Natriuretic response to the combination of atrial natriuretic peptide and terlipressin in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites

Multisystem hemodynamic effects of terlipressin in cirrhosis: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS-AKI) is a serious complication of advanced liver disease. Pharmacologic options are limited in effectiveness, therefore liver transplantation is the definitive therapy. Early investigation into terlipressin as a first-line therapy for HRS-AKI has been promising but expected hemodynamic changes across organ systems in patients with cirrhosis have not been thoroughly examined.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of the literature including adult patients with cirrhosis who received terlipressin and hemodynamic parameters were recorded. Non-human studies, case reports, conference abstracts, and review articles were excluded. Searches were performed up to December 2024 in the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL.

RESULTS

Of 2022 studies retrieved, 56 studies met inclusion criteria. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and cardiac output were the most reported parameters. Pulmonary arterial pressure and wedge pressure were the next most common. Systemic vascular resistance, hepatic and renal measures such as resistive indices and portal pressure gradients had fewer studies. Studies reported decreased heart rate, increased mean arterial pressure, decreased cardiac output/index, and increased systemic vascular resistance. Other hemodynamic outcomes were more varied across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Terlipressin exerts a variety of hemodynamic effects across organ systems and vascular beds. More studies are required to understand if any hemodynamic parameters might predict terlipressin response or adverse events.

Practice guidance for the use of terlipressin for liver cirrhosis-related complications

BACKGROUND

Liver cirrhosis is a major global health burden worldwide due to its high risk of morbidity and mortality. Role of terlipressin for the management of liver cirrhosis-related complications has been recognized during recent years. This article aims to develop evidence-based clinical practice guidance on the use of terlipressin for liver cirrhosis-related complications.

METHODS

Hepatobiliary Study Group of the Chinese Society of Gastroenterology of the Chinese Medical Association and Hepatology Committee of the Chinese Research Hospital Association have invited gastroenterologists, hepatologists, infectious disease specialists, surgeons, and clinical pharmacists to formulate the clinical practice guidance based on comprehensive literature review and experts' clinical experiences.

RESULTS

Overall, 10 major guidance statements regarding efficacy and safety of terlipressin in liver cirrhosis were proposed. Terlipressin can be beneficial for the management of cirrhotic patients with acute variceal bleeding and hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). However, the evidence regarding the use of terlipressin in cirrhotic patients with ascites, post-paracentesis circulatory dysfunction, and bacterial infections and in those undergoing hepatic resection and liver transplantation remains insufficient. Terlipressin-related adverse events, mainly including gastrointestinal symptoms, electrolyte disturbance, and cardiovascular and respiratory adverse events, should be closely monitored.

CONCLUSION

The current clinical practice guidance supports the use of terlipressin for gastroesophageal variceal bleeding and HRS in liver cirrhosis. High-quality studies are needed to further clarify its potential effects in other liver cirrhosis-related complications.

Role of Terlipressin in Cirrhotic Patients with Ascites and without Hepatorenal Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence

Ascites, a common complication in cirrhosis, is prone to the development of acute kidney injury or hepatorenal syndrome and can be complicated by circulatory dysfunction after paracentesis. Terlipressin has not been considered as the mainstay treatment option for ascites in cirrhosis yet. The present work aimed to systematically review the current evidence regarding the use of terlipressin in cirrhosis with ascites and without hepatorenal syndrome. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies. Twelve studies were eligible. In 3 studies (1 randomized controlled trial and 2 single-arm studies without controls) involving 32 patients who received terlipressin for nonrefractory ascites, terlipressin improved hemodynamics by decreasing the heart rate and cardiac output and increasing the mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance. In 5 studies (1 randomized controlled trial, 2 single-arm studies without controls, and 2 comparative studies with controls) involving 67 patients who received terlipressin for refractory ascites, terlipressin improved renal function by increasing the glomerular filtration rate, renal blood flow, urinary sodium, and urine output and decreasing serum creatinine. In 4 studies (4 randomized controlled trials) involving 71 patients who received terlipressin for preventing from paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction, terlipressin prevented from paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction by increasing the mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance and decreasing plasma renin. Terlipressin may improve hemodynamics, severity of ascites, and renal function and prevent from paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction in cirrhosis with ascites and without hepatorenal syndrome. However, no study has evaluated the effect of terlipressin for prevention of acute kidney injury.

Treatment for ascites in adults with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Approximately 20% of people with cirrhosis develop ascites. Several different treatments are available; including, among others, paracentesis plus fluid replacement, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, aldosterone antagonists, and loop diuretics. However, there is uncertainty surrounding their relative efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the benefits and harms of different treatments for ascites in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis through a network meta-analysis and to generate rankings of the different treatments for ascites according to their safety and efficacy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and trials registers until May 2019 to identify randomised clinical trials in people with cirrhosis and ascites.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or status) in adults with cirrhosis and ascites. We excluded randomised clinical trials in which participants had previously undergone liver transplantation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We performed a network meta-analysis with OpenBUGS using Bayesian methods and calculated the odds ratio, rate ratio, and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI) based on an available-case analysis, according to National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Decision Support Unit guidance.

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 49 randomised clinical trials (3521 participants) in the review. Forty-two trials (2870 participants) were included in one or more outcomes in the review. The trials that provided the information included people with cirrhosis due to varied aetiologies, without other features of decompensation, having mainly grade 3 (severe), recurrent, or refractory ascites. The follow-up in the trials ranged from 0.1 to 84 months. All the trials were at high risk of bias, and the overall certainty of evidence was low or very low. Approximately 36.8% of participants who received paracentesis plus fluid replacement (reference group, the current standard treatment) died within 11 months. There was no evidence of differences in mortality, adverse events, or liver transplantation in people receiving different interventions compared to paracentesis plus fluid replacement (very low-certainty evidence). Resolution of ascites at maximal follow-up was higher with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (HR 9.44; 95% CrI 1.93 to 62.68) and adding aldosterone antagonists to paracentesis plus fluid replacement (HR 30.63; 95% CrI 5.06 to 692.98) compared to paracentesis plus fluid replacement (very low-certainty evidence). Aldosterone antagonists plus loop diuretics had a higher rate of other decompensation events such as hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome, and variceal bleeding compared to paracentesis plus fluid replacement (rate ratio 2.04; 95% CrI 1.37 to 3.10) (very low-certainty evidence). None of the trials using paracentesis plus fluid replacement reported health-related quality of life or symptomatic recovery from ascites.

FUNDING

the source of funding for four trials were industries which would benefit from the results of the study; 24 trials received no additional funding or were funded by neutral organisations; and the source of funding for the remaining 21 trials was unclear.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on very low-certainty evidence, there is considerable uncertainty about whether interventions for ascites in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis decrease mortality, adverse events, or liver transplantation compared to paracentesis plus fluid replacement in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis and ascites. Based on very low-certainty evidence, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and adding aldosterone antagonists to paracentesis plus fluid replacement may increase the resolution of ascites compared to paracentesis plus fluid replacement. Based on very low-certainty evidence, aldosterone antagonists plus loop diuretics may increase the decompensation rate compared to paracentesis plus fluid replacement.

Effect of perioperative terlipressin infusion on systemic, hepatic, and renal hemodynamics during living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

End-stage liver disease is associated with marked hemodynamic disturbances that are further aggravated during liver transplantation. Terlipressin has been shown to be effective in the management of sepsis-induced hypotension and hepatorenal syndrome and recently has been tried as infusion during liver transplantation. This study assessed the effect of intraoperative and postoperative terlipressin infusion on systemic, hepatic, and renal hemodynamics during adult living donor liver transplantation.

METHODS

Eighty recipients were randomly allocated into control (C group; n=40) and terlipressin (TP group; n=40), in which, terlipressin infusion was started at the beginning of surgery at a dose of 3 μg kg(-1) h(-1) to be reduced to 1.5 μg kg(-1) h(-1) after reperfusion and continued for 3 postoperative days; vasoactive agents were used as appropriate in all patients. Systemic hemodynamics, hepatic and renal arterial resistive indices (HARI, RARI), and portal venous blood flow (PBF) were compared between both groups intraoperatively and for 5 postoperative days.

RESULTS

With terlipressin infusion, there were significant increases in both mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance (P<.001), whereas heart rate and cardiac output decreased significantly (P<.001) throughout the study period compared with the C group. Vasoconstrictor drugs required during reperfusion were significantly lower in the TP group. There was a significant decrease in HARI, RARI, and portal venous blood flow in the TP group compared with the C group throughout the study period. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding liver function tests and serum lactate, whereas renal function tests were significantly better in the TP group.

CONCLUSION

Terlipressin infusion significantly decreased HARI, RARI, and portal vein flow and improved low systemic vascular resistance and mean arterial pressure. It helped to reduce intraoperative vasoactive support and might improve postoperative renal function.

Terlipressin Resolves Ascites of Cirrhotic Rats through Downregulation of Aquaporin 2

Objectives:

To investigate the presence of aquaporin (AQP) 1 and AQP2 in kidneys of cirrhotic rats with ascites, and to determine the effect of terlipressin on AQP1 and AQP2 levels and its therapeutic efficacy in ascites treatment.

Methods:

Eighteen rats were randomly divided into normal noncirrhotic rats treated with saline, cirrhotic rats treated with saline and cirrhotic rats treated with terlipressin ( n = 6 per group). In all rats, 24-h net fluidexcretion volume, presence or absence of ascites and portal vein pressure were measured; AQP1 and AQP2 mRNA and protein levels in renal tissue were evaluated.

Results:

Terlipressin resolved ascites in all animals in the terlipressintreated group, and significantly increased the 24-h net fluid-excretion volume and decreased portal vein pressure compared with saline treatment. AQP1 and AQP2 were significantly upregulated in cirrhotic rat kidneys compared with normal control rat kidneys. Terlipressin administration significantly down regulated AQP2 in rat kidneys but did not affect AQP1.

Conclusions:

AQP1 and AQP2 are important factors in ascites induction. Terlipressin appears to be an effective drug for the treatment of ascites due to liver cirrhosis in a rat model, possibly due to AQP2 reduction in kidneys.

Medical management of hepatorenal syndrome

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is defined as the occurrence of renal dysfunction in a patient with end-stage liver cirrhosis in the absence of another identifiable cause of renal failure. The prognosis of HRS remains poor, with a median survival without liver transplantation of <6 months. However, understanding the pathogenesis of HRS has led to the introduction of treatments designed to increase renal perfusion and mean arterial blood pressure using vasopressors and albumin, which has led to improvement in renal function in ∼50% of patients.

The use of terlipressin in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites and normal renal function: a multicentric study

Ascites is a common complication of liver cirrhosis, occurring in more than 50-60% of the patients within 10 years of the diagnosis. In 5-10% of patients, ascites cannot be mobilized, or its early recurrence cannot be prevented by medical treatment. This condition is known as "refractory ascites". The use of terlipressin in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites and normal renal function has not been evaluated. This prospective study was aimed at evaluating whether terlipressin in addition to standard therapy (diuretics plus albumin) might improve the outcome of refractory ascites in cirrhotic patients without HRS.

PATIENTS

26 cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites were prospectively enrolled in this study. All the patients had tense (grade 3) ascites, and 10/26 showed also massive peripheral edema. Patients received maximum diuretic treatment plus albumin and terlipressin.

RESULTS

Complete response was seen in 16/26 patients. The higher response to therapy was seen during the 2nd week of treatment. 6 patients showed a decrease of at least two points in the ascites score. No differences in clinical response to treatment were seen according to the etiology of the disease.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our study shows a synergistic effect of terlipressin vs treatment with albumin plus diuretics in patients with refractory ascites. One could speculate that albumin might enhance the vasoconstrictive response to terlipressin, thus contributing to counterbalance the negative effects of systemic vasodilation, which characterizes the hyperdynamic circulation of cirrhotic patients.

Critical care management of patients with end-stage liver disease

OBJECTIVES

To review the management of complications related to end-stage liver disease in the intensive care unit. The goal of this review is to address topics important to the practicing physician.

DATA SOURCES

We performed an organ system-based PubMed literature review focusing on the diagnosis and treatment of critical complications of end-stage liver disease. DATA SYNTHESIS AND FINDINGS: When available, preferential consideration was given to randomized controlled trials. In the absence of trials, observational and retrospective studies and consensus opinions were included. We present our recommendations for the neurologic, cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, renal, and infectious complications of end-stage liver disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications related to end-stage liver disease have significant morbidity and mortality. Management of these complications in the intensive care unit requires awareness and expertise among physicians from a wide variety of fields.

Terlipressin in hepatorenal syndrome: Evidence for present indications

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is the most frequent life threatening complication of advanced liver failure and cirrhosis. HRS results from a functional renal dysfunction due to circulatory disturbances in patients with advanced liver disease and portal hypertension. Reduction in the effective circulating blood volume and hence hypoperfusion of the kidney is the basic underlying common pathogenetic mechanism for the development of hepatorenal syndrome. The prognosis for HRS remains very poor with types 1 and 2-both having an expected survival time of 2 weeks and 6 months, respectively. Although the available data are derived from studies including a limited number of patients mainly affected by type 1 HRS, vasoconstrictor drugs, in particular the vasopressin analog Terlipressin, seem to be the most effective approach for the management of HRS. Associated with albumin infusion, these drugs have been shown to lead to reduced mortality and improved renal function in HRS. Terlipressin administration significantly increases mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance; while the heart rate, cardiac output, HVPG and portal venous blood flow decrease significantly. This decrease correlates well with the decrease in plasma renin activity. Thus the vasoconstrictor effect of Terlipressin reverses the basic pathology of HRS by reducing the plasma renin activity. The improvement in hemodynamics with Terlipressin is associated with an increase in glomerular filtration rate and deactivation of the vasoconstrictor and sodium-conserving hormones with reduced activity of the RAAS resulting in increased natriuresis. Terlipressin thus reverses HRS and is useful in bridging the patient to liver transplantation and may hence indirectly improve survival. Patients with HRS who show an improvement in renal function with Terlipressin and albumin seem to have an excellent post-transplantation outcome similar to that of patients without HRS. Thus, the use of Terlipressin has been shown to be safe, with minimal side effects that usually disappear after dose reduction, and results in an improved outcome in patients with HRS.

Effects of terlipressin on systemic, hepatic and renal hemodynamics in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Terlipressin has been shown to be effective in the management of hepatorenal syndrome. However, how terlipressin exerts its effect on the renal artery is unknown. The aim of the present study was to assess the effects of terlipressin on systemic, hepatic and renal hemodynamics in cirrhosis.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension were studied. Systemic and hepatic hemodynamics, hepatic and renal arterial resistive indices and neurohumoral factors were measured prior to and 30 min after intravenous administration of 1 mg terlipressin (n = 19) or placebo (n = 9).

RESULTS

After terlipressin, there were significant increases in both mean arterial pressure (P < 0.001) and systemic vascular resistance (P < 0.001), whereas heart rate (P < 0.001) and cardiac output (P < 0.001) decreased significantly. There was a significant decrease in the hepatic venous pressure gradient (P < 0.001). Portal venous blood flow also decreased significantly (P < 0.001). The mean hepatic arterial velocity increased significantly (P < 0.001). Although there was a significant decrease in the hepatic arterial resistive index (0.72 +/- 0.08 to 0.69 +/- 0.08, P < 0.001) and renal arterial resistive index (0.74 +/- 0.07 to 0.68 +/- 0.07, P < 0.001), portal vascular resistance was unchanged (P = 0.231). Plasma renin activity decreased significantly (P < 0.005), and there was a significant correlation between this decline and the decrease in renal arterial resistive index (r = 0.764, P < 0.005). The effects of terlipressin on systemic, hepatic and renal hemodynamics were observed similarly in patients with and without ascites. Placebo caused no significant effects.

CONCLUSION

Terlipressin decreases hepatic and renal arterial resistance in patients with cirrhosis.

Effects of terlipressin on the aquaretic system: evidence of antidiuretic effects

The vasopressin analog terlipressin is believed to cause vasoconstriction selectively by V1 receptor stimulation. However, a possible antidiuretic effect by V2 receptor stimulation has never been ruled out. Twenty-two patients with ascites, including seven with refractory ascites, were included. The subjects were studied during a 400 ml/h oral water load before and after infusion of 2 mg of terlipressin (18 patients) or placebo infusion (4 patients). Effects on the V2 receptors were assessed by evaluating aquaporin (AQP)2 excretion, free water clearance (C(H2O)), urine osmolality (Uosm), and fractional distal water excretion (DFeH2O). After terlipressin the excretion of AQP2 increased by 89% [144 ng/mmol creatinine, 95% confidence interval (CI) 73-214 ng/mmol creatinine, P = 0.001]. C(H2O) decreased 1.05 ml/min (from 0.17 to -0.89 ml/min, P = 0.001), and DFeH2O decreased 37% (19 vs. 12; 95% CI 2-11, P = 0.01). Uosm increased by 27% (93 mosmol/kgH2O, 95% CI 23-164 mosmol/kgH2O, P = 0.02). Plasma sodium decreased 1.1 mmol/l (P < 0.01). An increase in AQP2 excretion and a decrease in C(H2O) and distal water excretion after terlipressin despite water loading is a clear indication of activation of the antidiuretic system (V2 receptor effect).

Terlipressin improves renal function in patients with cirrhosis and ascites without hepatorenal syndrome

Patients with advanced cirrhosis and ascites are characterized by circulatory dysfunction with splanchnic vasodilatation and renal vasoconstriction, which often lead to ascites. The vasoconstrictor terlipressin improves renal function in hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). The aim of this study was to evaluate if terlipressin also improves renal function in patients with ascites without HRS. Twenty-three patients with cirrhosis participated; 15 with nonrefractory ascites were randomized to either terlipressin (N group, n = 11) or a placebo (P group, n = 4), and 8 had refractory ascites and received terlipressin (R group). The glomerular filtration rate (GFR), sodium clearance (C(Na)), lithium clearance (C(Li)), osmolal clearance (C(Osm)), and urine sodium concentration (U(Na)) were assessed before and after the injection of 2 mg of terlipressin or the placebo. GFR increased in the N group (69 +/- 19 versus 92 +/- 25 mL/min, P < 0.005) and in the R group (31 +/- 19 versus 41 +/- 31 mL/min, P < 0.05) after terlipressin. In the N group, terlipressin induced an increase in C(Na) (0.89 +/- 0.21 versus 1.52 +/- 1.45 mL/min, P < 0.05), C(Li) (17.3 +/- 8.9 versus 21.5 +/- 11.6 mL/min, P < 0.05), and C(Osm) (2.10 +/- 0.81 versus 3.06 +/- 2.0 mL/min, P < 0.05). In the R group, terlipressin induced an increase in C(Na) (0.11 +/- 0.18 versus 0.35 +/- 0.40 mL/min, P < 0.05) and C(Li) (5.5 +/- 4.2 versus 9.5 +/- 8.55 mL/min, P < 0.05). U(Na) increased in both groups after terlipressin (P < 0.005). Plasma norepinephrine (P < 0.05) and renin (P < 0.05) decreased after terlipressin. All parameters remained unchanged after the placebo.

CONCLUSION

The vasopressin 1 receptor agonist terlipressin improves renal function and induces natriuresis in patients with cirrhosis and ascites without HRS. Vasoconstrictors may represent a novel future treatment modality for these patients.

Systematic review: renal and other clinically relevant outcomes in hepatorenal syndrome trials

BACKGROUND

Although reversal of pretransplant renal dysfunction in hepatorenal syndrome reduces post-transplant complications, the overall impact on morbidity and mortality requires clarification.

AIM

To review trials of pharmacologic interventions in hepatorenal syndrome, with specific assessment of trial quality and study endpoints, including patient survival and renal outcome measures.

METHODS

Literature search and selection was carried out by a single reviewer. Data extraction and quality analysis were carried out by two independent reviewers.

RESULTS

Of 848 identified articles, 36 were eligible for inclusion. Twenty-one were full-text. Only 19% were randomized-controlled trials. About 50% of studies included only Type 1 hepatorenal syndrome patients. Serum creatinine, urine output and urine sodium were the most common renal outcome measures. Only 42% defined a primary renal endpoint. About 88% of articles reported mortality rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Existing literature of pharmacologic agents for use in hepatorenal syndrome is limited by poor study design, including non-randomization, heterogeneous study populations, lack of power, and limited use of clinically relevant outcomes. There is insufficient information in most trials to judge the impact of pharmacologic therapy on mortality or rates of transplantation. The validity of renal outcome measures as surrogate markers of more clinically relevant endpoints has not been established.

The use of vasoconstrictors in patients with cirrhosis: type 1 HRS and beyond

In patients with cirrhosis and type 1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), systemic vasodilation, which is mainly attributable to splanchnic vasodilation, plays a critical role in the activation of endogenous vasoconstrictor systems, resulting in renal vasoconstriction and functional renal failure. It has been suggested that the use of splanchnic (and systemic) vasoconstrictors such as terlipressin (a vasopressin analog) or alpha-1-adrenoceptor agonists (midodrine or noradrenaline) may improve renal function in patients with type 1 HRS. Six studies (with only one randomized study in a small series of patients) have shown that terlipressin improves renal function in these patients. However, there is evidence that terlipressin alone may be less effective than terlipressin combined with intravenous albumin in improving renal function. Future randomized studies should confirm this difference and evaluate the impact of terlipressin therapy (with or without intravenous albumin) on survival. Interestingly, in nonrandomized studies, the use of alpha-1 agonists combined with other therapies (octreotide and albumin for midodrine; furosemide and albumin for noradrenaline) has been shown to improve renal function in patients with type 1 HRS. The efficacy and safety of combined therapies including alpha-1 agonists should be confirmed in randomized studies. Finally, preliminary evidence suggests that vasoconstrictor administration may be a novel therapeutic approach targeting vasodilation involved in the mechanism of: (1) renal failure in type 2 HRS; (2) paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction; and (3) arterial hypotension induced by byproducts of gram-negative bacteria. Further studies are needed in all these fields.

Terlipressin versus albumin in paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction in cirrhosis: a randomized study

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic paracentesis in patients with cirrhosis induces arterial vasodilatation, causes a decrease in effective arterial blood volume and leads to circulatory dysfunction, which can be prevented by intravenous albumin. However, the use of albumin, being a blood product, is controversial. Recently, terlipressin, a vasoconstrictor, has been successfully used to combat this adverse effect of therapeutic paracentesis. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the preventive effect of terlipressin on paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis after therapeutic paracentesis and compared with that of intravenous albumin.

METHODS

Forty patients with cirrhosis and tense ascites underwent therapeutic paracentesis with albumin or terlipressin in a randomized pilot study at a tertiary center. Effective arterial blood volume was assessed by measuring plasma renin activity at baseline and at 4-6 days after treatment.

RESULTS

Effective arterial blood volumes as indicated by plasma renin activity before and 4-6 days after paracentesis did not differ in the two groups (19.15 +/- 12.1 to 20.33 +/- 12.8 ng/mL per h, P = 0.46 in the albumin group; and 20.11 +/- 10.6 to 21.08 +/- 10.52 ng/mL per h, P = 0.44 in the terlipressin group). Plasma aldosterone concentrations before and 4-6 days after paracentesis were also similar in both groups (1334.75 +/- 1058 to 1440.0 +/- 1161 pg/mL, P = 0.06 in the albumin group; and 1473.0 +/- 1168 to 1572.29 +/- 1182 pg/mL, P = 0.24 in the terlipressin group). Both terlipressin and albumin prevented paracentesis-induced renal impairment in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Terlipressin may be as effective as intravenous albumin in preventing paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis after therapeutic paracentesis.

Prevention of renal impairment by continuous infusion of human atrial natriuretic peptide after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Acute renal failure occurring immediately after liver transplantation and requiring hemodialysis is a major problem resulting in a poor prognosis. We investigated the efficacy of human atrial natriuretic peptide, which has potent natriuretic effects and unique protective effects for glomeruli in preventing acute renal failure after liver transplantation.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients who underwent live donor liver transplantation with model for end-stage liver disease scores greater than 15 were the subjects of the study. Subjects were prospectively randomized into two groups: patients that received synthetic human atrial natriuretic peptide infusion (Group H: n=19) and those that received conventional diuretics, furosemide and potassium canrenoate (Group C: n=18). The peri- and postoperative changes in hemodynamic status and renal function were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences in the changes in hemodynamic status between groups. Hemodialysis was required after liver transplantation in nine patients, two in Group H and seven in Group C (P=0.04). Postoperative creatinine clearance was higher in Group H (P=0.03). Aldosterone level was suppressed in group H (P=0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous infusion of synthetic human atrial natriuretic peptide might be effective for preventing acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis after liver transplantation.

Effects of somatostatin, terlipressin and somatostatin plus terlipressin on portal and systemic hemodynamics and renal sodium excretion in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Terlipressin and somatostatin are the most preferable agents for the control of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients. The present study evaluated the hemodynamic effects of somatostatin, terlipressin and somatostatin plus terlipressin in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension, as well as the effect of each regimen on renal sodium excretion.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with esophageal varices were randomly assigned to receive either an intravenous infusion of a placebo (n = 12) or somatostatin 250 microg/h after an initial bolus of 250 microg (n = 12) for 60 min. Thereafter, each patient received an intravenous injection of terlipressin 2 mg while the intravenous infusion of either somatostatin or placebo was maintained. Portal and systemic hemodynamic parameters, assessed by Doppler sonography, and urinary sodium excretion were evaluated at baseline, 60 min after placebo or somatostatin, and 30 min after terlipressin.

RESULTS

Placebo had no effect on the patients studied. After terlipressin, portal vein velocity, portal flow volume and cardiac output (CO) significantly decreased (0.09 vs 0.15 m/s, 0.56 vs 1 L/min and 6.4 vs 7.6 L/min, respectively [values are medians]), while mean arterial pressure (MAP) and systemic vascular resistance significantly increased (103.3 vs 89.9 mmHg and 1541 vs 1108dyn.s/cm(5), respectively). Fractional sodium excretion significantly increased in patients without ascites (0.43 vs 0.16%) while it did not change in patients with ascites. Somatostatin did not alter portal hemodynamics whereas it significantly reduced MAP, heart rate (HR) and CO (86.9 vs 98.6 mmHg, 65 vs 73 bpm and 8.4 vs 9.1 L/min, respectively) and, in patients with ascites, sodium excretion (0.13 vs 0.23%). The addition of terlipressin to somatostatin induced similar changes to those observed after terlipressin alone. The magnitude of increase in MAP was significantly higher in patients receiving terlipressin alone than in those receiving somatostatin plus terlipressin (15 vs 5.3%), while CO was conversely affected (-28.5 vs-20.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined treatment with somatostatin and terlipressin does not exert an additive portal hypotensive effect in cirrhotic patients as compared to terlipressin alone, whereas somatostatin alone may impair systemic hemodynamics. Compared with somatostatin, terlipressin exerts a more beneficial effect on renal sodium excretion in patients with or without ascites.

The effects of chronic treatment with octreotide versus octreotide plus midodrine on systemic hemodynamics and renal hemodynamics and function in nonazotemic cirrhotic patients with ascites

OBJECTIVES

The adrenergic agonist midodrine improved circulatory and renal dysfunction when acutely administered in nonazotemic cirrhotic patients with ascites while its combination with octreotide has recently been proposed as an effective treatment of type 1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). However, the effects of octreotide on systemic hemodynamics and renal function in cirrhotic patients are controversial. This study evaluated the effects of chronic treatment with octreotide versus octreotide plus midodrine on systemic hemodynamics and renal hemodynamics, and function in nonazotemic cirrhotic patients with ascites.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients were studied at baseline and 11 days after administration of subcutaneous octreotide 300 mug, b.i.d. alone (n = 12) or together with oral midodrine 7.5 mg, t.i.d. (n = 13).

RESULTS

Octreotide did not improve systemic hemodynamics whereas the addition of midodrine significantly decreased cardiac index (CI) and heart rate (HR), and increased mean arterial pressure (MAP) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR). Octreotide caused a decrease in renal vascular resistance (RVR) and increased renal blood flow (RBF) but significantly reduced glomerular filtration rate. The association of midodrine to octreotide did not modify renal hemodynamics and function as compared to baseline while it caused an almost significant minor increase in RVR and a significant minor decrease in RBF as compared to octreotide alone. Consequently, a significant minor increase in glomerular filtration rate was demonstrated. The plasma values of active renin, aldosterone, and glucagon were significantly reduced in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Octreotide does not improve systemic hemodynamics in nonazotemic cirrhotic patients with ascites while it impairs renal function. On the other hand, the addition of midodrine can ameliorate the hyperdynamic circulation without inducing renal dysfunction in these patients.

Differential effects of human atrial natriuretic peptide and furosemide on glomerular filtration rate and renal oxygen consumption in humans

OBJECTIVE

Imbalance in the renal medullary oxygen supply/demand relationship can cause hypoxic medullary damage and ischemic acute renal failure. Human atrial natriuretic peptide (h-ANP) increases glomerular filtration rate in clinical acute renal failure. This would increase renal oxygen consumption due to increased tubular load of sodium. Loop diuretics are commonly used in acute renal failure. Data on the effects of loop diuretics on glomerular filtration rate and renal oxygen consumption in humans are, however, controversial. We evaluated the effects of h-ANP and furosemide on renal oxygen consumption, glomerular filtration rate, and renal hemodynamics in humans.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective two-agent interventional study in a university hospital cardiothoracic ICU.

PATIENTS

Nineteen uncomplicated, mechanically ventilated postcardiac surgery patients with normal renal function.

INTERVENTIONS

h-ANP (25 and 50 ng/kg per minute, n=10) or furosemide (0.5 mg/kg per hour, n=9).

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate were measured using the infusion clearance technique for (51)Cr-labeled EDTA and paraaminohippurate, corrected for by renal extraction of PAH. h-ANP increased glomerular filtration rate, renal filtration fraction, fractional excretion of sodium, and urine flow. This was accompanied by an increase in tubular sodium reabsorption (9%) and renal oxygen consumption (26%). Furosemide infusion caused a 10- and 15-fold increase in urine flow and fractional excretion of sodium, respectively, accompanied by a decrease in tubular sodium reabsorption (-28%), renal oxygen consumption (-23%), glomerular filtration rate and filtration fraction (-12% and -7%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The filtered load of sodium is an important determinant of renal oxygen consumption. h-ANP improves glomerular filtration rate but does not have energy-conserving tubular effects. In contrast, furosemide decreases tubular sodium reabsorption and renal oxygen consumption and thus has the potential to improve the oxygen supply/demand relationship in clinical ischemic acute renal failure.

Review article: pathogenesis and pathophysiology of hepatorenal syndrome--is there scope for prevention?

The hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a functional impairment of the kidneys in chronic liver disease caused by a circulatory failure. The prognosis is poor, particularly with type 1 HRS, but also type 2, and only liver transplantation is of lasting benefit. However, recent research into the pathophysiology of ascites and HRS has stimulated new enthusiasm in their prevention and treatment. Patients with HRS have hyperdynamic circulatory dysfunction with reduced arterial blood pressure and reduced central blood volume, owing to preferential splanchnic arterial vasodilatation. Activation of potent vasoconstricting systems, including the sympathetic nervous and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone systems, counteracts the arterial vasodilatation and leads to a pronounced renal vasoconstriction with renal hypoperfusion, a reduced glomerular filtration rate, and intense sodium-water retention. Thus prevention of HRS should seek to improve liver function, limit arterial hypotension and central hypovolaemia, and reduce renal vasoconstriction and the renal and interstitial pressures. Portal pressure can be reduced with beta-adrenergic blockers and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Precipitating events, like infections, bleeding, and postparacentesis circulatory syndrome, should be treated to avoid further circulatory failure. Improvement in arterial blood pressure and central hypovolaemia can be achieved with vasoconstrictors, such as terlipressin (Glypressin), and plasma expanders such as human albumin. In the future endothelins, adenosine antagonists, long-acting vasoconstrictors, and antileukotriene drugs may play a role in preventing and treating HRS.

Systemic, portal and renal effects of terlipressin in patients with cirrhotic ascites: pilot study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Terlipressin is a vasopressin analog that may improve renal function in hepatorenal syndrome by mechanisms as yet unknown. The authors investigated the effect of the drug on systemic, hepatic and renal hemodynamics in cirrhosis.

METHODS

Six patients with cirrhosis and ascites were studied (five Child's B and one Child's C). Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac output (CO), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), reverse thermodilution unilateral real-time renal blood flow (RBF), urinary flow, and sodium concentrations were measured before and 1 h after an intravenous bolus of 2 mg of terlipressin.

RESULTS

Following terlipressin administration, HR fell significantly (84.2 +/- 6 to 70.8 +/- 4.9, P = 0.013), MAP increased (72.7 +/- 3.6 to 87 +/- 5.3 mmHg, P = 0.027), CO fell (7.4 +/- 0.8 to 6.4 +/- 0.8 L/min, P = 0.02) and SVR increased (1368.5 +/- 236 to 2079.7 +/- 458, P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in HVPG (12.3 +/- 1.6 to 14 +/- 0.9 mmHg, P-value not significant [NS]), RBF (255 +/- 0.02 compared with 249 +/- 0.02 mL/min, P-value NS), urinary volume (49.1 +/- 8.9 compared with 49.6 +/- 16.7 mL/ h, P-value NS) and urinary sodium excretion (4 +/- 1.1 compared with 5.9 +/- 3.5 mmol/ h).

CONCLUSION

In the present small study, the authors were able to demonstrate that a bolus injection of terlipressin produced an increase in MAP and SVR, along with a reduction in cardiac output without a reduction in renal blood flow. Further studies are necessary to define the effects of terlipressin on renal hemodynamics and sodium excretion.

Increased arterial compliance in cirrhosis is related to decreased arterial C-type natriuretic peptide, but not to atrial natriuretic peptide

BACKGROUND

Increased arterial compliance (COMPart) has recently been described in patients with cirrhosis, particularly in advanced disease. The aim of the present study was to relate COMPart with arterial levels of the circulating natriuretic peptides: atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP), both of which are vasodilators.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with cirrhosis, 14 non-cirrhotic patients with circulatory disturbances of the ischaemic and hypertensive type, and 10 healthy controls were investigated during a haemodynamic examination.

RESULTS

The patients with cirrhosis showed the well-known hyperdynamic circulation with elevated cardiac output, low arterial blood pressure, and reduced systemic vascular resistance. COMPart in the patients with cirrhosis (1.30 mL/mmHg) was significantly (P < 0.01) increased compared to that of non-cirrhotic patients (0.99 mL/mmHg) and controls (1.01 mL/mmHg). In the patients with cirrhosis, a significant inverse correlation was found between CNP and COMPart (r = -0.42, P < 0.01), but not between CNP and systemic vascular resistance (r = 0.31, P = 0.08). In the non-cirrhotic patients, CNP had a significant inverse correlation to COMPart (r = -0.68, P < 0.01) and a direct correlation to systemic vascular resistance (r = 0.62, P < 0.02). ANP was not significantly related to COMPart nor to systemic vascular resistance in any of the groups.

CONCLUSION

The finding of an inverse relation between CNP and COMPart may suggest that a compensatory down-regulation of CNP occurs in patients with cirrhosis and other types of circulatory disorders when vasodilation persists. Regulation of large and small arteries by CNP may be different in cirrhosis. Arterial ANP is not related to properties of the large or small arteries.

Clinical course, predictive factors and prognosis in patients with cirrhosis and type 1 hepatorenal syndrome treated with Terlipressin: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Terlipressin has been proposed to treat renal failure in patients with type 1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). However, the predictive factors for improved renal function and survival are unknown in patients with type 1 HRS treated with terlipressin. The aim of the present retrospective study was to investigate the predictive factors and prognosis of patients with type 1 HRS treated with terlipressin.

METHODS

The clinical charts of 18 consecutive patients with cirrhosis and type 1 HRS treated with terlipressin were studied. The predictive factors for improved renal function and survival were identified using univariate analyses.

RESULTS

Improved renal function, indicated by a significant decrease in serum creatinine (61 +/- 4%), occurred in 11 (60%) patients. The only predictive factor for improved renal function was a Child-Pugh's score < or =13 at the time of diagnosis of HRS (P = 0.02). Fifteen patients (83%) died at 45 days and the median survival was 24 days. Of the three patients who survived, two underwent successful orthotopic liver transplantation. Three predictive factors for survival were identified: absence of a precipitating factor for HRS (P = 0.012); improved renal function during terlipressin therapy (P = 0.05); and a dose of terlipressin > or =3 mg/day (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with type 1 HRS treated with terlipressin, patients with improved renal function had less severe cirrhosis (Child-Pugh >10 but < or =13) than patients without. The predictive factors for survival were the absence of a precipitating factor for HRS, the terlipressin-induced improvement in renal function and a dose of terlipressin of at least 3 mg/day. These findings suggest that a randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of terlipressin on survival in patients with type 1 HRS should be performed.

Terlipressin in patients with cirrhosis and type 1 hepatorenal syndrome: a retrospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Type 1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a severe complication of cirrhosis associated with a short median survival time (<2 weeks). Although the administration of terlipressin improves renal function, its effect on survival is unknown. This study investigated predictive factors of survival in patients with type 1 HRS treated with terlipressin.

METHODS

Ninety-nine patients with type 1 HRS treated with terlipressin in 24 centers were retrospectively studied. Terlipressin-induced improved renal function was defined as a decrease in serum creatinine value to <130 micromol/L or a decrease of at least 20% at the end of treatment.

RESULTS

At inclusion, the Child-Pugh score was 11.8 +/- 1.6 (mean +/- SD). Terlipressin (3.2 +/- 1.3 mg/day) was administered for 11 +/- 12 days. Renal function improved in 58% of patients (serum creatinine decreased by 46% +/- 17% from 272 +/- 114 micromol/L). Median survival time was 21 days. Survival rate was 40% at 1 month. Multivariate analysis showed that improved renal function and Child-Pugh score < or =11 at inclusion were independent predictive factors of survival (P < 0.0001 and 0.02, respectively). Thirteen patients underwent liver transplantation (92 +/- 95 days after HRS onset), 10 of whom had received terlipressin and had had improved renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective uncontrolled study shows that in patients with type 1 HRS, terlipressin-induced improved renal function is associated with an increase in survival. Thus, a randomized trial investigating the effect of terlipressin on survival in patients with type 1 HRS should be performed.

Relationships between haemodynamic alterations and the development of ascites or refractory ascites in patients with cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE

In patients with cirrhosis, the relationships between haemodynamic alterations and the development of ascites or the occurrence of refractory ascites are unknown. The aim of the present study was to compare haemodynamic measurements obtained in patients with non-refractory ascites to haemodynamic measurements obtained in patients without ascites and in patients with refractory ascites.

METHODS

A cohort of 121 patients was prospectively studied, of whom 29 patients did not have ascites, 45 had non-refractory ascites and 47 had refractory ascites. Splanchnic, renal and systemic haemodynamics were measured in all patients.

RESULTS

The hepatic venous pressure gradient was significantly higher in patients with non-refractory ascites than in patients without ascites (18.5 +/- 0.8 mmHg versus 15.8 +/- 0.7 mmHg). Renal and systemic haemodynamics did not significantly differ between patients with non-refractory ascites and patients without ascites. The glomerular filtration rate and renal blood flow were significantly lower in patients with refractory ascites than in patients with non-refractory ascites (77 +/- 4 versus 107 +/- 5 ml/min and 867 +/- 62 versus 1,008 +/- 68 ml/min, respectively). Splanchnic and systemic haemodynamics did not significantly differ between patients with refractory ascites and patients with non-refractory ascites.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with cirrhosis, an increase in portal hypertension was the sole haemodynamic alteration related to the development of ascites. Renal vasoconstriction (and subsequent renal hypoperfusion and hypofiltration) was the only haemodynamic alteration related to the occurrence of refractory ascites. The development of ascites or refractory ascites was not associated with any alteration in systemic haemodynamics.

Low-dose vasopressin restores diuresis both in patients with hepatorenal syndrome and in anuric patients with end-stage heart failure

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to confirm earlier reports that low-dose vasopressin (LDVP) analogues promote urine output in patients with hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and to check whether this mode of therapy could also be effective in renal shutdown due to nonhepatic conditions.

DESIGN

A prospective, open, interventional study.

SETTING

An intermediate-level (step-down) medical intensive care unit within a general medical ward of a large university-affiliated hospital.

SUBJECTS

Eighteen successive hospitalized patients with HRS (mean age 65 +/- 13 years) and 11 patients with end-stage congestive heart failure (CHF) (mean age 81 +/- 5 years) who failed to restore urine output with conventional treatment (fluids, dopamine, and diuretics) given for at least 24 h.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients received LDVP (1 IU h-1) continuously in addition to the conventional treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Urine output and creatinine clearance every 24 h.

RESULTS

In the HRS group, before treatment the urine output was 155 +/- 9 mL 24 -1h (mean +/- SD). After treatment with LDVP for 24, 48, and 72 h, urine output improved to 1067 +/- 87, 1020 +/- 501, and 1311 +/- 988 mL 24 -1h, respectively (P < 0.0001 for all measures; two-tailed paired t-test). In the CHF group, before treatment the urine output was 99 +/- 99 mL 24 -1h. After treatment with LDVP for 24, 48, and 72 h, this improved to 1125 +/- 994 mL 24 -1h (P = 0.0028), 1821 +/- 1300 mL 24 -1h (P = 0.004), and 2920 +/- 2423 mL 24 -1h (P = 0.0012), respectively. The improvement in urine output was not accompanied by a parallel improvement in creatinine clearance. The overall outcome did not change, and all patients except two in each group succumbed to their end-stage disease, due to nonrenal causes.

CONCLUSIONS

LDVP is effective in restoring urine output both in HRS and in CHF. This suggests that LDVP affects mechanisms not specifically related to liver disease. LDVP may be useful in critical patients with renal shutdown whilst awaiting liver or heart transplantation.

Relation between severity of liver disease and renal oxygen consumption in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Worsening cirrhosis may lead to increased renal O2 metabolism caused by activation of neurohumoral antinatriuretic substances.

AIMS

To evaluate the relation between the severity of liver disease, sodium excretion, and neurohumoral antinatriuretic substances on the one hand and renal O2 metabolism on the other in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Renal O2 consumption and haemodynamics as well as plasma concentrations of noradrenaline, renin, and aldosterone were measured. Investigations were performed in 14 patients with Pugh's grade A, 43 with grade B, and 29 with grade C liver disease.

RESULTS

Renal O2 consumption significantly increased with the severity of cirrhosis (grade A, 8.9 (1.6); grade B, 15.5 (1.3); grade C, 18.0 (1.5) ml/min/m2). Plasma concentrations of noradrenaline, renin, and aldosterone significantly increased while mean arterial presssure and systemic vascular resistance significantly decreased with the severity of the disease. A significant inverse correlation was found between renal O2 consumption and sodium excretion. A significant direct correlation was found between plasma levels of noradrenaline and aldosterone on the one hand and renal O2 consumption on the other. Renal blood flow and the glomerular filtration rate did not differ significantly between patients with grade C and grade A or B disease.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows for the first time that, in patients with cirrhosis, worsening of the disease is associated with an increase in renal O2 consumption. The results suggest that increased renal O2 consumption is due to renal tubular sodium retention caused by increased levels of neurohumoral antinatriuretic substances. This neurohumoral activation is related to cirrhosis induced vasodilation.