Dose adjustment and cost of itraconazole prophylaxis in lung transplant recipients receiving cyclosporine and tacrolimus (FK 506)

Fungal Infections in Lung Transplantation

Purpose of Review

We aim to understand the most common fungal infections associated with the post-lung transplant period, how to diagnose, treat, and prevent them based on the current guidelines published and our center’s experience.

Recent Findings

Different fungi inhabit specific locations. Diagnosis of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) depends on symptoms, radiologic changes, and a positive microbiological or pathology data. There are several molecular tests that have been used for diagnosis. Exposure to fungal prophylaxis can predispose lung transplant recipients to these emerging molds. Understanding and managing medication interactions and drug monitoring are essential in successfully treating IFIs.

Summary

With the increasing rate of lung transplantations being performed, and the challenges posed by the immunosuppressive regimen, understanding the risk and managing the treatment of fungal infections are imperative to the success of a lung transplant recipient. There are many ongoing clinical trials being conducted in hopes of developing novel antifungals.

Management of drug and food interactions with azole antifungal agents in transplant recipients

Azole antifungal agents are frequently used in hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplant recipients for prevention or treatment of invasive fungal infections. However, because of metabolism by or substrate activity for various isoenzymes of the cytochrome P450 system and/or P-glycoprotein, azole antifungals have the potential to interact with many of the drugs commonly used in these patient populations. Thus, to identify drug interactions that may result between azole antifungals and other drugs, we conducted a literature search of the MEDLINE database (1966-December 2009) for English-language articles on drug interaction studies involving the azole antifungal agents fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole. Another literature search between each of the azoles and the immunosuppressants cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and sirolimus, as well as the corticosteroids methylprednisolone, dexamethasone, prednisolone, and prednisone, was also conducted. Concomitant administration of azoles and immunosuppressive agents may cause clinically significant drug interactions resulting in extreme immunosuppression or toxicity. The magnitude and duration of an interaction between azoles and immunosuppressants are not class effects of the azoles, but differ between drug combinations and are subject to interpatient variability. Drug interactions in the transplant recipient receiving azole therapy may also occur with antibiotics, chemotherapeutic agents, and acid-suppressive therapies, among other drugs. Initiation of an azole antifungal in transplant recipients nearly ensures a drug-drug interaction, but often these drugs are required. Management of these interactions first involves knowledge of the potential drug interaction, appropriate dosage adjustments when necessary, and therapeutic or clinical monitoring at an appropriate point in therapy to assess the drug-drug interaction (e.g., immunosuppressive drug concentrations, signs and symptoms of toxicity). These aspects of drug interaction management are essential not only at the initiation of azole antifungal therapy, but also when these agents are removed from the regimen.

Itraconazole-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid nanoparticles for improved antifungal activity

Aims: Poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) nanoparticles containing the hydrophobic antifungal itraconazole (ITZ) were developed to address the need for more effective means of treating fungal infections. Materials & methods: PLGA–ITZ nanoparticles were synthesized using an oil-in-water emulsion evaporation method. Nanoparticle morphology (studied by transmission electron microscopy), size zeta potential (dynamic light scattering), encapsulation efficiency (UV–visible spectroscopy), release profile and antifungal activity were characterized. Results: PLGA–ITZ nanoparticles (of 220 nm in diameter) completely inhibited Aspergillus flavus growth over 11 days at 0.03 mg/ml ITZ; a similar effect was achieved at ×100 ITZ concentrations (3 mg/ml) in emulsified form. The ITZ in water formulation had the least antifungal effect, inhibiting growth for only 2 days at 3 mg/ml ITZ. Conclusion: This system is envisioned to increase bioavailability of ITZ by improving aqueous dispersibility and increasing antifungal penetration, thereby increasing antifungal activity of the entrapped drug.

Blood Concentration Curve of Cyclosporine: Impact of Itraconazole in Lung Transplant Recipients

Although the influence of cytochrome P450 inhibitory drugs on the area under the curve (AUC) of cyclosporine (CsA) has been described, data concerning the impact of these substances on the shape of the blood concentration curve are scarce. By assessment of CsA blood levels before and 1, 2, and 4 hr after oral intake (C0, C1, C2, and C4, respectively) CsA profiling examinations were performed in 20 lung transplant recipients taking 400 mg, 200 mg, and no itraconazole, respectively. The three groups showed comparable results for C0, C2, and AUC(0-12). Greater values were found for Cmax, Cmax-C0, peak-trough fluctuation and rise to Cmax in favor of the non-itraconazole group. Additionally, tmax was shorter in the non-itraconazole group. Comedication with the metabolic inhibitor itraconazole is associated with a flattening of the CsA blood concentration profile in lung transplant recipients. These changes cannot be assessed by isolated C0, C2, or AUC(0-12) values alone.

Antifungal therapy in children with invasive fungal infections: a systematic review

Invasive fungal infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Differences between children and adults are reported, yet few trials of antifungal agents have been performed in pediatric populations. We performed a systematic review of the literature to guide appropriate pediatric treatment recommendations. From available trials that compared antifungal agents in either prolonged febrile neutropenia or invasive candidal or Aspergillus infection, no clear difference in treatment efficacy was demonstrated, although few trials were adequately powered. Differing antifungal pharmacokinetics between children and adults were demonstrated, requiring dose modification. Significant differences in toxicity, particularly nephrotoxicity, were identified between classes of antifungal agents. Therapy needs to be guided by the pathogen or suspected pathogens, the degree of immunosuppression, comorbidities (particularly renal dysfunction), concurrent nephrotoxins, and the expected length of therapy.

Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of the Drug Interaction between Intravenous Itraconazole and Intravenous Tacrolimus or Intravenous Cyclosporin A in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

A single-institution, open-label prospective pharmacokinetic evaluation of the interaction between intravenous itraconazole and intravenous cyclosporin A and tacrolimus was conducted in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. The study was conducted in 2 phases, with patients acting as their own controls. In phase 1, steady-state concentrations and clearance of cyclosporin A and tacrolimus administered alone were evaluated. Phase 2 evaluated serum concentrations and clearance of cyclosporin A and tacrolimus under the influence of itraconazole therapy. Among 17 patients who completed both phases of the study, the mean increase in the serum tacrolimus concentration was 83% (P<.0001), and the mean increase in the serum cyclosporin A concentration was 80% (P=.0001). There was no correlation between serum itraconazole concentrations and the serum concentrations of tacrolimus or cyclosporin A. The drug interaction between itraconazole and calcineurin inhibitors is predictable and occurs within 48 hours of concomitant drug administration. The data suggest that dose reductions of tacrolimus and cyclosporin A in the range of 50% to 100% are necessary when itraconazole therapy is initiated and that subsequent close monitoring of serum concentrations is necessary to guide further dose modifications.

Sirolimus-Itraconazole Interaction in a Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipient

Interactions between azole antifungal agents and immunosuppressants that are metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4 (chiefly calcineurin inhibitors) are well documented. Interactions between itraconazole and sirolimus are known to occur in patients after solid organ transplantation, but interactions in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients have yet to be reported in the literature. We describe an allogeneic HSCT recipient who experienced supratherapeutic trough levels of sirolimus as a result of its coadministration with itraconazole. This patient was a 20-year-old African-American man who underwent HSCT for treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome with severe aplastic anemia. After several regimen changes, the patient received oral itraconazole 200 mg every 12 hours and sirolimus at a dosage of 7 mg/day on days 76-80 and 5 mg/day on days 81 and 82. His sirolimus whole blood trough levels were 17.5 and 35.6 ng/ml on days 80 and 82, respectively (therapeutic range 5-15 ng/ml). An interaction between itraconazole and sirolimus was suspected, and sirolimus was withheld on days 83-90. On day 90, the patient's sirolimus trough level had normalized to 4.4 ng/ml. Sirolimus was resumed at 1-2 mg/day, with adjustments as needed to maintain trough levels of 10-15 ng/ml. Both the itraconazole and sirolimus were eventually were discontinued. The patient died, however, from a disseminated adenovirus infection leading to end-organ failure. Sirolimus is extremely sensitive to the inhibitory potential of azole antifungals. We propose that itraconazole also has a potent effect on sirolimus metabolism. Preemptive sirolimus dosage reduction and close monitoring of its whole blood trough levels are required whenever this combination is considered to avoid immunosuppressant toxicity in already critically ill patients.

Itraconazole Prophylaxis in Lung Transplant Recipients Receiving Tacrolimus (FK 506): Efficacy and Drug Interaction

BACKGROUND

Itraconazole is often given for fungal prophylaxis to lung transplant recipients after transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the extent of interaction between tacrolimus and itraconazole in lung transplant recipients and the efficacy of itraconazole prophylaxis.

METHODS

The study group included 40 lung transplant recipients followed for at least 12 months. All received prophylactic itraconazole, 200 mg twice a day, for the first 6 months after transplantation. Tacrolimus levels and dosage requirements were compared during and after itraconazole therapy. Rejection rate, fungal infection rate, and renal function were assessed. The mean cost per daily treatment of the itraconazole/tacrolimus combination and tacrolimus alone was calculated.

RESULTS

The mean tacrolimus dose during itraconazole treatment was 3.26 +/- 2.1 mg/day compared with 5.74 +/- 2.9 mg/day after itraconazole was stopped (p < 0.0001) for a mean total daily dose elevation of tacrolimus of 76%. When the cost of itraconazole was taken into account, the average total daily cost of the combined treatment was US5.86 dollars less than the treatment with tacrolimus alone. No differences in the rejection or fungal infection rate, or in renal toxicity, were observed between the periods with and without itraconazole treatment, although less positive fungal isolates were identified during itraconazole therapy.

CONCLUSION

Prophylaxis therapy with itraconazole is highly effective. Itraconazole reduces the dose of tacrolimus and therefore lowers the cost of therapy without causing an increase in rejection rate and with renal function preservation.

Itraconazole antagonizes store-operated influx of calcium into chemoattractant-activated human neutrophils

We have investigated the effects of itraconazole (0.1-10 micro m), an antimycotic which is often used prophylactically in primary and secondary immunodeficiency disorders, including chronic granulomatous disease, on mobilization of Ca(2+) and restoration of Ca(2+) homeostasis following activation of neutrophils with FMLP or PAF. Transmembrane fluxes of Ca(2+), as well as cytosolic concentrations of the cation were measured using a combination of spectrofluorimetric and radiometric procedures. The abruptly occurring increases in cytosolic Ca(2+) following activation of the cells with either FMLP (1 micro m) or PAF (200 nm) were unaffected by itraconazole. However, the subsequent store-operated influx of the cation was attenuated by itraconazole at concentrations of 0.25 micro m and higher. The itraconazole-mediated inhibition of uptake of Ca(2+) was not associated with detectable alterations in the intracellular concentrations of cyclic AMP, ATP or inositol triphosphate, and appeared to be compatible with antagonism of store-operated Ca(2+) channels. Although a secondary property, this anti-inflammatory activity of itraconazole, if operative in vivo, may be beneficial in conditions associated with dysregulation of neutrophil Ca(2+) handling such as CGD.

Increased Bioavailability of Tacrolimus after Rectal Administration in Rats

The oral bioavailability of tacrolimus is low and varies considerably in humans due to first-pass metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and the active efflux mediated by P-glycoprotein. This study was undertaken to elucidate the usefulness of rectal administration of tacrolimus as an alternative route to improve its bioavailability. Tacrolimus powder was suspended in a suppository base (witepsol H-15) and the tacrolimus suppository was inserted into the anus of the rats. For comparison, tacrolimus was suspended in 0.5% sodium methylcellulose solution and administered orally to rats. The dose of tacrolimus was fixed to 2 mg/kg. Blood samples were collected periodically up to 24 h after dosing, and tacrolimus concentrations were assayed by microparticle enzyme immunoassay. The whole blood concentrations of tacrolimus after rectal administration were much greater than those after oral administration. The C(max) and AUC(0-24 h) values after rectal administration were 3.9- and 6.9-fold greater than those after oral administration, respectively. These results clearly suggest a possibility that rectal administration of tacrolimus is capable of improving its bioavailability and cutting the costs of tacrolimus treatment.

Tacrolimus dosage requirements after initiation of azole antifungal therapy in pediatric thoracic organ transplantation

Azole antifungals inhibit the metabolism of tacrolimus mediated by CYP3A4. Upon initiation of azole therapy, the required dose reduction of tacrolimus is unknown. We reviewed our experience with azole antifungals in our pediatric thoracic transplant population receiving tacrolimus. Tacrolimus levels and dosage requirements were compared before and during azole therapy. Thirty-one patients received both tacrolimus and an azole antifungal (fluconazole = 9, itraconazole = 22). The tacrolimus dose was empirically reduced by approximately one-third when azole therapy was initiated. Mean tacrolimus dose requirements decreased by 68% within the first month of therapy (pre-azole: 0.27 +/- 0.14 mg/kg/day; 30 day post-azole: 0.087 +/- 0.069 mg/kg/day; p < 0.001). Despite a mean decrease in tacrolimus dose from baseline of 33, 42, and 55% on day 1, 2, and 4 of azole therapy, respectively, there was still an unintended 38% increase in tacrolimus levels during the first month of azole therapy. A calculated dose-reduction protocol of 50% on day of azole initiation, 70% on day 3, and 75% on day 14 should result in minimal mean changes in the tacrolimus levels. There was no difference in tacrolimus dose reduction between fluconazole and itraconazole groups. Azole antifungals markedly decrease tacrolimus requirements within the first few days of therapy. An initial reduction in tacrolimus dose by one-third is insufficient, and dose reduction of at least 50% upon azole initiation seems warranted. Once azole antifungal therapy is initiated, frequent therapeutic drug monitoring is required.

Beneficial pharmacokinetic interaction between cyclosporine and itraconazole in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Itraconazole is often given for fungal prophylaxis to renal transplant recipients, who require concomitant cyclosporine in the immediate posttransplant period. We determined the extent of the pharmacokinetic interaction between cyclosporine and itraconazole oral solution in renal transplant recipients and the effect on daily drug costs.

METHOD

This was a single-center, open-label, nonrandomized study. Posttransplantation, renal transplant recipients received itraconazole solution 200 mg twice daily and cyclosporine, dosed to achieve target concentrations. Once at steady state, blood samples were collected over 12 hours for pharmacokinetic evaluation of cyclosporine, itraconazole, and hydroxy-itraconazole. Itraconazole was discontinued after approximately a 3-month prophylaxis regimen. Cyclosporine doses were titrated to achieve target concentrations and cyclosporine concentrations were once again determined when steady state was achieved. A noncompartmental analysis was used to analyze cyclosporine pharmacokinetic parameters. The pharmacoeconomic impact was measured based on the percent change in dose of cyclosporine when administered with and without itraconazole. Drug costs were calculated using the average wholesale price. The cost per patient, as well as the average cost, was calculated for the cyclosporine/itraconazole combination, as well as the cyclosporine regimen alone.

RESULTS

Eight renal transplant recipients completed the study. All were included for itraconazole analyses and seven for cyclosporine analyses. Mean peak and trough itraconazole levels were 1.64 +/- 0.82 and 1.23 +/- 0.90 microg/mL respectively. Mean peak and trough hydroxy-itraconazole levels were 2.37 +/- 1.55 and 2.20 +/- 1.48 microg/mL, respectively. While on itraconazole, a 48% reduction in the mean total daily dose of cyclosporine was necessary to maintain target concentrations (171 +/- 63.6 versus 329 +/- 103.5 mg, P =.003). This reduction in cyclosporine dose resulted in a discounted itraconazole daily drug cost of approximately 29.5%.

CONCLUSION

Administering itraconazole with cyclosporine allows for a decrease in the cyclosporine dose, thus lowering daily drug costs and providing adequate antifungal coverage with itraconazole and hydroxy-itraconazole trough concentrations above the MIC(90) of Candida and Aspergillus spp.

Primary cutaneous fungal infections in solid organ transplantation: a case series

Cutaneous fungal infections in solid-organ transplant patients present in a variety of nonspecific ways, requiring a high index of suspicion to diagnose correctly. In the present series of four transplant recipients, subsequent primary cutaneous fungal infections presented as papules, plaques, ulcers and subcutaneous nodules. Transplantations included one cardiac, two renal and one renal-pancreatic transplant. Fungal infections were limited to the skin; there was no evidence of disseminated disease in any case. The pathogens isolated were Scedosporium apiospermum (Pseudallescheria boydii), Alternaria species, Aspergillus fumigatus, and a coelomycete in the Coniothyrium-Microsphaeropsis complex of dark molds. Individuals were successfully treated with surgical debridement, antifungal agents, and reduction of immunosuppressive therapy. All patients and allografts survived. Accurate diagnosis, aggressive surgery and appropriate antifungal therapy, combined with close outpatient follow-up, optimize the likelihood of a cure in a transplant population.

Pharmacokinetic aspects of treating infections in the intensive care unit: focus on drug interactions

Pharmacokinetic interactions involving anti-infective drugs may be important in the intensive care unit (ICU). Although some interactions involve absorption or distribution, the most clinically relevant interactions during anti-infective treatment involve the elimination phase. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6 and 3A4 are the major isoforms responsible for oxidative metabolism of drugs. Macrolides (especially troleandomycin and erythromycin versus CYP3A4), fluoroquinolones (especially enoxacin, ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin versus CYP1A2) and azole antifungals (especially fluconazole versus CYP2C9 and CYP2C19, and ketoconazole and itraconazole versus CYP3A4) are all inhibitors of CYP-mediated metabolism and may therefore be responsible for toxicity of other coadministered drugs by decreasing their clearance. On the other hand, rifampicin is a nonspecific inducer of CYP-mediated metabolism (especially of CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP3A4) and may therefore cause therapeutic failure of other coadministered drugs by increasing their clearance. Drugs frequently used in the ICU that are at risk of clinically relevant pharrmacokinetic interactions with anti-infective agents include some benzodiazepines (especially midazolam and triazolam), immunosuppressive agents (cyclosporin, tacrolimus), antiasthmatic agents (theophylline), opioid analgesics (alfentanil), anticonvulsants (phenytoin, carbamazepine), calcium antagonists (verapamil, nifedipine, felodipine) and anticoagulants (warfarin). Some lipophilic anti-infective agents inhibit (clarithromycin, itraconazole) or induce (rifampicin) the transmembrane transporter P-glycoprotein, which promotes excretion from renal tubular and intestinal cells. This results in a decrease or increase, respectively, in the clearance of P-glycoprotein substrates at the renal level and an increase or decrease, respectively, of their oral bioavailability at the intestinal level. Hydrophilic anti-infective agents are often eliminated unchanged by renal glomerular filtration and tubular secretion, and are therefore involved in competition for excretion. Beta-lactams are known to compete with other drugs for renal tubular secretion mediated by the organic anion transport system, but this is frequently not of major concern, given their wide therapeutic index. However, there is a risk of nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity with some cephalosporins and carbapenems. Therapeutic failure with these hydrophilic compounds may be due to haemodynamically active coadministered drugs, such as dopamine, dobutamine and furosemide, which increase their renal clearance by means of enhanced cardiac output and/or renal blood flow. Therefore, coadministration of some drugs should be avoided, or at least careful therapeutic drug monitoring should be performed when available. Monitoring may be especially helpful when there is some coexisting pathophysiological condition affecting drug disposition, for example malabsorption or marked instability of the systemic circulation or of renal or hepatic function.

Itraconazole oral solution and intravenous formulations: a review of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

Itraconazole is a triazole antifungal agent with a broad spectrum of activity. It is well tolerated and highly efficacious, particularly because its main metabolite, hydroxy-itraconazole, also has considerable antifungal activity. Two new formulations of itraconazole, an oral solution and an intravenous formulation, have recently been developed, which combine lipophilic itraconazole with cyclodextrin. These formulations have improved the solubility of itraconazole, leading to enhanced absorption and bioavailability compared with the original capsule formulation, without having an impact on the tolerability profile of itraconazole. The oral solution and intravenous formulations of itraconazole produce consistent plasma concentrations and are ideal for the treatment of systemic fungal infections in a wide range of patient populations. The additional flexibility offered by the different routes of administration means that itraconazole treatment can be specifically tailored for use in all patients, including children and those requiring intensive care.

Pharmacology of itraconazole

Itraconazole is a triazole antifungal agent that has a broad spectrum of activity and is well tolerated. Itraconazole is highly efficacious, particularly because its main metabolite, hydroxy-itraconazole, also has considerable antifungal activity. The original capsule formulation of itraconazole may lead to variability in absorption and the plasma concentration. For the treatment of superficial fungal infections, this is not problematical because itraconazole accumulates at the infection site, making consistently high plasma concentrations unnecessary -- a characteristic that has been exploited in the development of a pulse regimen. Because consistent plasma concentrations are critical for the more serious systemic fungal infections, variable absorption of itraconazole from the capsules limits their application. Moreover, underlying disease processes and medical interventions can reduce absorption from the capsules in some patients with systemic fungal infections. To widen the beneficial application of itraconazole to include such patients, an oral solution and an intravenous formulation were developed. These formulations combine lipophilic itraconazole with hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin, a ring of substituted glucose molecules, which improves the solubility of itraconazole. The enhanced absorption and bioavailability of itraconazole from these new formulations make them ideal for the treatment of systemic fungal infections in a wide range of patient populations. The additional flexibility offered by the different routes of administration also means that itraconazole can be used in patients at high risk, such as children or those requiring intensive care, for whom the capsule formulation may be impractical.

The cost of treating systemic fungal infections

The increasing incidence of systemic fungal infections and rising medical costs have highlighted the need for an economic appraisal of antifungal agents to determine the most cost-effective therapeutic option. Cost savings derived from the prophylactic or empirical use of antifungal agents have been difficult to estimate because of the lack of information on the costs of systemic fungal infections. Fluconazole is effective in prophylaxis and represents a direct cost saving compared with polyenes. However, itraconazole oral solution, an effective and widely used antifungal prophylactic agent, has not been analysed for cost effectiveness. In empirical therapy, the development of new formulations of existing agents has prompted a number of cost comparisons. In particular, the cost of treatment with conventional amphotericin-B has been compared with the costs of the new lipid-associated formulations of amphotericin-B or the new intravenous (IV) formulation of itraconazole. The acquisition costs of lipid-associated amphotericin-B and IV itraconazole are higher than the cost of conventional amphotericin-B; however, these costs appear to be offset by reductions with both these agents in the cost for increased length of hospital stay and treating adverse events seen with conventional amphotericin-B. In neutropenic patients and bone marrow transplant recipients, IV itraconazole may be the most cost-effective option for empirical therapy.

Clinical experience with itraconazole in systemic fungal infections

The broad spectrum antifungal itraconazole is an effective and well tolerated agent for the prophylaxis and treatment of systemic fungal infections. The recent development of an itraconazole oral solution and an intravenous itraconazole solution has increased the options for the use of this drug and increased the oral bioavailability in a variety of at-risk patients. Reliable absorption of the itraconazole oral solution has been demonstrated in patients with HIV infection, neutropenic patients with haematological malignancy, bone marrow transplant recipients and neutropenic children. In clinical trials, itraconazole oral solution (5 mg/kg/day) was more effective at preventing systemic fungal infection in patients with haematological malignancy than placebo, fluconazole suspension (100 mg/day) or oral amphotericin-B (2 g/kg/day) and was highly effective at preventing fungal infections in liver transplant recipients. There were no unexpected adverse events with the itraconazole oral solution in any of these trials. In addition, intravenous itraconazole solution is at least as effective as intravenous amphotericin-B in the empirical treatment of neutropenic patients with systemic fungal infections, and drug-related adverse events are more frequent in patients treated with amphotericin-B. A large proportion of patients with confirmed aspergillosis also respond to treatment with intravenous itraconazole followed by oral itraconazole. The new formulations of itraconazole are therefore effective agents for prophylaxis and treatment of most systemic fungal infections in patients with haematological malignancy.

Oral antifungals as prophylaxis in haematological malignancy

In the standard treatment of patients with haematological malignancy, immunosuppressive therapy produces prolonged periods of neutropenia and mucositis, which increase the risk of systemic fungal infection. In allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, this risk extends well beyond the period of neutropenia when graft-versus-host disease, and its treatment, result in prolonged lymphocytopenia. Various agents are used for antifungal prophylaxis and treatment but all have limitations: amphotericin B is restricted by the need for intravenous infusion and the occurrence of adverse events, fluconazole by its narrow spectrum of activity and the emergence of fluconazole-resistant fungi and itraconazole capsules by erratic absorption. Oral administration of antifungals has clear advantages in prophylaxis and an important current strategy is to maximize the extent and reliability of the oral bioavailability of antifungal agents. Mucositis is the main obstacle for success of strategies based on oral delivery. In this review, the ability of these new oral formulations to deliver sufficient antifungal prophylaxis is evaluated.

Efficacy and safety of amphotericin B lipid complex injection (ABLC) in solid-organ transplant recipients with invasive fungal infections

BACKGROUND

Fungal infections following solid-organ transplantation are a major source of morbidity and mortality. This report describes the efficacy and safety of Amphotericin B Lipid Complex Injection (ABLC) in solid-organ transplant recipients.

METHODS

Three open-label, second-line treatment studies evaluated ABLC as a treatment for severe, life-threatening mycoses in patients who were refractory to or intolerant to conventional antifungal (mostly amphotericin B [AmB]) therapy or had pre-existing renal disease.

RESULTS

The 79 solid-organ transplant recipients (25 heart, 20 liver, 17 kidney, 11 lung, 5 multiple, 1 pancreas) who received ABLC in these studies had the following fungal infections: aspergillosis (n = 39); candidiasis (n = 20); zygomycosis (n = 8); cryptococcosis and histoplasmosis (n = 3 each); and blastomycosis, cladosporiosis, fusariosis, Bipolaris hawaiiensis, Dactylaria gallopava, and an unspecified fungal infection (n = 1 each). The median duration of ABLC therapy was 28 d (1-178 d). The daily dose ranged between 1.6 and 7.4 mg/kg (median, 4.6 mg/kg). The clinical response rate for the patients who could be assessed was 58% (39/67). Clinical response rates for heart, liver, kidney, and lung recipients were 59, 60, 67, and 40%, respectively; response rates for aspergillosis and candidiasis were 47 and 71%, respectively. Forty-six of the 79 patients (58%) survived for more than 28 d after the last dose of ABLC. Mean baseline serum creatinine was 3.2 mg/dL; 64 patients (81%) had stable (n = 37) or improved (n = 27) serum creatinine at the end of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

ABLC is safe and effective treatment for fungal infections in solid-organ transplant recipients. Its renal-sparing properties are particularly suited for this high-risk population for renal failure.

Effects of the antifungal agents on oxidative drug metabolism: clinical relevance

This article reviews the metabolic pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions with the systemic antifungal agents: the azoles ketoconazole, miconazole, itraconazole and fluconazole, the allylamine terbinafine and the sulfonamide sulfamethoxazole. The majority of these interactions are metabolic and are caused by inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated hepatic and/or small intestinal metabolism of coadministered drugs. Human liver microsomal studies in vitro, clinical case reports and controlled pharmacokinetic interaction studies in patients or healthy volunteers are reviewed. A brief overview of the CYP system and the contrasting effects of the antifungal agents on the different human drug-metabolising CYP isoforms is followed by discussion of the role of P-glycoprotein in presystemic extraction and the modulation of its function by the antifungal agents. Methods used for in vitro drug interaction studies and in vitro-in vivo scaling are then discussed, with specific emphasis on the azole antifungals. Ketoconazole and itraconazole are potent inhibitors of the major drug-metabolising CYP isoform in humans, CYP3A4. Coadministration of these drugs with CYP3A substrates such as cyclosporin, tacrolimus, alprazolam, triazolam, midazolam, nifedipine, felodipine, simvastatin, lovastatin, vincristine, terfenadine or astemizole can result in clinically significant drug interactions, some of which can be life-threatening. The interactions of ketoconazole with cyclosporin and tacrolimus have been applied for therapeutic purposes to allow a lower dosage and cost of the immunosuppressant and a reduced risk of fungal infections. The potency of fluconazole as a CYP3A4 inhibitor is much lower. Thus, clinical interactions of CYP3A substrates with this azole derivative are of lesser magnitude, and are generally observed only with fluconazole dosages of > or =200 mg/day. Fluconazole, miconazole and sulfamethoxazole are potent inhibitors of CYP2C9. Coadministration of phenytoin, warfarin, sulfamethoxazole and losartan with fluconazole results in clinically significant drug interactions. Fluconazole is a potent inhibitor of CYP2C19 in vitro, although the clinical significance of this has not been investigated. No clinically significant drug interactions have been predicted or documented between the azoles and drugs that are primarily metabolised by CYP1A2, 2D6 or 2E1. Terbinafine is a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6 and may cause clinically significant interactions with coadministered substrates of this isoform, such as nortriptyline, desipramine, perphenazine, metoprolol, encainide and propafenone. On the basis of the existing in vitro and in vivo data, drug interactions of terbinafine with substrates of other CYP isoforms are unlikely.

The spectrum of mycobacterial infection after lung transplantation

Despite the success of lung transplantation, infection is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. Mycobacterial infections have been reported rarely, with the majority due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Our aim was to assess the incidence, etiology, and clinical outcome of mycobacterial infection after lung transplantation; to do so, we have studied retrospectively all lung and heart- lung transplants performed over a 12-yr period between November 1986 and June 1998 (n = 261). Twenty-three patients (9%) (M:F, 11:12) were diagnosed with mycobacterial infections in 25 sites, including n = 19, pulmonary (M. avium complex [n = 13], M. tuberculosis [n = 2], M. abscessus [n = 2], M. asiaticum [n = 1], and M. kansasii [n = 1]) and n = 6 extrapulmonary (M. haemophilum [n = 5] and M. abscessus [n = 1]) infections. Time to diagnosis from transplantation was 677 +/- 735 d (range, 2- 3,086 d). Three episodes of transient colonization with M. avium were not treated; the remaining (22 of 25, 88%) were treated. Initial baseline therapy for nontuberculous mycobacteria included clarithromycin, rifampicin, ciprofloxacin, and/or ethambutol. All cutaneous lesions resolved completely, while clinical and graft function improved in 11 of 16 (69%) and 8 of 16 (50%) of patients treated, respectively. Seventeen of 23 patients (72%) survived at a follow-up of 1,658 +/- 759 d (range, 522-3,285 d). Complications, predominantly due to rifampicin, included gastrointestinal intolerance and an increased tendency for rejection. There were no deaths attributable to mycobacterial disease or therapy. We conclude that mycobacterial infection, particularly due to nontuberculous mycobacteria, is relatively common after lung transplantation and may be an unrecognized cause of graft dysfunction. Early treatment of cutaneous lesions is associated with excellent control; however, graft dysfunction may be permanent. Although drug toxicity and interactions with immunosuppressive agents were not infrequent, the majority of these infections can be managed successfully.

Drug interactions with itraconazole, fluconazole, and terbinafine and their management

A drug interaction develops when the effect of a drug is increased or decreased or when a new effect is produced by the prior, concurrent, or subsequent administration of the other. Before prescribing a drug, it is important to obtain a thorough drug history of the prescription and nonprescription medications taken by the patient. The nonprescription medications may include items such as nutritional supplements and herbal medications. The risk of side effects is an inevitable consequence of drug use. The frequency of adverse reactions is increased in those patients receiving multiple medications. Drug interactions reported in animal or in vitro studies may not necessarily develop in humans. When drug interactions are observed with a particular agent, it cannot be automatically assumed that all closely related drugs will necessarily produce the same interaction. However, caution is advised until sufficient experience accrues. The prescriber should not overestimate or underestimate the potential for a given drug interaction on the basis of personal experience alone. Drug interactions will not necessarily occur in every patient who is given a particular combination of drugs known to produce an interaction. For a clinically significant drug interaction to be manifest, several other factors may be relevant other than just using the two drugs. In many instances drug interactions can be predicted and therefore avoided if the pharmacodynamic effects, the pharmacokinetic properties, and the mechanisms of action of the 2 drugs in question are known. In the case of contraindicated drugs, it may be possible to use an alternative agent.