Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Part II diagnosis and management

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, also known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction characterized by an exanthem, fever, and hematologic and visceral organ involvement. The differential diagnosis includes other cutaneous adverse reactions, infections, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, and neoplastic disorders. Three sets of diagnostic criteria have been proposed; however, consensus is lacking. The cornerstone of management is immediate discontinuation of the suspected drug culprit. Systemic corticosteroids remain first-line therapy, but the literature on steroid-sparing agents is expanding. Longitudinal evaluation for sequelae is recommended. Adjunctive tests for risk stratification and drug culprit identification remain under investigation. Part II of this continuing medical education activity begins by exploring the differential diagnosis and diagnosis of drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms and concludes with an evidence-based overview of evaluation and treatment.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Part I. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinicopathological features, and prognosis

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS), also known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) characterized by an exanthem, fever, and hematologic and visceral organ involvement. Anticonvulsants, antibiotics, and allopurinol are the most common triggers. The pathogenesis involves a complex interplay between drugs, viruses, and the immune system primarily mediated by T-cells. DiHS/DRESS typically presents with a morbilliform eruption 2-6 weeks after drug exposure, and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and risk of relapse. Long-term sequelae primarily relate to organ dysfunction and autoimmune diseases. Part I of this continuing medical education activity on DiHS/DRESS provides an update on epidemiology, novel insights into pathogenesis, and a description of clinicopathological features and prognosis.

Is it ethical to lie by omission for a patient?

In the age of increasing transparency, dermatologists may encounter requests from patients to alter or withhold key medical information from their electronic medical records. Per the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, patients have the right to view their medical record and request amendments; however, the physician is the final decision maker on what information should be included in the chart. It is integral that medically necessary information is included in the chart in accordance with the principle of beneficence and nonmaleficence. Withholding medically pertinent history may cause harm to the patient. Navigating such challenging situations while maintaining transparency requires a thorough understanding of the patient's dilemma. This contribution provides a framework by applying multiple ethical principles and will empower dermatologists to navigate such requests.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a case report and review of the literature

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) use has been associated with numerous autoimmune side effects, known as immune related adverse events (irAEs). Cutaneous irAEs are common and affect up to 50% of patients treated with ICIs. There have been an increasing number of cases reported in the literature regarding ICI-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE). ICI-induced SCLE is important to recognize as it can result in a delayed and/or prolonged skin reaction despite treatment discontinuation. We describe a patient with gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma who developed SCLE following one cycle of nivolumab treatment. A 75-year-old man presented to our clinic with a new photo-distributed rash composed of oval scaly pink papules and plaques involving his chest and arms. Despite treatment with topical corticosteroids, he presented to the emergency department 1 week later with worsening rash. Skin biopsy showed vacuolar interface pattern, along with superficial perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate, consistent with a drug eruption. The clinicopathological presentation was consistent with ICI-induced SCLE. Nivolumab treatment was discontinued due to the severity of the rash. The rash remitted with systemic corticosteroids, high potency topical steroids, and hydroxychloroquine. Unfortunately, the patient developed intraperitoneal metastatic disease, and was enrolled in hospice care. In this paper, we highlight the importance of early identification and treatment of this irAE. A review of the literature, including a discussion on the management of ICI-induced SCLE is also provided.

Diagnostic methods for the confirmation of non-purulent cellulitis: a review

Cellulitis is the most common cause for skin disease hospitalization with costs totaling over $7 billion. It can be challenging to diagnose due to clinical similarities with other inflammatory conditions and the lack of a gold-standard diagnostic test. This article reviews the different testing methods for the diagnosis of non-purulent cellulitis based on three categories (1) clinical scoring assessments, (2) in vivo imaging techniques, and (3) laboratory assessments.

Smaller hospital discharge volume and urban area are associated with higher proportional cellulitis discharges

Cellulitis is commonly misdiagnosed, resulting in increased healthcare costs and complications. There is little published work regarding the relationship between hospital characteristics and cellulitis discharge rates. Here, we performed a cross-sectional analysis of cellulitis inpatient discharges using publicly available national data to examine hospital characteristics associated with higher proportional cellulitis discharge rates. The results of our study showed a strong association of increased proportion of cellulitis discharges in association with hospitals that discharged fewer total patients and a direct association with urban location. The factors that influence hospital cellulitis discharge diagnoses are numerous, and while its overdiagnosis remains a source of medical overspending and complications, our study may provide direction for more focused efforts to increase dermatology care in lower volume hospitals and urban areas.

A description of Kaposi sarcoma risk factors and outcomes in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients at a tertiary care medical center from 2005 to 2020

Kaposi sarcoma (KS) is a low-grade vascular malignancy caused by human herpesvirus-8 (HHV-8), also known as Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV). There are four established subtypes of KS, which are described by unique risk factors, presentation, and disease course. A "non-epidemic" variant to describe HIV-negative men who have sex with men (MSM) is emerging as a fifth subtype. We retrospectively examined patients with KS at an academic medical center in central Ohio, USA. To our knowledge, this is the first US-based report to describe KS risk factors and outcomes in the context of HIV status. Data were extracted from patient charts including demographic information, history at time of KS diagnosis, and information about KS disease course. HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients were grouped into established categories. HIV-negative patients who did not fit an existing subtype were described as "Unclassified-KS-Type." Demographic characteristics for AIDS-KS patients in our cohort match established trends in this subtype, such as male, MSM, and younger age at diagnosis compared to HIV-negative patients. Most Unclassified-KS-Type patients fit well into the emerging "non-epidemic KS" subtype. These patients are described as healthy, middle-aged, HIV-negative MSM with lower extremity lesions. This descriptive report provides an updated view of KS risk factors and outcomes to improve detection and treatment in dermatology.

Development of a Skin-Directed Scoring System for Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Epidermal Necrolysis: A Delphi Consensus Exercise

Importance

Scoring systems for Stevens-Johnson syndrome and epidermal necrolysis (EN) only estimate patient prognosis and are weighted toward comorbidities and systemic features; morphologic terminology for EN lesions is inconsistent.

Objectives

To establish consensus among expert dermatologists on EN terminology, morphologic progression, and most-affected sites, and to build a framework for developing a skin-directed scoring system for EN.

Evidence Review

A Delphi consensus using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness criteria was initiated with a core group from the Society of Dermatology Hospitalists to establish agreement on the optimal design for an EN cutaneous scoring instrument, terminology, morphologic traits, and sites of involvement.

Findings

In round 1, the 54 participating dermatology hospitalists reached consensus on all 49 statements (30 appropriate, 3 inappropriate, 16 uncertain). In round 2, they agreed on another 15 statements (8 appropriate, 7 uncertain). There was consistent agreement on the need for a skin-specific instrument; on the most-often affected skin sites (head and neck, chest, upper back, ocular mucosa, oral mucosa); and that blanching erythema, dusky erythema, targetoid erythema, vesicles/bullae, desquamation, and erosions comprise the morphologic traits of EN and can be consistently differentiated.

Conclusions and Relevance

This consensus exercise confirmed the need for an EN skin-directed scoring system, nomenclature, and differentiation of specific morphologic traits, and identified the sites most affected. It also established a baseline consensus for a standardized EN instrument with consistent terminology.

Topical Vehicles: A Dermatologist's Perspective

Topical treatment is mainstay for a variety of dermatologic conditions. There are several different types of topical vehicles, and choosing the most appropriate one is an essential part of treatment. Selection can vary depending on factors such as patient preference and anatomical location. Each topical vehicle has unique advantages and disadvantages that are important to consider. This article reviews some of the most common topical vehicles used in dermatology.

SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Vaccination Cutaneous Manifestations for the Inpatient Dermatologist

Purpose of Review

The overall purpose of this review was to characterize and summarize cutaneous eruptions associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as well as COVID-19 vaccination.

Recent Findings

Cutaneous eruptions associated with COVID-19 infection have a reported frequency of 1-20%. Increased COVID-19 disease severity has been associated with morbilliform exanthems, urticaria, retiform purpura, and livedo racemosa. Papulovesicular eruptions were associated with a milder COVID-19 disease course. A range of dermatoses have also been reported with COVID-19 vaccination but have rarely prevented subsequent vaccination.

Summary

Dermatologists should be aware of the associations between COVID-19 disease severity and cutaneous eruptions. Livedo racemosa and retiform purpura are particularly associated with increased disease severity and death. In the setting of COVID-19 vaccination, cutaneous eruptions can largely be managed symptomatically and very rarely do these reactions prevent subsequent vaccination.

An overview of the efficacy of phototherapy in oncodermatology

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous adverse events (AEs) following cancer immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and chemotherapy have been well-documented in the literature. A number of case reports have identified phototherapy, a form of light therapy that mimics sunlight exposure, as a noninvasive treatment modality for these cutaneous toxicities. By inducing local suppression of the immune system, phototherapy is a skin-directed treatment with minimal effect on tumor response. Phototherapy may therefore be a viable treatment option for cutaneous AEs from cancer therapies.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature for patients treated with phototherapy for cutaneous AEs following cancer immunotherapy, targeted therapy, or chemotherapy. We also included three previously unpublished cases from our own institution.

RESULTS

We identified 24 patients (80% male, mean age 67 years, range 49-75 years). Patients received the following phototherapy types: NB-UVB (n = 17), PUVA (n = 6), or PDT (n = 1). A topical steroid was used in conjunction with phototherapy in seven patients. At phototherapy onset, cancer treatment was either continued, temporarily discontinued, or discontinued (n = 9, 6, 7, respectively; in two cases, the cancer treatment course was unknown). Improvement of cutaneous AEs was observed in 96% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Phototherapy resulted in full or partial improvement in all but one patient. A topical steroid was used in nearly a third of patients, suggesting some oncodermatologists co-administer topicals to further boost response. Continuation of cancer therapy in the majority of patients highlights an additional advantage of phototherapy. We believe phototherapy may be an effective adjunctive treatment to topical steroids when treating these cutaneous toxicities.

Perceptions of dermatology and dermatologists by residency program directors of other medical specialties

More data are needed to characterize the perceptions of dermatology by nondermatologist physicians in order to address how current perceptions may be improved. Residency program directors of 21 medical specialties were contacted by e-mail and directed to a survey created with Research Electronic Data Capture software. Data from survey responses were collated and analyzed. A total of 80 residency program directors completed the survey. Physicians who worked more frequently with dermatologists were more likely to describe dermatologists positively. Most physicians believed dermatologists manage skin conditions, but fewer knew that they also manage hair, nail, or mucosal conditions. Cross-specialty collaboration between nondermatologists and dermatologists is associated with positive perceptions of dermatology. Further collaboration could provide the opportunity to educate physicians regarding the conditions treated by dermatologists and how their expertise may benefit patient care.

Cutaneous manifestations of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: An introduction for dermatologists

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is an emerging immunotherapy with promising efficacy for the treatment of previously refractory or relapsed malignancies. As a personalized medicine approach, T cells are genetically engineered to express a receptor designed to bind a specific tumor antigen, leading to selective immune-mediated destruction of tumor cells. Due to the novelty of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, the safety profile continues to evolve with limited information currently available on cutaneous adverse events. Improved understanding of the spectrum of cutaneous adverse events may facilitate earlier recognition and appropriate management of these toxicities. To explore this knowledge gap, we discuss the available case reports and clinical trial results of cutaneous reactions associated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.