Removal of the transducer protein from sensory rhodopsin I exposes sites of proton release and uptake during the receptor photocycle

The Blue-Green Sensory Rhodopsin SRM from Haloarcula marismortui Attenuates Both Phototactic Responses Mediated by Sensory Rhodopsin I and II in Halobacterium salinarum

Haloarchaea utilize various microbial rhodopsins to harvest light energy or to mediate phototaxis in search of optimal environmental niches. To date, only the red light-sensing sensory rhodopsin I (SRI) and the blue light-sensing sensory rhodopsin II (SRII) have been shown to mediate positive and negative phototaxis, respectively. In this work, we demonstrated that a blue-green light-sensing (504 nm) sensory rhodopsin from Haloarcula marismortui, SRM, attenuated both positive and negative phototaxis through its sensing region. The H. marismortui genome encodes three sensory rhodopsins: SRI, SRII and SRM. Using spectroscopic assays, we first demonstrated the interaction between SRM and its cognate transducer, HtrM. We then transformed an SRM-HtrM fusion protein into Halobacterium salinarum, which contains only SRI and SRII, and observed that SRM-HtrM fusion protein decreased both positive and negative phototaxis of H. salinarum. Together, our results suggested a novel phototaxis signalling system in H. marismortui comprised of three sensory rhodopsins in which the phototactic response of SRI and SRII were attenuated by SRM.

Mechanism divergence in microbial rhodopsins

A fundamental design principle of microbial rhodopsins is that they share the same basic light-induced conversion between two conformers. Alternate access of the Schiff base to the outside and to the cytoplasm in the outwardly open "E" conformer and cytoplasmically open "C" conformer, respectively, combined with appropriate timing of pKa changes controlling Schiff base proton release and uptake make the proton path through the pumps vectorial. Phototaxis receptors in prokaryotes, sensory rhodopsins I and II, have evolved new chemical processes not found in their proton pump ancestors, to alter the consequences of the conformational change or modify the change itself. Like proton pumps, sensory rhodopsin II undergoes a photoinduced E→C transition, with the C conformer a transient intermediate in the photocycle. In contrast, one light-sensor (sensory rhodopsin I bound to its transducer HtrI) exists in the dark as the C conformer and undergoes a light-induced C→E transition, with the E conformer a transient photocycle intermediate. Current results indicate that algal phototaxis receptors channelrhodopsins undergo redirected Schiff base proton transfers and a modified E→C transition which, contrary to the proton pumps and other sensory rhodopsins, is not accompanied by the closure of the external half-channel. The article will review our current understanding of how the shared basic structure and chemistry of microbial rhodopsins have been modified during evolution to create diverse molecular functions: light-driven ion transport and photosensory signaling by protein-protein interaction and light-gated ion channel activity. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Retinal Proteins - You can teach an old dog new tricks.

Molecular and evolutionary aspects of microbial sensory rhodopsins

Retinal proteins (~rhodopsins) are photochemically reactive membrane-embedded proteins, with seven transmembrane α-helices which bind the chromophore retinal (vitamin A aldehyde). They are widely distributed through all three biological kingdoms, eukarya, bacteria and archaea, indicating the biological significance of the retinal proteins. Light absorption by the retinal proteins triggers a photoisomerization of the chromophore, leading to the biological function, light-energy conversion or light-signal transduction. This article reviews molecular and evolutionary aspects of the light-signal transduction by microbial sensory receptors and their related proteins. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Retinal Proteins - You can teach an old dog new tricks.

Kinetics of proton release and uptake by channelrhodopsin-2

Electrophysiological experiments showed that the light-activated cation channel channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) pumps protons in the absence of a membrane potential. We determined here the kinetics of transient pH change using a water-soluble pH-indicator. It is shown that ChR2 released protons prior to uptake with a stoichiometry of 0.3 protons per ChR2. Comparison to the photocycle kinetics revealed that proton release and uptake match rise and decay of the P(3)(520) intermediate. As the P(3)(520) state also represents the conductive state of cation channeling, the concurrence of proton pumping and channel gating implies an intimate mechanistic link of the two functional modes. Studies on the E123T and S245E mutants show that these residues are not critically involved in proton translocation.

A Schiff base connectivity switch in sensory rhodopsin signaling

Sensory rhodopsin I (SRI) in Halobacterium salinarum acts as a receptor for single-quantum attractant and two-quantum repellent phototaxis, transmitting light stimuli via its bound transducer HtrI. Signal-inverting mutations in the SRI-HtrI complex reverse the single-quantum response from attractant to repellent. Fast intramolecular charge movements reported here reveal that the unphotolyzed SRI-HtrI complex exists in two conformational states, which differ by their connection of the retinylidene Schiff base in the SRI photoactive site to inner or outer half-channels. In single-quantum photochemical reactions, the conformer with the Schiff base connected to the cytoplasmic (CP) half-channel generates an attractant signal, whereas the conformer with the Schiff base connected to the extracellular (EC) half-channel generates a repellent signal. In the wild-type complex the conformer equilibrium is poised strongly in favor of that with CP-accessible Schiff base. Signal-inverting mutations shift the equilibrium in favor of the EC-accessible Schiff base form, and suppressor mutations shift the equilibrium back toward the CP-accessible Schiff base form, restoring the wild-type phenotype. Our data show that the sign of the behavioral response directly correlates with the state of the connectivity switch, not with the direction of proton movements or changes in acceptor pK(a). These findings identify a shared fundamental process in the mechanisms of transport and signaling by the rhodopsin family. Furthermore, the effects of mutations in the HtrI subunit of the complex on SRI Schiff base connectivity indicate that the two proteins are tightly coupled to form a single unit that undergoes a concerted conformational transition.

The distinct signaling mechanisms of microbial sensory rhodopsins in Archaea, Eubacteria and Eukarya

Most of the known archaeal-type microbial rhodopsins are retinal-binding ion transporters, such as bacteriorhodopsin (BR) and proteorhodopsin (PR). Their identification is the result of extensive studies of their photochemical and biophysical properties. The cells containing these pigments, however, use other microbial rhodopsins as photosensors to monitor environmental light signals. From the early studies of sensory rhodopsin I (HsSRI) in Halobacterium salinarum and sensory rhodopsin II (NpSRII) in Natronomonas pharaonis, we now know that several microbial sensory rhodopsins in the other major domain of life relay information on light intensity and quality to the cell. Three of the most studied photosensory transduction mechanisms of these microbial rhodopsins are dealt with in this review. We discuss recent progress in the understanding of genomic organization, photochemical properties and photosignaling mechanisms with respect to biological function.

Role of the cytoplasmic domain in Anabaena sensory rhodopsin photocycling: vectoriality of Schiff base deprotonation

Light-induced electric signals in intact E. coli cells generated by heterologously expressed full-length and C-terminally truncated versions of Anabaena sensory rhodopsin (ASR) demonstrate that the charge movements within the membrane-embedded part of the molecule are stringently controlled by the cytoplasmic domain. In particular, truncation inverts the direction of proton movement during Schiff base deprotonation from outward to cytoplasmic. Truncation also alters faster charge movements that occur before Schiff base deprotonation. Asp(217) as previously shown by FTIR serves as a proton acceptor in the truncated ASR but not in the full-length version, and its mutation to Asn restores the natural outward direction of proton movement. Introduction of a potential negative charge (Ser(86) to Asp) on the cytoplasmic side favors a cytoplasmic direction of proton release from the Schiff base. In contrast, mutation of the counterion Asp(75) to Glu reverses the photocurrent to the outward direction in the truncated pigment, and in both truncated and full-length versions accelerates Schiff base deprotonation more than 10-fold. The communication between the cytoplasmic domain and the membrane-embedded photoactive site of ASR demonstrated here is likely to derive from the receptor's use of a cytoplasmic protein for signal transduction, as has been suggested previously from binding studies.

Functional importance of the interhelical hydrogen bond between Thr204 and Tyr174 of sensory rhodopsin II and its alteration during the signaling process

Sensory rhodopsin II (SRII), a receptor for negative phototaxis in haloarchaea, transmits light signals through changes in protein-protein interaction with its transducer HtrII. Light-induced structural changes throughout the SRII-HtrII interface, which spans the periplasmic region, membrane-embedded domains, and cytoplasmic domains near the membrane, have been identified by several studies. Here we demonstrate by site-specific mutagenesis and analysis of phototaxis behavior that two residues in SRII near the membrane-embedded interface (Tyr174 on helix F and Thr204 on helix G) are essential for signaling by the SRII-HtrII complex. These residues, which are the first in SRII shown to be required for phototaxis function, provide biological significance to the previous observation that the hydrogen bond between them is strengthened upon the formation of the earliest SRII photointermediate (SRII(K)) only when SRII is complexed with HtrII. Here we report frequency changes of the S-H stretch of a cysteine substituted for SRII Thr204 in the signaling state intermediates of the SRII photocycle, as well as an influence of HtrII on the hydrogen bond strength, supporting a direct role of the hydrogen bond in SRII-HtrII signal relay chemistry. Our results suggest that the light signal is transmitted to HtrII from the energized interhelical hydrogen bond between Thr204 and Tyr174, which is located at both the retinal chromophore pocket and in helices F and G that form the membrane-embedded interaction surface to the signal-bearing second transmembrane helix of HtrII. The results argue for a critical process in signal relay occurring at this membrane interfacial region of the complex.

Importance of specific hydrogen bonds of archaeal rhodopsins for the binding to the transducer protein

Four rhodopsins, bacteriorhodopsin (bR), halorhodopsin (hR), sensory rhodopsin (sR) and phoborhodopsin (pR) exist in archaeal membranes. bR and hR work as a light-driven ion pump. sR and pR work as a photo-sensor of phototaxis, and form signaling complexes in membranes with their respective cognate transducer proteins HtrI (with sR) and HtrII (with pR), through which light signals are transmitted to the cytoplasm. What is the determining factor(s) of the specific binding to form the complex? Binding of the wild-type or mutated rhodopsins with HtrII was measured by isothermal titration calorimetric analysis (ITC). bR and hR could not bind with HtrII. On the other hand, sR could bind to HtrII, although the dissociation constant (K(D)) was about 100 times larger than that of pR. An X-ray crystallographic structure of the pR/HtrII complex revealed formation of two specific hydrogen bonds whose pairs are Tyr199(pR)/Asn74(HtrII) and Thr189(pR)/Glu43(HtrII)/Ser62(HtrII). To investigate the importance of these hydrogen bonds, the K(D) value for the binding of various mutants of bR, hR, sR and pR with HtrII was estimated by ITC. The K(D) value of T189V(pR)/Y199F(pR), double mutant/HtrII complex, was about 100-fold larger than that of the wild-type pR, whose K(D) value was 0.16 microM. On the other hand, bR and hR double mutants, P200T(bR)/V210Y(bR) and P240T(hR)/F250Y(hR), were able to bind with HtrII. The K(D) value of these complexes was estimated to be 60.1(+/-10.7) microM for bR and to be 29.1(+/-6.1) microM for hR, while the wild-type bR and hR did not bind with HtrII. We concluded that these two specific hydrogen bonds play important roles in the binding between the rhodopsins and transducer protein.

Bacteriorhodopsin-like proteins of eubacteria and fungi: the extent of conservation of the haloarchaeal proton-pumping mechanism

A stereotypical image of a retinal-binding proton pump derived from extensive studies of halobacterial ion-transporting and sensory rhodopsins is a fast-cycling protein which possesses two strategically placed carboxylic acids serving as proton donor and acceptor for the retinal Schiff base. We review recent biophysical and bioinformatic data on the novel eubacterial and eucaryotic rhodopsins to analyze the extent of conservation of the haloarchaeal mechanism of transmembrane proton transport. We show that only the most essential elements of the haloarchaeal proton-pumping machinery are conserved universally, and that a mere presence of these elements in primary structures does not guarantee the proton-pumping ability.

Five Residues in the HtrI Transducer Membrane-proximal Domain Close the Cytoplasmic Proton-conducting Channel of Sensory Rhodopsin I

Transducer-free sensory rhodopsins carry out light-driven proton transport in Halobacterium salinarum membranes. Transducer binding converts the proton pumps to signal-relay devices in which the transport is inhibited. In sensory rhodopsin I (SRI) binding of its cognate transducer HtrI inhibits transport by closing a cytoplasmic proton-conducting channel necessary for proton uptake during the SRI photochemical reaction cycle. To investigate the channel closure, a series of HtrI mutants truncated in the membrane-proximal cytoplasmic portion of an SRI-HtrI fusion were constructed and expressed in H. salinarum membranes. We found that binding of the membrane-embedded portion of HtrI is insufficient for channel closure, whereas cytoplasmic extension of the second HtrI transmembrane helix by 13 residues blocks proton conduction through the channel as well as full-length HtrI. Specifically the closure activity is localized in this 13-residue membrane-proximal cytoplasmic domain to the 5 final residues, each of which incrementally contributes to reduction of proton conductivity. Moreover, these same residues in the dark incrementally and proportionally increase the pKa of the Asp-76 counterion to the protonated Schiff base chromophore in the membrane-embedded photoactive site. We conclude that this critical region of HtrI alters the dark conformation of SRI as well as light-induced channel opening. The 5 residues in HtrI correspond in position to 5 residues demonstrated on the homologous NpHtrII to interact with the E-F loop of its cognate receptor NpSRII in the accompanying article (Yang, C.-S., Sineshchekov, O., Spudich, E. N., and Spudich, J. L. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 42970-42976). These results strongly suggest that the membrane-proximal region of Htr proteins interact with their cognate sensory rhodopsin cytoplasmic domains as part of the signal-relay coupling between the proteins.

An archaeal photosignal-transducing module mediates phototaxis in Escherichia coli

Halophilic archaea, such as Halobacterium salinarum and Natronobacterium pharaonis, alter their swimming behavior by phototaxis responses to changes in light intensity and color using visual pigment-like sensory rhodopsins (SRs). In N. pharaonis, SRII (NpSRII) mediates photorepellent responses through its transducer protein, NpHtrII. Here we report the expression of fusions of NpSRII and NpHtrII and fusion hybrids with eubacterial cytoplasmic domains and analyze their function in vivo in haloarchaea and in eubacteria. A fusion in which the C terminus of NpSRII is connected by a short flexible linker to NpHtrII is active in phototaxis signaling for H. salinarum, showing that the fusion does not inhibit functional receptor-transducer interactions. We replaced the cytoplasmic portions of this fusion protein with the cytoplasmic domains of Tar and Tsr, chemotaxis transducers from enteric eubacteria. Purification of the fusion protein from H. salinarum and Tar fusion chimera from Escherichia coli membranes shows that the proteins are not cleaved and exhibit absorption spectra characteristic of wild-type membranes. Their photochemical reaction cycles in H. salinarum and E. coli membranes, respectively, are similar to those of native NpSRII in N. pharaonis. These fusion chimeras mediate retinal-dependent phototaxis responses by Escherichia coli, establishing that the nine-helix membrane portion of the receptor-transducer complex is a modular functional unit able to signal in heterologous membranes. This result confirms a current model for SR-Htr signal transduction in which the Htr transducers are proposed to interact physically and functionally with their cognate sensory rhodopsins via helix-helix contacts between their transmembrane segments.

Retinylidene proteins: structures and functions from archaea to humans

Retinylidene proteins, containing seven membrane-embedded alpha-helices that form an internal pocket in which the chromophore retinal is bound, are ubiquitous in photoreceptor cells in eyes throughout the animal kingdom. They are also present in a diverse range of other organisms and locations, such as archaeal prokaryotes, unicellular eukaryotic microbes, the dermal tissue of frogs, the pineal glands of lizards and birds, the hypothalamus of toads, and the human brain. Their functions include light-driven ion transport and phototaxis signaling in microorganisms, and retinal isomerization and various types of photosignal transduction in higher animals. The aims of this review are to examine this group of photoactive proteins as a whole, to summarize our current understanding of structure/function relationships in the best-studied examples, and to report recent new developments.

Electrophysiological characterization of specific interactions between bacterial sensory rhodopsins and their transducers

The halobacterial phototaxis receptors sensory rhodopsin I and II (SRI, SRII) enable the bacteria to seek optimal light conditions for ion pumping by bacteriorhodopsin and/or halorhodopsin. The incoming signal is transferred across the plasma membrane by means of receptor-specific transducer proteins that bind tightly to their corresponding photoreceptors. To investigate the receptor/transducer interaction, advantage is taken of the observation that both SRI and SRII can function as proton pumps. SRI from Halobacterium salinarum, which triggers the positive phototaxis, the photophobic receptor SRII from Natronobacterium pharaonis (pSRII), as well as the mutant pSRII-F86D were expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Voltage-clamp studies confirm that SRI and pSRII function as light-driven, outwardly directed proton pumps with a much stronger voltage dependence than the ion pumps bacteriorhodopsin and halorhodopsin. Coexpression of SRI and pSRII-F86D with their corresponding transducers suppresses the proton transport, revealing a tight binding and specific interaction of the two proteins. These latter results may be exploited to further analyze the binding interaction of the photoreceptors with their downstream effectors.

Electrophysiological characterization of specific interactions between bacterial sensory rhodopsins and their transducers

The halobacterial phototaxis receptors sensory rhodopsin I and II (SRI, SRII) enable the bacteria to seek optimal light conditions for ion pumping by bacteriorhodopsin and/or halorhodopsin. The incoming signal is transferred across the plasma membrane by means of receptor-specific transducer proteins that bind tightly to their corresponding photoreceptors. To investigate the receptor/transducer interaction, advantage is taken of the observation that both SRI and SRII can function as proton pumps. SRI from Halobacterium salinarum, which triggers the positive phototaxis, the photophobic receptor SRII from Natronobacterium pharaonis (pSRII), as well as the mutant pSRII-F86D were expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Voltage-clamp studies confirm that SRI and pSRII function as light-driven, outwardly directed proton pumps with a much stronger voltage dependence than the ion pumps bacteriorhodopsin and halorhodopsin. Coexpression of SRI and pSRII-F86D with their corresponding transducers suppresses the proton transport, revealing a tight binding and specific interaction of the two proteins. These latter results may be exploited to further analyze the binding interaction of the photoreceptors with their downstream effectors.

Photo-induced proton transport of pharaonis phoborhodopsin (sensory rhodopsin II) is ceased by association with the transducer

Phoborhodopsin (pR; also sensory rhodopsin II, sRII) is a retinoid protein in Halobacterium salinarum and works as a receptor of negative phototaxis. Pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR; also pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, psRII) is a corresponding protein of Natronobacterium pharaonis. In bacterial membrane, ppR forms a complex with its transducer pHtrII, and this complex transmits the light signal to the sensory system in the cytoplasm. We expressed pHtrII-free ppR or ppR-pHtrII complex in H. salinarum Pho81/wr(-) cells. Flash-photolysis experiments showed no essential changes between pHtrII-free ppR and the complex. Using SnO2 electrode, which works as a sensitive pH electrode, and envelope membrane vesicles, we showed the photo-induced outward proton transport. This membranous proton transport was also shown using membrane vesicles from Escherichia coli in which ppR was functionally expressed. On the other hand, the proton transport was ceased when ppR formed a complex with pHtrII. Using membrane sheet, it was shown that the complex undergoes first proton uptake and then release during the photocycle, the same as pHtrII-free ppR, although the net proton transport ceases. Taking into consideration that the complex of sRII (pR) and its transducer undergoes extracellular proton circulation (J. Sasaki and J. L., Biophys. J. 77:2145-2152), we inferred that association with pHtrII closes a cytoplasmic channel of ppR, which lead to the extracellular proton circulation.

Multicolored protein conformation states in the photocycle of transducer-free sensory rhodopsin-I

Sensory rhodopsin-I (SRI), a phototaxis receptor of archaebacteria, is a retinal-binding protein that exists in the cell membrane intimately associated with a signal-transducing protein (HtrI) homologous to eubacterial chemotaxis receptors. Transducer-free sensory rhodopsin-I (fSRI), from cells devoid of HtrI, undergoes a photochemical cycle kinetically different from that of native SRI. We report here on the measurement and analysis of the photochemical kinetics of fSRI reactions in the 350-750-nm spectral range and in a 10(-7) s to 1 s time window. The lack of specific intermolecular interactions between SRI and HtrI results in early return of the ground form via distinct branching reactions in fSRI, not evident in the photocycle of native SRI. The chromophore transitions are loosely coupled to protein structural transitions. The coexistence of multiple spectral forms within kinetic intermediates is interpreted within the concept of multicolored protein conformational states.

Proton transport by sensory rhodopsins and its modulation by transducer-binding

The study of light-induced proton transfers in the archaeal sensory rhodopsins (SR), phototaxis receptors in Halobacterium salinarum, has contributed important insights into their mechanism of signaling to their cognate transducer subunits in the signaling complex. Essential features of the bacteriorhodopsin (BR) pumping mechanism have been conserved in the evolution of the sensors, which carry out light-driven electrogenic proton transport when their transducers are removed. The interaction of SRI with its transducer blocks proton-conducting channels in the receptor thereby inhibiting its proton pumping, indicating that the pump machinery, rather than the transport activity itself, is functionally important for signaling. Analysis of SRII mutants has shown that the salt bridge between the protonated Schiff base and its counterion Asp73 constrains the receptor in its inactive conformation. Similarly, in BR, the corresponding salt bridge between the protonated Schiff base and Asp85 contributes to constraining the protein in a conformation in which its cytoplasmic channel is closed. Transducer chimera studies further indicate that the receptor conformational changes are transmitted from the sensors to their cognate transducers through transmembrane helix-helix interaction. These and other results reviewed here support a signaling mechanism in which tilting of helices on the cytoplasmic side (primarily outward tilting of helix F), similar to that which occurs in BR in its open cytoplasmic channel conformation, causes structural alterations in the transducer transmembrane helices.

Sensory rhodopsin II from the haloalkaliphilic natronobacterium pharaonis: light-activated proton transfer reactions

In the present work the light-activated proton transfer reactions of sensory rhodopsin II from Natronobacterium pharaonis (pSRII) and those of the channel-mutants D75N-pSRII and F86D-pSRII are investigated using flash photolysis and black lipid membrane (BLM) techniques. Whereas the photocycle of the F86D-pSRII mutant is quite similar to that of the wild-type protein, the photocycle of D75N-pSRII consists of only two intermediates. The addition of external proton donors such as azide, or in the case of F86D-pSRII, imidazole, accelerates the reprotonation of the Schiff base, but not the turnover. The electrical measurements prove that pSRII and F86D-pSRII can function as outwardly directed proton pumps, whereas the mutation in the extracellular channel (D75N-pSRII) leads to an inwardly directed transient current. The almost negligible size of the photostationary current is explained by the long-lasting photocycle of about a second. Although the M decay, but not the photocycle turnover, of pSRII and F86D-pSRII is accelerated by the addition of azide, the photostationary current is considerably increased. It is discussed that in a two-photon process a late intermediate (N- and/or O-like species) is photoconverted back to the original resting state; thereby the long photocycle is cut short, giving rise to the large increase of the photostationary current. The results presented in this work indicate that the function to generate ion gradients across membranes is a general property of archaeal rhodopsins.

Functional expression of His-tagged sensory rhodopsin I in Escherichia coli

Sensory rhodopsin I (SRI) from Halobacterium salinarum was functionally expressed in Escherichia coli and subsequently purified to homogeneity using a C-terminal His-tag anchor. Yields of 3-4 mg SRI/l cell culture can be obtained. The absorption and photocycle properties of SRI were similar if not indistinguishable from those of the homologously expressed SRI. A global fit analysis of the photocycle data and the calculation of the spectra of states provided strong evidence for the existence of an N-like intermediate.

Time-resolved absorption and photothermal measurements with recombinant sensory rhodopsin II from Natronobacterium pharaonis

Purified wild-type sensory rhodopsin II from Natronobacterium pharaonis (pSRII-WT) and its histidine-tagged analog (pSRII-His) were studied by laser-induced optoacoustic spectroscopy (LIOAS) and flash photolysis with optical detection. The samples were either dissolved in detergent or reconstituted into polar lipids from purple membrane (PML). The quantum yield for the formation of the long-lived state M(400) was determined as Phi(M) = 0.5 +/- 0.06 for both proteins. The structural volume change accompanying the production of K(510) as determined with LIOAS was DeltaV(R,1) </= 10 ml for both proteins, assuming Phi(K) >/= Phi(M), indicating that the His tag does not influence this early step of the photocycle. The medium has no influence on DeltaV(R,1), which is the largest so far measured for a retinal protein in this time range (<10 ns). This confirms the occurrence of conformational movements in pSRII for this step, as previously suggested by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. On the contrary, the decay of K(510) is an expansion in the detergent-dissolved sample and a contraction in PML. Assuming an efficiency of 1.0, DeltaV(R,2) = -3 ml/mol for pSRII-WT and -4.6 ml/mol for pSRII-His were calculated in PML, indicative of a small structural difference between the two proteins. The energy content of K(510) is also affected by the tag. It is E(K) = (88 +/- 13) for pSRII-WT and (134 +/- 11) kJ/mol for pSRII-His. A slight difference in the activation parameters for K(510) decay confirms an influence of the C-terminal His on this step. At variance with DeltaV(R,1), the opposite sign of DeltaV(R,2) in detergent and PML suggests the occurrence of solvation effects on the decay of K(510), which are probably due to a different interaction of the active site with the two dissolving media.

Proton circulation during the photocycle of sensory rhodopsin II

Sensory rhodopsin II (SRII) in Halobacterium salinarum membranes is a phototaxis receptor that signals through its bound transducer HtrII for avoidance of blue-green light. In the present study we investigated the proton movements during the photocycle of SRII in the HtrII-free and HtrII-complexed form. We monitored sustained light-induced pH changes with a pH electrode, and laser flash-induced pH changes with the pH indicator pyranine using sealed membrane vesicles and open sheets containing the free or the complexed receptor. The results demonstrated that SRII takes up a proton in M-to-O conversion and releases it during O-decay. The uptake and release are from and to the extracellular side, and therefore SRII does not transport the proton across the membrane. The pH dependence of the SRII photocycle indicated the presence of a protonatable group (pK(a) approximately 7.5) in the extracellular proton-conducting path, which plays a role in proton uptake by the Schiff base in the M-to-O conversion. The extracellular proton circulation produced by SRII was not blocked by HtrII complexation, unlike the cytoplasmic proton conduction in SRI that was found in the same series of measurements to be blocked by its transducer, HtrI. The implications of this finding for current models of SRI and SRII signaling are discussed.

Positioning proton-donating residues to the Schiff-base accelerates the M-decay of pharaonis phoborhodopsin expressed in Escherichia coli

Phoborhodopsin (also called sensory rhodopsin II, sR-II) is a receptor for the negative phototaxis of Halobacterium salinarum (pR), and pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR) is the corresponding receptor of Natronobacterium pharaonis. pR and ppR are retinoid proteins and have a photocycle similar to that of bacteriorhodopsin (bR). A major difference between the photocycle of the ion pump bR and the sensor pR or ppR is found in their turnover rates which are much faster for bR. A reason for this difference might be found in the lack of a proton-donating residue to the Schiff base which is formed between the lysine of the opsin and retinal. To reconstruct a bR-like photochemical behavior, we expressed ppR mutants in Escherichia coli in which proton-donating groups have been reintroduced into the cytoplasmic proton channel. In measurement of the photocycle it could be shown that the F86D mutant of ppR (Phe86 was substituted by Asp) showed a faster decay of M-intermediate than the wild-type, which was even accelerated in the F86D/L40T double mutant.

Time-resolved absorption and photothermal measurements with sensory rhodopsin I from Halobacterium salinarum

An expansion accompanying the formation of the first intermediate in the photocycle of transducer-free sensory rhodopsin I (SRI) was determined by means of time-resolved laser-induced optoacoustic spectroscopy. For the native protein (SRI-WT), the absolute value of the expansion is approximately 5.5 mL and for the mutant SRI-D76N, approximately 1.5 mL per mol of phototransformed species (in 0.5 M NaCl), calculated by using the formation quantum yield for the first intermediate (S610) of Phi610 = 0.4 +/- 0.05 for SRI-WT and 0.5 +/- 0.05 for SRI-D76N, measured by laser-induced optoacoustic spectroscopy and by laser flash photolysis. The similarity in Phi610 and in the determined value of the energy level of S610, E610 = (142 +/- 12) kJ/mol for SRI-WT and SRI-D76N indicates that Asp76 is not directly involved in the first step of the phototransformation. The increase with pH of the magnitude of the structural volume change for the formation of S610 in SRI-WT and in SRI-D76N upon excitation with 580 nm indicates also that amino acids other than Asp76, and other than those related to the Schiff base, are involved in the process. The difference in structural volume changes as well as differences in the activation parameters for the S610 decay should be attributed to differences in the rigidity of the cavity surrounding the chromophore. Except for the decay of the first intermediate, which is faster than in the SRI-transducer complex, the rate constants of the photocycle for transducer-free SRI in detergent suspension are strongly retarded with respect to wild-type membranes (this comparison should be done with great care because the preparation of both samples is very different).

Car: a cytoplasmic sensor responsible for arginine chemotaxis in the archaeon Halobacterium salinarum

A new metabolic signaling pathway for arginine, both a chemoeffector and a fermentative energy source, is described for Halobacterium salinarum. Systematic screening of 80+ potentially chemotactic compounds with two behavioral assays identified leucine, isoleucine, valine, methionine, cysteine, arginine and several peptides as strong chemoattractants. Deletion analysis of a number of potential halobacterial transducer genes led to the identification of Car, a specific cytoplasmic arginine transducer which lacks transmembrane helices and was biochemically shown to be localized in the cytoplasm. Flow assays were used to show specific adaptive responses to arginine and ornithine in wild-type but not Deltacar cells, demonstrating the role of Car in sensing arginine. The signaling pathway from external arginine to the flagellar motor of the cell involves an arginine:ornithine antiporter which was quantitatively characterized for its transport kinetics and inhibitors. By compiling the chemotactic behavior, the adaptive responses and the characteristics of the arginine:ornithine antiporter to arginine and its analogs, we now understand how the combination of arginine uptake and its metabolic conversion is required to build an effective sensing system. In both bacteria and the archaea this is the first chemoeffector molecule of a soluble methylatable transducer to be identified.

The specificity of interaction of archaeal transducers with their cognate sensory rhodopsins is determined by their transmembrane helices

Chimeras of the Halobacterium salinarum transducers HtrI and HtrII were constructed to study the structural determinants for their specific interaction with the phototaxis receptors sensory rhodopsins I and II (SRI and SRII), respectively. Interaction of receptors and transducers was assessed by two criteria: phototaxis responses by the cells and transducer-modulation of receptor photochemical reaction kinetics in membranes. Coexpression of HtrI with SRII or HtrII with SRI did not result in interaction by either criterion. Each receptor was coexpressed with chimeric transducers in which various domains of the two transducers were interchanged. The results show that the presence of the two transmembrane helices of HtrI in a chimera is necessary and sufficient for functional transducer complexation with SRI, i.e., for wild-type SRI photoreactions and attractant and 2-photon repellent phototaxis responses. Additionally, a previously demonstrated chaperone-like facilitation of SRI folding or stability by HtrI was shown to depend only on the two transmembrane helices of HtrI in chimeric transducers. Similarly, the two transmembrane helices of HtrII specify interaction with the repellent receptor SRII according to motility analysis and laser-flash spectroscopy. The results support a model in which the membrane domains of the receptor/transducer complexes, consisting of the seven helices of the receptor interacting with the four-helix bundle of the transducer dimer, produce SRI- and SRII-specific signals to the flagellar motor by means of interchangeable cytoplasmic domains.

The transducer protein HtrII modulates the lifetimes of sensory rhodopsin II photointermediates

We studied the photochemical reaction cycle of sensory rhodopsin II (SRII) by flash photolysis of Halobacterium salinarum membranes genetically engineered to contain or to lack its transducer protein HtrII. Flash photolysis data from membranes containing HtrII were fit well in the 10 micros-10 s range by three rate constants and a linear unbranched pathway from the unphotolyzed state with 487 nm absorption maximum to a species with absorption maximum near 350 nm (M) followed by a species with maximum near 520 nm (O), as has been found in previous studies of wild-type membranes. Data from membranes devoid of HtrII exhibited similar M and O intermediates but with altered kinetics, and a third intermediate absorbing maximally near 470 nm (N) was present in an equilibrium mixture with O. The modulation of SRII photoreactions by HtrII indicates that SRII and HtrII are physically associated in a molecular complex. Arrhenius analysis shows that the largest effect of HtrII, the acceleration of O decay, is attributable to a large decrease in activation enthalpy. Based on comparison of SRII photoreactions to those of sensory rhodopsin I and bacteriorhodopsin, we interpret this kinetic effect to indicate that HtrII interacts with SRII so that it alters the reaction process involving deprotonation of Asp73, the proton acceptor from the Schiff base.

Photoresponses of Halobacterium salinarum to repetitive pulse stimuli

Halobacterium salinarum cells from 3-day-old cultures have been stimulated with different patterns of repetitive pulse stimuli. A short train of 0.6-s orange light pulses with a 4-s period resulted in reversal peaks of increasing intensity. The reverse occurred when blue light pulses were delivered as a finite train: with a 3-s period, the response declined in sequence from the first to the last pulse. To evaluate the response of the system under steady-state conditions of stimulation, continuous trains of pulses were also applied; whereas blue light always produced a sharply peaked response immediately after each pulse, orange pulses resulted in a declining peak of reversals that lasted until the subsequent pulse. An attempt to account for these results in terms of current excitation/adaptation models shows that additional mechanisms appear to be at work in this transduction chain.

HtrI is a dimer whose interface is sensitive to receptor photoactivation and His-166 replacements in sensory rhodopsin I

Single cysteine substitutions were introduced into three positions of otherwise cysteineless HtrI, a phototaxis transducer found in Halobacterium salinarum that transmits signals from the photoreceptor sensory rhodopsin I (SRI) to a cytoplasmic pathway controlling the cell's motility. Oxidative cross-linking of the monocysteine HtrI mutants in membrane suspensions resulted in dimer forms evident in SDS-polyacrylamide gels. The rate of cross-linking of I64C on the cytoplasmic side of HtrI was accelerated by SRI binding in the dark and further increased by SRI photoactivation. Several residue replacements of His-166 in SRI accelerated the cross-linking rate of I64C in the dark and His-166 mutants that exhibit "inverted signaling" (mediating repellent instead of the normally attractant response to orange light) inverted the light effect on the cross-linking rate of I64C. Secondary structure prediction of HtrI indicates a coiled coil structure in the cytoplasmic region following TM2, a dimerization domain found in a diverse group of proteins. We conclude that 1) HtrI exists as a dimer both in the absence of SRI and in the SRI-HtrI complex, 2) binding of SRI in the dark increases reactivity of the two cysteines at position 64 in the dimer by increasing their proximity or mobility, 3) light activation of wild-type SRI further increases their reactivity, 4) His-166 replacements in the SRI receptor have conformational effects on the structure of HtrI at position 64, and 5) inverted signaling by His-166 mutants likely results from an inverted conformational change at this region induced by SRI photoactivation.

Variations on a molecular switch: transport and sensory signalling by archaeal rhodopsins

The archaeal rhodopsins are a family of seven-transmembrane-helix, visual pigment-like proteins found in Halobacterium salinarum and related halophilic Archaea. Two, bacteriorhodopsin (BR) and halorhodopsin (HR), are transport rhodopsins that carry out light-driven electrogenic translocation of protons and chloride, respectively, across the cell membrane. The other two, sensory rhodopsins I and II (SRI and SRII), are phototaxis receptors that send signals to tightly bound transducer proteins that in turn control a phosphorylation cascade modulating the cell's flagellar motors. Recent progress has cast light on how nature has modified the common design of these proteins to carry out their distinctly different functions: electrogenic ion transport and non-electrogenic signal transduction. A key shared mechanism between BR and SRII appears to be an interhelical salt bridge locked conformational switch that is released by photoisomerization of retinal. In BR disruption of the lock opens a cytoplasmic half-channel that ensures uptake of the transported proton from the cytoplasmic side of the membrane at a critical time in the pumping cycle. Transducer-free SRI uses the same mechanism to carry out light-driven proton transport, but interaction with its transducer blocks the cytoplasmic half-channel thereby interrupting the transport cycle. In SRI, transducer interaction also disrupts the salt bridge in the dark, poising the receptor in an intermediate conformation able to produce opposite signals depending on the colour of the stimulus light. A model for signalling is proposed in which the salt bridge-controlled half-channel is used to modulate interaction with the Htr proteins when the receptor signalling states are formed.

Suppressor mutation analysis of the sensory rhodopsin I-transducer complex: insights into the color-sensing mechanism

The molecular complex containing the phototaxis receptor sensory rhodopsin I (SRI) and transducer protein HtrI (halobacterial transducer for SRI) mediates color-sensitive phototaxis responses in the archaeon Halobacterium salinarum. One-photon excitation of the complex by orange light elicits attractant responses, while two-photon excitation (orange followed by near-UV light) elicits repellent responses in swimming cells. Several mutations in SRI and HtrI cause an unusual mutant phenotype, called orange-light-inverted signaling, in which the cell produces a repellent response to normally attractant light. We applied a selection procedure for intragenic and extragenic suppressors of orange-light-inverted mutants and identified 15 distinct second-site mutations that restore the attractant response. Two of the 3 suppressor mutations in SRI are positioned at the cytoplasmic ends of helices F and G, and 12 suppressor mutations in HtrI cluster at the cytoplasmic end of the second HtrI transmembrane helix (TM2). Nearly all suppressors invert the normally repellent response to two-photon stimulation to an attractant response when they are expressed with their suppressible mutant alleles or in an otherwise wild-type strain. The results lead to a model for control of flagellar reversal by the SRI-HtrI complex. The model invokes an equilibrium between the A (reversal-inhibiting) and R (reversal-stimulating) conformers of the signaling complex. Attractant light and repellent light shift the equilibrium toward the A and R conformers, respectively, and mutations are proposed to cause intrinsic shifts in the equilibrium in the dark form of the complex. Differences in the strength of the two-photon signal inversion and in the allele specificity of suppression are correlated, and this correlation can be explained in terms of different values of the equilibrium constant (Keq) for the conformational transition in different mutants and mutant-suppressor pairs.

His166 is critical for active-site proton transfer and phototaxis signaling by sensory rhodopsin I

Photoinduced deprotonation of the retinylidene Schiff base in the sensory rhodopsin I transducer (SRI-Htrl) complex results in formation of the phototaxis signaling state S373. Here we report identification of a residue, His166, critical to this process, as well as to reprotonation of the Schiff base during the recovery phase of the SRI photocycle. Each of the residue substitutions A, D, G, L, S, V, or Y at position 166 reduces the flash yield of S373, to values ranging from 2% of wild type for H166Y to 23% for H166V. The yield of S373 is restored to wild-type levels in Htrl-free H166L by alkaline deprotonation of Asp76, a Schiff base proton acceptor normally not ionized in the SRI-Htrl complex, showing that proton transfer from the Schiff base in H166L occurs when an acceptor is made available. The flash yield and rate of decay of S373 of the mutants are pH dependent, even when complexed with Htrl, which confers pH insensitivity to wild-type SRI, suggesting that partial disruption of the complex has occurred. The rates of S373 reprotonation at neutral pH are also prolonged in all H166X mutants, with half-times from 5 s to 160 s (wild type, 1 s). All mutations of His166 tested disrupt phototaxis signaling. No response (H166D, H166L), dramatically reduced responses (H166V), or inverted responses to orange light (H166A, H166G, H166S, and H166Y) or to both orange and near-UV light (H166Y) are observed. Our conclusions are that His166 1) plays a role in the pathways of proton transfer both to and from the Schiff base in the SRI-Htrl complex, either as a structurally important residue or possibly as a participant in proton transfers; 2) is involved in the modulation of SRI photoreaction kinetics by Htrl; and 3) is important in phototaxis signaling. Consistent with the involvement of the His imidazole moiety, the addition of 10 mM imidazole to membrane suspensions containing H166A receptors accelerates S373 decay 10-fold at neutral pH, and a negligible effect is seen on wild-type SRI.

Molecular mechanism of photosignaling by archaeal sensory rhodopsins

Two sensory rhodopsins (SRI and SRII) mediate color-sensitive phototaxis responses in halobacteria. These seven-helix receptor proteins, structurally and functionally similar to animal visual pigments, couple retinal photoisomerization to receptor activation and are complexed with membrane-embedded transducer proteins (HtrI and HtrII) that modulate a cytoplasmic phosphorylation cascade controlling the flagellar motor. The Htr proteins resemble the chemotaxis transducers from Escherichia coli. The SR-Htr signaling complexes allow studies of the biophysical chemistry of signal generation and relay, from the photobiophysics of initial excitation of the receptors to the final output at the level of the flagellar motor switch, revealing fundamental principles of sensory transduction and more broadly the nature of dynamic interactions between membrane proteins. We review here recent advances that have led to new insights into the molecular mechanism of signaling by these membrane complexes.

Shuttling between two protein conformations: the common mechanism for sensory transduction and ion transport

It has recently become known that light-dependent interconversions between two protein conformations underlie both ion transport in bacteriorhodopsin and halorhodopsin and phototaxis signaling by the sensory rhodopsins of halobacteria. In the transport proteins, the two conformations facilitate alternating access of an occluded ion-binding site to the two surfaces of the membrane, and in the sensory receptors the conformations modulate signal-transducer activity. In sensory rhodopsin I, the same conformational equilibrium is implicated in providing both sensory signaling when bound to its transducer and proton transport when free.

Protonatable residues at the cytoplasmic end of transmembrane helix-2 in the signal transducer HtrI control photochemistry and function of sensory rhodopsin I

Neutral residue replacements were made of 21 acidic and basic residues within the N-terminal half of the Halobacterium salinarium signal transducer HtrI [the halobacterial transducer for sensory rhodopsin I (SRI)] by site-specific mutagenesis. The replacements are all within the region of HtrI that we previously concluded from deletion analysis to contain sites of interaction with the phototaxis receptor SRI. Immunoblotting shows plasmid expression of the htrI-sopI operon containing the mutations produces SRI and mutant HtrI in cells at near wild-type levels. Six of the HtrI mutations perturb photochemical kinetics of SRI and one reverses the phototaxis response. Substitution with neutral amino acids of Asp-86, Glu-87, and Glu-108 accelerate, and of Arg-70, Arg-84, and Arg-99 retard, the SRI photocycle. Opposite effects on photocycle rate cancel in double mutants containing one replaced acidic and one replaced basic residue. Laser flash spectroscopy shows the kinetic perturbations are due to alteration of the rate of reprotonation of the retinylidene Schiff base. All of these mutations permit normal attractant and repellent signaling. On the other hand, the substitution of Glu-56 with the isosteric glutamine converts the normally attractant effect of orange light to a repellent signal in vivo at neutral pH (inverted signaling). Low pH corrects the inversion due to Glu-56 -> Gln and the apparent pK of the inversion is increased when arginine is substituted at position 56. The results indicate that the cytoplasmic end of transmembrane helix-2 and the initial part of the cytoplasmic domain contain interaction sites with SRI. To explain these and previous results, we propose a model in which (i) the HtrI region identified here forms part of an electrostatic bonding network that extends through the SRI protein and includes its photoactive site; (ii) alteration of this network by photoisomerization-induced Schiff base deprotonation and reprotonation shifts HtrI between attractant and repellent conformations; and (iii) HtrI mutations and extracellular pH alter the equilibrium ratios of these conformations.

Signal transduction in the archaeon Halobacterium salinarium is processed through three subfamilies of 13 soluble and membrane-bound transducer proteins

Eubacterial transducers are transmembrane, methyl-accepting proteins central to chemotaxis systems and share common structural features. We identified a large family of transducer proteins in the Archaeon Halobacterium salinarium using a site-specific multiple antigenic peptide antibody raised against 23 amino acids, representing the highest homology region of eubacterial transducers. This immunological observation was confirmed by isolating 13 methyl-accepting taxis genes using a 27-mer oligonucleotide probe, corresponding to conserved regions between the eubacterial and first halobacterial phototaxis transducer gene htrI. On the basis of the comparison of the predicted structural domains of these transducers, we propose that at least three distinct subfamilies of transducers exist in the Archaeon H. salinarium: (i) a eubacterial chemotaxis transducer type with two hydrophobic membrane-spanning segments connecting sizable domains in the periplasm and cytoplasm; (ii) a cytoplasmic domain and two or more hydrophobic transmembrane segments without periplasmic domains; and (iii) a cytoplasmic domain without hydrophobic transmembrane segments. We fractionated the halobacterial cell lysate into soluble and membrane fractions and localized different halobacterial methyl-accepting taxis proteins in both fractions.

Different modes of proton translocation by sensory rhodopsin I

The membrane-bound complex between sensory rhodopsin I (SRI) and its transducer HtrI forms the functional photoreceptor unit that allows transmission of light signals to the flagellar motor. Although being a photosensor, SRI, the mutant SRI-D76N and the HtrI-SRI complex can transport protons, as we demonstrate by using the sensitive and ion-specific black lipid membrane technique. SRI sustains an orange light-driven (one-photon-driven) outward proton transport which is enhanced by additional blue light (two-photon-driven). The vectoriality of the two-photon-driven transport could be reversed at neutral pH from the outward to the inward direction by switching the cut-off wavelength of the long wavelength light from 550 to 630 nm. The cut-off wavelength determining the reversal point decreases with decreasing pH. The currents could be enhanced by azide. A two-photon-driven inward proton transport by SRI-D76N (catalyzed by azide) and by the complex HtrI-SRI is demonstrated. The influence of pH and azide concentration on the rise and decay kinetics of the SRI380 intermediate is analyzed. The different modes of proton translocation of the SRI species are discussed on the basis of a general model of proton translocation of retinal proteins and in the context of signal transduction.

Transducer protein HtrI controls proton movements in sensory rhodopsin I

Sensory rhodopsin I (SR-I lambda(max) 587 nm) is a phototaxis receptor in the archaeon Halobacterium salinarium. Photoisomerization of retinal in SR-I generates a long-lived intermediate with lambda(max) 373 nm which transmits a signal to the membrane-bound transducer protein HtrI. Although SR-I is structurally similar to the electrogenic proton pump bacteriorhodopsin (BR), early studies showed its photoreactions do not pump protons, nor result in membrane hyperpolarization. These studies used functionally active SR-I, that is, SR-I complexed with its transducer HtrI. Using recombinant DNA methods we have expressed SR-I protein containing mutations in ionizable residues near the protonated Schiff base, and studied wild-type and site-specifically mutated SR-I in the presence and absence of the transducer protein. UV-Vis kinetic absorption spectroscopy, FT-IR, and pH and membrane potential probes reveal transducer-free SR-I photoreactions result in vectorial proton translocation across the membrane in the same direction as that of BR. This proton pumping is suppressed by interaction with transducer which diverts the proton movements into an electroneutral path. A key step in this diversion is that transducer interaction raises the pK(a) of the aspartyl residue in SR-I (Asp76) which corresponds to the primary proton-accepting residue in the BR pump (Asp85). In transducer-free SR-I, our evidence indicates the pK(a) of Asp76 is 7.2, and ionized Asp76 functions as the Schiff base proton acceptor in the SR-I pump. In the SR-I/HtrI complex, the pK(a) of Asp76 is 8.5, and therefore at physiological pH (7.4) Asp76 is neutral. Protonation changes on Asp76 are clearly not required for signaling since the SR-I mutants D76N and D76A are active in phototaxis. The latent proton-translocation potential of SR-I may reflect the evolution of the SR-I sensory signaling mechanism from the proton pumping mechanism of BR.

Oxygen-insensitive synthesis of the photosynthetic membranes of Rhodobacter sphaeroides: a mutant histidine kinase

Two new loci, prrB and prrC, involved in the positive regulation of photosynthesis gene expression in response to anaerobiosis, have been identified in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. prrB encodes a sensor histidine kinase that is responsive to the removal of oxygen and functions through the response regulator PrrA. Inactivation of prrB results in a substantial reduction of photosynthetic spectral complexes as well as in the inability of cells to grow photosynthetically at low to medium light intensities. Together, prrB and prrA provide the major signal involved in synthesis of the specialized intracytoplasmic membrane (ICM), harboring components essential to the light reactions of photosynthesis. Previously, J. K. Lee and S. Kaplan (J. Bacteriol. 174:1158-1171, 1992) identified a mutant which resulted in high-level expression of the puc operon, encoding the apoproteins giving rise to the B800-850 spectral complex, in the presence of oxygen as well as in the synthesis of the ICM under conditions of high oxygenation. This mutation is shown to reside in prrB, resulting in a leucine-to-proline change at position 78 in mutant PrrB (PRRB78). Measurements of mRNA levels in cells containing the prrB78 mutation support the idea that prrB is a global regulator of photosynthesis gene expression. Two additional mutants, PRRB1 and PRRB2, which make two truncated forms of the PrrB protein, possess substantially reduced amounts of spectral complexes. Although the precise role of prrC remains to be determined, evidence suggests that it too is involved in the regulatory cascade involving prrB and prrA. The genetic organization of the photosynthesis response regulatory (PRR) region is discussed.

The photoreceptor sensory rhodopsin I as a two-photon-driven proton pump

Proton translocation experiments with intact cells of Halobacterium salinarium overproducing sensory rhodopsin I (SRI) revealed transport activity of SRI in a two-photon process. The vectoriality of proton translocation depends on pH, being outwardly directed above, and inwardly directed below, pH 5.7. Activation of the transport cycle requires excitation of the initial dark state of SRI, SRI590, to form the intermediate SRI380. Action spectra identify the photocycle intermediates SRI380 and SRI520 as the two photochemically reactive species in the outwardly directed transport process. As shown by flash photolysis experiments, SRI520 undergoes a so-far unknown photochemical reaction to SRI380 with a half-time of <200 micros. Mutation of SRI residue Asp-76, the residue which is equivalent to the proton acceptor Asp-85 in bacteriorhodopsin, to asparagine leads to inactivation of proton translocation. This demonstrates that the underlying mechanisms of proton transport in both retinal proteins share similar features. However, SRI is to our knowledge the first case where photochemical reactions between two thermally unstable photoproducts of a retinal protein constitute a catalytic ion transport cycle.

Residue replacements of buried aspartyl and related residues in sensory rhodopsin I: D201N produces inverted phototaxis signals

Residue replacements were made at five positions (Arg-73, Asp-76, Tyr-87, Asp-106, and Asp-201) in the Halobacterium salinarium phototaxis receptor sensory rhodopsin I (SR-I) by site-specific mutagenesis. The sites were chosen for their correspondence in position to residues of functional importance in the homologous light-driven proton pump bacteriorhodopsin found in the same organism. This work identifies a residue in SR-I shown to be of vital importance to its attractant signaling function: Asp-201. The effect of the substitution with the isosteric asparagine is to convert the normally attractant signal of orange light stimulation to a repellent signal. In contrast, similar neutral substitution of the four other ionizable residues near the photoactive site allows essentially normal attractant and repellent phototaxis signaling. Wild-type two-photon repellent signaling by the receptor is intact in the Asp-201 mutant, genetically separating the wild-type attractant and repellent signal generation processes. A possible explanation and implications of the inverted signaling are discussed. Results of neutral residue substitution for Asp-76 confirm our previous evidence that proton transfer reactions involving this residue are not important to phototaxis but that Asp-76 functions as the Schiff base proton acceptor in proton translocation by transducer-free SR-I.

The primary structure of sensory rhodopsin II: a member of an additional retinal protein subgroup is coexpressed with its transducer, the halobacterial transducer of rhodopsin II

The blue-light receptor genes (sopII) of sensory rhodopsin (SR) II were cloned from two species, the halophilic bacteria Haloarcula vallismortis (vSR-II) and Natronobacterium pharaonis (pSR-II). Upstream of both sopII gene loci, sequences corresponding to the halobacterial transducer of rhodopsin (Htr) II were recognized. In N. pharaonis, psopII and phtrII are transcribed as a single transcript. Comparison of the amino acid sequences of vHtr-II and pHtr-II with Htr-I and the chemotactic methyl-accepting proteins from Escherichia coli revealed considerable identities in the signal domain and methyl-accepting sites. Similarities with Htr-I in Halobacterium salinarium suggest a common principle in the phototaxis of extreme halophiles. Alignment of all known retinal protein sequences from Archaea identifies both SR-IIs as an additional subgroup of the family. Positions defining the retinal binding site are usually identical with the exception of Met-118 (numbering is according to the bacteriorhodopsin sequence), which might explain the typical blue color shift of SR-II to approximately 490 nm. In archaeal retinal proteins, the function can be deduced from amino acids in positions 85 and 96. Proton pumps are characterized by Asp-85 and Asp-96; chloride pumps by Thr-85 and Ala-96; and sensors by Asp-85 and Tyr-96 or Phe-96.

Identification of distinct domains for signaling and receptor interaction of the sensory rhodopsin I transducer, HtrI

The phototaxis-deficient mutant of Halobacterium salinarium, Pho81, lacks both sensory rhodopsin I (SR-I) and its putative transducer protein HtrI, according to immunoblotting and spectroscopic criteria. From restriction analysis and selected DNA sequencing, we have determined that the SR-I- HtrI- phenotype results from an insertion of a 520-bp transposable element, ISH2, into the coding region of the SR-I apoprotein gene sopI and deletion of 11 kbp upstream of ISH2 including the first 164 bp of sopI and the entire htrI gene. SR-I and HtrI expression as well as full phototaxis sensitivity are restored by transformation with a halobacterial plasmid carrying the htrI-sopI gene pair and their upstream promoter region. An internal deletion of a portion of htrI encoding the putative methylation and signaling domains of HtrI (253 residues) prevents the restoration of phototaxis, providing further evidence for the role of HtrI as a transducer for SR-I. Analysis of flash-induced photochemical reactions of SR-I over a range of pH shows that the partially deleted HtrI maintains SR-I interactions sites responsible for modulation of the SR-I photocycle.

Removal of transducer HtrI allows electrogenic proton translocation by sensory rhodopsin I

Sensory rhodopsin I (sR-I) is a phototaxis receptor in halobacteria, which is closely related to the light-driven proton pump bacteriorhodopsin and the chloride pump halorhodopsin found in the same organisms. The three pigments undergo similar cyclic photoreactions, in spite of their different functions. In intact cells or isolated membranes sR-I is complexed with protein HtrI, the next link in the signal transduction chain, and does not function as an electrogenic ion pump. However, illumination of sR-I in membranes lacking HtrI causes pH changes in the medium, and its photoreaction kinetics become pH-dependent. We show here that in closed vesicles, near neutral pH it functions as an electrogenic proton pump capable of generating at least -80 mV transmembrane potential. The action spectrum shows a maximum 37 nm below the 587-nm absorption maximum of the native pigment. This apparent discrepancy occurs because the 587-nm form of HtrI-free sR-I exists in a pH-dependent equilibrium with a 550-nm absorbing species generated through deprotonation of one group with a pKa of 7.2, which we have tentatively identified as Asp-76. We interpret the results in terms of a general model for ion translocation by the bacterial rhodopsins.

The Schiff base counterion of bacteriorhodopsin is protonated in sensory rhodopsin I: spectroscopic and functional characterization of the mutated proteins D76N and D76A

Both sensory rhodopsin I (SR-I), a phototaxis receptor, and bacteriorhodopsin (BR), a light-driven proton pump, share residues which have been identified as critical for BR functioning. This includes Asp76, which in the case of bacteriorhodopsin (Asp85) functions both as the Schiff base counterion and proton acceptor. We found that substituting an Asn for Asp76 (D76N) in SR-I has no effect on its visible absorption unlike the analogous mutation (D85N) in BR which shifts the absorption to longer wavelengths. The mutated proteins D76N and D76A are also fully functional as phototaxis receptors in contrast to BR, where the analogous substitutions block proton transport. D76N was also found to exhibit a spectrally normal SR587-->S373 transition. However, FTIR difference spectroscopy reveals that two bands in the SR587-->S373 difference spectrum at 1766/1749 cm-1 (negative/positive), assigned to the C=O stretch mode of a carboxylic acid, disappear in D76N, although no changes are observed in the carboxylate region. In addition, the kinetics and yield of this photoreaction are altered. On this basis, it is concluded that, unlike Asp85 in bacteriorhodopsin, Asp76 is protonated in SR-I and undergoes an increase in its hydrogen bonding during the SR587-->S373 transition. This model accounts for the difference in color of SR-I and BR and the finding that Asn can substitute for Asp76 without greatly altering the SR-I phenotype. Interestingly, parallels exist between this residue and Asp83 in the visual receptor rhodopsin which has recently been found to exist in a protonated form and to undergo an almost identical change in hydrogen bonding during rhodopsin activation.