Tennis elbow: treatment of resistant cases by denervation

Failed surgical treatment for lateral epicondylitis: literature review and treatment considerations for successful outcomes

Background

Lateral epicondylitis is a common cause of elbow pain in the general population. It is recognized as a degenerative tendinopathy of the common extensor origin believed to be multifactorial, involving elements of repetitive microtrauma associated with certain physiologic and anatomic risk factors.

Methods

Initial treatment typically involves a combination of conservative treatment measures, with up to 90% success at 12-18 months. Surgical treatment is reserved for recalcitrant disease; traditionally involving open surgical débridement of the common extensor origin with reported success rates greater than 90%.

Results

Failure of surgical treatment can be multifactorial and present a challenge in determining the optimum management. Residual symptoms may be due to an incorrect initial diagnosis, inadequate surgical débridement, new pathology as a complication of the initial surgery and/or other patient-related and physician- related factors. Even more of a challenge is the possibility that etiology can be due to a combination of listed factors.

Discussion

In this review, we review the classification scheme for evaluating failed surgical treatment of LE first proposed by Morrey and expand on this classification system based on the senior author's experience. We present the senior author's preferred systematic approach to evaluation and management of these patients, as well as a salvage surgery technique used by the senior author to address the most common etiologies of surgical failure in these patients.

[Epicondylosis : Open surgical procedure-when and how for lateral and medial epicondylitis?]

BACKGROUND

Epicondylosis of the elbow are common pathologies, with a higher incidence for radial epicondylosis. Approximately 90% are self-limiting under conservative treatment.

TREATMENT

Multiple surgical procedures exist for the treatment of refractory cases. Arthroscopic treatment has been described for both radial and medial pathologies. Open and arthroscopic procedures show equivalent results in the surgical treatment of radial epicondylosis. This paper describes the most common open surgical procedures for the treatment of radial epicondylosis. Furthermore, the pros and cons of the arthroscopic versus the open approach are discussed, and the indications for an open surgical procedure for radial pathologies are highlighted. The authors believe that the open technique represents the standard treatment in the surgical treatment of ulnar epicondylosis.

LIMITATIONS

Arthroscopic procedures have been described, but studies comparing the clinical outcome versus open surgical treatment are lacking. The anatomic proximity of the flexor origin to the ulnar nerve with the risk of iatrogenic damage is another limiting factor. In addition, concomitant pathologies on the ulnar side can better be ruled out preoperatively, so that arthroscopy has a rather low significance in the treatment of ulnar epicondylosis.

The Effect of Elbow and Forearm Position on the Resisted Wrist Extension Test and Incidence of Sensory Disturbance of the Superficial Radial Nerve in Patients with Lateral Epicondylitis

Background: The aim of this study is to determine the effect of elbow and forearm position on the resisted wrist extension test (RWET) in patients with lateral epicondylitis. We also looked at the incidence of associated sensory disturbance of the superficial radial nerve (SRN) and the effect of treatment of lateral epicondylitis on sensory disturbance.

Methods: Sixty-three consecutive patients (68 limbs) with lateral epicondylitis and an equal number of age and gender matched volunteers were investigated. Patients with lateral epicondylitis were subdivided into two groups based on history of corticosteroid injection. We performed the RWET in four limb positions namely elbow extended and forearm pronated (EP), elbow flexed and forearm pronated (FP), elbow extended and forearm supinated (ES), elbow flexed and forearm supinated (FS). Sensory disturbance in the SRN was assessed using a Wartenberg pin wheel.

Results: The positivity rate of the RWET was significantly higher in the EP position (100%) compared to the FP (66%), ES (62%) and the FS (24%) positions in limbs with lateral epicondylitis. The RWET was positive only in one subject in the EP position in the control group (1.5%). Sensory disturbance in the SRN territory was present in 63.2% of limbs and only two subjects (2.9%) in the control group. The incidence of sensory disturbance was significantly higher (74.5% vs. 48.3%, p < 0.05) in patients who did not have a corticosteroid injection.

Conclusions: The sensitivity and specificity of the RWET is better when it is performed with the elbow in extension with the forearm pronated (EP); 63.2% of limbs with lateral epicondylitis were noted to have an associated sensory disturbance of the SRN and a corticosteroid injection seems to decrease the incidence of sensory disturbances.

Level of Evidence: Level II (Diagnostic)

Total Denervation of the Elbow: Cadaveric Feasibility Study

PURPOSE

Total elbow arthroplasty for the treatment of patients with severe elbow osteoarthritis is associated with postoperative activity limitations and risk of midterm complications. Elbow denervation could be an attractive therapeutic option for young, active patients. The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility of selective total elbow denervation via 2 anteriorly based approaches.

METHODS

Selective total elbow denervation was performed in 14 cadaver elbows by 2 fellowship-trained elbow surgeons. Lateral and medial approaches to the elbow were used. The length of skin incisions and the minimum distance between them were noted. The number of articular branches identified and their respective distances from the lateral or medial epicondyle of the humerus were recorded.

RESULTS

The anterolateral and anteromedial approaches allowed for the identification of all mixed and sensory nerves in all 14 cases. The mean number of resultant articular branches per cadaver was 1 for the musculocutaneous nerve, 2 (range, 1-3) for the radial nerve, 1 (range, 1-3) for the posterior cutaneous nerve of the forearm, 2 (range, 1-3) for the ulnar nerve, and 2 (range, 1-3) for the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve; the collateral ulnar nerve was connected directly to the capsule. The length of the medial and lateral incisions was 15 cm (range, 12-18 cm) and 12 cm (range, 10-16 cm), respectively. The mean minimum distance between the incisions was 7.5 cm (range, 6.7-8.5 cm).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that selective elbow denervation via 2 approaches is feasible.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Selective elbow denervation via 2 approaches is feasible. Surgeons should target the articular branches of the musculocutaneous, radial, ulnar, and collateral ulnar nerves, posterior cutaneous nerve of the forearm, as well as medial antebrachial cutaneous nerves when carrying out this procedure.

Epicondylopathia humeri radialis

BACKGROUND

Lateral epicondylitis is a common orthopaedic condition often massively restricting the quality of life of the affected patients. There are a wide variety of treatment options - with varying levels of evidence.

METHOD

The following statements and recommendations are based on the current German S2k guideline Epicondylopathia radialis humeri (AWMF registry number: 033 - 2019). All major German specialist societies participated in this guideline, which is based on a systematic review of the literature and a structured consensus-building process.

OUTCOMES

Lateral epicondylitis should be diagnosed clinically and can be confirmed by imaging modalities. The Guidelines Commission issues recommendations on clinical and radiological diagnostic workup. The clinical condition results from the accumulated effect of mechanical overload, neurologic irritation and metabolic changes. Differentiating between acute and chronic disorder is helpful. Prognosis of non-surgical regimens is favourable in most cases. Most cases spontaneously resolve within 12 months. In case of unsuccessful attempted non-surgical management for at least six months, surgery may be considered as an alternative, if there is a corresponding structural morphology and clinical manifestation. At present, it is not possible to recommend a specific surgical procedure.

CONCLUSION

This paper provides a summary of the guideline with extracts of the recommendations and statements of its authors regarding the pathogenesis, prevention, diagnostic workup as well as non-surgical and surgical management.

Strategy for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis of the elbow using denervation surgery

Background

A number of treatments for lateral epicondylitis of the elbow have been described. We have developed a strategy for the treatment of this condition.

Methods

We diagnosed lateral epicondylitis of the elbow in 86 patients. Conservative treatment resulted in resolution in 71 patients. Surgery was required in the remaining 15 patients. If the posterior branch of the posterior cutaneous nerve of the forearm showed a positive response to local anesthesia (block test), we performed denervation surgery on the posterior branch of the posterior cutaneous nerve of the forearm. Patients were asked to rate the degree of pain and sensory disturbance using a visual analog scale; the 11-item version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand measure; and the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation.

Results

A positive response to the block test was seen in 10 elbows (67%). After denervation surgery, pain relief was seen in 9 of 10 elbows (90%). The mean follow-up period was 30.4 months. At final follow-up, the average scores on the visual analog scale, 11-item version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, and Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation were 4.3 mm, 10.45 points, and 5.9 points, respectively. In the early period after denervation surgery, sensory disturbance was observed in 9 cases (90%).

Conclusion

Our strategy of denervation surgery for lateral epicondylitis of the elbow was effective for pain relief among patients showing a positive response to the block test.

Medium-term results after treatment of percutaneous tennis elbow release under local anaesthesia

Background:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of the technique of percutaneous release of common extensor procedure under local anesthesia for lateral epicondylitis and to emphasize its simplicity.

Methods:

Forty seven elbows (41 patients) were treated surgically for lateral epicondylitis in the outpatient minor procedure room under local anaesthesia. The indication for surgery was continuation of sypmtoms (such as pain, movement and power loss) despite conservative treatment lasting more than six months The treatment results were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS).

Results:

Twentysix right elbows and fifteen left elbows were treated surgically. Dominate elbow rate was 74%. The follow-up period was 36 to 72 months (mean 52 months). All patients had full range of motion. The average post operative pain score was 2.6(range 0 to 9). The average post operative MEPS score was 82 (range 40 to 100). ). Sixteen patients had excellent, twenty patients had good, two patients had fair and three patients had poor outcomes (repetitive problems).

Conclusion:

The percutaneous release of the common extensor origin is an important treatment option with minimal morbidity, safety, simplicity and good to excellent results in most patients. The procedure can be performed under local anaesthetic and leave a rarely visible scar. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Tennis elbow: A clinical review article

Lateral epicondylitis, or tennis elbow is a common condition that presents with pain and tenderness around the common extensor origin of the elbow. Tennis elbow is estimated to affect 1-3% of the adult population each year and is more common in the dominant arm. It is generally regarded as an overuse injury involving repeated wrist extension against resistance, although it can occur as an acute injury (trauma to the lateral elbow). Up to 50% of all tennis players develop symptoms due to various factors including poor swing technique the use of heavy racquet. It's also seen in labourers who utilise heavy tools or engage in repetitive gripping or lifting task. In this article, we discuss the existing literature in the field and the current thinking on optimum treatment modalities. We have reviewed the literature available on med line and have discussed the condition with our specialist colleagues in the field.

Semicircumferential Detachment of the Extensor Enthesis For Surgical Treatment of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis: A Prospective Study

About 10% of patients with lateral epicondylitis are nonresponsive to conservative treatment; as controversy persists on etiology and pathogenesis of this pathology, there is no surgical technique universally approved. The purpose of this study is to describe and evaluate the clinical outcomes of our technique consisting in a semicircumferential and partial detachment of the entire extensor apparatus enthesis. The technique was performed on 14 consecutive patients affected by painful chronic epicondylitis between January 2010 and April 2016. Two patients were lost during follow-up. At 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery patients were revaluated. Outcomes were assessed using Visual Analog Scale, DASH score (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand), Jamar test, and time to return to work. The mean surgical time was 16 minutes. The postoperative outcomes were excellent in most patients as mean Visual Analog Scale score improved from 9.25 to 2.6 and mean DASH score improved from 82.9 to 29.6. No recurrence was recorded at 2 years of follow-up. The procedure is rapid to perform, reproducible and provides low complication rates and no relapse in our experience. As a result, we recommend this technique in nonresponding to conservative treatment lateral epicondylitis.

Selective Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Denervation for Painful Arthritis: Clinical Outcomes and Cadaveric Study

PURPOSE

To determine the innervation pattern to the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint and assess the safety and efficacy of selective joint denervation for the treatment of pain and impairment associated with thumb CMC arthritis.

METHODS

Cadaveric dissections were performed in 10 fresh upper extremities to better define the innervation patterns to the CMC joint and guide the surgical approach for CMC joint denervation. Histologic confirmation of candidate nerves was performed with hematoxylin and eosin staining. Results from a series of 12 patients with symptomatic thumb CMC arthritis who underwent selective denervation were retrospectively evaluated to determine the safety and efficacy of this treatment approach. Differences in preoperative and postoperative measurements of grip and key-pinch strength as well as subjective reporting of symptoms were compared.

RESULTS

Nerve branches to the thumb CMC joint were found to arise from the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (10 of 10 specimens), the palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve (7 of 10 specimens), and the radial sensory nerve (4 of 10 specimens). With an average follow-up time of 15 months, 11 of 12 patients (92%) reported complete or near-complete relief of pain. Average improvements in grip and lateral key-pinch strength were 4.1 ± 3.0 kg (18% ± 12% from baseline) and 1.7 ± 0.5 kg (37% ± 11% from baseline), respectively. One patient experienced the onset of new pain consistent with a neuroma that resolved with steroid injection. All patients were released to light activity at 1 week after surgery, and all activity restrictions were lifted by 6 weeks after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective denervation of the CMC joint is an effective approach to treat pain and alleviate impairment associated with CMC arthritis. The procedure is well tolerated, with faster recovery as compared with trapeziectomy. Branches arising from the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve, and radial sensory nerve can be identified and resected with a single-incision Wagner approach.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic V.

Open, Arthroscopic, and Percutaneous Surgical Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review

Background: Approximately 10% of patients with lateral epicondylitis go on to have surgical treatment; however, multiple surgical treatment options exist. The purpose of this study was to review the literature for the clinical outcomes of open, arthroscopic, and percutaneous treatment of lateral epicondylitis. The authors hypothesized that the clinical outcome of all 3 analyzed surgical treatments would be equivalent. Methods: A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar in July 2016 to compare the functional outcome, pain, grip strength, patient satisfaction, and return to work at 1-year follow-up for open, arthroscopic, and percutaneous treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Results: Six studies (2 Level I and 4 Level II) including 179 elbows (83 treated open, 14 arthroscopic, 82 percutaneous) were analyzed. Three outcome measures (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [DASH] score, visual analog scale [VAS], and patient satisfaction) were reported for more than one category of surgical technique. Of these, the authors noted no clinically significant differences between the techniques. Conclusions: This is the first systematic review looking at high-level evidence to compare open, percutaneous, and arthroscopic techniques for treating lateral epicondylitis. There are no clinically significant differences between the 3 surgical techniques (open, arthroscopic, and percutaneous) in terms of functional outcome (DASH), pain intensity (VAS), and patient satisfaction at 1-year follow-up.

Surgical Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

A number of surgical techniques for managing tennis elbow have been described. One of the most frequently performed involves excising the affected portion of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB). The results of this technique, as well as most other described surgical techniques for this condition, have been reported as excellent, yet none have been compared with placebo surgery.

HYPOTHESIS

The surgical excision of the degenerative portion of the ECRB offers no additional benefit over and above placebo surgery for the management of chronic tennis elbow.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

This study investigated surgical excision of the macroscopically degenerated portion of the ECRB (surgery; n = 13) as compared with skin incision and exposure of the ECRB alone (sham; n = 13) to treat patients who had tennis elbow for >6 months and had failed at least 2 nonsurgical modalities. The primary outcome measure was defined as patient-rated frequency of elbow pain with activity at 6 months after surgery. Secondary outcome measures included patient-rated pain and functional outcomes, range of motion, epicondyle tenderness, and strength at 6 months and 2.5 years. All outcome measures up to and including the 6-month follow-up were measured in person; the longer-term questionnaire was conducted in person or over the phone.

RESULTS

The 2 groups, surgery and sham, were similar for age, sex, hand dominance, and duration of symptoms. Both procedures improved patient-rated pain frequency and severity, elbow stiffness, difficulty with picking up objects, difficulty with twisting motions, and overall elbow rating >6 months and at 2.5 years ( P < .01). Both procedures also improved epicondyle tenderness, pronation-supination range, grip strength, and modified Orthopaedic Research Institute-Tennis Elbow Testing System at 6 months ( P < .05). No significant difference was observed between the groups in any parameter at any stage. No side effects or complications were reported. The study was stopped before the calculated number of patients were enrolled (40 per group); yet, a post hoc futility analysis was conducted that showed, based on the magnitude of the differences between the groups, >6500 patients would need to be recruited per group to see a significant difference between the groups at 26 weeks in the primary outcome (patient-rated frequency of elbow pain with activity).

CONCLUSION

With the number of available participants, this study failed to show additional benefit of the surgical excision of the degenerative portion of the ECRB over placebo surgery for the management of chronic tennis elbow.

[Lateral epicondylitis: conservative - operative]

BACKGROUND

Lateral epicondylitis is a common disease of the common extensor origin at the lateral humerus. Despite its common self-limitation it can lead to chronic therapy-resistant pain with remarkable functional disability of the affected arm.

OBJECTIVES

Different conservative and operative treatment options of lateral epicondylitis are described and compared regarding benefits and risks. Additionally, recent surgical techniques and their complications are mentioned. Based on the current literature, it is shown which treatment option can be recommended.

METHODS

This review was based on the literature analysis in PubMed regarding "conservative and operative therapy of lateral epicondylitis" as well as the clinical experience of the authors.

RESULTS

Conservative treatment is the primary choice for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis if concomitant pathologies such as instability among others can be excluded. It should include strengthening against resistance with eccentric stretching of the extensor group. In persistent cases, operative treatment is warranted. Resection of the pathologic tissue at the extensor origin with debridement and refixation of the healthy tendinous tissue yields good results.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with lateral epicondylitis can be treated conservatively with success. Radiological evaluation should be performed in therapy-resistant cases. In the case of partial or complete rupture of the extensor origin, operative therapy is indicated.

Complications of Lateral Epicondylar Release

Reported complication rates are low for lateral epicondylitis management, but the anatomic complexity of the elbow allows for possible catastrophic complication. This review documents complications associated with lateral epicondylar release: 67 studies reporting outcomes of lateral epicondylar release with open, percutaneous, or arthroscopic methods were reviewed and 6 case reports on specific complications associated with the procedure are included. Overall complication rate was 3.3%. For open procedures it was 4.3%, percutaneous procedures 1.9%, and arthroscopic procedures 1.1%. In higher-level studies directly comparing modalities, the complication rates were 1.3%, 0%, and 1.2%, respectively.

Pulsed radiofrequency on radial nerve under ultrasound guidance for treatment of intractable lateral epicondylitis

Lateral epicondylitis is a painful and functionally limiting disorder. Although lateral elbow pain is generally self-limiting, in a minority of people symptoms persist for a long time. When various conservative treatments fail, surgical approach is recommended. Surgical denervation of several nerves that innervate the lateral humeral epicondyle could be considered in patients with refractory pain because it denervates the region of pain. Pulsed radiofrequency is a minimally invasive procedure that improves chronic pain when applied to various neural tissues without causing any significant destruction and painful complication. This procedure is safe, minimally invasive, and has less risk of complications relatively compared to the surgical approach. The radial nerve can be identified as a target for pulsed radiofrequency lesioning in lateral epicondylitis. This innovative method of pulsed radiofrequency applied to the radial nerve has not been reported before. We reported on two patients with intractable lateral epicondylitis suffering from elbow pain who did not respond to nonoperative treatments, but in whom the ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency neuromodulation of the radial nerve induced symptom improvement. After a successful diagnostic nerve block, radiofrequency probe adjustment around the radial nerve was performed on the lateral aspect of the distal upper arm under ultrasound guidance and multiple pulsed treatments were applied. A significant reduction in pain was reported over the follow-up period of 12 weeks.

Innervation of the Elbow Joint: A Cadaveric Study

PURPOSE

To describe elbow innervation patterns in 15 cadaveric extremities.

METHODS

Fifteen fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities were dissected under loupe magnification. The median, radial, musculocutaneous, and ulnar nerves were dissected at the elbow joint and explored both proximally and distally to find capsular branches and identifiable anatomical patterns.

RESULTS

In 11 of specimens, the ulnar nerve innervated the articular surface of the elbow joint with an average 1.5 branches. The radial nerve gave off a branch to the posterolateral capsule in 10 cases of the specimens, originating 11 ± 3 cm above the lateral epicondyle. After piercing the lateral intermuscular septum, this radial nerve branch innervated the anterolateral capsule in 12 cases (80%). The median nerve sent branches to the joint in 1 specimen. The musculocutaneous nerve innervated the anterior capsule with 1 or 2 branches in 10 of 13 specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of the innervation of the anterior capsule comes from the radial and musculocutaneous nerves with minimal contribution from the median nerve. The ulnar and radial nerves innervate the posteromedial and posterolateral capsule, respectively.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Accurate understanding of peripheral nerve anatomy is essential for future elbow denervation studies.

The Boyd-McLeod procedure for tennis elbow: mid- to long-term results

BACKGROUND

Tennis elbow is a common condition that usually responds to conservative measures. In refractory cases, surgical intervention is indicated. A plethora of surgical techniques have been described. We report the mid- to long-term outcomes of the Boyd-McLeod procedure for refractory tennis elbow.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis and current review of patients that had undergone the Boyd-McLeod procedure over a 12-year period was undertaken. Demographics, time to discharge, length of follow-up and outcome scores were collected.

RESULTS

Seventy patients underwent surgery. Mean time to discharge was 15.35 weeks, with 88% successful outcomes. Fifty-four patients were available for current follow-up at mean of 5.52 years (range 1.17 years to 11.49 years). Range of motion in all patients was unchanged. There were no revision procedures. Mean (SD) Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 90.85 (13.11), with 75.5% returning a good or excellent score and 24.5% a fair outcome. The mean (SD) Oxford Elbow Score was 44.04 (6.92); mean (SD) pain score was 89.5 (17.58); mean (SD) function score was 95.34 (9.59) and mean (SD) socio-psychological score was 91.50 (17.01). Overall, 83% of patients had an Oxford Elbow Score of 43 or greater, suggesting excellent outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

We show that the Boyd-McLeod procedure is an excellent option over both the short- and long-term for refractory tennis elbow.

Joint denervation and neuroma surgery as joint-preserving therapy for ankle pain

Partial joint denervation or surgical neuroma therapy are alternative concepts to treat pain around the ankle joint that preserve joint function and relieve pain by interrupting neural pathways that transmit pain impulses from the joint to the brain. This review article summarizes the indication, anatomic background, operative techniques, and clinical results of joint denervation or neuroma surgery, which, although rarely reported and used, may provide a valuable alternative treatment in selected patients with neurogenous problems around the ankle.

Denervation of the lateral humeral epicondyle for treatment of chronic lateral epicondylitis

PURPOSE

Chronic lateral epicondylitis remains a treatment challenge. Traditional surgical treatments for lateral epicondylitis involve variations of the classic Nirschl lateral release. Anatomic studies reveal that the posterior branch or branches of the posterior cutaneous nerve of the forearm consistently innervate the lateral humeral epicondyle. We undertook the present study to determine the effectiveness of denervation of the lateral humeral epicondyle in treating chronic lateral epicondylitis.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved prospective study included 30 elbows in 26 patients. Inclusion criteria included failure to respond to nonoperative treatment for more than 6 months and improvement in grip strength and in visual analog pain scale after diagnostic nerve block of the posterior branches of the posterior cutaneous nerve of the forearm proximal to the lateral humeral epicondyle. We excluded patients who had undergone previous surgery for lateral epicondylitis. Outcome measures included visual analog pain scale and grip strength testing. Denervation surgery involved identification and transection of the posterior cutaneous nerve of the forearm branches with implantation into the triceps. The presence of radial tunnel syndrome was noted but did not affect inclusion criteria; if it was present, we did not correct it surgically. We used no postoperative splinting and permitted immediate return to activities of daily living.

RESULTS

At a mean of 28 months of follow-up, the average visual analog scale score decreased from 7.9 to 1.9. Average grip strength with the elbow extended improved from 13 to 24 kg. A total of 80% of patients had good or excellent results, as defined by an improvement of 5 or more points on the visual analog scale for pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Denervation of the lateral epicondyle was effective in relieving pain in 80% of patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis who had a positive response to a local anesthetic block of the posterior branches of the posterior cutaneous nerve of the forearm. Radial nerve compression syndromes must be evaluated as a confounding source of symptoms and may require additional treatment in patients who fail to improve with denervation alone.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Percutaneous tennis elbow release under local anaesthesia

Introduction:

When the non-operative treatment of tennis elbow fails to improve the symptoms a surgical procedure can be performed. Many different techniques are available. The percutaneous release of the common extensor origin was first presented by Loose at a meeting in 1962. Despite the simplicity of the operation and its effectiveness in relieving pain with minimal scarring this procedure is still not widely accepted. This study presents the long-term results of percutaneous tennis elbow release in patients when conservative measures including local steroid injections have failed to relieve the symptoms.

Patients and Methods:

Percutaneous release of the extensor origin was performed in 24 consecutive patients (seven male and seventeen female), providing 30 elbows for this study. The age of the patients ranged from 26 to 71 years with mean age of 55 years. The technique involved a day case procedure in the operating theatre using local anaesthesia without the need for a tourniquet. The lateral elbow was infiltrated with 5mls 1% lignocaine and 5mls 0.5% bupivicaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline. All operations were performed by the senior author. The patients were assessed post operatively by using DASH (disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand) score and Oxford elbow scores. The mean follow up period was 36 months (1-71months).

Results:

Twenty one patients returned the DASH and Oxford elbow questionnaires. Four patients were lost in the follow up. The post operative outcome was good to excellent in most patients. Eighty seven percent of patients had complete pain relief. The mean post-op DASH score was 8.47 (range 0 to 42.9) and the mean Oxford elbow score was 42.8 (range 16 to 48). There were no complications reported. All the patients returned to their normal jobs, hobbies such as gardening, horse riding and playing musical instruments.

Conclusion:

In our experience Percutaneous release of the epicondylar muscles for humeral epicondylitis has a high rate of success, is relatively simple to perform, is done as a day case procedure and has been without complications. Percutaneous release is a viable treatment option after failed conservative management of tennis elbow.

High resolution imaging of tunnels by magnetic resonance neurography

Peripheral nerves often traverse confined fibro-osseous and fibro-muscular tunnels in the extremities, where they are particularly vulnerable to entrapment and compressive neuropathy. This gives rise to various tunnel syndromes, characterized by distinct patterns of muscular weakness and sensory deficits. This article focuses on several upper and lower extremity tunnels, in which direct visualization of the normal and abnormal nerve in question is possible with high resolution 3T MR neurography (MRN). MRN can also serve as a useful adjunct to clinical and electrophysiologic exams by discriminating adhesive lesions (perineural scar) from compressive lesions (such as tumor, ganglion, hypertrophic callous, or anomalous muscles) responsible for symptoms, thereby guiding appropriate treatment.

Epicondylectomy versus denervation for lateral humeral epicondylitis

BACKGROUND

Traditional management of lateral humeral epicondylitis ("tennis elbow") relies upon antiinflammatory medication, rehabilitation, steroid injection, counterforce splinting, and, finally, surgery to the common extensor origin. The diversity of surgical approaches for lateral humeral epicondylitis (LHE) suggests perhaps that the ideal technique has not been determined. Denervation of the lateral humeral epicondyle is the concept of interrupting the neural pathway that transmits the pain message. Epicondylectomy may accomplish its relief of LHE by denervating the epicondyle.

METHODS

Since it is known that the posterior branch of the posterior cutaneous nerve of the forearm innervates the lateral humeral epicondyle, 30 patients who were treated surgically for refractory LHE were retrospectively evaluated. Group 1 consisted of 17 patients who were treated with epicondylectomy alone, group II consisted of seven patients who were treated with lateral epicondylectomy plus neurectomy, and group III consisted of seven patients treated with lateral denervation alone.

RESULTS

Denervation alone gave statistically significantly greater improvement in pain relief (p < 0.001) and statistically significantly faster return to work than did epicondylectomy alone (p < 0.001). Denervation plus epicondylectomy gave results that were the same as denervation alone.

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that denervation gives significant relief from LHE once traditional non-surgical treatment has failed.

Lateral epicondylitis treatment by extensor carpi radialis fasciotomy and radial nerve decompression: is outcome influenced by the occupational disease compensation aspect?

INTRODUCTION

The etiology, treatment, and patient management in cases of chronic epicondylitis, within the legislation on occupational disease, remain highly controversial.

HYPOTHESIS

Recognition as an occupational disease has a negative influence on the functional result of epicondylitis treated with aponeurotomy and neurolysis of the motor branch of the radial nerve.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients (30 cases of epicondylitis) were operated between January 2007 and January 2008. There were nine men and 19 women whose mean age was 46.1 years. A preoperative EMG found anomalies in the deep posterior interosseous nerve in all cases. Patients were divided into two groups: one group of patients recognized as having an occupational disease and a group of patients whose disease was not considered occupation-related.

RESULTS

The patients were seen at follow-up at a mean 21.8 months. In the group of patients with occupational disease, there were six excellent, nine good, and five acceptable results; in the second group, there were six excellent, two good, and two acceptable results.

CONCLUSION

Recognition of epicondylitis as an occupational disease has a significant influence only on the time to pain relief and the result on strength.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV. Retrospective study.

Surgery for lateral elbow pain

BACKGROUND

Surgery is sometimes recommended for persistent lateral elbow pain where other less invasive interventions have failed.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefits and safety of surgery for lateral elbow pain.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science unrestricted by date or language (to 15 December 2010).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and controlled clinical trials assessing a surgical intervention compared with no treatment or another intervention including an alternate surgical intervention, in adults with lateral elbow pain.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five trials involving 191 participants with persistent symptoms of at least five months duration and failed conservative treatment. Three trials compared two different surgical procedures and two trials compared surgery to a non-surgical treatment. All trials were highly susceptible to bias. Meta-analysis was precluded due to differing comparator groups and outcome measures. One trial (24 participants) reported no difference between open extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) surgery and radiofrequency microtenotomy, although reanalysis found that pain was significantly lower in the latter group at three weeks (MD -2.80 points on 10 point scale, 95% CI -5.07 to -0.53). One trial (26 participants) reported no difference between open ECRB surgery and decompression of the posterior interosseous nerve in terms of the number of participants with improvement in pain pain on activity, or tenderness on palpation after an average of 31 months following surgery. One trial (45 participants) found that compared with open release of the ERCB muscle, percutaneous release resulted in slightly better function. One trial (40 participants) found comparable results between open surgical release of the ECRB and botulinum toxin injection at two years, although we could not extract any data for this review. One trial (56 participants) found that extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) improved pain at night compared with percutaneous tenotomy at 12 months (MD 5 points on 100 point VAS, 95% CI 1.12 to 8.88), but there were no differences in pain at rest or pain on applying pressure.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Due to a small number of studies, large heterogeneity in interventions across trials, small sample sizes and poor reporting of outcomes, there was insufficient evidence to support or refute the effectiveness of surgery for lateral elbow pain. Further well-designed randomised controlled trials and development of standard outcome measures are needed.

Outcome of release of the lateral extensor muscle origin for epicondylitis

Fifty-five elbows in 53 patients affected by lateral epicondylitis for more than a year were operated on with lateral extensor release. Fifty-one patients (53 elbows) were followed-up 90 months postoperatively by two independent observers using Verhaar's score and the subjective grading scheme described by Svernlöv and Adolfsson. According to Verhaar's score 26 (49%) were excellent or good and 27 (51%) fair or poor. Women had significantly worse results than men (p<0.005). In the self-assessment there was no significant difference between men and women and 20 (40%) of the patients rated their elbows as completely recovered, 26 (47%) as improved, 7 (13%) as unchanged, and none as worse. Patients whose symptoms remained unchanged after operation were re-examined and found to have other conditions that were likely to have caused the pain. Lateral release can reduce symptoms in chronic lateral epicondylitis but some residual pain can be anticipated.

CRPS of the upper or lower extremity: surgical treatment outcomes

The hypothesis is explored that CRPS I (the "new" RSD) persists due to undiagnosed injured joint afferents, and/or cutaneous neuromas, and/or nerve compressions, and is, therefore, a misdiagnosed form of CRPS II (the "new" causalgia). An IRB-approved, retrospective chart review on a series of 100 consecutive patients with "RSD" identified 40 upper and 30 lower extremity patients for surgery based upon their history, physical examination, neurosensory testing, and nerve blocks. Based upon decreased pain medication usage and recovery of function, outcome in the upper extremity, at a mean of 27.9 months follow-up (range of 9 to 81 months), gave results that were excellent in 40% (16 of 40 patients), good in 40% (16 of 40 patients) and failure 20% (8 of 40 patients). In the lower extremity, at a mean of 23.0 months follow-up (range of 9 to 69 months) the results were excellent in 47% (14 of 30 patients), good in 33% (10 of 30 patients) and failure 20% (6 of 30 patients). It is concluded that most patients referred with a diagnosis of CRPS I have continuing pain input from injured joint or cutaneous afferents, and/or nerve compressions, and, therefore, similar to a patient with CRPS II, they can be treated successfully with an appropriate peripheral nerve surgical strategy.

Innervation of the elbow joint and surgical perspectives of denervation: a cadaveric anatomic study

PURPOSE

Peripheral articular denervation has been proposed as an alternative treatment for degenerative arthritis. It shows particular promise in the elbow because the joint is non-weight bearing and easily exposed. Accurate knowledge of peripheral neuroanatomy is required for future denervation surgeries, yet very few studies focus on the articular branches of the ulnar, median, and radial nerves that provide elbow capsule innervation.

METHODS

Twenty-three upper limbs from skeletally mature fresh-frozen cadavers were used for dissection of the ulnar, median, and radial nerves. The presence, number, location, and diameter of articular branches to the elbow capsule were recorded.

RESULTS

The ulnar nerve typically supplied 1 to 2 large branches to the elbow capsule (range, 0-4). In the 3 specimens with a greater number, a thinner diameter was noted (<1 mm compared with 1.2 mm). The median nerve contributed an average of 1.3 branches (range, 0-4) and showed an inverse ratio with the ulnar nerve contribution. The posterior interosseous nerve contributed a range of 0 to 4 branches, arising at 5 mm to 2 mm after bifurcation of the radial nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

Most previous upper-extremity nerve studies have failed to fully characterize the contributions of all 3 major nerves to capsular innervation. We have thoroughly documented the articular branching patterns of all 3 major nerves and show that all 3 may contribute branches to the capsule.

Selective loss of unmyelinated nerve fibers after extracorporeal shockwave application to the musculoskeletal system

Application of extracorporeal shockwaves (ESW) to the musculoskeletal system may induce long-term analgesia in the treatment of chronic tendinopathies of the shoulder, heel and elbow. However, the molecular and cellular mechanisms behind this phenomenon are largely unknown. Here we tested the hypothesis that long-term analgesia caused by ESW is due to selective loss of nerve fibers in peripheral nerves. To test this hypothesis in vivo, high-energy ESW were applied to the ventral side of the right distal femur of rabbits. After 6 weeks, the femoral and sciatic nerves were investigated at the light and electron microscopic level. Application of ESW resulted in a selective, substantial loss of unmyelinated nerve fibers within the femoral nerve of the treated hind limb, whereas the sciatic nerve of the treated hind limb remained unaffected. These data might indicate that alleviation of chronic pain by selective partial denervation may play an important role in the effects of clinical ESW application to the musculoskeletal system.

Ten- to 14-year follow-up of the Nirschl surgical technique for lateral epicondylitis

BACKGROUND

Good to excellent short-term results have been reported for the surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis using various surgical techniques.

HYPOTHESIS

Surgical treatment for lateral epicondylitis using the mini-open Nirschl surgical technique will lead to durable results at long-term follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Records from 139 consecutive surgical procedures (130 patients) for lateral epicondylitis performed by 1 surgeon between 1991 and 1994 were retrospectively reviewed. Eighty-three patients (92 elbows) were available by telephone for a mean follow-up of 12.6 years (range, 10-14 years). Outcome measures included the Numeric Pain Intensity Scale, Nirschl and Verhaar tennis elbow-specific scoring systems, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons elbow form. Preoperative data were collected retrospectively.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study group was 46 years (range, 23-70 years) with 45 men and 38 women. Eighty-seven of the procedures were primary, and 5 were revision tennis elbow surgeries. Concomitant procedures were performed in 30 patients including ulnar nerve release in 24 patients, medial tennis elbow procedures in 23 patients, shoulder arthroscopy in 2 patients, carpal tunnel release in 1 patient, and triceps debridement and osteophyte excision in 1 patient. The mean duration of preoperative symptoms was 2.2 years (range, 2 months to 10 years). The mean Nirschl tennis elbow score improved from 23.0 to 71.0, and the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score improved from 34.3 to 87.7 at a minimum of 10-year follow-up (P < .05). The Numeric Pain Intensity Scale pain score improved from 8.4 preoperatively to 2.1 (P < .05). Results were rated as excellent in 71 elbows, good in 6 elbows, fair in 9 elbows, and poor in 6 elbows by the Nirschl tennis elbow score. By the criteria of Verhaar et al, the results were excellent in 45 elbows, good in 32 elbows, fair in 8 elbows, and poor in 7 elbows. Eighty-four percent good to excellent results were achieved using both scoring systems. Ninety-two percent of the patients reported normal elbow range of motion. The overall improvement rate was 97%. Patient satisfaction averaged 8.9 of 10. Ninety-three percent of those available at a minimum of 10-year follow-up reported returning to their sports.

CONCLUSION

The mini-open Nirschl surgical technique with accurate resection of the tendinosis tissue remains highly successful in the long term.

Anatomy of the posterior antebrachial cutaneous nerve: practical information for the surgeon operating on the lateral aspect of the elbow

PURPOSE

To investigate the anatomic relationships of the posterior antebrachial cutaneous nerve (PABCN) to anatomic landmarks on the lateral side of the elbow.

METHODS

The PABCN was explored in 30 cadaveric upper extremities. Distances were noted from easily identifiable structures including the lateral epicondyle, the lateral intermuscular septum, and the radial nerve.

RESULTS

The path of the PABCN follows the spiral groove initially, diverging as the radial nerve pierces the lateral intermuscular septum. The PABCN emerges from the posterior compartment through a hiatus in the deep fascia at a mean of 6.6 cm proximal to the lateral epicondyle and passes a mean of 2.1 cm anterior to the lateral epicondyle.

CONCLUSIONS

The anatomic relationships determined in this study should enable the surgeon to avoid injuring the PABCN when performing surgery in the lateral elbow region.

Debridement of extensors and drilling of the lateral epicondyle for tennis elbow: a retrospective follow-up study

Twenty-one patients treated for tennis elbow with debridement of the extensors, without repair of the affected tendons, and with decortication by drilling of the lateral epicondyle were reviewed retrospectively after a mean follow-up of 15 months (range, 11-33 months). The early postoperative period was characterized by a painful and slow recovery. At latest follow-up, 17 patients (81%) had a satisfactory outcome with no or only mild pain. Of the patients, 20 (95%) felt that they were better or much better compared with preoperatively. There were 2 complications: 1 hematoma that was aspirated and 1 temporary frozen shoulder. Debridement of the extensors and drilling of the lateral epicondyle relieved pain and restored function in the majority of the patients. However, recovery was slow and was never found to be immediate as described in other series of tennis elbow procedures where the extensors were simply released and the lateral epicondyle was not decorticated.

Lateral epicondylitis

Lateral epicondylitis is a diagnostic term that describes a pattern of pain and localized tenderness at the lateral epicondyle of the distal humerus. In this article, we discuss the pathology, clinical presentation, and treatment of this disorder. After a description of nonoperative treatment, we focus on the operative techniques for treating the disorder, and touch on postoperative care and results of treatment.

Surgery for lateral elbow pain

BACKGROUND

This review is one in a series of reviews of interventions for lateral elbow pain. Lateral elbow pain, or tennis elbow, is a common condition causing pain in the lateral elbow and forearm and lack of strength and function of the elbow and wrist. Surgery is sometimes recommended in treating chronic cases of lateral elbow pain where other less invasive interventions have failed. Various operations have been described based upon the surgeon's concept of the pathological entity. The most described surgical procedures involve release of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) from the lateral epicondyle region based upon the premise that there is pathology in the attachment of ECRB to the lateral epicondyle. No systematic review has previously been published assessing the effect of surgical interventions for lateral elbow pain.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of surgical interventions in the treatment of adults with lateral elbow pain.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Comprehensive electronic searches of MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and SCISEARCH were combined with searches of the Cochrane Clinical Trials Registrar and the Musculoskeletal Review Group's specialist trial database. Identified keywords and authors were researched in an effort to identify as many trials as possible. Searches were conducted up to October 2001.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Two independent reviewers assessed all identified studies against pre-determined inclusion criteria. Randomised and pseudo randomised trials in all languages were to be included in the review provided they were studying the effects of a surgical intervention and included a control as treatment for adults with lateral elbow pain. The control intervention could comprise no treatment or another intervention including an alternate surgical intervention. Outcomes of interest included pain, function, disability and quality of life, strength and adverse effects.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The planned collection and analysis of data is described.

MAIN RESULTS

Our search did not identify any controlled trials investigating the effect of surgery on lateral elbow pain.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

At this time there are no published controlled trials of surgery for lateral elbow pain. Without a control group, it is not possible to draw any conclusions about the value of this modality of treatment.

Lateral epicondylitis

Satisfactory treatment of lateral epicondylitis results from correct diagnosis followed by a well-controlled operative or nonoperative treatment program. Many options for nonoperative and operative treatment exist for lateral epicondylitis. More study is needed on outcomes of both nonoperative treatment and operative treatment so that each patient can attain maximal improvement. Balanced assessments of specific patient populations, along with definitions of the optimal treatment for each group, are required. This will allow physicians to integrate the available information and improve patient care.

Lateral tennis elbow: "Is there any science out there?"

As orthopaedic surgeons, we are besieged by myths that guide our treatment of lateral epicondylitis, or "tennis elbow." This extends from the term used to describe the condition to the nonoperative and operative treatments as well. The term epicondylitis suggests an inflammatory cause; however, in all but 1 publication examining pathologic specimens of patients operated on for this condition, no evidence of acute or chronic inflammation is found. Numerous nonoperative modalities have been described for the treatment of lateral tennis elbow. Most are lacking in sound scientific rationale. This has led to a therapeutic nihilism with respect to the nonoperative management of this condition. An examination of the literature can only lead us to believe that most, if not all, common nonoperative therapeutic modalities used for the treatment of tennis elbow are unproven at best or costly and time-consuming at worst. Most of the published literature on the nonoperative treatment of patients with lateral tennis elbow consists of poorly designed trials. The selection criteria are nebulous, the control group is questionably designed, and the number of patients is often too low to avoid a serious loss of study power. These studies therefore have a high beta error, implying an inability to detect a difference between groups, even if one truly existed. If clinical signs and symptoms persist beyond the limit of acceptability of both patient and surgeon, then an array of surgical options are available. These range from a 10-minute office procedure (the percutaneous release of the extensor origin with the patient under local anesthetic) to an extensive joint denervation, in which all radial nerve branches ramifying to the lateral epicondyle are directly or indirectly divided. How is the surgeon to choose, given the fact that most of the published surgical studies are case series of one type of operation or another, consisting of patients operated on and evaluated by the same surgeon, who has a vested interest in his or her own patients' successful outcome? The orthopaedic surgeon therefore has very little on which to "hang his hat" when it comes to objective data to guide treatment of patients with lateral tennis elbow syndrome. In the final analysis we are guided simply by our own subjective viewpoint and clinical experience. In 1999, to have such a common clinical condition have such a paucity of peer-reviewed published data of acceptable scientific quality is disappointing. In this review article we will examine the "myths" of tennis elbow: the name, the salient features on history and physical examination, the diagnostic modalities, the pathology of the "lesion," the anatomy of the lateral elbow and extensor origin and why it has led to such confusion in differential diagnosis, the nonoperative and operative treatment of tennis elbow, and finally the various studies that have been carried out on elbow biomechanics as it relates to the pathoetiology of true "tennis elbow." It is our hope that the reader will emerge with a clearer picture of the pathoetiology of the condition and the scientific rationale (or lack thereof) of the various operative and nonoperative treatment modalities.

Radial neuropathy

The radial nerve is the largest branch of the brachial plexus, and is commonly involved in upper extremity mononeuropathies. The radial nerve is primarily responsible for motor innervation of the upper extremity extensors, as well as receiving cutaneous innervation from most of the posterior arm, forearm, and hand. There are a variety of sites at which the radial nerve is susceptible to trauma and entrapment. Localizing radial nerve lesions is dependent on clinical knowledge of radial nerve anatomy, and sensory and motor examination.

Disputed radial tunnel syndrome

True neurogenic radial tunnel syndrome is an uncommon condition caused by entrapment of the radial or posterior interosseous nerve in the radial tunnel and is usually easily identifiable by focal motor weakness in the distribution of the posterior interosseous nerve. Roles and Maudsley, analogizing to carpal tunnel syndrome, believed "radial tunnel syndrome" had a different presentation: proximal forearm pain and tenderness in the region of the supinator muscle. However, their patients lacked weakness or other neurologic deficit. They and subsequent surgeons have decompressed the radial nerve to treat forearm pain and tenderness, even though it is debatable whether radial nerve entrapment causes the forearm discomfort. The term "radial tunnel syndrome" is best reserved for the truly neurogenic cases. Surgical approaches to "persistent tennis elbow" should be assessed in a controlled fashion, rather than adopted on the basis of a flawed analogy to carpal tunnel syndrome.

Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: Follow-up on 33 Cases with Regard to Vascular Compression

This follow-up study on 33 operations performed for thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) proves high efficiency in relieving neurological and arterial symptoms, whereas benefit to venous compression is somewhat less. Twenty-six patients (average age was 36 years) were operated on for TOS, seven of them on both sides. There was a higher incidence in females. All patients showed neurological symptoms. In 15, operations on various entrapment syndromes of the upper extremity were performed previously. Six patients presented with an incomplete resection of the first rib. Arterial compression symptoms were evident in 15 cases, symptoms of venous compression in 14 limbs. All patients underwent a resection of the first rib, bilateral in seven cases, using the axillary and supraclavicular approach. In seven patients, a cervical rib and scalenus muscles were resected additionally, in three patients bilaterally. In two cases a neurolysis of the brachial plexus was performed. Using the supraclavicular approach, no complications occurred. In one early patient using the transaxillary approach to a postoperative hemothorax required a revision. Neurological results after surgery showed a total release in 26 limbs (n = 33). In 14 limbs (n = 15) with arterial compression symptoms and in 6 (n = 14) with symptoms of venous compression the operation showed a curative effect.