Positive intravenous line tip cultures as predictors of bacteraemia

Predictive Performance of Gram Staining of Catheter Tips for Candida Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections

We analyzed 2462 episodes of suspected catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for detecting Candida CRBSI by gram staining of catheter tips were 66.1%, 99.4%, 84.4%, and 98.4%, respectively. Gram staining may be useful for the early detection of Candida CRBSI.

Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections

Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections are associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, significance of a positive blood culture with this pathogen is often underestimated or findings are misinterpreted as contamination, which can result in inadequate diagnostic and therapeutic consequences. We here review and discuss current diagnostic and therapeutic key elements and open questions for the management of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections.

Expert consensus-based clinical practice guidelines management of intravascular catheters in the intensive care unit

The French Society of Intensive Care Medicine (SRLF), jointly with the French-Speaking Group of Paediatric Emergency Rooms and Intensive Care Units (GFRUP) and the French-Speaking Association of Paediatric Surgical Intensivists (ADARPEF), worked out guidelines for the management of central venous catheters (CVC), arterial catheters and dialysis catheters in intensive care unit. For adult patients: Using GRADE methodology, 36 recommendations for an improved catheter management were produced by the 22 experts. Recommendations regarding catheter-related infections’ prevention included the preferential use of subclavian central vein (GRADE 1), a one-step skin disinfection(GRADE 1) using 2% chlorhexidine (CHG)-alcohol (GRADE 1), and the implementation of a quality of care improvement program. Antiseptic- or antibiotic-impregnated CVC should likely not be used (GRADE 2, for children and adults). Catheter dressings should likely not be changed before the 7th day, except when the dressing gets detached, soiled or impregnated with blood (GRADE 2− adults). CHG dressings should likely be used (GRADE 2+). For adults and children, ultrasound guidance should be used to reduce mechanical complications in case of internal jugular access (GRADE 1), subclavian access (Grade 2) and femoral venous, arterial radial and femoral access (Expert opinion). For children, an ultrasound-guided supraclavicular approach of the brachiocephalic vein was recommended to reduce the number of attempts for cannulation and mechanical complications. Based on scarce publications on diagnostic and therapeutic strategies and on their experience (expert opinion), the panel proposed definitions, and therapeutic strategies.

Should non-bacteraemic patients with a colonized catheter receive antimicrobial therapy?

OBJECTIVES

The impact of antimicrobial therapy on the outcomes of patients with colonized catheters and no bacteraemia has not been assessed. This study assessed whether targeted antibiotic therapy is related to a poor outcome in patients with positive cultures of blood drawn through a non-tunnelled central venous catheter (CVC) and without concomitant bacteraemia.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study involving adult patients with positive blood cultures drawn through a CVC and negative peripheral vein blood cultures. Patients were classified into two groups: those with clinical improvement and those with a poor outcome. These two groups were compared. The outcome was considered poor in the presence of one or more of the following: death, bacteraemia or other infection due to the same microorganism, and evidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were included (31 with a poor outcome). The only independent predictors of a poor outcome were a McCabe and Jackson score of 1-2 and a median APACHE score of 5. No association was found between the use of targeted antimicrobial therapy and a poor outcome when its effect was adjusted for the rest of the variables.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that antimicrobial therapy was not associated with a poor outcome in non-bacteraemic patients with positive blood cultures drawn through a CVC.

How to use central venous catheter tip cultures

Central venous catheter (CVC) tip cultures are useful in the assessment of a patient with a potential catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). However, these results can be misleading particularly in the absence of concomitant peripheral and central line blood cultures. Catheter tip cultures should not be submitted to the laboratory unless CRBSI is suspected as the predictive value of culture results depends on the pretest probability of CRBSI. A positive CVC tip culture does not usually warrant further investigation or therapy (except in the case of Staphylococcus aureus and possibly Candida sp) while a negative catheter tip culture in isolation does not definitively exclude CRBSI. Clinicians can use alternative criteria for the diagnosis of CRBSI that do not require catheter tip cultures if necessary. Further research into the significance of CVC tip cultures in the absence of concomitant bacteraemia is required.

The risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection after withdrawal of colonized catheters is low

Most episodes of catheter-related bloodstream infection (C-RBSI) are documented before or at the time of catheter withdrawal. The risk of C-RBSI in the period after removing a colonized catheter in patients without bacteremia (late C-RBSI) is unknown. We assessed the risk of developing a late C-RBSI episode in an unselected population with positive catheter tip cultures and analyzed associated risk factors. We analyzed retrospectively all colonized catheter tips between 2003 and 2010 and matched them with blood cultures. C-RBSI episodes were classified as early C-RBSI (positive blood cultures were obtained ≤24 h after catheter withdrawal) or late C-RBSI (positive blood cultures were obtained ≥24 h after catheter withdrawal). We analyzed the risk factors associated with late C-RBSI episodes by comparison with a selected group of early C-RBSI episodes. We collected a total of 17,981 catheter tips: 4,533 (25.2 %) were colonized. Of them, 1,063 (23.5 %) were associated to early C-RBSI episodes and from the remaining 3,470, only 143 (4.1 %) were associated to late C-RBSI episodes. Then, they corresponded to 11.9 % of the total 1,206 C-RBSI episodes. After comparing early and late C-RBSI episodes, we found that late C-RBSI was significantly associated with the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, p = 0.028) and with higher mortality (p = 0.030). According to our data, patients with colonized catheter tips had a 4.1 % risk of developing late C-RBSI, which was associated with higher crude mortality.

Clinical significance of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from central venous catheter tip cultures in patients without concomitant bacteremia

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical implications of a positive central venous catheter (CVC) tip culture with multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MRAB) in patients without concurrent bacteremia.

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter study was conducted in 9 teaching hospitals in the Republic of Korea from May 2008 to April 2012. Study subjects included adult patients (aged ≥ 18 y) who yielded an MRAB-positive CVC tip culture without concurrent MRAB bacteremia. All patients were observed for the development of subsequent MRAB bacteremia for 6 months after CVC removal. Multivariable Firth logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors independently associated with subsequent MRAB bacteremia.

RESULTS

During the study period, subsequent MRAB bacteremia was observed in 18.8% of patients (21/112). Of the 112 patients, 23 (20.5%) did not show systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). None of the 23 patients without SIRS presented with subsequent MRAB bacteremia. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that prior administration of carbapenems (odds ratio (OR) 7.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43-34.77) or corticosteroids (OR 6.67, 95% CI 1.19-37.44), and C-reactive protein ≥ 40 mg/l (OR 18.11, 95% CI 2.22-148.07) were positive predictive factors. Prior acquisition of MRAB at a site other than the catheter (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.03-0.39) was a negative predictive factor for developing MRAB bacteremia.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that patients with a CVC tip colonized with MRAB should be closely monitored for signs and symptoms of subsequent MRAB bacteremia.

Clinical significance of Candida colonization of intravascular catheters in the absence of documented candidemia

In order to assess the significance of Candida colonization of intravascular catheters (IVC) in patients without documented candidemia, we retrospectively reviewed all Candida-positive IVC tip cultures over a 4-year period. Cases were defined as those with a culture yielding ≥15 colony-forming units of Candida spp. that either did not have blood cultures (BC) taken or had concomitant BC negative for Candida. Patients were followed up until death or 8 months after discharge. Risk factors for poor outcome following IVC removal (death, candidemia, or Candida-related complication) were analyzed. We analyzed a total of 40 patients. Overall mortality was 40.0%, with no death directly attributed to Candida infection. Twenty-two patients received antifungal therapy at the time of IVC removal. Only 1 patient developed a metastatic complication (chorioretinitis) attributable to transient candidemia (2.5% of the global cohort and 3.7% among those with concomitant BC). There were no cases of subsequent candidemia. In the multivariate analysis, the use of antifungal therapy did not show any impact on the risk of poor outcome. The risk of invasive disease in patients with isolated IVC colonization by Candida seems to be low. Nevertheless, the initiation of systemic antifungal therapy should be carefully considered in such context.

Bacteremic complications of intravascular catheter tip colonization with Gram-negative micro-organisms in patients without preceding bacteremia

Although Gram-negative micro-organisms are frequently associated with catheter-related bloodstream infections, the prognostic value and clinical implication of a positive catheter tip culture with Gram-negative micro-organisms without preceding bacteremia remains unclear. We determined the outcomes of patients with intravascular catheters colonized with these micro-organisms, without preceding positive blood cultures, and identified risk factors for the development of subsequent Gram-negative bacteremia. All patients with positive intravascular catheter tip cultures with Gram-negative micro-organisms at the University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands, between 2005 and 2009, were retrospectively studied. Patients with Gram-negative bacteremia within 48 h before catheter removal were excluded. The main outcome measure was bacteremia with Gram-negative micro-organisms. Other endpoints were length of the hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, secondary complications of Gram-negative bacteremia, and duration of intensive care admission. A total of 280 catheters from 248 patients were colonized with Gram-negative micro-organisms. Sixty-seven cases were excluded because of preceding positive blood cultures, leaving 213 catheter tips from 181 patients for analysis. In 40 (19%) cases, subsequent Gram-negative bacteremia developed. In multivariate analysis, arterial catheters were independently associated with subsequent Gram-negative bacteremia (odds ratio [OR] = 5.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20–20.92), as was selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) (OR = 2.47, 95% CI: 1.07–5.69). Gram-negative bacteremia in patients who received SDD was predominantly caused by cefotaxime (part of the SDD)-resistant organisms. Mortality was significantly higher in the group with subsequent Gram-negative bacteremia (35% versus 20%, OR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.00–4.49). Patients with a catheter tip colonized with Gram-negative micro-organisms had a high chance of subsequent Gram-negative bacteremia from any cause. This may be clinically relevant, as starting antibiotic treatment pre-emptively in high-risk patients with Gram-negative micro-organisms cultured from arterial intravenous catheters may be beneficial.

Development of bacteraemia or fungaemia after removal of colonized central venous catheters in patients with negative concomitant blood cultures

There are limited data on the clinical significance of positive central venous catheter (CVC) tip cultures associated with concomitant negative blood cultures performed at the time of CVC removal. A retrospective cohort study of all patients who yielded isolated positive CVC tip cultures was conducted in a tertiary-care hospital with 2200 beds during a 10-year period. All patients with isolated positive CVC tip cultures were observed for the development of subsequent bacteraemia or fungaemia between 2 and 28 days after CVC removal. An isolated positive CVC tip culture was defined as a case in which (i) a CVC tip culture yielded > or = 15 colonies using a semiquantitative culture method and (ii) at least two sets of blood samples revealed no organism at, or close to, the time of CVC removal (48 h before to 48 h after CVC removal). During the study period, 312 patients with isolated positive CVC cultures were enrolled. Eight (2.6%; 95% CI 1.2-5.1) of the 312 patients yielding isolated bacterial or fungal CVC tip cultures developed subsequent bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by the same species as that isolated from the tip culture (Staphylococcus aureus, 1: Enterococcus spp.; 2: Pseudomonas aeruginosa; and 3: Candida spp.). Among 125 patients from whose CVC tips the above four organisms were grown, seven (12.3%) of 57 patients who did not receive appropriate antibiotic therapy within 48 h after CVC removal subsequently developed BSI, but only one (1.5%) of 68 patients who did receive appropriate therapy developed BSI (OR 0.11, p 0.02).

Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America

These updated guidelines replace the previous management guidelines published in 2001. The guidelines are intended for use by health care providers who care for patients who either have these infections or may be at risk for them.

Bacteremic complications of intravascular catheters colonized with Staphylococcus aureus

Patients with Staphylococcus aureus colonization of an intravascular catheter but without demonstrated bacteremia within 24 h after intravascular catheter removal had a 24% (12 of 49 patients) chance of subsequent S. aureus bacteremia if they did not receive immediate antistaphylococcal antibiotics. Treatment within 24 h after intravascular catheter removal led to a 83% reduction in the incidence of subsequent bacteremia.

Aspirin Treatment Is Associated With a Significantly Decreased Risk of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in Hemodialysis Patients With Tunneled Catheters

BACKGROUND

Hemodialysis patients with tunneled catheters are at increased risk of bacteremic Staphylococcus aureus infections. In vitro and in vivo studies showed that aspirin has direct antistaphylococcal effects by inhibiting expression of alpha-toxin and matrix adhesion genes through activation of sigma factor B stress-induced operon. We hypothesized that long-term treatment with aspirin may decrease the frequency of S aureus bacteremia in such patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed electronic medical records for a variety of clinical parameters, including catheter dwell times, blood culture results, and aspirin use in our dialysis population.

RESULTS

A total of 4,722 blood cultures were performed in 872 patients during more than 476 patient-catheter-years. There was a lower rate of catheter-associated S aureus bacteremia in patients treated with aspirin versus those not treated with aspirin (0.17 versus 0.34 events/patient-catheter-year, P = 0.003), whereas no such difference was observed for other bacteria. This association was dose dependent, seen mostly with the 325-mg aspirin dose. Using the Cox proportional hazard method, risk to develop a first episode of S aureus bacteremia decreased by 54% in patients using aspirin (confidence interval, 24 to 72; P = 0.002). Aspirin was associated with decreased risk of: (1) a first episode of methicillin-resistant S aureus bacteremia and (2) metastatic complications during the first episode of catheter-related S aureus bacteremia.

CONCLUSION

These data are consistent with our clinical hypothesis that aspirin has a clinically useful antistaphylococcal effect in the dialysis population.

Clinical significance of isolated Staphylococcus aureus central venous catheter tip cultures

This retrospective cohort study examined the clinical significance of isolated Staphylococcus aureus central venous catheter (CVC) tip cultures (i.e., positive tip cultures without concomitant positive blood cultures). Subsequent S. aureus bacteraemia was found in nine (12%) of 77 patients at a median time of 4 days after CVC removal. A high co-morbidity score and no effective antibiotic treatment within 48 h of CVC removal were independent risk-factors for septic complications following multivariate analysis. A matched case-control study that compared the above cohort with patients with CVC tip cultures negative for S. aureus supported the significance of these findings.

Mucosa or skin as source of coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteraemia?

Nosocomial bacteraemia is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and cost worldwide, and is most commonly caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CONS). Establishing the source of CONS bacteraemia is therefore important in the prevention and management of this infection. CONS infections are presumed to originate at the cutaneous sites of central venous catheters (CVCs), a belief that has led to prevention strategies that focus almost exclusively on the skin. However, mucosal colonisation by CONS is well established, suggesting that mucosal sites might be an important source of CONS bacteraemia. We review the published material that evaluates the source(s) of CONS. We included only studies that used a strict definition of CONS bacteraemia, evaluated skin and other potential sources of CONS, and studied the molecular association between CONS blood isolates and their potential sources. Three published reports fulfilled our criteria. In cancer patients with CONS or CONS bacteraemia, most of the colonising strains that had a molecular match with the strain recovered from the blood of the same patient were mucosal isolates; by contrast, no association was seen between CONS blood and skin isolates. Furthermore, in several patient populations evidence was reported of mucosal colonisation by CONS and in several reports experimental and clinical mucosal translocation of CONS with subsequent bacteraemia was documented. Together these data indicate that mucosal sites are an important source of CONS bacteraemia. Clinical strategies for the treatment of patients with a positive blood culture for CONS, the widespread use of antimicrobial-coated CVCs, and maximum barrier protection for CVC insertion should be reassessed, and strategies to decrease mucosal colonisation by CONS should be developed.

Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections

These guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the American College of Critical Care Medicine (for the Society of Critical Care Medicine), and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America contain recommendations for the management of adults and children with, and diagnosis of infections related to, peripheral and nontunneled central venous catheters (CVCs), pulmonary artery catheters, tunneled central catheters, and implantable devices. The guidelines, written for clinicians, contain IDSA evidence-based recommendations for assessment of the quality and strength of the data. Recommendations are presented according to the type of catheter, the infecting organism, and the associated complications.

Intravascular catheter-related infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Coagulase-negative staphylococci,Staphylococcus aureus, aerobic gram-negative bacilli, andCandida albicansmost commonly cause catheter-related bloodstream infection. Management of catheter-related infection varies according to the type of catheter involved. After appropriate cultures of blood and catheter samples are done, empirical iv antimicrobial therapy should be initiated on the basis of clinical clues, the severity of the patient's acute illness, underlying disease, and the potential pathogen (s) involved. In most cases of nontunneled CVC-related bacteremia and fungemia, the CVC should be removed.

Central venous catheters: preventing infection and occlusion

As central venous catheters (CVCs) become more widely used in today's healthcare environment, nurses require expert knowledge in relation to CVC maintenance to prevent complications and maximize efforts to optimize the individual's health status. This is especially so since CVCs have begun to be used outside intensive care units, e.g. in general wards, and can be associated with high incidences of infection, occlusion and subsequent compromise in patient health. Nurses are responsible for the maintenance and use of central access devices, such as CVCs, resulting in a need for literature specific to the nursing aspects of CVC management. This article addresses many nursing issues pertaining to care of the central line, focusing on evidence- and research-based literature, and also reviews the literature to make recommendations for practice.