Comparisons of prognostic scoring systems for myelodysplastic syndromes: a Korean multicenter study

Should We Look beyond Revised International Prognostic Scoring System: A Retrospective Observational Study of Progression of Myelodysplastic Syndrome to Acute Leukemia

Introduction Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a clonal stem cell disorder and heterogeneous condition resulting in peripheral cytopenias with marrow dysplasia due to ineffective hematopoiesis. The revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) predicts the risk of progression to acute leukemia (AL). Indian data on MDS and its progression to AL are limited. Additionally, the cytogenetic findings are dictated by patients' racial background. Study intended to analyze the cytogenetic profile of the patients with MDS.

Objectives This study aimed to (1) evaluate the clinicohematologic and morphologic spectrum of newly diagnosed MDS cases, (2) evaluate the cytogenetic profile of these cases, and (3) study the cases progressed to AL.

Materials and Methods MDS cases diagnosed and followed-up during a 5-year study period, from January 2015 to December 2019, were included in the study and the study was conducted at regional cancer center in Western India. De novo diagnosed MDS cases with complete workup were considered and MDS due to secondary causes were excluded. Baseline clinical, hematologic findings were tabulated along with cytogenetics and risk stratified as per IPSS-R, and their progression was studied.

Results A total of 63 cases of de novo MDS were diagnosed over a period of 5 years with 45 cases on follow-up and 15 cases (33.3%) progressed to AL. Maximum number of cases belonged to MDS-excess blast (EB) category accounting to 48 cases (76.1%). Apparently normal karyotyping was the commonest cytogenetic finding in 33 MDS cases (61.2%) and in 8 cases that progressed to AL (53.4%).

Conclusion MDS cases diagnosed at relatively early age were at higher risk of progression to AL. Majority of the cases that progressed to AL were risk stratified in high and very high risk groups and 10 cases which progressed to AL belonged to good category, interestingly apparent normal karyotyping was the commonest cytogenetic finding in more than 50% of the cases progressed to AL. Molecular mutations could only explain this progression and studies integrating molecular mutations with present IPSS-R scoring system should be conducted, as it could translate into better risk stratification and help in early identification and better management of cases at risk in progression to AL.

Decitabine: An effective and safe treatment for myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia

Objective

Decitabine is reported to be valuable in treating multiple malignant blood diseases. However, the application of decitabine in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has not been fully examined. Thus, our study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of decitabine in treating such patients.

Materials and Methods

Clinical data of MDS or AML patients treated with decitabine were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients were regularly followed up, and the risk factors affecting clinical efficacy were also detected.

Results

A total of 36 patients (MDS, n = 27; AML, n = 9) were included in the study. The response rate of MDS patients was 55%, and there were three cases (15%) of complete remission (CR), three cases (15%) of marrow CR, and five cases (15%) of hematologic improvement. It was about three cycles to achieve the best efficiencies. Gender, age, percentage of blasts in bone marrow, International Prognostic Scoring System risk group, and cytogenetic factors were not associated with response rate. The median overall survival of MDS patients was 8 (1-44) months. Agranulocytosis (P = 0.037) and severe anemia (P = 0.044) were the independent factors for prognosis. The complete response rate of AML was 33.3%. From the investigation, infection was the most common complication in our cohort, especially lung infection with the incidence of 27.8%.

Conclusions

Our data demonstrated that decitabine was effective and relatively safe in treating MDS and AML. Patients with agranulocytosis and severe anemia were prone to have poor survival, which should be monitored in clinical practice.

First Cytogenetic Profile of Omani Patients with de novo Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Comparison with data from Asia, Africa, Europe and North and South America

Clonal cytogenetic abnormalities have been reported among 30-80% of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS); however, 20-70% of patients with MDS show a normal karyotype that may nevertheless harbour a cryptic genetic alteration. Earlier reports have suggested that the distribution of specific chromosomal aberrations varies among Western and Asian countries, with geographical and ethnic differences in the frequency of specific chromosomal aberrations. This article compared the cytogenetic data of 36 adult Omani patients with MDS to previously reported data from other populations. Differences were noted between the percentages of clonal aberrations and the median age of Omani subjects at presentation in comparison to individuals of different ethnicities and from various geographical locations. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first report to describe the cytogenetic data of patients with MDS from Oman.

Does Indian Myelodysplastic Syndrome Have a Biology Different from That in the West ?

abstract.

Clinical Prognostic Factors in 86 Chinese Patients with Primary Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Trisomy 8: A Single Institution Experience

PURPOSE

The objective was to determine the characteristics and prognostic factors of 86 Chinese patients with trisomy 8 aberrations and compare the prognostic value of International Prognostic System (IPSS) and Revised IPSS (IPSS-R) in this cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 86 cases diagnosed with primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with isolated tr8 or with tr8 and other additional cytogenetic aberrations diagnosed and treated at the Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology between July 2002 and March 2013 were reviewed.

RESULTS

The median survival of the entire group was 23.0 months, and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) developed in 43% (37/86) patients within the follow up time. The univariate analysis revealed that overall survival (OS) was correlated with age, thrombocytopenia, absolute neutrophil count, marrow blasts, cytogenetic status and red blood cell transfusion at diagnosis, and the multivariate analysis revealed that age, marrow blasts, cytogenetic status and transfusion dependence were independent parameters for the OS. The cytogenetic complexity and marrow blasts had the strongest impact on the AML transformation by multivariate analysis. Comparing the two prognostic systems, both two systems could successfully discriminate risk groups for survival. IPSS-R was more refined than IPSS for predicting OS, but had no advantage in predicting the risk of AML development.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed the influence of clinical factors on the prognosis of 86 Chinese MDS patients with trisomy 8. In addition, IPSS-R can further refine prognostic discrimination in the IPSS risk categories.

Use of azacitidine for myelodysplastic syndromes: controversial issues and practical recommendations

Azacitidine is recommended for patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) who are not eligible for intensive therapy or for patients with lower-risk MDS who have thrombocytopenia or neutropenia or have anemia that is unresponsive to other therapies. However, standard treatment with azacitidine has not been optimized and many issues about the use of azacitidine remain unresolved. The use of azacitidine is expanding rapidly, but limited comparative clinical trial data are available to (i) define the optimal use of azacitidine in patients with higher-risk MDS or around the time of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, (ii) identify those patients with lower-risk MDS who may benefit from treatment, and (iii) guide physicians on alternative therapies after treatment failure. Increasing evidence suggests that the clinical features, prognostic factors, and cytogenetic profiles of patients with MDS in Asia differ significantly from those of patients in Western countries, so the aim of this review is to summarize the evidence and provide practical recommendations on the use of azacitidine in patients with MDS in the Republic of Korea. Evidence considered in this review is based on published clinical data and on the clinical experience of an expert panel from the acute myeloid leukemia/MDS Working Party of the Korean Society of Hematology.

Improvement of the WHO classification-based prognostic scoring system (WPSS) by including age for Korean patients with the myelodysplastic syndrome

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to improve the predictive power of the WHO classification-based prognostic scoring system (WPSS) by including age in patients with the myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

136 Korean patients with de novo MDS between 1995 and 2008 were evaluated retrospectively. All patients were reclassified according to WHO criteria. 114 patients were included in the final analysis. An individualized age-adapted scoring system was developed to improve the accuracy of prognosis of the WPSS.

RESULTS

The WPSS was significantly associated with the prediction of survival and the leukemia-free survival. While the risk of a patient with the WPSS was best represented by the values 0 (very low), +1 (low), +2 (intermediate), +3 (high), and +4 (very high), these values were found to vary between -1.0 and 4.2 in the same patients when age was included as a factor. The WPSS may vary according to age, <55 or ≥55 years. The estimated difference in median survival was more prominent in the lower risk groups of the WPSS than in the higher-risk groups.

CONCLUSION

In addition to the WPSS, age was found to significantly influence the prognosis of patients with MDS and provided a more individualized prognosis for the patients with MDS.

Predictive factors of response and survival following chemotherapy treatment in acute myeloid leukemia progression from myelodysplastic syndrome

OBJECTIVE

The progression of myelodysplastic syndrome to acute myeloid leukemia (MDS/AML) is generally incurable and its prognosis is extremely poor. It is important to determine the predictive factors of response and survival in diseases treated with chemotherapy.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients who had been diagnosed of MDS/AML and had undergone chemotherapy between April 2001 and March 2008 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 29 patients, 21 patients had an abnormal karyotype. Among them, 13 had complex type abnormalities and/or monosomy 7. Twenty-four patients were administered a low-dose AraC containing regimen and 5 received an AML-like regimen as the initial chemotherapy. The responses were CR4/PR2/NR23. The response rate (RR) in the patients with a normal karyotype was significantly better than in those with an abnormal karyotype (62.5% vs. 4.8%, p=0.003). Univariate analyses showed that the hemoglobin level and cytogenetic abnormalities were factors that contributed to the overall survival.

CONCLUSION

In MDS/AML, patients with a normal karyotype tended to have a better response to chemotherapy. The hemoglobin level and cytogenetic abnormalities were significant factors affecting the overall survival.

Is International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) still standard in predicting prognosis in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome? External validation of the WHO Classification-Based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS) and comparison with IPSS

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to evaluate the prognostic value of the WHO Classification-Based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS) and to compare it with that of the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

149 patients de novo diagnosed as having myelodysplastic syndrome between December 1994 and February 2007, were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

WPSS presented an excellent method for risk-stratifying patients into five subgroups, with different risks of death and leukaemic evolution. On univariate analysis, three components of WPSS - cytogenetic risk, WHO category and transfusion dependency - had good correlations with overall survival (OS) and time to leukaemic evolution (TTL). However, one component of IPSS - number of peripheral cytopenias - did not correlate with OS or TTL. WPSS could distinguish the truly low-risk patients (very low) who had an excellent long-term survival with rare leukaemic evolution, while IPSS could not. These patients should be managed with clinical observation and delayed treatment strategies. Furthermore, on multivariate analysis for OS, WPSS was found to be an independent prognostic factor for survival along with age [P = 0.04; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-2.85] and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (P = 0.002; HR = 2.47; 95% CI 1.41-4.31). On the other hand, the prognostic significance of IPSS was not confirmed.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the WPSS might be a more powerful predictor of prognosis than IPSS and that independent validation of several other, larger data sets should be necessary.

Iron chelation therapy in the myelodysplastic syndromes and aplastic anemia: a review of experience in South Korea

Emerging clinical data indicate that transfusion-dependent patients with bone marrow-failure syndromes (BMFS) are at risk of the consequences of iron overload, including progressive damage to hepatic, endocrine, and cardiac organs. Despite the availability of deferoxamine (DFO) in Korea since 1998, data from patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, aplastic anemia, and other BMFS show significant iron overload and damage to the heart and liver. The recent introduction of deferasirox, a once-daily, oral iron chelator, may improve the availability of iron chelation therapy to iron-overloaded patients, and improve compliance in patients who may otherwise find adherence to the DFO regimen difficult.

Cytogenetic analysis of 52 Indian patients with de novo myelodysplastic syndromes?a comparative analysis of results with reports from Asia

Most published data on myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are derived from Western countries, which report MDS as a disease of the elderly. However, it was observed that Asian MDS patients were younger than subjects in Western reports. With this in mind, the study was conducted prospectively on 52 Indian patients to define chromosomal abnormalities and to understand ethno-geographical differences, if any, underlying the pathogenesis of MDS among this Asian population. Cytogenetic analysis was performed using GTG banding and karyotyped according to the International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (ISCN). The incidence of MDS was predominant in the age group of 41-60 years (44.23%), with a median age at diagnosis of 55 years. The disease was more frequent in males (33 patients, 63.46%) than females (19 patients, 36.53%). Of 48 patients successfully karyotyped, 17 had normal karyotype (35.4%) and 31 patients (64.5%) had a chromosomal abnormality. The most frequent chromosome abnormalities were del 5q/-5 in 13 patients (42%), -7/7q- in 10 patients (32.2%), +8 and del 20q- in 6 cases each (19.3%) and i(17)(q10) in 1 patient (3.2%). In addition to these non-random chromosomal abnormalities, some rare abnormalities were also encountered. A higher rate of transformation to acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) was observed in the Chinese population compared to other Asian countries. The incidence of chromosomal abnormalities varied considerably across the different Asian populations. The overall frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in our study was comparable to most Western reports. Further prospective studies are warranted to elucidate precisely the ethnic differences in the pathogenesis of MDS in the Indian population.

The impact of intensive antileukaemic treatment strategies on prognosis of myelodysplastic syndrome patients aged less than 61 years according to International Prognostic Scoring System risk groups

The present study applied the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) to 306 consecutive myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients diagnosed between August 1977 and September 2000 at the University Medical Centre Nijmegen. The aim was to investigate whether the IPSS could be used as a prognostic tool in MDS patients aged less than 61 years who were treated with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML)-like chemotherapy with or without transplantation, and whether the scoring system discriminated between the subgroups of patients who benefit from intensive treatment strategies. The patients were retrospectively assigned to the IPSS risk categories and compared with the IPSS workshop patients. Eighty-three of 159 patients aged < 61 years, classified as intermediate 1, intermediate 2 and high risk according to the IPSS, received intensive treatment consisting of chemotherapy only (n = 30), chemotherapy followed by either autologous stem cell transplantation (n = 7) or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (n = 46). After intensive treatment, the median survival was 2.6 years for the intermediate 1 risk group (n = 33), 3.4 years for the intermediate 2 risk group (n = 27) and 0.9 years for the high-risk group (n = 23). We conclude that the IPSS is an improved scoring system for patients receiving supportive care. Nevertheless, the scoring system does not seem to be the best method for predicting outcome after intensive antileukaemic treatment. In particular, intermediate 2 risk patients may benefit from intensive treatment.

Pathogenesis, classification, and treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) comprise a heterogeneous group of clonal myeloid disorders characterized by morphologic dysplasia in one or more cell lineages. Dysplasia in MDS is associated with insufficient production of blood cells and consecutive cytopenia(s). The natural course and prognosis of MDS vary among patients and depend on genetic defects that occur during clonal evolution. In a significant group of patients (roughly 30%) progression to secondary leukemia is observed. These patients appear to have a grave prognosis. The treatment of patients with MDS has to be adjusted to the individual situation and age in each case. In many patients, control of blast cell production by palliative cytoreduction, continuous support with red blood cells, as well as other supportive measures, seem appropriate. In other patients, however, curative therapy (chemotherapy, stem cell transplantation) should be considered. The final decision to offer curative therapy must be based on many different factors including age and the overall situation of the patient. Recently established scoring systems aimed at predicting survival and evolution of leukemia in MDS may be helpful in this regard.

Application of different prognostic scoring systems and comparison of the FAB and WHO classifications in Korean patients with myelodysplastic syndrome

We retrospectively studied 227 patients with MDS (1) to identify the prognostic factors of survival and acute leukemia evolution in Korean patients with MDS, (2) to apply different prognostic scoring systems to the same group of patients, and (3) to compare the FAB with the WHO classification. Six scoring systems were applied to the patients, and the FAB and WHO classifications were compared. The patients' median age was 57 years. The median survival time was 21 months, and age, dysgranulopoiesis and the IPSS cytogenetic groups were independent prognostic factors for survival. Acute leukemia occurred in 34 patients, and the cumulative incidence was 27.1% at 3 years. Marrow blast percentage was the only independent prognostic factor for acute leukemia evolution. Most scoring systems successfully discriminated risk groups for survival and acute leukemia evolution, but patient distribution into risk groups varied according to the scoring systems. Refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia and RAEB II seemed to have different prognoses from RA or RARS and RAEB I, respectively. In summary, our MDS patients had different disease natures from those of Western countries regarding clinical features, prognostic factors and cytogenetic profiles. Although the WHO classification seems to improve the FAB classification, further studies are warranted to validate the utility of the WHO classification before it is accepted for routine clinical use. Our study has the limitations of retrospective analysis, and our results should be verified in future prospective studies.