The arrangement of the transmembrane helices in the secretin receptor family of G-protein-coupled receptors

Revisiting the evolution of Family B1 GPCRs and ligands: Insights from mollusca

Family B1 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are one of the most well studied neuropeptide receptor families since they play a central role in many biological processes including endocrine, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular and reproduction in animals. The genes for these receptors emerged from a common ancestral gene in bilaterian genomes and evolved via gene/genome duplications and deletions in vertebrate and invertebrate genomes. Their existence and function have mostly been characterized in vertebrates and few studies exist in invertebrate species. Recently, an increased interest in molluscs, means a series of genomes have become available, and since they are less modified than insect and nematode genomes, they are ideal to explore the origin and evolution of neuropeptide gene families. This review provides an overview of Family B1 GPCRs and their peptide ligands and incorporates new data obtained from Mollusca genomes and taking a comparative approach challenges existing models on their origin and evolution.

Use of Cysteine Trapping to Map Spatial Approximations between Residues Contributing to the Helix N-capping Motif of Secretin and Distinct Residues within Each of the Extracellular Loops of Its Receptor

Amino-terminal regions of secretin-family peptides contain key determinants for biological activity and binding specificity, although the nature of interactions with receptors is unclear. A helix N-capping motif within this region has been postulated to directly contribute to agonist activity while also stabilizing formation of a helix extending toward the peptide carboxyl terminus and docking within the receptor amino terminus. We used cysteine trapping to systematically explore spatial approximations between cysteines replacing each residue in this motif of secretin (sec), Phe(6), Thr(7), and Leu(10), and cysteines incorporated into the extracellular face of the receptor. Each peptide was a full agonist for cAMP, but had a lower binding affinity than natural hormone. These bound to COS cells expressing 61 receptor constructs incorporating cysteines in every position along each extracellular loop (ECL) and adjacent parts of transmembrane (TM) segments. Patterns of covalent labeling were distinct for each probe, with Cys(6)-sec labeling multiple residues in the carboxyl-terminal half of ECL2 and throughout ECL3, Cys(7)-sec predominantly labeling only single residues in the carboxyl-terminal end of ECL2 and the amino-terminal end of ECL3, and Cys(10)-sec not efficiently labeling any of these residues. These spatial constraints were used to refine our model of secretin bound to its receptor, now bringing ECL3 above the amino terminus of the ligand and revealing possible charge-charge interactions between this part of secretin and receptor residues in TM5, TM6, ECL2, and ECL3, which can orient and stabilize the peptide-receptor complex. This was validated by testing predicted approximations by mutagenesis and residue-residue complementation studies.

Structural and functional insights into the juxtamembranous amino-terminal tail and extracellular loop regions of class B GPCRs

Class B guanine nucleotide-binding protein GPCRs share heptahelical topology and signalling via coupling with heterotrimeric G proteins typical of the entire superfamily of GPCRs. However, they also exhibit substantial structural differences from the more extensively studied class A GPCRs. Even their helical bundle region, most conserved across the superfamily, is predicted to differ from that of class A GPCRs. Much is now known about the conserved structure of the amino-terminal domain of class B GPCRs, coming from isolated NMR and crystal structures, but the orientation of that domain relative to the helical bundle is unknown, and even less is understood about the conformations of the juxtamembranous amino-terminal tail or of the extracellular loops linking the transmembrane segments. We now review what is known about the structure and function of these regions of class B GPCRs. This comes from indirect analysis of structure-function relationships elucidated by mutagenesis and/or ligand modification and from the more direct analysis of spatial approximation coming from photoaffinity labelling and cysteine trapping studies. Also reviewed are the limited studies of structure of some of these regions. No dominant theme was recognized for the structures or functional roles of distinct regions of these juxtamembranous portions of the class B GPCRs. Therefore, it is likely that a variety of molecular strategies can be engaged for docking of agonist ligands and for initiation of conformational changes in these receptors that would be expected to converge to a common molecular mechanism for activation of intracellular signalling cascades.

Nematode and arthropod genomes provide new insights into the evolution of class 2 B1 GPCRs

Nematodes and arthropods are the most speciose animal groups and possess Class 2 B1 G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Existing models of invertebrate Class 2 B1 GPCR evolution are mainly centered on Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster and a few other nematode and arthropod representatives. The present study reevaluates the evolution of metazoan Class 2 B1 GPCRs and orthologues by exploring the receptors in several nematode and arthropod genomes and comparing them to the human receptors. Three novel receptor phylogenetic clusters were identified and designated cluster A, cluster B and PDF-R-related cluster. Clusters A and B were identified in several nematode and arthropod genomes but were absent from D. melanogaster and Culicidae genomes, whereas the majority of the members of the PDF-R-related cluster were from nematodes. Cluster A receptors were nematode and arthropod-specific but shared a conserved gene environment with human receptor loci. Cluster B members were orthologous to human GCGR, PTHR and Secretin members with which they probably shared a common origin. PDF-R and PDF-R related clusters were present in representatives of both nematodes and arthropods. The results of comparative analysis of GPCR evolution and diversity in protostomes confirm previous notions that C. elegans and D. melanogaster genomes are not good representatives of nematode and arthropod phyla. We hypothesize that at least four ancestral Class 2 B1 genes emerged early in the metazoan radiation, which after the protostome-deuterostome split underwent distinct selective pressures that resulted in duplication and deletion events that originated the current Class 2 B1 GPCRs in nematode and arthropod genomes.

Similarity between class A and class B G-protein-coupled receptors exemplified through calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor modelling and mutagenesis studies

Modelling class B G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) using class A GPCR structural templates is difficult due to lack of homology. The plant GPCR, GCR1, has homology to both class A and class B GPCRs. We have used this to generate a class A–class B alignment, and by incorporating maximum lagged correlation of entropy and hydrophobicity into a consensus score, we have been able to align receptor transmembrane regions. We have applied this analysis to generate active and inactive homology models of the class B calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor, and have supported it with site-directed mutagenesis data using 122 CGRP receptor residues and 144 published mutagenesis results on other class B GPCRs. The variation of sequence variability with structure, the analysis of polarity violations, the alignment of group-conserved residues and the mutagenesis results at 27 key positions were particularly informative in distinguishing between the proposed and plausible alternative alignments. Furthermore, we have been able to associate the key molecular features of the class B GPCR signalling machinery with their class A counterparts for the first time. These include the [K/R]KLH motif in intracellular loop 1, [I/L]xxxL and KxxK at the intracellular end of TM5 and TM6, the NPXXY/VAVLY motif on TM7 and small group-conserved residues in TM1, TM2, TM3 and TM7. The equivalent of the class A DRY motif is proposed to involve Arg^2.39, His^2.43 and Glu^3.46, which makes a polar lock with T^6.37. These alignments and models provide useful tools for understanding class B GPCR function.

Calcitonin and calcitonin receptor-like receptors: common themes with family B GPCRs?

The calcitonin receptor (CTR) and calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) are two of the 15 human family B (or Secretin-like) GPCRs. CTR and CLR are of considerable biological interest as their pharmacology is moulded by interactions with receptor activity-modifying proteins. They also have therapeutic relevance for many conditions, such as osteoporosis, diabetes, obesity, lymphatic insufficiency, migraine and cardiovascular disease. In light of recent advances in understanding ligand docking and receptor activation in both the family as a whole and in CLR and CTR specifically, this review reflects how applicable general family B GPCR themes are to these two idiosyncratic receptors. We review the main functional domains of the receptors; the N-terminal extracellular domain, the juxtamembrane domain and ligand interface, the transmembrane domain and the intracellular C-terminal domain. Structural and functional findings from the CLR and CTR along with other family B GPCRs are critically appraised to gain insight into how these domains may function. The ability for CTR and CLR to interact with receptor activity-modifying proteins adds another level of sophistication to these receptor systems but means careful consideration is needed when trying to apply generic GPCR principles. This review encapsulates current thinking in the realm of family B GPCR research by highlighting both conflicting and recurring themes and how such findings relate to two unusual but important receptors, CTR and CLR.

The structure and function of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor and its ligands

Glucagon-like peptide-1(7-36)amide (GLP-1) is a 30-residue peptide hormone released from intestinal L cells following nutrient consumption. It potentiates the glucose-induced secretion of insulin from pancreatic beta cells, increases insulin expression, inhibits beta-cell apoptosis, promotes beta-cell neogenesis, reduces glucagon secretion, delays gastric emptying, promotes satiety and increases peripheral glucose disposal. These multiple effects have generated a great deal of interest in the discovery of long-lasting agonists of the GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) in order to treat type 2 diabetes. This review article summarizes the literature regarding the discovery of GLP-1 and its physiological functions. The structure, function and sequence-activity relationships of the hormone and its natural analogue exendin-4 (Ex4) are reviewed in detail. The current knowledge of the structure of GLP-1R, a Family B GPCR, is summarized and discussed, before its known interactions with the principle peptide ligands are described and summarized. Finally, progress in discovering non-peptide ligands of GLP-1R is reviewed. GLP-1 is clearly an important hormone linking nutrient consumption with blood sugar control, and therefore knowledge of its structure, function and mechanism of action is of great importance.

Lifting the lid on GPCRs: the role of extracellular loops

GPCRs exhibit a common architecture of seven transmembrane helices (TMs) linked by intracellular loops and extracellular loops (ECLs). Given their peripheral location to the site of G-protein interaction, it might be assumed that ECL segments merely link the important TMs within the helical bundle of the receptor. However, compelling evidence has emerged in recent years revealing a critical role for ECLs in many fundamental aspects of GPCR function, which supported by recent GPCR crystal structures has provided mechanistic insights. This review will present current understanding of the key roles of ECLs in ligand binding, activation and regulation of both family A and family B GPCRs.

Binding specificity of the ectodomain of the parathyroid hormone receptor

The parathyroid hormone (PTH)1 receptor is a member of the class B G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family and regulates bone and mineral metabolism of vertebrates. A truncated highly active parathyroid hormone fragment PTH (1-34) exerts stimulatory effects on the receptor and is used for treatment of osteoporosis. To study the interacting amino acids of the natural peptide ligand PTH (1-84) with the ectodomain of its receptor we used peptide micro arrays on solid cellulose membranes. The amino acids Arg20 and Trp23 within the identified core binding stretch PTH (20-26) were found to be most important for affinity to the ectodomain of PTH1R. Isothermal titration calorimetry and NMR spectroscopy allowed peptide binding studies in solution and verified peptide positions required for high affinity. With this combination of biochemical and biophysical methods we extend former findings on this essential interaction and can now provide a strategy to screen for optimized therapeutic peptides.

Elucidation of the active conformation of the amino terminus of receptor-bound secretin using intramolecular disulfide bond constraints

Family B G protein-coupled receptors include several potentially important drug targets, yet our understanding of the molecular basis of ligand binding to and activation of these receptors is incomplete. While NMR and crystal structures exist for peptide ligand-associated amino-terminal domains of several family members, these only provide insights into the conformation of the carboxyl-terminal region of the peptides. The amino-terminal region of these peptides, critical for biological activity, is believed to interact with the helical bundle domain, and is, therefore, unconstrained in these structures. The aim of the current study was to provide insights into the conformation of the amino terminus of secretin as bound to its receptor. We prepared a series of conformationally constrained secretin peptides containing intramolecular disulfide bonds that were predicted by molecular modeling to approximate the conformation of the analogous region of PACAP bound to its receptor that had been determined using transfer-NOE NMR techniques. Secretin peptides with pairs of cysteine residues in positions 2-7, 3-5, 3-6, 4-7, 7-9, and 4-10 were studied as linear and disulfide-bonded forms. The analog with a disulfide bond connecting positions 7-9 had binding affinity and biological activity similar to natural secretin, supporting the relevance of this constraint to its active conformation. While this feature is shared between secretin and PACAP, absence of activity in other constrained peptides in this series also suggest that there are differences between these receptor-bound conformations. It will be critical to extend similar studies to other family members to learn what structural elements might be most conserved in this family.

Exploring the binding site crevice of a family B G protein-coupled receptor, the type 1 corticotropin releasing factor receptor

Family B of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is composed of receptors that bind peptides, such as secretin, glucagon, parathyroid hormone, and corticotropin releasing factor (CRF), which play critical physiological roles. These receptors, like all GPCRs, share a common structural motif of seven membrane-spanning segments, which have been proposed to bind small ligands, such as antalarmin, a nonpeptide antagonist of the type 1 receptor for CRF (CRF(1)). This leads to the hypothesis that as for family A GPCRs, the binding sites of small ligands for family B GPCRs are on the surface of a water-accessible crevice, the binding-site crevice, which is formed by the membrane-spanning segments and extends from the extracellular surface of the receptor into the plane of the membrane. To test this hypothesis we have begun to obtain structural information about family B GPCRs, using as a prototype the CRF(1), by determining the ability of sulfhydryl-specific methanethiosulfonate derivatives, such as the methanethiosulfonate-ethylammonium (MTSEA), to react with CRF(1) and thus irreversibly inhibit (125)I-Tyr(0)-sauvagine binding. We found that MTSEA inhibited (125)I-Tyr(0)-sauvagine binding to CRF(1) and that antalarmin protected against this irreversible inhibition. To identify the susceptible cysteine(s), we mutated, one at a time, four endogenous cysteines to serine. Mutation to serine of Cys211, Cys233, or Cys364 decreased the susceptibility of sauvagine binding to irreversible inhibition by MTSEA. Thus, Cys211, Cys233, and Cys364 at the cytoplasmic ends of the third, fourth, and seventh membrane-spanning segments, respectively, are exposed in the binding site crevice of CRF(1).

Allosteric ligands for G protein-coupled receptors: a novel strategy with attractive therapeutic opportunities

Allosteric receptor ligands bind to a recognition site that is distinct from the binding site of the endogenous messenger molecule. As a consequence, allosteric agents may attach to receptors that are already transmitter-bound. Ternary complex formation opens an avenue to qualitatively new drug actions at G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), in particular receptor subtype selective potentiation of endogenous transmitter action. Consequently, suitable exploitation of allosteric recognition sites as alternative molecular targets could pave the way to a drug discovery paradigm different from those aimed at mimicking or blocking the effects of endogenous (orthosteric) receptor activators. The number of allosteric ligands reported to modulate GPCR function is steadily increasing and some have already reached routine clinical use. This review aims at introducing into this fascinating field of drug discovery and at providing an overview about the achievements that have already been made. Various case examples will be discussed in the framework of GPCR classification (family A, B, and C receptors). In addition, the behavior at muscarinic receptors of hybrid derivatives incorporating both an allosteric and an orthosteric fragment in a common molecular skeleton will be illustrated.

Allosteric modulators of class B G-protein-coupled receptors

Class B GPCR’s are activated by peptide ligands, typically 30-40 amino acid residues, that are involved in major physiological functions such as glucose homeostasis (glucagon and glucagon-like peptide 1), calcium homeostasis and bone turnover (parathyroid hormone and calcitonin), and control of the stress axis (corticotropin-releasing factor). Peptide therapeutics have been developed targeting these receptors but development of nonpeptide ligands, enabling oral administration, has proved challenging. Allosteric modulation of these receptors provides a potential route to developing nonpeptide ligands that inhibit, activate, or potentiate activation of these receptors. Here the known mechanisms of allosteric modulators targeting Class B GPCR’s are reviewed, particularly nonpeptide antagonists of the corticotropin-releasing factor 1 receptor and allosteric enhancers of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor. Also discussed is the potential for antagonist ligands to operate by competitive inhibition of one of the peptide binding sites, analogous to the Charniere mechanism. These mechanisms are then used to discuss potential strategies and management of pharmacological complexity in the future development of allosteric modulators for Class B GPCR’s.

Importance of lipid-exposed residues in transmembrane segment four for family B calcitonin receptor homo-dimerization

Dimerization of the prototypic family B G protein-coupled secretin receptor is determined by the lipid-exposed face of transmembrane segment four (TM4), and has substantial functional importance, facilitating G protein coupling. Recently, we demonstrated that the human secretin receptor elicits an inter-receptor bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) signal with most other human family B peptide receptors, except for the calcitonin receptor. In this study we have explored the occurrence and importance of calcitonin receptor oligomerization. Static and saturation receptor BRET were utilized to demonstrate that, unlike the human calcitonin receptor that does not yield a significant homomeric BRET signal, the rabbit calcitonin receptor exhibits strong resonance energy transfer. Within the lipid-exposed face of TM4, rabbit and human calcitonin receptors differ by a single amino acid (Arg236 in human; His in rabbit), while Thr253 that occurs in human and rabbit calcitonin receptors is unique across family B receptors. Mutating Arg236 or Thr253 of the human calcitonin receptor to residues found in the rabbit calcitonin receptor or the human secretin receptor (R236H, R236Y and T253A) resulted in generation of significant BRET signals. Similarly, mutation of Val250 of the human calcitonin receptor to another key lipid-facing residue found in the secretin receptor (V250I) also increased the receptor BRET signal. These data support the consistent theme of lipid-exposed residues of TM4 being important for the dimerization of the calcitonin receptor. However, rabbit and human calcitonin receptor constructs bound calcitonin and stimulated cAMP similarly, suggesting that differences in BRET could reflect differences in orientation or in the stability of homo-dimeric receptor complexes, which were nevertheless similarly effective in eliciting the functions attributed to that complex. The likelihood of human calcitonin receptor dimerization, even in the absence of a significant BRET signal, was further supported by data demonstrating that the peptide representing TM4 of this receptor that disrupts the rabbit receptor BRET signal, produced a right shift in the cAMP concentration-response curves for both rabbit and human receptors.

Seven transmembrane receptors as shapeshifting proteins: the impact of allosteric modulation and functional selectivity on new drug discovery

It is useful to consider seven transmembrane receptors (7TMRs) as disordered proteins able to allosterically respond to a number of binding partners. Considering 7TMRs as allosteric systems, affinity and efficacy can be thought of in terms of energy flow between a modulator, conduit (the receptor protein), and a number of guests. These guests can be other molecules, receptors, membrane-bound proteins, or signaling proteins in the cytosol. These vectorial flows of energy can yield standard canonical guest allostery (allosteric modification of drug effect), effects along the plane of the cell membrane (receptor oligomerization), or effects directed into the cytosol (differential signaling as functional selectivity). This review discusses these apparently diverse pharmacological effects in terms of molecular dynamics and protein ensemble theory, which tends to unify 7TMR behavior toward cells. Special consideration will be given to functional selectivity (biased agonism and biased antagonism) in terms of mechanism of action and potential therapeutic application. The explosion of technology that has enabled observation of diverse 7TMR behavior has also shown how drugs can have multiple (pluridimensional) efficacies and how this can cause paradoxical drug classification and nomenclatures.

Focus on the splicing of secretin GPCRs transmembrane-domain 7

The family of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is one of the largest protein families in the mammalian genome with a fundamental role in cell biology. GPCR activity is finely tuned by various transcriptional, post-transcriptional and post-translational mechanisms. Alternative pre-mRNA splicing is now emerging as a crucial process regulating GPCR biological function. Intriguingly, this mechanism appears to extensively target the Secretin family of GPCRs, especially the exon that encodes a 14 amino acid sequence that forms the distal part of 7th transmembrane helix, and exhibits an unusually high level of sequence conservation among most Secretin GPCRs. Do the "TMD7-short" receptor variants have a role as novel regulators of GPCR signallng and, if so, what are the implications for hormonal actions and physiology?

Functional importance of a structurally distinct homodimeric complex of the family B G protein-coupled secretin receptor

Oligomerization of G protein-coupled receptors has been described, but its structural basis and functional importance have been inconsistent. Here, we demonstrate that the agonist occupied wild-type secretin receptor is predominantly in a guanine nucleotide-sensitive high-affinity state and exhibits negative cooperativity, whereas the monomeric receptor is primarily in a guanine nucleotide-insensitive lower affinity state. We previously demonstrated constitutive homodimerization of this receptor through the lipid-exposed face of transmembrane (TM) IV. We now use cysteine-scanning mutagenesis of 14 TM IV residues, bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET), and functional analysis to map spatial approximations and functional importance of specific residues in this complex. All, except for three helix-facing mutants, trafficked to the cell surface, where secretin was shown to bind and elicit cAMP production. Cells expressing complementary-tagged receptors were treated with cuprous phenanthroline to establish disulfide bonds between spatially approximated cysteines. BRET was measured as an indication of receptor oligomerization and was repeated after competitive disruption of oligomers with TM IV peptide to distinguish covalent from noncovalent associations. Although all constructs generated a significant BRET signal, this was disrupted by peptide in all except for single-site mutants replacing five residues with cysteine. Of these, covalent stabilization of receptor homodimers through positions of Gly(243), Ile(247), and Ala(250) resulted in a GTP-sensitive high-affinity state of the receptor, whereas the same procedure with Ala(246) and Phe(240) mutants resulted in a GTP-insensitive lower affinity state. We propose the existence of a functionally important, structurally specific high-affinity dimeric state of the secretin receptor, which may be typical of family B G protein-coupled receptors.

Structural diversity of G protein-coupled receptors and significance for drug discovery

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of membrane-bound receptors and also the targets of many drugs. Understanding of the functional significance of the wide structural diversity of GPCRs has been aided considerably in recent years by the sequencing of the human genome and by structural studies, and has important implications for the future therapeutic potential of targeting this receptor family. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the five main human GPCR families--Rhodopsin, Secretin, Adhesion, Glutamate and Frizzled/Taste2--with a focus on gene repertoire, general ligand preference, common and unique structural features, and the potential for future drug discovery.

The amphioxus (Branchiostoma floridae) genome contains a highly diversified set of G protein-coupled receptors

Background

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are one of the largest families of genes in mammals. Branchiostoma floridae (amphioxus) is one of the species most closely related species to vertebrates.

Results

Mining and phylogenetic analysis of the amphioxus genome showed the presence of at least 664 distinct GPCRs distributed among all the main families of GPCRs; Glutamate (18), Rhodopsin (570), Adhesion (37), Frizzled (6) and Secretin (16). Surprisingly, the Adhesion GPCR repertoire in amphioxus includes receptors with many new domains not previously observed in this family. We found many Rhodopsin GPCRs from all main groups including many amine and peptide binding receptors and several previously uncharacterized expansions were also identified. This genome has however no genes coding for bitter taste receptors (TAS2), the sweet and umami (TAS1), pheromone (VR1 or VR2) or mammalian olfactory receptors.

Conclusion

The amphioxus genome is remarkably rich in various GPCR subtypes while the main GPCR groups known to sense exogenous substances (such as Taste 2, mammalian olfactory, nematode chemosensory, gustatory, vomeronasal and odorant receptors) in other bilateral species are absent.

Computational studies of Family A and Family B GPCRs

A full picture of the similarities between Family A and Family B GPCRs (G-protein coupled receptors) has been frustrated by the lack of clear homology between the respective sequences. Here, we review previous computational studies on GPCR dimerization in which the putative dimerization interfaces have been analysed using entropy, the ET (evolutionary trace) method and related methods. The results derived from multiple sequence alignments of Family A subfamilies have been mapped on to the rhodopsin crystal structure using standard alignments. Similarly, the results for the Family B alignments have been mapped on to the rhodopsin crystal structure using the 'cold-spot' alignment. For both Family A and Family B GPCRs, the sequence analysis indicates that there are functional sites on essentially all transmembrane helices, consistent with the parallel daisy chain model of GPCR oligomerization in which each GPCR makes interactions with a number of neighbouring GPCRs. The results are not too sensitive to the quality of the alignment. Molecular Dynamics simulations of the activation process within a single transmembrane bundle of the rhodopsin and the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor have been reviewed; the key observation, which is consistent with other computational studies, is that there is a translation and bending of helix 6, which contributes to a significant opening out of the intracellular face of the receptor, as shown in the accompanying movies. The simulations required the application of specific experiment-derived harmonic and half-harmonic distance restraints and so the application of such simulations to Family B GPCRs requires considerable care because of the alignment problem. Thus, in order to address the alignment problem, we have exploited the observation that GCR1, a plant GPCR, has homology with Family A, Family B and Family E GPCRs. The resulting alignment for transmembrane helix 3 is presented.

Transmembrane segment IV contributes a functionally important interface for oligomerization of the Class II G protein-coupled secretin receptor

Oligomerization of the Class II G protein-coupled secretin receptor has been reported, but the molecular basis for this and its functional significance have not been determined. In the current work, we have examined the possible contribution of each of the transmembrane (TM) segments of this receptor to its homo-oligomerization, using the method of competitive disruption screening for inhibition of receptor bioluminescence resonance energy transfer signal. TM IV was the only segment that was found to disrupt receptor bioluminescence resonance energy transfer. Evaluation of predicted interhelical and lipid-exposed faces of this TM segment demonstrated that its lipid-exposed face represented the determinant for oligomerization. This was further confirmed by mutagenesis of the intact secretin receptor. Morphological FRET was utilized to demonstrate that secretin receptor oligomerization occurred at the cell surface and that this oligomerization was disrupted by mutating Gly(243) and Ile(247), key residues within the lipid-exposed face of TM IV. Although disruption of the receptor oligomerization interface had no effect on secretin binding parameters, it reduced the ability of secretin to stimulate intracellular cAMP. This supports a clear functional effect of oligomerization of this receptor. Such an effect might be particularly relevant to clinical situations in which this receptor is overexpressed, such as in certain neoplasms.

Mapping the architecture of secretin receptors with intramolecular fluorescence resonance energy transfer using acousto-optic tunable filter-based spectral imaging

The molecular structure and agonist-induced conformational changes of class II G protein-coupled receptors are poorly understood. In this work, we developed and characterized a series of dual cyan fluorescent protein (CFP)-tagged and yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)-tagged secretin receptor constructs for use in various functional and fluorescence analyses of receptor structural variants. CFP insertions within the first or second intracellular loop domains of this receptor were tolerated poorly or partially, respectively, in receptors tagged with a carboxyl-terminal yellow fluorescent protein that itself had no effect on secretin binding or cAMP production. A similar CFP insertion into the third intracellular loop resulted in a plasma membrane-localized receptor that bound secretin and signaled normally. This fully active third-loop variant exhibited a significant decrease in fluorescence resonance energy transfer signals that were recorded with an acousto-optic tunable filter microscope after exposure to secretin agonist but not to a receptor antagonist. These data demonstrate changes in the relative positions of intracellular structures that support a model for secretin receptor activation.

New insight into the biochemical mechanisms regulating auxin transport in plants

The transport of the plant hormone auxin has been under intense investigation since its identification 80 years ago. Studies have gradually refined our understanding of the importance of auxin transport in many aspects of plant signalling and development, and the focus has intensified in recent years towards the identification of the proteins involved in auxin transport and their functional mechanism. Within the past 18 months, the field has progressed rapidly, with confirmation that several distinct classes of proteins, previously dubbed as 'putative auxin permeases' or 'auxin transport facilitators', are bona fide transporters of IAA (indol-3-ylacetic acid). In this review we will appraise the recent transport data and highlight likely future research directions, including the characterization of auxiliary proteins necessary for the regulation of auxin transporters.

Evolution of secretin family GPCR members in the metazoa

Background

Comparative approaches using protostome and deuterostome data have greatly contributed to understanding gene function and organismal complexity. The family 2 G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are one of the largest and best studied hormone and neuropeptide receptor families. They are suggested to have arisen from a single ancestral gene via duplication events. Despite the recent identification of receptor members in protostome and early deuterostome genomes, relatively little is known about their function or origin during metazoan divergence. In this study a comprehensive description of family 2 GPCR evolution is given based on in silico and expression analyses of the invertebrate receptor genes.

Results

Family 2 GPCR members were identified in the invertebrate genomes of the nematodes C. elegans and C. briggsae, the arthropods D. melanogaster and A. gambiae (mosquito) and in the tunicate C. intestinalis. This suggests that they are of ancient origin and have evolved through gene/genome duplication events. Sequence comparisons and phylogenetic analyses have demonstrated that the immediate gene environment, with regard to gene content, is conserved between the protostome and deuterostome receptor genomic regions. Also that the protostome genes are more like the deuterostome Corticotrophin Releasing Factor (CRF) and Calcitonin/Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CAL/CGRP) receptors members than the other family 2 GPCR members. The evolution of family 2 GPCRs in deuterostomes is characterised by acquisition of new family members, with SCT (Secretin) receptors only present in tetrapods. Gene structure is characterised by an increase in intron number with organismal complexity with the exception of the vertebrate CAL/CGRP receptors.

Conclusion

The family 2 GPCR members provide a good example of gene duplication events occurring in tandem with increasing organismal complexity during metazoan evolution. The putative ancestral receptors are proposed to be more like the deuterostome CAL/CGRP and CRF receptors and this may be associated with their fundamental role in calcium regulation and the stress response, both of which are essential for survival.

Approaches to the molecular modeling of 7-transmembrane helical receptors

7-Transmembrane helical receptors (7TMs) represent the single most important class of target for drug therapy; therefore, a great deal of effort has gone into computational studies of their structures. Historically, these were based on low resolution electron diffraction data, together with the use of computational methods such as multiple sequence alignments, distance geometry, and molecular mechanics calculations. In the year 2000 the situation changed when the first crystal structure of a 7TM, was published. It was then possible to use the homology modeling techniques to generate more accurate models of these proteins. This unit reviews the modeling of 7TMs and describes in detail how homology modeling can be used to build a structure of the 5-HT2a receptor. Special attention is given to the initial sequence alignment, the most important step in the process. Use of automatic alignment programs often produces incorrect results, and manual intervention is necessary before proceeding further.

Secretin receptor oligomers form intracellularly during maturation through receptor core domains

Oligomerization of numerous G protein-coupled receptors has been documented, including the prototypic family B secretin receptor. The clinical significance of oligomerization of this receptor became clear with the recent observation that a misspliced form present in pancreatic cancer could associate with the wild-type receptor and act as a dominant negative inhibitor of its normal growth inhibitory function. Our goal was to explore the molecular mechanism of this interaction using bioluminescence (BRET) and fluorescence (FRET) resonance energy transfer and fluorescence microscopy with a variety of receptor constructs tagged with luciferase or cyan or yellow fluorescent proteins. BRET signals comparable to those obtained from cells coexpressing differentially tagged wild-type receptors were observed for similarly tagged secretin receptors in which all or part of the amino-terminal domain was deleted. As expected, neither of these constructs bound secretin, and only the partially truncated construct sorted to the plasma membrane. Receptors lacking the majority of the carboxyl-terminal domain, including that important for phosphorylation-mediated desensitization, also produced BRET signals above background. These findings suggested that the receptor's membrane-spanning core is responsible for secretin receptor oligomerization. Interestingly, alanine substitutions for a -GxxxG- helix interaction motif in transmembrane segment 7 created nonfunctional receptors that were capable of forming oligomers. Furthermore, treatment of receptor-expressing cells with brefeldin A did not eliminate the BRET signals, and morphologic FRET experiments confirmed the expected subcellular localizations of receptor oligomers. We conclude that secretin receptor oligomerization occurs through -GxxxG- motif-independent interactions of transmembrane segments during the maturation of nascent molecules.

Signaling mechanisms of secretin receptor

Secretin, a 27-amino acid gastrointestinal peptide, was initially discovered based on its activities in stimulating pancreatic juice. In the past 20 years, secretin was demonstrated to exhibit pleiotropic functions in many different tissues and more importantly, its role as a neuropeptide was substantiated. To carry out its activities in the central nervous system and in peripheral organs, secretin interacts specifically with one known receptor. Secretin receptor, a member of guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptor (GPCR) in the secretin/VIP/glucagon subfamily, possesses the characteristics of GPCR with seven conserved transmembrane domains, a relatively large amino-terminal extracellular domain and an intracellular carboxyl terminus. The structural features and signal transduction pathways of the secretin receptor in various tissues are reviewed in this article.

Use of probes with fluorescence indicator distributed throughout the pharmacophore to examine the peptide agonist-binding environment of the family B G protein-coupled secretin receptor

Fluorescence techniques can provide insight into the environment of fluorescence indicators situated at distinct sites within a ligand as it is bound to its receptor. Here, we have developed a series of analogues of the 27-amino acid hormone, secretin, that incorporate a fluorescent Alexa Fluor 488 into the amino terminus, the carboxyl terminus, and positions 13 and 22. Each probe bound with high affinity and was biologically active, stimulating full cAMP responses in receptor-bearing Chinese hamster ovary-SecR cells. Treatment with 10 mum guanosine 5'-(beta,gamma-imido)triphosphate (GppNHp) shifted the agonist-bound receptor into a G protein-uncoupled low affinity state. Fluorescence spectra for the probes in solution and bound to the receptor demonstrated maximal emission at 521 nm after excitation at 481 nm. Collisional quenching of fluorescence with potassium iodide revealed that Alexa at the amino terminus of secretin was more accessible than at the other three positions within the probes. Of note, quenching constants for each probe were higher when bound in the active state than in the G protein-uncoupled, low affinity state of the receptor, with the most marked changes occurring for the two midregion probes. Anisotropy values and fluorescence lifetimes confirmed this, with higher anisotropy and longer lifetimes observed for position 13 and 22 probes bound to the receptor in its uncoupled state than in its active state. These observations suggest that the amino terminus of secretin as docked to the receptor is most exposed to the hydrophilic aqueous milieu, and that the major changes in conformation and exposure to the medium occur in the midregion of secretin. Photoaffinity labeling studies have demonstrated approximation of each of these ligand residues with distinct receptor residues. Combining the fluorescence data with photoaffinity labeling data provides insights into the conformation and dynamics of a natural peptide ligand docked to a Family B G protein-coupled receptor.

Functional characterization and purification of the secretin receptor expressed in baculovirus-infected insect cells

Structural insights into Class II G protein-coupled receptors have been limited by the absence of a plentiful and highly enrichable source such as rhodopsin in the Class I family. With structural differences predicted to exist between these families, and with the key importance of an intact, disulfide-bonded amino-terminal domain for the Class II receptors, an overproduction and purification scheme is critically important. In this work, we have established and characterized a baculoviral expression and purification system for the secretin receptor. Hemagglutinin epitope-tagged wild-type rat secretin receptor construct was expressed using the recombinant baculovirus/Sf9 insect cell-based system, achieving a level of expression substantially higher than that previously achieved in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-SecR) cells. Receptor expressed in Sf9 cells had similar affinity for secretin (Ki=1.4+/-0.2 nM) and similar potency to stimulate intracellular cAMP in response to this hormone (EC50=194+/-45 pM) as did wild-type receptor expressed in CHO cells. Receptors from Sf9 cells were also affinity labeled saturably and specifically by a photolabile secretin analogue. The receptors were purified to homogeneity by solubilization with sodium deoxycholate, selective ammonium sulfate precipitation, gel filtration and immunoaffinity purification. This expression system should facilitate the structural characterization of this receptor and its important amino-terminal domain.

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis of the antagonist- and partial agonist-occupied states of the cholecystokinin receptor

Changes in receptor conformation are believed to be key for ligand-induced regulation of cellular signaling cascades. However, little information exists about specific conformations of a receptor. We recently applied fluorescence resonance energy transfer to determine distances from distinct points distributed over the surface and within the helical bundle of the cholecystokinin receptor to the amino terminus of a full agonist CCK analogue (Harikumar, K. G., Pinon, D. I., Wessels, W. S., Dawson, E. S., Lybrand, T. P., Prendergast, F. G., and Miller, L. J. (2004) Mol. Pharmacol. 65, 28-35). Here, we apply the same experimental strategy to determine distances from the same receptor positions to an analogous point at the amino terminus of structurally related partial agonist (Alexa488-Gly-[(Nle(28,31))CCK-26-32]phenethyl ester) and antagonist (Alexa488-Gly-[(D-Trp31, Nle(28,31))CCK-26-32]phenethyl ester) ligands. A high degree of spectral overlap and fluorescence transfer was observed for ligand-occupied fluorescent-tagged receptors with no transfer observed for the ligand-occupied pseudo-wild type null cysteine-reactive mutant receptor (C94S). For the partial agonist, calculated distances to receptor positions 94, 102, 204, and 341, representing sites within the helical confluence, and the first, second, and third loops, were 21 +/- 0.4, 18 +/- 0.4, 25 +/- 1, and 17 +/- 1 angstroms, not different from those measured previously for the analogous full agonist. For the antagonist, the analogous distances were 21 +/- 2, 28 +/- 2, 15 +/- 1 and 21 +/- 1 angstroms. Distances to the first and third loops were longer and the distance to the second loop was shorter for the antagonist relative to both the full and partial agonist probes, whereas all three probes demonstrated similar distances to the intrahelical reference point. This supports the possibilities of changes in the conformation of the probe and/or the receptor induced by structurally similar ligands having distinct intrinsic biological activities.

The positive charge at Lys-288 of the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor is important for binding the N-terminus of peptide agonists

Lysine-288 in the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor was predicted to be ideally positioned to play a role in hormone binding. Subsequent mutation of Lys-288 to Ala or Leu greatly reduced hormone affinity, while substitution with Arg had minimal effect. Compared to wild type, the Lys288-Ala receptor had a reduced affinity for three peptide ligands with complete N-terminal sequences but not for their N-truncated analogues. Hence, the role of this positively charged residue, which is conserved at the equivalent position in all other Family B receptors, was determined to be important for receptor interaction with the N-terminal eight residues of peptide agonists.

Evolutionary trace of G protein-coupled receptors reveals clusters of residues that determine global and class-specific functions

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activation mediated by ligand-induced structural reorganization of its helices is poorly understood. To determine the universal elements of this conformational switch, we used evolutionary tracing (ET) to identify residue positions commonly important in diverse GPCRs. When mapped onto the rhodopsin structure, these trace residues cluster into a network of contacts from the retinal binding site to the G protein-coupling loops. Their roles in a generic transduction mechanism were verified by 211 of 239 published mutations that caused functional defects. When grouped according to the nature of the defects, these residues sub-divided into three striking sub-clusters: a trigger region, where mutations mostly affect ligand binding, a coupling region near the cytoplasmic interface to the G protein, where mutations affect G protein activation, and a linking core in between where mutations cause constitutive activity and other defects. Differential ET analysis of the opsin family revealed an additional set of opsin-specific residues, several of which form part of the retinal binding pocket, and are known to cause functional defects upon mutation. To test the predictive power of ET, we introduced novel mutations in bovine rhodopsin at a globally important position, Leu-79, and at an opsin-specific position, Trp-175. Both were functionally critical, causing constitutive G protein activation of the mutants and rapid loss of regeneration after photobleaching. These results define in GPCRs a canonical signal transduction mechanism where ligand binding induces conformational changes propagated through adjacent trigger, linking core, and coupling regions.

Spatial approximation between the amino terminus of a peptide agonist and the top of the sixth transmembrane segment of the secretin receptor

Distinct spatial approximations between residues within the secretin pharmacophore and its receptor can provide important constraints for modeling this agonist-receptor complex. We previously used a series of probes incorporating photolabile residues into positions 6, 12, 13, 14, 18, 22, and 26 of the 27-residue peptide and demonstrated that each covalently labeled a site within the receptor amino terminus. Although supporting a critical role of this domain for ligand binding, it does not explain the molecular mechanism of receptor activation. Here, we developed probes having photolabile residues at the amino terminus of secretin to explore possible approximations with a different receptor domain. The first probe incorporated a photolabile p-benzoyl-l-phenylalanine into the position of His(1) of rat secretin ([Bpa(1),Tyr(10)]secretin-27). Because His(1) is critical for function, we also positioned a photolabile Bpa as an amino-terminal extension, in positions -1 (rat [Bpa(-1),Tyr(10)]secretin-27) and -2 (rat [Bpa(-2),Gly(-1),Tyr(10)]secretin-27). Each analog was shown to be a full agonist, stimulating cAMP accumulation in receptor-bearing Chinese hamster ovary-SecR cells in a concentration-dependent manner, with the position -2 probe being most potent. They bound specifically and saturably, although the position 1 analog had lowest affinity, and all were able to label the receptor efficiently. Sequential specific cleavage, purification, and sequencing demonstrated that the sites of covalent attachment for each probe were high within the sixth transmembrane segment. This suggests that secretin binding may exert tension between the receptor amino terminus and the transmembrane domain to elicit a conformational change effecting receptor activation.

Spatial approximation between two residues in the mid-region of secretin and the amino terminus of its receptor. Incorporation of seven sets of such constraints into a three-dimensional model of the agonist-bound secretin receptor

Photoaffinity labeling of receptors by bound agonists can provide important spatial constraints for molecular modeling of activated receptor complexes. Secretin is a 27-residue peptide hormone with a diffuse pharmacophoric domain that binds to the secretin receptor, a prototypic member of the Class B family of G protein-coupled receptors. In this work, we have developed, characterized, and applied two new photolabile probes for this receptor, with sites for covalent attachment in peptide positions 12 and 14, surrounding the previously most informative site of affinity labeling of this receptor. The [Tyr10,(BzBz)Lys12]rat secretin-27 probe covalently labeled receptor residue Val6, whereas the [Tyr10,(BzBz)Lys14]rat secretin-27 probe labeled receptor residue Pro38. When combined with previous photoaffinity labeling data, there are now seven independent sets of constraints distributed throughout the peptide and receptor amino-terminal domain that can be used together to generate a new molecular model of the ligand-occupied secretin receptor. The amino-terminal domain of this receptor presented a stable platform for peptide ligand interaction, with the amino terminus of the peptide hormone extended toward the transmembrane helix domain of the receptor. This provides clear insights into the molecular basis of natural ligand binding and supplies testable hypotheses regarding the molecular basis of activation of this receptor.

Spatial approximation between a photolabile residue in position 13 of secretin and the amino terminus of the secretin receptor

The amino-terminal domain of class B G protein-coupled receptors is critically important for natural peptide agonist binding and action. The precise role it plays and the molecular basis of the interaction between ligand and this domain are not well understood. In the current work, we have developed a new probe for affinity labeling the secretin receptor through a photolabile benzoyl-phenylalanine residue in position 13. This represented a high affinity ligand (K(i) = 56 +/- 8 nM) that was a potent full agonist to stimulate cellular cAMP (EC(50) = 236 +/- 22 pM). It covalently labeled the secretin receptor saturably in a single site. This was localized to the amino-terminal domain near the first transmembrane segment using a series of chemical and enzymatic digestions. Edman degradation sequencing of radiolabeled cyanogen bromide and skatole digestion products that were attached to glass beads and further cleaved with endoproteinase Asp-N demonstrated that the labeled residue represented Val(103). This is in contrast with previous photoaffinity labeling through positions 6, 18, 22, and 26 of secretin that all labeled the distal end of the amino terminus of this receptor. Together, these five pairs of residue-residue approximations provide important constraints to better understand the molecular conformation of the agonist-bound receptor.

Evidence for a direct interaction between the Thr11 residue of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and Tyr184 located in the first extracellular loop of the VPAC2 receptor

We developed previously VPAC(1) [vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)/pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) receptor]>VPAC(2) receptor selective ligands. Replacement of the VIP-Thr(11) by an Arg(11) in these ligands contributed to their selectivity: Arg(11)-VIP had a 200-fold lower affinity when compared with VIP at VPAC(2) receptors as opposed to 3- to 5-fold higher affinity at VPAC(1) receptors. Comparison of the binding and functional properties of related VIP analogues suggested that the VPAC(1) selectivity of Arg(11)-VIP was due to the loss of a hydrogen bond between the hydroxy group of Thr residue and the VPAC(2) receptor, steric hindrance between the Arg side chain and the VPAC(2) receptor and charge attraction by the VPAC(1) receptor. Comparison of the ability of VIP analogues to activate adenylate cyclase through chimaeric VPAC(1)/VPAC(2) and VPAC(2)/VPAC(1) receptors indicated that the first extracellular receptor loop carried most of the VPAC(2) receptors' ability to discriminate VIP from Arg(11)-VIP. Based on results obtained for a truncated VPAC(2) receptor and the closely related PACAP-preferring receptor (PAC(1)) and secretin receptors, we hypothesized that Thr(11) interacted with the VPAC(2) receptor Tyr(184) (similar to the VPAC(1) receptor Phe(200) residue). The Y184F (Tyr(184)-->Phe) VPAC(2) mutant lost the ability to discriminate VIP from Val(11)-VIP, and the F200Y VPAC(1) mutant acquired the ability to discriminate the natural peptide from Val(11)-VIP. These results support the hypothesis that the hydroxy group of the native VIP-Thr(11) side chain can indeed form a hydrogen bond with the Tyr side chain in the VPAC(2) receptor.

Residue 19 of the parathyroid hormone (PTH) modulates ligand interaction with the juxtamembrane region of the PTH-1 receptor

Recent data suggest that the binding of parathyroid hormone (PTH)-(1-34) to the PTH-1 receptor (P1R) involves a high-affinity interaction between the C-terminal (15-34) domain of the ligand and the amino-terminal extracellular (N) domain of the receptor and a low-affinity interaction between the N-terminal (1-14) portion of PTH and the juxtamembrane (J) region of the receptor, with the latter interaction giving rise to signal transduction. We investigated whether residues C-terminal of position 14 in PTH(1-34) contribute to the J component of the interaction mechanism by comparing the capacity of PTH analogues N-terminally modified to improve J domain affinity and C-terminally truncated at position 14, 20, or 34 to stimulate cAMP formation in COS-7 cells transiently transfected with P1R-delNt, a P1R construct that lacks most of the N domain. In these cells, the potency of [M]PTH(1-34) (M = Ala(1,3,12),Gln(10),Har(11),Trp(14),Arg(19)) was 120-fold greater than that of [M]PTH(1-14) (EC(50)s = 3.0 +/- 0.8 and 360 +/- 90 nM, respectively) but was equal to that of [M]PTH(1-20) (EC(50) = 2.3 +/- 0.3 nM). Reverting the Arg(19) substitution of [M]PTH(1-20) to the native Glu reduced cAMP signaling potency on P1R-delNt by 12-fold (EC(50) of [M]PTH(1-20)-Glu(19) = 27 +/- 4 nM), and it decreased the analog's capacity to inhibit the binding of the J domain-selective radioligand, (125)I-[Aib(1,3),Nle(8),M,Tyr(21)]ratPTH(1-21), to the full-length P1R stably expressed in LLC-PK1 cells by 40-fold. The Glu(19) --> Arg modification, however, did not affect the capacity of PTH(15-31) to inhibit the binding of the N domain-selective radioligand (125)I-bPTH(3-34) to the full-length receptor. The overall data suggest that residues (15-20) of PTH, and particularly residue 19, contribute to the capacity of the N-terminal portion of the ligand to interact with the juxtamembrane region of the receptor. The NMR data presented in the accompanying manuscript suggests that this role could involve intramolecular effects on secondary structure in the N-terminal portion of the ligand.

Purification and characterization of a receptor for human parathyroid hormone and parathyroid hormone-related peptide

The human parathyroid hormone (PTH) receptor (hPTH1R), containing a 9-amino acid sequence of rhodopsin at its C terminus, was transiently expressed in COS-7 cells and solubilized with 0.25% n-dodecyl maltoside. Approximately 18 microg of hPTH1R were purified to homogeneity per mg of crude membranes by single-step affinity chromatography using 1D4, a monoclonal antibody to a rhodopsin epitope. The N terminus of the hPTH1R is Tyr(23), consistent with removal of the 22-amino acid signal peptide. Comparisons of hPTH1R by quantitative immunoblotting and Scatchard analysis revealed that 75% of the receptors in membrane preparations were functional; there was little, if any, loss of functional receptors during purification. The binding affinity of the purified hPTH1R was slightly lower than membrane-embedded hPTH1R (K(d) = 16.5 +/- 1.3 versus 11.9 +/- 1.9 nm), and the purified receptors bound rat [Nle(8,21),Tyr(34)]PTH-(1-34)-NH(2) (PTH-(1-34)), and rat [Ile(5),Trp(23),Tyr(36)]PTHrP-(5-36)-NH(2) with indistinguishable affinity. Maximal displacement of (125)I-PTH-(1-34) binding by rat [alpha-aminoisobutyric acid (Aib)(1,3),Nle(8),Gln(10),Har(11),Ala(12),Trp(14),Arg(19),Tyr(21)]PTH-(1-21)-NH(2) and rat [Aib(1,3),Gln(10),Har(11),Ala(12),Trp(14)]PTH-(1-14)-NH(2) of 80 and 10%, respectively, indicates that both N-terminal and juxtamembrane ligand binding determinants are functional in the purified hPTH1R. Finally, PTH stimulated [(35)S]GTP gamma S incorporation into G alpha(s) in a time- and dose-dependent manner, when recombinant hPTH1R, G alpha(s)-, and beta gamma-subunits were reconstituted in phospholipid vesicles. The methods described will enable structural studies of the hPTH1R, and they provide an efficient and general technique to purify proteins, particularly those of the class II G protein-coupled receptor family.

Molecular characterization of a ligand-tethered parathyroid hormone receptor

It was recently shown that the covalent tethering of the N-terminus of parathyroid hormone (PTH) to the seventh helical bundle of the G-protein coupled PTH-receptor (PTH1R) leads to autoactivation [Shimizu et al., J. Biol. Chem. 275 (2000) 19456-19460]. Here, we have developed molecular models for the interaction of PTH(1-11) tethered to PTH1R and refined them with molecular dynamics simulations. The starting structure of the ligand/receptor complex is based on experimental data from a series of spectroscopic structural studies of PTH(1-34) and the extracellular domains of PTH1R and intermolecular contact points derived from photoaffinity labeling. The resulting PTH1R/[Arg(11)]PTH(1-11) complex has the N-terminus of PTH interacting with residues of the third extracellular loop of PTH1R, as a possible mode for receptor activation. The hydrophobic residues leucine-5 and methionine-8, centrally located in the N-terminal alpha-helix of PTH(1-11), are located in deep, well-defined hydrophobic pockets in the central core of the seventh helical bundle, consistent with the requirement of these amino acids for autoactivation. We postulate that the improved signaling properties of [Arg(11)]PTH(1-11) over wild type PTH(1-11) is due to a stable hydrogen bond between Arg(11) and E444, at the beginning of TM7. The model provides atomic insight into currently available biochemical data as well as numerous putative ligand/receptor interactions, and thereby may further the rational design of reduced-size PTH agonists at the PTH1 receptor.

Length analyses of mammalian G-protein-coupled receptors

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play a crucial role in mediating effects of extracellular messengers in a wide variety of biological systems, comprising the largest gene superfamily at least in mammals. Mammalian GPCRs are broadly classified into three families based on pharmacological properties and sequence similarities. These sequence similarities are largely confined to the seven transmembrane domains, and much less in the extracellular and intracellular loops and terminals (LTs). Together with the fact that the LTs vary considerably in length and sequence, the LT length of GPCRs has not been studied systematically. Here we have applied a statistical analysis to the length of the LTs of a wide variety of mammalian GPCRs in order to examine the existence of any trends in molecular architecture among a known mammalian GPCR population. Tree diagrams constructed by cluster analyses, using eight length factors in a given GPCR, revealed possible length relations among GPCRs and defined at least three groups. Most samples in Group J (joined) and Group M (minor) had an exceptionally long N-terminal and I3 loop, respectively; and other samples were considered as Group O (other/original). This length-based classification largely coincided with the conventional sequence- and pharmacology-based classification, suggesting that the LT length contains some biological information when analysed at the population level. Principle component analyses suggested the existence of inherent length differences between loops and terminals as well as between extracellular and intracellular LTs. Wilcoxon rank transformation tests unveiled statistically significant differences between Group O and Group J, not only in the N-terminal and I3 loop, but also in the E3 loop. Correlation analyses identified an E1-I2 length-correlation in Group O and Group J and an N-E3 length-correlation in Group J. Taken together, these results suggest a possible functional importance of LT length in the GPCR superfamily.

ADP-Ribosylation Factor-Dependent Phospholipase D Activation by VPAC Receptors and a PAC1 Receptor Splice Variant

The VPAC(1) and VPAC(2) receptors for vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and the PAC(1) receptor for pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide are members of a subfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). We recently reported that phospholipase D (PLD) activation by members of the rhodopsin group of GPCRs occurs by at least two routes, one of which seems to involve the small G protein ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF) and its physical association with GPCRs. Here we report that rat VPAC and PAC(1) receptors can also stimulate PLD (albeit less potently than adenylate cyclase) in transfected cells and also in cells where they are natively expressed. PLD responses of the VPAC receptors and the hop1 spice variant of the PAC(1) receptor but not its null form are sensitive to brefeldin A (BFA), an inhibitor of GTP exchange at ARF. The presence of the hop1 cassette in the rat PAC(1) receptor facilitates PLD activation in the absence of marked changes in ligand binding, receptor internalization, and adenylate cyclase activation, with some reduction in phospholipase C activation. Both VPAC(2) and PAC(1-hop1) (but not PAC(1-null)) receptors were shown to associate with immunoprecipitates directed against native or epitope-tagged ARF. A chimeric construct of the VPAC(2) receptor body with intracellular loop 3 (i3) of the PAC(1-null) receptor mediated BFA-insensitive activation of PLD, whereas the response of the corresponding PAC(1-hop1) construct was BFA-sensitive. Motifs in i3 of the PAC(1-hop1) receptor may act as critical determinants of coupling to ARF-dependent PLD activation by contributing to the GPCR:ARF interface.

Identification of two pairs of spatially approximated residues within the carboxyl terminus of secretin and its receptor

The carboxyl-terminal domains of secretin family peptides have been shown to contain key determinants for high affinity binding to their receptors. In this work, we have examined the interaction between carboxyl-terminal residues within secretin and the prototypic secretin receptor. We previously utilized photoaffinity labeling to demonstrate spatial approximation between secretin residue 22 and the receptor domain that includes the first 30 residues of the amino terminus (Dong, M., Wang, Y., Pinon, D. I., Hadac, E. M., and Miller, L. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 903-909). Here, we further refined the site of labeling with the p-benzoyl-phenylalanine (Bpa(22)) probe to receptor residue Leu(17) using progressive cleavage of wild type and mutant secretin receptors (V13M and V16M) and sequence analysis. We also developed a new probe incorporating a photolabile Bpa at position 26 of secretin, closer to its carboxyl terminus. This analogue was also a potent agonist (EC(50) = 72 +/- 6 pm) and bound to the secretin receptor specifically and with high affinity (K(i) = 10.3 +/- 2.4 nm). It covalently labeled the secretin receptor at a single site saturably and specifically. This was localized to the segment between residues Gly(34) and Ala(41) using chemical and enzymatic cleavage of labeled wild type and A41M mutant receptor constructs and immunoprecipitation of epitope-tagged receptor fragments. Radiochemical sequencing identified the site of covalent attachment as residue Leu(36). These new insights, along with our recent report of contact between residue 6 within the amino-terminal half of secretin and this same amino-terminal region of this receptor (Dong, M., Wang, Y., Hadac, E. M., Pinon, D. I., Holicky, E. L., and Miller, L. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 19161-19167), support a key role for this region, making the molecular details of this interaction of major interest.

Characterization of a novel VPAC(1) selective agonist and identification of the receptor domains implicated in the carboxyl-terminal peptide recognition

Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide (VIP) interacts with a high affinity to two subclasses of G protein coupled receptors named VPAC(1) and VPAC(2), and has a 3 - 10 fold preference for VPAC(1) over VPAC(2) receptors. Selective ligands for each receptor subclass were recently described. [R(16)]-PACAP (1 - 23) and [L(22)]-VIP are two selective VPAC(1) agonists. Chimaeric human VPAC(2)-VPAC(1) recombinant receptors expressed in CHO cells were used to identify the receptor domains implicated in these two selective ligands recognition. The VPAC(2) preference for [R(16)]-PACAP (1 - 27) over [R(16)]-PACAP (1 - 23) did not require the receptor's NH(2)-terminus domain but involved the whole transmembrane domain. In contrast, the selectivity of [L(22)]-VIP depended only on the presence of the NH(2) terminus and EC(2) domains of the VPAC(1) receptor. The present data support the idea that in the GPCR-B family of receptors the different selective ligands require different domains for their selectivity, and that the peptides carboxyl terminal sequence (amino acids 24 - 27) folds back on the transmembrane receptor domain, close to the peptides, aminoterminus.

Cloning of CCRL1, an orphan seven transmembrane receptor related to chemokine receptors, expressed abundantly in the heart

In an attempt to identify novel chemokine receptor genes, cDNA expressed sequence tags (EST) were analyzed for a significant homology with mammalian chemokine receptors. The sequence from one of the selected EST clones was used to generate a full-length cDNA encoding a putative seven transmembrane receptor, CCRL1-CC chemokine receptor like 1. The full-length receptor encodes a polypeptide of 350 amino acids and has about 35% homology to the chemokine receptors CCR6 and CCR7. Northern blot analysis indicates predominant expression of about 5.0, 2.0 and 1.3kb mRNA forms in human heart tissue, while low-level expression of the 2.0 and 1.3kb forms was observed in lung, pancreas and spleen and in fetal tissues. In-situ hybridization confirmed the presence of CCRL1 mRNA in cardiac muscle cells. Similar to the chemokine receptor CCR6, CCRL1 maps to chromosome 6 and has one intron in the 5' untranslated region. Coupled transcription-translation of CCRL1 cDNA yielded a glycosylated polypeptide of about 45kDa.

Modelling G-protein-coupled receptors for drug design

The G-protein coupled receptors form a large and diverse multi-gene superfamily with many important physiological functions. As such, they have become important targets in pharmaceutical research. Molecular modelling and site-directed mutagenesis have played an important role in our increasing understanding of the structural basis of drug action at these receptors. Aspects of this understanding, how these techniques can be used within a drug-design programme, and remaining challenges for the future are reviewed.