Chromatographic resolution of the rod pigment from the four cone pigments of the chicken retina

Transcriptome profiling of developing photoreceptor subtypes reveals candidate genes involved in avian photoreceptor diversification

Avian photoreceptors are a diverse class of neurons, comprised of four single cones, the two members of the double cone, and rods. The signaling events and transcriptional regulators driving the differentiation of these diverse photoreceptors are largely unknown. In addition, many distinctive features of photoreceptor subtypes, including spectral tuning, oil droplet size and pigmentation, synaptic targets, and spatial patterning, have been well characterized, but the molecular mechanisms underlying these attributes have not been explored. To identify genes specifically expressed in distinct chicken (Gallus gallus) photoreceptor subtypes, we developed fluorescent reporters that label photoreceptor subpopulations, isolated these subpopulations by using fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and subjected them to next-generation sequencing. By comparing the expression profiles of photoreceptors labeled with rhodopsin, red opsin, green opsin, and violet opsin reporters, we have identified hundreds of differentially expressed genes that may underlie the distinctive features of these photoreceptor subtypes. These genes are involved in a variety of processes, including phototransduction, transcriptional regulation, cell adhesion, maintenance of intra- and extracellular structure, and metabolism. Of particular note are a variety of differentially expressed transcription factors, which may drive and maintain photoreceptor diversity, and cell adhesion molecules, which may mediate spatial patterning of photoreceptors and act to establish retinal circuitry. These analyses provide a framework for future studies that will dissect the role of these various factors in the differentiation of avian photoreceptor subtypes.

Cone visual pigments

Cone visual pigments are visual opsins that are present in vertebrate cone photoreceptor cells and act as photoreceptor molecules responsible for photopic vision. Like the rod visual pigment rhodopsin, which is responsible for scotopic vision, cone visual pigments contain the chromophore 11-cis-retinal, which undergoes cis-trans isomerization resulting in the induction of conformational changes of the protein moiety to form a G protein-activating state. There are multiple types of cone visual pigments with different absorption maxima, which are the molecular basis of color discrimination in animals. Cone visual pigments form a phylogenetic sister group with non-visual opsin groups such as pinopsin, VA opsin, parapinopsin and parietopsin groups. Cone visual pigments diverged into four groups with different absorption maxima, and the rhodopsin group diverged from one of the four groups of cone visual pigments. The photochemical behavior of cone visual pigments is similar to that of pinopsin but considerably different from those of other non-visual opsins. G protein activation efficiency of cone visual pigments is also comparable to that of pinopsin but higher than that of the other non-visual opsins. Recent measurements with sufficient time-resolution demonstrated that G protein activation efficiency of cone visual pigments is lower than that of rhodopsin, which is one of the molecular bases for the lower amplification of cones compared to rods. In this review, the uniqueness of cone visual pigments is shown by comparison of their molecular properties with those of non-visual opsins and rhodopsin. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Retinal Proteins - You can teach an old dog new tricks.

Visual photoreceptor subtypes in the chicken retina: melatonin-synthesizing activity and in vitro differentiation

The chicken retina contains five visual photoreceptor subtypes, based on the specific opsin gene they express. In addition to the central role they play in vision, some or all of these photoreceptors translate photoperiodic information into a day-night rhythm of melatonin production. This indolic hormone plays an important role in the photoperiodic regulation of retinal physiology. Previous studies have stopped short of establishing whether melatonin synthesis takes place in all the photoreceptor spectral subtypes. Another issue that has been left unsettled by previous studies is when during development are retinal precursor cells committed to a specific photoreceptor subtype and to a melatoninergic phenotype? To address the first question, in situ hybridization of the five opsins was combined with immunofluorescent detection of the melatonin-synthesizing enzyme hydroxyindole O-methyltransferase (HIOMT, EC.2.1.1.4). Confocal microscopy clearly indicated that all photoreceptor spectral subtypes are involved in melatonin synthesis. To tackle the second question, retinal precursor cells were dissociated between embryonic day 6 (E6) and E13 and cultured in serum-free medium for 4 days to examine their ability to autonomously activate the expression of opsins and HIOMT. Real-time PCR on cultured precursors indicated that red-, green- and violet-sensitive cones are committed at E6, rods at E10 and blue-sensitive cones at E12. HIOMT gene expression was programmed at E6, probably reflecting the differentiation of early cones. The present study provides a better characterization of photoreceptor subtypes in the chicken retina and describes a combination of serum-free culture and real-time PCR that should facilitate further developmental studies.

Dark adaptation and the retinoid cycle of vision

Following exposure of our eye to very intense illumination, we experience a greatly elevated visual threshold, that takes tens of minutes to return completely to normal. The slowness of this phenomenon of "dark adaptation" has been studied for many decades, yet is still not fully understood. Here we review the biochemical and physical processes involved in eliminating the products of light absorption from the photoreceptor outer segment, in recycling the released retinoid to its original isomeric form as 11-cis retinal, and in regenerating the visual pigment rhodopsin. Then we analyse the time-course of three aspects of human dark adaptation: the recovery of psychophysical threshold, the recovery of rod photoreceptor circulating current, and the regeneration of rhodopsin. We begin with normal human subjects, and then analyse the recovery in several retinal disorders, including Oguchi disease, vitamin A deficiency, fundus albipunctatus, Bothnia dystrophy and Stargardt disease. We review a large body of evidence showing that the time-course of human dark adaptation and pigment regeneration is determined by the local concentration of 11-cis retinal, and that after a large bleach the recovery is limited by the rate at which 11-cis retinal is delivered to opsin in the bleached rod outer segments. We present a mathematical model that successfully describes a wide range of results in human and other mammals. The theoretical analysis provides a simple means of estimating the relative concentration of free 11-cis retinal in the retina/RPE, in disorders exhibiting slowed dark adaptation, from analysis of psychophysical measurements of threshold recovery or from analysis of pigment regeneration kinetics.

A visual pigment expressed in both rod and cone photoreceptors

Rods and cones contain closely related but distinct G protein-coupled receptors, opsins, which have diverged to meet the differing requirements of night and day vision. Here, we provide evidence for an exception to that rule. Results from immunohistochemistry, spectrophotometry, and single-cell RT-PCR demonstrate that, in the tiger salamander, the green rods and blue-sensitive cones contain the same opsin. In contrast, the two cells express distinct G protein transducin alpha subunits: rod alpha transducin in green rods and cone alpha transducin in blue-sensitive cones. The different transducins do not appear to markedly affect photon sensitivity or response kinetics in the green rod and blue-sensitive cone. This suggests that neither the cell topology or the transducin is sufficient to differentiate the rod and the cone response.

The visual ecology of avian photoreceptors

The spectral sensitivities of avian retinal photoreceptors are examined with respect to microspectrophotometric measurements of single cells, spectrophotometric measurements of extracted or in vitro regenerated visual pigments, and molecular genetic analyses of visual pigment opsin protein sequences. Bird species from diverse orders are compared in relation to their evolution, their habitats and the multiplicity of visual tasks they must perform. Birds have five different types of visual pigment and seven different types of photoreceptor-rods, double (uneven twin) cones and four types of single cone. The spectral locations of the wavelengths of maximum absorbance (lambda(max)) of the different visual pigments, and the spectral transmittance characteristics of the intraocular spectral filters (cone oil droplets) that also determine photoreceptor spectral sensitivity, vary according to both habitat and phylogenetic relatedness. The primary influence on avian retinal design appears to be the range of wavelengths available for vision, regardless of whether that range is determined by the spectral distribution of the natural illumination or the spectral transmittance of the ocular media (cornea, aqueous humour, lens, vitreous humour). Nevertheless, other variations in spectral sensitivity exist that reflect the variability and complexity of avian visual ecology.

Characterization of lamprey rhodopsin by isolation from lamprey retina and expression in mammalian cells

A visual pigment was extracted from lamprey retina and was expressed in cultured mammalian cells (293S) using a cDNA fragment isolated from lamprey retina. The extracted pigment, a putative lamprey rhodopsin, had an absorption maximum at 503 nm. The recombinant lamprey rhodopsin, reconstituted with 11-cis-retinal, showed an absorption maximum at about 500 nm. Both pigments reacted with an anti-bovine rhodopsin antibody (Rh29), which recognizes the short photoreceptor cells in lamprey retina. Unlike rhodopsins of higher vertebrates, the lamprey rhodopsin bleached gradually in the presence of 100 mM hydroxylamine even in the dark. Our results suggest that, despite its high similarities with other vertebrate rhodopsins, lamprey rhodopsin has a character different from those of higher vertebrates.

Visual pigments and oil droplets from six classes of photoreceptor in the retinas of birds

Microspectrophotometric examination of the retinal photoreceptors of the budgerigar (shell parakeet), Melopsittacus undulatus (Psittaciformes) and the zebra finch, Taeniopygia guttata (Passeriformes), demonstrate the presence of four, spectrally distinct classes of single cone that contain visual pigments absorbing maximally at about 565, 507, 430-445 and 360-380 nm. The three longer-wave cone classes contain coloured oil droplets acting as long pass filters with cut-offs at about 570, 500-520 and 445 nm, respectively, whereas the ultraviolet-sensitive cones contain a transparent droplet. The two species possess double cones in which both members contain the long-wave-sensitive visual pigment, but only the principal member contains an oil droplet, with cut-off at about 420 nm. A survey of the cones of the pigeon, Columba livia (Columbiformes), confirms the presence of the three longer-wave classes of single cone, but also reveals the presence of a fourth class containing a visual pigment with maximum absorbance at about 409 nm, combined with a transparent droplet. No evidence was found for a fifth, ultraviolet-sensitive receptor. In the chicken, Gallus gallus (Galliformes), the cone class with a transparent droplet contains "chicken violet" with maximum absorbance at about 418 nm. The rods of all four species contain visual pigments that are spectrally similar, with maximum absorbance between about 506 and 509 nm. Noticeably, in any given species, the maximum absorbance of the rods is spectrally very similar to the maximum absorbance of the middle-wavelength-sensitive cone pigments.

The differences in the expressions of visual pigments and transducin in photoreceptor cell differentiation

The distribution and accumulation of visual pigments, i.e., rod pigment, rhodopsin and red sensitive cone pigment, iodopsin, and transducin in the retina of chicken and chicken embryo were investigated immunohistochemically using their specific antibodies. The immunoreactivities of these proteins appeared at the early stage of photoreceptor differentiation (embryonal day 15) and increased in the photoreceptor cells appeared to reach maximum at the end of the embryonal period (embryonal day 20). On the other hand, although the immunoreactivity of beta gamma subunit of transducin (T beta gamma) was detected at embryonal day 15, the expression level of T beta gamma still remained in low level during the embryonal period. These observations suggest that both T beta gamma and visual pigments are expressed during the embryonic period in chicken photoreceptor cells, but their accumulations in the cells are different.

Difference in molecular properties between chicken green and rhodopsin as related to the functional difference between cone and rod photoreceptor cells

Using low-temperature spectroscopy, we have investigated the photobleaching process of chicken green, a green-sensitive cone visual pigment present in chicken retina, and compared it to that of rhodopsin, a rod visual pigment. Like rhodopsin, chicken green converts to all-trans-retinal and opsin through batho, lumi, and meta I, II, and III intermediates. However, all of the intermediates of chicken green except lumi, are less stable than the corresponding intermediates of rhodopsin. While early intermediates, batho and lumi are similar in absorption maxima between chicken green and rhodopsin, the meta intermediates of chicken green are about 20 nm blue shifted from those of rhodopsin. Low-temperature time-resolved spectroscopy was applied to estimate the thermodynamic properties of meta intermediates, and it indicated that the less stable properties of meta II and III intermediates of chicken green originate from the smaller activation enthalpies. The decay of the meta II intermediate of chicken green is greatly suppressed when a chicken green sample is irradiated at alkaline conditions while the net charge becomes similar to that of rhodopsin at neutral conditions. These results strongly suggest that the functional properties of chicken green that are different from those of rhodopsin are regulated by the dissociative amino acid residue(s).

Is chicken green-sensitive cone visual pigment a rhodopsin-like pigment? A comparative study of the molecular properties between chicken green and rhodopsin

Chicken green is a visual pigment present in chicken green-sensitive cones and has an amino acid sequence more similar than any other cone visual pigments to the rod visual pigments, rhodopsins. Here we have investigated the molecular properties of chicken green and compared them with those of rhodopsin to elucidate whether or not chicken green is a rhodopsin-like pigment. While chicken green has a molecular extinction coefficient and a photosensitivity very similar to those of rhodopsin, it displays faster regeneration from 11-cis-retinal and opsin and faster formation and decay of the physiologically active meta II intermediate than rhodopsin. These differences correlate with the physiological difference between cones and rods. Thus in spite of the similarity in amino acid sequence, chicken green displays molecular properties required for a cone visual pigment that are clearly different from those of rhodopsin.

Primary structures of chicken cone visual pigments: vertebrate rhodopsins have evolved out of cone visual pigments

The chicken retina contains rhodopsin (a rod visual pigment) and four kinds of cone visual pigments. The primary structures of chicken red (iodopsin) and rhodopsin have been determined previously. Here we report isolation of three cDNA clones encoding additional pigments from a chicken retinal cDNA library. Based on the partial amino acid sequences of the purified chicken visual pigments together with their biochemical and spectral properties, we have identified these clones as encoding the chicken green, blue, and violet visual pigments. Chicken violet was very similar to human blue not only in absorption maximum (chicken violet, 415 nm; human blue, 419 nm) but also in amino acid sequence (80.6% identical). Interestingly, chicken green was more similar (71-75.1%) than any other known cone pigment (42.0-53.7%) to vertebrate rhodopsins. The fourth additional cone pigment, chicken blue, had relatively low similarity (39.3-54.6%) in amino acid sequence to those of the other vertebrate visual pigments. A phylogenetic tree of vertebrate visual pigments constructed on the basis of amino acid identity indicated that an ancestral visual pigment evolved first into four groups (groups L, S, M1, and M2), each of which includes one of the chicken cone pigments, and that group Rh including vertebrate rhodopsins diverged from group M2 later. Thus, it is suggested that the gene for scotopic vision (rhodopsin) has evolved out of that for photopic vision (cone pigments). The divergence of rhodopsin from cone pigments was accompanied by an increase in negative net charge of the pigment.

Diurnal control of rod function in the chicken

We studied rod function in the chicken by recording corneal electroretinograms (ERGs). The following experiments were performed to demonstrate rod function during daytime: (1) determining the dark-adaptation function; (2) measuring the spectral sensitivity by a a-b-wave amplitude criterion in response to monochromatic flickering light of different frequencies ranging from 6.5-40.8 Hz (duty cycle 1:1); (3) analyzing the response vs. log stimulus intensity (V-log I) function in order to reveal a possible two phase process; and (4) determining the spectral sensitivity function either in a non-dark adapted state or after dark adaptation of the animals for 1 and 24 h. None of these experiments demonstrated clear evidence of rod function during daytime. On the other hand, we found rods histologically by light- and electron microscopy. Therefore, we repeated our ERG recordings during the night (between midnight and 3:00 A.M.). Without previous dark adaptation, rod function could be seen immediately in the same experiments described above. The result shows that, in the chicken, rods are turned on endogenously during the night but are scarcely functional during the day.

Chicken red-sensitive cone visual pigment retains a binding domain for transducin

Iodopsin (a red-sensitive cone visual pigment) and rhodopsin (a rod pigment) were isolated from chicken retina. They were separately reconstituted into phosphatidylcholine liposomes and then mixed with rod transducin (T alpha and T beta gamma) purified from bovine retina. Iodopsin enhanced, only when irradiated, the binding of GppNHp to T alpha to a similar extent to irradiated rhodopsin. Furthermore, the binding of GppNHp to T alpha in the presence of a photobleaching intermediate of iodopsin preferably required T beta gamma-2 rather than T beta gamma-1, which is very similar in profile to that in the presence of the intermediate of rhodopsin (J. Biol. Chem., in press). These results indicate that the binding domain for transducin in iodopsin should closely resemble that in rhodopsin.

Monoclonal antibodies to chicken iodopsin

The protein moiety of chicken iodopsin, R-photopsin, was purified from the chicken retina using a sucrose flotation method followed by two steps of column chromatography. Apparent molecular weights of R-photopsin and scotopsin (the protein moiety of chicken rhodopsin), which was partly purified in the process of purification of R-photopsin, were estimated to be 34,000 and 36,000, respectively, by sodium docecylsulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Using the purified R-photopsin as an antigen, four kinds of hybridoma cells which secreted monoclonal antibodies specific for R-photopsin and iodopsin were prepared. The antibodies thus obtained reacted with neither other chicken cone visual pigments nor rhodopsin as analyzed by immunoblots and immunoprecipitation methods. All the monoclonal antibodies stained the majority of the cone outer segments in chicken retina, while an antiserum raised against cattle rhodopsin stained the rod outer segments as well as some cone outer segments in the retina.

Monoclonal antibodies specific to chicken iodopsin

Monoclonal antibodies (mABs) from hybridoma cells were raised and screened with a purified cone pigment, iodopsin, from the chicken retina. Four different methods were used to test these antibodies: (1) dot-immunobinding assay; (2) enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA); (3) one dimensional immunoblotting and (4) two dimensional immunoblotting. Three classes of antibody producing cell lines were identified. One class produces a mAB specific to iodopsin. The mAB from the second class crossreacts with iodopsin and probably one of the other three cone pigments. The mAB from the third class probably crossreacts with all the four cone pigments in the chicken retina. The mABs from all these classes of hybridoma cell lines were selected so that they do not crossreact with rhodopsin. Two dimensional immunoblotting indicated that iodopsin has a much higher isoelectric point than rhodopsin, as suggested from the known amino acid sequences of human rod and cone pigments.

Isolation and sequence determination of the chicken rhodopsin gene

A chicken genomic library was screened with a bovine opsin cDNA probe. A clone isolated under high stringency hybridization conditions contained DNA sequences highly homologous to all of the five exons of bovine and human opsin genes. Sequence comparison of the putative open reading frame in the chicken DNA fragment of 4.3 kb with bovine opsin cDNA revealed 82% identity for the nucleotide and 87% for the deduced amino acid sequence, indicating that this DNA fragment contains the complete chicken opsin gene. The position of four introns and amino acid sequences at all putative cytoplasmic loops are exactly conserved in chicken and mammals.

Monoclonal antibody-recognizing cone visual pigment

Monoclonal antibodies were raised to a crude photoreceptor-membrane suspension from chicken retinas. Clones producing antibodies against cone outer segments were selected by screening with immunocytochemistry on semithin sections of the retina. One monoclonal antibody, called COS-1, specifically labelled outer segments of double cones and one type of single cones; outer segments of rods and several single cones were not stained. On immunoblots of retinal photoreceptor membranes, this antibody recognized a protein with an apparent molecular mass of 33,000. The visual pigment character of the 33,000 protein was indirectly established by another monoclonal antibody, OS-2, which labelled all outer segments on semithin sections and four bands (33,000-, 36,000-, 38,000-40,000- and a composite band between 66,000-72,000 MW) on immunoblots. Of these, the 36,000- and the 72,000 MW protein bands were identified with an anti-rhodopsin polyclonal antibody as rhodopsin monomer and dimer. Monoclonal antibody OS-2 is assumed therefore to represent an antibody against a common epitope of all visual pigments of the chicken. The monoclonal antibody COS-1 was found to bind to certain cone outer segments of many other vertebrate species as well.

Simplified concanavalin-A sepharose adsorption method for separation of cone visual pigments from rhodopsin

Batch adsorption of chicken photoreceptor extract using Concanavalin-A Sepharose enables separation of rod and cone pigments and separation of cone pigments of different color sensitivity. In earlier work, column separations using the same adsorption medium, although effective, with high resolution, were slow, demanding and required many differential bleachings of column fractions for analysis. It is shown here that affinity separations can be performed in the batch adsorption mode to purify cattle, frog and chicken rhodopsin. These procedures are more rapid and much more convenient. An extract from the chicken retina can rapidly be separated into four fractions, including three highly enriched (80% or more) visual pigment fractions: (1) extraneous proteins, carotenoids and phospholipids; (2) short wavelength-sensitive pigments; (3) iodopsin; and (4) rhodopsin. While the resolution is not as great as that of the columns, the selectivity is sufficient to produce cone pigments, which are only slightly contaminated with rhodopsin and free of other proteins, either to experiment with directly or to enable heavier loading on high resolution columns. The method is adaptable both to highly labile pigments and to very small quantities, neither of which perform well in column separations.

Microspectrophotometry of vertebrate photoreceptors. A brief review

Since the early 1960s, measurements of the absorbance spectra of both photosensitive and inert pigments within intact isolated visual receptor cells have been achieved in a great number of species, including representatives of all the vertebrate groups as well as some invertebrates, principally the insects. The technique has meant a rapid advance in our understanding of the basis of colour vision throughout the animal kingdom as well as increasing our knowledge of the behaviour of visual pigments in situ. A review of these advances, especially within the fish, birds and primates is presented with emphasis on the limitations of the technique, and the intriguing questions that microspectrophotometric analysis of the pigments of visual receptor cells has raised.