Efficacy of cyclosporin A in children with type 2 autoimmune hepatitis

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease of unknown aetiology which may affect any patient irrespective of age, sex, and ethnicity. At baseline, the clinical spectrum of the disease varies largely from asymptomatic cases to acute liver failure with massive hepatocyte necrosis. The aim of these EASL guidelines is to provide updated guidance on the diagnosis and management of AIH both in adults and children. Updated guidance on the management of patients with variants and specific forms of AIH is also provided, as is detailed guidance on the management of AIH-associated cirrhosis, including surveillance for portal hypertension and hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as liver transplantation in decompensated cirrhosis.

Autoimmune hepatitis: Towards a personalized treatment

Autoimmune hepatitis is an uncommon condition that affects both adults and children and is characterized by chronic and recurrent inflammatory activity in the liver. This inflammation is accompanied by elevated IgG and autoantibody levels. Historically, treatment consists of steroids with the addition of azathioprine, which results in remission in approximately 80% of patients. Despite significant advancements in our understanding of the immune system over the past two decades, few modifications have been made to treatment algorithms, which have remained largely unchanged since they were first proposed more than 40 years ago. This review summarized the various treatment options currently available as well as our experiences using them. Although steroids are the standard treatment for induction therapy, other medications may be considered. Cyclosporin A, a calcineurin inhibitor that decreases T cell activation, has proven effective for induction of remission, but its long-term side effects limit its appeal for maintenance. Tacrolimus, a drug belonging to the same family, has been used in patients with refractory diseases with fewer side effects. Sirolimus and everolimus have interesting effects on regulatory T cell populations and may become viable options in the future. Mycophenolate mofetil is not effective for induction but is a valid alternative for patients who are intolerant to azathioprine. B cell-depleting drugs, such as rituximab and belimumab, have been successfully used in refractory cases and are useful in both the short and long term. Other promising treatments include anti-tumor necrosis factors, Janus kinases inhibitors, and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy. This growing armamentarium allows us to imagine a more tailored approach to the treatment of autoimmune hepatitis in the near future.

Long-term outcomes of patients with type 1 or 2 autoimmune hepatitis presenting in childhood

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In children with autoimmune hepatitis, uncertainties include outcomes associated with type 2 hepatitis, the possibility of and criteria for attempting withdrawal of treatment, and long-term outcomes. We report our experience on these issues.

METHODS

From 1973 to 2002, 117 children with type 1 (n = 65) or type 2 (n = 52) hepatitis, excluding fulminant hepatitis, were treated, primarily with prednisone and azathioprine. Median follow-up was 20 years in survivors.

RESULTS

Normalisation of aminotransferases and prothrombin ratio were observed in 93% and 84% of children, respectively; sustained remission after treatment withdrawal was recorded in 24% of the entire population, with a median follow-up of 7 years. Sustained treatment-free remission was obtained in 11 of 24 children with follow-ups of 4-22 years based on durable normalisation of aminotransferases (without histological assessment). Gastrointestinal bleeding from varices and the emergence of extrahepatic autoimmune disorders occurred in 10 and 22 patients, respectively. Liver transplantation was performed in 23 patients at a median age of 21 years. The 30-year probabilities of overall and native liver survival were 81% and 61%, respectively. No differences were observed between type 1 and 2 hepatitis for any of the component parts of outcome. In the multivariate analysis, a persistent abnormal prothrombin ratio was associated with worse probabilities of overall and native liver survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of liver outcome, type 2 hepatitis is not different from type 1. Withdrawal of treatment is possible without prior liver histology. A persistent abnormal prothrombin ratio identifies patients who will require liver transplantation in adolescence or early adulthood.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

In children with autoimmune hepatitis, there are conflicting reports on the differences in outcome between type 1 and type 2 hepatitis, and on the possibility of treatment withdrawal, before which liver histology is required; data concerning >10-year overall and native liver survival rates are limited. In this study, we found no differences in outcomes between type 1 and 2 hepatitis; a durable treatment-free state was achieved in 19% of all patients throughout childhood and early adulthood, and in 45% of children for whom treatment withdrawal was attempted without prior liver histology; prothrombin was found to be predictive of 30-year overall and native liver survival. The results allow for a less-strict approach to treatment withdrawal in children, avoiding the risks of a liver biopsy, and they provide a tool to help anticipate the need for liver transplantation before complications occur.

A reasoned approach to the treatment of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammatory liver disease affecting all ages, characterised by elevated transaminase and immunoglobulin G levels, positive autoantibodies, interface hepatitis on histology and good response to immunosuppressive treatment. If untreated, it has a poor prognosis. The aim of this review is to analyse AIH therapeutic interventions with reference to our knowledge of the pathogenesis of AIH. Standard treatment, based on steroids and azathioprine, leads to disease remission in 80-90% of patients. Alternative first-line treatment with budesonide is effective in adults, but less so in the juvenile form of AIH; first-line treatment with ciclosporin does not provide convincing advantages compared to standard treatment. Second-line treatments are needed for patients not responding or intolerant to first-line standard management. Mycophenolate mofetil is the most widely used second-line drug, and has good efficacy particularly for patients intolerant to azathioprine, but is teratogenic. Only few and heterogeneous data on calcineurin inhibitors and m-TOR inhibitors are available. Biologicals, including anti-tumour necrosis factor- α and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, have given ambivalent results and may have severe side-effects. Clinical trials with new therapeutic options aiming at targeting B lymphocytes and proinflammatory cytokines, or expanding regulatory T cells to restore tolerance are ongoing.

Use of immunosuppression in non-transplant hepatology

Human liver possesses a persistent and tightly regulated immune response. Maintaining this homeostatic state is the key to prevent pathological processes, as a failure in clearing dangerous stimuli, is associated with tissue damage. A dysregulation of the liver immune homeostasis is involved in many disease processes and the use of the immunosuppression aims to control the inflammatory response, where the physiologic mechanisms failed. The use of steroids which targets broadly the inflammatory cascade and the immune system activation have been extensively employed in both acute and chronic liver diseases. They currently are the backbone of the treatment of autoimmune diseases such as autoimmune hepatitis or IgG4 sclerosing cholangitis. The steroid use in acute liver injury, especially alcohol mediated and drug induced liver injury (DILI), have been debated, despite the biological rationale. The immunosuppression molecules currently employed in liver diseases target the immune system broadly, causing multiple side effects either intrinsic in the mechanisms of the drug or secondary to off-target toxicity. The future of immunosuppressant treatment is moving towards more selective strategies, targeting disease specific pathways. This review aims to explore the rationale of use of immunosuppression in non-transplant hepatology. A broad summary of the immune biology of liver immune mediated diseases will be provided to the readers in order to highlight the potential therapeutic targets. An extensive description of the molecules employed in liver diseases will follow and the clinical evidences in AIH, IgG4 related cholangitis, alcoholic hepatitis and DILI will be reviewed.

Autoimmune Hepatitis in Children: Prednisone Plus Azathioprine Versus Cyclosporine: A Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to find the outcome and adverse effects of 2 initial treatments in children with autoimmune hepatitis, prednisone (PRED) plus azathioprine (AZA) versus cyclosporine (CsA).

STUDY DESIGN

Between December 2008 and February 2012, 50 consecutive patients were centrally randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. Group 1: PRED was indicated at a dose of 1 to 2 mg · kg · day (up to 60 mg/day) and AZA at a dose of 1 to 2 mg · kg · day. Group 2: CsA was administered at a dose of 4 mg · kg · day orally divided into 2 doses. After remission, all patients were given a combination of PRED at 0.3 to 0.5 mg · kg · day and AZA at 1 to 2 mg · kg · day. Children presenting liver failure were placed on a triple immunosuppressive regimen if this condition persisted after 1 week of treatment, after liver function normalization they were switched back to their initial scheme.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients received PRED-AZA and 24 CsA. Both treatments showed similar initial results in effectiveness and safety, although remission was achieved earlier with PRED-AZA: 8.6 versus CsA: 13.6 weeks (P < 0.0081). All children recovered liver function in a mean time of 32 ± 26 days. Cushingoid syndrome was more frequently observed with PRED-AZA (P < 0.001) and gingival hypertrophy with CsA (P < 0.001). A significant increase in body mass index was observed in all patients from initial treatment to remission, being greater with PRED-AZA.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar outcomes were obtained with PRED plus AZA or CsA treatments. Either therapeutic strategy could be used according to the particular characteristics of each patient. Triple immunosuppression was beneficial in patients with liver failure at onset.

Long-term follow-up of children and young adults with autoimmune hepatitis treated with cyclosporine

BACKGROUND

Cyclosporine (CSA) is an alternative treatment for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), however, its unknown long-term safety and efficacy have limited its use.

AIMS

Examine the long-term outcome of children and young adults with AIH treated with CSA for at least 4 years.

METHODS

Twenty patients were included in this retrospective study: 15 with classical AIH and 5 with autoimmune hepatitis/autoimmune sclerosing cholangitis overlap syndrome (ASC). CSA was administered as first (12 patients) or second-line (8 patients) treatment, alone or in combination with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil and/or prednisone.

RESULTS

CSA determined initial clinical and biochemical remission in all patients. At the end of follow-up (median 8.6; range 4-20.4 years), all patients are alive with their native liver; 15 in complete remission (75%), 2 with incomplete response to treatment and 3 listed for liver transplant. Side effects were mild and transitory after dose tapering or, in 1 case, after CSA withdrawal. Hypertrichosis and moderate gingival hyperplasia were the most frequent. Two patients presented mild transient glomerular filtration rate (GFR) reduction. Median GFR at the beginning and end of treatment was not statistically different for all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CSA was effective and safe in the long-term treatment of our cohort of patients with AIH, tailoring the treatment remains key-points during CSA administration.

Novel Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies in Juvenile Autoimmune Hepatitis

Juvenile autoimmune hepatitis (JAIH) is a rare, chronic, inflammatory disease of the liver characterized by a complex interaction between genetic, immunological, and environmental factors leading to loss of immunotolerance to hepatic antigens. It affects both children and adolescents, most commonly females, and its clinical manifestations are quite variable. JAIH is progressive in nature and if left untreated may lead to cirrhosis and terminal liver failure. Although JAIH was first described almost 50 years ago, there have been few significant advances in the clinical management of these patients, both in terms of available diagnostic tools and therapeutic options. Aminotransferase activity, class G immunoglobulins and autoantibodies are the biomarkers used to diagnose AIH and monitor treatment response alongside clinical and histological findings. Despite their utility and cost-effectiveness, these biomarkers are neither an accurate expression of AIH pathogenic mechanism nor a precise measure of treatment response. Current standard of care is mainly based on the administration of steroids and azathioprine. This combination of drugs has been proven effective in inducing remission of disease in the majority of patients dramatically improving their survival; however, it not only fails to restore tolerance to hepatic autoantigens, but it also does not halt disease progression in some patients, it is often needed life-long and finally, it has deleterious side-effects. The ideal therapy should be enough selective to contrast immune-mediated live damage while preserving or potentiating the ability to develop permanent tolerance vs. pathogenic autoantigens. By reviewing the state of the art literature, this article highlights novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for managing pediatric AIH with a special focus on new strategies of immunotherapy. These promising tools could improve the diagnostic algorithm, more accurately predict disease prognosis, and provide targeted, individualized treatment.

Second-line Agents in Pediatric Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Ten percent to 20% of children with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) require second-line therapy to achieve remission. Although current guidelines exist on first-line management, evidence for second-line therapy in treatment-refractory patients is lacking. Our aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of second-line treatments used in this population.

METHODS

Electronic and manual searches were used to identify potential studies for inclusion. Studies were selected based on reported response rates to second-line therapies in children who failed response to prednisone and azathioprine. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by 2 reviewers. Meta-analysis using weighted estimate of response rates at 6 months was performed for each treatment option. Heterogeneity was assessed.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies of 76 pediatric patients with AIH were included in the review. Overall response rates at 6 months were estimated as 36% for mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (N = 34, 95% confidence interval [CI] (16-57)), and 50% for tacrolimus (N = 4, 95% CI (0-100%)) and 83% for cyclosporine (N = 15, 95% CI (66%-100%)). Adverse effects were most frequent with cyclosporine (64% experiencing at least 1 adverse effect) followed by tacrolimus (54%) and MMF (48%). Pooled estimates of adverse events were 78% for cyclosporine (95% CI (54%-100%)), 42% for tacrolimus (95% CI (0%-85%)) and 45% for MMF (95% CI (25%-68%)). Sensitivity analyses were not performed due to small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclosporine had the highest response rate at 6 months in children with standard-treatment-refractory AIH; however, it also had the highest rate of adverse events. MMF was the second most efficacious option with a low adverse effect rate.

Seronegative autoimmune hepatitis in children: Spectrum of disorders

BACKGROUND

A few children with acute or chronic liver disease display histological features compatible with autoimmune hepatitis, but lack specific serological markers.

AIM

To describe features, management and outcome of childhood seronegative autoimmune hepatitis.

METHODS

From 1988 to 2010, 38 children were included under the following criteria: negative virological studies, no serum autoantibodies, exclusion of other causes of liver diseases, and liver histology compatible with autoimmune hepatitis.

RESULTS

Four groups were identified: (1) 12 with increased serum gamma globulin concentrations; (2) 10 with normal or low serum gamma globulins and no combined blood disease; (3) 10 with combined aplastic anemia; and (4) 6 with peripheral thrombocytopenia with/without neutropenia. Immunosuppressive treatment was associated with aminotransferases normalization in all but one child who required liver transplantation. Relapses occurred in 10 children. Lymphocytopenia was found at the time of the diagnosis of hepatitis in 13 children, 12 in groups 3 or 4. All 38 children are alive after 4-17 years, 18 still under immunosuppression.

CONCLUSIONS

Childhood seronegative autoimmune hepatitis includes a spectrum of disorders. Early liver histology is recommended and, if compatible with autoimmune hepatitis, immunosuppressive treatment should be started. Initial lymphocytopenia may indicate future hematological complication.

Juvenile autoimmune hepatitis: Spectrum of the disease

Juvenile autoimmune hepatitis (JAIH) is a progressive inflammatory liver disease, affecting mainly young girls, from infancy to late adolescence, characterized by active liver damage, as shown by high serum activity of aminotransferases, by elevated immunoglobulin G levels, high titers of serum non organ-specific and organ-specific autoantibodies, and by interface hepatitis on liver biopsy. It is a multifactorial disease of unknown etiology in which environmental factors act as a trigger in genetically predisposed individuals. Two types of JAIH are identified according to the autoantibody panel detected at diagnosis: AIH-1, characterized by the presence of anti-smooth muscle antibody and/or antinuclear antibody and AIH-2, by anti-liver-kidney microsomal antibody type 1 and/or by the presence of anti-liver cytosol type 1 antibody. Epidemiological distribution, genetic markers, clinical presentation and pattern of serum cytokines differentiate the two types of AIH suggesting possible pathogenetic mechanisms. The most effective therapy for AIH is pharmacological suppression of the immune response. Treatment should be started as soon as the diagnosis is made to avoid severe liver damage and progression of fibrosis. The aim of this review is to outline the most significant and peculiar features of JAIH, based largely on our own personal database and on a review of current literature.

Review article: The prevention and reversal of hepatic fibrosis in autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressive treatment of autoimmune hepatitis can prevent or reverse hepatic fibrosis, but these anti-fibrotic effects are inconsistent secondary gains.

AIM

To describe the anti-fibrotic effects of current therapies for autoimmune hepatitis, discuss the pathogenic mechanisms of hepatic fibrosis that might be targeted by anti-fibrotic interventions, indicate the non-invasive diagnostic tests of hepatic fibrosis that must be validated in autoimmune hepatitis and to suggest promising treatment opportunities.

METHODS

Studies cited in PubMed from 1972 to 2013 for autoimmune hepatitis, hepatic fibrosis, cirrhosis, anti-fibrotic therapy and non-invasive tests of hepatic fibrosis were selected.

RESULTS

Hepatic fibrosis improves in 53-57% of corticosteroid-treated patients with autoimmune hepatitis; progressive fibrosis slows or is prevented in 79%; and cirrhosis may be reversed. Progressive hepatic fibrosis is associated with liver inflammation, and the inability to fully suppress inflammatory activity within 12 months is associated with progression to cirrhosis (54%) and death or need for liver transplantation (15%). Liver tissue examination remains the gold standard for assessing hepatic fibrosis, but laboratory and radiological tests may be useful non-invasive methods to measure the fibrotic response. Severe liver inflammation can confound radiological assessments, and the preferred non-invasive test in autoimmune hepatitis is uncertain. Individualised treatment adjustments and adjunctive anti-fibrotic therapies are poised for study in this disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevention and reversal of hepatic fibrosis are achievable objectives in autoimmune hepatitis. Strategies that evaluate individualised therapies adjusted to the rapidity and completeness of the inflammatory response, and the use of adjunctive anti-fibrotic interventions, must be evaluated.

Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis is a disease of the hepatic parenchyma that can present in acute or chronic forms. In common with many autoimmune diseases, autoimmune hepatitis is associated with non-organ-specific antibodies in the context of hepatic autoimmunity. This dichotomy has made definition of a unifying hypothesis in the pathophysiology of the disease difficult, although data from the past 8 years have drawn attention to the role of regulatory T cells. Several triggers have been identified, and the disease arises in genetically susceptible individuals. Clinical and biochemical remission is achievable in up to 85% of cases. For the remaining patients, alternative immunosuppression strategies are an option. Liver transplantation provides an excellent outcome for patients with acute liver failure or complications of end-stage liver disease, including hepatocellular carcinoma. Variant or overlapping syndromes are worthy of consideration when unexpected disease features arise.

Review article: the management of autoimmune hepatitis beyond consensus guidelines

BACKGROUND

Consensus guidelines aid in the diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis, but they are frequently based on low-quality clinical evidence, conflicting experiences and divergent opinions. Recommendations may be weak, discrepant or non-existent at critical decision points.

AIMS

To identify the decision points where guidelines are weak or non-existent and review the evidence essential in the decision process.

METHODS

Full-text articles published in English using the keyword 'autoimmune hepatitis' were identified by PubMed from 1972 to 2013. Personal experience and investigations in autoimmune hepatitis also identified important contributions.

RESULTS

Seventy per cent of the guidelines developed by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and 48% of those proposed by the British Society of Gastroenterology are based on low-quality evidence, conflicting experiences or divergent opinions. The key uncertainties in diagnosis relate to the timing of liver biopsy, recognising acute severe (fulminant) disease, interpreting coincidental nonclassical histological changes, accommodating atypical or deficient features in non-White patients, differentiating drug-induced from classical disease and identifying overlap syndromes. The key uncertainties in management relate to pre-treatment testing for thiopurine methyltransferase activity, treating asymptomatic mild disease, determining treatment end points, managing suboptimal responses, incorporating nonstandard medications as front-line and salvage agents, using azathioprine in pregnancy and instituting surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Consensus guidelines are fraught with uncertainties in the diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis. Each decision point must counterbalance the current available evidence and tailor the application of this evidence to the individual patient.

Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) was the first chronic liver disease in which remission was achieved by immunosuppression. Prognosis is poor when left untreated. Since the original description in 1950 by Waldenström, the initially reported treatment option has remained until today and is the core of the basic therapeutic strategy of inducing remission with steroids and azathioprine. Immunosuppression as a treatment concept spans different situations including the induction and maintenance of remission, treatment of nonresponders, avoidance of side effects, perioperative treatment of liver transplantation candidates and the issue of withdrawal. Alternative immunosuppressive drugs such as transplantation immunosuppressants have been administered and reported in small series. In an attempt to optimize side effect management, a recent large multicenter prospective treatment trial suggests that budesonide may offer an alternative for noncirrhotic AIH patients with lower steroid side effects. With an early diagnosis and effective therapy, only 4% of transplant candidates are transplanted for AIH. After liver transplantation there is a considerable risk for graft loss because of recurrent AIH, and lifelong vigilance and therapeutic attention is important.

Drug choices in autoimmune hepatitis: part B--Nonsteroids

Nonsteroidal medications, previously unfamiliar in the management of autoimmune hepatitis, can supplement or replace conventional corticosteroid regimens, especially in problematic patients. Mycophenolate mofetil is a next-generation purine antagonist that has been useful in treating patients with azathioprine intolerance. It has been less effective in salvaging patients with steroid-refractory disease. Azathioprine is the choice as a corticosteroid-sparing agent in treatment-naive patients and in individuals with corticosteroid intolerance, incomplete response and relapse after drug withdrawal. Tacrolimus is preferred over cyclosporine for recalcitrant disease because of its established preference in organ transplantation, but replacement with cyclosporine should be considered if the disease worsens on treatment. Rapamycin has antiproliferative and proapoptotic actions that warrant further study in autoimmune hepatitis. The nonstandard, nonsteroidal medications are mainly salvage therapies with off-label indications that must be used in highly individualized and well-monitored clinical situations.

Advances in the current treatment of autoimmune hepatitis

Current treatment strategies for autoimmune hepatitis are complicated by frequent relapse after drug withdrawal, medication intolerance, and refractory disease. The objective of this review is to describe advances that have improved treatment outcomes by defining the optimum objectives of initial therapy, managing relapse more effectively, identifying problematic patients early, and incorporating the new pharmacological interventions that have emerged as frontline and salvage therapies. Initial corticosteroid treatment should be continued until serum aminotransferase, γ-globulin, and immunoglobulin G levels are normal, and maintenance of this improvement for 3-8 months before liver tissue assessment. Improvement to normal liver tissue is the ideal histological result that justifies drug withdrawal, but it is achievable in only 22 % of patients. Minimum portal hepatitis, inactive cirrhosis, or minimally active cirrhosis is the most common treatment end point. Relapse after drug withdrawal warrants institution of a long-term maintenance regimen, preferably with azathioprine. Mathematical models can identify problematic adult patients early, as also can clinical phenotype (age ≤ 30 years and HLA DRB1 03), rapidity of treatment response (≤ 24 months), presence of antibodies to soluble liver antigen, and non-white ethnicity. The calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine and tacrolimus) can be effective in steroid-refractory disease; mycophenolate mofetil can be corticosteroid-sparing and effective for azathioprine intolerance; budesonide combined with azathioprine can be effective for treatment-naïve, non-cirrhotic patients. Standard treatment regimens for autoimmune hepatitis can be upgraded without adjustments that require major new expertise.

Therapy of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis was the first chronic liver disease with a favourable response to drug therapy and a dismal prognosis when left untreated. Since its original description in 1950 and first treatment studies the basic therapeutic strategy of inducing remission with steroids and azathioprine has not been modified in principle. A timely diagnosis before cirrhosis develops, the avoidance of immunosuppressant side effect, non-responders to standard induction therapy, and adherence to therapy are the greatest challenges. Alternative immunosuppressive drugs have been tested in small series and include transplant immunosuppressants. A recent large multicenter prospective treatment trial suggests that budesonide may offer an alternative in non-cirrhotic AIH patients capable of minimizing unwanted steroid effects. The ultimate treatment approach upon drug treatment failure is liver transplantation. Only four percent of transplant candidates are transplanted for AIH but the risk for graft loss because of recurrence has to be considered and recurrent AIH treated after transplantation.

Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an inflammatory liver disease that mainly affects females. It is characterized histologically by interface hepatitis, biochemically by increased aspartate and alanine aminotransferase levels, and serologically by the presence of autoantibodies and increased levels of immunoglobulin G. AIH affects both adults and children, and is particularly aggressive in the latter group. It is a relatively rare but devastating disease, which progresses rapidly unless immunosuppressive treatment is started promptly. With appropriate treatment 80% of patients achieve remission and long-term survival. Those patients who progress to end-stage liver disease because they are unresponsive or nonadherent to treatment, and those with fulminant liver failure (encephalopathy grade II-IV) at diagnosis, require liver transplantation. Seropositivity for smooth muscle and/or antinuclear antibodies defines type 1 AIH, while positivity for liver kidney microsomal type 1 antibodies defines type 2 AIH. The primary cause of AIH is unknown; however, considerable knowledge about the mechanisms of liver damage involved has been gathered over the past 30 years, which is likely to provide the basis for specific modes of treatment and a possible cure.

Cyclosporin A--a review on fermentative production, downstream processing and pharmacological applications

In present times, the immunosuppressants have gained considerable importance in the world market. Cyclosporin A (CyA) is a cyclic undecapeptide with a variety of biological activities including immunosuppressive, anti-inflammatory, antifungal and antiparasitic properties. CyA is produced by various types of fermentation techniques using Tolypocladium inflatum. In the present review, we discuss the biosynthetic pathway, fermentative production, downstream processing and pharmacological activities of CyA.

Pharmacological management of autoimmune hepatitis

INTRODUCTION

Without prompt immunosuppressive treatment, autoimmune hepatitis is a devastating, albeit rare, liver disease. It affects both adults and children, being particularly aggressive in the latter. Eighty per cent of patients respond satisfactorily to treatment; the other 20% progress to end-stage liver disease and require transplantation.

AREAS COVERED

This review emphasizes the importance of a timely diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis and provides a practical guide for its treatment. The authors summarize the treatment options available for autoimmune hepatitis and stress that most patients respond successfully to standard treatment with prednisolone and azathioprine, two well-tried and inexpensive drugs. The authors also review the options for difficult-to-treat patients (non-responders and frequent relapsers), for whom newer immunosuppressive agents--usually employed as anti-rejection drugs--have been tried with variable success.

EXPERT OPINION

Autoimmune hepatitis is exquisitely responsive to immunosuppression but treatment must be started as soon as possible to achieve full remission and halt progression of liver disease. New strategies aiming at treating the unresponsive patients and at specifically curbing the liver autoimmune attack, without provoking unwanted systemic side effects, are being investigated and may be available within the next 5 years.

Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the liver with a dismal prognosis when left untreated. Key for the improvement of prognosis is a timely diagnosis before cirrhosis has developed. This is reached by the exclusion of other causes of hepatitis, elevated immunoglobulin G, autoantibody profile and histological assessment. Treatment achieves remission rates in 80% of individuals and consists of immunosuppression with corticosteroids and azathioprine. A recent randomised controlled multicenter trial has added budesonide to the effective treatment options in non-cirrhotic patients and leads to a reduction of unwanted steroid side effects. Autoimmune hepatitis is an autoimmune disease of unknown aetiology. Association studies of major histocompatibility complex and other genes demonstrate an influence of immunogenetics. However, apart from the autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type 1, in which 10% of patients suffer from an autoantibody-positive autoimmune hepatitis linked to mutations of the autoimmune regulator gene, there is no clear evidence for a hereditary aetiology of this disease.

[Autoimmune hepatitis: diagnostic and therapeutic up-to-date]

Autoimmune hepatitis is a disorder of unknown aetiology that occurs in children and adults of all ages with a female predominance. The spectrum of presentation is wide, ranging from no symptoms to acute liver failure. The diagnosis is based on high level serum gammaglobulins, characteristic circulating autoantibodies and histologic abnormalities (necrosis and inflammation). Autoimmune hepatitis is classified on the basis of the autoantibody pattern: type 1 (antinuclear and/or smooth muscle antibodies) is the classic form whereas type II (liver-kidney microsome 1 antibody) is much less common and occurs mainly in childhood. Mixed forms of autoimmune hepatitis that share features with other putative autoimmune liver diseases, primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis, have been described. Because of therapeutic issues, it is important to distinguish autoimmune hepatitis from other forms of hepatitis and the use of diagnostic scoring systems may be helpful. The treatment of autoimmune hepatitis has not changed for the past 30 years. It consists of corticosteroids associated with azathioprine. This treatment is rapidly effective but usually only suspensive. Relapse after treatment withdrawal is the rule (80% of cases). The main risk factor of recurrence is the degree of residual inflammation on liver biopsy. The frequency of side effects justifies an attempt of drug discontinuation provided that criteria of clinical, biochemical and histological remission are achieved after at least 2 years of treatment.

Advances in the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is characterized by chronic inflammation of the liver, interface hepatitis (based on histologic examination), hypergammaglobulinemia, and production of autoantibodies. Many clinical and basic science studies have provided important insights into the pathogenesis and treatment of AIH. Transgenic mice that express human antigens and develop autoantibodies, liver-infiltrating CD4(+) T cells, liver inflammation, and fibrosis have been developed as models of AIH. AIH has been associated with autoantibodies against members of the cytochrome P450 superfamily of enzymes, transfer RNA selenocysteine synthase, formiminotransferase cyclodeaminase, and the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases, whereas alleles such as DRB1*0301 and DRB1*0401 are genetic risk factors in white North American and northern European populations. Deficiencies in the number and function of CD4(+)CD25(+) (regulatory) T cells disrupt immune homeostasis and might be corrected as a therapeutic strategy. Treatment can be improved by continuing corticosteroid therapy until normal liver test results and normal liver tissue are within normal limits, instituting ancillary therapies to prevent drug-related side effects, identifying problematic patients early, and providing long-term maintenance therapy after patients experience a first relapse. Calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolate mofetil are potential salvage therapies, and reagents such as recombinant interleukin-10, abatacept, and CD3-specific antibodies are feasible as therapeutics. Liver transplantation is an effective salvage therapy, even in the elderly, and AIH must be considered in all patients with graft dysfunction after liver transplantation. Identification of the key defects in immune homeostasis and antigen targets will direct new therapies.

Difficult treatment decisions in autoimmune hepatitis

Treatment decisions in autoimmune hepatitis are complicated by the diversity of its clinical presentations, uncertainties about its natural history, evolving opinions regarding treatment end points, varied nature of refractory disease, and plethora of alternative immunosuppressive agents. The goals of this article are to review the difficult treatment decisions and to provide the bases for making sound therapeutic judgments. The English literature on the treatment problems in autoimmune hepatitis were identified by Medline search up to October 2009 and 32 years of personal experience. Autoimmune hepatitis may have an acute severe presentation, mild inflammatory activity, lack autoantibodies, exhibit atypical histological changes (centrilobular zone 3 necrosis or bile duct injury), or have variant features reminiscent of another disease (overlap syndrome). Corticosteroid therapy must be instituted early, applied despite the absence of symptoms, or modified in an individualized fashion. Pursuit of normal liver tests and tissue is the ideal treatment end point, but this objective must be tempered against the risk of side effects. Relapse after treatment withdrawal requires long-term maintenance therapy, preferably with azathioprine. Treatment failure or an incomplete response warrants salvage therapy that can include conventional medications in modified dose or empirical therapies with calcineurin inhibitors or mycophenolate mofetil. Liver transplantation supersedes empirical drug therapy in decompensated patients. Elderly and pregnant patients warrant treatment modifications. Difficult treatment decisions in autoimmune hepatitis can be simplified by recognizing its diverse manifestations and individualizing treatment, pursuing realistic goals, applying appropriate salvage regimens, and identifying problematic patients early.

Mycophenolate mofetil as rescue treatment for autoimmune liver disease in children: a 5-year follow-up

BACKGROUND/AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) therapy in children with autoimmune liver disease who are resistant to or intolerant of standard immunosuppression.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

(a) failure to achieve/maintain remission with prednisolone/azathioprine therapy or (b) significant treatment side-effects. Initial MMF dose was 20mg/kg/day, gradually increased to a maximum of 40 mg/kg/day. Azathioprine was stopped when MMF was commenced.

RESULTS

Twenty-six children (17 female) were recruited. Median (range) age at diagnosis was 9.9 (1.2-14.4) years. Sixteen had Type 1 autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), two Type 2 AIH, and eight had autoimmune sclerosing cholangitis (ASC). Median (range) time from diagnosis to addition of MMF was 14.9 (0.2-108.6) months. Eighteen children responded to MMF, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) normalising in 14. At median (range) follow-up of 61.5 (19.5-96.3) months, AST remained normal in 12. All 18 children were well, but two had clinical signs of portal hypertension. Eight (6 ASC) did not respond: AST remained elevated in seven, one was listed for transplant for decompensated liver disease and one had clinical signs of portal hypertension. MMF was well tolerated. Leukopenia (n=7) was the most common side-effect.

CONCLUSIONS

MMF is an effective rescue therapy for children with AIH, but not for those with ASC.

Non-classical phenotypes of autoimmune hepatitis and advances in diagnosis and treatment

Non-classical manifestations of autoimmune hepatitis can delay diagnosis and treatment. Our aims were to describe the clinical phenotypes that can confound the diagnosis, detail scoring systems that can ensure their recognition, and outline advances in treatment that can improve their outcome. Prime source and review articles in English were selected through Medline from 1970-2008 and assimilated into personal libraries spanning 32 years. Acute severe or asymptomatic presentations and atypical histological findings, including centrilobular zone 3 necrosis and concurrent bile duct changes, are compatible with the diagnosis. Cholangiographic abnormalities may be present in children and adults with the disease, and autoimmune hepatitis must be considered in patients without autoantibodies or with antimitochondrial antibodies and no other cholestatic features. Asymptomatic patients frequently become symptomatic; mild disease can progress; and there are no confident indices that justify withholding treatment. Two diagnostic scoring systems with complementary virtues have been developed to evaluate patients with confusing features. Normal liver tests and tissue constitute the optimal end point of treatment, and the first relapse is an indication for long-term azathioprine therapy. Cyclosporine, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil are promising salvage therapies, and budesonide with azathioprine may be a superior frontline treatment. We conclude that the non-classical phenotypes of autoimmune hepatitis can be recognized promptly, diagnosed accurately, and treated effectively.

Safety issues in the management of autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Prednisone and azathioprine are effective in the treatment of autoimmune hepatitis, but diverse side effects can diminish their net benefit.

OBJECTIVES

Describe the frequency and nature of these side effects and propose management strategies to minimize their impact.

METHODS

Pertinent articles published from 1970 to 2007 were identified by Medline search and through a personal library.

RESULTS

Medication is prematurely discontinued in 13% of patients mainly because of cosmetic changes, cytopenia, or osteopenia. Populations at high risk are the elderly, those with pre-existent co-morbidities, patients with near-zero thiopurine methyltransferase activity, individuals who are treatment-dependent, pregnant women, and asymptomatic patients who are over-treated.

CONCLUSIONS

Proper patient selection, effective pre-treatment counseling, preemptive protective measures, realistic treatment objectives, and early identification of problematic patients can reduce complications. Individualized dosing schedules and the emergence of non-steroidal medications are realistic expectations.

Autoimmune hepatitis in children: diagnosis, pathology and treatment

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is characterized by progressive inflammation of the liver and destruction of liver parenchyma. Rare in absolute terms, it is nevertheless an important cause of noninfectious chronic liver disease in children. In many ways, the diagnosis and treatment of children with AIH has changed little over the last 10 years. However, in recent years, steady progress in defining the genetic, immunologic and potential environmental triggers that underlie this disease, in addition to increasing experience with a wider array of therapeutic agents, promises to expand our understanding and ability to treat AIH effectively. This review will summarize the current clinical and pathophysiological understanding of AIH in children, along with therapeutic options.

Follow-up of children with autoimmune hepatitis treated with cyclosporine

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of cyclosporine in inducing and maintaining remission of the inflammatory process in autoimmune hepatitis, when used in combination with low doses of prednisone and azathioprine and to identify the prognostic factors associated with sustained remission.

METHODS

Eighty-four patients with autoimmune hepatitis were consecutively recruited from 5 centers between January 1994 and March 2001. Cyclosporine was administered during the first 6 months. Thereafter, in patients with aminotransferase levels of lower than twice the normal values, prednisone and azathioprine were initiated.

RESULTS

Normal aminotransferase levels were observed in 94.05% (79/84) of the patients, 72% of them within the first 6 months of treatment. Total serum bilirubin level of greater than 1.2 mg/dL and portal hypertension at diagnosis jointly predicted a significant delay in remission. Adverse effects related to cyclosporine remained mild and transient. Low doses of prednisone and standard doses of azathioprine were not implicated in relapse of the disease during the follow-up of any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

This protocol allowed control of the liver inflammatory process and was well tolerated. The response to this immunosuppressive therapy can be predicted with accuracy. Factors delaying remission can be identified early at diagnosis and may contribute to the development of more effective treatment policies for this condition.

Clinical and biochemical features of autoimmune hepatitis in 36 pediatric patients

BACKGROUND: Few studies on autoimmune hepatitis have enrolled non-Caucasian groups. AIMS: To evaluate Brazilian children with type 1 and 2 autoimmune hepatitis regarding outcome and clinical and biochemical parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients were submitted to a protocol that evaluated the clinical history, physical and biochemical data, and the course of the disease. Twenty-four children had type 1 autoimmune hepatitis, seven had type 2 and five had unclassified autoimmune hepatitis. Most patients were females (77%), with a median age at diagnosis of 11 years, and the median duration of symptoms was 5.5 and 8 months for types 1 and 2, respectively. Jaundice and choluria were the most common clinical manifestations. RESULTS: Treatment with azathioprine and prednisone was successful in patients with type 1 and 2 autoimmune hepatitis. AST and ALT decreased after 4 to 8 weeks of treatment compared to pretreatment levels in type 1 autoimmune hepatitis. Increased GGT values returned to pretreatment levels after 1 year in the two types. Three patients died and three other patients underwent liver transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Non-Caucasian children had a similar disease when compared to Caucasian ones with autoimmune hepatitis. Increased levels of GGT during the first year of treatment should not be the only parameter for the indication of cholangiopathy.

Autoimmune hepatitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis

Autoimmune liver disease in children presents predominantly as autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). These diagnoses must be considered in patients who have acute and chronic hepatitis, particularly when an extrahepatic autoimmune disorder is present. In AIH, the timely and sustained control of liver inflammation is critical to improve the short- and long-term outcomes. No effective treatment for PSC has been identified to date, but supportive care, careful attention to complications and associated nonhepatic diseases, and liver transplantation significantly improve the long-term outcome.

Cost-effectiveness of pharmacotherapy for autoimmune hepatitis

In > 80% of patients with autoimmune hepatitis, steroid therapy alone or in combination with azathioprine results in disease remission. Treatment response results in reversal of fibrosis and excellent long-term survival in many patients, whereas untreated patients may expect a 10-year survival of < 30%. The use of azathioprine monotherapy (2 mg/kg/day) has gained widespread acceptance in maintaining remission in clinical practice. Although all patients with autoimmune hepatitis may not need treatment, particularly those with mild disease, alternative strategies are required in patients who have failed to achieve remission on standard therapy of steroids with or without azathioprine, or patients with azathioprine-induced drug toxicity. In such circumstances, the use of salvage therapy in the form of ciclosporin, tacrolimus or mycophenolate mofetil may be warranted. Liver transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients who present with subacute liver failure or decompensated cirrhosis. Salvage therapy results in an exponential rise in cost with each increment in therapeutic escalation. As an alternative to standard therapy, it has also been suggested that novel therapies such as ciclosporin, tacrolimus or mycophenolate mofetil be initiated to achieve remission. However, a > 10-fold cost differential exists between the charges associated with more potent immunosuppression and standard therapy. Therefore, in evaluating novel immunosuppression in autoimmune hepatitis, it behoves clinicians not only to consider end points pertaining to efficacy, but also end points pertaining to cost-effectiveness. Moreover, the exact role of pharmacogenomics and genotyping of thiopurine methyltransferase in patients with autoimmune hepatitis needs to be fully defined.

Detection of autoimmune regulator gene mutations in children with type 2 autoimmune hepatitis and extrahepatic immune-mediated diseases

Autoimmune regulator gene mutations were identified in 3 children with type 2 autoimmune hepatitis and extrahepatic immune diseases, including 1 child with immune hepatitis recurrence after liver transplantation. These findings suggest that autoimmune regulator gene variants might predispose children to systemic autoimmune disease, a recurrence of immune disease, or both.

Clinical features and biochemical data of Caucasian children at diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of systematic epidemiological data regarding clinical characteristics, sex distribution and autoantibody pattern in Caucasian children with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).

STUDY DESIGN

Data of 142 children presenting with AIH (97 girls and 45 boys) have been analysed for their clinical, serological, and histological profile.

RESULTS

Clinical findings were jaundice (58%), unspecific weakness (57%), anorexia (47%), abdominal pain (38%) and paleness (26%). One hundred and three children (73%) (68 girls, 35 boys, 1.9:1) had AIH type 1 and 35 patients (25%) (27 girls, 8 boys, 3.4:1) type 2 due to specific autoantibodies. Four children could not be classified. Histology of 122 children revealed active hepatitis in 64 (52%), cirrhosis in 46 (38%), and mild inflammatory activity in 12 individuals (10%). The most prevalent HLA type was B8.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort the prevalence of AIH was half as frequent in boys as in girls. Type 1 was the most frequent diagnosis (73%) and was more prevalent in older children. Type 2 was equally age distributed. The clinical presentation of AIH in children was unspecific and type I and type II could only be differentiated by the determination of the specific autoantibodies. Ninety percent of patients presented with high inflammatory activity or liver cirrhosis.

Treatment challenges and investigational opportunities in autoimmune hepatitis

New drugs and advances in molecular biology afford opportunities to upgrade the treatment of autoimmune hepatitis. The aims of this study were to define treatment problems, identify possible solutions, and stimulate investigations to improve patient care. A clinical subcommittee of the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group reviewed current management difficulties and proposed corrective actions. The assessment of new front-line and salvage therapies for adults and children were given top priority. Cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil were endorsed as drugs worthy of rigorous study in severe disease, and budesonide was endorsed for study as front-line therapy in mild disease. Diagnostic criteria and treatment regimens for children required codification, and pharmacokinetic studies were encouraged to develop optimal dosing schedules based on therapeutic ranges. Collaborative efforts were proposed to help understand racial, geographical, and genetic factors affecting outcome and to establish definitions and therapies for variant syndromes and graft dysfunction after transplantation. The development of experimental animal models was deemed essential for the study of site-specific molecular interventions, and gene therapy was endorsed as a means of bolstering reparative processes. In conclusion, evolving pharmacological and technical advances promise to improve the treatment of autoimmune hepatitis, and investigations of these advances are timely, feasible, and necessary.

Efficacy of tacrolimus in the treatment of steroid refractory autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an immune mediated chronic liver disease with a prevalence of 17 cases/100,000. Resistance to the standard treatment of AIH (prednisone and azathioprine) occurs in 15% to 20%. There is currently no standard treatment of patients with steroid refractory AIH.

GOALS

Determine the efficacy of tacrolimus in the treatment of steroid refractory AIH.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study evaluating the efficacy of Tacrolimus in the treatment of steroid refractory AIH.

RESULTS

Between October 1998 and February 2002, 11 patients with steroid refractory AIH were treated with tacrolimus. Mean age was 63 years. Median duration of steroid treatment before starting tacrolimus was 9 months. Median duration of tacrolimus treatment was 25 months. Median follow-up period was 16 months. Median baseline ALT, AST were 77 U/L and 68 U/L and became 21 U/L and 32 U/L respectively at end of follow-up (P = 0.005 and 0.01 respectively). Significant weight reduction was seen in all patients (P = 0.02). Tacrolimus treatment was safe and well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Use of low dose tacrolimus led to successful biochemical and histologic remission and weaning off prednisone in patients with steroid refractory AIH. This data supports further studies in evaluating the use of tacrolimus in the treatment of AIH.

Treatment of autoimmune hepatitis: Current and future therapies

Autoimmune hepatitis is an uncommon liver disease affecting children and adults. Early diagnosis and start of treatment improve the response and long-term outcome. Initial treatment depends on patient's age and the clinical, laboratory, and histological features that allow the prediction of the response, as well as the presence or absence of associated extrahepatic disorders. In specialized centers, short-term cyclosporine is used safely and successfully to control the liver inflammatory process. Low doses of prednisone in association with azathioprine are sufficient to sustain the response. Maintenance treatment must be administered for several years, and withdrawal can be attempted after at least 4 years of a complete and sustained response. Future research should focus on the recovery of immune homeostasis in these patients by less aggressive means.

Features and outcome of autoimmune hepatitis type 2 presenting with isolated positivity for anti-liver cytosol antibody

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) type 2 is identified by the presence in the serum of anti-liver/kidney microsome type 1 autoantibody. Anti-liver cytosol autoantibody has been reported in children with autoimmune liver disorders mostly in association with anti-liver/kidney microsome reactivity. However, its role as a sole marker of AIH type 2 is debated. We describe here a series of 18 children and adolescents (15 girls, 3 boys) with AIH with serum anti-liver cytosol type 1 (aLC1) as the only autoimmune marker.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted from 3 pediatric hepatology units of all children with an autoimmune liver disease associated with aLC1 as found by immunofluorescence and/or immunodiffusion or immunoblotting.

RESULTS

Age at first symptoms ranged from 11 months to 14 years; 12 children presented with acute hepatitis, 1 with progressive jaundice, and 5 were asymptomatic. Anti-liver/kidney microsome, antimitochondria, and anti-actin autoantibodies were not detected. Signs of cirrhosis were present in 11 children. Immunosuppressive treatment was effective in all except 2 children who had subfulminant hepatic failure and who required liver transplantation. Sixteen patients (14 with their native liver) currently are alive; 14 patients still are on immunosuppressive therapy after 1 to 22 years. According to the international scoring system for the diagnosis of AIH, 16 patients corresponded to a definite diagnosis and 2 corresponded to a probable diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of aLC1 in children with acute or chronic liver disease of unknown origin strongly supports a diagnosis of AIH and is an indication for early immunosuppressive therapy.

Effectiveness and safety of ciclosporin as therapy for autoimmune diseases of the liver in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Conventional treatment for autoimmune hepatitis results in a significant percentage of failures and several, poorly tolerated, side-effects. Therapy for autoimmune cholangitis and giant cell hepatitis associated with autoimmune haemolysis is poorly documented. Ciclosporin is a promising treatment for all of these diseases.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 12 patients treated in our unit between 1987 and 2001. Eight had autoimmune hepatitis, two had autoimmune cholangitis and two had giant cell hepatitis. Indications for ciclosporin were treatment failure (four patients) and contraindications to/refusal of steroids (eight patients). Ciclosporin was administered in five untreated cases and in seven patients during relapse. The mean duration of ciclosporin administration was 35.6 months (8-89 months). The median follow-up was 6.5 years (1.5-15 years).

RESULTS

All patients achieved complete remission in a median period of 4.5 weeks (2-12 weeks). No treatment withdrawal due to side-effects occurred. Three patients required a combination of ciclosporin with conventional treatment due to severe liver function impairment. Tolerance to ciclosporin was excellent. A 20% transient elevation of serum creatinine occurred in one case, gingival hypertrophy in two and moderate hypertrichosis in two.

CONCLUSIONS

Ciclosporin may be considered as a safe treatment for all autoimmune liver diseases and as an effective alternative for front-line therapy.

Transition of care between paediatric and adult gastroenterology. Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare chronic disease of the liver with an excellent prognosis under medical therapy capable of reaching complete remission. The diagnosis of AIH relies on the exclusion of viral, metabolic, genetic and toxic aetiologies of chronic hepatitis, or hepatic injury. Autoantibodies contribute to the diagnosis of AIH and have led to the serological subclassification into three distinct types. Also, immunogenetic associations suggest heterogeneity of the syndrome of AIH. Treatment is not based on serological types but is uniformly employed for all subtypes of AIH. Although 90% of patients respond to treatment, immunosuppressive drugs used in transplant medicine have been employed for patients with treatment failure. New drugs, such as budenoside, are being evaluated for the long-term treatment of AIH with a reduction in steroid side-effects. Liver transplantation is an established treatment option for patients who fail to reach remission and progress to cirrhosis and liver failure. In Europe, about 4% of cirrhotic patients with the diagnosis of AIH undergo transplantation. The diagnosis and awareness of the disease is designed to reduce mortality and morbidity.

Review article: immunopathogenetic and therapeutic aspects of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis is a chronic, progressive liver disease that responds well to immunosuppressive therapy, but has a poor prognosis if untreated. Possible triggering factors include viruses, other autoimmune disorders and drugs. The molecular mechanisms contributing to the pathogenesis include: reactions of autoantibodies against their corresponding autoantigens; aberrant expression of histocompatibility antigen class I and II molecules, cell adhesion molecules and cytokines; increased oxidative stress; and the occurrence of angiogenesis. The prevalence of the disease is highest in Caucasians, Europeans and women. The natural history of autoimmune hepatitis shows a poor prognosis, with frequent progression to cirrhosis and hepatic insufficiency in untreated patients. The occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma is rare and is found only in long-standing cirrhosis. Corticosteroids as monotherapy or in combination with azathioprine are the treatments of choice; different therapeutic schedules and particularities of treatment for pregnant women and children have been established. To avoid treatment-associated adverse effects, alternative therapies have been proposed, including ciclosporin, budesonide, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, ursodeoxycholic acid, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, mercaptopurine and free radical scavengers. Liver transplantation is indicated for patients refractory to or intolerant of immunosuppressive therapy.