Care of burns victims in Europe

The modified 5-item frailty index as a predictor of complications in burn patients

The modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5), as a measure of frailty and biological age, has been shown to be a reliable predictor of complications and mortality in a variety of surgical specialties. However, its role in burn care remains to be fully elucidated. We, therefore, correlated frailty with in-hospital mortality and complications after burn injury. The medical charts of all burn patients admitted between 2007 and 2020 who had ≥ 10 % of their total body surface area affected were retrospectively reviewed. Data on clinical, demographic, and outcome parameters were collected and evaluated, and mFI-5 was calculated on the basis of the data obtained. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to investigate the association between mFI-5 and medical complications and in-hospital mortality. A total of 617 burn patients were included in this study. Increasing mFI-5 scores were significantly associated with increased in-hospital mortality (p < 0.0001), myocardial infarction (p = 0.03), sepsis (p = 0.005), urinary tract infections (p = 0.006), and perioperative blood transfusions (p = 0.0004). They were also associated with an increase in the length of hospital stay and the number of surgical procedures, albeit without statistical significance. An mFI-5 score of ≥ 2 was a significant predictor of sepsis (odds ratio [OR] = 2.08; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03 to 3.95; p = 0.04), urinary tract infection (OR = 2.82; 95% CI: 1.47 to 5.19; p = 0.002), and perioperative blood transfusions (OR = 2.61; 95% CI: 1.61 to 4.25; p = 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that an mFI-5 score of ≥ 2 was not an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.44; 95% CI: 0.61 to 3.37; p = 0.40). mFI-5 is a significant risk factor for only a few select complications in the burn population. It is not a reliable predictor of in-hospital mortality. Therefore, its utility as a risk stratification tool in the burn unit may be limited.

Are burn centers in German-speaking countries prepared to respond to a burn disaster? Survey-based study

Burn disasters present a challenge not only to burn centers but the entire healthcare system. Most burn centers worldwide are unprepared to deal with a burn disaster as it is an uncommon event. We investigated the status of burn center preparedness in German-speaking countries to respond to a burn disaster. Self-administered survey questionnaires were sent to the directors of burn centers; the questions of survey used before in a similar way in Belgium were translated into German language. Of the 46 questioned burn centers, 32 (78%) responded, including all of the German adult burn centers. A clear difference in the preparation status of the burn centers in the three countries was observed due to geopolitical factors such as decentralized healthcare systems. However, the healthcare system is generally well-prepared concerning command, transfer, and capacity to provide sustained supplies to handle a massive influx of patients. Nevertheless, there are some gaps in the areas of planning and preparation, funding for disaster activities, and regular training of staff for burn disasters. We call for a unified burn disaster plan and increased cooperation between burn centers and civil defense regarding communication and training. We strongly recommend the implementation of a special disaster fund and telemedicine in disaster management to circumvent shortages in burn staff.

Effect of primary admission to burn centers on the outcomes of severely burned patients

OBJECTIVE

Burns represent a special form of severe trauma. Due to long hospitalization, rehabilitation, and extensive scar treatment, severe burn injuries rank among the most expensive traumatic injuries regarding associated health care costs. The presented single-burn-center experiences evaluated the effects of primary versus secondary burn intensive care unit (BICU) admissions on outcomes in severely burned patients.

METHODS

Within 30 months, 186 patients were admitted to the BICU. The cases were divided into two groups depending on their admission type: "primary" vs. "secondary". All patients were analyzed retrospectively regarding the need for surgery, encountered complications, time of hospitalization and overall survival.

RESULTS

The incidence of primary BICU-admissions was 65.1%. Both patient groups were comparable regarding demographics, comorbidities, % TBSA burn, associated inhalation injuries, ABSI scores and intubation rates (p>0.05). Both groups received similar numbers of operations and had overall comparable mortality rates (p>0.05). However, duration until first burn excision, length of ventilation, as well as BICU- and overall hospital length of stay were significantly shorter in the "primary"- compared to the "secondary" group (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Several burn societies have published precise criteria of when a patient needs to be referred to a burn center. In the presented series, patients that were primarily treated at a BICU showed significantly better outcomes regarding several parameters. In order to further optimize treatment of burn patients it therefore appears that precise initial assessment and if appropriate respective primary transport to dedicated burn centers needs to be re-emphasized, especially among first- and emergency care providers.

In view of standardization Part 2: Management of challenges in the initial treatment of burn patients in Burn Centers in Germany, Austria and Switzerland

INTRODUCTION

Initial therapy of severe burns in specialized burn trauma centers is a challenging task faced by the treating multi-professional and interdisciplinary team. A lack of consistent operating procedures and varying structural conditions was recently demonstrated in preliminary data of our group. These results raised the question on how specific treatment measures in acute burn care are met in the absence of standardized guidelines.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A specific questionnaire containing 57 multiple-choice questions was sent to all 22 major burn centers in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. The survey included standards of airway management and ventilation, fluid management and circulation, body temperature monitoring and management, topical burn wound treatment and a microbiological surveillance. Additionally, the distribution of standardized course systems was covered.

RESULTS

17 out of 22 questionnaires (77%) were returned completed. Regarding volume resuscitation, results showed a similar approach in estimating initial fluid while discrepancies persisted in the use of colloidal fluid and human albumin. Elective tracheostomy and the need for bronchoscopy with suspected inhalation injury were the most controversial issues revealed by the survey. Topical treatment of burned body surface also followed different principles regarding the use of synthetic epidermal skin substitutes or enzymatic wound debridement. Less discrepancy was found in basic diagnostic measures, body temperature management, estimation of the extent of burns and microbiological surveillance.

CONCLUSION

While many burn-related issues are clearly not questionable and managed in a similar way in most participating facilities, we were able to show that the most contentious issues in burn trauma management involve initial volume resuscitation, management of inhalation trauma and topical burn wound treatment. Further research is required to address these topics and evaluate a potential superiority of a regime in order to increase the level of evidence.

Novel use of a flowable collagen-glycosaminoglycan matrix (Integra™ Flowable Wound Matrix) combined with percutaneous cannula scar tissue release in treatment of post-burn malfunction of the hand--A preliminary 6 month follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Long-term function following severe burns to the hand may be poor secondary to scar adhesions to the underlying tendons, webspaces, and joints. In this pilot study, we report the feasibility of applying a pasty dermal matrix combined with percutaneous cannula teno- and adhesiolysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this 6 month follow-up pilot study, we included eight hands in five patients with hand burns undergoing minimal-invasive, percutaneous cannula adhesiolysis and injection of INTEGRA™ Flowable Wound Matrix for a pilot study of this new concept. The flowable collagen-glycosaminoglycan wound matrix (FCGWM) was applied with a buttoned 2mm cannula to induce formation of a neo-gliding plane. Post treatment follow-up was performed to assess active range of motion (AROM), grip strength, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and quality of life Short-Form (SF)-36 questionnaire.

RESULTS

No complications were detected associated with the treatment of FCGWM injection. The mean improvement (AROM) at 6 months was 30.6° for digits 2-5. The improvement in the DASH score was a mean of 9 points out of 100. The VSS improved by a mean of 2 points out of 14.

DISCUSSION

The study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of percutaneous FCGWM for dermal augmentation after burn. Results from this pilot study show improvements in AROM for digits 2-5, functional scores from the patient's perspective (DASH) and scar quality (VSS). The flowable form of established INTEGRA™ wound matrix offers the advantage of minimal-invasive injection after scar release in the post-burned hand with a reduction in the risk of postsurgical re-scarring.

Epidemiology of burns in Iran during the last decade (2000-2010): review of literature and methodological considerations

The approach to burn prevention, to be effective in a particular area, should be based on sound knowledge of etiological patterns of burns injuries and must take into account the geographical variations and socioeconomic differences in burn epidemiology. Although many articles are published on burns epidemiology in Iran, a holistic view of burn epidemiology in Iran is not well presented in literature. In this study, a wide literature review was made on articles published regarding burns injuries in Iran. Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, and Iranian scientific information (SID) databases were searched for information on epidemiology of burns in Iran during the years 2000-2010. During the investigation we found that few Farsi journals were not indexed in SID during the earlier years of the decade, so to increase the chance of capturing necessary information these were checked by hand. As the second source, available data from the Iranian National Home Injury Registry Database (INHIRD) during two Iranian calendar years in the period 2001-2003 were used to extract necessary information. The results of this review helped in defining the magnitude of the burns problem, exploring the role of gender and age in burns, defining the agents causing burns, burn extent, burn mortality and place of injury occurrence. Some areas with paucity of information as well as methodological pitfalls in published research were identified and discussed.

Evaluation of infrastructure, equipment and training of 28 burn units/burn centers in Germany, Austria and Switzerland

Treatment of burn patients requires special training and skills, and an adequate infrastructure. In the United States, burn center referral criteria and requirements of burn centers are defined by the American Burn Association (ABA) in the Guidelines for the Operation of Burn Centers, and in Germany, by the German Society for Burn Treatment (DGV). The European Burn centers in Austria and the German-speaking part of Switzerland share the standards in the setting of the German-speaking Association for Burn Therapy (DAV) with some modifications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current infrastructure of burn centers in the three German-speaking countries with respect to the existing guidelines. Therefore, guidelines for burn center referral criteria and burn center requirements were compared between the USA (ABA) and Germany (DGV). In addition, a questionnaire was sent to all burn centers in Germany, Austria and the German-speaking part of Switzerland, in order to collect current information regarding the architectural and medical infrastructure, available equipment and care-providing personnel. The comparison of guidelines for the USA and Germany revealed similar burn center referral criteria for both countries. With respect to burn center requirements, both the USA and Germany have similar requirements, albeit with different focus points. In Germany, the main focus lies on the infrastructural requirements for burn centers, while in the US, the main focus lies on the requirements for medical and nursing personnel. Critical review of the responses from the burn centers of German-speaking countries revealed that the biggest infrastructural differences among centers were observed in burn units providing pediatric care, as compared to adult burn centers. In summary, the DGV guidelines for German-speaking countries reflect an overall adoption of the ABA guidelines, and the burn centers included in this study met those requirements. As a result of the positive experience and effective treatment of burn patients in German-speaking countries, we recommend an adoption of the ABA guidelines to those countries and societies that are in need of appropriate standards of burn care.

Severe burn injury in Europe: a systematic review of the incidence, etiology, morbidity, and mortality

INTRODUCTION

Burn injury is a serious pathology, potentially leading to severe morbidity and significant mortality, but it also has a considerable health-economic impact. The aim of this study was to describe the European hospitalized population with severe burn injury, including the incidence, etiology, risk factors, mortality, and causes of death.

METHODS

The systematic literature search (1985 to 2009) involved PubMed, the Web of Science, and the search engine Google. The reference lists and the Science Citation Index were used for hand searching (snowballing). Only studies dealing with epidemiologic issues (for example, incidence and outcome) as their major topic, on hospitalized populations with severe burn injury (in secondary and tertiary care) in Europe were included. Language restrictions were set on English, French, and Dutch.

RESULTS

The search led to 76 eligible studies, including more than 186,500 patients in total. The annual incidence of severe burns was 0.2 to 2.9/10,000 inhabitants with a decreasing trend in time. Almost 50% of patients were younger than 16 years, and ~60% were male patients. Flames, scalds, and contact burns were the most prevalent causes in the total population, but in children, scalds clearly dominated. Mortality was usually between 1.4% and 18% and is decreasing in time. Major risk factors for death were older age and a higher total percentage of burned surface area, as well as chronic diseases. (Multi) organ failure and sepsis were the most frequently reported causes of death. The main causes of early death (< 48 hours) were burn shock and inhalation injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the lack of a large-scale European registration of burn injury, more epidemiologic information is available about the hospitalized population with severe burn injury than is generally presumed. National and international registration systems nevertheless remain necessary to allow better targeting of prevention campaigns and further improvement of cost-effectiveness in total burn care.

[Importance of proper initial treatment of moderate and major burns]

BACKGROUND/AIM

Burns are common injuries with frequency depending on human factors, development of protection, industry and traffic, eventual wars. Organized treatment of major burn injuries has tremendous medical, social and economic importance. The aim of this study was to analyze initial treatment of major and moderate burns, to compare it with the current recommendations and to signify the importance of organized management of burns.

METHODS

In a prospective study 547 adult patients with major burns were analyzed, covering a period of eight years, with the emphasis on the initial hospital admission and emergency care for burns greater than 10% of total body surface area (TBSA).

RESULTS

In the different groups of major burns, the percentage of hospital admission was: 81.5 in burns greater than 10% TBSA, 37.7 in burns of the functional areas, 54.5 in the III degree burns, 81.6 in electrical burns, 55.9 in chemical burns, 61.9 in inhalation injury, 41.0 in burns in patients with the greater risk and 100 in burns with a concomitant trauma. In the group of 145 patients with burns greater than 10% TBSA, intravenous fluids were given in 87 patients, analgesics in 45, corticosteroids in 29, antibiotics in 23 and oxygen administration in 14. In the same group, wound irrigation was done in 14.4%, removing of the clothing and shoes in 29.6%, elevation of the legs in 8.9% and prevention of hypothermia in 7.6% of the victims. There were no initial estimations of burn extent (percentage of a burn), notes about the patient and injury and tetanus immunizations.

CONCLUSION

Based on these findings, it is concluded that there should be much more initial hospital admissions of major burns, and also, necessary steps in the emergency care of burns greater than 10% TBSA should be taken more frequently. On the other side, unnecessary or wrong steps should be avoided in the initial burn treatment.

Überlebensstrategie der Schwerbrandverletztenzentren im Kontext der Y-DRG: Budgetsicherung

BACKGROUND

The system of German diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) has undergone modifications for burn cases (Y-DRG) since 2003. The DRG catalog includes two of seven Y-DRGs without a case weight.

METHODS

The BG Trauma Center in Ludwigshafen could demonstrate that the cost of burn care treatment could not be reimbursed through Y-DRGs in 2004.

RESULTS

By being accredited as a so-called "individual hospital-based unit" for burn care (Besondere Einrichtung), it was possible to agree to an "all-inclusive" contract. The daily rate is reimbursed with 2792 Euros/day. The reimbursement of the treatment of burn patients is thus cost covering.

CONCLUSION

In summary the budget for 2006 should be calculated by an individualized hospital rate for all Y-DRGs, especially as it was shown that the additional payments (Zusatzentgelte) for selected therapies did not cover the costs of special treatments in burn care in 2005 and 2006. The problem has been recognized and published internationally. The special and cost-intensive treatment of burn patients is difficult to calculate in a system of diagnosis-related groups due to the low number of cases.

Knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of occupational physicians related to burn cases: a cross-sectional survey in Turkey

The primary care of victims of burns at the workplace is provided by occupational physicians. In Turkey, the routine practice is to certify physicians for work in occupational medicine. The aim was to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of occupational physicians regarding burn cases. A total of 510 occupational physicians working in Ankara were surveyed by mail, and 101 (19.8%) physicians responded. Most of these physicians (n=67, 66.3%) had encountered burn cases within the prior year. The most frequent type of burn was scalds (n=55, 54.5%) followed by thermal burns (n=37, 36.6%). Of the respondents, 22 (21.8%) knew the most appropriate classification of burns. Regarding first-aid treatments prior to triage, only 4% chose the valid items. The mean rate of favourable attitudes of the participants toward first aid of different types of burn injuries was 70.8%. Only 31.7% of the physicians surveyed used up-to-date first-aid modalities. We conclude that Turkish occupational physicians have inadequate knowledge and inappropriate attitudes toward the first aid and primary care of burn victims. With the vital support of the Burn and Fire Disaster Institute at Başkent University, nationwide educational policies could be improved and assessed.

Current status of burn care facilities: A nationwide survey

The problems associated with burn injuries are wide-ranging, and the social and economic impacts of burns affect all of society. Only burn units have the capability to properly care for these patients, and this specialization translates to increased costs. The aim of this study was to examine the current status of burn units in Turkey. There are no reliable epidemiological data on burns and burn units in our country, so we conducted our own survey. In March 2003, Turkey had 1198 hospitals with 159,290 patient beds. To collect data related to burn care centers, we mailed a questionnaire to every hospital (974 total sent) and a different questionnaire to every City Health Directorate (81 total sent). Seven hundred and seventy-seven hospitals (79.8%) responded, and the results indicate that the number of burn care centers has risen significantly in the past decade. At most centers, plastic-reconstructive surgeons and general surgeons are the physicians who care for burn patients. The survey findings indicate that Turkey needs many more burn centers, and also better quality units. In addition, in-service training of health care professionals is required. As well, a curriculum should be developed for continuous public education geared towards burn prevention and first aid.

Medical management after indoor fires: A review

Fires involving mass burn casualties require extreme efforts and flexibility from the regular health care system. The café fire in Volendam, which occurred shortly after midnight on the first of January 2001, resulted in the worst indoor mass burns incident in Dutch history. During the extensive medical evaluation of this disaster, it became obvious that information on similar incidents is relatively scarce in the literature. This article systematically reviews the existing information in the medical literature on indoor fires and provides findings and knowledge used in the evaluation of the medical management after indoor fires and for future mass burn casualty preparedness, mitigation and response.

METHODS

A literature review was undertaken for burn disasters with characteristics similar to the indoor Volendam fire disaster. In all fires, the following aspects were investigated: characteristics of the fire; the initial emergency response; triage and on-site treatment; primary and secondary distribution; hospital admission; severity of the sustained injuries and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of nine similar indoor fires were selected. The number of people involved was reported in seven fires (range 137-6000). All reports provided the mortality rate (range 1.4% to over 50%). Data regarding the emergency response could be collected in half of the studies. On-scene triage was performed in five fires. The number of hospitals participating in the primary distribution ranged from 1 to 19. Except for the Volendam fire, all patients were primarily distributed to general hospitals.

CONCLUSION

Characteristics of indoor fires, which are relevant for disaster preparedness, mitigation and response are not frequently reported in medical literature. The current articles on indoor fires, mainly report on numbers of casualties and the mortality. Limited data are available to provide insight in the characteristics of management and medical treatment and to come up with suggestions for improvement of future burn incidents management. The evaluation of disasters should be based on uniform methods and structured reports and effective record keeping is essential to achieve this.

Miracles take a little longer: the challenges of the uncompensated major incident

The challenges of managing uncompensated major incidents (UMI) are many and complex. A concomitant loss of infrastructure is common in large-scale disasters. Significant planning, including liaison with relevant agencies on an international basis is necessary to facilitate a rapid and co-ordinated response to such events. UMIs must be managed in a structured manner in common with that utilized for smaller-scale major incidents, although some modification may be appropriate. Use of the ‘expectant’ triage category should be implemented at an early stage to prevent scarce health service resources being monopolized by patients with no possibility of survival. Many patients will be suitable for treatment at the scene without subsequent urgent referral to hospital facilities. The early involvement of military forces is vital to provide manpower, tents (for casualty clearing stations and temporary shelter), high volume transportation and forward dressing stations at the scene and at receiving hospitals. The military can also facilitate the restoration of infrastructure, including access and egress routes. The risk of uncompensated major incidents occurring is real and is not limited to natural catastrophes occurring in developing countries.

Fire injuries, disasters, and costs from cigarettes and cigarette lights: a global overview

BACKGROUND

Fires cause 1% of the global burden of disease. Fire (includes explosion) disasters have immense health, social, and environmental costs. We will provide initial estimates of overall U. S. and global fire tolls from smoking.

METHODS

We tabulated and summarized smoking-related fire and disaster tolls from published documents. We compared those tolls to U.S. fire, burn, and fire death rates per billion cigarettes extrapolated globally. Smoking-attributable percentages of adult and child access to cigarette lighter and match ignitions (lights), and resultant fires, burns, and deaths ignited by young children, were estimated from likely smoking-attributable lights usage. Cigarette plus cigarette lights fire tolls were multiplied times published and estimated fire costs.

RESULTS

Smoking is the leading cause of residential or total fire death in all eight countries with available statistics. Smoking is a leading cause of fires in many more countries. Cigarettes cause numerous fire disasters. Cigarette lights cause an estimated 100,000 U.S. and one million global, child-playing fires per year. Cigarette lights fire injuries likely rival U.S., and possibly global, cigarette fire injury numbers. Smoking causes an estimated 30% of U. S. and 10% of global fire death burdens. Smoking's estimated U.S. and global fire costs were $6.95 (sensitivity range $5.34-22.8) and $27.2 (sensitivity range $8.2-89.2) billion, respectively, in 1998 U. S. dollars.

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking likely causes large global fire tolls. U.S. fire tolls have fallen when smoking decreased. Further reducing smoking can substantially reduce fire and disaster tolls.