FK 506 and rapamycin in combination are not antagonistic but produce extended small bowel graft survival in the mouse

The Effects of Rapamycin on the Intestinal Graft in a Rat Model of Cold Ischemia Perfusion and Preservation

Attenuating the rheological and structural consequences of intestinal ischemia-reperfusion-injury (IRI) is important in transplant proceedings. Preconditioning is an often-proposed remedy. This technique uses physical or pharmacological methods to manipulate key ischemia pathways, such as oxidation, inflammation, and autophagy, prior to ischemia. This study determined the time-dependent effects of Rapamycin preconditioning on small-bowel grafts undergoing cold ischemia perfusion and preservation. Our main parameters were mucosa and cell injury and autophagy. A total of 30 male Wistar rats were divided into 5 groups: sham, preservation-control, and 3 treated groups (Rapamycin administered either 0, 30, or 60 min prior to perfusion). After perfusion, the intestines were placed in chilled IGL-1 solution for 12 h. Thereafter, they were reperfused. Histology and bioanalysis (LDH and lactate) were used to ascertain intestinal injury while immunohistochemistry was used for measuring changes in autophagy markers (Beclin-1, LC3B, and p62 proteins). The results show no significant difference amongst the groups after vascular perfusion. However, intestinal injury findings and autophagy changes demonstrate that administering Rapamycin 30 min or 60 min prior was protective against adverse cold ischemia and reperfusion of the intestinal graft. These findings show that Rapamycin is protective against cold ischemia of the small intestine, especially when administered 30 min before the onset.

Cellular and molecular targeting for nanotherapeutics in transplantation tolerance

The induction of donor-specific tolerance to transplanted cells and organs, while preserving immune function as a whole, remains a highly sought after and elusive strategy for overcoming transplant rejection. Tolerance necessitates modulating a diverse array of cell types that recognize and respond to alloantigens, including antigen presenting cells and T lymphocytes. Nanotherapeutic strategies that employ cellular and biomaterial engineering represent an emerging technology geared towards the goal of inducing transplant tolerance. Nanocarriers offer a platform for delivering antigens of interest to specific cell types in order to achieve tolerogenic antigen presentation. Furthermore, the technologies also provide an opportunity for local immunomodulation at the graft site. Nanocarriers delivering a combination of antigens and immunomodulating agents, such as rapamycin, provide a unique technology platform with the potential to enhance outcomes for the induction of transplant tolerance.

The use of sirolimus as a rescue therapy in pediatric intestinal transplant recipients

To review our experience with SRL as a second-line therapy in our series of 45 SBTx recipients (1997-2009). Retrospective review of five children converted to SRL: 3 M/2 F; median of three yr old (range 20 months-18 yr); rescue indications, adverse events with SRL, resolution of tacrolimus-related side effects, incidence of rejection, PTLD, or GVHD were summarized. Tacrolimus was discontinued (average 13 months after transplant) because of refractory hemolytic anemia in four patients with decreased renal function and because of advanced renal failure and unclear neutropenia in one. PTLD and GVHD had been previously diagnosed in two. Tacrolimus-related side effects disappeared in all five although other immunosuppressants and splenectomy were used simultaneously or later in most of them. Adverse events reported after the conversion were infections (tuberculosis and Pneumocystis carinii in two) and mild hypertriglyceridemia. No rejection, GVHD, or PTLD episode was observed. Four patients are alive with excellent quality of life (median follow-up 18 months). Sirolimus is a safe rescue therapy in SBTx children when tacrolimus is not well tolerated. Renal function and hematologic disorders seem to improve, although other simultaneous strategies could be also involved. Further studies could demonstrate its efficacy as a first-line treatment.

A prospective, randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: results at 1 year

BACKGROUND

This is the 1-year report of a randomized, multicenter, clinical trial comparing the combination of sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Prior to transplantation, recipients were randomized to receive tacrolimus plus corticosteroids with either sirolimus (n=185) or MMF (n=176). The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 6 months was the primary endpoint of the study. Patient and graft survival, renal function, study drug dosing and discontinuations were evaluated at 1 year.

RESULTS

At 1 year, there was no difference in patient survival (95.7% sirolimus vs. 97.2% MMF; P=0.45) or graft survival (90.8% sirolimus vs. 94.3% MMF; P=0.22). Patients without delayed graft function (DGF) receiving MMF had significantly better graft survival (99% vs. 93%; P=0.01). Patients receiving a transplant from a live donor had a trend towards better graft survival with MMF as compared to sirolimus (98% vs. 91%; P=0.07). Patients receiving sirolimus had a significantly higher incidence of study drug discontinuation (26.5% vs. 14.8% MMF; P=0.006). Patients receiving MMF had significantly better renal function as shown by median serum creatinine levels (1.3 mg/dL vs. 1.5 mg/dL; P=0.03) and a trend towards higher calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl), (58.4 ml/min vs. 54.3 ml/min; P=0.06). More patients in the sirolimus group had a serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL, (20.4% vs. 11.0%; P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus is safe and effective in live and deceased donor kidney transplantation when given in combination with sirolimus or MMF. Patient and graft survival were excellent in both arms. Renal function is superior for patients treated with tacrolimus + MMF combination.

Sirolimus in combination with tacrolimus and corticosteroids for the treatment of resistant chronic graft-versus-host disease

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in haematopoietic transplant recipients. Sirolimus is a macrocyclic triene antibiotic with immunosuppressive, antifungal and antitumour properties, that has activity in the prevention and treatment of acute GVHD. We conducted a phase II trial of sirolimus combined with tacrolimus and methylprednisolone in patients with steroid-resistant cGVHD. Thirty-five patients who developed GVHD after day 100 post-transplant were studied. Six patients had a complete response and 16 a partial response with an overall response rate of 63%. Major adverse events related to the combination of tacrolimus and sirolimus were hyperlipidaemia, renal dysfunction and cytopenias. Four patients had thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) and 27 (77%) had infectious complications. The median survival for the whole group was 15 months. A significantly better outcome was observed in patients with a platelet count > or = 100 x 10(9)/l, as well as in those with true chronic manifestations of GVHD compared to those with acute GVHD beyond day 100. Controlled trials comparing this approach with alternative strategies to determine which can best achieve the goal of GVHD-free survival are warranted.

Rapamycin inhibits the growth and metastatic progression of non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Lung cancer has a dismal prognosis and comprises 5.5% of post-transplant malignancies. We explored whether rapamycin inhibits the growth and metastatic progression of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Murine KLN-205 NSCLC was used as the model tumor in syngeneic DBA/2 mice to explore the effect of rapamycin on tumor growth and metastastic progression. We also examined the effect of rapamycin on cell cycle progression, apoptosis, and proliferation using murine KLN-205 NSCLC cells and human A-549 NSCLC cells as targets. The in vivo and in vitro effects of cyclosporine and those of rapamycin plus cyclosporine were also investigated.

RESULTS

Rapamycin but not cyclosporine inhibited tumor growth; s.c. tumor volume was 1290 +/- 173 mm(3) in untreated DBA/2 mice, 246 +/- 80 mm(3) in mice treated with rapamycin, and 1203 +/- 227 mm(3) in mice treated with cyclosporine (P < 0.001). Rapamycin but not cyclosporine prevented the formation of distant metastases; eight of eight untreated mice and four of six mice treated with cyclosporine developed pulmonary metastases whereas only one of six mice treated with rapamycin developed pulmonary metastases (P = 0.003). In vitro, rapamycin induced cell cycle arrest at the G(1) checkpoint and blocked proliferation of both KLN-205 and A-549 cells but did not induce apoptosis. Cyclosporine did not prevent cell cycle progression and had a minimal antiproliferative effect on KLN-205 and A-549 cells.

CONCLUSIONS

The immunosuppressive macrolide rapamycin but not cyclosporine prevents the growth and metastatic progression of NSCLC. A rapamycin-based immunosuppressive regimen may be of value in recipients of allografts.

Observations regarding the use of sirolimus and tacrolimus in high-risk cadaveric renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Balancing the risk of acute rejection (AR) with drug-induced toxicities complicates the selection of the optimal immunosuppressive regimen, especially in the high-risk renal transplant recipient. This study was designed to determine the optimal dosage combinations of tacrolimus and sirolimus in a high-risk cadaveric renal transplant population.

METHODS

Primary cadaveric renal transplant recipients were randomly assigned to receive either standard tacrolimus (trough levels of 10-15 ng/mL) plus reduced sirolimus (trough levels of 5-10 ng,mL) (Group I) or to receive reduced tacrolimus (trough levels of 5-10 ng,mL) plus standard sirolimus (trough levels of 10-15 ng/mL) (Group II). All patients received Thymoglobulin induction and steroids.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine (16 in Group I and 23 in Group II) high-risk renal transplant recipients (100% cadaveric donors, 79% African-American recipients, and 59% delayed graft function) are the subjects of this report. At 6 months, the patient survival rate was 94 and 100% and the graft survival rate was 94 and 83% in Groups I and II, respectively. The incidence of biopsy-proven AR was 6 and 5% in Groups I and II, respectively. Eight patients (50%) in Group I required discontinuation of tacrolimus, seven because of biopsy-proven tacrolimus nephrotoxicity and one secondarily to interstitial pneumonitis. Wound complications were the most frequent adverse event reported in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of tacrolimus and sirolimus was associated with a low risk of AR in this cohort of high-risk renal transplant recipients. However, 50% of patients who received standard tacrolimus and reduced sirolimus combination had to be discontinued from the regimen because of biopsy-proven nephrotoxicity. These preliminary results provide evidence that sirolimus should not be added to tacrolimus without dosage adjustments. We have discontinued recruitment of patients to the standard tacrolimus and reduced sirolimus combination and we have tightened our criteria for selection of marginal donor kidneys with our high-risk renal transplant recipients.

A prospective randomized multicenter study of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus in renal-transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Recently, sirolimus (SRL) was introduced as an immunosuppressant in solid-organ transplantation. This study evaluated combinations of SRL and tacrolimus (Tac).

METHODS

This 6-month study investigated the safety and efficacy of Tac and steroids in combination with three different doses of SRL in renal-transplant recipients. A total of 104 patients were randomized in four groups: one group received Tac and steroids (control n=28), and three groups also received the following daily SRL doses: 0.5 mg (TacSRL0.5, n=25), 1 mg (TacSRL1, n=25), or 2 mg (TacSRL2, n=26). Tac doses were adjusted to whole-blood trough levels. Steroids were tapered from 20 mg per day to 5 mg per day. The SRL groups underwent a second randomization to discontinue SRL at either month 3 or 5.

RESULTS

At month 6, patient survival rates were 100%, 100%, 96.0%, and 100%, and graft survival rates were 96.4%, 84.0%, 88.0%, and 84.6%, respectively. The overall safety profile was similar in all groups. The incidences of infections during months 1 to 3 were similar in all groups (control 46.4%, TacSRL0.5 32.0%, TacSRL1 56.0%, TacSRL2 46.2%). The 3-month incidences of hypercholesteremia (cholesterol >240 mg/dL or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol >160 mg/dL) were 21.4%, 36.0%, 48.0%, and 50.0% (P=0.019). Lipid levels improved after withdrawal of SRL. The 3-month incidences of biopsy-proven acute rejection were 28.6% (control), 8.0% (TacSRL0.5), 8.0% (TacSRL1), and 3.8% (TacSRL2) (P=0.014).

CONCLUSION

Tac in combination with low doses of SRL provides a very effective and safe regimen.

Synergistic effects of malononitrilamides (FK778, FK779) with tacrolimus (FK506) in prevention of acute heart and kidney allograft rejection and reversal of ongoing heart allograft rejection in the rat

BACKGROUND

The effects of tacrolimus (FK506) and malononitrilamides (MNA) (FK778 and FK779) monotherapy and combination therapy were examined in prevention of acute heart and kidney allograft rejection and reversal of ongoing acute heart allograft rejection in the rat.

METHODS

Brown Norway (RT1n)-to-Lewis (RT11) and ACI (RT1a)-to-Lewis (RT11) combinations were used, respectively, for heart and kidney transplantation models. Immunosuppressants were administered orally from day 1 to day 14 for preventing acute rejection and from day 4 to day 34 after transplantation for the reversal of ongoing acute rejection.

RESULTS

In the prevention of acute heart rejection model, recipient rats treated with monotherapy of tacrolimus or MNA (FK778, FK779) showed a dose-related prolongation of mean survival time (MST) compared with naive control rats (P<0.01). The mean survival time in combination therapy of tacrolimus (FK506) and FK778 indicated that an additive to synergistic interaction was produced when compared with the respective monotherapies (combination index [CI]=0.631-1.022). These results were reproducible with tacrolimus and FK779 combination therapy (CI=0.572-0.846). Furthermore, similar results were also found in the prevention of acute kidney allograft rejection in the rat (CI=0.137-0.516). In the reversal of ongoing acute heart allograft rejection, combination therapy of tacrolimus and FK778 demonstrated a strong synergistic interaction (CI=0.166-0.970) compared with monotherapy of tacrolimus or FK778.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy of tacrolimus and MNA (FK778, FK779) produces synergistic effects in prevention of acute heart and kidney rejection and reversal of ongoing heart allograft rejection in the rat.

Sirolimus: its discovery, biological properties, and mechanism of action

Sirolimus is the USAN-assigned generic name for the natural product rapamycin. Sirolimus is produced by a strain of Streptomyces hygroscopicus, isolated from a soil sample collected from Rapa Nui commonly known as Easter Island. Although sirolimus was isolated as an antifungal agent with potent anticandida activity, subsequent studies revealed impressive antitumor and immunosuppressive activities. Sirolimus demonstrates activity against several murine tumors, such as B16 43 melanocarcinoma, Colon 26 tumor, EM ependymoblastoma, and mammary and colon 38 solid tumors. Sirolimus is a potent inhibitor of antigen-induced proliferation of T cells, B cells, and antibody production. Demonstration of the potent immunosuppressive activity of sirolimus in animal models of organ transplantation led to clinical trials and subsequent approval by regulatory authorities for prophylaxis of renal graft rejection. Interest in sirolimus as an immunosuppressive therapy in organ transplantation derives from its unique mechanism of action, its unique side-effect profile, and its ability to synergize with other immunosuppressive agents. The molecular mechanism underlying the antifungal, antiproliferative, and immunosuppressive activities of sirolimus is the same. Sirolimus forms an immunosuppressive complex with intracellular protein, FKBP12. This complex blocks the activation of the cell-cycle-specific kinase, TOR. The downstream events that follow the inactivation of TOR result in the blockage of cell-cycle progression at the juncture of G1 and S phase.

Observations on the use of sirolimus and tacrolimus in high-risk renal transplant recipients

Sirolimus is the first of a group of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors to be introduced for clinical use in the United States. At the University of Tennessee in Memphis, we have evolved strategies for the use of sirolimus in kidney transplant recipients; which utilize the drug as a primary immunosuppressant and exploit its potential for preserving renal function. Conversions from the calcineurins to sirolimusbased immunosuppression established the efficacy of calcineurin-free immunosuppressants in selected high-risk patients. The conversion experience stimulated the design of protocols for primary use of sirolimus. Posttransplant use of sirolimus was associated with low incidence of rejection whether sirolimus was used with low-dose Prograf or in calcineurin-free protocols. Primary use with full-dose Prograf was associated with a high incidence of calcineurin-related nephrotoxicity and was abandoned in our program. Hematologic and lipid side effects were manageable, as was an observed increase in wound-healing problems and lymphocele formation. Continuous modifications of the sirolimus protocols to increase our benefit-to-risk ratio are ongoing and indicate a continued role for the drug in posttransplant immune suppression.

Intestinal transplantation before and after the introduction of sirolimus

INTRODUCTION

Small bowel transplantation has been limited by high rates of rejection and graft loss. In June 2000, we began using sirolimus, an immunosuppression agent with proven efficacy in kidney transplantation. We reviewed results among intestinal transplant recipients before and after the introduction of sirolimus.

METHODS

Thirty-one intestinal transplants were performed in 29 patients at our center between July 1998 and April 2001. All patients were followed for at least 30 days posttransplant. In the first 19 transplants (group 1), patients received tacrolimus, steroids, and antibody induction therapy (either daclizumab or OKT3). In the next 12 consecutive transplants (group 2), patients received tacrolimus, steroids, basiliximab, and sirolimus.

RESULTS

Eighteen children (7 males and 11 females, mean age 2.1+/-2.2 years) and 11 adults (9 males and 2 females, mean age 38.1+/-12.4 years) underwent transplantation. All patients survived transplantation. The overall reoperation rate was 1.7 procedures per patient in group 1 and 1.1 procedures per patient in group 2. The most common indications were abscess (n=7), planned second look (n=7), leaks/fistulas (n=6), dehiscence (n=6), obstruction (n=4), ischemic bowel (n=3), perforations (n=3), stomal complications (n=3), and graft removal (n=3). The incidence of biopsy-proven rejection in the first 30 days was 73.7% in group 1 and 16.7% in group 2 (P<0.002). Sirolimus was temporarily held or discontinued in 66.7% of patients. Actuarial 1-year graft survival was 91.7% with sirolimus and 57.9% without sirolimus (P<0.04). Actuarial 1-year patient survival was 91.7% with sirolimus and 79% without sirolimus (P=0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

An immunosuppressive regimen that includes sirolimus has improved graft survival. Furthermore, this regimen has significantly decreased the incidence of early rejection and has eliminated early graft loss caused by fulminant rejection.

Rapamycin in transplantation: a review of the evidence

Rapamycin in transplantation: A review of the evidence. The calcineurin inhibitors have been the mainstays of immunosuppression for solid organ transplantation over the last two decades, but nephrotoxicity limits their therapeutic benefit. Rapamycin is a new drug with both immunosuppressant and antiproliferative properties that has a unique mechanism of action distinct from that of the calcineurin inhibitors. It has a role as a maintenance immunosuppressant either alone or in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor and can also be used to treat refractory acute rejection. Theoretical evidence suggests that it may limit the development and progression of chronic rejection in transplant recipients, but this has yet to be confirmed. This review examines the current in vitro animal and human work underlying the use of rapamycin and, in addition, comments on the pharmacokinetics and side-effect profile of this promising new agent.

Effect of tacrolimus (FK506) and sirolimus (rapamycin) mono- and combination therapy in prolongation of renal allograft survival in the monkey

BACKGROUND

Our previous studies confirmed that tacrolimus (FK506) and sirolimus [rapamycin (RAPA)], in combination, are not antagonistic but are synergistic in the prolongation of heart and small bowel grafts in the rodent. The aim of this study was to confirm further the synergistic effect of combined FK506 and RAPA in the more clinically relevant model, kidney transplantation in monkeys.

METHODS

A total of 60 male Vervet monkeys were randomly assigned to 10 groups (n> or =5). Monkeys with renal allografts were treated with different doses of FK506 and/or RAPA orally for 60 days. Graft survival, body weight, clinical biochemistry determinations, oral glucose tolerance test, trough levels of the two drugs, and histopathology were investigated.

RESULTS

Low doses of FK506 (1 or 4 mg/kg) combined with RAPA (0.5 mg/kg) produced synergistic effect in the prolongation of renal graft survival [combination index (CI) = 0.292, 0.565]. There were no additive or synergistic drug-associated toxicities such as hyperglycemia, nephrotoxicity, and hyperlipidemia. There also was no pharmacological antagonism.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant therapy of low-dose (drug-optimal) FK506 and RAPA produced a synergistic effect in the prolongation of kidney allograft survival in Vervet monkeys without additive drug-associated toxicities.