Adenosine A1 receptor blockade selectively potentiates the motor effects induced by dopamine D1 receptor stimulation in rodents

Neuromodulator regulation and emotions: insights from the crosstalk of cell signaling

The unraveling of the regulatory mechanisms that govern neuronal excitability is a major challenge for neuroscientists worldwide. Neurotransmitters play a critical role in maintaining the balance between excitatory and inhibitory activity in the brain. The balance controls cognitive functions and emotional responses. Glutamate and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) are the primary excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters of the brain, respectively. Disruptions in the balance between excitatory and inhibitory transmission are implicated in several psychiatric disorders, including anxiety disorders, depression, and schizophrenia. Neuromodulators such as dopamine and acetylcholine control cognition and emotion by regulating the excitatory/inhibitory balance initiated by glutamate and GABA. Dopamine is closely associated with reward-related behaviors, while acetylcholine plays a role in aversive and attentional behaviors. Although the physiological roles of neuromodulators have been extensively studied neuroanatomically and electrophysiologically, few researchers have explored the interplay between neuronal excitability and cell signaling and the resulting impact on emotion regulation. This review provides an in-depth understanding of "cell signaling crosstalk" in the context of neuronal excitability and emotion regulation. It also anticipates that the next generation of neurochemical analyses, facilitated by integrated phosphorylation studies, will shed more light on this topic.

Involvement of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors on guanosine-mediated anti-tremor effects in reserpinized mice

Parkinson's disease (PD) signs and symptoms regularly include tremor. Interestingly, the nucleoside guanosine (GUO) has already proven to be effective in reducing reserpine-induced tremulous jaw movements (TJMs) in rodent models, thus becoming a promising antiparkinsonian drug. Here, we aimed at revealing the mechanism behind GUO antiparkinsonian efficacy by assessing the role of adenosine A₁ and A_2A receptors (A₁R and A_2AR) on GUO-mediated anti-tremor effects in the reserpinized mouse model of PD. Reserpinized mice showed elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and cellular membrane damage in striatal slices assessed ex vivo and GUO treatment reversed ROS production. Interestingly, while the simultaneous administration of sub-effective doses of GUO (5 mg/kg) and SCH58261 (0.01 mg/kg), an A_2AR antagonist, precluded reserpine-induced TJMs, these were ineffective on reverting ROS production in ex vivo experiments. Importantly, GUO was able to reduce TJM and ROS production in reserpinized mouse lacking the A_2AR, thus suggesting an A_2AR-independent mechanism of GUO-mediated effects. Conversely, the administration of DPCPX (0.75 mg/kg), an A₁R antagonist, completely abolished both GUO-mediated anti-tremor effects and blockade of ROS production. Overall, these results indicated that GUO anti-tremor and antioxidant effects in reserpinized mice were A₁R dependent but A_2AR independent, thus suggesting a differential participation of adenosine receptors in GUO-mediated effects.

Adenosine heteroreceptor complexes in the basal ganglia are implicated in Parkinson's disease and its treatment

The adenosine homo, iso and heteroreceptor complexes in the basal ganglia play a highly significant role in modulating the indirect and direct pathways and the striosomal projections to the nigro-striatal DA system. The major adenosine receptor complexes in the striato-pallidal GABA neurons can be the A2AR-D2R and A2AR-D2R-mGluR5 receptor complexes, in which A2AR protomers and mGluR5 protomers can allosterically interact to inhibit D2R protomer signaling. Through a reorganization of these heteroreceptor complexes upon chronic dopaminergic treatment a pathological and prolonged inhibition of D2R receptor protomer signaling can develop with motor inhibition and wearing off of the therapeutic effects of levodopa and dopamine receptor agonists. The direct pathway is enriched in D1R in and around glutamate synapses enhancing the ability of these GABA neurons to be activated and increase motor initiation. The brake on these GABA neurons is in this case exerted by A1R forming A1R-D1R heteroreceptor complexes in which they allosterically inhibit D1R signaling and thereby reduce motor initiation. Upon chronic levodopa treatment a reorganization of the D1R heteroreceptor complexes develops with the formation of putative A1R-D1R-D3 in addition to D1R-D3R complexes in which D3R enhances D1R protomer signaling and may make the A1R protomer brake less effective. Alpha-synuclein monomers-dimers are postulated to form complexes with A2AR homo and heteroprotomers in the plasma membrane enhancing alpha-synuclein aggregation and toxicity. The alpha-synuclein fibrils formed in the A2AR enriched dendritic spines of the striato-pallidal GABA neurons may reach the surrounding DA terminals via extracellular-vesicle-mediated volume transmission involving internalization of the vesicles and their cargo (alpha-synuclein fibrils) into the vulnerable DA terminals, enhancing their degeneration followed by retrograde flow of these fibrils in the DA axons to the vulnerable nigral DA nerve cells.

Brain Dopamine Transmission in Health and Parkinson's Disease: Modulation of Synaptic Transmission and Plasticity Through Volume Transmission and Dopamine Heteroreceptors

This perspective article provides observations supporting the view that nigro-striatal dopamine neurons and meso-limbic dopamine neurons mainly communicate through short distance volume transmission in the um range with dopamine diffusing into extrasynaptic and synaptic regions of glutamate and GABA synapses. Based on this communication it is discussed how volume transmission modulates synaptic glutamate transmission onto the D1R modulated direct and D2R modulated indirect GABA pathways of the dorsal striatum. Each nigro-striatal dopamine neuron was first calculated to form large numbers of neostriatal DA nerve terminals and then found to give rise to dense axonal arborizations spread over the neostriatum, from which dopamine is released. These neurons can through DA volume transmission directly influence not only the striatal GABA projection neurons but all the striatal cell types in parallel. It includes the GABA nerve cells forming the island-/striosome GABA pathway to the nigral dopamine cells, the striatal cholinergic interneurons and the striatal GABA interneurons. The dopamine modulation of the different striatal nerve cell types involves the five dopamine receptor subtypes, D1R to D5R receptors, and their formation of multiple extrasynaptic and synaptic dopamine homo and heteroreceptor complexes. These features of the nigro-striatal dopamine neuron to modulate in parallel the activity of practically all the striatal nerve cell types in the dorsal striatum, through the dopamine receptor complexes allows us to understand its unique and crucial fine-tuning of movements, which is lost in Parkinson's disease. Integration of striatal dopamine signals with other transmitter systems in the striatum mainly takes place via the receptor-receptor interactions in dopamine heteroreceptor complexes. Such molecular events also participate in the integration of volume transmission and synaptic transmission. Dopamine modulation of the glutamate synapses on the dorsal striato-pallidal GABA pathway involves D2R heteroreceptor complexes such as D2R-NMDAR, A2AR-D2R, and NTSR1-D2R heteroreceptor complexes. The dopamine modulation of glutamate synapses on the striato-entopeduncular/nigral pathway takes place mainly via D1R heteroreceptor complexes such as D1R-NMDAR, A2R-D1R, and D1R-D3R heteroreceptor complexes. Dopamine modulation of the island/striosome compartment of the dorsal striatum projecting to the nigral dopamine cells involve D4R-MOR heteroreceptor complexes. All these receptor-receptor interactions have relevance for Parkinson's disease and its treatment.

Adenosine A1-Dopamine D1 Receptor Heteromers Control the Excitability of the Spinal Motoneuron

While the role of the ascending dopaminergic system in brain function and dysfunction has been a subject of extensive research, the role of the descending dopaminergic system in spinal cord function and dysfunction is just beginning to be understood. Adenosine plays a key role in the inhibitory control of the ascending dopaminergic system, largely dependent on functional complexes of specific subtypes of adenosine and dopamine receptors. Combining a selective destabilizing peptide strategy with a proximity ligation assay and patch-clamp electrophysiology in slices from male mouse lumbar spinal cord, the present study demonstrates the existence of adenosine A₁-dopamine D₁ receptor heteromers in the spinal motoneuron by which adenosine tonically inhibits D₁ receptor-mediated signaling. A₁-D₁ receptor heteromers play a significant control of the motoneuron excitability, represent main targets for the excitatory effects of caffeine in the spinal cord and can constitute new targets for the pharmacological therapy after spinal cord injury, motor aging-associated disorders and restless legs syndrome.

Modulation of spinal motor networks by astrocyte-derived adenosine is dependent on D1-like dopamine receptor signaling

Astrocytes modulate many neuronal networks, including spinal networks responsible for the generation of locomotor behavior. Astrocytic modulation of spinal motor circuits involves release of ATP from astrocytes, hydrolysis of ATP to adenosine, and subsequent activation of neuronal A₁ adenosine receptors (A₁Rs). The net effect of this pathway is a reduction in the frequency of locomotor-related activity. Recently, it was proposed that A₁Rs modulate burst frequency by blocking the D₁-like dopamine receptor (D₁LR) signaling pathway; however, adenosine also modulates ventral horn circuits by dopamine-independent pathways. Here, we demonstrate that adenosine produced upon astrocytic stimulation modulates locomotor-related activity by counteracting the excitatory effects of D₁LR signaling and does not act by previously described dopamine-independent pathways. In spinal cord preparations from postnatal mice, a D₁LR agonist, SKF 38393, increased the frequency of locomotor-related bursting induced by 5-hydroxytryptamine and N-methyl-d-aspartate. Bath-applied adenosine reduced burst frequency only in the presence of SKF 38393, as did adenosine produced after activation of protease-activated receptor-1 to stimulate astrocytes. Furthermore, the A₁R antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine enhanced burst frequency only in the presence of SKF 38393, indicating that endogenous adenosine produced by astrocytes during network activity also acts by modulating D₁LR signaling. Finally, modulation of bursting by adenosine released upon stimulation of astrocytes was blocked by protein kinase inhibitor-(14-22) amide, a protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor, consistent with A₁R-mediated antagonism of the D₁LR/adenylyl cyclase/PKA pathway. Together, these findings support a novel, astrocytic mechanism of metamodulation within the mammalian spinal cord, highlighting the complexity of the molecular interactions that specify motor output. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Astrocytes within the spinal cord produce adenosine during ongoing locomotor-related activity or when experimentally stimulated. Here, we show that adenosine derived from astrocytes acts at A₁ receptors to inhibit a pathway by which D₁-like receptors enhance the frequency of locomotor-related bursting. These data support a novel form of metamodulation within the mammalian spinal cord, enhancing our understanding of neuron-astrocyte interactions and their importance in shaping network activity.

Caffeine Protects Dopaminergic Neurons From Dopamine-Induced Neurodegeneration via Synergistic Adenosine-Dopamine D2-Like Receptor Interactions in Transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans

Previous studies have suggested that caffeine reduces the risk of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia. However, caffeine is also known to promote dopamine signaling, which seemingly contradicts this observed effect. To this end, the study aimed to clarify the mechanism of caffeine neuroprotection in vivo when excess dopamine is present. Transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans (UA57) overproducing dopamine was exposed to caffeine for 7 days and monitored by observing GFP-tagged dopaminergic (DA) neurons via fluorescence microscopy. Caffeine (10 mM) prevented neuronal cell loss in 96% of DA neurons, with a mean GFP intensity that is 40% higher than control (0.1% DMSO). To confirm if cAMP plays a role in the observed neuroprotection by caffeine, cAMP levels were elevated via forskolin (10 μM), an adenylyl cyclase activator. Forskolin (10 μM) exposure did not confer neuroprotection and was similar to control (0.1% DMSO) at the 7th day, suggesting that cAMP is not the sole secondary messenger utilized. Rotigotine (160 μM), a dopamine D2-like receptor (DOP2R) agonist, was not able to confer significant neuroprotection to the nematodes. This suggests that DOP2R activation is necessary but insufficient to mimic neuroprotection by caffeine. Lastly, co-administration of caffeine (10 mM) with olanzapine (160 μM), a DOP2R antagonist, eliminated neuroprotection. This suggests that the protective effect must involve both adenosine receptor antagonism and activation of DOP2Rs. Taken together, we show that caffeine protects DA neurons from dopamine-induced neurodegeneration and acts by modulating adenosine receptor-DOP2R interactions in C. elegans.

Gliotransmission and adenosinergic modulation: insights from mammalian spinal motor networks

Astrocytes are proposed to converse with neurons at tripartite synapses, detecting neurotransmitter release and responding with release of gliotransmitters, which in turn modulate synaptic strength and neuronal excitability. However, a paucity of evidence from behavioral studies calls into question the importance of gliotransmission for the operation of the nervous system in healthy animals. Central pattern generator (CPG) networks in the spinal cord and brain stem coordinate the activation of muscles during stereotyped activities such as locomotion, inspiration, and mastication and may therefore provide tractable models in which to assess the contribution of gliotransmission to behaviorally relevant neural activity. We review evidence for gliotransmission within spinal locomotor networks, including studies indicating that adenosine derived from astrocytes regulates the speed of locomotor activity via metamodulation of dopamine signaling.

Adenosine receptors as markers of brain iron deficiency: Implications for Restless Legs Syndrome

Deficits of sensorimotor integration with periodic limb movements during sleep (PLMS) and hyperarousal and sleep disturbances in Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) constitute two pathophysiologically distinct but interrelated clinical phenomena, which seem to depend mostly on alterations in dopaminergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission, respectively. Brain iron deficiency is considered as a main pathogenetic mechanism in RLS. Rodents with brain iron deficiency represent a valuable pathophysiological model of RLS, although they do not display motor disturbances. Nevertheless, they develop the main neurochemical dopaminergic changes found in RLS, such as decrease in striatal dopamine D₂ receptor density. On the other hand, brain iron deficient mice exhibit the characteristic pattern of hyperarousal in RLS, providing a tool to find the link between brain iron deficiency and sleep disturbances in RLS. The present study provides evidence for a role of the endogenous sleep-promoting factor adenosine. Three different experimental preparations, long-term (22 weeks) severe or moderate iron-deficient (ID) diets (3- or 7-ppm iron diet) in mice and short-term (3 weeks) severe ID diet (3-ppm iron diet) in rats, demonstrated a significant downregulation (Western blotting in mouse and radioligand binding saturation experiments in rat brain tissue) of adenosine A₁ receptors (A1R) in the cortex and striatum, concomitant to striatal D2R downregulation. On the other hand, the previously reported upregulation of adenosine A_2A receptors (A2AR) was only observed with severe ID in both mice and rats. The results suggest a key role for A1R downregulation in the PLMS and hyperarousal in RLS.

Cannabinoid-induced depression of synaptic transmission is switched to stimulation when dopaminergic tone is increased in the globus pallidus of the rodent

Because activation of D2 receptors reverses the neurochemical effects of cannabinoids, we examined whether increasing dopaminergic tone in the globus pallidus (GPe) switches cannabinoid induced depression of synaptic transmission. GABAergic synaptic currents evoked in pallidal neurons by stimulation of striatal projections (IPSCs) were depressed by perfusion with the CB1R agonist ACEA. Coactivation of D2Rs with quinpirole converted the depression into stimulation. Pretreatment with pertussis toxin (PTX) to limit Gi/o protein coupling also switched the CB1R-induced depression of IPSCs. The stimulation of IPSCs was blocked by the selective PKA blocker H89. Changes in the paired pulse ratio during both inhibitory and stimulatory responses indicate that the effects are due to changes in transmitter release. Postsynaptic depolarization induces endocannabinoid release that inhibits transmitter release (DSI). When D2Rs were activated with quinpirole, depolarization increased transmission instead of depressing it. This increase was blocked by AM251. We also examined the effects of CB1R/D2R coactivation on cAMP accumulation in the GPe to further verify that the AC/PKA cascade is involved. CB1R/D2R coactivation converted the inhibition of cAMP seen when each receptor is stimulated alone into a stimulation. We also determined the effects on turning behavior of unilateral injection of ACEA into the GPe of awake animals and its modification by dopamine antagonists. Blockade of D2 family receptors with sulpiride antagonized the motor effects of ACEA. We show, for the first time, that cannabinoid-inhibition of synaptic transmission in the GPe becomes a stimulation after D2Rs or PTX treatment and that the switch is probably relevant for the control of motor behavior.

Mechanisms of the psychostimulant effects of caffeine: implications for substance use disorders

BACKGROUND

The psychostimulant properties of caffeine are reviewed and compared with those of prototypical psychostimulants able to cause substance use disorders (SUD). Caffeine produces psychomotor-activating, reinforcing, and arousing effects, which depend on its ability to disinhibit the brake that endogenous adenosine imposes on the ascending dopamine and arousal systems.

OBJECTIVES

A model that considers the striatal adenosine A2A-dopamine D2 receptor heteromer as a key modulator of dopamine-dependent striatal functions (reward-oriented behavior and learning of stimulus-reward and reward-response associations) is introduced, which should explain most of the psychomotor and reinforcing effects of caffeine.

HIGHLIGHTS

The model can explain the caffeine-induced rotational behavior in rats with unilateral striatal dopamine denervation and the ability of caffeine to reverse the adipsic-aphagic syndrome in dopamine-deficient rodents. The model can also explain the weaker reinforcing effects and low abuse liability of caffeine, compared with prototypical psychostimulants. Finally, the model can explain the actual major societal dangers of caffeine: the ability of caffeine to potentiate the addictive and toxic effects of drugs of abuse, with the particularly alarming associations of caffeine (as adulterant) with cocaine, amphetamine derivatives, synthetic cathinones, and energy drinks with alcohol, and the higher sensitivity of children and adolescents to the psychostimulant effects of caffeine and its potential to increase vulnerability to SUD.

CONCLUSIONS

The striatal A2A-D2 receptor heteromer constitutes an unequivocal main pharmacological target of caffeine and provides the main mechanisms by which caffeine potentiates the acute and long-term effects of prototypical psychostimulants.

Modulation of dopamine-mediated facilitation at the neuromuscular junction of Wistar rats: A role for adenosine A1/A2A receptors and P2 purinoceptors

This study aims to understand how dopamine and the neuromodulators, adenosine and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) modulate neuromuscular transmission. Adenosine and ATP are well-recognized for their regulatory effects on dopamine in the central nervous system. However, if similar interactions occur at the neuromuscular junction is unknown. We hypothesize that the activation of adenosine A1/A2A and/or P2 purinoceptors may influence the action of dopamine on neuromuscular transmission. Using the rat phrenic nerve hemi-diaphragm, we assessed the influence of dopamine, adenosine and ATP on the height of nerve-evoked muscle twitches. We investigated how the selective blockade of adenosine A1 receptors (2.5nM DPCPX), adenosine A2A receptors (50nM CSC) and P2 purinoceptors (100μM suramin) modified the effects of dopamine. Dopamine alone increased indirect muscle contractions while adenosine and ATP either enhanced or depressed nerve-evoked muscle twitches in a concentration-dependent manner. The facilitatory effects of 256μM dopamine were significantly reduced to 29.62±2.79% or 53.69±5.45% in the presence of DPCPX or CSC, respectively, relative to 70.03±1.57% with dopamine alone. Alternatively, the action of 256μM dopamine was potentiated from 70.03±1.57, in the absence of suramin, to 86.83±4.36%, in the presence of suramin. It can be concluded that the activation of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors and P2 purinoceptors potentially play a central role in the regulation of dopamine effects at the neuromuscular junction. Clinically this study offers new insights for the indirect manipulation of neuromuscular transmission for the treatment of disorders characterized by motor dysfunction.

Caffeine stimulates locomotor activity in the mammalian spinal cord via adenosine A1 receptor-dopamine D1 receptor interaction and PKA-dependent mechanisms

Caffeine is a potent psychostimulant that can have significant and widely variable effects on the activity of multiple neuronal pathways. The most pronounced caffeine-induced behavioral effect seen in rodents is to increase locomotor activity which has been linked to a dose-dependent inhibition of A1 and A(2A) receptors. The effects of caffeine at the level of the lumbar spinal central pattern generator (CPG) network for hindlimb locomotion are lacking. We assessed the effects of caffeine to the locomotor function of the spinal CPG network via extracellular ventral root recordings using the isolated neonatal mouse spinal cord preparation. Addition of caffeine and of an A1 receptor antagonist significantly decreased the cycle period accelerating the ongoing locomotor rhythm, while decreasing burst duration reversibly in most preparations suggesting the role of A1 receptors as the primary target of caffeine. Caffeine and an A1 receptor antagonist failed to stimulate ongoing locomotor activity in the absence of dopamine or in the presence of a D1 receptor antagonist supporting A1/D1 receptor-dependent mechanism of action. The use of caffeine or an A1 receptor blocker failed to stimulate an ongoing locomotor rhythm in the presence of a blocker of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) supporting the need of this intracellular pathway for the modulatory effects of caffeine to occur. These results support a stimulant effect of caffeine on the lumbar spinal network controlling hindlimb locomotion through the inhibition of A1 receptors and subsequent activation of D1 receptors via a PKA-dependent intracellular mechanism.

The safety of istradefylline for the treatment of Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

Antagonism of the A2A receptor improves motor behavior in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), according to results of clinical studies which confirm findings of previous experimental research. The xanthine derivative, istradefylline , has the longest half-life out of the available A2A receptor antagonists. Istradefylline easily crosses the blood-brain barrier and shows a high affinity to the human A2A receptor.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review aims to discuss the safety and tolerability of istradefylline against the background of the currently available drug portfolio for the treatment of PD patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Istradefylline was safe and well tolerated in clinical trials, which have focused on l-DOPA-treated PD patients. The future of istradefylline as a complementary drug for modulation of the dopaminergic neurotransmission also relies on its potential to act like an l-DOPA plus dopamine agonist sparing future treatment alternative and to reduce the risk of predominant l-DOPA-related onset of motor complications in addition to its direct ameliorating effect on motor symptoms. Dopamine-substituting drugs may dose-dependently produce systemic side effects, particularly onset of hypotension and nausea by peripheral dopamine receptor stimulation. Istradefylline does not interfere with these peripheral receptors and therefore shows a good safety and tolerability profile.

Dopamine heteroreceptor complexes as therapeutic targets in Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

Several types of D2R and D1R heteroreceptor complexes were discovered in the indirect and direct pathways of the striatum, respectively. The hypothesis is given that changes in the function of the dopamine heteroreceptor complexes may help us understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the motor complications of long-term therapy in Parkinson's disease (PD) with l-DOPA and dopamine receptor agonists.

AREAS COVERED

In the indirect pathway, the potential role of the A2AR-D2R, A2AR-D2R-mGluR5 and D2R-NMDAR heteroreceptor complexes in PD are covered and in the direct pathway, the D1R-D3R, A1R-D1R, D1R-NMDAR and putative A1R-D1R-D3R heteroreceptor complexes.

EXPERT OPINION

One explanation for the more powerful ability of l-DOPA treatment versus treatment with the partial dopamine receptor agonist/antagonist activity to induce dyskinesias, may be that dopamine formed from l-DOPA acts as a full agonist. The field of D1R and D2R heteroreceptor complexes in the CNS opens up a new understanding of the wearing off of the antiparkinson actions of l-DOPA and dopamine receptor agonists and the production of l-DOPA-induced dyskinesias. It can involve a reorganization of the D1R and D2R heteroreceptor complexes and a disbalance of the D1R and D2R homomers versus non-dopamine receptor homomers in the direct and indirect pathways.

The role of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors in the caffeine effect on MDMA-induced DA and 5-HT release in the mouse striatum

3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, “ecstasy”) popular as a designer drug is often used with caffeine to gain a stronger stimulant effect. MDMA induces 5-HT and DA release by interaction with monoamine transporters. Co-administration of caffeine and MDMA may aggravate MDMA-induced toxic effects on DA and 5-HT terminals. In the present study, we determined whether caffeine influences DA and 5-HT release induced by MDMA. We also tried to find out if adenosine A1 and A2A receptors play a role in the effect of caffeine by investigating the effect of the selective adenosine A1 and A2A receptor antagonists, DPCPX and KW 6002 on DA and 5-HT release induced by MDMA. Mice were treated with caffeine (10 mg/kg) and MDMA (20 or 40 mg/kg) alone or in combination. DA and 5-HT release in the mouse striatum was measured using in vivo microdialysis. Caffeine exacerbated the effect of MDMA on DA and 5-HT release. DPCPX or KW 6002 co-administered with MDMA had similar influence as caffeine, but KW 6002 was more potent than caffeine or DPCPX. To exclude the contribution of MAO inhibition by caffeine in the caffeine effect on MDMA-induced increase in DA and 5-HT, we also tested the effect of the nonxanthine adenosine receptor antagonist CGS 15943A lacking properties of MAO activity modification. Our findings indicate that adenosine A1 and A2A receptor blockade may account for the caffeine-induced exacerbation of the MDMA effect on DA and 5-HT release and may aggravate MDMA toxicity.

Disease-specific heteromerization of G-protein-coupled receptors that target drugs of abuse

Drugs of abuse such as morphine or marijuana exert their effects through the activation of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the opioid and cannabinoid receptors, respectively. Moreover, interactions between either of these receptors have been shown to be involved in the rewarding effects of drugs of abuse. Recent advances in the field, using a variety of approaches, have demonstrated that many GPCRs, including opioid, cannabinoid, and dopamine receptors, can form associations between different receptor subtypes or with other GPCRs to form heteromeric complexes. The formation of these complexes, in turn, leads to the modulation of the properties of individual protomers. The development of tools that can selectively disrupt GPCR heteromers as well as monoclonal antibodies that can selectively block signaling by specific heteromer pairs has indicated that heteromers involving opioid, cannabinoid, or dopamine receptors may play a role in various disease states. In this review, we describe evidence for opioid, cannabinoid, and dopamine receptor heteromerization and the potential role of GPCR heteromers in pathophysiological conditions.

Caffeinated Alcoholic Beverages - An Emerging Trend in Alcohol Abuse

Alcohol use disorders are pervasive in society and their impact affects quality of life, morbidity and mortality, as well as individual productivity. Alcohol has detrimental effects on an individual’s physiology and nervous system, and is associated with disorders of many organ and endocrine systems impacting an individual’s health, behavior, and ability to interact with others. Youth are particularly affected. Unfortunately, adolescent usage also increases the probability for a progression to dependence. Several areas of research indicate that the deleterious effects of alcohol abuse may be exacerbated by mixing caffeine with alcohol. Some behavioral evidence suggests that caffeine increases alcohol drinking and binge drinking episodes, which in turn can foster the development of alcohol dependence. As a relatively new public health concern, the epidemiological focus has been to establish a need for investigating the effects of caffeinated alcohol. While the trend of co-consuming these substances is growing, knowledge of the central mechanisms associated with caffeinated ethanol has been lacking. Research suggests that caffeine and ethanol can have additive or synergistic pharmacological actions and neuroadaptations, with the adenosine and dopamine systems in particular implicated. However, the limited literature on the central effects of caffeinated ethanol provides an impetus to increase our knowledge of the neuroadaptive effects of this combination and their impact on cognition and behavior. Research from our laboratories indicates that an established rodent animal model of alcoholism can be extended to investigate the acute and chronic effects of caffeinated ethanol.

Dysregulation of brain adenosine is detrimental to the expression of conditioned freezing but not general Pavlovian learning

Glutamatergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission is modulated by adenosine, whose ambient level in the brain is in turn regulated by the metabolic enzyme, adenosine kinase (ADK). Brain adenosinergic tone can therefore be effectively reduced and increased by up- and down-regulation of ADK expression, respectively. Although changes in brain ADK levels can yield multiple behavioral effects, the precise functional significance of telencephalon (neocortical and limbic structures) adenosine remains ill-defined. Among the phenotypes identified in transgenic mice with brain-wide ADK overexpression (ADK(TG) mice) and reduced adenosinergic tone, working memory deficiency and potentiated response to systemic N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor blockade were exacerbated by the introduction of local ADK disruption (elevated adenosinergic tone) restricted to the telencephalon (ADK(TG):ADK(Tel-def) mice). These two phenotypes, which are central to schizophrenia cognitive/negative symptoms, appear to be regulated by adenosinergic activities within and outside the telencephalon in a complementary manner. Here, we extended this unique comparison between ADK(TG) mice ADK(TG):ADK(Tel-def) mice to another prominent phenotype previously documented in ADK(TG) mice - namely, impaired Pavlovian conditioned freezing. We found that ADK(TG):ADK(Tel-def) mice again were associated with a more severe phenotype while sharing a similar phenotype profile. Furthermore, we qualified that this Pavlovian phenotype did not translate into a general deficiency in associative learning, since no such deficit was evident in three other (aversive and appetitive) Pavlovian learning paradigms. The present study has thus identified a hitherto unknown function of brain adenosine: the execution of conditioned freezing behavior, which is dependent on the balance of adenosinergic changes between the telencephalon and the rest of the brain.

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of bivalent ligands against A(1)-D(1) receptor heteromers

AIM

To design and synthesize bivalent ligands for adenosine A1-dopamine D1 receptor heteromers (A1-D1R), and evaluate their pharmacological activities.

METHODS

Bivalent ligands and their corresponding A1R monovalent ligands were designed and synthesized. The affinities of the bivalent ligands for A1R and D1R in rat brain membrane preparation were examined using radiolabeled binding assays. To demonstrate the formation of A1-D1R, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) was conducted in HEK293 cells transfected with D1-CFP and A1-YFP. Molecular modeling was used to analyze the possible mode of protein-protein and protein-ligand interactions.

RESULTS

Two bivalent ligands for A1R and D1R (20a, 20b), as well as the corresponding A1R monovalent ligands (21a, 21b) were synthesized. In radiolabeled binding assays, the bivalent ligands showed affinities for A1R 10-100 times higher than those of the corresponding monovalent ligands. In FRET experiments, the bivalent ligands significantly increased the heterodimerization of A1R and D1R compared with the corresponding monovalent ligands. A heterodimer model with the interface of helixes 3, 4, 5 of A1R and helixes 1, 6, 7 from D1R was established with molecular modeling. The distance between the two ligand binding sites in the heterodimer model was approximately 48.4 Å, which was shorter than the length of the bivalent ligands.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the existence of A1-D1R in situ and a simultaneous interaction of bivalent ligands with both the receptors.

Adenosine receptor containing oligomers: their role in the control of dopamine and glutamate neurotransmission in the brain

While the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) oligomerization has been questioned during the last fifteen years, the existence of a multi-receptor complex involving direct receptor-receptor interactions, called receptor oligomers, begins to be widely accepted. Eventually, it has been postulated that oligomers constitute a distinct functional form of the GPCRs with essential receptorial features. Also, it has been proven, under certain circumstances, that the GPCR oligomerization phenomenon is crucial for the receptor biosynthesis, maturation, trafficking, plasma membrane diffusion, and pharmacology and signalling. Adenosine receptors are GPCRs that mediate the physiological functions of adenosine and indeed these receptors do also oligomerize. Accordingly, adenosine receptor oligomers may improve the molecular mechanism by which extracellular adenosine signals are transferred to the G proteins in the process of receptor transduction. Importantly, these adenosine receptor-containing oligomers may allow not only the control of the adenosinergic function but also the fine-tuning modulation of other neurotransmitter systems (i.e. dopaminergic and glutamatergic transmission). Overall, we underscore here recent significant developments based on adenosine receptor oligomerization that are essential for acquiring a better understanding of neurotransmission in the central nervous system under normal and pathological conditions.

Adenosine hypothesis of schizophrenia--opportunities for pharmacotherapy

Pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia based on the dopamine hypothesis remains unsatisfactory for the negative and cognitive symptoms of the disease. Enhancing N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDAR) function is expected to alleviate such persistent symptoms, but successful development of novel clinically effective compounds remains challenging. Adenosine is a homeostatic bioenergetic network modulator that is able to affect complex networks synergistically at different levels (receptor-dependent pathways, biochemistry, bioenergetics, and epigenetics). By affecting brain dopamine and glutamate activities, it represents a promising candidate for reversing the functional imbalance in these neurotransmitter systems believed to underlie the genesis of schizophrenia symptoms, as well as restoring homeostasis of bioenergetics. Suggestion of an adenosine hypothesis of schizophrenia further posits that adenosinergic dysfunction might contribute to the emergence of multiple neurotransmitter dysfunctions characteristic of schizophrenia via diverse mechanisms. Given the importance of adenosine in early brain development and regulation of brain immune response, it also bears direct relevance to the aetiology of schizophrenia. Here, we provide an overview of the rationale and evidence in support of the therapeutic potential of multiple adenosinergic targets, including the high-affinity adenosine receptors (A(1)R and A(2A)R), and the regulatory enzyme adenosine kinase (ADK). Key preliminary clinical data and preclinical findings are reviewed.

Differential effects of selective adenosine antagonists on the effort-related impairments induced by dopamine D1 and D2 antagonism

Mesolimbic dopamine (DA) is a critical component of the brain circuitry regulating behavioral activation and effort-related processes. Rats with impaired DA transmission reallocate their instrumental behavior away from food-reinforced tasks with high response requirements, and instead select less effortful food-seeking behaviors. Previous work showed that adenosine A(2A) antagonists can reverse the effects of DA D(2) antagonists on effort-related choice. However, less is known about the effects of adenosine A(1) antagonists. Despite anatomical data showing that A(1) and D(1) receptors are co-localized on the same striatal neurons, it is uncertain if A(1) antagonists can reverse the effects DA D(1) antagonists. The present work systematically compared the ability of adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptor antagonists to reverse the effects of DA D(1) and D(2) antagonists on a concurrent lever pressing/feeding choice task. With this procedure, rats can choose between responding on a fixed ratio 5 lever-pressing schedule for a highly preferred food (i.e. high carbohydrate pellets) vs. approaching and consuming a less preferred rodent chow. The D(1) antagonist ecopipam (0.2 mg/kg i.p.) and the D(2) antagonist eticlopride (0.08 mg/kg i.p.) altered choice behavior, reducing lever pressing and increasing lab chow intake. Co-administration of the adenosine A(1) receptor antagonists 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX; 0.375, 0.75, and 1.5 mg/kg i.p.), and 8-cyclopentyltheophylline (CPT; 3.0, 6.0, 12.0 mg/kg i.p.) failed to reverse the effects of either the D(1) or D(2) antagonist. In contrast, the adenosine A(2A) antagonist KW-6002 (0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg i.p.) was able to produce a robust reversal of the effects of eticlopride, as well as a mild partial reversal of the effects of ecopipam. Adenosine A(2A) and DA D(2) receptors interact to regulate effort-related choice behavior, which may have implications for the treatment of psychiatric symptoms such as psychomotor slowing, fatigue or anergia that can be observed in depression and other disorders.

Adenosine-dopamine interactions in the pathophysiology and treatment of CNS disorders

Adenosine-dopamine interactions in the central nervous system (CNS) have been studied for many years in view of their relevance for disorders of the CNS and their treatments. The discovery of adenosine and dopamine receptor containing receptor mosaics (RM, higher-order receptor heteromers) in the striatum opened up a new understanding of these interactions. Initial findings indicated the existence of A(2A)R-D(2)R heterodimers and A(1)R-D(1)R heterodimers in the striatum that were followed by indications for the existence of striatal A(2A)R-D(3)R and A(2A)R-D(4)R heterodimers. Of particular interest was the demonstration that antagonistic allosteric A(2A)-D(2) and A(1)-D(1) receptor-receptor interactions take place in striatal A(2A)R-D(2)R and A(1)R-D(1)R heteromers. As a consequence, additional characterization of these heterodimers led to new aspects on the pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease (PD), schizophrenia, drug addiction, and l-DOPA-induced dyskinesias relevant for their treatments. In fact, A(2A)R antagonists were introduced in the symptomatic treatment of PD in view of the discovery of the antagonistic A(2A)R-D(2)R interaction in the dorsal striatum that leads to reduced D(2)R recognition and G(i/o) coupling in striato-pallidal GABAergic neurons. In recent years, indications have been obtained that A(2A)R-D(2)R and A(1)R-D(1)R heteromers do not exist as heterodimers, rather as RM. In fact, A(2A)-CB(1)-D(2) RM and A(2A)-D(2)-mGlu(5) RM have been discovered using a sequential BRET-FRET technique and by using the BRET technique in combination with bimolecular fluorescence complementation. Thus, other pathogenic mechanisms beside the well-known alterations in the release and/or decoding of dopamine in the basal ganglia and limbic system are involved in PD, schizophrenia and drug addiction. In fact, alterations in the stoichiometry and/or topology of A(2A)-CB(1)-D(2) and A(2A)-D(2)-mGlu5 RM may play a role. Thus, the integrative receptor-receptor interactions in these RM give novel aspects on the pathophysiology and treatment strategies, based on combined treatments, for PD, schizophrenia, and drug addiction.

The effects of systemic, intrastriatal, and intrapallidal injections of caffeine and systemic injections of A2A and A1 antagonists on forepaw stepping in the unilateral 6-OHDA-lesioned rat

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Given that adenosine A2A antagonists appear to be therapeutic in several animal models of Parkinson's disease (PD), we examined the extent to which caffeine and selective A2A and A1 antagonists could enhance contralateral forepaw stepping in the unilateral 6-OHDA-lesioned rat.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following unilateral injections of 12 microg 6-OHDA into the medial forebrain bundle (MFB), frequency of stepping with both front paws was counted separately as the paws were dragged anteriorally and laterally by a treadmill.

RESULTS

The MFB lesions decreased contralateral stepping by 74-83%, and 8 mg/kg 3,4-dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine (L-DOPA) increased contralateral stepping by 25-26%. Caffeine given systemically (15 mg/kg) or into the dorsal striatum or external globus pallidus (GPE; 20-40 microg) increased contralateral forepaw stepping by 14%, 27%, and 26%, respectively, and enhanced the effect of 8 mg/kg L-DOPA on stepping. The selective A(2A) antagonist SCH-58261 (2 mg/kg) also increased stepping by 13% and enhanced the therapeutic effect of L-DOPA, whereas the selective A(1) [corrected] antagonist 8-cyclopentyltheophylline (3-7 mg/kg) and A(1) agonist N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (0.03-0.2 mg/kg) had no effect. None of these drugs appeared to produce dyskinesic effects.

CONCLUSIONS

In this well-validated animal model of the akinesic effects of PD, caffeine and a selective A2A, but not an A1, antagonist were able to provide both monotherapeutic and adjunctive therapeutic effects. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that A2A antagonists may be therapeutic in human PD patients and indicate that the dorsal striatum and GPE are critical sites of therapeutic action.

Pharmacological characterization of a novel, potent adenosine A1 and A2A receptor dual antagonist, 5-[5-amino-3-(4-fluorophenyl)pyrazin-2-yl]-1-isopropylpyridine-2(1H)-one (ASP5854), in models of Parkinson's disease and cognition

Central adenosine A(2A) receptor is a promising target for drugs to treat Parkinson's disease (PD), and the central blockade of adenosine A(1) receptor improves cognitive function. In the present study, we investigated the effect of a novel adenosine A(1) and A(2A) dual antagonist, 5-[5-amino-3-(4-fluorophenyl) pyrazin-2-yl]-1-isopropylpyridine-2(1H)-one (ASP5854), in animal models of PD and cognition. The binding affinities of ASP5854 for human A(1) and A(2A) receptors were 9.03 and 1.76 nM, respectively, with higher specificity and no species differences. ASP5854 also showed antagonistic action on A(1) and A(2A) agonist-induced increases of intracellular Ca(2+) concentration. ASP5854 ameliorated A(2A) agonist 2-[p-(2-carboxyethyl) phenethylamino]-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (CGS21680)- and haloperidol-induced catalepsy in mice, with the minimum effective doses of 0.32 and 0.1 mg/kg, respectively, and it also improved haloperidol-induced catalepsy in rats at doses higher than 0.1 mg/kg. In unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats, ASP5854 significantly potentiated l-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA)-induced rotational behavior at doses higher than 0.032 mg/kg. ASP5854 also significantly restored the striatal dopamine content reduced by 1-metyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine treatment in mice at doses higher than 0.1 mg/kg. Furthermore, in the rat passive avoidance test, ASP5854 significantly reversed the scopolamine-induced memory deficits, whereas the specific adenosine A(2A) antagonist 8-((E)-2-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)ethenyl)-1,3-diethyl-7-methyl-3,7-dihydro-1H-purine-2,6-dione (KW-6002; istradefylline) did not. Scopolamine- or 5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine (dizocilpine maleate) (MK-801)-induced impairment of spontaneous alternation in the mouse Y-maze test was ameliorated by ASP5854, whereas KW-6002 did not exert improvement at therapeutically relevant dosages. These results demonstrate that the novel, selective, and orally active dual adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors antagonist ASP5854 improves motor impairments, is neuroprotective via A(2A) antagonism, and also enhances cognitive function through A(1) antagonism.

Adenosine receptor–dopamine receptor interactions in the basal ganglia and their relevance for brain function

The dopamine D1 and D2 receptors are major receptors in the regulation of striatal function and striatal adenosine A1 and A2A receptors are major modulators of their signaling. The evidence suggests the existence of antagonistic A1-D1 heteromeric receptor complexes in the basal ganglia and prefrontal cortex and especially in the direct striatonigral-striatoentopeduncular GABA pathways. The neurochemical and behavioral findings showing antagonistic A1-D1 receptor interactions can be explained by the existence of such A1-D1 heteromeric receptor complexes and of antagonistic interactions at the level of the second messengers. In contrast, A2A-D2 receptor heteromers may exist in the dorsal and ventral striato-pallidal GABA pathways, where activation of A2A receptors reduces D2 receptor recognition, coupling and signaling. As a result of the A2A receptor-induced reduction of D2 receptor signaling, the activity of these GABA neurons is increased resulting in reduced motor and reward functions mediated via the indirect pathway, causing a reduced glutamate drive to the prefrontal and motor areas of the cerebral cortex. Thus, A2A receptor antagonists and A2A receptor agonists, respectively, may offer novel treatments of Parkinson's disease (reduced D2 receptor signaling) and of schizophrenia and drug addiction (increased D2 receptor signaling).

Combination of adenosine A1 and A2A receptor blocking agents induces caffeine-like locomotor stimulation in mice

The spontaneous locomotor activity of C57BL/6J mice was examined, using an automated detection system based on infra-red beams, after administration of caffeine (3-30 mg/kg, i.p.), the adenosine A(2A) receptor selective antagonist SCH 58261 (0.312-2.5 mg/kg, i.p.) and the A(1) selective antagonist DPCPX (1.25-5 mg/kg, i.p.). SCH 58261 failed to influence motor activity in mice habituated to the test environment. DPCPX produced a small increase in motility and locomotion (significant at the dose of 5.0 mg/kg), much weaker than that produced by caffeine. Combined administration of DPCPX (1.2 mg/kg, i.p.) and SCH 58261 (1.2 mg/kg, i.p.) produced stimulation of motility and locomotion comparable with the effect of caffeine (15 mg/kg, i.p.). In contrast to motility and locomotion, rearing counts were not significantly influenced by DPCPX, SCH 58261, their combination, or by caffeine. Caffeine (15 mg/kg, i.p.) caused an increase in NGFI-A mRNA (an immediate early gene was chosen as an index of neuronal activation) in the piriform cortex 4 h after injection. This effect was reproduced by the combination of A(1) and A(2A) receptor antagonist. It is hypothesised that the stimulatory effect of low doses of caffeine in C57BL/6J mice is due to concomitant blockade of both A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors.

Blockade of adenosine and dopamine receptors inhibits the development of rapid tolerance to ethanol in mice

RATIONALE

Several reports have suggested the involvement of brain adenosine and dopamine receptors in different actions produced by ethanol such as motor incoordination or anxiolytic, hypnotic and reinforcing effects. The co-localization and interaction between adenosine and dopamine receptors in different brain regions has also been well documented. However, few studies have demonstrated the involvement of these mechanisms in the tolerance induced by ethanol.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of adenosine and dopamine receptors in the development of rapid tolerance to ethanol-induced motor incoordination in mice.

METHODS

In connection with the rota-rod apparatus, the effects of acute administration of the adenosine receptor antagonists caffeine (non-selective), 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX, adenosine A1 receptor antagonist) and 4-(2-[7-amino-2-{2-furyl}{1,2,4}triazolo-{2,3-a}{1,3,5}triazin-5-yl-amino]ethyl)phenol (ZM241385, adenosine A2A receptor antagonist), together with R(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SCH23390, dopamine D1 receptor antagonist) and sulpiride (dopamine D2 receptor antagonist), alone or in combination with ethanol (2.25 g/kg, i.p.), were studied. Twenty-four hours after, all animals were re-tested on the rota-rod after receiving the same dose of ethanol.

RESULTS

The repeated administration of ethanol promoted a significant reduction of motor impairment on day 2 (i.e. rapid tolerance). This effect was blocked by caffeine (3.0-30.0 mg/kg, i.p.), DPCPX (3.0-6.0 mg/kg, i.p.) or SCH23390 (0.01-0.03 mg/kg, s.c.), but not with ZM241385 (0.5-1.0 mg/kg, i.p.) or sulpiride (1.0-3.0 mg/kg, i.p.).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the rapid tolerance to ethanol-induced motor impairment in mice may be modulated by adenosine A1 receptors and dopamine D1 receptors.

Caffeine and the dopaminergic system

Caffeine is the most widely consumed psychostimulant substance, being self-administered throughout a wide range of conditions and present in numerous dietary products. Due to its widespread use and low abuse potential, caffeine is considered an atypical drug of abuse. The main mechanism of action of caffeine occurs via the blockade of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors. Adenosine is a modulator of CNS neurotransmission and its modulation of dopamine transmission through A2A receptors has been implicated in the effects of caffeine. This review provides an updated summary of the results reported in the literature concerning the behavioural pharmacology of caffeine and the neurochemical mechanisms underlying the psychostimulant effects elicited by caffeine. The review focuses on the effects of caffeine mediated by adenosine A2A receptors and on the influence that pre-exposure to caffeine may exert on the effects of classical drugs of abuse.

The time-course of ribavirin-provoked changes of basal and AMPH-induced motor activities in rats

The time-course of changes of basal and amphetamine (AMPH)-induced locomotor and stereotypic activities in adult male Wistar rats after a single ribavirin injection was studied. In the first set of experiments, 10, 20 or 30 mg ribavirin/kg body weight (b.w.) were injected i.p. to rats and their basal motor activities were recorded every 10 min for 2 h and compared with those of saline-treated controls. In the second set of experiments, the animals were pretreated with ribavirin and 20 min later i.p. injected with AMPH (1.5 mg/kg b.w.). The controls received AMPH 20 min after the saline injection. Motor activity was recorded after the first injection and until 120 min after AMPH administration. Ribavirin did not significantly affect the time-course of either basal locomotor or stereotypic activities. Pretreatment with any of the applied ribavirin doses decreased the AMPH-induced hyperlocomotor response. However, the most pronounced effect was observed with ribavirin doses of 20 mg/kg and 30 mg/kg when administered during the first 10 min and 30 min after the AMPH injection respectively. In contrast, the stereotypic activities of these animals were only slightly changed. These results indicate a different susceptibility of regions in the basal ganglia to ribavirin.

Effects of adenosine A1, dopamine D1 and metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors-modulating agents on locomotion of the reserpinised rats

The pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease and l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (l-DOPA)-induced dyskinesia are characterised by an imbalance between activity of the direct and indirect pathways regulated by dopamine D1 and D2 receptors, respectively. In this study, we investigated the effects of treatments combining adenosine A(1) and metabotropic glutamate 5 (mGlu5) receptors modulators on locomotion induced by dopamine D1 receptor activation in the reserpine-treated rats. Administration of the adenosine A(1) receptor agonist and mGlu5 receptor antagonist resulted in the significant reduction of dopamine D1 receptor agonist-induced locomotion. The combination of adenosine A(1) receptor agonist with mGlu5 receptor antagonist had no greater effect than these compounds alone. However, the adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist attenuated the inhibitory effect of mGlu5 receptor antagonist. The data suggest that the effect of mGlu5 receptor blockade on locomotion elicited by dopamine D1 receptor stimulation involves activation of adenosine A(1) receptors. This interaction can improve our understanding of pathophysiology of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia.

The effects of tiazofurin on basal and amphetamine-induced motor activity in rats

The effects of tiazofurin (TR; 2-beta-d-ribofuranosylthiazole-4-carboxamide), a purine nucleoside analogue on basal and amphetamine (AMPH)-induced locomotor and stereotypic activity of adult Wistar rat males were studied. The animals were injected with low (3.75, 7.5, and 15 mg/kg ip) and high (62.5, 125, and 250 mg/kg ip) TR doses. Neither low nor high TR doses influenced basal locomotor and stereotypic activity in comparison with the corresponding controls treated with saline only. However, pretreatment with TR at any dose applied, except for the lowest one, significantly decreased AMPH-induced (1.5 mg/kg ip) locomotor activity, while AMPH-induced stereotypic activity was inhibited with the two highest TR doses. In addition, TR was detected in the brain by HPLC already 15 min after the injection (125 mg/kg ip) to reach a maximum 2 h after the administration and was detectable in this tissue during the next 4 h. Our results indicate that TR modifies central regulation of the motor activity, possibly by influencing dopaminergic (DA-ergic) transmission.

Subchronic caffeine exposure induces sensitization to caffeine and cross-sensitization to amphetamine ipsilateral turning behavior independent from dopamine release

We have recently shown that repeated exposure to caffeine sensitizes rats to the motor activating effects of dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptor agonists. In order to study the role of dopamine in this effect, sensitization to caffeine and cross-sensitization between caffeine and amphetamine was evaluated by studying turning behavior and in vivo striatal dopamine release in unilaterally 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats. Administration of caffeine (15 mg/kg) for 2 weeks, on alternate days, induced a significant increase in ipsilateral turning behavior during the course of treatment, indicating that sensitization to caffeine took place in the intact striatum. Caffeine modestly increased dopamine release in the intact dorsa-lateral striatum and no significant difference between the first (+38%) and the last (+51%) injection was observed. Amphetamine (2 mg/kg) induced a significantly higher ipsilateral turning behavior in caffeine-sensitized rats than in vehicle-pretreated rats, however, a similar increase in dopamine release (+900 and +800%) was observed in the two groups. The results are the first demonstration that caffeine pre-exposure sensitizes the motor-stimulant effects of caffeine itself and of amphetamine. Sensitized ipsilateral turning after caffeine and amphetamine are not correlated to modification in striatal dopamine release, rather, postsynaptic modifications in dopamine and adenosine receptor interaction might be involved in the sensitization phenomena observed.

Adenosine A1 receptors control dopamine D1-dependent [(3)H]GABA release in slices of substantia nigra pars reticulata and motor behavior in the rat

Abnormalities in dopaminergic control of basal ganglia function play a key role in Parkinson's disease. Adenosine appears to modulate the dopaminergic control in striatum, where an inhibitory interaction between adenosine and dopamine receptors has been demonstrated. However the interaction has not been established in substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) where density of both receptors is high. Here we have explored the interaction between A1/D1 receptors in SNr. In SNr slices, SKF 38393, a selective D1 receptor agonist, produced a stimulation of depolarization-induced Ca(2+)-dependent [(3)H]GABA release that was inhibited by adenosine. The adenosine inhibition was abolished by 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), a selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonist. DPCPX per se enhanced GABA release, indicating inhibition of the release by endogenous adenosine. When D1 receptors were blocked with SCH 23390 or the slices were depleted of dopamine, the effect of DPCPX was suppressed, showing that activation of dopamine receptors was necessary for the adenosine inhibition. In normal slices, 2-chloro-n(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA), a selective A1 agonist, inhibited GABA release, but the inhibition was prevented by the blockade of D1 receptors with SCH 23390. Superperfusion with 8-bromo-cAMP produced a stimulation of GABA release that was not blocked by CCPA: this finding indicates that the blockade of D1 effects caused by activation of A1 receptors is specific. To see if these actions on GABA release were correlated with changes in motor behavior we studied the effect of unilateral intranigral injections of modifiers of adenosine A1 and dopamine D1 receptors in rats challenged with systemic methamphetamine. Both the A1 agonist CCPA and the D1 antagonist SCH 23390 produced ipsilateral turning whereas the A1 antagonist DPCPX caused contralateral turning. These motor effects are consistent with the findings on GABA release. The results indicate the presence of an inhibitory A1/D1 receptor interaction in SNr. The inhibition exerted by A1 adenosine receptors on GABAergic striatonigral transmission would be due exclusively to blockade of the facilitation resulting from activation of D1 dopamine receptors. The data permit to better understand the action of adenosine antagonists in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Dopamine D1 receptors and adenosine A1 receptors in the rat nucleus accumbens regulate motor activity but not prepulse inhibition

Locomotor activity and sensorimotor gating (measured as prepulse inhibition of startle) are regulated by mesoaccumbal dopamine. Recent evidence indicated antagonistic interactions between adenosine A(1) receptors and dopamine D(1) receptors, as well as between adenosine A(2) receptors and dopamine D(2) receptors in the nucleus accumbens. Therefore, it is conceivable that accumbal dopamine and adenosine are both involved in the regulation of prepulse inhibition and locomotion. We tested whether accumbal adenosine A(1) and dopamine D(1) receptors control locomotor activity and prepulse inhibition using the following four treatments. (1) Injections of the selective adenosine A(1) receptor agonist N(6)-cyclopentanyladenosine (CPA 1.5 and 3 microg/microl per side) into the nucleus accumbens. (2) Stimulation of the ventral tegmental area by local infusion of the GABA(A) receptor antagonist picrotoxin (25-100 ng/0.5 microl bilaterally). (3) Picrotoxin injections into the ventral tegmental area (100 ng/0.5 microl) and simultaneous bilateral injections of CPA (3 microg/microl per side) into the nucleus accumbens. (4) Injections of the selective dopamine D(1) receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (3 microg/0.5 microl per side) into the nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area stimulation by picrotoxin. Intra-accumbal CPA infusion reduced locomotor activity but had no effect on prepulse inhibition. Picrotoxin stimulation of the ventral tegmental area increased locomotor activity which was antagonized by co-administration of CPA or SCH 23390 into the nucleus accumbens. An enhancement of prepulse inhibition was observed after stimulation of the ventral tegmental area and co-administration of SCH 23390 into the nucleus accumbens. These findings demonstrate that adenosine A(1) and dopamine D(1) receptors are involved in the regulation of locomotor activity mediated by the mesoaccumbal dopamine system. The finding that locomotor effects induced by stimulation of the mesoaccumbal dopamine system were not accompanied by a prepulse inhibition-deficit suggests a dissociation of the neuronal substrates involved in the control of locomotion and the regulation of sensorimotor gating.

Catalepsy and hypolocomotion induced by a nitric oxide donor: attenuation by theophylline

Nitric oxide (NO) promotes adenosine release in the striatum and hippocampus. Behavioral effects of the nitric oxide donor sodium nitroprusside were studied in mice and included an examination of spontaneous locomotion and catalepsy, which are behaviors modulated by adenosine. Sodium nitroprusside caused a dose-dependent (2, 4 and 6 mg/kg) decrease in locomotor activity and catalepsy at the dose of 6 mg/kg. These effects were substantially attenuated by pretreatment with the non-selective adenosine receptors antagonist theophylline (10 and 30 mg/kg). Moreover, combined treatment with theophylline (30 mg/kg) and sodium nitroprusside (6 mg/kg) induced limbic seizures in 23% of animals. The pretreatment with the selective adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1, 3-dimethylxanthine (CPT) (1.2 mg/kg) caused no effect on the spontaneous or sodium nitroprusside-induced behavior. These data suggest that these behavioral effects of sodium nitroprusside are at least partially mediated by adenosine in the striatum and hippocampus, probably via adenosine A(2A) receptors.

Adenosine/dopamine interaction: implications for the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Evidence for a role of dopaminergic neurotransmission in the motor effects of adenosine antagonists, such as caffeine, is reviewed, based on the existence of specific antagonistic interactions between specific subtypes of adenosine and dopamine receptors in the striatum. Both adenosine A(1) and adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists induce motor activation in rodents. At least a certain degree of dopaminergic activity is required to obtain adenosine antagonist-induced motor activation, with adenosine A(1) antagonists being the most sensitive and non-selective adenosine antagonists the most resistant to striatal dopamine depletion. When considering long-term treatment with adenosine antagonists concomitant administration of dopamine agonists might be required in order to obtain strong motor effects (cross-sensitization) and to avoid the development of telerance.

The cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuit with synaptic plasticity. II. Mechanism of synergistic modulation of thalamic activity via the direct and indirect pathways through the basal ganglia

A possible mechanism underlying the modulatory role of dopamine, adenosine and acetylcholine in the modification of corticostriatal synapses, subsequent changes in signal transduction through the "direct" and "indirect" pathways in the basal ganglia and variations in thalamic and neocortical cell activity is proposed. According to this mechanism, simultaneous activation of dopamine D1/D2 receptors as well as inactivation of adenosine A1/A(2A) receptors or muscarinic M4/M1 receptors on striatonigral/striatopallidal inhibitory cells can promote the induction of long-term potentiation/depression in the efficacy of excitatory cortical inputs to these cells. Subsequently augmented inhibition of the activity of inhibitory neurons of the output nuclei of the basal ganglia through the "direct" pathway together with reduced disinhibition of these nuclei through the "indirect" pathway synergistically increase thalamic and neocortical cell firing. The proposed mechanism can underlie such well known effects as "excitatory" and "inhibitory" influence of dopamine on striatonigral and striatopallidal cells, respectively; the opposite action of dopamine and adenosine on these cells; antiparkinsonic effects of dopamine receptor agonists and adenosine or acetylcholine muscarinic receptor antagonists.

Lack of synergism between caffeine and SKF 38393 on rotational behavior in 6-hydroxydopamine-denervated rats

We have recently shown a synergistic effect between caffeine and the dopamine D(2) receptor agonist, bromocriptine, on contralateral rotational behavior in unilaterally 6-hydroxydopamine-denervated rats. In addition, we found that bromocriptine prevented caffeine-induced tolerance to this behavior following repeated treatment. In the present study, we investigated whether or not the dopamine D(1) receptor agonist, (+/-)-phenyl-2,3,4, 5-tetrahydro-(1H)-3-benzazepine-7,8-diol (SKF 38393), presented similar characteristics. Different groups of rats received simultaneous injections of either vehicle plus vehicle, caffeine (40 mg/kg) plus vehicle, SKF 38393 (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 mg/kg) plus vehicle, or caffeine plus SKF 38393 (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 mg/kg) for 5 consecutive days, and both ipsilateral and contralateral rotational behavior was measured. Results showed that, on the first day of treatment, caffeine produced significantly more rotational behavior than did a low dose of SKF 38393 (0.5 mg/kg), and significantly less turning than at higher doses (2 and 4 mg/kg). Combined treatment with caffeine and a high dose of SKF 38393 (4 mg/kg) produced significantly more rotational behavior than did caffeine plus vehicle. With repeated administration, caffeine produced sustained tolerance to its effects on rotational behavior, whereas SKF 38393 did not. In the groups treated with low doses of SKF 38393 (0.5, and 1 mg/kg) plus caffeine, tolerance was observed while in the groups that received high doses of SKF 38393 (2 and 4 mg/kg) plus caffeine, no tolerance was observed to rotational behavior. These results suggest that maximal stimulation of dopamine D(1) receptors may be needed to prevent the tolerance effects of caffeine in this animal model. This finding may have clinical relevance to the therapeutic treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Stimulation of adenosine A1 receptors attenuates dopamine D1 receptor-mediated increase of NGFI-A, c-fos and jun-B mRNA levels in the dopamine-denervated striatum and dopamine D1 receptor-mediated turning behaviour

Adenosine A1 receptors antagonistically and specifically modulate the binding and functional characteristics of dopamine D1 receptors. In the striatum this interaction seems to take place in the GABAergic strionigro-strioentopeduncular neurons, where both receptors are colocalized. D1 receptors in the strionigro-strioentopeduncular neurons are involved in the increased striatal expression of immediate-early genes induced by the systemic administration of psychostimulants and D1 receptor agonists. Previous results suggest that a basal expression of the immediate-early gene c-fos tonically facilitates the functioning of strionigro-strioentopeduncular neurons and facilitates D1 receptor-mediated motor activation. The role of A1 receptors in the modulation of the expression of striatal D1 receptor-regulated immediate-early genes and the D1 receptor-mediated motor activation was investigated in rats with a unilateral lesion of the ascending dopaminergic pathways. The systemic administration of the A1 agonist N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA, 0.1 mg/kg) significantly decreased the number of contralateral turns induced by the D1 agonist SKF 38393 (3 mg/kg). Higher doses of CPA (0.5 mg/kg) were necessary to inhibit the turning behaviour induced by the D2 agonist quinpirole (0.1 mg/kg). By using in situ hybridization it was found that CPA (0.1 mg/kg) significantly inhibited the SKF 38393-induced increase in the expression of NGFI-A and c-fos mRNA levels in the dopamine-denervated striatum. The increase in jun-B mRNA expression could only be inhibited with the high dose of CPA (0.5 mg/kg). A stronger effect of the A1 agonist was found in the ventral striatum (nucleus accumbens) compared with the dorsal striatum (dorsolateral caudate-putamen). The results indicate the existence of antagonistic A1-D1 receptor-receptor interactions in the dopamine-denervated striatum controlling D1 receptor transduction at supersensitive D1 receptors.

Modulation of endogenous GABA release by an antagonistic adenosine A1/dopamineD1 receptor interaction in rat brain limbic regions but not basal ganglia

Behavioral and biochemical studies suggest that a negative interaction exists between adenosine A(1) and dopamine D(1) receptors in the brain and that this may contribute to the psychomotor effects of adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists. We examined the functional significance of A(1) and D(1) receptor subtypes in modulating electrically evoked endogenous GABA release from slices/punches of rat basal ganglia (striatum, globus pallidus, striatum containing globus pallidus, and substantia nigra reticulata) and limbic regions (ventral pallidum and nucleus accumbens). In basal ganglia, stimulation of A(1) receptors with the selective agonist R-PIA (1-100 nM) resulted in a concentration-dependent decrease in GABA release. The selective A(1) antagonist DPCPX (10-100 nM) increased GABA release, suggesting that endogenous adenosine tonically inhibits GABA release. However, in basal ganglia, consistent dopamine D(1) receptor modulation of GABA, release was not observed in response to either D(1) agonists or antagonists. Furthermore, the A(1) receptor-mediated inhibition of GABA release was not changed by concurrent activation of D(1) receptors, thus confirming the lack of D(1) receptor modulation under these conditions. In contrast, in ventral pallidum and nucleus accumbens, stimulation of D(1) receptors with SKF-82958 (1 microM) increased GABA release significantly. The D(1) receptor-mediated increase in GABA release was attenuated by concurrent activation of adenosine A(1) receptors. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that an antagonistic A(1)/D(1) receptor interaction may be important in modulating GABA release in limbic regions.

Immunohistochemical localization of caffeine-induced c-Fos protein expression in the rat brain

Although caffeine is the most widely used central nervous system stimulant, the neuronal populations and pathways mediating its stimulant effects are not well understood. Using c-Fos protein as a marker for neuronal activation, the present study investigated the pattern of c-Fos induction at 2 hours after low locomotor-stimulant doses (1, 5, 10, and 30 mg/kg, i.p.) of caffeine and compared them with those after a higher dose (75 mg/kg, i.p.) or saline injection in adult male rats. Fos-immunoreactive neurons were counted in selected nuclei across the entire brain. Caffeine induced an increase in locomotor activity in a dose-dependent manner up to doses of 30 mg/kg and a decline at 75 mg/kg. Quantitative analysis of Fos-immunoreactive neurons indicated that no structures showed significant Fos expression at doses below 75 mg/kg or a biphasic pattern of Fos expression, as in locomotion. In contrast, caffeine at 75 mg/kg induced a significant increase compared with the saline condition in the number of Fos-immunoreactive neurons in the majority of structures examined. The structures included the striatum, nucleus accumbens, globus pallidus, and substantia nigra pars reticulata and autonomic and limbic structures including the basolateral and central nuclei of the amygdala, paraventricular and supraoptic hypothalamic nuclei, periventricular hypothalamus, paraventricular thalamic nuclei, parabrachial nuclei, locus coeruleus, and nucleus of the solitary tract. The locomotor-enhancing effects of low doses of caffeine did not appear to be associated with significant Fos expression in the rat brain.