Age as a prognostic factor for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy

Age 70 +/- 5 Years and Cancer-Specific Outcomes After Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review

A secondary analysis of 2 randomized Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trials demonstrated that age ≥70 years was a favorable prognostic factor among men treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). In contrast, several series based on men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) suggested that older age was an unfavorable prognostic factor. Our study was initiated to determine whether these observations reflect a true but paradoxical underlying age-related treatment-dependent biological phenomenon. We conducted a systematic review (PubMed, January 1, 1999-January 30, 2023) evaluating the effect of age on cancer-specific outcomes after definitive local treatment with either RP or EBRT. Our main objective was to assess possible interactions between age (using a cutoff of 70 +/- 5 years) and treatment type, with regard to adverse cancer-specific outcomes (eg, pathology, biochemical failure, distant metastasis, or prostate cancer-specific survival). Forty-five studies were selected for inclusion in this systematic review, including 30 and 15 studies with patients treated with RP and EBRT, respectively. Among patients treated with RP, 10 (50%) of these studies suggested that older age was associated with worse outcome(s) after RP. None suggested that age was a favorable prognostic factor after RP. Among the EBRT-based studies, 8 (53%) suggested that older age was associated with better outcomes, with an additional 3 studies (21%) trending to support a better outcome. None of these studies involving EBRT suggested that older age was an adverse prognostic factor. This systematic review suggests that age using a categorical cutoff of 70 +/- 5 years may be an adverse prognostic factor for men undergoing RP but a favorable prognostic factor for men treated with EBRT. Further research is needed to validate these findings.

Short-term prognosis of low-risk prostate cancer patients is favorable despite the presence of pathological prognostic factors: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer patients with pathological prognostic factors have a poor prognosis, but it is unclear whether pathological prognostic factors are associated with prognosis limited to low-risk patients with good prognosis according to NCCN guidelines. The present study examined whether prognosis is influenced by pathological prognostic factors using radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens from low-risk patients.

METHODS

We evaluated diagnostic accuracy by examining biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival with respect to clinical and pathological prognostic factors in 419 all-risk patients who underwent RP. Clinical prognostic factors included age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, PSA density, and risk stratification, while pathological prognostic factors included grade group, lymphovascular space invasion, extraprostatic extension, surgical margins, seminal vesicle invasion, intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDCP), and pT. In a subsequent analysis restricted to 104 low-risk patients, survival curves were estimated for pathological prognostic factors using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank and generalized Wilcoxon tests.

RESULTS

In the overall risk analysis, the presence of pathological prognostic factors significantly shortened BCR-free survival (p < 0.05). Univariable analysis revealed that PSA density, risk categories, and pathological prognostic factors were significantly associated with BCR-free survival, although age and PSA were not. In multivariable analysis, age, risk categories, grade group, IDCP, and pT significantly predicted BCR-free survival (p < 0.05). Conversely, no statistically significant differences were found for any pathological prognostic factors in low-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In low-risk patients, pathological prognostic factors did not affect BCR-free survival, which suggests that additional treatment may be unnecessary even if pathological prognostic factors are observed in low-risk patients with RP.

Impact of age on treatment response in men with prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy

Objective

To analyse the effect of age at diagnosis on clinical outcomes of localized prostate cancer (PCa) treated with radiation therapy.

Subjects and methods

We identified 12 784 patients with intermediate‐ or high‐risk localized PCa treated with radiation therapy (RT) and neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) between 2000 and 2015 from nationwide Veterans Affairs data. Patients were grouped into three age categories (≤59, 60–69, and ≥70 years old). Outcomes included immediate PSA response (3‐month post‐RT PSA and 2‐year PSA nadir, grouped into <0.10 ng/ml, 0.10–0.49 ng/ml, and ≥0.50 ng/ml), biochemical recurrence, and PCa‐specific mortality. Multivariable regression models included ordinal logistic regression for short‐term PSA outcomes, Cox regression for biochemical recurrence, and Fine‐Gray competing risks regression for PCa‐specific mortality.

Results

A total of 2136 patients (17%) were ≤59 years old at diagnosis, 6107 (48%) were 60–69 years old, and 4541 (36%) were ≥70 years old. Median follow‐up was 6.3 years. Younger age was associated with greater odds of higher 3‐month PSA group (≤59 vs. ≥70: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.90, 95% CI 1.64–2.20; p < 0.001) and higher 2‐year PSA nadir group (≤59 vs. ≥70: aOR 1.89, 95% CI 1.62–2.19, p < 0.001). Younger age was associated with greater risk of biochemical recurrence (≤59 vs. ≥70: adjusted hazard ratio 1.45, 95% CI 1.26–1.67, p < 0.001) but not PCa‐specific mortality (p = 0.16).

Conclusion

In a large nationwide sample of US veterans treated with ADT and RT for localized PCa, younger age was associated with inferior short‐term PSA response and higher risk of biochemical recurrence.

Clinical utility of (18)F-fluorocholine positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in biochemical relapse of prostate cancer after radical treatment: results of a multicentre study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate (18)F-fluorocholine positron-emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in restaging patients with a history of prostate adenocarcinoma who have biochemical relapse after early radical treatment, and to correlate the technique's disease detection rate with a set of variables and clinical and pathological parameters.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective multicentre study that included 374 patients referred for choline-PET/CT who had biochemical relapse. In all, 233 patients who met the following inclusion criteria were analysed: diagnosis of prostate cancer; early radical treatment; biochemical relapse; main clinical and pathological variables; and clinical, pathological and imaging data needed to validate the results. Criteria used to validate the PET/CT: findings from other imaging techniques, clinical follow-up, treatment response and histological analysis. Different statistical tests were used depending on the distribution of the data to correlate the results of the choline-PET/CT with qualitative [T stage, N stage, early radical prostatectomy (RP) vs other treatments, hormone therapy concomitant to choline-PET/CT] and quantitative [age, Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels at diagnosis, PSA nadir, PSA level on the day of the choline-PET/CT (Trigger PSA) and PSA doubling time (PSADT)] variables. We analysed whether there were independent predictive factors associated with positive PET/CT results.

RESULTS

Choline-PET/CT was positive in 111 of 233 patients (detection rate 47.6%) and negative in 122 (52.4%). Disease locations: prostate or prostate bed in 26 patients (23.4%); regional and/or distant lymph nodes in 52 (46.8%); and metastatic bone disease in 33 (29.7%). Positive findings were validated by: results from other imaging techniques in 35 patients (15.0%); at least 6 months of clinical follow-up in 136 (58.4%); treatment response in 24 (10.3%); histological analysis of lesions in 17 (7.3%); and follow-up plus imaging results in 21 (9.0%). The statistical analysis of qualitative variables, corresponding to patients' clinical characteristics, and the positive/negative final PET/CT results revealed that only whether or not early treatment with RP was done was statistically significant (P < 0.001), with the number of positive results higher in patients who did not undergo a RP. Among the quantitative variables, Gleason score, Trigger PSA and PSADT clearly differentiated the two patient groups (positive and negative choline-PET/CT: P = 0.010, P = 0.001 and P = 0.025, respectively). A Gleason score of <5 or ≥ 8 clearly differentiated positive from negative PET. Trigger PSA: mean of 8 ng/mL for positive PET/CT vs 2.8 ng/mL for negative PET/CT; PSADT: mean of 8 months for positive vs 12.6 months for negative. The optimal threshold values were: 3 ng/mL for Trigger PSA level and 6 months for PSADT (Youden index/receiver operating characteristic curve). Analysing these two variables together showed that PSADT was more conclusive in patients with lower Trigger PSA levels. Analysing variables by location showed that only PSADT was able to differentiate between those with disease confined to the prostate compared with the other two locations (lymph nodes and bone), with shorter PSADT in these two, which was statistically significant (P < 0.002). In the patient group with a PSA level of <1.5 ng/mL, 30.8% had the disease, 7% of whom had metastatic bone disease. In the multivariate logistic regression, the risks factors that were clearly independent for those with positive PET/CT were: PSA level of >3 ng/mL, no early RP, and Gleason score of ≥ 8.

CONCLUSION

Our results support the usefulness of (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT in biochemical relapse of prostate cancer after radical treatment, with an overall disease detection rate close to 50%, and it can be recommended as first-line treatment. As mentioned above, besides Trigger PSA levels, there are other clinical and pathological variables that need to be considered so as to screen patients properly and thus minimise the number of nodular lesions and increase the diagnostic accuracy of the examination.

ERG expression is associated with increased risk of biochemical relapse following radical prostatectomy in early onset prostate cancer

PURPOSE

ERG expression has been proposed to signify molecular subtype of PCA. However, its significance in early onset prostate cancer (PCA) is not characterized.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

ERG protein expression was investigated in a cohort of 121 men diagnosed with localized PCA at <50 years of age with a mean follow-up time of 65.7 months. ERG was correlated to patients' outcome and clinical-pathological parameters using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

ERG expression was detected in 76/118 (64.4 %) analyzable patients' samples and showed interfocal heterogeneity (differences between foci) in 17/118 (14.4 %) patients. There was significant association between ERG expression and Gleason score (p = 0.022), but not with any other clinical-pathologic parameter, including pre-surgical PSA levels, tumor volume, pathological stage, surgical margin or lymph-vascular invasion. ERG had significant effect on the rate of biochemical relapse following radical prostatectomy, with ERG positive patients showing higher relapse rates vs. ERG negative patients (p = 0.007). However, considering time till biochemical relapse post-radical prostatectomy, ERG expression showed positive insignificant trends (p = 0.071). Notably, and of great significance, in this cohort of early onset disease, none of the ERG negative PCA patients exhibited biochemical relapse.

CONCLUSION

The study results suggest that ERG expression may be of added prognostic value in localized prostate cancer in patients with early onset PCA. However, the issue of ERG interfocal heterogeneity observed may require the evaluation of several tumor foci to assess ERG status per case. Incorporating ERG status into existing nomograms may be of added prognostic value in patients with early onset PCA.

Impact of age on clinical presentation, treatment, and cancer-specific survival of patients with small-cell carcinoma of the prostate

Background

The effects of age on clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes for patients with small-cell carcinoma of the prostate (SCCP) are unclear.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed on 259 patients who were identified with SCCP in the national Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry from January 1973 to December 2004. The patients were categorized into two groups according to age at diagnosis, ie, younger than 75 years (n = 158, 61%) or 75 years and older (n = 101, 39%). Patient and treatment characteristics and cancer-specific survival were compared between the groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent prognostic factors associated with cancer-specific survival.

Results

The median age of the patients was 72 (30–95) years. There was no significant difference in terms of tumor characteristics, concomitant adenocarcinoma grade, SEER stage, and treatment (including prostatectomy and radiation therapy) received between the groups. Median cancer-specific survival was 19 months (95% confidence interval 13–25). By multivariate Cox proportional hazard modeling, older age group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.95; P = 0.001), concomitant high-grade adenocarcinoma (HR 7.13; P = 0.007), and not having prostatectomy (HR 3.77; P = 0.005) were found to be significant independent predictors of poor cancer-specific survival.

Conclusion

Older patients with SCCP had increased risk of poor cancer-specific survival. Whether this age-related poor outcome can be attributed to more aggressive tumor biology in older patients, or is simply a refection of age-related poor performance status and suboptimal chemotherapy needs further investigation.

Prostate cancer in men less than the age of 50: a comparison of race and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes for men 50 years of age in relation to other age groups stratified by race to further define prostate cancer (CaP) in young men. Controversy exists regarding the appropriate age to undergo CaP screening, outcomes for early intervention, and whether there is unique age-associated tumor biology. We compared clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes for men <50 years of age in relation to other age groups stratified by race to further define CaP in young men.

METHODS

A multi-institutional review of 12,081 records of patients diagnosed with CaP from 1989-2009 was conducted. Patients were stratified by age group, race, and decade of treatment. Demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics were compared across age groups using chi-square tests and analysis of variance. The primary study endpoints, time to biochemical recurrence and all-cause mortality, were compared across age groups using Kaplan-Meier estimation and univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis.

RESULTS

Only 4.5% of the study sample was <50 years of age. A higher percentage of African Americans diagnosed were <50 compared with Caucasians (8.3% vs 3.3%, P<.0001). Positive family history was more prevalent in the <50 cohort (36.1% vs 22.0%, P<.0001). Despite these findings, both racial subgroups for men<50 years of age demonstrated improved clinicopathologic features than other age quartiles. Furthermore, both Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analysis demonstrated that the <50 cohort had a lower incidence of biochemical recurrence and greater overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Race and family history appear to play a significant role in the incidence of CaP in younger men. Younger age at diagnosis is associated with more favorable outcomes and indicates that population-based screening at younger ages could potentially lead to improved survival for high-risk groups.

Predictive factors of [(11)C]choline PET/CT in patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

Detection of recurrence in prostate cancer patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy by [(11)C]choline PET/CT depends on the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. The role of other clinical and pathological variables has not been explored.

METHODS

A total of 2,124 prostate cancer patients referred to our Institution for [(11)C]choline PET/CT from December 2004 to January 2007 for restaging of disease were retrospectively considered for this study. Inclusion criteria were: previous treatment by radical prostatectomy, and biochemical failure, defined as at least two consecutive PSA measurements of >0.2 ng/ml. These criteria were met for 358 patients. Binary logistic analysis was used to investigate the predictive factors of [(11)C]choline PET/CT. PET/CT findings were validated using criteria based on histological analysis, and follow-up clinical and imaging data. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the performance of [(11)C]choline PET/CT in relation to PSA levels.

RESULTS

The mean PSA level was 3.77 +/- 6.94 ng/ml (range 0.23-45 ng/ml; median 1.27 ng/ml). PET/CT was positive for recurrence in 161 of 358 patients (45%). On an anatomical region basis, [(11)C]choline pathological uptake was observed in lymph nodes (107/161 patients, 66%), prostatectomy bed (55/161 patients, 34%), and in the skeleton (46/161 patients, 29%). PET/CT findings were validated using histological criteria (46/358, 13%), and follow-up clinical and imaging criteria (312/358, 87%). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy were, respectively, 85%, 93%, 91%, 87%, and 89%. In multivariate analysis, high PSA levels, advanced pathological stage, previous biochemical failure and older age were significantly (P < 0.05) associated with an increased risk of positive PET/CT findings. The percentage of positive scans was 19% in those with a PSA level between 0.2 and 1 ng/ml, 46% in those with a PSA level between 1 and 3 ng/ml, and 82% in those with a PSA level higher than 3 ng/ml. ROC analysis showed that PET/CT-positive and PET/CT-negative patients could be best distinguished using a PSA cut-off value of 1.4 ng/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to PSA levels, pathological stage, previous biochemical failure and age should be considered by physicians when referring prostate cancer patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy to [(11)C]choline PET/CT.

Correlations between age, Charlson score and outcome in clinical unilateral T3a prostate cancer

According to the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines, a life expectancy of > 10 years is considered an important factor in the treatment of prostate cancer. The Charlson score is used to predict mortality based on comorbidities. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between age, Charlson score and outcome in patients with cT3a prostate cancer. Between 1987 and 2004, 200 patients, who were with clinical T3a prostate cancer and who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP), were previously detected by digital rectal examination (DRE). Patients were categorized into two age groups (< 65 and >or= 65 years old). Patients were also divided into two groups according to Charlson score ( = 0 and >or= 1). Both age and Charlson score were analyzed regarding their predictive power of patients' outcomes. The mean follow-up period was 70.6 months, and the mean age of patients was 63.3 years. In all, 106 patients were < 65 years old and 94 patients were >or= 65 years old. Age was a significant predictor of overall survival (OS). A Charlson score of 0 was found in 110 patients, and of >or= 1 in 90 patients. Charlson score was not a significant predictor of biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS), clinical progression-free survival (CPFS) or OS. Cox multivariate analysis showed that margin status was a significant independent factor in BPFS, and cancer volume was a significant independent factor in CPFS. Charlson score does not influence the outcome in patients with clinical locally advanced prostate cancer. Age may influence OS. RP can be performed in motivated healthy older patients. However, the patients need to be counseled regarding possible surgery-related side effects, such as urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction, which are age- and comorbidity-dependent.

Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in Men Older than 70 Years of Age with Localized Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Morbidity, Reconvalescence, and Short-Term Clinical Outcomes between Younger and Older Men

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the safety and efficacy of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (eL-RPE) in elderly versus younger men with localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

Patients undergoing eL-RPE were retrospectively subdivided into group eL-RPE1 (72 men aged 71 yr and older) and group eL-RPE2 (132 men aged 59 yr and younger). Group eL-RPE1 was compared with a group of 70 contemporary, comparable patients aged 71 yr and older undergoing open retropubic radical prostatectomy (group OPEN-RPE).

RESULTS

Compared with group eL-RPE2, patients of group eL-RPE1 had a higher pathologic stage (45% vs. 32% stage pT3 or greater, p<0.001) and higher Gleason score (median 7 vs. 6, p<0.001). Prostate-specific antigen recurrence was significantly worse compared with age-matched controls for younger patients with high-stage or high-grade lesions (p<0.001). Importantly operative time, analgesic requirements, hospital stay, convalescence, and complication rates were comparable. Urinary continence rate was significantly better in group eL-RPE2 at 6 mo (67% vs. 91%, respectively, p<0.001). Group eL-RPE1 and group OPEN-RPE patients had statistically similar pathologic stage and Gleason score (each p>0.05), similar operative time (p=0.12), but less blood loss (p<0.001), shorter hospital stay (p<0.001), and more rapid convalescence (p<0.001) occurred in eL-RPE1.

CONCLUSIONS

eL-RPE is feasible and efficacious even in elderly patients with unfavorable, large-volume disease. eL-RPE offers the advantages of decreased blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and more rapid recovery over OPEN-RPE. However, the elderly patient must be informed preoperatively about the observed higher incontinence rate.

Age impact in clinicopathologic presentation and the clinical evolution of prostate cancer in patients submitted to radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the influence of age in pathological findings and clinical evolution of prostate cancer in patients treated with radical prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five hundred and fifty-six patients operated on between 1991 and 2000 were selected. Patients were divided into age groups of between 10 and 49 years, 50 to 59 years, 60 to 69 years and 70 to 83 years.

RESULTS

Patients having less than 60 years of age presented clinical stage (p = 0.001), PSA (p = 0.013) and biopsy Gleason score (p = 0.013) more favorable than older patients. Age groups did not show any relationship between either postoperative Gleason score or pathological stage or risk of non-confined organ disease and involvement of seminal vesicles. After a mean follow-up of 58.3 months, 149 (27%) patients presented recurrence. Patients aged between 40 and 59 years presented a disease-free survival rate significantly higher when compared to patients aged between 60 and 83 years (p = 0.022). However, when controlled with clinical stage, PSA, Gleason score and percentage of positive fragments, there was no relationship between age and biochemical recurrence risk (p = 0.426).

CONCLUSIONS

Even though younger patients presented more favorable preoperative characteristics, postoperative pathological findings and biochemical recurrence rates did not differ between studied age groups.

Clinical outcomes by age in men with hormone refractory prostate cancer: a pooled analysis of 8 Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) studies

PURPOSE

We determined if age is a prognostic factor of clinical outcomes, specifically overall survival, disease-free survival and progression-free survival in men with hormone refractory prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 8 multi-institutional trials performed by Cancer and Leukemia Group B were combined. Eligible patients had progressive adenocarcinoma of the prostate after androgen ablation, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2, and adequate hematological, renal and hepatic function. The proportional hazards model stratified by study was used to assess the prognostic importance of age for predicting clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 1,194 men 132 (11%) were 50 to 60 years old and 120 (10%) were 80 to 89 years old. Median survival was 12.2 months (95% CI 10.6 to 13.8) in men 50 to 59 years old, 15.9 months (95% CI 14.2 to 17.6) in men 60 to 69 years old, 15.6 months (95% CI 13.8 to 16.9) in men 70 to 79 years old and 8.9 months (95% CI 6.6 to 12.1) in men 80 to 89 years old. Compared to 70 to 79-year-old men the HR for death in octogenarians was 1.3 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.6, p = 0.015). Furthermore, the HR for prostate cancer death in octogenarians was 1.3 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.7, p = 0.010) and in 50 to 59-year-old men it was 1.3 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.6, p = 0.042) compared to men 70 to 79 years old. Black men were at lower risk for death than white men (HR 0.77, 95 CI% 0.65 to 0.92, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Octogenarians and white men are at increased risk for death compared to other men with hormone refractory prostate cancer.

Clinical and pathological characteristics of patients presenting with biochemical progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy for pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

To identify risk factors for biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (RP) in men with pathologically organ-confined (OC) prostate cancer (PCa).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical and pathological features of 350 consecutive patients with pathologically OC PCa treated only with RP and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy were analyzed, retrospectively, to identify predictor parameters of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure (PSA>or=0.4 ng/ml). The median follow-up was 58.6 months (range: 3.9-183 months). All pathological specimens were step sectioned at 4-mm intervals. Kaplan-Meier progression-free survival rates and chi2 test were adopted for statistical analyses. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to test the association between pathological Gleason score and surgical margin status.

RESULTS

67 patients (19.1%) failed at a median follow-up of 40.2 months (range 1.9-123.3). Age and preoperative PSA failed to reveal significance also in patients with serum PSA>or=20 ng/ml (p=0.46). Patients with T3 clinical stage had a higher progression rate compared to T1C and T2 (43.5 vs. 27.8 and 17.3%, respectively) even if no high statistical significance was pointed out. Presence of perineural infiltration (p=0.04) and prostatic apex infiltration (p=0.74) in the prostatectomy specimens failed to reveal significance. A high pathological Gleason score (>or=7; p=0.0003) and surgical margin status (p<0.0001) were shown to be the most powerful predictive parameters of biochemical progression.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with pathologically OC PCa the presence of a high pathological Gleason score and positive surgical margins appear to represent the most important factors for prediction of outcome following RP.

Prognostic factors in prostate cancer

Prognostic factors in organ confined prostate cancer will reflect survival after surgical radical prostatectomy. Gleason score, tumour volume, surgical margins and Ki-67 index have the most significant prognosticators. Also the origins from the transitional zone, p53 status in cancer tissue, stage, and aneuploidy have shown prognostic significance. Progression-associated features include Gleason score, stage, and capsular invasion, but PSA is also highly significant. Progression can also be predicted with biological markers (E-cadherin, microvessel density, and aneuploidy) with high level of significance. Other prognostic features of clinical or PSA-associated progression include age, IGF-1, p27, and Ki-67. In patients who were treated with radiotherapy the survival was potentially predictable with age, race and p53, but available research on other markers is limited. The most significant published survival-associated prognosticators of prostate cancer with extension outside prostate are microvessel density and total blood PSA. However, survival can potentially be predicted by other markers like androgen receptor, and Ki-67-positive cell fraction. In advanced prostate cancer nuclear morphometry and Gleason score are the most highly significant progression-associated prognosticators. In conclusion, Gleason score, capsular invasion, blood PSA, stage, and aneuploidy are the best markers of progression in organ confined disease. Other biological markers are less important. In advanced disease Gleason score and nuclear morphometry can be used as predictors of progression. Compound prognostic factors based on combinations of single prognosticators, or on gene expression profiles (tested by DNA arrays) are promising, but clinically relevant data is still lacking.

Impact of Patient Age at Treatment on Outcome Following Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

Historically young patients with prostate cancer have been found to have poorer outcomes. Recent studies suggest favorable pathological findings and improved survival in younger patients undergoing RRP. We assessed age at treatment as a predictor of post-RRP survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified 5,509 patients treated with RRP for prostate cancer at our institution between 1987 and 1995. Age at treatment was classified into categories of younger than 55, 55 to 59, 60 to 64, 65 to 69 and 70 years or older. CSS, sPFS and biochemical PFS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Younger patients had lower preoperative prostate specific antigen, and tumor grade and stage. CSS, sPFS and biochemical PFS were similar across age groups but overall survival decreased with older age at treatment. After multivariate adjustment the risk of cancer death was lower in patients 70 years or older (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.90), while the risk of progression was lower in all age groups compared to that in men younger than 55 years (RR 0.57 to 0.62). On stratified subset analysis sPFS was progressively worse with younger age in patients with high risk pathological findings. However, the addition of age to multivariate models incorporating preoperative prostate specific antigen, pathological features and adjuvant therapy failed to improve their predictive value for CSS and sPFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite more favorable clinicopathological features younger patients undergoing RRP for prostate cancer have survival similar to that of older counterparts. Given the greater proportionate impact of prostate cancer on survival, it is particularly important to pursue aggressive treatment in younger patients.

Prostate biopsy: is age important for determining the pathological features in prostate cancer?

INTRODUCTION

The influence of age on the aggressiveness of prostate cancer (PCa) is controversial. This study aims to assess the influence of age in determining the pathological features of biopsies from patients diagnosed with PCa.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We selected 1422 patients with clinical suspicion of PCa; among them, 547 (38.5%) had received a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. Patients were categorized into the following age groups: up to 50 years old, 51 to 60 years, 61 to 70 years, 71 to 80 years, and over 80 years. The evaluated variables were histological grade, presence of perineural invasion and estimate of tumor volume through measurement of the maximum percentage of tissue with cancer in one fragment and total percentage of tissue with cancer in the sample.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 66.4 years, with age range from 32 to 94 years. The estimate of tumor volume by maximum percentage of tissue with cancer in one fragment (p = 0.064), total percentage of tissue with cancer in the sample (p = 0.443), and Gleason score (p = 0.485) were not statistically different in relation to the age groups under study. The presence of perineural invasion occurred more frequently among the 50 years and 81 years age groups when compared with patients aged from 51 to 60 and from 61 to 80 years (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Age did not represent a determining factor for pathological findings concerning Gleason score and estimate of tumor volume by the variables in use.

Impacto de la edad y de la comorbilidad en la supervivencia y toxicidad del paciente con cáncer de próstata irradiado

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

We intended to assess the impact of age on radiation outcome in patients treated for prostate cancer with 2D planning radiation therapy in clinical practice at the Hospital Clínic of Barcelona Radiation Oncology Department.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

One hundred eighty three patients, treated from November 1993 to April 1999, were included. Median follow-up was 41.8 months and median age was 70 years old. Median dose to prostate was 70 Gy. Univariate (Kaplan-Meier with log rank test comparison) and multivariate analysis (Cox's regression models) were done to assess the effect of age on toxicity and to study prognostic factors for disease control, survival and radiation treatment toxicity.

RESULTS

Five years disease free survival probability was 61.94%, with an overall survival probability of 82.83%. Although comorbidity increased significantly with age, reduced overall survival by a factor of 0.4, from 94.85% to 78.55% at 5 years. No differences were seen with regard to age in acute or late toxicity. Five years toxicity free probability was 66.46%.

CONCLUSIONS

Comorbidities decrease life expectancy in prostate cancer patients treated with radiation. Age does not necessarily suppose an increased risk of late toxicity for selected patients.

Do younger men have better biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy?

OBJECTIVES

To examine the relationship between age and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (RP), controlling for the year of surgery. Prior studies have suggested that younger men have lower prostate-specific antigen recurrence rates after RP, although none of the prior studies had controlled for the year of surgery.

METHODS

We examined the data from 1753 men treated with RP between 1988 and 2002 at five equal access medical centers. We compared age, as a categorical variable according to decade of life (50 years old or younger, 51 to 60, 61 to 70, and older than 70 years), with the clinical and pathologic variables at RP, as well as the time to biochemical recurrence, using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Age was significantly related to the year of surgery, with the more recently treated patients being younger than less recently treated patients (P <0.001). After controlling for the year of surgery, the younger men had smaller prostates, fewer high-grade tumors on biopsy, and less lymph node metastasis, but a greater percentage of cores with cancer. On multivariate analysis, men 50 years old or younger had significantly lower recurrence rates than did the older men. Moreover, men older than 70 years had significantly greater prostate-specific antigen failure rates than men aged 51 to 70 years or men aged 50 years or younger.

CONCLUSIONS

The average age of men undergoing RP has decreased with time. Independent of this, young men have more favorable outcomes after RP than older men. Continued screening to detect prostate cancer among younger men when it is most curable appears warranted.

Does age influence the behaviour of localized prostate cancer?

OBJECTIVE

To assess, in a meta-analysis of published studies, whether age influences the behaviour of localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

The Medline database was searched from 1966 to 2000 to identify studies analysing the outcome of localized prostate cancer by age, using disease-specific outcome measures, and having controlled for the established prognostic factors of grade, T stage and, where available, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level.

RESULTS

In all, 34 studies were identified, which included a total of 27 551 patients. The incomplete and heterogeneous nature of the reports precluded any quantitative overview. The findings of these reports are described and methodological shortcomings discussed.

CONCLUSION

The evidence suggests that young age was an adverse prognostic factor in some series of radiation therapy before the advent of PSA assays, when men typically presented clinically with locally advanced disease, but that age has no significant prognostic effect in contemporary series of localized prostate cancer. Possible explanations for this difference are discussed, together with implications for further studies.

Prostate cancer detection, characterization, and clinical outcomes in men aged 70 years and older referred for transrectal ultrasound and prostate biopsies

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic findings and treatment options chosen in men aged 70 years and older referred for prostate biopsy.

METHODS

Age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), biopsy pathology, clinical stage, treatment pursued, and treatment outcome were analyzed in 210 men age 70 years and older referred for transrectal ultrasound and prostate biopsies. All patients were followed for a mean of 46.9 months (range 28 to 63).

RESULTS

Cancer was found in 120 (56.8%) of the patients. The cancer detection rate was significantly higher (81.0%) in patients aged 80 years and older than those younger than 80 years. Cancer patients aged 80 years and older had a higher rate of poorly differentiated cancer (64.7%) compared with the 70 to 74-year-olds (33.3%) and 75 to 79-year-olds (32.1%). The patients aged 80 years and older also had a larger proportion of high-stage cancer. The patients younger than 80 years had a significantly higher incidence of stable/falling PSA with treatment compared with the older patients. Of the 210 patients, 41 (19.4%) died within 5 years of the diagnostic procedure; 3 died of prostate cancer. The death rate was not significantly different among the three age groups evaluated. None of the patients aged 80 years and older died of prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients aged 80 years and older who are diagnosed with prostate cancer are less likely to respond well to treatment and usually die of unrelated causes. Aggressive diagnosis, staging, and treatment in octogenarians should be guided by the patients' symptoms, overall health, and personal preferences.