Femoral venous access is safe in burned children: an analysis of 224 catheters

Development of apheresis techniques and equipment designed for patients weighing less than 10 kg

The procedure of apheresis in pediatric patients, particularly in those with low weight (body weight<10 kg) presents an important challenge due to particularities of this group. There are no specific guidelines or enough scientific evidence to standardize the practice in this group of patients. In addition to the psychological aspect, the correct calculation of the total blood volume, the extracorporeal volume of the cell separator and an estimated decrease in hematocrit must be considered. Personalized protocols for priming of the apheresis equipment, sufficient blood flow and adequate anticoagulation are essential for patient comfort and therapeutic success. The purpose of this article is to present the results of the national study of apheresis practices in low weight group of children conducted from 2012 to 2018. Protocols and patients' data collected from various apheresis centers in Argentina were compared with the apheresis protocols around the world. Our protocols and data were similar to those in other countries; however, no detailed and specific guidelines for apheresis practices in this population of patients with unique requirements have been developed to date.

Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter–Related Infections

Background:

Although many catheter-related blood-stream infections (CRBSIs) are preventable, measures to reduce these infections are not uniformly implemented.

Objective:

To update an existing evidenced-based guideline that promotes strategies to prevent CRBSIs.

Data Sources:

The MEDLINE database, conference proceedings, and bibliographies of review articles and book chapters were searched for relevant articles.

Studies Included:

Laboratory-based studies, controlled clinical trials, prospective interventional trials, and epidemiologic investigations.

Outcome Measures:

Reduction in CRBSI, catheter colonization, or catheter-related infection.

Synthesis:

The recommended preventive strategies with the strongest supportive evidence are education and training of healthcare providers who insert and maintain catheters; maximal sterile barrier precautions during central venous catheter insertion; use of a 2% chlorhexidine preparation for skin antisepsis; no routine replacement of central venous catheters for prevention of infection; and use of antiseptic/antibiotic-impregnated short-term central venous catheters if the rate of infection is high despite adherence to other strategies (ie, education and training, maximal sterile barrier precautions, and 2% chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis).

Conclusion:

Successful implementation of these evidence-based interventions can reduce the risk for serious catheter-related infection.

Infections in Burns

Infections remain a leading cause of death in burn patients. This is as a result of loss of the environmental barrier function of the skin predisposing these patients to microbial colonization leading to invasion. Therefore, reconstitution of the environmental barrier by debriding the devitalized tissue and wound closure with application of allograft versus autograft is of optimal importance.

Prevention of catheter-related blood stream infections in children with intestinal failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) account for a major source of morbidity in children with intestinal failure. Many of these patients require long-term central venous access, placing them at significant risk for these infections. The purpose of this review is to highlight the most current strategies and interventions for minimizing CRBSIs in this population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Strategies for the prevention of CRBSIs continue to evolve, although most have not been specifically evaluated in children with intestinal failure. Some of the more recent interventions that are likely to be effective in this population include creating standardized protocols for catheter insertion and maintenance, ethanol lock therapy, and occasional use of antimicrobial catheters and dressings.

SUMMARY

Every effort must be made to prevent CRBSIs in infants and children with intestinal failure. Disease specific risk factors must be considered when determining the best approach for infection prevention. Because of their long-term access needs, checklists and protocols to maintain strict sterile technique at the time of catheter insertion are useful. Additionally, these children often have some degree of intestinal bacterial overgrowth secondary to dilation and dysmotility. Therefore, the use of antimicrobial locks, catheters and dressings likely provide benefit for some patients.

Pediatric burn injuries

Pediatric burns comprise a major mechanism of injury, affecting millions of children worldwide, with causes including scald injury, fire injury, and child abuse. Burn injuries tend to be classified based on the total body surface area involved and the depth of injury. Large burn injuries have multisystemic manifestations, including injuries to all major organ systems, requiring close supportive and therapeutic measures. Management of burn injuries requires intensive medical therapy for multi-organ dysfunction/failure, and aggressive surgical therapy to prevent sepsis and secondary complications. In addition, pain management throughout this period is vital. Specialized burn centers, which care for these patients with multidisciplinary teams, may be the best places to treat children with major thermal injuries. This review highlights the major components of burn care, stressing the pathophysiologic consequences of burn injury, circulatory and respiratory care, surgical management, and pain management of these often critically ill patients.

Femoral central venous catheters are not associated with higher rates of infection in the pediatric critical care population

BACKGROUND

Adult data show a difference in central venous catheter (CVC) infection rates between 3 major sites: subclavian (SC), internal jugular (IJ), and femoral veins. We hypothesized that in patients in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), there is no difference in rates of CVC infection among these three sites, but specifically the femoral compared to all other sites.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, data from January 1999 to January 2008 were collected prospectively for internal review and quality assurance. All PICU patients with a CVC were enrolled. The rate of CVC infection was determined using Cox regression survival analysis to account for various durations of CVC placement at the various sites, then adjusted for severity of illness, number of lumens, and patient age. Mortality was compared in patients with a CVC infection versus those without.

RESULTS

A total of 4,512 patients with a CVC were enrolled. No site was associated with an increased risk of infection compared with the other sites, with hazard ratios of 0.951 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.612-1.478) for the SC site, 0.956 (95% CI, 0.593-1.541) for the IJ site, and 1.120 (95% CI, 0.753-1.665) for the femoral site. No significant association between mortality and presence of CVC infection was found when adjusted for age, severity of illness, and duration of CVC placement. An association was found between the presence of a CVC infection and prolonged PICU length of stay (3.98 days longer; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Femoral CVCs are not associated with higher rates of infection in the PICU. In addition, the presence of CVC infection does not affect mortality, but is associated with longer PICU admission.

[Incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infection in an intensive care unit]

BACKGROUND

Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is one of the most common nosocomial infections. The incidence is higher in paediatric patients than in adults, especially in those admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICU). CLABSI-related morbidity makes it a major health problem; therefore it is necessary to develop prevention strategies against it.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An intervention study in a paediatric ICU (PICU) was performed, in order to assess the impact of the introduction of the program «Bacteraemia zero» in December 2007. This program aims to prevent CLABSI. Demographic data and variables related to hospitalisation and infection were collected from January to December 2007 (before the intervention) and from January to December 2008 (after the intervention), and were compared. In the first period, 497 patients were studied, and 495 in the second.

RESULTS

A reduction of 30.4% in the incidence of CLABSI (P=0.49) in the second year was observed (5.5 to 3.8 episodes per 1000 catheter-days). The CVC use ratio was 0.59 and 0.64, respectively. The most frequently isolated organism was coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a «no bacteraemia» program, involving all staff in the PICU as well as the professionals in infection control, reduces the incidence of CLABSI.

Decreasing PICU catheter-associated bloodstream infections: NACHRI's quality transformation efforts

OBJECTIVE

Despite the magnitude of the problem of catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CA-BSIs) in children, relatively little research has been performed to identify effective strategies to reduce these complications. In this study, we aimed to develop and evaluate effective catheter-care practices to reduce pediatric CA-BSIs.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Our study was a multi-institutional, interrupted time-series design with historical control data and was conducted in 29 PICUs across the United States. Two central venous catheter-care practice bundles comprised our intervention: the insertion bundle of pediatric-tailored care elements derived from adult efforts and the maintenance bundle derived from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations and expert pediatric clinician consensus. The bundles were deployed with quality-improvement teaching and methods to support their adoption by teams at the participating PICUs. The main outcome measures were the rate of CA-BSIs from January 2004 to September 2007 and compliance with each element of the insertion and maintenance bundles from October 2006 to September 2007.

RESULTS

Average CA-BSI rates were reduced by 43% across 29 PICUs (5.4 vs 3.1 CA-BSIs per 1000 central-line-days; P < .0001). By September 2007, insertion-bundle compliance was 84% and maintenance-bundle compliance was 82%. Hierarchical regression modeling showed that the only significant predictor of an observed decrease in infection rates was the collective use of the insertion and maintenance bundles, as demonstrated by the relative rate (RR) and confidence intervals (CIs) (RR: 0.57 [95% CI: 0.45-0.74]; P < .0001). We used comparable modeling to assess the relative importance of the insertion versus maintenance bundles; the results showed that the only significant predictor of an infection-rate decrease was maintenance-bundle compliance (RR: 0.41 [95% CI: 0.20-0.85]; P = .017).

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast with adult ICU care, maximizing insertion-bundle compliance alone cannot help PICUs to eliminate CA-BSIs. The main drivers for additional reductions in pediatric CA-BSI rates are issues that surround daily maintenance care for central lines, as defined in our maintenance bundle. Additional research is needed to define the optimal maintenance bundle that will facilitate elimination of CA-BSIs for children.

Access technique and its problems in parenteral nutrition - Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition, Chapter 9

Catheter type, access technique, and the catheter position should be selected considering to the anticipated duration of PN aiming at the lowest complication risks (infectious and non-infectious). Long-term (>7-10 days) parenteral nutrition (PN) requires central venous access whereas for PN <3 weeks percutaneously inserted catheters and for PN >3 weeks subcutaneous tunnelled catheters or port systems are appropriate. CVC (central venous catheter) should be flushed with isotonic NaCl solution before and after PN application and during CVC occlusions. Strict indications are required for central venous access placement and the catheter should be removed as soon as possible if not required any more. Blood samples should not to be taken from the CVC. If catheter infection is suspected, peripheral blood-culture samples and culture samples from each catheter lumen should be taken simultaneously. Removal of the CVC should be carried out immediately if there are pronounced signs of local infection at the insertion site and/or clinical suspicion of catheter-induced sepsis. In case PN is indicated for a short period (max. 7-10 days), a peripheral venous access can be used if no hyperosmolar solutions (>800 mosm/L) or solutions with a high titration acidity or alkalinity are used. A peripheral venous catheter (PVC) can remain in situ for as long as it is clinically required unless there are signs of inflammation at the insertion site.

Complication rates with central venous catheters inserted at femoral and non-femoral sites in very low birth weight infants

OBJECTIVE

To compare the complication rates of femoral versus nonfemoral sites of percutaneously inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) in very low birth weight infants.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2006, 518 PICCs inserted in 334 neonates with a birth body weight>or=1500 g were studied. 278 catheters were inserted at nonfemoral sites, and 240 catheters at a femoral site. All catheter-related complications were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

The infants with femoral PICCs had a significantly higher rate of catheter-related sepsis (CRS) than those with nonfemoral PICCs (22.5% vs. 12.2%, P=0.002) and the incidence rate was also significantly higher (10.9 vs. 6.8 episodes per 1000 catheter days, P=0.012). The infants with nonfemoral PICCs had significantly higher rates of phlebitis, catheter site inflammation, and need for early removal than those with femoral PICCs. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the significant contributors to CRS were duration of the PICC placement (P<0.001) and insertion of the PICC at a femoral site (P=0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

Because of a higher rate of CRS, the femoral site should not be considered for the placement of PICCs in VLBW infants, when possible.

Reduction of catheter-associated bloodstream infections in pediatric patients: experimentation and reality

OBJECTIVE

Few data exist on successes at reducing pediatric catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CA-BSI). The objective was to eradicate CA-BSI with a multifaceted pediatric-relevant intervention proven effective in adult patients.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort of pediatric intensive care (PICU) patients with historical controls.

SETTING

Multidisciplinary PICU.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

PICU patients with intervention targeting PICU providers.

INTERVENTIONS

Multifaceted intervention involving preintervention staff surveys, provider educational program, creation of central catheter procedure cart, guideline-supported central catheter insertion checklist, nursing staff empowerment to stop procedures that breached guidelines, and real-time data feedback to PICU leadership.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We measured rate of CA-BSI per 1000 catheter days from August 2001 through September 2006. Reliable use of evidence-based best practices for insertion of central catheters in our PICU was associated with a statistically and clinically significant decrease in our CA-BSI rate for 24 months postintervention (p < .05). During a portion of this postintervention period, we experienced a dramatic increase in our CA-BSI rate that was ultimately found to be due to the introduction of a new positive displacement mechanical valve intravenous port in April 2004. After removal of this positive displacement mechanical valve, our CA-BSI rate dropped from 5.2 +/- 4.5 CA-BSI per 1000 central catheter days to a rate of 3.0 +/- 1.9 CA-BSI per 1000 central catheter days. Chart review of postintervention CA-BSI cases revealed that these patients acquired CA-BSI weeks after both PICU admission and after insertion of the most recent central catheter.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that improving practices for insertion of central catheters leads to a reduction of CA-BSI among pediatric patients but not elimination of CA-BSI. More research is needed to identify best practices for maintenance of central catheters for children. In addition, our experience shows that even despite good interventions to control CA-BSI, institutions must remain vigilant to factors such as new technology with apparent advantages but short track records of use.

Infectious complications of percutaneous central venous catheterization in pediatric patients: a Spanish multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

Analysis of infectious complications and risk factors in percutaneous central venous catheters.

DESIGN

One-year observational, prospective, multicenter study (1998-1999).

SETTING

Twenty Spanish pediatric intensive care units.

PATIENTS

Eight hundred thirty-two children aged 0-14 years.

INTERVENTION

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

One thousand ninety-two catheters were analyzed. Seventy-four (6.81%) catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) were found. The CRBSI rate was 6.4 per 1,000 CVC days (95% CI 5.0-8.0). Risk factors for CRBSI were weight under 8 kg (p < 0.001), cardiac failure (RR 2.69; 95% CI 1.95-4.38; p < 0.001), cancer (RR 1.66; 95% CI 0.97-2.78; p=0.05), silicone catheters (RR 2.82; 95% CI 1.49-5.35; p = 0.006), guidewire exchange catheterization (p=0.002), obstructed catheters (RR 2.67; 95% CI 1.63-4.39; p<0.001), and more than 12 days' indwelling time (RR 5.9; 95% CI 3.63-9.41; p<0.001). Multivariate Cox regression identified lower patient weight (HR 2.4; 95% CI 1.11-5.19; p=0.002), guidewire exchange catheterization (HR 2.2; 95% CI 1.07-4.54; p=0.049) and more than 12 days' indwelling time (HR 1.97; 95% CI 0.89-4.36; p=0.089) as significant independent predictors of CRBSI. Factors which protected against infection were the use of povidone-iodine on hubs (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.19-0.96; p=0.025) and porous versus impermeable dressing (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.23-0.74; p=0.004). Two children (0.24%) died from endocarditis following catheter-related sepsis due to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in one case and P. aeruginosa in the other.

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter-related sepsis is associated with lower patient weight and more than 12 days' indwelling time, but not with the insertion site. Cleaning hubs with povidone-iodine protects from infection.

Mechanical and Infectious Complications of Central Venous Cannulation in Children: Lessons Learned From a 10-Year Experience Placing More Than 1000 Catheters

We sought to better describe the expected incidence of mechanical and infectious complications associated with central venous cannulation of critically ill children. We undertook a retrospective analysis of a prospective data collection of 1056 consecutive percutaneous central venous catheters inserted under the supervision of an experienced surgeon. There were 245 (23%) subclavian (SC), 118 (11%) internal jugular (IJ), and 693 (66%) femoral (F) catheters placed in 289 children with an average age of 6.4 +/- 5.1 years (range, 4 weeks to 18 years) admitted to a burn intensive care unit. Catheter sepsis occurred in 7.4% of SC, 7.6% of IJ, and 4.9% of F catheters (NS, P = .25), for an overall sepsis rate of 5.8%. The number of catheter lumens did not impact infection rate. Infection rates increased in catheters left in situ more than 10 days, increasing to 37.5% at 14 days. Acute mechanical complications occurred in three insertions (0.3%), including two (0.8%) SC, zero (0%) IJ, and one (0.1%) F catheters (NS, P = .20). All three were arterial cannulations that were recognized and treated successfully without surgery. There were no pneumothoraces, vascular lacerations, acute thromboses, or catheter emboli. There were six (0.6%) cases of deep venous thrombosis that occurred in cannulated sites: one (0.4%) SC, two (1.6.%) IJ, and three (0.4%) F sites (NS, P = .23). Patient age did not influence complication rates. A total of 239 (23%) of the CVCs were placed in infants less than 24 months; 273 (26%) 2 to 5 years, 259 (25%) 6 to 10 years, and 285 (27%) >10 to 18 years. Catheter sepsis occurred in 6.7%, 5.9%, 6.2%, and 4.6%, respectively (NS, P = .75). There was no difference in rates of infection or mechanical complication between younger and older children. When closely supervised by an experienced surgeon, a low rate of infection (5.8%), acute mechanical complication (0.3%), and deep venous thrombosis (0.6%) accompanies central venous cannulation of critically ill children.

Pediatric catheter-related bloodstream infections: latest strategies to decrease risk

Central venous catheters are often mandatory devices when caring for critically ill children. They are required to deliver medications, nutrition, and blood products, as well as for monitoring hemodynamic status and drawing laboratory samples. Any foreign object that is introduced to the body is at risk for infection. Central venous catheters carry a particularly high risk of infection and these infections can be life threatening. Advanced practice nurses possess the power to influence catheter-related line infections in their critical care units. Understanding current recommendations for catheter material selection, site selection, site preparation, and site care can affect rates of catheter-related bloodstream infections. This article discusses risk factors for developing catheter-related bloodstream infections in critically ill children, as well as measures to decrease incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections, including a review of recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Sepsis in pediatric burn patients

OBJECTIVE

To review the specific infections common in pediatric burns, including their categorization, diagnosis, and treatment.

DESIGN

Review of the literature and expert opinion.

RESULTS

Children with serious burns are prone to a host of septic complications. This proclivity to infection is secondary to the immunosuppressive effect of burn injury, the loss of the skin and mucosal physical barriers, and the requirement for invasive support devices.

CONCLUSION

Sepsis is common in the pediatric burn patient and can markedly increase morbidity and mortality. Anticipation, prompt diagnosis of infection, and effective therapy can result in successful outcomes for many of these children.

Central venous catheter use in the pediatric patient: mechanical and infectious complications

OBJECTIVE

Following the introduction and widespread use of central venous catheters (CVCs) in adults, these devices are being used with increasing frequency in the pediatric population. This review will focus on differences between adults and children regarding CVC use and its potential complications. Both mechanical and infectious complications will be discussed.

DATA SOURCES

Systematic review of the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

CVC-related complications in pediatric patients are closely linked to age, body size, and age-related immune status. In older children, many complications are similar to those encountered in adult patients. Because of ongoing growth and body changes, a cutoff point beyond which children can be regarded as "young adults" is difficult to define; many of our recommendations are therefore age-related. More frequently than in adults, an implanted port may be the first choice in pediatric patients when long indwelling times are expected. The optimal site of insertion also depends on factors such as the patients' age as well as the need for sedation and analgesia during the insertion procedure. In contrast to guidelines in adult patients, we recommend that a radiograph always be made following CVC insertion to check the position of the catheter. Regarding prevention of infectious complications, we recommend full sterile barrier precautions during CVC insertion and strict protocols for catheter care. CVCs should be removed as soon as possible when they are no longer needed, but there is no place for elective CVC replacement on a routine basis. New developments such as the use of impregnated catheters might help reduce infection rates; however, additional research will be required to provide more evidence of benefit in the pediatric population.

Catheter-related infections in children treated with hemodialysis

Infectious complications of the central venous catheter (CVC) are a major source of morbidity among children treated with hemodialysis (HD), with catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) being the most important clinical manifestations. As only a few studies of children on HD have been published, the management of CVC-related infections in this population is mainly based on data derived from adults or occasionally from children not affected by end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The aim of this review is to discuss current knowledge concerning the epidemiology, prevention, and treatment of catheter-related infections in children on HD. Catheters impregnated with antibiotics/antiseptics, lock antibiotic prophylaxis, nasal mupirocin, and the application of ointments at the exit-site have all been proposed as means of reducing the risk of CVC infections, but their real efficacy in the pediatric population has not yet been demonstrated. Furthermore, it is not clear how long antibiotic therapy should be continued, and there is still debate as to whether the catheter has to be removed. We propose some practical guidelines for the management of CRBSI in children with percutaneously inserted and surgically implanted HD catheters, but a number of unresolved clinical issues still remain, which will require prospective clinical trials specifically performed in pediatric patients with ESRD.

Clinical review: vascular access for fluid infusion in children

The current literature on venous access in infants and children for acute intravascular access in the routine situation and in emergency or intensive care settings is reviewed. The various techniques for facilitating venous cannulation, such as application of local warmth, transillumination techniques and epidermal nitroglycerine, are described. Preferred sites for central venous access in infants and children are the external and internal jugular veins, the subclavian and axillary veins, and the femoral vein. The femoral venous cannulation appears to be the most safe and reliable technique in children of all ages, with a high success and low complication rates. Evidence from the reviewed literature strongly supports the use of real-time ultrasound techniques for venous cannulation in infants and children. Additionally, in emergency situations the intraosseous access has almost completly replaced saphenous cutdown procedures in children and has decreased the need for immediate central venous access.

Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections

BACKGROUND

Although many catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are preventable, measures to reduce these infections are not uniformly implemented.

OBJECTIVE

To update an existing evidenced-based guideline that promotes strategies to prevent CRBSIs.

DATA SOURCES

The MEDLINE database, conference proceedings, and bibliographies of review articles and book chapters were searched for relevant articles.

STUDIES INCLUDED

Laboratory-based studies, controlled clinical trials, prospective interventional trials, and epidemiologic investigations.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Reduction in CRBSI, catheter colonization, or catheter-related infection.

SYNTHESIS

The recommended preventive strategies with the strongest supportive evidence are education and training of healthcare providers who insert and maintain catheters; maximal sterile barrier precautions during central venous catheter insertion; use of a 2% chlorhexidine preparation for skin antisepsis; no routine replacement of central venous catheters for prevention of infection; and use of antiseptic/antibiotic-impregnated short-term central venous catheters if the rate of infection is high despite adherence to other strategies (ie, education and training, maximal sterile barrier precautions, and 2% chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis).

CONCLUSION

Successful implementation of these evidence-based interventions can reduce the risk for serious catheter-related infection.

Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter–Related Infections

These guidelines have been developed for practitioners who insert catheters and for persons responsible for surveillance and control of infections in hospital, outpatient, and home health-care settings. This report was prepared by a working group comprising members from professional organizations representing the disciplines of critical care medicine, infectious diseases, health-care infection control, surgery, anesthesiology, interventional radiology, pulmonary medicine, pediatric medicine, and nursing. The working group was led by the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), in collaboration with the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA), Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), Surgical Infection Society (SIS), American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), American Thoracic Society (ATS), American Society of Critical Care Anesthesiologists (ASCCA), Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), Infusion Nurses Society (INS), Oncology Nursing Society (ONS), Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology (SCVIR), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and is intended to replace the Guideline for Prevention of Intravascular Device–Related Infections published in 1996. These guidelines are intended to provide evidence-based recommendations for preventing catheter-related infections. Major areas of emphasis include 1) educating and training health-care providers who insert and maintain catheters; 2) using maximal sterile barrier precautions during central venous catheter insertion; 3) using a 2% chlorhexidine preparation for skin antisepsis; 4) avoiding routine replacement of central venous catheters as a strategy to prevent infection; and 5) using antiseptic/antibiotic impregnated short-term central venous catheters if the rate of infection is high despite adherence to other strategies (i.e., education and training, maximal sterile barrier precautions, and 2% chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis). These guidelines also identify performance indicators that can be used locally by health-care institutions or organizations to monitor their success in implementing these evidence-based recommendations.

Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections

BACKGROUND

Although many catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSIs) are preventable, measures to reduce these infections are not uniformly implemented.

OBJECTIVE

To update an existing evidenced-based guideline that promotes strategies to prevent CR-BSIs.

DATA SOURCES

The MEDLINE database, conference proceedings, and bibliographies of review articles and book chapters were searched for relevant articles.Studies Included: Laboratory-based studies, controlled clinical trials, prospective interventional trials, and epidemiological investigations.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Reduction in CR-BSI, catheter colonization, or catheter-related infection.

SYNTHESIS

The recommended preventive strategies with the strongest supportive evidence are education and training of healthcare providers who insert and maintain catheters; maximal sterile barrier precautions during central venous catheter insertion; use of a 2% chlorhexidine preparation for skin antisepsis; no routine replacement of central venous catheters for prevention of infection; and use of antiseptic/antibiotic impregnated short-term central venous catheters if the rate of infection is high despite adherence to other strategies (i.e. education and training, maximal sterile barrier precautions and 2% chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis).

CONCLUSION

Successful implementation of these evidence-based interventions can reduce the risk for serious catheter-related infection.

Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S

These guidelines have been developed for practitioners who insert catheters and for persons responsible for surveillance and control of infections in hospital, outpatient, and home health-care settings. This report was prepared by a working group comprising members from professional organizations representing the disciplines of critical care medicine, infectious diseases, health-care infection control, surgery, anesthesiology, interventional radiology, pulmonary medicine, pediatric medicine, and nursing. The working group was led by the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), in collaboration with the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA), Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), Surgical Infection Society (SIS), American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), American Thoracic Society (ATS), American Society of Critical Care Anesthesiologists (ASCCA), Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), Infusion Nurses Society (INS), Oncology Nursing Society (ONS), Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology (SCVIR), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and is intended to replace the Guideline for Prevention of Intravascular Device-Related Infections published in 1996. These guidelines are intended to provide evidence-based recommendations for preventing catheter-related infections. Major areas of emphasis include 1) educating and training health-care providers who insert and maintain catheters; 2) using maximal sterile barrier precautions during central venous catheter insertion; 3) using a 2% chlorhexidine preparation for skin antisepsis; 4) avoiding routine replacement of central venous catheters as a strategy to prevent infection; and 5) using antiseptic/antibiotic impregnated short-term central venous catheters if the rate of infection is high despite adherence to other strategies (ie, education and training, maximal sterile barrier precautions, and 2% chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis). These guidelines also identify performance indicators that can be used locally by health-care institutions or organizations to monitor their success in implementing these evidence-based recommendations.

Burns

During the past 20 yrs, as burn care has evolved as a specialty of surgery, survival and outcome quality have soared. Public expectations for survival and long-term outcomes are at previously unprecedented levels. These changes are the result of a number of advances in aspects of burn care that have occurred in parallel and have fostered increasing regionalization of this resource-intensive activity into fewer specialized centers. These are complex hospitalizations and can be divided into four phases: initial evaluation and resuscitation, initial wound excision and biological closure, definitive wound closure, and rehabilitation and reconstruction.

Catheter infection risk related to the distance between insertion site and burned area

A prospective observational study of central venous catheters (CVC) was carried out in order to determine if a CVC inserted near an open burn wound increases catheter infection risk in burned patients. The study was carried out during a 12-month period (1998-1999) at the Benaim Foundation's Burn Unit in Buenos Aires (C.E.P.A.Q.). Eighty-three CVCs were inserted in 20 burned patients during the study period. Twenty-six catheters were inserted near an open wound (NOW) and 57 far from an open wound (FOW). NOW CVCs were considered when 25 cm2 surrounding the catheter's insertion site overlapped the wound. Colonization rates were 84% (22/26 CVCs) in those inserted NOW and 47% (27/57 CVCs) in FOW (P = 0.001). Colonization relative risk of NOW-CVCs was 1.79 (95% confidence interval, 1.3-2.46). Bacteremia rates were 27% (7/26 CVCs) in CVCs inserted NOW and 6% (3/57 CVCs) in FOW (P = 0.004). Bacteremic risk of NOW-CVCs was 5.12 (95% confidence interval, 1.44-18.22). Colonization rates were higher and sooner in NOW-CVCs than in FOW-CVCs. We suggest that insertion of catheters near an open burn wound should be avoided and, if inevitable, should not be left in place for period exceeding 3 days.

Central venous catheters in pediatric patients--subclavian venous approach as the first choice

BACKGROUND

It is critical to establish a safe and functional i.v. access in severely sick patients. We evaluated the frequency of application and complications of central venous catheters in a pediatric intensive care unit.

METHODS

Pediatric patients in whom central venous catheters were inserted between March 1997 and May 1999 in the Pediatric Emergency Room and Intensive Care Unit were enrolled in this study. Patients were evaluated with respect to age, sex, weight, central venous catheter indication, site, duration of catheter stay and complications.

RESULTS

During the study period a total of 156 central venous catheters were successfully inserted into 146 patients. Of the 156 central venous catheter attempts, 148 (94.9%) were placed into the subclavian vein, six were inserted into the femoral vein, and two into the jugular vein. In 156 attempts, arterial injuries occurred in 20 cases (12.8%). Pneumothorax developed in two patients on mechanical ventilation. Three catheters had to be removed due to catheter related infections. The mortality rate was 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that subclavian central venous catheterization is a safe procedure with minimal complications in pediatric patients. Arterial injury was the most frequent complication. In experienced hands, the success rate was 100%. Subclavian central venous catheter insertion may be considered as the first approach in critically ill patients.

Management of the high-risk pediatric burn patient

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Inhalation injury, flame burn exceeding 30%, and age under 48 months all have been cited as independent risk factors for mortality; the combination of all 3 risk factors is unusual. The authors have experienced an overall reduction in mortality rate and chose to examine this high-risk group to define techniques useful in improving outcome in pediatric burns.

METHODS

A review was done of children with all 3 risk factors over a recent 9-year interval. All were treated with a system of care emphasizing precise fluid repletion, early wound excision and closure, and avoidance of injurious pulmonary inflating pressures and concentrations of oxygen. Data are expressed as mean +/- SD.

RESULTS

There were 26 children admitted with all 3 risk factors. Their average age was 2.1 +/- 1.1 years (range, 5 weeks to 3.7 years), and burn size was 61% +/- 21% (range, 30% to 98%) of the body surface. All required mechanical ventilation for an average of 28 +/- 4.5 days (range, 7 to 74 days). Two children underwent tracheostomy; all others were treated with protracted oral intubation. Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) was used in 3 children, all of whom were considered for extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO) support, although none went on to ECMO. Only 7 children (27%) never had any bacteremia. Ventilator-related pneumonia occurred in 8 children (31%). Total lengths of stay, including acute and rehabilitation hospitalizations, averaged 105 +/- 10 days (1.87 +/- 0.2; range, 0.66 to 4.8 days per percent burn). After exclusion of 1 child with a 98% third-and fourth-degree burn, pre-hospital cardiac arrest, and anoxic brain injury who had support withdrawn at 6 hours, all children survived to discharge; 23 followed up in our clinic currently are alive and well with no overt residual respiratory insufficiency.

CONCLUSION

A high rate of survival can be expected in young children with large burns and inhalation injury.

Transcutaneously tunneled central venous lines in cancer patients: an analysis of device-related morbidity factors based on prospective data collection

BACKGROUND

Long-term transcutaneous tunneled central venous catheters are frequently placed in cancer patients, accounting for significant costs and morbidity. Factors influencing outcome, though, are poorly studied.

METHODS

Between June 1991 and June 1993, 923 central venous tunneled catheters were placed in 791 patients at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Placement-, device-, and patient-related parameters were charted prospectively (median follow-up: 120 days) and correlated to device-specific outcome events.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 28.5 years (range: 0.025 - 84.5). Disease distribution included hematologic malignancies (64.7%), solid tumors (30.4%), and others (4.9%). Primary indications for line access included chemotherapy (72.8%), bone marrow transplantation (18.7%), total parenteral nutrition (6.4%), and drug administration (2.1%). There were 11 insertion complications (1.2%), including insertion failure (n = 6), hemorrhage (n = 4), and malposition (n = 1). Subsequent to placement, a proven or suspected device-specific complication occurred in 540 lines (58.5%). Per 10,000 catheter days, there were 17.6 infection episodes, 8.1 thrombotic complications, 6.9 instances of catheter breakage, 3.5 accidental or inadvertent cases of displacement, and 0.6 device leaks. Reasons for line removal or other termination of follow-up were patient's death (32.1%), treatment end (28%), infection (19.6%), suspected infection (6.3%), displacement (6.8%), thrombosis (3.1%), leak (1%), and others (3.1%). Median device-specific duration was 365 days, compared with a median complication-free device-specific duration of 167 days (P < 0.0001), reflecting a highly significant device salvage rate after complications. Catheter tip position emerged as the dominant independent prognostic factor for reduced device-specific duration or complication-free device-specific duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Transcutaneous tunneled central venous lines can be placed safely, with a considerable incidence of subsequent device-specific complications, but a high salvage rate. Factors determining outcome are related to device placement, as well as the patient's disease status. In this study, patients alive 90 days after catheter placement had a 37% chance for a device complication, with a 20% chance for device loss. Future analyses of intermediate-term intravenous access should employ the measurement of device-specific outcome as a reference parameter to assess clinical results.

Infradiaphragmatic central venous pressures reflect supradiaphragmatic pressures in stable burn patients

OBJECTIVE

Because the skin of the groin is often spared, femoral central venous catheters are sometimes used in patients with extensive burns. The accuracy of central venous pressures obtained from the infradiaphragmatic location relative to the traditional supradiaphragmatic value is not known in this population.

METHODS

Seventeen seriously injured but hemodynamically stable burn patients were enrolled in a protocol approved by the human studies committee in which, during scheduled central venous line rotations, supradiaphragmatic and infradiaphragmatic central venous pressures were determined simultaneously.

RESULTS

These 17 patients were an average of 21.8+/-20.1 years old (range, 6 months to 61 years), and the average burn size was 60.8+/-22.6% (range, 20 to 90%). Supradiaphragmatic and infradiaphragmatic pressures correlated well, with an r value of 0.903, p less than 0.01.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of clinically significant abdominal distention, infradiaphragmatic central venous pressure is an accurate reflection of supradiaphragmatic pressure, and indirectly, circulating blood volume.