Mapping of nucleosome positions

The ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling enzyme Fun30 represses transcription by sliding promoter-proximal nucleosomes

The evolutionarily conserved ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling enzyme Fun30 has recently been shown to play important roles in heterochromatin silencing and DNA repair. However, how Fun30 remodels nucleosomes is not clear. Here we report a nucleosome sliding activity of Fun30 and its role in transcriptional repression. We observed that Fun30 repressed the expression of genes involved in amino acid and carbohydrate metabolism, the stress response, and meiosis. In addition, Fun30 was localized at the 5' and 3' ends of genes and within the open reading frames of its targets. Consistent with its role in gene repression, we observed that Fun30 target genes lacked histone modifications often associated with gene activation and showed an increased level of ubiquitinated histone H2B. Furthermore, a genome-wide nucleosome mapping analysis revealed that the length of the nucleosome-free region at the 5' end of a subset of genes was changed in Fun30-depleted cells. In addition, the positions of the -1, +2, and +3 nucleosomes at the 5' end of target genes were shifted significantly, whereas the position of the +1 nucleosome remained largely unchanged in the fun30Δ mutant. Finally, we demonstrated that affinity-purified, single-component Fun30 exhibited a nucleosome sliding activity in an ATP-dependent manner. These results define a role for Fun30 in the regulation of transcription and indicate that Fun30 remodels chromatin at the 5' end of genes by sliding promoter-proximal nucleosomes.

Characterization of nucleosome positioning in hepadnaviral covalently closed circular DNA minichromosomes

Hepadnaviral covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) exists as an episomal minichromosome in the nucleus of virus-infected hepatocytes, and serves as the transcriptional template for the synthesis of viral mRNAs. To obtain insight on the structure of hepadnaviral cccDNA minichromosomes, we utilized ducks infected with the duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) as a model and determined the in vivo nucleosome distribution pattern on viral cccDNA by the micrococcal nuclease (MNase) mapping and genome-wide PCR amplification of isolated mononucleosomal DHBV DNA. Several nucleosome-protected sites in a region of the DHBV genome [nucleotides (nt) 2000 to 2700], known to harbor various cis transcription regulatory elements, were consistently identified in all DHBV-positive liver samples. In addition, we observed other nucleosome protection sites in DHBV minichromosomes that may vary among individual ducks, but the pattern of MNase mapping in those regions is transmittable from the adult ducks to the newly infected ducklings. These results imply that the nucleosomes along viral cccDNA in the minichromosomes are not random but sequence-specifically positioned. Furthermore, we showed in ducklings that a significant portion of cccDNA possesses a few negative superhelical turns, suggesting the presence of intermediates of viral minichromosomes assembled in the liver, where dynamic hepatocyte growth and cccDNA formation occur. This study supplies the initial framework for the understanding of the overall complete structure of hepadnaviral cccDNA minichromosomes.

Ubiquitination of histone H2B regulates chromatin dynamics by enhancing nucleosome stability

The mechanism by which ubiquitination of histone H2B (H2Bub1) regulates H3-K4 and -K79 methylation and the histone H2A-H2B chaperone Spt16-mediated nucleosome dynamics during transcription is not fully understood. Upon investigating the effect of H2Bub1 on chromatin structure, we find that contrary to the supposed role for H2Bub1 in opening up chromatin, it is important for nucleosome stability. First, we show that H2Bub1 does not function as a "wedge" to non-specifically unfold chromatin, as replacement of ubiquitin with a bulkier SUMO molecule conjugated to the C-terminal helix of H2B cannot functionally support H3-K4 and -K79 methylation. Second, using a series of biochemical analyses, we demonstrate that nucleosome stability is reduced or enhanced, when the levels of H2Bub1 are abolished or increased, respectively. Besides transcription elongation, we show that H2Bub1 regulates initiation by stabilizing nucleosomes positioned over the promoters of repressed genes. Collectively, our study reveals an intrinsic difference in the property of chromatin assembled in the presence or absence of H2Bub1 and implicates the regulation of nucleosome stability as the mechanism by which H2Bub1 modulates nucleosome dynamics and histone methylation during transcription.

Lux ex tenebris: nucleotide resolution DNA repair and nucleosome mapping

In recent years a great deal of progress has been made in understanding how the various DNA repair mechanisms function when DNA is assembled into chromatin. In the case of nucleotide excision repair, a core group of DNA repair proteins is required in vitro to observe DNA repair activity in damaged DNA devoid of chromatin structure. This group of proteins is not sufficient to promote repair in the same DNA when assembled into nucleosomes; the first level of chromatin compaction. Clearly other factors are required for efficient DNA repair of chromatin. For some time chromatin has been considered a barrier to be overcome, and inhibitory to DNA metabolic processes including DNA repair. However, an emerging picture suggests a fascinating link at the interface of chromatin metabolism and DNA repair. In this view these two fundamental processes are mechanistically intertwined and function in concert to bring about regulated DNA repair throughout the genome. Light from the darkness has come as a result of many elegant studies performed by a number of research groups. Here we describe two techniques developed in our laboratories which we hope have contributed to our understanding in this arena.

Histone acetylation, chromatin remodelling, transcription and nucleotide excision repair in S. cerevisiae: studies with two model genes

We describe the technology and two model systems in yeast designed to study nucleotide excision repair (NER) in relation to transcription and chromatin modifications. We employed the MFA2 and MET16 genes as models. How transcription-coupled (TCR) and global genome repair (GGR) operate at the transcriptionally active and/or repressed S. cerevisiae MFA2 locus, and how this relates to nucleosome positioning are considered. We discuss the role of the Gcn5p histone acetyltransferase, also associated with MFA2's transcriptional activation, in facilitating efficient NER at the transcriptionally active and inactive genes. The effect of Gcn5p's absence in reducing NER was local and UV stimulates Gcn5p-mediated histone acetylation at the repressed MFA2 promoter. After UV irradiation Swi2p is partly responsible for facilitating access to restriction of DNA in the cores of the nucleosomes at the MFA2 promoter. The data suggest similarities between chromatin remodelling for NER and transcription, yet differences must exist to ensure this gene remains repressed in alpha cells during NER. For MET16, we consider experiments examining chromatin structure, transcription and repair in wild type and cbf1Delta cells under repressing or derepressing conditions. Cbf1p is a sequence specific DNA binding protein required for MET16 chromatin remodelling and transcription.

Rad4-Rad23 interaction with SWI/SNF links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with nucleotide excision repair

Chromatin rearrangement occurs during nucleotide excision repair (NER). Here we show that Snf6 and Snf5, two subunits of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, copurify with the NER damage-recognition heterodimer Rad4-Rad23. This interaction between SWI/SNF and Rad4-Rad23 is stimulated by UV irradiation. We demonstrate that NER in the transcriptionally silent, nucleosome-loaded HML locus is reduced in yeast cells lacking functional SWI/SNF. In addition, using a restriction enzyme accessibility assay, we observed UV-induced nucleosome rearrangement at the silent HML locus. Notably, this rearrangement is markedly attenuated when SWI/SNF is inactivated. These results indicate that the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex is recruited to DNA lesions by damage-recognition proteins to increase DNA accessibility for NER in chromatin.

Footprinting of mammalian promoters: use of a CpG DNA methyltransferase revealing nucleosome positions at a single molecule level

Promoters are molecular ‘modules’, which are controlled as individual entities yet are often analyzed by nuclease digestion methodologies which, a priori, destroy this modularity. About 40% of mammalian genes contain CpG islands in their promoters and exonic regions, which are normally unmethylated. We developed a footprinting strategy to map the chromatin structure at unmethylated CpG islands by treatment of isolated nuclei with the CpG-specific DNA methyltransferase SssI (M.SssI), followed by genomic bisulfite sequencing of individual progeny DNA molecules. This gave single molecule resolution over the promoter region and allowed for the physical linkage between binding sites on individual promoter molecules to be maintained. Comparison of the p16 promoters in two human cell lines, J82 and LD419, expressing the p16 gene at 25-fold different levels showed that the two cell lines contain remarkably different, heterogeneously positioned nucleosomes over the promoter region, which were not distinguishable by standard methods using nucleases. Our high resolution approach gives a ‘digitized’ visualization of each promoter providing information regarding nucleosome occupancy and may be utilized to define transcription factor binding and chromatin remodeling.

RNA polymerase I transcription factors in active yeast rRNA gene promoters enhance UV damage formation and inhibit repair

UV photofootprinting and repair of pyrimidine dimers by photolyase was used to investigate chromatin structure, protein-DNA interactions, and DNA repair in the spacer and promoter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae rRNA genes. Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains about 150 copies of rRNA genes separated by nontranscribed spacers. Under exponential growth conditions about half of the genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase I (RNAP-I). Initiation of transcription requires the assembly of the upstream activating factor (UAF), the core factor (CF), TATA binding protein, and RNAP-I with Rrn3p on the upstream element and core promoter. We show that UV irradiation of wild-type cells and transcription factor mutants generates photofootprints in the promoter elements. The core footprint depends on UAF, while the UAF footprint was also detected in absence of the CFs. Fractionation of active and inactive promoters showed the core footprint mainly in the active fraction and similar UAF footprints in both fractions. DNA repair by photolyase was strongly inhibited in active promoters but efficient in inactive promoters. The data suggest that UAF is present in vivo in active and inactive promoters and that recruitment of CF and RNAP-I to active promoters generates a stable complex which inhibits repair.

Kinetochores prevent repair of UV damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromeres

Centromeres form specialized chromatin structures termed kinetochores which are required for accurate segregation of chromosomes. DNA lesions might disrupt protein-DNA interactions, thereby compromising segregation and genome stability. We show that yeast centromeres are heavily resistant to removal of UV-induced DNA lesions by two different repair systems, photolyase and nucleotide excision repair. Repair resistance persists in G(1)- and G(2)/M-arrested cells. Efficient repair was obtained only by disruption of the kinetochore structure in a ndc10-1 mutant, but not in cse4-1 and cbf1 Delta mutants. Moreover, UV photofootprinting and DNA repair footprinting showed that centromere proteins cover about 120 bp of the centromere elements CDEII and CDEIII, including 20 bp of flanking CDEIII. Thus, DNA lesions do not appear to disrupt protein-DNA interactions in the centromere. Maintaining a stable kinetochore structure seems to be more important for the cell than immediate removal of DNA lesions. It is conceivable that centromeres are repaired by postreplication repair pathways.

Nucleosome position-dependent and -independent activation of HIS7 epression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by different transcriptional activators

ARO4 and HIS7 are two tandemly orientated genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that are transcribed into the same direction. The ARO4 terminator and the HIS7 promoter regions are sensitive to Micrococcus nuclease (Mnase) and separated by a positioned nucleosome. The HIS7 promoter is target for the transcription factors Gcn4p and Bas1p/Bas2p that activate its transcription upon amino acid starvation and purine limitation, respectively. Activation of the HIS7 gene by Gcn4p overexpression but not by Bas1p/Bas2p releases an ordered nucleosome distribution to yield increased Mnase sensitivity throughout the intergenic region. This remodeling is SNF2 dependent but mostly GCN5 independent. Accordingly, SNF2 is necessary for the Gcn4p-mediated transcriptional activation of the HIS7 gene. GCN5 is required for activation upon adenine limitation by Bas1p/Bas2p. Our data suggest that activation of HIS7 transcription by Gcn4p and Bas1p/Bas2p is supported by a nucleosome position-dependent and -independent mechanism, respectively. Whereas Gcn4p activation causes Swi/Snf-mediated remodeling of the nucleosomal architecture at the HIS7 promoter, the Bas1p/Bas2p complex presumably activates in combination with Gcn5p-dependent histone acetylation.

A Nucleosome-Free dG-dC-Rich Sequence Element Promotes Constitutive Transcription of the Essential Yeast RIO1 Gene

RIO1 is an essential gene that encodes a protein serine kinase and is transcribed constitutively at a very low level. Transcriptional activation of RIO1 dispenses with a canonical TATA box as well as with classical transactivators or specific DNA-binding factors. Instead, a dG-dC-rich sequence element, that is located 40 to 48 bp upstream the single site of mRNA initiation, is essential and presumably constitutes the basal promoter. In addition, we demonstrate here that this promoter element comprises a nucleosomefree gap which is centered at the dG-dC tract and flanked by two positioned nucleosomes. This element is both, necessary and sufficient, for basal transcription initiation at the RIO1 promoter and, thus, constitutes a novel type of core promoter element.

Repair of UV lesions in silenced chromatin provides in vivo evidence for a compact chromatin structure

Genes positioned close to telomeres in yeast are silenced by a heterochromatin-like structure containing Sir proteins. To investigate whether silencing also affects DNA repair, we studied removal of UV lesions by photolyase and nucleotide excision repair (NER) in strains containing the URA3 gene inserted 2 kilobases from a telomere. URA3 was transcriptionally active in sir3delta mutants, partially silenced in SIR3 cells, or completely silenced by overexpression of SIR3 or deletion of RPD3. The active URA3 showed efficient repair by both pathways. Fast repair of the promoter and 3' end by photolyase reflected a non-nucleosomal structure. Partial silencing had no remarkable effect on photolyase but reduced repair by NER, indicating differential accessibility for the two repair reactions. Complete silencing inhibits NER and photolyase in the coding region as well as in the promoter and the 3'-end. Conventional nuclease footprinting analyses revealed subtle changes in the promoter proximal nucleosome under partially silenced conditions but a pronounced reorganization of chromatin extending over the whole gene in silenced chromatin. Thus, both repair systems are sensitive to chromatin changes associated with silencing and provide direct evidence for a compact structure of heterochromatin.

Reb1p-dependent DNA bending effects nucleosome positioning and constitutive transcription at the yeast profilin promoter

The molecular basis of constitutive gene activation is largely unknown. The yeast profilin gene (PFY1), encoding a housekeeping component of the actin cytoskeleton, is constitutively transcribed at a moderate level. The PFY1 promoter dispenses with classical transactivators and a consensus TATA box; however, it contains a canonic site for the abundant multifunctional nuclear factor rDNA enhancer-binding protein (Reb1p) combined with a dA.dT element. Reb1p binds specifically in vitro. Mutation of this site reduces PFY1 expression to about 35%. A nucleosome-free gap of about 190 bp is centered at the genomic Reb1p binding site in vivo and spans the presumptive core promoter and transcriptional initiation sites. Nucleosomes at the border of the gap are positioned. Mutation of the Reb1p motif in the genomic PFY1 promoter abolishes nucleosome positioning, fills the gap with a non-positioned nucleosome, and reduces transcription by a factor of 3. From permutation studies we conclude that Reb1p induces a strong bend into the DNA. Phasing analyses indicate that it is directed toward the major groove. The data suggest that Reb1p plays an architectural role on DNA and that Reb1p-dependent DNA bending leads to a DNA conformation that is incompatible with packaging into nucleosomes and concomitantly facilitates constitutive transcription. In the absence of other transcription activators, Reb1p excludes nucleosomes and moderately stimulates transcription by distorting DNA.

Permanent nucleosome exclusion from the Gal4p-inducible yeast GCY1 promoter

The promoter of the galactose-inducible yeast GCY1 gene allows high rates of basal transcription and is kept free of nucleosomes regardless of growth conditions. The general regulatory factor, Reb1p, as well as the nucleotide sequence of a single Gal4p-binding site, structurally cooperate to exclude nucleosomes from about 480 bp of DNA that spans the UAS(GAL), the Reb1p-binding site, the TATA-box, and the transcriptional initiation sites. Gal4p, which induces transcription of GCY1 about 25-fold in the presence of galactose, is not required for the alteration in chromatin configuration in the promoter upstream region since the hypersensitive site is unchanged when Gal4p is inactive or absent. As soon as either the Reb1p-binding site or the UAS(GAL) or both are mutated, nucleosomes slip into the promoter of GCY1 paralleled by a reduction of basal transcription activity to about 30% in either single mutant and to <10% in the double mutant. In the mutant of the Reb1p-binding site, induction by galactose/Gal4p restores a nucleosome-free state to an extent resembling the GCY1 wild-type promoter, showing that, in principle, activated Gal4p can exclude nucleosomes on its own. Northern blots of GCY1 transcripts confirm that Reb1p modulates basal transcription and has little influence on the galactose-induced state.

Transcription initiation in vivo without classical transactivators: DNA kinks flanking the core promoter of the housekeeping yeast adenylate kinase gene, AKY2, position nucleosomes and constitutively activate transcription

The housekeeping gene of the major adenylate kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (AKY2, ADK1) is constitutively transcribed at a moderate level. The promoter has been dissected in order to define elements that effect constitutive transcription. Initiation of mRNA synthesis at the AKY2 promoter is shown to be mediated by a non-canonic core promoter, (TA)(6). Nucleotide sequences 5' of this element only marginally affect transcription suggesting that promoter activation can dispense with transactivators and essentially involves basal transcription. We show that the core promoter of AKY2 is constitutively kept free of nucleosomes. Analyses of permutated AKY2 promoter DNA revealed the presence of bent DNA. DNA structure analysis by computer and by mutation identified two kinks flanking an interstitial stretch of 65 bp of moderately bent core promoter DNA. Kinked DNA is likely incompatible with packaging into nucleosomes and responsible for positioning nucleosomes at the flanks allowing unimpeded access of the basal transcription machinery to the core promoter. The data show that in yeast, constitutive gene expression can dispense with classical transcriptional activator proteins, if two prerequisites are met: (i) the core promoter is kept free of nucleosomes; this can be due to structural properties of the DNA as an alternative to chromatin remodeling factors; and (ii) the core promoter is pre-bent to allow a high rate of basal transcription initiation.

Multiple factors prevent transcriptional interference at the yeast ARO4-HIS7 locus

Increased transcriptional activity may cause transcriptional interference in organisms with compact genomes such as the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Replacement of the yeast ARO4 promoter by the stronger ACT1 promoter increases ARO4 transcription and simultaneously reduces the basal transcription of the downstream HIS7 gene. The open reading frames of ARO4 and HIS7 are tandemly transcribed and are separated by 416 bp. In wild-type cells, a nuclease-resistant site suggests that the two genes are separated by a single positioned nucleosome. Transcriptional interference correlates with Micrococcus nuclease accessibility of this otherwise nuclease-resistant site. Deletion analyses of the region between the two open reading frames revealed that transcriptional interference increases upon removal of either parts of the ARO4 3' end or HIS7 promoter sequences. The abolishment of the Abf1p-binding site within the HIS7 promoter significantly enhances transcriptional interference, resulting in a histidine auxotrophic strain. Our data suggest that the yeast cell prevents transcriptional interference by the combined action of efficient ARO4 transcription termination, the positioning of a fixed nucleosome, and transcription factor binding to the HIS7 promoter.

Transcriptional state and chromatin structure of the murine entactin and laminin gamma1 genes

The positions of nucleosomes in the proximal 5' regions of the coordinately regulated murine entactin/nidogen and laminin gamma1 genes have been identified in four different transcriptional states--constitutively off, basal, induced, and constitutively induced. In the entactin gene a 450 base pair (bp) region of open chromatin is present between three positioned nucleosomes and the transcriptional start site in the basal, induced, and constitutively induced states. Additionally there is a 200 bp open chromatin region at approximately -2.1 kbp that is only present in the induced and constitutively induced states. In the laminin gamma1 gene, a 650 bp region of nucleosome-free chromatin is present between nucleosomes positioned at approximately -750 and +120 in all transcriptionally active states. These results suggest that basal co-expression of these genes requires sites present in these near upstream regions. The induction to high levels appears to involve additional sites and possibly the production of new and/or the modification of existing trans-acting factors.

The mapping of nucleosomes and regulatory protein binding sites at the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MFA2 gene: a high resolution approach

We have developed an end-labelling approach to map the positions of nucleosomes and protein binding sites at nucleotide resolution by footprinting micrococcal nuclease (MNase)-sensitive sites. Using this approach we determined that the MFA2 gene and its upstream control regions have four positioned nucleosomes when transcription is repressed in mating type alpha cells and that the nucleosomes lose their positioning when the gene became transcriptionally active in mating type a cells. We also detected MNase-hypersensitive sites in the alpha2 operator region of MFA2 in alpha cells but not in a cells. These probably result from the change in the local DNA conformation due to protein(s) binding in this region that governs MFA2 transcription.

Upstream nucleosomes and Rgr1p are required for nucleosomal repression of transcription

The mechanisms of transcription repression and derepression in vivo are not fully understood. We have obtained evidence that begins to clarify the minimum requirements for counteracting nucleosomal repression in vivo. Location of the TATA element near the nucleosome dyad does not block RNA polymerase II transcription in vivo if there is a nucleosome-free region located immediately upstream. However, location of the TATA element similarly within the nucleosome does block transcription if the region upstream of it is nucleosome bound. Histone H4 depletion derepresses transcription in the latter case, supporting the idea that the nucleosomes are responsible for the repression. These results raise the intriguing possibility that the minimum requirement for derepression of transcription in vivo is a nucleosome-free region upstream of the core promoter. Importantly, we find that a C-terminal deletion in RGR1, a component of the mediator/holoenzyme complex and a global repressor, can also derepress transcription.