Laparoscopic Nephrectomy Via the Reproperitoneal Approach

Technical and Anatomical Aspects of Retroperitoneoscopic Renal Surgery: A Summary of Tribulations and Resolutions Encountered at a Tertiary Care Institute of North India

INTRODUCTION

Kidneys are a retroperitoneal organ but the widely practiced laparoscopic approach to renal surgery is transperitoneal due to the advantages of greater working space at the cost of entering the peritoneal cavity, risk of injury to intraperitoneal organs, and the increased risk of postoperative bowel complications. The classic open approach to kidney procedures has been the flank approach without violating the peritoneal cavity instead of the retroperitoneal approach to renal surgery with the advantages of direct access to the renal hilum, especially the renal artery. Being a technically challenging procedure, the retroperitoneoscopic approach is less practiced and needs an experienced surgical team. Through this study, we have tried to unveil the myths and illustrate the exact position of ports, which is the decisive initial step in retroperitoneoscopic surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted at a developing tertiary center in northern India with novice staff mainly to determine the technical and anatomical caveats pertaining to the retroperitoneoscopic approach for renal surgeries, the challenges faced, and their resolutions. The decision for the site of incision for primary or camera port was taken only after a proper anatomical study of the cadavers and ongoing retroperitoneal surgical experience while treating various patients suffering from renal diseases. The study comprised eight patients, during the period from June 2023 to March 2024. Various parameters, such as demographic variables, diagnosis, mean operative time, estimated blood loss, technical difficulties encountered and their resolution, complications, and reasons for conversion were studied. A total of 15 cadavers were dissected during the above time period to study finer anatomical details of port positioning and other details.

RESULTS

After an elaborate study of 15 cadavers and thereafter performing surgery on eight patients during the above time period, surgery was successfully performed on six patients, and two patients needed conversion to open procedure due to dense adhesions and non-progression while complications occurred in two patients (peritoneal rent and renal vein injury), which were managed laparoscopically.

CONCLUSION

 Nonetheless, restrictions of surgical space make retroperitoneoscopic space a challenging procedure but with elaborate experience, which we gained through cadaveric study, and surgical results obtained during the initial few cases such as the exact site of the primary port and technical intricacies, and handling of complications if and when faced, we hope our study will certainly make retroperitoneal space more amicable to urologists.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of completely retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy versus traditional retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of completely retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy (CRNU) for the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed and Web of Science databases was conducted to identify trials comparing the outcomes of CRNU and other surgical procedures. A total of 6 case-control studies were selected for analysis. The efficacy and safety of CRNU were evaluated using mean difference or hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CIs, employing continuous or dichotomous method with a random or fixed-effect model. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 11.0 software.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis indicated that CRNU in subjects with UTUC was significantly associated with a shorter operation time (standardized mean difference, -1.36; 95% CI, -1.61 to -1.11, P < .001) and lower blood loss (standardized mean difference, -0.54; 95% CI, -0.77 to -0.31, P < .001) when compared to traditionally retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy (TRNU). No significant difference was observed in the occurrence of grade I & II complications (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.49-2.2, P = .915) and total complications (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.38-1.27, P = .238) between CRNU and TRNU.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that CRNU is an advanced surgical technique that is safe and effective for the treatment of UTUC. We recommend that CRNU be further employed for patients with UTUC. Further randomized, multicenter trials are needed to validate these results, given the limitations of this study.

Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy: current status

The classic retroperitoneal open surgical access to the kidney has been duplicated while performing laparoscopy but is less common than transperitoneal laparoscopy. We reviewed minimally invasive retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy as a part of the international consultation on urological diseases and European Association of Urology international consultation on minimally invasive surgery in urology. A Pubmed/Medline search was performed to identify studies assessing the feasibility, safety and efficacy of laparoscopic and robotic retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy. The articles were reviewed to assess outcomes after simple, radical and donor nephrectomy and comparative trials between retroperitoneoscopic versus the open and transperitoneal route were evaluated. Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy is feasible for most cases of benign non-functioning kidneys. Retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy is also feasible for most tumours and may be better suited for posteriorly located tumours. Both retroperitoneoscopic and transperitoneal nephrectomy have similar outcomes but the operative time may be shorter for the former. The data are insufficient for robotic retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy probably because of limited space and lack of benefit of a robot in ablative surgeries.

Level of evidence: 3a

Original Dissecting Balloon for Retroperitoneal Laparoscopy: A Cost-Effective Alternative to the Commercially Available Device

Objective: Optimal retroperitoneal space creation is of pivotal importance in laparoscopic retroperitoneal surgery. The aim of this study is to report the balloon dissecting technique developed at our institution, comparing the costs of such device with that of the commercially available balloon retroperitoneal expanders. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients, scheduled to undergo retroperitoneoscopic surgery, were randomly divided into two groups. In group 1, retroperitoneal dilatation was performed with the commercially available balloon expander. In group 2, we employed the original balloon dilator created with two middle fingers of a #8 powder-free surgical glove tied to a nondisposable 11 mm trocar and filled with 600 mL of saline, employing simultaneously two 50 mL syringes. Subjective evaluation of the created space was performed by a surgeon blinded in both groups. Economical evaluation included the costs of the disposable materials and of the time in the operative room required to create the dilation. Results: In all the cases, the created dilatation was considered good. In group 1, the time required to dilate the retroperitoneal space was medially 3.15 minutes, whereas in group 2, the time required to prepare the dissecting balloon was medially 1.16 minutes and the time required to dissect the retroperitoneal space was 4.41 minutes (total 5.57 minutes). Considering the costs of the disposable material, the overall costs to create the retroperitoneal space resulted to be 141.95€ in group 1 and 60.27€ in group 2 (p < 0.005). Conclusion: The original dissecting balloon employed at our institution revealed to be easy and of fast manner and offers a valid option for the proper retroperitoneal dissection. Moreover, it revealed to be cost-effective compared with the commercially available supply.

A two-center experience with the exclusive use of laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy for benign renal disease in children

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate a two-center experience with pediatric transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy, specifically focusing on the outcome parameters of operative time, complication, analgesic requirement, and postoperative stay.

METHODS

This ambispective study was conducted over a 4-year period between May 2001 and May 2005 in two tertiary pediatric surgical centers. Data were prospectively recorded from an in-house expanded medical audit system (EMAS) and a Microsoft Excel database. Information on patient demographics, operative time, complications, analgesic requirement, and length of hospital stay were retrieved and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 30 consecutive patients with a mean age of 4.43 years (range, 3 months to 15 years) underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy. All the patients underwent unilateral nephrectomy/nephroureterectomy for multidysplastic kidney (n = 12), reflux nephropathy (n = 13), pelvicoureteric junction obstruction (n = 4), or cystic disease of indeterminate cause (n = 1). The mean operative time was 93 +/- 30 min. The principal hemostatic devices used were the Harmonic Scalpel (20 cases), liga clips (5 cases), and hook diathermy and endoshears exclusively (4 cases). There were no conversions, but the intraoperative complications of bleeding (n = 2), difficult location (n = 1), difficult extraction (n = 1), and requirement for a liver retractor (n = 2) were encountered. An additional five patients had problems in the immediate postoperative period, two of whom went on to have long term difficulties with recurrent urinary tract infections resulting from a residual ureteric stump, which required surgery. Nearly one-third of the patients required morphine for analgesia in the immediate postoperative period, with the figure falling to 20% by day 1. The median postoperative hospital stay was 1 day (range, 0-16 days). At this writing, all the patients remain under surveillance with a mean follow-up period of 2.88 years, and no patients have experienced complications secondary to intraabdominal adhesions.

CONCLUSION

Transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy is technically feasible in most cases of benign renal disease. The intraoperative complications are minimal, and recovery for most is robust. Two-thirds of the patients are discharged within 24 h. In this study, narcotic analgesics were prescribed in about a one-third of all the cases for a limited period. Further problems may be seen when refluxing ureters are incompletely excised. However, the transperitoneal approach does not mitigate against complete excision because the exposure to the pelvis is adequate. At the midterm follow-up assessment, adhesive obstruction was not encountered, confirming this approach as a tenable alternative to other laparoscopic approaches for nephrectomy.

A simple device for making a glove balloon for retroperitoneal dissection

Expansion of the retroperitoneal space is required prior to a retroperitoneal or an extraperitoneal laparoscopic procedure. This is usually performed by inflating a homemade glove balloon or a commercially available balloon. The latter is expensive and the former can sometimes be cumbersome. The present device is a metal cannula with a specially designed nut that holds the fingerstalls of a glove in position obviating the need for a tie. It was used in nine patients for three upper ureterolithotomies, three nephrectomies and three pyelolithotomies, all performed by the retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach. The fingerstalls did not burst or come off during inflation, the quality of dissection was satisfactory and all procedures were performed successfully. This simple reusable device provides a reliable and economical method for making a homemade balloon.

Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of renal pelvis and ureter: Nagoya experience

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis and ureter, we analyzed the clinical outcomes and long-term cancer control of 89 patients.

METHODS

In 36 patients, the kidney was retroperitoneoscopically dissected and the ureteral end was resected with open procedure (combined laparoscopy group). In 53 patients, the ureteral end with a bladder cuff was transected using an endoscopic stapler (pure laparoscopy group). Sixty patients underwent open nephroureterectomy (open group). The median follow-up period was 35, 31, and 17 months in the open, combined, and pure laparoscopy groups, respectively.

RESULTS

The average operative time and bleeding volume was 5.4 hours and 665 mL in the open group, 5.1 hours and 580 mL in the combined laparoscopy group, and 4.3 hours and 354 mL in the pure laparoscopy group, respectively. The cause-specific patient survival rate at 3 years was 81% in the open group, 86% in the combined laparoscopy group, and 80% in the pure laparoscopy group. The bladder recurrence-free rate at 3 years was 51% in the open group, 65% in the combined laparoscopy group, and 45% in the pure laparoscopy group. The extravesical recurrence-free rate at 3 years was 71% in the open surgery group, 76% in the combined laparoscopy group, and 71% in the pure laparoscopy group. No statistically significant difference was seen in patient survival, bladder recurrence, or extravesical recurrence rates among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy is less invasive than open surgery and is a safe and effective alternative.

A simple technique for facilitating kidney entrapment using a laparoscopic sack during retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy

The mouth of a LapSac was opened horizontally using a guidewire and, thereafter, the kidney was moved onto the center of the mouth. Forceps lifted the mouth and the specimen entered into the sack automatically under its own weight. Use of this technique facilitated kidney entrapment.

Retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis and ureter: Nagoya experience

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of our new retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy for patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis and ureter, we present the operative procedure and analysis of the clinical outcome of retroperitoneoscopy in 23 patients.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy between February 2000 and February 2002. Patient age ranged from 44 to 83 years (mean 66.7). Each kidney was retroperitoneoscopically dissected en bloc, together with the perirenal fatty tissue, lymph nodes, and/or adrenal gland, without transecting the ureter. The lower ureter was resected with the bladder cuff transected using an ultrasonic scalpel and an endoscopic gastrointestinal automatic stapler. The dissected specimen was removed intact through a 6-cm-long original incision.

RESULTS

The mean operating time was 4.8 hours, including 0.7 hours for complete removal of the ureteral end with the bladder cuff. The mean estimated blood loss was 304 mL. The mean time to recovery to normal activity was 18 days. In the mean follow-up period of 15 months, 2 patients died of cancer progression in the sixth postoperative month, 2 died of other causes, and 4 had recurrent transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy using an endoscopic gastrointestinal automatic stapler is a fast, low-risk, and minimally invasive procedure and might be an alternative to other laparoscopic techniques and open nephroureterectomy. However, long-term follow-up is necessary to confirm the efficacy for patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis and ureter.

Endoscopically aided retroperitoneal placement of a lumboperitoneal shunt. Technical note

The authors developed a method for retroperitoneal placement of a lumboperitoneal (LP) shunt with the aid of endoscopic monitoring. To perform this procedure, the patient is positioned laterally, the retroperitoneum is entered and dilated with a balloon through a small incision in the flank, and the space is maintained with CO2 insufflation. A peritoneal catheter is introduced into the cavity from the lumbar incision, through which the spinal catheter has been inserted. With the aid of a percutaneous nephroscope inserted in the cavity, the peritoneum is opened with endoscopically guided forceps through the manipulation channel. The shunt tube is then inserted into the pelvic peritoneum with the same forceps. Only two small skin incisions are needed for this method, and the shunt system is shorter compared with the conventional LP setup, which may lessen the risk of obstruction. This method is advantageous in patients who have undergone previous abdominal surgery, because it provides access to the peritoneum without concern for the presence of peritoneal adhesions.

Hand-assisted vs. retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy

PURPOSE

We retrospectively compared our initial experience with the hand-assisted and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy techniques to determine if there are important differences between these approaches.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-four laparoscopic cases consisting of 12 hand-assisted and 12 retroperitoneal nephrectomies were compared. All cases but one were radical nephrectomies with intact specimen extraction performed for suspected stage T1 neoplasms. Data were collected from medical records and a postoperative questionnaire. To determine if significant learning curves existed, the first six nephrectomies in each group were compared with the second six nephrectomies on the basis of operative criteria. The two groups did not differ significantly in age, body mass index, ASA rating, or number of previous abdominal operations.

RESULTS

Although the mean tumor volume was greater in the hand-assisted group than the retroperitoneal group, the difference did not quite reach statistical significance (91.19 v 24.7 cc3; P = 0.06). The mean operative time, estimated blood loss, narcotic use (milligrams of intravenous morphine equivalent), hours to oral intake, hospital stay, and estimated percent activity at 2 weeks for the hand-assisted group (238.33 min, 293.75 mL, 35.7 mg, 17.56 hours, 4.4 days, 74.75%, respectively) were not significantly different from the values in the retroperitoneal group (255.83 min, 141.67 mL, 24.5 mg, 22.36 hours, 3.6 days, 76.91%). We found no significant difference in the mean operative times for the first and second six cases in either group.

CONCLUSION

In the initial experience and comparison of hand-assisted and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy, we found no significant differences in operative time, estimated blood loss, narcotic usage, hours to oral intake, hospital stay, or activity level at 2 weeks postoperatively. A randomized trial is under way at our institution.

Retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy by the posterior lumber approach for renal-cell carcinoma associated with chronic renal failure

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and invasiveness of retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF), a group known to have relatively high surgical risk.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between May 1996 and September 1999, six CRF patients maintained on hemodialysis underwent retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy for clinically localized RCC by the posterior lumber approach. The excised kidneys were evacuated via a posterior skin incision (5 cm) between two port sites; the muscle layers were not incised.

RESULTS

The procedure was completed in all patients with no major complications. The mean operative time was 162 (range 135-210) minutes, and the estimated blood loss was 58 (15-100) mL; none of the patients required a blood transfusion. Regular hemodialysis was restarted on postoperative day 2 or 3.

CONCLUSIONS

This procedure seems to be minimally invasive and suitable for the treatment of small RCC in atrophic kidneys, especially in patients with CRF.

Retroperitoneoscopic pyelotomy combined with the transposition of crossing vessels for ureteropelvic junction obstruction

PURPOSE

We developed a new approach of retroperitoneoscopic pyelotomy combined with the transposition of crossing vessels for ureteropelvic junction obstruction as an alternative to conventional antegrade or retrograde endopyelotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From February 1997 to August 1999 we treated 5 cases of ureteropelvic junction obstruction due to crossing vessels that were diagnosed by helical computerized tomography. Ureterovascular hydronephrosis characterized by a malrotated renal pelvis with anterior crossing vessels was observed in 4 cases and ureteropelvic junction obstruction with a posterior crossing artery was present in 1. After endoureterotomy stent insertion under cystoscopic guidance we performed retroperitoneoscopic endopyelotomy with the kidney in standard position. Crossing vessels were transposed to a higher position to remove obstruction and fixed with peripelvic tissue via retroperitoneoscopy. In all cases a longitudinal incision approximately 1.5 cm. long was made with a potassium titanyl phosphate laser.

RESULTS

Convalescence was uneventful in all patients and the endoureterotomy stent was removed 4 to 8 weeks after surgery. Postoperatively helical computerized tomography showed the successful transposition of crossing vessels and significant hydronephrosis resolution in all cases. All patients were asymptomatic during followup of 17 to 28 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite our small number of patients our results are sufficient to conclude that retroperitoneoscopic pyelotomy combined with the transposition of crossing vessels is a simple and reliable method for treating ureterovascular hydronephrosis and associated conditions.

Simple nephrectomy: retroperitoneal approach

Direct extraperitoneal surgery has become the preferred approach to laparoscopic nephrectomy since the introduction of the balloon dilation method. The lateral decubitus position provides good exposure, but the prone position is used at some centers to gain better exposure with the aid of gravity. The open conversion rate ranges from 0 to 16% and the complication rate from 5% to 45%, with most complications being minor. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic simple nephrectomy is definitely superior to open nephrectomy as judged by analgesic use and recovery time. The higher complication rate and lower efficiency can be taken care of by experience and proper case selection.

Gasless retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy for a case with renal cell carcinoma

A 53-year-old man with incidental renal cell carcinoma underwent gasless retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy. Convalescence was uneventful. There remained no evidence of disease during the 58-month follow up.

Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for benign diseases of the kidney: prospective nonrandomized comparison with open surgical nephrectomy

PURPOSE

To describe, define, and evaluate the efficacy of retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy (RPN) for benign diseases of the kidney and to compare it with open surgical nephrectomy (OSN) via a flank approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From August 1995 to November 1997, 29 men and 14 women (mean age 33 years) with severely damaged kidneys underwent RPN. Among these, 11 patients had undergone prior surgery, 3 had chronic renal failure, and 8 patients had a percutaneous nephrostomy. The RPN was performed via three or four ports, with the kidneys being removed intact from the retroperitoneal working space. During the same period, 43 patients underwent OSN through a flank approach (extrapleural and extraperitoneal) for nonfunctioning or poorly functioning kidneys.

RESULTS

In the RPN group, two patients required conversion to OSN. The operative time and estimated blood loss ranged from 40 to 210 minutes (mean 114 minutes) and 50 to 450 mL (mean 127 mL), respectively. In the OSN group, the corresponding values were 60 to 100 minutes (mean 104 minutes) and 70 to 600 mL (mean 266 mL), respectively. The mean length of hospitalization after RPN was considerably shorter--2 to 7 days (mean 3.4 days)--than after conventional open surgery--4 to 16 days (mean 8.6 days). The incidences of minor and major complications were 21% and 5%, respectively, in the RPN group and 33% and 2% in the OSN group. The postoperative analgesic requirement was significantly less (P < 0.001) in RPN group. The interval to return to normal activity ranged from 7 to 30 days (mean 20.3 days) and 20 to 60 days (mean 32.9 days) in the RPN and OSN group, respectively, with superior performance status, cosmesis, and quality of life observed in the former group.

CONCLUSION

Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy is as effective as open nephrectomy for benign kidney diseases with less postoperative pain, a shorter hospital stay, earlier recuperation, and excellent cosmesis. This procedure can also be performed in patients who have undergone abdominal operations previously, in those with chronic renal failure, and in those with a percutaneous nephrostomy. The operation has become our first line of approach for benign diseases of the kidney.

Transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for giant hydronephrosis

PURPOSE

We evaluate laparoscopic nephrectomy for giant hydronephrosis with an emphasis on the operative technique of retroperitoneoscopic surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During the last 2 years 13 men and 5 women underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy for giant hydronephrosis via a transperitoneal (6) or retroperitoneal (12) approach. The etiology was congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction in 17 patients and hydronephrosis caused by stone disease in 1. Three patients had a contralateral obstructed kidney. Renal parameters were normal in all patients.

RESULTS

All procedures were successfully completed without the need for conversion to open surgery. Mean operating time was 113.8 minutes (range 70 to 165) and average blood loss was 260 ml. (range 40 to 600). No patient required a blood transfusion. Postoperative recovery was uneventful with an average postoperative hospital stay of only 3.2 days (range 2 to 5).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic nephrectomy is a good alternative to open surgery for giant hydronephrosis and significantly reduced the morbidity of surgery. A retroperitoneal approach is feasible, despite the large amount of retroperitoneal space occupied by these hugely dilated kidneys. Modifications of our technique have been invaluable to the successful outcome in this series.

Modified minimal cost retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy, nephrectomy with isthumusectomy and nephroureterectomy in children: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility of retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy, nephrectomy with isthmusectomy and nephroureterectomy in children with nonfunctioning kidneys and renal anomalies, at minimal cost using a modified technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eleven children (aged 4-16 years) underwent retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy, nephroureterectomy, or nephrectomy with isthmusectomy for nonfunctioning kidneys. Three patients had previously undergone percutaneous nephrostomy to evaluate whether the kidney could be salvaged, but this did not alter the success of technique, although adhesions and fibrosis required careful and precise dissection.

RESULTS

All procedures were completed successfully with minor complications (peritoneal transgression via the port in two patients, with no consequences). The mean operative duration, blood loss and hospital stay were 109 min, 82 mL and 2.25 days, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Retroperitoneoscopic procedures can be conducted safely, successfully and at minimal cost without compromising any principles of technique. It is not essential to prepare the bowel or use ureteric catheterization and renal artery embolization. Expensive balloon dissectors, trocar-sealing balloons, endostaplers and endobags, lap sacs or morcellators are not required. The direct approach to the kidney via retroperitoneoscopy is also quicker.

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a five-year experience

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for patients with small renal cell carcinoma by comparing the clinical results of patients treated laparoscopically with those of patients treated with traditional open radical nephrectomy.

METHODS

Of 100 patients with localized, small (less than 5 cm in diameter) renal cell carcinoma treated by the same surgical team between 1992 and 1998, 60 patients underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and 40 underwent open radical nephrectomy. Of the 60 laparoscopically treated patients, the first 11 and the most recent 34 patients were operated on transperitoneally and the other 15 retroperitoneally.

RESULTS

The mean operative time of the laparoscopically treated patients was longer than that of the open nephrectomy patients (5.2 versus 3.3 hours, P<0.001). The mean blood loss of the laparoscopically treated patients was less than that of the open nephrectomy patients (255 versus 512 mL, P<0.001). One laparoscopically treated patient needed conversion to open surgery. The time to full convalescence of the laparoscopically treated patients was shorter than that of the open nephrectomy patients (23 versus 57 days, P<0.001). Two of the 59 laparoscopically treated patients and 1 of the 40 open nephrectomy patients had metastatic disease. The former 2 are alive with stable disease and the latter died of progressive disease 11 months after surgery. The 5-year disease-free rate was 95.5% in laparoscopy patients and 97.5% in open nephrectomy patients (P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is a less invasive alternative to open surgery for patients with localized small renal cell carcinoma.

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in children

PURPOSE

We report our experience with retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy in children, and describe our surgical technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five and 15 children 9 months to 17 years old underwent nephrectomy with cystoscopy plus intravesical ureteral stump fulguration for ureteral ablation and nephrectomy only, respectively. Surgical indications were unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney in 8 cases (parental preference for surgery), a refluxing, chronic pyelonephritic kidney in 5, renal vascular hypertension in 2, and hydronephrosis and chronic pyelonephritis in 5, including 3 in whom a nephrostomy tube was placed percutaneously before laparoscopic nephrectomy. Access was obtained by a 10 mm. incision made posterior to the anterosuperior iliac spine with dissection into the retroperitoneal space and trochar placement. Two and sometimes 3 additional 5 mm. ports were placed retroperitoneally.

RESULTS

Average operative time was 1 hour 42 minutes. The most recent cases were performed in less than 1 hour and in 3 nephrectomy only required 30 minutes. All but 1 procedure were completed laparoscopically. One case was converted to open surgery secondary to obscured visibility due to bleeding. Blood loss in all cases was less than 30 cc (average 5 to 10). A total of 13 children were discharged home immediately postoperatively. Five children underwent concomitant procedures, including contralateral ureteroneocystotomy in 4, circumcision in 1 and cystoscopic fulguration of the ureteral stump in 5. Those who underwent ureteral reimplantation were hospitalized for 48 hours. One patient remained hospitalized for 3 days due to fever of unknown origin and 2 were admitted to the hospital for 23-hour observation. All children returned to full activity within 1 week of surgery. Analgesia consisted of 1 dose of ketorolac, bupivacaine injections at the incisional sites at the completion of the procedure, and acetaminophen postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

As confirmed by parent questionnaire, patient satisfaction was excellent.

Initial experiences with the retroperitoneal approach for endoscopic nephrectomy with the patient in the prone position

Retroperitoneal endoscopic nephrectomy with the patient in the prone position was performed in 12 patients. Indications for this procedure were end-stage kidneys with ureteropelvic junction stenosis or distal ureteric obstruction, nonfunctional kidneys with drug resistant renin-mediated hypertension, and distal ureter malignancy. The retroperitoneal area was exposed using an open surgical technique in combination with the use of a liquid-filled dissection balloon. Removal of kidney tissue was performed with a morcellator through one of the ports. On average, the operating time was 210 min (range 160-480 min) to complete a one-sided nephrectomy. No major complications occurred. Mean hospital stay in this series was 6.6 days, and the follow-up period was uncomplicated in all cases. Retroperitoneal endoscopic nephrectomy with the patient in the prone position is an acceptable alternative to open nephrectomy in selected indications.