Prophylaxis with anti-HBs immune globulins and nucleoside analogues after liver transplantation for HBV infection

Efficacy and Safety of Hepatitis B Virus Vaccination Following Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin Withdrawal After Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and oral nucleoside/nucleotide analogs have been the mainstay of hepatitis B virus (HBV) prophylaxis after liver transplantation. However, long-term HBIG administration could have disadvantages, such as an increase in medical costs and the development of mutant HBV strains. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of HBV vaccination after the withdrawal of HBIG after liver transplantation.

METHODS

This prospective open-label single-arm observational clinical trial enrolled 41 patients who underwent liver transplantation between 2010 and 2016 because of a condition related to chronic HBV infection. At the time of enrollment, all patients had taken entecavir and discontinued HBIG administration. When hepatitis B surface antibody titer was undetectable after the withdrawal of HBIG, a recombinant HBV vaccine was injected intramuscularly at month 0, 1, and 6.

RESULTS

After excluding 5 patients who dropped out and 2 patients who had a persistent hepatitis B surface antibody titer, 9 (26.5%) of 34 patients had a positive vaccination response. The median hepatitis B surface antibody titer at seroconversion was 86 (12-1000) IU/L, and those at the end of follow-up were 216 (30-1000) IU/L. No patients experienced HBV recurrence during the study period. Sex (female, odds ratio 32.91 [1.83-592.54], P = .018) and the dosing interval of HBIG before withdrawal (≥90 days, 16.21 [1.21-217.31], P = .035) were independent contributing factors for positive response to the vaccination.

CONCLUSION

HBV vaccination still deserves consideration as active immunoprophylaxis after liver transplantation because it could provide added immunity to nucleoside/nucleotide analogs monotherapy with excellent cost-effectiveness.

Immunoglobulin, nucleos(t)ide analogues and hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplant: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) represents an efficient strategy for reducing the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). Unfortunately, the long-term use of HBIG presents high costs. Therefore, the use of prophylaxis based only on nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUC) has been recently postulated. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of HBIG ± NUC vs HBIG alone or NUC alone in post-LT HBV recurrence prophylaxis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Cochrane databases. The primary outcome investigated was the HBV recurrence after LT. Three analyses were done comparing the effect of (a) HBIG + NUC vs HBIG alone; (b) HBIG+NUC vs NUC alone; and (c) HBIG alone vs NUC alone. Sub-analyses were also performed investigating the effect of low and high genetic barrierto-recurrence NUC.

RESULTS

Fifty-one studies were included. The summary OR (95%CI) showed a decreased risk with the combination of HBIG + NUC vs HBIG alone for HBV recurrence, being 0.36 (95% CI = 0.22-0.61; P < .001). HBIG + NUC combined treatment reduced HBV reappearance respect to NUC alone (OR = 0.22; 95% CI = 0.16-0.30; P < .0001). Similarly, HBIG alone was significantly better than NUC alone in preventing HBV recurrence (OR = 0.20; 95% CI = 0.09-0.44; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylaxis with HBIG is relevant in preventing post-LT HBV recurrence. Its combination with NUC gives the best results in terms of protection. The present results should be considered in light of the fact that also old studies based on lamivudine use were included. Studies exploring in detail high genetic barrier-to-recurrence NUC and protocols with definite use of HBIG are needed.

Long-term consequences of stopping HBIG and/or nucleotide analogues in liver transplant recipients administered hepatitis B vaccination to prevent HBV reinfection

BACKGROUND

The long-term administration of nucleotide analogues (NAs) and hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) comprises standard prophylaxis for patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver diseases to prevent HBV reinfection after liver transplantation (LT). However, prolonging the prophylaxis strategy involves safety issues, such as the development of escape mutations and/or emerging resistant strains, and is also associated with high costs; further, it remains unclear how long prophylactic treatment should be continued.

METHOD

Liver transplantation recipients responding to hepatitis B vaccination due to HBV-related liver diseases were retrospectively analysed after stopping HBIG and/or NAs, administered to prevent HBV reinfection, after long-term follow-up. The safety and effectiveness of the strategy were then evaluated for these responders.

RESULT

Seventy-eight responders were enrolled. All responders discontinued HBIG, among which 36 stopped both HBIG and NAs. During follow-up, four recipients experienced HBV reinfection, which was associated with HBV escape mutations, after the withdrawal of both HBIG and NAs. No death or graft loss occurred in recipients during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

A careful withdrawal of HBIG and/or NAs is feasible and safe for responders to hepatitis B vaccination receiving transplants for HBV-related liver diseases.

Hepatitis B immunoglobulin prophylaxis after liver transplantation: experience in a tertiary transplant centre

BACKGROUND

Prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleoside analogs can prevent hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplant (LT).

AIM

To determine the efficacy and cost of maintaining immunoprophylaxis with HBIG and hyperimmune plasma (HIP) for 6 months after LT.

MATERIAL & METHODS

The study included 22 HBV related LT recipients who were on entecavir and either HBIG or HIP for 6 months. Post transplant HBIG or HIP dose and cost incurred towards prophylaxis were noted. The cost of 200 IU of HBIG at the time of study was Rs 8250/- (US Dollars 135) and that of 2000 IU of HIP was Rs 8000/- (USD 130.7). The loading and maintenance costs at end of 6 months were compared between the two groups. Response to HBIG and HIP was assessed by checking for HBsAg reactivity, anti HBs titer response and HBV DNA viral load.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Median and range, Kruskal Wallis (KW) sign rank Sum Test and Correlation Coefficient (r2) was used for analysis.

RESULTS

Thirteen recipients received HBIG and 9 recipients HIP. The anti HBs response to HIP was significantly high compared to HBIG (KW Sign rank Sum test P < 0.05); titers remained high until the study period. Between 8 and 30 days, the titer achieved by both HBIG and HIP was similar (KW Sign rank Sum test not significant). Despite low anti HBs titer of <100 IU/L, none of the recipients on HBIG had HBsAg reactivity while 3 on HIP had transient HBsAg positivity. The total cost with HBIG was 13.9 times the cost of HIP.

CONCLUSION

HIP immunoprophylaxis in combination with entecavir achieves a high anti HBs titer at a significant low cost during anhepatic and loading phase. HBV reactivation rates with HBIG and HIP is low despite low anti HBs titer.

Efficacy and safety of entecavir and/or tenofovir for prophylaxis and treatment of hepatitis B recurrence post-liver transplant

AIMS

To establish the efficacy and safety of entecavir (ETV) and/or tenofovir (TDF) in the treatment and prevention of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eight patients (four men) received treatment with ETV and/or TDF after liver transplantation as prophylaxis for HBV recurrence or as posttransplant treatment of HBV. Four liver transplants were in patients with HBV-associated cirrhosis who had received prior nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment until HBV DNA became undetectable. After transplantation, two of these four were treated with ETV + TDF and the other two with just TDF. All received intramuscular hepatitis B immunoglobulins. The reasons for the other four liver transplants were primary biliary cirrhosis in two cases, alcoholic cirrhosis, and hepatitis C virus. Two of the patients were donor anti-HBcAb-positive/recipient anti-HBcAb-negative. They received no anti-HBV prophylaxis so they had a recurrence of HBV. These four patients required treatment with ETV+TDF for the HBV DNA to become negative.

RESULTS

The mean age was 60 (39-67) years. The mean follow-up was 9.5 (3-20) months. The mean follow-up of the patients who received prophylaxis was 8.2 (3-19) months. These had no HBV recurrence. The mean follow-up of the patients who received treatment for HBV recurrence was 12 (3-19) months. ETV combined with TDF was necessary for the HBV DNA to become undetectable because this was not possible using different nucleos(t)ide analogues. There were no significant adverse effects from these drugs and no alteration of renal function during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapy with ETV and/or TDF seems to be efficient and safe when used in the prophylaxis and treatment of HBV recurrence after liver transplantation. They are well tolerated and seem to have no interactions with immunosuppressive medication.

One-year vaccination against hepatitis B virus with a MPL-vaccine in liver transplant patients for HBV-related cirrhosis

Conflicting results have been reported on vaccination against hepatitis B virus (HBV) as a prophylaxis against viral recurrence after liver transplantation. We investigated the efficacy of 1-year, monthly vaccination using an adjuvant 3-deacylated monophosphoryl-lipid-A (MPL) recombinant S vaccine initially administered together with hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIg) in 18 patients transplanted for HBV-related cirrhosis. All received 12 vaccine doses (HBsAg, 20 mcg plus MPL, 50 mcg): the initial six doses (phase I) were administered within 7days after intravenous HBIg (2000IU), while the last 6 (phase II) following HBIg withdrawal. All patients received lamivudine during the study. Anti-HBs titers were determined before each dose and then for 1year after vaccination. After phase I anti-HBs titers were greater than 100IU/l in all patients and in three (16.6%) were greater than 500IU/l. After phase II 10 patients (55.5%) achieved anti-HBs titers greater than 100IU/l and five (27.7%) greater than 500IU/l. One year after vaccination eight patients (44.4%) maintained anti-HBs titers greater than 100IU/l, with a median titer of 234IU/l (102-1205), and 2 (11.1%) greater than 500IU/l. One-year extended monthly vaccination with a MPL-adjuvant recombinant vaccine induces a sustained protective anti-HBs response in approximately half of transplant recipients.

Lamivudine or adefovir dipivoxil alone or combined with immunoglobulin for preventing hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in the liver graft is a grave complication following liver transplantation for HBV cirrhosis. Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) seems effective in increasing survival after liver transplantation. HBIg and anti-viral drugs are given alone or in combination for its prevention.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of different regimens for preventing HBV reactivation following liver transplantation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded until February 2010. We attempted to identify further trials by reviewing the reference lists and contacting the principal authors of identified trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials addressing benefits and harms of lamivudine or adefovir dipivoxil alone or in combination with hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIg) for preventing recurrent HBV infection in patients who are liver transplanted due to HBV infection with or without hepatocellular carcinoma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the trials for risk of bias and extracted data. We contacted study authors whenever information was lacking. We collected information on adverse events. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen in serum after liver transplantation. Relative risks were calculated from individual trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Four trials, recruiting 136 participants, were included. Two trials compared lamivudine alone versus HBIg alone. Randomisation was performed one week after transplantation in one of the trials and after six months after transplantation in another; from transplantation until randomisation, HBIg alone was given to all patients in the two trials. A third trial compared combination treatment with lamivudine and HBIg versus lamivudine alone after one month of combination treatment, and a fourth trial compared the combination of lamivudine and HBIg versus a combination of lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil after at least 12-month of lamivudine and HBIg combination treatment. Statistically significant differences were not detected in any of the comparisons and outcomes. All trials were open-labelled, and none of the trials were adequately powered to show a difference in HBV recurrence. No meta-analyses were performed since the identified trials assessed different comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review could not derive clear evidence from randomised clinical trials for the treatment of patients with chronic HBV following liver transplantation for preventing recurrence of HBV infection. Large randomised clinical trials comparing long-term combination treatment to each of the monotherapy alone, including the newer antiviral drugs, are needed.

Hyperimmune anti-HBs plasma as alternative to commercial immunoglobulins for prevention of HBV recurrence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B immune globulins (HBIG) in combination with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) are effectively used for the prevention of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). However, associated treatment costs for HBIG are exceedingly high.

METHODS

Fresh frozen plasma obtained from blood donors with high anti-HBs levels (hyperimmune plasma, HIP) containing at least 4,500 IU anti-HBs was used as alternative treatment for HBV recurrence prophylaxis post-LT.

RESULTS

Twenty-one HBV-related LT recipients received HIP starting at transplantation, followed by long-term combination treatment with NA. Mean follow-up time was 4.5 years (range 0.5-12.6) and each patient received on average 8.2 HIP per year (range 5.8-11.4). Anti-HBs terminal elimination kinetic after HIP administration was 20.6 days (range 13.8-30.9), which is comparable to values reported for commercial HBIG products. All 21 patients remained free of HBV recurrence during follow-up and no transfusion-transmitted infection or other serious complication was observed. Seven patients developed reversible mild transfusion reactions. The cost for one HIP unit was US$140; average yearly HBIG treatment cost was US$1,148 per patient, as compared to US$25,000-100,000 for treatment with commercial HBIG.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that the use of HIP may be a useful and economical approach for the prevention of HBV recurrence post-LT if used in combination with NA. Additional prospective controlled studies in larger populations are needed to confirm these results.

Prevention of recurrent hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation: hepatitis B immunoglobulin, antiviral drugs, or both? Systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate antiviral prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus (HBV) following liver transplantation.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical trials and comparative cohort studies comparing the use of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg), antivirals, or both following liver transplantation for HBV infection were included. The primary outcome was reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Other outcomes included all-cause and HBV-related mortality, HB-related active liver disease, and reappearance of HBV DNA after transplantation. Relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported.

RESULTS

Twenty studies (22 comparisons) were included. Ten studies compared HBIg to combination treatment, 9 compared antivirals to combination treatment, and 3 compared lamivudine (LAM) to HBIg. Combination treatment reduced HBsAg reappearance (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.12-0.66), and was superior to HBIg alone in all other outcome measures. Combination treatment was significantly better than antivirals in preventing reappearance of HBsAg (RR 0.31; 95% CI 0.22-0.44), even when low-dose HBIg was given. No significant difference was found between HBIg and LAM monotherapy for all measured outcomes. Major limitations with regard to comparability of the study groups in non-randomized trials were revealed.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination treatment with HBIg and LAM reduced HBV recurrence following liver transplantation, compared with HBIg or LAM alone, and reduced mortality compared with HBIg alone.

Liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus. Pre-emptive and peri-operative prophylaxis

In the past, reinfection of the graft by hepatitis B virus (HBV) after liver transplantation for HBV-related liver disease was often followed by severe liver damage and reduced survival. The long-term administration of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) dramatically reduced this risk. However, this procedure was ineffective in most patients with active viral replication pre-transplant. The use of lamivudine in the pre-transplant setting partially solved this problem. The emergence of resistant mutants to lamivudine was also solved by the addition of adefovir. At present, combination therapy by oral antivirals pre-transplant and HBIG plus the same drugs post-transplant achieves nearly 100% of protection against graft reinfection. In a recent study, a new intravenous HBIG, Niuliva has shown high efficacy in achieving protective anti-HBs levels after liver transplantation for HBV-related liver diseases, as well as a good safety profile. Using combination therapies, the doses of HBIG can be reduced or even stopped after several weeks or months post-transplant, continuing with oral antivirals alone. The recently introduced antivirals achieve a very high antiviral potency and low risk of resistance. This may further increase the efficacy in preventing graft reinfection in the post-liver transplantation setting.

Viral persistence after liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Prophylaxis to prevent recurrent HBV infection in liver transplant (LT) recipients has evolved over time, and we manage patients who receive lamivudine monoprophylaxis, lamivudine with HBV immunoglobulin (HBIg), and lamivudine and adefovir with HBIg.

METHODS

Serum was examined with sensitive assays to detect the persistence of HBV, and to identify mutations that might confer resistance to the antiviral prophylaxis. Forty patients were studied, and sera were collected 20 days to 13.3 years after LT.

RESULTS

Overall, HBV DNA was detected in serum of 67.5% of patients (8 of 10 of lamivudine monoprophylaxis patients, 15 of 24 of those receiving lamivudine and HBIg, and 4 of 6 of those receiving lamivudine, adefovir and HBIg). Thus, HBV infection persists for most of the patients despite successful prophylaxis after LT. Of those patients with detectable serum HBV DNA, three of eight of the lamivudine monoprophylaxis group had sequences associated with resistance to lamivudine (YMDD mutants), compared with only 1 of 15 of the lamivudine and HBIg cohort. Three of the lamivudine and HBIg cohort had the I126A Hepatitis B surface antigen escape variant. In those serum HBV DNA-positive patients who were receiving lamivudine, adefovir, and HBIg, only one of four had YMDD mutant, and none had Hepatitis B surface antigen escape variants. None of the 40 patients suffered clinical HBV recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations imply that the selection of resistant virus may be essential, but is not sufficient to cause overt failure of prophylaxis with development of clinical disease. It seems likely that the patients' immune response contributes, at least partially, to the long-term control of infection in these patients.

Viral hepatitis after liver transplantation

Recurrence of the original liver disease following liver transplantation is a typical complication in viral hepatitis. Recent advances, particularly the development of strategies to prevent or effectively treat hepatitis B, have led to substantial improvements in the post-transplantation outcome of hepatitis B candidates. While the efficacy of antivirals to treatrecurrent hepatitis C has improved in recent years, there is as yet no therapy to universally prevent recurrent infection, and tolerability of antivirals remains a matter of concern.

Recurrence of hepatitis B is associated with cumulative corticosteroid dose and chemotherapy against hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation

The incidence of hepatitis B (HB) recurrence after a liver transplantation has been reduced by prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and lamivudine. However, the long-term incidence of recurrence is <10%, and the factors associated with HB recurrence are unclear. This study analyzed the factors associated with HB recurrence in 203 recipients who underwent liver transplantation for HB in 3 major centers in Korea over 4 years. Eighty-five patients (41.9%) had a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Preoperative active virus replicators with the HBeAg(+) (46.8%) and/or hepatitis B virus DNA(+) (39.4%) were observed in 136 patients (67.0%). The HB prophylaxis consisted of either HBIG monotherapy (n = 95, HBIG group) or combination therapy with lamivudine (n = 108, combination group). HB recurrence was defined as the appearance of the HBsAg. The follow-up period was 28.3 +/- 13.1 months (mean +/- SD). HB recurred in 21 patients (10.3%) after transplantation. The time from transplantation to recurrence was 16.3 +/- 9.4 months. Pre-LT DNA positivity was more prevalent in HBIG group (55.8%) than in the combination group (39.8%) (P = 0.015). However, the incidence of HB recurrence was similar in the HBIG (6.3%) and combination group (13.8%), as well as between the active replicators (12.5%) and nonreplicators (4.1%) (P < 0.05). There was a far higher incidence of HB recurrence in patients receiving corticosteroid pulse therapy (21.0% vs. 7.9%), patients who experienced HCC recurrence (31.3% vs. 8.6%), and patients receiving chemotherapy to prevent HCC recurrence (25.0% vs. 4.4%) (P < 0.05). The cumulative corticosteroid dose was higher in patients who experienced recurrence of HB (P = 0.002). Multivariable analysis confirmed the effect of the cumulative corticosteroid dose and chemotherapy to be risk factors. Liver transplantation for HB is safe, with low recurrence rates if adequate prophylaxis is used. However, the cumulative corticosteroid dose and the chemotherapy used for HCC were risk factors for HB recurrence, so careful monitoring for HB recurrence is needed in these patients.

Adefovir dipivoxil for wait-listed and post-liver transplantation patients with lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B: final long-term results

Wait-listed (n = 226) or post-liver transplantation (n = 241) chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) were treated with adefovir dipivoxil for a median of 39 and 99 weeks, respectively. Among wait-listed patients, serum HBV DNA levels became undetectable (<1,000 copies/mL) in 59% and 65% at weeks 48 and 96, respectively. After 48 weeks, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin, bilirubin, and prothrombin time normalized in 77%, 76%, 60%, and 84% of wait-listed patients, respectively. Among posttransplantation patients, serum HBV DNA levels became undetectable in 40% and 65% at weeks 48 and 96, respectively. After 48 weeks, ALT, albumin, bilirubin, and prothrombin time normalized in 51%, 81%, 76%, and 56% of posttransplantation patients, respectively. Among wait-listed patients who underwent on-study liver transplantation, protection from graft reinfection over a median of 35 weeks was similar among patients who did (n = 34) or did not (n = 23) receive hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg). Hepatitis B surface antigen was detected on the first measurement only in 6% and 9% of patients who did or did not receive HBIg, respectively. Serum HBV DNA was detected on consecutive visits in 6% and 0% of patients who did or did not receive HBIg, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events led to discontinuation of adefovir dipivoxil in 4% of patients. Cumulative probabilities of resistance were 0%, 2%, and 2% at weeks 48, 96, and 144, respectively. In conclusion, adefovir dipivoxil is effective and safe in wait-listed or posttransplantation CHB patients with lamivudine-resistant HBV and prevents graft reinfection with or without HBIg.

A prophylactic approach for bone marrow transplantation from a hepatitis B surface antigen-positive donor

It has been accepted that bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is the only curative therapeutic option for certain hematologic malignancies. The southeast Asia region is an endemic area of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection; thus, BMT using a hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive donor is occasionally unavoidable. Organ transplantation using a HBsAg-positive donor can lead to post-transplantation de novo HBV infection and severe HBV-related hepatitis if no effective prophylactic measures are taken prior to and after transplantation. In this report, a four-level approach was designed for a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia, beginning with a booster HBV vaccination before performing BMT with a HBsAg-positive donor. Prior to BMT, the HBV viral load of the donor was reduced to an undetectable level by antiviral therapy. After BMT, hepatitis B immunoglobulin was administered intramuscularly for 1 wk together with a long-term antiviral drug, lamivudine. One year after discontinuation of lamivudine, the patient is still free of HBV infection.

Protocol liver biopsies in long-term management of patients transplanted for hepatitis B-related liver disease

AIM: To evaluate the long-term histological outcome of patients transplanted for HBV-related liver disease and given HBIg prophylaxis indefinitely after LT.

METHODS: Forty-two consecutive patients transplanted for hepatitis B were prospectively studied. HBsAg, HBV-DNA and liver function tests were evaluated in the serum 3, 6 and 12 mo after LT and then yearly. LB was obtained 6 and 12 mo after LT and yearly thereafter. Chronic hepatitis (CH) B after LT was classified as minimal, mild, moderate or severe.

RESULTS: HBV recurred in 7/42 (16.6 %) patients after 6-96 mo of follow-up. A hundred and eighty-seven LB were evaluated. Four of 7 patients with graft reinfection, all with unknown HBV DNA status before LT, developed cirrhosis at 12-36 mo of follow-up. Of the 122 LB obtained from 28 HBsAg+/HCV- recipients with no HBV recurrence after LT, all biopsies were completely normal in only 2 patients (7.1 %), minimal/non-specific changes were observed in 18 (64.2 %), and at least 1 biopsy showed CH in the remaining 8 (28.5 %). Twenty-nine LB obtained from 7 patients transplanted for HBV-HCV cirrhosis and remaining HBsAg- after LT revealed recurrent CH-C. Actuarial survival was similar in patients with HBsAg+ or HBsAg- liver diseases.

CONCLUSION: Though protocol biopsies may enable the detection of graft dysfunction at an early stage, the risk of progression and the clinical significance of these findings remains to be determined.

Response to an experimental HBV vaccine permits withdrawal of HBIg prophylaxis in fulminant and selected chronic HBV-infected liver graft recipients

Strategies using lamivudine and hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIg) for prevention of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation (LT) are expensive since life-long treatment is needed. We evaluated the possibility to obtain protective hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) antibody (anti-HBs) titers after LT and to discontinue HBIg prophylaxis after a reinforced course of vaccination against HBV using an experimental adjuvant HBsAg / AS04 vaccine (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals [GSK], Rixensart, Belgium) in patients transplanted for hepatitis B. Fifteen LT patients on stable low-level immunosuppression were vaccinated with a double dose of the vaccine at 0, 1, 2, 6, and 12 months: 5 patients were transplanted for nonviral diseases and 10 patients were transplanted for HBV on HBIg monotherapy. HBIg were continued during baseline vaccination (0, 1, and 2 months) and when anti-HBs titers determined every 6 weeks dropped below 150 IU/L. Overall follow-up was 18 months. Sustained long-term response to vaccination was defined as anti-HBs titers >500 IU/L without further need for HBIg administration during a follow-up period of at least 12 months. Overall sustained response to vaccination was 53% (8 / 15 patients); 80% (4 / 5 patients) in the nonviral disease group and 40% (4 / 10 patients) in the HBV group (2 /2 fulminant and 2/8 chronically infected patients) developed a sustained long-term response and were completely free of HBIg at the end of the 18-month follow-up. No HBV recurrence, rejection episodes, or side effects occurred during the follow-up. In conclusion, protective anti-HBs titers were obtained in a substantial number of LT patients following a reinforced course of HBV vaccination with vaccines containing new immunostimulating adjuvants. Vaccination seems well tolerated and safe and allows long-term discontinuation of HBIg.

Asian-Pacific consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B: a 2005 update

BACKGROUND/AIMS

A large amount of new data on the treatment of chronic hepatitis B has become available such that the 2003 consensus statement requires revision and update.

METHODS

New data were presented, discussed and debated in an expert pre-meeting to draft a revision. The revised contents were finalized after discussion in a general meeting of APASL.

RESULTS

Conceptual background, including the efficacy and safety profile of currently available and emerging drugs, was reviewed. Nineteen recommendations were formed and unresolved issues and areas for further study were suggested.

CONCLUSION

The current therapy of chronic hepatitis B is modestly effective but not satisfactory. The development of new drugs and new strategies is required to further improve the outcomes of treatment.

Liver transplantation for viral hepatitis

Viral hepatitis is associated with two forms of liver failure that may require liver transplantation: fulminant hepatic failure associated with all forms of acute viral hepatitis and chronic liver failure as a result of chronic hepatitis B and C infection (or both). This review briefly discusses liver transplantation for fulminant hepatitis but focuses on transplantation for hepatitis B- and hepatitis C-associated cirrhosis.

Management of HBV Infection in Liver Transplantation Patients

In the absence of preventative therapy, reinfection of allografts with hepatitis B virus (HBV) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) resulted in dismal allograft and patient survival. Major advances in the management of HBV-infected recipients of OLT during the past 15 years have steadily reduced the rate of reinfection, resulting in improved outcomes. Initially, long-term use of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) as a source of anti-HBs antibodies was effective in preventing or delaying reinfection. Lamivudine monotherapy made it possible to suppress HBV replication prior to OLT, markedly decreasing the risk of reinfection. Although lamivudine monotherapy used before and after OLT could prevent reinfection, its effectiveness was limited by progressive development of lamivudine-resistant mutant infections. Combination therapy with HBIG and lamivudine after OLT reduced both HBV recurrence and the risk of lamivudine resistance even in patients with active HBV replication. Introduction of adefovir provided a safe, alternative oral antiviral able to treat effectively lamivudine-resistant mutants HBV. Available strategies to prevent reinfection have resulted in OLT outcomes for HBV-infected patients comparable to those for patients transplanted for non-HBV indications. In the future, combination therapies of HBIG and both nucleoside and/or nucleotide agents will undoubtedly be optimized. Development of new drugs to treat HBV will increase opportunities to combine agents to enhance safety, efficacy and prevent emergence of HBV escape mutants. New vaccines and adjuvants may make it possible to generate anti-HBs in immunosuppressed patients, eliminating the need for HBIG.