Teriparatide and denosumab, alone or combined, in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: the DATA study randomised trial

First-line treatment of osteoporosis with osteoanabolic therapy: a new opportunity

Osteoporosis is a national health priority, and over six million Australians over the age of 50 years have poor bone health. Fragility fractures due to osteoporosis are associated with an increased morbidity and mortality risk and a high economic cost to the community. It is a chronic condition requiring long-term management. Despite notable advances in pharmacotherapy, large treatment gaps remain. Antiresorptive drugs have been the foundation of treatment; however, their efficacy wanes and rare adverse effects accumulate with prolonged use. Osteoanabolic drugs form new bone and can also restore deteriorated bone microarchitecture, in addition to increasing bone mineral density. Currently, antiresorptive drugs are used as first-line drugs for osteoporosis. However, recent studies have highlighted the superiority of anabolic drugs for fracture reduction over antiresorptives. Furthermore, for patients at very high risk or imminent risk of fracture, the use of sequential therapy with an osteoanabolic medication followed by an antiresorptive is superior to achieving optimal long-term bone health outcomes. This article will discuss the evidence supporting the anti-fracture benefits of osteoanabolic drugs, emphasising their benefits as first-line agents for osteoporosis. Challenges surrounding transitions between osteoanabolic and antiresorptive medications are also discussed, highlighting considerations for the optimal treatment sequence with a focus on recent updates to Australian prescribing recommendations and PBS requirements.

Nanomaterials-Based Drug Delivery Systems for Therapeutic Applications in Osteoporosis

The etiology of osteoporosis is rooted in the disruption of the intricate equilibrium between bone formation and bone resorption processes. Nevertheless, the conventional anti-osteoporotic medications and hormonal therapeutic regimens currently employed in clinical practice are associated with a multitude of adverse effects, thereby constraining their overall therapeutic efficacy and potential. Recently, nanomaterials have emerged as a promising alternative due to their minimal side effects, efficient drug delivery, and ability to enhance bone formation, aiding in restoring bone balance. This review delves into the fundamental principles of bone remodeling and the bone microenvironment, as well as current clinical treatment approaches for osteoporosis. It subsequently explores the research status of nanomaterial-based drug delivery systems for osteoporosis treatment, encompassing inorganic nanomaterials, organic nanomaterials, cell-mimicking carriers and exosomes mimics and emerging therapies targeting the osteoporosis microenvironment. Finally, the review discusses the potential of nanomedicine in treating osteoporosis and outlines the future trajectory of this burgeoning field. The aim is to provide a comprehensive reference for the application of nanomaterial-based drug delivery strategies in osteoporosis therapy, thereby fostering further advancements and innovations in this critical area of medical research.

Aetiology, diagnosis and treatment of thalassemia-associated osteoporosis of the adult

AIM

This review aims to overview factors contributing to TAO development and addresses the targeted diagnostic work-up and treatment management in adult thalassemic patients.

RESULTS

Osteoporosis management in Thalassemia is challenging because several factors contributing to its pathogenesis should be considered and controlled starting from child- hood. A multidisciplinary approach is crucial. Evidence concerning the efficacy of available anti-osteoporosis drugs in thalassemic patients is scarce. In this scenario, clinical experience and center resources often guide the treatment choice. More efforts should be made to share knowledge in this field in order to indicate specific treatment strategies for TAO management.

METHODS

We performed a literature search in Pubmed from 1992 to March 2024 using the words Thalassemia and: osteoporosis, Bisphosphonates, Denosumab, Teriparatide, Romosozumab, hormone replacement therapy, growth hormone, hypogonadism, calcium, vitamin D, bone disease, sarcopenia. The search was limited to English literature including original studies, reviews, meta-analyses, case reports.

Risk assessment and drug interruption guidelines for dentoalveolar surgery in patients with osteoporosis receiving anti-resorptive therapy

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a rare and challenging complication of anti-resorptive therapy. This review addresses the critical issue of risk management in patients with osteoporosis who require dentoalveolar surgery while undergoing anti-resorptive therapy. Dental practitioners should be aware of these risks; however, they should not refuse treatment based solely on them. This review discusses the risks through five major factors: invasive dentoalveolar surgeries, concomitant oral infection, type of medication, duration of medication, and preoperative drug discontinuation. Additionally, we discussed the local factors associated with dental practices. Our review underscored the importance of personalized risk assessment, considering each patient's unique drug history and oral condition. Based on a comprehensive literature review and clinical evidence, we proposed specific guidelines for preoperative drug interruption tailored to different anti-resorptive agents. These recommendations aimed to balance osteoporosis management by minimizing the risk of MRONJ during oral surgical interventions and bridging the knowledge gap in managing patients with osteoporosis requiring dental care. This review will allow clinicians to improve their practice and optimize patient outcomes by providing evidence-based strategies.

'Bone Health-Across a Woman's Lifespan'

Despite a high burden of osteoporosis and minimal trauma fractures worldwide, there is still a treatment gap in timely diagnosis and optimal treatment. There is also a lack of international consensus and guidelines on the management of bone fragility in premenopausal women. This review article provides an overview of the current understanding of factors impacting women's bone health across the adult lifespan, as well as dilemmas in the diagnosis, assessment and management of osteoporosis in premenopausal and postmenopausal women, premature ovarian insufficiency and bone health following breast cancer.

Sequential and Long-term Therapy for Osteoporosis

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Osteoporosis requires life-long management. This involves the use of different drugs in various sequences followed by long-term maintenance therapy. This review highlights the important transitions among osteoporosis therapies and outlines a strategy of intermittent bisphosphonate therapy for long-term maintenance.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the past few years, the effects and limitations of long-term treatment with bisphosphonates and denosumab have become apparent as have several key factors in the sequential use of anti-remodeling drugs and osteoanabolic agents. Strategies for transitions from estrogen, bisphosphonates, denosumab and the bone-forming drugs will be discussed, based on extant evidence, clinical experience and expert opinion. By appropriate selection of both the initial and subsequent drugs for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, therapeutic benefits can be optimized and safety issues minimized. Developing a strategy for long-term maintenance of the benefits of the initial therapies can provide a life plan for managing patients with osteoporosis.

Effect of a single-dose denosumab on mineral homeostasis in infertile men: insights from a pilot intervention study and a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Denosumab, a drug that inhibits RANKL to reduce bone resorption in osteoporotic postmenopausal women, has been shown to improve semen quality in a subgroup of infertile men. This study aimed to investigate the effects of denosumab on mineral homeostasis in young infertile men.

METHODS

Secondary data from two clinical trials designed to test the effect on semen quality were used: (1) a pilot intervention study with 12 men receiving a single-dose of 60 mg denosumab and (2) a single-center, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial, where 100 infertile men were randomized 1:1 to receive denosumab 60 mg once sc. or placebo. A linear mixed model for repeated measures was employed to analyze data from follow-up samples.

RESULTS

In the pilot intervention study, denosumab treatment induced a decrease in ionized calcium 5, 20, 40, and 80 days after treatment compared with baseline (all p < 0.05). Serum phosphate decreased on all time points up to and including day 40 (all p < 0.05), while alkaline phosphatase was only lowered at 40 days and onwards (p = 0.014). Serum PTH increased significantly at all time points up to and including day 80 (p = 0.026). One hundred eighty days after treatment, all reported analyses were comparable to baseline levels. The observed temporal changes were confirmed in the RCT with differences in serum calcium (p < 0.001) and phosphate (p < 0.001) on day 14, PTH (p < 0.002), and alkaline phosphatase (p < 0.001) on days 80 and 160. Denosumab treatment had no significant effect on vitamin D status, renal function, or serum albumin concentration after 80 and 160 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Small but significant changes in mineral homeostasis and bone mineral content were observed but the changes were transient and normalized after treatment cessation. A single injection of denosumab in infertile men appears to have no major long-term impact on bone or mineral homeostasis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03030196. Registered January 24, 2017.

Effect of donepezil on bone metabolism among older adults with Alzheimer's disease

Older adults with Alzheimer's disease (AD), in addition to significant cognitive disability, have twice the risk of fracture compared to those with normal cognition. Fractures among older adults with AD are associated with substantial morbidity, loss of physical function, and significant mortality. Prior studies have shown a decreased risk of fracture among those taking acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, such as donepezil. With both cognitive and non-cognitive benefits, donepezil would be a valuable component in a fracture prevention program for older adults with AD. Though anti-amyloid therapies are now clinically available, donepezil may still have non-cognitive benefits. However, the specific effects of donepezil on bone metabolism are unknown. We have designed this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to investigate the effect of AD treatment with donepezil on bone metabolism. The study will measure the change in bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, and bone quality related to 12-months of donepezil therapy. This will be the first known study of changes in bone metabolism among older adults with AD.

Cardiovascular Safety of Romosozumab Compared to Commonly Used Anti-osteoporosis Medications in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to investigate the cardiovascular safety of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Romosozumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting sclerostin, has been shown to increase bone mineral density and reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures. However, in previous studies, romosozumab therapy was identified as a potential risk factor for cardiovascular events, particularly in patients with predisposing cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the safety and efficacy of romosozumab versus alendronate, teriparatide, denosumab, or placebo in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Contrast-based network meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. The pooled estimates are presented as risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Of the 5282 articles retrieved, 25 RCTs were included in this review (n = 24,942), and 18 randomized controlled trials (n = 16,777) were included in the network meta-analysis. The results indicated no significant differences in cardiovascular mortality rate between romosozumab and placebo. Regarding the risk of major cardiovascular events, no significant differences were found in the direct evidence or the network meta-analysis with placebo as the reference.

CONCLUSION

Romosozumab might be a safe option for treating postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The cardiovascular concerns associated with this treatment seem less significant than previously suggested, although additional real-world data are required to confirm this conclusion.

Bone Health ECHO Case Report: Significant Elevation in Bone Turnover Markers and Progression of Vertebral Fractures After Denosumab Discontinuation Followed by a PTH-Analog

Bone Health ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes) is a virtual community of practice, where healthcare professionals have met via videoconferencing weekly since 2015. This model of learning is focused on short didactics and the presentation of real but de-identified patient cases followed by highly interactive discussions. These are often clinical situations with diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas that are not readily addressed by randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials and clinical practice guidelines. Here we present the case of a woman with postmenopausal osteoporosis with adverse consequences following discontinuation of denosumab and uncertainties on next steps for management. This case highlights the relevance of selection of the initial bone-targeted medication and the sequence of therapy in osteoporosis management.

Enhancing bone regeneration and osseointegration using rhPTH(1-34) and dimeric R25CPTH(1-34) in an osteoporotic beagle model

This study investigates the effects of two parathyroid hormone (PTH) analogs, rhPTH(1-34) and dimeric R25CPTH(1-34), on bone regeneration and osseointegration in a postmenopausal osteoporosis model using beagle dogs. Twelve osteoporotic female beagles were subjected to implant surgeries and assigned to one of three groups: control, rhPTH(1-34), or dimeric R25CPTH(1-34). Bone regeneration and osseointegration were evaluated after 10 weeks using micro-computed tomographic (micro-CT), histological analyses, and serum biochemical assays. Results showed that the rhPTH(1-34) group demonstrated superior improvements in bone mineral density, trabecular architecture, and osseointegration compared to controls, while the dimeric R25CPTH(1-34) group exhibited similar, though slightly less pronounced, anabolic effects. Histological and TRAP assays indicated both PTH analogs significantly enhanced bone regeneration, especially in artificially created bone defects. The findings suggest that both rhPTH(1-34) and dimeric R25CPTH(1-34) hold potential as therapeutic agents for promoting bone regeneration and improving osseointegration around implants in osteoporotic conditions, with implications for their use in bone-related pathologies and reconstructive surgeries.

Prevention and Management of Denosumab Discontinuation Rebound Fractures

Denosumab rebound-associated fractures occur in approximately 1 out of 14 patients who discontinue denosumab therapy without sequential antiresorptive therapy. They occur due to excessive bone resorption after missed or delayed denosumab doses. The fractures are multiple and quality of life altering. This phenomenon occurs in all patient populations that use prolonged denosumab therapy. Average delay in denosumab dosing beyond 7 months or discontinuation of denosumab without sequential therapy is associated with increased mortality in retrospective studies. Multiple medication regimens used after the end of denosumab therapy have been shown to substantially reduce the risk of rebound vertebral fractures.

Surgical Management of Adult Spinal Deformity Patients with Osteoporosis

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) commonly affects older adults, with up to 68% prevalence in those over 60, and is often complicated by osteoporosis, which reduces bone mineral density (BMD) and increases surgical risks. Osteoporotic patients undergoing ASD surgery face higher risks of complications like hardware failure, pseudoarthrosis, and proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). Medical management with antiresorptive medications (e.g., bisphosphonates, SERMs, and denosumab) and anabolic agents (e.g., teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab) can improve BMD and reduce complications. While bisphosphonates reduce fracture risk, teriparatide and newer agents like romosozumab show promise in increasing bone density and improving fusion rates. Surgical adaptations such as consideration of age-adjusted alignment, fusion level selection, cement augmentation, and the use of expandable screws or tethers enhance surgical outcomes in osteoporotic patients. Specifically, expandable screws and cement augmentation have been shown to improve fixation stability. However, further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of these treatments, specifically in osteoporotic ASD patients.

Treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis with concurrent denosumab and romosozumab: a case report

Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disorder for which treatment options include antiresorptive therapies (e.g., bisphosphonates, denosumab); anabolics (e.g., teriparatide, abaloparatide); and dual mechanisms (e.g., romosozumab). Management of osteoporosis with concurrent antiresorptive and anabolic agents may be superior to monotherapy, as demonstrated in the DATA trial with the combination of denosumab and teriparatide. However, there is limited experience with the combination of denosumab and romosozumab, which may be an alternative antiresorptive/anabolic regimen for individuals who are not candidates for PTH receptor agonists. In this case, we present a young man with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis who could not tolerate a daily injectable anabolic and who experienced improvement in bone mineral density with concurrent denosumab and off-label romosozumab administration.

Discovery of Novel Antiosteoporosis Leads with Bone Resorption Inhibition and Anabolic Promotion through a Chemotype-Assembly Approach

Developing a dual-efficiency agent with antiresorptive and anabolic applications is a promising strategy for treating osteoporosis. This study reports the discovery of dual antiosteoporosis agents via a chemotype-assembly approach. Chemotype analysis identified 12 antiresorptive and 12 anabolic chemotypes and 7 dual-function chemotype-assembly rules. Based on these assembly rules, a dual-functional compound S24 was discovered. S24 exhibits osteoclastogenesis inhibition with an IC50 value of 10.28 μM and osteoblast differentiation stimulation at 10 μM. S24 derivatives were designed and synthesized based on the activity relationship of the chemotypes. This yielded a more active compound, S24-14, with an osteoclastogenesis inhibition IC50 value of 0.40 μM and osteoblast differentiation stimulation at 1.0 μM; compound S24-14 also suppressed bone loss in vivo. These results prove that S24-14 can be a potential lead for antiosteoporosis drug development.

Teriparatide in postmenopausal osteoporosis: uncovering novel insights into efficacy and safety compared to other treatments - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of teriparatide compared to other treatments for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Methods

A review of studies from 2000 to January 2023 analyzed randomized controlled trials on postmenopausal women treated with teriparatide (PTH 1-34), comparing it to placebo or other osteoporosis treatments. The analysis focused on bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers, and clinical outcomes, employing Review Manager 5.4.1 and the RoB 2 tool for bias assessment.

Results

Our analysis of 23 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) found that PTH (134) treatment significantly increased lumbar spine BMD (mean difference (MD) = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.01-0.03) and femoral neck BMD (MD = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00-0.01). However, there were no significant changes in total hip and radial bone BMD among the 3536 and 2046 participants, respectively. We also found that PTH (1-34) increased P1NP in a larger cohort (n = 1415) when compared to osteocalcin (n = 206). Although the risk of adverse events increased (relative risk (RR) = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.32-2.07), the incidence of fractures decreased significantly (RR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.45-0.072), with no significant difference observed in mortality rates between treatment and control groups.

Conclusion

Teriparatide improves lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD in postmenopausal women. Particularly notable is the novel finding regarding its effect on radius BMD, an area less explored in previous research. Despite an uptick in adverse events, the marked decrease in fracture incidence confirms its clinical utility for high-risk osteoporosis patients, highlighting the necessity for ongoing investigations into its full skeletal effects.

The use of denosumab in osteoporosis - an update on efficacy and drug safety

INTRODUCTION

Denosumab (Prolia) is a fully human monoclonal antibody against the receptor activator of the nuclear factor kappaB ligand. It is a potent antiresorptive agent that reduces osteoclastogenesis.

AREAS COVERED

Denosumab has been shown to improve bone mineral density and reduce the incidence of new fractures in postmenopausal women and men. It is also used in the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, as well as for the prevention of bone loss and reduction of fracture risk in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for non-metastatic prostate cancer and women receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer. Initial safety concerns included infections, cancer, skin reactions, cardiovascular disease, hypocalcemia, osteonecrosis of the jaw, and atypical femur fractures; however, further study and experience provide reassurance on these issues. Anecdotal reports have raised concerns about an increased risk of multiple vertebral fractures following discontinuation of denosumab.

EXPERT OPINION

Although bisphosphonates are often selected as initial therapy for osteoporosis, denosumab may be an appropriate initial therapy in patients at high risk for fracture, including older patients who have difficulty with the dosing requirements of oral bisphosphonates, as well as patients who are intolerant of, unresponsive to, or have contraindications to other therapies. Additional data is needed to address questions regarding treatment duration and discontinuation.

[Translated article] Evaluation, differential diagnosis and treatment of vertebral osteoporosis: How to avoid the occurrence of new fractures

Osteoporosis is a highly prevalent and multifactorial disease whose main manifestation is the appearance of fragility or low-impact fractures. The most frequent locations of osteoporotic fractures occur at the vertebrae, femoral, distal end of the radius and humerus. Osteoporotic vertebral fracture deserves special mention among them due to its prevalence, importance as it often goes unnoticed and medium-long term consequences are: pain, deformity, disability and deterioration in quality of life. In this review we will focus on the classification and initial evaluation of the patient with osteoporosis, estimation of risk factors, laboratory and imaging studies for an adequate assessment using simple radiography, dual densitometry and magnetic resonance imaging. We will also address the main aspects of the differential diagnosis, treatment and prevention of vertebral fragility fracture, briefly reviewing the main therapeutic agents currently used for its prevention and treatment.

Romosozumab versus parathyroid hormone receptor agonists: which osteoanabolic to choose and when?

Osteoanabolic agents are used as a first line treatment in patients at high fracture risk. The PTH receptor 1 (PTH1R) agonists teriparatide (TPTD) and abaloparatide (ABL) increase bone formation, bone mineral density (BMD), and bone strength by activating PTH receptors on osteoblasts. Romosozumab (ROMO), a humanized monoclonal antibody against sclerostin, dramatically but transiently stimulates bone formation and persistently reduces bone resorption. Osteoanabolic agents increase BMD and bone strength while being more effective than antiresorptives in reducing fracture risk in postmenopausal women. However, direct comparisons of the antifracture benefits of osteoanabolic therapies are limited. In a direct comparison of TPTD and ABL, the latter resulted in greater BMD increases at the hip. While no differences in vertebral or non-vertebral fracture risk were observed between the two drugs, ABL led to a greater reduction of major osteoporotic fractures. Adverse event profiles were similar between the two agents except for hypercalcemia, which occurred more often with TPTD. No direct comparisons of fracture risk reduction between ROMO and the PTH1R agonists exist. Individual studies have shown greater increases in BMD and bone strength with ROMO compared with TPTD in treatment-naive women and in women previously treated with bisphosphonates. Some safety aspects, such as a history of tumor precluding the use of PTH1R agonists, and a history of major cardiovascular events precluding the use of ROMO, should also be considered when choosing between these agents. Finally, convenience of administration, reimbursement by national health systems and length of clinical experience may influence patient choice.

Evaluation, differential diagnosis and treatment of vertebral osteoporosis: How to avoid the occurrence of new fractures

Osteoporosis is a highly prevalent and multifactorial disease whose main manifestation is the appearance of fragility or low-impact fractures. The most frequent locations of osteoporotic fractures occur at the vertebrae, femoral, distal end of the radius and humerus. Osteoporotic vertebral fracture deserves special mention among them due to its prevalence, importance as it often goes unnoticed and medium-long term consequences are: pain, deformity, disability and deterioration in quality of life. In this review we will focus on the classification and initial evaluation of the patient with osteoporosis, estimation of risk factors, laboratory and imaging studies for an adequate assessment using simple radiography, dual densitometry and magnetic resonance imaging. We will also address the main aspects of the differential diagnosis, treatment and prevention of vertebral fragility fracture, briefly reviewing the main therapeutic agents currently used for its prevention and treatment.

Safety and efficacy of sequential treatments for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Background

The sequential anti-osteoporotic treatment for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) is important, but the order in which different types of drugs are used is confusing and controversial. Therefore, we performed a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of available sequential treatments to explore the most efficacious strategy for long-term management of osteoporosis.

Methods

In this network meta-analysis, we searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to September 19, 2023 to identify randomised controlled trials comparing sequential treatments for women with PMO. The identified trials were screened by reading the title and abstract, and only randomised clinical trials involving sequential anti-osteoporotic treatments and reported relevant outcomes for PMO were included. The main outcomes included vertebral fracture risk, the percentage change in bone mineral density (BMD) in different body parts, and all safety indicators in the stage after switching treatment. A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed using the multivariate random effects method and evaluated using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Confidence in the Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) framework. This study is registered with PROSPERO: CRD42022360236.

Findings

A total of 19 trials comprising 18,416 participants were included in the study. Five different sequential treatments were investigated as the main interventions and compared to the corresponding control groups. The intervention groups in this study comprised the following treatment switch protocols: switching from an anabolic agent (AB) to an anti-resorptive agent (AR) (ABtAR), transitioning from one AR to another AR (ARtAAR), shifting from an AR to an AB (ARtAB), switching from an AB to a combined treatment of AB and AR (ABtC), and transitioning from an AR to a combined treatment (ARtC). A significant reduction in the incidence of vertebral fractures was observed in ARtC, ABtAR and ARtAB in the second stage, and ARtC had the lowest incidence with 81.5% SUCRA. ARtAAR and ABtAR were two effective strategies for preventing fractures and improving BMD in other body parts. Especially, ARtAAR could improve total hip BMD with the highest 96.1% SUCRA, and ABtAR could decrease the risk of total fractures with the highest 94.3% SUCRA. Almost no difference was observed in safety outcomes in other comparisons.

Interpretation

Our findings suggested that the ARtAAR and ABtAR strategy are the effective and safe sequential treatment for preventing fracture and improving BMD for PMO. ARtC is more effective in preventing vertebral fractures.

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (82170900, 81970762), the Hunan Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, and the Hunan Province High-level Health Talents "225" Project.

Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Maintains Bone Mass After Withdrawal of Human Parathyroid Hormone in Ovariectomized Mice

The intermittent injection of teriparatide, a recombinant fragment of human parathyroid hormone (PTH 1-34), activates anabolic activity on bone turnover. However, the PTH administration period is limited to 2 years. Thus, sequential therapy after discontinuation of PTH is required. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) has been widely used for bone fracture healing. In this study, we examined the effects of LIPUS on bone mass after PTH withdrawal in ovariectomized (OVX) model mice. The LIPUS-non-irradiated femoral trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) in the treated after PTH withdrawal was significantly decreased. Meanwhile, the femoral BMD in the OVX + PTH-LIPUS group was remarkably higher than that of the OVX group. Additionally, mRNA expression of Runx2, Osterix, Col1a1, and ALP increased significantly following LIPUS irradiation after PTH withdrawal. These results suggest that LIPUS protected against femoral trabecular BMD loss and up-regulated the osteogenic factors following PTH withdrawal in OVX mice.

Effects of stepwise administration of osteoprotegerin and parathyroid hormone-related peptide DNA vectors on bone formation in ovariectomized rat model

Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disease that impairs bone mineral density, microarchitecture, and strength. It requires continuous management, and further research into new treatment options is necessary. Osteoprotegerin (OPG) inhibits bone resorption and osteoclast activity. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of stepwise administration of OPG-encoded minicircles (mcOPG) and a bone formation regulator, parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP)-encoded minicircles (mcPTHrP) in osteoporosis. The combined treatment with mcOPG and mcPTHrP significantly increased osteogenic marker expression in osteoblast differentiation compared with the single treatment groups. A model of postmenopausal osteoporosis was established in 12-week-old female rats through ovariectomy (OVX). After 8 weeks of OVX, mcOPG (80 µg/kg) was administered via intravenous injection. After 16 weeks of OVX, mcPTHrP (80 µg/kg) was injected once a week for 3 weeks. The bone microstructure in the femur was evaluated 24 weeks after OVX using micro-CT. In a proof-of-concept study, stepwise treatment with mcOPG and mcPTHrP on an OVX rat model significantly improved bone microstructure compared to treatment with mcOPG or mcPTHrP alone. These results suggest that stepwise treatment with mcOPG and mcPTHrP may be a potential treatment for osteoporosis.

Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Management of Bone Loss in Patients with Critical Illness

Patients with critical illnesses are at higher risk of comorbidities, which can include bone mineral density loss, bone turnover marker increase, and fragility fractures. Patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) have a higher risk of bone fractures. Since hypermetabolism is a characteristic of ICU patients, such patients are often rapidly affected by systemic deterioration, which often results in systemic wasting disease. Major risk factors for ICU-related bone loss include physical restraint, inflammation, neuroendocrine stress, malnutrition, and medications. A medical history of critical illness should be acknowledged as a risk factor for impaired bone metabolism. Bone loss associated with ICU admission should be recognized as a key component of post-intensive care syndrome, and further research that focuses on treatment protocols and prevention strategies is required. Studies aimed at maintaining gut integrity have emphasized protein administration and nutrition, while research is ongoing to evaluate the therapeutic benefits of anti-resorptive agents and physical therapy. This review examines both current and innovative clinical strategies that are used for identifying risk factors of bone loss. It provides an overview of perioperative outcomes and discusses the emerging novel treatment modalities. Furthermore, the review presents future directions in the treatment of ICU-related bone loss.

Trabecular bone deterioration in a postmenopausal female suffering multiple spontaneous vertebral fractures due to a delayed denosumab injection - A post-treatment re-initiation bone biopsy-based case study

Background

Denosumab, is a potent anti-resorptive that, increases bone mineral density, and reduces fracture risk in osteoporotic patients. However, several case studies have reported multiple vertebral fractures in patients discontinuing denosumab.

Case presentation

This case report describes a 64-year-old female with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with denosumab, who had her 11th injection delayed by 4 months. The patient suffered eight spontaneous vertebral fractures. After consent, an iliac crest bone biopsy was obtained following re-initiation of the denosumab treatment and analyzed by micro-computed tomography and histomorphometry.

Results

micro-computed tomography analysis revealed a low trabecular bone volume of 10 %, a low trabecular thickness of 97 μm, a low trabecular spacing of 546 μm, a high trabecular number of 1.8/mm, and a high structure model index of 2.2, suggesting trabecular thinning and loss of trabecular plates. Histomorphometric trabecular bone analysis revealed an eroded perimeter per bone perimeter of 33 % and an osteoid perimeter per bone perimeter of 62 %. Importantly, 88 % of the osteoid perimeter was immediately above an eroded-scalloped cement line with no sign of mineralization, and often with no clear bone-forming osteoblasts on the surface. Moreover, only 5 % of the bone perimeter was mineralizing, reflecting that only 8 % of the osteoid perimeter underwent mineralization, resulting in a mineralization lag time of 545 days. Taken together, this indicates limited bone formation and delayed mineralization.

Conclusion

We present a case report of multiple vertebral fractures after denosumab discontinuation with histomorphometric evidence that denosumab discontinuation leads to extensive trabecular bone resorption followed by a limited bone formation and delayed mineralization if the denosumab treatment is reinitiated. This highlights the importance of developing optimal discontinuation strategies for patients that are to discontinue treatment.

Skeletal response to teriparatide in real-life setting: effects of age, baseline bone density and prior denosumab use

OBJECTIVES

Teriparatide (TPD) is an osteoanabolic agent used in patients with high osteoporotic fracture risk. Predictors of therapeutic response to TPD in real-life setting are not well characterised. This study investigated the influence of previous antiresorptive therapy, age and other patient characteristics on the skeletal response to TPD.

METHODS

Retrospective study at the metabolic bone clinic, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium. Patients with osteoporosis and a high fracture burden received TPD for 9-18 months. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at baseline, 9 and 18 months at lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH).

RESULTS

BMD at LS increased at 9 months (change mean (standard error) 6.8 % (0.7) p < 0.001) and at 18 months (8.0 % (0.9) p < 0.001), while BMD at FN and TH did not change significantly. Non-response in BMD change at the LS was seen with prior denosumab use (odds ratio 0.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.049-0.912, p = 0.037). Changes in BMD at TH were significantly greater in younger patients and in patients with a lower baseline BMD.

CONCLUSION

TPD-induced changes in BMD at TH might depend on age and baseline BMD and at LS on prior denosumab use. The results suggest that these factors may be relevant for clinical decision making when initiating TPD treatment, although larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Biologic Antiresorptive: Denosumab

Background

Osteoporosis is an age-related common bone disorder characterized by low bone mineral density and increased fragility fracture risk. Various Antiresorptive medications are being used to target osteoclast mediated bone resorption to prevent bone loss and reduce fracture risk.

About Denosumab

Denosumab is a novel biological antiresorptive drug that belongs to the class of monoclonal antibodies. It binds to and inhibits the cytokine receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), which is requisite for osteoclast differentiation, function and survival.

Effectiveness

Denosumab has been shown to be a potent and effective therapy for osteoporosis, with clinical trial data demonstrating significant improvement in bone mineral density (BMD) and reductions in fracture risk at various skeletal sites for more than 10 years of treatment.

Safety Profile

Denosumab has a favourable benefit/risk profile, with low rates of complications such as infection, atypical femoral fracture and osteonecrosis of the jawbone.

Challenges

However, denosumab treatment requires continuous administration, as discontinuation leads to rapid bone mineral loss and increased risk of multiple vertebral fractures due to rebound of bone turnover. Therefore, modification to another anti-osteoporosis drug therapy after denosumab discontinuation is required to maintain bone health.

Conclusion

Denosumab is a promising biological antiresorptive therapy for osteoporosis that offers high efficacy and safety, but also poses challenges for long-term management.

Bone Remodeling and Modeling: Cellular Targets for Antiresorptive and Anabolic Treatments, Including Approaches Through the Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)/PTH-Related Protein Pathway

Bone is continuously in a state of building and renewal, though the process of remodeling that takes place at many sites asynchronously throughout the skeleton, with bone formation and resorption equal at these sites (bone multicellular units). Remodeling takes place on bone surfaces, both on trabeculae and in the cortex, and serves the purposes of replacing old bone or that damaged by microfractures throughout the skeleton. The bone loss and consequent osteoporotic fractures that result from excess resorption over formation have mainly been prevented or treated by antiresorptive drugs that inhibit osteoclast formation and/or activity. Virtually all of the evidence leading to acceptance of antiresorptive drugs as treatment has depended upon their prevention of vertebral fractures. In recent decades, new prospects came of anabolic treatments that partly restore bone volume and microstructure restore bone that has been lost. The first of these was parathyroid hormone (PTH), shown by daily injection to increase markers of bone formation and prevent fractures. This field of interest enlarged with the discovery of PTH-related protein (PTHrP), so closely related in structure and action to PTH. The structural relationship between PTH and PTHrP is important in assessing their physiological and pharmacological roles, with the N-terminal domains of the 2 having virtually equal actions on target cells. Abaloparatide, a peptide analogue based on the structures of PTHrP and PTH, has been approved in some countries as a therapy for osteoporosis. Treatment through the PTH receptor activation pathway, and probably with any anabolic therapy, needs to be followed by antiresorptive treatment in order to maintain bone that has been restored. No matter how effective anabolic therapies for the skeleton become, it seems highly likely that there will be a continuing need for antiresorptive drugs.

Combination Therapy of Denosumab and Teriparatide in Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a chronic disease that often requires long-term treatment for many years. The clinician should know about all the drugs that are currently being used for treatment in osteoporosis and their mechanism of action, efficacy, safety profile, mode of administration and number of years they can be given safely without causing significant adverse effects. The categories of drugs that are currently being used for osteoporosis are antiresorptives such as oral and intravenous bisphosphonates, denosumab, and anabolics like teriparatide. This article will focus on the combination therapy of denosumab and teriparatide and will discuss how this combination is better than other class of drugs when given alone or in combination in osteoporosis patients especially those who are at high risk of fragility fractures.

Exercise for optimizing bone health after hormone-induced increases in bone stiffness

Hormones and mechanical loading co-regulate bone throughout the lifespan. In this review, we posit that times of increased hormonal influence on bone provide opportunities for exercise to optimize bone strength and prevent fragility. Examples include endogenous secretion of growth hormones and sex steroids that modulate adolescent growth and exogenous administration of osteoanabolic drugs like teriparatide, which increase bone stiffness, or its resistance to external forces. We review evidence that after bone stiffness is increased due to hormonal stimuli, mechanoadaptive processes follow. Specifically, exercise provides the mechanical stimulus necessary to offset adaptive bone resorption or promote adaptive bone formation. The collective effects of both decreased bone resorption and increased bone formation optimize bone strength during youth and preserve it later in life. These theoretical constructs provide physiologic foundations for promoting exercise throughout life.

Denosumab Use in Chronic Kidney Disease Associated Osteoporosis: A Narrative Review

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients have a high incidence of bone disease and increased fracture risk, making effective management of their bone health a clinical challenge. Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody, has been investigated as a therapeutic option in this patient population. In this review, we summarize the current evidence on the efficacy and safety of denosumab in CKD and HD patients. A comprehensive search of the relevant literature was conducted, including randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and meta-analyses. The findings suggest that denosumab reduces the risk of fractures and improves bone mineral density in all stages of CKD. The results of this review support the use of denosumab as a promising option for managing bone disease in CKD and HD patients.

[The recombinant human parathyroid hormone, teriparatide as an alternative remedy for the medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw]

In developed countries, osteoporosis is one of the most common debilitating conditions in the population over the age of 50. Unfortunately, the pathomechanism of the disease is still not fully understood. Nowadays, the administration of antiresorptive drugs blocking osteoclastic activity is the most commonly used medication to slow down the speed of the bone loss. One of the uncommon side effects of such drugs is the medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). Recently, a number of alternative therapeutic approaches has been tested and published, amongst them the recombinant human parathyroid hormone (rhPTH, teriparatide) use, which is turning into a promising treatment modality. According to certain meta-analyses, its pharmacological effect on increasing bone mineral density and controlling pathological vertebral fractures is superior to antiresorptive drugs; however, the so-called "off-label" application of teriparatide remains controversial. As intermittent administration of teriparatide stimulates bone formation, several animal and clinical studies indicated that systemic application of teriparatide shortened fracture healing time and improved quality of the callus and the newly formed bone. Furthermore, recently several clinical studies showed the beneficial effect of the intermittent rhPTH administration in the management of MRONJ. This article reviews the history of the anabolic effect of the low-dose rhPTH discovery, provides evidence-based data from animal and human studies, summarizes its biological mechanisms and the clinical benefits of the anabolic therapy and also their possible role in the management of MRONJ. The majority of the clinical data indicates that, in the case of therapy-resistant osteonecrosis, it may be worthwhile to apply short-term intermittent teriparatide therapy. Notwithstanding, more randomized clinical trials are necessary in order to confirm the efficacy and the safety of the use of teriparatide in the treatment of MRONJ. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(36): 1406-1415.

Identification of ROCK1 as a novel biomarker for postmenopausal osteoporosis and pan-cancer analysis

BACKGROUND

Postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP) is a prevalent bone disorder with significant global impact. The elevated risk of osteoporotic fracture in elderly women poses a substantial burden on individuals and society. Unfortunately, the current lack of dependable diagnostic markers and precise therapeutic targets for PMOP remains a major challenge.

METHODS

PMOP-related datasets GSE7429, GSE56814, GSE56815, and GSE147287, were downloaded from the GEO database. The DEGs were identified by "limma" packages. WGCNA and Machine Learning were used to choose key module genes highly related to PMOP. GSEA, DO, GO, and KEGG enrichment analysis was performed on all DEGs and the selected key hub genes. The PPI network was constructed through the GeneMANIA database. ROC curves and AUC values validated the diagnostic values of the hub genes in both training and validation datasets. xCell immune infiltration and single-cell analysis identified the hub genes' function on immune reaction in PMOP. Pan-cancer analysis revealed the role of the hub genes in cancers.

RESULTS

A total of 1278 DEGs were identified between PMOP patients and the healthy controls. The purple module and cyan module were selected as the key modules and 112 common genes were selected after combining the DEGs and module genes. Five Machine Learning algorithms screened three hub genes (KCNJ2, HIPK1, and ROCK1), and a PPI network was constructed for the hub genes. ROC curves validate the diagnostic values of ROCK1 in both the training (AUC = 0.73) and validation datasets of PMOP (AUC = 0.81). GSEA was performed for the low-ROCK1 patients, and the top enriched field included protein binding and immune reaction. DCs and NKT cells were highly expressed in PMOP. Pan-cancer analysis showed a correlation between low ROCK1 expression and SKCM as well as renal tumors (KIRP, KICH, and KIRC).

CONCLUSIONS

ROCK1 was significantly associated with the pathogenesis and immune infiltration of PMOP, and influenced cancer development, progression, and prognosis, which provided a potential therapy target for PMOP and tumors. However, further laboratory and clinical evidence is required before the clinical application of ROCK1 as a therapeutic target.

Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: An In-depth Review

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery aims to correct abnormal spinal curvature in adults, leading to improved functionality and reduced pain. However, this surgery is associated with various complications, one of which is proximal junctional failure (PJF). PJF can have a significant impact on a patient's quality of life, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of its causes and the development of effective management strategies. This review aims to provide an in-depth understanding of PJF in ASD surgery. PJF is a complex complication resulting from a multitude of factors including patient characteristics, surgical techniques, and postoperative management. Age, osteoporosis, overcorrection of sagittal alignment, and poor bone quality are identified as significant risk factors. The clinical implications of PJF are substantial, often requiring revision surgery and causing a considerable decrease in patients' quality of life. Prevention strategies include careful preoperative planning, appropriate patient selection, and optimization of surgical techniques. Treatment often necessitates a multifaceted approach, including surgical intervention and the management of underlying risk factors. Predictive modeling is an emerging field that may offer a promising avenue for the risk stratification of patients and individualized preventive strategies. A thorough understanding of PJF's pathogenesis, risk factors, and clinical implications is essential for surgeons involved in ASD surgery. Current preventive measures and treatment strategies aim to mitigate the risk and manage the complications of PJF, but the complication cannot be entirely prevented. Future research should focus on the development of more effective preventive and treatment strategies, and predictive models could be valuable in this pursuit.

An angiogenic approach to osteoanabolic therapy targeting the SHN3-SLIT3 pathway

Often, disorders of impaired bone formation involve not only a cell intrinsic defect in the ability of osteoblasts to form bone, but moreover a broader dysfunction of the skeletal microenvironment that limits osteoblast activity. Developing approaches to osteoanabolic therapy that not only augment osteoblast activity but moreover correct this microenvironmental dysfunction may enable both more effective osteoanabolic therapies and also addressing a broader set of indications where vasculopathy or other forms microenvironment dysfunction feature prominently. We here review evidence that SHN3 acts as a suppressor of not only the cell intrinsic bone formation activity of osteoblasts, but moreover of the creation of a local osteoanabolic microenvironment. Mice lacking Schnurri3 (SHN3, HIVEP3) display a very robust increase in bone formation, that is due to de-repression of ERK pathway signaling in osteoblasts. In addition to loss of SHN3 augmenting the differentiation and bone formation activity of osteoblasts, loss of SHN3 increases secretion of SLIT3 by osteoblasts, which in a skeletal context acts as an angiogenic factor. Through this angiogenic activity, SLIT3 creates an osteoanabolic microenvironment, and accordingly treatment with SLIT3 can increase bone formation and enhance fracture healing. These features both validate vascular endothelial cells as a therapeutic target for disorders of low bone mass alongside the traditionally targeted osteoblasts and osteoclasts and indicate that targeting the SHN3/SLIT3 pathway provides a new mechanism to induce therapeutic osteoanabolic responses.

The Inflammatory Contribution of B-Lymphocytes and Neutrophils in Progression to Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a bone disease characterized by structural deterioration and low bone mass, leading to fractures and significant health complications. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms by which B-lymphocytes and neutrophils contribute to the development of osteoporosis and potential therapeutics targeting these immune mediators to reduce the proinflammatory milieu. B-lymphocytes-typically appreciated for their canonical role in adaptive, humoral immunity-have emerged as critical regulators of bone remodeling. B-lymphocytes communicate with osteoclasts and osteoblasts through various cytokines, including IL-7, RANK, and OPG. In inflammatory conditions, B-lymphocytes promote osteoclast activation and differentiation. However, B-lymphocytes also possess immunomodulatory properties, with regulatory B-lymphocytes (Bregs) secreting TGF-β1 to restrain pathogenic osteoclastogenesis. Neutrophils, the body's most prevalent leukocyte, also contribute to the proinflammatory environment that leads to osteoporotic bone remodeling. In aged individuals, neutrophils display reduced chemotaxis, phagocytosis, and apoptosis. Understanding the delicate interplay between B-lymphocytes and neutrophils in the context of impaired bone metabolism is crucial for targeted therapies for osteoporosis.

Quality of life of postmenopausal women with teriparatide, denosumab and alendronate: One-year prospective study with a propensity score-matched comparison

Background/purpose: To evaluate and compare the effects of parathyroid hormone analogues, receptor activators of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand inhibitors and bisphosphonates on the quality of life of postmenopausal women. Methods: A prospective observational study of 23 matched postmenopausal women was conducted with propensity score analysis on quality of life at one-year follow-up. Visual analogue scale for back pain and outcome scores were carried out as the quality of life or treatment adherence measurements. Results: Teriparatide use was associated with significant improvements in visual analogue scale, EuroQol 5-level 5-dimension general health status and Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire physical function, whereas denosumab and alendronate groups only demonstrated improved Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire scores but worsened back pain. Baseline average visual analogue scale back pain predicted one-year average back pain progression (partial eta squared = 0.617, p = 0.001). Conclusions: One-year continuous teriparatide treatment is most effective in improving quality of life outcomes in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Baseline average visual analogue scale back pain remained the only predictive factor for one-year back pain progression.

Sequential treatment of teriparatide and alendronate versus alendronate alone for elevation of bone mineral density and prevention of refracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporosis: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous vertebroplasty was the most common strategy for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. However, refracture after vertebroplasty also occurred and bone mineral density (BMD) was one of the main factors associated with refracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty.

AIMS

To investigate the efficacy of a short-sequential treatment of teriparatide followed by alendronate on prevention of refracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporotic patients, and compare it with the therapy of alendronate alone.

METHODS

From January 2018 to January 2020, we recruited 165 female osteoporosis patients after percutaneous vertebroplasty who were assigned into sequential treatment of teriparatide followed by alendronate group (TPTD + ALN group) and alendronate alone group (ALN group). The vertebral fracture occurred during this process was also recorded in both the groups. A total of 105 participants completed the 1-year follow-up. Furthermore, BMD and serum procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) and C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) were compared between the two groups during 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The 105 patients were finally included, with 59 in ALN group and 46 in TPTD + ALN group. During 1-year follow-up, the vertebral refracture rate in TPTD + ALN group was much lower than that in ALN group (2.2% vs. 13.6%, p < 0.05). At 12 months, the BMDs at lumbar in TPTD + ALN group were significantly elevated when compared to the ALN group (0.65 ± 0.10 vs. 0.57 ± 0.07, p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

A short-sequential administration of teriparatide followed by alendronate was more effective in elevating the BMD and decreasing the refracture rate at 12-month follow-up, compared to the counterpart with alendronate alone.

Immune microenvironment: novel perspectives on bone regeneration disorder in osteoradionecrosis of the jaws

Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws (ORNJ) is a severe complication that occurs after radiotherapy of head and neck malignancies. Clinically, conservative treatments and surgeries for ORNJ exhibited certain therapeutic effects, whereas the regenerative disorder of the post-radiation jaw remains a pending problem to be solved. In recent years, the recognition of the role of the immune microenvironment has led to a shift from an osteoblasts (OBs) or bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BMSCs)-centered view of bone regeneration to the concept of a complicated microecosystem that supports bone regeneration. Current advances in osteoimmunology have uncovered novel targets within the immune microenvironment to help improve various regeneration therapies, notably therapies potentiating the interaction between BMSCs and immune cells. However, these researches lack a thorough understanding of the immune microenvironment and the interaction network of immune cells in the course of bone regeneration, especially for the post-operative defect of ORNJ. This review summarized the composition of the immune microenvironment during bone regeneration, how the immune microenvironment interacts with the skeletal system, and discussed existing and potential strategies aimed at targeting cellular and molecular immune microenvironment components.

Effects of four-year cyclic versus two-year daily teriparatide treatment on volumetric bone density and bone strength in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of cyclic vs daily teriparatide treatment (TPTD) on volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and bone strength at the hip and spine in women who were previously untreated.

METHODS

A total of 86 women were randomized to a 24-month open label treatment of either daily TPTD (20 μg daily) or cyclic TPTD (20 μg daily for 3 months followed by 3 months off). During a 2-year extension, women in the daily TPTD group were switched to alendronate (ALN) and those in the cyclic TPTD group continued on cyclic TPTD (without any ALN). QCT images were acquired at baseline, 2-years (n = 54) and 4-years (n = 35) and analyzed for volumetric integral, cortical and trabecular bone mineral density (vBMD) and bone strength (by finite element analysis) at the hip and spine. The primary analysis presented here compared the responses across equal total TPTD doses (2 years daily vs 4 years cyclic).

RESULTS

In the spine, integral vBMD and strength increased substantially after 2 years daily and 4 years cyclic TPTD, with no significant differences (vBMD +12 % vs +11 %, respectively, p = 0.70; spine strength +21 % vs +16 %, respectively, p = 0.35). At the hip, the gains were smaller, but again no significant differences were detected between the groups for the increases in either vBMD (+2 % in both groups, p = 0.97) or hip strength (3 % vs 3 %, p = 0.91). In the spine, the vBMD increment was about twice as large in the trabecular vs peripheral compartment; in the hip, significant vBMD gain was seen only in the trabecular compartment.

CONCLUSIONS

The gains in volumetric BMD and bone strength for an equivalent dose of TPTD did not depend on whether it was administered every day over two years or cyclically over four years.

Biosimilarity Assessment of the Biosimilar Teriparatide Candidate and the Reference Drug in Healthy Subjects

SAL001, a recombinant form of parathyroid hormone, is a biosimilar drug to teriparatide and is planned to be used in osteoporosis treatment. A single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-way crossover trial was conducted in healthy subjects to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety between SAL001 and the reference drug. Sixty-four subjects were enrolled in the study, and 61 subjects completed the study. In each period, 20 μg of the test or reference formulation was administered subcutaneously. SAL001 was administered by autoinjector pen, whereas the reference drug was administered by a self-matched injection pen. Serial blood samples were obtained for the analyses of PK and serum calcium concentration. Geometric mean ratios with 90%CIs for the maximum plasma concentration (C_max ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) were estimated. The safety of these 2 formulations was also evaluated. Overall, the 90%CIs for the geometric mean ratios of C_max , AUC from time 0 to the last quantifiable time point, and AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity of the test or reference product were within 80.0%-125.0% of biosimilarity criteria. Other PK parameters, serum calcium concentration, and safety profiles had no significant differences between the 2 formulations. SAL001 demonstrated PK similarity to the reference drug, and the serum calcium concentration and safety profiles of SAL001 were also considered comparable to the reference drug.

Nanotechnology for Targeted Drug Delivery to Treat Osteoporosis

Bone diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, Paget's disease, and osteoporosis cause mortality and mobility limits. Nanomedicine and nano delivery systems have been utilised to deliver active drug moiety to the precisely targeted site in a controlled manner, and it serves as a means of diagnostic tools. The utilisation of nanomedicine is expanding vigorously for assured targeting and efficient drug delivery. Nanotechnology offers various advantages, such as site-specific targeting, precise drug release kinetics, and improved bone mineral density. Recent medications available for osteoporosis are not viable due to the adverse effects associated with them and low patient compliance. There is an urgent need to develop biocompatible and appropriate drug delivery nanocarriers such as nanoparticles, liposomes, hydrogels, dendrimers, micelles, mesoporous particles, etc. These carriers enhance drug delivery and therapeutic effectiveness in bone tissues. The use of nanotechnology is also associated with toxicity. This article presents the review of various reports on nanocarrier systems and biologics for the treatment of osteoporosis. It aims to provide researchers with a clue for inventing a new drug delivery system with site-specific targeting for the treatment of osteoporosis.

The Effect of Zoledronic Acid on Bone Microarchitecture and Strength after Denosumab and Teriparatide Administration: DATA-HD Study Extension

The combination of denosumab and teriparatide is an effective treatment strategy in postmenopausal osteoporosis, though skeletal gains are promptly lost when these agents are discontinued. In the DATA-HD study, we reported that a single dose of zoledronic acid (ZOL) maintains the increases in areal spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) achieved with this combination for at least 12 months. The capacity of ZOL to maintain corresponding improvements in peripheral volumetric BMD and microarchitecture, however, has not been reported. In the 15-month DATA-HD study, 76 postmenopausal osteoporotic women were randomized to receive 9 months of teriparatide (20-μg or 40-μg daily) overlapped with denosumab (60 mg at months 3 and 9). In the Extension study, 53 participants received a single dose of ZOL (5 mg intravenously) 24-35 weeks after the last denosumab dose. We measured volumetric BMD and microarchitecture at the distal radius and tibia using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography at months 27 and 42. Despite ZOL administration, total and cortical BMD gradually decreased over 27 months resulting in values similar to baseline at the radius but still significantly above baseline at the tibia. At both sites, cortical porosity decreased to values below pretreatment baseline at month 27 but then increased from month 27 to 42. There were no significant changes in trabecular parameters throughout the 27-month post-ZOL observation period. Stiffness and failure load, at both sites, decreased progressively from month 15 42 though remained above baseline at the tibia. These findings suggest that in contrast to the largely maintained gains in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived spine and hip BMD, a single dose of ZOL was not as effective in maintaining the gains in volumetric peripheral bone density and microarchitecture produced by 15 months of overlapping treatment with denosumab and teriparatide. Alternative therapeutic approaches that can fully maintain improvements in peripheral bone parameters require further study. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

The why and how of sequential and combination therapy in osteoporosis. A review of the current evidence

It is now well recognized that over the lifetime of a patient with osteoporosis, more than one medication will be needed to treat the disease and to decrease fracture risk. Though current gaps in osteoporosis therapy can be potentially mitigated with sequential and combination regimens, how to move seamlessly amongst the multiple treatments currently available for osteoporosis for sustained efficacy is still unclear. Data from recent studies show that an anabolic agent such as teriparatide or romosozumab followed by an antiresorptive affords maximal gain in BMD and possibly better and earlier fracture risk reduction compared to a regimen which follows the opposite sequence. Sequentially moving to a bisphosphonate such as alendronate from an anabolic agent such as abaloparatide has also been shown to preserve the fracture reduction benefits seen with the latter. This sequence of an anabolic agent followed by an antiresorptive should especially be considered in the high-risk patient with imminent fracture risk to rapidly reduce the risk of subsequent fractures. The data surrounding optimum timing of initiation of bisphosphonate therapy following denosumab discontinuation is still unclear. Though data suggests that combining a bisphosphonate with teriparatide does not provide substantial BMD gains compared to monotherapy, the concomitant administration of denosumab with teriparatide has been shown to significantly increase areal BMD as well as to increase volumetric BMD and estimated bone strength. This narrative review explores the available evidence regarding the various sequential and combination therapy approaches and the potential role they could play in better managing osteoporosis.

Risk factors for poor response to denosumab treatment in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

Denosumab has been reported to increase bone mineral density (BMD) and suppress fractures, but poor responders are not uncommon. This study aimed to identify risk factors for poor response to denosumab treatment. This is the first study to explore risk factors for poor response to denosumab.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective observational study investigated 227 Japanese postmenopausal women who received denosumab with monitoring of BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at 6-month intervals. Risk factors were identified using Cox's proportional hazard modeling. Poor responders were defined as not exceeding the least significant change of BMD from baseline for 3 years.

RESULTS

Mean relative change from baseline for 3 years in lumbar spine (LS)-BMD, femoral neck (FN)-BMD, and total hip (TH)-BMD were 12.6%, 6.8%, and 6.1%, respectively. Numbers of poor responders were 10 in LS-BMD, 47 in FN-BMD, 38 in TH-BMD. Risk factors for poor response were concomitant glucocorticoid use for LS-BMD, low body mass index or initiation at higher BMD for FN-BMD, and pretreatment with bisphosphonates or initiation at higher BMD for TH-BMD.

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for insufficient denosumab effect differed between BMD measurement sites. These results should be taken into consideration when selecting denosumab in clinical practice.

Comparison of the efficacy between sequential therapy with teriparatide and denosumab and denosumab monotherapy in suppressing fragility fracture risk

In this retrospective study, the effectiveness of short-term teriparatide with denosumab in reducing fragility fracture risk was determined in comparison with denosumab monotherapy. Administration of sequential teriparatide with denosumab showed excellent outcomes in suppressing the risk for fragility fractures compared with denosumab monotherapy.

INTRODUCTION

To determine the effectiveness of short-term teriparatide with denosumab in reducing the risk of fragility fractures in comparison to denosumab monotherapy.

METHODS

The data of postmenopausal patients treated with denosumab for > 2 years between August 2015 and October 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. One hundred sixty four postmenopausal women of a total 615 were excluded, since they did not undergo > 2 bone mineral density (BMD) tests, were lost to follow-up, or received long-term teriparatide therapy. Total 320 patients received denosumab monotherapy and 131 patients received teriparatide for ≥ 3 months followed by denosumab. The number of osteoporotic fractures, presence of back pain before and after treatment, and annual BMD during treatment were comparatively assessed using t-test, Chi-square test, and linear mixed model analysis.

RESULTS

Before treatment, the denosumab monotherapy group had fewer osteoporotic fractures (mean ± standard deviation; 0.459 ± 0.689) than the sequential therapy group had (1.037 ± 0.871; p < 0.001). After treatment, the sequential therapy group had fewer osteoporotic fractures than the denosumab monotherapy group had (0.119 ± 0.348 versus 0.144 ± 0.385; p < 0.001). At 1 and 2 years after treatment, the increase in lumbar spine BMD was greater in the sequential therapy group than in the denosumab monotherapy group (p = 0.08, group × time). The difference between post and pre-treatment back pain visual analog scale score was significantly lower in the sequential therapy group than in the monotherapy group (3.246 ± 3.426 versus 1.734 ± 3.049; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Short-term teriparatide use before denosumab showed excellent outcomes in suppressing the risk of fragility fractures compared with denosumab monotherapy.