Structurally and immunologically distinct poly(A) polymerases in rat liver. Occurrence of a tumor-type enzyme in normal liver

A history of poly A sequences: from formation to factors to function

Biological polyadenylation, first recognized as an enzymatic activity, remained an orphan enzyme until poly A sequences were found on the 3' ends of eukarvotic mRNAs. Their presence in bacteria viruses and later in archeae (ref. 338) established their universality. The lack of compelling evidence for a specific function limited attention to their cellular formation. Eventually the newer techniques of molecular biology and development of accurate nuclear processing extracts showed 3' end formation to be a two-step process. Pre-mRNA was first cleaved endonucleolytically at a specific site that was followed by sequential addition of AMPs from ATP to the 3' hydroxyl group at the end of mRNA. The site of cleavage was specified by a conserved hexanucleotide, AAUAAA, from 10 to 30 nt upstream of this 3' end. Extensive purification of these two activities showed that more than 10 polypeptides were needed for mRNA 3' end formation. Most of these were in complexes involved in the cleavage step. Two of the best characterized are CstF and CPSF, while two other remain partially purified but essential. Oddly, the specific proteins involved in phosphodiester bond hydrolysis have yet to be identified. The polyadenylation step occurs within the complex of poly A polymerase and poly A-binding protein, PABII, that controls poly A length. That the cleavage complex, CPSF, is also required for this step attests to a tight coupling of the two steps of 3' and formation. The reaction reconstituted from these RNA-free purified factors correctly processes pre-mRNAs. Meaningful analysis of the role of poly A in mRNA metabolism or function was possible once quantities of these proteins most often over-expressed from cDNA clones became available. The large number needed for two simple reactions of an endonuclease, a polymerase and a sequence recognition factor, pointed to 3' end formation as a regulated process. Polyadenylation itself had appeared to require regulation in cases where two poly A sites were alternatively processed to produce mRNA coding for two different proteins. The 64-KDa subunit of CstF is now known to be a regulator of poly A site choice between two sites in the immunoglobulin heavy chain of B cells. In resting cells the site used favors the mRNA for a membrane-bound protein. Upon differentiation to plasma cells, an upstream site is used the produce a secreted form of the heavy chain. Poly A site choice in the calcitonin pre-mRNA involves splicing factors at a pseudo splice site in an intron downstream of the active poly site that interacts with cleavage factors for most tissues. The molecular basis for choice of the alternate site in neuronal tissue is unknown. Proteins needed for mRNA 3' end formation also participate in other RNA-processing reactions: cleavage factors bind to the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase during transcription; splicing of 3' terminal exons is stimulated port of by cleavage factors that bind to splicing factors at 3' splice sites. nuclear ex mRNAs is linked to cleavage factors and requires the poly A II-binding protein. Most striking is the long-sought evidence for a role for poly A in translation in yeast where it provides the surface on which the poly A-binding protein assembles the factors needed for the initiation of translation. This adaptability of eukaryotic cells to use a sequence of low information content extends to bacteria where poly A serves as a site for assembly of an mRNA degradation complex in E. coli. Vaccinia virus creates mRNA poly A tails by a streamlined mechanism independent of cleavage that requires only two proteins that recognize unique poly A signals. Thus, in spite of 40 years of study of poly A sequences, this growing multiplicity of uses and even mechanisms of formation seem destined to continue.

Tissue and species distribution of liver type and tumor type nuclear poly(A) polymerases

Previous studies in this laboratory have identified two distinct nuclear poly(A) polymerases, a 48 kDA tumor type enzyme and a 36-38 kDA liver type enzyme. To investigate the tissue and species specificity of these enzymes, nuclear extracts were prepared from various rat tissues, pig brain and two human cell lines. These as well as whole cell extract from yeast were probed for the two enzymes by immunoblot analysis using polyclonal anti-tumor poly(A) polymerase antibodies or autoimmune sera which contain antibodies specific for the liver type enzyme. Results indicate that both tumor and liver type enzymes are conserved across species ranging from rat to human. The yeast enzyme does not appear to be immunologically related to the liver or the tumor type poly(A) polymerase. The liver type enzyme appears to be specific for normal tissues whereas the tumor type enzyme is detected only in tissues in a "tumorigenic" state or cell lines originating from tumor tissues.

Autoantibodies against RNA polymerase I in scleroderma and Sjögren's syndrome sera

Anti-RNA polymerase I antibodies were detected by radioimmunoassay in the sera of 8 out of 9 Sjögren's syndrome patients, 11 out of 19 individuals with scleroderma, and 19 out of 19 systemic lupus erythematosus patients. The results of the radioimmunoassay were confirmed by demonstrating the ability of the patients' IgG to inhibit RNA polymerase I activity in vitro. Sera from four patients in each category were also tested for reaction with individual subunits of RNA polymerase I. All 4 SLE sera, 3 out of 4 scleroderma sera and 1 out of 4 Sjögren's syndrome sera contained antibodies against the 65 kDa (S3) subunit of RNA polymerase I in addition to antibodies against one other subunit. Sera from the remaining scleroderma and Sjögren's syndrome patients tested in this assay contained only anti-S3 antibodies. These results demonstrate that anti-RNA polymerase I antibodies are characteristic of a variety of rheumatic autoimmune sera.

Antibodies against nuclear poly(A) polymerases in rheumatic autoimmune diseases

Sera from 53 patients, 26 with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 8 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 9 with Sjogren's syndrome (SS), and 10 with scleroderma (Scl), were screened for the presence of antibodies against liver-type poly(A) polymerase and tumor-type poly(A) polymerase. Sixty percent of the patients with the above four autoimmune diseases have antibodies directed against liver poly(A) polymerase, whereas sera from 74% of the patients contained anti-hepatoma poly(A) polymerase antibodies. About 25% of the patients produced antibodies exclusively against the tumor poly(A) polymerase. IgG containing anti-liver or anti-tumor poly(A) polymerase antibodies inhibited the activity of the respective enzyme. IgG containing antibodies against liver and tumor enzymes inhibited the activity of both enzymes, whereas IgG from sera that did not react with poly(A) polymerase had no effect on either enzyme. These data demonstrated the specificity of these autoantibodies and confirmed the results of the radioimmunoassay.

Cell-free synthesis of tumor-type poly(A) polymerase

Previous studies in this laboratory suggested that in adult liver, either the gene for the tumor-type poly(A) polymerase is poorly transcribed or the mRNA for this enzyme is largely not expressed. To test these possibilities, total RNA from rat liver and Morris hepatoma 3924A RNA were isolated by using a guanidine thiocyanate method; poly(A+) RNA and poly(A-) RNA were separated by oligo(dT)-cellulose chromatography and used for translation in a rabbit reticulocyte lysate system. After in vitro translation, the products were immunoprecipitated with either purified anti-tumor poly(A) polymerase antibodies or control immunoglobulins. When the polypeptides translated from poly(A+) or poly(A-) hepatoma RNA were precipitated with immune sera, a unique [35S]methionine-labeled 35-kilodalton (kDa) protein was observed. This band was not apparent when control serum was used for the immunoprecipitation. The radiolabeled 35-kDa polypeptide was not evident when the products were incubated with highly purified tumor nuclear poly(A) polymerase prior to immunoprecipitation. Prior incubation of the translation products with bovine serum albumin instead of poly(A) polymerase had no effect on the immunoprecipitation. This 35-kDa protein was not apparent when liver poly(A+) RNA was used to direct translation. These data demonstrate that (a) the tumor enzyme is not synthesized as a precursor, (b) tumor mRNA, but not normal liver mRNA, contains detectable sequences coding for tumor-type poly(A) polymerase, and (c) poly(A) polymerase mRNA also exists as a poly(A-) population.