Demonstration of a functional motilin receptor in TE671 cells from human cerebellum

The influence of herbal medicine on serum motilin and its effect on human and animal model: a systematic review

Introduction: Motilin (MLN) is a gastrointestinal (GI) hormone produced in the upper small intestine. Its most well understood function is to participate in Phase III of the migrating myoelectric complex component of GI motility. Changes in MLN availability are associated with GI diseases such as gastroesophageal reflux disease and functional dyspepsia. Furthermore, herbal medicines have been used for several years to treat various GI disorders. We systematically reviewed clinical and animal studies on how herbal medicine affects the modulation of MLN and subsequently brings the therapeutic effects mainly focused on GI function. Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases to collect all articles published until 30 July 2023, that reported the measurement of plasma MLN levels in human randomized controlled trials and in vivo herbal medicine studies. The collected characteristics of the articles included the name and ingredients of the herbal medicine, physiological and symptomatic changes after administering the herbal medicine, changes in plasma MLN levels, key findings, and mechanisms of action. The frequency patterns (FPs) of botanical drug use and their correlations were investigated using an FP growth algorithm. Results: Nine clinical studies with 1,308 participants and 20 animal studies were included in the final analyses. Herbal medicines in clinical studies have shown therapeutic effects in association with increased levels of MLN, including GI motility regulation and symptom improvement. Herbal medicines have also shown anti-stress, anti-tumor, and anti-inflammatory effects in vivo. Various biochemical markers may correlate with MLN levels. Markers may have a positive correlation with plasma MLN levels included ghrelin, acetylcholine, and secretin, whereas a negative correlation included triglycerides and prostaglandin E2. Markers, such as gastrin and somatostatin, did not show any correlation with plasma MLN levels. Based on the FP growth algorithm, Glycyrrhiza uralensis and Paeonia japonica were the most frequently used species. Conclusion: Herbal medicine may have therapeutic effects mainly on GI symptoms with involvement of MLN regulation and may be considered as an alternative option for the treatment of GI diseases. Further studies with more solid evidence are needed to confirm the efficacy and mechanisms of action of herbal medicines. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=443244, identifier CRD42023443244.

Motilin Comparative Study: Structure, Distribution, Receptors, and Gastrointestinal Motility

Motilin, produced in endocrine cells in the mucosa of the upper intestine, is an important regulator of gastrointestinal (GI) motility and mediates the phase III of interdigestive migrating motor complex (MMC) in the stomach of humans, dogs and house musk shrews through the specific motilin receptor (MLN-R). Motilin-induced MMC contributes to the maintenance of normal GI functions and transmits a hunger signal from the stomach to the brain. Motilin has been identified in various mammals, but the physiological roles of motilin in regulating GI motility in these mammals are well not understood due to inconsistencies between studies conducted on different species using a range of experimental conditions. Motilin orthologs have been identified in non-mammalian vertebrates, and the sequence of avian motilin is relatively close to that of mammals, but reptile, amphibian and fish motilins show distinctive different sequences. The MLN-R has also been identified in mammals and non-mammalian vertebrates, and can be divided into two main groups: mammal/bird/reptile/amphibian clade and fish clade. Almost 50 years have passed since discovery of motilin, here we reviewed the structure, distribution, receptor and the GI motility regulatory function of motilin in vertebrates from fish to mammals.

The Mechanism of Action of Ghrelin and Motilin in the Pacemaker Potentials of Interstitial Cells of Cajal from the Murine Small Intestine

Interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs) are pacemaker cells that exhibit periodic spontaneous depolarization in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and generate pacemaker potentials. In this study, we investigated the effects of ghrelin and motilin on the pacemaker potentials of ICCs isolated from the mouse small intestine. Using the whole-cell patch-clamp configuration, we demonstrated that ghrelin depolarized pacemaker potentials of cultured ICCs in a dose-dependent manner. The ghrelin receptor antagonist [D-Lys] GHRP-6 completely inhibited this ghrelin-induced depolarization. Intracellular guanosine 5'-diphosphate-β-S and pre-treatment with Ca2+free solution or thapsigargin also blocked the ghrelin-induced depolarization. To investigate the involvement of inositol triphosphate (IP3), Rho kinase, and protein kinase C (PKC) in ghrelin-mediated pacemaker potential depolarization of ICCs, we used the IP3 receptor inhibitors 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate and xestospongin C, the Rho kinase inhibitor Y-27632, and the PKC inhibitors staurosporine, Go6976, and rottlerin. All inhibitors except rottlerin blocked the ghrelin-induced pacemaker potential depolarization of ICCs. In addition, motilin depolarized the pacemaker potentials of ICCs in a similar dose-dependent manner as ghrelin, and this was also completely inhibited by [D-Lys] GHRP-6. These results suggest that ghrelin induced the pacemaker potential depolarization through the ghrelin receptor in a G protein-, IP3-, Rho kinase-, and PKC-dependent manner via intracellular and extracellular Ca2+ regulation. In addition, motilin was able to depolarize the pacemaker potentials of ICCs through the ghrelin receptor. Therefore, ghrelin and its receptor may modulate GI motility by acting on ICCs in the murine small intestine.

Motilin: from gastric motility stimulation to hunger signalling

After the discovery of motilin in 1972, motilin and the motilin receptor were studied intensely for their role in the control of gastrointestinal motility and as targets for treating hypomotility disorders. The genetic revolution - with the use of knockout models - sparked novel insights into the role of multiple peptides but contributed to a decline in interest in motilin, as this peptide and its receptor exist only as pseudogenes in rodents. The past 5 years have seen a major surge in interest in motilin, as a series of studies have shown its relevance in the control of hunger and regulation of food intake in humans in both health and disease. Luminal stimuli, such as bitter tastants, have been identified as modulators of motilin release, with effects on hunger and food intake. The current state of knowledge and potential implications for therapy are summarized in this Review.

Regulation of Gastrointestinal Motility by Motilin and Ghrelin in Vertebrates

The energy balance of vertebrates is regulated by the difference in energy input and energy expenditure. Generally, most vertebrates obtain their energy from nutrients of foods through the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Therefore, food intake and following food digestion, including motility of the GI tract, secretion and absorption, are crucial physiological events for energy homeostasis. GI motility changes depending on feeding, and GI motility is divided into fasting (interdigestive) and postprandial (digestive) contraction patterns. GI motility is controlled by contractility of smooth muscles of the GI tract, extrinsic and intrinsic neurons (motor and sensory) and some hormones. In mammals, ghrelin (GHRL) and motilin (MLN) stimulate appetite and GI motility and contribute to the regulation of energy homeostasis. GHRL and MLN are produced in the mucosal layer of the stomach and upper small intestine, respectively. GHRL is a multifunctional peptide and is involved in glucose metabolism, endocrine/exocrine functions and cardiovascular and reproductive functions, in addition to feeding and GI motility in mammals. On the other hand, the action of MLN is restricted and species such as rodentia, including mice and rats, lack MLN peptide and its receptor. From a phylogenetic point of view, GHRL and its receptor GHS-R1a have been identified in various vertebrates, and their structural features and various physiological functions have been revealed. On the other hand, MLN or MLN-like peptide (MLN-LP) and its receptors have been found only in some fish, birds and mammals. Here, we review the actions of GHRL and MLN with a focus on contractility of the GI tract of species from fish to mammals.

The motilin agonist erythromycin increases hunger by modulating homeostatic and hedonic brain circuits in healthy women: a randomized, placebo-controlled study

The motilin agonist, erythromycin, induces gastric phase III of the migrating motor complex, which in turn generates hunger peaks. To identify the brain mechanisms underlying these orexigenic effects, 14 healthy women participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study. Functional magnetic resonance brain images were acquired for 50 minutes interprandially. Intravenous infusion of erythromycin (40 mg) or saline started 10 minutes after the start of scanning. Blood samples (for glucose and hormone levels) and hunger ratings were collected at fixed timepoints. Thirteen volunteers completed the study, without any adverse events. Brain regions involved in homeostatic and hedonic control of appetite and food intake responded to erythromycin, including pregenual anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, amygdala, caudate, pallidum and putamen bilaterally, right accumbens, hypothalamus, and midbrain. Octanoylated ghrelin levels decreased, whereas both glucose and insulin increased after erythromycin. Hunger were higher after erythromycin, and these differences covaried with the brain response in most of the abovementioned regions. The motilin agonist erythromycin increases hunger by modulating neurocircuitry related to homeostatic and hedonic control of appetite and feeding. These results confirm recent behavioural findings identifying motilin as a key orexigenic hormone in humans, and identify the brain mechanisms underlying its effect.

The motilin receptor agonist erythromycin stimulates hunger and food intake through a cholinergic pathway

BACKGROUND

Motilin-induced phase III contractions have been identified as a hunger signal. These phase III contractions occur as part of the migrating motor complex (MMC), a contractility pattern of the gastrointestinal tract during fasting. The mechanism involved in this association between subjective hunger feelings and gastrointestinal motility during the MMC is largely unknown, however, as is its ability to stimulate food intake.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to 1) investigate the occurrence of hunger peaks and their relation to phase III contractions, 2) evaluate whether this relation was cholinergically driven, and 3) assess the ability of the motilin receptor agonist erythromycin to induce food intake.

DESIGN

An algorithm was developed to detect hunger peaks. The association with phase III contractions was studied in 14 healthy volunteers [50% men; mean ± SEM age: 25 ± 2 y; mean ± SEM body mass index (BMI; in kg/m(2)): 23 ± 1]. The impact of pharmacologically induced phase III contractions on the occurrence of hunger peaks and the involvement of a cholinergic pathway were assessed in 14 healthy volunteers (43% men; age: 29 ± 3 y; BMI: 23 ± 1). Last, the effect of erythromycin administration on food intake was examined in 15 healthy volunteers (40% men; age: 28 ± 3 y; BMI: 22 ± 1).

RESULTS

The occurrence of hunger peaks and their significant association with phase III contractions was confirmed (P < 0.0001). Pharmacologically induced phase III contractions were also significantly associated with hunger peaks (P < 0.05), and this association involved a cholinergic pathway. Administering erythromycin significantly stimulated food intake compared with placebo (53% ± 13% compared with 10% ± 5%; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Motilin-induced phase III contractions induced hunger feelings through a cholinergic pathway. Moreover, erythromycin stimulated food intake, suggesting a physiologic role of motilin as an orexigenic signal from the gastrointestinal tract. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02633579.

Motilin-induced gastric contractions signal hunger in man

RATIONALE

Hunger is controlled by the brain, which receives input from signals of the GI tract (GIT). During fasting, GIT displays a cyclical motor pattern, the migrating motor complex (MMC), regulated by motilin.

OBJECTIVES

To study the relationship between hunger and MMC phases (I-III), focusing on spontaneous and pharmacologically induced phase III and the correlation with plasma motilin and ghrelin levels. The role of phase III was also studied in the return of hunger after a meal in healthy individuals and in patients with loss of appetite.

FINDINGS

In fasting healthy volunteers, mean hunger ratings during a gastric (62.5±7.5) but not a duodenal (40.4±5.4) phase III were higher (p<0.0005) than during phase I (27.4±4.7) and phase II (37±4.5). The motilin agonist erythromycin, but not the cholinesterase inhibitor neostigmine, induced a premature gastric phase III, which coincided with an increase in hunger scores from 29.2±7 to 61.7±8. The somatostatin analogue octreotide induced a premature intestinal phase III without a rise in hunger scores. Hunger ratings significantly correlated (β=0.05; p=0.01) with motilin plasma levels, and this relationship was lost after erythromycin administration. Motilin, but not ghrelin administration, induced a premature gastric phase III and a rise in hunger scores. In contrast to octreotide, postprandial administration of erythromycin induced a premature gastric phase III accompanied by an early rise in hunger ratings. In patients with unexplained loss of appetite, gastric phase III was absent and hunger ratings were lower.

CONCLUSIONS

Motilin-induced gastric phase III is a hunger signal from GIT in man.

Effects of motilin on intracellular free calcium in cultured smooth muscle cells from the antrum of neonatal rats

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of motilin on [Ca(2+)](i) regulation and its underlying molecular mechanism in cultured antral smooth muscle cells (ASMCs).

METHODS

Antral cells were isolated and cultured from neonatal rats, and then the [Ca(2+)](i) in these cells was evaluated by calcium fluorescent probe Fluo-3/AM on a laser scanning confocal microscope.

RESULTS

We show that motilin dose-dependently increased [Ca(2+)](i) concentration in cultured ASMCs. Pre-incubation of cells with either the calcium antagonist verapamil (10(-5) mol L(-1)) or the calcium chelator Egtazic (EGTA, 0.1 mmol L(-1)) significantly suppressed motilin (10(-6) mol L(-1)) induced [Ca(2+)](i) increase as indicated by fluorescent intensity. Interestingly, after mixing with the non-selective intracellular calcium release blocker TMB-8 (10(-5) mol L(-1)), guanosine triphosphate regulatory protein antagonist NEM (10(-5) mol L(-1)), phospholipase C (PLC) inhibitor compound 48/80 (1.2 microg mL(-1)) and ryanodine at high concentration (10(-5) mol L(-1)), the motilin-induced [Ca(2+)](i) increase was only partially blocked. The protein kinase C inhibitor d-sphingosine (10(-6) mol L(-1)), however, did not show any inhibitory effect on motilin-induced [Ca(2+)](i) elevation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that motilin-stimulated [Ca(2+)](i) elevation in ASMCs is probably due to sustained extracellular Ca(2+) influx and Ca(2+) release from Ca(2+) stores via inositol tris-phosphate receptors and ryanodine receptors. Specifically, motilin-induced [Ca(2+)](i) release is accompanied with guanosine triphosphate-binding protein-coupled receptor-PLC-inositol tris-phosphate signalling cascades.

Mutational analysis of predicted intracellular loop domains of human motilin receptor

Motilin is an important endogenous regulator of gastrointestinal motor function, mediated by the class I G protein-coupled motilin receptor. Motilin and erythromycin, two chemically distinct full agonists of the motilin receptor, are known to bind to distinct regions of this receptor, based on previous systematic mutagenesis of extracellular regions that dissociated the effects on these two agents. In the present work, we examined the predicted intracellular loop regions of this receptor for effects on motilin- and erythromycin-stimulated activity. We prepared motilin receptor constructs that included sequential deletions throughout the predicted first, second, and third intracellular loops, as well as replacing the residues in key regions with alanine, phenylalanine, or histidine. Each construct was transiently expressed in COS cells and characterized for motilin- and erythromycin-stimulated intracellular calcium responses and for motilin binding. Deletions of receptor residues 63-66, 135-137, and 296-301 each resulted in substantial loss of intracellular calcium responses to stimulation by both motilin and erythromycin. Constructs with mutations of residues Tyr66, Arg136, and Val299 were responsible for the negative impact on biological activity stimulated by both agonists. These data suggest that action by different chemical classes of agonists that are known to interact with distinct regions of the motilin receptor likely yield a common activation state of the cytosolic face of this receptor that is responsible for interaction with its G protein. The identification of functionally important residues in the predicted cytosolic face provides strong candidates for playing roles in receptor-G protein interaction.

Molecular characterization and distribution of motilin family receptors in the human gastrointestinal tract

BACKGROUND

Motilin and ghrelin have been recognized as important endogenous regulators of gastrointestinal motor function in mammals, mediated respectively by the motilin receptor and by the closely related ghrelin receptor. The aims of this study were to explore the distribution of motilin and ghrelin receptors along the human gastrointestinal tract and to establish the molecular nature of the human motilin receptor.

METHODS

Post mortem and surgical human tissue specimens with no hemorrhage, necrosis, or tumor were obtained from various parts of the gastrointestinal tract. We analyzed levels of expression of mRNA for motilin and ghrelin receptors and examined their molecular identities. Portions of some specimens were also studied by immunohistochemistry for expression of the motilin and ghrelin receptor.

RESULTS

The long form of the motilin receptor, but not the short form, was expressed in all parts of the gastrointestinal tract, and expressed at higher levels in muscle than in mucosa. Motilin receptor immunoreactivity was present in muscle cells and the myenteric plexus, but not in mucosal or submucosal cells. In contrast, ghrelin receptor mRNA was expressed equally in all parts of the gastrointestinal tract, with similar levels of expression in mucosal and muscle layers.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the motilin and ghrelin receptors are expressed along the human gastrointestinal tract, but they have clearly distinct distributions in regard to both level and layer. The diffuse muscle expression of the motilin receptor, at both the levels of the gene and the protein product, along the entire gastrointestinal tract makes it a useful potential target for motilide drugs for dysmotility.

Delineation of the motilin domain involved in desensitization and internalization of the motilin receptor by using full and partial antagonists

Studies with fragments of the gastrointestinal peptide, motilin, indicate that the C-terminal region of this peptide plays an important role in the desensitization of the motilin receptor (MTLR).

AIM

To verify this hypothesis we studied the desensitization, phosphorylation and internalization induced by motilin analogues of different chain length with agonistic and antagonistic properties in CHO-MTLR cells.

METHODS

We studied motilin [1-22], the [1-14] fragment, the analogues Phe(3)[1-22] and Phe(3)[1-14], and two putative antagonists, GM-109 and MA-2029 (modified 1-4 and 1-3 fragments). Activation and desensitization (2h preincubation with the motilin analogues 10muM) were studied in CHO-MTLR cells by an aequorin based luminescence assay. Phosphorylation was studied by immunoprecipitation and internalization was visualized in CHO-MTLR cells containing an enhanced green fluorescent protein (CHO-MTLR-EGFP).

RESULTS

Motilin [1-22] and [1-14] were more potent than Phe(3)[1-22] and Phe(3)[1-14] (pEC(50): 9.77, 8.78, 7.36 and 6.65, respectively) to induce Ca(2+) release. GM-109 and MA-2029 were without agonist activity. [1-22] and Phe(3)[1-22] decreased the second response to motilin from 78+/-2% to 11+/-3% and 34+/-3% (P<0.001), respectively, whereas [1-14], Phe(3)[1-14], GM-109 and MA-2029 had no desensitizing effect (68+/-5%, 78+/-3%, 78+/-6% and 78+/-5%, respectively, P>0.05). The rank order of MTLR-phosphorylation was: [1-22]>[1-14]>Phe(3)[1-22]=Phe(3)[1-14]>GM-109=MA-2029. Only motilin [1-22] and [1-14] induced receptor MTLR-EGFP internalization as shown by a decrease in membrane fluorescence: 20+/-3% and 7+/-3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The C-terminus of motilin enhances desensitization, phosphorylation and internalization of the MTLR while modifications of the N-terminus can favor a conformation of the receptor that is less susceptible to phosphorylation and internalization.

Molecular characterization and distribution of motilin family receptors in the human gastrointestinal tract

BACKGROUND

Motilin and ghrelin have been recognized as important endogenous regulators of gastrointestinal motor function in mammals, mediated respectively by the motilin receptor and by the closely related ghrelin receptor. The aims of this study were to explore the distribution of motilin and ghrelin receptors along the human gastrointestinal tract and to establish the molecular nature of the human motilin receptor.

METHODS

Post mortem and surgical human tissue specimens with no hemorrhage, necrosis, or tumor were obtained from various parts of the gastrointestinal tract. We analyzed levels of expression of mRNA for motilin and ghrelin receptors and examined their molecular identities. Portions of some specimens were also studied by immunohistochemistry for expression of the motilin and ghrelin receptor.

RESULTS

The long form of the motilin receptor, but not the short form, was expressed in all parts of the gastrointestinal tract, and expressed at higher levels in muscle than in mucosa. Motilin receptor immunoreactivity was present in muscle cells and the myenteric plexus, but not in mucosal or submucosal cells. In contrast, ghrelin receptor mRNA was expressed equally in all parts of the gastrointestinal tract, with similar levels of expression in mucosal and muscle layers.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the motilin and ghrelin receptors are expressed along the human gastrointestinal tract, but they have clearly distinct distributions in regard to both level and layer. The diffuse muscle expression of the motilin receptor, at both the levels of the gene and the protein product, along the entire gastrointestinal tract makes it a useful potential target for motilide drugs for dysmotility.

Central, but not peripheral application of motilin increases c-Fos expression in hypothalamic nuclei in the rat brain

Previous immunocytochemical studies have shown the presence of motilin-immunoreactive neurons in specific brain areas of rats and autoradiographic studies in rabbits demonstrated motilin-binding sites in the central nervous system as well. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the anatomical localisation and neurochemical features of neurons activated by central administration of motilin (Mo) in rats. One week after cannulation, an intracerebroventricular injection of Mo (ICV, 3 microg/6 mul 0.9% saline) was given. For comparative purposes, a group of animals received an intravenous injection of motilin (IV, 9 microg/300 mul 0.9% saline) or an equal volume of saline. Neuronal excitation was assessed by c-Fos immunocytochemistry and combined with immunostaining for neurotransmitter markers. In contrast to the IV motilin-treated animals, the ICV motilin-treated animals displayed a significant increase in c-Fos expression in the supraoptic nuclei (SO) and paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus (PVH). At the level of the dorsomedial, ventromedial and lateral hypothalamic nuclei, ICV administration of motilin did not induce changes in c-Fos expression. In addition, the cerebellum did not show c-Fos expression after ICV motilin administration either. These findings might suggest distinct pathways and actions of centrally released and systemic motilin, but, particularly in rodents, do not rule out the possibility that the effects seen in the SO and PVH after ICV application are aspecific in nature. At present, we cannot exclude the fact that the results observed with motilin in rodents are due to cross-interaction with other related (e.g. ghrelin) or not yet identified receptors.

Signaling pathways mediating gastrointestinal smooth muscle contraction and MLC20 phosphorylation by motilin receptors

The signaling cascades initiated by motilin receptors in gastric and intestinal smooth muscle cells were characterized. Motilin bound with high affinity (IC(50) 0.7 +/- 0.2 nM) to receptors on smooth muscle cells; the receptors were rapidly internalized via G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2). Motilin selectively activated G(q) and G(13), stimulated G alpha(q)-dependent phosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis and 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP(3))-dependent Ca(2+) release, and increased cytosolic free Ca(2+). PI hydrolysis was blocked by expression of G alpha(q) minigene and augmented by overexpression of dominant negative RGS4(N88S) or GRK2(K220R). Motilin induced a biphasic, concentration-dependent contraction (EC(50) = 1.0 +/- 0.2 nM), consisting of an initial peak followed by a sustained contraction. The initial Ca(2+)-dependent contraction and myosin light-chain (MLC)(20) phosphorylation were inhibited by the PLC inhibitor U-73122 and the MLC kinase inhibitor ML-9 but were not affected by the Rho kinase inhibitor Y27632 or the PKC inhibitor bisindolylmaleimide. Sustained contraction and MLC(20) phosphorylation were RhoA dependent and mediated by two downstream messengers: PKC and Rho kinase. The latter was partly inhibited by expression of G alpha(q) or G alpha(13) minigene and abolished by coexpression of both minigenes. Sustained contraction and MLC(20) phosphorylation were partly inhibited by Y27632 and bisindolylmaleimide and abolished by a combination of both inhibitors. The inhibition reflected phosphorylation of two MLC phosphatase inhibitors: CPI-17 via PKC and MYPT1 via Rho kinase. We conclude that motilin initiates a G alpha(q)-mediated cascade involving Ca(2+)/calmodulin activation of MLC kinase and transient MLC(20) phosphorylation and contraction as well as a sustained G alpha(q)- and G alpha(13)-mediated, RhoA-dependent cascade involving phosphorylation of CPI-17 by PKC and MYPT1 by Rho kinase, leading to inhibition of MLC phosphatase and sustained MLC(20) phosphorylation and contraction.

Effects of a nonpeptide motilin receptor antagonist on proximal gastric motor function

AIM

To assess the effects of the motilin receptor antagonist RWJ-68023 on basal and motilin-stimulated proximal gastric volume.

METHODS

Eighteen healthy male volunteers received RWJ-68023 in two different doses or placebo for 135 min. After 45 min, subjects received a motilin infusion for 90 min. Proximal gastric volume was measured with a barostat at constant pressure and during isobaric distensions. Abdominal symptoms were scored using visual analogue scales. Motilin and RWJ-68023 concentrations were assessed by radioimmunoassay and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, respectively.

RESULTS

Both dosages of RWJ-68023 were safe and well tolerated. The most common adverse events were of gastrointestinal origin. RWJ-68023 did not affect basal proximal gastric volume, but the high-dose RWJ-68023 reduced the contractile effect of motilin on the stomach. This antagonizing effect of RWJ-68023 was only significant (P = 0.014) during the distension procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The RWJ-68023 doses used in this study were selected to accomplish plasma concentrations that would block the motilin effect entirely. However, the antagonizing effect of RWJ-68023 was partial and only present when the tonic condition of the stomach was modulated by motilin.

The motilin pharmacophore in CHO cells expressing the human motilin receptor

We performed a structure-activity study with the human motilin receptor, which was recently cloned from thyroid tissue. N-terminal fragments, Ala-analogs of motilin, and motilides were tested in a cell line that expresses the cloned human motilin receptor and apoaequorin. Full potency to induce calcium fluxes was obtained with N-terminal fragments of 14 amino acids. Motilin fragments 1-14 in which residues 1 (Phe), 4 (Ile), and 7 (Tyr) were replaced by Ala showed the largest reduction in potency. Only motilides with an enol configuration had markedly higher potencies compared to erythromycin A. The potencies to induce Ca(2+) fluxes correlated strongly with rabbit binding and contractility data, suggesting that the cloned receptor is indeed the motilin receptor, responsible for contractile effects. Conservation of the motilin pharmacophore in evolution indicates an important physiological role of motilin.

Design and synthesis of motilin antagonists derived from the [1-4] fragment of porcine motilin

A series of cyclic peptides having the general structure H-Phe-c[-N(epsilon)-Lys-X-NH-(CH(2))(n)-CO-] were designed on the basis of structure-activity relationship studies of motilin. All were motilin antagonists. The cyclic peptides, in which X is a 3-tert-butyl-substituted tyrosine residue (H-Phe-c[-N(epsilon)-Lys-Tyr(3-tBu)-beta Ala-] (3), H-Phe-c[-N(epsilon)-Lys-Tyr(3-tBu)-Gly-] (6), H-Phe-c[-N(epsilon)-Lys-Tyr(3-tBu)-Abu-] (7), and H-Phe-c[-N(epsilon)-Lys-Tyr(3-tBu)-Ahx-] (8)) showed potent motilin receptor antagonistic activity in the rabbit smooth muscle (pA(2) > 7). The 3-tert-butyl Tyr was found to be the moiety responsible for enhanced binding to the motilin receptor, while the size of the ring had little importance.