Odontogenic ghost cell carcinoma: report of a case and review of the literature

Treatment challenges of persistent ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma: a case report and literature review

The aim of this case report is to review and compare the clinical, radiologic, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical features, along with the treatment of a case of ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma. In addition, a report of the existing published literature with an emphasis on treatment will be described to provide information on this rare but aggressive tumor. The family of odontogenic ghost cell tumors comprises a spectrum of lesions characterized by odontogenic epithelium with ghost cell keratinization and calcifications. It appears that early detection is vital in proper treatment due to the high possibility of malignant transformation.

A novel parotid carcinoma with a prominent ghost cell population: a masquerading tumor or "salivary ghost cell carcinoma"?

Ghost cell is one of several unique cellular morphologies associated with aberrant keratinization. We encountered a novel parotid tumor containing numerous ghost cells and herein describe its histological features and discuss diagnostic problems. The patient was a 90-year-old Japanese male, who complained of swelling of the left parotid area for four months. Positron emission tomography indicated no cervical lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis. The tumor was successfully resected with no signs of recurrence or metastasis for six months after surgery. Histologically, the tumor was mainly composed of squamous cells forming irregularly shaped nests with a mixture of pleomorphic giant or multinucleated cells and bland basaloid cell. Keratinized areas were occupied by a prominent ghost cell population. Immunohistochemically, CK5/6 and CK19 were widely positive as well as AE1/AE3, p40 and p63. Nuclear expression of β-catenin was also observed. The present case can be regarded as a particular form of squamous cell carcinoma and is believed to contain a large number of ghost cells resulting from an unclear mechanism. However, it seems difficult to consider such tumors as a clinicopathologically independent entity at present. Applying a term such as "salivary ghost cell carcinoma" would be premature.

Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma of anterior mandible: A rare case report with review of literature

A 24-year-old male reported to the outpatient department with a complaint of swelling of the anterior lower jaw region for 9 months with history of traumatic injury and extraction of teeth from the same region, a month before the onset of swelling. Swelling was obvious extra- and intraorally which on examination presented as a soft to firm non-tender and non-fluctuant mass with an approximate size of 4 cm × 3 cm, extending from 34 to 43 region with obliteration of labial vestibule. Panoramic radiograph and cone-beam computed tomography showed a well-defined radiolucency in the mandibular anterior region crossing the midline with erosion of labial bony plates and root of 42 along with a tooth-like radiopaque mass within the lesion. Provisional diagnoses of odontogenic keratocyst, ameloblastomas, central giant cell granuloma and calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor were listed. The histopathological and immunohistochemical examination of lesion followed by the biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma.

Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma of the jaws: Report of two cases and a literature review

BACKGROUND

Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma (GCOC) is a rare malignant odontogenic epithelial tumor with features of benign calcifying odontogenic cysts. Herein, we report two new cases of GCOC and systematically review the previous literature.

CASE SUMMARY

In case 1, a 46-year-old man complained of painless swelling of the right maxilla for 3 years, with a 1-mo history of hemorrhinia in the right nasal cavity. In case 2, a 72-year-old man was referred to our hospital with a chief complaint of painful swelling of the right mandible. Initially, the preliminary diagnoses were ameloblastomas. Thus, the two patients underwent resection of the tumor under general anesthesia. Finally, immunohistochemical examination confirmed the diagnosis of GCOC. The patient in case 1 was followed for 2 years, with no evidence of recurrence. However, the patient in case 2 was lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSION

GCOC is a rare malignant odontogenic epithelial tumor with high recurrence. Local extensive resection is necessary for the definitive treatment of GCOC.

Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma with suspected cholesterol granuloma of the maxillary sinus in a patient treated with combined modality therapy: A case report and the review of literature

RATIONALE

Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma (GCOC) is a rare malignant odontogenic tumor with aggressive growth characteristics.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 41-year-old Chinese male visited our hospital in 2013, with a 4-month history of bloody purulent rhinorrhea with a peculiar smell in the right nasal cavity.

DIAGNOSES

The patient suffered from recurrent GCOC with suspected cholesterol granuloma of the maxillary sinus. The patient was incorrectly diagnosed with a calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor at his first recurrence. Physical examination, radiological examination, and histopathology were used to identify GCOC.

INTERVENTIONS

Considering the recurrence of GCOC and poor effects of single surgery, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy were performed after radical surgical excision.

OUTCOMES

So far, no significant evidence has suggested recurrence or metastasis after a long-term follow-up.

LESSONS

We advocate wide surgery with clean margins at the first accurate diagnosis. Combined modality therapy could be taken for the recurrent GCOC. We expect to provide a new treatment strategy to prevent the growth of this neoplasm.

Ghost Cell Odontogenic Carcinoma Arising Denovo with Distant Metastasis: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Ghost Cell Odontogenic Carcinoma (GCOC) is a rare malignant odontogenic tumour of epithelial origin accounting about 0.37% to 2.1% of all odontogenic tumours. They are characterized by the presence of ameloblastic islands along with ghost cells representing aberrant keratinization. The aim of this case report is to present a rare case that was diagnosed in a 37-year-old male patient and to describe the behavior of the tumour.

Pediatric Metastatic Odontogenic Ghost Cell Carcinoma: A Multimodal Treatment Approach

Odontogenic ghost cell carcinoma (OGCC) is a rare and aggressive tumor wherein optimal treatment remains uncertain. We report the first pediatric metastatic OGCC case treated with multimodal therapy: surgery, adjuvant chemoradiation, and adjuvant immunotherapy. Adjuvant therapy was utilized due to locally advanced disease with pathologic features indicative of high recurrence risk. This multimodal approach was modeled after management of primary head and neck cancer, where adjuvant chemoradiation and immunotherapy are associated with improved outcomes. Our patient is alive and disease free at 14 months indicating a potentially positive role for multimodal therapy in the management of OGCC.

Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma: A rare case report and review of literature

Objectives: Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma is a rare condition characterized by ameloblastic-like islands of epithelial cells with aberrant keratinitation in the form of Ghost cell with varying amounts of dysplastic dentina. Material and Methods: We report a case of a 70 year-old woman with a rapid onset of painful swelling right maxillary tumor. Magnetic resonance showed a huge tumor dependent on the right half of the right hard palate with invasion of the pterygoid process and focally to the second branch of the trigeminal. Radiological stage was T4N0. The patient underwent a right subtotal maxillectomy with clear margins. Adjuvant radiotherapy was given. The patient was free of residual or recurrent disease 12 months after surgery. Results: The tumor was 3,9cm in diameter. It was spongy and whitish gray. Microscopically the tumor was arranged in nets and trabeculae, occasionally forming palisade. Tumoral cells had clear cytoplasm with vesicular nuclei. There was atipia and mitosi with vascular and perineural invasion. The excised tumor was diagnosed as a GCOC. Conclusions: Ghost cell carcinoma is a rare odontogenic carcinoma. Its course is unpredictable, ranging from locally invasive tumors of slow growth to highly aggressive and infiltrative ones. Wide surgical excision with clean margins is the treatment of choice although its combination with postoperative radiation therapy, with or without chemotherapy, remains controversial.

Key words:Ameloblastic carcinoma, calcifying odontogenic cyst, Ghost cell carcinoma, keratinizing epithelial odontogenic cyst, maxillary tumor, odontogenic carcinoma.

Ki-67 and p53 expression in ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma: a case report and literature review

Ghost cell odontogenic carcinomas are rare neoplasms that arise in the maxillary bones either from a calcifying odontogenic cyst or de novo. They are aggressive locally and can metastasize. We report herein a case of a ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma arising in the mandible of a Caucasian male 86 years of age. We have described the clinical and radiographic features, histological characteristics, immunohistochemistry findings, and surgical treatment. We especially focused on how Ki-67 expression guides the treatment choice. Finally, we reviewed 32 cases described in the literature and compared them with the cases described up until 2014 to help clinicians identify the diagnostic characteristics of and select appropriate treatment modalities for ghost cell odontogenic carcinomas.

Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma arising in the background of a benign calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor of the mandible

Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma (GCOC) is a rare malignant variant of odontogenic tumor with ghost cells; only 29 cases are documented. Our patient was a 68-year-old man with a painless, well-defined, radiolucent swelling of the mandibular gingiva in the right incisor-to-molar region. It was diagnosed as a benign calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor (CCOT) on fenestration biopsy. Eighteen years later, he returned with swelling in the same area. The lesion was excised, diagnosed as GCOC, and considered a secondary malignant manifestation of the benign CCOT. No adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy was administered, and his postoperative course was uneventful for 48 months, with no recurrence or distant metastasis. Among the 30 reported cases of GCOC, the mean age at diagnosis was 40.3 years, 22 (73%) involved the maxilla. Twelve (40%) were secondary malignant manifestations of benign CCOTs or dentinogenic ghost cell tumors. Five patients died of recurrence or distant metastasis.

Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma arising in calcifying odontogenic cyst

A case of exceptionally rare odontogenic malignant tumor, called ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma, is described. The tumor was considered to be derived from calcifying odontogenic cyst, which had been resected 5 years before. In the present resected specimen, cellular atypia, mitotic activity, Ki-67 labeling index, and p53 positivity were all increased in comparison with the initially resected specimen. This is a valuable case in which malignant transformation from calcifying odontogenic cyst to ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma was proven by the histopathologic and immunohistochemical findings. Pathologists should be aware of this rare entity.

Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma transformed from a dentinogenic ghost cell tumor of maxilla after multiple recurrences

Dentinogenic ghost cell tumor (DGCT), also referred to as odontogenic ghost cell tumor, is a rare tumor classified as a neoplastic variant of calcifying odontogenic cyst (COC). Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma (GCOC) is the especially rare malignant counterpart of DGCT and COC. The case of a middle-aged male with a maxillary DGCT which transformed to GCOC after 5 recurrences during a 21-year period is presented. When the diagnosis of GCOC (first identified as malignant after 17-year recurrence) was made, the tumor cells showed more obvious atypia, necrosis, and numerous mitoses, and interestingly the ghost cell was hard to find and even disappeared. The significances in pathologic diagnosis and clinical treatment are discussed.

Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma of the mandible: a case report demonstrating expression of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) and vitronectin receptor

INTRODUCTION

Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma is a rare neoplastic variant of calcifying odontogenic cyst, with aggressive growth characteristics. A painful swelling in the jaws with local paraesthesia is the most common symptom. Although it often causes irregular destruction of the adjacent bone, immunohistochemical expression of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) and vitronectin receptor has not previously been described in this carcinoma.

CASE REPORT

This article describes a ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma affecting the mandible of a 55-year-old man. The patient was treated by segmental mandibulectomy and there was no evidence of recurrence or metastasis for 1.8 years. Cytological features including the immunohistochemical expression of TRAP and vitronectin receptor were studied.

CONCLUSION

Specimens revealed varying sized islands of anucleate cell clusters with homogenous, pale eosinophilic cytoplasm, so called ghost cells, admixed with sheets of tumour. TRAP and vitronectin receptor were detected in the ghost cells, but they were not expressed in the tumour cells. Our findings suggest that some of the cytokines produced by ghost cells may play important roles in causing extensive bone resorption in the ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma.

Peripheral dentinogenic ghost cell tumor of the gingiva

BACKGROUND

A dentinogenic ghost cell tumor is a locally invasive neoplasm that is characterized by ameloblastoma-like islands of epithelial cells in a mature connective tissue stroma.

METHODS

A 43-year-old male patient presented a well-circumscribed sessile, exophytic mass of the gingiva with a diameter of 2 cm located in the canine area of the right maxilla. The lesion was enucleated.

RESULTS

The lesion showed odontogenic epithelium, ghost cells, dentinoid material, and giant cells. The final microscopic diagnosis was a dentinogenic ghost cell tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

A dentinogenic ghost cell tumor is an extremely rare tumor, and only a few cases have been reported in the English literature. The peripheral, extraosseous lesion can be easily confused with other gingival lesions such as reactive or inflammatory lesions or other peripheral odontogenic tumors. The clinical appearance of all of these lesions is similar; therefore, the definitive diagnosis depends on histology, and a biopsy with a microscopic examination is mandatory.

Clinical and radiological features of odontogenic ghost cell carcinoma: review of the literature and report of four new cases

OBJECTIVES

To analyse systematically the clinical and radiological features of odontogenic ghost cell carcinoma (OGCC).

METHODS

Clinical and radiological features of 22 OGCCs (4 new and 18 from the literature) were analysed.

RESULTS

There were 17 (77%) males and 5 (23%) females (male-to-female ratio of 3.4:1). Ages ranged from 13 years to 72 years (mean 36.7) with a peak in the fourth (40.9%) and fifth (27.3%) decades. The maxilla was involved in 68% and the mandible in 32%. Our study confirmed that OGCC is more prevalent in Asians (12/18) than in other racial groups. The mixed radiolucent and radiopaque lesion pattern was the most frequent (14/19) compared with radiolucent lesions (5/19). 89% (17/19) showed poorly defined borders and 11% (2/19) showed well defined borders. Root resorption was reported in 31% (6/19) of patients and tooth displacements in 21%.

CONCLUSIONS

OGCC demonstrates clinical and radiographic features of a malignant tumour with high recurrence.

Odontogenic ghost cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Odontogenic ghost cell carcinoma (OGCC), a malignant counterpart of the calcifying odontogenic cyst (COC), is exceedingly rare. Previous descriptions of this tumor were based on identification of malignant histologic characteristics such as infiltration, cellular pleomorphism, numerous mitoses, and necrosis concurrent with classical benign COC or its solid benign variant, the odontogenic ghost cell tumor.

METHODS

We present a case of a young Asian man who underwent multiple local excisions of a recurring maxillary COC. After one such excision, a rapid onset of painful swelling ensued, and the patient was referred to our institution for definitive surgery.

RESULTS

The patient underwent a right subtotal maxillectomy. Intraoperatively, a 5-cm tumor was found to be extending into the right maxillary sinus and nasal cavity. The excised tumor was diagnosed as an OGCC. The tumor was excised with clear margins, and no adjunctive radiotherapy was given. The patient was free of residual or recurrent disease 18 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of this case and prior cases found in the literature, OGCCs show a spectrum of growth from slow growing locally invasive tumors to highly aggressive, rapidly growing, infiltrative tumors. Wide local excision with histologically clean margins is the recommended mode of treatment. We recommend close long-term surveillance of recurrent or long-standing benign COCs and OGCC.

Clinicopathologic spectrum of the so-called calcifying odontogenic cysts: a study of 21 intraosseous cases with reconsideration of the terminology and classification

The so-called calcifying odontogenic cyst (COC) represents a heterogeneous group of lesions that exhibit a variety of clinicopathologic and behavioral features. Because of this diversity, there has been confusion and disagreement on the terminology and classification of these lesions. We reviewed the clinicopathologic features of 21 intraosseous cases that were previously diagnosed as COC or under related diagnostic terms. Based on the biologic behavior, the lesions of the present series were divided into three subgroups: cyst, benign tumor, and malignant tumor. Sixteen cases (nine men and seven women) proved to be unicystic lesions with (five cases) or without associated odontoma. The lining epithelium of the cystic lesions fulfilled the histologic criteria for COC proposed by the World Health Organization, and their overall clinicopathologic features were consistent with that of developmental odontogenic cysts. The age of patients from the cyst group peaked at the second decade. The maxilla was affected more often (69%) than the mandible, with a predilection for the canine-premolar region (62.5%). Thirteen patients with follow-up information revealed no recurrence following enucleation. The four cases in the benign tumor group had variable clinicopathologic features. Two cases were solid tumors consisting of ameloblastoma-like sheets of odontogenic epithelium that contained ghost cells/calcification foci and juxtaepithelial dentinoid. Both patients experienced multiple recurrences following conservative surgeries. The other two lesions contained typical areas of COC and other types of odontogenic tumors (one ameloblastoma and one odontogenic myxofibroma). All four lesions occurred in the mandible and were relatively large. In the present series one case identified as malignant tumor arose from a previously benign COC. The tumor shared some features of COC (ghost cell foci and dystrophic calcification) but also had prominent mitotic activity, nuclear and cytoplasmic pleomorphism, areas of tumor necrosis, and infiltrative/destructive growth. Recognizing the extreme diversity in clinicopathologic features and biologic behavior among the so-called COCs, we suggest that the term COC should be used to specifically designate the unicystic lesions with or without an associated odontoma, i.e., lesions of the cyst group, and other related lesions identified as benign tumor and malignant tumor should be termed and classified separately. A tentative scheme with respect to the terminology and classification for this group of disparately behaving lesions was herein proposed to reflect the likely difference of their nature.

Aggressive epithelial odontogenic ghost cell tumor in the mandible: CT and MR imaging findings

We report a case of aggressive epithelial odontogenic ghost cell tumor arising from the mandible in a 32-year-old man. On CT and MR studies, the tumor was seen as a large, heterogeneous soft-tissue mass that caused marked destruction of the mandible and invaded the mouth floor and tongue base. The tumor displayed a variety of densities and signal intensities on CT and MR images, which correlated well with the degree of cellularity of epithelial islands, abundance of ghost cells and eosinophilic materials, calcification, and cystic areas on histologic sections. Owing to the unpredictable biological behavior of this type of tumor, careful, long-term follow-up is highly recommended.

Odontogenic ghost cell carcinoma: a case report with reference to the relation between apoptosis and ghost cells

The neoplastic variant of calcifying odontogenic cyst has various designations, and its malignant counterpart has been reported as aggressive epithelial odontogenic ghost cell tumor or odontogenic ghost cell carcinoma. We present a case of odontogenic ghost cell carcinoma with reference to the relation between the ghost cells and apoptosis. A 33-year-old man complained of a mandibular mass. The mass occupied the entire right side of the mandible with destruction of both buccal and lingual bone. The mass also infiltrated into submandibular and sublingual spaces. Histologically, the mass was composed of a solid proliferation of hyperchromatic and pleomorphic epithelial cells with abnormal mitoses. Islands of ghost cells were frequently admixed with nucleated cells, and there were foci of ameloblastic differentiation. Immunohistochemical stains for cytokeratins, involucrin, and apoptosis-related proteins such as Bcl-2, Bcl-X(L), and Bax were done. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay was also performed. The nucleated cells adjacent to the ghost cells expressed cytokeratins and involucrin, but the ghost cells had no reaction. Bcl-2 was negative. Both Bcl-X(L) and Bax were demonstrated in the nucleated cells adjacent to the ghost cells. The ghost cells exhibited Bax protein. Some nucleated cells adjacent to the ghost cells were positive with TUNEL assay. The above results indicate that ghost cells undergo abnormal terminal differentiation as an apoptotic process.

Aggressive (malignant) epithelial odontogenic ghost cell tumor

A 57-year-old man had an expanding cystic lesion of the anterior maxilla that demonstrated destruction and disruption of local structures. A cystic odontogenic neoplasm as well as various forms of odontogenic carcinoma was suspected. Incisional biopsy and microscopic examination revealed an aggressive epithelial odontogenic tumor with histologic features suggesting malignant transformation from an odontogenic cyst. The patient continues to refuse further treatment despite remaining tumor. This case further documents the malignant potential of a calcifying odontogenic cyst and the existence of at least an aggressive or possibly malignant form of epithelial odontogenic ghost cell tumor. To date, metastatic work-up has not been performed.

Odontogenic ghost cell carcinoma: report of four new cases and review of the literature

Only 12 odontogenic ghost cell carcinomas (OGCC) have been reported in the English language literature to date. This article reports four additional cases of this rare odontogenic tumour and examines them in relation to those previously described. Judging from the number of published cases, the OGCC is more prevalent in Asians than other racial groups, occurs more often in the maxilla than the mandible, and is slightly more common in males than females. Histologically, elements of a benign calcifying odontogenic cyst (COC) can be identified in all the malignant variants, either separated or admixed with the malignant epithelial component. The latter can consist of either small basaloid cells or large epithelial cells. Despite the differing histological presentations, the biological behavior of the tumour is unpredictable, with some cases characterized by relatively indolent growth and others by a locally aggressive and potentially fatal course. The tumour apparently arises most often from malignant transformation of a preexisting benign COC, although it may also develop from other odontogenic tumours.

Epithelial odontogenic ghost cell tumour of the mandibular gingiva

The epithelial odontogenic ghost cell tumour (EOGCT) is considered as a solid 'neoplastic' variant of the calcifying odontogenic cyst and is an uncommon lesion for which various names have been proposed over the years. We describe here an extraosseous case occurring on the edentulous mandibular gingiva in the right bicuspid area of a 70-year-old woman. The lesion was a painless nodule that appeared clinically as a hyperplastic mass, which was considered to be of reactive nature. Radiographic examination showed a localised resorption of the underlying mandibular bone. The tumour was excised; there was no recurrence at a 2-year follow-up examination.

Intraosseous squamous cell carcinoma arising in association with a squamous odontogenic tumour of the mandible

We report a rare occurrence of intraosseous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) arising in association with a squamous odontogenic tumour (SOT), which had not previously been documented in the literature. A 53-year-old man had, for 5 years, a well-demarcated radiolucency attached to the impacted third molar of the mandible. The enucleated specimen had a characteristic pattern of SOT, but in which a few epithelial islands showed atypical features suggestive of SCC. Intense p53-, proliferating cell nuclear antigen- and Ki-67-positive cells were detected in carcinoma areas. Within 2 months, aggressive bone destruction showing typical findings of intraosseous SCC appeared. The present tumour is presumably a malignant variant of SOT.

Proliferative activity of calcifying odontogenic cysts as evaluated by proliferating cell nuclear antigen labeling index

The calcifying odontogenic cyst (COC) presents with diverse histological features; thus, several subclassifications have been proposed. To evaluate the significance of the various histological features and subtypes of COC from the perspective of proliferative activity, the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) labeling index (LI; the percentage of positive nuclei) was assessed immunohistochemically in 25 cases of COC (21 benign and four malignant). All of the benign cases were of the cystic variety and further subclassified into non-proliferative subtype (NPS; four cases); proliferative subtype (PS; eight cases); and COC associated with odontoma (COCaO, nine cases). The PCNA LI of the malignant COC (65.2+/-5.6) was significantly higher than that of the benign COC (11.6+/-9.0; P = 0.002). Non-proliferative subtype (6.8+/-2.8) showed the lowest PCNA LI and PS (17.2+/-11.2) the highest of among the three subtypes of benign cystic COC (P = 0.028). In nine cases of COCaO, six showed epithelial lining of the non-proliferative type as NPS and the other three had lining with proliferative features as PS. The PCNA LI of the latter COCaO group (14.3+/-6.6) was significantly higher than that of the former (6.1+/-4.3; P = 0.05), as seen between PS and NPS. These results demonstrate that PCNA LI is a possible parameter for differentiating malignant COC from benign COC and, whatever the subtypes, the proliferative features in the lining are the main factor influencing the proliferating activity of COC.

Immunohistochemical analysis of a dentinogenic ghost cell tumour

A dentinogenic ghost cell tumour in an 80-year-old male patient is presented. It is an extremely rare tumour and only 10 cases have been reported in the English literature. The lesion showed odontogenic epithelium, ghost cells, dentinoid, giant cells. The immunohistochemical analysis for Mib-1 and bel-2 showed a strong positivity of the cells of the odontogenic epithelium, while with p53 only a rare positivity was observed. Completely negative were the ghost cells, giant cells and dentinoid material. In this tumour the cells expressing Mib-1 and bcl-2 could be the cells that proliferate, and that could undergo malignant transformation.

Odontogenic ghost cell carcinoma: a case report with immunohistochemical and ultrastructural characterization

The odontogenic ghost cell tumor (OGCT) is the rare, neoplastic variant of the calcifying odontogenic cyst (COC). To date, there have been only four reports of malignant OGCTs, in five patients. We report an additional case of a malignant odontogenic ghost cell tumor that involved the right maxilla of a 20-year-old man. Our report includes its immunocytochemical and ultrastructural characterization.