1
|
Huang B, Rampulla V, Ri M, Lindblad M, Nilsson M, Rouvelas I, Klevebro F. Staging laparoscopy with peritoneal lavage to identify peritoneal metastases and free intraperitoneal cancer cells in the management of locally advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2024; 50:108059. [PMID: 38503223 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gastric cancer often presents in advanced stage with a significant risk for peritoneal dissemination. Staging laparoscopy can be used to detect peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC+) and free cancer cells in peritoneal lavage cytology (CY+). The current study aimed to present the outcomes of staging laparoscopy and the prognosis of PC+ and CY+ in a Swedish high-volume center. MATERIALS AND METHODS A cohort study including all consecutive patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who underwent staging laparoscopy between February 2008 and October 2022. The laparoscopy findings were categorized as PC+, PC-CY+ (positive cytology without peritoneal carcinomatosis) or negative laparoscopy (PC-CY-). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) stratified by laparoscopy findings. The secondary endpoint was OS within each laparoscopy finding group stratified by subsequent treatment. RESULTS Among 168 patients who underwent staging laparoscopy, 78 patients (46%) had PC-CY-, 29 patients (17%) had PC-CY+ and 61 patients (36%) had PC+. Decreased OS was observed for both PC-CY+ patients (aHR 2.14, 95% CI 1.13-4.06) and PC+ patients (aHR 5.36, 95% CI 3.21-8.93), compared to PC-CY-. Patients with PC-CY+ who converted to PC-CY- after chemotherapy and underwent tumor resection seemed to have a better prognosis compared to patients with persisting PC-CY+. CONCLUSIONS Staging laparoscopy is an important tool in the staging of locally advanced gastric cancer. Tumor resection for patients with PC-CY+ who convert to PC-CY- may lead to improved survival for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Huang
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, and Center for Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, C1.77, Karolinska University Hospital, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - V Rampulla
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, and Center for Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, C1.77, Karolinska University Hospital, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden; Surgical Oncology Unit, Surgical Department ASST Bergamo Ovest, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 24047 Treviglio, BG, Italy
| | - M Ri
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, and Center for Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, C1.77, Karolinska University Hospital, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Lindblad
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, and Center for Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, C1.77, Karolinska University Hospital, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Nilsson
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, and Center for Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, C1.77, Karolinska University Hospital, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - I Rouvelas
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, and Center for Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, C1.77, Karolinska University Hospital, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - F Klevebro
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, and Center for Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, C1.77, Karolinska University Hospital, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Doesburg JR, Luttikhold J, Lindblad M, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Eshuis WJ, Derks S, Geijsen ED, Pouw RE, Gisbertz SS, Nilsson M, Daams F. Diagnostic workup for esophageal cancer patients can be improved with checklists and clearer protocols; a comparative study between two tertiary centers in Europe. Eur J Surg Oncol 2024; 50:107318. [PMID: 38145609 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rapid and complete workup of newly diagnosed esophageal cancer is vital for a timely, individual and high-quality treatment strategy. The aim of this study was to uncover potential delay, inefficiencies and non-contributing investigations in the diagnostic process in two tertiary referral centers. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included all newly diagnosed esophageal cancer patients referred to or diagnosed in the Amsterdam UMC and Karolinska University Hospital between July 2020 and July 2021. Radiology, pathological assessment and multidisciplinary team meeting reports were reviewed. To assess time interval from diagnosis to treatment, dates of diagnosis, admittance to referral hospital, MDT meeting and start of treatment were collected. RESULTS In total, 252 esophageal cancer patients were included, 187 were treated with curative intent. Curatively treated patients had a mean age of 66 years, were predominantly male (74.9 %) with an adenocarcinoma (71.1 %). Curatively treated patients had a median time from diagnosis to referral of seven days (IQR:0-11) and of 35 days (IQR:28-45) between diagnosis and start of treatment. Main reasons for the significant (P < 0.001) differences in time between diagnosis and treatment between centers, Amsterdam UMC (39 days) vs Karolinska (27 days), were need for additional diagnostics (47.8 %) and differences in referral routine. Gastroscopy was repeated in 32.2 % of patients, mainly for further anatomical mapping. CONCLUSION Significant time differences between centers in the path from diagnosis to start treatment can be explained by differences in workup approach, referral routines and MDT meeting regulations. Repeat of gastroscopy can be prevented with clearer endoscopy guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J R van Doesburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - J Luttikhold
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, And Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Lindblad
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, And Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W J Eshuis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S Derks
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E D Geijsen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R E Pouw
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Nilsson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, And Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - F Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lindblad M, Bladh M, Björnsson-Hallgren H, Sydsjö G, Johansson T. No correlation to collagen synthesis disorders in patients with Perthes' disease: a nationwide Swedish register study of 3488 patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25:42. [PMID: 38195509 PMCID: PMC10775491 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-07161-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mutations of the COL2A1 gene have been identified in patients with Perthes' disease. Several studies have hypothesised a connection between Perthes' disease and collagen synthesis disorders, especially COL2A1-related disorders, but no large studies on the subject have been made. The aim of this study was thus to discover if there is a connection between patients presenting with Perthes' disease, and collagen synthesis disorders. A secondary aim was to see if the children with both disorders had less optimal birth characteristics than the rest. METHODS Swedish national registers were used to collect data on children diagnosed with Perthes' disease or a collagen synthesis disorder. These registers include all births in Sweden, and data from both outpatient and in-hospital visits. A wide range of data is included besides diagnoses. All children with follow-up data to the age of 15 years were included. Pearson's chi-square was used for analysis. Statistical significance was further analysed with Fisher's Exact Test. RESULTS In total, 3488 children with either diagnosis were included. 1620 children had only Perthes disease, while 1808 children had only a collagen synthesis disorder. Five children were found to have both the diagnosis Perthes' disease and a collagen synthesis disorder. One child was large for their gestational age and none of the children had a low birthweight. Two of the children were moderately preterm. CONCLUSIONS The distinct lack of overlap in such a large body of material raises doubt about a connection between the presentation of Perthes' disease and collagen synthesis disorders, either COL2A1-related or not. We could not find an overrepresentation of less optimal birth characteristics either.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lindblad
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
| | - M Bladh
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - H Björnsson-Hallgren
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - G Sydsjö
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - T Johansson
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nilsson K, Klevebro F, Sunde B, Rouvelas I, Lindblad M, Szabo E, Halldestam I, Smedh U, Wallner B, Johansson J, Johnsen G, Aahlin EK, Johannessen HO, Alexandersson von Döbeln G, Hjortland GO, Wang N, Shang Y, Borg D, Quaas A, Bartella I, Bruns C, Schröder W, Nilsson M. Oncological outcomes of standard versus prolonged time to surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer in the multicentre, randomised, controlled NeoRes II trial. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:1015-1024. [PMID: 37657554 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal time to surgery (TTS) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for oesophageal cancer is unknown and has traditionally been 4-6 weeks in clinical practice. Observational studies have suggested better outcomes, especially in terms of histological response, after prolonged delay of up to 3 months after nCRT. The NeoRes II trial is the first randomised trial to compare standard to prolonged TTS after nCRT for oesophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with resectable, locally advanced oesophageal cancer were randomly assigned to standard delay of surgery of 4-6 weeks or prolonged delay of 10-12 weeks after nCRT. The primary endpoint was complete histological response of the primary tumour in patients with adenocarcinoma (AC). Secondary endpoints included histological tumour response, resection margins, overall and progression-free survival in all patients and stratified by histologic type. RESULTS Between February 2015 and March 2019, 249 patients from 10 participating centres in Sweden, Norway and Germany were randomised: 125 to standard and 124 to prolonged TTS. There was no significant difference in complete histological response between AC patients allocated to standard (21%) compared to prolonged (26%) TTS (P = 0.429). Tumour regression, resection margins and number of resected lymph nodes, total and metastatic, did not differ between the allocated interventions. The first quartile overall survival in patients allocated to standard TTS was 26.5 months compared to 14.2 months after prolonged TTS (P = 0.003) and the overall risk of death during follow-up was 35% higher after prolonged delay (hazard ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 0.94-1.95, P = 0.107). CONCLUSION Prolonged TTS did not improve histological complete response or other pathological endpoints, while there was a strong trend towards worse survival, suggesting caution in routinely delaying surgery for >6 weeks after nCRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Nilsson
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm; Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
| | - F Klevebro
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm; Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
| | - B Sunde
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm; Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
| | - I Rouvelas
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm; Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
| | - M Lindblad
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm; Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
| | - E Szabo
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro
| | | | - U Smedh
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg
| | - B Wallner
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå
| | - J Johansson
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - G Johnsen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim
| | - E K Aahlin
- Department of GI and HPB Surgery, University Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø
| | - H-O Johannessen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - G Alexandersson von Döbeln
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; Medical Unit of Head, Neck, Lung and Skin Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - G O Hjortland
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - N Wang
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm
| | - Y Shang
- Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
| | - D Borg
- Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - A Quaas
- Institute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Cologne
| | - I Bartella
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - C Bruns
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - W Schröder
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - M Nilsson
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm; Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Klevebro F, Konradsson M, Han S, Luttikhold J, Nilsson M, Lindblad M, Andersson M, Low DE. ERAS guidelines-driven upper gastrointestinal contrast study after esophagectomy can detect delayed gastric conduit emptying and improve outcomes. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:1838-1845. [PMID: 36229553 PMCID: PMC10017562 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09695-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delayed gastric conduit emptying can occur after esophagectomy and has been shown to be associated with increased risk for postoperative complications. Application of a standardized clinical protocol after esophagectomy including an upper gastrointestinal contrast study has the potential to improve postoperative outcomes. METHODS Prospective cohort including all patients operated with esophagectomy at two high-volume centers for esophageal surgery. The standardized clinical protocol included an upper gastrointestinal contrast study on day 2 or 3 after surgery. All images were compiled and evaluated for the purpose of the study. Clinical data was collected in IRB approved institutional databases at the participating centers. RESULTS The study included 119 patients treated with esophagectomy of whom 112 (94.1%) completed an upper gastrointestinal contrast study. The results showed that 8 (7.1%) patients had radiological delayed gastric conduit emptying defined as no emptying of contrast through the pylorus. Partial conduit emptying was seen in 34 (30.4%) patients, and 70 (62.5%) patients had complete conduit emptying. Complete or partial emptying was associated with significantly earlier nasogastric tube removal (3 vs. 6 days) and hospital discharge 8 vs. 17 days, P < 0.001). Radiological signs of delayed gastric conduit emptying were shown to be associated with increased risk of postoperative complications. There was, however, no association with severe postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo score, pulmonary complications, anastomotic leak or need for intensive care. CONCLUSION The results of the study demonstrate that postoperative upper gastrointestinal contrast studies can be used to assess the level of emptying of the gastric conduit after esophagectomy. Application of upper gastrointestinal contrast study in the ERAS guidelines-driven standardized clinical pathway after esophagectomy has the potential to improve postoperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Klevebro
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Halsov 13, 14186, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - M Konradsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Halsov 13, 14186, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - S Han
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, USA
| | - J Luttikhold
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Halsov 13, 14186, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Nilsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Halsov 13, 14186, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Lindblad
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Halsov 13, 14186, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Andersson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D E Low
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Analatos A, Håkanson BS, Lundell L, Lindblad M, Thorell A. Author response to: Tension-free mesh versus suture-alone cruroplasty in antireflux surgery: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Br J Surg 2021; 108:e390. [PMID: 34595501 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A Analatos
- Department of Clinical Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Nyköping Hospital, Nyköping, Sweden.,Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Sweden
| | - B S Håkanson
- Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyds Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Lundell
- Department of Clinical Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - M Lindblad
- Department of Clinical Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Thorell
- Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyds Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hollertz P, Lindblad M, Sandström P, Halldestam I, Edholm D. Outcome of microscopically non-radical oesophagectomy for oesophageal and oesophagogastric junctional cancer: nationwide cohort study. BJS Open 2021; 5:6273342. [PMID: 33972990 PMCID: PMC8110895 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Microscopically non-radical (R1) oesophageal cancer resection has been associated with worse survival. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for R1 resection and to investigate how this affects long-term survival. Methods The Swedish National Register for Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer was used to identify all patients who underwent oesophageal cancer resection with curative intent between 2006 and 2017. Risk factors for R1 resection were assessed by multivariable logistic regression analysis, and factors predicting 5-year survival identified by multivariable Cox regression. Results The study included 1460 patients. Surgical margins were involved microscopically in 142 patients (9.7 per cent). The circumferential resection margin was involved in 114 (7.8 per cent), the proximal margin in 53 (3.6 per cent), and the distal margin in 29 (2.0 per cent). In 30 specimens (2.1 per cent), two or all three margins were involved. Independent risk factors for R1 resection were male sex, low BMI, absence of neoadjuvant treatments, and clinical T4 disease. The 5-year survival rate for the entire cohort was 42.2 per cent, but only 18.0 per cent for those who had an R1 resection. Independent risk factors for death within 5 years of resection were male sex, age above 60 years, normal BMI, ASA fitness grade III, intermediate-level education, R1 resection (hazard ratio 1.80, 95 per cent c.i. 1.40 to 2.32), clinical T3 disease, and clinical lymph node metastasis. Conclusion R1 resection is common and predicts poor 5-year survival. Absence of neoadjuvant treatment is a risk factor for R1 resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Hollertz
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Västervik Hospital, Västervik, Sweden
| | - M Lindblad
- Division of Surgery, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Sandström
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - I Halldestam
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - D Edholm
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Linder G, Klevebro F, Edholm D, Johansson J, Lindblad M, Hedberg J. Burden of in-hospital care in oesophageal cancer: national population-based study. BJS Open 2021; 5:6271348. [PMID: 33960365 PMCID: PMC8103496 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Oesophageal cancer management requires extensive in-hospital care. This cohort study aimed to quantify in-hospital care for patients with oesophageal cancer in relation to intended treatment, and to analyse factors associated with risk of spending a large proportion of survival time in hospital. Methods All patients with oesophageal cancer in three nationwide registers over a 10-year period were included. In-hospital care during the first year after diagnosis was evaluated, and the proportion of survival time spent in hospital, stratified by intended treatment (curative, palliative or best supportive care), was calculated. Associations between relevant factors and a greater proportion of survival time in hospital were analysed by multivariable logistic regression. Results In-hospital care was provided for a median of 39, 26, and 15 days in the first year after diagnosis of oesophageal cancer in curative, palliative, and best supportive care groups respectively. Patients receiving curatively intended treatment spent a median of 12 per cent of their survival time in hospital during the first year after diagnosis, whereas those receiving palliative or best supportive care spent 19 and 23 per cent respectively. Factors associated with more in-hospital care included older age, female sex, being unmarried, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Conclusion The burden of in-hospital care during the first year after diagnosis of oesophageal cancer was substantial. Important clinical and socioeconomic factors were identified that predisposed to a greater proportion of survival time spent in hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Linder
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - F Klevebro
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Centre for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D Edholm
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - J Johansson
- Department of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - M Lindblad
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Centre for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Hedberg
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kung CH, Jestin Hannan C, Linder G, Johansson J, Nilsson M, Hedberg J, Lindblad M. Impact of surgical resection rate on survival in gastric cancer: nationwide study. BJS Open 2020; 5:6043682. [PMID: 33688944 PMCID: PMC7944854 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There are marked geographical variations in the proportion of patients undergoing resection for gastric cancer. This study investigated the impact of resection rate on survival. Methods All patients with potentially curable gastric cancer between 2006 and 2017 were identified from the Swedish National Register of Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer. The annual resection rate was calculated for each county per year. Resection rates in all counties for all years were grouped into tertiles and classified as low, intermediate or high. Survival was analysed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results A total of 3465 patients were diagnosed with potentially curable gastric cancer, and 1934 (55.8 per cent) were resected. Resection rates in the low (1261 patients), intermediate (1141) and high (1063) tertiles were 0–50.0, 50.1–62.5 and 62.6–100 per cent respectively. The multivariable Cox analysis revealed better survival for patients diagnosed in counties during years with an intermediate versus low resection rate (hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95 per cent c.i. 0.74 to 0.90; P < 0.001) and high versus low resection rate (HR 0.80, 0.73 to 0.88; P < 0.001). Conclusion This national register study showed large regional variation in resection rates for gastric cancer. A higher resection rate appeared to be beneficial with regard to overall survival for the entire population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C-H Kung
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Skellefteå County Hospital, Skellefteå, Sweden
| | - C Jestin Hannan
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - G Linder
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - J Johansson
- Department of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - M Nilsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Digestive Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Hedberg
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - M Lindblad
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Digestive Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Analatos A, Håkanson BS, Lundell L, Lindblad M, Thorell A. Tension-free mesh versus suture-alone cruroplasty in antireflux surgery: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Br J Surg 2020; 107:1731-1740. [PMID: 32936951 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antireflux surgery is effective for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) but recurrence of hiatal hernia remains a challenge. In other types of hernia repair, use of mesh is associated with reduced recurrence rates. The aim of this study was to compare the use of mesh versus sutures alone for the repair of hiatal hernia in laparoscopic antireflux surgery. METHODS Patients undergoing laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for GORD between January 2006 and December 2010 were allocated randomly to closure of the diaphragmatic hiatus with crural sutures or non-absorbable polytetrafluoroethylene mesh (CruraSoft®). The primary outcome was recurrence of hiatal hernia, as determined by barium swallow study 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes were: intraoperative and postoperative complications, use of antireflux medication, postoperative oesophageal acid exposure, quality of life, dysphagia and duration of hospital stay. RESULTS Some 77 patients were randomized to the suture technique and 82 patients underwent mesh repair. At 1 year, the hiatal hernia had recurred in six of 64 patients (9 per cent) in the mesh group and two of 64 (3 per cent) in the suture group (P = 0·144). Reflux symptoms, use of proton pump inhibitors and oesophageal acid exposure did not differ between the groups. At 3 years, recurrence rates were 13 and 10 per cent in the mesh and suture groups respectively (P = 0·692). Dysphagia scores decreased in both groups, but more patients had dysphagia for solid food after mesh closure (P = 0·013). Quality-of-life scores were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSION Tension-free crural repair with non-absorbable mesh does not reduce the incidence of recurrent hiatal hernia compared with use of sutures alone in patients undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication. NCT03730233 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Analatos
- Department of Clinical Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Nyköping Hospital, Nyköping, Sweden
- Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - B S Håkanson
- Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd, Sweden
| | - L Lundell
- Department of Clinical Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - M Lindblad
- Department of Clinical Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Thorell
- Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jestin Hannan C, Linder G, Kung CH, Johansson J, Lindblad M, Hedberg J. Geographical differences in cancer treatment and survival for patients with oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junctional cancers. Br J Surg 2020; 107:1500-1509. [PMID: 32484241 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Only around one-quarter of patients with cancer of the oesophagus and the gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) undergo surgical resection. This population-based study investigated the rates of treatment with curative intent and resection, and their association with survival. METHODS Patients diagnosed with oesophageal and GOJ cancer between 2006 and 2015 in Sweden were identified from the National Register for Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer (NREV). The NREV was cross-linked with several national registries to obtain information on additional exposures. The annual proportion of patients undergoing treatment with curative intent and surgical resection in each county was calculated, and the counties divided into groups with low, intermediate and high rates. Treatment with curative intent was defined as definitive chemoradiation therapy or surgery, with or without neoadjuvant oncological treatment. Overall survival was analysed using a multilevel model based on county of residence at the time of diagnosis. RESULTS Some 5959 patients were included, of whom 1503 (25·2 per cent) underwent surgery. Median overall survival after diagnosis was 7·7, 8·8 and 11·1 months respectively in counties with low, intermediate and high rates of treatment with curative intent. Corresponding survival times for the surgical resection groups were 7·4, 9·3 and 11·0 months. In the multivariable analysis, a higher rate of treatment with curative intent (time ratio 1·17, 95 per cent c.i. 1·05 to 1·30; P < 0·001) and a higher resection rate (time ratio 1·24, 1·12 to 1·37; P < 0·001) were associated with improved survival after adjustment for relevant confounders. CONCLUSION Patients diagnosed in counties with higher rates of treatment with curative intent and higher rates of surgery had better survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Jestin Hannan
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - G Linder
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - C-H Kung
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Departments of Surgery, Skellefteå County Hospital, Skellefteå, Sweden
| | | | - M Lindblad
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Hedberg
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kung CH, Tsai JA, Lundell L, Johansson J, Nilsson M, Lindblad M. Nationwide study of the impact of D2 lymphadenectomy on survival after gastric cancer surgery. BJS Open 2020; 4:424-431. [PMID: 32129948 PMCID: PMC7260415 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Gastrectomy including D2 lymphadenectomy is regarded as the standard curative treatment for advanced gastric cancer in Asia. This procedure has also been adopted gradually in the West, despite lack of support from RCTs. This study sought to investigate any advantage for long‐term survival following D2 lymphadenectomy in routine gastric cancer surgery in a Western nationwide population‐based cohort. Methods All patients who had a gastrectomy for cancer in Sweden in 2006–2017 were included in the study. Prospectively determined data items were retrieved from the National Register of Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer. Extent of lymphadenectomy was categorized as D1+/D2 or the less extensive D0/D1 according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association classification. Overall survival was analysed and, in addition, a variety of possible confounders were introduced into the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results A total of 1677 patients underwent gastrectomy, of whom 471 (28·1 per cent) were classified as having a D1+/D2 and 1206 (71·9 per cent) a D0/D1 procedure. D1+/D2 lymphadenectomy was not associated with higher 30‐ or 90‐day postoperative mortality. Median overall survival for D1+/D2 lymphadenectomy was 41·5 months with a 5‐year survival rate of 43·7 per cent, compared with 38·5 months and 38·5 per cent respectively for D0/D1 (P = 0·116). After adjustment for confounders, in multivariable analysis survival was significantly higher after D1+/D2 than following D0/D1 lymphadenectomy (hazard ratio 0·81, 95 per cent c.i. 0·68 to 0·95; P = 0·012). Conclusion This national registry study showed that long‐term survival after gastric cancer surgery was improved after gastrectomy involving D1+/D2 lymphadenectomy compared with D0/D1 dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C-H Kung
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Skellefteå County Hospital, Skellefteå, Sweden
| | - J A Tsai
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Lundell
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - J Johansson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - M Nilsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Digestive Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Lindblad
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Digestive Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Klevebro F, Nilsson K, Lindblad M, Ekman S, Johansson J, Lundell L, Ndegwa N, Hedberg J, Nilsson M. Association between time interval from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy to surgery and complete histological tumor response in esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer: a national cohort study. Dis Esophagus 2019; 33:5610874. [PMID: 31676895 PMCID: PMC7203996 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doz078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Revised: 07/24/2019] [Accepted: 08/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The optimal time interval from neoadjuvant therapy to surgery in the treatment of esophageal cancer is not known. The aim of this study was to investigate if a prolonged interval between completed neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery was associated with improved histological response rates and survival in a population-based national register cohort. The population-based cohort study included patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy due to cancer in the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Patients were divided into two groups based on the median time from completed neoadjuvant treatment to surgery. The primary outcome was complete histological response. Secondary outcomes were lymph node tumor response, postoperative complications, R0 resection rate, 90-day mortality, and overall survival. In total, 643 patients were included, 344 (54%) patients underwent surgery within 49 days, and 299 (47%) after 50 days or longer. The groups were similar concerning baseline characteristics except for a higher clinical tumor stage (P = 0.009) in the prolonged time to surgery group. There were no significant differences in complete histological response, R0 resection rate, postoperative complications, 90-day mortality, or overall survival. Adjusted odds ratio for ypT0 in the prolonged time to surgery group was 0.99 (95% confidence interval: 0.64-1.53). Complete histological response in the primary tumor (ypT0) was associated with significantly higher overall survival: adjusted hazard ratio: 0.55 (95% CI 0.41-0.76). If lymph node metastases were present in these patients, the survival was, however, significantly lower: adjusted hazard ratio for ypT0N1: 2.30 (95% CI 1.21-4.35). In this prospectively collected, nationwide cohort study of esophageal and junctional type 1 and 2 cancer patients, there were no associations between time to surgery and histological complete response, postoperative outcomes, or overall survival. The results suggest that it is safe for patients to postpone surgery at least 7 to 10 weeks after completed chemoradiotherapy, but no evidence was seen in favor of recommending a prolonged time to surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. A definitive answer to this question requires a randomized controlled trial of standard vs. prolonged time to surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Klevebro
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, and Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden,Address correspondence to: Dr. Fredrik Klevebro, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, K42 14186 Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail:
| | - K Nilsson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, and Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Lindblad
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, and Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - S Ekman
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Johansson
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden
| | - L Lundell
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, and Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - N Ndegwa
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, and Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden,Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Hedberg
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - M Nilsson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, and Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jeremiasen M, Linder G, Hedberg J, Lundell L, Björ O, Lindblad M, Johansson J. Improvements in esophageal and gastric cancer care in Sweden-population-based results 2007-2016 from a national quality register. Dis Esophagus 2019; 33:5585604. [PMID: 31608927 PMCID: PMC7672200 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doz070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2019] [Revised: 05/23/2019] [Accepted: 06/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The Swedish National Register for Esophageal and Gastric cancer was launched in 2006 and contains data with adequate national coverage and of high internal validity on patients diagnosed with these tumors. The aim of this study was to describe the evolution of esophageal and gastric cancer care as reflected in a population-based clinical registry. The study population was 12,242 patients (6,926 with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers and 5,316 with gastric cancers) diagnosed between 2007 and 2016. Treatment strategies, short- and long-term mortality, gender aspects, and centralization were investigated. Neoadjuvant oncological treatment became increasingly prevalent during the study period. Resection rates for both esophageal/GEJ and gastric cancers decreased from 29.4% to 26.0% (P = 0.022) and from 38.8% to 33.3% (P = 0.002), respectively. A marked reduction in the number of hospitals performing esophageal and gastric cancer surgery was noted. In gastric cancer patients, an improvement in 30-day mortality from 4.2% to 1.6% (P = 0.005) was evident. Overall 5-year survival after esophageal resection was 38.9%, being higher among women compared to men (47.5 vs. 36.6%; P < 0.001), whereas no gender difference was seen in gastric cancer. During the recent decade, the analyses based on the Swedish National Register for Esophageal and Gastric cancer database demonstrated significant improvements in several important quality indicators of care for patients with esophagogastric cancers. The Swedish National Register for Esophageal and Gastric cancer offers an instrument not only for the control and endorsement of quality of care but also a unique tool for population-based clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Jeremiasen
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Surgery, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden,Address correspondence to: Martin Jeremiasen, MD, Department of Surgery, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden.
| | - G Linder
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - J Hedberg
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - L Lundell
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology Karolinska Institutet (CLINTEC), Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden,Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - O Björ
- Department of Radiation Science, Oncology, Umea University, Umea, Sweden
| | - M Lindblad
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology Karolinska Institutet (CLINTEC), Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Johansson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Surgery, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Konradsson M, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bruns C, Chaudry MA, Cheong E, Cuesta MA, Darling GE, Gisbertz SS, Griffin SM, Gutschow CA, van Hillegersberg R, Hofstetter W, Hölscher AH, Kitagawa Y, van Lanschot JJB, Lindblad M, Ferri LE, Low DE, Luyer MDP, Ndegwa N, Mercer S, Moorthy K, Morse CR, Nafteux P, Nieuwehuijzen GAP, Pattyn P, Rosman C, Ruurda JP, Räsänen J, Schneider PM, Schröder W, Sgromo B, Van Veer H, Wijnhoven BPL, Nilsson M. Diagnostic criteria and symptom grading for delayed gastric conduit emptying after esophagectomy for cancer: international expert consensus based on a modified Delphi process. Dis Esophagus 2019; 33:5585602. [PMID: 31608938 PMCID: PMC7150655 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doz074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Revised: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Delayed gastric conduit emptying (DGCE) after esophagectomy for cancer is associated with adverse outcomes and troubling symptoms. Widely accepted diagnostic criteria and a symptom grading tool for DGCE are missing. This hampers the interpretation and comparison of studies. A modified Delphi process, using repeated web-based questionnaires, combined with live interim group discussions was conducted by 33 experts within the field, from Europe, North America, and Asia. DGCE was divided into early DGCE if present within 14 days of surgery and late if present later than 14 days after surgery. The final criteria for early DGCE, accepted by 25 of 27 (93%) experts, were as follows: >500 mL diurnal nasogastric tube output measured on the morning of postoperative day 5 or later or >100% increased gastric tube width on frontal chest x-ray projection together with the presence of an air-fluid level. The final criteria for late DGCE accepted by 89% of the experts were as follows: the patient should have 'quite a bit' or 'very much' of at least two of the following symptoms; early satiety/fullness, vomiting, nausea, regurgitation or inability to meet caloric need by oral intake and delayed contrast passage on upper gastrointestinal water-soluble contrast radiogram or on timed barium swallow. A symptom grading tool for late DGCE was constructed grading each symptom as: 'not at all', 'a little', 'quite a bit', or 'very much', generating 0, 1, 2, or 3 points, respectively. For the five symptoms retained in the diagnostic criteria for late DGCE, the minimum score would be 0, and the maximum score would be 15. The final symptom grading tool for late DGCE was accepted by 27 of 31 (87%) experts. For the first time, diagnostic criteria for early and late DGCE and a symptom grading tool for late DGCE are available, based on an international expert consensus process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Konradsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden,Department of Gastroenterology, Landspitali National University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland,Address correspondence to: Magnus Konradsson, MD, Department of Clinical Science, Investigation and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, 14186 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - M I van Berge Henegouwen
- Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam
| | - C Bruns
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - M A Chaudry
- Department of Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - E Cheong
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - M A Cuesta
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - G E Darling
- Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - S S Gisbertz
- Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam
| | - S M Griffin
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - C A Gutschow
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - W Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - A H Hölscher
- Centre for Esophageal and Gastric Surgery, AGAPLESION Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Y Kitagawa
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - J J B van Lanschot
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Lindblad
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden,Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L E Ferri
- Department of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - D E Low
- Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - M D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - N Ndegwa
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - S Mercer
- Queen Alexandra Hospital Portsmouth, United Kingdom
| | - K Moorthy
- The Center for Visceral, Thoracic and Specialized Tumor Surgery, Hirslanden Medical Center, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - C R Morse
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - P Nafteux
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium,Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Aging, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - P Pattyn
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - C Rosman
- Department of surgery, Radboud university center Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J P Ruurda
- Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J Räsänen
- Department of General, Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital and Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland
| | - P M Schneider
- The Center for Visceral, Thoracic and Specialized Tumor Surgery, Hirslanden Medical Center, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - W Schröder
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - B Sgromo
- Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
| | - H Van Veer
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium,Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Aging, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - B P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Nilsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden,Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sunde B, Klevebro F, Johar A, Johnsen G, Jacobsen AB, Glenjen NI, Friesland S, Lindblad M, Ajengui A, Lundell L, Lagergren P, Nilsson M. Health-related quality of life in a randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy plus surgery in patients with oesophageal cancer (NeoRes trial). Br J Surg 2019; 106:1452-1463. [PMID: 31436322 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Revised: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 05/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are few data comparing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (nCT) compared with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with oesophageal cancer. METHODS In the NeoRes trial, patients were assigned randomly in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive either cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 and an infusion of 750 mg per m2 5-fluorouracil over 24 h on days 1-5 in three 21-day cycles (nCT) or the same chemotherapy regimen, but with the addition of 40 Gy radiotherapy (nCRT). HRQoL data were collected at baseline, after neoadjuvant therapy and at 1, 3 and 5 years after surgery. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire QLQ-C30 and disease-specific modules were used. RESULTS Of 181 patients randomized, 165 were included in the analysis of HRQoL. In a direct comparison between the allocated treatments, odynophagia after completion of neoadjuvant therapy but before surgery (P = 0·047) and troublesome coughing at 3 years' follow-up (P = 0·011) were more pronounced in the nCRT arm. In the longitudinal analyses within each treatment arm, a large deterioration in HRQoL was noted at 1 year. Some recovery was seen in both arms over time but, after 3 and 5 years, patients in the nCRT arm reported more symptoms compared with baseline than patients in the nCT arm. CONCLUSION HRQoL after multimodal treatment for cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction was impaired and more pronounced in patients who underwent nCRT, with only partial recovery over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Sunde
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - F Klevebro
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Johar
- Department of Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - G Johnsen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, St Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - A-B Jacobsen
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - N I Glenjen
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - S Friesland
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Lindblad
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Ajengui
- Division of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Lundell
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Lagergren
- Department of Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - M Nilsson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sunde B, Johnsen G, Jacobsen AB, Glenjen NI, Friesland S, Lindblad M, Rouvelas I, Wang N, Lundell L, Lagergren P, Nilsson M. Effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy vs chemotherapy alone on the relief of dysphagia in esophageal cancer patients: secondary endpoint analysis in a randomized trial. Dis Esophagus 2019; 32:5063601. [PMID: 30084992 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Dysphagia is the most significant symptom in patients with esophageal cancer. There are different therapeutic interventions designed to relieve dysphagia, but few studies have addressed the effects of neoadjuvant therapy. The aim of this study is to compare the effects on dysphagia of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and further to study the association between dysphagia response and histological response. Patient reported swallowing function was a secondary endpoint in the NeoRes trial, in which patients were randomized between neoadjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Patients completed dysphagia questionnaires before the start and after neoadjuvant therapy, using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) esophageal cancer modules QLQ-OES24/OG25. Chirieac tumor regression grade (TRG) was used to assess the histological response. Out of 181 patients were randomized, of whom 87% completed the dysphagia questionnaires before and 73% after neoadjuvant treatment. Patient characteristics were similar between the treatment arms. Among patients reporting dysphagia at baseline, neoadjuvant therapy improved dysphagia in both arms. The mean dysphagia score after neoadjuvant treatment was significantly lower after nCT compared to after nCRT (P = 0.022). The reported dysphagia did not differ between those with a complete histological response (TRG 1) and those without any response at all (TRG 4) (P = 0. 583).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Sunde
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases
| | - G Johnsen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim
| | - A-B Jacobsen
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo
| | - N I Glenjen
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - S Friesland
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Lindblad
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases
| | - I Rouvelas
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases
| | - N Wang
- Department of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Lundell
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases
| | - P Lagergren
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Nilsson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Claassen Y, Bastiaannet E, Hartgrink H, Dikken J, De Steur W, Slingerland M, Verhoeven R, Van Eycken E, De Schutter H, Lindblad M, Hedberg J, Johnson E, Hjortland G, Jensen L, Larsson H, Koessler T, Chevallay M, Allum W, Van de Velde C. International comparison of treatment strategy and survival in metastatic gastric cancer: a survey from the EURECCA Upper GI group. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.10.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
|
19
|
Affiliation(s)
- M Nilsson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Upper Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - I Rouvelas
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Upper Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - T Irino
- Department of Surgery, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - S Kamiya
- Division of Gastric Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - M Hayami
- Department of Upper Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Lindblad
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Upper Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Busweiler LAD, Jeremiasen M, Wijnhoven BPL, Lindblad M, Lundell L, van de Velde CJH, Tollenaar RAEM, Wouters MWJM, van Sandick JW, Johansson J, Dikken JL. International benchmarking in oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery. BJS Open 2018; 3:62-73. [PMID: 30734017 PMCID: PMC6354189 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2018] [Accepted: 08/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Benchmarking on an international level might lead to improved outcomes at a national level. The aim of this study was to compare treatment and surgical outcome data from the Swedish National Register for Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer (NREV) and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA). Methods All patients with primary oesophageal or gastric cancer who underwent a resection and were registered in NREV or DUCA between 2012 and 2014 were included. Differences in 30‐day mortality were analysed using case mix‐adjusted multivariable logistic regression. Results In total, 4439 patients underwent oesophagectomy (2509 patients) or gastrectomy (1930 patients). Estimated resection rates were comparable. Swedish patients were older but had less advanced disease and less co‐morbidity than Dutch patients. Neoadjuvant treatment rates were lower in Sweden than in the Netherlands, both for patients who underwent oesophagectomy (68·6 versus 90·0 per cent respectively; P < 0·001) and for those having gastrectomy (38·3 versus 56·6 per cent; P < 0·001). In Sweden, transthoracic oesophagectomy was performed in 94·7 per cent of patients, whereas in the Netherlands, a transhiatal approach was undertaken in 35·8 per cent. Higher annual procedural volumes per hospital were observed in the Netherlands. Adjusted 30‐day and/or in‐hospital mortality after gastrectomy was statistically significantly lower in Sweden than in the Netherlands (odds ratio 0·53, 95 per cent c.i. 0·29 to 0·95). Conclusion For oesophageal and gastric cancer, there are differences in patient, tumour and treatment characteristics between Sweden and the Netherlands. Postoperative mortality in patients with gastric cancer was lower in Sweden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L A D Busweiler
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing Leiden the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden the Netherlands
| | - M Jeremiasen
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital Lund Sweden.,Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University Lund Sweden
| | - B P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam the Netherlands
| | - M Lindblad
- Department of Surgery, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
| | - L Lundell
- Department of Surgery, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden the Netherlands
| | - R A E M Tollenaar
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing Leiden the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden the Netherlands
| | - M W J M Wouters
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing Leiden the Netherlands.,Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - J W van Sandick
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - J Johansson
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital Lund Sweden.,Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University Lund Sweden
| | - J L Dikken
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Claassen YHM, Bastiaannet E, Hartgrink HH, Dikken JL, de Steur WO, Slingerland M, Verhoeven RHA, van Eycken E, de Schutter H, Lindblad M, Hedberg J, Johnson E, Hjortland GO, Jensen LS, Larsson HJ, Koessler T, Chevallay M, Allum WH, van de Velde CJH. International comparison of treatment strategy and survival in metastatic gastric cancer. BJS Open 2018; 3:56-61. [PMID: 30734016 PMCID: PMC6354181 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the randomized Asian REGATTA trial, no survival benefit was shown for additional gastrectomy over chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced gastric cancer with a single incurable factor, thereby discouraging surgery for these patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate treatment strategies for patients with metastatic gastric cancer in daily practice in five European countries, along with relative survival in each country. Methods Nationwide population‐based data from Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden were combined. Patients with primary metastatic gastric cancer diagnosed between 2006 and 2014 were included. The proportion of gastric resections performed and the administration of chemotherapy (irrespective of surgery) within each country were determined. Relative survival according to country was calculated. Results Overall, 15 057 patients with gastric cancer were included. The proportion of gastric resections varied from 8·1 per cent in the Netherlands and Denmark to 18·3 per cent in Belgium. Administration of chemotherapy was 39·2 per cent in the Netherlands, compared with 63·2 per cent in Belgium. The 6‐month relative survival rate was between 39·0 (95 per cent c.i. 37·8 to 40·2) per cent in the Netherlands and 54·1 (52·1 to 56·9) per cent in Belgium. Conclusion There is variation in the use of gastrectomy and chemotherapy in patients with metastatic gastric cancer, and subsequent differences in survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y H M Claassen
- Department of Surgery Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden the Netherlands
| | - E Bastiaannet
- Department of Surgery Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden the Netherlands
| | - H H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden the Netherlands
| | - J L Dikken
- Department of Surgery Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden the Netherlands
| | - W O de Steur
- Department of Surgery Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden the Netherlands
| | - M Slingerland
- Department of Medical Oncology Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden the Netherlands
| | - R H A Verhoeven
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL) Utrecht the Netherlands
| | | | | | - M Lindblad
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden
| | - J Hedberg
- Department of Surgical Science Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden
| | - E Johnson
- Department of Gastroenterological and Paediatric Surgery Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.,Department of Oncology Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
| | - G O Hjortland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway
| | - L S Jensen
- Department of Surgery Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
| | - H J Larsson
- The Danish National Registries, National Quality Improvement Programme (RKKP) Aarhus Denmark
| | - T Koessler
- Department of Medical Oncology Geneva University Hospital Geneva Switzerland
| | - M Chevallay
- Department of Surgery Geneva University Hospital Geneva Switzerland
| | - W H Allum
- Department of Surgery Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgery Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Klevebro F, Lindblad M, Johansson J, Lundell L, Nilsson M. Outcome of neoadjuvant therapies for cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction based on a national data registry. Br J Surg 2016; 103:1864-1873. [PMID: 27689845 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2016] [Revised: 04/24/2016] [Accepted: 07/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized trials have shown that neoadjuvant treatment improves survival in the curative treatment of oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. Results from population-based observational studies are, however, sparse and ambiguous. METHODS This prospective population-based cohort study included all patients who had oesophagectomy for cancer in Sweden, excluding clinical T1 N0, recorded in the National Register for Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer, 2006-2014. Patients were stratified into three groups: surgery alone, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS Neoadjuvant treatment was given to 521 patients (51·1 per cent) and 499 (48·9 per cent) received surgery alone. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased the risk of postoperative surgical complications compared with surgery alone (adjusted odds ratio 2·01, 95 per cent c.i. 1·24 to 3·25; P = 0·005). Postoperative mortality was significantly increased after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared with surgery alone (odds ratio 2·37, 1·06 to 5·29; P = 0·035). Survival improved in patients with squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, whereas after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy survival was significantly improved only in the subgroup with the highest performance status and without known co-morbidity. In adenocarcinoma there was a trend towards improved overall survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy did not offer a survival benefit. Stratified analysis including only patients with adenocarcinoma in the highest performance category without known co-morbidity showed a strong trend towards improved survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery alone (adjusted hazard ratio 0·47, 0·21 to 1·04; P = 0·061). CONCLUSION For patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction, neoadjuvant treatments seemed to increase long-term survival, but also the risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality, compared with surgery alone. Neither neoadjuvant treatment option seemed to improve survival significantly among patients with adenocarcinoma, compared with surgery alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Klevebro
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, and Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Lindblad
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, and Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Johansson
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - L Lundell
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, and Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Nilsson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, and Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sunde B, Ericson J, Kumagai K, Lundell L, Tsai JA, Lindblad M, Rouvelas I, Friesland S, Wang N, Nilsson M. Relief of dysphagia during neoadjuvant treatment for cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Dis Esophagus 2016; 29:442-7. [PMID: 25809837 DOI: 10.1111/dote.12352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Dysphagia is the main symptom of cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction and causing nutritional problems and weight loss, often counteracted by insertion of self-expandable metal stents or nutrition via an enteral route. Clinical observations indicate that neoadjuvant therapy may effectively and promptly alleviate dysphagia, making such nutrition supportive interventions redundant before surgical resection. The objective of the current study was to carefully study the effects of induction neoadjuvant therapy on dysphagia and its subsequent course and thereby investigate the actual need for alimentary gateways for nutritional support. Thirty-five consecutive patients scheduled for neoadjuvant therapy were recruited and assessed regarding dysphagia and appetite at baseline, after the first cycle of preoperative treatment with either chemotherapy alone or with chemoradiotherapy and before surgery. Platinum-based therapy in combination with 5-fluorouracil was administered intravenously days 1-5 every 3 weeks and consisted of three treatments. Patients receiving combined chemoradiotherapy started radiotherapy on day one of second chemotherapy cycle. They received fractions of 2 Gy/day each up to a total dose of 40 Gy. Watson and Ogilvie dysphagia scores were used to assess dysphagia, while appetite was assessed by the Edmonton Assessment System Visual analogue scale-appetite questionnaire. Patients were evaluated at regular outpatient clinic visits or by telephone. The histological tumor response in the surgical specimen was assessed using the Chirieac scale. Ten patients scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 25 patients scheduled for chemoradiotherapy were included in the analysis. There was a significant improvement in dysphagia in both treatment groups, according to both scales, already from baseline to the completion of the first chemotherapy cycle which remained to the end of the neoadjuvant treatment (P < 0.001). Appetite also improved after the first chemotherapy cycle (P = 0.03). Body weight did not change during any type of neoadjuvant therapy. We were unable to demonstrate any association between relief of dysphagia and the degree of histological response to neoadjuvant therapy in the surgical specimen. The present study shows that a platin - 5FU-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with or without concomitant radiotherapy, effectively and promptly relieves dysphagia in patients presenting with cancers of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction already after the first cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Sunde
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Technology and Intervention (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Ericson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Technology and Intervention (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - K Kumagai
- Department of Surgery, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Lundell
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Technology and Intervention (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J A Tsai
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Technology and Intervention (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Lindblad
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Technology and Intervention (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - I Rouvelas
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Technology and Intervention (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - S Friesland
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - N Wang
- Department of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Nilsson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Technology and Intervention (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ericson J, Sunde B, Nilsson M, Lindblad M, Irino T, Rouvelas I. SUN-PP129: Weight Development after Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy with Side-to-Side Anastomosis for Cancer. Clin Nutr 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0261-5614(15)30280-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
25
|
Klevebro F, Johnsen G, Johnson E, Viste A, Myrnäs T, Szabo E, Jacobsen AB, Friesland S, Tsai JA, Persson S, Lindblad M, Lundell L, Nilsson M. Morbidity and mortality after surgery for cancer of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction: A randomized clinical trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs. neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015; 41:920-6. [PMID: 25908010 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.03.226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2014] [Revised: 02/08/2015] [Accepted: 03/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the incidence and severity of postoperative complications after oesophagectomy for carcinoma of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) after randomized accrual to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant therapy improves long-term survival after oesophagectomy. To date, evidence is insufficient to determine whether combined nCT, or nCRT alone, is the most beneficial. METHODS Patients with carcinoma of the oesophagus or GOJ, resectable with a curative intention, were enrolled in this multicenter trial conducted at seven centres in Sweden and Norway. Study participants were randomized to nCT or nCRT followed by surgery with two-field lymphadenectomy. Three cycles of cisplatin/5-fluorouracil was administered in all patients, while 40 Gy of concomitant radiotherapy was administered in the nCRT group. RESULTS Of the randomized 181 patients, 91 were assigned to nCT and 90 to nCRT. One-hundred-and-fifty-five patients, 78 nCT and 77 nCRT, underwent resection. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the incidence of surgical or nonsurgical complications (P-value = 0.69 and 0.13, respectively). There was no 30-day mortality, while the 90-day mortality was 3% (2/78) in the nCT group and 6% (5/77) in the nCRT group (P = 0.24). The median Clavien-Dindo complication severity grade was significantly higher in the nCRT group (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between patients randomized to nCT and nCRT. However, complications were significantly more severe after nCRT. REGISTRATION TRIAL DATABASE The trial was registered in the Clinical Trials Database (registration number NCT01362127).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Klevebro
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - G Johnsen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Norway
| | - E Johnson
- Department of Paediatric and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ullevål University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - A Viste
- Department of Acute and Gastrointestinal Surgery Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway
| | - T Myrnäs
- Department of Surgery, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden
| | - E Szabo
- Department of Surgery, Örebro University Hospital, Sweden
| | - A-B Jacobsen
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | - S Friesland
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J A Tsai
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - S Persson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Lindblad
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Lundell
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Nilsson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kumagai K, Rouvelas I, Tsai JA, Mariosa D, Klevebro F, Lindblad M, Ye W, Lundell L, Nilsson M. Meta-analysis of postoperative morbidity and perioperative mortality in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junctional cancers. Br J Surg 2014; 101:321-38. [PMID: 24493117 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 157] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/06/2013] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The long-term survival benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and chemoradiotherapy (NACR) for oesophageal carcinoma are well established. Both are burdened, however, by toxicity that could contribute to perioperative morbidity and mortality. METHODS MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and Embase were searched to capture the incidence of any postoperative complications, cardiac complications, respiratory complications, anastomotic leakage, postoperative 30-day mortality, total postoperative mortality and treatment-related mortality in randomized clinical trials comparing NAC or NACR with surgery alone, or NAC versus NACR. Meta-analyses comparing NAC and NACR were conducted by using adjusted indirect comparison. RESULTS Twenty-three relevant studies were identified. Comparing NAC or NACR with surgery alone, there was no increase in morbidity or mortality attributable to neoadjuvant therapy. Subgroup analysis of NACR for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) suggested an increased risk of total postoperative mortality and treatment-related mortality compared with surgery alone: risk ratio 1·95 (95 per cent confidence interval 1·06 to 3·60; P = 0·032) and 1·97 (1·07 to 3·64; P = 0·030) respectively. A combination of direct comparison and adjusted indirect comparison showed no difference between NACR and NAC regarding morbidity or mortality. CONCLUSION Neither NAC nor NACR for oesophageal carcinoma increases the risk of postoperative morbidity or perioperative mortality compared with surgery alone. There was no clear difference between NAC and NACR. Care should be taken with NACR in oesophageal SCC, where an increased risk of postoperative mortality and treatment-related mortality was apparent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Kumagai
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lindblad M. Local Growth Disturbances in Tuberculous Disease of the Knee-Joint in Children. Acta Radiol 2013. [DOI: 10.1177/028418513601700403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
28
|
Lindblad M, Berking C. A meat control system achieving significant reduction of visible faecal and ingesta contamination of cattle, lamb and swine carcasses at Swedish slaughterhouses. Food Control 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.07.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
29
|
Van Der Fels-Klerx H, Klemsdal S, Hietaniemi V, Lindblad M, Ioannou-Kakouri E, Van Asselt E. Mycotoxin contamination of cereal grain commodities in relation to climate in North West Europe. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess 2012; 29:1581-92. [DOI: 10.1080/19440049.2012.689996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
30
|
Lindblad M, Börjesson T, Hietaniemi V, Elen O. Statistical analysis of agronomical factors and weather conditions influencing deoxynivalenol levels in oats in Scandinavia. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess 2012; 29:1566-71. [DOI: 10.1080/19440049.2011.647335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
31
|
Shore R, Ljung R, Mattsson F, Lagergren J, Lindblad M. 6565 POSTER Androgens in the Etiology of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma – a Population-based Cohort Study on Prostate Cancer Patients in Sweden 1961 to 2008. Eur J Cancer 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(11)71876-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
32
|
Abstract
AIMS To model the effect of water activity (a(w)) and concentration of undissociated lactic acid (HLac) on the time to growth (TTG) and the growth/no growth boundary of acid-adapted generic Escherichia coli, used as model organisms for Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC). METHODS AND RESULTS For each of two E. coli strains, the TTG in brain heart infusion broth at 27 degrees C was estimated at 30 combinations of a(w) (range 0.945-0.995) and concentration of HLac (range 0-6.9 mol m(-3)) by using an automated turbidity reader. Survival analysis was used to develop a model predicting the TTG and the growth/no growth boundary. CONCLUSIONS The present model can be used to predict the TTG and to indicate the growth/no growth boundary of acid-adapted E. coli strains as a function of a(w) and concentration of HLac. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY Fermented food products have been implicated as sources of STEC in several outbreaks. The study results are relevant for modelling of growth of STEC in fermented food and can be used in microbiological risk assessments or in the design and validation of food-production processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lindblad
- National Food Administration, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
|
34
|
Rutegård M, Lagergren J, Rouvelas I, Lindblad M, Blazeby JM, Lagergren P. Population-based study of surgical factors in relation to health-related quality of life after oesophageal cancer resection. Br J Surg 2008; 95:592-601. [PMID: 18300270 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oesophagectomy for cancer has a negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQL), but factors influencing postoperative HRQL have been sparsely studied. This study explored how selected surgical factors affected HRQL 6 months after operation. METHODS This population-based study was based on a Swedish network of physicians with almost complete nationwide coverage and data on oesophageal cancer surgery collected prospectively between 2001 and 2005. Patients completed validated HRQL questionnaires 6 months after operation. Mean scores with 95 per cent confidence intervals were calculated and clinically relevant differences between groups were analysed in a linear regression model, adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS Some 355 patients were included in the analysis (participation rate 79.6 per cent). Extensive surgery, as indicated by a transthoracic approach, more extensive lymphadenectomy, wider resection margins and a longer duration of operation, was not associated with worse HRQL measures than less extensive operations. Dysphagia was similar in patients who had handsewn and stapled anastomoses. Technical surgical complications had significant deleterious effects on several aspects of HRQL. CONCLUSION This study provides no evidence to suggest that less extensive surgery for oesophageal cancer should be recommended from the perspective of HRQL. It is essential, however, that attention be paid to minimizing technical surgical complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rutegård
- Unit of Esophageal and Gastric Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
The relationship between aflatoxin B1 and G1 was examined in samples from 199 aflatoxin contaminated lots of inshell Brazil nuts imported to Europe. In most of the samples, the relationship between B1 and G1 were approximately 50/50 indicating that the major responsible aflatoxin producing fungi cannot be Aspergillus flavus, which produces solely B aflatoxins. Fungal strains were isolated from two batches of Brazil nuts and isolates of both A. nomius and A. flavus could be identified. The A. nomius isolates were good producers of both B and G aflatoxins, while the A. flavus strains only produced B aflatoxins. In conclusion, this study suggests that A. nomius is an important producer of aflatoxins in Brazil nuts and that its occurrence, and possibly other B and G aflatoxin producers, should be further examined since this may influence strategies for prevention and control of aflatoxins in Brazil nuts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Olsen
- Microbiology Division, National Food Administration, P.O. Box 622, SE-756 46 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - P. Johnsson
- Microbiology Division, National Food Administration, P.O. Box 622, SE-756 46 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - T. Möller
- Chemistry Division 2, National Food Administration, P.O. Box 622, 756 46 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - R. Paladino
- Besana V. spa – Gruppo Besana/Uno MOC spa, Via Ferrovia 210, 80040 S. Gennaro Vesuviano, Italy
| | - M. Lindblad
- Microbiology Division, National Food Administration, P.O. Box 622, SE-756 46 Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Johnsson P, Lindblad M, Thim A, Jonsson N, Vargas E, Medeiros N, Brabet C, Quaresma de Araújo M, Olsen M. Growth of aflatoxigenic moulds and aflatoxin formation in Brazil nuts. WORLD MYCOTOXIN J 2008. [DOI: 10.3920/wmj2008.1033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The present study aimed at gaining more knowledge of the growth of aflatoxigenic moulds and aflatoxin production in Brazil nuts in relation to humidity conditions and storage time. For this purpose, the growth of aflatoxigenic moulds and the increase in aflatoxin levels in Brazil nuts was studied in the laboratory at temperature and humidity conditions that are relevant for the Amazon region. Fresh unprocessed Brazil nuts in shell were inoculated with an aflatoxin producing strain of Aspergillus nomius previously isolated from Brazil nuts. The nuts were stored at 27 °C in combination with 97, 90 or 80% surrounding relative humidity in a respirometer for up to 3 months. The General Linear Model (GLM) was used for evaluation of the effect of water activity and time on aflatoxigenic mould levels and on aflatoxin levels, as well as the relationship between mould and aflatoxin levels. During storage at the highest relative humidity (97%) aflatoxin formation occurred rapidly, whereas storage at 90% relative humidity resulted in slower aflatoxin formation. At the lowest relative humidity (80%), aflatoxin formation occurred sporadically during storage. The increase in mould and aflatoxin levels along the production chain is also described, using field data collected in the state of Para, Brazil. The growth of aflatoxigenic moulds and aflatoxin formation increased rapidly between 40-90 days following collection of the nuts, before the nuts reached the final drying stage at the processing plant. In addition, a logistic regression model predicting the probability that the European legislative limit of 4 µg/kg for aflatoxins in nuts will be exceeded in relation to colony counts of either one selected aflatoxigenic mould strain (laboratory experiments) or of a mixture of aflatoxigenic strains (field data) was developed. The probability that total aflatoxin levels will exceed the European legislative limit of 4 µg/kg increased rapidly from approx. 30% to above 80% for both experimental and field samples at mould levels between 2 and 3 log cfu/g.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. Johnsson
- National Food Administration, P.O. Box 622, 751 26 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - M. Lindblad
- National Food Administration, P.O. Box 622, 751 26 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - A. Thim
- National Food Administration, P.O. Box 622, 751 26 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - N. Jonsson
- Swedish Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, P.O. Box 7033, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - E. Vargas
- Lacqsa/Lanagro-MG, Avenida Raja Gabaglia 245, Cidade Jardim, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, CEP: 30350-480, Brazil
| | - N. Medeiros
- Laboratório Nacional Agropecuário no Estado do Pará (Lanagro-PA), Av. Almirante Barroso 1234, Bairro Marco, Belém, CEP: 66093-020, Brazil
| | - C. Brabet
- Centre de coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (CIRAD), rue JF Breton 73, 34398 Montpellier, Cedex 5, France
| | - M. Quaresma de Araújo
- Laboratório Nacional Agropecuário no Estado do Pará (Lanagro-PA), Av. Almirante Barroso 1234, Bairro Marco, Belém, CEP: 66093-020, Brazil
| | - M. Olsen
- National Food Administration, P.O. Box 622, 751 26 Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oesophageal cancer resection carries a risk of nutritional disorders. The aim of this study was to estimate weight change after surgery in a population-based setting and to identify nutritional problems that might correlate with weight loss. METHODS Data were collected through the Swedish Esophageal and Cardia Cancer Register, a nationwide registry of oesophageal cancer surgery. Patients who underwent oesophageal cancer surgery between 2001 and 2004 were followed up until April 2005, and data on patient and tumour characteristics and surgical treatment were collected. Six months after surgery the patients were asked to complete a questionnaire about weight and a health-related quality of life questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) with an oesophageal-specific module (EORTC QLQ-OES18)). RESULTS The response rate to the questionnaire was 76.9 per cent and weight change in 226 patients was analysed. Six months after operation 63.7 per cent had lost more than 10 per cent of their preoperative BMI, and 20.4 per cent had lost more than 20 per cent. Appetite loss, eating difficulties and odynophagia were significantly linked to postoperative weight loss, whereas dysphagia or reflux did not correlate with malnutrition. CONCLUSION Malnutrition is a considerable problem after oesophagectomy, and is linked to appetite loss, eating difficulties and odynophagia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Martin
- Unit of Esophageal and Gastric Research (ESOGAR), Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lindblad M. Microbiological sampling of swine carcasses: A comparison of data obtained by swabbing with medical gauze and data collected routinely by excision at Swedish abattoirs. Int J Food Microbiol 2007; 118:180-5. [PMID: 17706823 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2007] [Revised: 06/28/2007] [Accepted: 07/10/2007] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Swab sample data from a 13-month microbiological baseline study of swine carcasses at Swedish abattoirs were combined with excision sample data collected routinely at five abattoirs. The aim was to compare the numbers of total aerobic counts, Enterobacteriaceae, and Escherichia coli, recovered by swabbing four carcass sites with gauze (total area 400 cm2) with those obtained by excision at equivalent sites (total area 20 cm2). The results are considered in relation to the process hygiene criteria that are stated in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005. These criteria apply only to destructive sampling of total aerobic counts and Enterobacteriaceae, but alternative sampling schemes, as well as alternative indicator organisms such as E. coli, are allowed if equivalent guarantees of food safety can be provided. Swab sampling resulted in higher mean log numbers of total aerobic counts at four of the five abattoirs, compared with excision, and lower or equal standard deviations at all abattoirs. The percentage of swab and excision samples positive for Enterobacteriaceae at the different abattoirs ranged from 68 to 100% and 15 to 24%, respectively. Similarly, the percentages of swab samples that were positive for E. coli were higher than the percentages of positive excision samples (range 52 to 84% and 3 to 14%, respectively). Due to the low percentage of positive excision results, the mean log numbers of Enterobacteriaceae and E. coli were only compared at two and one abattoirs, respectively, using log probability regression to substitute censored observations. Higher mean log numbers of Enterobacteriaceae were recovered by swabbing compared with excision at one abattoir, whereas the numbers of Enterobacteriaceae and E. coli did not differ significantly between sampling methods at one abattoir. This study suggests that the same process hygiene criteria as those stipulated for excision can be used for swabbing with gauze without compromising food safety. For monitoring of low numbers of Enterobacteriaceae and E. coli, like those found on swine carcasses at Swedish abattoirs, the results also show that swabbing of a relatively large area is superior to excision of a smaller area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lindblad
- National Food Administration, P.O. Box 622, SE-751 26 Uppsala, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Martin L, Lagergren J, Jia C, Lindblad M, Rouvelas I, Viklund P. The influence of needle catheter jejunostomy on weight development after oesophageal cancer surgery in a population-based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007; 33:713-7. [PMID: 17321099 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2006] [Accepted: 01/09/2007] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS We aimed to assess whether needle catheter jejunostomy (NCJ) influences the weight development or discharge from hospital after oesophageal cancer surgery in an unselected and prospectively collected series of patients. METHODS Data regarding patients who underwent oesophageal cancer surgery between April 2001 and October 2004 and were followed up until April 2005 were collected from the Swedish Esophageal and Cardia Cancer Register. Details of patient characteristics, including preoperative body weight and length, tumour characteristics, surgical procedures, including NCJ insertion, complications and ward time were obtained. Six months postoperatively the patients responded to a questionnaire that gave information about postoperative weight development. Relative risks were estimated as odds ratios (ORs) calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using multinomial logistic regression, adjusted for patient and tumour characteristics, type of treatment, type of hospital and occurrence of complications. RESULTS A total of 233 patients participated, among whom 48% received NCJ. Patients with NCJ had a 42% statistically non-significantly decreased risk of weight loss compared to those without NCJ after adjustment for covariates (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.25-1.39). Patients with NCJ had a non-statistically significantly longer hospital stay than patients without NCJ, but were seemingly less often discharged to other care homes than their own home compare to the group without NCJ (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.28-1.38). CONCLUSION Use of needle catheter jejunostomy might counteract weight loss and facilitate discharge to home after oesophageal cancer resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Martin
- Unit of Esophageal and Gastric Research (ESOGAR), Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
This 13-month survey was conducted to estimate the prevalence and counts of foodborne pathogenic bacteria and indicator bacteria on swine carcasses in Sweden. A total of 541 swine carcasses were sampled by swabbing prechill at the 10 largest slaughterhouses in Sweden. Pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica was detected by PCR in 16% of the samples. The probability of finding Y. enterocolitica increased with increasing counts of Escherichia coli. No samples were positive for Salmonella. The prevalences of Campylobacter, Listeria monocytogenes, and verocytotoxin-producing E. coli were low (1, 2, and 1%, respectively). None of the verocytotoxin-positive enrichments, as determined by a reverse passive latex agglutination assay, tested positive for the virulence genes eaeA or hlyA by PCR. Coagulase-positive staphylococci, E. coli, and Enterobacteriaceae were recovered from 30, 57, and 87% of the samples, respectively, usually at low levels (95th percentiles, 0.79, 1.09, and 1.30 log CFU/cm2, respectively). The mean log level of Enterobacteriaceae was 0.35 log CFU/cm2 higher than that of E. coli on carcasses positive for both bacteria. The mean log level of aerobic microorganisms was 3.48 log CFU/cm2, and the 95th percentile was 4.51 log CFU/cm2. These data may be useful for risk assessment purposes and can serve as a basis for risk management actions, such as the use of E. coli as an alternative indicator organism for process hygiene control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lindblad
- National Food Administration, P.O. Box 622, SE-751 26 Uppsala, Sweden.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Rouvelas I, Jia C, Viklund P, Lindblad M, Lagergren J. Surgeon volume and postoperative mortality after oesophagectomy for cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007; 33:162-8. [PMID: 17125959 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2006] [Accepted: 10/16/2006] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Oesophagectomy remains the curative treatment of choice for patients with localised oesophageal or cardia cancer, but severe postoperative complications are common. Our aim was to assess the association between surgeon volume and postoperative mortality after oesophagectomy. METHODS Prospective, population-based study of Swedish residents diagnosed with oesophageal or cardia cancer, treated with oesophagectomy during the period April 2001 through December 2005. Details concerning patients, tumours, and surgery were collected from the Swedish Oesophageal and Cardia Cancer register. All 607 patients registered during the study period were included in the study. Risk of mortality 30 and 90 days after oesophagectomy was assessed using multivariable logistic regression, expressed in odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for relevant covariates. RESULTS The 30-day mortality in low-, medium-, and high-volume surgeon groups were 7.1%, 2.1%, and 2.6%, respectively. The corresponding 90-day figures were 11.4%, 4.8%, and 8.9%. Adjusted ORs for 30- and 90-day mortality were decreased non-significantly by 58% and 14%, respectively, among patients in the high-volume group, compared to the low-volume group (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.10-1.80; OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.31-2.38). The mortality rates differed considerably between individual high-volume surgeons, but without any trend of further decreased risk with increasing volume among these surgeons (p values for trend 0.84 and 0.80 for 30- and 90-day mortality, respectively). CONCLUSION Patients with resectable oesophageal cancer should be advised to choose a high-volume surgeon, but they should also be aware that differences among individual surgeons might further affect survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Rouvelas
- Unit of Oesophageal and Gastric Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
This 1-year study was conducted to estimate the prevalence and concentrations of pathogenic and indicator bacteria on Swedish broiler chickens. A total of 636 chilled carcasses were collected from 10 slaughterhouses and sent to the National Food Administration for analyses of carcass rinses. No carcasses were positive for Salmonella. Campylobacter, predominantly Campylobacter jejuni, were detected on 15% (by enrichment) or 14% (by direct plating) of the carcasses. With one exception, all samples from late December through April were Campylobacter negative. The 10th and 90th percentiles of Campylobacter numbers per carcasses were 3.0 and 5.0 log CFU, respectively, and the maximum was 7.1 log CFU. Coagulase-positive staphylococci were detected on 68% of the carcasses, with a maximum of 3.5 log CFU/cm2. The 10th and 90th percentiles were 3.4 and 4.4 log CFU/cm2 for total aerobic microorganisms, 1.8 and 3.3 log CFU/cm2 for Enterobacteriaceae, and 2.0 and 3.6 log CFU/cm2 for Escherichia coli. No correlation was found between numbers of any indicator bacteria and numbers of pathogenic bacteria. Subsets of the samples were analyzed for Listeria monocytogenes, Clostridium perfringens, pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica, and Enterococcus, resulting in prevalence estimates of 29, 18, 9 (as determined by a PCR assay), and 97%, respectively. L. monocytogenes was most common at slaughterhouses with a low prevalence of coagulase-positive staphylococci, and vice versa. These results will improve the ability of researchers to assess the importance of chicken as a source of foodborne pathogens and can serve as a basis for risk management actions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lindblad
- National Food Administration, P.O. Box 622, SE-751 26 Uppsala, Sweden.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric acid suppressing drugs (that is, histamine(2) receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors) could affect the risk of oesophageal or gastric adenocarcinoma but few studies are available. AIMS To study the association between long term treatment with acid suppressing drugs and the risk of oesophageal or gastric adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS Persons registered in the general practitioners research database in the UK and aged 40-84 years during the period 1994-2001. METHODS Population based nested case control study. Multivariable unconditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS In 4 340 207 person years of follow up, 287 patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma, 195 with gastric cardia adenocarcinoma, and 327 with gastric non-cardia adenocarcinoma were identified, and 10 000 control persons were randomly sampled. "Oesophageal" indication for long term acid suppression (that is, reflux symptoms, oesophagitis, Barrett's oesophagus, or hiatal hernia) rendered a fivefold increased risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (odds ratio (OR) 5.42 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.13-9.39)) while no association was observed among users with a group of other indications, including peptic ulcer and "gastroduodenal symptoms" (that is, gastritis, dyspepsia, indigestion, and epigastric pain) (OR 1.74 (95% CI 0.90-3.34)). "Peptic ulcer" indication (that is, gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, or unspecified peptic ulcer) was associated with a greater than fourfold increased risk of gastric non-cardia adenocarcinoma among long term users (OR 4.66 (95% CI 2.42-8.97)) but no such association was found in those treated for a group of other indications (that is, "oesophageal" or "gastroduodenal symptoms") (OR 1.18 (95% CI 0.60-2.32)). CONCLUSIONS Long term pharmacological gastric acid suppression is a marker of increased risk of oesophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma. However, these associations are most likely explained by the underlying treatment indication being a risk factor for the cancer rather than an independent harmful effect of these agents per se.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L A García Rodríguez
- Department of Surgery, P9: 03, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Chandanos E, Lindblad M, Jia C, Rubio CA, Ye W, Lagergren J. Tamoxifen exposure and risk of oesophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma: a population-based cohort study of breast cancer patients in Sweden. Br J Cancer 2006; 95:118-22. [PMID: 16755290 PMCID: PMC2360495 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
In a population-based cohort study of all women aged over 50 years with breast cancer in the Swedish Cancer Register in 1961–2003, those diagnosed before 31 December 1987 were regarded as unexposed to tamoxifen, whereas those diagnosed after that date were considered potentially exposed. Crosslinkages within the Cancer Register and the Registers of Death and Emigration enabled follow-up. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) of oesophageal and gastric cancer represented relative risks. Among 138 885 cohort members contributing with 1 075 724 person-years of follow-up, we found a nonsignificantly increased risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma during the potential tamoxifen exposure period (SIR 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83–3.08), but the risk estimates decreased with increasing latency interval. No association was observed during the unexposed period. No increased risk of cardia adenocarcinoma was identified in either period. The risk of non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma was increased in the potential tamoxifen period (SIR 1.27, 1.03–1.57), and almost doubled (SIR 1.86, 95% CI 1.10–3.14) in the period of longest latency (10–14 years). The corresponding overall SIR was increased in the unexposed group also, but here SIR did not increase with longer latency intervals. An increased risk of tobacco-related tumours, that is, oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma and lung cancer, was limited to the unexposed cohort, indicating that confounding by smoking might explain the increased SIR during the unexposed period. We concluded that there might be a link between tamoxifen and risk of non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Chandanos
- Unit of Esophageal and Gastric Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lindblad M, Hansson I, Vågsholm I, Lindqvist R. Postchill campylobacter prevalence on broiler carcasses in relation to slaughter group colonization level and chilling system. J Food Prot 2006; 69:495-9. [PMID: 16541677 DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-69.3.495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Data from an ongoing national surveillance program of Campylobacter prevalence in broiler slaughter groups were related to results from a 1-year baseline study of broiler carcasses postchill. The goals were to establish the relation between Campylobacter prevalence in slaughter groups and on carcasses and to determine the effect of various chilling systems on Campylobacter prevalence. Pooled cloacal and neck skin samples from the surveillance program were analyzed after enrichment. Carcass rinse samples from the baseline study were analyzed after enrichment and by direct plating. Data from both studies were available for 614 carcasses. Direct-plating analyses indicated that the percentages of carcasses positive for Campylobacter jejuni and other Campylobacter spp. in slaughter groups with negative cloacal samples were 2 and 10%, respectively, whereas enrichment analyses indicated prevalences of 2% in both cases. Campylobacter prevalence in slaughter groups with a high degree of intestinal colonization (more than half of the pooled cloacal samples positive) was significantly higher than in slaughter groups with a low degree of colonization (76 to 85% and 30 to 50%, respectively, depending on Campylobacter spp. and analytical method). The prevalence of Campylobacter-positive carcasses postchill was at the same level as the prevalence of carcasses that originated from slaughter groups with positive neck skin samples at four of the six slaughterhouses. Only at one slaughterhouse, with an air-chilling system, was the postchill prevalence (13%) lower than that expected from slaughter group data (23%). The postchill prevalence (43%) was higher than that expected from slaughter group data (33%) at one slaughterhouse with immersion chilling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lindblad
- National Food Administration, Microbiology Division, P.O. Box 622, SE-751 26 Uppsala, Sweden.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
Oesophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma share an unexplained male predominance, which would be explained by the hypothesis that oestrogens are protective in this respect. We carried out a nested case–control study of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) among 299 women with oesophageal cancer, 313 with gastric cancer, and 3191 randomly selected control women, frequency matched by age and calendar year in the General Practitioners Research Database in the United Kingdom. Data were adjusted for age, calendar year, tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption, body mass index, hysterectomy, and upper gastrointestinal disorders. Among 1 619 563 person-years of follow-up, more than 50% reduced risk of gastric adenocarcinoma was found among users of HRT compared to nonusers (odds ratio (OR), 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29–0.79). This inverse association appeared to be stronger for gastric noncardia (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14–0.78) and weaker for gastric cardia tumours (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.23–2.01). There was no association between HRT and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.41–3.32).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lindblad
- Unit of Oesophageal and Gastric Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
The objectives of the study were to investigate the extent to which consumers can separate nuts with a high content of aflatoxin from sound nuts, and whether sorting results can be improved by information or whether they are affected by certain factors. A test panel consisting of 100 subjects was asked to crack 300 g Brazil nuts and to sort the nuts into those they considered edible and inedible. The test showed that consumers can, on current behaviour, discriminate aflatoxin-contaminated Brazil nuts to a significant extent. The median and the 95th percentile of the total concentrations of aflatoxins (B1, B2, G1, G2) in the samples before sorting were 1.4 and 557 microg kg(-1), respectively, and in the edible fractions after sorting 0.4 and 56 microg kg(-1), respectively. Given that levels of aflatoxins before sorting exceed either 2 microg aflatoxin B1 kg(-1) or totally 4 microg aflatoxins kg(-1), there was no effect of aflatoxin concentrations before sorting on the probability of exceeding these thresholds in the edible fraction. This means that similar sorting results were obtained for samples with aflatoxin levels exceeding either of the two thresholds, irrespective of if the thresholds were exceeded with a few microg kg(-1) or up to more than 1000 microg kg(-1). None of the tested factors (such as sex, age, level of education, ethnic background or knowledge of mycotoxins) had any effects on the probability of exceeding either of the two aflatoxin thresholds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Marklinder
- Department of Domestic Sciences, Uppsala University, Dag Hammarskjölds väg 21, SE-752 37 Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lindblad M, Johnsson P, Jonsson N, Lindqvist R, Olsen M. Predicting noncompliant levels of ochratoxin A in cereal grain from Penicillium verrucosum counts. J Appl Microbiol 2005; 97:609-16. [PMID: 15281942 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02332.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To model the probability of exceeding the European legislative limit of 5 microg ochratoxin A (OTA) per kilogram grain in relation to Penicillium verrucosum levels and storage conditions, and to evaluate the possibilities of using P. verrucosum colony counts for predicting noncompliant OTA levels. METHODS AND RESULTS Cereal samples were inoculated with P. verrucosum spores and stored for up to 9 months at temperatures and water activities ranging from 10-25 degrees C and aw 0.77-0.95. A logistic regression analysis showed that the probability of exceeding 5 microg OTA kg(-1) grain was related to colony counts of P. verrucosum and water activity. The sensitivity and specificity of various P. verrucosum count thresholds for predicting noncompliant OTA levels were estimated, using data from the storage trial and natural cereal samples. CONCLUSION The risk of exceeding 5 microg OTA kg(-1) grain increased with increasing levels of P. verrucosum, and with increasing water activities. A threshold of 1000 CFU P. verrucosum per gram grain is suggested to predict whether or not the legislative limit is exceeded. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY This study has provided a tool to evaluate the levels of P. verrucosum in grain in relation to OTA levels. Hence, mycological analyses can be used to identify cereal samples with high risk of containing OTA levels above the legislative limit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lindblad
- National Food Administration, Microbiology Division, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
The lack of data on consumer refrigeration temperatures and storage times limits our ability to assess and manage risks associated with microbial hazards. This study addressed these limitations by collecting data on temperatures and storage handling practices of chilled foods. Consumers from 102 households in Uppsala, Sweden, were instructed to purchase seven food items (minced meat, fresh herring fillets, soft cheese, milk, sliced cooked ham, vacuum-packed smoked salmon, and ready-to-eat salad) and to store them using their normal practices. They were interviewed the next day, and food temperatures were measured. In general, there were no significant relations between temperature and characteristics of the respondents (e.g., sex, age, education, age of the refrigerator). Mean storage temperatures ranged from 6.2 degrees C for minced meat to 7.4 degrees C for ready-to-eat salad. Maximum temperatures ranged from 11.3 to 18.2 degrees C. Data were not significantly different from a normal distribution, except for ready-to-eat salad, although distributions other than the normal fitted data better in most cases. Five percent to 20% of the food items were stored at temperatures above 10 degrees C. Most respondents knew the recommended maximum temperature, but less than one fourth claimed to know the temperature in their own refrigerator. Practical considerations usually determined where food was stored. For products with a long shelf life, stated storage times were different for opened and unopened packages. The current situation might be improved if consumers could be persuaded to use a thermometer to keep track of refrigerator temperature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I M Marklinder
- Department of Domestic Sciences, Uppsala University, Dag Hammarskjölds väg 21, SE-752 37 Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Stanford M, Whittall T, Bergmeier LA, Lindblad M, Lundin S, Shinnick T, Mizushima Y, Holmgren J, Lehner T. Oral tolerization with peptide 336-351 linked to cholera toxin B subunit in preventing relapses of uveitis in Behcet's disease. Clin Exp Immunol 2004; 137:201-8. [PMID: 15196263 PMCID: PMC1809095 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02520.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Behcet's disease (BD) specific peptide (p336-351) was identified within the human 60 kD heat shock protein (HSP60). Oral p336-351 induced uveitis in rats which was prevented by oral tolerization with the peptide linked to recombinant cholera toxin B subunit (CTB). This strategy was adopted in a phase I/II clinical trial by oral administration of p336-351-CTB, 3 times weekly, followed by gradual withdrawal of all immunosuppressive drugs used to control the disease in 8 patients with BD. The patients were monitored by clinical and ophthalmological examination, as well as extensive immunological investigations. Oral administration of p336-351-CTB had no adverse effect and withdrawal of the immunosuppressive drugs showed no relapse of uveitis in 5 of 8 patients or 5 of 6 selected patients who were free of disease activity prior to initiating the tolerization regimen. After tolerization was discontinued, 3 of 5 patients remained free of relapsing uveitis for 10-18 months after cessation of all treatment. Control of uveitis and extra-ocular manifestations of BD was associated with a lack of peptide-specific CD4+ T cell proliferation, a decrease in expression of TH1 type cells (CCR5, CXCR3), IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha production, CCR7+ T cells and costimulatory molecules (CD40 and CD28), as compared with an increase in these parameters in patients in whom uveitis had relapsed. The efficacy of oral peptide-CTB tolerization will need to be confirmed in a phase III trial, but this novel strategy in humans might be applicable generally to autoimmune diseases in which specific antigens have been identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Stanford
- Department of Ophthalmology, Guy's, King's and St. Thomas' School of Medicine and Dentistry, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|