Congenital non-syndromal sensorineural hearing impairment due to connexin 26 gene mutations--molecular and audiological findings

Audiological Phenotypes of Connexin Gene Mutation Patterns: A Glance at Different GJB2/GJB6 Gene Mutation Profiles

GJB2 mutations are the most common cause of autosomal-recessive non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). The available evidence shows large phenotypic variability across different genotypes and allelic variants. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and audiological features of a cohort of subjects with different GJB2/GJB6 gene mutation profiles from a tertiary referral center in Northeastern Italy. We considered 57 patients with GJB2/GJB6 mutations presenting with congenital, non-syndromic SNHL, mainly coming from the Veneto region (Italy). The samples were screened for mutations in exons 1 and 2 of the GJB2 gene and for the GJB6 gene deletion del (GJB6-D13S1830). Free-field and air-conduction frequency-specific thresholds and the pure-tone average (PTA) were considered in the statistical analysis. Five patients (8.87%) had connexin gene mutations in simple heterozygosis, 15 (26.31%) in compound heterozygosis, 34 (59.64%) in homozygosis, and 3 (5.26%) with digenic patterns. The frequency-specific air-conduction thresholds showed significantly different mean values across the different genotypes (Roy's largest-root test, p = 0.0473). Despite the evidence already available on genetic SNHL, many new insights are to be expected. Further large-scale prospective studies including different populations are necessary to confirm these preliminary findings about the clinical and audiological features of patients with different GJB2/GJB6 gene mutation patterns.

Genetic etiology of non-syndromic hearing loss in Europe

Hearing impairment not etiologically associated with clinical signs in other organs (non-syndromic) is genetically heterogeneous, so that over 120 genes are currently known to be involved. The frequency of mutations in each gene and the most frequent mutations vary throughout populations. Here we review the genetic etiology of non-syndromic hearing impairment (NSHI) in Europe. Over the years, epidemiological data were scarce because of the large number of involved genes, whose screening was not cost-effective until implementation of massively parallel DNA sequencing. In Europe, the most common form of autosomal recessive NSHI is DFNB1, which accounts for 11-57% of the cases. Mutations in STRC account for 16% of the recessive cases, and only a few more (MYO15A, MYO7A, LOXHD1, USH2A, TMPRSS3, CDH23, TMC1, OTOF, OTOA, SLC26A4, ADGRV1 and TECTA) have contributions higher than 2%. As regards autosomal-dominant NSHI, DFNA22 (MYO6) and DFNA8/12 (TECTA) represent the most common forms, accounting for 21% and 18% of elucidated cases, respectively. The contribution of ACTG1 and WFS1 drops to 9% in both cases, followed by POU4F3 (6.5%), MYO7A (5%), MYH14 and COL11A2 (4% each). Four additional genes contribute 2.5% each one (MITF, KCNQ4, EYA4, SOX10) and the remaining are residually represented. X-linked hearing loss and maternally-inherited NSHI have minor contributions in most countries. Further knowledge on the genetic epidemiology of NSHI in Europe needs a standardization of the experimental approaches and a stratification of the results according to clinical features, familial history and patterns of inheritance, to facilitate comparison between studies.

The Analysis of GJB2, GJB3, and GJB6 Gene Mutations in Patients with Hereditary Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss Living in Sivas

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to investigate the presence of GJB2, GJB3, and GJB6 gene mutations in non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss (NSHL) cases living in Sivas region, to provide appropriate genetic counseling for cases who were found to have mutation, and to contribute to decrease the frequency of mutant allele in the next generation and plan treatment and rehabilitation with early diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 53 unrelated cases that were diagnosed with congenital NSHL between June 2009 and March 2010. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification method was used for genotyping of GJB2, GJB3, and GJB6 gene mutations.

RESULTS

Heterozygous 35delG variant was determined in 1.9% (n=1) of cases, homozygous 35delG in 15.1% (n=8), heterozygous IVS1+1G>A mutation in 1.9% (n=1), compound heterozygous in 3.8% (n=2), and homozygous IVS1+1G>A variant in 3.8% (n=2). None of the cases had mutation in GJB3 and GJB6 genes. Mutated allele frequencies in the present study were found to be 17.9% for 35delG and 6.6% for IVS1+1G>A.

CONCLUSION

The present study showed that 35delG mutation is the most common variant in the Sivas region, and that IVS1+1G>A mutation should be investigated in hearing loss. Another result of the present study was that genetic analyzes would allow early diagnosis of hearing impairments particularly when infants whose parents have consanguinity do not pass the newborn hearing screening.

GJB2 Mutation Spectrum and Genotype-Phenotype Correlation in 1067 Han Chinese Subjects with Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss

Mutations in Gap Junction Beta 2 (GJB2) have been reported to be a major cause of non-syndromic hearing loss in many populations worldwide. The spectrums and frequencies of GJB2 variants vary substantially among different ethnic groups, and the genotypes among these populations remain poorly understood. In the present study, we carried out a systematic and extended mutational screening of GJB2 gene in 1067 Han Chinese subjects with non-syndromic hearing loss, and the resultant GJB2 variants were evaluated by phylogenetic, structural and bioinformatic analysis. A total of 25 (23 known and 2 novel) GJB2 variants were identified, including 6 frameshift mutations, 1 nonsense mutation, 16 missense mutations and 2 silent mutations. In this cohort, c.235delC is the most frequently observed pathogenic mutation. The phylogenetic, structural and bioinformatic analysis showed that 2 novel variants c.127G>T (p.V43L), c.293G>C (p.R98P) and 2 known variants c. 107T>C (p.L36P) and c.187G>T (p.V63L) are localized at highly conserved amino acids. In addition, these 4 mutations are absent in 203 healthy individuals, therefore, they are probably the most likely candidate pathogenic mutations. In addition, 66 (24 novel and 42 known) genotypes were identified, including 6 homozygotes, 20 compound heterozygotes, 18 single heterozygotes, 21 genotypes harboring only polymorphism(s) and the wild type genotype. Among these, 153 (14.34%) subjects were homozygous for pathogenic mutations, 63 (5.91%) were compound heterozygotes, and 157 (14.71%) carried single heterozygous mutation. Furthermore, 65.28% (141/216) of these cases with two pathogenic mutations exhibited profound hearing loss. These data suggested that mutations in GJB2 gene are responsible for approximately 34.96% of non-syndromic hearing loss in Han Chinese population from Zhejiang Province in eastern China. In addition, our results also strongly supported the idea that other factors such as alterations in regulatory regions, additional genes, and environmental factors may contribute to the clinical manifestation of deafness.

Connexin gene mutations among Ugandan patients with nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Congenital deafness occurs in approximately 1 in 1,000 live births, and 50% of these cases are hereditary. Connexin mutations have been identified as the most common cause of hereditary hearing loss in many populations. The prevalence of this mutation in African patients has not been adequately studied. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of connexin 26 and 30 mutations in a population of hearing-impaired patients from Uganda.

STUDY DESIGN

This is an observational study.

METHODS

Coding regions of both GJB2 and GJB6, noncoding exon 1 of GJB2, and 30 nucleotides of intronic sequence bordering the exons were analyzed in 126 subjects from Uganda with confirmed bilateral, severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. All variants were analyzed for possible clinical significance using a combination of database searches and in silico tools.

RESULTS

Complete sequence data were obtained on 115/126 individuals; 11 had only partial or no results. Only one reported pathogenic variant was found in GJB2 (c.208C>G; p.Pro70Ala) and none in GJB6. Three reported variants and two novel variants within intron 1 of GJB2 and two variants within exon 3 of GJB6 were also found.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the most common types of deletions in the GJB2 gene (c.35delG, c.167delT or c.235delC) were found in this large cohort of deaf children from Uganda. This prompts a search for genetic causes of deafness among this and other previously studied African populations.

Analysis of the presence of the GJB6 mutations in patients heterozygous for GJB2 mutation in Brazil

Mutations in the GJB2 gene, mainly 35delG, are responsible for most autosomal recessive inherited genetic hearing loss. The audiometric standard of these hearing losses remains inconsistent and other genes, such as GJB6, have been involved in association with GJB2. The objective of the study was to identify the deletions del(GJB6-D13S1830) and del(GJB6-D13S1854) in patients heterozygous for 35delG/GJB2 and analyze the phenotype they present. 101 patients with mild to profound degree of sensorineural hypoacusis were evaluated. The allele-specific PCR technique was used to identify 35delG. The del(GJB6-D13S1830) and del(GJB6-D13S1854) were identified through the PCR multiplex technique. 90% of the subjects presented a normal genotype for the analyzed mutations; 6.93% were shown to be heterozygous for 35delG/GJB2 and 1% presented compound heterozygosis GJB2/GJB6). The data found reinforced the hypothesis of an interaction of more than one gene as the cause of autosomal recessive genetic hearing loss and emphasized the importance of an early diagnosis for appropriate intervention.

GJB2 (Connexin 26) gene mutations among hearing-impaired persons in a Swedish cohort

CONCLUSION

The most common mutation in the Swedish population was Connexin 26 (C×26) 35delG, which indicates that the percentage of Swedish persons with C×26 mutations and polymorphisms in the GJB2 gene among non-syndromic hearing-impaired (HI) persons is comparable to the rest of Europe. The results strongly support a Swedish policy to offer all children with diagnosed hearing impairment genetic tests for the C×26 35delG mutation.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to search for mutations in the GBJ2 gene among Swedish persons with non-syndromic hearing impairment to further clarify how common these mutations are in Sweden, one of the northernmost countries in Europe.

METHODS

Seventy-nine patients with non-syndromic hearing impairment participated in the study. For 87% of the participants, a pure tone audiogram showed a severe or profound hearing impairment. Dried blood spots on filter paper, taken at 3-5 days of age in the Swedish nationwide neonatal screening programme for congenital disorders and saved in a biobank, were used for the molecular genetic analyses.

RESULTS

The total number of subjects with one or two pathologic mutations or a mutation of unknown consequence found in the GJB2 gene was 28 of 79 (35%). Nineteen (19) persons (24%) were homozygotes for the 35delG mutation.

Congenital cytomegalovirus infection - a common cause of hearing loss of unknown aetiology

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection as a cause of various types of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in a group of nonsyndromic children with otherwise unknown aetiology of hearing loss. Furthermore, the occurrence of combined congenital CMV infection and connexin 26 (Cx26) mutations was investigated.

METHODS

The dried blood spot (DBS) cards of 45 children with various degrees of hearing deficits and 46 children with severe/profound hearing loss were tested for CMV DNA with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. The DBS cards of the 46 children with severe/profound hearing loss were also analysed for Cx26 mutations.

RESULTS

Of the 45 children with various degrees of hearing loss, nine were positive for CMV DNA (20%). The nine children represented severe/profound, mild and unilateral hearing loss. From the 46 children with severe/profound hearing loss, nine of 46 (20%) were positive for CMV DNA. In addition, three of the CMV DNA-positive children were carriers of mutations of Cx26.

CONCLUSION

Congenital CMV infection is a high risk factor in hearing impairment among children.

Allele-specific impairment of GJB2 expression by GJB6 deletion del(GJB6-D13S1854)

Mutations in the GJB2 gene, which encodes connexin 26, are a frequent cause of congenital non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss. Two large deletions, del(GJB6-D13S1830) and del(GJB6-D13S1854), which truncate GJB6 (connexin 30), cause hearing loss in individuals homozygous, or compound heterozygous for these deletions or one such deletion and a mutation in GJB2. Recently, we have demonstrated that the del(GJB6-D13S1830) deletion contributes to hearing loss due to an allele-specific lack of GJB2 mRNA expression and not as a result of digenic inheritance, as was postulated earlier. In the current study we investigated the smaller del(GJB6-D13S1854) deletion, which disrupts the expression of GJB2 at the transcriptional level in a manner similar to the more common del(GJB6-D13S1830) deletion. Interestingly, in the presence of this deletion, GJB2 expression remains minimally but reproducibly present. The relative allele-specific expression of GJB2 was assessed by reverse-transcriptase PCR and restriction digestions in three probands who were compound heterozygous for a GJB2 mutation and del(GJB6-D13S1854). Each individual carried a different sequence variant in GJB2. All three individuals expressed the mutated GJB2 allele in trans with del(GJB6-D13S1854), but expression of the GJB2 allele in cis with the deletion was almost absent. Our study clearly corroborates the hypothesis that the del(GJB6-D13S1854), similar to the larger and more common del(GJB6-D13S1830), removes (a) putative cis-regulatory element(s) upstream of GJB6 and narrows down the region of location.

Vestibular dysfunction in DFNB1 deafness

Mutations of GJB2 and GJB6 (connexin-26 and 30) at the DFNB1 locus are the most common cause of autosomal recessive, nonsyndromic deafness. Despite their widespread expression throughout the vestibular system, vestibular dysfunction has not been widely recognized as a commonly associated clinical feature. The observations of vertigo accompanying DFNB1 deafness in several large families prompted our hypothesis that vestibular dysfunction may be an integral, but often overlooked, component of DFNB1 deafness. Our aim was to define the prevalence of vestibular dysfunction in Cases of DFNB1 deafness and Controls with other forms of deafness. We developed and used a survey to assess symptoms of vestibular dysfunction, medical, and family history was distributed to Cases with deafness due to pathogenic GJB2 and/or GJB6 mutations and deaf Controls without DFNB1 deafness. Our results showed: Surveys were returned by 235/515 Cases (46%) with DFNB1 mutations and 121/321 Controls (38%) without these mutations. The mean age of Cases (41) was younger than Controls (51; P < 0.001). Vestibular dysfunction was reported by 127 (54%) of Cases and was present at significantly higher rates in Cases than in deaf Controls without DFNB1 deafness (P < 0.03). Most (63%) had to lie down in order for vertigo to subside, and 48% reported that vertigo interfered with activities of daily living. Vertigo was reported by significantly more Cases with truncating than non-truncating mutations and was also associated with a family history of dizziness. We conclude that vestibular dysfunction appears to be more common in DFNB1 deafness than previously recognized and affects activities of daily living in many patients.

Post-translational modifications of connexin26 revealed by mass spectrometry

Gap junctions play important roles in auditory function and skin biology; mutations in the Cx26 (connexin26) gene are the predominant cause of inherited non-syndromic deafness and cause disfiguring skin disorders. Mass spectrometry (MS) was used to identify PTMs (post-translational modifications) of Cx26 and to determine whether they occur at sites of disease-causing mutations. Cx26 was isolated from transfected HeLa cells by sequential immunoaffinity and metal chelate chromatography using a tandem C-terminal haemagglutinin epitope and a (His-Asn)6 sequence. In-gel and in-solution enzymatic digestions were carried out in parallel with trypsin, chymotrypsin and endoproteinase GluC. Peptides were fractionated using a reversed-phase matrix by stepwise elution with increasing concentrations of organic solvent. To improve detection of low-abundance peptides and to maximize sequence coverage, MALDI-TOF-MS (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry; MS) and MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS/MS (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight/time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry; MS/MS) spectra were acquired from each elution step using an Applied Biosystems 4800 tandem mass spectrometer. Acquisition, processing and interpretation parameters were optimized to improve ionization and fragmentation of hydrophobic peptides. MS and MS/MS coverage of Cx26 was significantly above that reported for other membrane proteins: 71.3% by MS, with 29.9% by MS/MS. MS coverage was 92.6% if peptides resulting from in-source collisions and/or partial enzymatic cleavages were considered. A variety of putative PTMs of Cx26 were identified, including acetylation, hydroxylation, gamma-carboxyglutamation, methylation and phosphorylation, some of which are at sites of deafness-causing mutations. Knowledge of the PTMs of Cx26 will be instrumental in understanding how alterations in the cellular mechanisms of Cx26 channel biogenesis and function lead to losses in auditory function and disfiguring skin disorders.

The digenic hypothesis unraveled: the GJB6 del(GJB6-D13S1830) mutation causes allele-specific loss of GJB2 expression in cis

Connexin 26 and connexin 30 are the major connexins expressed in the cochlea, where they are co-localized and form heteromeric gap junctions. Mutations in the GJB2 gene, which encodes connexin 26, are the most common cause of prelingual non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss. The large del(GJB6-D13S1830) mutation which involves GJB6 (connexin 30), causes hearing loss in homozygous individuals, or when compound heterozygous with a GJB2 mutation. Until now, it remained unresolved whether this phenomenon results from digenic inheritance or because of lack of GJB2 mRNA expression. After RNA extraction from buccal epithelium, a tissue known to express connexin 26 as well as connexin 30, allele-specific expression of GJB2 was investigated by reverse-transcriptase PCR and restriction digestions in three unrelated individuals compound heterozygous for a GJB2 mutation and del(GJB6-D13S1830). Each proband carried a different sequence change in GJB2. The mutated GJB2 allele in trans with del(GJB6-D13S1830) was expressed in all three individuals whereas the GJB2 allele located in cis with the deletion was not expressed at all. Thus, mutations in these two genes do not cause hearing loss through a digenic mechanism of inheritance alone, as was postulated previously, but instead GJB2 expression is abolished through an effect in cis with the deletion. Our study provides unequivocal support for the hypothesis that del(GJB6-D13S1830) eliminates a putative cis-regulatory element located within the deleted region.

Audiological and genetic features of the mtDNA mutations

CONCLUSIONS

Significant difference in the incidence of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations was found between the Chinese and USA populations. The identification of the mtDNA A1555G mutation in a large proportion of Chinese probands with nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss (NSHL) provides a molecular explanation for the high prevalence of aminoglycoside-induced deafness in China.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to characterize the audiological and genetic features of NSHL due to mutations in mtDNA.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The mtDNA and audiogram analyses were performed in 498 NSHL patients (290 from China and 208 from the USA) with and without history of aminoglycoside exposure. A PCR and restriction enzyme digestion protocol was used for mutational screening and the European Workshop on Genetic Hearing Loss criteria were applied for audiological classification.

RESULTS

All Chinese probands (15.5%) with mtDNA mutation were found to carry the homoplasmic mtDNA A1555G mutation, whereas four probands (1.9%) from the USA were found to carry the mtDNA A1555G and two (1%) had mtDNA G7444A. Approximately 63% of the probands with mtDNA mutations had post-lingual hearing loss and 56.8% of them had a medical history of exposure to aminoglycosides. Hearing losses are bilateral, sensorineural, and symmetric. The main audiogram shapes found were sloping.

Is hearing loss due to mutations in the Connexin 26 gene progressive?

Serial audiograms were analysed for seven subjects, who were homozygous for the 35delG GJB2 mutation. The criterion for determining progression of hearing loss was at least a 1-dB loss in air conduction pure-tone average-3 (ACPTA-3) or ACPTA-4 per year for 2 to 10 years, with a minimum change of 10 dB ACPTA 3 or 4. Bilateral progression of hearing loss was found in 43% (3/7) of the subjects. A meta-analysis of seven studies with non-overlapping data sets and similar ascertainment criteria indicated that 19% of DFNB1 subjects with GJB2 mutations have progressive hearing loss. These data suggest that it may be incorrect to assume that congenital hearing loss due to this mutation is stable. We recommend rigorous audiologic surveillance for individuals with DFNB1.

Effects of GJB2 genotypes on the audiological phenotype: variability is present for all genotypes

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Recent studies have revealed a genotype-phenotype correlation for mutations in the GJB2 gene. Since ethnic difference may have an effect for the degree of hearing loss due to background genes, we aimed to search for confirmation of previously suggested genotype-phenotype correlation in GJB2 deafness in the Turkish population.

METHODS

Pure tone audiograms of 63 unrelated probands with GJB2-associated hearing loss having 15 different mutations were obtained and evaluated for correlation between the degree of hearing loss and genotypes.

RESULTS

Three GJB2 genotypes identified in more than one family were homozygous c.35delG (44 probands), homozygous p.E120del (four probands) and c.[35delG]+[IVS1+1G>A] (two probands). No statistical difference for the degree of hearing loss was observed when the genotypes were compared individually or grouped according to their effects on the protein. The most likely explanation for this result is the relatively small size of the studied population. Degree of hearing loss was variable in c.35delG and p.E120del homozygotes. Intra-familial phenotypic variability was present for some genotypes. The detailed audiological data for homozygous p.E120del and c.[35delG]+[328delG] genotypes are reported for the first time in this study.

CONCLUSION

Previously reported genotype-phenotype correlations for the GJB2 deafness should be cautiously interpreted during the clinical counseling since variability in the degree of hearing loss is present for all GJB2 genotypes.

Non-syndromic, autosomal-recessive deafness

Non-syndromic deafness is a paradigm of genetic heterogeneity with 85 loci and 39 nuclear disease genes reported so far. Autosomal-recessive genes are responsible for about 80% of the cases of hereditary non-syndromic deafness of pre-lingual onset with 23 different genes identified to date. In the present article, we review these 23 genes, their function, and their contribution to genetic deafness in different populations. The wide range of functions of these DFNB genes reflects the heterogeneity of the genes involved in hearing and hearing loss. Several of these genes are involved in both recessive and dominant deafness, or in both non-syndromic and syndromic deafness. Mutations in the GJB2 gene encoding connexin 26 are responsible for as much as 50% of pre-lingual, recessive deafness. By contrast, mutations in most of the other DFNB genes have so far been detected in only a small number of families, and their contribution to deafness on a population scale might therefore be limited. Identification of all genes involved in hereditary hearing loss will help in our understanding of the basic mechanisms underlying normal hearing, in early diagnosis and therapy.

Late postnatal onset of hearing loss due to GJB2 mutations

GJB2 mutations account for approximately 50% of recessive non-syndromic deafness, with 35delG being the most prevalent. Homozygous 35delG mutations cause pre-lingual, non-progressive hearing loss that is detected on newborn hearing screening programmes. We present a sibling pair with homozygous 35delG mutations, who passed hearing tests in early infancy and developed progressive sensorineural hearing loss, one requiring a cochlear implant. These cases illustrate that deafness due to such mutations may have a late onset and consequently be missed on neonatal screening programmes and they may present an argument to consider neonatal screening for GJB2 mutations in order to aid early intervention.

Clinical Course of Hearing and Language Development in GJB2 and Non-GJB2 Deafness following Habilitation with Hearing Aids

Mutations in the GJB2 gene (connexin 26) are the most common cause of nonsyndromic autosomal recessive sensorineural hearing loss. Genetic testing of GJB2 may offer opportunities to predict the features of hearing loss and prognostication of speech-language development in children with hearing loss. The present study assessed the clinical features of hearing and some aspects of language development in congenital deafness due either to GJB2 mutations or to other factors in Japanese patients who had been habilitated with hearing aids. Thirty-five unrelated subjects with nonsyndromic, congenital, bilateral sensorineural hearing loss were enrolled in the study. Among them, 16 had biallelic GJB2 mutations related to hearing loss and 17 lacked such mutations. As has been reported in populations of European ancestry, the present Japanese subjects with GJB2 mutations had a relatively high incidence of the flat pattern audiogram and nonprogressive pure tone thresholds compared with subjects without GJB2 mutations. Subjects with GJB2 mutations and those without GJB2 mutations both showed a similar tendency in speech perception, some aspects of language development, and communication methods. In both groups, development of reading ability tended to be normal, but vocabulary development tended to be delayed. The present results establish the basis for future studies to aid in the evaluation and follow-up of patients with congenital hearing loss associated with GJB2 mutations who are habilitated with hearing aids.

Autosomal recessive and sporadic deafness in Morocco: High frequency of the 35delG GJB2 mutation and absence of the 342-kb GJB6 variant

Deafness is a heterogeneous disorder showing different pattern of inheritance and involving a multitude of different genes. Mutations in the gene, GJB2 Gap junction type 1), encoding the gap junction protein connexin-26 on chromosome 13q11 may be responsible for up 50% of autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss cases (ARNSHL), and for 15-30% of sporadic cases. However, a large proportion (10-42%) of patients with GJB2 has only one GJB2 mutant allele. Recent reports have suggested that a 342-kb deletion truncating the GJB6 gene (encoding connexin-30), was associated with ARNSHL through either homozygous deletion of Cx30, or digenic inheritance of a Cx30 deletion and a Cx26 mutation in trans. Because mutations in Connexin-26 (Cx26) play an important role in ARNSHL and that distribution pattern of GJB2 variants differs considerably among ethnic groups, our objective was to find out the significance of Cx26 mutations in Moroccan families who had hereditary and sporadic deafness. One hundred and sixteen families with congenital deafness (including 38 multiplex families, and 78 families with sporadic cases) were included. Results show that the prevalence of the 35delG mutation is 31.58% in the family cases and 20.51% in the sporadic cases. Further screening for other GJB2 variants demonstrated the absence of other mutations; none of these families had mutations in exon 1 of GJB2 or the 342-kb deletion of GJB6. Thus, screening of the 35delG in the GJB2 gene should facilitate routinely used diagnostic for genetic counselling in Morocco.

Audiological features of GJB2 (connexin 26) deafness

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to characterize audiological profiles in patients with GJB2 deafness

DESIGN

We screened DNA from 399 individuals with nonsyndromic deafness for mutations in the connexin 26 gene (GJB2) by sequence analysis. A total of 77 (19%) of these deaf individuals were biallelic GJB2 mutations (either homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations) (GJB2 deafness). Using the audiological classification criteria of genetic deafness proposed by the European Workshop on Genetic Hearing Loss, we analyzed audiograms of these patients to characterize audiological features of the GJB2 deafness. In addition, we reviewed audiological data of 411 deafness cases from the literature providing details of audiological data (including 157 with GJB2 deafness).

RESULTS

All categories of hearing loss severity were found, with significant differences in the findings from GJB2 cases: 1 (4.5%) of 22 individuals with mild hearing loss, 10 (13.3%) of 75 with moderate loss, 14 (14.9%) of 94 with severe loss, and 52 (25%) of 208 with profound deafness (Chi-square test, 3 df, p = 0.016). 81.6% of patients with GJB2 mutations had severe to profound loss, 18.4% with mild to moderate loss (Chi-square test, p = 0.014). The 235delC mutation was always associated with profound deafness. The main audiogram shapes found were residual/sloping (72.7%) and flat (23.4%). There were no differences in the severity and audiogram shapes of the hearing impairment between homozygous and compound heterozygous GJB2 deafness (Chi-square test, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that the probability of finding biallelic GJB2 mutations increases with the severity of hearing loss. Audiograms associated with GJB2 deafness were usually nonspecific. Patients with unknown causes of severe or profound hearing loss should be routinely tested for GJB2 mutations, but due to the variability in hearing loss, individuals with lesser degrees of hearing loss should not be precluded from testing.

Assessment of the genetic causes of recessive childhood non-syndromic deafness in the UK - implications for genetic testing

Approximately one in 2000 children is born with a genetic hearing impairment, mostly inherited as a non-syndromic, autosomal recessive trait, for which more than 30 different genes have been identified. Previous studies have shown that one of these genes, connexin 26 (GJB2), accounts for 30-60% of such deafness, but the relative contribution of the many other genes is not known, especially in the outbred UK population. This lack of knowledge hampers the development of diagnostic genetic services for deafness. In an effort to determine the molecular aetiology of deafness in the population, 142 sib pairs with early-onset, non-syndromic hearing impairment were recruited. Those in whom deafness could not be attributed to GJB2 mutations were investigated further for other mapped genes. The genetic basis of 55 cases (38.7%) was established, 33.1% being due to mutations in the GJB2 gene and 3.5% due to mutations in SLC26A4. None of the remaining 26 loci investigated made a significant contribution to deafness in a Caucasian population. We suggest that screening the GJB2 and SLC26A4 genes should form the basis of any genetic testing programme for childhood deafness and highlight a number of important issues for consideration and future work.

Nuclear and mitochondrial genes mutated in nonsyndromic impaired hearing

Half of the cases with congenital impaired hearing are hereditary (HIH). HIH may occur as part of a multisystem disease (syndromic HIH) or as disorder restricted to the ear and vestibular system (nonsyndromic HIH). Since nonsyndromic HIH is almost exclusively caused by cochlear defects, affected patients suffer from sensorineural hearing loss. One percent of the total human genes, i.e. 300-500, are estimated to cause syndromic and nonsyndromic HIH. Of these, approximately 120 genes have been cloned thus far, approximately 80 for syndromic HIH and 42 for nonsyndromic HIH. In the majority of the cases, HIH manifests before (prelingual), and rarely after (postlingual) development of speech. Prelingual, nonsyndromic HIH follows an autosomal recessive trait (75-80%), an autosomal dominant trait (10-20%), an X-chromosomal, recessive trait (1-5%), or is maternally inherited (0-20%). Postlingual nonsyndromic HIH usually follows an autosomal dominant trait. Of the 41 mutated genes that cause nonsyndromic HIH, 15 cause autosomal dominant HIH, 15 autosomal recessive HIH, 6 both autosomal dominant and recessive HIH, 2 X-linked HIH, and 3 maternally inherited HIH. Mutations in a single gene may not only cause autosomal dominant, nonsyndromic HIH, but also autosomal recessive, nonsyndromic HIH (GJB2, GJB6, MYO6, MYO7A, TECTA, TMC1), and even syndromic HIH (CDH23, COL11A2, DPP1, DSPP, GJB2, GJB3, GJB6, MYO7A, MYH9, PCDH15, POU3F4, SLC26A4, USH1C, WFS1). Different mutations in the same gene may cause variable phenotypes within a family and between families. Most cases of recessive HIH result from mutations in a single locus, but an increasing number of disorders is recognized, in which mutations in two different genes (GJB2/GJB6, TECTA/KCNQ4), or two different mutations in a single allele (GJB2) are involved. This overview focuses on recent advances in the genetic background of nonsyndromic HIH.

Etiological diagnosis of bilateral, sensorineural hearing impairment in a pediatric Greek population

Early diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of childhood deafness are essential for a child's normal growth. Etiological diagnosis of hearing loss makes prevention, family scheduling and more effective therapy feasible goals. Etiological assessment of sensorineural deafness still remains difficult although recently with the progress of genetics it has become more efficient. In this retrospective study, the etiology of bilateral, sensorineural hearing loss with indication for hearing aids has been studied in 153 hearing impaired children. Etiological diagnosis was based on family and patient record, physical, audiological and laboratory examinations. Among the 94 children who completed the diagnostic protocol etiological groups revealed the following distribution: non-hereditary acquired hearing impairment was present in 36 children (38%) and hereditary was present in 44 (47%) children. The etiology remained unknown in 14 (15%) children. Non-syndromic autosomal dominant type accounted for 13 (29% of hereditary hearing loss) children, non-syndromic autosomal recessive type for 21 (48%) children and syndromic deafness for 10 (23%) children. Modern diagnostic methods, such as genetic testing, help diminish the number of cases with hearing impairment of unknown etiology, for the benefit of children who receive early and appropriate medical, audiologic, genetic and educational counseling based on the etiology of their hearing loss.

Hearing impairment in Dutch patients with connexin 26 (GJB2) and connexin 30 (GJB6) mutations

OBJECTIVE

Despite the identification of mutations in the connexin 26 (GJB2) gene as the most common cause of recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss, the pattern of hearing impairment with these mutations remains inconsistent. Recently a deletion encompassing the GJB6 gene was identified and hypothesized to also contribute to hearing loss. We hereby describe the hearing impairment in Dutch patients with biallelic connexin 26 (GJB2) and GJB2+connexin 30 (GJB6) mutations.

METHODS

The audiograms of patients who were screened for GJB2 and GJB6 mutations were analysed retrospectively. Standard statistical testing was done for symmetry and shape, while repeated measurement analysis was used to assess the relation between mutation and severity. Progression was also studied via linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of 222 hearing-impaired individuals, 35 exhibited sequence variations; of these 19 had audiograms for study. Hearing loss in patients with biallelic "radical" (i.e. deletions, nonsense and splice site) mutations was significantly worse than in the wild type and heterozygotes (SAS proc GENMOD, p=0.013). The presence of at least one missense mutation in compound heterozygotes tends to lead to better hearing thresholds compared to biallelic radical mutations (p=0.08). One patient with the [35delG]+[del(GJB6-D13S1830)] genotype was severely impaired. Non-progressive hearing impairment was demonstrated in five 35delG homozygotes in individual longitudinal analyses. However a patient with the [299A>C]+[416G>A] genotype showed significant threshold progression in the lower frequencies. Findings on asymmetry and shape were inconclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support the hypothesis that severity is a function of genotype and its effect on the amino acid sequence. A bigger cohort is required to establish non-progressivity more definitively.

Prevalence of the GJB2 mutations and the del(GJB6-D13S1830) mutation in Brazilian patients with deafness

Mutations in the GJB2 gene are the most common cause of sensorineural non-syndromic deafness in different populations. One specific mutation, 35delG, has accounted for the majority of the mutations detected in the GJB2 gene in many countries. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of GJB2 mutations and the del(GJB6-D13S1830) mutation in non-syndromic deaf Brazilians. The 33 unrelated probands were examined by clinical evaluation to exclude syndromic forms of deafness. Mutation analysis in the GJB2 gene and the testing for the del(GJB6-D13S1830) were performed in both the patients and their family members. The 35delG mutation was found in nine of the probands or in 14 of the mutated alleles. The V37I mutation and the del(GJB6-D13S1830) mutation were also found in two patients, both are compound heterozygote with 35delG mutation. These findings strengthen the importance of genetic diagnosis, providing early treatment, and genetic counseling of deaf patients.

Clinical application of genetic testing for deafness

Advances in the molecular biology of hearing and deafness have identified many genes essential for normal auditory function. Allele variants of these genes cause nonsyndromic deafness, making mutation screening a valuable test to unequivocally diagnose many different forms of inherited deafness. In this study, genetic testing of GJB2, SLC26A4 and WFS1 is reviewed.

GJB2: the spectrum of deafness-causing allele variants and their phenotype

Genetic testing was completed on 1,294 persons with deafness referred to the Molecular Otolaryngology Research Laboratories to establish a diagnosis of DFNB1. Exon 2 of GJB2 was screened for coding sequence allele variants by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) complemented by bidirectional sequencing. If two deafness-causing mutations of GJB2 (encoding Connexin 26) were identified, further screening was not performed. If only a single deafness-causing mutation was identified, we screened for the g.1777179_2085947del (hereafter called del(GJB6-D13S1830); GenBank NT_024524.13) and mutations in the noncoding region of GJB2. Phenotype-genotype correlations were evaluated by categorizing mutations as either protein truncating or nontruncating. A total of 205 persons carried two GJB2 exon 2 mutations and were diagnosed as having DFNB1; 100 persons carried only a single deafness-causing allele variant of exon 2. A total of 37 of these persons were c.35delG carriers, and 51 carried other allele variants of GJB2. Persons diagnosed with DFNB1 segregating two truncating/nonsense mutations had a more severe phenotype than persons carrying two missense mutations, with mean hearing impairments being 88 and 37%, respectively (P < 0.05). The number of deaf c.35delG carriers was greater than expected when compared to the c.35delG carrier frequency in normal-hearing controls (P < 0.05), suggesting the existence of at least one other mutation outside the GJB2 coding region that does not complement GJB2 deafness-causing allele variants.

High prevalence of V37I genetic variant in the connexin-26 (GJB2) gene among non-syndromic hearing-impaired and control Thai individuals

Hearing loss is highly prevalent with a worldwide incidence of 1-2 per 1000 newborns. Several previous studies have demonstrated that mutations of connexin 26 (Cx26 or GJB2) are responsible for most cases of the recessive non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss (NSSHL). Certain mutations have been described frequently among various populations, which include 35delG, 167delT, and 235delC. Recently, a missense mutation, V37I, was reported as a pathogenic change in East Asian affected individuals. To identify genetic variants associated with NSSHL in Thai population, we performed mutation analysis of Cx26 in 166 unrelated probands with NSSHL and 205 controls. We identified seven novel genetic variants in Cx26. We also identified a high prevalence of the V37I mutation among both affected probands (11.1%) and control subjects (8.5%), which suggests that the pathologic role of V37I may be modified by other genes. Our data support previous studies that show heterogeneity in the frequencies and types of mutations in Cx26 within populations and among ethnicities and that before clinical significance and causality can be attributed to a genetic variant, functional characterization is necessary.

Connexin 26 mutations in nonsyndromic autosomal recessive hearing loss: speech and hearing rehabilitation

OBJECTIVE

Hearing loss is the most common form of sensory impairment, with approximately one infant/1000 born with profound congenital deafness. A pre-lingual bilateral sensorineural hearing impairment poses a substantial problem as it negatively impacts on the subject's ability to conduct a normal social life. The aim of the study was to observe, in a group of children affected by pre-lingual non-syndromic autosomal recessive hearing impairment: (1) the role of the possible mutation of connexin 26 in the pathogenesis of the hearing loss; (2) the audiological and clinical aspects of the hearing impairment; (3) therapy to be adopted for the different patients.

METHODS

The study was carried out on 39 patients, 16 males and 23 females, aged between six and 17 years (mean 12 years), affected by non syndromic congenital deafness, presumably hereditary, referred to the out-patients audiology clinic for children of the Department of Otolaryngology of the Federico II University of Naples.

RESULTS

Our study conducted on 39 children with pre-lingual bilateral sensorineural autosomal recessive deafness showed as follows: (I) from a molecular perspective: an incidence of 41% in the cases studied of mutations in the encoding of the connexin 26 gene; a prevalence in our case study of the 35delG mutation (69%). (II) The characteristics of the hearing impairments in the children studied were homogeneous, regardless of the presence or absence of a connexin 26 mutation: the hearing impairment was pre-lingual bilateral sensorineural, the impairment often involved mainly the high frequencies, but, especially in the severe forms an involvement of all the frequencies was not rare; the hearing impairments were symmetrical and non progressive in time. (III) The results of the application of prosthesis and thereafter rehabilitative language therapy are generally satisfactory but correlated of course to the severity of the hearing loss.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we hope that further developments in the research on genetic hearing impairments will promptly result in advances in clinical practice.

A genotype-phenotype correlation for GJB2 (connexin 26) deafness

INTRODUCTION

Mutations in GJB2 are the most common cause of non-syndromic autosomal recessive hearing impairment, ranging from mild to profound. Mutation analysis of this gene is widely available as a genetic diagnostic test.

OBJECTIVE

To assess a possible genotype-phenotype correlation for GJB2.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of audiometric data from people with hearing impairment, segregating two GJB2 mutations.

SUBJECTS

Two hundred and seventy seven unrelated patients with hearing impairment who were seen at the ENT departments of local and university hospitals from Italy, Belgium, Spain, and the United States, and who harboured bi-allelic GJB2 mutations.

RESULTS

We found that 35delG homozygotes have significantly more hearing impairment, compared with 35delG/non-35delG compound heterozygotes. People with two non-35delG mutations have even less hearing impairment. We observed a similar gradient of hearing impairment when we categorised mutations as inactivating (that is, stop mutations or frame shifts) or non-inactivating (that is, missense mutations). We demonstrated that certain mutation combinations (including the combination of 35delG with the missense mutations L90P, V37I, or the splice-site mutation IVS1+1G>A, and the V37I/V37I genotype) are associated with significantly less hearing impairment compared with 35delG homozygous genotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first large systematic analysis indicating that the GJB2 genotype has a major impact on the degree of hearing impairment, and identifying mild genotypes. Furthermore, this study shows that it will be possible to refine this correlation and extend it to additional genotypes. These data will be useful in evaluating habilitation options for people with GJB2 related deafness.

Genetic screening for deafness

Genetic testing for deafness has become a reality. It has changed the paradigm for evaluating deaf and hard-of-hearing persons and will be used by physicians for diagnostic purposes and as a basis for treatment and management options. Although mutation screening is currently available for only a limited number of genes, in these specific instances, diagnosis, carrier detection, and reproductive risk counseling can be provided. In the coming years there will be an expansion of the role of genetic testing and counseling will not be limited to reproductive issues. Treatment and management decisions will be made based on specific genetic diagnoses. Although genetic testing may be a confusing service for the practicing otolaryngologist, it is an important part of medical care. New discoveries and technologies will expand and increase the complexity of genetic testing options and it will become the responsibility of otolaryngologists to familiarize themselves with current discoveries and accepted protocols for genetic testing.

Prevalence of GJB2 mutations in prelingual deafness in the Greek population

OBJECTIVE

Mutations in the gene encoding the gap junction protein connexin 26 (GJB2) have been shown as a major contributor to prelingual, sensorineural, nonsyndromic, recessive deafness. One specific mutation, 35delG, has accounted for the majority of the mutations detected in the GJB2 gene in Caucasian populations. The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence and spectrum of GJB2 mutations in prelingual deafness in the Greek population.

METHODS

In a collaboration with the major referral centers for childhood deafness in Greece, patients were examined by an extensive questionnaire to exclude syndromic forms and environmental causes of deafness and by allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of the 35delG mutation. Patients heterozygous for the 35delG mutation were further analyzed by direct genomic sequencing of the coding region of the GJB2 gene.

RESULTS

The 35delG mutation was found in 42.2% of the chromosomes in 45 familial cases of prelingual, nonsyndromic deafness (18 homozygotes and 2 heterozygotes) and in 30.6% of the chromosomes in 165 sporadic cases (45 homozygotes and 11 heterozygotes). Direct genomic sequencing in heterozygous patients revealed the L90P (2 alleles), W24X (2 alleles), R184P (2 alleles), and 291insA (1 allele) mutations.

CONCLUSION

Mutations in the GJB2 gene are responsible for about one third of prelingual, sensorineural, nonsyndromic deafness in the Greek population, and allele-specific PCR is an easy screening method for the common 35delG mutation.

Effectiveness of sequencing connexin 26 (GJB2) in cases of familial or sporadic childhood deafness referred for molecular diagnostic testing

PURPOSE

Hearing loss is a common congenital disorder that is frequently associated with mutations in the GJB2 gene encoding the connexin 26 protein (Cx26). We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of direct DNA sequencing for detection of Cx26 mutations as a clinical diagnostic test.

METHODS

We designed a clinical assay using a three-step polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based DNA sequencing strategy to detect all possible mutations in the open reading frame and flanking sequences of Cx26. The results of the first 324 cases of childhood deafness referred for diagnostic testing were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 127 of the 324 (39.2%) cases had at least one mutant Cx26 allele (36.1% of sporadic cases, 70% of familial cases). Of these 127 case, 57 (44.8%) were homozygotes or compound heterozygotes. Thirty-four different mutations were identified, including 10 novel mutations, 6 of which (T8M, K15T, R32L, M93I, N206S, and 511-512insAACG) may be pathogenic. We also provide new evidence on the pathogenicity or nonpathogenicity of 12 previously reported mutations, and clarify the confusing nomenclature of the 313-326del14 mutation.

CONCLUSION

A simple and rigorous method for efficient PCR-based sequence analysis of Cx26 is a sensitive clinical assay for evaluating deaf children. Its widespread use is likely to identify additional pathogenic mutations and lead to a better understanding of the clinical significance of previously identified mutations.

GJB2 (connexin 26) variants and nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss: a HuGE review

Despite the enormous heterogeneity of genetic hearing loss, variants in one locus, Gap Junction Beta 2 or GJB2 (connexin 26), account for up to 50% of cases of nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss in some populations. This article reviews genetic epidemiology studies of the alleles of GJB2, prevalence rates, genotype-phenotype relations, contribution to the incidence of hearing loss, and other issues related to the clinical validity of genetic testing for GJB2. This review focuses primarily on three alleles: 167 Delta T, 35 Delta G, and 235 Delta C. These alleles are recessive for nonsyndromic prelingual sensorineural hearing loss, and the evidence suggests complete penetrance but variable expressivity.

Hereditary deafness and phenotyping in humans

Hereditary deafness has proved to be extremely heterogeneous genetically with more than 40 genes mapped or cloned for non-syndromic dominant deafness and 30 for autosomal recessive non-syndromic deafness. In spite of significant advances in the understanding of the molecular basis of hearing loss, identifying the precise genetic cause in an individual remains difficult. Consequently, it is important to exclude syndromic causes of deafness by clinical and special investigation and to use all available phenotypic clues for diagnosis. A clinical approach to the aetiological investigation of individuals with hearing loss is suggested, which includes ophthalmology review, renal ultrasound scan and neuro-imaging of petrous temporal bone. Molecular screening of the GJB2 (Connexin 26) gene should be undertaken in all cases of non-syndromic deafness where the cause cannot be identified, since it is a common cause of recessive hearing impairment, the screening is straightforward, and the phenotype unremarkable. By the same token, mitochondrial inheritance of hearing loss should be considered in all multigeneration families, particularly if there is a history of exposure to aminoglycoside antibiotics, since genetic testing of specific mitochondrial genes is technically feasible. Most forms of non-syndromic autosomal recessive hearing impairment cause a prelingual hearing loss, which is generally severe to profound and not associated with abnormal radiology. Exceptions to this include DFNB2 (MYO7A), DFNB8/10 (TMPRSS3) and DFNB16 (STRC) where age of onset may sometimes be later on in childhood, DFNB4 (SLC26A4) where there may be dilated vestibular aqueducts and endolymphatic sacs, and DFNB9 (OTOF) where there may also be an associated auditory neuropathy. Unusual phenotypes in autosomal dominant forms of deafness, include low frequency hearing loss in DFNA1 (HDIA1) and DFNA6/14/38 (WFS1), mid-frequency hearing loss in DFNA8/12 (TECTA), DFNA13 (COL11A2) and vestibular symptoms and signs in DFNA9 (COCH) and sometimes in DFNA11 (MYO7A). Continued clinical evaluation of types and course of hearing loss and correlation with genotype is important for the intelligent application of molecular testing in the next few years.

Progressive hearing loss in hearing impaired children: immediate results of antiphlogistic--rheologic infusion therapy

OBJECTIVE

The question whether progressive sensorineural hearing loss during childhood is the fateful course of a main illness has been discussed controversially over 60 years. No medicamentous therapy with satisfactory results has been described in the literature. The goal of this study was to determine whether an infusion therapy, developed for the treatment of sudden hearing loss in the elderly, can induce recovery after progression in sensorineural hearing loss during childhood.

METHODS

Out of 20 children suffering from acute progression in sensorineural hearing loss, seven children were treated with an infusion therapy containing prednisolone, pentoxifylline and a plasma expander (group I), and 13 children were not treated (group II). All children were advised not to use hearing aids for 6 weeks.

RESULTS

In group I, we observed partial to complete restoration of hearing threshold towards the original hearing threshold given by previous routine controls in 6/7 children. In group II, only three children recovered, with the state of ten children's' hearing loss remaining unchanged. The long-term follow-up, however, showed no distinct difference in either group.

CONCLUSION

Infusion therapy can be helpful when treating acutely progressing sensorineural hearing loss during childhood. The benefit for communicative competence has to be discussed. Further studies should be conducted.

Population-based genetic study of childhood hearing impairment in the Trent Region of the United Kingdom

The objective of the study was to investigate childhood hearing impairment in a population-based sample from a genetic perspective. Participants included 82 families with hearing-impaired children (aged 4-13) previously ascertained in the Trent Health Region. A questionnaire was mailed to all families, followed by a home visit and Connexin-26 35delG mutation screen. The Connexin-26 35delG mutation was identified in seven families (approximately 10 per cent of non-syndromal hearing impairment). Children of these families were significantly more likely than children with other modes of inheritance to have a profound hearing loss with a flat audiogram profile. The families of children with a significant admission to a neonatal intensive care unit were significantly less likely to have had genetic counselling. Eight families visited were found to have features suggestive of a genetic syndrome that had not been previously assigned a specific diagnosis. The study concluded that hearing-impaired children should be investigated systematically according to an agreed-upon protocol, which should include Connexin-26 35delG mutation analysis at least for those with severe-to-profound hearing loss.