The muscarinic agonist xanomeline increases monoamine release and immediate early gene expression in the rat prefrontal cortex

Psychosis as a disorder of muscarinic signalling: psychopathology and pharmacology

Dopaminergic receptor antagonism is a crucial component of all licensed treatments for psychosis, and dopamine dysfunction has been central to pathophysiological models of psychotic symptoms. Some clinical trials, however, indicate that drugs that act through muscarinic receptor agonism can also be effective in treating psychosis, potentially implicating muscarinic abnormalities in the pathophysiology of psychosis. Here, we discuss understanding of the central muscarinic system, and we examine preclinical, behavioural, post-mortem, and neuroimaging evidence for its involvement in psychosis. We then consider how altered muscarinic signalling could contribute to the genesis and maintenance of psychotic symptoms, and we review the clinical evidence for muscarinic agents as treatments. Finally, we discuss future research that could clarify the relationship between the muscarinic system and psychotic symptoms.

Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia: aetiology, pathophysiology, and treatment

Cognitive deficits are a core feature of schizophrenia, account for much of the impaired functioning associated with the disorder and are not responsive to existing treatments. In this review, we first describe the clinical presentation and natural history of these deficits. We then consider aetiological factors, highlighting how a range of similar genetic and environmental factors are associated with both cognitive function and schizophrenia. We then review the pathophysiological mechanisms thought to underlie cognitive symptoms, including the role of dopamine, cholinergic signalling and the balance between GABAergic interneurons and glutamatergic pyramidal cells. Finally, we review the clinical management of cognitive impairments and candidate novel treatments.

Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Agonists as Novel Treatments for Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia remains a challenging disease to treat effectively with current antipsychotic medications due to their limited efficacy across the entire spectrum of core symptoms as well as their often burdensome side-effect profiles and poor tolerability. An unmet need remains for novel, mechanistically unique, and better tolerated therapeutic agents for treating schizophrenia, especially those that treat not only positive symptoms but also the negative and cognitive symptoms of the disease. Almost 25 years ago, the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) agonist xanomeline was reported to reduce psychotic symptoms and improve cognition in patients with Alzheimer's disease. The antipsychotic and procognitive properties of xanomeline were subsequently confirmed in a small study of acutely psychotic patients with chronic schizophrenia. These unexpected clinical findings have prompted considerable efforts across academia and industry to target mAChRs as a new approach to potentially treat schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. The authors discuss recent advances in mAChR biology and pharmacology and the current understanding of the relative roles of the various mAChR subtypes, their downstream cellular effectors, and key neural circuits mediating the reduction in the core symptoms of schizophrenia in patients treated with xanomeline. They also provide an update on the status of novel mAChR agonists currently in development for potential treatment of schizophrenia and other neuropsychiatric disorders.

Acute gene expression changes in the mouse hippocampus following a combined Gulf War toxicant exposure

AIMS

Approximately 30% of the nearly 700,000 Veterans who were deployed to the Gulf War from 1990 to 1991 have reported experiencing a variety of symptoms including difficulties with learning and memory, depression and anxiety, and increased incidence of neurodegenerative diseases. Combined toxicant exposure to acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors has been studied extensively as a likely risk factor. In this study, we modeled Gulf War exposure in male C57Bl/6J mice with simultaneous administration of three chemicals implicated as exposure hazards for Gulf War Veterans: pyridostigmine bromide, the anti-sarin prophylactic; chlorpyrifos, an organophosphate insecticide; and the repellant N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET).

MAIN METHODS

Following two weeks of daily exposure, we examined changes in gene expression by whole transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) with hippocampal isolates. Hippocampal-associated spatial memory was assessed with a Y-maze task. We hypothesized that genes important for neuronal health become dysregulated by toxicant-induced damage and that these detrimental inflammatory gene expression profiles could lead to chronic neurodegeneration.

KEY FINDINGS

We found dysregulation of genes indicating a pro-inflammatory response and downregulation of genes associated with neuronal health and several important immediate early genes (IEGs), including Arc and Egr1, which were both reduced approximately 1.5-fold. Mice exposed to PB + CPF + DEET displayed a 1.6-fold reduction in preference for the novel arm, indicating impaired spatial memory.

SIGNIFICANCE

Differentially expressed genes observed at an acute timepoint may provide insight into the pathophysiology of Gulf War Illness and further explanations for chronic neurodegeneration after toxicant exposure.

The M1/M4 preferring muscarinic agonist xanomeline modulates functional connectivity and NMDAR antagonist-induced changes in the mouse brain

Cholinergic drugs acting at M1/M4 muscarinic receptors hold promise for the treatment of symptoms associated with brain disorders characterized by cognitive impairment, mood disturbances, or psychosis, such as Alzheimer's disease or schizophrenia. However, the brain-wide functional substrates engaged by muscarinic agonists remain poorly understood. Here we used a combination of pharmacological fMRI (phMRI), resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI), and resting-state quantitative EEG (qEEG) to investigate the effects of a behaviorally active dose of the M1/M4-preferring muscarinic agonist xanomeline on brain functional activity in the rodent brain. We investigated both the effects of xanomeline per se and its modulatory effects on signals elicited by the NMDA-receptor antagonists phencyclidine (PCP) and ketamine. We found that xanomeline induces robust and widespread BOLD signal phMRI amplitude increases and decreased high-frequency qEEG spectral activity. rsfMRI mapping in the mouse revealed that xanomeline robustly decreased neocortical and striatal connectivity but induces focal increases in functional connectivity within the nucleus accumbens and basal forebrain. Notably, xanomeline pre-administration robustly attenuated both the cortico-limbic phMRI response and the fronto-hippocampal hyper-connectivity induced by PCP, enhanced PCP-modulated functional connectivity locally within the nucleus accumbens and basal forebrain, and reversed the gamma and high-frequency qEEG power increases induced by ketamine. Collectively, these results show that xanomeline robustly induces both cholinergic-like neocortical activation and desynchronization of functional networks in the mammalian brain. These effects could serve as a translatable biomarker for future clinical investigations of muscarinic agents, and bear mechanistic relevance for the putative therapeutic effect of these class of compounds in brain disorders.

Protective effect of nanocurcumin against neurotoxicity induced by doxorubicin in rat's brain

Cognitive impairment is one of the serious side effects that cancer-treated patients suffer from after treatment by doxorubicin (DOX). Investigating the mechanisms underlying this impairment is crucial for its treatment or prevention. The current study investigates the cortical and hippocampal neurochemical changes induced by an acute dose of DOX (20 mg/kg, i.p.) and evaluates the neuroprotective effect of nanocurcumin (NC) (50 mg/kg, p.o.) against these changes. Animals were randomly divided into four groups, control, rats treated with either NC or DOX, and the fourth group treated with NC prior to DOX. Cortical dopamine level has significantly increased (71.88 %) after DOX injection. This was associated with a significant rise in the levels of lipid peroxidation (183.99 %, 201.4 %) and nitric oxide (36.54 %, 55 %) and a significant reduction in reduced glutathione (13 %, 21.44 %) in the cortex and hippocampus, respectively. In addition, DOX inhibited the cortical and hippocampal activities of acetylcholinesterase (94.82 %, 62.75 %) and monoamine oxidase (64.40 %, 68.84 %), respectively. Protection with NC mitigates the changes induced in the oxidative stress parameters by DOX. However, the effect on the activities of AchE and MAO was insignificant. This was reflected in the level of dopamine that showed non-significant changes in comparison to control and DOX-treated rats. The present findings indicate that oxidative stress, inhibition in AchE, MAO, and the subsequent elevation in dopamine could have a crucial role in mediating the chemo-brain adverse effects induced by DOX. In addition, protection with NC mitigated some of these adverse effects thus rendering DOX more tolerable.

Selective allosteric modulation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors for the treatment of schizophrenia and substance use disorders

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChRs) subtypes represent exciting new targets for the treatment of schizophrenia and substance use disorder (SUD). Recent advances in the development of subtype-selective allosteric modulators have revealed promising effects in preclinical models targeting the different symptoms observed in schizophrenia and SUD. M₁ PAMs display potential for addressing the negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia, while M₄ PAMs exhibit promise in treating preclinical models predictive of antipsychotic-like activity. In SUD, there is increasing support for modulation of mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic circuitry involved in SUD with selective M₄ mAChR PAMs or M₅ mAChR NAMs. Allosteric modulators of these mAChR subtypes have demonstrated efficacy in rodent models of cocaine and ethanol seeking, with indications that these ligand may also be useful for other substances of abuse, as well as in various stages in the cycle of addiction. Importantly, allosteric modulators of the different mAChR subtypes may provide viable treatment options, while conferring greater subtype specificity and corresponding enhanced therapeutic index than orthosteric muscarinic ligands and maintaining endogenous temporo-spatial ACh signaling. Overall, subtype specific mAChR allosteric modulators represent important novel therapeutic mechanisms for schizophrenia and SUD.

In Vivo Pharmacological Comparison of TAK-071, a Positive Allosteric Modulator of Muscarinic M1 Receptor, and Xanomeline, an Agonist of Muscarinic M1/M4 Receptor, in Rodents

Activation of the M₁ muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (M₁R) may be an effective therapeutic approach for Alzheimer's disease (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies, and schizophrenia. Previously, the M₁R/M₄R agonist xanomeline was shown to improve cognitive function and exert antipsychotic effects in patients with AD and schizophrenia. However, its clinical development was discontinued because of its cholinomimetic side effects. We compared in vivo pharmacological profiles of a novel M₁R-selective positive allosteric modulator, TAK-071, and xanomeline in rodents. Xanomeline suppressed both methamphetamine- and MK-801-induced hyperlocomotion in mice, whereas TAK-071 suppressed only MK-801-induced hyperlocomotion. In a previous study, we showed that TAK-071 improved scopolamine-induced cognitive deficits in a rat novel object recognition task (NORT) with 33-fold margins versus cholinergic side effects (diarrhea). Xanomeline also improved scopolamine-induced cognitive impairments in a NORT; however, it had no margin versus cholinergic side effects (e.g., diarrhea, salivation, and hypoactivity) in rats. These side effects were observed even in M₁R knockout mice. Evaluation of c-Fos expression as a marker of neural activation revealed that xanomeline increased the number of c-Fos-positive cells in several cortical areas, the hippocampal formation, amygdala, and nucleus accumbens. Other than in the orbital cortex and claustrum, TAK-071 induced similar c-Fos expression patterns. When donepezil was co-administered to increase the levels of acetylcholine, the number of TAK-071-induced c-Fos-positive cells in these brain regions was increased. TAK-071, through induction of similar neural activation as that seen with xanomeline, may produce procognitive and antipsychotic effects with improved cholinergic side effects.

Positive allosteric modulation of M1 and M4 muscarinic receptors as potential therapeutic treatments for schizophrenia

Current antipsychotic drugs provide symptomatic relief for positive symptoms of schizophrenia, but do not offer symptom management for negative and cognitive symptoms. In addition, many patients discontinue treatment due to adverse side effects. Therefore, there is a critical need to develop more effective and safe treatment options. Although the etiology of schizophrenia is unclear, considerable data from post-mortem, neuroimaging and neuropharmacology studies support a role of the muscarinic acetylcholine (mAChRs) in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Substantial evidence suggests that activation of mAChRs has the potential to treat all symptom domains of schizophrenia. Despite encouraging results in demonstrating efficacy, clinical trials of nonselective mAChR agonists were limited in their clinical utility due to dose-limiting peripheral side effects. Accordingly, efforts have been made to specifically target centrally located M1 and M4 mAChR subtypes devoid of adverse-effect liability. To circumvent this limitation, there have been tremendous advances in the discovery of ligands that bind at allosteric sites, binding sites distinct from the orthosteric site, which are structurally less conserved and thereby afford high levels of receptor subtype selectivity. The discovery of subtype-specific allosteric modulators has greatly advanced our understanding of the physiological role of various muscarinic receptor subtypes in schizophrenia and the potential utility of M1 and M4 mAChR subtypes as targets for the development of novel treatments for schizophrenia and related disorders. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Neuropharmacology on Muscarinic Receptors'.

Selective activation of M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors reverses MK-801-induced behavioral impairments and enhances associative learning in rodents

Positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) of the M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) represent a novel approach for the treatment of psychotic symptoms associated with schizophrenia and other neuropsychiatric disorders. We recently reported that the selective M4 PAM VU0152100 produced an antipsychotic drug-like profile in rodents after amphetamine challenge. Previous studies suggest that enhanced cholinergic activity may also improve cognitive function and reverse deficits observed with reduced signaling through the N-methyl-d-aspartate subtype of the glutamate receptor (NMDAR) in the central nervous system. Prior to this study, the M1 mAChR subtype was viewed as the primary candidate for these actions relative to the other mAChR subtypes. Here we describe the discovery of a novel M4 PAM, VU0467154, with enhanced in vitro potency and improved pharmacokinetic properties relative to other M4 PAMs, enabling a more extensive characterization of M4 actions in rodent models. We used VU0467154 to test the hypothesis that selective potentiation of M4 receptor signaling could ameliorate the behavioral, cognitive, and neurochemical impairments induced by the noncompetitive NMDAR antagonist MK-801. VU0467154 produced a robust dose-dependent reversal of MK-801-induced hyperlocomotion and deficits in preclinical models of associative learning and memory functions, including the touchscreen pairwise visual discrimination task in wild-type mice, but failed to reverse these stimulant-induced deficits in M4 KO mice. VU0467154 also enhanced the acquisition of both contextual and cue-mediated fear conditioning when administered alone in wild-type mice. These novel findings suggest that M4 PAMs may provide a strategy for addressing the more complex affective and cognitive disruptions associated with schizophrenia and other neuropsychiatric disorders.

Antipsychotic drug-like effects of the selective M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor positive allosteric modulator VU0152100

Accumulating evidence suggests that selective M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) activators may offer a novel strategy for the treatment of psychosis. However, previous efforts to develop selective M4 activators were unsuccessful because of the lack of M4 mAChR subtype specificity and off-target muscarinic adverse effects. We recently developed VU0152100, a highly selective M4 positive allosteric modulator (PAM) that exerts central effects after systemic administration. We now report that VU0152100 dose-dependently reverses amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion in rats and wild-type mice, but not in M4 KO mice. VU0152100 also blocks amphetamine-induced disruption of the acquisition of contextual fear conditioning and prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex. These effects were observed at doses that do not produce catalepsy or peripheral adverse effects associated with non-selective mAChR agonists. To further understand the effects of selective potentiation of M4 on region-specific brain activation, VU0152100 alone and in combination with amphetamine were evaluated using pharmacologic magnetic resonance imaging (phMRI). Key neural substrates of M4-mediated modulation of the amphetamine response included the nucleus accumbens (NAS), caudate-putamen (CP), hippocampus, and medial thalamus. Functional connectivity analysis of phMRI data, specifically assessing correlations in activation between regions, revealed several brain networks involved in the M4 modulation of amphetamine-induced brain activation, including the NAS and retrosplenial cortex with motor cortex, hippocampus, and medial thalamus. Using in vivo microdialysis, we found that VU0152100 reversed amphetamine-induced increases in extracellular dopamine levels in NAS and CP. The present data are consistent with an antipsychotic drug-like profile of activity for VU0152100. Taken together, these data support the development of selective M4 PAMs as a new approach to the treatment of psychosis and cognitive impairments associated with psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia.

The muscarinic acetylcholine receptor agonist BuTAC mediates antipsychotic-like effects via the M4 subtype

The generation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) subtype-selective compounds has been challenging, requiring use of nonpharmacological approaches, such as genetically engineered animals, to deepen our understanding of the potential that members of the muscarinic receptor subtype family hold as therapeutic drug targets. The muscarinic receptor agonist 'BuTAC' was previously shown to exhibit efficacy in animal models of psychosis, although the particular receptor subtype(s) responsible for such activity was unclear. Here, we evaluate the in vitro functional agonist and antagonist activity of BuTAC using an assay that provides a direct measure of G protein activation. In addition, we employ the conditioned avoidance response paradigm, an in vivo model predictive of antipsychotic activity, and mouse genetic deletion models to investigate which presynaptic mAChR subtype mediates the antipsychotic-like effects of BuTAC. Our results show that, in vitro, BuTAC acts as a full agonist at the M2AChR and a partial agonist at the M1 and M4 receptors, with full antagonist activity at M3- and M5AChRs. In the mouse conditioned avoidance response (CAR) assay, BuTAC exhibits an atypical antipsychotic-like profile by selectively decreasing avoidance responses at doses that do not induce escape failures. CAR results using M2(-/-), M4(-/-), and M2/M4 (M2/M4(-/-)) mice found that the effects of BuTAC were near completely lost in M2/M4(-/-) double-knockout mice and potency of BuTAC was right-shifted in M4(-/-) as compared with wild-type and M2(-/-) mice. The M2/M4(-/-) mice showed no altered sensitivity to the antipsychotic effects of either haloperidol or clozapine, suggesting that these compounds mediate their actions in CAR via a non-mAChR-mediated mechanism. These data support a role for the M4AChR subtype in mediating the antipsychotic-like activity of BuTAC and implicate M4AChR agonism as a potential novel therapeutic mechanism for ameliorating symptoms associated with schizophrenia.

Allosteric modulation of the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor: improving cognition and a potential treatment for schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease

Allosteric modulation of AMPA, NR2B, mGlu2, mGlu5 and M1, targeting glutamatergic dysfunction, represents a significant area of research for the treatment of schizophrenia. Of these targets, clinical promise has been demonstrated using muscarinic activators for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and schizophrenia. These diseases have inspired researchers to determine the effects of modulating cholinergic transmission in the forebrain, which is primarily regulated by one of five subtypes of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR), a subfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Of these five subtypes, M1 is highly expressed in brain regions responsible for learning, cognition and memory. Xanomeline, an orthosteric muscarinic agonist with modest selectivity, was one of the first compounds that displayed improvements in behavioral disturbances in AD patients and efficacy in schizophrenics. Since these initial clinical results, many scientists, including those in our laboratories, have strived to elucidate the role of M1 with compounds that display improved selectivity for this receptor by targeting allosteric modes of receptor activation. A survey of selected compounds in this area will be presented.

Novel allosteric agonists of M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors induce brain region-specific responses that correspond with behavioral effects in animal models

M(1) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) represent a viable target for treatment of multiple disorders of the central nervous system (CNS) including Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia. The recent discovery of highly selective allosteric agonists of M(1) receptors has provided a major breakthrough in developing a viable approach for the discovery of novel therapeutic agents that target these receptors. Here we describe the characterization of two novel M(1) allosteric agonists, VU0357017 and VU0364572, that display profound differences in their efficacy in activating M(1) coupling to different signaling pathways including Ca(2+) and β-arrestin responses. Interestingly, the ability of these agents to differentially activate coupling of M(1) to specific signaling pathways leads to selective actions on some but not all M(1)-mediated responses in brain circuits. These novel M(1) allosteric agonists induced robust electrophysiological effects in rat hippocampal slices, but showed lower efficacy in striatum and no measureable effects on M(1)-mediated responses in medial prefrontal cortical pyramidal cells in mice. Consistent with these actions, both M(1) agonists enhanced acquisition of hippocampal-dependent cognitive function but did not reverse amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion in rats. Together, these data reveal that M(1) allosteric agonists can differentially regulate coupling of M(1) to different signaling pathways, and this can dramatically alter the actions of these compounds on specific brain circuits important for learning and memory and psychosis.

Muscarinic mechanisms in psychotic disorders

Schizophrenia is a devastating disease with several broad symptom clusters and the current monoamine-based treatments do not adequately treat the disease, especially negative and cognitive symptoms. A proposed alternative approach for treating schizophrenia is through the use of compounds that activate certain muscarinic receptor subtypes, the so-called muscarinic cholinergic hypothesis theory. This theory has been revitalized with a number of recent and provocative findings including postmortem reports in schizophrenia patients showing decreased numbers of muscarinic M(1) and M(4) receptors in brain regions associated with schizophrenia as well as decreased muscarinic receptors in an in vivo imaging study. Studies with M(4) knockout mice have shown that there is a reciprocal relationship between M(4) and dopamine receptor function, and a number of muscarinic agonists have shown antidopaminergic activity in a variety of preclinical assays predictive of antipsychotic efficacy in the clinic. Furthermore, the M(1)/M(4) preferring partial agonist xanomeline has been shown to have antipsychotic-like and pro-cognitive activity in preclinical models and in clinical trials to decrease psychotic-like behaviors in Alzheimer's patients and positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. Therefore, we propose that an agonist with M(1) and M(4) interactions would effectively treat core symptom clusters associated with schizophrenia. Currently, research is focused on developing subtype-selective muscarinic agonists and positive allosteric modulators that have reduced propensity for parasympathetic side-effects, but retain the therapeutic benefit observed with their less selective predecessors.

Muscarinic and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists and allosteric modulators for the treatment of schizophrenia

Muscarinic and nicotinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptors (mAChRs and nAChRs) are emerging as important targets for the development of novel treatments for the symptoms associated with schizophrenia. Preclinical and early proof-of-concept clinical studies have provided strong evidence that activators of specific mAChR (M(1) and M(4)) and nAChR (α(7) and α(2)β(4)) subtypes are effective in animal models of antipsychotic-like activity and/or cognitive enhancement, and in the treatment of positive and cognitive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. While early attempts to develop selective mAChR and nAChR agonists provided important preliminary findings, these compounds have ultimately failed in clinical development due to a lack of true subtype selectivity and subsequent dose-limiting adverse effects. In recent years, there have been major advances in the discovery of highly selective activators for the different mAChR and nAChR subtypes with suitable properties for optimization as potential candidates for clinical trials. One novel strategy has been to identify ligands that activate a specific receptor subtype through actions at sites that are distinct from the highly conserved ACh-binding site, termed allosteric sites. These allosteric activators, both allosteric agonists and positive allosteric modulators, of mAChR and nAChR subtypes demonstrate unique mechanisms of action and high selectivity in vivo, and may provide innovative treatment strategies for schizophrenia.

Muscarinic agonists and antagonists in schizophrenia: recent therapeutic advances and future directions

Existing therapies for schizophrenia have limited efficacy, and significant residual positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms remain in many individuals with the disorder even after treatment with the current arsenal of antipsychotic drugs. Preclinical and clinical data suggest that selective activation of the muscarinic cholinergic system may represent novel therapeutic mechanisms for the treatment of schizophrenia. The therapeutic relevance of earlier muscarinic agonists was limited by their lack of receptor selectivity and adverse event profile arising from activation of nontarget muscarinic receptors. Recent advances in developing compounds that are selective to muscarinic receptor subtypes or activate allosteric receptor sites offer tremendous promise for therapeutic targeting of specific muscarinic receptor subtypes in schizophrenia.

Oxotremorine treatment restores hippocampal neurogenesis and ameliorates depression-like behaviour in chronically stressed rats

RATIONALE

Chronic stress results in cognitive impairment, affects hippocampal neurogenesis and is known to precipitate affective disorders such as depression. In addition to stress, neurotransmitters such as acetylcholine (ACh) modulate adult neurogenesis. Earlier, we have shown that oxotremorine, a cholinergic muscarinic agonist, ameliorates stress-induced cognitive impairment and restores cholinergic function.

OBJECTIVES

In the current study, we have looked into the possible involvement of adult neurogenesis in cognitive restoration by oxotremorine. Further, we have assessed the effect of oxotremorine treatment on depression-like behaviour and hippocampal volumes in stressed animals.

METHODS

Chronic restraint stressed rats were treated with either vehicle or oxotremorine. For neurogenesis studies, proliferation, survival and differentiation of the progenitor cells in the hippocampus were examined using 5'-bromo-2-deoxyuridine immunohistochemistry. Depression-like behaviour was evaluated using forced swim test (FST) and sucrose consumption test (SCT). Volumes were estimated using Cavalieri's estimator.

RESULTS

Hippocampal neurogenesis was severely decreased in stressed rats. Ten days of oxotremorine treatment to stressed animals partially restored proliferation and survival, while it completely restored the differentiation of the newly formed cells. Stressed rats showed increased immobility and decreased sucrose preference in the FST and SCT, respectively, and oxotremorine ameliorated this depression-like behaviour. In addition, oxotremorine treatment recovered the stress-induced decrease in hippocampal volume.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the restoration of impaired neurogenesis and hippocampal volume could be associated with the behavioural recovery by oxotremorine. Our results imply the muscarinic regulation of adult neurogenesis and incite the potential utility of cholinomimetics in ameliorating cognitive dysfunction in stress-related disorders.

The antipsychotic potential of muscarinic allosteric modulation

The cholinergic hypothesis of schizophrenia emerged over 50 years ago based on clinical observations with both anticholinergics and pan-muscarinic agonists. Not until the 1990s did the cholinergic hypothesis of schizophrenia receive renewed enthusiasm based on clinical data with xanomeline, a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M(1)/M(4)-preferring orthosteric agonist. In a clinical trial with Alzheimer's patients, xanomeline not only improved cognitive performance, but also reduced psychotic behaviors. This encouraging data spurred a second clinical trial in schizophrenic patients, wherein xanomeline significantly improved the positive, negative and cognitive symptom clusters. However, the question remained: Was the antipsychotic efficacy due to activation of M(1), M(4) or both M(1)/M(4)? Classical orthosteric ligands lacked the muscarinic receptor subtype selectivity required to address this key question. More recently, functional assays have allowed for the discovery of ligands that bind at allosteric sites, binding sites distinct from the orthosteric (acetylcholine) site, which are structurally less conserved and thereby afford high levels of receptor subtype selectivity. Recently, allosteric ligands, with unprecedented selectivity for either M(1) or M(4), have been discovered and have demonstrated comparable efficacy to xanomeline in preclinical antipsychotic and cognition models. These data suggest that selective allosteric activation of either M(1) or M(4) has antipsychotic potential through distinct, yet complimentary mechanisms.

Confocal Analysis of Cholinergic and Dopaminergic Inputs onto Pyramidal Cells in the Prefrontal Cortex of Rodents

Cholinergic and dopaminergic projections to the rat medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) are both involved in cognitive functions including attention. These neuronal systems modulate mPFC neuronal activity mainly through diffuse transmission. In order to better understand the anatomical level of influence of these systems, confocal microscopy with triple-fluorescent immunolabeling was used in three subregions of the mPFC of rats and Drd1a-tdTomato/Drd2-EGFP transgenic mice. The zone of interaction was defined as a reciprocal microproximity between dopaminergic and cholinergic axonal segments as well as pyramidal neurons. The density of varicosities, along these segments was considered as a possible activity-dependant morphological feature. The percentage of cholinergic and dopaminergic fibers in microproximity ranged from 12 to 40% depending on the layer and mPFC subregion. The cholinergic system appeared to have more influence on dopaminergic fibers since a larger proportion of the dopaminergic fibers were within microproximity to cholinergic fibers. The density of both cholinergic and dopaminergic varicosities was significantly elevated within microproximities. The main results indicate that the cholinergic and dopaminergic systems converge on pyramidal cells in mPFC particularly in the layer V. In transgenic mice 93% of the pyramidal cells expressed the transgenic marker for Drd2 expression, but only 22% expressed the maker for Drd1ar expression. Data presented here suggest that the modulation of mPFC by dopaminergic fibers would be mostly inhibitory and localized at the output level whereas the cholinergic modulation would be exerted at the input and output level both through direct interaction with pyramidal cells and dopaminergic fibers.

Associations between betel nut (Areca catechu) and symptoms of schizophrenia among patients in Nepal: A longitudinal study

Betel nut is one of the mostly widely used substances in the world, particularly across Asia. Arecoline, a partial muscarinic agonist, has been hypothesized to have beneficial effects on both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. This study aims to further explore associations between betel use and symptoms of schizophrenia in a 4-month longitudinal study in Nepal. Sixty Nepali patients with schizophrenia were recruited from regional outpatient clinics. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Social Adaptation Self-Evaluation Scale were used to assess symptoms and social functioning in regular betel users and non-users. No significant group differences or dose-response relationships were noted on either initial or follow-up assessments. Stratifying by sex also failed to reveal an association between symptoms and betel use, which stands in contrast with previously reported data from Micronesia. There were no differences seen in social functioning other than a significantly higher proportion of betel users holding jobs. It was also noted that significantly fewer betel chewers were taking anti-cholinergic medication, which may tentatively indicate a potentially therapeutic role in the future for partial muscarinic agonists in the treatment of medication-induced movement disorders.

Recent advances in treating cognitive impairment in schizophrenia

INTRODUCTION

Schizophrenia is often associated with chronic disability and poor outcome. In addition to positive symptoms, such as hallucinations and delusions, and negative symptoms including poverty of speech and blunted affect, schizophrenia is also associated with deficits in cognitive function. It has been increasingly recognized that the severity of cognitive impairment is a major determinant of outcome. Therefore, interventions to improve cognitive function also have the capacity to improve quality of life and social and occupational outcomes. Whilst some of the antipsychotic drugs have shown some selective benefits, there is some controversy about the extent of these benefits.

OBJECTIVES

This article provides an overview of research into drugs that might enhance cognition in schizophrenia.

CONCLUSION

Drugs such as modafanil and galantamine are being evaluated, and a number of new drugs are currently in development. Standardized cognitive assessment measures are being developed so studies can be compared more easily. This field is advancing rapidly, but as yet, no widely applicable, evidence-based treatments are available to the clinician.

Insulin, IGF-1, and muscarinic agonists modulate schizophrenia-associated genes in human neuroblastoma cells

BACKGROUND

Genes associated with energy metabolism are decreased in schizophrenia brain and human and rodent diabetic skeletal muscle. These and other similarities between diabetes and schizophrenia suggest that an insulin signaling deficit may underlie schizophrenia. We determined with human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma and astrocyte cell lines whether insulin or other molecules could modulate genes opposite to their change reported in schizophrenia brain.

METHODS

Both cell lines were treated with insulin, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, IGF-2, or brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Genes whose expression was found with microarrays to be changed by insulin in a reciprocal manner to their change in schizophrenia were used in a 16-gene miniarray to identify small molecules that might mimic insulin.

RESULTS

Insulin phosphorylated its receptor in the neuroblastoma cells but not in astrocytes and, like IGF-1, increased ERK1/2 and Akt phosphorylation. Insulin and IGF-1 increased the expression of genes decreased in schizophrenia, including those involved in mitochondrial functions, glucose and energy metabolism, hydrogen ion transport, and synaptic function. These gene effects were confirmed and shown to be dose related with the 16-gene miniarrays. Most of 1940 pharmacologically unique compounds failed to alter gene expression, with the exception of muscarinic agonists, which mimicked insulin and IGF-1, and which were blocked by the muscarinic antagonists atropine and telenzepine.

CONCLUSIONS

Stimulation of muscarinic and insulin/IGF-1 receptors alter genes associated with metabolic and synaptic functions in a manner reciprocal to their changes in schizophrenia. Pharmacologic activation of these receptors may normalize genomic alterations in schizophrenia and better address root causes of this disease.

Novel selective allosteric activator of the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor regulates amyloid processing and produces antipsychotic-like activity in rats

Recent studies suggest that subtype-selective activators of M(1)/M(4) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) may offer a novel approach for the treatment of psychotic symptoms associated with schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease. Previously developed muscarinic agonists have provided clinical data in support of this hypothesis, but failed in clinical development because of a lack of true subtype specificity and adverse effects associated with activation of other mAChR subtypes. We now report characterization of a novel highly selective agonist for the M(1) receptor with no agonist activity at any of the other mAChR subtypes, termed TBPB [1-(1'-2-methylbenzyl)-1,4'-bipiperidin-4-yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2(3H)-one]. Mutagenesis and molecular pharmacology studies revealed that TBPB activates M(1) through an allosteric site rather than the orthosteric acetylcholine binding site, which is likely critical for its unprecedented selectivity. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings demonstrated that activation of M(1) by TBPB potentiates NMDA receptor currents in hippocampal pyramidal cells but does not alter excitatory or inhibitory synaptic transmission, responses thought to be mediated by M(2) and M(4). TBPB was efficacious in models predictive of antipsychotic-like activity in rats at doses that did not produce catalepsy or peripheral adverse effects of other mAChR agonists. Finally, TBPB had effects on the processing of the amyloid precursor protein toward the non-amyloidogenic pathway and decreased Abeta production in vitro. Together, these data suggest that selective activation of M(1) may provide a novel approach for the treatment of symptoms associated with schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease.

Wash-resistantly bound xanomeline inhibits acetylcholine release by persistent activation of presynaptic M(2) and M(4) muscarinic receptors in rat brain

We studied the effects of 3-[3-hexyloxy-1,2,5-thiadiazo-4-yl]-1,2,5,6-tetrahydro-1-methylpyridine (xanomeline) wash-resistant binding on presynaptic muscarinic regulation of electrically evoked [(3)H]acetylcholine (ACh) release from rat brain slices. In both cortical and striatal tissues that possess M(2) and M(4) autoreceptors, respectively, immediate application of 10 microM xanomeline had no effect on evoked [(3)H]ACh release or its inhibition by 10 microM carbachol. In contrast, preincubation with 1, 10, or 100 microM xanomeline for 15 min decreased evoked release of ACh measured after 53 min of washing in xanomeline-free medium in a concentration-dependent manner. The maximal inhibitory effect equaled the immediate effect of the muscarinic full agonist carbachol, and it was completely (at 1 and 10 microM xanomeline) or partially (at 100 microM xanomeline) blocked by 1 microM N-methylscopolamine. Neither presence of N-methylscopolamine during 100 microM xanomeline treatment nor previous irreversible inactivation of the classical receptor binding site using propylbenzylcholine mustard in cortical slices prevented the inhibitory effect of wash-resistantly bound xanomeline. Treatment of cortical slices with xanomeline slightly decreased the number of muscarinic binding sites, and it markedly decreased affinity for N-methylscopolamine. When applied as in acetylcholine release experiments, xanomeline did not impair presynaptic alpha(2)-adrenoceptor-mediated regulation of noradrenaline release. The functional studies in brain tissue reported in this work demonstrate that xanomeline can function as a wash-resistant agonist of native presynaptic muscarinic M(2) and M(4) receptors with both competitive and allosteric components of action.

Towards a muscarinic hypothesis of schizophrenia

Although the neurotransmitter dopamine plays a prominent role in the pathogenesis and treatment of schizophrenia, the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia fails to explain all aspects of this disorder. It is increasingly evident that the pathology of schizophrenia also involves other neurotransmitter systems. Data from many streams of research including pre-clinical and clinical pharmacology, treatment studies, post-mortem studies and neuroimaging suggest an important role for the muscarinic cholinergic system in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. This review will focus on evidence that supports the hypothesis that the muscarinic system is involved in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia and that muscarinic receptors may represent promising novel targets for the treatment of this disorder.

Added donepezil for stable schizophrenia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

RATIONALE

Schizophrenia is a disorder with cognitive deficits that could stem from cholinergic dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to examine if donepezil administered to stable, medicated outpatients with schizophrenia improves cognition and psychopathology.

METHODS

We conducted a double-blind placebo-controlled trial of donepezil up to 10 mg/day added for 8 weeks to ongoing antipsychotic treatment in 36 typical community-treated schizophrenia patients not selected for cognitive impairment.

RESULTS

Donepezil did not improve measures of cognition or psychopathology. It was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Consistent with other studies, addition of donepezil to stable patients with schizophrenia did not improve cognition or measures of psychopathology. This result does not support the hypothesis that residual symptoms and cognitive problems result from a cholinergic deficit that can be remedied by an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. A donepezil add-on strategy might make sense in selected schizophrenia cases where a pathological process is known to affect cholinergic neurons (e.g., history of head injury or comorbid dementia).

Cholinergic targets for cognitive enhancement in schizophrenia: focus on cholinesterase inhibitors and muscarinic agonists

RATIONALE

Alterations in the central cholinergic system of patients with schizophrenia such as reduced numbers of muscarinic and nicotinic receptors in the cortex and hippocampus may contribute to the cognitive impairment of schizophrenia. Therefore, pharmacological treatments that enhance central cholinergic function may be useful as cognitive enhancers in schizophrenia.

METHODS

Searches were conducted for articles which investigated alterations of central cholinergic systems in patients with schizophrenia. Additional searches were conducted for animal and human trials of potential cognitive enhancing compounds that target the cholinergic system and any preliminary trials conducted with schizophrenic patients.

RESULTS

Currently available treatments which are potentially suitable for this purpose include acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, muscarinic agonists, nicotinic agonists, and allosteric potentiators of nicotinic receptor function. Although some open label studies demonstrate modest cognitive improvements of schizophrenic patients treated with donepezil, data from a blinded, placebo controlled study demonstrate no effect. Data from a controlled trial of galantamine, a combined acetylcholinesterase inhibitor and allosteric potentiator of the nicotinic receptor, indicates that this may be an effective alternative. In addition, some preclinical data indicates that selective M(1) muscarinic agonists under development may have potential as cognitive enhancers and antipsychotic treatments for schizophrenic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A cholinergic approach to ameliorating the cognitive dysfunction of schizophrenia appears viable. There is some preliminary data to support the efficacy of combined acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and allosteric potentiators of the nicotinic receptor, whereas future trials are awaited for more specific muscarinic agonists currently under development.

Muscarinic mechanisms of antipsychotic atypicality

The interactions of the atypical antipsychotic drugs (APD) clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine and ziprasidone with muscarinic receptors were reviewed. Only clozapine and olanzapine have marked affinity for muscarinic receptors in radioligand binding studies; however, the affinity of these compounds is considerably lower than classical muscarinic antagonists. Although functional assays in cell lines transfected with muscarinic receptors suggest that olanzapine and clozapine have weak partial agonist activity at muscarinic receptors, particularly M4 receptors, studies in vitro and in vivo indicate that the compounds function as antagonists. In animal studies and in humans, clozapine has pronounced antimuscarinic effects whereas olanzapine has weak antimuscarinic effects. However, olanzapine significantly occupies central muscarinic receptors in humans. Overall, the role of muscarinic receptors in the antipsychotic effects of clozapine and olanzapine is controversial and complex.

The muscarinic M1/M4 receptor agonist xanomeline exhibits antipsychotic-like activity in Cebus apella monkeys

Xanomeline is a muscarinic M(1)/M(4) preferring receptor agonist with little or no affinity for dopamine receptors. The compound reduces psychotic-like symptoms in patients with Alzheimer's disease and exhibits an antipsychotic-like profile in rodents without inducing extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) at therapeutically relevant doses. In the present study, we examined whether the xanomeline-induced functional dopamine antagonism found in rodent studies could also be observed in nonhuman primates. In addition, we studied whether the lack of EPS observed in rodents also applies to primates. To this end, we investigated the effects of xanomeline on the behavior induced by D-amphetamine and (-)-apomorphine in drug-naive Cebus apella monkeys. Antipsychotic compounds antagonize amphetamine-induced motor unrest and stereotypies in this species. Xanomeline inhibited D-amphetamine-induced motor unrest, stereotypies and arousal as well as apomorphine-induced stereotypies and arousal in drug-naive Cebus apella monkeys. Xanomeline did not induce EPS but vomiting occurred in some monkeys at high doses, in accordance with emetic events observed in Alzheimer patients following xanomeline administration. Even when xanomeline was tested in EPS-sensitized Cebus apella monkeys, EPS were not observed at the dose range of xanomeline used in the D-amphetamine-apomorphine combination study (0.5-3 mg/kg). However, when xanomeline was tested at 4 mg/kg, moderate dystonia was seen in two out of three monkeys. It is concluded that xanomeline inhibits D-amphetamine- and (-)-apomorphine-induced behavior in Cebus apella monkeys at doses that do not cause EPS. These data further substantiate that muscarinic receptor agonists may be useful in the pharmacological treatment of psychosis.

Xanomeline and the antipsychotic potential of muscarinic receptor subtype selective agonists

Binding studies initially suggested that the muscarinic agonist, xanomeline, was a subtype selective muscarinic M(1) receptor agonist, and a potential new treatment for Alzheimer's disease. However, later in vitro and in vivo functional studies suggest that this compound is probably better described as a subtype selective M(1)/M(4) muscarinic receptor agonist. This subtype selectivity profile has been claimed to explain the limited classical cholinomimetic side effects, particularly gastrointestinal, seen with xanomeline in animals. However, in both healthy volunteers and Alzheimer's patients many of these side effects have been reported for xanomeline and in the patient population this led to a >50% discontinuation rate. Clearly, the preclinical studies have not been able to predict this adverse profile of xanomeline, and this suggests that either xanomeline is not as subtype selective as predicted from preclinical research or that there are differences between humans and animals with regard to muscarinic receptors. Nevertheless, in Alzheimer's patients xanomeline dose-dependently improves aspects of behavioral disturbance and social behavior including a reduction in hallucinations, agitation, delusions, vocal outbursts and suspiciousness. The effects on cognition are not as robust and mainly seen at the highest doses tested. These effects in Alzheimer's patients have given impetus to the suggestion that muscarinic agonists have potential antipsychotic effects. The current review assesses the antipsychotic profile of xanomeline within the framework of the limited clinical studies with cholinergic agents in man, and the preclinical research on xanomeline using various models commonly used for the assessment of new antipsychotic drugs. In general, xanomeline has an antipsychotic-like profile in various dopamine models of psychosis and this agrees with the known interactions between the cholinergic and dopaminergic systems in the brain. Moreover, current data suggests that the actions of xanomeline at the M(4) muscarinic receptor subtype might mediate its antidopaminergic effects. Particularly intriguing are studies showing that xanomeline, even after acute administration, selectively inhibits the firing of mesolimbic dopamine cells relative to dopamine cell bodies projecting to the striatum. This data suggest that xanomeline would have a faster onset of action compared to current antipsychotics and would not induce extrapyramidal side effects. The preclinical data on the whole are promising for an antipsychotic-like profile. If in a new formulation (i.e., transdermal) xanomeline has less adverse effects, this drug may be valuable in the treatment of patients with psychosis.

Cholinergic modulation of basal and amphetamine-induced dopamine release in rat medial prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens

Behavioral evidence suggests that muscarinic/cholinergic inhibition of brain dopaminergic activity may be a useful principle for developing novel antipsychotic drugs (APDs). Thus, oxotremorine, a muscarinic agonist, attenuates amphetamine-induced locomotor activity in rodents, an effect also produced by a wide variety of proven APDs, whereas scopolamine, a muscarinic antagonist, has the opposite effect. Since atypical APDs such as clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, ziprasidone and quetiapine, increase brain acetylcholine as well as dopamine (DA) release in a region-specific manner, their effects on cholinergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission may also contribute to various actions of these drugs. Oxotremorine (0.5-1.5 mg/kg) dose-dependently and preferentially increased DA release in rat medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), compared to the nucleus accumbens (NAC). However, S-(-)-scopolamine (0.5-1.5 mg/kg) produced similar increases in DA release in the mPFC, but the effect was much less than that of oxotremorine. Whereas a dose of S-(-)-scopolamine of 0.5 mg/kg comparably increased DA release in the mPFC and NAC, 1.5 mg/kg had no effect on DA release in the NAC. Oxotremorine-M (0.5 mg/kg), a M(1/4)-preferring agonist, also increased DA release in the mPFC, but not the NAC, an effect completely abolished by telenzepine (3 mg/kg), a M(1/4)-preferring antagonist, which by itself had no effect on DA release in either region. Oxotremorine (0.5, but not 1.5, mg/kg) attenuated amphetamine (1 mg/kg)-induced DA release in the NAC, whereas S-(-)-scopolamine did not. Oxotremorine (1.5 mg/kg) and S-(-)-scopolamine (0.5 mg/kg) modestly but significantly potentiated amphetamine (1 mg/kg)-induced DA release in the mPFC. These results suggest that stimulation of muscarinic receptors, in particular M(1/4), as indicated by the effect of oxotremorine-M and telenzepine, may preferentially increase cortical DA release and inhibit amphetamine-induced DA release in the NAC.

Role of the cholinergic muscarinic system in bipolar disorder and related mechanism of action of antipsychotic agents

The evidence for the involvement of cholinergic muscarinic receptors in mania and depression is reviewed. Small pilot trials with cholinesterase inhibitors and muscarinic agonists suggest that stimulation of muscarinic receptors may produce an antimanic effect, possibly by activation of muscarinic M(4) receptors. It is concluded that it is not likely that currently used mood stabilizers, such as lithium, valproic acid and carbamazepine, work directly through muscarinic receptor mechanisms. Furthermore, the evidence indicates that antipsychotic agents used for mania are working through the common mechanism of antagonism of dopamine D(2) receptors, and interactions with muscarinic receptors do not play a key role. Finally, it is hypothesized that olanzapine has robust antimanic activity, due to blockade of dopamine D(2) receptors and antagonism of other monoaminergic receptors. Olanzapine may normalize mood due to antidepressant-like activities, such as 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonism and increasing cortical norepinephrine and dopamine.