The influence of race and previous pregnancy outcome on outcomes in the current pregnancy

A Comparison of Birth Outcomes Among Black, Hispanic, and Black Hispanic Women

BACKGROUND

While non-Hispanic Black populations tend to be disproportionately affected by adverse reproductive outcomes, Hispanic populations tend to demonstrate healthier birth outcomes, regardless of socioeconomic background. Little is known about birth outcomes for women who are both Black and Hispanic. We examined whether birth outcomes and risk factors for women who are both Black and Hispanic most closely resemble those of women who are only Black or Hispanic and also compared these outcomes to those for Whites.

METHODS

Using the 2013 US natality files, we examined 2,970,315 singleton births to Black Hispanic, Hispanic, Black, and White mothers. We used logistic regression to calculate predicted probabilities of low birth weight (LBW), preterm birth (PTB), or small for gestational age (SGA). Race-stratified regression analysis was used to identify the factors that significantly predicted risk for each outcome for each racial/ethnic group.

RESULTS

Black mothers had the highest prevalence and predicted probabilities of experiencing all three outcomes. Black Hispanic mothers were less likely than Black mothers and more likely than Hispanic mothers to experience each of the adverse outcomes. We also found support for racial variation in risk and protective factors for mothers in the different groups. Factors like age and education inconsistently predicted risk of experiencing the birth outcomes for all groups. Overall, Black Hispanic mothers had birth outcomes and risk factor profiles like Hispanic mothers, although they had sociodemographic characteristics and health behaviors like Black mothers.

CONCLUSIONS

Patterning of birth outcomes among Black Hispanic women suggest an intersection of risk and protective factors associated with their respective racial and ethnic identities. Additional information about sociodemographic context is needed to develop a more complete picture of how factors related to race and ethnic group membership influence Black Hispanic women's birth outcomes.

Results of the Recent Immigrant Pregnancy and Perinatal Long-term Evaluation Study (RIPPLES)

BACKGROUND

People who immigrate to Western nations may experience fewer chronic health problems than original residents of those countries, which raises concerns about long-term environmental or lifestyle factors in those countries. We tested whether the "healthy immigrant effect" extends to the risk of placental dysfunction during the short interval of pregnancy.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of data for 796 105 women who had a first documented obstetric delivery in Ontario between 1995 and 2005. Recency of immigration was determined for each woman as the time from her enrolment in universal health insurance to her date of delivery, classified as less than 3 months, 3-5 months, 6-11 months, 12-23 months, 24-35 months, 36-47 months, 48-59 months and 5 years or more (the referent). The primary composite outcome was maternal placental syndrome (defined as a diagnosis of pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, placental abruption or placental infarction).

RESULTS

The mean age of the women was 28.8 years. Maternal placental syndrome occurred in 45 216 women (5.7%). The risk of this outcome was lowest among the women who had immigrated less than 3 months before delivery (3.8%) and highest among those living in Ontario at least 5 years (6.0%), for a crude odds ratio (OR) of 0.62 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-0.71). After adjustment for maternal age, income status, pre-existing hypertension, diabetes mellitus, multiple gestation and receipt of prenatal ultrasonography, the risk of maternal placental syndrome was correlated with the number of months since immigration in a gradient manner (OR, 95% CI): less than 3 months (0.53, 0.47-0.61), 3-5 months (0.68, 0.61-0.76), 6-11 months (0.67, 0.63-0.71), 12-23 months (0.69, 0.66-0.73), 24-35 months (0.75, 0.70-0.79), 36-47 months (0.75, 0.70-0.80) and 48-59 months (0.82, 0.77-0.87).

INTERPRETATION

There was a progressively lower risk of maternal placental syndromes associated with recency of immigration. The "healthy immigrant effect" may extend to common placental disorders, diminishes with the duration of residency and underscores the importance of nongenetic determinants of maternal health accrued over a brief period.

Prenatal cystic fibrosis screening in Mexican Americans: An economic analysis

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the cost benefit of cystic fibrosis screening in Mexican American gravid women.

STUDY DESIGN

With the use of decisions analysis techniques, a cost-benefit analysis was performed. Baseline assumptions were based on published references. Sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Under the baseline assumptions, screening was not cost beneficial. Threshold analysis showed that, if the test was priced under 53.00 dollars, screening became cost beneficial. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that lower acceptance rates of amniocentesis or termination made the screening strategy less attractive. If the test sensitivity was raised to 90%, which required testing of >60 mutations, the cost of screening would need to be <100.00 dollars for the program to be cost beneficial.

CONCLUSION

Cystic fibrosis screening is not cost beneficial in Mexican American women over a wide range of assumptions. This is principally due to the poor sensitivity of the test in this population. Cultural factors, such as lower acceptance of amniocentesis and pregnancy termination of affected fetuses, further lower the cost-benefit ratio of screening.

Ethnicity and sources of prenatal care: findings from a national survey

BACKGROUND

Improving pregnancy outcomes for minorities is a major goal of health providers and policy makers. Since most strategies involve an intervention during pregnancy, it is important to know where minority women with various characteristics receive prenatal care and why. Our purpose was to evaluate services of prenatal care for white, African-American, Mexican-American, and Puerto Rican women.

METHODS

The National Maternal and Infant Health Survey (1988) was used to ascertain age, income, marital status, education level, and source of funding of the study population of 21,000 women, who were assigned to an ethnic group based on self-indentification in the survey. The sources of prenatal care were classified as private (private physician, nurse-midwife, health maintenance organization) or public (state or local health department, community health center, hospital-based clinic).

RESULTS

When categorized by ethnic group alone, 78 percent of white women received private care compared with 51 percent of Mexican-American women, 44 percent of African-American women, and 37 percent of Puerto Rican women. Private health insurance was held by 78 percent of white, 50 percent of African-American, 49 percent of Mexican-American, and 47 percent of Puerto Rican women. Of those with private insurance, 86, 62, 69, and 59 percent, respectively, received private care. Of white women with Medicaid funding, 52 percent received private care as opposed to a range of 20 to 42 percent for minority women.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial differences in sources of prenatal care exist between white and minority women and between different minority groups, suggesting that policy makers and health caregivers should tailor prenatal care intervention to the needs of specific minority populations.

Prognostic significance of prior preterm twin delivery on subsequent singleton pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to determine whether preterm birth of twins is associated with an increased risk of preterm birth in a subsequent singleton pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

The Medical University of South Carolina perinatal database was accessed to identify a cohort of patients who were delivered of twins followed by a singleton gestation (1981 to 1993). Maternal transports were excluded to minimize referral bias. Preterm birth was defined as < 37 weeks' gestation. Relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-four patients were identified who were delivered of twins followed by a singleton gestation. Preterm delivery occurred in 86 (59.7%) of the twins and 21 (14.6%) of the subsequent singletons. Preterm birth of twins was associated with a significantly increased risk of preterm delivery in a subsequent singleton pregnancy (relative risk 2.87, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 8.09). In the subset of women who were delivered of twins at < 30 weeks' gestation, 42% of the subsequent singletons were delivered preterm (relative risk 6.11, 95% confidence interval 2.07 to 18.02). The relative risk of preterm birth of a singleton after delivery of twins between 30 and 34 weeks' gestation was 3.63 (95% confidence interval 1.02 to 12.92). However, if the preceding twins delivered between 34 and 37 weeks' gestation, the relative risk of preterm birth of the subsequent singleton was not significantly increased (relative risk 1.42, 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 5.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Preterm birth of twins before 34 weeks' gestation is associated with a significant risk for preterm delivery in a subsequent singleton pregnancy. The magnitude of risk increases with decreasing gestational age of the preceding twin delivery.