Circadian rhythm generation, expression and entrainment in a molluscan model system

Understanding the significance of biological clock and its impact on cancer incidence

The circadian clock is an essential timekeeper that controls, for humans, the daily rhythm of biochemical, physiological, and behavioral functions. Irregular performance or disruption in circadian rhythms results in various diseases, including cancer. As a factor in cancer development, perturbations in circadian rhythms can affect circadian homeostasis in energy balance, lead to alterations in the cell cycle, and cause dysregulation of chromatin remodeling. However, knowledge gaps remain in our understanding of the relationship between the circadian clock and cancer. Therefore, a mechanistic understanding by which circadian disruption enhances cancer risk is needed. This review article outlines the importance of the circadian clock in tumorigenesis and summarizes underlying mechanisms in the clock and its carcinogenic mechanisms, highlighting advances in chronotherapy for cancer treatment.

Fast delayed rectifier potassium current: critical for input and output of the circadian system

The ability to generate intrinsic circadian rhythms in electrical activity appears to be a key property of central pacemaker neurons and one essential to the function of the circadian timing system. Previous work has demonstrated that suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) neurons express the fast delayed rectifier (FDR) potassium current and raise questions about the function of this current. Here, we report that mice lacking both Kcnc1 and Kcnc2 genes [double knock-out (dKO)] fail to express the Kv3.1 and 3.2 channels in the SCN as well as exhibit a greatly reduced FDR current. SCN neurons from these dKO mice exhibit reduced spontaneous activity during the day as well as reduced NMDA-evoked excitatory responses during the night. Interestingly, the daily rhythm in PER2 expression in the SCN was not altered in the dKO mice, although the photic induction of c-Fos was attenuated. Behaviorally, the dKO mice exhibited extremely disrupted daily rhythms in wheel-running behavior. In a light/dark cycle, some of the dKO mice were arrhythmic, whereas others expressed a diurnal rhythm with low amplitude and significant activity during the day. When placed in constant darkness, the dKO mice exhibited low-amplitude, fragmented rhythms and attenuated light responses. Together, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that the FDR current is critical for the generation of robust circadian rhythms in behavior as well as the synchronization of the circadian system to the photic environment.

Calcium response to retinohypothalamic tract synaptic transmission in suprachiasmatic nucleus neurons

Glutamate released from retinohypothalamic tract (RHT) synapses with suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) neurons induces phase changes in the circadian clock presumably by using Ca2+ as a second messenger. We used electrophysiological and Ca2+ imaging techniques to simultaneously record changes in the membrane potential and intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) in SCN neurons after stimulation of the RHT at physiologically relevant frequencies. Stimulation of the RHT sufficient to generate an EPSP did not produce detectable changes in [Ca2+]i, whereas EPSP-induced action potentials evoked an increase in [Ca2+]i, suggesting that the change in postsynaptic somatic [Ca2+]i produced by synaptically activated glutamate receptors was the result of membrane depolarization activating voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels. The magnitude of the Ca2+ response was dependent on the RHT stimulation frequency and duration, and on the SCN neuron action potential frequency. Membrane depolarization-induced changes in [Ca2+]i were larger and decayed more quickly in the dendrites than in the soma and were attenuated by nimodipine, suggesting a compartmentalization of Ca2+ signaling and a contribution of L-type Ca2+ channels. RHT stimulation at frequencies that mimicked the output of light-sensitive retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) evoked [Ca2+]i transients in SCN neurons via membrane depolarization and activation of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels. These data suggest that for Ca2+ to induce phase advances or delays, light-induced signaling from RGCs must augment the underlying oscillatory somatic [Ca2+]i by evoking postsynaptic action potentials in SCN neurons during a period of slow spontaneous firing such as occurs during nighttime.

Neurons and networks in daily rhythms

Biological pacemakers dictate our daily schedules in physiology and behaviour. The molecules, cells and networks that underlie these circadian rhythms can now be monitored using long-term cellular imaging and electrophysiological tools, and initial studies have already suggested a theme--circadian clocks may be crucial for widespread changes in brain activity and plasticity. These daily changes can modify the amount or activity of available genes, transcripts, proteins, ions and other biologically active molecules, ultimately determining cellular properties such as excitability and connectivity. Recently discovered circadian molecules and cells provide preliminary insights into a network that adapts to predictable daily and seasonal changes while remaining robust in the face of other perturbations.

Neural circuits underlying circadian behavior in Drosophila melanogaster

Circadian clocks include control systems for organizing daily behavior. Such a system consists of a time-keeping mechanism (the clock or pacemaker), input pathways for entraining the clock, and output pathways for producing overt rhythms in behavior and physiology. In Drosophila melanogaster, as in mammals, neural circuits play vital roles in all three functional subdivisions of the circadian system. Regarding the pacemaker, multiple clock neurons, each with cell-autonomous pacemaker capability, are coupled to each other in a network. The outputs of different sets of clock neurons in this network combine to produce the normal bimodal pattern of locomotor activity observed in Drosophila. Regarding input, multiple sensory modalities (including light, temperature, and pheromones) use their own circuitry to entrain the clock. Regarding output, distinct circuits are likely involved for controlling the timing of eclosion and for generating the locomotor activity rhythms. This review summarizes work on all of these circadian circuits, and discusses the broader utility of studying the fly's circadian system.

Zebrafish circadian clocks: cells that see light

In the classical view of circadian clock organization, the daily rhythms of most organisms were thought to be regulated by a central, ‘master’ pacemaker, usually located within neural structures of the animal. However, with the results of experiments performed in zebrafish, mammalian cell lines and, more recently, mammalian tissues, this view has changed to one where clock organization is now seen as being highly decentralized. It is clear that clocks exist in the peripheral tissues of animals as diverse as Drosophila, zebrafish and mammals. In the case of Drosophila and zebrafish, these tissues are also directly light-responsive. This light sensitivity and direct clock entrainability is also true for zebrafish cell lines and early-stage embryos. Using luminescent reporter cell lines containing clock gene promoters driving the expression of luciferase and single-cell imaging techniques, we have been able to show how each cell responds rapidly to a single light pulse by being shifted to a common phase, equivalent to the early day. This direct light sensitivity might be related to the requirement for light in these cells to activate the transcription of genes involved in DNA repair. It is also clear that the circadian clock in zebrafish regulates the timing of the cell cycle, demonstrating the wide impact that this light sensitivity and daily rhythmicity has on the biology of zebrafish.

Flies and fish: birds of a feather

The identification of specific clock-containing structures has been a major endeavour of the circadian field for many years. This has lead to the identification of many key components of the circadian system, including the suprachiasmatic nucleus in mammals, and the eyes and pineal glands in lower vertebrates. However, the idea that these structures represent the only clocks in animals has been challenged by the discovery of peripheral pacemakers in most organs and tissues, and even a number of cell lines. In Drosophila, and vertebrates such as the zebrafish, these peripheral clocks appear to be highly autonomous, being set directly by the environmental light/dark cycle. However, a hierarchy of clocks may still exist in mammals. In this review, we examine some of the current views regarding peripheral clocks, their organization and how they are entrained.

Role of membrane conductances and protein synthesis in subjective day phase advances of the hamster circadian clock by neuropeptide Y

Neurons of the mammalian circadian pacemaker in the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nuclei exhibit a rhythm in firing rate that can be reset by neuropeptide Y. We recorded the effects of neuropeptide Y on Na+ and K+ conductances of hamster suprachiasmatic nuclei neurons using whole-cell, perforated-patch and cell-attached patch-clamp recordings, both in dissociated and brain slice preparations. While neuropeptide Y had no effect on voltage-gated Na+ currents, neuropeptide Y activated a leak K+ current. Neuropeptide Y phase advances in the suprachiasmatic nuclei brain slice preparation were blocked by a number of K+ channel blockers (tetraethylammonium chloride, dendrotoxin-I, glybenclamide). However, a K+ ionophore, valinomycin, did not shift the rhythm. The inhibition by tetraethylammonium chloride did not persist in the presence of glutamatergic receptor blockers. We have previously shown that glutamate can oppose neuropeptide Y phase-shifting actions, suggesting that K+ channel inhibition acts by inducing glutamate release. Protein synthesis inhibitors had no effect on clock phase when applied during the subjective day, and had no influence on neuropeptide Y-induced phase shifts. On the other hand, glutamate's ability to inhibit neuropeptide Y shifts was abolished by protein synthesis inhibition. Thus, while neuropeptide Y phase shifts do not require protein synthesis, glutamate blocks neuropeptide Y shifts via increased gene expression during the subjective day, at a time when it does not reset the clock. These results indicate that neuropeptide Y phase shifts via a mechanism that does not involve changes in membrane conductance or protein synthesis.

The DBP gene is expressed according to a circadian rhythm in the suprachiasmatic nucleus and influences circadian behavior

DBP, a PAR leucine zipper transcription factor, accumulates according to a robust circadian rhythm in liver and several other tissues of mouse and rat. Here we report that DBP mRNA levels also oscillate strongly in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus, believed to harbor the central mammalian pacemaker. However, peak and minimum levels of DBP mRNA are reached about 4 h earlier in the SCN than in liver, suggesting that circadian DBP expression is controlled by different mechanisms in SCN and in peripheral tissues. Mice homozygous for a DBP-null allele display less locomotor activity and free-run with a shorter period than otherwise isogenic wild-type animals. The altered locomotor activity in DBP mutant mice and the highly rhythmic expression of the DBP gene in SCN neurons suggest that DBP is involved in controlling circadian behavior. However, since DBP-/- mice are still rhythmic and since DBP protein is not required for the circadian expression of its own gene, dbp is more likely to be a component of the circadian output pathway than a master gene of the clock.