Association of Lp(a) rather than integrally-bound apo(a) with triglyceride-rich lipoproteins of human subjects

Association between hepatic steatosis and lipoprotein(a) levels in non-alcoholic patients: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

It is well known that lipid abnormalities exist in the context of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The association between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels and NAFLD is poorly understood. The main objective of the present study was to assess the association between Lp(a) levels and NAFLD.

METHODS

This systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42023392526). A literature search was performed to detect studies that evaluated the association between Lp(a) levels, NAFLD and steatohepatitis (NASH).

RESULTS

Ten observational studies, including 40,045 patients, were identified and considered eligible for this systematic review. There were 9266 subjects in the NAFLD groups and 30,779 individuals in the respective control groups. Five studies evaluated patients with NAFLD (hepatic steatosis was associated with lower Lp(a) levels in four studies, while the remaining showed opposite results). Two studies evaluating NASH patients showed that Lp(a) levels were not different compared to controls. However, the increment of Lp(a) levels was correlated with liver fibrosis in one of them. In addition, one study analyzed simultaneously patients with NAFLD and NASH, showing a neutral result in NAFLD patients and a positive relationship in NASH patients. Two studies that included patients with the new definition of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) also showed neutral results.

CONCLUSION

Although there could be an association between Lp(a) levels and hepatic steatosis, the results of the studies published to date are contradictory and not definitive.

High levels of lipoprotein(a) in transgenic mice exacerbate atherosclerosis and promote vulnerable plaque features in a sex-specific manner

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Despite increased clinical interest in lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), many questions remain about the molecular mechanisms by which it contributes to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Existing murine transgenic (Tg) Lp(a) models are limited by low plasma levels of Lp(a) and have not consistently shown a pro-atherosclerotic effect of Lp(a).

METHODS

We generated Tg mice expressing both human apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) and human apoB-100, with pathogenic levels of plasma Lp(a) (range 87-250 mg/dL). Female and male Lp(a) Tg mice (Tg(LPA+/0;APOB+/0)) and human apoB-100-only controls (Tg(APOB+/0)) (n = 10-13/group) were fed a high-fat, high-cholesterol diet for 12 weeks, with Ldlr knocked down using an antisense oligonucleotide. FPLC was used to characterize plasma lipoprotein profiles. Plaque area and necrotic core size were quantified and immunohistochemical assessment of lesions using a variety of cellular and protein markers was performed.

RESULTS

Male and female Tg(LPA+/0;APOB+/0) and Tg(APOB+/0) mice exhibited proatherogenic lipoprotein profiles with increased cholesterol-rich VLDL and LDL-sized particles and no difference in plasma total cholesterol between genotypes. Complex lesions developed in the aortic sinus of all mice. Plaque area (+22%), necrotic core size (+25%), and calcified area (+65%) were all significantly increased in female Tg(LPA+/0;APOB+/0) mice compared to female Tg(APOB+/0) mice. Immunohistochemistry of lesions demonstrated that apo(a) deposited in a similar pattern as apoB-100 in Tg(LPA+/0;APOB+/0) mice. Furthermore, female Tg(LPA+/0;APOB+/0) mice exhibited less organized collagen deposition as well as 42% higher staining for oxidized phospholipids (OxPL) compared to female Tg(APOB+/0) mice. Tg(LPA+/0;APOB+/0) mice had dramatically higher levels of plasma OxPL-apo(a) and OxPL-apoB compared to Tg(APOB+/0) mice, and female Tg(LPA+/0;APOB+/0) mice had higher plasma levels of the proinflammatory cytokine MCP-1 (+3.1-fold) compared to female Tg(APOB+/0) mice.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest a pro-inflammatory phenotype exhibited by female Tg mice expressing Lp(a) that appears to contribute to the development of more severe lesions with greater vulnerable features.

Effect of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation on the Postprandial Metabolism of Apolipoprotein(a) in Familial Hypercholesterolemia

AIM

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a low-density lipoprotein-like particle containing apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) that increases the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Postprandial redistribution of apo(a) protein from Lp(a) to triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) may also increase the atherogenicity of TRL particles. Omega-3 fatty acid (ω3FA) supplementation improves postprandial TRL metabolism in FH subjects. However, its effect on postprandial apo(a) metabolism has yet to be investigated.

METHODS

We carried out an 8-week open-label, randomized, crossover trial to test the effect of ω3FA supplementation (4 g/day) on postprandial apo(a) responses in FH patients following ingestion of an oral fat load. Postprandial plasma total and TRL-apo(a) concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, and the corresponding areas under the curve (AUCs) (0-10h) were determined using the trapezium rule.

RESULTS

Compared with no ω3FA treatment, ω3FA supplementation significantly lowered the concentrations of postprandial TRL-apo(a) at 0.5 (-17.9%), 1 (-18.7%), 2 (-32.6%), and 3 h (-19.2%) (P＜0.05 for all). Postprandial TRL-apo(a) AUC was significantly reduced with ω3FA by 14.8% (P＜0.05). By contrast, ω3FA had no significant effect on the total AUCs of apo(a), apoC-III, and apoE (P＞0.05 for all). The decrease in postprandial TRL-apo(a) AUC was significantly associated with changes in the AUC of triglycerides (r=0.600; P＜0.01) and apoB-48 (r=0.616; P＜0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Supplementation with ω3FA reduces postprandial TRL-apo(a) response to a fat meal in FH patients; this novel metabolic effect of ω3FA may have implications on decreasing the risk of ASCVD in patients with FH, especially in those with elevated plasma triglyceride and Lp(a) concentrations. However, the clinical implications of these metabolic findings require further evaluation in outcome or surrogate endpoint trials.

Sortilin enhances secretion of apolipoprotein(a) through effects on apolipoprotein B secretion and promotes uptake of lipoprotein(a)

Elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an independent, causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and calcific aortic valve stenosis. Lp(a) is formed in or on hepatocytes from successive noncovalent and covalent interactions between apo(a) and apoB, although the subcellular location of these interactions and the nature of the apoB-containing particle involved remain unclear. Sortilin, encoded by the SORT1 gene, modulates apoB secretion and LDL clearance. We used a HepG2 cell model to study the secretion kinetics of apo(a) and apoB. Overexpression of sortilin increased apo(a) secretion, while siRNA-mediated knockdown of sortilin expression correspondingly decreased apo(a) secretion. Sortilin binds LDL but not apo(a) or Lp(a), indicating that its effect on apo(a) secretion is likely indirect. Indeed, the effect was dependent on the ability of apo(a) to interact noncovalently with apoB. Overexpression of sortilin enhanced internalization of Lp(a), but not apo(a), by HepG2 cells, although neither sortilin knockdown in these cells or Sort1 deficiency in mice impacted Lp(a) uptake. We found several missense mutations in SORT1 in patients with extremely high Lp(a) levels; sortilin containing some of these mutations was more effective at promoting apo(a) secretion than WT sortilin, though no differences were found with respect to Lp(a) internalization. Our observations suggest that sortilin could play a role in determining plasma Lp(a) levels and corroborate in vivo human kinetic studies which imply that secretion of apo(a) and apoB are coupled, likely within the hepatocyte.

Lipoprotein(a) the Insurgent: A New Insight into the Structure, Function, Metabolism, Pathogenicity, and Medications Affecting Lipoprotein(a) Molecule

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], aka “Lp little a”, was discovered in the 1960s in the lab of the Norwegian physician Kåre Berg. Since then, we have greatly improved our knowledge of lipids and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Lp(a) is an enigmatic class of lipoprotein that is exclusively formed in the liver and comprises two main components, a single copy of apolipoprotein (apo) B-100 (apo-B100) tethered to a single copy of a protein denoted as apolipoprotein(a) apo(a). Plasma levels of Lp(a) increase soon after birth to a steady concentration within a few months of life. In adults, Lp(a) levels range widely from <2 to 2500 mg/L. Evidence that elevated Lp(a) levels >300 mg/L contribute to CVD is significant. The improvement of isoform-independent assays, together with the insight from epidemiologic studies, meta-analyses, genome-wide association studies, and Mendelian randomization studies, has established Lp(a) as the single most common independent genetically inherited causal risk factor for CVD. This breakthrough elevated Lp(a) from a biomarker of atherosclerotic risk to a target of therapy. With the emergence of promising second-generation antisense therapy, we hope that we can answer the question of whether Lp(a) is ready for prime-time clinic use. In this review, we present an update on the metabolism, pathophysiology, and current/future medical interventions for high levels of Lp(a).

Distinct metabolism of apolipoproteins (a) and B-100 within plasma lipoprotein(a)

OBJECTIVES

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is mainly similar in composition to LDL, but differs in having apolipoprotein (apo) (a) covalently linked to apoB-100. Our purpose was to examine the individual metabolism of apo(a) and apoB-100 within plasma Lp(a).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The kinetics of apo(a) and apoB-100 in plasma Lp(a) were assessed in four men with dyslipidemia [Lp(a) concentration: 8.9-124.7nmol/L]. All subjects received a primed constant infusion of [5,5,5-(2)H3] L-leucine while in the constantly fed state. Lp(a) was immunoprecipitated directly from whole plasma; apo(a) and apoB-100 were separated by gel electrophoresis; and isotopic enrichment was determined by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Multicompartmental modeling analysis indicated that the median fractional catabolic rates of apo(a) and apoB-100 within Lp(a) were significantly different at 0.104 and 0.263 pools/day, respectively (P=0.04). The median Lp(a) apo(a) production rate at 0.248nmol/kg·day(-1) was significantly lower than that of Lp(a) apoB-100 at 0.514nmol/kg·day(-1) (P=0.03).

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that apo(a) has a plasma residence time (11days) that is more than twice as long as that of apoB-100 (4days) within Lp(a), supporting the concept that apo(a) and apoB-100 within plasma Lp(a) are not catabolized from the bloodstream as a unit in humans in the fed state.

Postprandial lipoprotein(a) is affected differently by specific individual dietary fatty acids in healthy young men

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is considered a risk factor for coronary heart disease. Our aim was to investigate the effect of individual fatty acids on postprandial plasma Lp(a) and its association with lipemia and tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA). Five test fats dominated by (approximately 43% g/kg) stearic (S), palmitic (P), oleic, C18:1 trans (T), or linoleic acid were produced by interesterification. Sixteen young healthy men were served the individual test fats incorporated into meals (1g fat/kg body wt) after a 12-h fast in random order on different days, separated by 3-wk washout periods. Blood samples were drawn before and 2, 4, 6, and 8 h after eating. There was a pronounced increase in Lp(a) concentrations after intake of the test meals, and the test fats resulted in a difference in Lp(a) response (P < 0.001; diet x time interaction). However, T fat did not change Lp(a) during the time course studied. T fat resulted in less area under the plasma Lp(a) concentration curve compared to S and P fat (P </= 0.003). Test fat with saturated fatty acids resulted in the highest Lp(a) and lowest plasma triacylglycerol (TAG) response, with the reversed situation for T fat. There was no association between Lp(a) and t-PA. In conclusion, intake of meals high in individual dietary fatty acids increased postprandial plasma Lp(a) differently. There seems to be a complex regulatory role of plasma TAG on nonfasting plasma Lp(a) concentrations.

Xuezhikang decreases serum lipoprotein(a) and C-reactive protein concentrations in patients with coronary heart disease

BACKGROUND

Increased serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) concentrations are independent risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD). Xuezhikang, an extract of cholestin, effectively lowers fasting cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations. We studied whether xuezhikang lowered Lp(a) and hsCRP concentrations.

METHODS

We randomly divided 60 CHD patients into two groups to receive xuezhikang (1200 mg daily) or placebo for 6 weeks. The fasting hsCRP concentration and the postprandial changes of serum lipid concentrations at 2, 4, and 6 h after a high-fat meal (800 calories; 50 g of fat) were measured before and after the 6-week protocol.

RESULTS

The two groups had similar baseline fasting lipid and hsCRP concentrations. The postprandial triglyceride and Lp(a) concentrations were significantly increased (P <0.05). After 6 weeks, the fasting and postprandial lipid concentrations decreased significantly in the xuezhikang group, accompanied by a significant reduction in fasting hsCRP concentration (P <0.001). The placebo group had no significant change in lipid concentrations, whereas the fasting serum hsCRP concentration was reduced significantly (P <0.05). The reduction in hsCRP was closely related to the changes in fasting Lp(a) concentration (r = 0.402; P <0.05) and triglyceride area under the curve (r = 0.441; P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Xuezhikang effectively decreased fasting Lp(a) and postprandial triglyceride concentrations, which were associated with reductions of fasting hsCRP concentrations in CHD patients.

Postprandial effects of dietary trans fatty acids on apolipoprotein(a) and cholesteryl ester transfer

BACKGROUND

The consumption of trans fatty acids adversely affects fasting plasma lipoprotein concentrations.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether postprandial lipoprotein metabolism is affected by the consumption of trans fatty acids.

DESIGN

In a randomized crossover study, 19 healthy men consumed fatty meals that were identical except that 10% of energy was provided as trans 18:1 acids in the trans meal and as oleic acid in the cis meal.

RESULTS

The meals induced similar responses in plasma lipids. Cholesteryl ester transfer (CET) was activated after consumption of both meals (P < 0.0001); however, it was 28% higher after the trans meal than after the cis meal (280 +/- 129 compared with 219 +/- 116 nmol cholesteryl ester/mL plasma * 6 h; time x diet interaction: P < 0.0001). Plasma apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] concentrations remained constant; however, triacylglycerol-rich lipoproteins formed 4 h after ingestion of the trans meal contained a higher concentration of apo(a) than did those formed after ingestion of the cis meal (48.9 +/- 6.6 compared with 39.6 +/- 5.4 U/L; P < 0.02). The change in CET and in the proportion of plasma apo(a) in the triacylglycerol-rich lipoprotein fractions correlated with indexes of alimentary lipemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Consumption of meals high in trans fatty acids results in higher CET and postprandial lipoprotein concentrations enriched in apo(a) than does consumption of meals free of trans fatty acids. This study highlights the importance of double-bond configuration in determining postprandial lipoprotein composition.

Differential apolipoprotein(a) isoform expression in heterozygosity is an independent contributor to lipoprotein(a) levels variability

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels represent an independent risk factor for cardio- and cerebrovascular diseases. Since lipoprotein(a) levels show a wide variability even in subjects with similar apolipoprotein(a) isoforms, we investigated the contribution of apolipoprotein(a) heterozygosity to lipoprotein(a) variance. Lipoprotein(a) levels, apolipoprotein(a) isoforms identification and expression, and the correlation with other lipo-apolipoprotein parameters have been investigated in 628 subjects >18 years of age.

RESULTS

In our study, 246 subjects were found heterozygous for apolipoprotein(a) isoforms. Lipoprotein(a) levels were higher in females. About 40% of the subjects expressed the larger isoform more intensely than the dominant isoform. Lipoprotein(a) was correlated with apolipoprotein(a) dominant isoform size, HDL-cholesterol and smaller apolipoprotein(a) isoform expression rate. Lipoprotein(a) was independently correlated with the smaller apolipoprotein(a) isoform, with its expression rate and with LDL-cholesterol. The inclusion of the smaller apolipoprotein(a) expression rate in a multiple regression model explained at least an additional 4% of the lipoprotein(a) variance after correction for apolipoprotein(a) size.

CONCLUSIONS

The smaller isoforms are not always effectively dominant in heterozygosis since 40% of the subjects expressed more the larger isoform. The individual variability of apolipoprotein(a) isoform expression in heterozygosis could explain part of the lipoprotein(a) levels variability.

Quantification of lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a) in plasma and lipoprotein fractions in the hypertriglyceridemic state

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD) in particular in association with high low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations. Hypertriglyceridemia on the other hand has been found to be associated with low Lp(a) values. This observation could be confirmed in 851 patients of the outpatient lipid clinic. Lp(a) median levels were 2.7-fold higher in patients with triglycerides below 200 mg/dl as compared with patients expressing triglyceride levels above 200 mg/dl (19 vs 7 mg/dl, P < 0.0001). In contrast to these data apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] has been detected in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL). To find out whether the presence of apo(a) in TRL is determined by the concentration of these particles, apo(a) concentrations were measured in TRL in fasting plasma of ten hypertriglyceridemic patients and ten normal controls with Lp(a) serum levels above 25 mg/dl. The apo(a) concentration in TRL did not show statistically significant differences between controls and patients (2.0+/-0.9 vs 1.8+/-1.6 mg/dl). In the second part of the study apo(a) levels in TRL were measured before and after fat feeding in eight healthy volunteers. Again no significant differences were observed in the apo(a) concentrations of the d < 1.006 a ml fraction before and after fat feeding (1.03+/-1.06 vs 0.81+/-0.63 mg/dl). In summary, this study fails to show an association of apo(a) with TRL for different states of hypertriglyceridemia. This negative finding is shown for constant particle numbers but might not be true if the particle number in TRL increases.