Response to flutamide withdrawal in advanced prostate cancer in progression under combination therapy

PSA response to antiandrogen withdrawal: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Antiandrogen withdrawal (AAW) response is the paradoxical decrease in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) following the withdrawal of antiandrogen in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Currently, the reported literature on the proportion of patients exhibiting AAW response and the differences in PSA response between the types of antiandrogens is unclear.

METHODS

This review aimed to explore the PSA response to AAW and to identify if the response depends on the type of antiandrogens. A literature search was performed using databases PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE with a cut-off date of 23rd of November 2020. Studies reporting on outcomes of AAW and prostate cancer were included. Studies were screened by two reviewers and relevant data extracted. Meta-analysis of outcomes was reported using random-effects and fixed-effects model. A subgroup analysis was performed for type of antiandrogen.

RESULTS

From 450 studies, 23 were included with a total of 1474 patients with advanced prostate cancer were available for further analysis. Overall, 395 (26%) patients had any reduction in PSA levels (95% CI: 20-32%) and 183 (11%) patients had a ≥50% reduction in PSA levels (95% CI: 6-16%). Among the 1212 patients on first-generation antiandrogens, 30% (95% CI: 23-38%) had any PSA decline with 15% patients having a ≥50% PSA decline (95% CI: 8-22%). In contrast, among the 108 patients on second-generation antiandrogens, 7% (95% CI: 0-13%) had any PSA decline and only 1% (95% CI: 0-5%) had a ≥50% PSA decline. Also, among the 154 patients on androgen synthesis inhibitors, 26% (95% CI: 19-33%) had any PSA decline and only 4% (95% CI: 0-13%) had a ≥50% PSA decline.

CONCLUSIONS

One-fourth of patients treated with AAW show a PSA response. However, PSA response to AAW is uncommon with second-generation antiandrogens and androgen synthesis inhibitors. Further research is required to understand the differences in response between the types of antiandrogen.

Androgen Receptor Targeted Treatments of Prostate Cancer: 35 Years of Progress with Antiandrogens

PURPOSE

Antiandrogens inhibit the androgen receptor and have an important role in the treatment of prostate cancer. This review provides a historical perspective on the development and clinical benefit of antiandrogens in the treatment of prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched PubMed® for clinical trials with the search terms antiandrogens and prostate cancer combined with drug names for antiandrogens. This article represents a collaboration of clinical investigators who have made critical scientific contributions leading to the approval of antiandrogens for treating patients with prostate cancer.

RESULTS

Antiandrogens differ in chemical structure and exert varying efficacy and safety profiles. The unfavorable therapeutic index of steroidal antiandrogens led to replacement by safer nonsteroidal agents. Flutamide, nilutamide and bicalutamide, which were designed to target the androgen receptor, were developed primarily for use in combination with castration to provide combined androgen blockade. Modest clinical benefits were observed with the combination of first generation antiandrogens and castration vs castration alone. With increased knowledge of androgen receptor structure and its biological functions a new generation of antiandrogens without agonist activity was designed to provide more potent inhibition of the androgen receptor. Randomized clinical trials in patients with metastatic, castration resistant prostate cancer showed significant survival benefits, which led to the approval of enzalutamide in August 2012. Apalutamide was recently approved while darolutamide is not yet approved in the United States. These next generation antiandrogens are being actively tested in earlier disease states such as nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Evolving knowledge of resistance mechanisms to androgen receptor targeted treatments will stimulate research and drug discovery for additional compounds. Further testing in nonmetastatic castration resistant prostate cancer as well as castration sensitive disease states will hopefully augment our ability to treat a broader spectrum of patients with prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Antiandrogens have already provided important benefits for prostate cancer treatment. Greater knowledge about the structural and functional biology of the androgen receptor in prostate cancer will facilitate further discovery and development of further improved antiandrogens with enhanced clinical activity in patients with advanced metastatic disease. Testing these new agents earlier in the course of prostate cancer may further improve the survival and quality of life of patients with current local and/or systemic treatment modalities.

Antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome (AAWS) in the treatment of patients with prostate cancer

Antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome is an unpredictable event diagnosed in patients with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treated with combined androgen blockade therapy. It is defined by prostate-specific antigen value reduction, occasionally associated with a radiological response, that occurs 4-6 weeks after first-generation antiandrogen therapy discontinuation. New-generation hormonal therapies, such as enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate, improved the overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, and recent trials have also shown the efficacy of abiraterone in hormone-sensitive disease. In the last few years, several case reports and retrospective studies suggested that the withdrawal syndrome may also occur with these new drugs. This review summarizes literature data and hypothesis about the biological rationale underlying the syndrome and its potential clinical relevance, focusing mainly on new-generation hormonal therapies. Several in vitro studies suggest that androgen receptor gain-of-function mutations are involved in this syndrome, shifting the antiandrogen activity from antagonist to agonist. Several different drug-specific point mutations have been reported. The association of the withdrawal syndrome for enzalutamide and abiraterone needs confirmation by additional investigations. However, new-generation hormonal therapies being increasingly used in all stages of disease, more patients may experience the syndrome when stopping the treatment at the time of disease progression, although the clinical relevance of this phenomenon in the management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer remains to be defined.

Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

In the contemporary scene, less than 5% of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PC) have metastases at first presentation, compared to 20-25%, more than 20 years ago. Nonetheless, the use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has increased over the years, suggesting that patients in Europe and United States may receive ADT in cases of lower disease burden, and not always according to evidence based indications. Nonetheless, PC remains the second most common cause of cancer death after lung cancer in American men. Thus, there is a need for more effective, specific and well tolerated agents which can provide a longer and good quality of life while avoiding the side effects related to disease and treatment morbidity.After mentioning the current knowledge on the endocrinology of androgens and androgen receptor, relevant to PC development, as well as the possible events occurring during PC initiation, we will compare different hormonal compounds available for the treatment of PC, both from a pharmacological standpoint, and in terms of contemporary clinical indications.

Treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Objective. An increasing number of patients with prostate cancer develop hormone-refractory disease after standard treatment modalities. In these patients, early clinical trials with chemotherapy produced disappointing response rates. However, clinical trials that employ response criteria such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and clinical benefit response have produced encouraging responses. This article reviews current and future treatment options for the management of hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Data Sources. A MEDLINE search for the years 1978 to 1998 was completed. The following terms were used in our search: prostate cancer, hormone-refractory, treatment, and chemotherapy. Relevant articles referenced in the literature obtained in our MEDLINE search were reviewed.

Study Selection. Randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials were used in our review. Clinical trials using prostate-specific antigen or a palliation of symptoms as primary criteria for response were given priority.

Data Synthesis. Several genetic alterations, including the overexpression of bcl-2 or mutations in p53, may lead to the development of hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Agents such as estramustine and taxanes, which affect microtubule function and potentially modulate bcl-2, appear to be particularly active in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer. In addition, mitoxantrone as well as other agents has been shown to be beneficial in improving the quality of life in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Conclusion. Hormone-refractory prostate cancer is not a chemotherapy-resistant disease as once believed; significant progress in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer has been made with new combinations of chemotherapy agents. Promising new treatments are currently under evaluation to assess their potential benefit over the standard treatment modalities that are currently available.

Saudi oncology society and Saudi urology association combined clinical management guidelines for prostate cancer

This is an update to the previously published Saudi guidelines for the evaluation, medical, and surgical management of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. It is categorized according to the stage of the disease using the tumor node metastasis staging system 7(th) edition. The guidelines are presented with supporting evidence level, they are based on comprehensive literature review, several internationally recognized guidelines, and the collective expertise of the guidelines committee members (authors) who were selected by the Saudi oncology society and Saudi urological association. Considerations to the local availability of drugs, technology, and expertise have been regarded. These guidelines should serve as a roadmap for the urologists, oncologists, general physicians, support groups, and health care policy makers in the management of patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the prostate to.

Switching and withdrawing hormonal agents for castration-resistant prostate cancer

The antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome (AAWS) is characterized by tumour regression and a decline in serum PSA on discontinuation of antiandrogen therapy in patients with prostate cancer. This phenomenon has been best described with the withdrawal of the nonsteroidal antiandrogens, bicalutamide and flutamide, but has also been reported with a wide range of hormonal agents. Mutations that occur in advanced prostate cancer and induce partial activation of the androgen receptor (AR) by hormonal agents have been suggested as the main causal mechanism of the AAWS. Corticosteroids, used singly or in conjunction with abiraterone, docetaxel and cabazitaxel might also be associated with the AAWS. The discovery of the Phe876Leu mutation in the AR, which is activated by enzalutamide, raises the possibility of withdrawal responses to novel hormonal agents. This Review focusses on the molecular mechanisms responsible for withdrawal responses, the role of AR mutations in the development of treatment resistance, and the evidence for the sequential use of antiandrogens in prostate cancer therapy. The implications of AR mutations for the development of novel drugs that target the AR are discussed, as are the challenges associated with redefining the utility of older treatments in the current therapeutic landscape.

Saudi oncology society and Saudi urology association combined clinical management guidelines for prostate cancer

In this report, updated guidelines for the evaluation, medical, and surgical management of prostate cancer are presented. They are categorized according the stage of the disease using the tumor node metastasis staging system 7(th) edition. The recommendations are presented with supporting evidence level.

GnRH agonists and the rapidly increasing use of combined androgen blockade in prostate cancer

The discovery of medical castration with GnRH agonists in 1979 rapidly replaced surgical castration and high doses of estrogens for the treatment of prostate cancer. Soon afterwards, it was discovered that androgens were made locally in the prostate from the inactive precursor DHEA of adrenal origin, a mechanism called intracrinology. Taking into account these novel facts, combined androgen blockade (CAB) using a pure antiandrogen combined with castration in order to block the two sources of androgens was first published in 1982. CAB was the first treatment shown in randomized and placebo-controlled trials to prolong life in prostate cancer, even at the metastatic stage. Most importantly, the results recently obtained with the novel pure antiandrogen enzalutamide as well as with abiraterone, an inhibitor of 17α-hydroxylase in castration-resistant prostate cancer, has revitalized the CAB concept. The effects of CAB observed on survival of heavily pretreated patients further demonstrates the importance of the androgens made locally in the prostate and are a strong motivation to apply CAB to efficiently block all sources of androgens earlier at start of treatment and, even better, before metastasis occurs. The future of research in this field thus seems to be centered on the development of more potent blockers of androgens formation and action in order to obtain better results at the metastatic stage and, for the localized stage, reduce the duration of treatment required to achieve complete apoptosis and control of prostate cancer proliferation before it reaches the metastatic or noncurable stage.

Is there an anti-androgen withdrawal syndrome for enzalutamide?

BACKGROUND

The anti-androgen withdrawal syndrome (AAWS) can be seen in one-third of patients after discontinuation of first-generation non-steroidal anti-androgen therapy. With the introduction of new agents for anti-androgen therapy as well as alternate mechanisms of action, new therapeutic options before and after docetaxel chemotherapy have arisen (Ohlmann et al. in World J Urol 30(4):495-503, 2012). The question regarding the occurrence of an enzalutamide withdrawal syndrome (EWS) has not been evaluated yet. In this study, we assess prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response after discontinuation of enzalutamide.

METHODS

In total 31 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) underwent an enzalutamide withdrawal and were evaluated. Data were gathered from 6 centres in Germany. Patients with continuous oral administration of enzalutamide with rising serum PSA levels were evaluated, starting from enzalutamide withdrawal until subsequent therapy was initiated, follow-up ended or death of the patient occurred. Statistical evaluation was performed applying one-sided binomial testing using R-statistical software, version 3.0.1.

RESULTS

Mean withdrawal follow-up was 6.5 weeks (range 1-26.1 weeks). None of the 31 patients showed a PSA decline. Mean relative PSA rise over all patients was 73.9 % (range 0.5-440.7 %) with a median of 44.9 %.

CONCLUSIONS

If existent, an AAWS is at least very rare for enzalutamide in patients with mCRPC after taxane-based chemotherapy and does not play a clinical role in this setting. This may be attributed to the different pharmacodynamics of enzalutamide. Longer duration of therapy or a longer withdrawal interval may reveal a rare EWS in the future.

Bone microenvironment-targeted manipulations for the treatment of osteoblastic metastasis in castration-resistant prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Most patients with advanced prostate cancer will develop incurable bone metastasis. Although prostate cancer is the quintessential androgen-dependent neoplastic disease in males, the tumor will ultimately become refractory to androgen ablation treatment. Understanding the complex dialog between prostate cancer and the bone microenvironment has allowed the development of promising treatment strategies.

AREAS COVERED

The present review summarizes the pathophysiology of prostate cancer bone metastasis and provides a concise update on bone microenvironment-targeted therapies for prostate cancer. The current and future prospects and challenges of these strategies are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

A wide variety of signaling pathways, bone turnover homeostatic mechanisms and immunoregulatory networks are potential targets for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Anti-survival factor therapy can enhance the efficacy of existing treatment regimens for mCRPC by exploiting the interaction between the bone microenvironment and androgen signaling networks. In addition, many novel bone microenvironment-targeted strategies have produced promising objective clinical responses. Further elucidation of the complex interactions between prostate cancer cells and the bone stroma will open up new avenues for treatment interventions that can produce sustained cancer suppression.

A review of tasquinimod in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer

Castration resistant prostate cancer remains a major clinical burden and novel therapeutic options are urgently required to improve survival. Tasquinimod is an orally administered quinoline-3-carboxamide with potent antiangiogenic and antitumorigenic action that has shown promise in the treatment of advanced prostate cancers. This review explores both preclinical and clinical findings to date. In summary, tasquinimod has been shown to demonstrate a potent in vitro and in vivo anticancer action and completed early phase clinical trials have demonstrated good drug tolerance and prolonged progression-free survival. Although Phase III clinical trials are on-going, the findings to date highlight the promise of this drug in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.

Steroid derivatives as pure antagonists of the androgen receptor

BACKGROUND

While the androgens of testicular origin (representing about 50% of total androgens in men over 50 years) can be completely eliminated by surgical or medical castration with GnRH (gonadotropin-releasing hormone) agonists or antagonists, the antiandrogens currently available as blockers of androgen binding to the androgen receptor (AR), namely bicalutamide (BICA), flutamide (FLU) and nilutamide have too weak affinity to completely neutralize the other 50% of androgens made locally from dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in the prostate cancer tissue by the mechanisms of intracrinology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Series of steroid derivatives having pure and potent antagonistic activity on the human and rodent AR were synthesized. Assays of AR binding and activity in carcinoma mouse Shionogi and human LNCaP cells as well as in vivo bioavailability measurements and in vivo prostate weight assays in the rat were used.

RESULTS

The chosen lead steroidal compound, namely EM-5854, has a 3.7-fold higher affinity than BICA for the human AR while EM-5855, an important metabolite of EM-5854, has a 94-fold higher affinity for the human AR compared to BICA. EM-5854 and EM-5855 are 14 times more potent than BICA in inhibiting androgen (R1881)-stimulated prostatic specific antigen (PSA) secretion in human prostatic carcinoma LNCaP cells in vitro. MDV3100 has a potency comparable to bicalutamide in these assays. Depending upon the oral formulation, EM-5854 is 5- to 10-times more potent than BICA to inhibit dihydrotestosterone (DHT)-stimulated ventral prostatic weight in vivo in the rat while MDV3100 has lower activity than BICA in this in vivo model. These data are supported by respective 40-fold and 105-fold higher potencies of EM-5854 and EM-5855 compared to BICA to inhibit cell proliferation in the androgen-sensitive Shionogi carcinoma cell model.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the present preclinical results data need evaluation in clinical trials in men, combination of the data obtained in vitro in human LNCaP cells as indicator of potency in the human prostate and the data on metabolism evaluated in vivo on ventral prostate weight in the rat, could suggest the possibility of a 70- to 140-fold higher potency of EM-5854 compared to bicalutamide (Casodex) for the treatment of prostate cancer in men.

Saudi Oncology Society clinical management guidelines for prostate cancer

In this report, guidelines for the evaluation, medical and surgical management of testicular germ cell tumors is presented. It is categorized according to the stage of the disease using the tumor node metastasis staging system, 7th edition. The recommendations are presented with supporting level of evidence.

Androgen regulates ADAMTS15 gene expression in prostate cancer cells

Prostate cancer is a major cause of mortality, largely as a consequence of metastases and transformation to androgen-independent growth. Metalloproteinases are implicated in cancer progression. A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTS) are expressed in prostate cancer cells, with ADAMTS-1 and ADAMTS-15 being the most abundant. ADAMTS-15 but not ADAMTS-1 expression was downregulated by androgen in LNCaP prostate cancer cells, possibly through androgen response elements associated with the gene. ADAMTS-15 expression is predictive for survival in breast cancer, and the situation may be similar in prostate cancer, as androgen independence is usually due to aberrant signaling through its receptor.

Novel Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) in the Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer

Androgen deprivation therapy has been the mainstay of treatment for advanced and metastatic prostate cancer. The use of novel agents targeting the androgen receptor and its signaling pathways offers a promising approach that is both safe and effective. We describe the rationale behind the use of these compounds in clinical development and the existing challenges as to how best to incorporate these new and emerging therapies in the changing treatment paradigm of metastatic prostate cancer.

Hormonal therapy of prostate cancer

Of all cancers, prostate cancer is the most sensitive to hormones: it is thus very important to take advantage of this unique property and to always use optimal androgen blockade when hormone therapy is the appropriate treatment. A fundamental observation is that the serum testosterone concentration only reflects the amount of testosterone of testicular origin which is released in the blood from which it reaches all tissues. Recent data show, however, that an approximately equal amount of testosterone is made from dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) directly in the peripheral tissues, including the prostate, and does not appear in the blood. Consequently, after castration, the 95-97% fall in serum testosterone does not reflect the 40-50% testosterone (testo) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) made locally in the prostate from DHEA of adrenal origin. In fact, while elimination of testicular androgens by castration alone has never been shown to prolong life in metastatic prostate cancer, combination of castration (surgical or medical with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist) with a pure anti-androgen has been the first treatment shown to prolong life. Most importantly, when applied at the localized stage, the same combined androgen blockade (CAB) can provide long-term control or cure of the disease in more than 90% of cases. Obviously, since prostate cancer usually grows and metastasizes without signs or symptoms, screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is absolutely needed to diagnose prostate cancer at an 'early' stage before metastasis occurs and the cancer becomes non-curable. While the role of androgens was believed to have become non-significant in cancer progressing under any form of androgen blockade, recent data have shown increased expression of the androgen receptor (AR) in treatment-resistant disease with a benefit of further androgen blockade. Since the available anti-androgens have low affinity for AR and cannot block androgen action completely, especially in the presence of increased AR levels, it becomes important to discover more potent and purely antagonistic blockers of AR. The data obtained with compounds under development are promising. While waiting for this (these) new anti-androgen(s), combined treatment with castration and a pure anti-androgen (bicalutamide, flutamide or nilutamide) is the only available and the best scientifically based means of treating prostate cancer by hormone therapy at any stage of the disease with the optimal chance of success and even cure in localized disease.

A dramatic, objective antiandrogen withdrawal response: case report and review of the literature

Antiandrogen withdrawal response is an increasingly recognized entity in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. To our knowledge, there have been no reports describing a durable radiologic improvement along with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) with discontinuation of the antiandrogen agent bicalutamide. We report a case in which a dramatic decline of serum PSA levels associated with a dramatic improvement in radiologic disease was achieved with bicalutamide discontinuation.

Rosiglitazone attenuates insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor survival signaling in PC-3 cells

PPARgamma, a member of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor family, is overexpressed in prostate cancer. Natural and synthetic ligands of PPARgamma via genomic and nongenomic actions promote cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of several prostate cancer cells, in vitro. Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) inhibits the adriamycin-induced apoptosis of PC-3 human prostate cancer cells. Therefore, we have analyzed the ability of two PPARgamma ligands,15dPGJ2 and rosiglitazone, a natural and a synthetic PPARgamma ligand, respectively, to increase the adriamycin-induced cytotoxicity of PC-3 cells and to suppress the IGF-1 survival effect on adriamycin-induced apoptosis of PC-3 cells. Our data revealed that both the PPARgamma ligands increased the adriamycin-induced cytostasis of PC-3 cells, however, only rosiglitazone added to the adriamycin-induced apoptosis of PC-3 cells. In addition, rosiglitazone attenuated the type I IGF receptor (IGF-1R) survival signaling on adriamycin-induced apoptosis of PC-3 cells via its nongenomic action on ERK1/2 and AKT phosphorylation. Because the IGF-1R signaling is probably the most important host tissue (bone) metastasis microenvironment-related survival signaling for prostate cancer cells, we conclude that rosiglitazone effects on IGF-1R-mediated activation of ERK1/2 and AKT could have clinical implications for the management of androgen ablation-refractory and chemotherapy-resistant advanced prostate cancer with bone metastasis.

Antiandrogen withdrawal in castrate-refractory prostate cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group trial (SWOG 9426)

BACKGROUND

Antiandrogen withdrawal is a potential therapeutic maneuver for patients with progressive prostate cancer. This study was designed to examine antiandrogen withdrawal effects within the context of a large multi-institutional prospective trial.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria included progressive prostate adenocarcinoma despite combined androgen blockade. Eligible patients received prior initial treatment with an antiandrogen plus orchiectomy or luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist. Patients were stratified according to type of antiandrogen, type of progression (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] or radiographic), presence or absence of metastatic disease, and prior LHRH agonist versus surgical castration.

RESULTS

A total of 210 eligible and evaluable patients had a median follow-up of 5.0 years; 64% of patients previously received flutamide, 32% bicalutamide, and 3% nilutamide. Of the 210 patients, 21% of patients had confirmed PSA decreases of >or=50% (95% CI, 16% to 27%). No radiographic responses were recorded. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3 months (95% CI, 2 months to 4 months); however, 19% had 12-month or greater progression-free intervals. Median overall survival (OS) after antiandrogen withdrawal was 22 months (20 and 40 months for those with and without radiographic evidence of metastatic disease, respectively). Multivariate analyses indicated that longer duration of antiandrogen use, lower PSA at baseline, and PSA-only progression at study entry were associated with both longer PFS and OS. Longer antiandrogen use was the only significant predictor of PSA response.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate a relatively modest rate of PSA response in patients who were undergoing antiandrogen withdrawal; however, PFS can be relatively prolonged (>or=1 year) in approximately 19% of patients.

Mechanisms of bone metastasis in prostate cancer: clinical implications

Prostate cancer shows a strong predilection to spread to the bones. Once prostate tumour cells are engrafted in the skeleton, curative therapy is no longer possible and palliative treatment becomes the only option. Herein, we review the multifactorial mechanisms and complex cellular interactions that take place inside the bone metastatic microenvironment. Emphasis is given to the detection and treatment of the micrometastatic stage of prostate cancer, as well as our recent attempts to target the bone metastasis microenvironment-related survival factors using an anti-survival factor manipulation which can increase the efficacy of anticancer therapies such as androgen ablation therapy and chemotherapy in advanced prostate cancer.

Long-term effectiveness of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist or antiandrogen monotherapy in elderly men with localized prostate cancer (T1-2) : a retrospective study

AIM

To evaluate the long-term effectiveness, side effects and compliance rates of two types of drugs (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone [LHRH] agonist and antiandrogen) that were used individually to treat patients with localized prostate cancer (T1-2) at our institution.

METHODS

Ninety-seven patients who were diagnosed in the period from April 1997 to January 2000 as having clinically localized prostate cancer (T1-2) received either LHRH agonist (leuprolide acetate 7.5 mg/month) monotherapy (group 1, n = 62) or antiandrogen monotherapy (group 2, n = 35; 18 received bicalutamide 50 mg q.d., 13 received nilutamide 150 mg t.i.d. and 4 received flutamide 250 mg t.i.d.). The mean age in both groups was 76 years.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was (50.8 +/- 8.5) months in group 1 and (43.1 +/- 2.2) months in group 2. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels rose in only 1 of the 62 patients (1.6%) in group 1, and in 20 of the 35 patients (57.1%) in group 2. In group 2, 10 of the 20 patients (50%) with increasing PSA levels were treated with LHRH salvage therapy, and eight (80%) responded. Hot flashes (54.8%) and lethargy (41.9%) were the most common side effects in group 1. In contrast, nipple-tenderness (40%) and light-dark adaptation (17.1%) were more often seen in group 2. Only 1 of the 62 patients (1.6%) in group 1 switched to another medication because of adverse side effects; whereas 8 of the 35 patients (22.9%) in group 2 did so.

CONCLUSION

Unlike antiandrogen monotherapy, LHRH agonist monotherapy provided long-term durable control of localized prostate cancer (T1-2). It can also be an effective treatment option for patients whose disease failed to respond to antiandrogen monotherapy. The limitations of our study are the lack of health outcomes analysis and a small sample size.

Bone alkaline phosphatase serum level predicts the response to antiandrogen withdrawal

OBJECTIVE

To analyze if the biochemical response to antiandrogen withdrawal correlates with total and percent free serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) and bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A group of 46 patients in whom maximal androgen blockade (MAB) failed was included in this study. Flutamide was used in 32 patients and bicalutamide in 14. Total and free PSA and BAP were determined in serum the same day in which antiandrogen was withdrawn. Thereafter, serum PSA was determined every 15 days. A biochemical response was established when a decrease in serum PSA greater than 50% was observed. The duration of biochemical response was considered until the first of two consecutive PSA serum elevations.

RESULTS

The rate of biochemical responses was 23.9%. The mean duration of responses was 5.2 months. The mean serum PSA in patients who responded to the antiandrogen withdrawal was 86.4 ng/ml, while it was 98.6 ng/ml in those who did not respond, P > 0.05. The mean of percent free PSA was 13.9 and 17.7%, respectively, P > 0.05. However, the mean BAP in responder patients was significantly lower, 18.9 ng/ml versus 100.6 ng/ml, P < 0.03. The rate of responses to flutamide withdrawal was 25% and to bicalutamide withdrawal 21.4%, P > 0.05. Other factors as age, Gleason score, initial clinical stage and the period of antiandrogen exposure were also analyzed. However, none of them had statistical significance. Serum BAP was the only predictor of response in the logistic regression analysis and a cut-off point of 50 ng/ml provided a relative risk of 1.46 (95% CI 1.17-1.83).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower serum levels of BAP seems to correlate with a better response to antiandrogen withdrawal. Moreover, a level of BAP higher than 50 ng/ml would predict strongly the absence of response.

Treatment options in hormone-refractory prostate cancer: current and future approaches

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality among men in Western countries. The initial treatment of advanced prostate cancer is suppression of testicular androgen production by medical or surgical castration, but nearly all men with metastases will develop disease progression. Patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) have a median survival of approximately 18 months and no therapy has yet demonstrated a definitive survival advantage. However, in the past several years, a number of promising new treatment strategies have emerged. One of the most important new treatment strategies involves secondary hormonal manipulation after the failure of primary androgen deprivation. This approach is predicated on the recognition that HRPC is a heterogeneous disease and some patients may respond to alternative hormonal interventions despite the presence of castrate levels of testosterone. Until recently, cytotoxic chemotherapy was felt to be relatively ineffective in the treatment of HRPC. Combination regimens incorporating new active agents have demonstrated significant activity in this setting, renewing interest in the use of chemotherapy to treat HRPC. Recent advances in the understanding of prostate cancer biology have led to the development of drugs directed against precise molecular alterations in the prostate tumour cell. Biologic agents now in development include those capable of altering signal transduction, blocking angiogenesis, inhibiting cell cycle progression, and stimulating apoptosis. In addition, many types of immune therapies are showing promise. Evaluating these agents, and incorporating them into existing regimens, are major goals of ongoing clinical research in advanced prostate cancer.

Management of hot flashes in breast-cancer survivors

Hot flashes can be a major problem for patients with a history of breast cancer. Although oestrogen can alleviate hot flashes to a large extent in most patients, there has been debate about the safety of oestrogen use in survivors of breast cancer. The decrease in hot flashes achieved with progestational agents is similar to that seen with oestrogen therapy but, again, there is some debate about the safety of progestational agents in patients with a history of breast cancer. Several alternative substances have therefore been investigated. These include a belladonna alkaloid preparation, clonidine, soy phyto-oestrogens, vitamin E, gabapentin, and several of the newer antidepressants, with venlafaxine being the best studied to date. Several studies in progress may provide better non-hormonal means of treating hot flashes in the future.

Antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome associated with prostate cancer therapies: incidence and clinical significance

The antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome is a well established phenomenon in prostate cancer. It is widely accepted that a subset of patients will benefit from the withdrawal of antiandrogen or steroidal hormone from hormonal therapy, exhibiting decreasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values and clinical improvement. The pathophysiology of antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome is not completely understood, although androgen receptor gene mutations seem to be the likely explanation. Currently, it is not possible to identify the subset of patients whose tumours will respond to antiandrogen or steroid withdrawal. Tumours that will respond may be classified as androgen-independent and hormone-sensitive tumours as opposed to androgen-independent and hormone-insensitive tumours that do not respond. Patients who respond to antiandrogen withdrawal experience approximately 6 months with improved quality of life; however, it is unknown if this translates into prolonged survival. At the very least, antiandrogen withdrawal offers a therapeutic modality that is not associated with adverse effects and improves quality of life even if only for a very limited time. Recent reports suggest that adding a secondary hormonal therapy such as amino- glutethimide, ketoconazole or steroidal hormones may enhance the response rate and prolong response time to the antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome. However, unless there is proof that this secondary hormonal manipulation prolongs survival, maintenance of quality of life is mandatory because of the possible adverse effects from these potent drugs. The fact that about 30% of patients will respond to antiandrogen or steroid withdrawal in hormone refractory prostate cancer must be taken into account in clinical trials of new cytotoxic agents which have been and will be conducted. Cessation of flutamide for at least 4 weeks and, in the case of bicalutamide, even 8 weeks, is mandatory before antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome can be excluded as the cause of decreasing PSA values. The antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome offers another piece of the puzzle of prostatic carcinoma, but at the same time it demonstrates how different advanced prostate cancer cells may react to therapeutic strategies and, therefore, hormone refractory prostate cancer remains a difficult challenge which must be solved in the future.

"Decoy" of androgen-responsive element induces apoptosis in LNCaP cells

BACKGROUND

In an androgen-dependent manner, the androgen receptor (AR) binds to the androgen-responsive element (ARE) in the regulatory region of target genes. We hypothesize that an "ARE decoy, " a double-stranded oligonucleotide containing the same DNA sequence as ARE, can inhibit prostatic proliferation by competitive inhibition of AR transcriptional activity.

METHODS

We synthesized a 23-mer ARE decoy based on the deduced ARE sequence at the promoter region of the human prostate-specific antigen (PSA) gene. The nuclear extract was prepared from LNCaP cells, and DNA-protein interactions were examined by gel shift assay. Then the antiandrogen effect of the ARE decoy was studied in LNCaP cells transfected with the ARE decoy by lipofection. After 24-hr incubation with 10(-9) M dihydrotestosterone (DHT), induction of apoptosis was examined by DNA fragmentation.

RESULTS

The gel shift assay demonstrated specific binding of the ARE decoy to the LNCaP nuclear protein which is most likely AR. The transfection experiment showed DNA fragmentation in the ARE decoy-transfected cells despite the presence of DHT, though not in the cells transfected with the control decoy.

CONCLUSIONS

The ARE decoy had an antiandrogen effect and induced apoptosis in LNCaP cells. This ARE decoy may become a potential therapeutic tool for prostate cancers when combined with a highly efficient transfection method.

Serologic tumor markers, clinical biology, and therapy of prostatic carcinoma

PSA has been a valuable tool in enhancing our understanding of the prevalence and virulence of prostate cancer. PSA also has contributed to the understanding of important phenomena related to the androgen regulation of the cancer; however, it has not been useful in detecting some forms of androgen-independent (neuroendocrine) progression and is of limited prognostic value in androgen-independent prostate cancer. PSA also has been valuable in the accelerated development of therapies for prostate cancer; however, it must be used cautiously for this purpose, because it may not reflect the most relevant clone. In addition, some agents may directly affect PSA release independent of their antitumor activity. Most importantly, before PSA is adopted as a surrogate end point in clinical trials in prostate cancer, it must be prospectively validated. Future studies must focus on the development of prospective serologic tumor markers that can predict virulence of disease and to reflect androgen-independent progression.

Secondary hormonal manipulations in hormone refractory prostate cancer

Hormone refractory prostate cancer is clinically heterogeneous, and many patients retain sensitivity to subsequent hormonal manipulations, even after combined androgen blockage. Antiandrogen withdrawal is a mandatory first step. Subsequent treatment with an alternate antiandrogen, adrenal androgen inhibitor (such as ketoconazole), or glucocorticoid may provide both subjective and objective clinical benefit in up to 65% of patients.

Controversies in the management of advanced prostate cancer

For advanced prostate cancer, the main hormone treatment against which other treatments are assessed is surgical castration. It is simple, safe and effective, however it is not acceptable to all patients. Medical castration by means of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) analogues such as goserelin acetate provides an alternative to surgical castration. Diethylstilboestrol, previously the only non-surgical alternative to orchidectomy, is no longer routinely used. Castration reduces serum testosterone by around 90%, but does not affect androgen biosynthesis in the adrenal glands. Addition of an anti-androgen to medical or surgical castration blocks the effect of remaining testosterone on prostate cells and is termed combined androgen blockade (CAB). CAB has now been compared with castration alone (medical and surgical) in numerous clinical trials. Some trials show advantage of CAB over castration, whereas others report no significant difference. The author favours the view that CAB has an advantage over castration. No study has reported that CAB is less effective than castration. Of the anti-androgens which are available for use in CAB, bicalutamide may be associated with a lower incidence of side-effects compared with the other non-steroidal anti-androgens and, in common with nilutamide, has the advantage of once-daily dosing. Only one study has compared anti-androgens within CAB: bicalutamide plus LH-RH analogue and flutamide plus LH-RH analogue. At 160-week follow-up, the groups were equivalent in terms of survival and time to progression. However, bicalutamide caused significantly less diarrhoea than flutamide. Withdrawal and intermittent therapy with anti-androgens extend the range of treatment options.

Management of Hormone-Sensitive and Hormone-Refractory Metastatic Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is a significant health problem in the United States and is the focus of increasing attention in our society. With the aging of the US population, it is likely that prostate cancer will continue to grow in importance. The options for systemic therapy of metastatic prostate cancer should be familiar to physicians, including nonspecialists, whose patients seek their advice and counsel. METHODS: Past and recent literature was surveyed to provide an understanding of the systemic treatment of advanced prostate cancer. The author presents a review of the systemic treatment of metastatic prostate cancer in different clinical circumstances and addresses the current status of chemotherapy in the management of advanced prostate cancer. RESULTS: Early androgen deprivation used over prolonged periods appears to be modestly superior to delayed androgen deprivation with a small potential survival advantage and an advantage in delaying disease progression in advanced prostate cancer. Patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer may benefit from secondary hormonal therapy (eg, adrenal enzyme inhibitors, antiandrogens, glucocorticoids) and chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The choices of therapy for metastatic prostate cancer depend on individual patient preference. Patients and physicians should be aware of the possible side effects associated with the therapeutics options for treatment of metastatic prostate cancer.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of the antiandrogens and their efficacy in prostate cancer

Prostatic cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death in males. Treatment by radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy is useful in the early stages of the disease. Whenever metastases occur, patients are usually treated by surgical (orchidectomy) or medical [gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue] castration. This form of treatment is, however, associated with unwanted adverse effects, such as flushing, loss of libido and potency and all patients ultimately escape therapy after a delay of 1 to 2 years. For this reason antiandrogens have been developed as another means of endocrine ablation therapy. Antiandrogens fall in 2 groups of which the first group, the steroidal antiandrogens such as cyproterone acetate (CPA), have a direct blocking effect at the cellular level but also inhibit testosterone production by their additional gestagenic properties blocking gonadotropin secretion. Except in preventing the flare-up associated with the start of GnRH analogue therapy and in reducing flushing, no evidence exist of any superiority for CPA over classical therapy in terms of adverse effects and survival. The second group, the nonsteroidal or 'pure' antiandrogens, only block androgens at the cellular level without any central effects. In contrast with other forms of castration, patients on pure antiandrogens as monotherapy preserve their sexual function and potency, at the expense of a slightly inferior androgen blockade and gynecomastia. These latter effects are explained by a compensatory rise in androgens as a result of the blockade at the central level, which weakens the androgen blockade, and by peripheral aromatisation of the increased androgens to oestrogens. In addition, some evidence exist that pure antiandrogens improve survival if combined with other forms of castration as they also inhibit the adrenal androgens, the so-called maximal androgen blockade (MAB). If patients escape control under MAB, a trial of stopping the antiandrogen must always be considered, as some tumours have 'learned' to be activated by these drugs. At the moment it is not yet clear if antiandrogens are of any benefit in downstaging the extent of disease before prostatectomy and/or radiotherapy. Of the currently known pure antiandrogens, bicalutamide offers some advantages over flutamide as it possesses a much longer half-life, allowing a once daily regimen, and has advantages over nilutamide in terms of fewer adverse effects.

Endocrine therapy of prostate cancer

Endocrine therapy is effective treatment for patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Most patients will benefit from androgen withdrawal in terms of symptomatic relief and delay in progression of diseases. It does not, however, cure patients with metastatic prostate cancer. This finding emphasizes the need for the development of effective nonendocrine therapies.

Prostate-specific antigen response to withdrawal of megestrol acetate in a patient with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Clinically significant responses after withdrawal of flutamide in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) are well documented. Failure to recognize this syndrome of response results in potential morbidity due to salvage therapy, confusion in interpretation of disease state, and introduction of a possible source of error in clinical trials. In this case report, we describe a patient with HRPC whose prostate-specific antigen levels decreased substantially in response to withdrawal of megestrol acetate. Such a response should be considered when megestrol acetate is used in the treatment of HRPC.

Flutamide withdrawal plus hydrocortisone resulted in clinical complete response in a patient with prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Combined androgen blockade (CAB) (medical or surgical castration plus antiandrogen therapy) is considered by many to be the optimal endocrine maneuver for patients with metastatic prostate carcinoma. When progression occurs after CAB, the discontinuation of the antiandrogen is recommended. The authors present a patient that had a clinical complete response to flutamide withdrawal plus hydrocortisone that, at last follow-up, had been maintained for more than 46 months.

METHODS

A 71-year-old man with a positive family history of prostate carcinoma presented in 1989 with urinary frequency and a suspicious digital rectal examination. He was found to have a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (Gleason 4+4). He was started on CAB and his prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentration declined from 96 ng/mL to the normal range and was maintained for the next 24 months. In 1991 his PSA began to rise, and reached 64 ng/mL by 1993. The patient was enrolled on a clinical trial that discontinued the flutamide administration and hydrocortisone was initiated.

RESULTS

Physical examination at the time of enrollment was unremarkable. His PSA declined to below the limits of detection after this maneuver and at last follow-up had been maintained there for more than 46 months. In 1995, the patient underwent a repeat biopsy of the prostate and all six tissue cores were negative for carcinoma. At last follow-up in December 1996, the patient had no evidence of disease and was being followed routinely; however, the authors were continuing treatment with testicular suppression (leuprolide) plus hydrocortisone.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors believe the residual androgens and steroids produced by the adrenal cortex play a meaningful role in prostate carcinoma cell proliferation. Based on this case and data from trials supporting the activity of flutamide withdrawal plus adrenal suppression, it appears reasonable to evaluate prospectively the discontinuation of antiandrogen versus antiandrogen withdrawal plus adrenal suppression in individuals failing CAB.

Steroid hormone withdrawal syndromes. Pathophysiology and clinical significance

The steroid withdrawal syndrome has brought a new dimension to the treatment of advanced prostate cancer not only in the way we treat androgen-independent disease but also in terms of insights into the development of hormonal resistance. The data now confirm that 30% of cases have a meaningful subjective, biochemical, and objective response to the withdrawal of a steroid hormone as the first maneuver after primary hormonal therapy failure. Larger studies are needed to define further the withdrawal effect related to the other steroid hormone family members and to determine the objective response proportions. Although controversy surrounds the cause of the steroid withdrawal phenomenon, studies suggest that the androgen receptor plays a pivotal role. Molecular studies of the androgen receptors involving larger number of patients are paramount if we are going to develop a better understanding of the evolution of the withdrawal effect and hormone resistance.