Fractionated half-body irradiation (HBI) for the rapid palliation of widespread, symptomatic, metastatic bone disease: a randomized Phase III trial of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)

Half body irradiation (HBI) for bone metastases in the modern radiotherapy technique era - A systematic review

Bone metastases (BMs) are the most common cause of cancer-related pain and radiation therapy plays a key role in treating pain caused by it. The half-body irradiation (HBI) is a modality that can be used to treat patients with multiple painful BMs. In the modern era, concerns about toxicity and the availability of new agents requiring robust bone marrow function have limited the use of HBI in advanced cancer. Concerns about HBI toxicity stem from outdated techniques; modern methods like volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and helical tomotherapy now allow safer irradiation of complex target volumes. We conducted a systematic review to present updated information about HBI efficacy and potential toxicity. Pain relief usually occurs very quickly 2-3 weeks after HBI. The overall pain response rate was high in all the series, accounting for a median of 84 % (75.6-89 %), with a median of 36 % complete pain response. The toxicity is usually limited to G1/G2, with very rare G3 cases. More than 50 % of patients can reduce analgesic intake after HBI. Additionally, with modern radiotherapy techniques, quality of life is improved in most patients. HBI is a safe and effective method and should once again be reconsidered for more frequent use.

Hemibody Irradiation for Bone Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hemibody irradiation (HBI) is a radiation therapy technique that involves treating one-half of the patient's skeletal system in a single radiation field. It is mostly given as upper hemibody irradiation (UHBI), lower hemibody irradiation (LHBI), or sequential UHBI and LHBI. It is used to treat extensive bone metastases from solid tumors. It was primarily utilized in the 1980s and 1990s and has since fallen out of favor. However, it is a potentially cost-effective treatment for widespread bone metastases. To determine its efficacy, we performed a meta-analysis of all available published articles on the efficacy of HBI to relieve pain from bone metastases. Twenty-seven articles involving 1318 patients were identified and analyzed. Our findings show that 80% of the patients had complete or partial pain relief and 29% had complete pain relief. The trials were of poor quality, but the results showed minimal heterogeneity in the response rates. These response rates are consistent with those seen with focal irradiation of bone metastases and for radionuclide treatment of bone metastases. The toxicity of the treatments decreased when delivered with modern treatment techniques. In light of this, we propose that this technique warrants re-evaluation with modern treatment methods.

Stereotactic Body Reirradiation in Gynaecological Cancer: Outcomes and Toxicities from a Single Institution Experience

AIMS

To report toxicity profile, outcomes and quality of life (QoL) data in patients with recurrent gynaecological cancer who underwent stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) retreatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from patients' folders were retrospectively extracted, focusing on the primary neoplasm, previous systemic therapies and previous radiotherapy. Concerning SBRT, the total dose (five daily fractions) was delivered with a linear accelerator using intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques. Acute and late toxicities were assessed by the CTCAE 4.03 scale. QoL was evaluated according to the Cancer Linear Analogue Scale [CLAS1 (fatigue), CLAS2 (energy level), CLAS3 (daily activities)].

RESULTS

Between December 2005 and August 2021, 23 patients (median age 71 years, range 48-80) with 27 lesions were treated. Most patients had endometrial (34.8%), ovarian (26.1%) and cervical cancer (26.1%) as the primary tumour. The most common SBRT schedules in five fractions were 30 Gy (33.3%), 35 Gy (29.6%) and 40 Gy (29.6%). The median follow-up was 32 months (range 3-128). There were no patients reporting acute or late toxicities higher than grade 2, except for a bone fracture. One- and 2-year local control was 77.9% and 70.8%, respectively. One- and 2-year overall survival was 82.6% and 75.1%, respectively. The overall response rate was 96.0%. Regarding QoL, no statistically significant difference was identified between the baseline and follow-up values: the median CLAS1, CLAS2 and CLAS3 scores for each category were 6 (range 4-10) at baseline and 6 (range 3-10) 1 month after SBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary experience suggests that SBRT retreatment for recurrent gynaecological cancer is a highly feasible and safe treatment with limited side-effects and no short-term QoL impairment.

Volumetric Intensity-Modulated Arc Stereotactic Radiosurgery Boost in Oligometastatic Patients with Spine Metastases: a Dose-escalation Study

AIMS

To report the final results of a dose-escalation study of volumetric intensity-modulated arc stereotactic radiosurgery (VMAT-SRS) boost after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in patients with spine metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Oligometastatic cancer patients bearing up to five synchronous metastases (visceral or bone, including vertebral ones) and candidates for surgery or radiosurgery were considered for inclusion. 25 Gy was delivered in 10 daily fractions (2 weeks) to the metastatic lesion, affected vertebrae and adjacent ones (one cranial and one caudal vertebra). Sequentially, the dose to spinal metastases was progressively increased (8 Gy, 10 Gy, 12 Gy) in the patient cohorts. Dose-limiting toxicities were defined as any treatment-related non-hematologic acute adverse effects rated as grade ≥3 or any acute haematological toxicity rated as ≥ 4 by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale.

RESULTS

Fifty-two lesions accounting for 40 consecutive patients (male/female: 29/11; median age: 71 years; range 40-85) were treated from April 2011 to September 2020. Most patients had a primary prostate (65.0%) or breast cancer (22.5%). Thirty-two patients received 8 Gy VMAT-SRS boost (total BED _α/β10: 45.6 Gy), 14 patients received 10 Gy (total BED _α/β10: 51.2 Gy) and six patients received 12 Gy (total BED _α/β10: 57.6 Gy). The median follow-up time was over 70 months (range 2-240 months). No acute toxicities > grade 2 and no late toxicities > grade 1 were recorded. The overall response rate based on computed tomography/positron emission tomography-computed tomography/magnetic resonance was 78.8%. The 24-month actuarial local control, distant metastases-free survival and overall survival rates were 88.5%, 27.1% and 90.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A 12 Gy spine metastasis SRS boost following 25 Gy to the affected and adjacent vertebrae was feasible with an excellent local control rate and toxicity profile.

Bias due to statistical handling of death and reirradiation in the assessment of duration of response after palliative radiotherapy: a scoping review and analysis of clinical data

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the influence of handling death and reirradiation on the estimation of duration of response (DOR).

METHODS

First, we performed a scoping review on methods to assess DOR in palliative radiotherapy. Second, we performed three different analyses on a subgroup of patients from a previously published prospective study. The first analysis was a competing risks analysis considering relapse of pain as the event of interest and death and reirradiation as competing events (Analysis A). The second and third analyses were standard survival analyses where the event of interest was a composite outcome of relapse of pain, death, or reirradiation (Analysis B) and relapse of pain (Analysis C), respectively.

RESULTS

Death was considered as an event of interest in less than half of the papers, while reirradiation was not considered in any of the studies. Competing risks analysis was not performed in any of the studies. In the analysis of clinical data, competing risks analysis showed that relapse of pain predominated as the cause of the end of response. Median DOR was correctly estimated to be 4.1 months in Analyses A and B, but was overestimated to be 8.1 months in Analysis C.

CONCLUSIONS

Death and reirradiation should be treated as the events of interest that mark the end of response (as in Analyses A and B) to avoid overestimation of treatment efficacy and an invalid assumption of independent censoring.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The definition of end of response remains inconclusive in the assessment of DOR. We recommend competing risks analysis (Analysis A), by which we can estimate cumulative incidence of each event type and evaluate the necessity of reirradiation.

Short course palliative radiotherapy in advanced solid tumors: a pooled analysis (the SHARON project)

Previous trials showed the tolerability and efficacy of a palliative radiotherapy (RT) regimen (SHARON) based on the 4 fractions delivered in 2 days in different oncological settings. In order to identify possible predictors of symptomatic response, the purpose of this study is to perform a pooled analysis of previous trials. We analyzed the impact on symptomatic response of the following parameters: tumor site, histological type, performance status (ECOG), dominant symptom, and RT dose using the Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. One-hundred-eighty patients were analyzed. Median RT dose was 20 Gy (range: 14-20 Gy). The overall response rate was 88.8% (95% CI 83.3-92.7%) while pre- and post-treatment mean VAS was 5.3 (± 7.7) and 2.2 (± 2.2), respectively (p < 0.001). The overall response rate of pain, dyspnea, bleeding, dysphagia, and other symptoms was 86.2%, 90.9%, 100%, 87.5%, and 100%, respectively. Comparing the symptomatic effect based on the analyzed parameters no significant differences were recorded. However, patients with locally advanced disease showed a higher rate of symptomatic responses than metastatic ones (97.3% vs 83.0%; p = 0.021). Finally, the complete pain response rate was more than double in patients with mild to moderate (VAS: 4-7) compared to those with severe (VAS > 7) pain (36.0% vs 14.3%; p = 0.028). This pooled analysis showed high efficacy of the SHARON regimen in the relief of several cancer-related symptoms. The markedly and significantly higher complete pain response rate, in patients with mild-moderate pain, suggests early referral to palliative RT for patients with cancer-related pain.

Use and Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Trials of Palliative Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review

IMPORTANCE

Approximately 50% of all patients with cancer have an indication for radiotherapy, and approximately 50% of radiotherapy is delivered with palliative intent, with the aim of alleviating symptoms. Symptoms are best assessed by patient-reported outcomes (PROs), yet their reliable interpretation requires adequate reporting in publications.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the use and reporting of PROs in clinical trials of palliative radiotherapy.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

This preregistered systematic review searched PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials for clinical trials of palliative radiotherapy published from 1990 to 2020. Key eligibility criteria were palliative setting, palliative radiotherapy as treatment modality, and clinical trial design (per National Institutes of Health definition). Two authors independently assessed eligibility. Trial characteristics were extracted and standard of PRO reporting was assessed in adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) PRO extension. The association of the year of publication with the use of PROs was assessed by logistic regression. Factors associated with higher CONSORT-PRO adherence were analyzed by multiple regression. This study is reported following the PRISMA guidelines.

FINDINGS

Among 7377 records screened, 225 published clinical trials representing 24 281 patients were eligible. Of these, 45 trials (20%) used a PRO as a primary end point and 71 trials (31%) used a PRO as a secondary end point. The most prevalent PRO measures were the Numeric Rating Scale/Visual Analogue Scale (38 trials), European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (32 trials), and trial-specific unvalidated measures (25 trials). A more recent year of publication was significantly associated with a higher chance of PROs as a secondary end point (odds ratio [OR], 1.04 [95% CI, 1.00-1.07]; P = .03) but not as primary end point. Adherence to CONSORT-PRO was poor or moderate for most items. Mean (SD) adherence to the extension adherence score was 46.2% (19.6%) for trials with PROs as primary end point and 31.8% (19.8%) for trials with PROs as a secondary end point. PROs as a primary end point (regression coefficient, 9.755 [95% CI, 2.270-17.240]; P = .01), brachytherapy as radiotherapy modality (regression coefficient, 16.795 [95% CI, 5.840-27.751]; P = .003), and larger sample size (regression coefficient, 0.028 [95% CI, 0.006-0.049]; P = .01) were significantly associated with better PRO reporting per extension adherence score.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this systematic review of palliative radiotherapy trials, the use and reporting of PROs had room for improvement for future trials, preferably with PROs as a primary end point.

Palliative Efficacy of High-Dose Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Radiotherapy for Painful Non-Spine Bone Metastases: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

(1) Background: The superiority of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) over conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) in terms of pain palliation for bone metastases remains controversial. (2) Methods: This propensity score-matched study compared the overall pain response (OR) 3 months after radiotherapy among patients with painful (≥2 points on a 0-to-10 scale) non-spine bone metastases. Patients with lesions that were treated with SBRT or cEBRT and whose pain scores were evaluated 3 months after radiotherapy were included in this study. Pain response was evaluated according to the International Consensus Criteria. (3) Results: A total of 234 lesions (SBRT, n = 129; cEBRT, n = 105) were identified in our institutional database. To reduce the confounding effects, 162 patients were selected using a propensity score-matched analysis (n = 81 for each treatment). The OR rate at 3 months after SBRT was significantly higher than that after cEBRT (76.5% vs. 56.8%; p = 0.012). A noteworthy finding of our study is that the same trend was observed even after 6 months (75.9% vs. 50.0%; p = 0.011). The 1-year local failure rates after SBRT and cEBRT were 10.2% and 33.3% (p < 0.001), respectively. (4) Conclusions: Our findings suggest that SBRT is superior to cEBRT for pain palliation in patients with non-spine bone metastases.

The efficacy of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy on pain and quality of life in patients with painful bone metastases: a prospective study

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of radiation therapy in alleviating pain and improving the quality of life (QoL) with validated questionnaires in patients with painful bone metastases (BoM).

METHODS

This prospective, observational study recruited 167 patients with painful BoM who were treated with palliative radiotherapy (PRT) from February 2015 to February 2018. After the first clinical assessment, the patients filled out specific questionnaires and underwent a fast radiotherapy treatment within 48 hours. The patients were followed up for eight weeks.

RESULTS

The median age was 66.30 years. The most common primary cancer was lung cancer (31.1%). The most often prescribed scheme was 8 Gy in one fraction (70%). The patients experienced significant pain response and improved QoL compared with baseline, especially in the first two weeks after radiation. Overall, reduced pain and drug score were reported at two weeks of PRT in 68 (51.5%) and 37 (28%) of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PRT is an effective treatment option for patients with painful BoM.

Net Pain Relief After Palliative Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases: A Useful Measure to Reflect Response Duration? A Further Analysis of the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study

Purpose

Pain response rates are equivalent after single 8 Gy and fractionated palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases. Reirradiation remains more frequent after a single fraction, although this does not simply reflect pain recurrence. Given the possible role of stereotactic radiation therapy in providing durable pain control, measures of durability are required. Net pain relief (NPR), the proportion of remaining life spent with pain response, may provide this. This study assesses the use of NPR as an outcome measure after palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases.

Methods and Materials

This is a secondary analysis of data collected in the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study, a randomized trial comparing palliative radiation therapy delivered as 8 Gy in a single fraction and 24 Gy in 6 fractions. NPR was assessed by survival cohorts, treatment regimen, and primary diagnoses. The consequences of missing data upon the use of NPR in future studies were considered within sensitivity analyses.

Results

Patients whose pain improved after palliative radiation therapy experienced improvement for 56.6% of their remaining lives. Missing responses in questionnaires mean the range of uncertainty in NPR is 36.1% to 62.1%. When response beyond reirradiation was excluded, NPR after treatments of single-fraction 8 Gy and 24 Gy in 6 fractions was 49.0% and 56.5%, respectively (P = .004). Differential willingness to reirradiate may be influencing this outcome. When response beyond reirradiation was included, this difference was not seen (NPR of 55.4% vs 57.7%, respectively [P = .191]).

Conclusions

Patients who responded to conventional radiation therapy experienced improved pain control for approximately half of their remaining life. NPR may provide valuable information in assessing pain response durability. Missing data are, however, inevitable in this population. This must be minimized and the consequences recognized and reported. Additionally, reirradiation protocols and the frequency and duration of trial follow-up may have a significant impact upon this outcome, requiring careful consideration during trial design if NPR is to be used in future studies.

Efficacy and safety of 3D-conformal half body irradiation in patients with multiple bone metastases

Half-body irradiation (HBI) represented a standard treatment for multiple painful bone metastases (BMs). However, its use has progressively reduced due to the associated toxicity rates. The aim of this paper was to evaluate HBI delivered by conformal radiotherapy (RT) technique in a large patients population with widespread BMs. HBI was delivered in 3 Gy fractions, bid, ≥ 6 h apart, on 2 consecutive days (total dose: 12 Gy) using 3-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT) box technique. The target included pelvic bones, lumbar-sacral vertebrae and upper third of femurs. Acute and late toxicity was scored based on RTOG and EORTC-RTOG scales, respectively. Pain was evaluated using the Pain-Drug scores and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). One hundred and eighty patients were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective analysis. Grade 3 and 4 acute toxicity rates were 1.1% and 0.0%, respectively. Mean VAS before and after HBI was 5.3 versus 2.7, respectively (p: 0.0001). Based on VAS, 37.5% of patients showed complete pain relief (VAS: 0) while 38.1% had partial response (≥ 2-point VAS reduction). Overall, Pain and Drug Score reduction was observed in 76.3% and 50.4% of patients, respectively. 1-, 2-, and 3-year pain progression free survival was 77.0%, 63.4%, and 52.7%, respectively. Thirty patients (16.7%) underwent RT retreatment on the same site with median 15.9 months interval (range 2-126 months). HBI delivered with 3D-CRT technique is safe and effective. It provides long lasting pain control in patients with multiple BMs with negligible rates of relevant toxicity.

Comparative Evaluation of Two Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Regimens for Painful Bone Metastases

Aims and background

In 75% of the patients with bone metastases (BM) pain is the dominant symptom. Radiotherapy (XRT) plays a major role in the palliation of pain in patients with BM. Several schedules of short and long fractionation XRT are used in clinical practice, with hypofractionated treatments being even more attractive for practical reasons. A considerable body of evidence supports the clinical use of short schedules and single-dose XRT. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of two short fractionated schedules of 8 Gy as a single dose and 20 Gy in 5 fractions in relieving pain in patients with multiple uncomplicated BM.

Method

From January to December 2001, 130 patients with 146 painful BM were treated with palliative localized XRT. There were 42 males and 88 females with a median age of 58 years (range 28–84). The commonest sites of treatment were the spine (59.6%) and pelvis (14.4%). The primary endpoint was clinically significant pain relief in the first six months of follow-up evaluated with the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) pain measurement score measuring pain severity and pain frequency. Analgesic use was also recorded before and after treatment as drug frequency and drug severity. Patients with painful BM from any primary tumor site were irradiated. Treatment schedules consisted of a course of XRT with 4 Gy/fraction/day (total dose: 20 Gy/5 fractions) (group A, 59 lesions) or with a single dose of 8 Gy (group B, 87 lesions).

Results

There was no significant difference in complete response (CR) rates between treatment schedules: complete pain relief was achieved in 17/59 lesions (29%) in the fractionated group and in 29/87 lesions (33%) in the single-dose group. Also the overall response (complete + partial) was similar: 35/59 lesions (60%) in group A and 60/87 (69%) in group B. The minimum, maximum and median follow-up was 3, 23, and 9 months, respectively, for group A and 3, 20, and 11 months for group B. The actuarial median duration of pain relief was similar: 4.5 months in group A and 4 months in group B. No particular side effects were recorded in either group.

Conclusions

There were no differences between the two fractionation schedules used in our study with regard to pain relief and use of analgesics. Palliation of pain was obtained in approximately two thirds of patients with both schedules, providing further evidence of the similar efficacy between single and multiple fractions. With regard to pain response these data justify a recommendation for the use of a more simple and convenient 8 Gy single fraction for the palliation of uncomplicated BM.

Multiple Tumor Marker Elevation in Androgen Ablation-Refractory Prostate Cancer with Long-Term Response to Metronomic Chemotherapy: A Case Report

Outcomes in hormone-refractory prostate cancer are very poor. The time from progression to death is only 12–19 months. We present the case of a 69-year-old man with hormone-refractory prostate cancer and bone metastases treated with metronomic chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide based). He had had a colon adenocarcinoma ten years before. The atypical features of this case were an unusually long-lasting response to metronomic chemotherapy and an increase in serum levels of some non-prostate-specific tumor markers (CEA and CA 19–9) that was not related to a relapse of colon cancer. We hypothesize a potential role of hypoxia inducing CA 19–9 and CEA expression in tumor cells, which may predict the development of progressive resistance to antiangiogenic therapies.

An Evaluation of Half-Body Irradiation in the Treatment of Widespread, Painful Metastatic Bone Disease

Aims

Evaluation of analgesic uptake, pain intensity, and quality-of-life changes after half-body irradiation of patients with bone metastases.

Material and Methods

Ninety-five patients (97 irradiations) were treated with single half-body irradiation fraction (3–8 Gy). Thirty-three patients had upper-half-body irradiation, 55 lower-half-body irradiation and 9 middle-half-body irradiation. The patients were examined on the day of irradiation, 2 and 4 weeks later, and then once a month. The intake of analgesics, pain level (from 0 to 10), and the quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) were evaluated. The fluctuations of pain levels and the particular scaling values of QLQ-C30 during a one-year period were analyzed (Kendall t correlation).

Results

Over the course of 5 months, the incidence of patients using strong opioids decreased from 43.8% to 33.3%, and the incidence of patients who did not need to resort to analgesics increased from 6.7% to 25%. The mean pain level decreased from 6.1 points (half-body irradiation) to 3.1 points 2 weeks later. An inverse correlation between pain level readings and time was statistically significant. An increase was observed in the values of the five functional scales as reflected on the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (four of which correlated significantly with the observation time). A similar situation prevailed with respect to global health status. A decrease was observed in most of the values on the symptoms scales; 6 saw a significant decrease, in correlation with the follow-up. Correlations were also found between pain intensity and functionality, and between symptoms scales readings and global health status.

Conclusions

Half-body irradiation of cancer patients suffering from painful multiple bone dissemination is an effective and simple treatment modality that affords significant quality-of-life improvement and pain relief, thus allowing for a reduction in the use of strong analgesics.

History of the development of radiotherapy in Latin America

Radiotherapy was the first nonsurgical treatment for malignant tumours and represents one of the oldest disciplines of oncology. In Latin America, as in many parts of the world, the history of modern oncology begins with the implementation of radiation therapy facilities. The development of radiotherapy in Latin America was possible thanks to the seminal work of radiation oncologists in different countries. As a large territory, there is a need to implement modern facilities and equipment, but unfortunately there are disparities in the access and quality of radiotherapy services across Latin America and even within individual countries. In this review, we describe the history, challenges and success in the implementation of radiotherapy and the frustration caused by the lack of facilities in several Latin American countries.

Apatinib alone or combined with radiotherapy in metastatic prostate cancer: Results from a pilot, multicenter study

Background

To study safety and efficacy of apatinib in combination of radiotherapy in patients with symptomatic bony disease prostate cancer(SBPC), based on the potential synergistic antitumor activity between apatinib and Radiation Therapy (RT).

Patients and methods

In phase I dose escalation part, 18 patients received apatinib dose at 250 mg every other day, 250 mg daily and 500 mg daily. In phase II part, the 250 mg daily cohorts were expanded to 20 patients in combination of RT (6 Gy/fraction, 5 fraction in total), one patient lost followed up and excluded the study, comparing with RT alone cohort with 10 patients, ratio of RT to RT + apatinib was 1 to 2. Evaluations included adverse events (AEs), prostate specific antigen (PSA) changes, radiographic evaluation and pain relief.

Results

In phase I study, common apatinib-related AEs (arAEs) were fatigue, anorexia, hand foot syndrome, proteinuria, and hypertension (HTN). Grade 3arAEs included HTN, proteinuria, liver dysfunction. In phase II study, combination apatinib with RT cohorts, AEs events increased comparing with either apatinib alone or RT alone; at the same time, combination cohorts showed PSA declines of ≥50% in 12 patients, and stable disease in 6 patients. Combination cohorts had pain control significantly improved in both level and duration comparing with RT alone.

Conclusions

In SBPC patients, apatinib at less than 500 mg daily dose as mono-therapy had tolerable toxicity. Apatinib at dose of 250 mg daily in combining with RT synergized pain control, the overall AEs were manageable. Further studies are needed in large sample size future trials.

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in painful bone metastases: Using quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient as an indicator of effectiveness of single fraction versus multiple fraction radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Bone metastases are a common cause of cancer-related pain. The aim of this study is to determine the optimal radiotherapy schedule for the treatment of painful bone metastases and verify if could cause different biological effects on bone. This has been achieved using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifteen patients received Multiple Fractions Radiation Therapy (MFRT) with a total dose of 30Gy in 10 daily fractions of 3Gy given over 2 weeks and 15 patients received a Single Fraction Radiation Therapy (SFRT) with a dose of 8Gy. Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values after SFRT or MFRT were compared with response to treatment (pain relief), assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) before radiotherapy and at 1 and 3 months after the completion of treatment.

RESULTS

The two schedules had equal efficacy in terms of pain control, without any difference at 1 and 3 months post radiotherapy. In both treatments, pain reduction was related to an increase in the ADC. However, the median ADC value had an increase of 575 points between the baseline and 3 months (from 1010 to 1585, p=0.02) in the 30Gy group, while it was only 178 points (from 1417 to 1595) in the 8Gy group.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in the ADC values after radiotherapy corresponds to increased cell death. Despite an equal pain control, MFRT treatment seems to be more effective to achieve cancer cells kill. Our preliminary data could also explain the higher retreatment rates in SFRT vs MFRT in long survivors.

MRI-guided focused ultrasound robotic system for the treatment of bone cancer

BACKGROUND

A novel MRI-conditional robot was developed that navigates a focused ultrasound (FUS) transducer. With this robotic system the transducer can access bones. The intended application is pain palliation from bone cancer using thermal ablation using FUS.

METHODS

The robotic system has four computer-controlled axes (three linear and one angular). The robotic system was manufactured using a digital manufacturing 3D printer, using acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) plastic. MRI-conditional optical encoders were used to accurately control the robotic system.

RESULTS

The robotic system was successfully tested for MRI safety and compatibility, using fast-gradient pulse sequences and a liquid phantom. The robotic system has been tested for its functionality for creating discrete and multiple (overlapping) lesions in a gel phantom.

CONCLUSIONS

An MRI-conditional FUS robotic system was developed that has the potential to create thermal lesions with the intention of treating bone cancer for the purpose of pain palliation. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The role of radiation therapy in the treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer

In the setting of castrate-resistant prostate cancer, patients present with a variety of symptoms, including bone metastases, spinal cord compression and advanced pelvic disease. Fortunately, a variety of radiotherapeutic options exist for palliation. This article focuses on these options, including both external beam radiotherapy and radiopharmaceuticals.

Quality of life after palliative radiotherapy in bone metastases: A literature review

Objective

To investigate the quality of life (QOL) following palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases.

Methods

A literature search was conducted in OvidSP Medline (1946–Jan Week 4 2014), Embase (1947–Week 5 2014), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Dec 2013) databases. The search was limited to English. Subject headings and keywords included ‘palliative radiation’, ‘cancer palliative therapy’, ‘bone metastases’, ‘quality of life’, and ‘pain’. All studies (prospective or retrospective) reporting change in QOL before and after palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases were included.

Results

Eighteen articles were selected from a total of 1730. The most commonly used tool to evaluate QOL was the Brief Pain Inventory. Seventeen studies collected data prospectively. An improvement in symptoms and functional interference scores following radiotherapy was observed in all studies. The difference in changes in QOL between responders and non responders was inconsistently reported.

Conclusion

QOL improves in patients who respond to palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases.

Burden of skeletal-related events in prostate cancer: unmet need in pain improvement

PURPOSE

Up to 75% of patients with prostate cancer experience metastatic bone disease, which leads to an increased risk for skeletal-related events (SREs) including pathological bone fracture, spinal cord compression, and hypercalcemia of malignancy. Our objective was to systematically review the literature on the impact of SREs on quality of life (QOL), morbidity, and survival with a primary focus on the impact of SREs on pain in prostate cancer patients.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, limiting to peer-reviewed English-language human studies published in 2000-2010. The search was based on the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency definition of an SRE, which includes pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression (SCC), hypercalcemia of malignancy, and radiotherapy or surgery to bone resulting from severe bone pain.

RESULTS

A total of 209 articles were screened, of which 173 were excluded, and 36 were included in this review. Patients with SREs had more pain and worse survival compared with no SREs. Pathologic bone fractures worsened QOL and were associated with shorter survival. Radiation therapy of SCC alleviated pain and improved morbidity. SCC was associated with decreases in patient survival. Radiation therapy and surgery to bone improved pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific SREs are associated with worse outcomes, including increased pain, poorer QOL, morbidity, and survival. Treatment of SREs is associated with improved pain, although there remains a need for more effective treatment of SREs in prostate cancer patients.

Volumetric intensity modulated arc therapy for stereotactic body radiosurgery in oligometastatic breast and gynecological cancers: feasibility and clinical results

In the present study, the preliminary results of the first stereotactic body radiosurgery (SRS) experience with volumetric intensity modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in oligometastatic breast and recurrent gynecological tumors (OBRGT) are reported in terms of feasibility, toxicity and efficacy. Patients were treated in a head-first supine treatment position on a customized body frame immobilization shell. SRS-VMAT treatment plans were optimized using the ERGO++ treatment planning system. Response assessment was performed 8-12 weeks after treatment by morphologic imaging modalities, or if feasible, also by functional imaging. Thirty-six lesions in 24 consecutive patients (median age, 63 years; range, 40-81) were treated: 13.9% had primary or metastatic lung lesions, 30.5% had liver metastases, 36.1% had bone lesions, 16.7% had lymph node metastases and 2.8% had a primary vulvar melanoma. The median dose was 18 Gy (BED2 Gy, α/β: 10=50.4 Gy), the minimal dose was 12 Gy (BED2 Gy, α/β: 10=26.4 Gy) and the maximal dose was 28 Gy (BED2 Gy, α/β: 10=106.4 Gy). Seven patients (29.2%) experienced acute toxicity, which however was grade 2 in only 1 case. Moreover, only 3 patients (12.5%) developed late toxicity of which only 1 was grade 2. Objective response rate was 77.7% including 16 lesions achieving complete response (44.4%) and 12 lesions achieving partial response (33.3%). The median duration of follow-up was 15.5 months (range, 6-50). Recurrence/progression within the SRS-VMAT treated field was observed in 6 patients (total lesions=7) with a 2-year inside SRS-VMAT field disease control expressed on a per lesion basis of 69%. Recurrence/progression of disease outside the SRS-VMAT field was documented in 15 patients; the 2-year outside SRS-VMAT field metastasis‑free survival, expressed on a per patient basis, was 35%. Death due to disease was documented in 6 patients and the 2-year overall survival was 58%. Although the maximum tolerated dose was not reached, SRS-VMAT resulted in positive early clinical results in terms of tumor response, local control rate and toxicity.

[New therapy concepts for castration-resistant prostate cancer: between hormone manipulation, targeted therapy and chemotherapy]

Within the last 2 years the therapeutic landscape of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) has dramatically changed. While chemotherapy with docetaxel has only shown a survival benefit in CRPC patients in the last 10 years, in the meantime 4 approved drugs are available for this indication and approval for immunotherapy with sipuleucel-T is expected. Docetaxel still plays a significant role in the treatment of CRPC but is also a cesura in the therapeutic sequence. For asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic, chemotherapy naive CRPC patients a significant survival benefit was shown for treatment with the androgen biosynthesis inhibitor abiraterone. Clinical data for the antiandrogen enzalutamide are expected shortly for this indication. For patients where docetaxel has failed abiraterone, enzalutamide and cabazitaxel have shown survival benefits in phase III trials. The radionuclide alpharadin not only palliated morbidity induced by bone metastases but also prolonged survival of CRPC patients. This review deals with the various drugs with respect to mode of action, clinical results and indications and will focus on new treatment options, such as targeted therapy with cabozantinib or immunotherapy with sipuleucel-T and prostvac.

Half-body irradiation with tomotherapy for pain palliation in metastatic breast cancer

CONTEXT

Half-body irradiation (HBI) is the fastest and most effective tool against uncontrolled pain from widespread bone metastases but is somewhat toxic.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the feasibility of lower HBI with helical tomotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer in terms of acute toxicity and delay in chemotherapy administration.

METHODS

Thirteen breast cancer patients with multiple painful bone metastases to the lower half of the body were enrolled in this prospective trial. Eight patients were receiving chemotherapy. Target volume included all bones from the L3-L4 interface to the femoral shafts. Radiation consisted of 8 Gy in one fraction, delivered with helical tomotherapy. Patients were premedicated only with oral steroids. Pain intensity was scored using the Numeric Rating Scale from 0 to 10. Toxicity was scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. Quality of life was scored with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30, before and 21 days after the radiation course. This trial was approved by the local review board.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was at seven months (range 2-12 months). All but two patients had pain relief in the radiated field. Six patients stopped their analgesic drug consumption. Toxicity was acceptable: two Grade 3 hematologic toxicities were registered (anemia and leukopenia). Grade 1-2 toxicities were hematologic = 13, fever = 3, nausea = 2, and diarrhea = 1. Three of the eight patients had a delay in chemotherapy administration because of leukopenia or anemia. Twelve patients answered to European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30, and an improved quality of life was documented in eight cases.

CONCLUSION

Lower HBI delivered with helical tomotherapy resulted in a well-tolerated regimen, without significant delay in chemotherapy schedule.

Radium-223 for the treatment of prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Bone metastases cause significant morbidity and mortality in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Until recently, treatment options have been limited, but now six drugs are known to extend life expectancy, with docetaxel the current standard first-line cytotoxic therapy. Phase III studies have also shown a survival advantage for sipuleucel-T, cabazitaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide and radium-223 . Radium-223 is unique among these agents, as the only bone-directed therapy shown to prolong survival in CRPC.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the current standard of care for CRPC and recent drug developments that have demonstrated a survival benefit. It focuses on bone-directed therapies, in particular radium-223, the first-in-class alpha-emitting radionuclide and discusses the pivotal studies to date. A PubMed search using the keywords below was performed.

EXPERT OPINION

Radium-223 is set to become a new standard of care for the treatment of bony metastatic CRPC. It improves both survival and quality of life, delays skeletal events and is well tolerated. Its optimal use in the evolving treatment strategies for men with CRPC and bone metastases is yet to be determined.

Radiotherapy of Bone Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients - Current Approaches

Bone metastases (BM) represent the most frequent indication for palliative radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer. BM increase the risk of skeletal-related events defined as pathological fractures, spinal cord compression, and, most frequently, bone pain. The therapeutic goals of palliative radiotherapy for BM are pain relief, recalcification, and stabilization, reducing spinal cord compression and minimizing the risk of paraplegia. In advanced tumor stages radiotherapy may also be used to alleviate symptoms of generalized bone metastasis. This requires an individual approach including factors, such as life expectancy and tumor progression at different sites. Side effects of radiation therapy of the middle and lower spine may include nausea and emesis requiring adequate antiemetic prophylaxis. Irradiation of large bone marrow areas may cause myelotoxicity making monitoring of blood cell counts mandatory. Radiotherapy is an effective tool in palliation treatment of BM and is part of an interdisciplinary approach. Preferred technique, targeting, and different dose schedules are described in the guidelines of the German Society for Radiooncology (DEGRO) which are also integrated in 2012 recommendations of the Working Group Gynecologic Oncology (AGO).

Overview of Diagnosis and Management of Metastatic Disease to Bone

Background

Bone metastases occur frequently in patients with advanced cancer and are a serious complication of cancer. The decision to treat is often individualized, based on each patient's clinical presentation, life expectancy, and quality of life.

Methods

We reviewed the current literature pertaining to management of metastatic disease to bone, and the medical, radiotherapeutic, and surgical treatment options for management of bone metastasis are discussed.

Results

Current management of skeletal metastasis includes analgesia, systemic therapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. We propose treatment algorithms for management of vertebral and nonvertebral bone metastases and suggest individualized interventions based on clinical presentation.

Conclusions

Management of bone metastases is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. The goal of treatment is often palliative, and intervention and treatment regimens should be individualized based on the specific clinical presentation of each patient.

Castration-resistant prostate cancer: mechanisms, targets, and treatment

Patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), who progress after docetaxel therapy, had until very recently, only a few therapeutic options. Recent advances in this field brought about new perspectives in the treatment of this disease. Molecular, basic, and translational research has given us a better understanding on the mechanisms of CRPC. This great investment has turned into a more rational approach to the development of new drugs. Some of the new treatments are already available to our patients outside clinical trials and may include inhibitors of androgen biosynthesis; new chemotherapy agents; bone-targeted therapy; and immunotherapy. This paper aims to review the mechanisms of prostate cancer resistance, possible therapeutic targets, as well as new options to treat CRPC.

Quality of life and toxicity of stereotactic radiotherapy in pancreatic tumors: a case series

AIM

To analyze the results of extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy (ESRT) experience in pancreatic cancer patients.

METHODS

Four noncoplanar fixed beams were used in all patients.

RESULTS

Analysis of 16 patients was carried out. Overall response rate was 56.2%. Fifteen patients experienced local and/or distant progression of disease (median follow-up: 24 months). Two-year local progression-free, distant progression-free, and overall survivals were 85.7%, 58.7%, and 50.0%, respectively. Toxicity was less than grade 2 in all, although 1 patient had severe duodenal bleeding. Quality of life scores were unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

ESRT was associated with low complication rate, and not worsening the patients' quality of life.

Radiation for bone metastases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To synopsize the current state-of-the-art for radiation and treatment of painful bone metastases with a focus on prostate cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although external beam radiation has long been known to palliate painful bone metastatic disease for patients with prostate cancer, new studies continue to evolve in this area. Data from randomized studies over the past decade emphasize that palliation can be achieved with single-fraction radiation strategies. Despite these data, and various supportive national and international guidelines, single-fraction regimens are relatively underutilized in the USA as compared with other countries. In addition to external beam radiation, beta-emitting isotopes are also effective as systemic agents for the palliation of painful bone metastases. New alpha-emitters such as Alpharadin (radium-223) are under current development but remain unproven at this time and recent data indicate that this agent can prolong survival in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

SUMMARY

Radiation in various forms is highly effective for palliation of pain associated with bone metastases.

Update of the international consensus on palliative radiotherapy endpoints for future clinical trials in bone metastases

PURPOSE

To update the international consensus on palliative radiotherapy endpoints for future clinical trials in bone metastases by surveying international experts regarding previous uncertainties within the 2002 consensus, changes that may be necessary based on practice pattern changes and research findings since that time.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A two-phase survey was used to determine revisions and new additions to the 2002 consensus. A total of 49 experts from the American Society for Radiation Oncology, the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, the Faculty of Radiation Oncology of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, and the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology who are directly involved in the care of patients with bone metastases participated in this survey.

RESULTS

Consensus was established in areas involving response definitions, eligibility criteria for future trials, reirradiation, changes in systemic therapy, radiation techniques, parameters at follow-up, and timing of assessments.

CONCLUSION

An outline for trials in bone metastases was updated based on survey and consensus. Investigators leading trials in bone metastases are encouraged to adopt the revised guideline to promote consistent reporting. Areas for future research were identified. It is intended for the consensus to be re-examined in the future on a regular basis.

New approach for treatment of vertebral metastases using intensity-modulated radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To perform aggressive radiotherapy for vertebral metastases. Using very steep dose gradients from intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), a protocol based on the concept of partial volume dose to the spinal cord was evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

50 patients with vertebral metastases were treated using IMRT. In previously unirradiated cases, where a prescribed dose of 80 Gy (BED10) was delivered, the constraint to the spinal cord should be less than 100 Gy (BED2). For previously irradiated cases, on the other hand, the dose is the same as in the previously unirradiated case; however, constraints for the spinal cord are a cumulative BED2 of less than 150 Gy, BED2 of less than 100 Gy in each instance, and a treatment gap of more than 6 months. There were 6 patients considered for a partial volume dose to the spinal cord. They all received higher BED2, ranging from 51-157 Gy of D1cc.

RESULTS

Among the 24 patients who survived longer than 1 year, there was 1 case of transient radiation myelitis. There were no other cases of spinal cord sequelae.

CONCLUSION

Based on the present results, we recommend a BED2 of 100 Gy or less at D1cc as a constraint for the spinal cord in previously unirradiated cases, and a cumulative BED2 of 150 Gy or less at D1cc in previously irradiated cases, when the interval was not shorter than 6 months and the BED2 for each session was 100 Gy or less. The prescribed BED10 of 80 Gy could be safely delivered to the vertebral lesions.

Dose-Fractionation Schedules for Radiotherapy of Bone Metastases

BACKGROUND: Bone metastases are common in breast cancer patients. Radiotherapy is safe and effective. This review aimes to contribute to the definition of the appropriate radiation regimens for different endpoints. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Information was compiled by searching PubMed and MEDLINE databases including early-release publications. When possible, primary sources were quoted. Full articles were obtained. References were checked for additional material when appropriate. RESULTS: Randomized trials and meta-analyses demonstrated that single-fraction radiotherapy with 1 × 8 Gy is as effective for pain relief as multi-fraction regimens such as 5 × 4 Gy or 10 × 3 Gy. Re-irradiation for recurrent pain is required more often after single-fraction radiotherapy. Re-irradiation with another single fraction is safe and effective. Multi-fraction long-course radiotherapy such as 10 × 3 Gy leads to better re-calcification and better local control of metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). Because both re-calcification and MSCC recurrences occur only several months after radiotherapy, long-course radiotherapy is particularly appropriate for patients with a favorable survival prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: For uncomplicated painful bone metastases, single-fraction radiotherapy with 1 × 8 Gy may be considered the standard regimen. If re-calcification is a major goal, longer-course radiotherapy (i.e. 10 × 3 Gy) should be used. For MSCC, 10 × 3 Gy is preferable for patients with a favorable survival prognosis.

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for bladder cancer (summary - JUA 2009 Edition)

In Japan, until now, the treatment of bladder cancer has been based on guidelines from overseas. The problem with this practice is that the options recommended in overseas guidelines are not necessarily suitable for Japanese clinical practice. A relatively large number of clinical trials have been conducted in Japan in the field of bladder cancer, and the Japanese Urological Association (JUA) considered it appropriate to formulate their own guidelines. These Guidelines present an overview of bladder cancer at each clinical stage, followed by clinical questions that address problems frequently faced in everyday clinical practice. In this English translation of a shortened version of the original Guidelines, we have abridged each overview, summarized each clinical question and its answer, and only included the references we considered of particular importance.

Half body irradiation of patients with multiple bone metastases: a phase II trial

AIM OF STUDY

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of half-body irradiation (HBI) on pain and quality of life in cancer patients with multiple bone metastases. The secondary aim was to evaluate side effects of the treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 44 patients received lower (n = 37), upper (n = 5), or sequential HBI (n = 2). The dose for lower HBI was 8 Gy in one fraction and for upper HBI 7 Gy in one fraction, with reduction of the lung dose to 6 Gy in one fraction by partial shielding. The majority of patients (n = 41) were males with prostate cancers (93%). Outcome and side effects were measured by the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30), and by the doctors' toxicity scores in the medical record. Pain relief was defined as a reduction of more than 10 points on the QLQ-C30 scale. Evaluations were performed before and 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

Relief of pain was observed in 76% of the patients receiving HBI with 8.8% of the patients experiencing complete pain relief with no residual pain in the treated field. For most patients, the pain relief was lasting throughout the follow-up period. About one third of the patients were able to reduce their intake of analgesics. Grade 1-2 diarrhoea was the most common side effect observed in 49% of the patients two weeks after treatment. Mild pulmonary symptoms (grade 1-2) were observed in four of seven patients receiving upper HBI. No clear effect was observed on the patients' global quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Single fraction HBI is safe and effective providing long lasting pain reduction in 76% of patients with multiple bone metastases.

IAEA's role in the global management of cancer-focus on upgrading radiotherapy services

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is an intergovernmental organization composed by 138 Member States within the United Nations. It has a mandate to seek to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity throughout the world. Within the IAEA structure, the Division of Human Health contributes to the enhancement of the capabilities in Member States to address needs related to prevention, diagnosis and treatment of health problems through the development and application of nuclear and radiation techniques within a framework of quality assurance. In view of the increasing cancer incidence rates in developing countries the activities in improving management of cancer have become increasingly important. This review will outline the IAEA's role in cancer management focusing on activities related to improving radiotherapy worldwide.