Relationship of family history and outcome after breast conservation therapy in women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Prognostic factors for cancer-specific survival in 220 patients with breast cancer: A single center experience

OBJECTIVES

Hospital-based breast cancer survival studies are scarce in western Iran. Furthermore, the relationship between breast cancer survival and clinical parameters has been extensively studied, but many of the findings come from developing countries. This paper aims to estimate the survival of hospital-based breast cancer patients and its predictor factors.

METHOD

This retrospective analysis was conducted on 578 patients with primary breast cancer who underwent surgery between 2004 and 2020. Information was collected from medical reports by the Hospital information system in Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah, Iran. One-, 2-, 5-, and 10-year breast cancer-specific survival has been calculated using the Kaplan-Meier process. Crude and adjusted Hazard Ratios (HR) were calculated using the Cox proportional regression model.

RESULT

One-, 2-, and 5-year overall breast cancer survival were 219 (99.54%), 196 (89.09%), 159 (72.27%), and 70 (31.81%), respectively. Univariate analysis of breast cancer patients with tumor-related variables revealed that factors such as age, menopause status, lymph node metastasis, number of lymph nodes, organ metastasis, and stage of disease were significantly associated with disease-specific survival (p < .05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that metastasis (HR = 41.77, 95% CI: 15.3-114.15) and lymph node metastasis (HR = 5.26, 95% CI: 1.9-14.6) were significantly related to survival.

CONCLUSION

The findings demonstrate that survival is relatively low and is consistent with late-stage disease diagnosis. It is believed that this is due to a poor level of awareness, lack of screening programs, and subsequent late access to treatment.

The association between prognosis of breast cancer and first-degree family history of breast or ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Whether a positive family history of breast cancer or ovarian cancer (FHBOC) would affect the prognosis of breast cancer is still up for debate and further study. This meta-analysis was performed to clarify this issue. We reviewed two databases (PubMed and CNKI) for research articles published at any time from the inception of these databases to April 1, 2016 for articles detecting the impact of FHBOC on the prognosis of breast cancer. A meta-analysis was conducted to generated combined hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Eighteen studies were included in our qualitative analysis, with 15 studies ultimately part of the quantitative analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that a positive FHBOC was associated with better OS (0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.95) and BCSS (0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.99). In subgroup analyses, several subgroups (maximally adjusted studies, population based studies, high quality studies, family history of breast cancer, studies from Europe, studies from Asia, 1 affected relative, or tumor size > 2 cm), a positive first-degree FHBOC was associated with better prognosis of breast cancer. Notably, for those patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery, first-degree FHBOC was not a risk factor for OS (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.53-2.21). Our meta-analysis demonstrated that a first-degree FHBOC was associated with better OS and BCSS in patients with breast cancer. These findings support that clinical management should not differ between women with and without FHBOC.

Interactions of Family History of Breast Cancer with Radiotherapy in Relation to the Risk of Breast Cancer Recurrence

Purpose

We examined associations between a family history of breast cancer and the risk of breast cancer recurrence in women who received or did not receive radiotherapy.

Methods

Our study included 2,440 women enrolled in the Breast Cancer Registry of Greater Cincinnati. Information on breast cancer risk factors, including detailed family history of breast cancer, characteristics of the primary tumor, treatment received, and recurrence status was collected at baseline and via updates. Associations between a family history of breast cancer and the risk of breast cancer recurrence were examined separately in women treated with and without radiotherapy using survival analysis.

Results

Over an average follow-up time of 8.78 years, we found no associations between a family history of breast cancer and the risk of breast cancer recurrence among women with a history of radiotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75–1.23). Among women who did not receive radiotherapy, the total number of relatives with breast cancer was positively associated with the risk of breast cancer recurrence (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.00–1.47). We found no interactions of radiotherapy with family history (p-interaction >0.05).

Conclusion

Radiotherapy for a primary breast cancer in women with a family history of breast cancer does not increase risk of breast cancer recurrence. If these findings are replicated in future studies, the results may translate into an important health message for breast cancer survivors with a family history of breast cancer.

The impact of in situ breast cancer and family history on risk of subsequent breast cancer events and mortality - a population-based study from Sweden

Background

The clinical behavior of in situ breast cancer is incompletely understood and several factors have been associated with invasive recurrence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term risk of subsequent breast cancer and mortality among women diagnosed with in situ breast cancer, in relation to family history

Methods

Using the population-based Swedish Multi-Generation and Cancer Registers we identified 8111 women diagnosed with in situ breast cancer between 1980 and 2004. We used standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) to measure the relative risk of subsequent invasive or contralateral in situ breast cancer and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for relative risks of death.

Results

Among women diagnosed with in situ breast cancer, the cumulative 10-year and 20-year risk for subsequent contralateral or ipsilateral invasive cancer was approximately 10 % and 18 %, respectively. The risk of subsequent invasive breast cancer was increased more than 4-fold (SIR 4.6 (95 % CI 4.2 − 4.9)) among women with in situ breast cancer as compared to women in the general population and the risk of contralateral in situ breast cancer was increased almost 16-fold (SIR 16.0 (95 % CI 13.2–19.1)). Having a family history of breast cancer increased the risk of contralateral invasive breast cancer by almost 50 % (incidence rate ratio 1.5 (95 % CI 1.0–2.0)). Women under forty years old at diagnosis, without family history, had a 7-fold increased risk, and those with a family history had a 14-fold increased risk for subsequent invasive breast cancer with SIRs of 7.2 (95 % CI 4.8–10.5) and 14.3 (95 % CI 7.4–25.0), respectively. The overall risk of death in women with in situ breast cancer was significantly increased by 30 % compared to the general population but was highly dependent on the occurrence of a second invasive cancer event (SMR 1.3 (95 % CI 1.2–1.4)).

Conclusions

Among women with in situ breast cancer, a positive family history increases the risk of contralateral invasive breast cancer by almost 50 %. The risk of subsequent invasive breast cancer and mortality is substantially higher in younger women, which should be taken into account when planning their treatment and follow up.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-016-0764-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Evaluation of a breast cancer nomogram for predicting risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ after local excision

PURPOSE

Prediction of patients at highest risk for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after local excision of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains a clinical concern. The aim of our study was to evaluate a published nomogram from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center to predict for risk of IBTR in patients with DCIS from our institution.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified 794 patients with a diagnosis of DCIS who had undergone local excision from 1990 through 2007 at the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). Clinicopathologic factors and the performance of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center nomogram for prediction of IBTR were assessed for 734 patients who had complete data.

RESULTS

There was a marked difference with respect to tumor grade, prevalence of necrosis, initial presentation, final margins, and receipt of endocrine therapy between the two cohorts. The biggest difference was that more patients received radiation in the MDACC cohort (75% at MDACC v 49% at MSKCC; P < .001). Follow-up time in the MDACC cohort was longer than in the MSKCC cohort (median 7.1 years v 5.6 years), and the recurrence rate was lower in the MDACC cohort (7.9% v 11%). The median 5-year probability of recurrence was 5%, and the median 10-year probability of recurrence was 7%. The nomogram for prediction of 5- and 10-year IBTR probabilities demonstrated imperfect calibration and discrimination, with a concordance index of 0.63.

CONCLUSION

Predictive models for IBTR in patients with DCIS who were treated with local excision are imperfect. Our current ability to accurately predict recurrence on the basis of clinical parameters alone is limited.

Association between patient and tumor characteristics with clinical outcomes in women with ductal carcinoma in situ

We synthesized the evidence of the association between patient and tumor characteristics with clinical outcomes in women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. We identified five randomized controlled clinical trials and 64 observational studies that were published in English from January 1970 to January 2009. Younger women with clinically presented ductal carcinoma in situ had higher risk of ipsilateral recurrent cancer. African Americans had higher mortality and greater rates of advanced recurrent cancer. Women with larger tumor size, comedo necrosis, worse pathological grading, positive surgical margins, and at a higher risk category, using a composite prognostic index, had worse outcomes. Inconsistent evidence suggested that positive HER2 receptor and negative estrogen receptor status were associated with worse outcomes. Synthesis of evidence was hampered by low statistical power to detect significant differences in predictor categories and inconsistent adjustment practices across the studies. Future research should address composite prediction indices among race groups for all outcomes.

Survival analysis of 1148 women diagnosed with breast cancer in Southern Iran

BACKGROUND

While there has been much research regarding risk factors and prognostic factors for breast cancer in general, research specific to Iran is sparse. Further, the association between breast cancer survival and socio-demographic and pathologic factors has been widely studied but the majority of these studies are from developed countries. Southern Iran has a population of approximately 4 million. To date, no research has been performed to determine breast cancer survival and to explore the association between the survival and socio-demographic and pathologic factors in Southern Iran, where this study was conducted.

METHODS

The data were obtained from the cancer registry in Fars province, Southern Iran and included 1148 women diagnosed with breast cancer between 2000 and 2005. The association between survival, and sociodemographic and pathological factors, distant metastasis at diagnosis, and treatment options was investigated using Cox regression.

RESULTS

The majority of patients were diagnosed with an advanced tumour size. Five-year overall survival was 58% (95%CI; 53%-62%). Cox regression showed that family income (good vs poor: hazard ratio 0.46, 95%CI; 0.23-0.90) smoking (HR = 1.40, 95%CI; 1.07-1.86), metastases to bone (HR = 2.25, 95%CI; 1.43-3.52) and lung (HR = 3.21, 95%CI;1.70-6.05), tumour size (< or = 2 cm vs > or = 5 cm: HR = 2.07, 95%CI;1.39-3.09) and grade (poorly vs well differentiated HR = 2.33, 95%CI; 1.52-3.37), lymph node ratio (0 vs 1: HR = 15.31, 95%CI; 8.89-26.33) and number of involved node (1 vs >15: HR = 14.98, 95%CI; 8.83-25.33) were significantly related to survival.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to evaluate breast cancer survival in Southern Iran and has used a wide range of explanatory factors, 44. The results demonstrate that survival is relatively poor and is associated with diagnosis with late stage disease. We hypothesise that this is due to low level of awareness, lack of screening programs and subsequent late access to treatment.

Family history of breast cancer and all-cause mortality after breast cancer diagnosis in the Breast Cancer Family Registry

Although having a family history of breast cancer is a well established breast cancer risk factor, it is not known whether it influences mortality after breast cancer diagnosis. We studied 4,153 women with first primary incident invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 1991 and 2000, and enrolled in the Breast Cancer Family Registry through population-based sampling in Northern California, USA; Ontario, Canada; and Melbourne and Sydney, Australia. Cases were oversampled for younger age at diagnosis and/or family history of breast cancer. Carriers of germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 were excluded. Cases and their relatives completed structured questionnaires assessing breast cancer risk factors and family history of cancer. Cases were followed for a median of 6.5 years, during which 725 deaths occurred. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate associations between family history of breast cancer at the time of diagnosis and risk of all-cause mortality after breast cancer diagnosis, adjusting for established prognostic factors. The hazard ratios for all-cause mortality were 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.84-1.15) for having at least one first- or second-degree relative with breast cancer, and 0.85 (95% CI = 0.70-1.02) for having at least one first-degree relative with breast cancer, compared with having no such family history. Estimates did not vary appreciably when stratified by case or tumor characteristics. In conclusion, family history of breast cancer is not associated with all-cause mortality after breast cancer diagnosis for women without a known germline mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Therefore, clinical management should not depend on family history of breast cancer.

Late toxicity is not increased in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers undergoing breast radiotherapy in the United Kingdom

PURPOSE

To undertake the first substantial clinical study of breast radiotherapy toxicity in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers in the United Kingdom.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Acute and late radiation effects were evaluated in a retrospective study of 55 BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers treated with radiotherapy for breast cancer at four centers between 1983 and 2002. Individual matching with controls who had sporadic breast cancer was undertaken for age at diagnosis, time since completion of radiation, and treatment variables. Detailed assessments were undertaken by one examiner. Median follow-up was 6.75 years for carriers and 7.75 years for controls. Rates of late events (rib fractures, lung fibrosis, necrosis of soft tissue/bone, and pericarditis) as well as LENT-SOMA scores and clinical photography scores of breast size, shape, and skin telangiectasia were the primary end points.

RESULTS

No increase in clinically significant late toxicity was seen in the mutation carriers.

CONCLUSIONS

These data add substantial weight to the evidence that the outcomes in the treated breast from radiotherapy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations are comparable with those in women with sporadic breast cancer.

259 Patients with DCIS of the breast applying USC/Van Nuys prognostic index: a retrospective review with long term follow up

BACKGROUND

The Van Nuys Prognostic Index (VNPI) is a simple score for predicting the risk of local recurrence (LR) in patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) conservatively treated. This score combines three independent predictors of Local Recurrence. The VNPI has recently been updated with the addition of age as a fourth parameter into the scoring system (University of Southern California/ VNPI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our database consisted of 408 women with DCIS. Applying the USC/VNPI we reviewed retrospectively 259 patients who were treated with breast conserving surgery with or without radiotherapy (RT). Of these patients 63.5% had a low VNPI score, 32% intermediate and 4.5% a high score. In the low score group, the majority of the patients underwent Conservative Surgery (CS) without RT while in the intermediate group, almost half of the patients received RT. Eighty-three percent (83%) of the patients with high VNPI were treated with Conservative Surgery plus RT. Nodal assessment by Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy was obtained in 32 patients since 2002.

RESULTS

Twenty-one Local Recurrences were observed (8%) with a mean follow up of 130 months: sixteen were invasive. No statistically significant differences in Disease Free Survival were reached in all groups of VNPI score between patients treated with Conservative Surgery or Conservative Surgery plus RT. However it was noted that the higher the VNPI score, the lower was the risk of local recurrence in the group treated additionally with RT, even though it was not statistically significant. Further analysis included those patients treated with Conservative Surgery alone and followed up. Disease-free survival (DFS) at 10 years was 94% with low VNPI and 83% in both intermediate and high score (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the subgroups of VNPI. The Local Relapse rate after Conservative Surgery alone, increased with tumor size, margin width, and pathology classification (P < 0,05), while age was not found to be a significant factor. Lesions with only mammographic appearances are associated with lower DFS but it did not reach significance (P = ns), while assumption of estrogenic hormones and familial history of breast cancer are significant factors associated with a higher risk of local recurrence. After multivariate analysis including seven clinical and pathological factors, the only significant predictors of local recurrence remained margin width of surgical excision, previous therapy with estrogens (contraceptives or Hormone Replacement Therapy) and the Van Nuys pathologic classification. The overall survival breast cancer specific was 99% and no differences were observed between groups (P = ns). The comparison of patients treated with a total mastectomy and those conservatively treated showed a significantly better local relapse free survival rate obtained with mastectomy (98.2% vs. 89.7% at 10 years P = 0.02). However, the overall cause-specific survival did not prove any better outcome (98.7% in both groups). Of the 32 patients who underwent a Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, four were found to have micrometastases and all of them had a previous Directional Vacuum Assisted Biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Although in our series there is not a significant difference in LR rates by the parameter of age, the new USC/VNPI is still a simple and reliable scoring system for therapeutic management of DCIS. We did not find any statistically significant advantage in groups treated with the addition of RT. Obtaining wide surgical margins appears to be the strongest prognostic factor for local recurrence, regardless of other pathological factors or the addition of adjuvant radiation therapy. However, only prospective randomized studies can precisely predict the risk of LR of conservatively treated DCIS. The clinical significance of Sentinel Lymph Nodes micrometastases Immuno-Histo-Chemistry-detected found in DCIS patients remains uncertain. However, we hypothesize that the anatomical disruption after preoperative biopsy procedures increases the likelihood of epithelial cell displacement and the frequency of IHC-positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes, both of which are directly proportional to the degree of manipulation.

Management of BRCA1/2 associated breast cancer: a systematic qualitative review of the state of knowledge in 2006

INTRODUCTION

The optimal clinical management of breast cancer (BC) arising in BRCA1/2 mutations carriers is a difficult issue complicated by the risk of subsequent malignancies and by the potential differences in response to local and systemic therapies.

AIM

Systematically review the difference in outcome after breast conservation therapy (BCT) and uni-or bilateral mastectomy in BRCA1/2 related BC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We selected 20 studies, for which we evaluated the methodology, the characteristics of the populations, biases, confounding risk factors and outcomes.

RESULTS

All studies are retrospective, entailed by numerous biases. They varied with respect to patients' number, selection, and confounding factors. Hereditary BC patients carried an increased risk of ipsilateral recurrence in 5/17 studies, a worse survival in 4/14, an increased risk of contralateral BC in 14/16.

CONCLUSION

Except for contralateral risk, the presence of a BRCA mutation does not seem to offer additional prognostic information. Large prospective trials, stratified for risk reduction strategies are warranted.

Long-Term Outcome for Mammographically Detected Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Managed with Breast Conservation Treatment

BACKGROUND

The importance of negative final resection margins for optimal local control has been established for women with ductal carcinoma in situ (intraductal carcinoma) undergoing breast conservation treatment. This study evaluated long-term outcome after breast conservation treatment and whether reexcision or the presence of residual tumor in the reexcision specimen predicted for local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ with negative margins.

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of 192 women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast conservation treatment at the University of Pennsylvania from 1978 to 2000. Analysis was performed for unilateral, mammographically detected, intraductal breast carcinomas. Study endpoints of interest included rates of local recurrence, overall survival, and cause-specific survival. The median follow-up was 6.2 years (mean, 7 years; range, 0.1-21.4 years).

RESULTS

The 10-year overall survival and 10-year cause-specific survival rates were 87% and 99%, respectively. There were 11 local failures (6%) in the treated breast, with a 10-year actuarial local failure rate of 10% and a median time to local failure of 7.4 years (mean, 6.6 years; range, 1.6-10.2 years). Among the subset of 124 patients with negative final resection margins, there was no statistically significant difference in the 8-year actuarial local recurrence rates among patients who underwent single excision (7%), reexcision with residual tumor (8%), or reexcision with no residual tumor (0%).

DISCUSSION

The use of breast conservation treatment in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ remains an effective and durable treatment approach. The need for reexcision to achieve negative margins and the presence of residual ductal carcinoma in situ in the reexcision specimen do not negatively impact local recurrence rates in the current study. These findings suggest that requiring more than one surgery to obtain clear resection margins is not an adverse prognostic factor for local failure.

The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a review

BACKGROUND

Ductal carcinoma in situ represents about 20% of all tumours diagnosed within mammographic screening programs. The natural history of DCIS is poorly understood, as it cannot be observed directly. Estimates of the proportion of DCIS that progress to invasive cancer, as well as factors that may influence progression, are important for clinical management. Here we review various sources of evidence regarding the natural history of DCIS.

METHODS

We identified relevant publications of studies on: follow-up studies of DCIS initially misdiagnosed as benign, studies of recurrence of DCIS as invasive cancer, autopsy studies, studies of risk factors for DCIS, animal studies and studies that used mathematical models to study growth of DCIS and invasive cancer. Data sources included the MEDLINE data base, searches of articles cited in key reviews and editorials.

RESULTS

The most direct evidence regarding the progression of DCIS to invasive cancer comes from studies where DCIS was initially misdiagnosed as benign and treated by biopsy alone. These studies suggest that between 14-53% of DCIS may progress to invasive cancer over a period of 10 or more years. The reported prevalence of undiagnosed DCIS in autopsy studies, of approximately 9%, has been used to suggest a larger reservoir of DCIS may exist in the population. All types of study designs reviewed had limitations that may bias the estimate of progression in either direction.

CONCLUSION

The available evidence suggests not all DCIS will progress to invasive cancer in the medium term but precise estimates of progression are not possible given the limitations of the data. Mathematical modelling of various scenarios of progression and studies of genetic factors involved in progression may shed further light on the natural history of DCIS.

Predictors of local recurrence after breast-conservation therapy

Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) is a proven local treatment option for select patients with early-stage breast cancer. This paper reviews pathologic, clinical, and treatment-related features that have been identified as known or potential predictors for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in patients treated with BCT. Pathologic risk factors such as the final pathologic margin status of the excised specimen after BCT, the extent of margin involvement, the interaction of margin status with other adverse features, the role of biomarkers, and the presence of an extensive intraductal component or lobular carcinoma in situ all impact the likelihood of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. Predictors of positive repeat excision findings after conservative surgery include young age, presence of an extensive intraductal component, and close or positive margins in prior excision. Finally, treatment-related factors predicting ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence include extent of breast radiation therapy, use of a boost to the lumpectomy cavity, use of tamoxifen or chemotherapeutic agents, and timing of systemic therapy with irradiation. The ability to predict for an increased risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence enhances the ability to select optimal local treatment strategies for women considering BCT.

Ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence in hereditary breast cancer following breast-conserving therapy

The overall rate of an ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) ranges from 1% to 2% per year. Risk factors include young age but data on the impact of BRCA1/2 mutations or a definite positive family history for breast cancer are scarce. We investigated IBTR after BCT in patients with hereditary breast cancer (HBC). Through our family cancer clinic we identified 87 HBC patients, including 26 BRCA1/2 carriers, who underwent BCT between 1980 and 1995 (cases). They were compared to 174 patients with sporadic breast cancer (controls) also treated with BCT, matched for age and year of diagnosis. Median follow up was 6.1 years for the cases and 6.0 years for controls. Patient and tumour characteristics were similar in both groups. An IBTR was observed in 19 (21.8%) hereditary and 21 (12.1%) sporadic patients. In the hereditary patients more recurrences occurred elsewhere in the breast (21% versus 9.5%), suggestive of new primaries. Overall, the actuarial IBTR rate was similar at 2 years, but higher in hereditary as compared to sporadic patients at 5 years (14% versus 7%) and at 10 years (30% versus 16%) (P=0.05). Post-relapse and overall survival was not different between hereditary and sporadic cases. Hereditary breast cancer was therefore associated with a higher frequency of early (2-5 years) and late (>5 years) local recurrences following BCT. These data suggest an indication for long-term follow up in HBC and should be taken into account when additional 'risk-reducing' surgery after primary BCT is eventually considered.

Breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: the French Cancer Centers' experience

PURPOSE

To assess the long-term outcome for women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated in current clinical practice by conservative surgery with or without definitive breast irradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We analyzed 705 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ treated between 1985 and 1995 in nine French regional cancer centers; 515 underwent conservative surgery and radiotherapy (CS+RT) and 190 CS alone. The median follow-up was 7 years.

RESULTS

The 7-year crude local recurrence (LR) rate was 12.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.4-15.8) and 32.4% (95% CI 25-39.7) for the CS+RT and CS groups, respectively (p <0.0001). The respective 10-year results were 18.2% (95% CI 13.3-23) and 43.8% (95% CI 30-57.7). A total of 125 LRs occurred, 66 and 59 in the CS+RT and CS groups, respectively. Invasive or microinvasive LRs occurred in 60.6% and 52% of the cases in the same respective groups. The median time to LR development was 55 and 41 months. Nine (1.7%) and 6 (3.1%) nodal recurrences occurred in the CS+RT and CS groups, respectively. Distant metastases occurred in 1.4% and 3% of the respective groups. Patient age and excision quality (final margin status) were both significantly associated with LR risk in the CS+RT group: the LR rate was 29%, 13%, and 8% among women aged < or =40, 41-60, and > or =61 years (p <0.001). Even in the case of complete excision, we observed a 24% rate of LR (6 of 25) in women <40 years. Patients with negative, positive, or uncertain margins had a 7-year crude LR rate of 9.7%, 25.2%, and 12.2%, respectively (p = 0.008). RT reduced the LR rate in all subgroups, especially in those with comedocarcinoma (17% vs. 59% in the CS+RT and CS groups, respectively, p <0.0001) and mixed cribriform/papillary tumors (9% vs. 31%, p <0.0001). In the multivariate Cox regression model, young age and positive margins remained significant in the CS+RT group (p = 0.00012 and p = 0.016). Finally, the relative LR risk in the CS+RT group compared with the CS group was 0.35 (95% CI 0.25-0.51, p = 0.0001). Subsequent contralateral breast cancer occurred in 7.1% and 7.5% of the patients in the CS+RT and CS groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Despite the absence of randomization, our results are extremely consistent with the updated National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project B17 and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10853 trials. We also noted that the LR risk was very high in women <40 years and/or in the case of incomplete excision.

Age at diagnosis and outcome for women with ductal carcinoma-in-situ of the breast: a critical review of the literature

PURPOSE

Patients younger than 35 to 45 years old at the time of diagnosis of invasive breast cancer have been found to have a worse prognosis than older patients in many studies. However, the impact of patient age at diagnosis on the outcome of treatment with either lumpectomy and radiation therapy (RT) or mastectomy for patients with ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) of the breast has not been extensively analyzed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Articles addressing the effect of patient age at diagnosis on the outcome of treatment of DCIS with lumpectomy and RT or mastectomy were identified through the MEDLINE and CancerLit databases and reference lists of relevant articles. Studies were reviewed to determine the impact of patient age at diagnosis on clinical and pathologic features of DCIS, the influence of age on outcome after lumpectomy and RT, and the impact of age on outcome after mastectomy.

RESULTS

DCIS in younger patients more frequently contains adverse prognostic pathologic factors and extends over a greater distance in the breast than in older patients. In series with adequate follow-up, younger patients treated with lumpectomy and RT had a significantly higher rate of local recurrence than older patients, especially for invasive local recurrences. Some studies have suggested that careful attention to margin status and excising larger volumes of tissue can reduce this difference substantially. No available data show that younger patients have better long-term cancer-free survival rates if treated by mastectomy rather than lumpectomy and RT.

CONCLUSION

Successful treatment of younger patients with DCIS with lumpectomy and RT requires careful attention to patient evaluation, selection, and surgical technique. When this is done, age at diagnosis should not be a contraindication to breast-conserving therapy.