Hemodynamic reproducibility during blood flow measurements of hemodialysis synthetic grafts

Exploring correlations between anatomic characteristics of dialysis arteriovenous fistula stenosis and arteriovenous fistula blood flow rate (Qa)

Background:

Radiologic justification for endovascular treatment of a dialysis arteriovenous fistula circuit stenosis is currently based on ⩾50% severity. However, the clinical significance of any given stenosis is not always clear. The minimum luminal diameter of any stenotic lesion in the arteriovenous fistula circuit might exert a more predictive effect on the arteriovenous fistula blood flow rate (Qa).

Methods:

To investigate relationships between anatomic parameters of stenosis and Qa, this study was conducted in a cohort of patients with a variety of arteriovenous fistula stenotic lesions. The goals were to determine (1) the degree of correlation between arteriovenous fistula stenosis estimated during the procedure, and that which is measured, and (2) the correlations between two anatomic stenosis parameters (percent stenosis and stenosis minimum luminal diameter) and Qa.

Results:

The cohort comprised 113 patients. Only a moderate correlation between estimated and measured stenosis was seen. A correlation between measured stenosis and Qa for the whole cohort was not seen, but a weak correlation between estimated stenosis and Qa was seen. Correlations between stenosis minimum luminal diameter and Qa were superior. The superiority of stenosis minimum luminal diameter to percent stenosis in correlating with a Qa of <500 mL/h was also demonstrated by receiver operating characteristics curve analysis. Stenosis minimum luminal diameter cutoffs of ⩽2.5 mm or >4 mm seemed to have a good predictive value of Qa.

Conclusions:

Percent stenosis determination is fraught with uncertainty and exhibits a weak correlation with Qa. Compared with percent stenosis, the minimum luminal diameter of the stenosis demonstrates a superior correlation with Qa.

Vascular access surveillance: an ongoing controversy

Hemodialysis vascular access surveillance continues to be widely recommended despite ongoing controversy as to its benefit in prolonging access patency compared with clinical monitoring alone. The most common screening tests are access blood flow and dialysis venous pressure measurements. When surveillance test results cross a predetermined threshold, accesses are referred for intervention with correction of stenosis to reduce future thrombosis and prolong access survival. Current surveillance strategies have four components: (1) underlying condition; (2) screening test; (3) intervention; and (4) outcomes. However, limitations exist within each component that may prevent achieving the desired outcomes. This review discusses these limitations and their consequences. To date, randomized controlled trials have not consistently shown that surveillance improves outcomes in grafts, and there is limited evidence that surveillance reduces thrombosis without prolonging the life of native fistulae. In conclusion, current evidence does not support the concept that all accesses should undergo routine surveillance with intervention.

Blood Flow Measurements during Hemodialysis Vascular Access Interventions - Catheter-Based Thermodilution or Doppler Ultrasound?

Purpose

To test the clinical performance of catheter-based thermodilution and Doppler ultrasound of the feeding brachial artery for blood flow measurements during hemodialysis vascular access interventions.

Methods

Thirty patients with arteriovenous fistulas who underwent 46 interventions had access blood flow measured before and after every procedure. Two methods, catheter-based thermodilution and Doppler ultrasound, were compared to the reference method of ultrasound dilution. Catheter-based thermodilution and Doppler ultrasound were performed during the endovascular procedures while flow by ultrasound dilution was determined within three days of the procedure. The methods were compared using regression analysis and tested for systematic bias.

Results

Failure to position the thermodilutional catheter correctly was observed in 8 out of 46 (17%) pre-intervention measurements. Post-intervention measurements and ultrasound measurements were feasible in all patients. The average level of agreement was good when comparing catheter-based thermodilution to ultrasound dilution. However, blood flow by ultrasound dilution may differ by ±130 mL/min (±22%) at a flow level of 600 mL/min by thermodilution. Results from Doppler ultrasound displayed a moderate level of agreement on average when compared to ultrasound dilution. Blood flow by ultrasound dilution may differ by ±160 mL/min (±27%) at a flow level of 600 mL/min by Doppler ultrasound. No systematic bias was detected by either method.

Conclusions

On average, results from catheter-based thermodilution were more in agreement with results from the ultrasound dilution technique compared to Doppler ultrasound. However, considering the cost and the high technical failure rate of the thermodilutional system, we recommend the use of ultrasound.

Access Monitoring Does Not Really Improve Outcomes

It is widely accepted that hemodialysis access monitoring combined with preemptive percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) improves outcomes. The many studies that have evaluated monitoring during the last decade provide an opportunity to examine whether this hypothesis is valid. Because synthetic grafts are more likely than autogenous arteriovenous fistulas to benefit from monitoring, this review is restricted to grafts. Recent studies show that monitoring does not accurately predict graft thrombosis or failure, nor does it prolong graft life. However, monitoring can reduce thrombosis, and thereby reduce access-related hospitalizations and use of central venous dialysis catheters. Because preemptive PTA is expensive, however, monitoring does not reduce the cost of access-related care. The limited benefit that monitoring provides emphasizes the urgent need to develop better approaches to solving the problem of graft thrombosis and failure.

Epidemiology and blood flow surveillance of the native arteriovenous fistula: a review of the recent literature

Vascular access placement is a key management issue for hemodialysis patients. Despite being well regarded as the access of first choice, the native arteriovenous fistula (AVF) remains underutilized in the United States. The first part of this review examines recent epidemiology studies addressing patient factors associated with the use of the synthetic arteriovenous graft as opposed to the native fistula. Female gender and older age are consistently associated with a higher frequency of graft use. Diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and body mass index were associated with graft use in some but not all of the studies. Recent evidence also suggests an independent survival advantage for patients dialyzing via native fistulae especially for infection-related mortality. The second part reviews evidence surrounding the recommendations for blood flow surveillance of the native fistula. The hemodynamic features of the native fistula are examined and differences from synthetic grafts are highlighted. Clinical studies assessing the use of blood flow surveillance to prevent the sudden thrombosis of native fistulae are reviewed. Blood flow thresholds for further investigation are yet to be determined definitely for AVF and randomized studies should be performed to assesses the impact on AVF thrombosis rates.

Hemodialysis vascular access monitoring: current concepts

Most arteriovenous grafts fail due to irreversible thrombosis, and most clotted grafts have an underlying stenotic lesion. These observations raise the plausible hypothesis that early detection of graft stenosis with preemptive angioplasty will reduce the likelihood of graft thrombosis. A number of noninvasive methods can be used to detect hemodynamically significant graft stenosis with a high positive predictive value. These tests include clinical monitoring, as well as surveillance by static dialysis venous pressures, flow monitoring, or duplex ultrasound. However, these surveillance tests have a much lower positive predictive value for graft thrombosis in the absence of preemptive angioplasty. In other words, none of the currently available surveillance tests can reliably distinguish between stenosed grafts destined to clot, and those that will remain patent without intervention. As a consequence, any program of graft surveillance necessarily results in a substantial proportion of unnecessary angioplasties. Moreover, a substantial proportion of grafts thrombose despite a normal antecedent surveillance test. Numerous observational studies have found an impressive reduction of graft thrombosis after implementation of a stenosis surveillance program. In contrast, 5 of 6 randomized clinical trials failed to show a reduction of graft thrombosis in patients undergoing graft surveillance, as compared with those receiving only clinical monitoring. The lack of benefit of surveillance is largely attributable to the rapid recurrence of stenosis after angioplasty. Thus, routine surveillance for graft stenosis, with preemptive angioplasty, cannot be recommended for reduction of graft thrombosis. Future research should be directed at pharmacologic interventions to prevent graft stenosis.

Influence of luminal diameters on flow surveillance of hemodialysis grafts: insights from a mathematical model

Randomized controlled trials have not shown that surveillance of graft blood flow (Q) prolongs graft life. Because luminal diameters affect flow resistance, this study examined whether the influence of diameters on Q can explain the limitations of surveillance. Inflow artery and outflow vein diameters were determined from duplex ultrasound studies of 94 patients. These diameters were applied to a mathematical model for determination of how they affect the relation between Q and stenosis. Also determined was the correlation between Q (by ultrasound dilution) and diameters, stenosis, and mean arterial pressure in 88 patients. Artery and vein diameters varied widely between patients, but arteries generally were narrower than veins. The model predicts that the relation between Q and stenosis is sigmoid: as stenosis progresses, Q initially remains unchanged but then rapidly decreases. A narrower artery increases flow resistance, causing a longer delay followed by a more rapid reduction in Q. In a multiple regression analysis of data from patients, Q correlated with artery and vein diameters, sum of largest stenoses from each circuit segment, and mean arterial pressure (R = 0.689, P < 0.001). This study helps to explain why Q surveillance predicts thrombosis in some patients but not others. Luminal diameters control the relation between Q and stenosis, and these diameters vary widely. During progressive stenosis, the delay and then rapid reduction in Q may impair recognition of low Q before thrombosis occurs. Surveillance outcomes might be improved by taking frequent measurements so that there is no delay in discovering that Q has decreased.

American Society of Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology Section Editor: Stephen Ash: Stenosis Surveillance of Hemodialysis Grafts by Duplex Ultrasound Reduces Hospitalizations and Cost of Care

Most recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have found that hemodialysis graft surveillance combined with preemptive correction of stenosis does not prolong graft survival. Nevertheless, such programs may be justified if they reduce other adverse outcomes or decrease the cost of care. This study tested this hypothesis by applying a secondary analysis to our original RCT. This study of 101 patients evaluated correction of stenosis based upon blood flow (Q) and stenosis surveillance. Patients were randomly assigned to control, flow, or stenosis groups, and were followed for up to 28 months. Q was measured monthly by ultrasound dilution; stenosis was measured quarterly by duplex ultrasound. Stenosis of 50% was corrected by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) after referral for angiography. Referral criteria were: control group, clinical criteria; flow group, Q < 600 ml/min or clinical criteria; stenosis group, stenosis > 50% or clinical criteria. We compared access-related hospitalizations and cost of care, and use of central venous dialysis catheters (CVCs), among the three groups. Hospitalization rates were higher in the control and flow groups than in the stenosis group (0.50, 0.57, 0.18/patient-year, respectively [p < 0.01]), and hospitalization costs were lowest in the stenosis group (p = 0.026). The stenosis group had a trend toward lowest CVC rates (0.44, 0.32, 0.20/patient-year, respectively [p = 0.20]). The costs of care were higher in the control and flow groups than in the stenosis group (dollar 3727, dollar 4839, dollar 3306/patient-year, respectively [p = 0.015]). The costs of stenosis (dollar 142/patient-year) and Q (dollar 279/patient-year) measurements were minimal compared to the total cost of access-related care. In conclusion, stenosis surveillance by duplex ultrasound combined with preemptive correction yielded reduced hospitalization rates and costs, reduced total cost of access-related care, and a trend of reduced CVC rates. In contrast, flow surveillance did not yield a significant benefit. Stenosis surveillance provides important benefits that may justify application of such programs.

American Society of Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology Section Editor: Stephen Ash: Thresholds for Significant Decrease in Hemodialysis Access Blood Flow

During hemodialysis access surveillance, referral for evaluation and correction of stenosis is based upon determination that a significant decrease in blood flow (Q) has occurred. However, criteria for determining when a decrease is statistically significant have not yet been established. In this study we established such criteria by analyzing Q variation with the glucose pump test (GPT). We took nine Q measurements in each of 25 patients (18 grafts, 7 fistulas) during three dialysis sessions within a 2-week period (predialysis and during hours 1 and 3). We determined thresholds that define a significant percentage decrease in Q (deltaQ) for various p values. In order to confirm the general applicability of these thresholds, we computed the average within-patient Q variation during the three sessions (computed as a coefficient of variation and referred to as short-term variation). We then determined the relative influences of biological (true) variation and analytical error on short-term variation. We found that deltaQ must be > 33% to be significant at p < 0.05, whereas the threshold is > 17% for p < 0.20. Measuring Q at uniform versus different times during the sessions did not significantly reduce these thresholds. We also found that biological variation was nearly as large as short-term Q variation, whereas analytical error contributed minimally to short-term variation. In conclusion, this study defines thresholds for a significant deltaQ that have wide application in determining access referral for evaluation and correction of stenosis. Selection of a particular threshold should consider the relative importance of avoiding thrombosis versus avoiding unnecessary procedures. If avoiding unnecessary procedures is a priority, then we recommend a threshold of > 33%. These thresholds apply to other methods of measuring Q, provided analytical error is significantly less than biological variation.

Within-session and between-session variability of haemodialysis shunt flow measurements

BACKGROUND

Knowledge of the variability of a measurement method is essential for its clinical application. We investigated the variability of shunt flow measurements, since this is a relatively neglected area in the literature. In particular, no direct comparison of between-session and within-session variability was available until now.

METHODS

During two consecutive dialysis sessions, shunt flow was measured three times with the ultrasound dilution method in 24 chronic haemodialysis patients with various types of shunts. Needle orientation and blood pressure at the time of flow measurement were recorded. In these patients, shunt flow was also measured three times by duplex ultrasound before the first dialysis session.

RESULTS

The within-session variation coefficient (VC) of shunt flow measured with ultrasound dilution was 7.7%, whereas the between-session VC was 14.2% (n.s.). The within-session VC of Doppler shunt flow was 11.6% which was not significantly different from the corresponding figure of ultrasound dilution. Analysis of subgroups showed that changes in needle orientation caused large differences between sessions in radiocephalic fistulas but not in brachiocephalic fistulas: in the radiocephalic fistulas with the same needle orientation, VC was 6.7%, but with different needle orientation it was 23.5% (P = 0.02); the corresponding figures for brachiocephalic fistulas were 14.6% (same direction) and 11.4% (different direction, n.s.).

CONCLUSION

Reproducibility of shunt flow measurements between dialysis sessions in radiocephalic fistulas is critically dependent on similar needle orientation. With similar needle position and correction for blood pressure differences, flow changes of more than 20-25% are likely to reflect true flow changes. The variability of duplex flow measurements is at least as large as that of the ultrasound dilution method.

Prediction of failure of native arteriovenous fistulas using 'on-line' fistula flow measurements

BACKGROUND

Measurement of blood flow within native arteriovenous fistula during haemodialysis is recommended to detect incipient fistula failure. In the present study the value of such flow measurements was assessed in a group of patients on maintenance haemodialysis, with access via native arteriovenous fistulas.

METHODS

Flow was measured using the 'on-line' thermodilution technique, on three separate occasions, and correlated with subsequent fistula failure within 6 months.

RESULTS

Of the 53 patients studied, there were six failures (three thromboses and three inadequate dialysis filtration rates). Flow rates in patients who progressed to fistula failure were significantly less than flow rates in patients whose fistulas did not fail (U = 13.0, P < 0.0003). Failure was no more common in one type of fistula than another (type fistula: F = 0.29, P = 0.88; flow predicting failure: F = 7.22, P = 0.010). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses confirmed flow measurement to be a useful predictor of fistula failure (area under ROC curve 0.91). The optimal threshold of 576 mL/min flow gave a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 81%. Measurement of access resistance was less useful in predicting failure (area under ROC curve 0.87). Measurement of fall in flow from the previous measurement was of no use (area under ROC curve 0.535).

CONCLUSION

On-line thermodilution measurement of flow within established native arteriovenous fistula is useful in surveillance and early prediction of fistula failure. Fistula flow <576 mL/min may indicate incipient native fistula failure, and should prompt further investigation.

Best threshold for diagnosis of stenosis or thrombosis within six months of access flow measurement in arteriovenous fistulae

Canadian clinical practice guidelines recommend performing angiography when access blood flow (Qa) is <500 ml/min in native vessel arteriovenous fistulae (AVF), but data on the value of Qa that best predicts stenosis are sparse. Because correction of stenosis in AVF improves patency rates, this issue seems worthy of investigation. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were constructed to examine the relationship between different threshold values of Qa and stenosis in 340 patients with AVF. Stenosis was defined by the composite outcome of access failure or angiographic stenosis occurring within 6 mo of the first Qa measurement. The Qa value was then classified as true negative, true positive, false negative, or false positive for stenosis. An additional analysis was performed in which Qa was corrected for systolic BP before assigning it to one of the four diagnostic categories. The area under the curve for the composite definition of stenosis was 0.86. Graphically, Qa thresholds of <500 and <600 ml/min had similar efficacy for detecting stenosis or access failure within 6 mo, and both seemed superior to <400 ml/min. However, the frequency of the composite definition of stenosis among AVF with Qa between 500 and 600 ml/min was only 6 (25%) of 24, as compared with 58 (76%) of 76 when Qa was <500 ml/min. This suggests that most lesions that would be found using a threshold of <600 ml/min occurred in AVF with Qa <500 ml/min and that the small gain in sensitivity associated with the <600-ml/min threshold would be outweighed by the reduced specificity compared with <500 ml/min. Correcting Qa for BP did not improve diagnostic performance or change these results, which were consistent in several sensitivity analyses. Qa measurements seemed to predict stenosis or incipient access failure equally well in groups defined by diabetic status, gender, and AVF location. In conclusion, it was found that Qa <500 ml/min seems to be the most appropriate threshold for performing angiography in patients with native vessel AVF. It is recommended that clinicians arrange angiography when Qa is <500 ml/min in AVF.

Effect of time on sensitivity and specificity of access flow in predicting thrombosis

Dialysis access monitoring may help decrease thrombosis-related morbidity. We investigated the effect of time elapsed since an access flow measurement on test accuracy of a novel flow monitoring method called variable flow (VF) Doppler. A retrospective review was conducted in 36 patients with prosthetic grafts for vascular access using access thrombosis as the clinical endpoint. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and test sensitivity and specificity were determined for various follow-up time intervals. ROC analysis showed increasing test discrimination for shorter time intervals. Sensitivity and specificity for a commonly used surveillance threshold (600 ml/min) showed specificity that was little changed (88-93%) from follow-up time intervals of 15 days to 6 months. However, sensitivity was low (21%) at 6 months, increased to 50% at 2 months, 67% at 1 month, and 100% at 15 days (a single event). Low access blood flow using VF Doppler predicts near-term thrombosis. These data further imply that the discriminative value of access flow monitoring appears to be highly dependent on time from the flow measurement, improving with shorter time intervals from the measurement.

Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound dilution access blood flow measurement in detecting stenosis and predicting thrombosis in native forearm arteriovenous fistulae for hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Vascular access surveillance by ultrasound dilution blood flow rate (Qa) measurement is widely recommended; however, optimal criteria for detecting stenosis and predicting thrombosis in arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) are still not clearly defined.

METHODS

In a blinded trial, we evaluated the accuracy of single Qa measurement, Qa adjusted for mean arterial pressure (Qa/MAP), and decrease in Qa over time (dQa) in detecting stenosis and predicting thrombosis in an unselected population of 120 hemodialysis subjects with native forearm AVFs (91 AVFs, located at the wrist; 29 AVFs, located at the midforearm). All AVFs underwent fistulography, which identified greater than 50% stenosis in 54 cases.

RESULTS

Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that dQa, Qa, and Qa/MAP have a high stenosis discriminative ability with similar areas under the curve (AUCs), ie, 0.961 +/- 0.025, 0.946 +/- 0.021, and 0.912 +/- 0.032, respectively. In the population as a whole, optimal thresholds for stenosis were Qa less than 750 mL/min alone and in combination with dQa greater than 25% (efficiency, 90%); however, the best threshold depended on anastomotic site; it was Qa less than 750 mL/min for an AVF at the wrist and Qa less than 1,000 mL/min for an AVF in the midforearm. Qa was the best predictor of incipient thrombosis (AUC, 0.981 +/- 0.013) with an optimal threshold at less than 300 mL/min (efficiency, 94%). Pooled intra-assay and interassay variation coefficients were 8.2% for MAP, 7.9% for Qa, and 11.2% for Qa/MAP.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that ultrasound dilution Qa measurement is a reproducible and highly accurate tool for detecting stenosis and predicting thrombosis in forearm AVFs. Neither Qa/MAP nor dQa improve the diagnostic performance of Qa alone, although its combination with dQa increases the test's sensitivity for stenosis.

Access flow measurement during surveillance and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty intervention

The introduction of routine access flow measurement methodology has enabled accurate identification of problematic accesses and provided a means for follow-up evaluation. These methods have uncovered, in some cases, that interventions are either immediately unsuccessful or that they fail within 3 months to maintain flow above preintervention levels. The purpose of this article is to analyze the main problems that occur at each step in the loop of flow surveillance-intervention-follow-up and to provide suggestions for improving outcomes. Analysis of published access flow data suggests that the main problems lie in the areas of inadequate analysis of flow surveillance data, lack of objective technology for quantifying intervention effectiveness, and lack of follow-up flow measurements in the hemodialysis (HD) unit after the intervention. The following three recommendations may improve surveillance outcomes: 1). using a reliable access flow technology combined with analysis of all hemodynamic data (including mean arterial pressure) before referring patients for angiography to decrease surveillance false positives; 2). performing intra-access blood flow measurement during angioplasty, which may improve outcomes by giving warning of errors before the patient leaves the intervention suite. Success achieved in restoring flow as measured during the intervention usually predicts good immediate outcomes in the HD unit; 3). measuring access flows during the next week after angioplasty. If the results are unsatisfactory, the patient should be further evaluated to avoid a potential thrombotic event.

A randomized controlled trial of blood flow and stenosis surveillance of hemodialysis grafts

BACKGROUND

It is widely accepted that hemodialysis graft surveillance combined with correction of stenosis reduces thrombosis and prolongs graft survival. Nevertheless, few randomized controlled trials have evaluated this approach.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial, 101 patients were assigned to control, flow (Qa), or stenosis groups, and were followed for up to 28 months. All patients had monthly Qa measured by ultrasound dilution and quarterly percent stenosis measured by duplex ultrasound. Referral for angiography was based on the following criteria: (1) control group (N = 34), clinical criteria; (2) flow group (N = 32), Qa <600 mL/min or clinical criteria; and (3) stenosis group (N = 35), stenosis>50% or clinical criteria. Stenosis >or=50% during angiography was corrected by preemptive percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA).

RESULTS

The preemptive PTA rate in the control group (0.22/patient year) was two thirds the rate in the flow group (0.34/patient year), and was highest in the stenosis group (0.65/patient year, P < 0.01). The percentage of grafts that thrombosed was similar in the control (47%) and flow groups (53%), but reduced in the stenosis group (29%, P = 0.10). Two-year graft survival was similar in the control (62%), flow (60%), and stenosis groups (64%) (P = 0.89).

CONCLUSION

Qa and stenosis surveillance were not associated with improved graft survival, although thrombosis was reduced in the stenosis group. The most important factors in this result may be that monthly Qa and quarterly stenosis measurements were not accurate or timely indicators of risk of thrombosis or progressive stenosis. This study does not support the concept that Qa or stenosis surveillance are superior to aggressive clinical monitoring.

Native arteriovenous fistula blood flow and resistance during hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Measurement of vascular access flow (Qa) has been proposed as the ideal method for surveillance of native fistulae. However, debate exists about the influence of blood pressure (mean arterial pressure [MAP]) on Qa during dialysis.

METHODS

During three consecutive dialysis treatments, 10 patients had paired measurements of Qa and MAP performed at 30, 60, 120, 180, 210, and 240 minutes. Access resistance (AR; in peripheral resistance units, PRUs) was calculated from MAP and Qa values.

RESULTS

Overall pooled coefficients of variation (CVs) for MAP, Qa, and AR were 8.4%, 12.3%, and 12.9%, respectively. A significant reduction in Qa and MAP occurred throughout the dialysis treatment (Qa, 104 mL/min; P = 0.008; MAP, 10.4 mm Hg; P = 0.007). Mean percentages of change in Qa for the first third compared with the middle and last thirds of the session were -4.6% +/- 11.15% (SD) and -9.6% +/- 10.5%, respectively. Thus, Qa varied between 11.4% and -30.6% from baseline during the last hour of dialysis treatments. A stronger correlation between MAP and Qa was seen in radiocephalic (r2 = 0.55; P < 0.0001) compared with brachiocephalic fistulae (r2 = 0.06; P = 0.023). Mean AR was unchanged during the dialysis session (0.23 PRU; P = 0.358). AR for radiocephalic fistulae was significantly greater compared with brachiocephalic fistulae (6.03 +/- 3.90 versus 3.00 +/- 1.11 PRU; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Qa could decrease up to 30% from baseline, potentially impairing the ability of Qa to predict impending vascular access failure. AR remained stable during the treatment and may be a more useful measure of vascular access performance as part of an access surveillance program.

Association between blood pressure, ultrafiltration, and hemodialysis graft thrombosis: a multivariable logistic regression analysis

Although a low blood flow (Q(a)) is the most important cause of graft thrombosis, several studies have shown that Q(a) measurements do not accurately predict thrombosis. This suggests that additional variables may influence thrombosis. Identification of such variables may be essential to designing surveillance protocols that accurately predict thrombosis. In this nested case-control study, we prospectively followed 105 patients for up to 2.5 years in order to test the association of a number of variables with thrombosis. These included Q(a) (monthly by ultrasound dilution), percentage stenosis (quarterly by duplex ultrasound), mean arterial pressure (MAP), percentage ultrafiltration (%UF) during dialysis (%UF = 100[liters]/[kilogram of weight]), and other variables that defined patient and graft characteristics. Patients were divided into patent (n = 53) and thrombosed groups (n = 52), and MAP and %UF from seven consecutive dialysis sessions were analyzed. In the thrombosed group, the last session was the final session before thrombosis. A multivariable logistic regression model showed that Q(a), MAP (the predialysis average of seven sessions), and %UF (from the last session) were independently associated with thrombosis, whereas all other variables were not. The model yielded the following odds ratios for thrombosis: for a single Q(a) value (reduction of 1,000 mL/min), 12.0 (P < 0.01); for %UF (increase of 4%), 5.3 (P < 0.01); for MAP (reduction of 30 mm Hg), 4.1 (P = 0.02); and for percentage decrease in Q(a) (> or =20% versus <20%), 2.4 (P = 0.12). We conclude that in addition to Q(a), both %UF at the last session before thrombosis and average predialysis MAP from seven sessions are independently associated with thrombosis. These results help explain why Q(a) alone does not accurately predict thrombosis. A prospective study is needed to determine whether %UF at each session and a moving average MAP from seven sessions improve the prediction of thrombosis. However, it should be recognized that a large %UF is a preterminal event that likely provides too short a warning for intervention before thrombosis.

Blood flow surveillance of hemodialysis grafts: insights from two case reports

It is widely recommended that all hemodialysis grafts undergo blood flow (Qa) surveillance, and that stenosis be corrected when accompanied by a low Qa or decrease in Qa (deltaQa). This recommendation has, however, become increasingly controversial. Studies have shown that although there is an association between Qa and thrombosis, the accuracy of Qa in predicting thrombosis within individual patients is poor. We describe two cases that demonstrate common causes of poor predictive accuracy. These cases also show that application of Qa surveillance algorithms is often complex and ambiguous. Most studies reporting that surveillance with intervention reduces thrombosis or prolongs graft life have used historical or sequential control groups, or have been retrospective. Accurate assessment of the benefit of graft surveillance must await studies that are fully prospective and randomized with concurrent control groups. Until such studies have demonstrated sufficient benefit, we do not recommend periodic Qa surveillance with intervention of all hemodialysis grafts.

Vascular access: anatomy, examination, management

A systematic approach to managing vascular access problems is the key to reducing current high rates of access thrombosis and failure. This approach begins with a thorough knowledge of vascular access anatomy that, when combined with the physical examination, can help optimize access planning and maintenance. Because of the high complication rate of synthetic grafts, there has been increased emphasis on creating autogenous arteriovenous (AV) fistulae, which, once established, are more trouble-free. The benefit of increased fistula creation will not be realized, however, until the high rate of early fistula failure is reduced. It is widely recommended that graft surveillance programs be implemented and that stenosis be corrected when accompanied by graft dysfunction. Graft blood flow (Q(a)) is the preferred surveillance method, but has a poor accuracy in predicting thrombosis. Most studies that have evaluated the benefit of Q(a) surveillance have used historical control groups, or have been retrospective or nonrandomized. Consequently, we believe it is not currently possible to make definitive, evidence-based recommendations concerning Q(a) surveillance. The most important factor in access survival may be a team approach with an organized commitment to access planning followed by recognition and treatment of access problems.

Hemodialysis access assessment with intravascular ultrasound

Reliable identification and treatment of specific hemodialysis access complications may improve access patency and result in significant cost reduction. Angiography is the gold standard for the evaluation of vascular access; however, it has significant limitations. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a relatively new technique capable of detecting subtle vascular abnormalities. To investigate the safety, feasibility, and accuracy of IVUS imaging to detect hemodialysis access complications, including stenoses, graft deterioration, and thrombus, we performed 31 IVUS imaging studies in 22 hemodialysis patients. Nineteen studies were performed in the dialysis unit, and 12 studies in the angiography suite. The IVUS catheter was inserted into the graft through the access used for hemodialysis. Findings of 21 studies (17 patients) imaged on the same day by both angiography and IVUS were compared. Grafts and vessels were successfully imaged using IVUS in 29 of 31 studies. There were no adverse effects caused by IVUS. Angiography assessed 17 of 54 vessel segments as normal versus 9 of 54 segments by IVUS (P < 0.001). Angiography detected lesions in 25 segments as opposed to 33 segments by IVUS (P < 0.001). A thrombus was detected in 32 of 54 vessel segments by IVUS, but in only 1 of 54 segments by angiography (P < 0.001). In conclusion, IVUS imaging is feasible and safe to assess hemodialysis access in the angiographic suite and dialysis unit. IVUS detected more vascular abnormalities than angiography. IVUS may be a useful independent imaging and screening modality in the assessment of dialysis access complications, which may help increase graft patency and reduce cost.

Are hemodialysis access flow measurements by ultrasound dilution the standard of care for access surveillance?

Maintenance of vascular access function is vital to the delivery of adequate hemodialysis therapy. Failure of function is associated with significant morbidity and cost. Thus, access surveillance programs are suggested. The most common cause for access dysfunction is stenosis formation within the graft fistula. This may lead to reduced blood flow. The measurement of access blood flow has thus been recommended as the preferred method for surveillance. This article reviews blood flow among other methods for the screening of access dysfunction, the techniques used to measure it, the predictability of access flow measurements in determining the presence of access stenosis and allowing successful; intervention and finally the cost-effectiveness of such surveillance. Review of available evidence would suggest that access flow measurements are the best tests currently available to screen for access dysfunction, and as preventative interventions, such as angioplasty and surgery, are successful, they should be regarded as the present standard of care. This would appear to be a cost-effective strategy. Furthermore, the method of choice for access flow measurement is by ultrasound dilution technology.

Optimizing dialysis dose by increasing blood flow rate in patients with reduced vascular-access flow rate

Dialysis efficacy indexed by Kt/V can generally be augmented by increasing the dialyzer blood flow rate. However, increasing the dialyzer blood flow rate may lead to vascular-access recirculation (AR) in patients with a compromised vascular-access flow rate. This can have an attenuating effect on dialysis efficacy. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of dialyzer blood flow rates of 200, 300, and 400 mL/min on AR and Kt/V in 8 patients with low (<600 mL/min) and 13 patients with normal (>600 mL/min) vascular-access flow rates. AR and vascular-access flow rate were determined using an ultrasound saline dilution technique, and session-delivered Kt/V was computed using an on-line dialysate urea monitor. AR was minor and only observed in 4 patients in the low vascular-access flow rate group (0.9% +/- 0.6%) at dialyzer blood flow rates of 200 mL/min (1 patient), 300 mL/min (2 patients), and 400 mL/min (3 patients) and 4 patients in the normal vascular-access flow rate group (1.2% +/- 1.1%) at dialyzer blood flow rates of 200 mL/min (3 patients) and 300 mL/min (1 patient). Kt/V increased with increasing dialyzer blood flow rates in both groups, and in individual cases, there was no decrease in Kt/V at greater dialyzer blood flow rates in either group. Also in those patients with minor AR, Kt/V increased at greater dialyzer blood flow rates, except in 1 patient in the low-flow group, in whom Kt/V remained unchanged at a change in dialyzer blood flow rate from 300 to 400 mL/min, whereas AR increased. From this study, it is concluded that even in patients with low access flow, increasing dialyzer blood flow rate in general leads to an increase in delivered Kt/V regardless of vascular access flow rate.

Blood flow surveillance of hemodialysis grafts and the dysfunction hypothesis

It is widely recommended that hemodialysis graft surveillance programs should be implemented and that significant stenosis should be corrected when it is accompanied by graft dysfunction. The rationale for surveillance depends on the dysfunction hypothesis, which states that stenosis causes graft dysfunction [such as a decrease in graft blood flow (Qa)], and this dysfunction reliably precedes and accurately predicts thrombosis. The usefulness of Qa surveillance depends on accurate prediction of thrombosis so that stenosis can be corrected prior to thrombosis. An analysis of the dysfunction hypothesis indicates that some or all of its underlying assumptions are invalid. Most importantly, the presence of wide hemodynamic variation during Qa measurements makes Qa a relatively inaccurate predictor of thrombosis. A number of studies have evaluated the value of surveillance with intervention in reducing thrombosis rates and prolonging graft life. Review of these studies show that few have been prospective and randomized, and many have included historical control groups. It is debatable whether these studies have established that Qa surveillance with intervention should be applied to all grafts. Data from several studies suggest that severity of stenosis may be at least as accurate as Qa in predicting thrombosis. Consequently, inclusion of stenosis measurements (e.g., by duplex ultrasound) may improve the results of surveillance. These unresolved issues indicate it is premature to recommend routine Qa surveillance with intervention of all hemodialysis patients with grafts.