Oxidation of low-density lipoprotein in normotensive type 2 diabetic patients. Comparative effects of enalapril versus nifedipine: a randomized cross-over over study

Using genetics to assess the association of commonly used antihypertensive drugs with diabetes, glycaemic traits and lipids: a trans-ancestry Mendelian randomisation study

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Diabetes and hyperlipidaemia are common comorbidities in people with hypertension. Despite similar protective effects on CVD, different classes of antihypertensive drugs have different effects on CVD risk factors, including diabetes, glucose metabolism and lipids. However, these pleiotropic effects have not been assessed in long-term, large randomised controlled trials, especially for East Asians.

METHODS

We used Mendelian randomisation to obtain unconfounded associations of ACE inhibitors, β-blockers (BBs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs). Specifically, we used genetic variants in drug target genes and related to systolic BP in Europeans and East Asians, and applied them to the largest available genome-wide association studies of diabetes (74,124 cases and 824,006 controls in Europeans, 77,418 cases and 356,122 controls in East Asians), blood glucose levels, HbA_1c, and lipids (LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and triacylglycerols) (approximately 0.5 million Europeans and 0.1 million East Asians). We used coronary artery disease (CAD) as a control outcome and used different genetic instruments and analysis methods as sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

As expected, genetically proxied ACE inhibition, BBs and CCBs were related to lower risk of CAD in both ancestries. Genetically proxied ACE inhibition was associated with a lower risk of diabetes (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.93), and genetic proxies for BBs were associated with a higher risk of diabetes (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.09). The estimates were similar in East Asians, and were corroborated by systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. In both ancestries, genetic proxies for BBs were associated with lower HDL-cholesterol and higher triacylglycerols, and genetic proxies for CCBs were associated with higher LDL-cholesterol. The estimates were robust to the use of different genetic instruments and analytical methods.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Our findings suggest protective association of genetically proxied ACE inhibition with diabetes, while genetic proxies for BBs and CCBs possibly relate to an unfavourable metabolic profile. Developing a deeper understanding of the pathways underlying these diverse associations would be worthwhile, with implications for drug repositioning as well as optimal CVD prevention and treatment strategies in people with hypertension, diabetes and/or hyperlipidaemia.

Short- and long-term treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or calcium channel blockers for the prevention of diabetic nephropathy progression: A meta-analysis

Treatments with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or calcium channel blockers (CCBs) may delay the development of albuminuria in patients with early diabetic nephropathy. However, evidence in the literature has not been consistent. The present meta-analysis aimed to compare the short- and long-term therapeutic effects of ACE inhibitors and CCBs (when used separately) for preventing the progression of nephropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus. A comprehensive search of various databases was performed from inception until March 2015 for studies in the Chinese and English languages. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of ACE inhibitors with that of CCBs in patients with early diabetic nephropathy were considered. A total of 12 RCTs were included with a total of 947 patients. ACE inhibitors were indicated to be more effective in reducing the albumin excretion rate than CCBs after short-term treatments (<6 months) [mean difference (MD), 32.35; 95% confidence interval (CI), 31.62-33.07; P<0.00001]. There was no difference in serum creatinine values after treatment with either drug (MD, 8.7; 95% CI, -21.5-38.91; P=0.57). Data from six studies were used to compare long-term treatment effects (≥1 year). In terms of progression to normoalbuminuria, a marginal difference was obtained between the two drugs with better outcomes with ACE inhibitors [odds ratio (OR), 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49-1.00; P=0.05]. There was no statistically significant difference between ACE inhibitors and CCBs regarding the progression from microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 0.82-3.87; P=0.15). In conclusion, the present study indicated that the antiproteinuric efficacy of CCBs may be less than that of ACE inhibitors after short-term treatment in patients with DN. However, both types of drugs are equally effective in reducing the progression of microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria in the long term.

Antioxidant properties of drugs used in Type 2 diabetes management: could they contribute to, confound or conceal effects of antioxidant therapy?

OBJECTIVES

This is a narrative review, investigating the antioxidant properties of drugs used in the management of diabetes, and discusses whether these antioxidant effects contribute to, confound, or conceal the effects of antioxidant therapy.

METHODS

A systematic search for articles reporting trials, or observational studies on the antioxidant effect of drugs used in the treatment of diabetes in humans or animals was performed using Web of Science, PubMed, and Ovid. Data were extracted, including data on a number of subjects, type of treatment (and duration) received, and primary and secondary outcomes. The primary outcomes were reporting on changes in biomarkers of antioxidants concentrations and secondary outcomes were reporting on changes in biomarkers of oxidative stress.

RESULTS

Diabetes Mellitus is a disease characterized by increased oxidative stress. It is often accompanied by a spectrum of other metabolic disturbances, including elevated plasma lipids, elevated uric acid, hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, and central obesity. This review shows evidence that some of the drugs in diabetes management have both in vivo and in vitro antioxidant properties through mechanisms such as scavenging free radicals and upregulating antioxidant gene expression.

CONCLUSION

Pharmaceutical agents used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes has been shown to exert an antioxidant effect..

Effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor in insulin-resistant rats with myocardial infarction

Adverse cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction (MI) leads to progressive heart failure. Obese-insulin resistance increases risks of MI and heart failure. Although dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitor is known to exert cardioprotection, its effects on adverse remodeling after MI in obese-insulin-resistant rats are unclear. We hypothesized that DPP4 inhibitor reduces adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling and LV dysfunction in obese-insulin-resistant rats with MI. Rats were fed either normal diet (ND) or high-fat diet (HFD) for 12 weeks to induce obese-insulin resistance, followed by left anterior descending coronary artery ligation to induce MI. Then, rats in each dietary group were divided into five subgroups to receive vehicle, enalapril (10mg/kg/day), metformin (30mg/kg/day), DPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin (3mg/kg/day), or combined metformin and vildagliptin for 8 weeks. Heart rate variability (HRV), LV function, pathological and biochemical studies for LV remodeling, and cardiomyocyte apoptosis were determined. Obese-insulin-resistant rats had severe insulin resistance and LV dysfunction. HFD rats had a higher mortality rate than ND rats, and all treatments reduced the mortality rate in obese-insulin-resistant rats. Although all drugs improved insulin resistance, HRV, LV function as well as reduced cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis, vildagliptin effectively reduced cardiomyocyte cross-sectional areas more than enalapril and was related to markedly decreased ERK1/2 phosphorylation. In ND rats with MI, metformin neither improved LV ejection fraction nor reduced cardiac fibrosis. The infarct size and transforming growth factor-β expression were not different among groups. In obese-insulin-resistant rats with chronic MI, DPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin exerts better cardioprotection than enalapril in attenuating adverse LV remodeling.

Sulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition induces sustained reduction of systemic oxidative stress and improves the nitric oxide pathway in patients with essential hypertension

BACKGROUND

Essential hypertension is associated with enhanced LDL oxidation and impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation. The antioxidant status is linked to the nitric oxide (NO) pathway. Sulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors inhibit oxidative stress and atherogenesis in experimental models; therefore we tested whether this beneficial antioxidant activity could be also clinically relevant in patients with essential hypertension.

METHODS

Plasma LDL oxidizability was investigated initially in untreated normocholesterolemic patients with moderate essential hypertension without clinically evident target organ damage (n = 96) and in control normotensive subjects (n = 46). Patients were then randomly assigned into two age- and sex-matched groups to receive the new sulfhydryl ACE inhibitor zofenopril (15 to 30 mg/d; n = 48) or enalapril (20 mg/d, n = 48). LDL oxidizability was evaluated (generation of malondialdehyde, MDA) and systemic oxidative stress was evaluated by isoprostanes (8-isoPGF2alpha). Asymmetrical dimethyl-L-arginine (ADMA), a competitive inhibitor of endothelial NO synthase, and plasma nitrite and nitrates (NOx) were also measured.

RESULTS

LDL from hypertensive subjects had enhanced susceptibility to oxidation in vitro compared with that in control subjects (P <.05). Similarly, isoprostanes were significantly increased (P <.01) in hypertensive subjects versus control subjects. After 12-week treatment, MDA levels were significantly reduced by zofenopril (P <.05) but not enalapril treatment (P = not significant). Isoprostanes were normalized after zofenopril treatment (P <.03), whereas enalapril was ineffective. After treatment with both ACE inhibitors, plasma NOx concentrations were significantly reduced (P <.05). Similarly, hypertension increased ADMA concentration compared with the normotensive state, whereas ACE inihibition elicited a significant decrease. However, the reduction of ADMA concentration was significantly higher in patients receiving sulfhydryl ACE inhibition (P <.05 vs enalapril).

CONCLUSIONS

The sulfhydryl ACE inhibitor zofenopril reduces oxidative stress and improves the NO pathway in patients with essential hypertension. If confirmed in a large multicenter clinical trial, our data suggest a possible vasculoprotective effect of the compound in retarding vascular dysfunction and atherogenesis that often develops rapidly in hypertensive patients.

Renin-angiotensin system antagonism and lipid-lowering therapy in cardiovascular risk management

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and dyslipidaemia have been shown to be involved in the genesis and progression of atherosclerosis. Manipulation of the RAS has been effective in modifying human coronary artery disease progression. Similarly, the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors or statins have been shown to reduce cholesterol and lower cardiovascular events in primary and secondary prevention trials in coronary artery disease. In addition to their primary mode of action, statins and blockers of the RAS possess common additional properties that include restoration of endothelial activity and inhibition of cellular proliferation. This article reviews the current data on the common properties of these classes of drugs in which the beneficial effects extend beyond their antihypertensive and lipid-lowering properties.

Role of ACE inhibitors in treating hypertensive diabetic patients

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major determining factor of morbidity and mortality in type 2 diabetic patients. Hypertension, which accompanies diabetes in more than 70% of cases, contributes to increased prevalence of CVD events in this group of patients. Results from the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) indicated that reduction of elevated blood pressure might decrease CVD morbidity and mortality more than reduction of hyperglycemia. Activation of circulating and tissue renin-angiotensin system (RAS) contributes to the development of both hypertension and insulin resistance in patients with the cardiometabolic syndrome. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy in patients with the cardiometabolic syndrome may improve insulin action as well as lessen CVD. In clinical trials, ACE inhibitors have been shown to be more efficient than other antihypertensive medications (i.e., calcium channel blockers) in the reduction of CVD morbidity and mortality in hypertensive diabetics. In this article, we summarize possible mechanisms by which ACE inhibition may improve insulin resistance, coagulation/clotting, and vascular function abnormalities, and postpone or even prevent the development of type 2 diabetes in hypertensive patients.

The use of ACE inhibitors on diabetic patients without renal disease

Strategies that interrupt the renin-angiotensin system, especially with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition, reduce cardiovascular disease mortality and morbidity in high-risk persons such as those with the insulin resistance syndrome and diabetes mellitus. In the 1980s emphasis was placed on the renal protective effects of ACE inhibitors in patients with diabetes and proteinuria. During the past several years controlled clinical trials have demonstrated that ACE inhibition reduces cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality and morbidity. This is especially important in patients in the United States, where 80% of excess mortality for diabetes mellitus is attributed to CVD. This article reviews the clinical trials in high-risk patients, especially those with diabetes, that shown beneficial CVD risk reduction with ACE inhibitors.

Diabetes mellitus and diabetes-associated vascular disease

Diabetes-related cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death in patients with type 2 diabetes. Hypertension is common among diabetics and has the same pathogenetic mechanisms as insulin resistance, in which the activated renin-angiotensin system contributes to the emerging high blood pressure and hyperglycemia. Hyperglycemia is one of the triggering factors for vascular dysfunction and clotting abnormalities and, therefore, for accelerated atherosclerosis in diabetes. Glycated hemoglobin levels, as a reflection of the degree of glycemia, are strongly associated with the risk of cardiovascular disease in diabetics and in the general population. Tight glycemic control, the treatment of dyslipidemia and raised blood pressure, in addition to the use of antiplatelet therapy, all powerfully reduce the risks associated with diabetes. Furthermore, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors might offer additional cardioprotection to diabetics above that provided by blood pressure reduction.