Photopheresis for recurrent acute rejection in cardiac transplantation

Extracorporeal photopheresis in the treatment of cardiac allograft rejection: A single-centre experience

Despite novel immunosuppressive (IS) protocols, adverse effects of IS drugs continue to have notable negative impact on patient and cardiac allograft survival after heart transplantation (HTx). Therefore, IS regimens with less toxic side effects are sorely needed. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) in combination with tacrolimus-based maintenance IS therapy in the treatment of allograft rejection in adult HTx recipients. Indications for ECP included acute moderate-to-severe or persistent mild cellular rejection, or mixed rejection. Twenty-two patients underwent a median of 22(2-44) ECP treatments after HTx. Median duration of ECP course was 173.5(2-466) days. No relevant adverse effects of ECP were noted. Reduction of methylprednisolone doses was safe throughout the ECP course. ECP, used in conjunction with pharmacological anti-rejection therapy, had a successful reversal of cardiac allograft rejection, decreased the rates of subsequential rejection episodes and normalized the allograft function in patients completing the ECP course. Short- and long-term survivals were excellent (91% at 1 and 5 years post-ECP) and comparable to International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation registry data on HTx recipient overall survival. In conclusion, ECP can be safely used for the treatment and prevention of cardiac allograft rejection in conjunction with traditional IS regimen.

European multicenter study on the real-world use and clinical impact of extracorporeal photopheresis after heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Aim of this study was to describe the real-world use of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) and assess its impact on clinical outcomes in the modern era of heart transplantation.

METHODS

Seven transplant centers from 5 European countries participated in this retrospective, observational, single-arm chart review study. All patients received ECP after heart transplantation in 2015 or later. Data were extracted from medical records between November 2020 and December 2021.

RESULTS

Overall, 105 patients were enrolled and followed for an average of 2 years after initiation of ECP. Reasons to start ECP were acute cellular rejection (35.2%), rejection prevention (32.4%), mixed rejection (18.1%), and antibody-mediated rejection (14.3%). Rejection ISHLT grades improved from start to end of ECP treatment in 92% of patients treated with ECP for rejection. Of patients who started ECP to prevent rejection, 88% remained free from any rejection despite a reduction of calcineurin inhibitors. Overall survival was 95%, and no deaths were related to ECP. Safety events occurred in 18 patients, of which 13 experienced complications with venous access.

CONCLUSIONS

This study, the largest European ECP study in heart transplantation, demonstrates that ECP can effectively be used to treat different rejection types and to prevent rejection in the modern era of immunosuppression. Patients with rejections who have received ECP have shown high response as measured by histological improvements in ISHLT classification. A high percentage of patients in the prevention group remained free from rejection despite reduction in immunosuppression, in particular calcineurin inhibitors.

Immunogenic and immunotolerogenic effects of extracorporeal photopheresis in high immunological risk kidney recipients. A single center case series

The immunomodulatory effects of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) have been used for the treatment of T-cell mediated disorders, such as rejection in organ transplantation. Currently, it is an established therapy for heart and lung rejection, but not for kidney transplantation (KT), where experience is limited. In addition, some data suggest that ECP could generate an immune response against infections, thus being an alternative for the treatment of rejection in case of active or high-risk of infection. In the present study, we analyze four cases of use of ECP as concomitant therapy in patients with KT and high risk of opportunistic infections due to the high burden of immunosuppression throughout their renal diseases. Two patients had concomitant viral infection (cytomegalovirus and BK virus, respectively) and three patients were on treatment for graft rejection. In the two patients with active viral infection, the infection was successfully controlled during ECP treatment. In all cases, ECP has been shown to be a safe procedure, without complications.

Extracorporeal photopheresis and its role in heart transplant rejection: prophylaxis and treatment

Heart transplantation is the gold standard therapeutic option for select patients with end-stage heart failure. Unfortunately, successful long-term outcomes of heart transplantation can be hindered by immune-mediated rejection of the cardiac allograft, specifically acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Extracorporeal photopheresis is a cellular immunotherapy that involves the collection and treatment of white blood cells contained in the buffy coat with a photoactive psoralen compound, 8-methoxy psoralen, and subsequent irradiation with ultraviolet A light. This process is thought to cause DNA and RNA crosslinking, ultimately leading to cell destruction. The true mechanism of therapeutic action remains unknown. In the last three decades, extracorporeal photopheresis has shown promising results and is indicated for a variety of conditions. The American Society for Apheresis currently recommends the use of extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, scleroderma, psoriasis, pemphigus vulgaris, atopic dermatitis, graft-versus-host disease, Crohn's disease, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, and solid organ rejection in heart, lung, and liver transplantation. In this review, we aim to explore the proposed effects of extracorporeal photopheresis and to summarize published data on its use as a prophylactic and therapy in heart transplant rejection.

Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice - Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Eighth Special Issue

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis (TA) in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor in order to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Eighth Edition, like its predecessor, continues to apply the category and grading system definitions in fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was introduced in the Fourth Edition, has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of TA in a specific disease entity or medical condition. The Eighth Edition comprises 84 fact sheets for relevant diseases and medical conditions, with 157 graded and categorized indications and/or TA modalities. The Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue seeks to continue to serve as a key resource that guides the utilization of TA in the treatment of human disease.

Extracorporeal Photochemotherapy after Cardiac Transplantation: A New Therapeutic Approach to Allograft Rejection

Photopheresis (ECP) is a new immunomodulatory therapy in which recipient lymphocytes are treated extracorporeally with 8-methoxypsoralen and ultraviolet light. The treatment seems to induce an inhibition of both humoral and cellular rejection after transplantation.

Objective

Since recurrent rejection (RR) continues to be a severe complication after heart transplantation (HTx) and the immunosuppressive regimes used for the treatment are often associated with increased morbidity and mortality, we investigated whether ECP could have a beneficial effect on the number and severity of rejection episodes.

Methods

Eleven HTX recipients (5 M and 6 F, mean age 48.5 yrs) with RR were enrolled in the study. ECP was performed at weekly intervals during the 1st month, at 2 week intervals during the 2nd and 3rd month, and then monthly for another 3 months.

Results

The fraction of biopsies (EMB) with a grade 0/1A rejection increased during ECP from 46% to 72% while the EMB showing a 3A/3B rejection decreased from 42% to 18%. It is also noteworthy that out of the 78 EMB performed during ECP only one showed a 3B rejection in comparison with 13 out of 110 EMB in the pre-ECP period. Six rejection relapses were observed in a total follow-up of 60 months, two of them occurring during the tapering of oral steroid. Four relapses were reversed by ECP, one by IV steroids and the last by methotrexate after the failure of both IV steroids and ECP. The mean doses of immunosuppressive drugs resulted lower after 6 months of ECP: steroids were reduced from 13 to 8.25 mg/day, cyclosporine from 375 to 285 mg/day, azathioprine from 55 to 35 mg/day.

Conclusions

ECP is a well tolerated treatment. Its administration allows better RR control and significant reduction in immunosuppressive therapy. (Int J Artif Organs 2000; 23: 49–54)

Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice-Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Seventh Special Issue

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating, and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the Committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Seventh Edition, like its predecessor, has consistently applied the category and grading system definitions in the fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was used since the fourth edition has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis in a specific disease entity. The Seventh Edition discusses 87 fact sheets (14 new fact sheets since the Sixth Edition) for therapeutic apheresis diseases and medical conditions, with 179 indications, which are separately graded and categorized within the listed fact sheets. Several diseases that are Category IV which have been described in detail in previous editions and do not have significant new evidence since the last publication are summarized in a separate table. The Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue serves as a key resource that guides the utilization of therapeutic apheresis in the treatment of human disease. J. Clin. Apheresis 31:149-162, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Extracorporeal photopheresis after heart transplantation

The addition of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) to a standard immunosuppressive drug therapy after heart transplantation in clinical studies has shown to be beneficial, for example, by reducing acute rejection, allograft vasculopathy or CMV infection. However, the protocols varied considerably, have a predetermined finite number of ECP treatments and adjuvant immunosuppressive regimens used in combination with ECP have differed significantly. Furthermore, there are scarce data to guide which patients should be treated with ECP and when or who would benefit further if ECP were to be continued long term to increase the safety by reducing immunosuppressive drug toxicities without losing efficacy. The knowledge of the tolerance-inducing effects of ECP-like upregulation of regulatory T cells and of dendritic cells may allow to develop a strategy to monitor immunomodulation effects of ECP to further identify ECP responders, the optimal individual ECP schedule and whether ECP therapy can replace or reduce immunosuppressive drug therapy.

National Institutes of Health State of the Science Symposium in Therapeutic Apheresis: scientific opportunities in extracorporeal photopheresis

The clinical use of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) for accepted indications such as graft-versus-host disease, transplant rejection, and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma continues to increase. Expanded applications for ECP, such as the treatment of select autoimmune diseases, are being explored. Extracorporeal photopheresis's capacity to both immunotolerize in the autoreactive setting, while immunizing against a lymphoma is unusual and suggestive of a unique mechanism. It is likely that ECP's induction of dendritic cells is key to its efficacy in both of these settings, but exactly how ECP impacts other immune components and their interactions is not fully understood. Further basic science research is necessary to elucidate how these dissimilar cellular activities are functionally integrated. On the clinical side, collaborative multicenter trials designed to recognize the principal variables controlling therapeutic responses and improve prognostic indicators may enable tailoring devices, treatment schedules, and doses to the needs of the individual patients or diseases. This review describes our current understanding of how ECP influences the immune system, reviews the existing clinical applications of ECP, and explores areas for future basic science and clinical research as presented at the National Institutes of Health State of the Science Symposium in Therapeutic Apheresis in November 2012.

Extracorporeal photopheresis combined with pentostatin in the conditioning regimen for canine hematopoietic cell transplantation does not prevent GVHD

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) and the purine analog pentostatin exert potent immunomodulatory effects. We evaluated the use of these treatment modalities to prevent GVHD in a canine model of unrelated dog leukocyte Ag-mismatched hematopoietic cell transplantation, after conditioning with 920 cGy TBI. We have shown previously in this model that 36/40 dogs given MTX alone as postgrafting immunosuppression engrafted and that 25 of 40 dogs had severe GVHD and median survival of 21 days. In the current study, nine dogs received conditioning with 920 cGy TBI and postgrafting MTX either with ECP on days -2 to -1 alone (n=5) or ECP on days -6 and -5 combined with two doses of pentostatin (days -4 to -3) (n=4). Seven of nine dogs achieved engraftment. Six dogs developed severe acute GVHD (four in the group with ECP alone and two with pentostatin and ECP). We failed to demonstrate a positive impact of ECP and pentostatin for the prevention of GVHD compared with historical control dogs.

Extracorporeal photopheresis in addition to pentostatin in conditioning for canine hematopoietic cell transplantation: role in engraftment

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) and the purine analog pentostatin exert potent immunomodulatory effects, but have not been evaluated for their ability to enhance engraftment of hematopoietic stem cells. We evaluated, in a canine model of dog leukocyte antigen (DLA)-identical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), whether ECP in combination with pentostatin could enhance engraftment using a nonmyeloablative regimen consisting of 100 cGy TBI and postgrafting immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil and CYA. We have shown previously that with 100 cGy TBI alone as conditioning, all of the six dogs rejected their grafts 2-12 weeks after HCT. With the addition of pentostatin to 100 cGy TBI, 6 of 10 dogs rejected their graft. We now tested the additional use of ECP alone (n=2) or ECP and 3-6 doses of pentostatin (n=7) before 100 cGy TBI and HCT. Eight out of nine dogs rejected their grafts within 6-11 weeks after HCT. Compared with data without ECP, we failed to demonstrate a positive impact of the use of either ECP or pentostatin for prevention of rejection.

Photopheresis in solid organ transplant rejection

Photopheresis has become a key component in the therapeutic armamentarium of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, graft-versus-host disease following stem cell transplant, and allograft rejection of solid organs such as heart. Although it is considered a new treatment modality in its present form, the field of phototherapy dates back thousands of years. In this review, the reader will learn more about the history of photopheresis and how it became a therapeutic alternative for patients with solid organ transplants. An extensive literature search will highlight the evidence-based benefits of photopheresis (or lack thereof). A discussion of the mechanism of action of photopheresis and the technical aspects of the procedure will also be covered. Since photopheresis may be the best tolerated form of immunomodulation, current promising, albeit preliminary data on its efficacy warrant further investigation and understanding.

Characteristics of photopheresis treatments for the management of rejection in heart and lung transplant recipients

Photopheresis has been used in the management of rejection of heart and/or lung transplants. Although its mechanism of action remains unknown, irradiated T-helper cell-induced immunosuppression is the main theory. Since transplant recipients are often lymphopenic and lymphocytes are the target cells in phototherapy, we performed this study to determine which factors affect the cellular yield to undergo irradiation. We reviewed the records of all photophereses performed in our institution between July 1998 and April 2000 using the UVAR (first generation) or XTS (second generation) instruments (Therakos, Exton, PA). Our data included patient's blood volume, absolute lymphocyte count and hematocrit, catheter type, flow rate of collection cycles and centrifuge bowl size, as well as volume, hematocrit, and lymphocyte count of the cell suspension. With a mixed model multivariate analysis we sought to determine which variables predicted the lymphocyte yield. A total of 406 procedures in 25 adult patients was analyzed. There was no significant difference between the lymphocyte yield among the procedures performed with the first- and the second-generation instruments. The patient's absolute lymphocyte count was the only parameter, which positively correlated with the total number of lymphocytes collected for irradiation (P < 0.0001). Indeed, based on the mixed model, the total number of lymphocytes for irradiation can be predicted from the pre-procedure lymphocyte count. Additional studies are necessary to correlate the number of treated cells with patient outcome.

Extracorporeal photochemotherapy: a new therapeutic approach for allograft rejection

Photopheresis (ECP) is a new immunomodulatory therapy in which recipient lymphocytes are treated extracorporeally with 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) and ultraviolet light. The treatment seems to induce an inhibition of both umoral and cellular rejections after transplantation. More than 160 transplanted patients have been treated with ECP (107 heart, 30 kidney, 24 lung and I liver) in different studies. Indication for ECP included acute rejection, recurrent/refractory rejection, prophilaxis of rejection, need of reducing standard immunosuppression. Patient survival is satisfactory. Only one study where ECP was used as the last therapeutic resource in very compromised patients shows a high rate of mortality. On the contrary, when ECP was used earlier after the failure of a first immunosuppressive line the outcome was better with a very low mortality. An hystological resolution of acute rejection is reported in 89% of cardiac transplant patients. The rate of response is similar even in the other transplanted patients treated with ECP. A better control of alloreactivity has been also reported in both cardiac and renal transplant patients with recurrent rejection. In renal allograft the treatment induces a reduction of both lymphocytes and monocytes infiltrate and downregulates the expression of HLA-DR and integrins ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 on tubular cells. Markers of fibrogenesis such as TGFbeta1 and ASMA are only moderately reduced with a more focal pattern of distribution in the post-ECP specimens. The optimal schedule and the length of treatment are still unclear and probably a patient-tailored treatment is needed at least in responder patients. ECP is effective for patients resistant to conventional treatments, particularly when it is started early. This beneficial effect is obtained without the complications typically encountered with immunosuppressive regimens used to control rejection.