Atorvastatin markedly improves type III hyperlipoproteinemia in association with reduction of both exogenous and endogenous apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins

Composition and distribution of lipoproteins after evolocumab in familial dysbetalipoproteinemia: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) reduce fasting and post fat load cholesterol in non-HDL and intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL) in familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (FD). However, the effect of PCSK9 mAbs on the distribution and composition of atherogenic lipoproteins in patients with FD is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of the PCSK9 mAb evolocumab added to standard lipid-lowering therapy in patients with FD on fasting and post fat load lipoprotein distribution and composition.

METHODS

Randomized placebo-controlled double-blind crossover trial comparing evolocumab (140 mg subcutaneous every 2 weeks) with placebo during two 12-week treatment periods. Patients received an oral fat load at the start and end of each treatment period. Apolipoproteins (apo) were measured with ultracentrifugation, gradient gel electrophoresis, retinyl palmitate and SDS-PAGE.

RESULTS

PCSK9 mAbs significantly reduced particle number of all atherogenic lipoproteins, with a stronger effect on smaller lipoproteins than on larger lipoproteins (e.g. IDL-apoB 49%, 95%confidence interval (CI) 41-59 and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)-apoB 33%, 95%CI 16-50). Furthermore, PCSK9 mAbs lowered cholesterol more than triglyceride (TG) in VLDL, IDL and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (e.g. VLDL-C 48%, 95%CI 29-63%; and VLDL-TG 20%, 95%CI 6.3-41%). PCSK9 mAbs did not affect the post fat load response of chylomicrons.

CONCLUSION

PCSK9 mAbs added to standard lipid-lowering therapy in FD patients significantly reduced lipoprotein particle number, in particular the smaller and more cholesterol-rich lipoproteins (i.e. IDL and LDL). PCSK9 mAbs did not affect chylomicron metabolism. It seems likely that the observed effects are achieved by increased hepatic lipoprotein clearance, but the specific working mechanism of PCSK9 mAbs in FD patients remains to be elucidated.

Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia: an underdiagnosed lipid disorder

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review pathophysiological, epidemiological and clinical aspects of familial dysbetalipoproteinemia; a model disease for remnant metabolism and remnant-associated cardiovascular risk.

RECENT FINDINGS

Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia is characterized by remnant accumulation caused by impaired remnant clearance, and premature cardiovascular disease. Most familial dysbetalipoproteinemia patients are homozygous for apolipoprotein ε2, which is associated with decreased binding of apolipoprotein E to the LDL receptor. Although familial dysbetalipoproteinemia is an autosomal recessive disease in most cases, 10% is caused by autosomal dominant mutations. Of people with an ε2ε2 genotype 15% develops familial dysbetalipoproteinemia, which is associated with secondary risk factors, such as obesity and insulin resistance, that inhibit remnant clearance by degradation of the heparan sulfate proteoglycan receptor. The prevalence of familial dysbetalipoproteinemia ranges from 0.12 to 0.40% depending on the definition used. Clinical characteristics of familial dysbetalipoproteinemia are xanthomas and mixed hyperlipidemia (high total cholesterol and triglycerides); the primary lipid treatment goal in familial dysbetalipoproteinemia is non-HDL-cholesterol; and treatment consists of dietary therapy and treatment with statin and fibrate combination.

SUMMARY

Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia is a relatively common, though often not diagnosed, lipid disorder characterized by mixed hyperlipidemia, remnant accumulation and premature cardiovascular disease, which should be treated with dietary therapy and statin and fibrate combination.

Postprandial Hyperlipidemia and Remnant Lipoproteins

Fasting hypertriglyceridemia is positively associated with the morbidity of coronary heart disease (CHD), and postprandial (non-fasting) hypertriglyceridemia is also correlated with the risk status for CHD, which is related to the increase in chylomicron (CM) remnant lipoproteins produced from the intestine. CM remnant particles, as well as oxidized low density lipoprotein (LDL) or very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) remnants, are highly atherogenic and act by enhancing systemic inflammation, platelet activation, coagulation, thrombus formation, and macrophage foam cell formation. The cholesterol levels of remnant lipoproteins significantly correlate with small, dense LDL; impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and CHD prevalence. We have developed an assay of apolipoprotein (apo)B-48 levels to evaluate the accumulation of CM remnants. Fasting apoB-48 levels correlate with the morbidity of postprandial hypertriglyceridemia, obesity, type III hyperlipoproteinemia, the metabolic syndrome, hypothyroidism, chronic kidney disease, and IGT. Fasting apoB-48 levels also correlate with carotid intima-media thickening and CHD prevalence, and a high apoB-48 level is a significant predictor of CHD risk, independent of the fasting TG level. Diet interventions, such as dietary fibers, polyphenols, medium-chain fatty acids, diacylglycerol, and long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), ameliorate postprandial hypertriglyceridemia, moreover, drugs for dyslipidemia (n-3 PUFA, statins, fibrates or ezetimibe) and diabetes concerning incretins (dipeptidyl-peptidase IV inhibitor or glucagon like peptide-1 analogue) may improve postprandial hypertriglyceridemia. Since the accumulation of CM remnants correlates to impaired lipid and glucose metabolism and atherosclerotic cardiovascular events, further studies are required to investigate the characteristics, physiological activities, and functions of CM remnants for the development of new interventions to reduce atherogenicity.

Type III Hyperlipoproteinemia: Still Worth Considering?

Familial type III hyperlipoproteinemia (HLP) was first recognized as a distinct entity over 60 years ago. Since then, it has proven to be instructive in identifying the key role of apolipoprotein E (apoE) in removal of the remnants of very low density lipoproteins and chylomicrons produced by the action of lipoprotein lipase on these triglyceride-transporting lipoproteins. It has additionally shed light on the potent atherogenicity of the remnant lipoproteins. This review describes the history of development of our understanding of type III HLP, discusses the several genetic variants of apoE that play roles in the genesis of type III HLP, and describes the remarkable responsiveness of this fascinating disorder to lifestyle modification, especially carbohydrate restriction and calorie restriction, and, when required, the addition of pharmacotherapy.

Hyperlipoproteinemia type 3: the forgotten phenotype

Hyperlipoproteinemia type 3 (HLP3) is caused by impaired removal of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TGRL) leading to accumulation of TGRL remnants with abnormal composition. High levels of these remnants, called β-VLDL, promote lipid deposition in tuberous xanthomas, atherosclerosis, premature coronary artery disease, and early myocardial infarction. Recent genetic and molecular studies suggest more genes than previously appreciated may contribute to the expression of HLP3, both through impaired hepatic TGRL processing or removal and increased TGRL production. HLP3 is often highly amenable to appropriate treatment. Nevertheless, most HLP3 probably goes undiagnosed, in part because of lack of awareness of the relatively high prevalence (about 0.2% in women and 0.4-0.5% in men older than 20 years) and largely because of infrequent use of definitive diagnostic methods.

Lipid-lowering efficacy of atorvastatin

BACKGROUND

This represents the first update of this review, which was published in 2012. Atorvastatin is one of the most widely prescribed drugs and the most widely prescribed statin in the world. It is therefore important to know the dose-related magnitude of effect of atorvastatin on blood lipids.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objective To quantify the effects of various doses of atorvastatin on serum total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol and triglycerides in individuals with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease. The primary focus of this review was determination of the mean per cent change from baseline of LDL-cholesterol. Secondary objectives • To quantify the variability of effects of various doses of atorvastatin.• To quantify withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAEs) in placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 11, 2013), MEDLINE (1966 to December Week 2 2013), EMBASE (1980 to December Week 2 2013), Web of Science (1899 to December Week 2 2013) and BIOSIS Previews (1969 to December Week 2 2013). We applied no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled and uncontrolled before-and-after trials evaluating the dose response of different fixed doses of atorvastatin on blood lipids over a duration of three to 12 weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility criteria for studies to be included and extracted data. We collected information on withdrawals due to adverse effects from placebo-controlled trials.

MAIN RESULTS

In this update, we found an additional 42 trials and added them to the original 254 studies. The update consists of 296 trials that evaluated dose-related efficacy of atorvastatin in 38,817 participants. Included are 242 before-and-after trials and 54 placebo-controlled RCTs. Log dose-response data from both trial designs revealed linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides. The Summary of findings table 1 documents the effect of atorvastatin on LDL-cholesterol over the dose range of 10 to 80 mg/d, which is the range for which this systematic review acquired the greatest quantity of data. Over this range, blood LDL-cholesterol is decreased by 37.1% to 51.7% (Summary of findings table 1). The slope of dose-related effects on cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol was similar for atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, but rosuvastatin is about three-fold more potent. Subgroup analyses suggested that the atorvastatin effect was greater in females than in males and was greater in non-familial than in familial hypercholesterolaemia. Risk of bias for the outcome of withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAEs) was high, but the mostly unclear risk of bias was judged unlikely to affect lipid measurements. Withdrawals due to adverse effects were not statistically significantly different between atorvastatin and placebo groups in these short-term trials (risk ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.40).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This update resulted in no change to the main conclusions of the review but significantly increases the strength of the evidence. Studies show that atorvastatin decreases blood total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol in a linear dose-related manner over the commonly prescribed dose range. New findings include that atorvastatin is more than three-fold less potent than rosuvastatin, and that the cholesterol-lowering effects of atorvastatin are greater in females than in males and greater in non-familial than in familial hypercholesterolaemia. This review update does not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with atorvastatin because included trials were of short duration and adverse effects were not reported in 37% of placebo-controlled trials.

Dysbetalipoproteinaemia: a mixed hyperlipidaemia of remnant lipoproteins due to mutations in apolipoprotein E

Atherosclerosis is strongly associated with dyslipoproteinaemia, and especially with increasing concentrations of low-density lipoprotein and decreasing concentrations of high-density lipoproteins. Its association with increasing concentrations of plasma triglyceride is less clear but, within the mixed hyperlipidaemias, dysbetalipoproteinaemia (Fredrickson type III hyperlipidaemia) has been identified as a very atherogenic entity associated with both premature ischaemic heart disease and peripheral arterial disease. Dysbetalipoproteinaemia is characterized by the accumulation of remnants of chylomicrons and of very low-density lipoproteins. The onset occurs after childhood and usually requires an additional metabolic stressor. In women, onset is typically delayed until menopause. Clinical manifestations may vary from no physical signs to severe cutaneous and tendinous xanthomata, atherosclerosis of coronary and peripheral arteries, and pancreatitis when severe hypertriglyceridaemia is present. Rarely, mutations in apolipoprotein E are associated with lipoprotein glomerulopathy, a condition characterized by progressive proteinuria and renal failure with varying degrees of plasma remnant accumulation. Interestingly, predisposing genetic causes paradoxically result in lower than average cholesterol concentration for most affected persons, but severe dyslipidaemia develops in a minority of patients. The disorder stems from dysfunctional apolipoprotein E in which mutations result in impaired binding to low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors and/or heparin sulphate proteoglycans. Apolipoprotein E deficiency may cause a similar phenotype. Making a diagnosis of dysbetalipoproteinaemia aids in assessing cardiovascular risk correctly and allows for genetic counseling. However, the diagnostic work-up may present some challenges. Diagnosis of dysbetalipoproteinaemia should be considered in mixed hyperlipidaemias for which the apolipoprotein B concentration is relatively low in relation to the total cholesterol concentration or when there is significant disparity between the calculated LDL and directly measured LDL cholesterol concentrations. Genetic tests are informative in predicting the risk of developing the disease phenotype and are diagnostic only in the context of hyperlipidaemia. Specialised lipoprotein studies in reference laboratory centres can also assist in diagnosis. Fibrates and statins, or even combination treatment, may be required to control the dyslipidaemia.

Lipid lowering efficacy of atorvastatin

BACKGROUND

Atorvastatin is one of the most widely prescribed drugs and the most widely prescribed statin in the world. It is therefore important to know the dose-related magnitude of effect of atorvastatin on blood lipids.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the dose-related effects of atorvastatin on blood lipids and withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAE).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2011, MEDLINE (1966 to November 2011), EMBASE (1980 to November 2011), ISI Web of Science (1899 to November 2011) and BIOSIS Previews (1969 to November 2011). No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled and uncontrolled before-and-after trials evaluating the dose response of different fixed doses of atorvastatin on blood lipids over a duration of 3 to 12 weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. WDAE information was collected from the placebo-controlled trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-four trials evaluated the dose-related efficacy of atorvastatin in 33,505 participants. Log dose-response data revealed linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and triglycerides. Combining all the trials using the generic inverse variance fixed-effect model for doses of 10 to 80 mg/day resulted in decreases of 36% to 53% for LDL-cholesterol. There was no significant dose-related effects of atorvastatin on blood high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol. WDAE were not statistically different between atorvastatin and placebo for these short-term trials (risk ratio 0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.45).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Blood total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglyceride lowering effect of atorvastatin was dependent on dose. Log dose-response data was linear over the commonly prescribed dose range. Manufacturer-recommended atorvastatin doses of 10 to 80 mg/day resulted in 36% to 53% decreases of LDL-cholesterol. The review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with atorvastatin because of the short duration of the trials and the lack of reporting of adverse effects in 37% of the placebo-controlled trials.

Correlation of fasting serum apolipoprotein B-48 with coronary artery disease prevalence

BACKGROUND

Postprandial hyperlipidemia partially refers to the postprandial accumulation of chylomicrons and chylomicron remnants (CM-R). Many in vitro studies have shown that CM-R has highly atherogenic properties, but consensus is lacking on whether CM-R accumulation correlates with the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. We investigated the correlation between CM-R accumulation and the prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD).

DESIGN

Subjects who received a coronary angiography and did not take any lipid-lowering drugs (n = 189) were enrolled. Subjects with coronary artery stenosis (≥ 75%) were diagnosed as CAD. Biochemical markers for glucose and lipid metabolism including fasting apolipoprotein (apo) B-48 concentration were compared between CAD patients (n = 96) and age-, sex-, and body mass index (BMI)-matched non-CAD subjects without overt coronary stenosis (< 75%) (n = 67). We tried to determine which metabolic parameters were correlated with the prevalence of CAD by multiple logistic regression analysis, and whether or not the combination of high apo B-48 and other coronary risk factors (high triglyceride, low HDL-C, high HbA1c or low adiponectin levels) increased the prevalence of CAD.

RESULTS

Fasting serum apo B-48 levels were significantly higher in CAD patients than in non-CAD subjects (3·9 ± 2·4 vs. 6·9 ± 2·6 μg/mL, P < 0·0001) and had the most significant correlation with the existence of CAD. The clustering of high fasting apo B-48 levels (> 4·34 μg/mL, the cut-off value) and other coronary risk factors were found to be associated with a stronger risk of CAD compared with single high fasting apo B-48 levels.

CONCLUSION

Fasting serum apo B-48 levels significantly correlated with the prevalence of CAD.

Exploring the value of apoB48 as a marker for atherosclerosis in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

  Postprandial accumulation of atherogenic remnants has been described in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), familial combined hyperlipidaemia (FCH), familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) and coronary artery disease (CAD). Scarce data are available on fasting plasma apolipoprotein (apo) B48 levels in relation to these conditions and atherosclerosis.

DESIGN

  Treated patients with FCH (18), FH (20), T2DM (26), CAD (65), T2DM with CAD (T2DM/CAD) (28) and 33 healthy controls were included. Intima-media thickness (IMT) measurements were carried out to investigate subclinical atherosclerosis.

RESULTS

  LDL-C and total apoB were lowest in patients with T2DM/CAD owing to the more frequent use of lipid-lowering medication. Fasting plasma apoB48 was elevated in patients with FCH (11·38 ± 1·50 mg/L) and T2DM/CAD (9·65 ± 1·14 mg/L) compared with the other groups (anova, P < 0·01). CAD patients (8·09 ± 0·57 mg/L) had higher apoB48 levels than controls (5·74 ± 0·55 mg/L) and FH patients (5·40 ± 0·51 mg/L) (P = 0·02). IMT was highest in subjects with T2DM/CAD (0·77 ± 0·03 mm) (P < 0·01). The lowest IMT was measured in controls (0·56 ± 0·02 mm) and FCH patients (0·60 ± 0·03 mm). In the total group, the best association for apoB48 was found with fasting triglyceride (Pearson's r = 0·72, P < 0·001). In the subjects not using statins (n = 74), the best correlation was found with IMT (r = 0·52; P < 0·001), whereas total apoB was not associated with IMT (r = 0·20, P = 0·12).

CONCLUSIONS

  ApoB48 concentrations are highest in patients with FCH and in atherosclerotic subjects with T2DM. In patients not using statins, the surrogate atherosclerosis marker IMT correlates best with apoB48, suggesting that fasting apoB48 may help to detect subjects at risk.

Effects of CETP inhibition on triglyceride-rich lipoprotein composition and apoB-48 metabolism

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) facilitates the transfer of HDL cholesteryl ester to triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL). This study aimed to determine the effects of CETP inhibition with torcetrapib on TRL composition and apoB-48 metabolism. Study subjects with low HDL cholesterol (<40 mg/dl), either untreated (n = 9) or receiving atorvastatin 20 mg daily (n = 9), received placebo for 4 weeks, followed by torcetrapib 120 mg once daily for the next 4 weeks. A subset of the subjects not treated with atorvastatin participated in a third phase (n = 6), in which they received torcetrapib 120 mg twice daily for an additional 4 weeks. At the end of each phase, all subjects received a primed-constant infusion of [5,5,5-(2)H(3)]L-leucine, while in the constantly fed state, to determine the kinetics of TRL apoB-48 and TRL composition. Relative to placebo, torcetrapib markedly reduced TRL CE levels in all groups (≥-69%; P < 0.005). ApoB-48 pool size (PS) and production rate (PR) decreased in the nonatorvastatin once daily (PS: -49%, P = 0.007; PR: -49%, P = 0.005) and twice daily (PS: -30%, P = 0.01; PR: -27%, P = 0.13) cohorts. In the atorvastatin cohort, apoB-48 PS and PR, which were already lowered by atorvastatin, did not change with torcetrapib. Our findings indicate that CETP inhibition reduced plasma apoB-48 concentrations by reducing apoB-48 production but did not have this effect in subjects already treated with atorvastatin.

Comparative reactivity of remnant-like lipoprotein particles (RLP) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) to LDL receptor and VLDL receptor: effect of a high-dose statin on VLDL receptor expression

BACKGROUND

Comparison of the reactivity of remnant-like lipoprotein particles (RLP) and LDL particles to LDL receptor and VLDL receptor has not been investigated.

METHODS

LDL receptor- or VLDL receptor-transfected ldlA-7, HepG2 and L6 cells were used. Human LDL and rabbit β-VLDL were isolated by ultracentrifugation. Human RLP was isolated using an immunoaffinity mixed gel. The effect of statin on lipoprotein receptors was examined.

RESULTS

Both LDL receptor and VLDL receptor recognized RLP. In LDL receptor transfectants, RLP, β-VLDL and LDL all bound to LDL receptor. Cold RLP competed efficiently with DiI-β-VLDL; however, cold LDL competed weakly. In VLDL receptor transfectants, RLP and β-VLDL bound to VLDL receptor, but not LDL. RLP bound to VLDL receptor with higher affinity than β-VLDL because of higher apolipoprotein E in RLP. LDL receptor expression was induced in HepG2 by the low concentration of statin while VLDL receptor expression was induced in L6 myoblasts at higher concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

RLP are bound to hepatic LDL receptor more efficiently than LDL, which may explain the mechanism by which statins prevent cardiovascular risk by primarily reducing plasma RLP rather than by reducing LDL. Additionally, a high-dose of statins also may reduce plasma RLP through muscular VLDL receptor.

Impact of bezafibrate and atorvastatin on lipoprotein subclass in patients with type III hyperlipoproteinemia: result from a crossover study

BACKGROUND

We elucidated the difference between the effects of bezafibrate and atorvastatin in hypertriglyceridemia with apoE2/2 and 3/3.

METHODS

An open randomized crossover study consisted of a 4-week treatment period with bezafibrate (400 mg daily) or atorvastatin (10 mg daily) and a 4-week wash-out period.

RESULTS

Bezafibrate significantly decreased serum concentrations of triglyceride (apoE2/2, E3/3: -49.2%, -39.0%) and significantly increased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (+28.5%, +26.1%) in both apoE phenotypes but did not change serum concentrations of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Atorvastatin significantly decreased serum concentrations of LDL cholesterol (-34.0%, -30.0%) and triglyceride (-27.6%, -25.8%) in both apoE phenotypes but did not change HDL cholesterol concentrations. Changes in cholesterol in lipoprotein subfractions were not different between apoE2/2 and E3/3. Bezafibrate changed cholesterol distribution from small- to large-sized LDL and from large- to small-sized HDL. On the other hand, atorvastatin decreased cholesterol in all apoB-containing lipoprotein subfractions but did not change any of the HDL subfractions.

CONCLUSION

Bezafibrate and atorvastatin improve atherogenic dyslipidemia in considerably different ways. Extrapolating from the present data, we presume that the combination of these drugs may contribute to reduce LDL-C/HDL-C ratio effectively as well as lowering concentrations of serum triglyceride.

Effects of different doses of atorvastatin on human apolipoprotein B-100, B-48, and A-I metabolism

Nine hypercholesterolemic and hypertriglyceridemic subjects were enrolled in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study to test the effect of atorvastatin 20 mg/day and 80 mg/day on the kinetics of apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB-100) in triglyceride-rich lipoprotein (TRL), intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL), and LDL, of apoB-48 in TRL, and of apoA-I in HDL. Compared with placebo, atorvastatin 20 mg/day was associated with significant reductions in TRL, IDL, and LDL apoB-100 pool size as a result of significant increases in fractional catabolic rate (FCR) without changes in production rate (PR). Compared with the 20 mg/day dose, atorvastatin 80 mg/day caused a further significant reduction in the LDL apoB-100 pool size as a result of a further increase in FCR. ApoB-48 pool size was reduced significantly by both atorvastatin doses, and this reduction was associated with nonsignificant increases in FCR. The lathosterol-campesterol ratio was decreased by atorvastatin treatment, and changes in this ratio were inversely correlated with changes in TRL apoB-100 and apoB-48 PR. No significant effect on apoA-I kinetics was observed at either dose of atorvastatin. Our data indicate that atorvastatin reduces apoB-100- and apoB-48-containing lipoproteins by increasing their catabolism and has a dose-dependent effect on LDL apoB-100 kinetics. Atorvastatin-mediated changes in cholesterol homeostasis may contribute to apoB PR regulation.

Effects of atorvastatin and apoA-I/phosphatidylcholine discs on triglyceride-rich lipoprotein subfractions as characterized by capillary isotachophoresis

BACKGROUND

The present study examined the effects of atorvastatin and the in vitro effect of apolipoprotein (apo) A-I/phosphatidylcholine (POPC) discs on charge-based triglyceride-rich lipoprotein (TRL) subfractions in a patient with type III hyperlipoproteinemia (HLP) and the apoE2/2 phenotype.

METHODS

Charge-based lipoprotein subfractions were characterized by capillary isotachophoresis (cITP). cITP analysis was performed using plasma that had been prestained with a lipophilic dye on a Beckman P/ACE MDQ system.

RESULTS

Treatment with atorvastatin for 4 weeks markedly decreased the slow (s)-migrating TRL subfraction and both fast- and slow-migrating low-density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions, but did not affect the fast (f)-migrating TRL subfraction in this patient. ApoA-I/POPC discs consisted of two major charge-based subfractions that had the mobility of cITP fTRL and sTRL. Incubation of plasma from this patient in the presence of apoA-I/POPC discs caused not only a reduction in cITP fast- and intermediate-migrating HDL and an increase in cITP sHDL but also a reduction in fTRL and sTRL and an increase in sLDL.

CONCLUSION

Atorvastatin and apoA-I/POPC discs decreased cITP TRL subfractions in a complementary manner, suggesting that the combination of apoA-I/POPC discs and atorvastatin could be a promising therapeutic approach for hypertriglyceridemia.

Effects of Atorvastatin on Lipid Profile and Non-Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Diabetic Patients on Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Dyslipidemia and non-traditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, such as lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), homocysteine, oxidative stress and inflammation, are important determinants in the increased CV risk of hemodialysis (HD) patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of atorvastatin on these parameters in one of the groups with the highest CV risk: diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease under HD therapy.

METHODS

Twenty maintenance HD diabetic patients (mean age 64 +/- 10 years, mean time on HD 25 +/- 11 months) with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >2.59 mmol/l received atorvastatin (10 mg/day) for 4 months. Lipid profile, including total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG), apolipoproteins A1 and B (Apo-A and Apo-B), and the non-traditional risk factors Lp(a), homocysteine, autoantibodies against oxidized LDL-C (anti-LDLox), total antioxidant status (TAS), and high sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), were measured at baseline and at the end of the study. Safety was assessed by clinical and laboratory (liver and muscle enzymes) monitoring once a month.

RESULTS

Mean percent reductions for TC, LDL-C and TG were 18.5% (p < 0.001), 22% (p < 0.001) and 19% (p < 0.01), respectively. The ratios of TC/HDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C decreased after treatment (p < 0.05), whereas the ratios of LDL-C/Apo-B (p < 0.01) and Apo-A/Apo-B (p < 0.001) increased. No significant changes were observed in HDL-C. Concerning the non-traditional risk factors, levels of homocysteine, Lp(a), anti-LDLox and TAS did not change significantly. However, hs-CRP decreased from 5.4 (range 0.9-67.8) to 2.3 mg/l (range 0.4-21) (p < 0.01), whereas a concomitant increase in serum albumin was observed (from 38 +/- 2 to 40 +/- 1.7 g/l, p < 0.01). At baseline, hs-CRP was inversely associated with HDL-C and Apo-A, and directly related to Lp(a). The change in hs-CRP was inversely associated with the change of HDL-C, whereas a direct correlation was found with the change of TG.

CONCLUSIONS

Atorvastatin administration to diabetic patients on HD is associated with improvement of lipid profile and reduction of hs-CRP. These effects may be critical for the reduction of CV risk and mortality in HD population.