Apoptosis induction by the dual-action DNA- and protein-reactive antitumor drug irofulven is largely Bcl-2-independent

The acylfulvene alkylating agent, LP-184, retains nanomolar potency in non-small cell lung cancer carrying otherwise therapy-refractory mutations

More than 40% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients lack actionable targets and require non-targeted chemotherapeutics. Many become refractory to drugs due to underlying resistance-associated mutations. KEAP1 mutant NSCLCs further activate NRF2 and upregulate its client PTGR1. LP-184, a novel alkylating agent belonging to the acylfulvene class is a prodrug dependent upon PTGR1. We hypothesized that NSCLC with KEAP1 mutations would continue to remain sensitive to LP-184. LP-184 demonstrated highly potent anticancer activity both in primary NSCLC cell lines and in those originating from brain metastases of primary lung cancers. LP-184 activity correlated with PTGR1 transcript levels but was independent of mutations in key oncogenes (KRAS and KEAP1) and tumor suppressors (TP53 and STK11). LP-184 was orders of magnitude more potent in vitro than cisplatin and pemetrexed. Correlative analyses of sensitivity with cell line gene expression patterns indicated that alterations in NRF2, MET, EGFR and BRAF consistently modulated LP-184 sensitivity. These correlations were then extended to TCGA analysis of 517 lung adenocarcinoma patients, out of which 35% showed elevated PTGR1, and 40% of those further displayed statistically significant co-occurrence of KEAP1 mutations. The gene correlates of LP-184 sensitivity allow additional personalization of therapeutic options for future treatment of NSCLC.

A machine learning-based gene signature of response to the novel alkylating agent LP-184 distinguishes its potential tumor indications

BACKGROUND

Non-targeted cytotoxics with anticancer activity are often developed through preclinical stages using response criteria observed in cell lines and xenografts. A panel of the NCI-60 cell lines is frequently the first line to define tumor types that are optimally responsive. Open data on the gene expression of the NCI-60 cell lines, provides a unique opportunity to add another dimension to the preclinical development of such drugs by interrogating correlations with gene expression patterns. Machine learning can be used to reduce the complexity of whole genome gene expression patterns to derive manageable signatures of response. Application of machine learning in early phases of preclinical development is likely to allow a better positioning and ultimate clinical success of molecules. LP-184 is a highly potent novel alkylating agent where the preclinical development is being guided by a dedicated machine learning-derived response signature. We show the feasibility and the accuracy of such a signature of response by accurately predicting the response to LP-184 validated using wet lab derived IC50s on a panel of cell lines.

RESULTS

We applied our proprietary RADR® platform to an NCI-60 discovery dataset encompassing LP-184 IC50s and publicly available gene expression data. We used multiple feature selection layers followed by the XGBoost regression model and reduced the complexity of 20,000 gene expression values to generate a 16-gene signature leading to the identification of a set of predictive candidate biomarkers which form an LP-184 response gene signature. We further validated this signature and predicted response to an additional panel of cell lines. Considering fold change differences and correlation between actual and predicted LP-184 IC50 values as validation performance measures, we obtained 86% accuracy at four-fold cut-off, and a strong (r = 0.70) and significant (p value 1.36e-06) correlation between actual and predicted LP-184 sensitivity. In agreement with the perceived mechanism of action of LP-184, PTGR1 emerged as the top weighted gene.

CONCLUSION

Integration of a machine learning-derived signature of response with in vitro assessment of LP-184 efficacy facilitated the derivation of manageable yet robust biomarkers which can be used to predict drug sensitivity with high accuracy and clinical value.

Pretreatment with insulin-like growth factor I protects skeletal muscle cells against oxidative damage via PI3K/Akt and ERK1/2 MAPK pathways

Oxidative stress has an important role in the pathogenesis of many muscle diseases. The major contributors to oxidative stress in muscle tissue are reactive oxygen species such as oxygen ions, free radicals, and peroxides. Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) has been shown to increase muscle mass and promote muscle cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival. We, therefore, hypothesized that IGF-I might also be cytoprotective for muscle cells during oxidative stress. Exogenous hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) was used to induce oxidative stress/damage in two types of skeletal muscle cells. Apoptotic pathways were assessed after the oxidative damage and the effects of IGF-I on oxidative stress in muscle cells were examined. Different IGF-I sub-pathways were analyzed with measurement of the expression of pro-and anti-apoptotic proteins. It was found that H(2)O(2) diminishes muscle cell viability and induces a caspase-independent apoptotic cell death. Pretreatment with IGF-I protects muscle cells from H(2)O(2)-induced cell death and enhances muscle cells survival. This effect appears to result from the promotion of the anti-apoptotic protein, Bcl2. Further investigation shows that protection is via an IGF-I sub-pathway: PI3K/Akt and ERK1/2 MAPK pathways. Protecting muscle cells from oxidative damage presents a potential application in the treatment of the muscle wasting, which appears in many muscle pathologies including Duchenne muscle dystrophy and sarcopenia.

Synergy of Irofulven in combination with various anti-metabolites, enzyme inhibitors, and miscellaneous agents in MV522 lung carcinoma cells: marked interaction with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil

The novel agent Irofulven (HMAF, NSC 683863) has demonstrated significant antitumor activity against solid tumors in various xenograft models and human clinical trials. The antitumor potential of combining irofulven with 72 different anti-metabolite, enzyme inhibiting, and miscellaneous agents was investigated in this study. The human lung carcinoma MV522 cell line and its corresponding xenograft model were used to evaluate the activity of irofulven in combination with these different agents. Irofulven in combination with select anti-metabolites, notably cytidine or adenine-derived agents, displayed strong synergistic activity in both in vitro and in vivo studies. Agents demonstrating strong synergistic interaction with irofulven included gemcitabine, cyclocytidine, cytarabine, fludarabine phosphate, cladribine, and 5-fluorouracil. Other anti-metabolites, enzyme inhibitors, and a variety of miscellaneous agents failed to interact beneficially when administered in combination with irofulven. The therapeutic activity of irofulven is enhanced considerably when irofulven is combined with select anti-metabolite agents, and further clinical evaluation of these combinations is warranted. The synergistic interaction with these combinations may stem from a variety of actions including inhibition of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway, topoisomerase I activity, and caspase-dependent and independent induction of apoptosis.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irofulven and capecitabine administered every 2 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose, dose limiting toxicities (DLT), safety and pharmacokinetics of irofulven combined with capecitabine in advanced solid tumor patients.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Irofulven was given i.v. over 30 min on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks; capecitabine was given orally twice daily, day 1 to 15. Dose levels (DL) were: irofulven (mg/kg)/capecitabine (mg/m2/day): DL1: 0.3/1,700; DL2: 0.4/1,700; DL3: 0.4/2,000; DL4: 0.5/2,000.

RESULTS

Between May 2002 and March 2004, 37 patients were treated and 36 evaluable for MTD. DLT occurred in 1/6 evaluable patients in DL1 (grade 3 thrombocytopenia); 1/6 in DL3 (grade 3 thrombocytopenia); 2/7 in DL4 (grade 3 febrile neutropenia, grade 3 thrombocytopenia). DL4 was defined as the MTD and DL3 was established as the recommended dose (RD). DLTs occurred in 1 of 14 additional patients treated at DL3. No treatment-related deaths or grade 4 non-hematological toxicity occurred, and grade 3 toxicities were infrequent. Antitumor activity was observed; two partial responses were noted in thyroid carcinoma (DL1, DL4); one unconfirmed partial response was observed in a patient with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, (DL3); 12 patients had disease stabilization >3 months; of eight patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), one patient had PSA normalization and four short-term stabilizations of PSA occurred. Capecitabine and irofulven pharmacokinetics results did not suggest drug-drug interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Irofulven with capecitabine was adequately tolerated and evidence of antitumor activity was observed. The recommended dose is irofulven 0.4 mg/kg and capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2/day.

Phase I trial of irofulven (MGI 114) in pediatric patients with solid tumors

PURPOSE

We performed a Phase I trial of irofulven (MGI 114) to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and the plasma pharmacokinetics of irofulven in children < or=21 years of age with refractory/recurrent malignancies.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Thirty-five patients were entered into the study, of whom 34 were eligible. Patients received Irofulven daily x 5 days every 28 days over 10 min, following pre-treatment with ondansetron (0.45 mg/kg) and dexamethasone (12 mg/m(2)). The initial dose of irofulven was 8 mg/m(2) daily, with subsequent escalations to 10, 13, and 17 mg/m(2). Plasma pharmacokinetic samples were obtained in a subset patients.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were assessable for toxicity, and 30 were assessable for response. In heavily pre-treated patients, dose-limiting thrombocytopenia was observed in two patients at the 8 mg/m(2)/day, and in one patient at the 6 mg/m(2)/day dose level. In less heavily pre-treated patients, proteinuria and elevated creatinine were dose limiting in two patients at the 17 mg/m(2)/day dose level. At 13 mg/m(2)/day, constipation, hyperkalemia with elevated creatinine, and thrombocytopenia was dose limiting in three patients. There were no complete or partial responses. One patient with poorly differentiated carcinoma had stable disease and received 11 courses of therapy. Patients demonstrated a lower systemic exposure and greater clearance than adults treated at similar dose levels.

CONCLUSION

The MTD of irofulven administered daily x 5 every 28 days with concomitant ondansetron and dexamethasone is 6 mg/m(2)/day in heavily pre-treated patients and 10 mg/m(2)/day in less heavily pre-treated patients.

Can targeting apoptosis resolve the cancer saga?

A defect in apoptosis is almost always linked to many pathologies, including cancer. Carcinogenesis has been linked to abnormalities in the apoptotic pathway, and many drugs that are targeted at different parts of this pathway are being developed. There have been many promising drugs that target the extrinsic death receptor pathway as well as the intrinsic mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. There have also been developments in targeting initiator and effector caspases, as well as the death domains that are involved in transducing the apoptotic signals. In this review, the authors will briefly explain how apoptosis deregulation can lead to cancer and discuss drugs that promise success in targeting this anomaly. This article shall also explain how co-treatments with chemotherapy can increase survival of cancer patients. There is a problem of acquired resistance in some of these therapies but there may be ways to overcome this.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irofulven and cisplatin administered in a 30-min infusion every two weeks to patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

To determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose, safety and pharmacokinetics of irofulven combined with cisplatin in advanced solid tumor patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cisplatin and irofulven were given sequentially i.v. over 30 min on day 1 and 15 every 4 weeks. Four dose levels (DL) were explored: irofulven (mg/kg)/cisplatin (mg/m2): DL1: 0.3/30; DL2: 0.4/30; DL3: 0.4/40; DL4: 0.5/40. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) included dosing omission and delay > 1 week. MTD was the DL with DLT in 2/2 or > or = 2/6 patients during cycle 1-2.

RESULTS

Between March 2002 and April 2003, 33 patients were treated. DLT occurred in 1/6 patients in DL1 (hypomagnesemia, hypocalcemia); 1/6 in DL2 (thrombocytopenia); 2 heavily pretreated patients out of 6 patients in DL3 (neutropenic infection, thrombocytopenia, stomatitis); 2/3 in DL4 (asthenia, blurred vision). Three DLT occurred in 12 additional patients treated at DL2. No toxic deaths occurred; grade 4 toxicity and grade 3 non-hematological toxicity were infrequent. Six patients reported grade 1-2 visual events. Antitumor activity was observed over a broad spectrum of tumor types in all DLs: 1 partial response in bulky sarcoma (DL1); 1 clinical response in endometrial carcinoma (DL1); 2 partial responses not confirmed due to discontinuation (ovarian DL2, renal DL4); 8 stabilizations > 3 months; PSA response: 3/9 prostate cancer patients. Irofulven showed rapid elimination and high interpatient variability. Platinum and irofulven pharmacokinetics did not suggest drug-drug interactions.

CONCLUSION

Irofulven with cisplatin was adequately tolerated and substantial evidence of antitumor activity was observed. The recommended dose is irofulven 0.4 mg/kg and cisplatin 30 mg/m2.

Characterizations of irofulven cytotoxicity in combination with cisplatin and oxaliplatin in human colon, breast, and ovarian cancer cells

PURPOSE

This study assessed the cytotoxic effects of irofulven in combination with oxaliplatin and cisplatin in a panel of human cancer cell lines.

METHODS

Growth inhibition studies were performed using the human HT29 colon cancer cell line, irofulven-resistant derivative HT29/IF2, breast cancer cell line MCF7, and ovarian cancer line CAOV3. Irofulven-oxaliplatin combinations were compared with irofulven-cisplatin combinations in the same cell lines using similar experimental settings. Cells were exposed for 1 h to irofulven and then for 24 h to oxaliplatin or cisplatin and vice versa.

RESULTS

Single agent irofulven displayed cytotoxic effects against human colon HT29 cells, human breast cancer cell lines including MCF7, SKBR3, and ZR-75-1, and human ovarian cancer cell lines CAOV3, OVCAR3, and IGROV1, with OVCAR3 being the most sensitive cancer cell line (IC50: 2.4 microM). In all tested cell lines the oxaliplatin-irofulven combination led to clear evidence of synergistic activity. In HT29 and HT29/IF2, the sequence oxaliplatin followed by irofulven appears to be the most effective whereas in MCF7 cells, irofulven given prior to or simultaneously with oxaliplatin is more effective than the other schedule. The combination displays additive activity toward CAOV3 ovarian cells when irofulven was administered prior to or simultaneously with oxaliplatin and partially synergistic when oxaliplatin was followed by irofulven. In most of the cell lines, the sequence oxaliplatin followed by irofulven appears to be the most effective as compared to other schedules. A combination of irofulven with cisplatin has the same efficacy as with oxaliplatin for the same cell lines. Cell cycle studies show that irofulven increases the proportion of cells in the S phase. Cisplatin-irofulven and oxaliplatin-irofulven combinations block cells in G1/S and potently induce apoptosis.

CONCLUSION

Irofulven displays synergistic antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects when combined with oxaliplatin over a broad range of concentrations in human colon and breast cancer cells. Acquired resistance to irofulven has limited impact on the effects of cisplatin-irofulven and oxaliplatin-irofulven combinations. Based on these data, irofulven-oxaliplatin and cisplatin-irofulven combinations will be further explored in clinical trials, favoring the use schedules of oxaliplatin given prior to irofulven in patients with cancer.

Characterization and Multiparameter Analysis of Visual Adverse Events in Irofulven Single-Agent Phase I and II Trials

PURPOSE

Irofulven (6-hydroxymethylacylfulvene) is a novel agent, derived from illudin S, with potent apoptotic effects in preclinical models. In the Phase I trial evaluating intermittent weekly schedules, visual symptoms were dose limiting. The aim of this analysis was to better characterize the visual adverse events of irofulven and provide treatment guidelines.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Clinical data from 277 patients entered in single-agent Phase I to II clinical trials who received irofulven on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks; days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks; or days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks were included in this multiparameter analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 74 patients (27%) experienced visual symptoms. The most frequently reported symptoms were flashing lights (12% of patients), blurred vision (9%), and photosensitivity (8%). Grade 3 toxicity was observed in 12 patients (4%). The incidence and severity of visual events were dose dependent, with no grade 3 visual events occurring at doses < or =0.50 mg/kg and grade 1 to 2 events in only 12% and 8% of patients, at doses of < or =0.50 mg/kg and < or =20 mg/m2, respectively. Grade 1 to 2 toxicity was reversible in most patients. Abnormal electroretinogram and abnormal visual fields were noted after irofulven treatment in 24 of 39 patients (62%) and 15 of 26 patients (58%), respectively. All but 1 patient who had electroretinogram assessment received doses >0.50 mg/kg. Clinical examination and visual field assessment were found to be better correlated with symptoms and appear to be more appropriate for surveillance of irofulven retinal symptoms than electroretinograms.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of retained antitumor activity and reversibility of grade 1 and 2 visual symptoms at lower doses, it appears that an irofulven dose of < or =0.50 mg/kg or < or =20 mg/m2, not to exceed 50 mg in a single dose, given as a 30-minute infusion on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks or days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks minimizes the frequency and severity of visual symptoms.

Caspase-mediated apoptosis and caspase-independent cell death induced by irofulven in prostate cancer cells

Irofulven (hydroxymethylacylfulvene) is a novel antitumor drug, which acts by alkylating cellular macromolecular targets. The drug is a potent inducer of apoptosis in various types of tumor cells, whereas it is nonapoptotic in normal cells. This study defined molecular responses to irofulven involving mitochondrial dysfunction and leading to death of prostate tumor LNCaP-Pro5 cells. Irofulven caused early (2–5 hours) translocation of the proapoptotic Bax from cytosol to mitochondria followed by the dissipation of mitochondrial membrane potential and cytochrome c release at 4 to 12 hours. These effects preceded caspase activation and during the first 6 hours were not affected by caspase inhibitors. Processing of caspase-9 initiated the caspase cascade at ∼6 hours and progressed over time. The activation of the caspase cascade provided a positive feedback loop that enhanced Bcl-2-independent translocation and cytochrome c release. General and specific caspase inhibitors abrogated irofulven-induced apoptotic DNA fragmentation with the following order of potency: pan-caspase ≥ caspase-9 &gt; caspase-8/6 &gt; caspase-2 &gt; caspase-3/7 &gt; caspase-1/4. Abrogation of caspase-mediated DNA fragmentation failed to salvage irofulven-treated cells from growth inhibition and loss of viability, demonstrating a substantial contribution of a caspase-independent cell death. Monobromobimane, an inhibitor of alternative caspase-independent apoptotic pathway that is mediated by mitochondrial permeability transition, antagonized both apoptosis, measured as phosphatidylserine externalization, and cytotoxicity of irofulven. Collectively, the results indicate that irofulven-induced signaling is integrated at the level of mitochondrial dysfunction. The induction of both caspase-dependent and caspase-independent death pathways is consistent with pleiotropic effects of irofulven, which include targeting of cellular DNA and proteins.

Enhanced topoisomerase II targeting by annamycin and related 4-demethoxy anthracycline analogues

Targeting topoisomerase II (topo II) is regarded as an important component of the pleiotropic mechanism of action of anthracycline drugs. Here, we show that 4-demethoxy analogues of doxorubicin, including annamycin, exhibit a greater ability to trap topo II cleavage complexes than doxorubicin and some other 4-methoxy analogues. In leukemic CEM cells with wild-type topo II, annamycin induced substantial levels of topo II–mediated DNA-protein cross-links (15-37% of total DNA for 0.5-50 μmol/L drug), whereas doxorubicin-induced DNA-protein cross-links were marginal (0-4%). In CEM/VM-1 cells that harbor mutated, drug-resistant topo II, both 4-methoxy and 4-demethoxy drugs produced marginal DNA-protein cross-links. Annamycin, but not doxorubicin, formed topo II–mediated DNA-protein cross-links also in isolated CEM nuclei. In disparity with the unequal DNA-protein cross-link induction, both drugs induced comparable levels of DNA strand breaks in CEM cells. Compared with CEM, drug cytotoxicity against CEM/VM-1 cells was reduced 10.5- to 13.8-fold for 4-demethoxy analogues but only 3.8- to 5.5-fold for 4-methoxy drugs. Hence, growth inhibition by 4-demethoxy analogues seems more dependent on the presence of wild-type topo II. The enhanced topo II targeting by 4-demethoxy analogues was accompanied by a profound induction of apoptotic DNA fragmentation in leukemic CEM cells. Normal WI-38 fibroblasts, however, were markedly more resistant to annamycin-induced DNA-protein cross-links, apoptosis, and growth inhibition. The enhanced topo II targeting by 4-demethoxy doxorubicin analogues underscores the mechanistic diversity of anthracycline drugs. This diversity needs to be recognized as a factor in responses to drugs such as annamycin and doxorubicin.

Antitumor activity of irofulven against human ovarian cancer cell lines, human tumor colony-forming units, and xenografts

The objective of this study was to investigate the cytotoxic activity of irofulven (HMAF, MGI 114), a unique chemotherapeutic agent currently under clinical investigation, in various preclinical models of ovarian cancer. Antiproliferative effects of irofulven in ovarian cancer cell lines and ovarian tumor specimens were characterized in vitro using sulforhodamine B and human tumor colony-forming assays, respectively. Irofulven demonstrated marked activity against a panel of ovarian tumor cell lines, including IGROV1, OVCAR-3, OVCAR-4, OVCAR-5, OVCAR-8, and SK-OV-3, all of which exhibit various drug resistance mechanisms. In human tumor cloning assays, irofulven inhibited colony formation in surgically derived ovarian tumors at concentrations as low as 0.001 micro g /ml and indicated superior activity in comparison with paclitaxel when tested against the same tumor specimens. The antitumor activity of irofulven compared to that of paclitaxel was also examined using the SK-OV-3 xenograft model. In mice bearing subcutaneously implanted SK-OV-3 tumors, treatment with paclitaxel failed to inhibit tumor growth; whereas mice treated with maximum tolerated doses of irofulven had a 25% partial shrinkage rate, and the remaining animals had a mean tumor growth inhibition of 82%. The potent activity of irofulven against ovarian tumors in vitro and in vivo supports the evaluation of its clinical activity in ovarian cancer.

Antitumor activity of irofulven monotherapy and in combination with mitoxantrone or docetaxel against human prostate cancer models

BACKGROUND

Irofulven (6-hydroxymethylacylfulvene, HMAF, MGI 114) is a novel antitumor agent currently undergoing clinical trials in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. This report examines the efficacy of irofulven alone or in combination with mitoxantrone or docetaxel against androgen-independent prostate cancer cell lines.

METHODS

To elucidate the activity of irofulven monotherapy and in combination, PC-3 and DU-145 cell lines were utilized in cellular viability assessments and tumor growth inhibition studies.

RESULTS

Viability assays with irofulven and mitoxantrone show additive to synergistic activity. Furthermore, irofulven and mitoxantrone in combination exhibit enhanced antitumor activity against PC-3 and DU-145 xenografts. Additive combination effects are also observed when irofulven and docetaxel were tested against PC-3 xenografts and curative activity (8/10 CR) is observed in DU-145 xenografts.

CONCLUSIONS

These studies demonstrate that irofulven displays strong activity as monotherapy and in combination with mitoxantrone or docetaxel against androgen-independent prostate cancer in vitro and in vivo; thus, supporting the clinical investigation of irofulven against hormone-refractory prostate cancer.