Membrane association and conformational change of palmitoylated G(o)alpha

Palmitoylation modification of Galpha(o) depresses its susceptibility to GAP-43 activation

Interaction between GAP-43 (growth associated protein-43) and Galpha(o) (alpha subunit of Go protein) influences the signal transduction pathways leading to differentiation of neural cells. GAP-43 is known to increase guanine nucleotide exchange by Galpha(o), which is a major component of neuronal growth cone membranes. However, it is not clear whether GAP-43 stimulation is related to the Galpha(o) palmitoylation or the conversion of Galpha(o) from oligmers to monomers, which was shown to be a necessary regulatory factor in GDP/GTP exchange of Galpha(o). Here we expressed and purified GAP-43, GST-GAP-43 and Galpha(o) proteins, detected their stimulatory effect on [(35)S]-GTPgammaS binding of Galpha(o). It was found that the EC(50) of both GAP-43 and GST-GAP-43 activation were tenfold lower in case of depalmitoylated Galpha(o) than palmitoylated Galpha(o). Non-denaturing gel electrophoresis and p-PDM cross-linking analysis revealed that addition of GST-GAP-43 induced disassociation of depalmitoylated Galpha(o) from oligomers to monomers, but did not influence the oligomeric state of palmitoylated Galpha(o), which suggests that palmitoylation is a key regulatory factor in GAP-43 stimulation on Galpha(o). These results indicated the interaction of GAP-43 and Galpha(o) could accelerate conversion of depalmitoylated Galpha(o) but not palmitoylated Galpha(o) from oligomers to monomers, so as to increase the GTPgammaS binding activity of Galpha(o). Results here provide new evidence about how signaling protein palmitoylation is involved in the G-protein-coupled signal transduction cascade, and give a useful clue on the participation of GAP-43 in G-protein cycle by its preferential activation of depalmitoylated Galpha(o).

Membrane interactions of G proteins and other related proteins

Guanine nucleotide-binding proteins, G proteins, propagate incoming messages from receptors to effector proteins. They switch from an inactive to active state by exchanging a GDP molecule for GTP, and they return to the inactive form by hydrolyzing GTP to GDP. Small monomeric G proteins, such as Ras, are involved in controlling cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis, and they interact with membranes through isoprenyl moieties, fatty acyl moieties, and electrostatic interactions. This protein-lipid binding facilitates productive encounters of Ras and Raf proteins in defined membrane regions, so that signals can subsequently proceed through MEK and ERK kinases, which constitute the canonical MAP kinase signaling cassette. On the other hand, heterotrimeric G proteins undergo co/post-translational modifications in the alpha (myristic and/or palmitic acid) and the gamma (farnesol or geranylgeraniol) subunits. These modifications not only assist the G protein to localize to the membrane but they also help distribute the heterotrimer (Galphabetagamma) and the subunits generated upon activation (Galpha and Gbetagamma) to appropriate membrane microdomains. These proteins transduce messages from ubiquitous serpentine receptors, which control important functions such as taste, vision, blood pressure, body weight, cell proliferation, mood, etc. Moreover, the exchange of GDP by GTP is triggered by nucleotide exchange factors. Membrane receptors that activate G proteins can be considered as such, but other cytosolic, membranal or amphitropic proteins can accelerate the rate of G protein exchange or even activate this process in the absence of receptor-mediated activation. These and other protein-protein interactions of G proteins with other signaling proteins are regulated by their lipid preferences. Thus, G protein-lipid interactions control the features of messages and cell physiology.

Palmitoylation participates in G protein coupled signal transduction by affecting its oligomerization

Much in vivo and in vitro evidence has shown that the alpha subunits of heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G proteins) exist as oligomers in their base state and disaggregate when being activated. In this article, the influence of palmitoylation modification of Galpha(o) on its oligomerization was explored extensively. Galpha(o) protein was expressed and purified from Escherichia coli strain JM109 cotransformed with pQE60(Galpha(o)) and pBB131(N-myristoyltransferase). Non-denaturing gel electrophoresis analysis revealed that Galpha(o) existed to a small extent as monomers but mostly as oligomers including dimers, trimers, tetramers and pentamers which could disaggregate completely into monomers by GTPgammaS stimulation. Palmitoylated Galpha(o), on the other hand, only present as oligomers that were difficult to disaggregate into monomers. The effect of palmitoylation on oligomerization of Galpha(o) was further investigated by several other biochemical and biophysical methods including gel filtration chromatography, analytical ultracentrifugation and atomic force microscopy analysis. The results consistently demonstrated that palmitoylation facilitated oligomerization of the Galpha(o) protein. Autoradiography indicated that [(14)C]-palmitoylated Galpha(o) would in no case disaggregate into monomers after treatment with GTPgammaS. [(35)S]-GTPgammaS binding activity assay showed that palmitoylated Galpha(o) was saturated at only 7.8 nmol/mg compared to 21.8 nmol/mg for non-palmitoylated Galpha(o). Fluorescent quenching studies using BODIPY FL-GTPgammaS as a probe showed that the conformation of GTP-binding domain of Galpha(o) tended to become more compact after palmitoylation. These results implied that palmitoylation may regulate the GDP/GTP exchange of Galpha(o) by influencing the oligomerization state of Galpha(o) and thereby modulate the on-off switch of the G protein in G protein-coupled signal transduction.

Lipid–protein interactions in GPCR-associated signaling

Signal transduction via G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is a fundamental pathway through which the functions of an individual cell can be integrated within the demands of a multicellular organism. Since this family of receptors first discovered, the proteins that constitute this signaling cascade and their interactions with one another have been studied intensely. In parallel, the pivotal role of lipids in the correct and efficient propagation of extracellular signals has attracted ever increasing attention. This is not surprising given that most of the signal transduction machinery is membrane-associated and therefore lipid-related. Hence, lipid-protein interactions exert a considerable influence on the activity of these proteins. This review focuses on the post-translational lipid modifications of GPCRs and G proteins (palmitoylation, myristoylation, and isoprenylation) and their significance for membrane binding, trafficking and signaling. Moreover, we address how the particular biophysical properties of different membrane structures may regulate the localization of these proteins and the potential functional consequences of this phenomenon in signal transduction. Finally, the interactions that occur between membrane lipids and GPCR effector enzymes such as PLC and PKC are also considered.

Palmitoylation and its effect on the GTPase-activating activity and conformation of RGS2

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins act as negative regulators of G protein coupled signaling by accelerating the GTPase activity of the G proteins alpha subunits. Reversible palmitoylation, a common post-translational modification for various components of the G protein-coupled signaling pathway, plays an important role in the modulation of protein activity. RGS2 appears to act selectively to increase the GTPase activity of Gqalpha when single turnover assays are preformed in solution. However, less attention has been paid to the effects of palmitoylation of RGS2 on its conformation and GTPase-activating activity. Studies of palmitoylation on a series of RGS2 mutants in which alanine was substituted for cysteine revealed cysteine 106, 116 and 199 to be multiple putative palmitoylation sites in RGS2, the efficiency of palmitate incorporation being about 60% at each individual palmitoylation site. Palmitoylation of RGS2 inhibited the GTPase-activating activity toward a GTPase-deficient R183C mutant of Gqalpha in vitro, but mutation of cysteine 116 eliminated the inhibition of palmitoylation on GTPase-activating activity of RGS2. The effect of palmitoylation on conformation of RGS2 was examined by monitoring spectra of the intrinsic fluorescence and Circular Dichroism. The results suggested that GTPase-activating activity change of RGS2 might be related to conformational change of RGS2 upon palmitoylation. Taken together, these results provided clear and strong experimental evidence for palmitoylation sites in RGS2 as well as for effect of palmitoylation on the GTPase-activating activity and conformation of RGS2.

Palmitoylation regulates GDP/GTP exchange of G protein by affecting the GTP-binding activity of Goalpha

The effect of palmitoylation on the GTP-binding activity and conformation of Goalpha protein in hydrophobic and hydrophilic environments was studied. The binding assay was performed with an isotope labeled analog of GTP, GTP-gamma-35S, and its fluorescent analog, BODIPY FL-GTPgammaS was used to detect conformational change in the GTP-binding domain of Goalpha. Investigation of the GTP-gamma-35S binding activity of Goalpha shows that in a hydrophobic environment, mimicked by the presence of detergent, the apparent dissociation constant for palmitoylated Goalpha (K(D)=25.5x10(-9)+/-1.7x10(-9)M) increased threefold compared with that of non-palmitoylated Goalpha (K(D)=9.9x10(-9)+/-0.8x10(-9)M), while in an aqueous environment without detergent there is no significant difference between palmitoylated (K(D)=50.1 x 10(-9)+/-5.2x10(-9)M) and non-palmitoylated (K(D)=65.5x10(-9)+/-7.6x10(-9)M) Go(. This indicates that in a membrane environment palmitoylation may weaken the GTPgammaS binding ability of Go(. Fluorescent quenching studies using BODIPY FL-GTPgammaS as a probe showed that the conformation of the GTP-binding domain of Go( tends to become more compact after palmitoylation. These results imply that palmitoylation may regulate the GTP/GDP exchange of Goalpha by influencing the GTP-binding activity of Goalpha and facilitating the on-off switch function of the G protein in G protein-coupled signal transduction.

Determination of protein-bound palmitate turnover rates using a three-compartment model that formally incorporates [3H]palmitate recycling

The observation that the palmitoylation state of certain proteins can be biologically modulated led to the proposal that it could, much like phosphorylation, be an important dynamic regulator of protein function. However, based on single-phase exponential decay analysis of data from [(3)H]palmitate pulse/chase experiments, the measured protein-bound palmitate turnover rates were often found to be too slow to account for rapid physiological responses. This paper reports that exponential decay does not adequately describe the results of such experiments because it fails to account for the recycling of [(3)H]palmitate from cellular lipids to palmitoyl CoA. Taking this recycling into account, a three-compartment model was used to deduce the time-dependent changes of cellular [(3)H]palmitoyl CoA and to infer the time course for the incorporation of [(3)H]palmitate into proteins. The validity of the inferences made by the model was checked against data obtained by metabolic labeling of endogenous HEK293 cell proteins. In addition, the model could account for reported anomalies, discrepancies, and apparently paradoxical observations obtained by traditional analysis of data from pulse/chase experiments. Including the recycling of cellular palmitate in the formal description of the system offers a new tool for quantitative assessment of protein-bound palmitate turnover rates. Through the re-evaluation of these rates, the model provides a means for the reassessment of the potential physiological implications of dynamic palmitoylation. The model may also be generally applicable to other areas of research where recycling of tracer is a concern.

The Gβγ Dimer Drives the Interaction of Heterotrimeric Gi Proteins with Nonlamellar Membrane Structures

Heterotrimeric G proteins are peripheral membrane proteins that propagate signals from membrane receptors to regulatory proteins localized in distinct cellular compartments. To facilitate signal amplification, G proteins are in molar excess with respect to G protein-coupled receptors. Because G proteins are capable of translocating from membrane to cytosol, protein-lipid interactions play a crucial role in signal transduction. Here, we studied the binding of heterotrimeric G proteins (Galphabetagamma) to model membranes (liposomes) and that of the entities formed upon receptor-mediated activation (Galpha and Gbetagamma). The model membranes used were composed of defined membrane lipids capable of organizing into either lamellar or nonlamellar (hexagonal H(II)) membrane structures. We demonstrated that although heterotrimeric G(i) proteins and Gbetagamma dimers can bind to lipid bilayers of phosphatidylcholine, their binding to membranes was markedly and significantly enhanced by the presence of nonlamellar phases of phosphatidylethanolamine. Conversely, activated G protein alpha subunits showed an opposite membrane binding behavior with a marked preference for lamellar membranes. These results have important consequences in cell signaling. First, the binding characteristics of the Gbetagamma dimer account for the lipid binding behavior and the cellular localization of heterotrimeric G proteins. Second, the distinct protein-lipid interactions of heterotrimeric G proteins, Gbetagamma dimers, and Galpha subunits with membrane lipids explain, in part, their different cellular mobilizations during signaling upon receptor activation. Finally, their differential interactions with lipids suggest an active role of the membrane lipid secondary structure in the propagation of signals through G protein-coupled receptors.

Partial rescue of functional interactions of a nonpalmitoylated mutant of the G-protein G alpha s by fusion to the beta-adrenergic receptor

Most heterotrimeric G-protein alpha subunits are posttranslationally modified by palmitoylation, a reversible process that is dynamically regulated. We analyzed the effects of Galpha(s) palmitoylation for its intracellular distribution and ability to couple to the beta-adrenergic receptor (betaAR) and stimulate adenylyl cyclase. Subcellular fractionation and immunofluorescence microscopy of stably transfected cyc(-) cells, which lack endogenous Galpha(s), showed that wild-type Galpha(s) was predominantly localized at the plasma membrane, but the mutant C3A-Galpha(s), which does not incorporate [(3)H]palmitate, was mostly associated with intracellular membranes. In agreement with this mislocalization, C3A-Galpha(s) showed neither isoproterenol- or GTPgammaS-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activation nor GTPgammaS-sensitive high-affinity agonist binding, all of which were present in the wild-type Galpha(s) expressing cells. Fusion of C3A-Galpha(s) with the betaAR [betaAR-(C3A)Galpha(s)] partially rescued its ability to induce high-affinity agonist binding and to stimulate adenylyl cyclase activity after isoproterenol or GTPgammaS treatment. In comparison to results with the WT-Galpha(s) and betaAR (betaAR-Galpha(s)) fusion protein, the betaAR-(C3A)Galpha(s) fusion protein was about half as efficient at coupling to the receptor and effector. Chemical depalmitoylation by hydroxylamine of membranes expressing betaAR-Galpha(s) reduced the high-affinity agonist binding and adenylyl cyclase activation to a similar degree as that observed in betaAR-(C3A)Galpha(s) expressing membranes. Altogether, these findings indicate that palmitoylation ensured proper localization of Galpha(s) and facilitated bimolecular interactions of Galpha(s) with the betaAR and adenylyl cyclase.

Role of palmitoylation/depalmitoylation reactions in G-protein-coupled receptor function

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute one of the largest protein families in the human genome. They are subject to numerous post-translational modifications, including palmitoylation. This review highlights the dynamic nature of palmitoylation and its role in GPCR expression and function. The palmitoylation of other proteins involved in GPCR signaling, such as G-proteins, regulators of G-protein signaling, and G-protein-coupled receptor kinases, is also discussed.

Effects of a tryptophanyl substitution on the structure and antimicrobial activity of C-terminally truncated gaegurin 4

Gaegurin 4 (GGN4), a 37-residue antimicrobial peptide, consists of two amphipathic alpha helices (residues 2-10 and 16-32) connected by a flexible loop region (residues 11-15). As part of an effort to develop new peptide antibiotics with low molecular mass, the activities of C-terminally truncated GGN4 analogues were tested. Delta24-37 GGN4, a peptide analogue with 14 residues truncated from the C-terminus of GGN4, showed a complete loss of antimicrobial activity. However, the single substitution of aspartic acid 16 by tryptophan (D16W) in the Delta24-37 GGN4 completely restored the antimicrobial activity, without any significant hemolytic activity. In contrast, neither the D16F nor K15W substitution of the Delta24-37 GGN4 allowed such a dramatic recovery of activity. In addition, the D16W substitution of the native GGN4 significantly enhanced the hemolytic activity as well as the antimicrobial activity. The structural effect of the D16W substitution in the Delta24-37 GGN4 was investigated by CD, NMR, and fluorescence spectroscopy. The results showed that the single tryptophanyl substitution at position 16 of the Delta24-37 GGN4 induced an alpha helical conformation in the previously flexible loop region in intact GGN4, thereby forming an entirely amphipathic alpha helix. In addition, the substituted tryptophan itself plays an important role in the membrane-interaction of the peptide.