1
|
Fu VX, Lagarde SM, Favoccia CT, Heisterkamp J, van Oers AE, Coene PPLO, Koopman JSHA, van den Berg SAA, Dik WA, Jeekel J, Wijnhoven BPL. Intraoperative Music to Promote Patient Outcome (IMPROMPTU): A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. J Surg Res 2024; 296:291-301. [PMID: 38306934 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Perioperative music can have beneficial effects on postoperative pain, anxiety, opioid requirement, and the physiological stress response to surgery. The aim was to assess the effects of intraoperative music during general anesthesia in patients undergoing surgery for esophagogastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS The IMPROMPTU study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized multicenter trial. Adult patients undergoing surgery for stage II-III esophagogastric cancer were eligible. Exclusion criteria were a hearing impairment, insufficient Dutch language knowledge, corticosteroids use, or objection to hearing unknown music. Patients wore active noise-cancelling headphones intraoperatively with preselected instrumental classical music (intervention) or no music (control). Computerized randomization with centralized allocation, stratified according to surgical procedure using variable block sizes, was employed. Primary endpoint was postoperative pain on the first postoperative day. Secondary endpoints were postoperative pain during the first postoperative week, postoperative opioid requirement, intraoperative medication requirement, the stress response to surgery, postoperative complication rate, length of stay, and mortality, with follow-up lasting 30 d. RESULTS From November 2018 to September 2020, 145 patients were assessed and 83 randomized. Seventy patients (music n = 31, control n = 39) were analyzed. Median age was 70 [IQR 63-70], and 48 patients (69%) were male. Music did not reduce postoperative pain (numeric rating scale 1.8 (SD0.94) versus 2.0 (1.0), mean difference -0.28 [95% CI -0.76-0.19], P = 0.236). No statistically significant differences were seen in medication requirement, stress response, complication rate, or length of stay. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative, preselected, classical music during esophagogastric cancer surgery did not significantly improve postoperative outcome and recovery when compared to no music using noise-cancelling headphones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor X Fu
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christian T Favoccia
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joos Heisterkamp
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie E van Oers
- Department of Anesthesiology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Sjoerd A A van den Berg
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willem A Dik
- Department of Immunology, Laboratory Medical Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Jeekel
- Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Hootegem SJM, Chmelo J, van der Sluis PC, Lagarde SM, Phillips AW, Wijnhoven BPL. The yield of diagnostic laparoscopy with peritoneal lavage in gastric adenocarcinoma: A retrospective cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2024; 50:108233. [PMID: 38428107 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) with peritoneal lavage has been adopted as a standard staging procedure for patients with gastric cancer (GC). Evaluation of the value of DL is important given ongoing improvements in diagnostic imaging and treatment. As contemporary data from European centres are sparse, this retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the yield of DL in patients with potentially curable gastric cancer, and to identify predictive factors for peritoneal metastases. METHODS Patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach, treated between January 2016 and December 2018, were identified from institutional databases of two high volume European Upper-GI centres. Patients who underwent a DL with peritoneal lavage for potentially curable disease after clinical staging with imaging (cT1-4N0-3M0) were included. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a positive DL, defined as macroscopic metastatic disease, positive peritoneal cytology washings (PC+) or locally irresectable disease. RESULTS Some 80 of 327 included patients (24.5%) had a positive DL, excluding these patients from neoadjuvant treatment (66 of 327; 20.2%) and/or surgical resection (76 of 327; 23.2%). In 34 of 327 patients (10.3%), macroscopic metastatic disease was seen, with peritoneal deposits in 30 of these patients. Only 16 of 30 patients with peritoneal disease had positive cytology. Some 41 of 327 patients (12.5%) that underwent DL had PC+ in the absence of macroscopic metastases and five patients (1.5%) had an irresectable primary tumour. Diffuse type carcinoma had the highest risk of peritoneal dissemination, irrespective of cT and cN categories. CONCLUSION The diagnostic yield of staging laparoscopy is high, changing the management in approximately one quarter of patients. DL should be considered in patients with diffuse type carcinoma irrespective of cT and cN categories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J M van Hootegem
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - J Chmelo
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK
| | - P C van der Sluis
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A W Phillips
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK; School of Medical Education, Newcastle University, UK
| | - B P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Geerts JFM, van der Zijden CJ, van der Sluis PC, Spaander MCW, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Rosman C, van Laarhoven HWM, Verhoeven RHA, Wijnhoven BPL, Lagarde SM, Mostert B. Perioperative Chemotherapy for Gastro-Esophageal or Gastric Cancer: Anthracyclin Triplets versus FLOT. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1291. [PMID: 38610969 PMCID: PMC11011191 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: The FLOT4-AIO trial (2019) showed improved survival with perioperative fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) compared to anthracyclin triplets in gastric cancer treatment. It is unclear whether these results extend to real-world scenarios in the Netherlands. This study aimed to compare outcomes of perioperative FLOT to anthracyclin triplets in a real-world Dutch gastric cancer population. Methods: Patients diagnosed with resectable (cT2-4a/cTxN0-3/NxM0) gastric or gastro-esophageal junction carcinoma between 2015-2021 who received neoadjuvant FLOT or anthracyclin triplets were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), analyzed through multivariable Cox regression. Secondary outcomes included pathological complete response (pCR), neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycle completion, surgical resection rates, and adjuvant therapy. Results: Adjusted OS showed no significant survival benefit (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.77-1.01, p = 0.07), even though the median OS was numerically improved by 8 months with FLOT compared to anthracyclin triplets (48.1 vs. 39.9 months, p = 0.16). FLOT patients were more likely to undergo diagnostic staging laparoscopies (74.2% vs. 44.1%, p < 0.001), had higher rates of completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.68, p = 0.007), receiving adjuvant therapy (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.08-1.66, p = 0.08), and achieving pCR (OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.05-2.20, p = 0.03). No significant differences were observed in (radical) resection rates. Conclusion(s): Real-world data showed no significant OS improvement for FLOT-treated patients compared to anthracyclin triplets, despite more staging laparoscopies. However, FLOT patients demonstrated higher rates of neoadjuvant therapy completion, proceeding to adjuvant therapy, and increased pCR rates. Therefore, we recommend the continued use of neoadjuvant FLOT therapy in the current clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie F M Geerts
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob H A Verhoeven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), 3511 LC Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bianca Mostert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Jongh C, van der Meulen MP, Gertsen EC, Brenkman HJF, van Sandick JW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, van Lanschot JJB, Lagarde SM, Wijnhoven BPL, de Steur WO, Hartgrink HH, Stoot JHMB, Hulsewe KWE, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ, van Det MJ, Kouwenhoven EA, Daams F, van der Peet DL, van Grieken NCT, Heisterkamp J, van Etten B, van den Berg JW, Pierie JP, Eker HH, Thijssen AY, Belt EJT, van Duijvendijk P, Wassenaar E, Wevers KP, Hol L, Wessels FJ, Haj Mohammad N, Frederix GWJ, van Hillegersberg R, Siersema PD, Vegt E, Ruurda JP. Impact of 18FFDG-PET/CT and Laparoscopy in Staging of Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Cost Analysis in the Prospective Multicenter PLASTIC-Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15103-4. [PMID: 38526832 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15103-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unnecessary D2-gastrectomy and associated costs can be prevented after detecting non-curable gastric cancer, but impact of staging on treatment costs is unclear. This study determined the cost impact of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18FFDG-PET/CT) and staging laparoscopy (SL) in gastric cancer staging. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this cost analysis, four staging strategies were modeled in a decision tree: (1) 18FFDG-PET/CT first, then SL, (2) SL only, (3) 18FFDG-PET/CT only, and (4) neither SL nor 18FFDG-PET/CT. Costs were assessed on the basis of the prospective PLASTIC-study, which evaluated adding 18FFDG-PET/CT and SL to staging advanced gastric cancer (cT3-4 and/or cN+) in 18 Dutch hospitals. The Dutch Healthcare Authority provided 18FFDG-PET/CT unit costs. SL unit costs were calculated bottom-up. Gastrectomy-associated costs were collected with hospital claim data until 30 days postoperatively. Uncertainty was assessed in a probabilistic sensitivity analysis (1000 iterations). RESULTS 18FFDG-PET/CT costs were €1104 including biopsy/cytology. Bottom-up calculations totaled €1537 per SL. D2-gastrectomy costs were €19,308. Total costs per patient were €18,137 for strategy 1, €17,079 for strategy 2, and €19,805 for strategy 3. If all patients undergo gastrectomy, total costs were €18,959 per patient (strategy 4). Performing SL only reduced costs by €1880 per patient. Adding 18FFDG-PET/CT to SL increased costs by €1058 per patient; IQR €870-1253 in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS For advanced gastric cancer, performing SL resulted in substantial cost savings by reducing unnecessary gastrectomies. In contrast, routine 18FFDG-PET/CT increased costs without substantially reducing unnecessary gastrectomies, and is not recommended due to limited impact with major costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03208621. This trial was registered prospectively on 30-06-2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cas de Jongh
- Department of Surgery, Medical Oncology and Radiology, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Emma C Gertsen
- Department of Surgery, Medical Oncology and Radiology, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hylke J F Brenkman
- Department of Surgery, Medical Oncology and Radiology, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna W van Sandick
- Surgery and Nuclear Medicine Department, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Surgery Department, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Surgery and Pathology Department, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Surgery Department, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Surgery and Pathology Department, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Surgery Department, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jan J B van Lanschot
- Surgery and Nuclear Medicine Department, Erasmus Medical Center UMC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Surgery and Nuclear Medicine Department, Erasmus Medical Center UMC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Surgery and Nuclear Medicine Department, Erasmus Medical Center UMC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jan H M B Stoot
- Surgery Department, Zuyderland MC, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marc J van Det
- Surgery Department, ZGT Hospital, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | | | - Freek Daams
- Surgery and Pathology Department, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Surgery and Pathology Department, Location Vrije University, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Donald L van der Peet
- Surgery and Pathology Department, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Surgery and Pathology Department, Location Vrije University, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole C T van Grieken
- Surgery and Pathology Department, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Surgery and Pathology Department, Location Vrije University, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joos Heisterkamp
- Surgery Department, Elisabeth Twee-Steden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jean-Pierre Pierie
- Surgery Department, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Hasan H Eker
- Surgery Department, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Annemieke Y Thijssen
- Gastroenterology Department, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eric J T Belt
- Gastroenterology Department, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Eelco Wassenaar
- Surgery Department, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Kevin P Wevers
- Surgery Department, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Lieke Hol
- Gastroenterology Department, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank J Wessels
- Department of Surgery, Medical Oncology and Radiology, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Surgery, Medical Oncology and Radiology, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Geert W J Frederix
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, Medical Oncology and Radiology, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Vegt
- Surgery and Nuclear Medicine Department, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Surgery and Nuclear Medicine Department, Erasmus Medical Center UMC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, Medical Oncology and Radiology, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van der Sluis K, Guchelaar NAD, Triemstra L, Mathijssen RHJ, Ruurda JP, Wijnhoven BPL, van Sandick JW. Staging laparoscopy in gastric cancer patients: From a Dutch nationwide Delphi consensus towards a standardized protocol. Eur J Surg Oncol 2024; 50:108278. [PMID: 38531232 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Staging laparoscopy is a common diagnostic tool in gastric cancer, but its performance varies widely. The aim of this study was to gain Dutch nationwide consensus regarding the indications for and execution of staging laparoscopy in patients with gastric cancer. METHODS All surgeons in the Netherlands specialized in gastric cancer surgery (n = 52) were asked to participate in a Delphi consensus study. The study involved an initial questionnaire with a 3-point Likert scale, an online consensus meeting, and a second questionnaire using a 2-point Likert scale (agree/disagree). Consensus was defined as 70% or more agreement among participants. RESULTS In total, 45 experts completed both questionnaires (87% response rate). Consensus was reached on the indication to perform staging laparoscopy in cT3-4 or cN + or diffuse-type gastric cancer, including Siewert type III oesophagogastric junctional cancer. The experts agreed that if preoperative scans suggest infiltration of surrounding organs (cT4), the tumour's resectability should explicitly be investigated. Consensus was also reached for a systematic peritoneal cavity inspection according to Sugarbaker's Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) score. All regions should be inspected routinely, although the omental bursa may be inspected on indication. Aspiration of ascites or peritoneal washing should be performed for cytology. The experts agreed that restaging laparoscopy should be performed before resection in case of progressive disease on preoperative imaging. Without progression, global inspection was considered sufficient. CONCLUSIONS The results of this Dutch nationwide Delphi consensus study exposed the variability of performing staging laparoscopy in patients with gastric cancer and provided the concept for a standardized protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Niels A D Guchelaar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Lianne Triemstra
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wijnhoven BPL, Griffiths EA. Diagnosis and treatment of junctional cancer from a global perspective. Dis Esophagus 2024:doae017. [PMID: 38493308 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doae017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Erasmus University Medical Cancer, Department of Surgery and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Wijnhoven, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3000 CA, the Netherlands
| | - Ewen A Griffiths
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingam NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Van Der Sluis K, Taylor SN, Kodach LL, van Dieren JM, de Hingh IHJT, Wijnhoven BPL, Verhoeven RHA, Vollebergh MA, van Sandick JW. Tumor-positive peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric cancer is associated with poor outcome: A nationwide study. Eur J Cancer 2024; 199:113541. [PMID: 38237371 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical significance of tumor-positive peritoneal cytology (CYT+) in gastric cancer (GC) patients is unclear. This nationwide cohort study aimed to i) assess the frequency of cytological analysis at staging laparoscopy; ii) determine the prevalence of CYT+GC; and iii) compare overall survival (OS) in CYT+ patients versus those with (PM+) and those without (PM-) macroscopic peritoneal disease. METHODS All patients diagnosed with cT1-4, cN0-2 and M0 or synchronous PM GC between 2016-2021 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry database and linked to the nationwide pathology database. RESULTS A total of 4397 patients was included, of which 40 % underwent cytological assessment following staging laparoscopy (863/1745). The prevalence of CYT+ was 8 %. A total of 69 patients had CYT+(1.6 %), 789 (17.9 %) had PM+ and 3539 (80.5 %) had PM- disease. Hazard ratio for OS in CYT+ versus PM+ was 0.86 (95 %CI 0.64-1.17, p-value=0.338), and in PM- versus PM+0.43 (95 %CI 0.38-0.49, p-value<0.001). No survival difference was found between systemic chemotherapy versus surgical resection in CYT+ patients. DISCUSSION In this nationwide study, OS for gastric cancer patients with CYT+ was equally unfavorable as for those with PM+ and significantly worse as compared to those with PM-. The optimal treatment strategy has yet to be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Van Der Sluis
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Surgical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Steven N Taylor
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Surgical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Liudmila L Kodach
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jolanda M van Dieren
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Erasmus Medical Centre, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rob H A Verhoeven
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Department of Research & Development, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke A Vollebergh
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W van Sandick
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Surgical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van der Zijden CJ, van der Sluis PC, Mostert B, Nuyttens JJME, Spaander MCW, Toxopeus ELA, Valkema R, Beerepoot LV, van Halteren HK, Lagarde SM, Wijnhoven BPL. Induction chemotherapy followed by response evaluation and esophagectomy for advanced esophageal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2024; 50:107968. [PMID: 38241878 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.107968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with limited metastatic/advanced esophageal cancer not amenable for neoadjuvant therapy plus surgery have a poor prognosis and often receive palliative care. Alternatively, induction chemotherapy with response evaluation can be considered and in some patients surgery with curative intent may become feasible. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients treated with induction chemotherapy and to identify patient and/or tumor characteristics associated with survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with esophageal or junctional cancer who underwent induction chemotherapy between 2005 and 2021 were identified from an institutional database of a tertiary referral center. Response to therapy was assessed by (18F-FDG PET)/CT. Response to therapy and treatment options, including surgery or palliation, were discussed in the multidisciplinary tumor board. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan Meier method. Uni- and multivariable analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for survival. RESULTS 238 patients were identified. The majority had esophageal adenocarcinoma (68.9 %) and were treated with a taxane/platinum-based chemotherapy (79.4 %). Response evaluation was performed in 233 patients and 154 of 238 patients (64.7 %) underwent surgical exploration. Resection was performed in 127 patients (53.4 %) resulting in a median and 5-year OS of 26.3 months (95 % CI 18.8-33.8) and 29.6 %, respectively. Presence of T4b (HR = 2.01, 95 % CI 1.02-3.92) and poorly differentiated tumor (HR = 1.45, 95 % CI 1.02-2.10) was associated with worse survival (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION In carefully selected patients with advanced disease not amenable for standard curative treatment, induction chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy may result in a 5-year overall survival of approximately 30 %.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Bianca Mostert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joost J M E Nuyttens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eelke L A Toxopeus
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roelf Valkema
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Laurens V Beerepoot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Henk K van Halteren
- Department of Medical Oncology, Admiraal de Ruyter Hospital, Goes, the Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hermus M, van der Zijden CJ, Wijnhoven BPL, Busschbach JJ, Lagarde SM, Kranenburg LW. Patients' Preferences Towards Decision Counseling for Active Surveillance After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:1562-1567. [PMID: 38099991 PMCID: PMC10838222 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14651-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decision counseling (DC) is offered to enable patients to reflect on their treatment preferences and to think through the consequences of alternative treatment options. However, the timing of DC is debatable. In this study, patients who underwent DC at different times were interviewed about their experiences, specifically focusing on the timing of DC. METHODS Patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer eligible for participation in a prospective cohort study on active surveillance (SANO-2 study) were offered DC either before or after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Structured interviews were conducted by phone 1 week after DC, and responses were analyzed using frequency counts for the answers to set response categories. The primary outcome was the preferred time to receive DC, while the secondary outcome was the overall experience of patients with DC. RESULTS Overall, 40 patients were offered DC between 2021 and 2023. Patients who had counseling before the start of nCRT (n = 20) were satisfied with the timing of DC. Of the 20 patients who had DC after nCRT, 6 would have preferred counseling at an earlier time point. Patients who had DC both before or after the completion of nCRT reflected positively on DC. CONCLUSION It is recommended to introduce the option of DC as early as possible and discuss with the patient at which moment during the decision-making process they prefer to discuss all treatment options more extensively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merel Hermus
- Department of Psychiatry, Section of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Charlène J van der Zijden
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan J Busschbach
- Department of Psychiatry, Section of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonieke W Kranenburg
- Department of Psychiatry, Section of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van der Zijden CJ, van der Sluis PC, Mostert B, Nuyttens JJME, Spaander VMCW, Valkema R, Ruurda JP, Wijnhoven BPL, Lagarde SM. ASO Visual Abstract: Adjuvant Therapy for Patients with a Tumor-Positive Resection Margin After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15044-y. [PMID: 38403806 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15044-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Charlène J van der Zijden
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - P C van der Sluis
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B Mostert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J J M E Nuyttens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - V M C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Valkema
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - B P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
van Hootegem SJM, de Pasqual CA, Giacopuzzi S, Van Daele E, Vanommeslaeghe H, Moons J, Nafteux P, van der Sluis PC, Lagarde SM, Wijnhoven BPL. Outcomes after Surgical Treatment of Oesophagogastric Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastases: A Multicentre Retrospective Cohort Study. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:797. [PMID: 38398190 PMCID: PMC10887104 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Approximately 10-12% of patients with oesophageal or gastric cancer (OGC) present with oligometastatic disease at diagnosis. It remains unclear if there is a role for radical surgery in these patients. We aimed to assess the outcomes of OGC patients who underwent simultaneous treatment for the primary tumour and synchronous liver metastases. Patients with OGC who underwent surgical treatment between 2008 and 2020 for the primary tumour and up to five synchronous liver metastases aiming for complete tumour removal or ablation (i.e., no residual tumour) were identified from four institutional databases. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival and postoperative outcomes. Thirty-one patients were included, with complete follow-up data for 30 patients. Twenty-six patients (84%) received neoadjuvant therapy followed by response evaluation. Median OS was 21 months [IQR 9-36] with 2- and 5-year survival rates of 43% and 30%, respectively. While disease recurred in 80% of patients (20 of 25 patients) after radical resection, patients with a solitary liver metastasis had a median OS of 34 months. The number of liver metastases was a prognostic factor for OS (solitary metastasis aHR 0.330; p-value = 0.025). Thirty-day mortality was zero and complications occurred in 55% of patients. Long-term survival can be achieved in well-selected patients who undergo surgical resection of the primary tumour and local treatment of synchronous liver metastases. In particular, patients with a solitary liver metastasis seem to have a favourable prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sander J. M. van Hootegem
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (S.J.M.v.H.)
| | - Carlo A. de Pasqual
- General and Upper GI Surgery Division, University Hospital of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Simone Giacopuzzi
- General and Upper GI Surgery Division, University Hospital of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Elke Van Daele
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hanne Vanommeslaeghe
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Johnny Moons
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Philippe Nafteux
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pieter C. van der Sluis
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (S.J.M.v.H.)
| | - Sjoerd M. Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (S.J.M.v.H.)
| | - Bas P. L. Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (S.J.M.v.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Weijs TJ, van Laarhoven HWM, Wijnhoven BPL, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Management of locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction: the Neo-AEGIS trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 9:103-104. [PMID: 38215773 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(23)00407-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Teus J Weijs
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht 3508GA, Netherlands
| | | | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht 3508GA, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Valkema MJ, de Lussanet de la Sablonière QG, Valkema R, Thomeer MGJ, Dwarkasing RS, Harteveld AA, Doukas M, Mostert B, van der Zijden CJ, van der Sluis PC, Lagarde SM, Wijnhoven BPL, Verburg FA, van Lanschot JJB. 18 F-FDG PET/MRI for restaging esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Nucl Med Commun 2024; 45:128-138. [PMID: 37982560 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate whether 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) PET/MRI may potentially improve tumor detection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for esophageal cancer. METHODS This was a prospective, single-center feasibility study. At 6-12 weeks after nCRT, patients underwent standard 18 F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) followed by PET/MRI, and completed a questionnaire to evaluate burden. Two teams of readers either assessed the 18 F-FDG PET/CT or the 18 F-FDG PET/MRI first; the other scan was assessed 1 month later. Maximum standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass (SUL max ) and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC mean ) were measured at the primary tumor location. Histopathology of the surgical resection specimen served as the reference standard for diagnostic accuracy calculations. When patients had a clinically complete response and continued active surveillance, response evaluations until 9 months after nCRT served as a proxy for ypT and ypN (i.e. 'ycT' and 'ycN'). RESULTS In the 21 included patients [median age 70 (IQR 62-75), 16 males], disease recurrence was found in the primary tumor in 14 (67%) patients (of whom one ypM+, detected on both scans) and in locoregional lymph nodes in six patients (29%). Accuracy (team 1/team 2) to detect yp/ycT+ with 18 F-FDG PET/MRI vs. 18 F-FDG PET/CT was 38/57% vs. 76/61%. For ypN+, accuracy was 63/53% vs. 63/42%, resp. Neither SUL max (both scans) nor ADC mean were discriminatory for yp/ycT+ . Fourteen of 21 (67%) patients were willing to undergo a similar 18 F-FDG PET/MRI examination in the future. CONCLUSION 18 F-FDG PET/MRI currently performs comparably to 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Improvements in the scanning protocol, increasing reader experience and performing serial scans might contribute to enhancing the accuracy of tumor detection after nCRT using 18 F-FDG PET/MRI. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Register NL9352.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Bianca Mostert
- Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tonsbeek AM, Hundepool CA, Smit MM, Verduijn PS, Duraku LS, Sewnaik A, Wijnhoven BPL, Mureau MAM. Fasciocutaneous and jejunal free flaps for circumferential hypopharyngeal defect reconstruction: A 22-year multicenter cohort study. Head Neck 2024. [PMID: 38294120 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It remains unclear whether a tubed fasciocutaneous or jejunal free flap (FCFF and JFF) is preferable for reconstruction of circumferential pharyngolaryngoesophageal defects. METHODS All consecutive patients with circumferential pharyngolaryngoesophageal defects reconstructed with an FCFF or JFF between 2000 and 2022 were included. Outcomes of interest were rates of fistulas, strictures, and donor-site complications. RESULTS In total, 112 patients were included (35 FCFFs and 77 JFFs). Fistula and stricture rates were significantly lower following JFF compared to FCFF reconstructions, with 12% versus 34% (p = 0.008) and 29% versus 49% (p = 0.04), respectively. Severe donor-site complications leading to surgical intervention or ICU admittance only occurred after JFF reconstructions (18%, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS The high fistula and stricture rates in FCFF reconstructions and the rate of severe abdominal complications in JFF reconstructions illustrate inherent procedure-specific advantages and disadvantages. Relative pros and cons should be carefully weighed when tailoring treatments to the individual needs of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony M Tonsbeek
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline A Hundepool
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Merel M Smit
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter S Verduijn
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Liron S Duraku
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aniel Sewnaik
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Oncological and Gastro-Intestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc A M Mureau
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
van der Zijden CJ, van der Sluis PC, Mostert B, Nuyttens JJME, Spaander VMCW, Valkema R, Ruurda JP, Wijnhoven BPL, Lagarde SM. Adjuvant Therapy for Patients with a Tumor-Positive Resection Margin After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-14912-x. [PMID: 38245648 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14912-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 4-9% of patients have a tumor-positive resection margin after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and esophagectomy. Although it is associated with decreased survival, Western guidelines do not recommend adjuvant treatment. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the proportion of patients who received adjuvant therapy, and to evaluate overall survival (OS) after esophagectomy in patients with a tumor-positive resection margin. METHODS Patients diagnosed with resectable (cT2-4a/cTxN0-3/NxM0) esophageal cancer between 2015 and 2022, and treated with nCRT followed by irradical esophagectomy, were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a tumor-positive resection margin who started adjuvant treatment ≤16 weeks after esophagectomy, including chemotherapy/radiotherapy, immunotherapy, or targeted therapy. OS was calculated from the date of surgery until the date of death or last day of follow-up. RESULTS Overall, 376 patients were included in our study, of whom 357 were treated with nCRT. Of these 357 patients, 98.3% had a microscopically irradical resection and 1.7% had a macroscopically irradical resection. Approximately 72.3% of tumors showed a partial response (Mandard 2-3) and 11.8% showed little/no pathological response (Mandard 4-5) to nCRT. One of 357 patients underwent adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and 39 patients (61%) underwent adjuvant immunotherapy (nivolumab). The median and 5-year OS rate of all patients was 16.4 months (95% confidence interval 13.1-19.8) and 21%, respectively. CONCLUSION Real-world population-level data showed that no patients with a tumor-positive resection margin underwent adjuvant therapy following nCRT and esophagectomy prior to 2021. Interestingly, 61% of patients were treated with adjuvant nivolumab in 2021-2022. OS after irradical esophagectomy is poor and long-term data will explore the added value of nivolumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C J van der Zijden
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - P C van der Sluis
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B Mostert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J J M E Nuyttens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - V M C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Valkema
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - B P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hermus M, van der Zijden CJ, Wijnhoven BPL, Busschbach JJ, Lagarde SM, Kranenburg LW. ASO Visual Abstract: Patients' Preferences Towards Decision Counseling for Active Surveillance After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-023-14792-7. [PMID: 38182849 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14792-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Merel Hermus
- Department of Psychiatry, Section of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Charlène J van der Zijden
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan J Busschbach
- Department of Psychiatry, Section of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonieke W Kranenburg
- Department of Psychiatry, Section of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
van der Wilk BJ, Eyck BM, Noordman BJ, Kranenburg LW, Oppe M, Lagarde SM, Wijnhoven BPL, Busschbach JJ, van Lanschot JJB. ASO Visual Abstract: Characteristics Predicting Short-Term and Long-Term, Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Esophageal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:247-248. [PMID: 37843667 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14387-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Berend J van der Wilk
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Ben M Eyck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bo J Noordman
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonieke W Kranenburg
- Department of Psychiatry, Section of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Oppe
- Maths in Health, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan J Busschbach
- Department of Psychiatry, Section of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Jan B van Lanschot
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
van der Wilk BJ, Eyck BM, Noordman BJ, Kranenburg LW, Oppe M, Lagarde SM, Wijnhoven BPL, Busschbach JJ, van Lanschot JJB. Characteristics Predicting Short-Term and Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Esophageal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:8192-8202. [PMID: 37587357 PMCID: PMC10625935 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14028-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Esophagectomy is associated with lasting effect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Patients desire detailed information on the expected impact of treatment on their postoperative HRQOL. The aim of the present study is to identify clinicopathological characteristics predictive for changes in short-term and long-term HRQOL after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and surgery. METHODS HRQOL was measured using EORTC-QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES24 questionnaires prior to nCRT, three, six, nine and twelve months postoperatively and at a minimum of six years postoperatively. Based on previous experience and available literature, several subgroups were predefined for different clinicopathological characteristics: baseline global HRQOL, WHO performance status, histology, tumor stage and tumor location. The primary endpoints of the present study were the change compared to baseline in the HRQOL dimensions physical functioning and eating problems. Secondary endpoints were global HRQOL, fatigue and emotional problems. RESULTS In total, 134 (76%) of 177 patients who received HRQOL questionnaires, responded at baseline. Patients who reported a high baseline global HRQOL had a more severe deterioration in eating problems (+14.5 to + 18.0), global HRQOL (-16.0 to -28.0) and fatigue (+10.5 to +14.9) up to six years postoperatively compared to patients who reported a low baseline global HRQOL. Patients who had stage 2 tumor (UICC 6th edition) had a more severe deterioration in eating problems (+14.6 to +19.0) and global HRQOL (-10.1 to -17.1) than patients who had stage 3 tumor. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer in favorable condition at baseline decline more in terms of various HRQOL outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berend J van der Wilk
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Ben M Eyck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bo J Noordman
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonieke W Kranenburg
- Department of Psychiatry, Section of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Oppe
- Maths in Health, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan J Busschbach
- Department of Psychiatry, Section of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Jan B van Lanschot
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Huurman EA, Galema HA, de Raaff CAL, Wijnhoven BPL, Toorenvliet BR, Smeenk RM. Non-excisional techniques for the treatment of intergluteal pilonidal sinus disease: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 2023; 27:1191-1200. [PMID: 37930579 PMCID: PMC10638206 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02870-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Non-excisional techniques for pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) have gained popularity over the last years. The aim of this study was to review short and long-term outcomes for non-excisional techniques with special focus on the additive effect of treatment of the inner lining of the sinus cavity and the difference between primary and recurrent PSD. A systematic search was conducted in Embase, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases for studies on non-excisional techniques for PSD including pit picking techniques with or without additional laser or phenol treatment, unroofing, endoscopic techniques and thrombin gelatin matrix application. Outcomes were recurrence rates, healing rates, complication rates, wound healing times and time taken to return to daily activities. In total, 31 studies comprising 8100 patients were included. Non-excisional techniques had overall healing rates ranging from 67 to 100%. Recurrence rates for pit picking, unroofing and gelatin matrix application varied from 0 to 16% depending on the follow-up time. Recurrence rates after additional laser, phenol and endoscopic techniques varied from 0 to 29%. Complication rates ranged from 0 to 16%, and the wound healing time was between three and forty-seven days. The return to daily activities varied from one to nine days. Non-excisional techniques are associated with fast recovery and low morbidity but recurrence rates are high. Techniques that attempt to additionally treat the inner lining of the sinus have worse recurrence rates than pit picking alone. Recurrence rates do not differ between primary and recurrent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E A Huurman
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - H A Galema
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C A L de Raaff
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - B P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B R Toorenvliet
- Department of Surgery, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R M Smeenk
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hermus M, van der Wilk BJ, Dekker JWT, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Rosman C, Timmermans L, Wijnhoven BPL, van der Zijden CJ, van Lanschot JJB, Busschbach JJ, Lagarde SM, Kranenburg LW. Developing an e-learning tool for clinicians to take patient preferences into account in esophageal cancer treatment decision-making. Health Sci Rep 2023; 6:e1725. [PMID: 38111742 PMCID: PMC10726811 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.1725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 06/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Merel Hermus
- Section of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of PsychiatryErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Berend J. van der Wilk
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Cancer InstituteErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | | | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of SurgeryRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth Timmermans
- Department of Primary and Community CareRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Bas P. L. Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Cancer InstituteErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Charlène J. van der Zijden
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Cancer InstituteErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - J. Jan B. van Lanschot
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Cancer InstituteErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Jan J. Busschbach
- Section of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of PsychiatryErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M. Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Cancer InstituteErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Leonieke W. Kranenburg
- Section of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of PsychiatryErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Khoma O, Laurence JM, Sandroussi C, Wijnhoven BPL. Innovation in surgery. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1611-1613. [PMID: 37300542 PMCID: PMC10656751 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The process of innovation is always valuable and can lead to great advances, both intended and unanticipated. However, the outcomes must always be carefully examined in terms of metric which considers more than could ever be tested in a RCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleksandr Khoma
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Institute of Academic Surgery, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jerome M Laurence
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Institute of Academic Surgery, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Charbel Sandroussi
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Institute of Academic Surgery, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
de Wijkerslooth EML, van den Boom AL, Wijnhoven BPL. Changing the landscape of surgery for simple appendicitis. Lancet 2023; 402:1503-1504. [PMID: 37717588 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01555-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
de Wijkerslooth EML, Wijnhoven BPL, van den Boom AL. Duration of antibiotics in complicated appendicitis - Authors' reply. Lancet 2023; 402:1327-1328. [PMID: 37838435 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01563-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
de Veer MR, Hermus M, van der Zijden CJ, van der Wilk BJ, Wijnhoven BPL, Stiggelbout AM, Dekker JWT, Coene PPLO, Busschbach JJ, van Lanschot JJB, Lagarde SM, Kranenburg LW. Surgeon's steering behaviour towards patients to participate in a cluster randomised trial on active surveillance for oesophageal cancer: A qualitative study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49:106935. [PMID: 37210275 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Few studies have been conducted into how physicians use steering behaviour that may persuade patients to choose for a particular treatment, let alone to participate in a randomised trial. The aim of this study is to assess if and how surgeons use steering behaviour in their information provision to patients in their choice to participate in a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial investigating an organ sparing treatment in (curable) oesophageal cancer (SANO trial). MATERIALS AND METHODS A qualitative study was performed. Thematic content analysis was applied to audiotaped and transcribed consultations of twenty patients with eight different oncological surgeons in three Dutch hospitals. Patients could choose to participate in a clinical trial in which an experimental treatment of 'active surveillance' (AS) was offered. Patients who did not want to participate underwent standard treatment: neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by oesophagectomy. RESULTS Surgeons used various techniques to steer patients towards one of the two options, mostly towards AS. The presentation of pros and cons of treatment options was imbalanced: positive framing of AS was used to steer patients towards the choice for AS, and negative framing of AS to make the choice for surgery more attractive. Further, steering language, i.e. suggestive language, was used, and surgeons seemed to use the timing of the introduction of the different treatment options, to put more focus on one of the treatment options. CONCLUSION Awareness of steering behaviour can help to guide physicians in more objectively informing patients on participation in future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathijs R de Veer
- Department of Psychiatry, Section Medical Psychology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Merel Hermus
- Department of Psychiatry, Section Medical Psychology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Berend J van der Wilk
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M Stiggelbout
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jan J Busschbach
- Department of Psychiatry, Section Medical Psychology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan J B van Lanschot
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leonieke W Kranenburg
- Department of Psychiatry, Section Medical Psychology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Vissers PAJ, Luijten JCHBM, Lemmens VEPP, van Laarhoven HWM, Slingerland M, Wijnhoven BPL, Rosman C, Mook S, Heisterkamp J, Hendriksen EM, Gisbertz SS, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Verhoeven RHA. The association between hospital variation in curative treatment for esophagogastric cancer and health-related quality of life and survival. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49:107019. [PMID: 37659340 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As previous studies showed significant hospital variation in curative treatment of esophagogastric cancer, this study assesses the association between this variation and overall, cancer-specific and recurrence-free survival, and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). METHODS Patients diagnosed with potentially curable esophageal or gastric cancer between 2015 and 2018 as registered in the Netherlands Cancer Registry were included. Data on overall survival was available for all patients, data on cancer-specific and recurrence-free survival and HRQoL was available for subgroups. Patients were classified according to diagnosis in hospitals with low, medium or high probability of treatment with curative intent (LP, MP or HP). Multivariable models were used to assess the association between LP, MP and HP hospitals and HRQoL and survival. RESULTS This study includes 7,199 patients with esophageal, and 2,407 with gastric cancer. Overall and cancer-specific survival was better for patients diagnosed in HP versus LP hospitals for both esophageal (HR = 0.82, 95%CI:0.77-0.88 and HR = 0.82, 95%CI:0.75-0.91, respectively), and gastric cancer (HR = 0.82, 95%CI:0.73-0.92 and HR = 0.74, 95%CI:0.64-0.87, respectively). These differences disappeared after adjustments for treatment. Recurrence-free survival was worse for gastric cancer patients diagnosed in HP hospitals (HR = 1.50, 95%CI:1.14-1.96), which disappeared after adjustment for radicality of surgery. Minor, but no clinically relevant, differences in HRQoL were observed. CONCLUSIONS Patients diagnosed in hospitals with a high probability of treatment with curative intent have a better overall and cancer-specific but not recurrence-free survival, while minor differences in HRQoL were observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline A J Vissers
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Department of Research & Development, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Josianne C H B M Luijten
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Department of Research & Development, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Rijnstate Hospital, Department of Surgery, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - Valery E P P Lemmens
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Department of Research & Development, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Erasmus University Medical Centre, Department of Public Health, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marije Slingerland
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Erasmus University Medical Centre, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C Rosman
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Stella Mook
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joos Heisterkamp
- Elisabeth-Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Department of Surgery, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen M Hendriksen
- Medisch Spectrum Twente, Department of Radiation Oncology, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Rob H A Verhoeven
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Department of Research & Development, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
van der Veen A, Ramaekers M, Marsman M, Brenkman HJF, Seesing MFJ, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Stoot JHMB, Tegels JJW, Wijnhoven BPL, de Steur WO, Kouwenhoven EA, Wassenaar EB, Draaisma WA, Gisbertz SS, van der Peet DL, May AM, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Pain and Opioid Consumption After Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial (LOGICA-Trial). J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:2057-2067. [PMID: 37464143 PMCID: PMC10579125 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05728-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic gastrectomy could reduce pain and opioid consumption, compared to open gastrectomy. However, it is difficult to judge the clinical relevance of this reduction, since these outcomes are reported in few randomized trials and in limited detail. METHODS This secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial compared laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma (cT1-4aN0-3bM0). Postoperative pain was analyzed by opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (OME, mg/day) at postoperative day (POD) 1-5, WHO analgesic steps, and Numeric Rating Scales (NRS, 0-10) at POD 1-10 and discharge. Regression and mixed model analyses were performed, with and without correction for epidural analgesia. RESULTS Between 2015 and 2018, 115 patients in the laparoscopic group and 110 in the open group underwent surgery. Some 16 patients (14%) in the laparoscopic group and 73 patients (66%) in the open group received epidural analgesia. At POD 1-3, mean opioid consumption was 131, 118, and 53 mg OME lower in the laparoscopic group, compared to the open group, respectively (all p < 0.001). After correcting for epidural analgesia, these differences remained significant at POD 1-2 (47 mg OME, p = 0.002 and 69 mg OME, p < 0.001, respectively). At discharge, 27% of patients in the laparoscopic group and 43% patients in the open group used oral opioids (p = 0.006). Mean highest daily pain scores were between 2 and 4 at all PODs, < 2 at discharge, and did not relevantly differ between treatment arms. CONCLUSION In this multicenter randomized trial, postoperative pain was comparable between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy. After laparoscopic gastrectomy, this was generally achieved without epidural analgesia and with fewer opioids. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02248519.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arjen van der Veen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100 G04.228, 3508 GA, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - Mark Ramaekers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Marije Marsman
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Hylke J F Brenkman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100 G04.228, 3508 GA, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Maarten F J Seesing
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100 G04.228, 3508 GA, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | | | - Jan H M B Stoot
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen and Sittard-Geleen, Netherlands
| | - Juul J W Tegels
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen and Sittard-Geleen, Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wobbe O de Steur
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Werner A Draaisma
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Donald L van der Peet
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anne M May
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100 G04.228, 3508 GA, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100 G04.228, 3508 GA, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Valkema MJ, Spaander MCW, Boonstra JJ, van Dieren JM, Hazen WL, Erkelens GW, Holster IL, van der Linden A, van der Linde K, Oostenbrug LE, Quispel R, Schoon EJ, Siersema PD, Doukas M, Eyck BM, van der Wilk BJ, van der Sluis PC, Wijnhoven BPL, Lagarde SM, van Lanschot JJB. Active surveillance of oesophageal cancer after response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: dysphagia is uncommon. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1381-1386. [PMID: 37418342 PMCID: PMC10480037 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active surveillance is being investigated as an alternative to standard surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer. It is unknown whether dysphagia persists or develops when the oesophagus is preserved after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and severity of dysphagia during active surveillance in patients with an ongoing response. METHODS Patients who underwent active surveillance were identified from the Surgery As Needed for Oesophageal cancer ('SANO') trial. Patients without evidence of residual oesophageal cancer until at least 6 months after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were included. Study endpoints were assessed at time points that patients were cancer-free and remained cancer-free for the next 4 months. Dysphagia scores were evaluated at 6, 9, 12, and 16 months after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Scores were based on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer oesophago-gastric quality-of-life questionnaire 25 (EORTC QLQ-OG25) (range 0-100; no to severe dysphagia). The rate of patients with a (non-)traversable stenosis was determined based on all available endoscopy reports. RESULTS In total, 131 patients were included, of whom 93 (71.0 per cent) had adenocarcinoma, 93 (71.0 per cent) had a cT3-4a tumour, and 33 (25.2 per cent) had a tumour circumference of greater than 75 per cent at endoscopy; 60.8 to 71.0 per cent of patients completed questionnaires per time point after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. At all time points after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, median dysphagia scores were 0 (interquartile range 0-0). Two patients (1.5 per cent) underwent an intervention for a stenosis: one underwent successful endoscopic dilatation; and the other patient required temporary tube feeding. Notably, these patients did not participate in questionnaires. CONCLUSION Dysphagia and clinically relevant stenosis are uncommon during active surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria J Valkema
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurjen J Boonstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jolanda M van Dieren
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter L Hazen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | | | - I Lisanne Holster
- Department of Gastroenterology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Klaas van der Linde
- Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Liekele E Oostenbrug
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger Quispel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Group, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Erik J Schoon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michail Doukas
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ben M Eyck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
van Hootegem SJM, de Pasqual CA, Eyck BM, Mostert B, Bradshaw A, Phillips AW, Lagarde SM, Wijnhoven BPL. Clinical impact of routine response assessment after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer. BJS Open 2023; 7:zrad093. [PMID: 37738366 PMCID: PMC10516457 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carlo A de Pasqual
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- General and Upper GI Surgery Division, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Ben M Eyck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bianca Mostert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander Bradshaw
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Alexander W Phillips
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK
- School of Medical Education, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hermus M, van der Wilk BJ, Chang R, Dekker JWT, Coene PLO, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Rosman C, Heisterkamp J, Hartgrink HH, Timmermans L, Wijnhoven BPL, van der Zijden CJ, van Lanschot JJB, Busschbach J, Lagarde SM, Kranenburg LW. Esophageal cancer patients' need for information and support in making a treatment decision between standard surgery and active surveillance. Cancer Med 2023; 12:17266-17272. [PMID: 37392175 PMCID: PMC10501224 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study explores patients' need for information and support in deciding on esophageal cancer treatment, when experimental active surveillance and standard surgery are both feasible. METHODS This psychological companion study was conducted alongside the Dutch SANO-trial (Surgery As Needed for Oesophageal cancer). In-depth interviews and questionnaires were used to collect data from patients who declined participation in the trial because they had a strong preference for either active surveillance (n = 20) or standard surgery (n = 20). Data were analyzed using both qualitative and quantitative techniques. RESULTS Patients prefer to receive information directly from their doctors and predominantly rely on this information to make a treatment decision. Other information resources are largely used to confirm their treatment decision. Patients highly value support from their loved ones and appreciate emphatic doctors to actively involve them in the decision-making process. Overall, patients' needs for information and support during decision-making were met. CONCLUSIONS The importance of shared decision-making and the role doctors have in this process is underlined. The role of doctors is essential at the initial phase of decision-making: Once patients seem to have formed their treatment preference for either active surveillance or surgery, the influence of external resources (including doctors) may be limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merel Hermus
- Department of Psychiatry, Section of Medical Psychology and PsychotherapyErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Berend J. van der Wilk
- Department of SurgeryErasmus Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Rebecca Chang
- Department of Psychiatry, Section of Medical Psychology and PsychotherapyErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of SurgeryRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Joos Heisterkamp
- Department of SurgeryElisabeth Tweesteden HospitalTilburgThe Netherlands
| | - Henk H. Hartgrink
- Department of SurgeryLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth Timmermans
- Department of Primary and Community CareRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Bas P. L. Wijnhoven
- Department of SurgeryErasmus Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Charlène J. van der Zijden
- Department of SurgeryErasmus Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Jan J. B. van Lanschot
- Department of SurgeryErasmus Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Jan Busschbach
- Department of Psychiatry, Section of Medical Psychology and PsychotherapyErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M. Lagarde
- Department of SurgeryErasmus Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Leonieke W. Kranenburg
- Department of Psychiatry, Section of Medical Psychology and PsychotherapyErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hiensch A, Steenhagen E, van Vulpen JK, Ruurda JP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Kouwenhoven EA, Groenendijk RPR, van der Peet DL, Rosman C, Wijnhoven BPL, van Berge Henegouwen MI, van Laarhoven HWM, van Hillegersberg R, Siersema PD, May AM. Effects of exercise after oesophagectomy on body composition and adequacy of energy and protein intake: PERFECT multicentre randomized controlled trial. BJS Open 2023; 7:zrad057. [PMID: 37527034 PMCID: PMC10392959 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk Hiensch
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Elles Steenhagen
- Department of Dietetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jonna K van Vulpen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Anne M May
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Valkema MJ, Beukinga RJ, Chatterjee A, Woodruff HC, van Klaveren D, Noordzij W, Valkema R, Bennink RJ, Roef MJ, Schreurs W, Doukas M, Lagarde SM, Wijnhoven BPL, Lambin P, Plukker JTM, van Lanschot JJB. External validation of 18F-FDG PET-based radiomic models on identification of residual oesophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Nucl Med Commun 2023:00006231-990000000-00152. [PMID: 37132272 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Detection of residual oesophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is important to guide treatment decisions regarding standard oesophagectomy or active surveillance. The aim was to validate previously developed 18F-FDG PET-based radiomic models to detect residual local tumour and to repeat model development (i.e. 'model extension') in case of poor generalisability. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study in patients collected from a prospective multicentre study in four Dutch institutes. Patients underwent nCRT followed by oesophagectomy between 2013 and 2019. Outcome was tumour regression grade (TRG) 1 (0% tumour) versus TRG 2-3-4 (≥1% tumour). Scans were acquired according to standardised protocols. Discrimination and calibration were assessed for the published models with optimism-corrected AUCs >0.77. For model extension, the development and external validation cohorts were combined. RESULTS Baseline characteristics of the 189 patients included [median age 66 years (interquartile range 60-71), 158/189 male (84%), 40/189 TRG 1 (21%) and 149/189 (79%) TRG 2-3-4] were comparable to the development cohort. The model including cT stage plus the feature 'sum entropy' had best discriminative performance in external validation (AUC 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.55-0.73), with a calibration slope and intercept of 0.16 and 0.48 respectively. An extended bootstrapped LASSO model yielded an AUC of 0.65 for TRG 2-3-4 detection. CONCLUSION The high predictive performance of the published radiomic models could not be replicated. The extended model had moderate discriminative ability. The investigated radiomic models appeared inaccurate to detect local residual oesophageal tumour and cannot be used as an adjunct tool for clinical decision-making in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria J Valkema
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam
| | - Roelof J Beukinga
- Medical Imaging Centre, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen
| | - Avishek Chatterjee
- Department of Precision Medicine, GROW- School for Oncology, Maastricht University
| | - Henry C Woodruff
- Department of Precision Medicine, GROW- School for Oncology, Maastricht University
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Imaging, GROW - School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
| | | | - Walter Noordzij
- Medical Imaging Centre, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen
| | - Roelf Valkema
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam
| | - Roel J Bennink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam
| | - Mark J Roef
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven
| | - Wendy Schreurs
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen
| | - Michail Doukas
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam and
| | | | | | - Philippe Lambin
- Department of Precision Medicine, GROW- School for Oncology, Maastricht University
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Imaging, GROW - School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
| | - John T M Plukker
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
van der Zijden CJ, Lagarde SM, Hermus M, Kranenburg LW, van Lanschot JJB, Mostert B, Nuyttens JJME, Oudijk L, van der Sluis PC, Spaander MCW, Valkema MJ, Valkema R, Wijnhoven BPL. A prospective cohort study on active surveillance after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: protocol of Surgery As Needed for Oesophageal cancer-2. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:327. [PMID: 37038138 PMCID: PMC10084614 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10747-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by esophagectomy is a standard treatment for potentially curable esophageal cancer. Active surveillance in patients with a clinically complete response (cCR) 12 weeks after nCRT is regarded as possible alternative to standard surgery. The aim of this study is to monitor the safety, adherence and effectiveness of active surveillance in patients outside a randomized trial. METHODS This nationwide prospective cohort study aims to accrue operable patients with non-metastatic histologically proven adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction. Patients receive nCRT and response evaluation consists of upper endoscopy with bite-on-bite biopsies, endoscopic ultrasonography plus fine-needle aspiration of suspicious lymph nodes and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan. When residue or regrowth of tumor in the absence of distant metastases is detected, surgical resection is advised. Patients with cCR after nCRT are suitable to undergo active surveillance. Patients can consult an independent physician or psychologist to support decision-making. Primary endpoint is the number and severity of adverse events in patients with cCR undergoing active surveillance, defined as complications from response evaluations, delayed surgery and the development of distant metastases. Secondary endpoints include timing and quality of diagnostic modalities, overall survival, progression-free survival, fear of cancer recurrence and decisional regret. DISCUSSION Active surveillance after nCRT may be an alternative to standard surgery in patients with esophageal cancer. Similar to organ-sparing approaches applied in other cancer types, the safety and efficacy of active surveillance needs monitoring before data from randomized trials are available. TRIAL REGISTRATION The SANO-2 study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04886635 (May 14, 2021) - Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlène J van der Zijden
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Merel Hermus
- Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonieke W Kranenburg
- Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Jan B van Lanschot
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bianca Mostert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joost J M E Nuyttens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lindsey Oudijk
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter C van der Sluis
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maria J Valkema
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roelf Valkema
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hermus M, van der Wilk BJ, Chang RTH, Collee G, Noordman BJ, Coene PPLO, Dekker JWT, Hartgrink HH, Heisterkamp J, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Rosman C, Timmermans L, Wijnhoven BPL, van der Zijden CJ, Busschbach JJ, van Lanschot JJB, Lagarde SM, Kranenburg LW. Patient preferences for active surveillance vs standard surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer treatment: The NOSANO-study. Int J Cancer 2023; 152:1183-1190. [PMID: 36250325 PMCID: PMC10092042 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Active surveillance may be a safe and effective treatment in oesophageal cancer patients with a clinically complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). In the NOSANO-study we gained insight in patients' motive to opt for either an experimental treatment called active surveillance or for standard immediate surgery. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses methods were used. Forty patients were interviewed about their treatment preference, 3 months after completion of nCRT (T1). Data were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed according to the principles of grounded theory. In addition, at T1 and T2 (12 months after completion of nCRT) questionnaires on health-related quality of life, coping, anxiety and decisional regret (only T2) were administered. Interview data analyses resulted in a conceptual model with 'dealing with threat of cancer' as the central theme. Patients preferring active surveillance tend to cope with this threat by confiding in their bodies and good outcomes. Their mind-set is one of 'enjoy life now'. Patients preferring surgery tend to cope by minimizing uncertainty and eliminating the source of cancer. Their mind-set is one of 'don't give up, act now'. Furthermore, questionnaire results showed that patients with a preference for standard surgery had a lower quality of life. Patient preferences are individualized and thus difficult to predict. Our model can help healthcare professionals to determine patient preferences for treatment. Coping style and mind-set seem to be determining factors here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merel Hermus
- Department of Psychiatry, Section Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Berend J van der Wilk
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rebecca T H Chang
- Department of Psychiatry, Section Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerlise Collee
- Department of Psychiatry, Section Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bo J Noordman
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Henk H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Joos Heisterkamp
- Department of surgery, Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | | | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth Timmermans
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlène J van der Zijden
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan J Busschbach
- Department of Psychiatry, Section Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Jan B van Lanschot
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonieke W Kranenburg
- Department of Psychiatry, Section Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
de Wijkerslooth EML, Boerma EJG, van Rossem CC, van Rosmalen J, Baeten CIM, Beverdam FH, Bosmans JWAM, Consten ECJ, Dekker JWT, Emous M, van Geloven AAW, Gijsen AF, Heijnen LA, Jairam AP, Melles DC, van der Ploeg APT, Steenvoorde P, Toorenvliet BR, Vermaas M, Wiering B, Wijnhoven BPL, van den Boom AL. 2 days versus 5 days of postoperative antibiotics for complex appendicitis: a pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority randomised trial. Lancet 2023; 401:366-376. [PMID: 36669519 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02588-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The appropriate duration of postoperative antibiotics for complex appendicitis is unclear. The increasing global threat of antimicrobial resistance warrants restrictive antibiotic use, which could also reduce side-effects, length of hospital stay, and costs. METHODS In this pragmatic, open-label, non-inferiority trial in 15 hospitals in the Netherlands, patients with complex appendicitis (aged ≥8 years) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 2 days or 5 days of intravenous antibiotics after appendicectomy. Randomisation was stratified by centre, and treating physicians and patients were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was a composite endpoint of infectious complications and mortality within 90 days. The main outcome was the absolute risk difference (95% CI) in the primary endpoint, adjusted for age and severity of appendicitis, with a non-inferiority margin of 7·5%. Outcome assessment was based on electronic patient records and a telephone consultation 90 days after appendicectomy. Efficacy was analysed in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. Safety outcomes were analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial was registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, NL5946. FINDINGS Between April 12, 2017, and June 3, 2021, 13 267 patients were screened and 1066 were randomly assigned, 533 to each group. 31 were excluded from intention-to-treat analysis of the 2-day group and 30 from the 5-day group owing to errors in recruitment or consent. Appendicectomy was done laparoscopically in 955 (95%) of 1005 patients. The telephone follow-up was completed in 664 (66%) of 1005 patients. The primary endpoint occurred in 51 (10%) of 502 patients analysed in the 2-day group and 41 (8%) of 503 patients analysed in the 5-day group (adjusted absolute risk difference 2·0%, 95% CI -1·6 to 5·6). Rates of complications and re-interventions were similar between trial groups. Fewer patients had adverse effects of antibiotics in the 2-day group (45 [9%] of 502 patients) than in the 5-day group (112 [22%] of 503 patients; odds ratio [OR] 0·344, 95% CI 0·237 to 0·498). Re-admission to hospital was more frequent in the 2-day group (58 [12%] of 502 patients) than in the 5-day group (29 [6%] of 503 patients; OR 2·135, 1·342 to 3·396). There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION 2 days of postoperative intravenous antibiotics for complex appendicitis is non-inferior to 5 days in terms of infectious complications and mortality within 90 days, based on a non-inferiority margin of 7·5%. These findings apply to laparoscopic appendicectomy conducted in a well resourced health-care setting. Adopting this strategy will reduce adverse effects of antibiotics and length of hospital stay. FUNDING The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Joost van Rosmalen
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC - University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Coen I M Baeten
- Department of Surgery, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Esther C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | - Marloes Emous
- Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
| | | | - Anton F Gijsen
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Luc A Heijnen
- Department of Surgery, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, Netherlands
| | - An P Jairam
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Damian C Melles
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Medical Immunology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Maarten Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den Ijssel, Netherlands
| | - Bas Wiering
- Department of Surgery, Slingeland Hospital, Doetinchem, Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Vos EL, Nakauchi M, Gönen M, Castellanos JA, Biondi A, Coit DG, Dikken JL, D'ugo D, Hartgrink H, Li P, Nishimura M, Schattner M, Song KY, Tang LH, Uyama I, Vardhana S, Verhoeven RHA, Wijnhoven BPL, Strong VE. Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis in T1b Gastric Cancer: An International Comprehensive Analysis from the Global Gastric Group (G3) Alliance. Ann Surg 2023; 277:e339-e345. [PMID: 34913904 PMCID: PMC9192823 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to define criteria associated with low lymph node metastasis risk in patients with submucosal (pT1b) gastric cancer from 3 Western and 3 Eastern countries. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Accurate prediction of lymph node metastasis risk is essential when determining the need for gastrectomy with lymph node dissection following endoscopic resection. Under present guidelines, endoscopic resection is considered definitive treatment if submucosal invasion is only superficial, but this is not routinely assessed. METHODS Lymph node metastasis rates were determined for patient groups defined according to tumor pathological characteristics. Clinicopathological predictors of lymph node metastasis were determined by multivariable logistic regression and used to develop a nomogram in a randomly selected subset that was validated in the remainder. Overall survival was compared between Eastern and Western countries. RESULTS Lymph node metastasis was found in 701 of 3166 (22.1%) Eastern and 153 of 560 (27.3%) Western patients. Independent predictors of lymph node metastasis were female sex, tumor size, distal stomach location, lymphovascular invasion, and moderate or poor differentiation. Patients fulfilling the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline criteria, excluding the requirement that invasion not extend beyond the superficial submucosa, had a lymph node metastasis rate of 8.9% (53/594). Excluding moderately differentiated tumors lowered the rate to 3.4% (10/296). The nomogram's area under the curve was 0.690. Regardless of lymph node status, overall survival was better in Eastern patients. CONCLUSIONS The lymph node metastasis rate was lowest in patients with well differentiated tumors that were ≤3 cm and lacked lymphovascular invasion. These criteria may be useful in decisions regarding endoscopic resection as definitive treatment for pT1b gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elvira L Vos
- Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Masaya Nakauchi
- Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mithat Gönen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Alberto Biondi
- Division of General Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniel G Coit
- Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Johan L Dikken
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Domenico D'ugo
- Division of General Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Henk Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ping Li
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Makoto Nishimura
- Gastroenterology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mark Schattner
- Gastroenterology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kyo Young Song
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Laura H Tang
- Experimental and Gastrointestinal Pathology Services, Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ichiro Uyama
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Santosha Vardhana
- Lymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Rob H A Verhoeven
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vivian E Strong
- Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
van der Veen A, van der Meulen MP, Seesing MFJ, Brenkman HJF, Haverkamp L, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Stoot JHMB, Tegels JJW, Wijnhoven BPL, Lagarde SM, de Steur WO, Hartgrink HH, Kouwenhoven EA, Wassenaar EB, Draaisma WA, Gisbertz SS, van der Peet DL, van Laarhoven HWM, Frederix GWJ, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Cost-effectiveness of Laparoscopic vs Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Economic Evaluation Alongside a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:120-128. [PMID: 36576822 PMCID: PMC9856973 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.6337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Importance Laparoscopic gastrectomy is rapidly being adopted worldwide as an alternative to open gastrectomy to treat gastric cancer. However, laparoscopic gastrectomy might be more expensive as a result of longer operating times and more expensive surgical materials. To date, the cost-effectiveness of both procedures has not been prospectively evaluated in a randomized clinical trial. Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic compared with open gastrectomy. Design, Setting, and Participants In this multicenter randomized clinical trial of patients undergoing total or distal gastrectomy in 10 Dutch tertiary referral centers, cost-effectiveness data were collected alongside a multicenter randomized clinical trial on laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma (cT1-4aN0-3bM0). A modified societal perspective and 1-year time horizon were used. Costs were calculated on the individual patient level by using hospital registry data and medical consumption and productivity loss questionnaires. The unit costs of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy were calculated bottom-up. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated with the EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire, in which a value of 0 indicates death and 1 indicates perfect health. Missing questionnaire data were imputed with multiple imputation. Bootstrapping was performed to estimate the uncertainty surrounding the cost-effectiveness. The study was conducted from March 17, 2015, to August 20, 2018. Data analyses were performed between September 1, 2020, and November 17, 2021. Interventions Laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures Evaluations in this cost-effectiveness analysis included total costs and QALYs. Results Between 2015 and 2018, 227 patients were included. Mean (SD) age was 67.5 (11.7) years, and 140 were male (61.7%). Unit costs for initial surgery were calculated to be €8124 (US $8087) for laparoscopic total gastrectomy, €7353 (US $7320) for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, €6584 (US $6554) for open total gastrectomy, and €5893 (US $5866) for open distal gastrectomy. Mean total costs after 1-year follow-up were €26 084 (US $25 965) in the laparoscopic group and €25 332 (US $25 216) in the open group (difference, €752 [US $749; 3.0%]). Mean (SD) QALY contributions during 1 year were 0.665 (0.298) in the laparoscopic group and 0.686 (0.288) in the open group (difference, -0.021). Bootstrapping showed that these differences between treatment groups were relatively small compared with the uncertainty of the analysis. Conclusions and Relevance Although the laparoscopic gastrectomy itself was more expensive, after 1-year follow-up, results suggest that differences in both total costs and effectiveness were limited between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy. These results support centers' choosing, based on their own preference, whether to (de)implement laparoscopic gastrectomy as an alternative to open gastrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arjen van der Veen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Miriam P. van der Meulen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten F. J. Seesing
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hylke J. F. Brenkman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Leonie Haverkamp
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Misha D. P. Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jan H. M. B. Stoot
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen and Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
| | - Juul J. W. Tegels
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen and Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
| | - Bas P. L. Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M. Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wobbe O. de Steur
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Henk H. Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Werner A. Draaisma
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S. Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Donald L. van der Peet
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert W. J. Frederix
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle P. Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Guchelaar NAD, Noordman BJ, Koolen SLW, Mostert B, Madsen EVE, Burger JWA, Brandt-Kerkhof ARM, Creemers GJ, de Hingh IHJT, Luyer M, Bins S, van Meerten E, Lagarde SM, Verhoef C, Wijnhoven BPL, Mathijssen RHJ. Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Unresectable Peritoneal Surface Malignancies. Drugs 2023; 83:159-180. [PMID: 36633826 PMCID: PMC9908703 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-022-01828-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Malignancies of the peritoneal cavity are associated with a dismal prognosis. Systemic chemotherapy is the gold standard for patients with unresectable peritoneal disease, but its intraperitoneal effect is hampered by the peritoneal-plasma barrier. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy, which is administered repeatedly into the peritoneal cavity through a peritoneal implanted port, could provide a novel treatment modality for this patient population. This review provides a systematic overview of intraperitoneal used drugs, the performed clinical studies so far, and the complications of the peritoneal implemental ports. Several anticancer drugs have been studied for intraperitoneal application, with the taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel as the most commonly used drug. Repeated intraperitoneal chemotherapy, mostly in combination with systemic chemotherapy, has shown promising results in Phase I and Phase II studies for several tumor types, such as gastric cancer, ovarian cancer, colorectal cancer, and pancreatic cancer. Two Phase III studies for intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer have been performed so far, but the results regarding the superiority over standard systemic chemotherapy alone, are contradictory. Pressurized intraperitoneal administration, known as PIPAC, is an alternative way of administering intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and the first prospective studies have shown a tolerable safety profile. Although intraperitoneal chemotherapy might be a standard treatment option for patients with unresectable peritoneal disease, more Phase II and Phase III studies focusing on tolerability profiles, survival rates, and quality of life are warranted in order to establish optimal treatment schedules and to establish a potential role for intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the approach to unresectable peritoneal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niels A D Guchelaar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Bo J Noordman
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stijn L W Koolen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bianca Mostert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva V E Madsen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobus W A Burger
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra R M Brandt-Kerkhof
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert-Jan Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Misha Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Sander Bins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther van Meerten
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Luijten JCHBM, Verstegen MHP, van Workum F, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, Wijnhoven BPL, Verhoeven RHA, Rosman C. Survival after Ivor Lewis versus McKeown esophagectomy for cancer: propensity score matched analysis. Dis Esophagus 2023:6972913. [PMID: 36617230 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
It is unknown whether Ivor Lewis (IL) or McKeown (McK) esophagectomy is preferred in patients with potentially curable esophageal or gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. Patients with mid- and distal esophageal and GEJ cancer without distant metastases who underwent IL or McK esophagectomy in the Netherlands between 2015 and 2017, were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients were propensity score matched for sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiologist classification, comorbidity, tumor type, tumor location, clinical stage, neoadjuvant treatment and year of diagnosis. The primary outcome was a 3-year relative survival (RS). Secondary outcome parameters were number of lymph nodes examined, number of positive lymph nodes, radical resection rate, tumor regression grade, post-operative complications and mortality. A total of 1627 patients who underwent IL (n = 1094) or McK (n = 533) esophagectomy were included. Patient and tumor characteristics were balanced after propensity score matching, leaving 658 patients to be compared. The 3-year RS was 54% after IL and 50% after McK esophagectomy, P = 0.140. The median number of lymph nodes examined, median number of positive lymph nodes, radical resection rate and tumor regression grade were comparable between both groups. Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (2 vs. 5%, P = 0.006) occurred less frequently after IL esophagectomy. No differences were observed in post-operative anastomotic leakage rate, pulmonary complication rate and mortality rates. There was no statistically significant difference in the 3-year RS between IL and McK esophagectomy. Based on these results, both IL and McK esophagectomy can be performed in patients with mid to distal esophageal and GEJ cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C H B M Luijten
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht 3501, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525, The Netherlands
| | - M H P Verstegen
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525, The Netherlands.,Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - F van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525, The Netherlands.,Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | | | - M I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC-Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081, The Netherlands
| | - S S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC-Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081, The Netherlands
| | - B P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam 3015, The Netherlands
| | - R H A Verhoeven
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht 3501, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525, The Netherlands
| | - C Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Talavera-Urquijo E, Davies AR, Wijnhoven BPL. Prevention and treatment of a positive proximal margin after gastrectomy for cardia cancer. Updates Surg 2023; 75:335-341. [PMID: 35842570 PMCID: PMC9852102 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01315-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
A tumour-positive proximal margin (PPM) after extended gastrectomy for oesophagogastric junction (OGJ) adenocarcinoma is observed in approximately 2-20% of patients. Although a PPM is an unfavourable prognostic factor, the clinical relevance remains unclear as it may reflect poor tumour biology. This narrative review analyses the most relevant literature on PPM after gastrectomy for OGJ cancers. Awareness of the risk factors and possible measures that can be taken to reduce the risk of PPM are important. In patients with a PPM, surgical and non-surgical treatments are available but the effectiveness remains unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eider Talavera-Urquijo
- grid.414651.30000 0000 9920 5292Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Donostia, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Andrew R. Davies
- grid.420545.20000 0004 0489 3985Department of Surgery, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Bas P. L. Wijnhoven
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Talavera-Urquijo E, Wijnhoven BPL, P. L. Wijnhoven B. Evolution of laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer in the East and West. Chin J Cancer Res 2022; 34:579-586. [PMID: 36714340 PMCID: PMC9829492 DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2022.06.05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic gastrectomy has evolved differently in Eastern and Western countries. Feasibility, safety and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy were addressed step-by-step by several randomized controlled trials from the East. Few phase III studies were published from the West that largely did not show a difference between the laparoscopic and open approach. Despite this, laparoscopic gastrectomy is seen as the standard for the surgical treatment of early and advanced gastric cancer in many European countries. Here, we review and comment on some important studies on laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer from Eastern and Western countries and also comment on current and future challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eider Talavera-Urquijo
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Donostia, Donostia-San Sebastián 20014, Spain
| | - Bas P. L. Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam 3000, the Netherlands,Prof. Bas P. L. Wijnhoven, MD, PhD. Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ubels S, Lubbers M, Verstegen MHP, Bouwense SAW, van Daele E, Ferri L, Gisbertz SS, Griffiths EA, Grimminger P, Hanna G, Hubka M, Law S, Low D, Luyer M, Merritt RE, Morse C, Mueller CL, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson M, Reynolds JV, Ribeiro U, Rosati R, Shen Y, Wijnhoven BPL, Klarenbeek BR, van Workum F, Rosman C. Treatment of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: insights of an international case vignette survey and expert discussions. Dis Esophagus 2022; 35:6566833. [PMID: 35411928 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Anastomotic leak (AL) is a severe complication after esophagectomy. Clinical presentation of AL is diverse and there is large practice variation regarding treatment of AL. This study aimed to explore different AL treatment strategies and their underlying rationale. This mixed-methods study consisted of an international survey among upper gastro-intestinal (GI) surgeons and focus groups with expert upper GI surgeons. The survey included 10 case vignettes and data sources were integrated after separate analysis. The survey was completed by 188 respondents (completion rate 69%) and 6 focus groups were conducted with 20 international experts. Prevention of mortality was the most important goal of primary treatment. Goals of secondary treatment were to promote tissue healing, return to oral feeding and safe hospital discharge. There was substantial variation in the preferred treatment principles (e.g. drainage or defect closure) and modalities (e.g. stent or endoVAC) within different presentations of AL. Patients with local symptoms were treated by supportive means only or by non-surgical drainage and/or defect closure. Drainage was routinely performed in patients with intrathoracic collections and often combined with defect closure. Patients with conduit necrosis were predominantly treated by resection and reconstruction of the anastomosis or by esophageal diversion. This mixed-methods study shows that overall treatment strategies for AL are determined by vitality of the conduit and presence of intrathoracic collections. There is large variation in preferred treatment principles and modalities. Future research may investigate optimal treatment for specific AL presentations and aim to develop consensus-based treatment guidelines for AL after esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sander Ubels
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Merel Lubbers
- Department of Surgery, ZGT Hospital Group Twente, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - Moniek H P Verstegen
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Stefan A W Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Elke van Daele
- Department of Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lorenzo Ferri
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ewen A Griffiths
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Peter Grimminger
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - George Hanna
- Department of Surgery, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Michal Hubka
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, SE USA
| | - Simon Law
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Donald Low
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, SE USA
| | - Misha Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Robert E Merritt
- Department of Surgery, Ohio State University - Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Christopher Morse
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carmen L Mueller
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Magnus Nilsson
- Department of Surgery, Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - John V Reynolds
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ulysses Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Riccardo Rosati
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Yaxing Shen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan R Klarenbeek
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Triantafyllou T, van der Sluis P, Skipworth R, Wijnhoven BPL. The Implementation of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer: A Step Toward Better Outcomes? Oncol Ther 2022; 10:337-349. [PMID: 35945401 PMCID: PMC9681954 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-022-00206-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Esophagectomy is considered the cornerstone of the radical treatment of esophageal cancer. In the past decades, minimally invasive techniques including robot-assisted approaches have become popular. The aim of minimally invasive surgery is to reduce the surgical trauma, resulting in faster recovery, reduction in complications, and better quality of life after surgery. Secondly, a more precise dissection may lead to better oncological outcomes. As such, minimally invasive esophagectomy is now seen by many as the standard surgical approach. However, evidence supporting this viewpoint is limited. This narrative review summarizes recent prospectively designed studies on minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tania Triantafyllou
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgical Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Pieter van der Sluis
- Upper Gastrointestinal Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Skipworth
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgical Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Upper Gastrointestinal Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Sherwinter DA, Boni L, Bouvet M, Ferri L, Hyung WJ, Ishizawa T, Kaleya RN, Kelly K, Kokudo N, Lanzarini E, Luyer MDP, Mitsumori N, Mueller C, Park DJ, Ribero D, Rosati R, Ruurda JP, Sosef M, Schneider-Koraith S, Spinoglio G, Strong V, Takahashi N, Takeuchi H, Wijnhoven BPL, Yang HK, Dip F, Lo Menzo E, White KP, Rosenthal RJ. Use of fluorescence imaging and indocyanine green for sentinel node mapping during gastric cancer surgery: Results of an intercontinental Delphi survey. Surgery 2022; 172:S29-S37. [PMID: 36427927 PMCID: PMC9720539 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.06.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding the extent of tumor spread to local lymph nodes is critical to managing early-stage gastric cancer. Recently, fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green has been used to identify and characterize sentinel lymph nodes during gastric cancer surgery, but no published guidelines exist. We sought to identify areas of consensus among international experts in the use of fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green for mapping sentinel lymph nodes during gastric-cancer surgery. METHODS In this 2-round, online Delphi survey, 27 international experts voted on 79 statements pertaining to patient preparation and contraindications to fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green during gastric cancer surgery; indications; technical aspects; advantages/disadvantages and limitations; and training and research. Methodological steps were adopted during survey design to minimize bias. RESULTS Consensus was reached on 61 of 79 statements, including giving single injections of indocyanine green into each of the 4 quadrants peritumorally, administering indocyanine green on the same day as surgery, injecting a total of 1 to 5 mL of 5 mg/mL indocyanine green, injecting endoscopically into submucosa, and repeating indocyanine green injections a second time if sentinel lymph node visualization remains inadequate. Consensus also was reached that fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green is an acceptable single-agent modality for sentinel lymph node identification and that the sentinel lymph node basin method is preferred. However, sentinel lymph node dissection should be limited to T1 gastric cancer and tumors ≤4 cm in diameter, and further research is necessary to optimize the technique and render fluorescence-guided sentinel lymph nodes dissection acceptable for routine clinical use. CONCLUSION Although considerable consensus was achieved, further research is necessary before this technology should be used in routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luigi Boni
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, University of Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Woo Jin Hyung
- Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | - Norihiro Kokudo
- National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | - Doo Joong Park
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | - Jelle P Ruurda
- UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Meindert Sosef
- Atrium Medisch Centrum Parkstad, Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Giuseppe Spinoglio
- FPO Candolo Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment IRCCS, Turin, Italy
| | - Vivian Strong
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Hiroya Takeuchi
- Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Fernando Dip
- Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Kevin P White
- ScienceRight Research Consulting, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Eyck BM, Gao X, Yang Y, van der Wilk BJ, Wong I, Wijnhoven BPL, Liu J, Lagarde SM, Ka-On L, Hulshof MCCM, Li Z, Law S, Chao YK, van Lanschot JJB. Pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: multicentre East Asian and Dutch database comparison. Br J Surg 2022; 109:1312-1318. [PMID: 36036665 PMCID: PMC10364703 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with different ethnic and genetic backgrounds may respond differently to anticancer therapies. This study aimed to assess whether patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in East Asia had an inferior pathological response compared with patients treated in Northwest Europe. METHODS Patients with OSCC who underwent nCRT according to the CROSS regimen (carboplatin and paclitaxel with concurrent 41.4 Gy radiotherapy) followed by oesophagectomy between June 2012 and April 2020 were identified from East Asian and Dutch databases. The primary outcome was pCR, defined as ypT0 N0. Groups were compared using propensity score matching, adjusting for sex, Charlson Co-morbidity Index score, tumour location, cT and cN categories, interval between nCRT and surgery, and number of resected lymph nodes. RESULTS Of 725 patients identified, 133 remained in each group after matching. A pCR was achieved in 37 patients (27.8 per cent) in the Asian database and 58 (43.6 per cent) in the Dutch database (P = 0.010). The rate of ypT1-4 was higher in Asian than Dutch data (66.2 and 49.6 per cent; P = 0.004). The ypN1-3 rate was 44.4 per cent in the Asian and 33.1 per cent in the Dutch data set. Clear margins were achieved in 92.5 per cent of Asian and 95.5 per cent of Dutch patients. CONCLUSION Regional differences in responses to CROSS nCRT for oesophageal cancer were apparent, the origin of which will need evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben M Eyck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Xing Gao
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Division of Thoracic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linkou, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Berend J van der Wilk
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ian Wong
- Department of Surgery, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jun Liu
- Department of Medical and Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lam Ka-On
- Department of Clinical Oncology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Maarten C C M Hulshof
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Zhigang Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Simon Law
- Department of Surgery, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Yin Kai Chao
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linkou, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - J Jan B van Lanschot
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
De Pasqual CA, van der Sluis PC, Weindelmayer J, Lagarde SM, Giacopuzzi S, De Manzoni G, Wijnhoven BPL. Transthoracic esophagectomy compared to transhiatal extended gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Dis Esophagus 2022; 35:6490090. [PMID: 34969080 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doab090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 11/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Optimal surgical treatment for Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma is debated. The aim of this study was to compare transhiatal extended gastrectomy (TEG) and transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE). Patients with Siewert type II tumors who underwent a resection by TEG or TTE in two centers (Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, and University of Verona) between 2014 and 2019 were identified. To limit selection bias, patients were matched for baseline characteristics and compared with a multivariable logistic regression model. Some 159 patients treated by TEG (60 patients, 37.7%) or TTE (99 patients, 62.3%) were included. Patients in the TEG group were older, had less tumor invasion of the esophagus, and were more often excluded from neoadjuvant therapy. Post-operative morbidity was comparable (P = 0.88), while 90-day mortality was higher after TEG (90-day mortality 10.0% in TEG group vs. 2.0% in TTE group P = 0.01). R0 resection was achieved in 83.3% of patients after TEG and in 97.9% after TTE (P < 0.01), with the proximal resection margin involved in 16.6% of patients after TEG versus 0 in TTE group (P < 0.01). The 3-year overall survival was comparable (TEG: 36.5%, TTE: 48.4%, P = 0.12). At multivariable analysis, (y)pT category was an independent risk factor for 3-year recurrence. After matching, TEG was still associated with an increased risk of incomplete tumor resection (P = 0.03) and proximal margin involvement (P < 0.01), while there were no differences in post-operative morbidity (P = 0.56) and mortality (P = 0.31). Our data suggest that patients with Siewert type II tumors treated by TEG are exposed to a higher risk of positive proximal resection margin compared to TTE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pieter C van der Sluis
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacopo Weindelmayer
- Department of General and Upper G.I. Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simone Giacopuzzi
- Department of General and Upper G.I. Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni De Manzoni
- Department of General and Upper G.I. Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Veldhuijzen van Zanten SEM, Pieterman KJ, Wijnhoven BPL, Pruis IJ, Groot Koerkamp B, van Driel LMJW, Verburg FA, Thomeer MGJ. FAPI PET versus FDG PET, CT or MRI for Staging Pancreatic-, Gastric- and Cholangiocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Head-to-Head Comparisons of Diagnostic Performances. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12081958. [PMID: 36010308 PMCID: PMC9406684 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12081958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: There is a pressing demand for the development of cancer-specific diagnostic imaging tools, particularly for staging of pancreatic-, gastric- or cholangiocarcinoma, as current diagnostic imaging techniques, including CT, MRI and PET using FDG, are not fully adequate. The novel PET-tracer “FAPI” has the potential to visualize even small tumour deposits employing the tumour-specific expression of fibroblast-activating protein (FAP) in malignant cells. Methods: We performed a systematic review to select studies investigating the use of FAPI PET for staging pancreatic-, gastric- and cholangiocarcinoma (PROSPERO CRD42022329512). Patient-wise and lesion-wise comparisons were performed for primary tumour (T), lymph nodes (N), organ metastases (M) and peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and tumour-to-background ratios (TBR) were compared between PET using FAPI versus FDG (if reported). Results: Ten articles met the inclusion criteria. In all studies, FAPI PET showed superiority over FDG-PET/CT/MRI for the detection of T, N, M and PC, both in the patient-wise and in lesion-wise comparisons (when performed). Additionally, higher SUVmax and TBRmax values were reported for use of FAPI compared to FDG. Conclusions: The positive results of this review warrant prospective clinical studies to investigate the accuracy and clinical value of FAPI PET for diagnosing and staging patients with pancreatic-, gastric- and cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie E. M. Veldhuijzen van Zanten
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Correspondence:
| | - Kay J. Pieterman
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas P. L. Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ilanah J. Pruis
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lydi M. J. W. van Driel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik A. Verburg
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten G. J. Thomeer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ten Kate CA, van Hal AFRL, Erler NS, Doukas M, Nikkessen S, Vlot J, IJsselstijn H, Wijnhoven BPL, Wijnen RMH, Spaander MCW. Recommendations for endoscopic surveillance after esophageal atresia repair in adults. Dis Esophagus 2022; 35:6509009. [PMID: 35034110 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doab095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic surveillance of adults with esophageal atresia is advocated, but the optimal surveillance strategy remains uncertain. This study aimed to provide recommendations on appropriate starting age and intervals of endoscopic surveillance in adults with esophageal atresia. METHODS Participants underwent standardized upper endoscopies with biopsies. Surveillance intervals of 3-5 years were applied, depending on age and histopathological results. Patient's age and time to development of (pre)malignant lesions were calculated. RESULTS A total of 271 patients with esophageal atresia (55% male; median age at baseline endoscopy 26.7 (range 15.6-68.5) years; colon interposition n = 17) were included. Barrett's esophagus was found in 19 (7%) patients (median age 32.3 (17.8-56.0) years at diagnosis). Youngest patient with a clinically relevant Barrett's esophagus was 20.9 years. Follow-up endoscopies were performed in 108 patients (40%; median follow-up time 4.6 years). During surveillance, four patients developed Barrett's esophagus but no dysplasia or cancer was found. One 45-year-old woman with a colon interposition developed an adenoma with high-grade dysplasia which was radically removed. Two new cases of esophageal carcinoma were diagnosed in patients (55 and 66 years old) who were not under surveillance. One of them had been curatively treated for esophageal carcinoma 13 years ago. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that endoscopic screening of patients with esophageal atresia, including those with a colon interposition, can be started at 20 years of age. Up to the age of 40 years a surveillance interval of 10 years appeared to be safe. Endoscopic surveillance may also be warranted for patients after curative esophageal cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantal A Ten Kate
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Intensive Care, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne-Fleur R L van Hal
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Intensive Care, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole S Erler
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michail Doukas
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Suzan Nikkessen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - John Vlot
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Intensive Care, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke IJsselstijn
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Intensive Care, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - René M H Wijnen
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Intensive Care, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Galema HA, van Rees JM, Matthijsen RA, Hilling DE, Wijnhoven BPL, Lagarde SM. ICG-fluorescence angiography assessment of colon interposition for oesophageal cancer - A Video Vignette. Colorectal Dis 2022; 24:665. [PMID: 35114062 PMCID: PMC9314020 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Hidde A. Galema
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Oncological SurgeryErasmus MC Cancer InstituteRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Jan M. van Rees
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Oncological SurgeryErasmus MC Cancer InstituteRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Denise E. Hilling
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Oncological SurgeryErasmus MC Cancer InstituteRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Bas P. L. Wijnhoven
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Oncological SurgeryErasmus MC Cancer InstituteRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M. Lagarde
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Oncological SurgeryErasmus MC Cancer InstituteRotterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kamarajah SK, Evans RPT, Nepogodiev D, Hodson J, Bundred JR, Gockel I, Gossage JA, Isik A, Kidane B, Mahendran HA, Negoi I, Okonta KE, Sayyed R, van Hillegersberg R, Vohra RS, Wijnhoven BPL, Singh P, Griffiths EA, Kamarajah SK, Hodson J, Griffiths EA, Alderson D, Bundred J, Evans RPT, Gossage J, Griffiths EA, Jefferies B, Kamarajah SK, McKay S, Mohamed I, Nepogodiev D, Siaw-Acheampong K, Singh P, van Hillegersberg R, Vohra R, Wanigasooriya K, Whitehouse T, Gjata A, Moreno JI, Takeda FR, Kidane B, Guevara Castro R, Harustiak T, Bekele A, Kechagias A, Gockel I, Kennedy A, Da Roit A, Bagajevas A, Azagra JS, Mahendran HA, Mejía-Fernández L, Wijnhoven BPL, El Kafsi J, Sayyed RH, Sousa M M, Sampaio AS, Negoi I, Blanco R, Wallner B, Schneider PM, Hsu PK, Isik A, Gananadha S, Wills V, Devadas M, Duong C, Talbot M, Hii MW, Jacobs R, Andreollo NA, Johnston B, Darling G, Isaza-Restrepo A, Rosero G, Arias-Amézquita F, Raptis D, Gaedcke J, Reim D, Izbicki J, Egberts JH, Dikinis S, Kjaer DW, Larsen MH, Achiam MP, Saarnio J, Theodorou D, Liakakos T, Korkolis DP, Robb WB, Collins C, Murphy T, Reynolds J, Tonini V, Migliore M, Bonavina L, Valmasoni M, Bardini R, Weindelmayer J, Terashima M, White RE, Alghunaim E, Elhadi M, Leon-Takahashi AM, Medina-Franco H, Lau PC, Okonta KE, Heisterkamp J, Rosman C, van Hillegersberg R, Beban G, Babor R, Gordon A, Rossaak JI, Pal KMI, Qureshi AU, Naqi SA, Syed AA, Barbosa J, Vicente CS, Leite J, Freire J, Casaca R, Costa RCT, Scurtu RR, Mogoanta SS, Bolca C, Constantinoiu S, Sekhniaidze D, Bjelović M, So JBY, Gačevski G, Loureiro C, Pera M, Bianchi A, Moreno Gijón M, Martín Fernández J, Trugeda Carrera MS, Vallve-Bernal M, Cítores Pascual MA, Elmahi S, Halldestam I, Hedberg J, Mönig S, Gutknecht S, Tez M, Guner A, Tirnaksiz MB, Colak E, Sevinç B, Hindmarsh A, Khan I, Khoo D, Byrom R, Gokhale J, Wilkerson P, Jain P, Chan D, Robertson K, Iftikhar S, Skipworth R, Forshaw M, Higgs S, Gossage J, Nijjar R, Viswanath YKS, Turner P, Dexter S, Boddy A, Allum WH, Oglesby S, Cheong E, Beardsmore D, Vohra R, Maynard N, Berrisford R, Mercer S, Puig S, Melhado R, Kelty C, Underwood T, Dawas K, Lewis W, Bryce G, Thomas M, Arndt AT, Palazzo F, Meguid RA, Fergusson J, Beenen E, Mosse C, Salim J, Cheah S, Wright T, Cerdeira MP, McQuillan P, Richardson M, Liem H, Spillane J, Yacob M, Albadawi F, Thorpe T, Dingle A, Cabalag C, Loi K, Fisher OM, Ward S, Read M, Johnson M, Bassari R, Bui H, Cecconello I, Sallum RAA, da Rocha JRM, Lopes LR, Tercioti Jr V, Coelho JDS, Ferrer JAP, Buduhan G, Tan L, Srinathan S, Shea P, Yeung J, Allison F, Carroll P, Vargas-Barato F, Gonzalez F, Ortega J, Nino-Torres L, Beltrán-García TC, Castilla L, Pineda M, Bastidas A, Gómez-Mayorga J, Cortés N, Cetares C, Caceres S, Duarte S, Pazdro A, Snajdauf M, Faltova H, Sevcikova M, Mortensen PB, Katballe N, Ingemann T, Morten B, Kruhlikava I, Ainswort AP, Stilling NM, Eckardt J, Holm J, Thorsteinsson M, Siemsen M, Brandt B, Nega B, Teferra E, Tizazu A, Kauppila JH, Koivukangas V, Meriläinen S, Gruetzmann R, Krautz C, Weber G, Golcher H, Emons G, Azizian A, Ebeling M, Niebisch S, Kreuser N, Albanese G, Hesse J, Volovnik L, Boecher U, Reeh M, Triantafyllou S, Schizas D, Michalinos A, Balli E, Mpoura M, Charalabopoulos A, Manatakis DK, Balalis D, Bolger J, Baban C, Mastrosimone A, McAnena O, Quinn A, Ó Súilleabháin CB, Hennessy MM, Ivanovski I, Khizer H, Ravi N, Donlon N, Cervellera M, Vaccari S, Bianchini S, Asti E, Bernardi D, Merigliano S, Provenzano L, Scarpa M, Saadeh L, Salmaso B, De Manzoni G, Giacopuzzi S, La Mendola R, De Pasqual CA, Tsubosa Y, Niihara M, Irino T, Makuuchi R, Ishii K K, Mwachiro M, Fekadu A, Odera A, Mwachiro E, AlShehab D, Ahmed HA, Shebani AO, Elhadi A, Elnagar FA, Elnagar HF, Makkai-Popa ST, Wong LF, Tan YR, Thannimalai S, Ho CA, Pang WS, Tan JH, Basave HNL, Cortés-González R, Lagarde SM, van Lanschot JJB, Cords C, Jansen WA, Martijnse I, Matthijsen R, Bouwense S, Klarenbeek B, Verstegen M, van Workum F, Ruurda JP, van der Sluis PC, de Maat M, Evenett N, Johnston P, Patel R, MacCormick A, Smith B, Ekwunife C, Memon AH, Shaikh K, Wajid A, Khalil N, Haris M, Mirza ZU, Qudus SBA, Sarwar MZ, Shehzadi A, Raza A, Jhanzaib MH, Farmanali J, Zakir Z, Shakeel O, Nasir I, Khattak S, Baig M, Noor MA, Ahmed HH, Naeem A, Pinho AC, da Silva R, Bernardes A, Campos JC, Matos H, Braga T, Monteiro C, Ramos P, Cabral F, Gomes MP, Martins PC, Correia AM, Videira JF, Ciuce C, Drasovean R, Apostu R, Ciuce C, Paitici S, Racu AE, Obleaga CV, Beuran M, Stoica B, Ciubotaru C, Negoita V, Cordos I, Birla RD, Predescu D, Hoara PA, Tomsa R, Shneider V, Agasiev M, Ganjara I, Gunjić D, Veselinović M, Babič T, Chin TS, Shabbir A, Kim G, Crnjac A, Samo H, Díez del Val I, Leturio S, Ramón JM, Dal Cero M, Rifá S, Rico M, Pagan Pomar A, Martinez Corcoles JA, Rodicio Miravalles JL, Pais SA, Turienzo SA, Alvarez LS, Campos PV, Rendo AG, García SS, Santos EPG, Martínez ET, Fernández Díaz MJ, Magadán Álvarez C, Concepción Martín V, Díaz López C, Rosat Rodrigo A, Pérez Sánchez LE, Bailón Cuadrado M, Tinoco Carrasco C, Choolani Bhojwani E, Sánchez DP, Ahmed ME, Dzhendov T, Lindberg F, Rutegård M, Sundbom M, Mickael C, Colucci N, Schnider A, Er S, Kurnaz E, Turkyilmaz S, Turkyilmaz A, Yildirim R, Baki BE, Akkapulu N, Karahan O, Damburaci N, Hardwick R, Safranek P, Sujendran V, Bennett J, Afzal Z, Shrotri M, Chan B, Exarchou K, Gilbert T, Amalesh T, Mukherjee D, Mukherjee S, Wiggins TH, Kennedy R, McCain S, Harris A, Dobson G, Davies N, Wilson I, Mayo D, Bennett D, Young R, Manby P, Blencowe N, Schiller M, Byrne B, Mitton D, Wong V, Elshaer A, Cowen M, Menon V, Tan LC, McLaughlin E, Koshy R, Sharp C, Brewer H, Das N, Cox M, Al Khyatt W, Worku D, Iqbal R, Walls L, McGregor R, Fullarton G, Macdonald A, MacKay C, Craig C, Dwerryhouse S, Hornby S, Jaunoo S, Wadley M, Baker C, Saad M, Kelly M, Davies A, Di Maggio F, McKay S, Mistry P, Singhal R, Tucker O, Kapoulas S, Powell-Brett S, Davis P, Bromley G, Watson L, Verma R, Ward J, Shetty V, Ball C, Pursnani K, Sarela A, Sue Ling H, Mehta S, Hayden J, To N, Palser T, Hunter D, Supramaniam K, Butt Z, Ahmed A, Kumar S, Chaudry A, Moussa O, Kordzadeh A, Lorenzi B, Wilson M, Patil P, Noaman I, Bouras G, Evans R, Singh M, Warrilow H, Ahmad A, Tewari N, Yanni F, Couch J, Theophilidou E, Reilly JJ, Singh P, van Boxel G, Akbari K, Zanotti D, Sanders G, Wheatley T, Ariyarathenam A, Reece-Smith A, Humphreys L, Choh C, Carter N, Knight B, Pucher P, Athanasiou A, Mohamed I, Tan B, Abdulrahman M, Vickers J, Akhtar K, Chaparala R, Brown R, Alasmar MMA, Ackroyd R, Patel K, Tamhankar A, Wyman A, Walker R, Grace B, Abbassi N, Slim N, Ioannidi L, Blackshaw G, Havard T, Escofet X, Powell A, Owera A, Rashid F, Jambulingam P, Padickakudi J, Ben-Younes H, Mccormack K, Makey IA, Karush MK, Seder CW, Liptay MJ, Chmielewski G, Rosato EL, Berger AC, Zheng R, Okolo E, Singh A, Scott CD, Weyant MJ, Mitchell JD. Textbook outcome following oesophagectomy for cancer: international cohort study. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Textbook outcome has been proposed as a tool for the assessment of oncological surgical care. However, an international assessment in patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer has not been reported. This study aimed to assess textbook outcome in an international setting.
Methods
Patients undergoing curative resection for oesophageal cancer were identified from the international Oesophagogastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) from April 2018 to December 2018. Textbook outcome was defined as the percentage of patients who underwent a complete tumour resection with at least 15 lymph nodes in the resected specimen and an uneventful postoperative course, without hospital readmission. A multivariable binary logistic regression model was used to identify factors independently associated with textbook outcome, and results are presented as odds ratio (OR) and 95 per cent confidence intervals (95 per cent c.i.).
Results
Of 2159 patients with oesophageal cancer, 39.7 per cent achieved a textbook outcome. The outcome parameter ‘no major postoperative complication’ had the greatest negative impact on a textbook outcome for patients with oesophageal cancer, compared to other textbook outcome parameters. Multivariable analysis identified male gender and increasing Charlson comorbidity index with a significantly lower likelihood of textbook outcome. Presence of 24-hour on-call rota for oesophageal surgeons (OR 2.05, 95 per cent c.i. 1.30 to 3.22; P = 0.002) and radiology (OR 1.54, 95 per cent c.i. 1.05 to 2.24; P = 0.027), total minimally invasive oesophagectomies (OR 1.63, 95 per cent c.i. 1.27 to 2.08; P < 0.001), and chest anastomosis above azygous (OR 2.17, 95 per cent c.i. 1.58 to 2.98; P < 0.001) were independently associated with a significantly increased likelihood of textbook outcome.
Conclusion
Textbook outcome is achieved in less than 40 per cent of patients having oesophagectomy for cancer. Improvements in centralization, hospital resources, access to minimal access surgery, and adoption of newer techniques for improving lymph node yield could improve textbook outcome.
Collapse
|
50
|
Kamarajah SK, Evans RPT, Nepogodiev D, Hodson J, Bundred JR, Gockel I, Gossage JA, Isik A, Kidane B, Mahendran HA, Negoi I, Okonta KE, Sayyed R, van Hillegersberg R, Vohra RS, Wijnhoven BPL, Singh P, Griffiths EA, Kamarajah SK, Hodson J, Griffiths EA, Alderson D, Bundred J, Evans RPT, Gossage J, Griffiths EA, Jefferies B, Kamarajah SK, McKay S, Mohamed I, Nepogodiev D, Siaw-Acheampong K, Singh P, van Hillegersberg R, Vohra R, Wanigasooriya K, Whitehouse T, Gjata A, Moreno JI, Takeda FR, Kidane B, Guevara Castro R, Harustiak T, Bekele A, Kechagias A, Gockel I, Kennedy A, Da Roit A, Bagajevas A, Azagra JS, Mahendran HA, Mejía-Fernández L, Wijnhoven BPL, El Kafsi J, Sayyed RH, Sousa M M, Sampaio AS, Negoi I, Blanco R, Wallner B, Schneider PM, Hsu PK, Isik A, Gananadha S, Wills V, Devadas M, Duong C, Talbot M, Hii MW, Jacobs R, Andreollo NA, Johnston B, Darling G, Isaza-Restrepo A, Rosero G, Arias-Amézquita F, Raptis D, Gaedcke J, Reim D, Izbicki J, Egberts JH, Dikinis S, Kjaer DW, Larsen MH, Achiam MP, Saarnio J, Theodorou D, Liakakos T, Korkolis DP, Robb WB, Collins C, Murphy T, Reynolds J, Tonini V, Migliore M, Bonavina L, Valmasoni M, Bardini R, Weindelmayer J, Terashima M, White RE, Alghunaim E, Elhadi M, Leon-Takahashi AM, Medina-Franco H, Lau PC, Okonta KE, Heisterkamp J, Rosman C, van Hillegersberg R, Beban G, Babor R, Gordon A, Rossaak JI, Pal KMI, Qureshi AU, Naqi SA, Syed AA, Barbosa J, Vicente CS, Leite J, Freire J, Casaca R, Costa RCT, Scurtu RR, Mogoanta SS, Bolca C, Constantinoiu S, Sekhniaidze D, Bjelović M, So JBY, Gačevski G, Loureiro C, Pera M, Bianchi A, Moreno Gijón M, Martín Fernández J, Trugeda Carrera MS, Vallve-Bernal M, Cítores Pascual MA, Elmahi S, Halldestam I, Hedberg J, Mönig S, Gutknecht S, Tez M, Guner A, Tirnaksiz MB, Colak E, Sevinç B, Hindmarsh A, Khan I, Khoo D, Byrom R, Gokhale J, Wilkerson P, Jain P, Chan D, Robertson K, Iftikhar S, Skipworth R, Forshaw M, Higgs S, Gossage J, Nijjar R, Viswanath YKS, Turner P, Dexter S, Boddy A, Allum WH, Oglesby S, Cheong E, Beardsmore D, Vohra R, Maynard N, Berrisford R, Mercer S, Puig S, Melhado R, Kelty C, Underwood T, Dawas K, Lewis W, Bryce G, Thomas M, Arndt AT, Palazzo F, Meguid RA, Fergusson J, Beenen E, Mosse C, Salim J, Cheah S, Wright T, Cerdeira MP, McQuillan P, Richardson M, Liem H, Spillane J, Yacob M, Albadawi F, Thorpe T, Dingle A, Cabalag C, Loi K, Fisher OM, Ward S, Read M, Johnson M, Bassari R, Bui H, Cecconello I, Sallum RAA, da Rocha JRM, Lopes LR, Tercioti Jr V, Coelho JDS, Ferrer JAP, Buduhan G, Tan L, Srinathan S, Shea P, Yeung J, Allison F, Carroll P, Vargas-Barato F, Gonzalez F, Ortega J, Nino-Torres L, Beltrán-García TC, Castilla L, Pineda M, Bastidas A, Gómez-Mayorga J, Cortés N, Cetares C, Caceres S, Duarte S, Pazdro A, Snajdauf M, Faltova H, Sevcikova M, Mortensen PB, Katballe N, Ingemann T, Morten B, Kruhlikava I, Ainswort AP, Stilling NM, Eckardt J, Holm J, Thorsteinsson M, Siemsen M, Brandt B, Nega B, Teferra E, Tizazu A, Kauppila JH, Koivukangas V, Meriläinen S, Gruetzmann R, Krautz C, Weber G, Golcher H, Emons G, Azizian A, Ebeling M, Niebisch S, Kreuser N, Albanese G, Hesse J, Volovnik L, Boecher U, Reeh M, Triantafyllou S, Schizas D, Michalinos A, Balli E, Mpoura M, Charalabopoulos A, Manatakis DK, Balalis D, Bolger J, Baban C, Mastrosimone A, McAnena O, Quinn A, Ó Súilleabháin CB, Hennessy MM, Ivanovski I, Khizer H, Ravi N, Donlon N, Cervellera M, Vaccari S, Bianchini S, Asti E, Bernardi D, Merigliano S, Provenzano L, Scarpa M, Saadeh L, Salmaso B, De Manzoni G, Giacopuzzi S, La Mendola R, De Pasqual CA, Tsubosa Y, Niihara M, Irino T, Makuuchi R, Ishii K K, Mwachiro M, Fekadu A, Odera A, Mwachiro E, AlShehab D, Ahmed HA, Shebani AO, Elhadi A, Elnagar FA, Elnagar HF, Makkai-Popa ST, Wong LF, Tan YR, Thannimalai S, Ho CA, Pang WS, Tan JH, Basave HNL, Cortés-González R, Lagarde SM, van Lanschot JJB, Cords C, Jansen WA, Martijnse I, Matthijsen R, Bouwense S, Klarenbeek B, Verstegen M, van Workum F, Ruurda JP, van der Sluis PC, de Maat M, Evenett N, Johnston P, Patel R, MacCormick A, Smith B, Ekwunife C, Memon AH, Shaikh K, Wajid A, Khalil N, Haris M, Mirza ZU, Qudus SBA, Sarwar MZ, Shehzadi A, Raza A, Jhanzaib MH, Farmanali J, Zakir Z, Shakeel O, Nasir I, Khattak S, Baig M, Noor MA, Ahmed HH, Naeem A, Pinho AC, da Silva R, Bernardes A, Campos JC, Matos H, Braga T, Monteiro C, Ramos P, Cabral F, Gomes MP, Martins PC, Correia AM, Videira JF, Ciuce C, Drasovean R, Apostu R, Ciuce C, Paitici S, Racu AE, Obleaga CV, Beuran M, Stoica B, Ciubotaru C, Negoita V, Cordos I, Birla RD, Predescu D, Hoara PA, Tomsa R, Shneider V, Agasiev M, Ganjara I, Gunjić D, Veselinović M, Babič T, Chin TS, Shabbir A, Kim G, Crnjac A, Samo H, Díez del Val I, Leturio S, Ramón JM, Dal Cero M, Rifá S, Rico M, Pagan Pomar A, Martinez Corcoles JA, Rodicio Miravalles JL, Pais SA, Turienzo SA, Alvarez LS, Campos PV, Rendo AG, García SS, Santos EPG, Martínez ET, Fernández Díaz MJ, Magadán Álvarez C, Concepción Martín V, Díaz López C, Rosat Rodrigo A, Pérez Sánchez LE, Bailón Cuadrado M, Tinoco Carrasco C, Choolani Bhojwani E, Sánchez DP, Ahmed ME, Dzhendov T, Lindberg F, Rutegård M, Sundbom M, Mickael C, Colucci N, Schnider A, Er S, Kurnaz E, Turkyilmaz S, Turkyilmaz A, Yildirim R, Baki BE, Akkapulu N, Karahan O, Damburaci N, Hardwick R, Safranek P, Sujendran V, Bennett J, Afzal Z, Shrotri M, Chan B, Exarchou K, Gilbert T, Amalesh T, Mukherjee D, Mukherjee S, Wiggins TH, Kennedy R, McCain S, Harris A, Dobson G, Davies N, Wilson I, Mayo D, Bennett D, Young R, Manby P, Blencowe N, Schiller M, Byrne B, Mitton D, Wong V, Elshaer A, Cowen M, Menon V, Tan LC, McLaughlin E, Koshy R, Sharp C, Brewer H, Das N, Cox M, Al Khyatt W, Worku D, Iqbal R, Walls L, McGregor R, Fullarton G, Macdonald A, MacKay C, Craig C, Dwerryhouse S, Hornby S, Jaunoo S, Wadley M, Baker C, Saad M, Kelly M, Davies A, Di Maggio F, McKay S, Mistry P, Singhal R, Tucker O, Kapoulas S, Powell-Brett S, Davis P, Bromley G, Watson L, Verma R, Ward J, Shetty V, Ball C, Pursnani K, Sarela A, Sue Ling H, Mehta S, Hayden J, To N, Palser T, Hunter D, Supramaniam K, Butt Z, Ahmed A, Kumar S, Chaudry A, Moussa O, Kordzadeh A, Lorenzi B, Wilson M, Patil P, Noaman I, Bouras G, Evans R, Singh M, Warrilow H, Ahmad A, Tewari N, Yanni F, Couch J, Theophilidou E, Reilly JJ, Singh P, van Boxel G, Akbari K, Zanotti D, Sanders G, Wheatley T, Ariyarathenam A, Reece-Smith A, Humphreys L, Choh C, Carter N, Knight B, Pucher P, Athanasiou A, Mohamed I, Tan B, Abdulrahman M, Vickers J, Akhtar K, Chaparala R, Brown R, Alasmar MMA, Ackroyd R, Patel K, Tamhankar A, Wyman A, Walker R, Grace B, Abbassi N, Slim N, Ioannidi L, Blackshaw G, Havard T, Escofet X, Powell A, Owera A, Rashid F, Jambulingam P, Padickakudi J, Ben-Younes H, Mccormack K, Makey IA, Karush MK, Seder CW, Liptay MJ, Chmielewski G, Rosato EL, Berger AC, Zheng R, Okolo E, Singh A, Scott CD, Weyant MJ, Mitchell JD. Textbook outcome following oesophagectomy for cancer: international cohort study. Br J Surg 2022; 109:439-449. [PMID: 35194634 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Textbook outcome has been proposed as a tool for the assessment of oncological surgical care. However, an international assessment in patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer has not been reported. This study aimed to assess textbook outcome in an international setting. METHODS Patients undergoing curative resection for oesophageal cancer were identified from the international Oesophagogastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) from April 2018 to December 2018. Textbook outcome was defined as the percentage of patients who underwent a complete tumour resection with at least 15 lymph nodes in the resected specimen and an uneventful postoperative course, without hospital readmission. A multivariable binary logistic regression model was used to identify factors independently associated with textbook outcome, and results are presented as odds ratio (OR) and 95 per cent confidence intervals (95 per cent c.i.). RESULTS Of 2159 patients with oesophageal cancer, 39.7 per cent achieved a textbook outcome. The outcome parameter 'no major postoperative complication' had the greatest negative impact on a textbook outcome for patients with oesophageal cancer, compared to other textbook outcome parameters. Multivariable analysis identified male gender and increasing Charlson comorbidity index with a significantly lower likelihood of textbook outcome. Presence of 24-hour on-call rota for oesophageal surgeons (OR 2.05, 95 per cent c.i. 1.30 to 3.22; P = 0.002) and radiology (OR 1.54, 95 per cent c.i. 1.05 to 2.24; P = 0.027), total minimally invasive oesophagectomies (OR 1.63, 95 per cent c.i. 1.27 to 2.08; P < 0.001), and chest anastomosis above azygous (OR 2.17, 95 per cent c.i. 1.58 to 2.98; P < 0.001) were independently associated with a significantly increased likelihood of textbook outcome. CONCLUSION Textbook outcome is achieved in less than 40 per cent of patients having oesophagectomy for cancer. Improvements in centralization, hospital resources, access to minimal access surgery, and adoption of newer techniques for improving lymph node yield could improve textbook outcome.
Collapse
|