growing difficulty levels (low, intermediate, high) were defined using cut-off values set at the 33rd and 66th percentile (NCT04662346). RESULTS Factors included in the final multivariate model were a body mass index of ≥25 kg/m2 for males and ≥30 kg/m2 for females (odds ratio:2.39; P < .0001), borderline resectable tumor (odd ratio:1.98; P < .0001), uncinate process tumor (odds ratio:1.69; P < .0001), pancreatic duct size <4 mm (odds ratio:1.59; P < .0001), American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥3 (odds ratio:1.59; P < .0001), and hepatic artery originating from the superior mesenteric artery (odds ratio:1.43; P < .0001). In the training cohort, the absolute score value (odds ratio = 1.13; P = .0089) and difficulty groups (odds ratio = 2.35; P = .041) predicted severe postoperative complications. In the multicenter validation cohort, the absolute score value predicted severe postoperative complications (odds ratio = 1.16, P < .001), whereas the difficulty groups did not (odds ratio = 1.94, P = .082). In the learning curve cohort, both absolute score value (odds ratio:1.078, P = .04) and difficulty groups (odds ratio: 2.25, P = .017) predicted severe postoperative complications. Across all cohorts, a PD-ROBOSCORE of ≥12.51 doubled the risk of severe postoperative complications. The PD-ROBOSCORE score also predicted operative time, estimated blood loss, and vein resection. The PD-ROBOSCORE predicted postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, and postoperative mortality in the learning curve cohort. CONCLUSION The PD-ROBOSCORE predicts severe postoperative complications after robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. The score is readily available via www.pancreascalculator.com.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niccolò Napoli
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy
| | - Concetta Cacace
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Leia Jones
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Michael Ginesini
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Alice Salamone
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy
| | - Fabio Asta
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy
| | - Allegra Ripolli
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy
| | - Armando Di Dato
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marie L Cappelle
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ying Jui Chao
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Roeland F de Wilde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Daan Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Felix Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | - Olivier Saint-Marc
- Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Regional D'Orleans, Orléans, France
| | - Yan-Shen Shan
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Baiyong Shen
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Fabio Vistoli
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
van der Veen A, van der Meulen MP, Seesing MFJ, Brenkman HJF, Haverkamp L, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Stoot JHMB, Tegels JJW, Wijnhoven BPL, Lagarde SM, de Steur WO, Hartgrink HH, Kouwenhoven EA, Wassenaar EB, Draaisma WA, Gisbertz SS, van der Peet DL, van Laarhoven HWM, Frederix GWJ, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Cost-effectiveness of Laparoscopic vs Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Economic Evaluation Alongside a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:120-128. [PMID: 36576822 PMCID: PMC9856973 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.6337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Importance Laparoscopic gastrectomy is rapidly being adopted worldwide as an alternative to open gastrectomy to treat gastric cancer. However, laparoscopic gastrectomy might be more expensive as a result of longer operating times and more expensive surgical materials. To date, the cost-effectiveness of both procedures has not been prospectively evaluated in a randomized clinical trial. Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic compared with open gastrectomy. Design, Setting, and Participants In this multicenter randomized clinical trial of patients undergoing total or distal gastrectomy in 10 Dutch tertiary referral centers, cost-effectiveness data were collected alongside a multicenter randomized clinical trial on laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma (cT1-4aN0-3bM0). A modified societal perspective and 1-year time horizon were used. Costs were calculated on the individual patient level by using hospital registry data and medical consumption and productivity loss questionnaires. The unit costs of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy were calculated bottom-up. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated with the EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire, in which a value of 0 indicates death and 1 indicates perfect health. Missing questionnaire data were imputed with multiple imputation. Bootstrapping was performed to estimate the uncertainty surrounding the cost-effectiveness. The study was conducted from March 17, 2015, to August 20, 2018. Data analyses were performed between September 1, 2020, and November 17, 2021. Interventions Laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures Evaluations in this cost-effectiveness analysis included total costs and QALYs. Results Between 2015 and 2018, 227 patients were included. Mean (SD) age was 67.5 (11.7) years, and 140 were male (61.7%). Unit costs for initial surgery were calculated to be €8124 (US $8087) for laparoscopic total gastrectomy, €7353 (US $7320) for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, €6584 (US $6554) for open total gastrectomy, and €5893 (US $5866) for open distal gastrectomy. Mean total costs after 1-year follow-up were €26 084 (US $25 965) in the laparoscopic group and €25 332 (US $25 216) in the open group (difference, €752 [US $749; 3.0%]). Mean (SD) QALY contributions during 1 year were 0.665 (0.298) in the laparoscopic group and 0.686 (0.288) in the open group (difference, -0.021). Bootstrapping showed that these differences between treatment groups were relatively small compared with the uncertainty of the analysis. Conclusions and Relevance Although the laparoscopic gastrectomy itself was more expensive, after 1-year follow-up, results suggest that differences in both total costs and effectiveness were limited between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy. These results support centers' choosing, based on their own preference, whether to (de)implement laparoscopic gastrectomy as an alternative to open gastrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arjen van der Veen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Miriam P. van der Meulen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten F. J. Seesing
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hylke J. F. Brenkman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Leonie Haverkamp
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Misha D. P. Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jan H. M. B. Stoot
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen and Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
| | - Juul J. W. Tegels
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen and Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
| | - Bas P. L. Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M. Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wobbe O. de Steur
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Henk H. Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Werner A. Draaisma
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S. Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Donald L. van der Peet
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert W. J. Frederix
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle P. Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Brinkman DJ, Gupta I, Matteucci PB, Ouchouche S, de Jonge WJ, Coatney RW, Salam T, Chew DJ, Irwin E, Yazicioglu RF, Nieuwenhuizen GAP, Vervoordeldonk MJ, Luyer MDP. Splenic arterial neurovascular bundle stimulation in esophagectomy: A feasibility and safety prospective cohort study. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:1088628. [PMID: 36620453 PMCID: PMC9817142 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1088628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The autonomic nervous system is a key regulator of inflammation. Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve has been shown to have some preclinical efficacy. However, only a few clinical studies have been reported to treat inflammatory diseases. The present study evaluates, for the first time, neuromodulation of the splenic arterial neurovascular bundle (SpA NVB) in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), in which the SpA NVB is exposed as part of the procedure. Methods This single-center, single-arm study enrolled 13 patients undergoing MIE. During the abdominal phase of the MIE, a novel cuff was placed around the SpA NVB, and stimulation was applied. The primary endpoint was the feasibility and safety of cuff application and removal. A secondary endpoint included the impact of stimulation on SpA blood flow changes during the stimulation, and an exploratory point was C-reactive protein (CRP) levels on postoperative day (POD) 2 and 3. Results All patients successfully underwent placement, stimulation, and removal of the cuff on the SpA NVB with no adverse events related to the investigational procedure. Stimulation was associated with an overall reduction in splenic arterial blood flow but not with changes in blood pressure or heart rate. When compared to historic Propensity Score Matched (PSM) controls, CRP levels on POD2 (124 vs. 197 mg/ml, p = 0.032) and POD3 (151 vs. 221 mg/ml, p = 0.033) were lower in patients receiving stimulation. Conclusion This first-in-human study demonstrated for the first time that applying a cuff around the SpA NVB and subsequent stimulation is safe, feasible, and may have an effect on the postoperative inflammatory response following MIE. These findings suggest that SpA NVB stimulation may offer a new method for immunomodulatory therapy in acute or chronic inflammatory conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J. Brinkman
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands,Tytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands,David J. Brinkman,
| | - Isha Gupta
- Galvani Bioelectronics, Stevenage, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Wouter J. de Jonge
- Tytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Eric Irwin
- Galvani Bioelectronics, Stevenage, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Misha D. P. Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands,*Correspondence: Misha D. P. Luyer,
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sherwinter DA, Boni L, Bouvet M, Ferri L, Hyung WJ, Ishizawa T, Kaleya RN, Kelly K, Kokudo N, Lanzarini E, Luyer MDP, Mitsumori N, Mueller C, Park DJ, Ribero D, Rosati R, Ruurda JP, Sosef M, Schneider-Koraith S, Spinoglio G, Strong V, Takahashi N, Takeuchi H, Wijnhoven BPL, Yang HK, Dip F, Lo Menzo E, White KP, Rosenthal RJ. Use of fluorescence imaging and indocyanine green for sentinel node mapping during gastric cancer surgery: Results of an intercontinental Delphi survey. Surgery 2022; 172:S29-S37. [PMID: 36427927 PMCID: PMC9720539 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.06.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding the extent of tumor spread to local lymph nodes is critical to managing early-stage gastric cancer. Recently, fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green has been used to identify and characterize sentinel lymph nodes during gastric cancer surgery, but no published guidelines exist. We sought to identify areas of consensus among international experts in the use of fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green for mapping sentinel lymph nodes during gastric-cancer surgery. METHODS In this 2-round, online Delphi survey, 27 international experts voted on 79 statements pertaining to patient preparation and contraindications to fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green during gastric cancer surgery; indications; technical aspects; advantages/disadvantages and limitations; and training and research. Methodological steps were adopted during survey design to minimize bias. RESULTS Consensus was reached on 61 of 79 statements, including giving single injections of indocyanine green into each of the 4 quadrants peritumorally, administering indocyanine green on the same day as surgery, injecting a total of 1 to 5 mL of 5 mg/mL indocyanine green, injecting endoscopically into submucosa, and repeating indocyanine green injections a second time if sentinel lymph node visualization remains inadequate. Consensus also was reached that fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green is an acceptable single-agent modality for sentinel lymph node identification and that the sentinel lymph node basin method is preferred. However, sentinel lymph node dissection should be limited to T1 gastric cancer and tumors ≤4 cm in diameter, and further research is necessary to optimize the technique and render fluorescence-guided sentinel lymph nodes dissection acceptable for routine clinical use. CONCLUSION Although considerable consensus was achieved, further research is necessary before this technology should be used in routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luigi Boni
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, University of Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Woo Jin Hyung
- Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | - Norihiro Kokudo
- National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | - Doo Joong Park
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | - Jelle P Ruurda
- UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Meindert Sosef
- Atrium Medisch Centrum Parkstad, Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Giuseppe Spinoglio
- FPO Candolo Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment IRCCS, Turin, Italy
| | - Vivian Strong
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Hiroya Takeuchi
- Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Fernando Dip
- Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Kevin P White
- ScienceRight Research Consulting, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
de Graaff MR, Hogenbirk RNM, Janssen YF, Elfrink AKE, Liem RSL, Nienhuijs SW, de Vries JPPM, Elshof JW, Verdaasdonk E, Melenhorst J, van Westreenen HL, Besselink MGH, Ruurda JP, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Klaase JM, den Dulk M, van Heijl M, Hegeman JH, Braun J, Voeten DM, Würdemann FS, Warps ALK, Alberga AJ, Suurmeijer JA, Akpinar EO, Wolfhagen N, van den Boom AL, Bolster-van Eenennaam MJ, van Duijvendijk P, Heineman DJ, Wouters MWJM, Kruijff S, Koningswoud-Terhoeve CL, Belt E, van der Hoeven JAB, Marres GMH, Tozzi F, von Meyenfeldt EM, Coebergh RRJ, van den Braak, Huisman S, Rijken AM, Balm R, Daams F, Dickhoff C, Eshuis WJ, Gisbertz SS, Zandbergen HR, Hartemink KJ, Keessen SA, Kok NFM, Kuhlmann KFD, van Sandick JW, Veenhof AA, Wals A, van Diepen MS, Schoonderwoerd L, Stevens CT, Susa D, Bendermacher BLW, Olofsen N, van Himbeeck M, de Hingh IHJT, Janssen HJB, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Ramaekers M, Stacie R, Talsma AK, Tissink MW, Dolmans D, Berendsen R, Heisterkamp J, Jansen WA, de Kort-van Oudheusden M, Matthijsen RM, Grünhagen DJ, Lagarde SM, Maat APWM, van der Sluis PC, Waalboer RB, Brehm V, van Brussel JP, Morak M, Ponfoort ED, Sybrandy JEM, Klemm PL, Lastdrager W, Palamba HW, van Aalten SM, Tseng LNL, van der Bogt KEA, de Jong WJ, Oosterhuis JWA, Tummers Q, van der Wilden GM, Ooms S, Pasveer EH, Veger HTC, Molegraafb MJ, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Patijn GA, van der Veldt MEV, Boersma D, van Haelst STW, van Koeverden ID, Rots ML, Bonsing BA, Michiels N, Bijlstra OD, Braun J, Broekhuis D, Brummelaar HW, Hartgrink HH, Metselaar A, Mieog JSD, Schipper IB, de Steur WO, Fioole B, Terlouw EC, Biesmans C, Bosmans JWAM, Bouwense SAW, Clermonts SHEM, Coolsen MME, Mees BME, Schurink GWH, Duijff JW, van Gent T, de Nes LCF, Toonen D, Beverwijk MJ, van den Hoed E, Keizers B, Kelder W, Keller BPJA, Pultrum BB, van Rosum E, Wijma AG, van den Broek F, Leclercq WKG, Loos MJA, Sijmons JML, Vaes RHD, Vancoillie PJ, Consten ECJ, Jongen JMJ, Verheijen PM, van Weel V, Arts CHP, Jonker J, Murrmann-Boonstra G, Pierie JPEN, Swart J, van Duyn EB, Geelkerken RH, de Groot R, Moekotte NL, Stam A, Voshaar A, van Acker GJD, Bulder RMA, Swank DJ, Pereboom ITA, Hoffmann WH, Orsini M, Blok JJ, Lardenoije JHP, Reijne MMPJ, van Schaik P, Smeets L, van Sterkenburg SMM, Harlaar NJ, Mekke S, Verhaakt T, Cancrinus E, van Lammeren GW, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC, Vos AWF, Schouten- van der Velden AP, Woensdregt K, Mooy-Vermaat SP, Scharn DM, Marsman HA, Rassam F, Halfwerk FR, Andela AJ, Buis CI, van Dam GM, ten Duis K, van Etten B, Lases L, Meerdink M, de Meijer VE, Pranger B, Ruiter S, Rurenga M, Wiersma A, Wijsmuller AR, Albers KI, van den Boezem PB, Klarenbeek B, van der Kolk BM, van Laarhoven CJHM, Matthée E, Peters N, Rosman C, Schroen AMA, Stommel MWJ, Verhagen AFTM, van der Vijver R, Warlé MC, de Wilt JHW, van den Berg JW, Bloemert T, de Borst GJ, van Hattum EH, Hazenberg CEVB, van Herwaarden JA, van Hillegerberg R, Kroese TE, Petri BJ, Toorop RJ, Aarts F, Janssen RJL, Janssen-Maessen SHP, Kool M, Verberght H, Moes DE, Smit JW, Wiersema AM, Vierhout BP, de Vos B, den Boer FC, Dekker NAM, Botman JMJ, van Det MJ, Folbert EC, de Jong E, Koenen JC, Kouwenhoven EA, Masselink I, Navis LH, Belgers HJ, Sosef MN, Stoot JHMB. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical care in the Netherlands. Br J Surg 2022; 109:1282-1292. [PMID: 36811624 PMCID: PMC10364688 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic caused disruption of regular healthcare leading to reduced hospital attendances, repurposing of surgical facilities, and cancellation of cancer screening programmes. This study aimed to determine the impact of COVID-19 on surgical care in the Netherlands. METHODS A nationwide study was conducted in collaboration with the Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing. Eight surgical audits were expanded with items regarding alterations in scheduling and treatment plans. Data on procedures performed in 2020 were compared with those from a historical cohort (2018-2019). Endpoints included total numbers of procedures performed and altered treatment plans. Secondary endpoints included complication, readmission, and mortality rates. RESULTS Some 12 154 procedures were performed in participating hospitals in 2020, representing a decrease of 13.6 per cent compared with 2018-2019. The largest reduction (29.2 per cent) was for non-cancer procedures during the first COVID-19 wave. Surgical treatment was postponed for 9.6 per cent of patients. Alterations in surgical treatment plans were observed in 1.7 per cent. Time from diagnosis to surgery decreased (to 28 days in 2020, from 34 days in 2019 and 36 days in 2018; P < 0.001). For cancer-related procedures, duration of hospital stay decreased (5 versus 6 days; P < 0.001). Audit-specific complications, readmission, and mortality rates were unchanged, but ICU admissions decreased (16.5 versus 16.8 per cent; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The reduction in the number of surgical operations was greatest for those without cancer. Where surgery was undertaken, it appeared to be delivered safely, with similar complication and mortality rates, fewer admissions to ICU, and a shorter hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R de Graaff
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.,Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Gelre Ziekenhuizen, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands
| | - Rianne N M Hogenbirk
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Yester F Janssen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Arthur K E Elfrink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Dutch Obesity Clinic, Gouda, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, the Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jan-Willem Elshof
- Department of Surgery, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, the Netherlands
| | - Emiel Verdaasdonk
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Jarno Melenhorst
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marc G H Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Mark van Heijl
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes H Hegeman
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente Almelo-Hengelo, Almelo, Hengelo, the Netherlands
| | - Jerry Braun
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Daan M Voeten
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Franka S Würdemann
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Anne-Loes K Warps
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Anna J Alberga
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Annelie Suurmeijer
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Erman O Akpinar
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Nienke Wolfhagen
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - David J Heineman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michel W J M Wouters
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Schelto Kruijff
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Janssen THJB, Fransen LFC, Heesakkers FFBM, Dolmans-Zwartjes ACP, Moorthy K, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Luyer MDP. Effect of a multimodal prehabilitation program on postoperative recovery and morbidity in patients undergoing a totally minimally invasive esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 2022; 35:6455658. [PMID: 34875680 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doab082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Postoperative morbidity following esophagectomy remains substantial. Studies in major abdominal surgery have shown that prehabilitation can improve postoperative outcomes. This single-center study investigated the influence of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (MIE-IL). Data were collected on patients that underwent a MIE-IL and received a fully standardized enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program, between October 2015 and February 2020. The intervention group comprised patients enrolled in the PREPARE prehabilitation program. The control group comprised a retrospective cohort with similar ERAS care, prior to implementation of PREPARE. Postoperative outcomes included (functional) recovery, length of hospital stay (LOHS), cardiopulmonary complications (CPC) and other predefined outcomes. The PREPARE group comprised 52 and control group 43 patients. Median time to functional recovery was 6 vs. 7 days (P = 0.074) and LOHS 7 vs. 8 days (P = 0.039) in PREPARE and control patients, respectively. Hospital readmission rate was 9.6 vs. 14.3% (P = 0.484). A 17% reduction in thirty-day overall postoperative complication rate was observed in PREPARE patients, but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.106). Similarly, a clinically relevant reduction of 14% in CPC rate was observed (P = 0.190). Anastomotic leakage rate was similar (9.6 vs 14.0%; P = 0.511). Despite no difference in severity (Clavien-Dindo) of complications (P = 0.311), ICU readmission rate was lower in PREPARE patients (3.8 vs. 16.3%, P = 0.039). Prehabilitation prior to MIE-IL led to a shorter LOHS and reduced ICU readmission rate. Additionally, a clinically relevant improvement in postoperative recovery and reduced morbidity rate was observed in prehabilitated patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura F C Fransen
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Krishna Moorthy
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hoek VT, Edomskis PP, Stark PW, Lambrichts DPV, Draaisma WA, Consten ECJ, Lange JF, Bemelman WA, Hop WC, Opmeer BC, Reitsma JB, Scholte RA, Waltmann EWH, Legemate A, Bartelsman JF, Meijer DW, de Brouwer M, van Dalen J, Durbridge M, Geerdink M, Ilbrink GJ, Mehmedovic S, Middelhoek P, Boom MJ, Consten ECJ, van der Bilt JDW, van Olden GDJ, Stam MAW, Verweij MS, Vennix S, Musters GD, Swank HA, Boermeester MA, Busch ORC, Buskens CJ, El-Massoudi Y, Kluit AB, van Rossem CC, Schijven MP, Tanis PJ, Unlu C, van Dieren S, Gerhards MF, Karsten TM, de Nes LC, Rijna H, van Wagensveld BA, Koff eman GI, Steller EP, Tuynman JB, Bruin SC, van der Peet DL, Blanken-Peeters CFJM, Cense HA, Jutte E, Crolla RMPH, van der Schelling GP, van Zeeland M, de Graaf EJR, Groenendijk RPR, Karsten TM, Vermaas M, Schouten O, de Vries MR, Prins HA, Lips DJ, Bosker RJI, van der Hoeven JAB, Diks J, Plaisier PW, Kruyt PM, Sietses C, Stommel MWJ, Nienhuijs SW, de Hingh IHJT, Luyer MDP, van Montfort G, Ponten EH, Smulders JF, van Duyn EB, Klaase JM, Swank DJ, Ottow RT, Stockmann HBAC, Vermeulen J, Vuylsteke RJCLM, Belgers HJ, Fransen S, von Meijenfeldt EM, Sosef MN, van Geloven AAW, Hendriks ER, ter Horst B, Leeuwenburgh MMN, van Ruler O, Vogten JM, Vriens EJC, Westerterp M, Eijsbouts QAJ, Bentohami A, Bijlsma TS, de Korte N, Nio D, Govaert MJPM, Joosten JJA, Tollenaar RAEM, Stassen LPS, Wiezer MJ, Hazebroek EJ, Smits AB, van Westreenen HL, Lange JF, Brandt A, Nijboer WN, Mulder IM, Toorenvliet BR, Weidema WF, Coene PPLO, Mannaerts GHH, den Hartog D, de Vos RJ, Zengerink JF, Hoofwijk AGM, Hulsewé KWE, Melenhorst J, Stoot JHMB, Steup WH, Huijstee PJ, Merkus JWS, Wever JJ, Maring JK, Heisterkamp J, van Grevenstein WMU, Vriens MR, Besselink MGH, Borel Rinkes IHM, Witkamp AJ, Slooter GD, Konsten JLM, Engel AF, Pierik EGJM, Frakking TG, van Geldere D, Patijn GA, D’Hoore BAJL, de Buck AVO, Miserez M, Terrasson I, Wolthuis A, di Saverio S, de Blasiis MG. Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage versus sigmoidectomy for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis: three-year follow-up of the randomised LOLA trial. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:7764-7774. [PMID: 35606544 PMCID: PMC9485102 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09326-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study aimed to compare laparoscopic lavage and sigmoidectomy as treatment for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis during a 36 month follow-up of the LOLA trial.
Methods
Within the LOLA arm of the international, multicentre LADIES trial, patients with perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis were randomised between laparoscopic lavage and sigmoidectomy. Outcomes were collected up to 36 months. The primary outcome of the present study was cumulative morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes included reoperations (including stoma reversals), stoma rates, and sigmoidectomy rates in the lavage group.
Results
Long-term follow-up was recorded in 77 of the 88 originally included patients, 39 were randomised to sigmoidectomy (51%) and 38 to laparoscopic lavage (49%). After 36 months, overall cumulative morbidity (sigmoidectomy 28/39 (72%) versus lavage 32/38 (84%), p = 0·272) and mortality (sigmoidectomy 7/39 (18%) versus lavage 6/38 (16%), p = 1·000) did not differ. The number of patients who underwent a reoperation was significantly lower for lavage compared to sigmoidectomy (sigmoidectomy 27/39 (69%) versus lavage 17/38 (45%), p = 0·039). After 36 months, patients alive with stoma in situ was lower in the lavage group (proportion calculated from the Kaplan–Meier life table, sigmoidectomy 17% vs lavage 11%, log-rank p = 0·0268). Eventually, 17 of 38 (45%) patients allocated to lavage underwent sigmoidectomy.
Conclusion
Long-term outcomes showed that laparoscopic lavage was associated with less patients who underwent reoperations and lower stoma rates in patients alive after 36 months compared to sigmoidectomy. No differences were found in terms of cumulative morbidity or mortality. Patient selection should be improved to reduce risk for short-term complications after which lavage could still be a valuable treatment option.
Graphical abstract
Collapse
|
28
|
Scheerhoorn J, van Ede L, Luyer MDP, Buise MP, Bouwman RA, Nienhuijs SW. Postbariatric EArly discharge Controlled by Healthdot (PEACH) trial: study protocol for a preference-based randomized trial. Trials 2022; 23:67. [PMID: 35063007 PMCID: PMC8781161 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06001-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Performing bariatric surgery in a daycare setting has a potential reduction in hospital costs and increase in patients’ satisfaction. Although the feasibility and safety of such care pathway has already been proven, its implementation is hampered by concerns about timely detection of short-term complications. This study is designed to evaluate a combined outcome measurement in outpatient bariatric surgery supplemented by a novel wireless remote monitoring system versus current standard of care.
Methods and analysis
A total of 200 patients with multidisciplinary team approval for primary bariatric surgery will be assigned based on their preference to one of two postoperative trajectories: (1) standard of in-hospital care with discharge on the first postoperative day or (2) same day discharge with ongoing telemonitoring up to 7 days after surgery. The device (Healthdot R Philips) transfers heart rate, respiration rate, activity, and body posture of the patient continuously by LoRaWan network to our hospital’s dashboard (Philips Guardian). The primary outcome is a composite outcome measure within 30 days postoperative based on mortality, mild and severe complications, readmission, and prolonged length-of-stay. Secondary outcomes include patients’ satisfaction and data handling dimensions.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.govNCT04754893, Registered on 12 February 2021.
Collapse
|
29
|
Gantxegi A, Kingma BF, Ruurda JP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Luyer MDP, van Hillegersberg R. The Value of Paratracheal Lymphadenectomy in Esophagectomy for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus or Gastroesophageal Junction: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:1347-1356. [PMID: 34845567 PMCID: PMC8724204 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10810-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background The role of upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy for distal esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas remains a matter of debate. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of evidence on the incidence of nodal metastases in the upper mediastinum following transthoracic esophagectomy for distal esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma. Methods A literature search was performed using Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases up to November 2020 to include studies on patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy with upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy for distal esophageal and/or GEJ adenocarcinoma. The primary endpoint was the incidence of metastatic nodes in the upper mediastinum based on pathological examination. Secondary endpoints were the definition of upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy, recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy rate and survival. Results A total of 17 studies were included and the sample sizes ranged from 10-634 patients. Overall, the median incidence of upper mediastinal lymph node metastases was 10.0% (IQR 4.7-16.7). The incidences of upper mediastinal lymph node metastases were 8.3% in the 7 studies that included patients undergoing primary resection (IQR 2.0-16.6), 4,4% in the 1 study that provided neoadjuvant therapy to the full cohort, and 10.6% in the 9 studies that included patients undergoing esophagectomy either with or without neoadjuvant therapy (IQR 8.9-15.8%). Data on survival and RLN palsy rates were scarce and inconclusive. Conclusions The incidence of upper mediastinal lymph node metastases in distal esophageal adenocarcinoma is up to 10%. Morbidity should be weighed against potential impact on survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amaia Gantxegi
- Department of Surgery, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - B Feike Kingma
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bartella I, Fransen LFC, Gutschow CA, Bruns CJ, van Berge Henegouwen ML, Chaudry MA, Cheong E, Cuesta MA, Van Daele E, Gisbertz SS, van Hillegersberg R, Hölscher A, Mercer S, Moorthy K, Nafteux P, Nilsson M, Pattyn P, Piessen G, Räsanen J, Rosman C, Ruurda JP, Schneider PM, Sgromo B, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Luyer MDP, Schröder W. Technique of open and minimally invasive intrathoracic reconstruction following esophagectomy-an expert consensus based on a modified Delphi process. Dis Esophagus 2021; 34:6102597. [PMID: 33846718 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doaa127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 10/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, minimally invasive Ivor Lewis (IL) esophagectomy with high intrathoracic anastomosis has emerged as surgical standard of care for esophageal cancer in expert centers. Alongside this process, many divergent technical aspects of this procedure have been devised in different centers. This study aims at achieving international consensus on the surgical steps of IL reconstruction using Delphi methodology. METHODS The expert panel consisted of specialized esophageal surgeons from 8 European countries. During a two-round Delphi process, a detailed analysis and consensus on key steps of intrathoracic gastric tube reconstruction (IL esophagectomy) was performed. RESULTS Response rates in Delphi rounds 1 and 2 were 100% (22 of 22 experts) and 83.3% (20 of 24 experts), respectively. Three essential technical areas of intrathoracic gastric tube reconstruction were identified: first, vascularization of the gastric conduit, second, gastric mobilization, tube formation and pull-up, and third, anastomotic technique. In addition, 3 main techniques for minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis are currently practiced: (i) end-to-side circular stapled, (ii) end-to-side double stapling, and (iii) side-to-side linear stapled technique. The step-by-step procedural analysis unveiled common approaches but also different expert practice. CONCLUSION This precise technical description may serve as a clinical guideline for intrathoracic reconstruction after esophagectomy. In addition, the results may aid to harmonize the technical evolution of this complex surgical procedure and thereby facilitate surgical training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Bartella
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Laura F C Fransen
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Christian A Gutschow
- Department of General and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christiane J Bruns
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Mark L van Berge Henegouwen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Asif Chaudry
- Department of Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Edward Cheong
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - Miguel A Cuesta
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Elke Van Daele
- Department of GI Surgery, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Arnulf Hölscher
- Center for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Surgery, Markushospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Stuart Mercer
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Krishna Moorthy
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, St. Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Philippe Nafteux
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Magnus Nilsson
- Department of Upper Abdominal Disease, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Piet Pattyn
- Department of GI Surgery, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Guillaume Piessen
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Jari Räsanen
- Department of General Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Paul M Schneider
- Department of General and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Bruno Sgromo
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Wolfgang Schröder
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gantxegi A, Kingma BF, Ruurda JP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Luyer MDP, van Hillegersberg R. ASO Visual Abstract: The Value of Paratracheal Lymphadenectomy in Esophagectomy for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus or Gastroesophageal Junction: a Systematic Review of the Literature. Ann Surg Oncol 2021. [PMID: 34716840 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10895-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - B Feike Kingma
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gertsen EC, Brenkman HJF, van Hillegersberg R, van Sandick JW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, van Lanschot JJB, Lagarde SM, Wijnhoven BPL, de Steur WO, Hartgrink HH, Stoot JHMB, Hulsewe KWE, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ, van Det MJ, Kouwenhoven EA, van der Peet DL, Daams F, van Grieken NCT, Heisterkamp J, van Etten B, van den Berg JW, Pierie JP, Eker HH, Thijssen AY, Belt EJT, van Duijvendijk P, Wassenaar E, van Laarhoven HWM, Wevers KP, Hol L, Wessels FJ, Haj Mohammad N, van der Meulen MP, Frederix GWJ, Vegt E, Siersema PD, Ruurda JP. 18F-Fludeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Laparoscopy for Staging of Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Dutch Cohort Study (PLASTIC). JAMA Surg 2021; 156:e215340. [PMID: 34705049 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.5340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Importance The optimal staging for gastric cancer remains a matter of debate. Objective To evaluate the value of 18F-fludeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and staging laparoscopy (SL) in addition to initial staging by means of gastroscopy and CT in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter prospective, observational cohort study included 394 patients with locally advanced, clinically curable gastric adenocarcinoma (≥cT3 and/or N+, M0 category based on CT) between August 1, 2017, and February 1, 2020. Exposures All patients underwent an FDG-PET/CT and/or SL in addition to initial staging. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the number of patients in whom the intent of treatment changed based on the results of these 2 investigations. Secondary outcomes included diagnostic performance, number of incidental findings on FDG-PET/CT, morbidity and mortality after SL, and diagnostic delay. Results Of the 394 patients included, 256 (65%) were men and mean (SD) age was 67.6 (10.7) years. A total of 382 patients underwent FDG-PET/CT and 357 underwent SL. Treatment intent changed from curative to palliative in 65 patients (16%) based on the additional FDG-PET/CT and SL findings. FDG-PET/CT detected distant metastases in 12 patients (3%), and SL detected peritoneal or locally nonresectable disease in 73 patients (19%), with an overlap of 7 patients (2%). FDG-PET/CT had a sensitivity of 33% (95% CI, 17%-53%) and specificity of 97% (95% CI, 94%-99%) in detecting distant metastases. Secondary findings on FDG/PET were found in 83 of 382 patients (22%), which led to additional examinations in 65 of 394 patients (16%). Staging laparoscopy resulted in a complication requiring reintervention in 3 patients (0.8%) without postoperative mortality. The mean (SD) diagnostic delay was 19 (14) days. Conclusions and Relevance This study's findings suggest an apparently limited additional value of FDG-PET/CT; however, SL added considerably to the staging process of locally advanced gastric cancer by detection of peritoneal and nonresectable disease. Therefore, it may be useful to include SL in guidelines for staging advanced gastric cancer, but not FDG-PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma C Gertsen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hylke J F Brenkman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W van Sandick
- Department of Surgery, the Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jan J B van Lanschot
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wobbe O de Steur
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Henk H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jan H M B Stoot
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland MC, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
| | - Karel W E Hulsewe
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland MC, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marc J van Det
- Department of Surgery, ZGT hospital, Almelo, the Netherlands
| | | | - Donald L van der Peet
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole C T van Grieken
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joos Heisterkamp
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth Twee-Steden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Boudewijn van Etten
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Willem van den Berg
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jean Pierre Pierie
- Department of Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Hasan H Eker
- Department of Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Annemieke Y Thijssen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Eric J T Belt
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Eelco Wassenaar
- Department of Surgery, Gelre Ziekenhuizen, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Prospective Observational Cohort Study of Oesophageal-Gastric Cancer Patients (POCOP) of the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Group, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kevin P Wevers
- Department of Surgery, Isala Ziekenhuis, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Lieke Hol
- Department of Gastroenterology, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frank J Wessels
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Miriam P van der Meulen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Geert W J Frederix
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Erik Vegt
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Plat VD, Kasteleijn A, Greve JWM, Luyer MDP, Gisbertz SS, Demirkiran A, Daams F. Esophageal Cancer After Bariatric Surgery: Increasing Prevalence and Treatment Strategies. Obes Surg 2021; 31:4954-4962. [PMID: 34494230 PMCID: PMC8490213 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05679-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The number of bariatric procedures has increased exponentially over the last 20 years. On the background of ever-increasing incidence of esophageal malignancies, the altered anatomy after bariatric surgery poses challenges in treatment of these cancers. In this study, an epidemiological estimate is presented for the future magnitude of this problem and treatment options are described in a retrospective multicenter cohort. Methods The number of bariatric procedures, esophageal cancer incidence, and mortality rates of the general population were used for epidemiological estimates. A retrospective multicenter cohort was composed; patients were treated in three large oncological centers with a high upper gastrointestinal cancer caseload. Consecutive patients with preceding bariatric surgery who developed esophageal cancer between 2014 and 2019 were included. Results Approximately 3200 out of 6.4 million post bariatric surgery patients are estimated to have developed esophageal cancer between 1998 and 2018 worldwide. In a multicenter cohort, 15 patients with esophageal cancer or Barrett’s esophagus and preceding bariatric surgery were identified. The majority of patients had a history of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (46.7%) and had an adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus (60%). Seven patients received curative surgical treatment, five of whom are still alive at last follow-up (median follow-up 2 years, no loss to follow-up). Conclusion Based on worldwide data, esophageal cancer development following bariatric surgery has increased over the past decades. Treatment of patients with esophageal cancer after bariatric surgery is challenging and requires a highly individualized approach in which optimal treatment and anatomical limitations are carefully balanced. Graphical abstract ![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor D Plat
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Postbus 7075, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Kasteleijn
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Postbus 7075, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Willem M Greve
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
- School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Postbus 7075, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ahmet Demirkiran
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Rode Kruis Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Postbus 7075, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Luijten JCHBM, Haagsman VC, Luyer MDP, Vissers PAJ, Nederend J, Huysentruyt C, Creemers GJ, Curvers W, van der Sangen M, Heesakkers FBM, Schrauwen RWM, Jürgens MC, Buster EHCJ, Vincent J, Kneppelhout JK, Verhoeven RHA, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP. Implementation of a regional video multidisciplinary team meeting is associated with an improved prognosis for patients with oesophageal cancer A mixed methods approach. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:3088-3096. [PMID: 33926781 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have shown that multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTM) improve diagnostic work-up and treatment-decisions. This study aims to evaluate the influence of implementing a regional-video-Upper-GI-MDTM (uMDTM) for oesophageal cancer (OC) on the number of patients discussed, treatment-decisions, perspectives of involved clinicians and overall survival (OS) in the Eindhoven Upper-GI Network consisting of 1 resection hospital and 5 referring hospitals. METHODS Between 2012 and 2018, patients diagnosed with OC within this region, were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry(n = 1119). From 2014, an uMDTM was gradually implemented and a mixed-method quantitative and qualitative design was used to analyse changes. Quantitative outcomes were described before and after implementation of the uMDTM. Clinicians were interviewed to assess their perspectives regarding the uMDTM. RESULTS After participation in the uMDTM more patients were discussed in an MDTM (80%-89%,p < 0.0001) and involvement of a resection centre during the uMDTM increased (43%-82%,p < 0.0001). The proportion of patients diagnosed with potentially curable OC (cT1-4a-x, any cN, cM0) remained stable (59%-61%, p = 0.452). Endoscopic or surgical resections were performed more often (28%-34%,p = 0.034) and the use of best supportive care decreased (21%-15%,p = 0.018). In the qualitative part an improved knowledge, collaboration and discussion was perceived due to implementation of the uMDTM. Three-year OS for all OC patients increased after the implementation of the uMDTM (24%-30%,p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of a regional Upper-GI MDTM was associated with an increase in patients discussed with a resection centre, more curative resections and a better OS. It remains to be elucidated which factors in the clinical pathway explain this observed improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josianne C H B M Luijten
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Vera C Haagsman
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Pauline A J Vissers
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joost Nederend
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Wouter Curvers
- Department of Gastroenterology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Ruud W M Schrauwen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Erik H C J Buster
- Department of Gastroenterology, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Vincent
- Department of Oncology, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, the Netherlands
| | | | - Rob H A Verhoeven
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
van der Veen A, Brenkman HJF, Seesing MFJ, Haverkamp L, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Stoot JHMB, Tegels JJW, Wijnhoven BPL, Lagarde SM, de Steur WO, Hartgrink HH, Kouwenhoven EA, Wassenaar EB, Draaisma WA, Gisbertz SS, van der Peet DL, May AM, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer (LOGICA): A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:978-989. [PMID: 34581617 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.01540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The oncological efficacy and safety of laparoscopic gastrectomy are under debate for the Western population with predominantly advanced gastric cancer undergoing multimodality treatment. METHODS In 10 experienced upper GI centers in the Netherlands, patients with resectable (cT1-4aN0-3bM0) gastric adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to either laparoscopic or open gastrectomy. No masking was performed. The primary outcome was hospital stay. Analyses were performed by intention to treat. It was hypothesized that laparoscopic gastrectomy leads to shorter hospital stay, less postoperative complications, and equal oncological outcomes. RESULTS Between 2015 and 2018, a total of 227 patients were randomly assigned to laparoscopic (n = 115) or open gastrectomy (n = 112). Preoperative chemotherapy was administered to 77 patients (67%) in the laparoscopic group and 87 patients (78%) in the open group. Median hospital stay was 7 days (interquartile range, 5-9) in both groups (P = .34). Median blood loss was less in the laparoscopic group (150 v 300 mL, P < .001), whereas mean operating time was longer (216 v 182 minutes, P < .001). Both groups did not differ regarding postoperative complications (44% v 42%, P = .91), in-hospital mortality (4% v 7%, P = .40), 30-day readmission rate (9.6% v 9.1%, P = 1.00), R0 resection rate (95% v 95%, P = 1.00), median lymph node yield (29 v 29 nodes, P = .49), 1-year overall survival (76% v 78%, P = .74), and global health-related quality of life up to 1 year postoperatively (mean differences between + 1.5 and + 3.6 on a 1-100 scale; 95% CIs include zero). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic gastrectomy did not lead to a shorter hospital stay in this Western multicenter randomized trial of patients with predominantly advanced gastric cancer. Postoperative complications and oncological efficacy did not differ between laparoscopic gastrectomy and open gastrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arjen van der Veen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hylke J F Brenkman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten F J Seesing
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Leonie Haverkamp
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jan H M B Stoot
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen and Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
| | - Juul J W Tegels
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen and Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wobbe O de Steur
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Henk H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Werner A Draaisma
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Donald L van der Peet
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M May
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Pattamatta M, Fransen LFC, Dolmans-Zwartjes ACP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Evers SMAA, Kouwenhoven EA, van Det MJ, Hiligsmann M, Luyer MDP. Effect of direct oral feeding following minimally invasive esophagectomy on costs and quality of life. J Med Econ 2021; 24:54-60. [PMID: 33274674 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1859843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Following (minimally invasive) esophagectomy, patients often rely on tube feeding, since oral intake is often delayed. Consequently, additional support by a dietician and home care is needed until oral intake is commenced. In this study, the effects of direct start of oral feeding compared with tube feeding following an esophagectomy was evaluated on treatment costs and health-related quality of life (QoL). METHODS Patients undergoing a minimally invasive esophagectomy were randomized in the NUTRIENT II study between controls (nil-per-mouth during 5 days and subsequent tube feeding) and a group in whom oral feeding was started directly postoperatively. Total hospital costs (including readmission and outpatient costs) and home care data for a period of 6 months after surgery were analyzed. QoL (measured using EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EORTC OG-25) was assessed preoperatively and 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS A total 132 patients were included (n = 65 direct oral feeding group and n = 67 control group). Mean patient hospital costs were €26,014 in the intervention group over a 6-month period compared to €26,989 in the control group (p = .825). Furthermore, people with direct oral feeding required significantly less home care assistance; i.e. 23 (48.9%) intervention patients versus 37 (77.1%) control patients (p = .004). Also, QoL in patients with direct oral feeding progressed more quickly when compared to the control group. LIMITATIONS Hospital costs were derived from a single hospital unit whereas costs from all the participating units may be a better reflection of the cost deviation. Availability of homecare data was limited, leading to difficulty in detecting differences in costs. CONCLUSION This study suggests that direct oral feeding leads to similar total costs and a significantly reduced need for home care assistance. Furthermore, QoL in intervention group increased more quickly when compared to the control group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhuri Pattamatta
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Laura F C Fransen
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Silvia M A A Evers
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Trimbos Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marc J van Det
- Department of Surgery, ZGT Hospital Group Twente, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - Mickael Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Peters EG, Pattamatta M, Smeets BJJ, Brinkman DJ, Evers SMAA, de Jonge WJ, Hiligsmann M, Luyer MDP. The clinical and economical impact of postoperative ileus in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020; 32:e13862. [PMID: 32400934 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2019] [Revised: 03/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal surgery is associated with postoperative ileus (POI). Despite its widespread manifestation, the influence of POI on recovery, quality of life (QoL), and costs is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to assess whether the inflammatory processes found in experimental studies are also evident in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. In addition, the impact of POI on short and long-term QoL and costs was investigated. METHODS We analyzed the outcomes of the SANICS-II trial, including prospective evaluation of inflammatory parameters in blood samples, costs from a societal perspective and QoL, using validated questionnaires. Outcomes were compared between patients with and without POI, and in particular patients with POI as unique complication. KEY RESULTS A total of 265 patients (POI, n = 66 vs non-POI, n = 199) were included and 38/66 had POI as only complication. CRP levels were significantly increased on postoperative day (POD) 1, 2, 3, and 4 in patients with POI. Furthermore, plasma levels of cytokines IL-6, Il-8 and IL-10 were significantly increased the first 2 days after resection. Patients with POI had a higher overall complication rate and a reduced QoL 3 months postoperatively, even in the only POI group. Moreover, mean societal cost per patient with POI was 38%-47% higher at 3 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES Supporting findings from experimental studies, inflammatory parameters were increased in patients with only POI and comparable with all patients with POI. These results demonstrate the impact and large contribution of POI in postoperative inflammation, costs and QoL in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmeline G Peters
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,Tytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Madhuri Pattamatta
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Boudewijn J J Smeets
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Daan J Brinkman
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,Tytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Silvia M A A Evers
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Trimbos Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter J de Jonge
- Tytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mickaël Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kingma BF, Eshuis WJ, de Groot EM, Feenstra ML, Ruurda JP, Gisbertz SS, Ten Hoope W, Marsman M, Hermanides J, Hollmann MW, Kalkman CJ, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Scholten HJ, Buise M, van Det MJ, Kouwenhoven EA, van der Meer F, Frederix GWJ, Cheong E, Al Naimi K, van Berge Henegouwen MI, van Hillegersberg R. Paravertebral catheter versus EPidural analgesia in Minimally invasive Esophageal resectioN: a randomized controlled multicenter trial (PEPMEN trial). BMC Cancer 2020; 20:142. [PMID: 32087686 PMCID: PMC7036230 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-6585-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thoracic epidural analgesia is the standard postoperative pain management strategy in esophageal cancer surgery. However, paravertebral block analgesia may achieve comparable pain control while inducing less side effects, which may be beneficial for postoperative recovery. This study primarily aims to compare the postoperative quality of recovery between paravertebral catheter versus thoracic epidural analgesia in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. METHODS This study represents a randomized controlled superiority trial. A total of 192 patients will be randomized in 4 Dutch high-volume centers for esophageal cancer surgery. Patients are eligible for inclusion if they are at least 18 years old, able to provide written informed consent and complete questionnaires in Dutch, scheduled to undergo minimally invasive esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy and an intrathoracic anastomosis, and have no contra-indications to either epidural or paravertebral analgesia. The primary outcome is the quality of postoperative recovery, as measured by the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire on the morning of postoperative day 3. Secondary outcomes include the QoR-40 questionnaire score Area Under the Curve on postoperative days 1-3, the integrated pain and systemic opioid score and patient satisfaction and pain experience according to the International Pain Outcomes (IPO) questionnaire, and cost-effectiveness. Furthermore, the groups will be compared regarding the need for additional rescue medication on postoperative days 0-3, technical failure of the pain treatment, duration of anesthesia, duration of surgery, total postoperative fluid administration day 0-3, postoperative vasopressor and inotrope use, length of urinary catheter use, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, chronic pain at six months after surgery, and other adverse effects. DISCUSSION In this study, it is hypothesized that paravertebral analgesia achieves comparable pain control while causing less side-effects such as hypotension when compared to epidural analgesia, leading to shorter postoperative length of stay on a monitored ward and superior quality of recovery. If this hypothesis is confirmed, the results of this study can be used to update the relevant guidelines on postoperative pain management for patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Registry, NL8037. Registered 19 September 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B F Kingma
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, POBOX 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - W J Eshuis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E M de Groot
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, POBOX 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M L Feenstra
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, POBOX 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W Ten Hoope
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Marsman
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J Hermanides
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M W Hollmann
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C J Kalkman
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - H J Scholten
- Department of Anesthesiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - M Buise
- Department of Anesthesiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - M J van Det
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Group Twente, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - E A Kouwenhoven
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Group Twente, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - F van der Meer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Group Twente Almelo, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - G W J Frederix
- Department of Public Health, Healthcare Innovation & Evaluation and Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - E Cheong
- Department of Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - K Al Naimi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | | | - R van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, POBOX 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Konradsson M, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bruns C, Chaudry MA, Cheong E, Cuesta MA, Darling GE, Gisbertz SS, Griffin SM, Gutschow CA, van Hillegersberg R, Hofstetter W, Hölscher AH, Kitagawa Y, van Lanschot JJB, Lindblad M, Ferri LE, Low DE, Luyer MDP, Ndegwa N, Mercer S, Moorthy K, Morse CR, Nafteux P, Nieuwehuijzen GAP, Pattyn P, Rosman C, Ruurda JP, Räsänen J, Schneider PM, Schröder W, Sgromo B, Van Veer H, Wijnhoven BPL, Nilsson M. Diagnostic criteria and symptom grading for delayed gastric conduit emptying after esophagectomy for cancer: international expert consensus based on a modified Delphi process. Dis Esophagus 2019; 33:5585602. [PMID: 31608938 PMCID: PMC7150655 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doz074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Revised: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Delayed gastric conduit emptying (DGCE) after esophagectomy for cancer is associated with adverse outcomes and troubling symptoms. Widely accepted diagnostic criteria and a symptom grading tool for DGCE are missing. This hampers the interpretation and comparison of studies. A modified Delphi process, using repeated web-based questionnaires, combined with live interim group discussions was conducted by 33 experts within the field, from Europe, North America, and Asia. DGCE was divided into early DGCE if present within 14 days of surgery and late if present later than 14 days after surgery. The final criteria for early DGCE, accepted by 25 of 27 (93%) experts, were as follows: >500 mL diurnal nasogastric tube output measured on the morning of postoperative day 5 or later or >100% increased gastric tube width on frontal chest x-ray projection together with the presence of an air-fluid level. The final criteria for late DGCE accepted by 89% of the experts were as follows: the patient should have 'quite a bit' or 'very much' of at least two of the following symptoms; early satiety/fullness, vomiting, nausea, regurgitation or inability to meet caloric need by oral intake and delayed contrast passage on upper gastrointestinal water-soluble contrast radiogram or on timed barium swallow. A symptom grading tool for late DGCE was constructed grading each symptom as: 'not at all', 'a little', 'quite a bit', or 'very much', generating 0, 1, 2, or 3 points, respectively. For the five symptoms retained in the diagnostic criteria for late DGCE, the minimum score would be 0, and the maximum score would be 15. The final symptom grading tool for late DGCE was accepted by 27 of 31 (87%) experts. For the first time, diagnostic criteria for early and late DGCE and a symptom grading tool for late DGCE are available, based on an international expert consensus process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Konradsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden,Department of Gastroenterology, Landspitali National University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland,Address correspondence to: Magnus Konradsson, MD, Department of Clinical Science, Investigation and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, 14186 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - M I van Berge Henegouwen
- Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam
| | - C Bruns
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - M A Chaudry
- Department of Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - E Cheong
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - M A Cuesta
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - G E Darling
- Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - S S Gisbertz
- Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam
| | - S M Griffin
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - C A Gutschow
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - W Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - A H Hölscher
- Centre for Esophageal and Gastric Surgery, AGAPLESION Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Y Kitagawa
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - J J B van Lanschot
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Lindblad
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden,Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L E Ferri
- Department of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - D E Low
- Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - M D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - N Ndegwa
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - S Mercer
- Queen Alexandra Hospital Portsmouth, United Kingdom
| | - K Moorthy
- The Center for Visceral, Thoracic and Specialized Tumor Surgery, Hirslanden Medical Center, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - C R Morse
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - P Nafteux
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium,Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Aging, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - P Pattyn
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - C Rosman
- Department of surgery, Radboud university center Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J P Ruurda
- Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J Räsänen
- Department of General, Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital and Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland
| | - P M Schneider
- The Center for Visceral, Thoracic and Specialized Tumor Surgery, Hirslanden Medical Center, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - W Schröder
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - B Sgromo
- Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
| | - H Van Veer
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium,Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Aging, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - B P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Nilsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden,Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Pattamatta M, Smeets BJJ, Evers SMAA, Peters EG, Luyer MDP, Hiligsmann M. Quality of life and costs of patients prior to colorectal surgery. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2019; 20:193-198. [PMID: 31190575 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2019.1628641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To assess the quality of life and societal costs of patients prior to colorectal surgery in the Netherlands.Methods: This study is embedded in a previous randomized controlled trial (SANICS II). The quality of life was measured using EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. The iMTA medical consumption questionnaire (iMCQ) and the iMTA productivity costs questionnaire (iPCQ) were used to identify and measure healthcare and productivity costs. Subgroup analyses were performed based on age and gender.Results: A total of 178 patients were included in the cost analysis and a total of 161 patients in the quality of life analysis. The three-month mean societal cost per patient amounted to €3,211 of which €1,459 was due to productivity losses. The mean utility was 0.88 per patient. Gender was an important predictor in quality of life with men scoring significantly higher than women (0.92 versus 0.82) at p < 0.0001.Conclusion: Colorectal cancer represents a high economic burden in the Netherlands. Further research with repeated cost and quality of life measurements would be needed to explore the change over time and the effects of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Pattamatta
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - B J J Smeets
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,GROW school of oncology and developmental biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - S M A A Evers
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Center for Economic Evaluations, Trimbos Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E G Peters
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,Tytgat Institute of Liver and Intestinal Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - M Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Luyer MDP, Cuesta MA. Improvements in perioperative care for esophagectomy. J Thorac Dis 2019; 11:S619-S620. [PMID: 31080637 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.12.50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Miguel A Cuesta
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Koemans WJ, van der Kaaij RT, Boot H, Buffart T, Veenhof AAFA, Hartemink KJ, Grootscholten C, Snaebjornsson P, Retel VP, van Tinteren H, Vanhoutvin S, van der Noort V, Houwink A, Hahn C, Huitema ADR, Lahaye M, Los M, van den Barselaar P, Imhof O, Aalbers A, van Dam GM, van Etten B, Wijnhoven BPL, Luyer MDP, Boerma D, van Sandick JW. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus palliative systemic chemotherapy in stomach cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination, the study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (PERISCOPE II). BMC Cancer 2019; 19:420. [PMID: 31060544 PMCID: PMC6501330 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5640-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND At present, palliative systemic chemotherapy is the standard treatment in the Netherlands for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination. In contrast to lymphatic and haematogenous dissemination, peritoneal dissemination may be regarded as locoregional spread of disease. Administering cytotoxic drugs directly into the peritoneal cavity has an advantage over systemic chemotherapy since high concentrations can be delivered directly into the peritoneal cavity with limited systemic toxicity. The combination of a radical gastrectomy with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has shown promising results in patients with gastric cancer in Asia. However, the results obtained in Asian patients cannot be extrapolated to Western patients. The aim of this study is to compare the overall survival between patients with gastric cancer with limited peritoneal dissemination and/or tumour positive peritoneal cytology treated with palliative systemic chemotherapy, and those treated with gastrectomy, CRS and HIPEC after neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy. METHODS In this multicentre randomised controlled two-armed phase III trial, 106 patients will be randomised (1:1) between palliative systemic chemotherapy only (standard treatment) and gastrectomy, CRS and HIPEC (experimental treatment) after 3-4 cycles of systemic chemotherapy.Patients with gastric cancer are eligible for inclusion if (1) the primary cT3-cT4 gastric tumour including regional lymph nodes is considered to be resectable, (2) limited peritoneal dissemination (Peritoneal Cancer Index < 7) and/or tumour positive peritoneal cytology are confirmed by laparoscopy or laparotomy, and (3) systemic chemotherapy was given (prior to inclusion) without disease progression. DISCUSSION The PERISCOPE II study will determine whether gastric cancer patients with limited peritoneal dissemination and/or tumour positive peritoneal cytology treated with systemic chemotherapy, gastrectomy, CRS and HIPEC have a survival benefit over patients treated with palliative systemic chemotherapy only. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov NCT03348150 ; registration date November 2017; first enrolment November 2017; expected end date December 2022; trial status: Ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W J Koemans
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066CX, The Netherlands.
| | - R T van der Kaaij
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066CX, The Netherlands
| | - H Boot
- Department of Gastro-Intestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066CX, The Netherlands
| | - T Buffart
- Department of Gastro-Intestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066CX, The Netherlands
| | - A A F A Veenhof
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066CX, The Netherlands
| | - K J Hartemink
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066CX, The Netherlands
| | - C Grootscholten
- Department of Gastro-Intestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066CX, The Netherlands
| | - P Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066CX, The Netherlands
| | - V P Retel
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidomiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066CX, The Netherlands
| | - H van Tinteren
- Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066CX, The Netherlands
| | - S Vanhoutvin
- Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066CX, The Netherlands
| | - V van der Noort
- Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066CX, The Netherlands
| | - A Houwink
- Department of Anaesthesiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066CX, The Netherlands
| | - C Hahn
- Department of Anaesthesiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066CX, The Netherlands
| | - A D R Huitema
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066CX, The Netherlands
| | - M Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Los
- Department of Oncology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, Nieuwegein, 3435 CM, The Netherlands
| | - P van den Barselaar
- Clinical perfusion, Heartbeat, Kerkstraat 3A, Eemnes, 3755 CK, The Netherlands
| | - O Imhof
- Clinical perfusion, Heartbeat, Kerkstraat 3A, Eemnes, 3755 CK, The Netherlands
| | - A Aalbers
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066CX, The Netherlands
| | - G M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9713 GZ, The Netherlands
| | - B van Etten
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9713 GZ, The Netherlands
| | - B P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands
| | - M D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, 5623 EJ, The Netherlands
| | - D Boerma
- Department of Surgery, Sint Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, Nieuwegein, 3435 CM, The Netherlands
| | - J W van Sandick
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066CX, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
An esophagectomy is still correlated with a high morbidity rate, despite advances made in minimally invasive surgery, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and centralization of this type of surgery. The short-term benefits are clearly described for esophageal cancer surgery patients, however, the long-term effects are yet to be determined. In colorectal cancer, the association between complications, especially anastomotic leakage, shows detrimental effects on long-term survival and cancer recurrence. In esophageal cancer surgery, current evidence is scarce and the described results are conflicting. Optimization of perioperative care by introduction of minimally invasive surgery, ERAS programs and patient prehabilitation is promising and shows a clear effect on short-term outcomes. Potentially, this may also result in better outcomes on the long-term, although current evidence is insufficient to infer definite conclusions. Reduction of anastomotic leakage seems important to reduce risk of cancer recurrence and improve long-term outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura F C Fransen
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Affiliation(s)
- Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Pattamatta M, Evers SMAA, Smeets BJJ, Peters EG, Luyer MDP, Hiligsmann M. An economic evaluation of perioperative enteral nutrition in patients undergoing colorectal surgery (SANICS II study). J Med Econ 2019; 22:238-244. [PMID: 30523724 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1557200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The objective of this (trial based) economic evaluation was to assess, from a societal perspective, the cost-effectiveness of perioperative enteral nutrition compared with standard care in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Alongside the SANICS II randomized controlled trial, global quality-of-life, utilities (measured by EQ-5D-5L), healthcare costs, production losses, and patient and family costs were assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) (i.e. cost per increased global quality-of-life score or quality-adjusted life year [QALY] gained) and cost effectiveness acceptability curves were visualized. RESULTS In total, 265 patients were included in the original trial (n = 132 in the perioperative enteral nutrition group and n = 133 in the standard care group). At 6 months, global quality-of-life (83 vs 83, p = .357) did not differ significantly between the groups. The mean total societal costs for the intervention and standard care groups were €14,673 and €11,974, respectively, but did not reach statistical significance (p = .109). The intervention resulted in an ICER of -€6,276 per point increase in the global quality of life score. The gain in QALY was marginal (0.003), with an additional cost of €2,941, and the ICUR (Incremental cost utility ratio) was estimated at €980,333. LIMITATIONS The cost elements for all the participating centers reflect the reference prices from the Netherlands. Patient-reported questionnaires may have resulted in recall bias. Sample size was limited by exclusion of patients who did not complete questionnaires for at least at two time points. A power analysis based on costs and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) was not performed. The economic impact could not be analyzed at 1 month post-operatively where the effects could potentially be higher. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that perioperative nutrition is not beneficial for the patients in terms of quality-of-life and is not cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhuri Pattamatta
- a Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands
| | - Silvia M A A Evers
- a Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands
- b Trimbos Institute of Mental Health and Addiction , Center for Economic Evaluations , Utrecht , The Netherlands
| | - Boudewijn J J Smeets
- c Department of Surgery , Catharina Hospital Eindhoven , Eindhoven , The Netherlands
- d GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands
| | - Emmeline G Peters
- c Department of Surgery , Catharina Hospital Eindhoven , Eindhoven , The Netherlands
- e Tytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research , Academic Medical Center Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- c Department of Surgery , Catharina Hospital Eindhoven , Eindhoven , The Netherlands
| | - Mickael Hiligsmann
- a Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Baranov NS, van Workum F, van der Maas J, Kouwenhoven E, van Det M, van den Wildenberg FJH, Polat F, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Luyer MDP, Rosman C. The Influence of Age on Complications and Overall Survival After Ivor Lewis Totally Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23:1293-1300. [PMID: 30565069 PMCID: PMC6591183 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-4062-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2018] [Accepted: 11/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of elderly patients suffering from esophageal cancer is increasing, due to an increasing incidence of esophageal cancer and increasing life expectancy. However, the effect of age on morbidity, mortality, and survival after Ivor Lewis total minimally invasive esophagectomy (TMIE) is not well known. METHODS A prospectively documented database from December 2010 to June 2017 was analyzed, including all patients who underwent Ivor Lewis TMIE for esophageal cancer in three Dutch high-volume esophageal cancer centers. Patients younger than 75 years (younger group) were compared to patients aged 75 years or older (elderly group). Baseline patient characteristics and perioperative data were included. Surgical complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo scale. The primary outcome was postoperative complications Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3. Secondary outcome parameters were postoperative complications, in-hospital mortality, 30- and 90-day mortality and survival. RESULTS Four hundred and forty-six patients were included, 357 in the younger and 89 in the elderly group. No significant differences were recorded regarding baseline patient characteristics. There was no significant difference in complications graded Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 and overall complications, short-term mortality, and survival. Delirium occurred in 27.0% in the elderly and 11.8% in the younger group (p < 0.001). After correction for baseline comorbidity this difference remained significant (p = 0.001). Median hospital length of stay was 13 days in the elderly and 11 days in the younger group (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS Ivor Lewis TMIE can be safely performed in selected elderly patients without increasing postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaj S. Baranov
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marc van Det
- Department of Surgery, ZGT Hospital, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | | | - Fatih Polat
- Department of Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Misha D. P. Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Pattamatta M, Smeets BJJ, Evers SMAA, Rutten HJT, Luyer MDP, Hiligsmann M. Health-related quality of life and cost-effectiveness analysis of gum chewing in patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results of a randomized controlled trial. Acta Chir Belg 2018; 118:299-306. [PMID: 29378476 DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2018.1432742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative ileus (POI) and anastomotic leakage (AL) following colorectal surgery severely increase healthcare costs and decrease quality of life. This study evaluates the effects of reducing POI and AL via perioperative gum chewing compared to placebo (control) on in-hospital costs, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and assesses cost-effectiveness. METHODS In patients undergoing elective, open colorectal surgery, changes in HRQoL were assessed using EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaires and costs were estimated from a hospital perspective. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated. RESULTS In 112 patients, mean costs for ward stay were significantly lower in the gum chewing group when compared to control (€3522 (95% CI €3034-€4010) versus €4893 (95% CI €3843-€5942), respectively, p = .020). No differences were observed in mean overall in-hospital costs, or in mean change in any of the HRQoL scores or utilities. Gum chewing was dominant (less costly and more effective) compared to the control in more than 50% of the simulations for both POI and AL. CONCLUSION Reducing POI and AL via gum chewing reduced costs for ward stay, but did not affect overall in-hospital costs, HRQoL, or mapped utilities. More studies with adequate sample sizes using validated questionnaires at standardized time points are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhuri Pattamatta
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Boudewijn J. J. Smeets
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- GROW School of oncology and developmental biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Silvia M. A. A. Evers
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Trimbos Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Harm J. T. Rutten
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- GROW School of oncology and developmental biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Misha D. P. Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Mickael Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Postoperative ileus (POI) is an important contributor to postoperative morbidity. However, postoperative outcomes have improved by enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs. Enteral nutrition is an essential part of ERAS and many studies suggest a therapeutic effect of nutrition on POI. RECENT FINDINGS Early postoperative enteral nutrition has been shown to reduce various complications, including POI, although studies are heterogeneous. Experimental studies suggest that composition and timing of the enteral feed is important for the potential beneficial effects: lipid-enriched nutrition given just before, during, and directly after surgery was most effective in reducing POI in an experimental setting. In a clinical study in patients undergoing advanced rectal cancer surgery, direct start of enteral tube feeding reduced POI. Conversely, perioperative lipid-enriched enteral nutrition did not reduce POI in patients undergoing colorectal surgery with an ERAS protocol. SUMMARY POI is common and remains an important determinant of postoperative recovery following colorectal surgery. Nutrition is a potential therapeutic means to reduce POI. Timing and composition of the enteral feed have been shown to be essential for the beneficial effects of enteral nutrition in an experimental setup. However perioperative lipid-enriched nutrition does not reduce POI in patients undergoing colorectal surgery with an ERAS protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boudewijn J J Smeets
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Luyer MDP. Enteral nutrition during major surgery: how to proceed after SANICS II - Authors' reply. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 3:455. [PMID: 29893231 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(18)30138-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 04/18/2018] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
van den Boom AL, de Wijkerslooth EML, van Rosmalen J, Beverdam FH, Boerma EJG, Boermeester MA, Bosmans JWAM, Burghgraef TA, Consten ECJ, Dawson I, Dekker JWT, Emous M, van Geloven AAW, Go PMNYH, Heijnen LA, Huisman SA, Jean Pierre D, de Jonge J, Kloeze JH, Koopmanschap MA, Langeveld HR, Luyer MDP, Melles DC, Mouton JW, van der Ploeg APT, Poelmann FB, Ponten JEH, van Rossem CC, Schreurs WH, Shapiro J, Steenvoorde P, Toorenvliet BR, Verhelst J, Versteegh HP, Wijnen RMH, Wijnhoven BPL. Two versus five days of antibiotics after appendectomy for complex acute appendicitis (APPIC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2018; 19:263. [PMID: 29720238 PMCID: PMC5932884 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2629-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2018] [Accepted: 04/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Acute appendicitis is one of the most common indications for emergency surgery. In patients with a complex appendicitis, prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended after appendectomy. There is no consensus regarding the optimum duration of antibiotics. Guidelines propose 3 to 7 days of treatment, but shorter courses may be as effective in the prevention of infectious complications. At the same time, the global issue of increasing antimicrobial resistance urges for optimization of antibiotic strategies. The aim of this study is to determine whether a short course (48 h) of postoperative antibiotics is non-inferior to current standard practice of 5 days. Methods Patients of 8 years and older undergoing appendectomy for acute complex appendicitis – defined as a gangrenous and/or perforated appendicitis or appendicitis in presence of an abscess – are eligible for inclusion. Immunocompromised or pregnant patients are excluded, as well as patients with a contraindication to the study antibiotics. In total, 1066 patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the experimental treatment arm (48 h of postoperative intravenously administered (IV) antibiotics) or the control arm (5 days of postoperative IV antibiotics). After discharge from the hospital, patients participate in a productivity-cost-questionnaire at 4 weeks and a standardized telephone follow-up at 90 days after appendectomy. The primary outcome is a composite endpoint of infectious complications, including intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) and surgical site infection (SSI), and mortality within 90 days after appendectomy. Secondary outcomes include IAA, SSI, restart of antibiotics, length of hospital stay (LOS), reoperation, percutaneous drainage, readmission rate, and cost-effectiveness. The non-inferiority margin for the difference in the primary endpoint rate is set at 7.5% (one-sided test at ɑ 0.025). Both per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses will be performed. Discussion This trial will provide evidence on whether 48 h of postoperative antibiotics is non-inferior to a standard course of 5 days of antibiotics. If non-inferiority is established, longer intravenous administration following appendectomy for complex appendicitis can be abandoned, and guidelines need to be adjusted accordingly. Trial registration Dutch Trial Register, NTR6128. Registered on 20 December 2016. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2629-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Loes van den Boom
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth M L de Wijkerslooth
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Joost van Rosmalen
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC - University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marja A Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Academisch Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Imro Dawson
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle a/d IJssel, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marloes Emous
- Department of Surgery, MC Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Peter M N Y H Go
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Luc A Heijnen
- Department of Surgery, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Sander A Huisman
- Department of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Joske de Jonge
- Department of Surgery, Tergooi, Hilversum/Blaricum, The Netherlands
| | - Jurian H Kloeze
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Marc A Koopmanschap
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hester R Langeveld
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Damian C Melles
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC - University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johan W Mouton
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC - University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jeroen E H Ponten
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Joël Shapiro
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle a/d IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - Pascal Steenvoorde
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | - Joost Verhelst
- Department of Surgery, Ikazia Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hendt P Versteegh
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Rene M H Wijnen
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|