Conversion to rapamycin in renal allograft recipients with biopsy-proven calcineurin inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity

Mycophenolate-induced oral ulcers: Case report and literature review

PURPOSE

A case of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-induced oral ulceration in a kidney transplant recipient is reported.

SUMMARY

A 54-year-old man who had received a kidney transplant 7 months previously reported to our outpatient clinic with severe oral ulcers with odynophagia and was admitted to the hospital. His maintenance immunosuppressive agents at the time of admission consisted of tacrolimus and mycophenolate. The patient had stable renal function, with all laboratory values within normal ranges. After various alternative etiologies were ruled out, drug-induced oral ulceration was suspected, and the patient's tacrolimus dose was empirically reduced, resulting in reduction of the trough concentration from 10 ng/mL to 3.3 ng/mL without improvement of the ulceration. Mycophenolate-induced oral ulceration was suspected, and MMF was discontinued. Within 5 days of discontinuation, there was a remarkable improvement in both the size and severity of the ulceration, and the patient was discharged from the hospital. During the next clinic visit (a total of 12 days after MMF was discontinued), the patient's mouth and esophageal ulcers had completely healed. Six weeks after complete resolution of the ulcer, MMF at a dosage of 250 mg twice daily was initiated; the dosage was subsequently increased to 500 mg twice daily without a recurrence of ulceration.

CONCLUSION

A 54-year-old man developed oral ulceration after 7 months of MMF therapy. Discontinuation of therapy resulted in prompt resolution of the patient's ulcers, with no recurrence of ulceration at a lower MMF dose. This is the first case report indicating that mycophenolate-induced ulceration may be dose dependent.

Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to mTOR inhibitors stabilizes diabetic and hypertensive nephropathy after liver transplant

AIM: To investigate if conversion to the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) improves renal function in diabetic and/or hypertensive liver transplant patients immunosuppressed with tacrolimus or cyclosporine.

METHODS: The study included 86 liver graft recipients immunosuppressed with mTORi treatment after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), including all liver recipients with worsening renal function before conversion to mTORi (n = 55 patients) and recipients with normal renal function who converted to mTORi for other reasons (n = 31 patients). We identified patients with diabetes mellitus (n = 28), arterial hypertension (n = 27), proteinuria (n = 27) and all three factors (n = 8) (some patients have hypertension and diabetes and no proteinuria). The primary endpoint was evolution in renal function defined as the development in plasma creatinine as a function of diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HT) or proteinuria. We required elevated serum creatinine for at least two weeks to define renal dysfunction.

RESULTS: Only patients that converted because of renal failure with plasma creatinine levels > 1.5 mg/dL showed an improvement of renal function (2.14 to 1.77 mg/dL) (P = 0.02). Patients with DM showed no improvement of serum creatinine levels (1.31 mg/dL to 1.37 mg/dL) compared with non DM patients (1.31 mg/dL to 1.15 mg/dL) (P = 0.01), HT patients (1.48 mg/dL to 1.5 mg/dL) with non HT patients (1.21mg/dL to 1.08 mg/dL) and patients with proteinuria (1.44 mg/dL to 1.41 mg/dL) and no proteinuria (1.31 mg/dL to 1.11 mg/dL).

CONCLUSION: In OLT recipients with diabetes or hypertensive nephropathy, conversion to mTORi does not improve renal function but stabilizes plasma levels of creatinine. Proteinuria is not a contraindication to conversion to mTORi; it also stabilizes renal function. Conversion to mTORi should only be avoided in patients with diabetes, hypertension and proteinuria.

Calcineurin inhibitor sparing strategies in renal transplantation, part one: Late sparing strategies

Kidney transplantation improves quality of life and reduces the risk of mortality. A majority of the success of kidney transplantation is attributable to the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), cyclosporine and tacrolimus, and their ability to reduce acute rejection rates. However, long-term graft survival rates have not improved over time, and although controversial, evidence does suggest a role of chronic CNI toxicity in this failure to improve outcomes. Consequently, there is interest in reducing or removing CNIs from immunosuppressive regimens in an attempt to improve outcomes. Several strategies exist to spare calcineurin inhibitors, including use of agents such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), mycophenolate sodium (MPS), sirolimus, everolimus or belatacept to facilitate late calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal, beyond 6 mo post-transplant; or using these agents to plan early withdrawal within 6 mo; or to avoid the CNIs all together using CNI-free regimens. Although numerous reviews have been written on this topic, practice varies significantly between centers. This review organizes the data based on patient characteristics (i.e., the baseline immunosuppressive regimen) as a means to aid the practicing clinician in caring for their patients, by matching up their situation with the relevant literature. The current review, the first in a series of two, examines the potential of immunosuppressive agents to facilitate late CNI withdrawal beyond 6 mo post-transplant, and has demonstrated that the strongest evidence resides with MMF/MPS. MMF or MPS can be successfully introduced/maintained to facilitate late CNI withdrawal and improve renal function in the setting of graft deterioration, albeit with an increased risk of acute rejection and infection. Additional benefits may include improved blood pressure, lipid profile and serum glucose. Sirolimus has less data directly comparing CNI withdrawal to an active CNI-containing regimen, but modest improvement in short-term renal function is possible, with an increased risk of proteinuria, especially in the setting of baseline renal dysfunction and/or proteinuria. Renal outcomes may be improved when sirolimus is used in combination with MMF. Although data with everolimus is less robust, results appear similar to those observed with sirolimus.

Conversion to sirolimus in renal transplant recipients: a single-center experience

Maintenance immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) following renal transplantation is associated with nephrotoxicity and accelerated graft loss. Sirolimus (SRL) is a nonnephrotoxic immunosuppressive agent. We retrospectively analyzed our experience with kidney transplant recipients who were converted from CNI to SRL. A total of 58 renal transplant recipients were converted from CNI to SRL. SRL was started at a dose of 0.075 mg/kg and, at the same time, CNI dose was reduced by 50% daily for 3 days. SRL trough levels were targeted between 8 and 12 ng/mL. When target trough levels were achieved, CNI was withdrawn. The main indications for switching were posttransplant malignancies (n = 32) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) (n = 10). The mean time from transplantation to conversion was 84 +/- 71 months. Mean serum creatinine level was 1.63 +/- 0.52 mg/dL before conversion. Serum creatinine levels at the 1, 3, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3 years after conversion were 1.64 +/- 0.58 mg/dL (P = 0.67), 1.52 +/- 0.53 mg/dL (P = 0.414), 1.62 +/- 0.62 mg/dL (P = 0.734), and 1.48 +/- 0.58 mg/dL (P = 0.065), 1.58 +/- 0.53 mg/dL (P = 0.854), 1.88 +/- 0.77 mg/dL (P = 0.083), respectively. Daily proteinuria levels increased from 0.04 +/- 0.11 g/day at baseline to 0.55 +/- 1.33 g/day (P = 0.037) after conversion, in the responders group. In the nonresponders group, baseline proteinuria was 0.13 +/- 0.25 g/day, and increased to 1.44 +/- 2.44 g/day after conversion (P = 0.008). SRL was discontinued in 16 patients (31%) because of the occurrence of severe side effects. The proportion of patients remaining on SRL therapy over time was 43.1% at 1 year, 15.5% at 2 years after conversion, and 10.3% at 3 years after conversion. SRL conversion may be very useful in patients suffering from neoplasia; however, frequent side effects related with this intervention should be considered, and routine conversion from CNI to SRL to reduce nephrotoxicity should be discouraged.

Multicentric outcome analysis of sirolimus-based immunosuppression in 252 liver transplant recipients

SUMMARY

The use of sirolimus (SRL) in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been controversial after experimental data suggested an increased risk of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT). To assess the safety and efficacy of SRL as de novo immunosuppression in OLT recipients. Outcomes of 252 OLT patients who received SRL were compared with outcomes of 291 OLT recipients who received calcineurin inhibitor in a retrospective study. Primary outcomes of this study were: patient- and graft survivals, vascular, biliary, wound complications and rejection rates. Secondary outcomes were: postoperative infection rate, bone marrow and renal function and changes of lipid levels. Patient- and graft survivals, rejection and infection rates were similar. In the SRL group, HAT occurred in 1.2%, biliary complications in 19.4%, and incisional hernias in 9.1%. In the control group the incidence of HAT was 5.8% (P = 0.004), biliary complications 18.5% (P = NS) and incisional hernias 7.2% (P = NS). Patients on SRL experienced significantly higher levels of serum triglycerides but fewer acute cellular rejections. Bone marrow and renal functions were similar in both the groups. Our findings would suggest that SRL is safe and effective for very selected OLT recipients. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm our results.

Conversion to sirolimus in kidney-pancreas and pancreas transplantation

Reports on the use of sirolimus (SRL) in pancreas transplantation are still limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of SRL conversion in pancreas transplant patients. Among 247 patients undergoing simultaneous kidney-pancreas or solitary pancreas transplantation, 33 (13%) were converted to SRL. The reasons for conversion were calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) nephrotoxicity (n = 24; 73%), severe neurotoxicity owing to CNI (n = 1; 3%), severe and/or recurrent acute rejection episodes (n = 7; 21%), gastrointestinal (GI) side effects of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; n = 5; 15%), and hyperglycemia (n = 4; 12%). Before conversion, all patients were maintained on a CNI, MMF, and low-dose steroids. They were gradually converted to SRL associated with either CNI or MMF withdrawal. Sixty-three percent (n = 15) of patients who were converted owing to CNI nephrotoxicity, showed stable or improved renal function. At 12 months after conversion, serum creatinine levels were significantly decreased in this group (2.2 +/- 0.5 vs 1.6 +/- 0.3 mg/dL; P = .001) and C-peptide values increased (2.9 +/- 1.1.1 vs 3.1 +/- 1.3 nmol/L; P = .018). The only patient with leucoencephalopathy showed improved neurologic status after SRL conversion. All patients converted to SRL because of GI side effects of MMF showed improvements, and none of those converted because of hyperglycemia experienced improvement. There were no episodes of acute rejection after conversion. We concluded that conversion to SRL in pancreas transplantation should be considered an important alternative strategy, particularly for CNI nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity, and in cases of severe diarrhea due to MMF.

Patient selection critical for calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal in pediatric kidney transplantation

CNI withdrawal may be employed as a "rescue" strategy for patients with established renal allograft injury and/or declining allograft function, with the aim at eliminating CNI-associated nephrotoxic effects. This analysis reviews outcomes in a pediatric population and identifies risk factors for adverse events post-CNI withdrawal. We performed a retrospective analysis of 17 pediatric renal transplants who underwent CNI withdrawal, with conversion to sirolimus and MMF. Mean CrCl decreased from 64.3 +/- 22 to 59.38 +/- 28.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (p = 0.04) at six months and 57.46 +/- 31.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (p = 0.02) at 12 months post-withdrawal. Forty-one percent of patients experienced AR. Increased risk for AR was associated with prior AR history, lower sirolimus trough levels, and lower CNIT biopsy scores. Graft loss (24%) was associated with worse CrCl, proteinuria, and histologic chronicity. Proteinuria (spot protein/creatinine ratio) increased from 0.75 +/- 1.0 to 1.71 +/- 2.0 (p = 0.03), unrelated to de novo sirolimus use. Four patients returned to CNI-based immunosuppression due to AR (n = 3) and gastrointestinal side effects (n = 1). Careful selection of pediatric candidates for CNI withdrawal is recommended. Worsening graft function and graft loss may be minimized by selecting patients with high CNIT scores and low biopsy chronicity and excluding patients with prior AR history.

Conversion to sirolimus for chronic renal allograft dysfunction: risk factors for graft loss and severe side effects

We retrospectively reviewed our experience with 45 kidney transplant recipients (KTR) that were switched from CNI to SRL, mainly for chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) (41/45). The mean serum creatinine at switch was 2.5 ± 0.8 mg/dl. At 1 year, patient survival was 93%. Death-censored graft survival was 67% at 1 year and 54% at 2 years. SRL was stopped because of severe side effects in 15 patients. Among these, eight patients developed ‘de novo’ high-grade proteinuria. Univariate analysis revealed that (1) a higher SRL level at 1 month was a predictor of SRL withdrawal due to severe side effects (P = 0.006), and (2) predictors of graft failure after SRL conversion were low SRL loading dose (P = 0.03) and a higher creatinine level at conversion (P = 0.003).

In conclusion, the therapeutic index of SRL in patients suffering from CAD is narrow, with high exposure triggering serious adverse events that may mandate SRL discontinuation, while too low exposure may expose patients to under-immunosuppression and graft loss.

Effects of sirolimus vs. calcineurin inhibitors on renal dysfunction after orthotopic liver transplantation

Small uncontrolled series have suggested that sirolimus favorably impacts renal function after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We sought to retrospectively compare renal dysfunction between cohorts exposed to sirolimus-based and calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression. We retrospectively studied 79 patients converted to sirolimus-based immunosuppression and 100 control subjects continued on calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression after OLT at our institution from 2000 to 2005. We collected clinical, demographic, and medication history. Renal dysfunction was defined as two or more wk of creatinine > or =2.0 mg/dL. Cohorts were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Patients began sirolimus a median 83 d post-OLT and were followed on the medication for median 359 d. Patients in both the sirolimus and calcineurin inhibitor cohorts had median creatinine 1.2 mg/dL at study entry. Sirolimus-based immunosuppression was associated with a 1.8 (0.8-4.3, p = 0.17) hazards ratio for renal dysfunction. Adjusting for presence of hepatocellular carcinoma, combined kidney/liver transplantation, and age, the hazards ratio was 2.0 (0.8-4.8, p = 0.13). These point estimates were not substantially altered after subgroup analysis of sirolimus as the lone immunosuppressant, duration of exposure, and time between OLT and sirolimus conversion. In conclusion, our retrospective, controlled study showed that conversion to sirolimus after OLT did not protect against renal dysfunction. The effect of sirolimus on renal function will need to be prospectively evaluated in a prospective, randomized trial.

Use of sirolimus in solid organ transplantation

Sirolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor that inhibits cell cycle progression and has proven to be a potent immunosuppressive agent for use in solid organ transplant recipients. The drug was initially studied as an adjunct to ciclosporin (cyclosporine) to prevent acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Subsequent studies have shown efficacy when combined with a variety of other immunosuppressive agents. The most common adverse effects of sirolimus are hyperlipidaemia and myelosuppression. The drug has unique antiatherogenic and antineoplastic properties, and may promote immunological tolerance and reduce the incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy. Although sirolimus is relatively non-nephrotoxic when administered as monotherapy, it pharmacodynamically enhances the toxicity of calcineurin inhibitors. Ironically, the drug has been used to facilitate calcineurin inhibitor-free protocols designed to preserve renal function after solid organ transplantation. Whether sirolimus can be used safely over the long term with low doses of calcineurin inhibitors requires further study. The use of sirolimus as a corticosteroid-sparing agent also remains to be proven in controlled trials. Postmarketing studies have revealed a number of unforeseen adverse effects including impaired wound healing and possibly proteinuria, oedema, pneumonitis and thrombotic microangiopathy. Overall, sirolimus is a powerful agent when used judiciously with other available immunosuppressants. As is true for all immunosuppressive drugs available for treatment of solid organ transplant recipients, the efficacy of the drug must be balanced against its considerable adverse effects.

Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus for chronic renal allograft dysfunction: a systematic review of the evidence

BACKGROUND

Conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus has been used as a strategy to improve deteriorating renal allograft function but the efficacy and safety of this intervention is unknown.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of studies that involved conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus in kidney transplantation. The search yielded five randomized trials (n=1,040 patients) and 25 nonrandomized studies (n=977 patients).

RESULTS

In the randomized trials, conversion to sirolimus improved short-term creatinine clearance (weighted mean difference 6.4 mL/min; 95% CI 1.9 to 11.0) compared to controls. In the nonrandomized studies, renal function improved or stabilized in 66% (95% CI 61% to 72%), creatinine clearance improved (weighted mean change 5.7 mL/min; 95% CI 1.4 to 10.1), cholesterol increased (weighted mean change 20.8 mg/dL; 95% CI 11.2 to 30.4) and triglycerides increased (weighted mean change 40.1 mg/dL; 95% CI 18.6 to 61.7). Sirolimus was discontinued by 28% of patients (95% CI 0 to 59%) in the randomized trials and 17% (95% CI 12 to 22%) in the nonrandomized trials.

CONCLUSION

Conversion to sirolimus is associated with an improvement in short-term renal function. However, given the discontinuation rate and potential side effects, adequately powered randomized trials with longer follow-up of hard outcomes are needed to determine whether this strategy leads to a lasting benefit in the clinical care of transplant recipients.

Living Related Kidney Transplantation Without Calcineurin Inhibitors: Initial Experience in a Mexican Center

We performed a prospective randomized trial comparing sirolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/prednisone to cyclosporine/MMF/prednisone and selected induction therapy with basiliximab. Twenty patients received sirolimus (10 mg loading dose followed by 3 mg/m body surface area/day, keeping 24-hr trough levels at 10-15 ng/mL for six months and 5-10 ng/mL thereafter. Twenty-one patients began cyclosporine (4 to 8 mg/kg/day, keeping 12-hour trough levels at 150-300 ng/mL for 6 months and 100-200 ng/mL afterwards). Mean follow up was 15.8 months. One-year patient and graft survival was similar in both groups (>90%). Acute rejection rate was 16.6% in the sirolimus group and 5.2% in the cyclosporine group (P=NS). There were no differences in mean serum creatinine between groups. No patients who received basiliximab and had sirolimus target levels suffered acute rejection at one year. The sirolimus group had significantly higher cholesterol and triglycerides. A calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen using sirolimus produces comparable one-year transplant outcomes in living related kidney transplants compared to a calcineurin inhibitor regimen.

Rapamycin decreases leukocyte migration in vivo and effectively reduces experimentally induced chronic colitis

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressive calcineurin inhibitors, like cyclosporine (CsA), can be used for the clinical management of severe ulcerative colitis. However, patients treated with CsA are at a risk for developing kidney failure and may be more susceptible to colon cancer. Furthermore, severe neurotoxicity and hypertension are common problems. To avoid the side effects of CsA, new immunosuppressive drugs to treat colitis are needed. The aim of the present study was to test the immunosuppressive mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor rapamycin in an experimental model of chronic colitis and to compare its effectiveness with CsA.

METHODS

Chronic colitis was established in Balb/c mice after four feeding cycles of dextran sodium sulfate. Because leukocyte recruitment to sites of intestinal inflammation is crucial for the development of chronic colitis, intravital microscopy was used to study the effect of rapamycin and CsA on leukocyte-endothelium interactions and leukocyte extravasation. To assess the degree of colitis, histological sections were evaluated.

RESULTS

Both rapamycin and cyclosporine effectively reduced leukocyte sticking (>60%) in submucosal venules, as compared to controls. Furthermore, rapamycin, but not CsA, reduced (>35%) leukocyte extravasation in the mucosa. Both rapamycin and CsA treatments significantly improved the histologic inflammation score.

CONCLUSION

Our in vivo results demonstrate that rapamycin reduces leukocyte sticking and extravasation during chronic colitis induction and proves to be as effective as CsA at reducing experimental chronic colitis. These results support the use of rapamycin in clinical trials to avoid serious side effects of CsA therapy in chronic colitis patients.

Renal function in renal or liver transplant recipients after conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus

Two Six-month pilot studies were conducted in renal (n = 17) or liver (n = 15) transplant recipients to evaluate renal function after conversion from calcineurin inhibitor (CI)- to sirolimus (SRL)-based immunosuppression. After an SRL loading dose, doses were individualized to achieve whole blood trough levels of 10-22 ng/mL. Overall, serum creatinine did not change from baseline to six months post-conversion but an improvement from 219.9 to 201.4 micromol/L at three months was noted in renal transplant recipients (p < 0.05). Another finding was a numerical increase in the mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from 26.8 to 33.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at six months among liver transplant recipients (NS). All patients survived and all grafts were functioning at the end of the study. In conclusion, renal function remained stable, with a tendency towards improvement, after abrupt conversion from CI- to SRL-based therapy in renal or liver transplant recipients with moderate renal insufficiency.

Néphrotoxicité du sirolimus : données cliniques et expérimentales

Sirolimus (SRL, rapamycin) is a potent immunosuppressive drug that binds to and inhibits mammalian Target Of Rapamycine (mTOR) kinase activity, a central controller of cell growth. In response to amino acids, hormones and growth factors, mTOR activates the translational machinery. By inhibiting mTOR, SRL reduces the translational process and T-cell proliferation in the mid-to-late G1 phase of the cell cycle. The antiproliferative effects of SRL are not limited to activated T cells. SRL has also been shown to block the cell cycle in various cell types such as epithelial renal cells, and many types of tumor cell lines. Since the approval by the US Food and Drug Administration and by the European agency, SRL has provoked great interest, as evidenced by the exponential increase in clinical studies. However, whereas preclinical studies failed to show any nephrotoxic effect on animal models, many clinical trials raised the possibility that SRL might be associated with renal adverse events. The evidence for SRL-associated early graft nephrotoxicity emerged from these results, and subsequent experimental data gave some explanations about the involved mechanisms. The aim of this review is to summarize the various renal adverse events reported in clinical studies and to present the experimental evidence for putative mechanisms of action for this SRL-induced nephrotoxicity.

Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus in patients with chronic renal allograft dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Chronic renal transplant dysfunction in part may be due to the nephrotoxic effects of calcineurin inhibitors, which are still the mainstay of immunosuppressive therapy. Sirolimus, a new immunosuppressive compound devoid of significant nephrotoxicity, might therefore exhibit beneficial effects when used in renal transplant recipients with graft dysfunction.

METHODS

Twelve renal transplant recipients included in this study had all been receiving calcineurin inhibitors for more than 12 months, and were free of rejection for more than 12 months. However, they demonstrated moderate renal dysfunction with serum creatinine values ranging from 1.8 to 4.0 mg/dL (164 to 351 micromol/L). After reaching a sirolimus level of 10 to 20 ng/mL, calcineurin inhibitor therapy was withheld.

RESULTS

One month after initiation of sirolimus therapy, all patients were off calcineurin inhibitors. The average daily sirolimus dosage was 5.8+/-3.4 mg. No acute rejection episode and no graft failure was observed. No patient required hemodialysis or admission to the hospital. Calculated creatinine clearance increased from 63.4+/-9.9 to 69.2+/-9.7 mL/min (P=.0368) and serum bicarbonate increased from 20.8+/-3.17 to 22.5+/-3.7 meq/L (P=.001). Serum cholesterol increased from 180+/-26.5 to 239+/-28.8 mg/dL (4.65+/-0.69 to 6.18+/-0.74 mmol/L, P<.001), triglycerides increased from 155+/-53 to 289+/-123 mg/dL (1.75+/-0.6 to 3.26+/-1.39 mmol/L) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased from 99+/-32 to 131+/-25.1 mg/dL (2.56+/-0.83 to 3.39+/-0.65 mmol/L, P=.01). Arterial blood pressure remained well controlled (126+/-15.6/74+/-8.9 vs 134+/-16.8/83+/-9.7).

CONCLUSION

Conversion from calcineurin inhibitor therapy to sirolimus in patients more than 1 year after transplantation with impaired organ function is feasible, safe, and associated with a trend toward improved renal function.

Conversion from calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus for renal function deterioration in kidney allograft recipients

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitors play an important role in chronic allograft dysfunction. Sirolimus is an interesting alternative in renal transplant patients because it is less nephrotoxic than calcineurin inhibitors.

METHODS

A chart review of the clinical outcome of kidney transplant patients converted to sirolimus with progressive allograft dysfunction is reported herein. Fifteen patients (average age: 32.3 years, 44 months mean time of conversion) were included. Indication for conversion was a >20% increase in serum creatinine over the last 6 months or progression to the range of 2-4.5 mg/dL. Patients underwent abrupt cessation of cyclosporine and sirolimus addition at 2-5 mg/day.

RESULTS

Concomitant immunosuppression remained unchanged during conversion. Targeted sirolimus level was 8-12 ng/mL. Serum creatinine dropped from pre-conversion level of 2.75 +/- 0.83 to 2.14 +/- 0.67 and 1.97 +/- 0.66 mg/dL at 3 and 6 months (p <0.05). There was a significant decrease in blood urea nitrogen, hemoglobin and serum calcium at 3 months post-conversion as well as serum calcium and potassium at 6 months post-conversion (p <0.05). There were no rejection episodes. Patient and graft survival was 100% with three infectious complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitored sirolimus conversion with sharp withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitor is an alternative for patients with deteriorating renal function and chronic allograft nephropathy.

Conversion from Cyclosporine to Sirolimus in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Conversion from cyclosporine (CsA) to sirolimus (SRL) has mainly been done in clinical conditions warranting calcineurin inhibitor discontinuation. Little is known about the clinical outcome of conversion in renal transplant recipients without transplant dysfunction.

METHODS

This prospective, open-label, multicentric pilot study evaluates the safety and efficacy of converting patients with stable renal function from CsA to SRL.

RESULTS

Forty stable patients on CsA, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (1.5 g/day), and steroids (ST) were converted at 7.6+/-1.4 months after renal transplantation. At 1 year, graft and patient survival was 100% and the incidence of acute rejection 5%. Calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) increased from 54+/-18 to 66+/-16 ml/min (P<0.0001). Blood pressure remained unchanged. A gradual increase in the incidence and severity of proteinuria was observed from month 6 onwards with de novo proteinuria in 30% of the patients at 1 year. Protein excretion was below 1 g/day in 12.5%, between 1 and 3 g/day in 17.5% and above 3 g/day in 7.5% of the proteinuric cohort (P=0.0043, compared to baseline). No predictors could be identified for the development of proteinuria. All patients had a reduction in protein excretion following renin-angiotensin blockade and were continued on SRL.

CONCLUSION

Conversion of stable renal transplant recipients from a CsA-MMF-ST to a SRL-MMF-ST regimen is safe and results in improved renal function but is associated with the development of proteinuria in 30% of the patients requiring renin-angiotensin blockade.

Clinical application of sirolimus in renal transplantation: an update

In addition to an analysis of the final results of phase I/II and phase III clinical trials of sirolimus (SRL), this review focuses on the recent results of several studies in renal transplantation, which include diverse combinations of SRL with other immunosuppressive agents. While SRL was initially introduced as an adjunctive agent to calcineurin inhibitors, it is now serving as the base for therapies that spare or avoid these nephrotoxic drugs. However, to optimize the use of SRL as base therapy, further work is necessary to determine target concentrations, requirement for concomitant steroids and/or nucleoside synthesis blockers, and countermeasure therapy to overcome the drug's adverse effects.

Rapamycin rescue therapy in patients after kidney transplantation: first clinical experience

This study was aimed at analysing rapamycin (RAPA) rescue therapy with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal in renal transplant patients primarily presenting with CNI-nephrotoxicity (CNI-Neph), chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) without [CAN(a)] and with histological changes suggestive of chronic rejection [CAN(b)]. In 36 patient with CNI-Neph (n = 6), CAN(b) (n = 21), CAN(a) (n = 7), and others (n = 2) RAPA therapy was started 4.4-115 months (median 30.6 months) after renal transplantation. During a follow up of 3-33 months (median 19 months) parameters of kidney function were recorded. Three patients on haemodialysis did not show any recovery of graft function. Of the remaining 33 patients renal function improved in 22 (66.7%), was stable in three (9%) but deteriorated in eight (24%) patients, of whom seven (21%) required haemodialysis thereafter. Success rate of RAPA therapy differed with respect to the histological diagnosis: 70% in CAN(b), 80% in CNI-Neph and 33% in CAN(a). Furthermore, in patients with creatinine levels above 400 mum (n = 6) graft function rarely improved (n = 2, 33%). The RAPA rescue therapy with CNI withdrawal appears promising in a special cohort of patients with chronic renal allograft dysfunction even late after transplantation.

Benefit-Risk Assessment of Sirolimus in Renal Transplantation

Sirolimus (rapamycin) is a macrocyclic lactone isolated from a strain of Streptomyces hygroscopicus that inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-mediated signal-transduction pathways, resulting in the arrest of cell cycle of various cell types, including T- and B-lymphocytes. Sirolimus has been demonstrated to prolong graft survival in various animal models of transplantation, ranging from rodents to primates for both heterotopic, as well as orthotopic organ grafting, bone marrow transplantation and islet cell grafting. In human clinical renal transplantation, sirolimus in combination with ciclosporin (cyclosporine) efficiently reduces the incidence of acute allograft rejection. Because of the synergistic effect of sirolimus on ciclosporin-induced nephrotoxicity, a prolonged combination of the two drugs inevitably leads to progressive irreversible renal allograft damage. Early elimination of calcineurin inhibitor therapy or complete avoidance of the latter by using sirolimus therapy is the optimal strategy for this drug. Prospective randomised phase II and III clinical studies have confirmed this approach, at least for recipients with a low to moderate immunological risk. For patients with a high immunological risk or recipients exposed to delayed graft function, sirolimus might not constitute the best therapeutic choice--despite its ability to enable calcineurin inhibitor sparing in the latter situation--because of its anti-proliferative effects on recovering renal tubular cells. Whether lower doses of sirolimus or a combination with a reduced dose of tacrolimus would be advantageous in these high risk situations remains to be determined. Clinically relevant adverse effects of sirolimus that require a specific therapeutic response or can potentially influence short- and long-term patient morbidity and mortality as well as graft survival include hypercholesterolaemia, hypertriglyceridaemia, infectious and non-infectious pneumonia, anaemia, lymphocele formation and impaired wound healing. These drug-related adverse effects are important determinants in the choice of a tailor-made immunosuppressive drug regimen that complies with the individual patient risk profile. Equally important in the latter decision is the lack of severe intrinsic nephrotoxicity associated with sirolimus and its advantageous effects on arterial hypertension, post-transplantation diabetes mellitus and esthetic changes induced by calcineurin inhibitors. Mild and transient thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, gastrointestinal adverse effects and mucosal ulcerations are all minor complications of sirolimus therapy that have less impact on the decision for choosing this drug as the basis for tailor-made immunosuppressive therapy. It is clear that sirolimus has gained a proper place in the present-day immunosuppressive armament used in renal transplantation and will contribute to the development of a tailor-made immunosuppressive therapy aimed at fulfilling the requirements outlined by the individual patient profile.

Sirolimus Dosage during and after Conversion from Calcineurin Inhibitor Therapy to Sirolimus in Chronic Kidney Transplant Patients

Sirolimus (SRL) is an alternative to calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in kidney transplant patients with chronic allograft dysfunction.

METHODS

33 patients were converted to SRL receiving a single loading dose of 15 mg and initial maintenance dose of 5 mg/day. CNI was reduced by 50% on day 1 and tapered during 4-6 weeks after achieving SRL target (8-12 ng/ml). Concomitant immunosuppressive therapy remained unchanged.

RESULTS

Patient survival was 100% and graft survival was 85% after 1 year. Mean SRL dose decreased from 5 mg/day initially to 2.8 +/- 1.3 mg/day. SRL dose-adjusted trough concentration did not change significantly over time. Dose-adjusted trough concentrations of CNI before conversion and of SRL after 1 year did not correlate. We observed no severe infections, however, one rejection Banff Ia occurred 7 months after conversion associated with subtherapeutic SRL trough concentration. Adverse events were anemia, dyslipidemia, epistaxis, stomatitis, and bronchiolitis obliterans which occurred mainly during the conversion phase.

CONCLUSION

Overlapping conversion from CNI to SRL in chronic kidney transplant patients is possible and safe. However, further studies are necessary with shorter overlap and lower SRL loading and initial maintenance dose which might lead to a decrease in the high number of adverse events in the overlap phase.

Conversion to sirolimus-based maintenance immunosuppression using daclizumab bridge therapy in renal transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Conversion from calcineurin inhibitor (CI)-based maintenance immunosuppression to sirolimus (SRL)-based immunosuppression may be beneficial in selected renal transplant recipients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a daclizumab (DAC) bridge protocol in patients converted from CI- to SRL-based maintenance immunosuppression.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of renal transplant recipients who were converted to SRL at least 2 months post-transplant. The protocol consisted of an abrupt discontinuation of either cyclosporin (CsA) or tacrolimus (TAC), initiation of SRL within 48 h of CI discontinuation, and DAC 2 mg/kg at the time of CI discontinuation and again at 14 d (depending on the SRL serum concentration). The SRL starting dose was based on risk stratification in each patient.

RESULTS

Twenty-one renal transplant patients were converted to SRL (11 from TAC, 10 from CsA) between October 2001 and July 2003. Conversion occurred at a mean of 23 months post-transplant. Indications for SRL conversion included 12 for chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN), four for CI-associated neurotoxicity, two for thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), two for post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM), and one for polyomavirus interstitial nephritis (PVN). Mean follow-up was 16 months from time of conversion. Therapeutic SRL levels were reached at a mean of 14 d. Total serum cholesterol levels increased from a mean of 205 (+/- 47) to 234 (+/- 55) mg/dL (P = 0.014), and serum triglyceride levels increased from a mean of 186 (+/- 66) to 257 (+/- 88) mg/dL (P = 0.002). In addition, mean haemoglobin level decreased from 12.0 (+/- 2.3) to 10.5 (+/- 2.1) g/dL (P = 0.002); total white blood cell count decreased from 8300 (+/- 4300) to 4700 (+/- 1400)/mm(3) (P < 0.001); and platelet count decreased from 238 000 (+/- 72 800) to 186 000 (+/- 51 900)/mm(3) (P = 0.002) from before to after conversion. Patients experienced the following side-effects while taking SRL: diarrhoea (n = 6), peripheral oedema (n = 5), arthralgias (n = 4), anaemia (n = 4), oral ulcers (n = 1), deep vein thrombosis (n = 1), shortness of breath (n = 1), and mild increase in serum transaminases (n = 1). Two patients (9.5%) discontinued SRL due to side-effects, both secondary to severe arthralgias. There were two serious infections noted after conversion: one Pseudomonas aeruginosa urosepsis, and one PVN (that was ongoing prior to conversion). Patient survival was 100%, and kidney graft survival was 76%. Five patients (24%) lost their allograft after conversion due to progression of CAN (n = 2), persistent TMA in the kidney (n = 1), patient self-discontinuation of sirolimus (n = 1), and preexisting PVN unresponsive to cidofovir therapy (n = 1). Of the five patients who lost their allograft, the mean serum creatinine at the time of conversion was 3.5 (+/-1.1) mg/dL compared with 2.2 (+/- 0.8) mg/dL in patients who did not lose their allograft (P = 0.034). No acute rejection episodes occurred after conversion to sirolimus.

CONCLUSIONS

DAC bridge therapy provides safe and effective immunosuppressive coverage while converting renal transplant recipients from CI- to SRL-based maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. A pharmacoeconomic analysis, however, is necessary to determine the cost-effectiveness of this conversion protocol.

Benefit-Risk Assessment of Ciclosporin Withdrawal in Renal Transplant Recipients

Ciclosporin is associated with significant toxicity, including nephrotoxicity, and with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Many attempts have been made to wean patients from ciclosporin. Before the availability of new immunosuppressive drugs, the acute rejection rate observed after ciclosporin withdrawal did not permit the widespread use of withdrawal regimens even though meta-analysis did not show that they adversely affected patient or graft survival. Nevertheless, maintenance therapy with azathioprine and corticosteroids has not become routine practice. The introduction of mycophenolate mofetil and subsequently sirolimus has increased the number of clinical studies of the effects of ciclosporin withdrawal. In stable patients, this withdrawal is associated with a small but significant increase in the incidence of acute rejection episodes. Declining renal function and other forms of ciclosporin-related toxicity have improved. However, this improvement was also observed when ciclosporin was only reduced (and not withdrawn), which did not increase the risk of acute rejection. More precise definition of the patients who could benefit from ciclosporin-withdrawal may help to optimise the immunosuppressive regimen in this setting. In patients with chronic allograft deterioration, ciclosporin withdrawal together with mycophenolate mofetil introduction has been shown to improve renal function significantly in many small studies, and a large prospective randomised study. For the time being, ciclosporin withdrawal is a good therapeutic option for patients with declining renal function and signs of chronic ciclosporin nephrotoxicity on renal biopsy. Finally, recent preliminary studies have reported the results of complete avoidance of calcineurin inhibitors after renal transplantation. These results are promising as regards the incidence of acute rejection, renal function and safety, but need confirmation in larger trials with a longer follow-up. Nevertheless, it has become clear that the concept of an immunosuppressive regimen with little or no nephrotoxicity after renal transplantation is more and more important and plays a crucial part in tailoring immunosuppression to the needs of specific patient populations.

Renal function improves in liver transplant recipients when switched from a calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus

Sirolimus (Rapamune; Wyeth-Ayerst, Philadelphia, PA) is a newer immunosuppressive drug with no known acute or chronic nephrotoxic effects; however, limited data are available in liver transplant recipients. We prospectively evaluated changes in renal function in liver transplant recipients after conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus monotherapy. We measured serial serum creatinine levels in liver transplant recipients with chronic nephrotoxicity caused by calcineurin inhibitors before and after conversion to sirolimus therapy. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. Change in eGFR over time, incidence of acute hepatocellular rejection, and adverse events while being administered sirolimus monotherapy were recorded. Mean interval between liver transplantation and initiation of sirolimus therapy was 310 weeks (range, 9 to 780 weeks). Of 21 patients included in our study, 18 patients were converted to sirolimus monotherapy and 3 patients were switched to sirolimus and low-dose steroid therapy. Patients were followed up for a mean of 66.8 +/- 38.9 (SD) weeks after conversion. Renal function improved in 71% of patients (15 of 21 patients). Median eGFR improved significantly from 34 mL/min/1.73 m2 at the time of conversion to 43 mL/min/1.73 m2 at the last follow-up (27% increase in eGFR; P = 001). Median monthly change in eGFR was from -0.25 mL/min/1.73 m2 pre-sirolimus therapy to +1.28 mL/min/1.73 m2 post-sirolimus therapy (P =.09). Adverse events were mostly mild and self-limited. Only 1 patient developed biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection, which was treated with sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Two patients discontinued sirolimus therapy because of toxicity (oral ulceration, 1 patient; interstitial pneumonitis, 1 patient). Renal function improved significantly in the majority of liver transplant recipients with renal insufficiency caused by calcineurin inhibitors when converted to sirolimus therapy. Sirolimus monotherapy provided adequate immunosuppression with a low incidence of acute cellular rejection and minimal adverse events.

Ten years of sirolimus therapy in orthotopic liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Sirolimus therapy has been used in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients diagnosed with a variety of diseases; chronic graft rejection (CR), calcineurin associated renal toxicity, preemptive immune suppression, calcineurin related neurotoxicity, preemptive therapy in transplant recipients with history of hepatocellular carcinoma, and steroid resistant allograft rejection.

METHODS

A search for the medical literature and experiences involving sirolimus was done.

RESULTS

Several animal and human reports evaluating the use sirolimus in liver transplant recipients are found and discussed.

CONCLUSION

Sirolimus has been used for multitude of indications, primarily based on anecdotal experiences. However, reports of sirolimus related side effects have decreased the transplant communities' enthusiasm towards promoting this agent as a safe immune suppression agent.

Oral ulcers in kidney transplant recipients treated with sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil

BACKGROUND

In an attempt to reduce calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, transplant patients treated with tacrolimus can be switched to maintenance treatment with sirolimus.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial, 33 kidney transplant recipients on steroid-free maintenance treatment with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil continued tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (control group, n=18) or were converted from tacrolimus to sirolimus (study group, n=15) at 1 year after transplantation.

RESULTS

The study was prematurely stopped as a result of a cluster of nine patients suffering from painful oral ulcerations in the study group. Oral ulcerations did not occur in the control group. The authors here report on the individual cases suffering from this side effect of the instituted immunosuppressive regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors review the literature with respect to the occurrence of oral ulcers associated with the use of sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil and speculate on the causes of the high incidence of oral ulcers in their study group. Possible explanations are overimmunosuppression during the period of the conversion from tacrolimus to sirolimus without antiviral prophylaxis, the use of the oral emulsion instead of tablets, or the lack of corticosteroid co-administration.