Immunoelectron microscopic analysis of the A, B, and HU protein content of bacteriophage Mu transpososomes

Immunity of replicating Mu to self-integration: a novel mechanism employing MuB protein

We describe a new immunity mechanism that protects actively replicating/transposing Mu from self-integration. We show that this mechanism is distinct from the established cis-immunity mechanism, which operates by removal of MuB protein from DNA adjacent to Mu ends. MuB normally promotes integration into DNA to which it is bound, hence its removal prevents use of this DNA as target. Contrary to what might be expected from a cis-immunity mechanism, strong binding of MuB was observed throughout the Mu genome. We also show that the cis-immunity mechanism is apparently functional outside Mu ends, but that the level of protection offered by this mechanism is insufficient to explain the protection seen inside Mu. Thus, both strong binding of MuB inside and poor immunity outside Mu testify to a mechanism of immunity distinct from cis-immunity, which we call 'Mu genome immunity'. MuB has the potential to coat the Mu genome and prevent auto-integration as previously observed in vitro on synthetic A/T-only DNA, where strong MuB binding occluded the entire bound region from Mu insertions. The existence of two rival immunity mechanisms within and outside the Mu genome, both employing MuB, suggests that the replicating Mu genome must be segregated into an independent chromosomal domain. We propose a model for how formation of a 'Mu domain' may be aided by specific Mu sequences and nucleoid-associated proteins, promoting polymerization of MuB on the genome to form a barrier against self-integration.

Escherichia coli DnaA interacts with HU in initiation at the E. coli replication origin

Escherichia coli HU protein is a dimer encoded by two closely related genes whose expression is growth phase-dependent. As a major component of the bacterial nucleoid, HU binds to DNA non-specifically, but acts at the chromosomal origin (oriC) during initiation by stimulating strand opening in vitro. We show that the alpha dimer of HU is more active than other forms of HU in initiation of an oriC-containing plasmid because it more effectively promotes strand opening of oriC. Other results demonstrate that HU stabilizes the DnaA oligomer bound to oriC, and that the alpha subunit of HU interacts with the N-terminal region of DnaA. These observations support a model whereby DnaA interacts with the alpha dimer or the alphabeta heterodimer, depending on their cellular abundance, to recruit the respective form of HU to oriC. The greater activity of the alpha dimer of HU at oriC may stimulate initiation during early log phase compared with the lesser activity of the alphabeta heterodimer or the beta dimer.

Transposition is modulated by a diverse set of host factors in Escherichia coli and is stimulated by nutritional stress

The role of host factors in regulating bacterial transposition has never been comprehensively addressed, despite the potential consequences of transposition. Here, we describe a screen for host factors that influence transposition of IS903, and the effect of these mutations on two additional transposons, Tn10 and Tn552. Over 20,000 independent insertion mutants were screened in two strains of Escherichia coli; from these we isolated over 100 mutants that altered IS903 transposition. These included mutations that increased or decreased the extent of transposition and also altered the timing of transposition during colony growth. The large number of gene products affecting transposition, and their diverse functions, indicate that the overall process of transposition is modulated at many different steps and by a range of processes. Previous work has suggested that transposition is triggered by cellular stress. We describe two independent mutations that are in a gene required for fermentative metabolism during anaerobic growth, and that cause transposition to occur earlier than normal during colony development. The ability to suppress this phenotype by the addition of fumarate therefore provides direct evidence that transposition occurs in response to nutritional stress. Other mutations that altered transposition disrupted genes normally associated with DNA metabolism, intermediary metabolism, transport, cellular redox, protein folding and proteolysis and together these define a network of host proteins that could potentially allow readout of the cell's environmental and nutritional status. In summary, this work identifies a collection of proteins that allow the host to modulate transposition in response to cell stress.

Host factors that promote transpososome disassembly and the PriA-PriC pathway for restart primosome assembly

Initiation of bacteriophage Mu DNA replication by transposition requires the disassembly of the transpososome that catalyses strand exchange and the assembly of a replisome promoted by PriA, PriB, PriC and DnaT proteins, which function in the host to restart stalled replication forks. Once the molecular chaperone ClpX weakens the very tight binding of the transpososome to the Mu ends, host disassembly factors (MRFalpha-DF) promote the dissociation of the transpososome from the DNA template and the assembly of a new nucleoprotein complex. Prereplisome factors (MRFalpha-PR) further alter the complex, allowing PriA binding and loading of major replicative helicase DnaB onto the template promoted by the restart proteins. MRFalpha-PR is essential for DnaB loading by restart proteins even on the deproteinized Mu fork whereas MRFalpha-DF is not required on the deproteinized template. When the transition from transpososome to replisome was reconstituted using MRFalpha-DF and MRFalpha-PR, initiation of Mu DNA replication was strictly dependent upon added PriC and PriA helicase. In contrast, initiation on the deproteinized template was predominantly dependent upon PriB and did not require PriA's helicase activity. The results indicate that transition mechanisms beginning with the transpososome disassembly can determine the pathway of replisome assembly by restart proteins.

The Mu Transposase Interwraps Distant DNA Sites within a Functional Transpososome in the Absence of DNA Supercoiling

A Mu transpososome assembled on negatively supercoiled DNA traps five supercoils by intertwining the left (L) and right (R) ends of Mu with an enhancer element (E). To investigate the contribution of DNA supercoiling to this elaborate synapse in which E and L cross once, E and R twice, and L and R twice, we have analyzed DNA crossings in a transpososome assembled on nicked substrates under conditions that bypass the supercoiling requirement for transposition. We find that the transposase MuA can recreate an essentially similar topology on nicked substrates, interwrapping both E-R and L-R twice but being unable to generate the single E-L crossing. In addition, we deduce that the functional MuA tetramer must contribute to three of the four observed crossings and, thus, to restraining the enhancer within the complex. We discuss the contribution of both MuA and DNA supercoiling to the 5-noded Mu synapse built at the 3-way junction.

Enhancement of Sleeping Beauty transposition by CpG methylation: possible role of heterochromatin formation

The Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposase is the most active transposase in vertebrate cells, and the SB transposon system has been used as a tool for insertional mutagenesis and gene delivery. Previous studies have indicated that the frequency of chromosomal transposition is considerably higher in mouse germ cells than in mouse embryonic stem cells, suggesting the existence of unknown mechanisms that regulate SB transposition. Here, we demonstrated that CpG methylation of the transposon region enhances SB transposition. The transposition efficiencies of a methylated transposon and an unmethylated transposon which had been targeted in the same genomic loci by recombination-mediated cassette exchange in mouse erythroleukemia cells were compared, and at least a 100-fold increase was observed in the methylated transposon. CpG methylation also enhanced transposition from plasmids into the genome. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed that histone H3 methylated at lysine-9, a hallmark of condensed heterochromatin, was enriched at the methylated transposon, whereas the unmethylated transposon formed a relaxed euchromatin structure, as evidenced by enrichment of acetylated histone H3 and reporter gene expression. Possible roles of heterochromatin formation in the transposition reaction are discussed. Our findings indicate a novel relationship between CpG methylation and transposon mobilization.

Recruitment of HU by piggyback: a special role of GalR in repressosome assembly

In Gal repressosome assembly, a DNA loop is formed by the interaction of two GalR, bound to two distal operators, and the binding of the histone-like protein, HU, to an architecturally critical position on DNA to facilitate the GalR-GalR interaction. We show that GalR piggybacks HU to the critical position on the DNA through a specific GalR-HU interaction. This is the first example of HU making a specific contact with another protein. The GalR-HU contact that results in cooperative binding of the two proteins to DNA may be transient and absent in the final repressosome structure. A sequence-independent DNA-binding protein being recruited to an architectural site on DNA through a specific association with a regulatory protein may be a common mode for assembly of complex nucleoprotein structures.

Handoff from recombinase to replisome: insights from transposition

Bacteriophage Mu replicates as a transposable element, exploiting host enzymes to promote initiation of DNA synthesis. The phage-encoded transposase MuA, assembled into an oligomeric transpososome, promotes transfer of Mu ends to target DNA, creating a fork at each end, and then remains tightly bound to both forks. In the transition to DNA synthesis, the molecular chaperone ClpX acts first to weaken the transpososome's interaction with DNA, apparently activating its function as a molecular matchmaker. This activated transpososome promotes formation of a new nucleoprotein complex (prereplisome) by yet unidentified host factors [Mu replication factors (MRF alpha 2)], which displace the transpososome in an ATP-dependent reaction. Primosome assembly proteins PriA, PriB, DnaT, and the DnaB--DnaC complex then promote the binding of the replicative helicase DnaB on the lagging strand template of the Mu fork. PriA helicase plays an important role in opening the DNA duplex for DnaB binding, which leads to assembly of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme to form the replisome. The MRF alpha 2 transition factors, assembled into a prereplisome, not only protect the fork from action by nonspecific host enzymes but also appear to aid in replisome assembly by helping to activate PriA's helicase activity. They consist of at least two separable components, one heat stable and the other heat labile. Although the MRF alpha 2 components are apparently not encoded by currently known homologous recombination genes such as recA, recF, recO, and recR, they may fulfill an important function in assembling replisomes on arrested replication forks and products of homologous strand exchange.

Effect of mutations in the Mu-host junction region on transpososome assembly

Mu transposition occurs through a series of higher-order nucleoprotein complexes called transpososomes. The region where the Mu DNA joins the host DNA plays an integral role in the assembly of these transpososomes. We have created a series of point mutations at the Mu-host junction and characterized their effect on the Mu in vitro strand transfer reaction. Analysis of these mutant constructs revealed an inhibition in transpososome assembly at the point in the reaction pathway when the junction region is engaged by the transposase active site (i.e. the transition from LER to type 0). We found that the degree of inhibition was dependent upon the particular base-pair change at each position and whether the substitution occurred at the left or right transposon end. The MuB transposition protein, an allosteric effector of MuA, was shown to suppress all of the inhibitory Mu-host junction mutants. Most of the mutant constructs were also suppressed, to varying degrees, by the substitution of Mg(2+) with Mn(2+). Analysis of the mutant constructs has revealed hierarchical nucleotide preferences at positions -1 through +3 for transpososome assembly and suggests the possibility that specific metal ion-DNA base interactions are involved in DNA recognition and transpososome assembly.

The RAG1 homeodomain recruits HMG1 and HMG2 to facilitate recombination signal sequence binding and to enhance the intrinsic DNA-bending activity of RAG1-RAG2

V(D)J recombination is initiated by the specific binding of the RAG1-RAG2 (RAG1/2) complex to the heptamer-nonamer recombination signal sequences (RSS). Several steps of the V(D)J recombination reaction can be reconstituted in vitro with only RAG1/2 plus the high-mobility-group protein HMG1 or HMG2. Here we show that the RAG1 homeodomain directly interacts with both HMG boxes of HMG1 and HMG2 (HMG1,2). This interaction facilitates the binding of RAG1/2 to the RSS, mainly by promoting high-affinity binding to the nonamer motif. Using circular-permutation assays, we found that the RAG1/2 complex bends the RSS DNA between the heptamer and nonamer motifs. HMG1,2 significantly enhance the binding and bending of the 23RSS but are not essential for the formation of a bent DNA intermediate on the 12RSS. A transient increase of HMG1,2 concentration in transfected cells increases the production of the final V(D)J recombinants in vivo.

Supercoiling-dependent site-specific binding of HU to naked Mu DNA

Using HU chemical nucleases to probe HU-DNA interactions, we report here for the first time site-specific binding of HU to naked DNA. An unique feature of this interaction is the absolute requirement for negative DNA supercoiling for detectable levels of site-specific DNA binding. The HU binding site is the Mu spacer between the L1 and L2 transposase binding sites. Our results suggest recognition of an altered DNA structure which is induced by DNA supercoiling. We propose that recruitment of HU to this naked DNA site induces the DNA bending required for productive synapsis and transpososome assembly. Implications of HU as a supercoiling sensor with a potential in vivo regulatory role are discussed. Finally, using HU nucleases we have also shown that non-specific DNA binding by HU is stimulated by increasing levels of supercoiling.

Differential binding of the Escherichia coli HU, homodimeric forms and heterodimeric form to linear, gapped and cruciform DNA

We have shown recently that the relative abundance of the three dimeric forms (alpha2, alphabeta and beta2) of the HU protein from Escherichia coli varies during growth and in response to environmental changes. Using gel retardation assays we have compared the DNA binding properties of the three dimers with different DNA substrates. The determination of their DNA binding parameters shows that the relative affinities of HUalphabeta and HUalpha2 are comparable. Both recognize, with a high degree of affinity under stringent conditions, cruciform structures or DNA molecules with a nick or a gap, whereas they bind to linear DNA only at low salt. DNA containing a gap of two nucleotides is in fact the substrate recognized with the highest degree of affinity by these two forms under all conditions. Conversely, HUbeta2 binds very poorly to duplex DNA and shows a much lower affinity for nicked or gapped DNAs. However, HUbeta2 binds to cruciform DNA structures almost as well as HUalphabeta and HUalpha2. This almost exclusive binding of HUbeta2 to a unique substrate is surprising in regards of the quasi identity, in the three forms, of the flexible arms considered as the DNA-binding domains of the three forms of HU. Cruciform DNA may stabilize HUbeta2 structure which could be structurally defective.

Versatile action of Escherichia coli ClpXP as protease or molecular chaperone for bacteriophage Mu transposition

The molecular chaperone ClpX of Escherichia coli plays two distinct functions for bacteriophage Mu DNA replication by transposition. As specificity component of a chaperone-linked protease, it recognizes the Mu immunity repressor for degradation by the peptidase component ClpP, thus derepressing Mu transposition functions. After strand exchange has been promoted by MuA transposase, ClpX alone can alter the conformation of the transpososome (the complex of MuA with Mu ends), and the remodeled MuA promotes transition to replisome assembly. Although ClpXP can degrade MuA, the presence of both ClpP and ClpX in the reconstituted transposition system did not destroy MuA essential for initiation of DNA replication by specific host replication enzymes. Levels of ClpXP needed to overcome inhibition by the repressor did not prevent MuA from promoting strand transfer, and ClpP stimulated alteration of the transpososome by ClpX. Apparently intact MuA was still present in the resulting transpososome, promoting initiation of Mu DNA replication by specific replication enzymes. The results indicate that ClpXP can discriminate repressor and MuA in the transpososome as substrates of the protease or the molecular chaperone alone, degrading repressor while remodeling MuA for its next critical function.

The Mu transposase tetramer is inactive in unassisted strand transfer: an auto-allosteric effect of Mu A promotes the reaction in the absence of Mu B

A tetramer of the Mu transposase is the structural and functional core in all three stable higher-order nucleoprotein complexes (Type 0, Type 1 and Type 2 transpososomes) generated in a defined in vitro strand transfer reaction. Although functional in donor cleavage, we report here that contrary to previous belief, the Mu A tetramer is incapable of unassisted strand transfer. The Mu B protein is required to stimulate the tetramer for intermolecular strand transfer. In the absence of Mu B protein we show that additional Mu A molecules must be added to the core tetramer to stimulate intramolecular strand transfer. Mapping experiments indicate that domain II of the assisting Mu A mediates functional interactions with the core tetramer. The recipient site for Mu A stimulated strand transfer on the A tetramer is likely in domain II and is clearly different from the domain IIIb site used by the Mu B protein. The Mu accessory end binding sites and the Mu enhancer are not required in the Mu A assisted strand transfer, suggesting that helper A molecules in solution can interact with the core tetramer to stimulate the reaction. Finally, we argue that the strand transfer activity and protein sites for target interaction reside within the core tetramer; hence the role of the stimulatory A molecules appears to be limited to that of an auto-allosteric effector.

3'-end processing and kinetics of 5'-end joining during retroviral integration in vivo

Retroviral replication depends on integration of viral DNA into a host cell chromosome. Integration proceeds in three steps: 3'-end processing, the endonucleolytic removal of the two terminal nucleotides from each 3' end of the viral DNA; strand transfer, the joining of the 3' ends of viral DNA to host DNA; and 5'-end joining (or gap repair), the joining of the 5' ends of viral DNA to host DNA. The 5'-end joining step has never been investigated, either for retroviral integration or for any other transposition process. We have developed an assay for 5'-end joining in vivo and have examined the kinetics of 5'-end joining for Moloney murine leukemia virus (MLV). The interval between 3'-end and 5'-end joining is estimated to be less than 1 h. This assay will be a useful tool for examining whether viral or host components mediate 5'-end joining. MLV integrates its DNA only after its host cell has completed mitosis. We show that the extent of 3'-end processing is the same in unsynchronized and aphidicolin-arrested cells. 3'-end processing therefore does not depend on mitosis.

Switching from cut-and-paste to replicative Tn7 transposition

The bacterial transposon Tn7 usually moves through a cut-and-paste mechanism whereby the transposon is excised from a donor site and joined to a target site to form a simple insertion. The transposon was converted to a replicative element that generated plasmid fusions in vitro and cointegrate products in vivo. This switch was a consequence of the separation of 5'- and 3'-end processing reactions of Tn7 transposition as demonstrated by the consequences of a single amino acid alteration in an element-encoded protein essential for normal cut-and-paste transposition. The mutation specifically blocked cleavage of the 5' strand at each transposon end without disturbing the breakage and joining on the 3' strand, producing a fusion (the Shapiro Intermediate) that resulted in replicative transposition. The ability of Tn7 recombination products to serve as substrates for both the limited gap repair required to complete cut-and-paste transposition and the extensive DNA replication involved in cointegrate formation suggests a remarkable plasticity in Tn7's recruitment of host repair and replication functions.

Glycine-15 in the bend between two alpha-helices can explain the thermostability of DNA binding protein HU from Bacillus stearothermophilus

On the basis of sequence comparison of thermophilic and mesophilic DNA binding protein HUs, Bacillus stearothermophilus DNA binding protein HU (BstHU) seems to gain thermostability with a change in amino acid residues present on the molecular surface. To evaluate the contribution of exchange of each amino acid to the thermostability of BstHU, we constructed three mutants, BstHU-T13A (Thr13 to Ala), BstHU-G15E (Gly15 to Glu), and BstHU-T33L (Thr33 to Leu), in which the amino acids in BstHU were changed to the corresponding ones in Bacillus subtilis DNA binding protein HU (BsuHU). Stability of the mutant proteins was determined from thermal-denaturation curves. Replacement of Gly15 located in the turn region between alpha 1 and alpha 2 helices (HTH motif), with Glu (BstHU-G15E), resulted in a decrease in thermostability, and the Tm value was 54.0 degrees C compared to the Tm value of 63.9 degrees C for BstHU. The mutants, BstHU-T13A and BstHU-T33L, were, by contrast, slightly more stable (Tm values of 67.0 and 65.6 degrees C for BstHU-T13A and BstHU-T33L, respectively) than the wild type. We then generated the BsuHU mutant protein BsuHU-E15G, where Glu15 in BsuHU was in turn replaced by Gly, and we analyzed the thermostability. This substitution clearly enhanced the melting temperature by 11.8 degrees C (Tm value: 60.4 degrees C for BsuHU-E15G) compared to the value for BsuHU (Tm: 48.6 degrees C). Thus, Gly15 in the HTH motif of BstHU has an important role in the thermostability of BstHU. Characterization of the structure of the BstHU-G15E by 1H-NMR analysis showed that solvent accessibility of amide proton of Ala21 in the mutant was significantly increased compared with that of wild type, which means that the structure of the HTH motif in the N-terminal region in the mutant was changed to a more open conformation, thereby avoiding the interaction of Ala21 with either Ser17 by hydrogen bond or Ala11 by hydrophobic interaction.

Disassembly of the Mu transposase tetramer by the ClpX chaperone

Mu transposition is promoted by an extremely stable complex containing a tetramer of the transposase (MuA) bound to the recombining DNA. Here we purify the Escherichia coli ClpX protein, a member of a family of multimeric ATPases present in prokaryotes and eukaryotes (the Clp family), on the basis of its ability to remove the transposase from the DNA after recombination. Previously, ClpX has been shown to function with the ClpP peptidase in protein turnover. However, neither ClpP nor any other protease is required for disassembly of the transposase. The released MuA is not modified extensively, degraded, or irreversibly denatured, and is able to perform another round of recombination in vitro. We conclude that ClpX catalyzes the ATP-dependent release of MuA by promoting a transient conformational change in the protein and, therefore, can be considered a molecular chaperone. ClpX is important at the transition between the recombination and DNA replication steps of transposition in vitro; this function probably corresponds to the essential contribution of ClpX for Mu growth. Deletion analysis reveals that the sequence at the carboxyl terminus of MuA is important for disassembly by ClpX and can target MuA for degradation by ClpXP in vitro. These data contribute to the emerging picture that members of the Clp family are chaperones specifically suited for disaggregating proteins and are able to function with or without a collaborating protease.

Disassembly of the bacteriophage Mu transposase for the initiation of Mu DNA replication

Upon catalyzing strand transfer, the Mu transposase (MuA) remains tightly bound to the resulting transposition intermediate, the strand transfer complex (STC), and poses an impediment to host replication proteins. Additional host factors, which can be resolved into two fractions (Mu Replication Factor alpha and beta; MRF alpha and MRF beta), are required to disassemble the MuA complex and initiate DNA synthesis. MRF alpha modifies the protein content of the STC, removing MuA from the DNA in the process. The MRF beta promotes initiation of the Mu DNA synthesis on the STC altered by the MRF alpha. These host factors cannot promote initiation of Mu DNA synthesis if the STC is damaged by partial proteolysis. Moreover, the mutant protein MuA211 cannot be removed from the STC by MRF alpha, blocking initiation of DNA synthesis. These results indicate that MuA in the STC plays a critical function in beginning a sequence of events leading to the establishment of a Mu replication fork.

HU protein of Escherichia coli binds specifically to DNA that contains single-strand breaks or gaps

In this study, we have identified a protein in Escherichia coli that specifically binds to double-stranded DNA containing a single-stranded gap of one nucleotide. The gap-DNA binding (GDB) protein was purified to apparent homogeneity. The analysis of the amino-terminal sequencing of the GDB protein shows two closely related sequences we identify as the alpha and beta subunits of the HU protein. Furthermore, the GDB protein is not detected in the crude extract of an E. coli double mutant strain hupA hupB that has no functional HU protein. These results led us to identify the GDB protein as the HU protein. HU binds strongly to double-stranded 30-mer oligonucleotides containing a nick or a single-stranded gap of one or two nucleotides. Apparent dissociation constants were measured for these various DNA duplexes using a gel retardation assay. The KD(app) values were 8 nM for the 30-mer duplex that contains a nick and 4 and 2 nM for those that contain a 1-or a 2-nucleotide gap, respectively. The affinity of HU for these ligands is at least 100-fold higher than for the same 30-mer DNA duplex without nick or gap. Other single-stranded breaks or gaps, which are intermediate products in the repair of abasic sites after incision by the Fpg, Nth, or Nfo proteins, are also preferentially bound by the HU protein. Due to specific binding to DNA strand breaks, HU may play a role in replication, recombination, and repair.

DNA looping by Saccharomyces cerevisiae high mobility group proteins NHP6A/B. Consequences for nucleoprotein complex assembly and chromatin condensation

The formation of higher order protein.DNA structures often requires bending of DNA strands between specific sites, a process that can be facilitated by the action of nonspecific DNA-binding proteins which serve as assembly factors. A model for this activity is the formation of the invertasome, an intermediate structure created in the Hin-mediated site-specific DNA inversion reaction, which is stimulated by the prokaryotic nucleoid-associated protein HU. Previously, we have shown that the mammalian HMG1/2 proteins substitute for HU in this system and display efficient DNA wrapping activity in vitro. In the present work, we isolate the primary sources of assembly factor activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as measured by the ability to stimulate invertasome formation, and show that these are the previously identified NHP6A/B proteins. NHP6A/B have comparable or greater activity in DNA binding, bending, and supercoiling with respect to HU and HMG1 and appear to form more stable protein.DNA complexes. In addition, expression of NHP6A in mutant Escherichia coli cells lacking HU and Fis restores normal morphological appearance to these cells, specifically in nucleoid condensation and segregation. From these data we predict diverse architectural roles for NHP6A/B in manipulating chromosome structure and promoting the assembly of multicomponent protein.DNA complexes.

Characterization of functionally important sites in the bacteriophage Mu transposase protein

The 663 amino acid Mu transposase protein is absolutely required for Mu DNA transposition. Mutant proteins were constructed in vitro in order to locate regions of transposase that may be important for the catalysis of DNA transposition. Deletions in the A gene, which encodes the transposase, yielded two stable mutant proteins that aid in defining the end-specific DNA-binding domain. Linker insertion mutagenesis at eight sites in the Mu A gene generated two proteins, FF6 and FF14 (resulting from two and four amino acid insertions, respectively, at position 408), which were thermolabile for DNA binding in vitro at 43 degrees C. However, transposition activity in vivo was severely reduced for all mutant proteins at 37 degrees C, except those with insertions at positions 328 and 624. In addition, site-specific mutagenesis was performed to alter tyrosine 414, which is situated in a region that displays amino acid homology to the active sites of a number of nicking/closing enzymes. Tyrosine 414 may reside within an important, yet non-essential, site of transposase, as an aspartate-substituted protein had a drastically reduced frequency of transposition, while the remaining mutants yielded reduced, but substantial, frequencies of microMu transposition in vivo.

HU and functional analogs in eukaryotes promote Hin invertasome assembly

The prokaryotic protein HU functions as an accessory factor in many different biochemical reactions. We have characterized the role of HU in assembling the invertasome, an intermediate nucleoprotein complex involved in Hin-mediated site-specific recombination. Formation of this complex requires the looping of intervening DNA segments between sites bound by the Hin recombinase and the Fis protein. HU stimulates this process on substrates containing intervening segments of length < 100 bp. Characterization of the activity of HU in Hin-mediated recombination in vitro and in vivo yields evidence that its role in this reaction is primarily to facilitate the looping of the intervening DNA segment. By using this reaction as an assay, we identify proteins from mammals, yeast, trypanosomes, and wheat which can fulfill the same function in vitro. Using ligase-mediated circularization of short DNA fragments we also show that HU, the high mobility group (HMG) 1 and 2 proteins from mammals, and a protein from yeast can bend DNA extremely efficiently. These results support the view that this ubiquitous class of proteins enhance the assembly of nucleoprotein complexes under conditions of limited DNA flexibility.

Histones, HMG, HU, IHF: Même combat

In this review article we present a compilation of the proteins homologous to Escherichia coli HU: the HU-like family. Two of these, HU and IHF from E coli have been extensively characterized genetically and biochemically. Due to their DNA binding activities, these proteins confer a condensed shape to the chromosome and regulate the transcription of selected sets of its genes. The parallel between the dual function of the HU-like proteins and the roles described for eukaryotic histone and HMG proteins is striking, especially in the view that they are evolutionary unrelated.

The nonspecific DNA-binding and -bending proteins HMG1 and HMG2 promote the assembly of complex nucleoprotein structures

The mammalian high mobility group proteins HMG1 and HMG2 are abundant, chromatin-associated proteins whose cellular function is not known. In this study we show that these proteins can substitute for the prokaryotic DNA-bending protein HU in promoting the assembly of the Hin invertasome, an intermediate structure in Hin-mediated site-specific DNA inversion. Formation of this complex requires the assembly of the Hin recombinase, the Fis protein, and three cis-acting DNA sites, necessitating the looping of intervening DNA segments. Invertasome assembly is strongly stimulated by HU or HMG proteins when one of these segments is shorter than 104 bp. By use of ligase-mediated circularization assays, we demonstrate that HMG1 and HMG2 can bend DNA extremely efficiently, forming circles as small as 66 bp, and even 59-bp circles at high HMG protein concentrations. In both invertasome assembly and circularization assays, substrates active in the presence of HMG1 contain one less helical turn of DNA compared with substrates active in the presence of HU protein. Analysis of different domains of HMG1 generated by partial proteolytic digestion indicate that DNA-binding domain B is sufficient for both bending and invertasome assembly. We suggest that an important biological function of HMG1 and HMG2 is to facilitate cooperative interactions between cis-acting proteins by promoting DNA flexibility. A general role for HMG1 and HMG2 in chromatin structure is also suggested by their ability to wrap DNA duplexes into highly compact forms.

Implications of Tn5-associated adjacent deletions

The prokaryotic transposable element Tn5 has been found to promote the formation of adjacent deletions. The frequency of adjacent deletion formation is much lower than that of normal transposition events. Like normal transposition, however, adjacent deletion formation requires the activity of the transposase protein. The deletions can be divided into two classes, as distinguished by their endpoints. The occurrence of one of the two deletion classes is increased when the frequency of normal transposition is reduced by the introduction of a deletion or a certain base substitution at one of the two outside ends (OEs). The nature of the base substitution at the mutant OE influences the class of deletion found adjacent to the wild-type OE, even though these two ends are about 12 kbp apart. By studying the formation of these deletions, we have gained some insight into the way in which the transposase interacts with the OEs. Our observations suggest that there is a protein-mediated interaction between the two ends, that different end base pairs are involved in different transposition-related processes, and that the adjacent deletions are the result of nonproductive attempts at transposition.

Mechanistic aspects of DNA transposition

The past year has seen a number of important advances in our understanding of the mechanisms of DNA transposition. The molecular details of the protein-protein, protein-DNA and chemical-reaction steps in several transposition systems have been revealed and have highlighted remarkable uniformity in some areas, ranging from bacterial to retroviral mechanisms.

Assembly of the active form of the transposase-Mu DNA complex: a critical control point in Mu transposition

Discovery and characterization of a new intermediate in Mu DNA transposition allowed assembly of the transposition machinery to be separated from the chemical steps of recombination. This stable intermediate, which accumulates in the presence of Ca2+, consists of the two ends of the Mu DNA synapsed by a tetramer of the Mu transposase. Within this stable synaptic complex (SSC), the recombination sites are engaged but not yet cleaved. Thus, the SSC is structurally related to both the cleaved donor and strand transfer complexes, but precedes them on the transposition pathway. Once the active protein-DNA complex is constructed, it is conserved throughout transposition. The participation of internal sequence elements and accessory factors exclusively during SSC assembly allows recombination to be controlled prior to the irreversible chemical steps.

The Mu transpositional enhancer can function in trans: requirement of the enhancer for synapsis but not strand cleavage

The phage Mu transpositional enhancer has been previously shown to stimulate the initial rate of the Mu DNA strand transfer reaction by a factor of 100. We now show that the Mu enhancer can function in trans on an unlinked DNA molecule. This activity is greatly facilitated by the presence of a free DNA end proximal to the enhancer element. Function of the enhancer in trans does not alter either the requirement for donor DNA supercoiling or for the two Mu ends to be in their proper orientation on the donor plasmid. An important consequence of these findings is that we have been able to evaluate directly the step in the transposition reaction for which the enhancer is required. We show that the role of the enhancer is limited to promoting productive synapsis; efficient strand cleavage can occur in the absence of the enhancer.

Induction of the SOS response in Escherichia coli inhibits Tn5 and IS50 transposition

In response to DNA damage or the inhibition of normal DNA replication in Escherichia coli, a set of some 20 unlinked operons is induced through the RecA-mediated cleavage of the LexA repressor. We examined the effect of this SOS response on the transposition of Tn5 and determined that the frequency of transposition is reduced 5- to 10-fold in cells that constitutively express SOS functions, e.g., lexA(Def) strains. Furthermore, this inhibition is independent of recA function, is fully reversed by a wild-type copy of lexA, and is not caused by an alteration in the levels of the Tn5 transposase or inhibitor proteins. We isolated insertion mutations in a lexA(Def) background that reverse this transposition defect; all of these mapped to a new locus near 23 min on the E. coli chromosome.

Kinetic and structural analysis of a cleaved donor intermediate and a strand transfer intermediate in Tn10 transposition

Tn10 transposes by a nonreplicative "cut and paste" mechanism. We describe here two protein-DNA complexes that are reaction intermediates in the Tn10 transposition process: a cleaved donor complex whose DNA component consists of transposon sequences cleanly excised from flanking donor DNA, and a strand transfer complex whose DNA component contains transposon termini specifically joined to a target site. The kinetic behavior of the first species suggests that it is an early intermediate in the transposition reaction. These two Tn10 complexes are closely analogous to complexes identified in the pathway for replicative "cointegrate" formation by bacteriophage Mu and thus represent intermediates that may be common to both nonreplicative and replicative transposition. These and other results suggest that the Tn10 and Mu reactions are fundamentally very similar despite their very different biological outcomes. The critical difference between the two reactions is the fate of the DNA strand that is not joined to target DNA.