A multicenter randomized, masked comparison trial of natural versus synthetic surfactant for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome

Life-saving effect of pulmonary surfactant in premature babies

The discovery and replacement of lung surfactant have helped increase survival rates for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in extremely premature infants.

Animal derived surfactant extract versus protein free synthetic surfactant for the prevention and treatment of respiratory distress syndrome

BACKGROUND

A wide variety of surfactant preparations have been developed and tested including synthetic surfactants and surfactants derived from animal sources. Although clinical trials have demonstrated that both synthetic surfactant and animal derived surfactant preparations are effective, comparison in animal models has suggested that there may be greater efficacy of animal derived surfactant products, perhaps due to the protein content of animal derived surfactant.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effect of animal derived surfactant to protein free synthetic surfactant preparations in preterm infants at risk for or having respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).

SEARCH METHODS

Searches were updated of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library (2014), PubMed, CINAHL and EMBASE (1975 through November 2014). All languages were included.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials comparing administration of protein free synthetic surfactants to administration of animal derived surfactant extracts in preterm infants at risk for or having respiratory distress syndrome were considered for this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data collection and analysis were conducted according to the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen trials met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed that the use of animal derived surfactant rather than protein free synthetic surfactant resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of pneumothorax [typical relative risk (RR) 0.65, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.77; typical risk difference (RD) -0.04, 95% CI -0.06 to -0.02; number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) 25; 11 studies, 5356 infants] and a marginal reduction in the risk of mortality (typical RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.99; typical RD -0.02, 95% CI -0.04 to -0.00; NNTB 50; 13 studies, 5413 infants).Animal derived surfactant was associated with an increase in the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis [typical RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.76; typical RD 0.02, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.04; number needed to treat to harm (NNTH) 50; 8 studies, 3462 infants] and a marginal increase in the risk of any intraventricular hemorrhage (typical RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.15; typical RD 0.02, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.05; 10 studies, 5045 infants) but no increase in Grade 3 to 4 intraventricular hemorrhage (typical RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.27; typical RD 0.01, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.03; 9 studies, 4241 infants).The meta-analyses supported a marginal decrease in the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia or mortality associated with the use of animal derived surfactant preparations (typical RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.00; typical RD -0.03, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.00; 6 studies, 3811 infants). No other relevant differences in outcomes were noted.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Both animal derived surfactant extracts and protein free synthetic surfactant extracts are effective in the treatment and prevention of respiratory distress syndrome. Comparative trials demonstrate greater early improvement in the requirement for ventilator support, fewer pneumothoraces, and fewer deaths associated with animal derived surfactant extract treatment. Animal derived surfactant may be associated with an increase in necrotizing enterocolitis and intraventricular hemorrhage, though the more serious hemorrhages (Grade 3 and 4) are not increased. Despite these concerns, animal derived surfactant extracts would seem to be the more desirable choice when compared to currently available protein free synthetic surfactants.

Animal derived surfactant extract versus protein free synthetic surfactant for the prevention and treatment of respiratory distress syndrome

BACKGROUND

A wide variety of surfactant preparations have been developed and tested including synthetic surfactants and surfactants derived from animal sources. Although clinical trials have demonstrated that both synthetic surfactant and animal derived surfactant preparations are effective, comparison in animal models has suggested that there may be greater efficacy of animal derived surfactant products, perhaps due to the protein content of animal derived surfactant.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effect of animal derived surfactant to protein free synthetic surfactant preparations in preterm infants at risk for or having respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).

SEARCH METHODS

Searches were updated of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library (2014), PubMed, CINAHL and EMBASE (1975 through November 2014). All languages were included.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials comparing administration of protein free synthetic surfactants to administration of animal derived surfactant extracts in preterm infants at risk for or having respiratory distress syndrome were considered for this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data collection and analysis were conducted according to the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen trials met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed that the use of animal derived surfactant rather than protein free synthetic surfactant resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of pneumothorax [typical relative risk (RR) 0.65, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.77; typical risk difference (RD) -0.04, 95% CI -0.06 to -0.02; number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) 25; 11 studies, 5356 infants] and a marginal reduction in the risk of mortality (typical RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.99; typical RD -0.02, 95% CI -0.04 to -0.00; NNTB 50; 13 studies, 5413 infants).Animal derived surfactant was associated with an increase in the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis [typical RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.76; typical RD 0.02, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.04; number needed to treat to harm (NNTH) 50; 8 studies, 3462 infants] and a marginal increase in the risk of any intraventricular hemorrhage (typical RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.15; typical RD 0.02, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.05; 10 studies, 5045 infants) but no increase in Grade 3 to 4 intraventricular hemorrhage (typical RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.27; typical RD 0.01, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.03; 9 studies, 4241 infants).The meta-analyses supported a marginal decrease in the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia or mortality associated with the use of animal derived surfactant preparations (typical RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.00; typical RD -0.03, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.00; 6 studies, 3811 infants). No other relevant differences in outcomes were noted.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Both animal derived surfactant extracts and protein free synthetic surfactant extracts are effective in the treatment and prevention of respiratory distress syndrome. Comparative trials demonstrate greater early improvement in the requirement for ventilator support, fewer pneumothoraces, and fewer deaths associated with animal derived surfactant extract treatment. Animal derived surfactant may be associated with an increase in necrotizing enterocolitis and intraventricular hemorrhage, though the more serious hemorrhages (Grade 3 and 4) are not increased. Despite these concerns, animal derived surfactant extracts would seem to be the more desirable choice when compared to currently available protein free synthetic surfactants.

Surfactant

Exogenous pulmonary surfactant, widely used in neonatal care, is one of the best-studied treatments in neonatology, and its introduction in the 1990s led to a significant improvement in neonatal outcomes in preterm infants, including a decrease in mortality. This chapter provides an overview of surfactant composition and function in health and disease and summarizes the evidence for its clinical use.

Delivery and performance of surfactant replacement therapies to treat pulmonary disorders

Lung surfactant is crucial for optimal pulmonary function throughout life. An absence or deficiency of surfactant can affect the surfactant pool leading to respiratory distress. Even if the coupling between surfactant dysfunction and the underlying disease is not always well understood, using exogenous surfactants as replacement is usually a standard therapeutic option in respiratory distress. Exogenous surfactants have been extensively studied in animal models and clinical trials. The present article provides an update on the evolution of surfactant therapy, types of surfactant treatment, and development of newer-generation surfactants. The differences in the performance between various surfactants are highlighted and advanced research that has been conducted so far in developing the optimal delivery of surfactant is discussed.

A pilot, randomized, controlled clinical trial of lucinactant, a peptide-containing synthetic surfactant, in infants with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

OBJECTIVE

Inhibition of surfactant function and abnormal surfactant synthesis lead to surfactant dysfunction in children with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. We evaluated whether intratracheal lucinactant, a synthetic, peptide-containing surfactant, was safe and well-tolerated in infants with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, and assessed its effects on clinical outcomes.

METHODS AND MAIN RESULTS

Infants ≤ 2 yrs of age with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure were enrolled in a phase II, double-blind, multinational, placebo-controlled randomized trial across 36 pediatric intensive care units. Infants requiring mechanical ventilation with persistent hypoxemia meeting acute lung injury criteria were randomized to receive intratracheal lucinactant (175 mg/kg) or air placebo. One retreatment was allowed 12-24 hrs after initial dosing if hypoxemia persisted. Peri-dosing tolerability of intratracheal lucinactant and adverse experiences were assessed. Mechanical ventilation duration was analyzed using analysis of variance. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used for categorical variables.We enrolled 165 infants (84 lucinactant; 81 placebo) with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. There were no significant differences in baseline subject characteristics, with the exception of a lower positive end-expiratory pressure and higher tidal volume in placebo subjects. The incidence of transient peri-dosing bradycardia and desaturation was significantly higher in the lucinactant treatment group. There were no statistical differences between groups for other adverse events or mortality. Oxygenation improved in infants randomized to receive lucinactant as indicated by fewer second treatments (67% lucinactant vs. 81% placebo, p = .02) and a trend in improvement in partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood to fraction of inspired oxygen from eligibility to 48 hrs after dose (p = .06). There was no significant reduction in duration of mechanical ventilation with lucinactant (geometric least square means: 4.0 days lucinactant vs. 4.5 days placebo; p = .254). In a subset of infants (n = 22), the duration of mechanical ventilation in children with acute lung injury (partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood to fraction of inspired oxygen >200) was significantly shorter with lucinactant (least square means: 2.4 days lucinactant vs. 4.3 days placebo; p = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

In mechanically ventilated infants with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, treatment with intratracheal lucinactant appeared to be generally safe. An improvement in oxygenation and a significantly reduced requirement for retreatment suggests that lucinactant might improve lung function in infants with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

Surfactant therapy for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome

This article examines exogenous lung surfactant replacement therapy and its usefulness in mitigating clinical acute lung injury (ALI) and the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Surfactant therapy is beneficial in term infants with pneumonia and meconium aspiration lung injury, and in children up to age 21 years with direct pulmonary forms of ALI/ARDS. However, extension of exogenous surfactant therapy to adults with respiratory failure and clinical ALI/ARDS remains a challenge. This article reviews clinical studies of surfactant therapy in pediatric and adult patients with ALI/ARDS, focusing on its potential advantages in patients with direct pulmonary forms of these syndromes.

Myth: all surfactants are alike

There are several surfactant preparations available to the clinician, none of which are alike. They differ in their phospholipid and surfactant protein (SP) composition as well as dosing, yet they all have been shown to be clinically effective as surfactants. Head-to-head randomized clinical trials comparing surfactants have shown some advantages of preparations that contain SP-B and SP-C, primarily in short-term clinical outcomes. A new synthetic surfactant that contains a phospholipid mixture and a peptide resembling SP-B has shown promise as a potential alternative to animal-derived surfactants.

Does surfactant type cause a differential proinflammatory response in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome?

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to compare the pulmonary inflammatory response of premature infants with respiratory distress following instillation of one of two commonly available surfactant preparations.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized investigation of preterm infants who were less than 30 weeks of gestational age, weighed less than 1 kg at birth, and who qualified to receive surfactant. Infants with multiple congenital anomalies or whose mothers were taking anti-inflammatory medications were ineligible. Tracheal aspirates (TAs) were collected on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 and airway cytokines from TAs were assayed for interleukin (IL)-8 and IL-6.

RESULTS

Infants were evenly matched by gestation (26+/-2 days and 26+/-1 days [mean+/-SD], Surfactant A and B, respectively) and birth weight (730+/-141 g and 732+/-167 g). TA cytokine levels were not different between or within groups. Ventilator requirements and clinical outcomes were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The postnatal airway inflammatory response observed in preterm infants is not altered by the instillation of either surfactant preparation.

Animal-derived surfactants: where are we? The evidence from randomized, controlled clinical trials

Animal-derived surfactants, as well as synthetic surfactants, have been extensively evaluated in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants. Three commonly available animal-derived surfactants in the United States include beractant (BE), calfactant (CA) and poractant alfa (PA). Multiple comparative studies have been performed using these three surfactants. Prospective as well as retrospective studies comparing BE and CA have shown no significant differences in clinical or economic outcomes. Randomized, controlled clinical trials have shown that treatment with PA is associated with rapid weaning of oxygen and ventilatory pressures, fewer additional doses, cost benefits and survival advantage when compared with BE or CA. Recently, a study using an administrative database that included over 20,000 preterm infants has shown a significant decrease in mortality and cost benefits in favor of PA, when compared with BE or CA. Differences in outcomes between these animal-derived surfactants may be related to a higher amount of phospholipids and plasmalogens in PA. To date, animal-derived surfactants seem to be better than synthetic surfactants during the acute phase of RDS and in decreasing neonatal mortality. Further studies are needed comparing animal-derived surfactants with the newer generation of synthetic surfactants.

Synthetic surfactants: where are we? Evidence from randomized, controlled clinical trials

The benefits of exogenous synthetic or animal-derived surfactants for prevention or treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) are well established. Data from head-to-head trials comparing animal-derived surfactants primarily with the synthetic surfactant colfosceril suggest that the major clinical advantages afforded by the presence of surfactant protein (SP)-B and SP-C in animal-derived preparations relate to faster onset of action, a reduction in the incidence of RDS when used prophylactically, and a lower incidence of air leaks and RDS-related deaths. However, no benefits in terms of overall mortality or BPD have been shown in these head-to-head comparisons. Findings from trials of a new-generation synthetic surfactant containing a peptide that mimics SP-B, as well as their follow-up study suggest that its administration improves short-term clinical outcomes compared with colfosceril and results in survival through 1 year of age, which is at least comparable, if not perhaps superior, to that seen with animal-derived surfactants.

Transcriptional responses of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to lung surfactant

This study uses microarray analyses to examine gene expression profiles for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) induced by exposure in vitro to bovine lung surfactant preparations that vary in apoprotein content: (i) whole lung surfactant (WLS) containing the complete mixture of endogenous lipids and surfactant proteins (SP)-A, -B, -C, and -D; (ii) extracted lung surfactant (CLSE) containing lipids plus SP-B and -C; (iii) column-purified surfactant lipids (PPL) containing no apoproteins, and (iv) purified human SP-A. Exposure to WLS evoked a multitude of transcriptional responses in Mtb, with 52 genes up-regulated and 23 genes down-regulated at 30min exposure, plus 146 genes up-regulated and 27 genes down-regulated at 2h. Notably, WLS rapidly induced several membrane-associated lipases that presumptively act on surfactant lipids as substrates, and a large number of genes involved in the synthesis of phthiocerol dimycocerosate (PDIM), a cell wall component known to be important in macrophage interactions and Mtb virulence. Exposure of Mtb to CLSE, PPL, or purified SP-A caused a substantially weaker transcriptional response ( Collapse

Key Words

• mycobacterium tuberculosis
• microarray
• transcriptional responses
• surfactant
• surfactant proteins

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Animals
• Cattle
• Gene Expression Profiling
• Humans
• Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects
• Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
• Pulmonary Surfactants/metabolism
• Stress, Physiological

Collapse

Grants

• R01 HL055936 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 HL055936-08 NHLBI NIH HHS
• 5 R01 HL55936 NHLBI NIH HHS

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Ute Schwab Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Kyle H Rohde
Zhengdong Wang
Patricia R Chess
Robert H Notter
David G Russell

Collapse

Collaborators Collapse

Animal-derived surfactants for the treatment and prevention of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: summary of clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Available literature suggests that the advantage of animal-derived surfactants over first-generation synthetic agents derives from the presence of surface-active proteins and their phospholipid content. Here we summarize the results of clinical trials comparing animal-derived surfactant preparations with other animal-derived surfactants and with both first-and second-generation synthetic surfactants.

METHODS

Published clinical trials of comparisons of animal-derived surfactants were summarized and compared. Comparisons emphasized differences in (1) key surfactant components attributed with efficacy and (2) differences in published outcomes.

RESULTS

For the most important outcomes, mortality and chronic lung disease, currently available natural surfactants are essentially similar in efficacy. When examining secondary outcomes (pneumothorax, ventilator weaning, and need for supplemental oxygen), it appears that both calfactant and poractant have an advantage over beractant. The weight of the evidence, especially for study design and secondary outcomes, favors the use of calfactant. However, the superiority of poractant over beractant, when the higher initial dose of poractant is used, strengthens the case for use of poractant as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical trials suggest that the higher surfactant protein-B content in calfactant, and perhaps the higher phospholipid content in poractant (at higher initial dose), are the factors that most likely confer the observed advantage over other surfactant preparations.

A pilot randomized, controlled trial of later treatment with a peptide-containing, synthetic surfactant for the prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia

OBJECTIVE

Oxidant injury and lung inflammation in extremely premature infants are associated with the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Surfactant dysfunction resulting from these events may contribute to the pathogenesis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Treatment with exogenous surfactant may decrease the incidence or severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. We conducted a masked, multicenter, multinational, randomized, controlled, pilot study to estimate the effects of treating infants at high risk for developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia with lucinactant, a synthetic, peptide-containing surfactant, on safety during dosing and the incidence of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

METHODS

Preterm infants between 600 and 900 g requiring mechanical ventilation and a fraction of inspired oxygen of > or =0.30 between 3 and 10 days of age were randomly assigned to receive either sham air (placebo) or 1 of 2 doses of lucinactant (90 or 175 mg/kg total phospholipid) every 48 hours to a maximum of 5 doses, if they remained on mechanical ventilation.

RESULTS

Of 136 infants enrolled at 34 sites, 44 received placebo, 47 received 90 mg/kg total phospholipid, and 45 received 175 mg/kg total phospholipid. The 90 mg/kg group had a significantly higher percentage of boys (64%) compared with the placebo group (39%); no other significant differences in baseline characteristics among groups were present. Compared with placebo, both the 90 mg/kg and 175 mg/kg groups experienced a significantly higher incidence of desaturation and bradycardia during dosing. Twenty-four hours after dosing, the mean fraction of inspired oxygen was lower in both lucinactant groups (33%) compared with the placebo group (39%). The incidence of mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia was 66% in the placebo group, 79% in the 90 mg/kg group, and 58% in the 175 mg/kg group. These differences were not statistically significant. There were no statistical differences among groups for pneumothorax, pulmonary interstitial emphysema, intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, retinopathy of prematurity, or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

There were trends toward lower oxygen requirements and toward a lower incidence of mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age in infants who received the higher dose of lucinactant, and this warrants further investigation.

Surfactant for pediatric acute lung injury

This article reviews exogenous surfactant therapy and its use in mitigating acute lung injury (ALI) and the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in infants, children, and adults. Biophysical and animal research documenting surfactant dysfunction in ALI/ARDS is described, and the scientific rationale for treatment with exogenous surfactant is discussed. Major emphasis is placed on reviewing clinical studies of surfactant therapy in pediatric and adult patients who have ALI/ARDS. Particular advantages from surfactant therapy in direct pulmonary forms of these syndromes are described. Also discussed are additional factors affecting the efficacy of exogenous surfactants in ALI/ARDS.

One-year follow-up of very preterm infants who received lucinactant for prevention of respiratory distress syndrome: results from 2 multicenter randomized, controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The benefits of exogenous surfactants for prevention or treatment of respiratory distress syndrome are well established, but there is a paucity of long-term follow-up data from surfactant-comparison trials.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine and compare survival and pulmonary and neurodevelopmental outcomes through 1 year corrected age of preterm infants who received lucinactant and other surfactants in the SELECT (Safety and Effectiveness of Lucinactant Versus Exosurf in a Clinical Trial) and STAR (Surfaxin Therapy Against Respiratory Distress Syndrome) trials individually and, secondarily, from analysis using combined data from these 2 trials.

METHODS

All infants from both trials who were randomly assigned to administration of lucinactant (175 mg/kg), colfosceril palmitate (67.5 mg/kg), beractant (100 mg/kg), or poractant alfa (175 mg/kg) were prospectively followed through 1 year corrected age, at which point masked assessment of outcomes was performed for surviving infants. One-year survival was a key outcome of interest. Other parameters assessed included rates of rehospitalization and respiratory morbidity and gross neurologic status. Data were analyzed by comparing the different surfactants within each trial and, in secondary analysis, combining data from both trials to compare lucinactant versus the animal-derived surfactants (beractant and poractant) used in these trials. Survival rates over time were compared by using the Wilcoxon test for survival through 1 year corrected age and logistic regression for comparison of fixed time points. The latter analyses were performed by using the prespecified approach, where loss to follow-up or withdrawal of consent was imputed as a death, and also using raw data. Other outcomes were analyzed by using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test or logistic regression for categorical data, and analysis of variance on ranks was used for continuous data.

RESULTS

Very few cases were lost to follow-up in either trial (29 of 1546 enrolled in both trials [1.9%]). In the primary analysis of the SELECT trial comparing lucinactant to either colfosceril or beractant, there were no significant differences in the proportion of infants who were alive through 1 year corrected age. Fixed-time-point estimates of mortality at 1 year corrected age imputing loss to follow-up as a death were 28.1% for lucinactant, 31.0% for colfosceril, and 31.0% for beractant. By using raw data without imputing loss to follow-up as a death, mortality estimates at 1 year corrected age were computed to be 26.6%, 29.1%, and 28.3%, respectively. In the primary analysis of the STAR trial, significantly more infants treated with lucinactant were alive through 1 year corrected age compared with those who received poractant alfa. Fixed time estimates of mortality at 1 year corrected age imputing loss to follow-up as a death were 19.4% for lucinactant and 24.2% for poractant. These estimates using raw data that did not impute loss to follow-up as a death were 18.6% and 21.9%, respectively. In the combined analysis, survival through 1 year corrected age was higher for infants in the lucinactant group versus that of the infants in the animal-derived surfactants (beractant and poractant) group. The fixed-time-point estimates of mortality at 1 year corrected age imputing loss to follow-up as a death for lucinactant and animal-derived surfactants were 26.0% and 29.4%, respectively. However, the 1-year-corrected-age estimates using combined raw data were 24.6% for the lucinactant group and 26.7% for the animal-derived surfactant group. The incidence of postdischarge rehospitalizations, total number of rehospitalizations, incidence of respiratory illnesses, and total number of respiratory illnesses were generally similar among those in the treatment groups. Neurologic status at 1 year corrected age was essentially similar between infants who received lucinactant and those who received all other surfactants used in these 2 trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this 1-year follow-up of both lucinactant trials indicate that this new peptide-based synthetic surfactant is at least as good, if not superior, to animal-derived surfactants for prevention of respiratory distress syndrome and may be a viable alternative to animal-derived products.

Surfactant for respiratory distress syndrome: are there important clinical differences among preparations?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Respiratory distress syndrome is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity among infants born prematurely. The disorder arises from the developmental and biochemical abnormalities associated with preterm delivery. The decreased number of type II alveolar pneumocytes results in absent or reduced surfactant production, which leads to alveolar instability and a tendency to collapse during expiration and increased work of breathing necessitating the institution of supplemental oxygen therapy and positive pressure mechanical ventilation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Exogenous surfactant replacement therapy has been shown to be effective in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome and has become a standard of care in neonatal intensive care units. A number of controversies still exist over a number of issues, however, such as the comparative effectiveness of one surfactant preparation over another, timing of administration, dosing volumes and short versus long-term benefits. Furthermore, the emergence of a newer generation of synthetic, peptide-containing surfactants has opened a new era in surfactant therapy which may have implications for future practice and research.

SUMMARY

This paper discusses these developments and analyses the effectiveness of surfactant therapy against respiratory distress syndrome by appraising the evidence produced from published trials and systemic reviews.

Animal-derived surfactants versus past and current synthetic surfactants: current status

In this review, the authors assess major outcomes resulting from head-to-head comparison trials of animal-derived surfactants with previous and newer synthetic surfactants and among them. They also pay special attention to issues of study design and quality of the trials reviewed. Animal-derived surfactants that contain surfactant proteins (Survanta, Infasurf, and Curosurf) perform clinically better than Exosurf, a synthetic surfactant containing only phospholipids, primarily in outcomes related to acute management of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS; faster weaning and pneumothorax) but not in overall mortality or incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Trials comparing various animal-derived surfactants that provide different amounts of surface protein B (SP-B) or phospholipids have shown minor differences in outcomes related to the management of RDS or none at all. The exception is the suggestion of better survival using a high initial dose of Curosurf when compared with Survanta. This observation is based on analysis of trials of relatively lesser quality that have included a smaller number of infants than other surfactant comparisons, however. Data from recent trials comparing a new-generation synthetic surfactant that contains a peptide mimicking the action of SP-B, Surfaxin, have shown that it performs better than Exosurf (faster weaning and less BPD) and at least as well as the animal-derived surfactants Survanta and Curosurf. The ideal surfactant comparison trial to demonstrate which surfactant is better has yet to be conducted. Future surfactant comparison trials should pay particular attention to study design, be appropriately sized, and include long-term follow-up.

Lung surfactants

PURPOSE

The pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and cost considerations of exogenous lung surfactants are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Exogenous pulmonary surfactants, along with advancements in ventilatory care, have significantly reduced the incidence of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and its related complications in infants. The following exogenous surfactants are approved for the prophylaxis and treatment (rescue) of neonatal RDS: beractant, a modified natural surfactant; calfactant and poractant, both natural surfactants; and colfosceril, a synthetic surfactant that is not currently available in the United States. Lucinactant, a synthetic surfactant, is under investigation and received approvable status from the Food and Drug Administration in February 2005. The surfactants are delivered directly to their site of action, and only small amounts reach the systemic circulation. Bioavailability to the distal airways and alveoli depends on the method of delivery, the stage and severity of pulmonary disease, and the properties of the particular surfactant. According to data from clinical trials, the use of exogenous surfactant therapy for rescue within the first two hours of life appears to be as efficacious as prophylaxis in most premature infants.

CONCLUSION

Comparative trials of surfactants have proven the efficacy of both synthetic and natural surfactants in the prevention and treatment of RDS. However, these trials have universally demonstrated greater reduction in the immediate need for ventilator support in infants who receive natural surfactants. Natural preparations cause less pneumothorax, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and mortality compared with synthetic preparations. Synthetic agents offer the potential advantages of an unlimited supply with consistent pharmaceutical quality and no risk of transmitting infectious disease or causing immunologic sensitization.

Surfactant therapy in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome and in near-term or term newborns with acute RDS

Many different surfactant preparations derived from animal sources, as well as synthetic surfactants, are available for the treatment of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Natural, modified surfactants containing surfactant-associated proteins appear to be more effective than non-protein-containing synthetic surfactants. Comparative trials with poractant alfa at a higher initial dose of 200 mg/kg appear to be associated with rapid weaning of FiO2, less need for additional doses, and decreased mortality in infants <32 weeks gestation when compared with beractant. Early rescue (<30 min of age) surfactant therapy is an effective method to minimize over treatment of some preterm infants who may not develop RDS. Surfactant therapy followed by rapid extubation to nasal ventilation appears to be more beneficial than continued mechanical ventilation. In near-term or term newborns with acute RDS, surfactant therapy has been shown to be 70% effective in improving respiratory failure.

Surface properties of sulfur- and ether-linked phosphonolipids with and without purified hydrophobic lung surfactant proteins

Two novel C16:0 sulfur-linked phosphonolipids (S-lipid and SO(2)-lipid) and two ether-linked phosphonolipids (C16:0 DEPN-8 and C16:1 UnDEPN-8) were studied for surface behavior alone and in mixtures with purified bovine lung surfactant proteins (SP)-B and/or SP-C. Synthetic C16:0 phosphonolipids all had improved adsorption and film respreading compared to dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine, and SO(2)-lipid and DEPN-8 reached maximum surface pressures of 72mN/m (minimum surface tensions of <1mN/m) in compressed films on the Wilhelmy balance (23 degrees C). Dispersions of DEPN-8 (0.5mg/ml) and SO(2)-lipid (2.5mg/ml) also reached minimum surface tensions of <1mN/m on a pulsating bubble surfactometer (37 degrees C, 20cycles/min, 50% area compression). Synthetic lung surfactants containing DEPN-8 or SO(2)-lipid+0.75% SP-B+0.75% SP-C had dynamic surface activity on the bubble equal to that of calf lung surfactant extract (CLSE). Surfactants containing DEPN-8 or SO(2)-lipid plus 1.5% SP-B also had very high surface activity, but less than when both apoproteins were present together. Adding 10wt.% of UnDEPN-8 to synthetic lung surfactants did not improve dynamic surface activity. Surfactants containing DEPN-8 or SO(2)-lipid plus 0.75% SP-B/0.75% SP-C were chemically and biophysically resistant to phospholipase A(2) (PLA(2)), while CLSE was severely inhibited by PLA(2). The high activity and inhibition resistance of synthetic surfactants containing DEPN-8 or SO(2)-lipid plus SP-B/SP-C are promising for future applications in treating surfactant dysfunction in inflammatory lung injury.

Comparison of Infasurf (calfactant) and Survanta (beractant) in the prevention and treatment of respiratory distress syndrome

BACKGROUND

In biophysical and animal testing, Infasurf develops lower surface tension and restores total surfactant activity better than Survanta.

METHODS

We performed 2 prospective, randomized, masked clinical trials; 1 trial used a prophylactic strategy aimed at prevention of respiratory distress syndrome (prophylaxis trial) for infants who were born between 23 weeks, 0 days and 29 weeks, 6 days of gestation, and the second trial used a treatment strategy (treatment trial) for intubated infants with a birth weight of 401 to 2000 g who required fractional inspired oxygen of >0.4 to maintain an arterial oxygen saturation of >90% (or an arterial/alveolar oxygen ratio of <0.2) at any time before 36 hours of age. Our purpose was to determine if Infasurf (calfactant) was more effective than Survanta (beractant) at increasing the proportion of patients alive and not receiving supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. Informed, written, parental consent was required, and protocols were approved by the institutional review boards of all participating institutions. The dose of surfactant was 4 mL/kg (100 mg/kg) for Survanta and 3 mL/kg (105 mg/kg) for Infasurf for both trials. The assigned drug was drawn into 2 masked syringes and administered by a health care professional who, in most cases, was not directly responsible for caring for the patient. A maximum of 3 repeat treatments, at least 6 hours apart, were permitted if the neonate required fractional inspired oxygen of >0.30 to maintain an arterial oxygen saturation of >90% (or an arterial/alveolar oxygen ratio of 0.33) and the infant remained intubated for respiratory distress syndrome.

RESULTS

Both trials were halted for not meeting enrollment targets after a 32-month recruitment period. The decision to end recruitment was made after the interim analysis of the treatment trial. We enrolled 749 infants in the prophylaxis trial and 1361 infants in the treatment trial. The primary outcome (alive and not receiving supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age) rate in the prophylaxis trial was 52.1% for group 1 and 52.4% for group 2. In the treatment trial, the primary outcome rate was 58.7% in group 1 and 56.8% in group 2. Based on sample-size requirements for a conclusion of similarity, and the lack of statistical significance to the differences noted in the primary outcome, we have chosen not to break the investigator blind but to report the results as groups 1 and 2.

CONCLUSION

Early trial closure prevents us from either accepting or rejecting our null hypothesis.

New Synthetic Surfactants: The Next Generation?

Surfactant preparations have been proven to improve clinical outcome of infants at risk for or having respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). In clinical trials, ani mal-derived surfactant preparations reduce the risk of pneumothorax and mortality when compared to non-protein-containing synthetic surfactant preparations. In part, this is thought to be due to the presence of surfactant proteins in animal-derived surfactant preparations. Four native surfactant proteins have been identified. The hydrophobic surfactant proteins B (SP-B) and C (SP-C) are tightly bound to phospholipids. These proteins have important roles in maintaining the surface tension-lowering properties of pulmonary surfactant. Surfactant protein A (SP-A) and D (SP-D) are extremely hydrophilic and are not retained in the preparation of any commercial animal-derived surfactant products. These proteins are thought to have a role in recycling surfactant and improving host defense. There is concern that animal-derived products may have some batch-to-batch variation regarding the levels of native pulmonary surfactant proteins. In addition, there is concern regarding the hypothetical risk of transmission of viral or unconventional infectious agents from an animal source. New surfactant preparations, composed of synthetic phospholipids and essential hydrophobic surfactant protein analogs, have been developed. These surfactant protein analogs have been produced by peptide synthesis and recombinant technology to provide a new class of synthetic surfactants that may be a suitable alternative to animal-derived surfactants. Preliminary clinical studies have shown that treatment with these novel surfactant preparations can ameliorate RDS and improve clinical outcome. Clinicians will need to further understand any differences in clinical effects between available products.

Overview of surfactant replacement trials

Clinical trials have evaluated the overall efficacy of surfactant therapy, as well as the relative efficacy of different surfactant preparations, the optimal timing of administration and the optimal dosage. Surfactant therapy leads to significant clinical improvement in infants at risk for, or having, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Clinical trials that compared the effects of synthetic or animal-derived surfactant preparations to placebo or no therapy demonstrate that surfactant therapy lead to rapid improvement in oxygenation, decreased ventilator support, decreased risk of pneumothorax, and mortality. Earlier treatment, prophylactic treatment of infants at high risk of developing RDS, and selective re-treatment leads to improved clinical outcome as well. Currently available animal-derived surfactants are superior to non-protein-containing synthetic surfactants. Ongoing evaluation will determine if important differences in animal-derived products are noted. Future trials will evaluate third-generation surfactant products and further refine what constitutes optimal use of surfactant.

Centromere DNA, proteins and kinetochore assembly in vertebrate cells

The centromere is a specialized region of the chromosome that is essential for faithful chromosome segregation during mitosis and meiosis in eukaryotic cells. It is the site at which the kinetochore, the functional nucleoprotein complex responsible for microtubule binding and chromosome movement, is assembled through complex molecular mechanisms. Herein, I review recent advances in our understanding of centromeric DNAs as sites for kinetochore assembly and the mechanisms underlying kinetochore assembly in vertebrate cells.

Richardson score predicts short-term adverse respiratory outcomes in newborns >/=34 weeks gestation

OBJECTIVES

To develop a model to predict which newborns >/=34 weeks gestation with respiratory distress will die or will require prolonged (>3 days) assisted ventilation.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study using data from Northern California newborns >/=34 weeks gestation who presented with respiratory distress. We split the cohort into derivation and validation datasets. Bivariate and multivariate data analyses were performed on the derivation dataset. After developing a simple score on the derivation dataset, we applied it to the original as well as to a second validation dataset from Massachusetts.

RESULTS

Of 2276 babies who met our initial eligibility criteria, 203 (9.3%) had the primary study outcome (assisted ventilation >3 days or death). A simple score based on gestational age, the lowest PaO 2 /FIO 2 , a variable combining lowest pH and highest PaCO 2 , and the lowest mean arterial blood pressure had excellent performance, with a c-statistic of 0.85 in the derivation dataset, 0.80 in the validation dataset, and 0.80 in the secondary validation dataset.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple objective score based on routinely collected physiologic predictors can predict respiratory outcomes in infants >/=34 weeks gestation with respiratory distress.

Surfactant therapy for respiratory distress syndrome in premature neonates: a comparative review

Exogenous surfactant therapy has been part of the routine care of preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) since the beginning of the 1990s. Discoveries that led to its development as a therapeutic agent span the whole of the 20th century but it was not until 1980 that the first successful use of exogenous surfactant therapy in a human population was reported. Since then, randomized controlled studies demonstrated that surfactant therapy was not only well tolerated but that it significantly reduced both neonatal mortality and pulmonary air leaks; importantly, those surviving neonates were not at greater risk of subsequent neurological impairment. Surfactants may be of animal or synthetic origin. Both types of surfactants have been extensively studied in animal models and in clinical trials to determine the optimum timing, dose size and frequency, route and method of administration. The advantages of one type of surfactant over another are discussed in relation to biophysical properties, animal studies and results of randomized trials in neonatal populations. Animal-derived exogenous surfactants are the treatment of choice at the present time with relatively few adverse effects related largely to changes in oxygenation and heart rate during surfactant administration. The optimum dose of surfactant is usually 100 mg/kg. The use of surfactant with high frequency oscillation and continuous positive pressure modes of respiratory support presents different problems compared with its use with conventional ventilation. The different components of surfactant have important functions that influence its effectiveness both in the primary function of the reduction of surface tension and also in secondary, but nonetheless just as important, role of lung defense. With greater understanding of the individual surfactant components, particularly the surfactant-associated proteins, development of newer synthetic surfactants has been made possible. Despite being an effective therapy for RDS, surfactant has failed to have a significant impact on the incidence of chronic lung disease in survivors. Paradoxically the cost of care has increased as surviving neonates are more immature and consume a greater proportion of neonatal intensive care resources. Despite this, surfactant is considered a cost-effective therapy for RDS compared with other therapeutic interventions in premature infants.

Calfactant sterility in multiple doses from single-use vials

BACKGROUND

Calfactant is an exogenous surfactant used to treat and prevent respiratory distress syndrome in the newborn infant. It is available in single-use preservative-free vials, but contains enough volume to provide multiple doses to small infants.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the preservation of calfactant sterility at 12- and 24-hour intervals following initial violation of vial contents and to extrapolate cost savings associated with product conservation.

METHODS

A prospective sterility study was performed using calfactant suspension obtained from vials prescribed for infants who had received their dose in the delivery room or the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). After initial vial entry, test vials were stored in the NICU pharmacy satellite under refrigeration (temperature range 2.2-7.2 degrees C). Re-entry of test vials and sample removal was performed 12 and 24 hours after initial entry with an 18- or 20-gauge needle. All samples were removed by a neonatal respiratory therapist and placed into 3-mL latex-free, Leur-lok plastic syringes and examined by 3 culture media: MacConkey agar, blood agar, and thioglycollate broth.

RESULTS

A total of 89 surfactant samples from 45 vials were cultured; 45 at a mean time of 13.36 hours (range 11-41) and 44 at a mean time of 25.8 hours (range 22-60) after initial vial entry. These samples represented the technique of multiple respiratory therapists. All samples were negative for bacterial growth at 24 and 48 hours (beta = 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this short-term sterility study represent an initial step in the evaluation of multiple doses of surfactant from a single-use vial. The data suggest that 1-2 re-entries into a vial of calfactant, within 24 hours after the initial breach, can be a safe and economical method of providing more than a single dose of surfactant to infants weighing <1 kg. We encourage each institution to reproduce these findings before applying this concept to their patients.

Comparison of three treatment regimens of natural surfactant preparations in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome

The aim of the study was to compare the treatment regimen of three natural surfactants of different extraction and formulation (Alveofact [Surfactant A = SA], Poractant [Surfactant B = SB] and Beractant [Surfactant C = SC]) in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Premature infants of </=32 weeks' gestation with birth weight of </=2,000 g and with established RDS requiring artificial ventilation with a FiO2 >/=0.3 were randomly assigned to receive at least two doses of SA, SB or SC (100 mg/kg per dose). Infants who remained dependent on artificial ventilation with a FiO2 >/=0.3 received up to two additional doses. There were no differences among the groups regarding the necessity for more than two doses. The SA and the SB groups spent fewer days on a ventilator (p-value SA/SB 0.7, SA/SC 0.05, SB/SC 0.043) compared with the SC group, needed fewer days of oxygen administration (p-value SA/SB 0.14, SA/SC 0.05, SB/SC 0.04) and spent fewer days in hospital (p-value SA/SB 0.65, SA/SC 0.04, SB/SC 0.027). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of mortality, chronic lung disease, air leaks, necrotising enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity and intraventricular haemorrhage among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

The Alveofact and Poractant groups spent fewer days on the ventilator, needed fewer days of oxygen administration and spent fewer days in hospital compared with the Beractant group but no differences were observed among the three groups with regards to mortality and morbidity.

Predictors of alveolar air leaks

Persistent air leaks are caused by the failure of the postoperative lung to achieve a configuration that is physiologically amenable to healing. The raw pulmonary surface caused by the dissection of the fissure often is separated from the pleura, and the air leak fails to close. Additionally, higher air flow thorough an alveolar-pleural fistula seems to keep the fistula open. Other factors that interfere with wound healing, such as steroid use, diabetes, or malnutrition, can result in persistence of the leak. A thoracic surgeon can minimize the incidence of air leak through meticulous surgical technique and can identify patients in whom the balance of risks (Table 1) and benefits warrant operative intervention based on an understanding of the underlying pathophysiology.

Comparative randomized study: administration of natural and synthetic surfactant to premature newborns with respiratory distress syndrome

BACKGROUND

The respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in premature newborns has been etiologically correlated to immature lungs and specifically with surfactant deficiency. Exogenous administration of surfactant is nowadays considered to be the treatment of choice. In this paper we attempt a comparison of clinical results from the administration of natural Alveofact and synthetic Exosurf surfactants in premature newborns with respiratory distress syndrome.

METHODS

The study subjects were 92 premature newborns who had been hospitalized in the Department of Neonatology, of the University of Crete. A total of 42 subjects received synthetic surfactant and 50 subjects received natural surfactant. The surfactant was administered in one to three doses, depending on respiratory support requirements.

RESULTS

The time of administration was a little longer for the natural surfactant group. The duration of mechanical ventilatory support, requiring oxygen, the duration of hospitalization and the percentage of increase of arterial alveolar partial pressure oxygen ratio (a/APO2) were slightly higher for the synthetic surfactant group. The mortality rate during the neonatal period (28th day) was higher for the synthetic surfactant group than for the natural surfactant group (38.1 vs 24%). A similar tendency was noticed also as regards to complications, e.g. pneumothorax (11.2 vs 5.2%; relative risk (RR) 0.27) intraventricular hemorrhage (34.6 vs 21.1%; RR 0.61), septicemia (11.5 vs 5.2%; RR 0.46) and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (12.5 vs 2.8%; RR 0.22).

CONCLUSION

The use of natural surfactant seems to offer more advantages in comparison with its synthetic counterpart.

Bulk shear viscosities of endogenous and exogenous lung surfactants

Bulk shear viscosities were measured with a cone and plate microviscometer as a function of concentration, shear rate, and temperature for lavaged calf lung surfactant (LS), Exosurf, Infasurf, Survanta, and synthetic lipid mixtures dispersed in normal saline. Viscosity increased with phospholipid concentration for all surfactants, but its magnitude and shear dependence varied widely among the different preparations. Saline dispersions of Exosurf and synthetic phospholipids had low viscosities of only a few centipoise (cp) and exhibited minimal shear dependence. LS, Infasurf, Survanta, and lipid mixtures containing palmitic acid and tripalmitin had larger non-Newtonian viscosities that increased as shear rate decreased. At 35 mg of phospholipid/ml and 37 degrees C, viscosity values were 52.3 cp (Survanta), 31.1 cp (LS), and 25 cp (Infasurf) at a shear rate of 77 s(-1) and 16.9 cp (Survanta), 10.1 cp (LS), and 6.6 cp (Infasurf) at 770 s(-1). At 25 mg of phospholipid/ml and 37 degrees C, viscosity values at 77 s(-1) were 28.8 cp (Survanta), 4.7 cp (LS), and 12.5 cp (Infasurf). At fixed shear rate, viscosity was substantially decreased at 23 degrees C compared with 37 degrees C for LS and Infasurf but was increased for Survanta. Calcium (5 mM) greatly reduced the viscosity of both Survanta and Infasurf at 37 degrees C. Studies on synthetic mixtures indicated that phospholipid/apoprotein interactions were important in the rheology of lung-derived surfactants and that palmitic acid and tripalmitin contributed to the increased viscosity of Survanta. The viscous behavior of clinical exogenous surfactants potentially influences their delivery and distribution in lungs and varies significantly with composition, concentration, temperature, ionic environment, and physical formulation.

Lung surfactants for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: animal-derived or synthetic agents?

Exogenous surfactant therapy is widely used in the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Two types of surfactants are available: synthetic surfactants, and those derived from animal sources ("natural" surfactants). Both of these surfactants have been shown to be effective. In this article, we review the evidence to compare the two types of surfactants in terms of their physical properties, physiologic effects, and clinical outcomes. Natural surfactants have been shown to have advantages over synthetic surfactants in their physical properties and physiologic effects in animals, as well as in humans. A systematic review of 11 randomized clinical trials comparing natural and synthetic surfactants demonstrated that the use of natural surfactant preparations results in greater clinical benefits compared with synthetic surfactants. These benefits include a more rapid improvement in oxygenation and lung compliance after surfactant therapy, a decrease in the risk of mortality (typical relative risk 0.87; typical risk difference -0.02), and a decrease in the risk of pneumothorax (typical relative risk 0.63; typical risk difference -0.04). Although the use of natural surfactants results in a slightly increased risk of intraventricular hemorrhage (typical relative risk 1.09; typical risk difference 0.03), there is no increase in the risk of grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage. There are theoretical but unproven risks of natural surfactants, such as transmission of infectious agents, immunogenicity and impurities in composition. The use of natural surfactants is preferred in most situations. In addition, clinicians should determine the costs of different types of surfactants in their individual practice settings and use this information in decision-making.

Current surfactant use in premature infants

Exogenous surfactant therapy has been a significant advance in the management of preterm infants with RDS. It has become established as a standard part of the management of such infants. Both natural and synthetic surfactants lead to clinical improvement and decreased mortality, with natural surfactants having additional advantages over currently available synthetic surfactants. The use of prophylactic surfactant administered after initial stabilization at birth to infants at risk for RDS has benefits compared with rescue surfactant given to treat infants with established RDS. In infants who do not receive prophylaxis, earlier treatment (before 2 hours) has benefits over later treatment. The use of multiple doses of surfactant is a superior strategy to the use of a single dose, whereas the use of a higher threshold for retreatment seems to be as effective as a low threshold. Adverse effects of surfactant therapy are infrequent and usually not serious. Long-term follow-up of infants treated with surfactant in the neonatal period is reassuring. In the future we are likely to see the development of new types of surfactants. Further research is required to determine the optimal use of surfactant in conjunction with other respiratory interventions.

Animal-derived or synthetic surfactant for the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: a review

Animal-derived surfactants containing SP-B and SP-C are more effective in vitro and in animal models than their synthetic counterparts, but are not as effective as unmodified, naturally occurring surfactant. In clinical trials involving newborn babies with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) these short-term differences are reflected as improvements in gas exchange and lung function. Treatment with animal-derived surfactants results in fewer air leaks and lower neonatal mortality. The evidence is now strong enough to recommend routine use of animal-derived surfactants in very preterm infants with RDS. The newer generation of synthetic surfactants may be important in the future as they have the advantages of currently available animal products with the addition of better resistance to inactivation.

Neonatal acute respiratory failure

Acute respiratory failure is the most common problem seen in the preterm and term infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units. In preterm infants, the most common cause of acute respiratory failure is respiratory distress syndrome caused by surfactant deficiency. Acute respiratory failure in term and near term infants is usually a result of meconium aspiration syndrome, sepsis, pulmonary hypoplasia, and primary pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. The response to various methods of treatment may vary, depending on the severity of respiratory failure and the cause of the acute respiratory failure. We reviewed the evidence for efficacy and current utilization of newer treatment modalities, including exogenous surfactant administration, high frequency ventilation, inhaled nitric oxide therapy, antenatal steroids for the prevention of respiratory distress syndrome, and use of postnatal steroids for the prevention of chronic lung disease.

Natural surfactant extract versus synthetic surfactant for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome

BACKGROUND

This section is under preparation and will be included in the next issue.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effect of synthetic surfactant to natural surfactant in premature infants with established respiratory distress syndrome.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Searches were made of the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, Medline (MeSH terms: pulmonary surfactant; limits: age groups, newborn infant; publication type, clinical trial), previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, conference and symposia proceedings, expert informants, and journal hand searching in the English language.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials comparing administration of synthetic surfactants to administration of natural surfactant extracts in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome were considered for this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data regarding clinical outcomes including pneumothorax, patent ductus arteriosus, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage (all intraventricular hemorrhage and severe intraventricular hemorrhage), chronic lung disease, retinopathy of prematurity, and mortality were excerpted by the primary reviewer (R. Soll). Data analysis was conducted according to the standards of the Neonatal Cochrane Review Group.

MAIN RESULTS

The meta-analysis supports a significant reduction in the risk of pneumothorax (typical relative risk 0.68, 95% CI 0.56, 0.83; typical risk difference -0.04 95% CI -0.06, -0.02). No disadvantages to natural surfactant extract treatment are noted regarding other outcomes. A trend towards reduced mortality is noted in association with natural surfactant extract treatment.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Both natural surfactant extracts and synthetic surfactant extracts are effective in the treatment of established respiratory distress syndrome. Comparative trials demonstrate greater early improvement in the requirement for ventilatory support and fewer pneumothoraces associated with natural surfactant extract treatment. On clinical grounds, natural surfactant extracts would seem to be the more desirable choice.

Calfactant: a review of its use in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome

Calfactant (Infasurt) is a natural bovine surfactant which has been evaluated for intratracheal use in the prevention and rescue treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants. In 2 randomised, double-blind, multicentre clinical trials of prophylactic use, calfactant 100 or 105 mg phospholipid per kg bodyweight (mg/kg) reduced RDS incidence, RDS severity and mortality rates to a greater extent than colfosceril palmitate (Exosurf Neonatal) 67.5 mg/kg and was generally similar to beractant (Survanta) 100 mg/kg. Although the rate of mortality before discharge from hospital was significantly higher in infants with birthweights <600 g who received calfactant than in those who received beractant, this may not be a typical result. As rescue treatment, calfactant 100 or 105 mg/kg reduced RDS severity, but not mortality rates, significantly more than colfosceril palmitate 67.5 mg/kg or beractant 100 mg/kg in 2 randomised, double-blind, multicentre clinical trials. In addition, the duration of effect of calfactant as prophylaxis or rescue treatment appeared to be longer than that of beractant. In other randomised trials, prophylaxis was more effective than rescue treatment with calfactant, particularly in infants of < or =29 weeks gestational age. The incidence of pulmonary air leak events was lower with calfactant than with colfosceril palmitate (12 vs 22%) but was identical with calfactant and beractant (15% with either agent). The incidence of other complications associated with RDS was usually similar with all 3 agents in clinical trials in preterm infants. The incidence of intraventricular haemorrhage was significantly higher in 1 clinical trial, and that of septicaemia was significantly lower in another, with calfactant versus colfosceril palmitate, but the combined incidences of these complications was similar with the 2 agents when results from different trials were pooled. The incidence of acute adverse events (i.e. those which occurred during administration of the drug) with calfactant was similar to that with beractant and higher than that with colfosceril palmitate; the difference may been related to reduced RDS severity in calfactant versus colfosceril palmitate recipients. Acute adverse events were usually transient and not severe.

CONCLUSIONS

Calfactant is a well tolerated natural bovine surfactant which is effective in the prevention and treatment of RDS in preterm infants. Further investigation is needed to more clearly determine the efficacy and tolerability of calfactant relative to that of other surfactant preparations. When more data are available, it is likely that calfactant will be useful as an alternative to beractant (at least in infants of birthweights >600 g), and calfactant may be preferred over colfosceril palmitate in both the prophylaxis and treatment of RDS.

Comparative trial of artificial and natural surfactants in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome of prematurity: experiences in a developing country

We conducted a randomized clinical trial to compare the effects of a synthetic (Exosurf) and natural (Survanta) surfactant in infants with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Eighty-nine patients were randomly allocated to receive one of the two surfactants. Primary outcome variables were the acute and long-term effects of the surfactant preparations, i.e., ventilatory requirements at 24 h of age as judged by the oxygenation index (OI), and the combined incidence of chronic lung disease or death at 28 days. The OIs in the Exosurf and Survanta groups at 24 h were the same (10.1 and 7, respectively; P > 0.05). The magnitude and rapidity of response, however, were greater for Survanta than for Exosurf. When arterial/alveolar oxygen tension ratios (a/A) were compared, the Exosurf group had a significantly worse a/A ratio at 24 h than the Survanta group (0.21 Exosurf vs. 0.37 Survanta; P < 0.05). The long-term outcome as judged by the combined incidence of death or chronic lung disease was not different in the two groups (18.6% Exosurf vs. 15.2% Survanta; P > 0.05). When the complications of prematurity were compared, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. We conclude that both preparations are reasonable choices for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome of prematurity.

Instillation of calf lung surfactant extract (calfactant) is beneficial in pediatric acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Members of the Mid-Atlantic Pediatric Critical Care Network

OBJECTIVE

Prospective study of the efficacy of calf lung surfactant extract in pediatric respiratory failure.

DESIGN

Multi-institutional, prospective, randomized, controlled, unblinded trial.

SETTING

Eight pediatric intensive care units (ICU) of tertiary medical centers.

PATIENTS

Forty-two children with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure characterized by diffuse, bilateral pulmonary infiltrates, need for ventilatory support, and an oxygenation index of >7.

INTERVENTION

Instillation of intratracheal surfactant (80 mL/m2).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Ventilator parameters, arterial blood gases, and derived oxygenation and ventilation indices were recorded before and at intervals after surfactant administration. Complications and outcome measures, including mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, and length of pediatric ICU and hospital stay, were also examined. Patients who received surfactant demonstrated rapid improvement in oxygenation and, on average, were extubated 4.2 days (32%) sooner and spent 5 fewer days (30%) in pediatric intensive care than control patients. There was no difference in mortality or overall hospital stay. Surfactant administration was associated with no serious adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of calf lung surfactant extract, calfactant, appears to be safe and is associated with rapid improvement in oxygenation, earlier extubation, and decreased requirement for intensive care in children with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Further study is needed, however, before widespread use in pediatric respiratory failure can be recommended.

Comparison of rapid bolus instillation with simplified slow administration of surfactant in lung lavaged rats

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of modified porcine surfactant (Curosurf) given either by a simplified slow delivery technique or by the standard bolus method, on pulmonary gas exchange, lung mechanics, and surfactant distribution in rats with respiratory failure produced by lung lavage. Twelve rats with respiratory failure induced by lung lavage received 200 mg x kg(-1) body weight (b.w.) of tagged porcine surfactant, either by the standard bolus delivery technique or by a simplified 1-min intratracheal infusion method, not requiring interruption of mechanical ventilation. Cardiovascular parameters, arterial blood gases, and pulmonary mechanics were measured repeatedly. Surfactant distribution was also measured by dye-tagged microbead spheres. After surfactant administration, there were no overall major differences between groups in mean heart rate, blood pressure, arterial blood gases, dynamic lung compliance, respiratory system resistance, and pulmonary distribution of exogenous surfactant. However, after 180 min pulmonary gas exchange was better and compliance higher in the bolus than the 1-min infusion group. A transient decrease in blood pressure and heart rate was observed in the bolus group; this side effect was not seen in animals treated with the simplified 1-min infusion method. We conclude that in rats subjected to lung lavage, the infusion of porcine surfactant by a simplified 1-min procedure produced similar short-term effects compared to the same dose of surfactant given by the bolus method. We speculate that tracheal bolus dosing is highly effective and might be the preferable delivery method for porcine surfactant. Dosing by the simplified method described appears less effective, but since no significant differences were observed, and since it produced less acute adverse effects, it could be used when clinical circumstances preclude rapid delivery.

Surfactant replacement therapy. An update on applications

Surfactant replacement therapy has been shown to be an effective and often life-saving treatment for newborn infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). This article provides the clinician with an update regarding the various other applications of surfactant replacement therapy, as well as issues related to surfactant administration for the preparations approved for use in pediatric patients.

A risk-benefit assessment of natural and synthetic exogenous surfactants in the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome

Alveolar surfactant is central to pulmonary physiology. Quantitative and qualitative surfactant abnormalities appear to be the primary aetiological factors in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and exogenous replacement of surfactant is a rational treatment. Available exogenous surfactants have a natural (mammal-derived lung surfactants) or synthetic origin. Pharmacodynamic and clinical studies have demonstrated that exogenous surfactants immediately improve pulmonary distensibility and gas exchange; however, this is achieved more slowly and with more failures with synthetic surfactants. The ensuing advantageous haemodynamic effects are not so striking and they include an inconvenient increased left to right ductal shunt. Two strategies of administration have been used: prophylactic or rescue therapy to treat declared RDS. All methods of instillation require intubation. In addition to the early benefits (improved gas exchange and reduced ventilatory support) the incidence of classical complications of RDS, especially air leak events, is decreased except for the uncommon problem of pulmonary haemorrhage. The incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia is neither uniformly nor significantly reduced although the severity appears to be lessened. The overall incidence of peri-intraventricular haemorrhages is not diminished although separate trials have shown a decreased rate. The most striking beneficial effect of exogenous surfactants is the increased survival (of about 40%) of treated very low birthweight neonates. A small number of adverse effects has been described. The long term outcome of survivor neonates with RDS treated with surfactants versus control neonates with RDS not treated with surfactants is similar in terms of physical growth, at least as good in terms of respiratory status, with a similar or slightly better neurodevelopmental outcome. There is not clear benefit of exogenous surfactant therapy in extremely premature infants (< 26 weeks gestational age, birthweight < 750 g). The potential risks of contamination, inflammatory and immunogenic reaction and the inhalation of platelet activating factor remain a theoretical concern of surfactant therapy which has not been confirmed in clinical practice. The optimal timing of treatment favours prophylaxis over rescue treatment and early rescue treatment rather than delayed therapy. Meta-analyses suggest the clinical superiority of natural surfactant extracts over a synthetic one (colfosceril palmitate). The economic impact of surfactant therapy is favourable and the costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for surviving surfactant treated infants are low. In conclusion, the mid and long term benefit/risk ratio clearly favours the use of exogenous surfactants to prevent or to treat RDS in neonates who have a gestational age of > 26 weeks or a birthweight of > 750 g, especially with the prophylactic strategy using natural surfactant extracts.

A randomized comparison of surfactant dosing via a dual-lumen endotracheal tube in respiratory distress syndrome. The Spanish Surfactant Collaborative Group

AIM

To determine if 1-minute instillation of Curosurf via a dual-lumen endotracheal tube without interruption of mechanical ventilation could decrease the incidence of hypoxia (drop in oxygen saturation [SaO2] to <80%, or of transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen [PtcO2] to <50 mm Hg [6.6 kPa]) and bradycardia (heart rate below 80 beats/minute) at dosing, without affecting the efficacy of the standard bolus delivery.

DESIGN

Prospective, multicenter, randomized, nonblinded clinical trial.

SETTING

Neonatal intensive care units of the Spanish Surfactant Collaborative Group.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred ninety-eight infants (birth weight 600-2000 g) with respiratory distress syndrome needing mechanical ventilation with a fraction of inspired oxygen [FIO2] 0.40 were randomized before 24 hours to receive 200 mg/kg of Curosurf, either by bolus instillation (n = 99) or by a simplified dosing technique (n = 99), giving the full dose in 1 minute via a dual-lumen endotracheal tube without positioning, interruption of mechanical ventilation, or bagging. Two additional doses (100 mg/kg) were given within 12 and 24 hours of first dose, by the same method, if the infant still needed mechanical ventilation and had a FIO2 0.30. The effects of both procedures on the incidence of acute adverse events at dosing, gas exchange, ventilator requirements, and outcome at 28 days were compared.

RESULTS

Fewer episodes of hypoxia (18 vs 40% of doses), and a smaller decrease in heart rate and SaO2 were observed in the dual-lumen group. Efficacy of surfactant, based on improvement of oxygenation, ventilator requirements, and number of doses required, was similar in both groups. Infants in the dual-lumen group had a lower total time exposure to supplemental oxygen (195+/-199 vs 266+/-221 hours). No differences in the incidence of air leaks, intraventricular hemorrhage, patent ductus arteriosus, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, or survival were observed.

CONCLUSION

A simplified 1-minute Curosurf dosing procedure via a dual-lumen endotracheal tube without fractional doses, ventilator disconnection, changes in the infant's position, or manual bagging was found to reduce the number of dosing-related adverse transient episodes of hypoxia. Although the simplified method appeared to be as effective as bolus delivery, this should be confirmed in a larger trial.

Comparison of Infasurf (calf lung surfactant extract) to Survanta (Beractant) in the treatment and prevention of respiratory distress syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To compare the relative safety and efficacy of Infasurf (calf lung surfactant extract; ONY, Inc, Amherst, NY, IND #27169) versus Survanta (Beractant, Ross Laboratories, Columbus, OH) in reducing the acute severity of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) when given at birth and to infants with established RDS.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial.

SETTING

Thirteen neonatal intensive care units participated in the treatment arm: seven of these concurrently participated in the prevention arm.

PATIENTS

The treatment arm enrolled infants of </=2000 g birth weight with established RDS, and the prevention arm enrolled infants of </=29 weeks' gestation with birth weights <1250 g.

INTERVENTION

Infants were randomly assigned to receive Infasurf (n = 303, treatment arm; n = 180, prevention arm) or Survanta (n = 305, treatment arm; n = 194, prevention arm) in accordance with the Survanta package insert instructions.

OUTCOME MEASURES

We projected a 25% reduction between groups in the need for a third dose of surfactant for infants with established RDS, and a 25% reduction in the need for a second dose of surfactant for infants who received prophylactic surfactant. Secondary outcomes included the severity of RDS measured by inspired oxygen concentrations and mean airway pressure, air leaks, complications associated with surfactant administration, and survival to 36 weeks' postmenstrual age without the need for oxygen supplementation.

RESULTS

In the treatment arm, there was no difference between groups in the number of infants requiring more than two doses of surfactant. The interval between doses was significantly longer for Infasurf, suggesting an increased duration of treatment effect. The inspired oxygen concentration and mean airway pressure were lower in the Infasurf infants during the first 48 hours in the treatment arm. In the prevention arm, there were no differences with respect to the number of surfactant doses. The dosing intervals were longer for Infasurf infants after the second dose. No difference in inspired oxygen or mean airway pressure was noted during the first 72 hours. There were no significant differences in the incidence of air leaks, complications associated with dosing, complications of prematurity, mortality, or survival without chronic lung disease in the prevention or treatment arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Infants treated with Infasurf have a modest benefit in the acute phase of RDS. Infasurf seems to produce a longer duration of effect than Survanta.

A multicenter randomized masked comparison trial of synthetic surfactant versus calf lung surfactant extract in the prevention of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of a synthetic surfactant (Exosurf Neonatal, Burroughs Wellcome Co) and a surfactant extract of calf lung lavage (Infasurf, IND #27,169, ONY, Inc) in the prevention of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).

DESIGN AND SETTING

Ten-center randomized masked comparison trial.

PATIENTS

Premature infants (n = 871) <29 weeks gestational age by best obstetric estimate.

INTERVENTIONS

Infants were randomly assigned to a course of treatment with Exosurf Neonatal (n = 438) or Infasurf (n = 433) at birth, and if still intubated, at 12 and 24 hours of age. Crossover treatment was allowed within 72 hours of age if severe respiratory failure (defined as two consecutive a/A PO2 ratios </=.10) persisted after three doses of the randomized surfactant.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Three primary outcome measures of efficacy [the incidence of RDS; the incidence of RDS death; and the incidence of survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 28 days after birth] were compared using linear regression techniques.

RESULTS

Of 871 randomized infants, 18 infants did not receive treatment with a study surfactant, and 25 infants did not meet all eligibility criteria. The primary analysis of efficacy was performed in the 846 eligible infants and analysis of safety outcomes in the 853 infants who received study surfactant. Demographic characteristics did not differ between the two treatment groups. Compared with Exosurf, Infasurf treatment resulted in a 62% decrease in the incidence of RDS (Infasurf, 16% vs Exosurf, 42%) and a 70% decrease in RDS death (Infasurf, 1.7% vs Exosurf, 5.4%) but did not increase the incidence of survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 28 days. Treatment with Infasurf resulted in significant improvement in several secondary outcome measures. Infasurf-treated infants had lower average FIO2 (Infasurf, .33 [SEM] vs Exosurf, .42; difference .08; 95% confidence interval [CI], .06 to .11) and average mean airway pressure (Infasurf, 6.0 cm H2O vs Exosurf, 7.1 cm H2O; difference 1.1 cm H2O; 95% CI, .7 to 1.6 cm H2O) for the first 72 hours of life. Crossover surfactant treatment was significantly less frequent in the Infasurf compared with the Exosurf group (Infasurf, 1% vs Exosurf, 6%). Complications (bradycardia, clinical airway obstruction, and transcutaneous arterial desaturation) associated with second and third, but not initial, surfactant treatments were observed more frequently in the Infasurf treatment group. Infasurf-treated infants had significantly less air leak (</=7 days) (Infasurf, 8% vs Exosurf, 14%; adjusted relative risk [ARR] .55; 95% CI, .37 to .81). Severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) (grade 3 and 4) did not differ between the two groups (Infasurf, 11.8% vs Exosurf, 8.3%; ARR 1.41; 95% CI, .94 to 2.09) but total IVH occurred more frequently in Infasurf-treated infants (Infasurf, 39.0% vs Exosurf, 29.9%; ARR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.57).

CONCLUSION

Significant reductions in the incidence of RDS, the severity of early respiratory disease, the incidence of pulmonary air leaks associated with RDS, and the mortality attributable to RDS suggest that Infasurf is a more effective surfactant preparation than Exosurf Neonatal in the prophylaxis of RDS. However, Infasurf prophylaxis as used in this study was also associated with a greater risk of total but not severe IVH.