Monomeric bacteriochlorophyll is required for the triplet energy transfer between the primary donor and the carotenoid in photosynthetic bacterial reaction centers

Influence of the Electrochemical Properties of the Bacteriochlorophyll Dimer on Triplet Energy-Transfer Dynamics in Bacterial Reaction Centers

Energetics, protein dynamics, and electronic coupling are the key factors in controlling both electron and energy transfer in photosynthetic bacterial reaction centers (RCs). Here, we examine the rates and mechanistic pathways of the P⁺H_A^- radical-pair charge recombination, triplet state formation, and subsequent triplet energy transfer from the triplet state of the bacteriochlorophyll dimer (P) to the carotenoid in a series of mutant RCs (L131LH + M160LH (D1), L131LH + M197FH (D2), and L131LH + M160LH + M197FH (T1)) of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. In these mutants, the electronic structure of P is perturbed and the P/P⁺ midpoint potential is systematically increased due to addition of hydrogen bonds between P and the introduced residues. High-resolution, broad-band, transient absorption spectroscopy on the femtosecond to microsecond timescale shows that the charge recombination rate increases and the triplet energy transfer rate decreases in these mutants relative to the wild type (WT). The increase of the charge recombination rate is correlated to the increase in the energy level of P⁺H_A^- and the increase in the P/P⁺ midpoint potential. On the other hand, the decrease in rate of triplet energy transfer in the mutants can be explained in terms of a lower energy of ³P and a shift in the electron spin density distribution in the bacteriochlorophylls of P. The triplet energy-transfer rate follows the order of WT > L131LH + M197FH > L131LH + M160LH > L131LH + M160LH + M197FH, both at room temperature and at 77 K. A pronounced temperature dependence of the rate is observed for all of the RC samples. The activation energy associated to this process is increased in the mutants relative to WT, consistent with a lower ³P energy due to the addition of hydrogen bonds between P and the introduced residues.

Bacteriopheophytin triplet state in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers

It is well established that photoexcitation of Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers (RC) with reduced quinone acceptors results in the formation of a triplet state localized on the primary electron donor P with a significant yield. The energy of this long-lived and therefore potentially damaging excited state is then efficiently quenched by energy transfer to the RC spheroidenone carotenoid, with its subsequent decay to the ground state by intersystem crossing. In this contribution, we present a detailed transient absorption study of triplet states in a set of mutated RCs characterized by different efficiencies of triplet formation that correlate with lifetimes of the initial charge-separated state P(+)H A (-) . On a microsecond time scale, two types of triplet state were detected: in addition to the well-known spheroidenone triplet state with a lifetime of ~4 μs, in some RCs we discovered a bacteriopheophytin triplet state with a lifetime of ~40 μs. As expected, the yield of the carotenoid triplet increased approximately linearly with the lifetime of P(+)H A (-) , reaching the value of 42 % for one of the mutants. However, surprisingly, the yield of the bacteriopheophytin triplet was the highest in RCs with the shortest P(+)H A (-) lifetime and the smallest yield of carotenoid triplet. For these the estimated yield of bacteriopheophytin triplet was comparable with the yield of the carotenoid triplet, reaching a value of ~7 %. Possible mechanisms of formation of the bacteriopheophytin triplet state are discussed.

A photoprotection mechanism involving the D(2) branch in photosystem II cores with closed reaction centers

Nanosecond transient absorption spectroscopy has been used to study reaction centre (RC) chlorophyll triplet quenching by carotenoid in intact photosystem II cores from T. elongatus with closed RCs. We found a triplet beta-carotene ((3)Car) signal (absorption difference maximum at 530 nm) that is sensitized by the RC chlorophyll (Chl) triplet with a formation time of ca. 190 ns, has a decay time of 7 micros and is formed with a quantum yield between 10 and 20%. The (3)Car signal is assigned to the beta-carotene on the D(2) branch of the RC. We thus propose a new photoprotection mechanism operative in closed RCs where-as a consequence of the negative charge on the quinone Q(A)-the triplet chlorophyll ((3)Chl) is formed by the radical pair (RP) mechanism on the normally inactive D(2) branch where it can be subsequently quenched by the D(2) beta-carotene. We suggest that the D(2) branch becomes active when the RCs are closed under high light fluence conditions. Under these conditions the D(2) branch plays a photoprotective role. This interpretation allows combining many seemingly inconsistent observations in the literature and reveals the so far missing RC triplet quenching mechanism in photosystem II. The newly proposed mechanism also explains the reason why this RC triplet quenching is not observed in isolated D(1)-D(2)-cyt b(559) RCs. If Q(A) is either not present at all (as in the isolated RC) or is not charged (as in open RCs or with doubly reduced Q(A)) then the RC (3)Chl is formed on the D(1) branch. The D(1) branch (3)Chl can not be quenched due to the large distance to the beta-carotene. This interpretation is actually in line with the well-known (3)RC quenching mechanism in bacterial RCs, where also the carotenoid in the (analogous to the D(2) branch) B-branch of the RC becomes the quencher.

Two stereoisomers of spheroidene in the Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26 reaction center: a DFT analysis of resonance Raman spectra

From a theoretical analysis of the resonance Raman spectra of 19 isotopomers of spheroidene reconstituted into the reaction center (RC) of Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26, we conclude that the carotenoid in the RC occurs in two configurations. The normal mode underlying the resonance Raman transition at 1239 cm(-1), characteristic for spheroidene in the RC, has been identified and found to uniquely refer to the cis nature of the 15,15' carbon-carbon double bond. Detailed analysis of the isotope-induced shifts of transitions in the 1500-1550 cm(-1) region proves that, besides the 15,15'-cis configuration, spheroidene in the RC adopts another cis-configuration, most likely the 13,14-cis configuration.

Formation and geminate quenching of singlet oxygen in purple bacterial reaction center

The phosphorescence of singlet oxygen ((1)X( *)) photosensitized by the carotenoidless reaction center (RC) of Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26.1 has been investigated, using H(2)O and D(2)O as the suspending media. To enhance (under neutral conditions) the triplet quantum yield of the special pair P(870) (P) by the radical pair mechanism, the quinone acceptor Q(A) was removed by means of a chemical treatment. The phosphorescence signal fits the functional form P(0)[exp (-t/tau)-exp(-t/zeta)], regardless of whether (1)X( *) is sensitized by P(dagger) or M(dagger) (where the dagger denotes triplet excitation and M is a water-soluble molecule). The time constant zeta was identified with the decay time of (1)X( *); when P(dagger) is the sensitizer, one finds zeta(P)((1))=3.3+/-0.3 micros, and zeta(P)((2))=34+/-3 micros, where the superscripts 1 and 2 refer to H(2)O and D(2)O, respectively; the corresponding values for sensitization by M(dagger) (in the absence of RC) are zeta(M)((1))=3.7+/-0.4 micros, and zeta(M)((2))=75+/-5 micros. The addition of RC's to the solution of M in D(2)O reveals that the RC is a quencher of (1)X( *); however, for equal concentrations of the RC, zeta(P)((2))<zeta(M)((2)), showing that (1)X( *) is deactivated, after its entry into the suspending medium, mainly by the solvent or the same RC which acts as the sensitizer. The values of tau(P) are similar in both solvents, ca. 2 micros, but this time constant does not figure in the disappearance of P(dagger), which follows a bi-exponential course, alpha(1)exp(-t/tau(1))+alpha(2)exp(-t/tau(2)). The time constants tau(1) and tau(2) (72+/-5 micros and 12+/-1 micros, respectively) as well as the factor alpha(2) are insensitive to the oxygen content, and quenching of P(dagger) is manifested only through a threefold reduction in the magnitude of alpha(1); these data imply the absence of dynamic quenching and heterogeneity of the RC. The mean lifetime of (1)X( *) inside the protein matrix is identified with tau(P), and the absence of a prompt component in the phosphorescence signal rationalized by proposing that the radiative decay of (1)X( *) within the RC is much slower than that in an aqueous environment.

Replacement or exclusion of the B-branch bacteriopheophytin in the purple bacterial reaction centre: the H(B) cofactor is not required for assembly or core function of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides complex

All of the membrane-embedded cofactors of the purple bacterial reaction centre have well-defined functional or structural roles, with the exception of the bacteriopheophytin (H(B)) located approximately half-way across the membrane on the so-called inactive- or B-branch of cofactors. Sequence alignments indicate that this bacteriochlorin cofactor is a conserved feature of purple bacterial reaction centres, and a pheophytin is also found at this position in the Photosystem-II reaction centre. Possible structural or functional consequences of replacing the H(B) bacteriopheophytin by bacteriochlorophyll were investigated in the Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centre through mutagenesis of residue Leu L185 to His (LL185H). Results from absorbance spectroscopy indicated that the LL185H mutant assembled with a bacteriochlorophyll at the H(B) position, but this did not affect the capacity of the reaction centre to support photosynthetic growth, or change the kinetics of charge separation along the A-branch of cofactors. It was also found that mutation of residue Ala M149 to Trp (AM149W) caused the reaction centre to assemble without an H(B) bacteriochlorin, demonstrating that this cofactor is not required for correct assembly of the reaction centre. The absence of a cofactor at this position did not affect the capacity of the reaction centre to support photosynthetic growth, or the kinetics of A-branch electron transfer. A combination of X-ray crystallography and FTIR difference spectroscopy confirmed that the H(B) cofactor was absent in the AM149W mutant, and that this had not produced any significant disturbance of the adjacent ubiquinol reductase (Q(B)) site. The data are discussed with respect to possible functional roles of the H(B) bacteriopheophytin, and we conclude that the reason(s) for conservation of a bacteriopheophytin cofactor at this position in purple bacterial reaction centres are likely to be different from those underlying conservation of a pheophytin at the analogous position in Photosystem-II.

Protein Regulation of Carotenoid Binding

X-ray diffraction was used to determine high-resolution structures of the reaction center (RC) complex from the carotenoidless mutant, Rb. sphaeroides R-26.1, without or reconstituted with carotenoids. The results are compared with the structure of the RC from a semiaerobically grown Rb. sphaeroides strain 2.4.1. The investigation reveals the structure of the carotenoid in the different protein preparations, the nature of its binding site, and a plausible mechanism by which the carotenoid is incorporated unidirectionally in its characteristic geometric configuration. The structural data suggest that the accessibility of the carotenoid to the binding site is controlled by a specific "gatekeeper" residue which allows the carotenoid to approach the binding site from only one direction. Carotenoid binding to the protein is secured by hydrogen bonding to a separate "locking" amino acid. The study reveals the specific molecular interactions that control how the carotenoid protects the photosynthetic apparatus against photo-induced oxidative destruction.

Triplet energy transfer in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centres

[3-vinyl]-132-OH-bacteriochlorophyll a has been selectively exchanged against native bacteriochlorophyll a in the monomer binding sites at the A- and B-branch of the photosynthetic reaction centre from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Transient absorption difference measurements were performed on these samples over a temperature range from 4.2 to 300 K with 20 ns time resolution. Specifically the decay of the primary donor triplet state, 3P870, as well as the rise and decay rates of the carotenoid triplet state, 3Car (spheroidene), were measured. The observed rates revealed a thermally activated carotenoid triplet formation corresponding to the decay of the primary donor triplet state. The activation energies for the triplet energy transfer process were 100(+/-10) cm-1 for reaction centers from wild-type Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1, with and without exchange of the monomeric bacteriochlorophyll on the electron transfer-active branch, BA. For reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26.1 with both monomers exchanged against [3-vinyl]-132-OH-bacteriochlorophyll a, and subsequent spheroidene reconstitution the activation energy was 460(+/-20) cm-1. These activation energies correspond to the energy difference between the triplet states of the accessory BChl monomer, BB, and the primary donor when native BChl a or [3-vinyl]-132-OH-BChl a is present in the BB binding site. In all samples the 3Car formation rates were bi-phasic over a large temperature range. A fast temperature-independent rate was observed on the wavelength of the carotenoid triplet-triplet absorption which dominated at very low temperatures. Additionally, a slower temperature-independent 3Car formation rate was observed at low temperatures which could be explained with the assumption of heterogeneity in the energy barrier (3BB) and/or the primary donor triplet state (3P870). A tunneling mechanism as proposed earlier by Kolaczkowski (PhD thesis, Brown University, 1989) is not only unnecessary but also incompatible with the available experimental data.

Triplet energy transfer between the primary donor and carotenoids in Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26.1 reaction centers incorporated with spheroidene analogs having different extents of pi-electron conjugation

Three carotenoids, spheroidene, 3,4-dihydrospheroidene and 3,4,5,6-tetrahydrospheroidene, having 8, 9 and 10 conjugated carbon-carbon double bonds, respectively, were incorporated into Rhodobacter (Rb.) sphaeroides R-26.1 reaction centers. The extents of binding were found to be 95 +/- 5% for spheroidene, 65 +/- 5% for 3,4-dihydrospheroidene and 60 +/- 10% for 3,4,5,6-tetrahydrospheroidene. The dynamics of the triplet states of the primary donor and carotenoid were measured at room temperature by flash absorption spectroscopy. The carotenoid, spheroidene, was observed to quench the primary donor triplet state. The triplet state of spheroidene that was formed subsequently decayed to the ground state with a lifetime of 7.0 +/- 0.5 microseconds. The primary donor triplet lifetime in the Rb. sphaeroides R-26.1 reaction centers lacking carotenoids was 60 +/- 5 microseconds. Quenching of the primary donor triplet state by the carotenoid was not observed in the Rb. sphaeroides R-26.1 reaction centers containing 3,4-dihydrospheroidene nor in the R-26.1 reaction centers containing 3,4,5,6-tetrahydrospheroidene. Triplet-state electron paramagnetic resonance was also carried out on the samples. The experiments revealed carotenoid triple-state signals in the Rb. sphaeroides R-26.1 reaction centers incorporated with spheroidene, indicating that the primary donor triplet is quenched by the carotenoid. No carotenoid signals were observed from Rb. sphaeroides R-26.1 reaction centers incorporating 3,4-dihydrospheroidene nor in reaction centers incorporating 3,4,5,6-tetrahydrospheroidene. Circular dichroism, steady-state absorbance band shifts accompanying the primary photochemistry in the reaction center and singlet energy transfer from the carotenoid to the primary donor confirm that the carotenoids are bound in the reaction centers and interacting with the primary donor. These studies provide a systematic approach to exploring the effects of carotenoid structure and excited-state energy on triplet transfer between the primary donor and carotenoids in reaction centers from photosynthetic bacteria.

Triplet state energy transfer between the primary donor and the carotenoid in Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26.1 reaction centers exchanged with modified bacteriochlorophyll pigments and reconstituted with spheroidene

The dynamics of triplet energy transfer between the primary donor and the carotenoid were measured on several photosynthetic bacterial reaction center preparations from Rhodobacter sphaeroides: (a) wild-type strain 2.4.1, (b) strain R-26.1, (c) strain R-26.1 exchanged with 13(2)-hydroxy-[Zn]-bacteriochlorophyll at the accessory bacteriochlorophyll (BChl) sites and reconstituted with spheroidene and (d) strain R-26.1 exchanged with [3-vinyl]-13(2)-hydroxy-bacteriochlorophyll at the accessory BChl sites and reconstituted with spheroidene. The rise and decay times of the primary donor and carotenoid triplet-triplet absorption signals were monitored in the visible wavelength region between 538 and 555 nm as a function of temperature from 4 to 300 K. For the samples containing carotenoids, all of the decay times correspond well to the previously observed times for spheroidene (5 +/- 2 microseconds). The rise times of the carotenoid triplets were found in all cases to be biexponential and comprised of a strongly temperature-dependent component and a temperature-independent component. From a comparison of the behavior of the carotenoid-containing samples with that from the reaction center of the carotenoidless mutant Rb. sphaeroides R-26.1, the temperature-independent component has been assigned to the buildup of the primary donor triplet state resulting from charge recombination in the reaction center. Arrhenius plots of the buildup of the carotenoid triplet states were used to determine the activation energies for triplet energy transfer from the primary donor to the carotenoid. A model for the process of triplet energy transfer that is consistent with the data suggests that the activation barrier is strongly dependent on the triplet state energy of the accessory BChl pigment, BChlB.

Triplet state EPR of reaction centers from the His(L173)→Leu (L173) mutant of Rhodobacter sphaeroides which contains a heterodimer primary donor

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy has been used to examine the triplet states in reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides which have undergone a genetic modification affecting the primary donor. Reaction centers containing the His(L173)→Leu(L173) substitution in the amino acid sequence have a primary donor which consists of a BChl-BPh heterodimer. The triplets formed in this heterodimer reaction center were compared with those formed in the wild-type reaction center which contains the BChl-BChl homodimer. Both reaction centers transfer triplet energy to the carotenoid under illumination at liquid nitrogen temperatures (∼90 K). However, the intensity of the carotenoid triplet signal is significantly decreased in the Leu(L173) mutant compared with the wild-type reaction center. At 12 K, in wild-type reaction centers only the primary donor triplet is observed. The Leu(L173) mutant exhibits a signal similar to that observed by Bylina et al. (1990) in His(M200)→Leu(M200) mutant reaction centers from Rb. capsulatus. The values of the zero-field splitting parameters of this triplet are discussed within the context of various models for the primary donor triplet state. No alteration in the ability of the carotenoid to quench the primary donor triplet state results from mutations at these sites.

Carotenoid triplet state formation in Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26 reaction centers exchanged with modified bacteriochlorophyll pigments and reconstituted with spheroidene

Triplet state electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) experiments have been carried out at X-band on Rb. sphaeroides R-26 reaction centers that have been reconstituted with the carotenoid, spheroidene, and exchanged with 13(2)-OH-Zn-bacteriochlorophyll a and [3-vinyl]-13(2)-OH-bacteriochlorophyll a at the monomeric, 'accessory' bacteriochlorophyll sites BA,B or with pheophytin a at the bacteriopheophytin sites HA,B. The primary donor and carotenoid triplet state EPR signals in the temperature range 95-150 K are compared and contrasted with those from native Rb. sphaeroides wild type and Rb. sphaeroides R-26 reaction centers reconstituted with spheroidene. The temperature dependencies of the EPR signals are strikingly different for the various samples. The data prove that triplet energy transfer from the primary donor to the carotenoid is mediated by the monomeric, BChlB molecule. Furthermore, the data show that triplet energy transfer from the primary donor to the carotenoid is an activated process, the efficiency of which correlates with the estimated triplet state energies of the modified pigments.

Stark effect spectroscopy of carotenoids in photosynthetic antenna and reaction center complexes

The effects of electric fields on the absorption spectra of the carotenoids spheroidene and spheroidenone in photosynthetic antenna and reaction center complexes (wild-type and several mutants) from purple non-sulfur bacteria are compared with those for the isolated pigments in organic glasses. In general, the field effects are substantially larger for the carotenoid in the protein complexes than for the extracted pigments and larger for spheroidenone than spheroidene. Furthermore, the electrochromic effects for carotenoids in all complexes are much larger than those for the Qx transitions of the bacteriochlorophyll and bacteriopheophytin pigments which absorb in the 450-700 nm spectral region. The underlying mechanism responsible for the Stark effect spectra in the complexes is found to be dominated by a change in permanent dipole moment of the carotenoid upon excitation. The magnitude of this dipole moment change is found to be considerably larger in the B800-850 complex compared to the reaction center for spheroidene; it is approximately equivalent in the two complexes for spheroidenone. These results are discussed in terms of the effects of differences in the carotenoid functional groups, isomers and perturbations on the electronic structure from interactions with the organized environment in the proteins. these data provide a quantitative basis for the analysis of carotenoid bandshifts which are used to measure transmembrane potential, and they highlight some of the pitfalls in making such measurements on complex membranes containing multiple populations of carotenoids. The results for spheroidenone should be useful for studies of mutant proteins, since mutant strains are often grown semi-aerobically to minimize reversion.

Modified reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26. 2: Bacteriochlorophylls with modified C-3 substituents at sites BA and BB

Monomeric bacteriochlorophylls BA and BB in photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26 were exchanged with (13(2)-hydroxy-)bacteriochlorophylls containing a 3-vinyl- or 3-(alpha-hydroxyethyl)-substituent instead of the 3-acetyl group. The corresponding binding sites must be tolerant to the introduction of the polar residue at C-13(2) and modifications of the 3-acetyl group. According to HPLC analysis, the exchange with both pigments amounts to less than or equal to 50% of the total BChl contained in the complex, corresponding to less than or equal to 100% of the monomeric BChl alpha BA,B. The absorption spectra show significant changes in the QX and QY-region of the monomeric bacteriochlorophylls. By contrast, the absorption of the primary donor (P870) and reversible photobleaching is retained. The circular dichroism is also unchanged in the 870 nm region. The positive cd band located at around 800 nm in native reaction centers, shifts with the (blue-shifted) QY absorption(s) of BA and/or BB, whereas the position of the negative one remains nearly unaffected. The data indicate that the latter is the upper excitonic band of the primary donor, and that there is little interaction of the monomeric BA/BB with the primary donor.