Evaluation of a new screening assay ProC Global for identification of defects in the protein C/protein S anticoagulant pathway

Anticoagulant effects of protein C, protein S, and antithrombin levels on the protein C pathway in young children

The protein C (PC) pathway involves physiological anticoagulant factors (PC, protein S [PS], and factor V) and performs major anticoagulant functions in adults. Variations in overall PC pathway function due to dynamic changes in PC and PS in early childhood are poorly understood. We aimed to evaluate the contributions of PC pathway function during early childhood by measuring changes in plasma thrombin generation (TG) after administration of the PC activator protac. We evaluated correlations between anticoagulant factors and percentage of protac-induced coagulation inhibition (PiCi%). Before protac addition, TG in newborns (n = 35), infants (n = 42), young children (n = 35), and adults (n = 20) were 525 ± 74, 720 ± 96, 785 ± 53, and 802 ± 64 mOD/min, and PiCi% were 42.1 ± 9.9, 69.8 ± 11.0, 82.9 ± 4.4, and 86.9 ± 3.4%, respectively. The distribution of PiCi% on the two axes of TG (with or without protac) changed continuously with age and differed from that of warfarin-treated plasma and adult PC- or PS-deficient plasma. PiCi% increased dynamically during infancy and correlated with PS levels in newborns and PC levels in young children. Addition of PC or fresh frozen plasma equivalent to approximately 25% PC to PC-deficient plasma improved PiCi%. This automatic measurement requires only a small sample volume and is useful for analysis of developmental hemostasis.

In vitro diagnostics for the medical dermatologist. Part II: Hypercoagulability tests

The skin often provides initial clues of hypercoagulability with features such as livedo reticularis, livedo racemosa, retiform purpura, necrosis, and ulcerations. Because these cutaneous manifestations are nonspecific, laboratory testing is often needed to evaluate for underlying causes of hypercoagulability. Importantly, these disorders are reported to be the most common mimicker, resulting in an erroneous diagnosis of pyoderma gangrenosum. Understanding inherent properties of, and indications for, available tests is necessary for appropriate ordering and interpretation of results. Additionally, ordering of these tests in an indiscriminate manner may lead to inaccurate results, complicating the interpretation and approach to management. This second article in this continuing medical education series summarizes information on methodology, test characteristics, and limitations of several in vitro laboratory tests used for the work up of hypercoagulability and vasculopathic disease as it pertains to dermatologic disease.

Pro CR global: an effective screening test for thrombophilia

In the present study, the Pro C(R) Global test was evaluated as a screening test for estimation of the activity of the main plasma components of the anticoagulant protein C (PC) / protein S (PS) pathway; 300 patients with a history of thrombosis were investigated for Pro C(R) Global. It was positive in 74 patients. Tests for estimation of PC, PS, activated protein C resistance (APCR), and lupus anticoagulant (LAC) were performed in all the patients with abnormal Pro C(R) Global and in 10 patients with normal Pro C(R) Global. In all, 66 of the 74 patients had a defect in PC/PS/APCR or LAC; 18 patients had both PC and PS deficiency, 25 had PS deficiency alone, 10 had PC deficiency alone, one had APCR alone, eight had PS, PC deficiency with APCR, and four had PS deficiency with APCR. In the 10 patients who tested negative with the Pro C(R) Global test, PC, APCR, and LAC were negative in all. However, PS deficiency was seen in two of them. The sensitivity and specificity of Pro C(R) Global, calculated with respect to positivity of PC, PS, LAC, or APCR as the gold standard, were 97% and 50%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of the assay was 88.1%. It is thus recommended that Pro C(R) Global can be used effectively as a screening test to detect abnormality in the PC/PS/APCR/LAC pathway.

A review of the technical, diagnostic, and epidemiologic considerations for protein S assays

OBJECTIVES

To review the state of the art relating to protein S deficiency as a risk factor for thrombosis and to make recommendations regarding the use of protein S measurements in the assessment of thrombotic risk in individual patients and families.

DATA SOURCES, EXTRACTION, AND SYNTHESIS

Selection criteria were developed for the inclusion of publications from 1985 to 2001 based on the relevant literature concerned with the systematic review of diagnostic tests. Minimal selection criteria were agreed on and the articles stratified into level 1 if they met these criteria and level 2 if they did not meet these criteria. The included articles were reviewed by the authors and abstracted onto predetermined data collection forms. These forms were then scored and recommendations based on level 1 studies. As described elsewhere, results of discussions at the College of American Pathologists Conference XXXVI on Diagnostic Issues in Thrombophilia were used to revise the manuscript into its final form.

CONCLUSIONS

Consensus was reached on 16 recommendations for the use of protein S assays in the assessment of thrombotic risk in individuals and families. Two themes run through the conclusions. First, protein S assays are the most technically problematic of the assays reviewed at this conference. Second, only 2 papers evaluating the diagnostic use of protein S assays met our level 1 inclusion criteria. These 2 problems point out the need for better standardized assays and rigorous studies of the diagnostic utility of these assays.

Laboratory issues in diagnosing abnormalities of protein C, thrombomodulin, and endothelial cell protein C receptor

OBJECTIVE

To review the current understanding of the pathophysiology of protein C deficiency and its role in congenital thrombophilia. Recommendations for diagnostic testing for protein C function and concentration, derived from the medical literature and consensus opinions of recognized experts in the field, are included, specifying whom, how, and when to test. The role of related proteins, such as thrombomodulin and endothelial protein C receptor, is also reviewed. Data Sources.-Review of the published medical literature.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

A summary of the medical literature and proposed testing recommendations were prepared and presented at the College of American Pathologists Conference XXXVI: Diagnostic Issues in Thrombophilia. After discussion at the conference, consensus recommendations presented in this manuscript were accepted after a two-thirds majority vote by the participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Protein C deficiency is an uncommon genetic abnormality that may be a contributing cause of thrombophilia, often in conjunction with other genetic or acquired risk factors. When assay of protein C plasma levels is included in the laboratory evaluation of thrombophilia, a functional amidolytic protein C assay should be used for initial testing. The diagnosis of protein C deficiency should be established only after other acquired causes of protein C deficiency are excluded. A low protein C level should be confirmed with a subsequent assay on a new specimen. Antigenic protein C assays may be of benefit in subclassification of the type of protein C deficiency. The role of thrombomodulin and endothelial cell protein C receptor in thrombosis has yet to be clearly established, and diagnostic testing is not recommended at this time.

Antiphospholipid antibodies impact the protein C (PC) pathway behavior

Antiphospholipid antibodies may interfere with the PC pathway, displaying a resistance to the activated PC (resistant phenotype). This effect was evaluated by the APCR and the ProCG systems in 36 lupus anticoagulant samples, yielding abnormal results in 47% of APCR(original), 17% of APCR(modified), and 22% of ProCG test. ProCG values correlated with APCR(original) but not with APCR(modified). Most of lupus anticoagulants affecting the PC pathway showed abnormal APCR(original) results but not abnormal ProCG values. The different behavior between both systems may be due to the heterogeneity of the antibodies or could be attributed to the fact that, in the ProCG, a PC activator is added, while the APCR employs already activated exogenous PC.

An evaluation of screening tests for defects in the protein C pathway: commercial kits lack sensitivity and specificity

A comparative evaluation of four commercial coagulation test kits for screening the protein C pathway kits was performed at two centres. The tests were Acticlot V-OUT (V-OUT), the PCA test (PCA), the GradiThrom PCP test (PCP) and ProC Global (ProC). Reference ranges were established in 40 normal subjects and, with the exception of V-OUT and ProC, significant differences were observed between males and females. Consequently, sex-specific normal cut-off values (fifth percentile) were used that led to greatly improved sensitivity when compared with the manufacturers' recommended cut-off values. Plasma from patients with factor V Leiden (n = 23), congenital protein S deficiency (n = 19), congenital protein C deficiency (n = 11), lupus anticoagulant (n = 17) and thrombophilia with no demonstrable protein C pathway defect (n = 20) were tested. All kits showed 100% sensitivity to factor V Leiden, but sensitivity was variable for protein C deficiency (27-73%), and poor for protein S deficiency (29-35%). The lupus anticoagulant affected all kits to some degree, with 29-35% giving values below the fifth percentile of normal, whereas all kits gave 1/20 unexpected abnormal results in the thrombophilia group, with the same sample accounting for the abnormal results in three of the four kits. Overall sensitivity and specificity, respectively, for defects in the protein C pathway were: V-OUT, 60 and 91%; PCA, 70 and 86%; PCP 75 and 94%; and ProC, 66 and 88%. We conclude that all four kits lack the sensitivity and specificity required for routine laboratory screening for defects in the protein C pathway and cannot replace assays for the individual proteins of this system.

The reduced sensitivity of the ProC Global test in protein S deficient subjects reflects a reduction in the associated thrombotic risk

To investigate simultaneously a defect affecting the protein C/protein S (PC/PS) anticoagulant pathway is possible thanks to a methodological approach (ProC(R) Global; Dade Behring) based on the activation of endogenous plasma PC by a snake venom extract. Factor V (FV) Leiden, the most frequent cause of hereditary thrombosis, is well detected by the test with sensitivity of 100% irrespective of the presence/absence of thrombosis in the subjects investigated. The test is also suited to detect PC or PS defect, but in this case the in vitro impairment of the PC/PS pathway is less pronounced particularly for PS defects (sensitivity for PC and PS defect, 85-100 and 30-90%, respectively). In this study, we hypothesized that the lower sensitivity described for PS defect, compared with those of PC and FV Leiden defects, could also be related to the clinical condition of the subject investigated (symptomatic/asymptomatic) rather than solely to the PS plasma activity/level. Therefore, we analyzed 126 subjects with single congenital defects in the PC/PS pathway: 46 subjects with PS deficiency (26 thrombotic cases and 20 asymptomatic relatives), 40 subjects with PC deficiency (25 thrombotic cases and 15 asymptomatic relatives), and 40 heterozygous FV Leiden subjects (25 thrombotic cases and 15 asymptomatic relatives). By a cut-off of normalized Agkistrodon contortix snake venom ratio of 0.84, the sensitivity in the whole group of cases (sensitivity a) was 76.1, 95.0 and 100%, respectively, for PS, PC and FV Leiden defects. The test failed to detect 11 (23.9%) among the 46 PS-deficient subjects, and all these cases except two belonged to the asymptomatic subgroup (9/20; 45%). Excluding the 20 asymptomatic relatives, the new sensitivity (sensitivity b) for the PS defect was 92.3%. The comparison of the sensitivity in the symptomatic PS cases and in the asymptomatic ones was significantly different (P = 0.010). Among the 40 PC-deficient subjects, only two (5.0%) were not detected by the test and they belonged indifferently to the two subgroups. Finally, none of the 40 FV Leiden heterozygotes were misdiagnosed by the test. These results suggest that in symptomatic PS-deficient cases the test could reflect a post-thrombotic effect and/or reveal potential unidentified prothrombotic influences assessing a prothrombotic risk condition.

Sensitivity of the ProC global assay for protein C pathway abnormalities. clinical experience in 899 unselected patients with venous thromboembolism

The ProC Global is a clotting assay designed to globally evaluate the functionality of the protein C (PC) pathway, which is found defective in up to 30% of the Caucasian patients with thrombophilia. It is based on the ability of endogenous activated protein C (APC), generated by activation of PC by a snake venom extract, to prolong an activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). This retrospective study was carried out to evaluate the ability of this assay to distinguish patients with or without any PC pathway abnormalities in a cohort of 899 unselected patients with a history of thrombosis. The result of the ProC Global assay, expressed in PC activation time-normalized ratio (PCAT-NR), was significantly lower in patients in whom was previously demonstrated an abnormality of the PC pathway compared to those without. The cut-off level of PCAT-NR=0.75 was found to provide the best sensitivity-specificity ratio, since all the patients with the factor V (FV) Leiden mutation (n=71), APC resistance (n=3), PC deficiency (n=22), or combined defects (n=19) had a PCAT-NR below that value. The sensitivity of the ProC Global assay for a low protein S (PS) level (n=56) was only 66%, and was even weaker in the case of hereditary PS deficiency (46.6%, n=15). The assay did not perform well in samples from patients on oral anticoagulant treatment (OAT, n=64) or with liver failure (n=4), as the PCAT-NR was reduced in most cases, even in the absence of any abnormality. These results suggest that the ProC Global assay could be validly used as a first-step screening test for the FV Leiden-related APC resistance and PC deficiency in patients not on OAT. Given the moderate sensitivity of the assay for PS deficiency, this coagulation inhibitor must be determined in every case. However, the overall benefit of such a screening strategy is limited since more than 38% of the 659 patients without abnormality had a decreased PCAT-NR.

Modification of the ProC Global assay using dilution of patient plasma in factor V-depleted plasma as a screening assay for factor V Leiden mutation

The activated protein C (APC) resistant-factor V (factor V Leiden) has emerged as the most common inherited risk factor for thrombosis in the Caucasian population. Beside DNA analysis, the laboratory diagnosis is often based on the detection of a poor anticoagulant response to exogenous APC. The ProC Global assay (Dade Behring, Marburg, Germany) is a global clotting assay, which was primarily developed to evaluate the functionality of the protein C anticoagulant pathway. It is based on the ability of endogenous APC, generated by activation of protein C by an extract from Agkistrodon contortrix contortrix venom, to prolong an activated partial thromboplastin time. It was previously found to be highly sensitive for the factor V Leiden mutation and for protein C deficiency, but only moderately sensitivity for protein S deficiency. Here, we evaluated the performance of a modification of the ProC Global assay using a 1 : 5 pre-dilution of patient plasma in factor V-depleted plasma in the screening of the factor V Leiden mutation-related APC resistance. For that purpose, we investigated selected frozen plasma samples from 341 patients with a history of venous thromboembolism. The sensitivity for the factor V Leiden mutation of the modified assay was found to be 100%, as all the carriers of that mutation (five homozygotes and 77 heterozygotes) had a decreased response to the assay, i.e. a normalized ratio below 0.80. Its specificity was also 100% since none of the other tested patients had a decreased response, i.e. isolated protein C (n = 3) or protein S deficiency (n = 50), or without any abnormality of the protein C pathway (n = 143), even those on oral anticoagulant treatment (n = 76). However, it would be preferable that each laboratory defines both its reference range and its cut-off level. Finally, even if larger-scale multicentre studies are needed before definite recommendations could be made, these results suggest that the ProC Global performed using a 1 : 5 pre-dilution of the patient plasma in factor V-depleted plasma could be validly used as a screening assay of the factor V Leiden mutation-related APC resistance in patients with a history of thrombosis.

ProC global: a new automated screening assay for the evaluation of total function of the protein C system

Protein C (PC) pathway represents a major physiologic inhibitory mechanism regulating the coagulation cascade. A new automated functional screening assay (ProC Global) for the evaluation of the PC-system was tested to define its ability to identify patients with known inherited defects such as factor V (FV) Leiden mutation and PC and protein S (PS) deficiency. A total of 249 patients who were symptomatic or asymptomatic for previous venous thromboembolism (VTE) were evaluated, 50 of whom had FV Leiden mutation, 36 had PC deficiency, and 34 had PS deficiency. One hundred healthy subjects were also tested, as well as 40 blood donors of both sexes in whom coagulation abnormalities were not found. Results of ProC Global test were expressed as normalized ratio (NR) and values below an established cut-off level were consistent with a positive test. ProC Global was positive in all 50 patients with the FV Leiden mutation (mean NR = 0.59; range, 0.37 to 0.69). ProC Global correctly identified 32 of 36 (89%) PC defects (mean NR = 0.63; range, 0.34 to 1.21) and 25 of 34 (73.5%) PS defects (mean NR = 0.76; range, 0.5 to 1.23). Overall, 92.5% of hereditary defects of the PC system considered in this study were identified by ProC Global test. ProC Global exhibited NR above cut-off level in all 40 blood donors without coagulation defects. ProC Global is a new automated screening test with some diagnostic potential in identifying patients with defects of the PC system. However, ProC Global in its current form cannot substitute the assay of each single component of this inhibitory system in the daily screening for thrombophilia.

Evaluation of a global screening assay for the investigation of the protein C anticoagulant pathway

We have evaluated a global screening test for the protein C pathway, the 'ProC Global' (Dade Behring Ltd, Milton Keynes, UK). Patient groups tested included inherited protein C or S deficient and inherited/acquired activated protein C resistance. Results showed that protein C deficiencies and activated protein C resistance could be successfully detected with this test whereas deficiencies of protein S were less readily distinguished from the normal population. The ProC Global was unreliable in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies, raised plasma factor VIII:C and in those receiving oral anticoagulant therapy.

Screening for abnormalities of the protein C anticoagulant pathway using the ProC Global assay. Results of a European multicenter evaluation

ProC Global is a new global clotting assay designed to evaluate the functionality of the protein C anticoagulant pathway. It is based on the ability of endogenous activated protein C, generated by activation of protein C by Protac, to prolong an activated partial thromboplastin time, and the results are expressed in protein C activation time normalized ratio (PCAT-NR), after normalization. This multicenter trial involving five European laboratories was designed in order to determine the ability of the ProC Global assay to distinguish patients with and without abnormalities of the protein C pathway. The PCAT-NR was significantly lower in the patients with a thrombotic history not on oral anticoagulant treatment (n = 627) than in the healthy controls (n = 148), even after exclusion from both groups of the patients with abnormality of the protein C pathway. Using receiver operator characteristics analysis, the cut-off level of PCAT-NR = 0.80 was found to provide the best sensitivity-specificity ratio. All the carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation (n = 73), as well as all the patients with activated protein C resistance (n = 42), had a PCAT-NR below 0.80. The ProC Global assay performed well in patients with combined defects (97.0%, n = 33) or protein C deficiency (91.3%, n = 46), but it failed to detect all of them, and one patient with combined defects as well as four patients with a low protein C level had a PCAT-NR above the cut-off level. The sensitivity of the assay for protein S deficiency (n = 58) was weak (only 69.0%) and, surprisingly, more than 40% of the 375 patients without any of these abnormalities of the protein C pathway had a PCAT-NR below the cut-off level.

Screening for risk factors for thrombosis using a new generation of assays developed to evaluate the functionality of the protein C anticoagulant pathway

These results, obtained in a small series of patients, suggest that both the ProC Global assay and the PCP Test would be suitable, using well-defined cut-off levels, to identify all the carriers of the Factor V Leiden mutation and all the patients with a protein C deficiency or with combined defects of the protein C pathway. For both assays, however, the sensitivity for protein S deficiency was below 60%. These results in selected patients are congruent with those previously reported in the literature about the ProC Global assay, the PCP Test, and other assays evaluating the functionality of the protein C anticoagulant pathway. All demonstrated a weak sensitivity to protein S deficiency, suggesting that protein S plays only a minor role as an APC cofactor in such global assays. A major discrepancy between the two evaluated assays was obtained in the group of patients without abnormality of the protein C pathway. Actually, using the ProC Global assay, more than 40% of the patients had a decreased PCAT-NR while presenting with none of the three tested abnormalities, whereas none of the studied patients had a ratio below 1.80, and only 5 of 143 (3.5%) had a ratio below 2.00 when using the PCP Test. The observation that around 40% of the control patients had a decreased PCAT-NR could suggest the influence of currently unknown defects of the protein C/protein S pathway on the ProC Global assay. It could also be hypothesized that the higher factor VIII levels already reported in patients with a history of thrombosis than in controls had a significant role in the low responsiveness, but this parameter was not tested in the authors' series. In that connection, it is also well established that elevated factor VIII levels both shorten the APTT and reduce the anticoagulant effect of heparin when evaluated using APTT. Actually, some of the samples investigated in this study were obtained during the acute phase of thrombosis. It is not possible to draw out the hypothesis of an association of biologically undetectable minor changes in various factors involved in the protein C anticoagulant pathway; all the individual factors would remain within their normal ranges. Finally, because 40% of the patients without abnormalities of the protein C pathway had a decreased PCAT-NR, the question arises whether the ProC Global assay might in itself be a biologic marker of thrombophilia, independent of its sensitivity for abnormalities of the protein C anticoagulant pathway. In that connection, the correlation between the result of the ProC Global assay and the risk for thromboembolism was recently evaluated by two different groups. In both cases, the preliminary results suggested that a decreased response to the ProC Global assay might be an independent risk factor for venous thrombosis. The two global assays could therefore have distinctly different applications. If the global assays are used in the hemostasis laboratory to screen for abnormalities of the protein C pathway, and thus to rationalize the use of specific assays, the PCP Test should be chosen, because of its high specificity. Because only 3.5% of the control patients had a ratio below 2.00 (and none had a ratio below 1.80), the PCP Test could be accurately used as a first-step assay in the laboratory screening for these abnormalities of the protein C anticoagulant pathway. Using such a flow chart, the specific assays for APC resistance or the identification of the factor V Leiden mutation and protein C would be performed only in case of a ratio below a cut-off defined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-analysis in unselected patients. Because of the weak sensitivity of this assay to both constitutional and acquired protein S deficiencies (below 15% using 1.80 as the cut-off level, or 60% using 2.00), the measurement of this parameter had to be performed in all cases. If, on the other hand, the assay is used to screen for risk factors for thrombosis, the ProC Global assay could b

The Factor V (Leiden) test: evaluation of an assay based on dilute Russell Viper Venom Time for the detection of the Factor V Leiden mutation

In the present study a new clotting assay for the detection of an increased resistance of coagulation factor V against degradation by activated protein C (Factor V Leiden mutation, FVLM) was evaluated. The Factor V (Leiden) Test (Gradipore, North Ryde NSW, Australia) is based on the dilute Russell Viper Venom Time (DRVVT), which is prolonged when the plasma sample is preincubated with dilute whole Agkistrodon contortrix contortrix venom for activation of protein C (PC). In contrast to the DRVVT based global assay, Protein C Pathway Test (Gradipore, North Ryde NSW, Australia) this new assay is expected to be more specific for FVLM because of optimized amounts of the venom. The test result is expressed as the ratio between the DRVVT with and without addition of the venom. The following precision values were found: intraassay coefficient of variation (CV): 5.53% (n=20) in the normal range, 4.30% (n=20) in the pathological range; interassay CV: 6.90% (n=10) and 7.64% (n=10), respectively. A normal range (5th to 95th percentile) of 2.12 to 3.08 was calculated from 50 healthy controls. A ratio below 2.12 was found in all samples from patients with FVLM (n=21), in 9 of 12 patients with PC, in 0 of 6 with protein S (PS), and in 0 of 4 with antithrombin (AT) deficiency. There was, however, a good discrimination between carriers of the FVLM (highest ratio 1.44) and patients deficient in PC (lowest ratio 1.59), in particular when samples were prediluted with factor V deficient plasma FVDP (1.16 vs. 1.96, respectively). Predilution of samples with FVDP caused a clear discrimination between controls and patients deficient in PC, PS, AT, and FVLM-positive individuals and also in patients on oral anticoagulant treatment. Our data show that the Factor V (Leiden) Test discriminates well between carriers of the FVLM and healthy controls or patients deficient in PC, PS, and AT. Individuals presenting values between the lower cutoff of controls and the range in which FVLM-positive individuals are found are highly suspicious for protein C deficiency.