Spatially related amelogenin interactions in developing rat enamel as revealed by molecular cross-linking studies

Purification of Developing Enamel Matrix Proteins Using Preparative SDS-PAGE

In this chapter we discuss the potential of preparative SDS-PAGE for use in purifying native developing enamel matrix proteins. We believe that the methodology has the potential to provide the relatively large-scale single-step purification of any enamel protein that can be resolved as a single band during analytical SDS-PAGE. Of course, a single band on analytical SDS-PAGE does not guarantee absolute purity as the band may be comprised of two or more proteins migrating at the same apparent molecular weight on the gel. Where absolute purity is required, the methodology can be used in conjunction with other techniques such as ion-exchange chromatography or reverse-phase chromatography. We do not see preparative SDS-PAGE replacing chromatographic methodologies but believe that it can provide another powerful tool to add to the battery of purification techniques already available to researchers in the field.

Localization and quantitative co-localization of enamelin with amelogenin

Enamelin and amelogenin are vital proteins in enamel formation. The cooperative function of these two proteins controls crystal nucleation and morphology in vitro. We quantitatively analyzed the co-localization between enamelin and amelogenin by confocal microscopy and using two antibodies, one raised against a sequence in the porcine 32 kDa enamelin region and the other raised against full-length recombinant mouse amelogenin. We further investigated the interaction of the porcine 32 kDa enamelin and recombinant amelogenin using immuno-gold labeling. This study reports the quantitative co-localization results for postnatal days 1-8 mandibular mouse molars. We show that amelogenin and enamelin are secreted into the extracellular matrix on the cuspal slopes of the molars at day 1 and that secretion continues to at least day 8. Quantitative co-localization analysis (QCA) was performed in several different configurations using large (45 μm height, 33 μm width) and small (7 μm diameter) regions of interest to elucidate any patterns. Co-localization patterns in day 8 samples revealed that enamelin and amelogenin co-localize near the secretory face of the ameloblasts and appear to be secreted approximately in a 1:1 ratio. The degree of co-localization decreases as the enamel matures, both along the secretory face of ameloblasts and throughout the entire thickness of the enamel. Immuno-reactivity against enamelin is concentrated along the secretory face of ameloblasts, supporting the theory that this protein together with amelogenin is intimately involved in mineral induction at the beginning of enamel formation.

A mutation in the mouse Amelx tri-tyrosyl domain results in impaired secretion of amelogenin and phenocopies human X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta

Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) describes a broad group of clinically and genetically heterogeneous inherited defects of dental enamel bio-mineralization. Despite identification of a number of genetic mutations underlying AI, the precise causal mechanisms have yet to be determined. Using a multi-disciplinary approach, we describe here a mis-sense mutation in the mouse Amelx gene resulting in a Y --> H substitution in the tri-tyrosyl domain of the enamel extracellular matrix protein amelogenin. The enamel in affected animals phenocopies human X-linked AI where similar mutations have been reported. Animals affected by the mutation have severe defects of enamel bio-mineralization associated with absence of full-length amelogenin protein in the developing enamel matrix, loss of ameloblast phenotype, increased ameloblast apoptosis and formation of multi-cellular masses. We present evidence to demonstrate that affected ameloblasts express but fail to secrete full-length amelogenin leading to engorgement of the endoplasmic reticulum/Golgi apparatus. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed accumulations of both amelogenin and ameloblastin in affected cells. Co-transfection of Ambn and mutant Amelx in a eukaryotic cell line also revealed intracellular abnormalities and increased cytotoxicity compared with cells singly transfected with wild-type Amelx, mutant Amelx or Ambn or co-transfected with both wild-type Amelx and Ambn. We hypothesize that intracellular protein-protein interactions mediated via the amelogenin tri-tyrosyl motif are a key mechanistic factor underpinning the molecular pathogenesis in this example of AI. This study therefore successfully links phenotype with underlying genetic lesion in a relevant murine model for human AI.

Biomimetic self-assembling peptides as injectable scaffolds for hard tissue engineering

The production of bone-, dentine- and enamel-like biomaterials for the engineering of mineralized (hard) tissues is a high-priority in regenerative medicine and dentistry. An emerging treatment approach involves the use of short biomimetic peptides that self-assemble to form micrometer-long nanofibrils with well defined surface chemistry and periodicity that display specific arrays of functional groups capable of mineral nucleation. The fibrils also give rise to dynamically stable 3D scaffold gels for the potential control of crystal disposition and growth. Peptides can also be injected in their monomeric fluid state, with subsequent self-assembly and gelation in situ triggered by physiological conditions. In this way, they can infiltrate and self-assemble within irregular or microscopic cavities, for restorative treatment of bone defects, dentinal hypersensitivity or dental decay. Cell adhesion and proliferation is also supported by these scaffolds, offering further advantages for applications in hard tissue engineering. These self-assembling matrices also provide well defined model systems that can contribute greatly to the elucidation of the biological mechanisms of protein-mediated biomineralization.

Intracellular nanosphere subunit assembly as revealed by amelogenin molecular cross-linking studies

Enamel matrix comprises nanospheres predominantly composed of amelogenin. Studies have shown that recombinant amelogenin forms nanospheres similar to those formed in vivo, but it is unclear exactly how nanospheres assemble in vivo. Are amelogenin monomers secreted into the enamel matrix where they then self-assemble to form nanospheres, or does nanosphere assembly actually occur intracellularly? The aim of this study was to attempt to answer this question. Rat enamel organs were treated with the bifunctional cross-linker, dithio bis (succinimidyl propionate) (DSP), which cross-links primary amines lying in close molecular proximity. The key to this technique is the fact that DSP cross-links are later sensitive to reductive cleavage. The cross-linked proteins were first subjected to non-reducing sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) in the first dimension and then to reducing SDS-PAGE in the second dimension (so-called diagonal electrophoresis) followed by western blot probing with anti-amelogenin. The results indicated that intracellular amelogenin monomers are in close neighbor contact, forming complexes comprising up to six individual amelogenin monomers. We suggest that these initial complexes are prefabricated intracellularly before secretion. Once secreted, these prefabricated subunits assemble further to form the mature full-size nanospheres containing hundreds of individual amelogenins characteristic of enamel matrix.

Protein–Protein Interactions of the Developing Enamel Matrix

Extracellular matrix proteins control the formation of the inorganic component of hard tissues including bone, dentin, and enamel. The structural proteins expressed primarily in the enamel matrix are amelogenin, ameloblastin, enamelin, and amelotin. Other proteins, like biglycan, are also present in the enamel matrix as well as in other mineralizing and nonmineralizing tissues of mammals. In addition, the presence of sulfated enamel proteins, and "tuft" proteins has been examined and discussed in relation to enamel formation. The structural proteins of the enamel matrix must have specific protein-protein interactions to produce a matrix capable of directing the highly ordered structure of the enamel crystallites. Protein-protein interactions are also likely to occur between the secreted enamel proteins and the plasma membrane of the enamel producing cells, the ameloblasts. Such protein-protein interactions are hypothesized to influence the secretion of enamel proteins, establish short-term order of the forming matrix, and to mediate feedback signals to the transcriptional machinery of these cells. Membrane-bound proteins identified in ameloblasts, and which interact with the structural enamel proteins, include Cd63 (cluster of differentiation 63 antigen), annexin A2 (Anxa2), and lysosomal-associated glycoprotein 1 (Lamp1). These and related data help explain the molecular and cellular mechanisms responsible for the removal of the organic enamel matrix during the events of enamel mineralization, and how the enamel matrix influences its own fate through signaling initiated at the cell surface. The knowledge gained from enamel developmental studies may lead to better dental and nondental materials, or materials inspired by Nature. These data will be critical to scientists, engineers, and dentists in their pursuits to regenerate an entire tooth. For tooth regeneration to become a reality, the protein-protein interactions involving the key dental proteins must be identified and understood. The scope of this review is to discuss the current understanding of protein-protein interactions of the developing enamel matrix, and relate this knowledge to enamel biomineralization.

Matrix metalloproteinase inhibition impairs the processing, formation and mineralization of dental tissues during mouse molar development

Organotypic cultures of embryonic mouse tooth germs were used to investigate the developmental expression and roles of MMPs in the formation and mineralization of dentin and enamel matrices. The spatially and temporally regulated expression of MMP-2, MMP-9 and MMP-20 in developing mouse tooth germs in vivo was maintained in culture. The inhibition of metalloproteinases activity by marimastat altered the morphogenesis and mineralization of the tooth germs associated with an inhibition of the activation of both MMP-20 and MMP-2. MMP inhibition deregulated the molecular processing of two major dental matrix proteins, amelogenin and dentin sialoprotein (DSP). This coincided with their accumulation and the loss of their normal distribution within the extracellular matrix, resulting in a defective mineralization of dentin and enamel matrices. These findings demonstrate the critical role of MMPs in the processing and maturation of the dental matrix.

Controlled proteolysis of amelogenins reveals exposure of both carboxy- and amino-terminal regions

The matrix-mediated enamel biomineralization involves secretion of the enamel specific amelogenin proteins that through self-assembly into nanosphere structures provide the framework within which the initial enamel crystallites are formed. During enamel mineralization, amelogenin proteins are processed by tooth-specific proteinases. The aim of this study was to explore the factors that affect the activity of enamel proteases to process amelogenins. Two factors including amelogenin self-assembly and enzyme specificity are considered. We applied a limited proteolysis approach, combined with mass spectrometry, in order to determine the surface accessibility of conserved domains of amelogenin assemblies. A series of commercially available proteinases as well as a recombinant enamelysin were used, and their proteolytic actions on recombinant amelogenin were examined under controlled and limited conditions. The N-terminal region of the recombinant mouse amelogenin rM179 was found to be more accessible to tryptic digest than the C-terminal region. The endoproteinase Glu-C cleaved amelogenin at both the N-terminal (E18/V) and C-terminal (E178/V) sites. Chymotrypsin cleaved amelogenin at both the carboxy- (F151/S) and amino-terminal (W25/Y) regions. Interestingly, the peptide bond F/S152 was also recognized by the action of enamelysin on recombinant mouse amelogenin whereas thermolysin cleaved the S152/M153 peptide bond in addition to T63/L64 and I159/L160 and M29/I30 bonds. It was then concluded that regions at both the carboxy- and amino-terminal were exposed on the surface of amelogenin nanospheres when the N-terminal 17 amino acid residues were proposed to be protected from proteolysis, presumably as the result of their involvement in direct protein-protein interaction. Cleavage around the FSM locus occurred by recombinant enamelysin under limited conditions, in both mouse (F151/S152) and pig amelogenins (S148/M). Our in vitro observations on the limited proteolysis of amelogenin by enamelysin suggest that enamelysin cleaved amelogenin at the C-terminal region showing a preference of the enzyme to cleave the S/M and F/S bonds. The present limited proteolysis studies provided insight into the mechanisms of amelogenin degradation during amelogenesis.