Prolongation of morphine analgesia by competitive NMDA receptor antagonist D-CPPene (SDZ EAA 494) in rats

NMDA Receptor Antagonists: Emerging Insights into Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Applications in Neurological Disorders

Neurodegenerative disorders (NDs) include a range of chronic conditions characterized by progressive neuronal loss, leading to cognitive, motor, and behavioral impairments. Common examples include Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD). The global prevalence of NDs is on the rise, imposing significant economic and social burdens. Despite extensive research, the mechanisms underlying NDs remain incompletely understood, hampering the development of effective treatments. Excitotoxicity, particularly glutamate-mediated excitotoxicity, is a key pathological process implicated in NDs. Targeting the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, which plays a central role in excitotoxicity, holds therapeutic promise. However, challenges, such as blood-brain barrier penetration and adverse effects, such as extrapyramidal effects, have hindered the success of many NMDA receptor antagonists in clinical trials. This review explores the molecular mechanisms of NMDA receptor antagonists, emphasizing their structure, function, types, challenges, and future prospects in treating NDs. Despite extensive research on competitive and noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists, the quest for effective treatments still faces significant hurdles. This is partly because the same NMDA receptor that necessitates blockage under pathological conditions is also responsible for the normal physiological function of NMDA receptors. Allosteric modulation of NMDA receptors presents a potential alternative, with the GluN2B subunit emerging as a particularly attractive target due to its enrichment in presynaptic and extrasynaptic NMDA receptors, which are major contributors to excitotoxic-induced neuronal cell death. Despite their low side-effect profiles, selective GluN2B antagonists like ifenprodil and radiprodil have encountered obstacles such as poor bioavailability in clinical trials. Moreover, the selectivity of these antagonists is often relative, as they have been shown to bind to other GluN2 subunits, albeit minimally. Recent advancements in developing phenanthroic and naphthoic acid derivatives offer promise for enhanced GluN2B, GluN2A or GluN2C/GluN2D selectivity and improved pharmacodynamic properties. Additional challenges in NMDA receptor antagonist development include conflicting preclinical and clinical results, as well as the complexity of neurodegenerative disorders and poorly defined NMDA receptor subtypes. Although multifunctional agents targeting multiple degenerative processes are also being explored, clinical data are limited. Designing and developing selective GluN2B antagonists/modulators with polycyclic moieties and multitarget properties would be significant in addressing neurodegenerative disorders. However, advancements in understanding NMDA receptor structure and function, coupled with collaborative efforts in drug design, are imperative for realizing the therapeutic potential of these NMDA receptor antagonists/modulators.

The elusive rat model of conditioned placebo analgesia

Recent research on human placebo analgesia has suggested the need for rodent models to further elucidate the neural substrates of the placebo effect. This series of 3 experiments therefore was performed in an attempt to develop a model of placebo analgesia in rats. In each study, female Sprague-Dawley rats received an L5 spinal nerve ligation to induce a neuropathic pain condition. Each rat then underwent a 4-day conditioning procedure in which an active analgesic drug or its vehicle (unconditioned stimulus) was associated with the following cues (conditioned stimuli): novel testing room (environmental), vanilla scent cue (olfactory), dim incandescent lighting (visual), restraint procedure/injection (tactile), and time of day and injection-test latency (temporal). The analgesics for each experiment were as follows: Experiment 1 used 90 mg/kg gabapentin, experiment 2 used 3mg/kg loperamide hydrochloride, and experiment 3 used 6 mg/kg morphine sulfate. On the following test day, half of the animals received the opposite treatment, resulting in 4 conditioning manipulations: drug/drug, drug/vehicle, vehicle/drug, and vehicle/vehicle. Nociceptive thresholds were assessed with the mechanical paw withdrawal threshold test each day after the conditioning procedure. In all 3 experiments, no significant differences were detected on test day between control and placebo groups, indicating a lack of a conditioned placebo analgesic response. Our results contrast with prior research that implies the existence of a reliable and robust response to placebo treatment. We conclude that placebo analgesia in rats is not particularly robust and that it is difficult to achieve using conventional procedures and proper experimental design.

The effects of anandamide signaling enhanced by the FAAH inhibitor URB597 on coping styles in rats

RATIONALE

Coping styles are fundamental characteristics of behavior that affect susceptibility to, and resilience during, mental and physical illness. Shifts from passive to active coping are considered therapeutic goals in many stress-related disorders, but the neural control of coping is poorly understood. Based on earlier findings, we hypothesized that coping styles are influenced by endocannabinoids.

OBJECTIVES

Here, we tested whether FAAH inhibition by URB597 affects behaviors aimed at controlling a critical situation and the degree to which environmental stimuli influence behavior i.e., we studied the impact of URB597 on the two main attributes of coping styles.

METHODS

Rats were tested in the tail-pinch test of coping and in the elevated plus-maze test that was performed under highly divergent conditions.

RESULTS

Under the effects of URB597, rats focused their behavior more on the discomfort-inducing clamp in the tail-pinch test, i.e., they coped with the challenge more actively. In the elevated plus-maze, URB597-treated rats demonstrated an autonomous behavioral control by reducing both "wariness" induced by aversive conditions and "carelessness" resulting from favorable conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

URB597 treatment-induced behavioral changes indicated a shift towards active coping with challenges. This behavioral change appears compatible with the previously suggested role of endocannabinoids in emotional homeostasis. Albeit further studies are required to characterize the role of endocannabinoids in coping, these findings suggest that the enhancement of endocannabinoid signaling may become a therapeutic option in emotional disorders characterized by passive coping (e.g., anxiety and depression) and in physical diseases where active coping is therapeutically desirable.

Glycogen synthase kinase-3β contributes to remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia via regulating N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor trafficking

BACKGROUND

Although remifentanil provides perfect analgesia during surgery, postoperative hyperalgesia after remifentanil administration might be a challenge to anesthesiologists. The trafficking and activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors have a pivotal role in the development and maintenance of remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia. However, the underlying mechanisms of hyperalgesia are poorly elucidated. We designed the present study to examine the hypothesis that glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)-3β could contribute to remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia via regulating NMDA receptor trafficking in the spinal cord.

METHODS

Using a rat model of remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia, we first tested thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia at baseline (24 hours before incision) and 2, 6, 24, and 48 hours after remifentanil infusion. GSK-3β mRNA and protein expression and NMDA receptor subunits (NR1, NR2A, and NR2B) trafficking in the spinal cord L4-L6 segments were then measured using real-time polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analysis. Furthermore, we investigated the effects of TDZD-8, a selective GSK-3β inhibitor, on remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia and NMDA receptor subunits trafficking.

RESULTS

Remifentanil induced significant postoperative hyperalgesia, as indicated by increased paw withdrawal latencies and thresholds to thermal and mechanical stimulation, which were markedly improved by pretreatment with TDZD-8. Moreover, remifentanil infusion increased the expression of GSK-3β mRNA and protein as well as the GSK-3β activity in the spinal cord. More importantly, intraoperative infusion of remifentanil increased NMDA receptor subunits (NR1 and NR2B) trafficking from the intracellular pool to surface pool in the spinal cord, which was significantly attenuated by TDZD-8.

CONCLUSION

The above results suggest that activation of GSK-3β contributes to remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia via regulating NMDA receptor subunits (NR1 and NR2B) trafficking in the spinal cord. Inhibition of GSK-3β may be an effective novel option for the treatment of remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia.

Influence of memantine on nociceptive responses of the trigeminocervical complex after formalin injection

BACKGROUND

Glutamate receptors are implicated in central nervous system (CNS) pain pathways, including trigeminovascular activation, central sensitization, and cortical spreading depression.

METHODS

We investigated the influence of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist memantine on pain pathways involving trigeminocervical complex (TCC) using a formalin injection model. In Sprague Dawley rats, formalin was delivered into the left periorbital area. Memantine (10 mg/kg) or vehicle was injected intraperitoneally 30 min before the formalin injection. The sensory threshold for mechanical stimulation, assessed by the von Frey monofilament threshold (VFMF), was measured 1 h and 2 h after formalin injection. Formalin-induced pain behavior was measured by monitoring the time spent rubbing the injected area during 60 min after formalin injection. The brainstem was then removed, and sections that spanned the TCC were cut, and stained with a Fos antibody.

RESULTS

Pretreatment with memantine significantly attenuated formalin-induced pain behavior (p < 0.01) and the sensory threshold for VFMF (p < 0.001). In the TCC, the increase in formalin-induced Fos immunoreactivity was significantly attenuated in the memantine group (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that the NMDA receptor antagonist memantine inhibits the nociceptive process from trigemino-ophthalmic nerve endings to the TCC.

Glutamate modulation of antinociception, but not tolerance, produced by morphine microinjection into the periaqueductal gray of the rat

The periaqueductal gray (PAG) plays an important role in morphine antinociception and tolerance. Co-localization of mu-opioid and NMDA receptors on dendrites in the PAG suggests that glutamate may modulate morphine antinociception. Moreover, the involvement of glutamate in spinally mediated tolerance to morphine suggests that glutamate receptors may contribute to PAG mediated tolerance. These hypotheses were tested by microinjecting glutamate receptor antagonists and morphine into the ventrolateral PAG (vPAG) of the rat. Microinjection of the non-specific glutamate receptor antagonist kynurenic acid or the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 into the vPAG did not affect nociception. However, co-administration of these antagonists with morphine into the vPAG enhanced the acute antinociceptive effects of morphine as measured by a leftward shift in the morphine dose-response curves. Repeated microinjections of morphine into the vPAG caused a rightward shift in the dose-response curve for antinociception whether the glutamate receptor antagonists kynurenic acid or MK-801 were co-administered or not. The lack of effect of microinjecting glutamate receptor antagonists into the vPAG indicates that tonic glutamate release in the PAG does not contribute to nociceptive tone. That these antagonists enhance morphine antinociception indicates that endogenous glutamate counteracts the antinociceptive effect of morphine in the vPAG. However, this compensatory glutamate release does not contribute to tolerance to the antinociceptive effects of microinjecting morphine into the vPAG. Previous research showing that glutamate contributes to spinal mechanisms of tolerance indicate that different tolerance mechanisms are engaged in the vPAG and spinal cord.

NMDA receptor antagonism disrupts the development of morphine analgesic tolerance in male, but not female C57BL/6J mice

Multiple studies demonstrate that coadministration of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists with the opioid agonist morphine attenuates the development of analgesic tolerance. Sex differences in the effects of noncompetitive, but not competitive NMDA receptor antagonists on acute morphine analgesia, have been reported in mice, yet the role of sex in modulation of morphine tolerance by NMDA receptor antagonists has yet to be addressed. Therefore, we tested whether there is a sex difference in the effect of NMDA receptor antagonists on the development of morphine analgesic tolerance in C57BL/6J mice. Acutely, at a dose required to affect morphine tolerance in male mice, the noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist dizocilpine (MK-801) prolonged morphine analgesia similarly in both sexes in the hot plate and tail withdrawal assays. In the hot plate assay, coadministration of MK-801 or the competitive antagonist 3-(2-carboxpiperazin-4-yl)propyl-1-phosphanoic acid (CPP) with morphine attenuated the development of tolerance in male mice, while having no effect in females. Like normal and sham females, ovariectomized mice were similarly insensitive to the attenuation of morphine tolerance by MK-801 in the hot plate assay. Surprisingly, in the tail withdrawal assay, MK-801 facilitated the development of morphine-induced hyperalgesia and tolerance in males but not females. The results demonstrate that male mice are more sensitive to modulation of nociception and morphine analgesia after repeated coadministration of NMDA receptor antagonists. Furthermore, the underlying mechanisms are likely to be different from those mediating the sex difference in the modulation of acute morphine analgesia that has previously been reported.

Analgesic effects of morphine and loperamide in the rat formalin test: interactions with NMDA receptor antagonists

To reveal peripheral components of opiate analgesia, effects of loperamide, opioid agonist which does not penetrate the blood-brain barrier, were examined in formalin and acute thermal pain tests in comparison with morphine. Formalin administration induces pain behaviour such licking/biting of injected paw expressed as two phases. The first phase is caused by C-fibre activation due to peripheral stimulation, the second phase attributed to ongoing input from peripheral site, leading to spinal hyperexcitability, which is dependent on N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor activation. Loperamide (3-10 mg/kg) and morphine (6 mg/kg) reduced formalin-induced nociceptive behaviours and these effects were reversed by naloxone methiodide (0.03-10 mg/kg), opioid receptor antagonist which poorly penetrates the blood-brain barrier. Loperamide action was enhanced only by centrally active NMDA receptor antagonists memantine (3 mg/kg) and CGP 37849 (3 mg/kg), but not by NMDA/glycineB receptor antagonists showing weak or no central nervous system (CNS) activity. Present results suggest that central NMDA receptor blockade may be necessary to enhance analgesia induced through peripheral opioid mechanisms in formalin-evoked nociception.

Anti-allodynic interactions between NMDA receptor channel blockers and morphine or clonidine in neuropathic rats

Previous studies suggested that combining N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists with either mu-opioid agonist morphine or alpha2-adrenoreceptor agonist clonidine results in the significant synergistic enhancement of analgesic activity in the animal models of acute and neuropathic pain. When given alone, NMDA receptor antagonists, morphine and clonidine are capable of attenuating tactile allodynia associated with chronic nerve injury. The present study aimed to assess anti-allodynic effects of these compounds and to test additivity of these interactions using isobolographic analysis. Adult male Wistar rats with unilateral loose ligation of sciatic nerve developed significant tactile allodynia (between-paw difference of about 18-20 g). In separate groups of animals, dose-dependent anti-allodynic activity was confirmed for memantine (1.8-17.8 mg/kg), neramexane (1.8-17.8 mg/kg), morphine (1-10 mg/kg) and clonidine (0.01-0.1 mg/kg). In a subsequent series of experiments, memantine (or neramexane) and morphine (or clonidine) were co-administered at the fixed equi-effective dose ratios (six dose levels per drug combination). None of the tested combinations produced supra-additive, synergistic effects. In fact, memantine+clonidine, neramexane+clonidine and morphine+neramexane were producing simple additive effects, while morphine+memantine was characterized as the infra-additive combination. Thus, despite expectations based on previous studies, NMDA receptor channel blockers, memantine and neramexane, produce no synergistic interactions with either morphine or clonidine when administered acutely to rats with nerve injury-induced tactile allodynia.

Effects of low-affinity NMDA receptor channel blockers in two rat models of chronic pain

In contrast to conventional opioid analgesics, antagonists acting at the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) subtype of glutamate receptors are capable of suppressing pain-related phenomena in chronic pain models while having little or no effect on acute nociception. One of the few clinically used NMDA receptor antagonists, memantine, differs from prototypic antagonists with psychotomimetic activity such as phencyclidine and (+)MK-801, in showing lower receptor affinity, faster unblocking kinetics and stronger voltage-dependency. Recently, a series of novel amino-alkyl-cyclohexanes was reported to interact with NMDA receptors in a manner similar to that of memantine. The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of these compounds as well as (+)MK-801 and memantine in two rat models of chronic pain and the rotarod test. Unlike (+)MK-801 and memantine, most of the tested compounds were inactive against tactile allodynia induced by sciatic nerve ligation. On the other hand, all tested drugs were found to inhibit formalin-induced grooming behavior-a model of chronic pain induction. In agreement with previous reports on the effects of NMDA receptor antagonists in similar assays, the late phase seemed to be inhibited to a greater extent than the early phase. For all tested compounds, inhibition of formalin-induced behaviors occurred at dose levels that were also producing significant motor deficits (rotarod test). These results confirm low efficacy of acute administration of NMDA receptor antagonists in the models of established pain states. Thus, studies on the prevention and management of chronic pain should focus on preemptive or long-term administration of NMDA receptor antagonists.

Effects of NMDA receptor antagonists on acute mu-opioid analgesia in the rat

Mixed research findings have led to a debate regarding the effect of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists on opiate analgesia. NMDA antagonists have been found in various studies to enhance, to inhibit, or to have no effect on opiate analgesia. The present research used a single protocol to explore the effects of six NMDA receptor antagonists on acute morphine (3.0 mg/kg s.c.) and fentanyl (0.05 mg/kg s.c.) analgesia in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. NMDA receptor antagonists were selected based on their abilities to block various sites on the NMDA receptor complex, including the noncompetitive antagonists MK-801 (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg i.p.), dextromethorphan (10.0 and 30.0 mg/kg i.p.), and memantine (3.0 and 10.0 mg/kg i.p.), a glycine site antagonist, (+)-HA-966 (10.0 and 30.0 mg/kg i.p.), a competitive antagonist, LY235959 (1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg i.p.), and a polyamine site antagonist, ifenprodil (1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg i.p.). Analgesia was assessed using the tail-flick test. A single dose of each opiate was used. The low doses of the antagonists, which are known to produce significant neural and behavioral actions at NMDA receptors, had no effect on morphine or fentanyl analgesia. At the higher doses, morphine analgesia was significantly enhanced by LY235959 (3.0 mg/kg), and fentanyl analgesia was significantly enhanced by LY235959 (3.0 mg/kg), dextromethorphan (30.0 mg/kg), and (+)-HA-966 (30.0 mg/kg). Enhancement of analgesia occurred without any apparent adverse side effects. None of the NMDA antagonists affected tail-flick responses on their own, except the higher dose of LY235959 (3.0 mg/kg), which produced a mild analgesic effect. Because no consistent effects were observed, the data suggest that NMDA receptors are not involved in acute mu-opioid analgesia. The mechanisms underlying the enhancement of opiate analgesia by selected NMDA antagonists, such as LY235959, dextromethorphan, and (+)-HA-966, remain to be determined.

The competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist (-)-6-phosphonomethyl-deca-hydroisoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid (LY235959) potentiates the antinociceptive effects of opioids that vary in efficacy at the mu-opioid receptor

(-)-6-Phosphonomethyl-deca-hydroisoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid (LY235959) is a competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist shown to prevent the development of tolerance to the antinociceptive effects of morphine in rodents. Although administration of LY235959 alone generally does not produce antinociception, LY235959 potentiates the antinociceptive effects of morphine in squirrel monkeys. The present study was designed to determine whether LY235959 would potentiate the acute antinociceptive effects of morphine as well those of the opioid receptor agonists l-methadone, levorphanol, butorphanol, and buprenorphine. A squirrel monkey titration procedure was used in which shock (delivered to the tail) increased in intensity every 15 s (0.01-2.0 mA) in 30 increments. Five lever presses during any given 15-s shock period (fixed ratio 5) produced a 15-s shock-free period after which shock resumed at the next lower intensity. Morphine (0.3-3.0 mg/kg i.m.), l-methadone (0.1-0.56 mg/kg i.m.), levorphanol (0.1-1.0 mg/kg i.m.), butorphanol (1.0-10 mg/kg i.m.), and buprenorphine (0.01-0.03 mg/kg i.m.), but not LY235959 (0.1-1.0 mg/kg i.m.), dose and time dependently increased the intensity below which monkeys maintained shock 50% of the time (median shock level, MSL). LY235959 dose dependently potentiated the effect of each opioid agonist on MSL when concurrently administered to monkeys. Although LY235959 potentiated the antinociceptive effect of each opioid examined in a statistically significant manner, LY235959 seemed more potent and effective when combined with higher efficacy opioids. The present data suggest that the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist, LY235959, can potentiate the antinociceptive effects of a range of opioid receptor agonists independently of nonspecific motor effects.

Excitatory amino acid receptor antagonists and electroacupuncture synergetically inhibit carrageenan-induced behavioral hyperalgesia and spinal fos expression in rats

The interaction between electroacupuncture and an N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor antagonist, (DL-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid; AP5), or an (+/-)-alpha-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid/kainite (AMPA/KA) receptor antagonist, (6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3 (1H,4H); DNQX) administered intrathecally on carrageenan-induced thermal hyperalgesia and spinal c-Fos expression was investigated. The latency of paw withdrawal (PWL) from a thermal stimulus was used as a measure of hyperalgesia in awake rats. Intrathecal (i.t.) injection of 1 and 10 nmol AP5, but not DNQX, markedly increased the PWL of the carrageenan-injected paw. At a dose of 100 nmol, either AP5 or DNQX significantly increased the PWL of carrageenan-injected paw, with AP5 being more potent. The PWLs of the non-injected and normal saline (NS)-injected paws were not detectably affected by the administration of NMDA or AMPA/KA receptor antagonists at the doses tested. Unilateral electroacupuncture stimulation of the 'Zu-San-Li' (St 36) and 'Kun-Lun' (UB 60) acupuncture points (60 and 2 Hz alternately, 1-2-3 mA) contralateral to the carrageenan-injected paw significantly elevated the PWLs of carrageenan- and NS-injected paws. Although neither i.t. injection of 0.1 nmol AP5 nor 1 nmol DNQX alone had an effect on the PWL of the carrageenan- and NS-injected paws, both significantly potentiated electroacupuncture-induced analgesia in carrageenan-injected rats, especially 0.1 nmol AP5. Fos expression evoked by intraplantar (i.pl.) injection of carrageenan was examined in the spinal cord with immunohistochemical methods. Three hours after i.pl. injection of carrageenan, the number of Fos-like immunoreactive (Fos-LI) neurons was significantly increased in all the layers of the ipsilateral spinal cord at L(4-5), with the highest density in laminae I-II and V-VI. Intrathecally pre-administered AP5 (10 nmol) or DNQX (100 nmol) significantly reduced the total number of carrageenan-induced Fos-LI neurons. The reduction was most apparent in laminae I-II and IV-V. Similarly, following bilateral electroacupuncture stimulation of the 'Zu-San-Li' and 'Kun-Lun' acupuncture points, the numbers of carrageenan-induced Fos-LI neurons in laminae I-II and V-VI were also markedly reduced. When a combination of electroacupuncture with 10 nmol AP5 or 100 nmol DNQX was used, the level of Fos expression in the spinal cord induced by carrageenan was significantly lower than electroacupuncture or i.t. injection of AP5 or DNQX alone. These results demonstrate that electroacupuncture and NMDA or AMPA/KA receptor antagonists have a synergetic anti-nociceptive action against inflammatory pain. Furthermore, this study supports the idea that both NMDA and AMPA/KA receptors are involved in spinal nociceptive transmission in carrageenan-inflamed rats, with the former more preferentially mediating transmission of nociceptive information from cutaneous tissue.

Effects of diltiazem and MK-801 on morphine analgesia and pharmacokinetics in mice

The effects of diltiazem, an L-type calcium channel blocker, and MK-801, a non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist on morphine analgesia and pharmacokinetics were examined in mice. Mice received a subcutaneous injection of morphine (3.2 mg/kg) 30 min after a subcutaneous injection of diltiazem or MK-801. Diltiazem (20-60 mg/kg) potentiated morphine analgesia and increased serum morphine levels in a dose-dependent manner. MK-801 (0.3 mg/kg) significantly attenuated morphine analgesia but had no significant effect on serum or brain morphine levels. These results suggest that a modification of morphine metabolism is involved, at least in part, in the ability of diltiazem to enhance morphine analgesia, whereas MK-801 attenuates morphine analgesia without affecting morphine pharmacokinetics.

Ethanol enhances naloxone sensitization and disrupts morphine discrimination--comparison to dizocilpine and pentobarbital: explanation of enhancing acute and attenuating chronic effects

1. Ethanol affects ligand-gated ion channels as a positive modulator of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA(A)) receptor function and an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist. NMDA antagonists attenuate chronic drug effects. Accordingly, we found that ethanol decreased morphine dependence and locomotor sensitization. We now test whether ethanol alters sensitization to the disrupting effects of naloxone on schedule-controlled responding after morphine administration or affects the acute stimulus effects of morphine. 2. Groups of rats, trained to lever-press for food, were co-administered ethanol (1 g/kg; i.p.), the NMDA antagonist dizocilpine (DZ; 0.05 mg/kg; i.p.), the GABA(A) agonist pentobarbital (PB; 3 mg/kg i.p.), or vehicle with morphine (5 mg/kg s.c.). Separate groups received naloxone (0.1-1 mg/kg s.c.) 4-hrs later, prior to food sessions (FR15; 30 min) on three consecutive days. Ethanol enhanced the suppressive effects of higher naloxone doses on all three days. DZ and PB altered this behavior differentially by day and naloxone dose. 3. Next, we examined the effects of ethanol, DZ, PB, and naloxone (0.3 mg/kg; s.c.) on morphine discrimination. Rats, trained to discriminate morphine (3.2 mg/kg s.c.) from saline in a two-lever, food-reinforced procedure, were tested with morphine (0, 1-5.6 mg/kg) after vehicle and drug administrations. Naloxone blocked dose-related responding to morphine, demonstrating pharmacological specificity, and altered response rates. Both ethanol and DZ, but not PB, disrupted morphine-appropriate responding. 4. The paradox that ethanol and DZ attenuate chronic morphine effects while enhancing acute effects may reflect a temporal pattern of primary mu opiate receptor function followed by secondary NMDA-mediated processes induced by morphine administration.

Uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists potentiate morphine antinociception recorded from the tail but not from the hind paw in rats

We investigated the effects of pretreatment with low-affinity, uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists on morphine-induced antinociception in rats using the same intensity of thermal stimulus applied to the tail and the paws. Similar baseline responses to thermal stimuli of the same intensity were recorded from tails and hind paws. However, morphine produced equal antinociception from the tail and hind paw when used at doses of 2.5 and 6 mg/kg, respectively. These doses were used in further experiments. Thirty minutes before morphine, rats were administered the NMDA receptor antagonists dextromethorphan (2.5--30 mg/kg), memantine (2.5--15 mg/kg) and MRZ 2/579 (1-amino-1,3,3,5,5-pentamethyl-cyclohexane HCl) (1.25--10 mg/kg). All three compounds significantly and dose-dependently potentiated morphine-induced antinociception recorded from the tail. However, none of these NMDA receptor antagonists affected morphine antinociception recorded from the paw. These findings suggest that low-affinity NMDA receptor antagonists modulate differently morphine antinociceptive activity recorded from the tail and hind paws.

Opioid-NMDA receptor interactions may clarify conditioned (associative) components of opioid analgesic tolerance

Recent evidence suggests that acute administration of opioid analgesic drugs (such as morphine or heroin) produces delayed hyperalgesia. This hyperalgesic response is likely to result from hyperactivation of NMDA receptors triggered by stimulation of opioid receptors and may mediate acute tolerance. In support of this hypothesis, blockade of NMDA receptors attenuates opioid-induced delayed hyperalgesia and prolongs the duration of antinociceptive activity of morphine. Furthermore, the NMDA receptor-induced hyperalgesia is likely an unconditioned response to opioid receptor stimulation that becomes spatiotemporally associated with environmental cues accompanying repeated opioid exposure. This hypothesis conforms to the traditional Pavlovian requirement for conditioned and unconditioned responses to be qualitatively similar. In support of the role of NMDA receptor hyperactivation in morphine tolerance, NMDA receptor antagonists have been shown to block development of analgesic tolerance induced by repeated exposures to morphine. The view of the conditioned nature of opioid tolerance may be significantly extended by assuming that upon repeated drug administration an early-onset effect of a drug may become a predictive stimulus for a later-onset effect and, consequentially, it may become empowered to elicit the later-onset effect itself. Such 'intra-drug' conditioning hypothesis is well in line with the current experimental evidence but further studies will be needed to verify it directly.

Effects of the NMDA receptor antagonist, D-CPPene, on sensitization to the operant decrement produced by naloxone in morphine-treated rats

Sensitization to the rate-decreasing effects of opioid antagonists induced by acute pretreatment with opioid agonists has been suggested to reflect initial changes in opioid systems that underlie physical dependence. Glutamate receptors are implicated in the development and expression of opioid dependence, and antagonists acting at the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) subtype of glutamate receptors have been shown repeatedly to attenuate the severity of opioid withdrawal. The present study evaluated the ability of a competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, D-CPPene (SDZ EAA 494; 3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)-1-propenyl-1-phosphonic acid), to affect morphine-induced sensitization to naloxone in rats trained to lever-press on a multiple-trial, fixed-ratio 10 schedule of food reinforcement. D-CPPene (0.3-3 mg/kg) was administered either 4 h or 30 min prior to the test session. Morphine (10 mg/kg) or its vehicle was administered 4 h before naloxone challenge (0.3-3 mg/kg). D-CPPene failed to prevent morphine-induced potentiation of the naloxone-produced decrement in operant performance. Thus, these results suggest that agonist-induced sensitization to behavioral effects of opioid antagonists may be insensitive to NMDA receptor blockade.

Glutamate receptors and nociception: implications for the drug treatment of pain

Evidence from the last several decades indicates that the excitatory amino acid glutamate plays a significant role in nociceptive processing. Glutamate and glutamate receptors are located in areas of the brain, spinal cord and periphery that are involved in pain sensation and transmission. Glutamate acts at several types of receptors, including ionotropic (directly coupled to ion channels) and metabotropic (directly coupled to intracellular second messengers). Ionotropic receptors include those selectively activated by N-methyl-D-aspartate, alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid and kainate. Metabotropic glutamate receptors are classified into 3 groups based on sequence homology, signal transduction mechanisms and receptor pharmacology. Glutamate also interacts with the opioid system, and intrathecal or systemic coadministration of glutamate receptor antagonists with opioids may enhance analgesia while reducing the development of opioid tolerance and dependence. The actions of glutamate in the brain seem to be more complex. Activation of glutamate receptors in some brain areas seems to be pronociceptive (e.g. thalamus, trigeminal nucleus), although activation of glutamate receptors in other brain areas seems to be antinociceptive (e.g. periaqueductal grey, ventrolateral medulla). Application of glutamate, or agonists selective for one of the several types of glutamate receptor, to the spinal cord or periphery induces nociceptive behaviours. Inhibition of glutamate release, or of glutamate receptors, in the spinal cord or periphery attenuates both acute and chronic pain in animal models. Similar benefits have been seen in studies involving humans (both patients and volunteers); however, results have been inconsistent. More research is needed to clearly define the role of existing treatment options and explore the possibilities for future drug development.

Antinociceptive activity of combination of morphine and NMDA receptor antagonists depends on the inter-injection interval

The actual time-course of morphine antinociception is shorter than what would be predicted from its elimination kinetics, suggesting the presence of an acute tolerance phenomenon. Since antagonists acting at NMDA subtype of glutamate receptors were repeatedly shown to prolong acute morphine antinociception, acute tolerance may be attributed to hyperactivity of NMDA receptors. The ability of various site-selective NMDA receptor antagonists to affect morphine antinociception (tail-flick test) was assessed in mice 30 and 120 min after acute morphine challenge. Competitive NMDA receptor antagonist 3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)-1-propenyl-1-phosphonic acid (D-CPPene) (SDZ EAA 494; 0.1-1 mg/kg), low-affinity channel blockers 1-amino-3,5-dimethyl adamantane (memantine) (1-10 mg/kg) and 1-amino-1,3,3,5,5-pentamethyl-cyclohexan hydrochloride (MRZ 2/579) (1-10 mg/kg), glycine site antagonists 5-nitro-6,7-dichloro-1, 4-dihydro-2,3-quinoxalinedione (ACEA-1021) (5 or 10 mg/kg) and 8-chloro-4-hydroxy-1-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridaliono(4, 5-b)quinoline-5-oxide choline salt (MRZ 2/576) (1-10 mg/kg) were administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) 15 or 30 min prior to the tail-flick test (i.e., interval between injections of morphine and NMDA receptor antagonist was either 0-15 or 90-105 min). ACEA-1021, MRZ 2/576 and to the lesser extent, memantine and MRZ 2/579 enhanced morphine antinociception when tests were conducted 120 but not 30 min post-morphine. D-CPPene potentiated morphine antinociception irrespective of the interval between morphine administration and the tail-flick test. The results suggest that NMDA receptor antagonists may restore analgesic activity of morphine in acutely tolerant mice.

Evidence for opiate-activated NMDA processes masking opiate analgesia in rats

The acute interaction between opioid receptors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors on nociception was examined in rats using tail-flick and paw-pressure vocalisation tests. When injected at various times (1 to 6 h) after morphine (5 to 20 mg/kg, i.v.) or fentanyl (4x40 microgram/kg, i.v.), the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (1 mg/kg, s.c.) not only abolished the opiate-induced increase in nociceptive threshold, but also reduced it below the basal value (hyperalgesia). The noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 (0.15 or 0.30 mg/kg, s.c.) prevented the naloxone-precipitated hyperalgesia and enhanced the antinociceptive effects of morphine (7.5 mg/kg, i.v.) and fentanyl (4x40 microgram/kg, i.v.). These results indicate that the antinociceptive effects of morphine and fentanyl, two opiate analgesics widely used in humans in the management of pain, are blunted by concomitant NMDA-dependent opposing effects which are only revealed when the predominant antinociceptive effect is sharply blocked by naloxone. This study provides new rationale for beneficial adjunction of NMDA receptor antagonists with opiates for relieving pain by preventing pain facilitatory processes triggered by opiate treatment per se.