Prospective patient-based assessment of effectiveness of palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases

Evolving Practice Pattern of Palliative Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastases from Lung Cancer in Australia

AIMS

Radiation therapy is an effective treatment for bone metastases. Single-fraction conformal radiation therapy (SF-CRT) is equally effective as multifraction radiation therapy for the management of uncomplicated bone metastases. There has been a rapid development of advanced radiation therapy techniques (ART) in radiation oncology. We evaluated the changing pattern of SF-CRT and ART use for the management of bone metastases in lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a state-wide population-based cohort of lung cancer patients from Victoria, Australia, who received radiation therapy for bone metastases between 2012 and 2017. The primary outcomes were proportion of radiation therapy courses using: SF-CRT and ART. We identified a subcohort in which radiation therapy was delivered at the end of life (EOL), i.e. within 30 days of death. The Cochran-Armitage test for trend was used to evaluate the change in pattern of SF-CRT and ART use over time. Multivariable analyses were used to identify factors associated with the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 4335 courses of radiation therapy for bone metastases in lung cancer, 20% were SF-CRT - increasing from 19% in 2012 to 26% in 2017 (P-trend = 0.004). In multivariate analyses, treatment to the rib, shoulder, hip or extremities, and treatment in public institutions were independently associated with SF-CRT use, but the effect of year of radiation therapy was no longer significant. Five per cent of radiation therapy was delivered using ART, increasing markedly from 2016 onwards (P-trend < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, treatment in private institutions and more recent years of treatment were independently associated with the use of ART. There were 587 courses of radiation therapy delivered at the EOL, with SF-CRT more commonly used closer to death - 53%, 29% and 25% of radiation therapy within 7 days, 8-14 days and 15-30 days of death, respectively.

CONCLUSION

SF-CRT continued to be underutilised for bone metastases in lung cancer in Australia, including at the EOL. We observed an increase in ART use for bone metastases from 2016, which occurred contemporaneously with changes in government funding.

Transarterial Chemoembolization for the Palliation of Painful Bone Metastases Refractory to First-Line Radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization for the palliation of radiotherapy (RT)-failure bone metastases (BMs) with those of re-radiotherapy (Re-RT) in achieving pain relief.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty consecutive patients with RT-failure BMs who had undergone Re-RT (23 patients) and transarterial chemoembolization (27 patients) were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was clinical response, and the secondary endpoints were objective response and adverse events. Pain assessment was performed using the numerical rating scale, and tumor response was evaluated using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Pain relief was defined as lack of pain with no analgesic usage (complete pain response) or a decrease in pain score by ≥3 points with analgesic usage (partial pain response).

RESULTS

The pain relief rates in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups were 57% and 92%, respectively (P = .006). The median pain relief duration was 2 and 3 months in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups, respectively (P = .002). The 6-month pain-free survival rates were 30% and 51% in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups, respectively (P = .08). The median tumor reduction rates were -4% and 9% in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups, respectively (P < .001). The objective response rates were 0% and 11% in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups, respectively (P = .29). No serious adverse events or complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Transarterial chemoembolization achieved a superior response rate and longer duration of palliation in symptomatic RT-failure BMs.

Clinical outcomes of sacroplasty for metastatic sacral tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome and safety of sacroplasty for patients with secondary metastatic lesions to the sacrum.

METHODS

Several databases, including the Cochrane library, PubMed and EMBASE, were systematically searched to identify potentially eligible articles in English language. All the above databases were searched until December 2019. The search strategy was based on the combination of the following keywords: sacroplasty AND secondary tumours OR metastasis OR metastases. The reference list of the selected literature was also reviewed and a standard PRISMA template utilised.

RESULTS

From a total of 102 articles initially identified, a final seven studies were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. A total of 107 patients from these studies were included. The follow-up ranged from immediate post-operatively to 30.5 months. The mean preoperative VAS was 8.38 (range 6.9-9.3), which improved significantly to 3.01 (range 1.12-4.7) post-operatively (p < 0.001). The most frequent complication reported was cement leakage, which occurred in 26 patients (25.4%), but without any neurological or other adverse sequelae.

CONCLUSIONS

Sacroplasty in the management of secondary sacral tumours is a safe procedure that can achieve a significant reduction in pain, as quantified by VAS scores, and low complication rate.

Evaluation of effectiveness of palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases: a prospective cohort study

Objective

Radiotherapy is the standard local treatment for patients with painful bone metastases, but effectiveness has primarily been evaluated in trial populations. The aim of this study was to study pain response to palliative radiotherapy in a prospective cohort of unselected patients with bone metastases.

Methods

Patients with painful bone metastases referred to the UMC Utrecht for radiotherapy and enrolled in the PRESENT cohort were included in this study. For all patients, pain response to radiotherapy was assessed, and responders were defined as patients with a complete or partial pain response. Patients with stable pain scores, pain increase, or undetermined response were regarded non-responders. Pain scores obtained at baseline and after 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks following radiotherapy were obtained. Pain response rates of the total treated population, as well as response rates of the assessable patients, were calculated. To measure the percentage of the remaining time spent with pain relief, the net pain relief (NPR) was calculated by dividing the period of pain relief by the period of survival.

Results

Of the 432 patients enrolled in this study, 262 patients (61%) experienced a complete or partial response. In the 390 assessable patients, this percentage was 67%. Median time to response was 4 weeks (range 1–15 weeks), and the NPR was 64%.

Conclusion

Compared to randomized trial populations, palliative radiotherapy in our unselected patients with bone metastases showed similar pain response rates (61%), with a reasonable duration of this effect.

Analysis of predictors of pain response in patients with bone metastasis undergoing palliative radiotherapy: Does age matter?

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate whether age is a predictor of pain response after radiotherapy for painful bone metastasis (BM).

METHODS

Between June 2010 and June 2014, 204 patients with BM undergoing palliative radiotherapy participated in a multicentre prospective study. Patients completed the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) to rate the intensity pain (from 0 to 10) at baseline and 4 weeks after radiotherapy. To determine which variables predicted pain response and particularly whether age is a predictor, logistic regression analysis was used. Baseline variables considered were: age (≤65/66-75/>75 years), sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0-1/≥2), pretreatment pain score (≤4/5-7/≥8), radiotherapy (single/multiple fraction), primary tumour location, visceral metastases (yes/no), concomitant systemic chemotherapy and bisphosphonate use (yes/no).

RESULTS

Pain response was assessed in the 128 patients who completed BPI pretreatment and at 4 weeks after radiotherapy. According to univariate analysis, pain response was better in over 75-year-olds than younger patients: (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.1-9.1; P = 0.031). Response was better in patients receiving multiple fractions rather than a single fraction of 8 Gy (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2-6.1; P = 0.01), and in patients with a pretreatment pain score ≥8 vs ≤7 (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.1-5.0; P = 0.017). No other variables were significant. Multivariate analysis showed that treatment schedule (OR, 3.4; 95% CI 1.4-7.9; P = 0.004) and pre-radiotherapy pain score (OR, 2.8; 95% CI 1.3-6.3; P = 0.009) were the only independent predictors of pain response.

CONCLUSION

All patients with painful bone metastasis should be referred for palliative radiotherapy to relieve the pain regardless of age. Therefore, an older age should not be a reason to withhold palliative radiation treatment.

Treatment of painful bone metastases in prostate and breast cancer patients with the therapeutic radiopharmaceutical rhenium-188-HEDP. Clinical benefit in a real-world study

AIM

Rhenium-188-HEDP ((188)Re-HEDP) is an effective radiopharmaceutical for the palliative treatment of osteoblastic bone metastases. However, only limited data on its routine use are available and its effect on quality of life (QoL) has not been studied. Therefore, we evaluated the clinical benefit of (188)Re-HEDP in routine clinical care.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prostate or breast cancer patients with painful bone metastases receiving (188)Re-HEDP as a routine clinical procedure were eligible for evaluation. Clinical benefit was assessed in terms of efficacy and toxicity. Pain palliation and QoL were monitored using the visual analogue scale (VAS), corrected for opioid intake, and the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global health status/QoL-scale. Thrombocyte and leukocyte nadirs were used to assess haematological toxicity.

RESULTS

45 and 47 patients were evaluable for pain palliation and QoL, respectively. After a single injection of (188)Re-HEDP, the overall pain response rate was 69% and mean VAS-scores decreased relevantly and significantly (p < 0.05). Repeated treatment resulted in similar pain response. The overall QoL response rate was 68% and mean Global health status/QoL-scores increased relevantly and significantly. Haematological side effects were mild and transient.

CONCLUSION

The clinically relevant response on pain and quality of life and the limited adverse events prove clinical benefit of treatment with (188)Re-HEDP and support its use in routine clinical care. Its effectiveness appears comparable to that of external beam radiotherapy.

Radiation Therapy and Palliative Care Prolongs the Survival of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Bone Metastases

Objective In recent years, an increase has been observed in the incidence of bone metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In 2007, our institution established a team approach, which includes the provision of palliative care. In the present study we evaluate the effects of palliative care on the prognosis of HCC patients with bone metastases. Methods The subjects included 44 patients with bone metastases who were treated with radiotherapy between 2000 and 2014. The subjects were divided into groups that received radiotherapy from 2000 to 2006 and after 2007. The overall survival rates after radiotherapy were analyzed. Results The median survival time of the patients who received care between 2007 and 2014 was 6 months, which was significantly longer than that in the patients who received care between 2000 and 2006. Conclusion The present team approach in our hospital, which includes the provision of palliative care, started in 2007. This approach may have improved prognosis of patients with metastatic HCC.

Incidence of pain flare following palliative radiotherapy for symptomatic bone metastases: multicenter prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Palliative radiotherapy (RT) is an effective treatment for symptomatic bone metastases. Pain flare, a transient worsening of the bone pain after RT, has been described in previous reports with different incidence rates. The aim of the study was to prospectively evaluate the incidence of pain flare following RT for painful bone metastases and evaluate its effects on pain control and functionality of the patients.

METHODS

Between June 2010 and June 2014, 204 patients were enrolled in this study and 135 patients with complete data were evaluable. Pain flare was defined as a 2- point increase in worst pain score as compared with baseline with no decrease in analgesic intake or a 25% increase in analgesic intake as compared with baseline with no decrease in worst pain score. All pain medications and worst pain scores were collected before, daily during, and for 10 days after RT. The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) was filled out on the pretreatment and at the 4 weeks follow-up visit.

RESULTS

There were 90 men (66.7%) and 45 women (33.3%). Mean age was 66 years (SD 9.8). The most common primary cancer site was lung in 42 patients (31.1%), followed by prostate in 27 patients (20.0%). Forty-two patients (31.1%) patients received a single fraction of 8 Gy and 83 (61.5%) received 20 Gy in five fractions. The overall pain flare incidence across all centers was 51/135 (37.7%). The majority of pain flares occurred on days 1-5 (88.2%). The mean duration of the pain flare was 3 days (SD: 3). There were no significant relationships between the occurrence of pain flare and collected variables. All BPI items measured four weeks after end of RT showed significant improvement as compared with pretreatment scores (p < 0.001). No significant differences in BPI time trends were found between patients with and without flare pain.

CONCLUSION

Pain flare is a common event, occurring in nearly 40% of the patients that receive palliative RT for symptomatic bone metastases. This phenomenon is not a predictor for pain response.

Retrospective assessment of cancer pain management in an outpatient palliative radiotherapy clinic using the Pain Management Index

CONTEXT

The Pain Management Index (PMI) is a simple index linking the usual severity of cancer pain with the category of medication prescribed to treat it. Medication categories are derived from the World Health Organization's "analgesic ladder" approach to cancer pain, and the PMI is an indicator of the extent to which the medication prescribed corresponds to the recommended categories for mild, moderate, and severe pain.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess prevalence of inadequate pain management in an outpatient palliative radiotherapy clinic using the PMI.

METHODS

All patients with bone metastases referred for palliative radiotherapy from 1999 to 2006 were retrospectively analyzed for patient-rated pain scores (0-10 scale) and analgesic consumption. Pain scores were assigned 0, 1, 2, and 3 when patients reported no pain (0), mild (1-4), moderate (5-6), or severe pain (7-10), respectively. Analgesic scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 were assigned when patients were prescribed no pain medication, nonopioids, "weak" opioids, and "strong" opioids, respectively. The PMI score was calculated by subtracting the pain score from the analgesic score. A negative PMI score was considered an indicator of potentially inadequate pain management by the prescriber. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's r correlation, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine the relationship of PMI over time, and the relationship with predictive factors.

RESULTS

One thousand patients were included from January 1999 to December 2006. A negative PMI was calculated for 25.8% of patients at initial consultation. Prevalence of negative PMI significantly increased over years (P<0.0001). Higher Karnofsky Performance Status (P<0.0001) and breast primary cancer site (P<0.0001) were significantly associated with negative PMI after adjusting for year variable.

CONCLUSION

Despite publication of numerous cancer pain management guidelines, undermedication appears to be a persistent problem for patients with painful bone metastases referred for radiotherapy.

Elderly patients with painful bone metastases should be offered palliative radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy of palliative radiotherapy (RT) in relieving metastatic bone pain in elderly patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The response to RT for palliation of metastatic bone pain was evaluated from a prospective database of 558 patients between 1999 and 2008. The pain scores and analgesic intake were used to calculate the response according to the International Bone Metastases Consensus Working Party palliative RT endpoints. Subgroup analyses for age and other demographic information were performed.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found in the response rate in patients aged >or=65, >or=70, and >or=75 years compared with younger patients at 1, 2, or 3 months after RT. The response was found to be significantly related to the performance status.

CONCLUSION

Age alone did not affect the response to palliative RT for bone metastases. Elderly patients should be referred for palliative RT for their painful bone metastases, regardless of age, because they receive equal benefit from the treatment.

Dexamethasone for the prophylaxis of radiation-induced pain flare after palliative radiotherapy for symptomatic bone metastases: a phase II study

AIMS

Pain flare occurs in over one-third of patients receiving palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases. A single dose of dexamethasone can decrease the incidence of pain flare during the first 2 days immediately after radiotherapy. We conducted a phase II prospective study to investigate the prophylactic role of prolonged dexamethasone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with bone metastases treated with a single 8Gy were prescribed 8mg dexamethasone just before palliative radiotherapy and for 3 consecutive days after treatment. Worst pain score and analgesic consumption data were collected at baseline and daily for 10 days after treatment. Analgesic consumption was converted into a total daily oral morphine equivalent dose in the analysis. Pain flare was defined (a priori) as a two-point increase in worst pain on an 11-point numeric rating scale compared with baseline with no decrease in analgesic intake, or a 25% increase in analgesic intake with no decrease in worst pain score. To distinguish pain flare from progressive disease, we required that the worst pain score and analgesic intake returned to baseline levels after the increase/flare.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were evaluable (32 men, nine women). Their median age was 67 years. The overall incidence of pain flare was 9/41 (22%) within 10 days after the completion of radiotherapy. Most (55%) of these pain flares occurred on day 5. Absence of pain flare was 34/41(83%) and 39/41 (95%) for days 1-5 and 6-10 after the completion of radiotherapy, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Dexamethasone is effective in the prophylaxis of radiotherapy-induced pain flare after palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases. Randomised studies are needed to confirm this finding.

Update in Cancer Pain Syndromes

Cancer pain assessment and management are integral to palliative medicine. This paper reviews recent publications in the period 1999-2004 in the broad categories of epidemiology, pain assessment, nonpharmacologic approaches to cancer pain (radiation therapy, anesthetic blocks, palliative surgery and chemotherapy, complementary and alternative medicine), and in nociceptive pain, neuropathic pain, visceral pain, and bone pain.

Pain flare in patients with bone metastases after palliative radiotherapy--a nested randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

Short-course radiotherapy is a common treatment for the palliation of painful osseous metastases. Pain flare can be problematic, but its incidence has previously not been well-documented. The objectives of this study were to determine (1) the incidence of pain flare after palliative radiation for painful osseous metastases, and (2) whether single-fraction radiotherapy increases the risk of pain flare.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients accrued to a prospective randomized control trial comparing 8 Gy in one fraction to 20 Gy in five fractions (the Canadian Bone Metastasis Study) were approached to fill out a daily pain and analgesia diary for the 7 days post-radiotherapy. Patients assessed their average pain at the index site using the Present Pain Intensity (PPI) scale of the McGill-Melzack pain questionnaire and recorded their daily analgesic medications, which were translated into an analgesic score. Pain flare was defined as a two-point increase in the PPI with no decrease in analgesic score or a 50% increase in analgesic score with no decrease in PPI on at least two consecutive days.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients agreed to fill out the diary and 44 (94%) completed it. Fifteen of 44 (34.1%) patients experienced a pain flare that lasted a median of 3 days. Ten of 23 (43.5%) and 5/21 (23.8%) of patients who received 8 Gy and 20 Gy had a pain flare, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain flare is common after palliative radiotherapy for osseous metastases and patients receiving single fraction radiotherapy may be at higher risk. Further study is warranted to determine predictors and preventive interventions.

Impact of radiation oncology practice on pain: A cross-sectional survey

PURPOSE

A cross-sectional study was performed to evaluate the prevalence of pain in our radiotherapy (RT) department. The impact of RT practice on pain and pain management were analyzed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Of 126 patients, 93 (73.8%) completed the questionnaire proposed in this survey. It was designed to assess the proportion of patients experiencing pain in the department, the impact of RT practice on pain, and patients' estimate of the quality of management of their pain by the medical staff. Pain intensity and patient satisfaction were assessed using an 11-point numeric rating scale.

RESULTS

Of the 93 patients, 66 experienced pain during RT, 13 of whom were totally relieved by analgesic treatment. The mean pain intensity was 3.9 (SD 2.3). A total of 26 patients had a numeric rating >/=4, indicating that their pain was not sufficiently treated. The objective length of waiting time for a session, transportation, and mobilization for session positioning worsened the pain of a substantial proportion of patients. A total of 56% of patients had a favorable opinion about pain management in our department. A high percentage (72.2%) of patients found that the time spent by the medical staff for pain management was inadequate, and 54.5% believed that the psychological support they received was insufficient. Personnel in the RT department remained the primary source of information regarding pain control. However, 17.5% of patients did not report their pain or talked about it to non-health care professionals.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of pain was high in the department. The specific practice of RT worsened pain and nearly one-half of patients were not satisfied with its management. The necessity for medical staff to be more available was highlighted by patients.

Symptom control

Symptom control has become increasingly recognized as an important goal in patient care. In this article, advances in symptom assessment, and various definitions of symptom improvement are reviewed. Theoretical concepts underlying symptom control and clinically significant change are presented, as well as the role of symptom control as an endpoint in clinical trials. Symptom control is then surveyed in two broad categories for selected symptoms. The first area is therapy related symptoms, secondary to chemotherapy, radiation, hormonal therapy, and surgery. Symptoms reviewed include chemotherapy related mucositis, emesis, fatigue; hot flashes; and radiation related dermatitis, xerostomia, and mucositis. The second area is palliative oncologic approaches to disease-related symptoms. Results in palliative chemotherapy, palliative radiation therapy, cancer pain, and lack of appetite are summarized. Areas requiring further research are noted. Findings are presented in both a clinical and research context to help guide the reader with interpreting symptom control studies.