Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of milrinone lactate in pediatric patients with septic shock

The relationship between simulated milrinone exposure and hypotension in children

INTRODUCTION

Hypotension is an adverse event that may be related to systemic exposure of milrinone; however, the true exposure-safety relationship is unknown.

METHODS

Using the Pediatric Trials Network multicentre repository, we identified children ≤17 years treated with milrinone. Hypotension was defined according to age, using the Pediatric Advanced Life Support guidelines. Clinically significant hypotension was defined as hypotension with concomitant lactate >3 mg/dl. A prior population pharmacokinetic model was used to simulate milrinone exposures to evaluate exposure-safety relationships.

RESULTS

We included 399 children with a median (quarter 1, quarter 3) age of 1 year (0,5) who received 428 intravenous doses of milrinone (median infusion rate 0.31 mcg/kg/min [0.29,0.5]). Median maximum plasma milrinone concentration was 110.7 ng/ml (48.4,206.2). Median lowest systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 74 mmHg (60,85) and 35 mmHg (25,42), respectively. At least 1 episode of hypotension occurred in 178 (45%) subjects; clinically significant hypotension occurred in 10 (2%). The maximum simulated milrinone plasma concentrations were higher in subjects with clinically significant hypotension (251 ng/ml [129,329]) versus with hypotension alone (86 ng/ml [44, 173]) versus without hypotension (122 ng/ml [57, 208], p = 0.002); however, this relationship was not retained on multivariable analysis (odds ratio 1.01; 95% confidence interval 0.998, 1.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully leveraged a population pharmacokinetic model and electronic health record data to evaluate the relationship between simulated plasma concentration of milrinone and systemic hypotension occurrence, respectively, supporting the broader applicability of our novel, efficient, and cost-effective study design for examining drug exposure-response and -safety relationships.

Early administration of milrinone ameliorates lung and kidney injury during sepsis in juvenile rats

BACKGROUND

A sepsis model was created, induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP), in juvenile rat groups. Milrinone (MIL), which is known to have a modulatory effect on pro-inflammatory cytokines, was administered to the designated rat groups in the early period before severe sepsis developed. The study was aimed at investigating the possible protective effects of milrinone on the lung and kidney tissues of rats in the late phase of sepsis.

METHODS

The rat pups were divided into seven groups with six animals in each group: (1) healthy rats who received no drug; (2) CLP-S12 (sacrificed at hour 12); (3) CLP-S24 (sacrificed at hour 24); (4) CLP-MIL1-S12 (administered with 0.5 mg/kg milrinone at hour 1 and sacrificed at hour 12); (5) CLP-MIL1-S24 (administered with 0.5 mg/kg milrinone at hour 1 and sacrificed at hour 24): (6) CLP-MIL12-S24 (administered with 0.5 mg/kg milrinone at hour 12 and sacrificed at hour 24), (7) and CLP-MIL1,12-S24 (administered with 0.5 mg/kg milrinone at hours 1 and 12 and sacrificed at hour 24).

RESULTS

Significant differences were found between the early and late administration of milrinone in terms of both molecular and histopathological results. The results showed that the tissues were significantly preserved in the groups in which milrinone had been started in the early period compared to the sepsis control groups and the groups in which milrinone had been started in the late period.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to the positive inotropic effects of milrinone, its immunomodulatory properties that result in decreased cytokine storm can be beneficial during early period of sepsis.

A Review of Inotropes and Inopressors for Effective Utilization in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

ABSTRACT

Inotropes and inopressors are often first-line treatment in patients with cardiogenic shock. We summarize the pharmacology, indications, and contraindications of dobutamine, milrinone, dopamine, norepinephrine, epinephrine, and levosimendan. We also review the data on the use of these medications for acute decompensated heart failure and cardiogenic shock in this article.

Hemodynamic response to milrinone for refractory hypoxemia during therapeutic hypothermia for neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy

OBJECTIVE

Characterize the impact of milrinone on arterial pressure of neonates with persistent hypoxemic respiratory failure (HRF) and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) treated with inhaled nitric oxide and therapeutic hypothermia (TH).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study. Arterial pressure was assessed hourly for 24 h. The primary outcome was change in diastolic arterial pressure (DAP).

RESULTS

56 patients were included [(i) cases: HIE/TH who received milrinone (n = 9), (ii) Milrinone controls (n = 17), (iii) HIE controls (n = 30)]. Baseline demographics, severity of HRF and arterial pressure were comparable between groups. Only milrinone treated patients with HIE/TH had a marked drop in DAP in the first hour, which persisted for more than 12 h despite escalation in inotropes (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Milrinone treated patients with HRF and HIE/TH develop profound reduction in DAP and require escalation of cardiovascular support. The risk benefit profile of milrinone should be considered and pharmacological studies are warranted to evaluate drug metabolism and clearance in this population.

Albumin Nanoparticle Formulation for Heart-Targeted Drug Delivery: In Vivo Assessment of Congestive Heart Failure

Congestive heart failure is a fatal cardiovascular disease resulting in tissue necrosis and loss of cardiac contractile function. Inotropic drugs such as milrinone are commonly used to improve the myocardial contractility and heart function. However, milrinone is associated with severe side effects and lower circulation time. In this article, a novel protein nanoparticle formulation for heart-targeted delivery of milrinone has been designed and tested. The formulation was prepared using albumin protein conjugated with the targeting ligand, angiotensin II peptide to form nanoparticles following the ethanol desolvation method. The formulation was characterized for size, charge, and morphology and tested in a rat model of congestive heart failure to study pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and efficacy. The overall cardiac output parameters were evaluated comparing the formulation with the control non-targeted drug, milrinone lactate. This formulation exhibited improved pharmacokinetics with a mean retention time of 123.7 min, half-life of 101.3 min, and clearance rate of 0.24 L/(kg*h). The targeted formulation also significantly improved ejection fraction and fractional shortening parameters thus improving cardiac function. This study demonstrates a new approach in delivering inotropic drugs such as milrinone for superior treatment of congestive heart failure.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Milrinone in Infants, Children, and Adolescents

Milrinone is a type 3 phosphodiesterase inhibitor used to improve cardiac output in critically ill infants and children. Milrinone is primarily excreted unchanged in the urine, raising concerns for toxic accumulation in the setting of renal dysfunction of critical illness. We developed a population pharmacokinetic model of milrinone using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling in NONMEM to perform dose-exposure simulations in children with variable renal function. We included children aged <21 years who received intravenous milrinone per clinical care. Plasma milrinone concentrations were measured using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay (range 1-5000 ng/mL). We performed dose-exposure simulations targeting steady-state therapeutic concentrations of 100-300 ng/mL previously established in adults and children with cardiac dysfunction. We simulated concentrations over 48 hours in typical subjects with decreasing creatinine clearance (CrCl), estimated using the updated bedside Schwartz equation. Seventy-four patients contributed 111 plasma samples (concentration range, 4-634 ng/mL). The median (range) postmenstrual age (PMA) was 3.7 years (0-18), and median weight (WT) was 13.1 kg (2.6-157.7). The median serum creatinine and CrCl were 0.5 mg/dL (0.1-3.1) and 117.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 (13.1-261.3), respectively. A 1-compartment model characterized the pharmacokinetic data well. The final model parameterization was: Clearance (L/h) = 15.9*(WT [kg] / 70)0.75 * (PMA1.12 / (67.71.12 +PMA1.12 )*(CrCl / 117)0.522 ; and Volume of Distribution (L) = 32.2*(WT [kg] / 70). A loading dose of 50 µg/kg followed by a continuous infusion of 0.5 µg/kg/min resulted in therapeutic concentrations, except when CrCl was severely impaired at ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2 . In this setting, a 25 µg/kg loading dose and 0.25 µg/kg/min continuous infusion resulted in therapeutic exposures.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing of Milrinone After Patent Ductus Arteriosus Ligation in Preterm Infants

OBJECTIVES

The postoperative course of patent ductus arteriosus ligation is often complicated by postligation cardiac syndrome, occurring in 10-45% of operated infants. Milrinone might prevent profound hemodynamic instability and improve the recovery of cardiac function in this setting. The present study aimed to describe the population pharmacokinetics of milrinone in premature neonates at risk of postligation cardiac syndrome and give dosing recommendations.

DESIGN

A prospective single group open-label pharmacokinetics study.

SETTINGS

Two tertiary care neonatal ICUs: Tallinn Children's Hospital and Tartu University Hospital, Estonia.

PATIENTS

Ten neonates with postmenstrual age of 24.6-30.1 weeks and postnatal age of 5-27 days undergoing patent ductus arteriosus ligation and at risk of postligation cardiac syndrome, based on echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular output of less than 200 mL/kg/min 1 hour after the surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Milrinone at a dose of 0.73 μg/kg/min for 3 hours followed by 0.16 μg/kg/min for 21 hours. Four blood samples from each patient for milrinone plasma concentration measurements were collected.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Concentration-time data of milrinone were analyzed with nonlinear mixed-effects modeling software (NONMEM Version 7.3 [ICON Development Solutions, Ellicott City, MD]). Probability of target attainment simulations gave a dosing schedule that maximally attains concentration targets of 150-250 μg/L. Milrinone pharmacokinetics was described by a one-compartmental linear model with allometric scaling to bodyweight and an age maturation function of glomerular filtration rate. Parameter estimates for a patient with the median weight were 0.350 (L/hr) for clearance and 0.329 (L) for volume of distribution. The best probability of target attainment was achieved with a loading dose of 0.50 μg/kg/min for 3 hours followed by 0.15 μg/kg/min (postmenstrual age < 27 wk) or 0.20 μg/kg/min (postmenstrual age ≥ 27 wk).

CONCLUSIONS

Population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulations suggest a slow loading dose followed by maintenance infusion to reach therapeutic milrinone plasma concentrations within the timeframe of the postligation cardiac syndrome.

Inotropic Therapy for Sepsis

Sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock represent a dynamic clinical syndrome involving a systemic inflammatory response, circulatory changes, and end-organ dysfunction from an infection. Early aggressive management to restore perfusion and/or improve hypotension is critical to improving outcomes. Although the basic management principles of early goal-directed therapy for sepsis have not undergone significant changes, there has been a recent shift in recommendations related to the timing and type of inotropic support. The purpose of this article is to review fluid management along with previous and current inotrope recommendations in pediatric sepsis and septic shock.

Milrinone therapeutic drug monitoring in a pediatric population: Development and validation of a quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method

BACKGROUND

Milrinone is a potent selective phosphodiesterase type III inhibitor which stimulates myocardial function and improves myocardial relaxation. Although therapeutic monitoring is crucial to maintain therapeutic outcome, little data is available. A proof-of-principle study has been initiated in our institution to evaluate the clinical impact of optimizing milrinone dosing through therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in children following cardiac surgery. We developed a robust LC-MS/MS method to quantify milrinone in serum from pediatric patients in real-time.

METHODS

A liquid-liquid extraction procedure was used to prepare samples for analysis prior to measurement by LC-MS/MS. Performance characteristics, such as linearity, limit of quantitation (LOQ) and precision, were assessed. Patient samples were acquired post-surgery and analyzed to determine the concentration-time profile of the drug as well as to track turn-around-times.

RESULTS

Within day precision was <8.3% across 3 levels of QC. Between-day precision was <12%. The method was linear from 50 to 800μg/l; the lower limit of quantification was 22μg/l. Comparison with another LC-MS/MS method showed good agreement. Using this simplified method, turnaround times within 3-6h were achievable, and patient drug profiles demonstrated that some milrinone levels were either sub-therapeutic or in the toxic range, highlighting the importance for milrinone TDM.

CONCLUSIONS

This simplified and quick method proved to be analytically robust and able to provide therapeutic monitoring of milrinone in real-time in patients post-cardiac surgery.

Milrinone Dosing Issues in Critically Ill Children With Kidney Injury: A Review

Milrinone is an inotropic drug used in a variety of clinical settings in adults and children. The efficacy of milrinone in pediatric low-cardiac output syndrome after cardiac surgery is reported. Its primary route of removal from the body is through the kidney as unchanged drug in the urine. Milrinone is not known to be efficiently removed by extracorporeal dialytic therapies and thus has the potential to cause serious adverse effects and potentially worsens renal function in patients experiencing acute kidney injury (AKI). AKI is an important public health issue that is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and cost. It is a known risk factor for the development of chronic kidney disease. There are no specific therapies to mitigate AKI once it has developed, and interventions are focused on supportive care and dose adjustment of medications. Estimating glomerular filtration rate based on height and serum creatinine is the most commonly used clinical method for assessing kidney function and modification of medication doses. The purpose of this review is to discuss our current understanding of milrinone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in children with AKI and to describe the potential use of urinary biomarkers to guide therapeutic decision making for milrinone dosing.

Retrospective Evaluation of Milrinone Pharmacokinetics in Children With Kidney Injury

OBJECTIVES

Milrinone is an inotropic agent with vasodilating properties used in the treatment of ventricular dysfunction. Milrinone is predominantly eliminated by the kidneys and accumulates in the setting of acute kidney injury (AKI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate milrinone pharmacokinetics in children with AKI with or without continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

METHODS

Retrospective collection of milrinone therapeutic drug monitoring data in patients with AKI, including those requiring CRRT, through chart review from January 2008 to March 2014. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data were analyzed by Bayesian estimation using a pediatric population PK model (MW/Pharm). Clearance estimates were allometrically scaled to body weight.

RESULTS

Data on 11 patients were available for analysis. Three patients required CRRT. Milrinone concentrations during continuous infusion varied 30-fold and ranged from 44 to 1343 ng/mL. Of the 33 samples obtained in 11 patients, 24 were outside the target range (72.7%), with 16 (48.5%) above and 8 (24.2%) below. Patients with AKI had significantly lower milrinone clearance (4.72 ± 2.26 L/h per 70 kg) compared with published data in patients without AKI. There was large between-patient variability in milrinone clearance (range: 2.91-13.6 L/h per 70 kg). Clearance in patients on CRRT ranged from 2.8 to 7.19 L/h per 70 kg. A significant correlation between milrinone clearance and estimated creatinine clearance was observed (r = 0.70, P = 0.0097). Allometrically scaled milrinone clearance was lower in the youngest patients (younger than 2 years), suggestive of ongoing renal maturation and existing AKI.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric patients with AKI have significantly lower milrinone clearance compared with published data in patients without AKI. Large variability was noted in milrinone concentrations, and they were frequently outside the target range. The large between-patient variability in milrinone concentrations suggests that dosing regimens should be individualized in this population of critically ill patients. Evaluation of PK model-based milrinone dose optimization and the use of biomarkers as predictors of changes in clearance warrant further study.

Pharmacologic strategies in neonatal pulmonary hypertension other than nitric oxide

Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is approved for use in persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) but does not lead to sustained improvement in oxygenation in one-third of patients with PPHN. Inhaled NO is less effective in the management of PPHN secondary to congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), extreme prematurity, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Intravenous pulmonary vasodilators such as prostacyclin, alprostadil, sildenafil, and milrinone have been successfully used in PPHN resistant to iNO. Oral pulmonary vasodilators such as endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors such as sildenafil and tadalafil are used both during acute and chronic phases of PPHN. In the absence of infection, glucocorticoids may also be effective in PPHN. Many of these pharmacologic agents are not approved for use in PPHN and our knowledge is based on case reports and small trials. Large multicenter randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are required to evaluate alternate pharmacologic strategies in PPHN.

Milrinone in Enterovirus 71 Brain Stem Encephalitis

Enterovirus 71 (EV71) was implicated in a widespread outbreak of hand-foot-and-mouth disease (HFMD) across the Asia Pacific area since 1997 and has also been reported sporadically in patients with brain stem encephalitis. Neurogenic shock with pulmonary edema (PE) is a fatal complication of EV71 infection. Among inotropic agents, milrinone is selected as a therapeutic agent for EV71- induced PE due to its immunopathogenesis. Milrinone is a type III phosphodiesterase inhibitor that has both inotropic and vasodilator effects. Its clinical efficacy has been shown by modulating inflammation, reducing sympathetic over-activity, and improving survival in patients with EV71-associated PE. Milrinone exhibits immunoregulatory and anti-inflammatory effects in the management of systemic inflammatory responses in severe EV71 infection.

Safety and efficacy of the off-label use of milrinone in pediatric patients with heart diseases

Background and Objectives

Milrinone is often used in children to treat acute heart failure and prevent low cardiac output syndrome after cardiac surgery. Due to the lack of studies on the long-term milrinone use in children, the objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the current patterns of milrinone use for ≥3 days in infants and children with heart diseases.

Subjects and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients aged <13 years who received milrinone for ≥3 days from January 2005 to December 2012. Patients' characteristics including age, sex, height, weight, and body surface area were recorded. The following parameters were analyzed to identify the clinical application of milrinone: initial infusion rate, maintenance continuous infusion rate, total duration of milrinone therapy, and concomitantly infused inotropes. The safety of milrinone was determined based on the occurrence of adverse events such as hypotension, arrhythmia, chest pain, headache, hypokalemia, and thrombocytopenia.

Results

We assessed 730 admissions (684 patients) during this period. Ventricular septal defects were the most common diagnosis (42.4%) in these patients. Milrinone was primarily used after cardiac surgery in 715 admissions (97.9%). The duration of milrinone treatment varied from 3 to 64.4 days (≥7 days in 149 admissions). Ejection fraction and fractional shortening of the left ventricle improved in patients receiving milrinone after cardiac surgery. Dose reduction of milrinone due to hypotension occurred in only 4 admissions (0.5%). Although diverse arrhythmias occurred in 75 admissions (10.3%), modification of milrinone infusion to manage arrhythmia occurred in only 3 admissions (0.4%). Multivariate analysis indicated that the development of arrhythmia was not influenced by the pattern of milrinone use.

Conclusion

Milrinone was generally administered for ≥3 days in children with heart diseases. The use of milrinone for ≥3 days was effective in preventing low cardiac output after cardiac surgery when combined with other inotropes, suggesting that milrinone could be safely employed in pediatric patients with heart diseases.

Advances in pediatric pharmacology, therapeutics, and toxicology

In the United States, passage of the FDASIA legislation made BPCA and PREA permanent, no longer requiring reauthorization every 5 years. This landmark legislation also stressed the importance of performing clinical trials in neonates when appropriate. In Europe the Pediatric Regulation, which went into effect in early 2007, also provides a framework for expanding pediatric clinical research. Although much work remains, as a result of greater regulatory guidance more pediatric data are reaching product labels.

Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012

OBJECTIVE

To provide an update to the "Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock," last published in 2008.

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 68 international experts representing 30 international organizations was convened. Nominal groups were assembled at key international meetings (for those committee members attending the conference). A formal conflict of interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independent of any industry funding. A stand-alone meeting was held for all subgroup heads, co- and vice-chairs, and selected individuals. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee served as an integral part of the development.

METHODS

The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence from high (A) to very low (D) and to determine the strength of recommendations as strong (1) or weak (2). The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized. Some recommendations were ungraded (UG). Recommendations were classified into three groups: 1) those directly targeting severe sepsis; 2) those targeting general care of the critically ill patient and considered high priority in severe sepsis; and 3) pediatric considerations.

RESULTS

Key recommendations and suggestions, listed by category, include: early quantitative resuscitation of the septic patient during the first 6 hrs after recognition (1C); blood cultures before antibiotic therapy (1C); imaging studies performed promptly to confirm a potential source of infection (UG); administration of broad-spectrum antimicrobials therapy within 1 hr of recognition of septic shock (1B) and severe sepsis without septic shock (1C) as the goal of therapy; reassessment of antimicrobial therapy daily for de-escalation, when appropriate (1B); infection source control with attention to the balance of risks and benefits of the chosen method within 12 hrs of diagnosis (1C); initial fluid resuscitation with crystalloid (1B) and consideration of the addition of albumin in patients who continue to require substantial amounts of crystalloid to maintain adequate mean arterial pressure (2C) and the avoidance of hetastarch formulations (1C); initial fluid challenge in patients with sepsis-induced tissue hypoperfusion and suspicion of hypovolemia to achieve a minimum of 30 mL/kg of crystalloids (more rapid administration and greater amounts of fluid may be needed in some patients) (1C); fluid challenge technique continued as long as hemodynamic improvement, as based on either dynamic or static variables (UG); norepinephrine as the first-choice vasopressor to maintain mean arterial pressure ≥ 65 mm Hg (1B); epinephrine when an additional agent is needed to maintain adequate blood pressure (2B); vasopressin (0.03 U/min) can be added to norepinephrine to either raise mean arterial pressure to target or to decrease norepinephrine dose but should not be used as the initial vasopressor (UG); dopamine is not recommended except in highly selected circumstances (2C); dobutamine infusion administered or added to vasopressor in the presence of a) myocardial dysfunction as suggested by elevated cardiac filling pressures and low cardiac output, or b) ongoing signs of hypoperfusion despite achieving adequate intravascular volume and adequate mean arterial pressure (1C); avoiding use of intravenous hydrocortisone in adult septic shock patients if adequate fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy are able to restore hemodynamic stability (2C); hemoglobin target of 7-9 g/dL in the absence of tissue hypoperfusion, ischemic coronary artery disease, or acute hemorrhage (1B); low tidal volume (1A) and limitation of inspiratory plateau pressure (1B) for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); application of at least a minimal amount of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in ARDS (1B); higher rather than lower level of PEEP for patients with sepsis-induced moderate or severe ARDS (2C); recruitment maneuvers in sepsis patients with severe refractory hypoxemia due to ARDS (2C); prone positioning in sepsis-induced ARDS patients with a PaO2/FIO2 ratio of ≤ 100 mm Hg in facilities that have experience with such practices (2C); head-of-bed elevation in mechanically ventilated patients unless contraindicated (1B); a conservative fluid strategy for patients with established ARDS who do not have evidence of tissue hypoperfusion (1C); protocols for weaning and sedation (1A); minimizing use of either intermittent bolus sedation or continuous infusion sedation targeting specific titration endpoints (1B); avoidance of neuromuscular blockers if possible in the septic patient without ARDS (1C); a short course of neuromuscular blocker (no longer than 48 hrs) for patients with early ARDS and a Pao2/Fio2 < 150 mm Hg (2C); a protocolized approach to blood glucose management commencing insulin dosing when two consecutive blood glucose levels are > 180 mg/dL, targeting an upper blood glucose ≤ 180 mg/dL (1A); equivalency of continuous veno-venous hemofiltration or intermittent hemodialysis (2B); prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis (1B); use of stress ulcer prophylaxis to prevent upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with bleeding risk factors (1B); oral or enteral (if necessary) feedings, as tolerated, rather than either complete fasting or provision of only intravenous glucose within the first 48 hrs after a diagnosis of severe sepsis/septic shock (2C); and addressing goals of care, including treatment plans and end-of-life planning (as appropriate) (1B), as early as feasible, but within 72 hrs of intensive care unit admission (2C). Recommendations specific to pediatric severe sepsis include: therapy with face mask oxygen, high flow nasal cannula oxygen, or nasopharyngeal continuous PEEP in the presence of respiratory distress and hypoxemia (2C), use of physical examination therapeutic endpoints such as capillary refill (2C); for septic shock associated with hypovolemia, the use of crystalloids or albumin to deliver a bolus of 20 mL/kg of crystalloids (or albumin equivalent) over 5 to 10 mins (2C); more common use of inotropes and vasodilators for low cardiac output septic shock associated with elevated systemic vascular resistance (2C); and use of hydrocortisone only in children with suspected or proven "absolute"' adrenal insufficiency (2C).

CONCLUSIONS

Strong agreement existed among a large cohort of international experts regarding many level 1 recommendations for the best care of patients with severe sepsis. Although a significant number of aspects of care have relatively weak support, evidence-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the foundation of improved outcomes for this important group of critically ill patients.

Incidence of milrinone blood levels outside the therapeutic range and their relevance in children after cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether variability in milrinone blood levels (MBL) occurs during administration to critically ill children after surgical repair of congenital heart disease, and the clinical relevance of this variability.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study conducted in the pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary care teaching and referral hospital. MBL were measured at three time periods after starting milrinone infusion (9-12, 18-24, 40-48 h) and at the end of the infusion. MBL were categorized as within (100-300 ng/ml) or outside the therapeutic range. Low cardiac output syndrome was defined by elevation of either lactate (>2 mmol/l) or arteriovenous oxygen difference (>30%). Five other clinical outcomes were evaluated. Regression analyses evaluated the relationships between MBL and outcomes.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were included with a total of 220 MBL. Quantification of MBL was by high-performance liquid chromatography. Overall, 114 (52%) MBL were outside the therapeutic range: 78 (36%) subtherapeutic, and 36 (16%) supratherapeutic. Repeated-measures analysis found a significant association between supratherapeutic MBL and low cardiac output syndrome (p = 0.02), and supratherapeutic MBL were associated with arterial-central venous oxygen saturation difference >30% at time 3 (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, nontherapeutic MBL were common. Further investigation of milrinone dosing recommendations may improve the postoperative outcomes of children.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012

OBJECTIVE

To provide an update to the "Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock," last published in 2008.

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 68 international experts representing 30 international organizations was convened. Nominal groups were assembled at key international meetings (for those committee members attending the conference). A formal conflict of interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independent of any industry funding. A stand-alone meeting was held for all subgroup heads, co- and vice-chairs, and selected individuals. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee served as an integral part of the development.

METHODS

The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence from high (A) to very low (D) and to determine the strength of recommendations as strong (1) or weak (2). The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized. Recommendations were classified into three groups: (1) those directly targeting severe sepsis; (2) those targeting general care of the critically ill patient and considered high priority in severe sepsis; and (3) pediatric considerations.

RESULTS

Key recommendations and suggestions, listed by category, include: early quantitative resuscitation of the septic patient during the first 6 h after recognition (1C); blood cultures before antibiotic therapy (1C); imaging studies performed promptly to confirm a potential source of infection (UG); administration of broad-spectrum antimicrobials therapy within 1 h of the recognition of septic shock (1B) and severe sepsis without septic shock (1C) as the goal of therapy; reassessment of antimicrobial therapy daily for de-escalation, when appropriate (1B); infection source control with attention to the balance of risks and benefits of the chosen method within 12 h of diagnosis (1C); initial fluid resuscitation with crystalloid (1B) and consideration of the addition of albumin in patients who continue to require substantial amounts of crystalloid to maintain adequate mean arterial pressure (2C) and the avoidance of hetastarch formulations (1B); initial fluid challenge in patients with sepsis-induced tissue hypoperfusion and suspicion of hypovolemia to achieve a minimum of 30 mL/kg of crystalloids (more rapid administration and greater amounts of fluid may be needed in some patients (1C); fluid challenge technique continued as long as hemodynamic improvement is based on either dynamic or static variables (UG); norepinephrine as the first-choice vasopressor to maintain mean arterial pressure ≥65 mmHg (1B); epinephrine when an additional agent is needed to maintain adequate blood pressure (2B); vasopressin (0.03 U/min) can be added to norepinephrine to either raise mean arterial pressure to target or to decrease norepinephrine dose but should not be used as the initial vasopressor (UG); dopamine is not recommended except in highly selected circumstances (2C); dobutamine infusion administered or added to vasopressor in the presence of (a) myocardial dysfunction as suggested by elevated cardiac filling pressures and low cardiac output, or (b) ongoing signs of hypoperfusion despite achieving adequate intravascular volume and adequate mean arterial pressure (1C); avoiding use of intravenous hydrocortisone in adult septic shock patients if adequate fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy are able to restore hemodynamic stability (2C); hemoglobin target of 7-9 g/dL in the absence of tissue hypoperfusion, ischemic coronary artery disease, or acute hemorrhage (1B); low tidal volume (1A) and limitation of inspiratory plateau pressure (1B) for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); application of at least a minimal amount of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in ARDS (1B); higher rather than lower level of PEEP for patients with sepsis-induced moderate or severe ARDS (2C); recruitment maneuvers in sepsis patients with severe refractory hypoxemia due to ARDS (2C); prone positioning in sepsis-induced ARDS patients with a PaO (2)/FiO (2) ratio of ≤100 mm Hg in facilities that have experience with such practices (2C); head-of-bed elevation in mechanically ventilated patients unless contraindicated (1B); a conservative fluid strategy for patients with established ARDS who do not have evidence of tissue hypoperfusion (1C); protocols for weaning and sedation (1A); minimizing use of either intermittent bolus sedation or continuous infusion sedation targeting specific titration endpoints (1B); avoidance of neuromuscular blockers if possible in the septic patient without ARDS (1C); a short course of neuromuscular blocker (no longer than 48 h) for patients with early ARDS and a PaO (2)/FI O (2) <150 mm Hg (2C); a protocolized approach to blood glucose management commencing insulin dosing when two consecutive blood glucose levels are >180 mg/dL, targeting an upper blood glucose ≤180 mg/dL (1A); equivalency of continuous veno-venous hemofiltration or intermittent hemodialysis (2B); prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis (1B); use of stress ulcer prophylaxis to prevent upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with bleeding risk factors (1B); oral or enteral (if necessary) feedings, as tolerated, rather than either complete fasting or provision of only intravenous glucose within the first 48 h after a diagnosis of severe sepsis/septic shock (2C); and addressing goals of care, including treatment plans and end-of-life planning (as appropriate) (1B), as early as feasible, but within 72 h of intensive care unit admission (2C). Recommendations specific to pediatric severe sepsis include: therapy with face mask oxygen, high flow nasal cannula oxygen, or nasopharyngeal continuous PEEP in the presence of respiratory distress and hypoxemia (2C), use of physical examination therapeutic endpoints such as capillary refill (2C); for septic shock associated with hypovolemia, the use of crystalloids or albumin to deliver a bolus of 20 mL/kg of crystalloids (or albumin equivalent) over 5-10 min (2C); more common use of inotropes and vasodilators for low cardiac output septic shock associated with elevated systemic vascular resistance (2C); and use of hydrocortisone only in children with suspected or proven "absolute"' adrenal insufficiency (2C).

CONCLUSIONS

Strong agreement existed among a large cohort of international experts regarding many level 1 recommendations for the best care of patients with severe sepsis. Although a significant number of aspects of care have relatively weak support, evidence-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the foundation of improved outcomes for this important group of critically ill patients.

Pharmacology of milrinone in neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn and suboptimal response to inhaled nitric oxide

OBJECTIVES

Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn is a common problem with significant morbidity and mortality. Inhaled nitric oxide is the standard care, but up to 40% of neonates are nonresponders. Milrinone is a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor which increases the bioavailability of cyclic adenosine monophosphate and has been shown to improve pulmonary hemodynamics in animal experimental models. The primary objective was to investigate the pharmacological profile of milrinone in persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. Secondary objectives were to delineate short-term outcomes and safety profile.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

An open label study of milrinone in neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn was conducted. Patients received an intravenous loading dose of milrinone (50 μg/kg) over 60 mins followed by a maintenance infusion (0.33-0.99 μg/kg/min) for 24-72 hrs. Physiologic indices of cardiorespiratory stability and details of cointerventions were recorded. Serial blood milrinone levels were collected after the bolus, following initiation of the maintenance infusion to determine steady state levels, and following discontinuation of the drug to determine clearance. Echocardiography was performed before and after (1, 12 hrs) milrinone initiation.

INTERVENTIONS

Milrinone.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Eleven neonates with a diagnosis of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn who met eligibility criteria were studied. The median (SD) gestational age and weight at birth were 39.2 ± 1.3 wks and 3481 ± 603 g. The mean (± sd) half-life, total body clearance, volume of distribution, and steady state concentration of milrinone were 4.1 ± 1.1 hrs, 0.11 ± 0.01 L/kg/hr, 0.56 ± 0.19 L/kg, and 290.9 ± 77.7 ng/mL. The initiation of milrinone led to an improvement in PaO2 (p = 0.002) and a sustained reduction in FIO2 (p < 0.001), oxygenation index (p < 0.001), mean airway pressure (p = 0.03), and inhaled nitric oxide dose (p < 0.001). Although a transient reduction in systolic arterial pressure (p < 0.001) was seen following the bolus, there was overall improvement in base deficit (p = 0.01) and plasma lactate (p = 0.04) with a trend towards lower inotrope score. Serial echocardiography revealed lower pulmonary artery pressure, improved right and left ventricular output, and reduced bidirectional or right-left shunting (p < 0.05) after milrinone treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetics of milrinone in persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn is consistent with published data. The administration of intravenous milrinone led to better oxygenation and improvements in pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics in patients with suboptimal response to inhaled nitric oxide. These data support the need for a randomized controlled trial in neonates.

Use of milrinone in critically ill children

BACKGROUND

Optimal dose adjustment of milrinone in critically ill children is challenging because of conflicting information about the association between dose and outcomes in this age group.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the use of milrinone in critically ill children and to explore associations between milrinone dosing and clinical outcomes, specifically effectiveness and adverse events.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was performed in a consecutive sample of children admitted to a university-affiliated critical care unit (January to June 2004). The relations between milrinone dosing and its effectiveness (based on prevention of low cardiac output syndrome, defined as a difference in oxygen saturation between arterial and mixed venous blood of at least 30% or an increase in serum lactate > 2 mmol/L) and its adverse effects (thrombocytopenia, arrhythmia) were evaluated by logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 197 children from 213 admissions (ranging in age from newborn to 18 years) were included in the study. Milrinone was initiated with a median loading dose of 99.2 μg/kg (range 22.1-162.2 μg/kg). The initial loading dose was higher if given in the operating room rather than the Critical Care Unit (median 99.7 versus 51.0 μg/kg; p < 0.001). Subsequent loading doses, for patients who received them, were lower (median 49 μg/kg). Milrinone was infused at a median rate of 0.64 μg/kg per minute (range 0.13-2.08 μg/kg per minute) for a median of 43.1 h. There was no relation between serum creatinine level and the maintenance dose of milrinone (r2 ≤ 0.0335). Low cardiac output syndrome was relatively frequent (166 [77.9%] of the 213 admissions). There was a trend for occurrence of this syndrome in patients with greater average milrinone dose rate (odds ratio [OR] 8.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-69.15, p = 0.053) and with longer duration of milrinone therapy (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01-1.02, p < 0.05). Adverse events were relatively frequent (thrombocytopenia for 27 admissions [12.7%], arrhythmia for 82 admissions [38.5%]) but were not significantly associated with milrinone dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

A retrospective evaluation of milrinone use in critically ill children revealed variable utilization and frequent occurrence of both low cardiac output syndrome and adverse events. Further prospective research is needed to understand the impact of individual pharmacokinetic differences on pharmacodynamic responses, to guide optimal dose adjustment, improve outcomes, and minimize toxic effects.

A biphasic and brain-region selective down-regulation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate concentrations supports object recognition in the rat

BACKGROUND

We aimed to further understand the relationship between cAMP concentration and mnesic performance.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Rats were injected with milrinone (PDE3 inhibitor, 0.3 mg/kg, i.p.), rolipram (PDE4 inhibitor, 0.3 mg/kg, i.p.) and/or the selective 5-HT4R agonist RS 67333 (1 mg/kg, i.p.) before testing in the object recognition paradigm. Cyclic AMP concentrations were measured in brain structures linked to episodic-like memory (i.e. hippocampus, prefrontal and perirhinal cortices) before or after either the sample or the testing phase. Except in the hippocampus of rolipram treated-rats, all treatment increased cAMP levels in each brain sub-region studied before the sample phase. After the sample phase, cAMP levels were significantly increased in hippocampus (1.8 fold), prefrontal (1.3 fold) and perirhinal (1.3 fold) cortices from controls rat while decreased in prefrontal cortex (∼0.83 to 0.62 fold) from drug-treated rats (except for milrinone+RS 67333 treatment). After the testing phase, cAMP concentrations were still increased in both the hippocampus (2.76 fold) and the perirhinal cortex (2.1 fold) from controls animals. Minor increase were reported in hippocampus and perirhinal cortex from both rolipram (respectively, 1.44 fold and 1.70 fold) and milrinone (respectively 1.46 fold and 1.56 fold)-treated rat. Following the paradigm, cAMP levels were significantly lower in the hippocampus, prefrontal and perirhinal cortices from drug-treated rat when compared to controls animals, however, only drug-treated rats spent longer time exploring the novel object during the testing phase (inter-phase interval of 4 h).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results strongly suggest that a "pre-sample" early increase in cAMP levels followed by a specific lowering of cAMP concentrations in each brain sub-region linked to the object recognition paradigm support learning efficacy after a middle-term delay.

Pulmonary artery catheters

BACKGROUND

After its introduction in 1970, the use of the pulmonary artery catheter became a central part of the management of critically ill patients in adult and pediatric intensive care units. However, because it was introduced as a class II device, efficacy for its safety and clinical benefit did not exist during the early years of use. This review describes the pulmonary artery catheter and reviews the literature supporting its use.

METHODOLOGY

A search of MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database was made to find literature about pulmonary artery catheter use. Literature for both adult and pediatric patients was reviewed. Guidelines published by the Society for Critical Care Medicine and the American Heart Association were reviewed, including further review of references cited.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The evidence supporting the use of the pulmonary artery catheter is mostly limited to level IV (nonrandomized, historical controls, and expert opinion) and level V (case series, uncontrolled studies, and expert opinion). A higher level of evidence supports the use of the pulmonary artery catheter in selected pediatric patients, especially those with pulmonary arterial hypertension and shock refractory to standard fluid resuscitation and vasoactive agents. There are no data to suggest that use of the pulmonary artery catheter increases mortality in children.

Heart failure treatment in the intensive care unit in children

Although pediatric heart failure is generally a chronic, progressive disorder, recovery of ventricular function may occur with some forms of cardiomyopathy. Guidelines for the management of chronic heart failure in adults and children have recently been published by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation the American College of Cardiology, and the American Heart Association. The primary aim of heart failure therapy is to reduce symptoms, preserve long-term ventricular performance, and prolong survival primarily through antagonism of the neurohormonal compensatory mechanisms. Because some medications may be detrimental during an acute decompensation, physicians who manage these patients as inpatients must be knowledgeable about the medications and therapeutic goals of chronic heart failure treatment. Understanding the mechanisms of chronic heart failure may foster improved understanding of the treatment of decompensated heart failure.

Part 10: Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations

Note From the Writing Group: Throughout this article, the reader will notice combinations of superscripted letters and numbers (eg, “Family Presence During ResuscitationPeds-003”). These callouts are hyperlinked to evidence-based worksheets, which were used in the development of this article. An appendix of worksheets, applicable to this article, is located at the end of the text. The worksheets are available in PDF format and are open access.

Prostacyclin and milrinone by aerosolization improve pulmonary hemodynamics in newborn lambs with experimental pulmonary hypertension

Aerosolized prostacyclin (PGI2) produces selective pulmonary vasodilation in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). The response to PGI2 may be increased by phosphodiesterase type 3 inhibitors such as milrinone. We studied the dose response effects of aerosolized PGI2 and aerosolized milrinone both alone and in combination on pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics in newborn lambs with Nω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME)-induced PH. We hypothesized that coaerosolization of PGI2 with milrinone would additively decrease pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), prolong the duration of action of PGI2, and selectively dilate the pulmonary vasculature. Near-term lambs were delivered by C-section and instrumented and PH was induced by l-NAME (bolus 25 mg/kg; infusion 10 mg·kg−1·h−1) and indomethacin. In the first set of experiments, PGI2 was aerosolized at random doses of 2, 20, 100, 200, 500, and 1,000 ng·kg−1·min−1 followed by milrinone at doses of 0.1, 1, and 10 μg·kg−1·min−1 over 10 min. In the second set of experiments, milrinone at 1 μg·kg−1·min−1 was aerosolized in combination with PGI2 at doses of 20, 100, and 200 ng·kg−1·min−1 over 10 min. Pulmonary arterial pressures (PAP) and PVR decreased significantly with increasing doses of aerosolized PGI2 and milrinone. The combination of PGI2 and milrinone significantly reduced PAP and PVR more than either of the drugs aerosolized alone. Addition of milrinone significantly increased the duration of action of PGI2. When aerosolized independently, PGI2 and milrinone selectively dilated the pulmonary vasculature but the combination did not. Milrinone enhances the vasodilatory effects of PGI2 on the pulmonary vasculature but caution must be exercised regarding systemic hypotension.

Randomized trial of milrinone versus placebo for prevention of low systemic blood flow in very preterm infants

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of early prophylactic milrinone versus placebo for prevention of low systemic blood flow in high-risk preterm infants.

STUDY DESIGN

Double-blind randomized placebo controlled trial of milrinone (loading dose 0.75 microg/kg/min for 3 hours then maintenance 0.2 microg/kg/min until 18 hours after birth) versus placebo. Infants born <30 weeks gestational age and <6 hours of age were eligible and were monitored with serial echocardiography, head ultrasound scanning, and continuous invasive blood pressure. Primary outcome was maintenance of superior vena cava (SVC) flow > or =45 mL/kg/min through the first 24 hours. The exit criterion was hypotension unresponsive to volume and inotropes.

RESULTS

Ninety infants were enrolled, equal proportions maintained SVC flow > or =45 mL/kg/min after treatment commenced. No significant difference was observed in SVC flow, right ventricular output, and blood pressure during the first 24 hours; or grades 3 to 4 periventricular/intraventricular hemorrhage and death. Heart rate was higher and constriction of the ductus was slower in the infants randomized to milrinone.

CONCLUSIONS

Milrinone did not prevent low systemic blood flow during the first 24 hours in very preterm infants, and no adverse effects were attributable to milrinone. Use of a preventative treatment with rescue model allowed comparison of an inotrope with placebo in this high-risk group of infants.

Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock: 2007 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine

BACKGROUND

The Institute of Medicine calls for the use of clinical guidelines and practice parameters to promote "best practices" and to improve patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

2007 update of the 2002 American College of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Guidelines for Hemodynamic Support of Neonates and Children with Septic Shock.

PARTICIPANTS

Society of Critical Care Medicine members with special interest in neonatal and pediatric septic shock were identified from general solicitation at the Society of Critical Care Medicine Educational and Scientific Symposia (2001-2006).

METHODS

The Pubmed/MEDLINE literature database (1966-2006) was searched using the keywords and phrases: sepsis, septicemia, septic shock, endotoxemia, persistent pulmonary hypertension, nitric oxide, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and American College of Critical Care Medicine guidelines. Best practice centers that reported best outcomes were identified and their practices examined as models of care. Using a modified Delphi method, 30 experts graded new literature. Over 30 additional experts then reviewed the updated recommendations. The document was subsequently modified until there was greater than 90% expert consensus.

RESULTS

The 2002 guidelines were widely disseminated, translated into Spanish and Portuguese, and incorporated into Society of Critical Care Medicine and AHA sanctioned recommendations. Centers that implemented the 2002 guidelines reported best practice outcomes (hospital mortality 1%-3% in previously healthy, and 7%-10% in chronically ill children). Early use of 2002 guidelines was associated with improved outcome in the community hospital emergency department (number needed to treat = 3.3) and tertiary pediatric intensive care setting (number needed to treat = 3.6); every hour that went by without guideline adherence was associated with a 1.4-fold increased mortality risk. The updated 2007 guidelines continue to recognize an increased likelihood that children with septic shock, compared with adults, require 1) proportionally larger quantities of fluid, 2) inotrope and vasodilator therapies, 3) hydrocortisone for absolute adrenal insufficiency, and 4) ECMO for refractory shock. The major new recommendation in the 2007 update is earlier use of inotrope support through peripheral access until central access is attained.

CONCLUSION

The 2007 update continues to emphasize early use of age-specific therapies to attain time-sensitive goals, specifically recommending 1) first hour fluid resuscitation and inotrope therapy directed to goals of threshold heart rates, normal blood pressure, and capillary refill 70% and cardiac index 3.3-6.0 L/min/m.

High performance liquid chromatography using UV detection for the quantification of milrinone in plasma: improved sensitivity for inhalation

An improved analytical assay was developed and validated for the quantification of milrinone concentrations in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. A solid-phase extraction was optimized to isolate milrinone from a plasma matrix followed by HPLC using UV detection. Plasma samples (1 ml) were extracted using a C(18) solid-phase cartridge. Milrinone was separated on a strong cation exchange analytical column maintained at 23.4 degrees C. The mobile phase consisted of a gradient (10:90 to 45:55), 0.05 M phosphate buffer (pH 3):acetonitrile. Calibration curves were linear in the concentration range of 1.25-320 ng/ml. Mean drug recovery and accuracy were respectively > or =96% and > or =92%. Intra- and inter-day precisions (CV%) were < or =6.7% and < or =7.9%, respectively. This method proved to be reliable, specific and accurate. Using different types of column for extraction and separation of milrinone proved to be necessary to achieve the sensitivity and specificity required when milrinone is given by inhalation.

Correlation between plasma milrinone concentration and renal function in patients with cardiac disease

BACKGROUND

The dose of milrinone should be reduced in patients with renal failure. However, there is little data examining the relationship between plasma concentration of milrinone (pCmil) and renal function in intravenous infusion.

METHODS

We evaluated the pCmil relative to renal function during intravenous infusion. We enrolled 10 heart failure patients. Milrinone was continuously infused at a rate of 0.2 microg/kg/min. Blood samples were collected at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after the beginning of infusion. Urine was sampled during the first 24 h to calculate creatinine clearance (CLcr) and renal clearance of milrinone (rCLmil).

RESULTS

The pCmil exhibited stability over 6 h after the beginning of infusion. During the first 24 h, CLcr and rCLmil were 62.2+/-30.6 ml/min and 1.67+/-0.77 ml/kg/min (106.2+/-60.3 ml/min), respectively. The rCLmil was highly correlated with CLcr. Y=1.77X-3.89 (X, CLcr; Y, rCLmil; R(2)=0.809, P<0.0001). Significant correlations were observed between CLcr and the plasma concentration during the continuous infusion. This correlation was expressed as the equation Y=51.1 x (BW/X)+28.2 (X; CLcr, Y; plasma concentration; BW, body weight; R(2)=0.695, P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

The pCmil exhibited stability 6 h or later after the continuous infusion of milrinone 0.2 microg/kg/min. The pCmil can be estimated by the value of CLcr and BW.

Recent advances in sepsis and septic shock

Sepsis remains a common problem in all age groups. Recently surviving sepsis campaign has taken up a worldwide initiative by publishing international guidelines 2008 with a hope to disseminate information regarding management of sepsis for all age groups. This article presents a review of recent advances as they apply to pediatric age group supported by the available evidence with reference to standard definitions of pediatric sepsis and septic shock and management in the emergency room and pediatric intensive care unit.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008

OBJECTIVE

To provide an update to the original Surviving Sepsis Campaign clinical management guidelines, "Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock," published in 2004.

DESIGN

Modified Delphi method with a consensus conference of 55 international experts, several subsequent meetings of subgroups and key individuals, teleconferences, and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee. This process was conducted independently of any industry funding.

METHODS

We used the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence from high (A) to very low (D) and to determine the strength of recommendations. A strong recommendation (1) indicates that an intervention's desirable effects clearly outweigh its undesirable effects (risk, burden, cost) or clearly do not. Weak recommendations (2) indicate that the tradeoff between desirable and undesirable effects is less clear. The grade of strong or weak is considered of greater clinical importance than a difference in letter level of quality of evidence. In areas without complete agreement, a formal process of resolution was developed and applied. Recommendations are grouped into those directly targeting severe sepsis, recommendations targeting general care of the critically ill patient that are considered high priority in severe sepsis, and pediatric considerations.

RESULTS

Key recommendations, listed by category, include early goal-directed resuscitation of the septic patient during the first 6 hrs after recognition (1C); blood cultures before antibiotic therapy (1C); imaging studies performed promptly to confirm potential source of infection (1C); administration of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy within 1 hr of diagnosis of septic shock (1B) and severe sepsis without septic shock (1D); reassessment of antibiotic therapy with microbiology and clinical data to narrow coverage, when appropriate (1C); a usual 7-10 days of antibiotic therapy guided by clinical response (1D); source control with attention to the balance of risks and benefits of the chosen method (1C); administration of either crystalloid or colloid fluid resuscitation (1B); fluid challenge to restore mean circulating filling pressure (1C); reduction in rate of fluid administration with rising filing pressures and no improvement in tissue perfusion (1D); vasopressor preference for norepinephrine or dopamine to maintain an initial target of mean arterial pressure > or = 65 mm Hg (1C); dobutamine inotropic therapy when cardiac output remains low despite fluid resuscitation and combined inotropic/vasopressor therapy (1C); stress-dose steroid therapy given only in septic shock after blood pressure is identified to be poorly responsive to fluid and vasopressor therapy (2C); recombinant activated protein C in patients with severe sepsis and clinical assessment of high risk for death (2B except 2C for postoperative patients). In the absence of tissue hypoperfusion, coronary artery disease, or acute hemorrhage, target a hemoglobin of 7-9 g/dL (1B); a low tidal volume (1B) and limitation of inspiratory plateau pressure strategy (1C) for acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); application of at least a minimal amount of positive end-expiratory pressure in acute lung injury (1C); head of bed elevation in mechanically ventilated patients unless contraindicated (1B); avoiding routine use of pulmonary artery catheters in ALI/ARDS (1A); to decrease days of mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay, a conservative fluid strategy for patients with established ALI/ARDS who are not in shock (1C); protocols for weaning and sedation/analgesia (1B); using either intermittent bolus sedation or continuous infusion sedation with daily interruptions or lightening (1B); avoidance of neuromuscular blockers, if at all possible (1B); institution of glycemic control (1B), targeting a blood glucose < 150 mg/dL after initial stabilization (2C); equivalency of continuous veno-veno hemofiltration or intermittent hemodialysis (2B); prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis (1A); use of stress ulcer prophylaxis to prevent upper gastrointestinal bleeding using H2 blockers (1A) or proton pump inhibitors (1B); and consideration of limitation of support where appropriate (1D). Recommendations specific to pediatric severe sepsis include greater use of physical examination therapeutic end points (2C); dopamine as the first drug of choice for hypotension (2C); steroids only in children with suspected or proven adrenal insufficiency (2C); and a recommendation against the use of recombinant activated protein C in children (1B).

CONCLUSIONS

There was strong agreement among a large cohort of international experts regarding many level 1 recommendations for the best current care of patients with severe sepsis. Evidenced-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the first step toward improved outcomes for this important group of critically ill patients.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008

OBJECTIVE

To provide an update to the original Surviving Sepsis Campaign clinical management guidelines, "Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock," published in 2004.

DESIGN

Modified Delphi method with a consensus conference of 55 international experts, several subsequent meetings of subgroups and key individuals, teleconferences, and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee. This process was conducted independently of any industry funding.

METHODS

We used the GRADE system to guide assessment of quality of evidence from high (A) to very low (D) and to determine the strength of recommendations. A strong recommendation indicates that an intervention's desirable effects clearly outweigh its undesirable effects (risk, burden, cost), or clearly do not. Weak recommendations indicate that the tradeoff between desirable and undesirable effects is less clear. The grade of strong or weak is considered of greater clinical importance than a difference in letter level of quality of evidence. In areas without complete agreement, a formal process of resolution was developed and applied. Recommendations are grouped into those directly targeting severe sepsis, recommendations targeting general care of the critically ill patient that are considered high priority in severe sepsis, and pediatric considerations.

RESULTS

Key recommendations, listed by category, include: early goal-directed resuscitation of the septic patient during the first 6 hrs after recognition (1C); blood cultures prior to antibiotic therapy (1C); imaging studies performed promptly to confirm potential source of infection (1C); administration of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy within 1 hr of diagnosis of septic shock (1B) and severe sepsis without septic shock (1D); reassessment of antibiotic therapy with microbiology and clinical data to narrow coverage, when appropriate (1C); a usual 7-10 days of antibiotic therapy guided by clinical response (1D); source control with attention to the balance of risks and benefits of the chosen method (1C); administration of either crystalloid or colloid fluid resuscitation (1B); fluid challenge to restore mean circulating filling pressure (1C); reduction in rate of fluid administration with rising filing pressures and no improvement in tissue perfusion (1D); vasopressor preference for norepinephrine or dopamine to maintain an initial target of mean arterial pressure > or = 65 mm Hg (1C); dobutamine inotropic therapy when cardiac output remains low despite fluid resuscitation and combined inotropic/vasopressor therapy (1C); stress-dose steroid therapy given only in septic shock after blood pressure is identified to be poorly responsive to fluid and vasopressor therapy (2C); recombinant activated protein C in patients with severe sepsis and clinical assessment of high risk for death (2B except 2C for post-operative patients). In the absence of tissue hypoperfusion, coronary artery disease, or acute hemorrhage, target a hemoglobin of 7-9 g/dL (1B); a low tidal volume (1B) and limitation of inspiratory plateau pressure strategy (1C) for acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); application of at least a minimal amount of positive end-expiratory pressure in acute lung injury (1C); head of bed elevation in mechanically ventilated patients unless contraindicated (1B); avoiding routine use of pulmonary artery catheters in ALI/ARDS (1A); to decrease days of mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay, a conservative fluid strategy for patients with established ALI/ARDS who are not in shock (1C); protocols for weaning and sedation/analgesia (1B); using either intermittent bolus sedation or continuous infusion sedation with daily interruptions or lightening (1B); avoidance of neuromuscular blockers, if at all possible (1B); institution of glycemic control (1B) targeting a blood glucose < 150 mg/dL after initial stabilization ( 2C ); equivalency of continuous veno-veno hemofiltration or intermittent hemodialysis (2B); prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis (1A); use of stress ulcer prophylaxis to prevent upper GI bleeding using H2 blockers (1A) or proton pump inhibitors (1B); and consideration of limitation of support where appropriate (1D). Recommendations specific to pediatric severe sepsis include: greater use of physical examination therapeutic end points (2C); dopamine as the first drug of choice for hypotension (2C); steroids only in children with suspected or proven adrenal insufficiency (2C); a recommendation against the use of recombinant activated protein C in children (1B).

CONCLUSION

There was strong agreement among a large cohort of international experts regarding many level 1 recommendations for the best current care of patients with severe sepsis. Evidenced-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the first step toward improved outcomes for this important group of critically ill patients.

Population pharmacokinetics and dosing regimen design of milrinone in preterm infants

AIMS

To define the pharmacokinetics of milrinone in very preterm infants and determine an optimal dose regimen to prevent low systemic blood flow in the first 12 h after birth.

METHODS

A prospective open-labelled, dose-escalation pharmacokinetic study was undertaken in two stages. In stage one, infants received milrinone at 0.25 microg/kg/min (n = 8) and 0.5 microg/kg/min (n = 11) infused from 3 to 24 h of age. Infants contributed 4-5 blood samples for concentration-time data which were analysed using a population modelling approach. A simulation study was used to explore the optimal dosing regimen to achieve target milrinone concentrations (180-300 ng/ml). This milrinone regimen was evaluated in stage two (n = 10).

RESULTS

Infants (n = 29) born before 29 weeks gestation were enrolled. Milrinone pharmacokinetics were described using a one-compartment model with first-order elimination rate, with a population mean clearance (CV%) of 35 ml/h (24%) and volume of distribution of 512 ml (21%) and estimated half-life of 10 h. The 0.25 and 0.5 microg/kg/min dosage regimens did not achieve optimal milrinone concentration-time profiles to prevent early low systemic blood flow. Simulation studies predicted a loading infusion (0.75 microg/kg/min for 3 h) followed by maintenance infusion (0.2 microg/kg/min until 18 h of age) would provide an optimal milrinone concentration profile. This was confirmed in stage two of the study.

CONCLUSION

Population pharmacokinetic modelling in the preterm infant has established an optimal dose regimen for milrinone that increases the likelihood of achieving therapeutic aims and highlights the importance of pharmacokinetic studies in neonatal clinical pharmacology.

Pilot study of milrinone for low systemic blood flow in very preterm infants

OBJECTIVES

To examine the hemodynamic effects of milrinone given prophylactically to very preterm infants at high risk of low superior vena cava (SVC) flow and to investigate the preliminary efficacy and safety of an optimal dose.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective, open-label study in two stages. The first involved dose escalation in two cohorts. Milrinone infusions of 0.25 microg/kg per minute (n = 8) and then 0.5 microg/kg per minute (n = 11) were administered from 3 to 24 hours of age. Population pharmacokinetic modeling was used to develop an optimized dose regimen. Ten infants then were loaded with 0.75 microg/kg per minute for 3 hours, followed by 0.2 microg/kg per minute maintenance until 18 hours of age. Infants were monitored for blood pressure, serial echocardiograms, and blood milrinone levels. The primary outcome was maintenance of SVC flow greater than 45 mL/kg per minute through the first 24 hours.

RESULTS

Low SVC flow developed in 36% of babies at both 0.25 microg/kg per minute and 0.5 microg/kg per minute of milrinone. Blood levels on these two regimens were slow to reach the target range and accumulated above this range by 24 hours. At 0.75 to 0.2 microg/kg per minute, no infant had SVC flow below 45 mL/kg per minute, compared with 61% in historic control subjects. Four infants needed an additional inotrope to support blood pressure. Blood levels were within the target range in 9 of 10 babies.

CONCLUSIONS

We used population pharmacokinetic modeling to develop an optimal dosing regimen for milrinone. The efficacy and safety in this novel preventative approach to circulatory support is encouraging but inconclusive. We do not recommend the use of milrinone in preterm infants outside a research setting.

The effects of milrinone on hemodynamics in an experimental septic shock model

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the specific hemodynamic effects of the phosphodiesterase inhibitor milrinone in a rabbit model of septic shock in the absence of any other treatment.

DESIGN

A prospective, controlled, interventional study. Animal Model: Fourteen sedated New Zealand rabbits.

SETTING

Research laboratory of a health sciences university.

INTERVENTIONS

Rabbits were anesthetized and vascular catheters inserted in femoral artery and jugular vein. After a stabilization period and the recording of baseline measurements (H0), all animals received a 10-mL infusion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Two hours later (H2rabbits were randomly assigned to receive 5% dextrose (control group) or milrinone (milrinone group).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was monitored continuously, and a cardiac index (CI) was determined every 30 mins by a transpulmonary thermodilution technique using an integrated monitoring device (PICCO). No differences were detected between the two groups after stabilization (H0) or before the treatment (H2) for either CI (mL/min(-1)/kg(-1)) or MAP (mm Hg). CI decreased progressively in the control group during the following 4 hrs, but not in the treated group (at H6: 122 +/- 4 vs. 207 +/- 16 mL/min(-1)/kg(-1); p < .05). No drop of MAP occurred after milrinone infusion. A comparison of the treated and control group reveals that milrinone improved tissue perfusion as evidenced by measurements of central venous saturation (at H4: 0.59 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.71 +/- 0.03, p = .04), lactacidemia (at H6: 10.3 +/- 2.4 vs. 3.9 +/- 0.9 mmol/L, p = .03), creatinemia (at H6: 95 +/- 11 vs. 60 +/- 5 micromol/L, p = .02) and survival (at H6: 5 vs. 7, not significant).

CONCLUSION

Milrinone improves cardiac output and tissue perfusion in a rabbit model involving severe septic shock.

Pediatric considerations

OBJECTIVE

In 2003, critical care and infectious disease experts representing 11 international organizations developed management guidelines for other supportive therapies in sepsis that would be of practical use for the bedside clinician, under the auspices of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, an international effort to increase awareness and to improve outcome in severe sepsis.

DESIGN AND METHODS

The process included a modified Delphi method, a consensus conference, several subsequent smaller meetings of subgroups and key individuals, teleconferences, and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee. Pediatric representatives attended the various section meetings and workshops to contrast adult and pediatric management. These are published here as pediatric considerations.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric considerations included a more likely need for intubation due to low functional residual capacity, more difficult intravenous access, fluid resuscitation based on weight with 40-60 mL kg or higher needed, decreased cardiac output and increased systemic vascular resistance as the most common hemodynamic profile, greater use of physical examination therapeutic endpoints, the unsettled issue of high-dose steroids for therapy of septic shock, and greater risk of hypoglycemia with aggressive glucose control.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock

OBJECTIVE

In 2003, critical care and infectious disease experts representing 11 international organizations developed management guidelines for severe sepsis and septic shock that would be of practical use for the bedside clinician, under the auspices of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, an international effort to increase awareness and improve outcome in severe sepsis.

DESIGN

The process included a modified Delphi method, a consensus conference, several subsequent smaller meetings of subgroups and key individuals, teleconferences, and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee.

METHODS

We used a modified Delphi methodology for grading recommendations, built on a 2001 publication sponsored by the International Sepsis Forum. We undertook a systematic review of the literature graded along five levels to create recommendation grades from A to E, with A being the highest grade. Pediatric considerations were provided to contrast adult and pediatric management.

RESULTS

Key recommendations, listed by category and not by hierarchy, include early goal-directed resuscitation of the septic patient during the first 6 hrs after recognition; appropriate diagnostic studies to ascertain causative organisms before starting antibiotics; early administration of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy; reassessment of antibiotic therapy with microbiology and clinical data to narrow coverage, when appropriate; a usual 7-10 days of antibiotic therapy guided by clinical response; source control with attention to the method that balances risks and benefits; equivalence of crystalloid and colloid resuscitation; aggressive fluid challenge to restore mean circulating filling pressure; vasopressor preference for norepinephrine and dopamine; cautious use of vasopressin pending further studies; avoiding low-dose dopamine administration for renal protection; consideration of dobutamine inotropic therapy in some clinical situations; avoidance of supranormal oxygen delivery as a goal of therapy; stress-dose steroid therapy for septic shock; use of recombinant activated protein C in patients with severe sepsis and high risk for death; with resolution of tissue hypoperfusion and in the absence of coronary artery disease or acute hemorrhage, targeting a hemoglobin of 7-9 g/dL; appropriate use of fresh frozen plasma and platelets; a low tidal volume and limitation of inspiratory plateau pressure strategy for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome; application of a minimal amount of positive end-expiratory pressure in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome; a semirecumbent bed position unless contraindicated; protocols for weaning and sedation/analgesia, using either intermittent bolus sedation or continuous infusion sedation with daily interruptions/lightening; avoidance of neuromuscular blockers, if at all possible; maintenance of blood glucose <150 mg/dL after initial stabilization; equivalence of continuous veno-veno hemofiltration and intermittent hemodialysis; lack of utility of bicarbonate use for pH > or =7.15; use of deep vein thrombosis/stress ulcer prophylaxis; and consideration of limitation of support where appropriate. Pediatric considerations included a more likely need for intubation due to low functional residual capacity; more difficult intravenous access; fluid resuscitation based on weight with 40-60 mL/kg or higher needed; decreased cardiac output and increased systemic vascular resistance as the most common hemodynamic profile; greater use of physical examination therapeutic end points; unsettled issue of high-dose steroids for therapy of septic shock; and greater risk of hypoglycemia with aggressive glucose control.

CONCLUSION

Evidence-based recommendations can be made regarding many aspects of the acute management of sepsis and septic shock that are hoped to translate into improved outcomes for the critically ill patient. The impact of these guidelines will be formally tested and guidelines updated annually and even more rapidly as some important new knowledge becomes as available.