Lipid profiles after liver transplantation in patients receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporin

Immunosuppressive agents: effects on glucose and lipid metabolism

Immunosuppressive therapies are critical elements in successful organ transplantation. Although immunosuppressant drugs are essential in preventing graft rejection and graft maintenance after transplantation, their use is complicated by adverse effects, many being detrimental to graft and even patient long-term survival. Commonly used agents are associated with dysregulated glucose metabolism and dyslipidemia. This article focuses on the effects of immunosuppressive agents on glucose and lipid metabolism. Adrenal effects of these drugs, where known, also are discussed.

Simvastatin down regulates mRNA expression of RANTES and CCR5 in posttransplant renal recipients with hyperlipidemia

Chemokines and hyperlipidemia are involved in the mechanism of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). In this study, the mRNA expression of RANTES and its receptor CCR5 on peripheral blood mononuclear cells were measured in renal transplant recipients with hyperlipidemia, and the effect of simvastatin treatment observed to investigate the mechanism and prevention of CAN. Sixty recipients selected from 167 renal transplant recipients were divided into two groups: group A without hyperlipidemia (n = 30) and group B with hyperlipidemia (n = 30). The control group consisted of 30 healthy volunteers. The recipients in group B were treated with simvastatin for 3 months. We estimated serum lipid levels and mRNA expressions of RANTES and CCR5. The mRNA expressions of RANTES and CCR5 were significantly higher in renal transplant recipients compared with controls. The expressions were much higher in group B than in group A patients. In group B patients, serum lipid levels decreased dramatically after simvastatin treatment. Meanwhile, the mRNA expressions of RANTES and CCR5 were reduced significantly after 1.5 months of simvastatin treatment to a level significantly lower than that in group A after 3 months of treatment. The increased expressions of RANTES and CCR5 mRNAs in renal transplant recipients with hyperlipidemia might be involved in CAN due to hyperlipidemia. Simvastatin seemed to reduce the chemokine transcripts in renal recipients with hyperlipidemia.

A comparison of tacrolimus and cyclosporine in liver transplantation: effects on renal function and cardiovascular risk status

A retrospective chart review of 1065 consecutive liver allograft recipients in 11 centers from January 1997 to September 1998 was performed. Patients were followed for 3 years or until graft loss. Patients received either tacrolimus (n = 594), cyclosporine (n = 450) or no calcineurin inhibitor (n = 21). Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores at time of transplant were similar between the two groups. During follow-up, more patients switched from cyclosporine to tacrolimus (26.7%) than from tacrolimus to cyclosporine (12.8%; p < 0.0001). Patient and graft survival were equivalent. Corticosteroid use was more common in cyclosporine-treated patients (p < 0.00001). Patients receiving tacrolimus experienced lower serum creatinine levels at months 3 through 36 (p < 0.0001). Systolic blood pressure was lower in patients receiving tacrolimus (p < 0.001) despite a reduced requirement for anti-hypertensive agents (p < 0.0001). In addition, tacrolimus was associated with lower total cholesterol and triglyceride levels for months 3 through 24 and 3 through 12, respectively (p < 0.01), despite a reduced requirement for anti-hyperlipidemic agents. The incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus was similar in both groups. While both calcineurin inhibitors were associated with excellent patient and graft survival, renal function, blood pressure and serum lipid levels were significantly better with tacrolimus treatment.

Tacrolimus: a further update of its use in the management of organ transplantation

Extensive clinical use has confirmed that tacrolimus (Prograf) is a key option for immunosuppression after transplantation. In large, prospective, randomised, multicentre trials in adults and children receiving solid organ transplants, tacrolimus was at least as effective or provided better efficacy than cyclosporin microemulsion in terms of patient and graft survival, treatment failure rates and the incidence of biopsy-proven acute and corticosteroid-resistant rejection episodes. Notably, the lower incidence of rejection episodes after renal transplantation in tacrolimus recipients was reflected in improved cost effectiveness. In bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients, the incidence of tacrolimus grade II-IV graft-versus-host disease was significantly lower with tacrolimus than cyclosporin treatment. Efficacy was maintained in renal and liver transplant recipients after total withdrawal of corticosteroid therapy from tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, with the incidence of acute rejection episodes at up to 2 years' follow-up being similar with or without corticosteroids. Tacrolimus provided effective rescue therapy in transplant recipients with persistent acute or chronic allograft rejection or drug-related toxicity associated with cyclosporin treatment. Typically, conversion to tacrolimus reversed rejection episodes and/or improved the tolerability profile, particularly in terms of reduced hyperlipidaemia. In lung transplant recipients with obliterative bronchiolitis, conversion to tacrolimus reduced the decline in and/or improved lung function in terms of forced expiratory volume in 1 second. Tolerability issues may be a factor when choosing a calcineurin inhibitor. Cyclosporin tends to be associated with a higher incidence of significant hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, hirsutism, gingivitis and gum hyperplasia, whereas the incidence of some types of neurotoxicity, disturbances in glucose metabolism, diarrhoea, pruritus and alopecia may be higher with tacrolimus treatment. Renal function, as assessed by serum creatinine levels and glomerular filtration rates, was better in tacrolimus than cyclosporin recipients at up to 5 years' follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Recent well designed trials have consolidated the place of tacrolimus as an important choice for primary immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation and in BMT. Notably, in adults and children receiving transplants, tacrolimus-based primary immunosuppression was at least as effective or provided better efficacy than cyclosporin microemulsion treatment in terms of patient and graft survival, treatment failure and the incidence of acute and corticosteroid-resistant rejection episodes. The reduced incidence of rejection episodes in renal transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus translated into a better cost effectiveness relative to cyclosporin microemulsion treatment. The optimal immunosuppression regimen is ultimately dependent on balancing such factors as the efficacy of the individual drugs, their tolerability, potential for drug interactions and pharmacoeconomic issues.